{"meta":{"query_hash":"e4d094b943d4","filters":{"venue":"Global Jurist Advances"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e4d094b943d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Jurist+Advances"},"results":[{"id":"W1971069086","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1013","title":"Property Transferred in Breach of Trust","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Conceptual framework; Position (finance); Trust law; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Focus (optics); Relation (database); Express trust; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.0179607744056398,"score_gpt":0.3344342826251214,"score_spread":0.3164735082194816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971069086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3446127,0.001221091,0.00037744403,0.0035324083,0.0001121933,0.0003194141,0.000046116897,0.000054972148,0.64972365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977201,0.00083253597,0.00034217833,0.00005224883,0.00007023467,0.000018947636,0.0000030121876,0.0000024411886,0.0009582852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924463,0.000039777533,0.00017718606,0.00014669006,0.00018967631,0.00020204489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974746,0.000014790991,0.000036562556,0.00010474914,0.000037965936,0.000058464015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015581406,0.000060498,0.000117362586,0.000014905309,0.00011564028,0.000017667759,0.00022027217,0.000040360203,0.000070177215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027212942,0.00004458161,0.000040791518,0.00045684862,0.00019832555,0.00021778834,0.000012907517,0.00004848061,0.000016691327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001149051,0.0005365117,0.32795238,0.00003923273,0.000012417635,0.000014100372,0.00512014,0.00016884813,0.00017103934,0.2946494,0.0007438209,0.37047723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023143733,0.000018510815,0.02845865,0.000013951426,0.0000042804827,0.0000011967402,0.0013237299,0.000017758019,0.000036495894,0.0059265047,0.9638779,0.00008954863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006432591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018356916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007820148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009285961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985426506","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1082","title":"In Search of a Definition of Property: Conceptualizing property as need-actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property law; Business; Public property; Real property; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06659859312739655,"score_gpt":0.357058792937394,"score_spread":0.2904601998099975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985426506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108822465,0.002633347,0.00008969619,0.0014384749,0.0003178206,0.00051899266,0.00002899468,0.00004061894,0.8861096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956598,0.0008230562,0.0013275571,0.00009937342,0.00004703537,0.000017857408,0.0000025196002,0.0000050400135,0.002017739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984916,0.00026529736,0.00032805296,0.00020308763,0.0004087847,0.0003031712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945676,0.000037595128,0.00010866474,0.00012766285,0.00018763135,0.00008171198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042406854,0.000104034465,0.00024257838,0.000052922882,0.0001819784,0.000024396653,0.00018191029,0.00006634942,0.0002751067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002674797,0.000055610282,0.00006180826,0.00068593235,0.00059562054,0.0006015339,0.00002224699,0.00010348741,0.00002576535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012382815,0.00036698268,0.009481947,0.00008400888,0.000020193278,0.0000137956495,0.0047554024,0.000041996023,0.0010284602,0.97103715,0.00056651025,0.012479707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053872,0.00019705914,0.0004764672,0.00011413393,0.0000120794275,0.0000058267815,0.0073251077,0.0000073279452,0.0031590855,0.01803521,0.9699462,0.00018278153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01863207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055744005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96937966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013308629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004605624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98790294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986313535","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1164","title":"USA-Canada Class Actions: Trading in Procedural Fairness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Notice; Res judicata; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Political science; Settlement (finance); Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Action (physics); Legislature; Law; Business; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.01334012087626161,"score_gpt":0.255825465341427,"score_spread":0.24248534446516543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986313535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2657595,0.0010656599,0.00045123388,0.008771987,0.0013873455,0.00028741907,0.000023662762,0.00017660583,0.7220766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965451,0.00003776264,0.00013945112,0.0020289256,0.0007818383,0.000030960688,0.000014146888,0.0000080167965,0.0004138188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989203,0.000005151179,0.00024205726,0.0002455386,0.00025205206,0.00033486294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967784,0.0000118821645,0.00011575713,0.00011658685,0.00005684641,0.000021091777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006107683,0.00015091452,0.00015004167,0.00007043206,0.00019372639,0.00015912509,0.00018680489,0.00003944186,0.00026211276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038978178,0.00014856235,0.000048597365,0.00066792936,0.000042480144,0.0019778237,0.000041062023,0.000104797684,0.00014536643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010993348,0.00048346215,0.1609739,0.00032154185,0.000044091674,0.000035735124,0.000021447995,0.0042474014,0.00010407798,0.48960924,0.11831558,0.22573356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003037621,0.000002087411,0.042014122,0.00003038166,0.000011356472,0.0000051857924,0.0004394102,0.002719554,0.00000916207,0.00074534526,0.95353353,0.00018610158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054022957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81778234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83521795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041046372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011806779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9522764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037793309","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1109","title":"The Canadian Constructive Trust and the French Negotiorum Gestio: Two Institutions Serving one Same Legal Concept ?