{"meta":{"query_hash":"e4d094b943d4","filters":{"venue":"Global Jurist Advances"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e4d094b943d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Jurist+Advances"},"results":[{"id":"W1971069086","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1013","title":"Property Transferred in Breach of Trust","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Conceptual framework; Position (finance); Trust law; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Focus (optics); Relation (database); Express trust; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.0179607744056398,"score_gpt":0.3344342826251214,"score_spread":0.3164735082194816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971069086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31540394,0.007848897,0.15815407,0.061349116,0.0005607866,0.00020503998,0.000092520706,0.00012393597,0.45626172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914442,0.001047199,0.0025428075,0.0010497717,0.00009553701,0.000038752776,0.000011875036,0.000018196106,0.003751847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812587,0.0081941495,0.0011812472,0.0021592344,0.0051647676,0.0020418551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98262906,0.010335885,0.0026708369,0.0022884684,0.0016139997,0.00046163946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012801294,0.0004207581,0.00088083284,0.00290659,0.0072161565,0.01252887,0.0020365345,0.009526539,0.003380832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026943278,0.00047381842,0.0014233277,0.0020859651,0.07557436,0.015673157,0.008944559,0.008469764,0.0002700172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059498025,0.000004086117,0.00021260673,0.000019484405,0.000005724298,0.00017079616,0.0044498364,0.00025497237,0.00008863958,0.99303174,0.0001729496,0.0015831286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090957865,0.00002884854,0.0006460981,0.0001629356,0.000020373582,0.00022943312,0.004689058,0.00096696295,0.00036361898,0.980692,0.012167341,0.000024074705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005717685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033927697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012801294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01009955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050427676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07327765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985426506","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1082","title":"In Search of a Definition of Property: Conceptualizing property as need-actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property law; Business; Public property; Real property; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06659859312739655,"score_gpt":0.357058792937394,"score_spread":0.2904601998099975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985426506","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029170873,0.0070942193,0.44772077,0.09197791,0.0010837662,0.00009183268,0.00012158546,0.00013756196,0.4226016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90842193,0.0040493687,0.06140126,0.008478327,0.000893669,0.00028090045,0.00012206327,0.00013742436,0.016215008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996496,0.0018892232,0.00015137816,0.00046227765,0.0007185863,0.00028263775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953858,0.0024890834,0.0005129847,0.0007716795,0.00052332965,0.00031712218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006661636,0.0006128772,0.00073332683,0.0028152608,0.003567491,0.0077196257,0.0024325901,0.0037748124,0.0043207128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060878657,0.00028697663,0.00093789125,0.002569344,0.043316193,0.02943676,0.0052743847,0.008046403,0.0006623347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.389569e-7,0.0000020356692,0.000026081601,0.000006819773,7.9852407e-7,0.000007698524,0.00043511062,0.00003853012,0.00001447819,0.9987429,0.00017983251,0.00054480246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004199726,0.000009397009,0.000072876384,0.000046731406,0.000003821196,0.00004060056,0.0008020231,0.00033420767,0.00008555377,0.97481936,0.023776626,0.0000046134296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024435634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002533025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077196257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039857686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003189595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035230517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986313535","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1164","title":"USA-Canada Class Actions: Trading in Procedural Fairness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Notice; Res judicata; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Political science; Settlement (finance); Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Action (physics); Legislature; Law; Business; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.01334012087626161,"score_gpt":0.255825465341427,"score_spread":0.24248534446516543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986313535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05277622,0.0032699388,0.018056285,0.05513897,0.0004481194,0.00009352556,0.00012807896,0.00006785001,0.8700209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099345,0.0011052935,0.006134292,0.012826368,0.00012970684,0.00007929537,0.000042889467,0.000033359567,0.06971433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98704344,0.0027262664,0.00031541375,0.0011365258,0.0056475904,0.0031306827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509156,0.002278431,0.00036210963,0.0004982817,0.001297483,0.00047210255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006558431,0.000374444,0.00039299447,0.0010745022,0.016373271,0.011080753,0.0015190591,0.007359737,0.0056782505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013130561,0.00026899838,0.0005456221,0.0018977752,0.017546814,0.0031457355,0.004365664,0.0056523294,0.00037808245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007957678,0.0000050851913,0.00060443865,0.000008175177,0.000004123856,0.000039796018,0.0018946079,0.00018343757,0.00006659825,0.98859733,0.0036811987,0.0049073077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049451854,0.000044738787,0.0091504315,0.00024648692,0.00008651007,0.00025560564,0.007846437,0.0031697922,0.001190103,0.5483896,0.4294553,0.0001155925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8774546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9397768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12254542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044271052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072926186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32121044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037793309","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1109","title":"The Canadian Constructive Trust and the French Negotiorum