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Political science; Constructive; Doctrine; Equity (law); Tort; Lien; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Liability; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.014031420408215221,"score_gpt":0.3074975607740451,"score_spread":0.2934661403658299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037793309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11937779,0.01142148,0.0017782345,0.22365305,0.0014211884,0.0016606393,0.00074482535,0.00020536687,0.6397374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976845,0.0003644269,0.0007452707,0.0006138366,0.00026128886,0.00004579069,0.0000058108976,0.0000032382843,0.0002758783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988712,0.00008731281,0.00017475171,0.0002117838,0.00025249194,0.00040242475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999279,0.00010631734,0.00008966064,0.00019040772,0.0001225417,0.00021207561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027648205,0.000108393775,0.00012503931,0.00001335568,0.005571748,0.00043289692,0.00038907467,0.000049977985,0.000016092805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018529259,0.000072962604,0.000046202207,0.00036562208,0.0037874852,0.00040988566,0.00006423721,0.00017208635,0.000019414692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040219716,0.000007711476,0.0016404248,0.0000010788942,0.000011965144,0.0000013492412,0.001016929,0.00037133798,4.878636e-7,0.9909006,0.00009043783,0.005953699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008770808,0.000011238765,0.015921826,0.000020050054,0.00003198888,0.000009749386,0.005094524,0.000018560968,0.00000551796,0.16202714,0.8158261,0.00015619928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75354165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050336315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015142378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038656131","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1205","title":"Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Agricultural biotechnology; Statutory law; Political science; Negotiation; Law; Agriculture; Biology","score_opus":0.013031990894257169,"score_gpt":0.2654687138125719,"score_spread":0.25243672291831476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038656131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761639,0.0037311835,0.000016242067,0.0070605245,0.00011107989,0.00014300614,0.0002885129,0.00010545475,0.012380062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977275,0.00020871802,0.0012770544,0.000023161112,0.0002775425,0.000009037569,0.00007852914,4.1822105e-7,0.0003980353],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988325,0.00005645407,0.00016273068,0.0004690619,0.00022704677,0.00025218507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961734,0.0000902627,0.00005676777,0.00005708407,0.000113206195,0.000065347005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000059552767,0.00015134888,0.00017481062,0.000006666351,0.00016371252,0.00012986347,0.0003229226,0.00010192816,0.00016744336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040385676,0.000059697235,0.000048516475,0.00022470434,0.00045103524,0.00022375338,0.00017422023,0.00012297933,0.000034904948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042259923,0.0011879294,0.15038602,0.000014231625,0.00016584109,0.000036417045,0.00041989525,0.00008087403,0.49983937,0.18023941,0.00908857,0.15811884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015622476,0.00012455155,0.9003215,0.0000062372037,0.000006944162,0.000009887005,0.0031932783,0.000017981669,0.007996045,0.01538454,0.07258527,0.00019753106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015659906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022365309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7499355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083025254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000773303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24343826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068997246","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1039","title":"North America as a Medieval Legal Construction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal history; Law; Core (optical fiber); History; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.009992982864664449,"score_gpt":0.2861688978961509,"score_spread":0.2761759150314865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068997246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19508792,0.0036319024,0.0003606343,0.004649717,0.0022201652,0.00022367397,0.000057514993,0.00032106496,0.7934474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907095,0.0045672436,0.0010339181,0.00049828045,0.001130485,0.000013755167,0.000010782304,0.000006980961,0.0020290539],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986231,0.000077915145,0.0001934162,0.0002550905,0.00050232967,0.00034817844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.000030476413,0.000118356336,0.00012649878,0.00009376014,0.0001747102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008604486,0.000120388606,0.00015552284,0.000027002792,0.0006098505,0.00010697137,0.00018215695,0.0000597148,0.0011644985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097310374,0.000120394194,0.00008116355,0.00044809296,0.00062150514,0.00059867767,0.000026390198,0.000091503556,0.00048730953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047147852,0.00010238588,0.024117313,0.000009985592,0.000028245317,0.000034750057,0.0027135864,0.000028136225,0.0000041548715,0.052022077,0.005833728,0.9150585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018110221,0.00007324817,0.0027646758,0.0000073106953,0.000016296312,0.000011533076,0.001571716,0.000028941258,0.000003873498,0.0013221465,0.99387175,0.00014743368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029424196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008270015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015728436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060722527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122377272","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1191","title":"Will Negligence Law Poison the Well of Foreign Aid? A Case Comment on: Binod Sutradhar v. Natural Environment Research Council","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Personal injury; Action (physics); Liberian dollar; Law; Natural (archaeology); Relation (database); Common law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.04863034106752313,"score_gpt":0.3402469417336626,"score_spread":0.2916166006661395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122377272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10536529,0.013143795,0.00040250455,0.037742514,0.0003660795,0.0017690898,0.00045048073,0.00010216637,0.84065807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977324,0.00057387823,0.00035870256,0.0006056344,0.00023395776,0.000055938635,0.000005458365,0.000005672273,0.00042833405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974298,0.0001978254,0.00026233666,0.00030141574,0.001350482,0.00045816432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990302,0.00021872872,0.0001138591,0.00035993624,0.00019389867,0.00008340508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011835892,0.00012739589,0.00014312028,0.00001192465,0.0012716447,0.000079712365,0.00049282715,0.000054876826,0.000062347506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004443547,0.00009077792,0.000081170045,0.00031445347,0.0011588773,0.00024154832,0.00010289729,0.00020882563,0.00007146258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029261755,0.00016872778,0.00038587704,0.000009654435,0.0000071436416,0.000035089794,0.00038792705,0.00047517015,0.000015879445,0.99004525,0.006583842,0.0018561955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017016986,0.00006998488,0.00016609294,0.000015544543,0.000008782072,0.000010463124,0.0029307983,0.00004957304,0.00017922625,0.0429203,0.9533698,0.00010925561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04050614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023801794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94712496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010137347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020280565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}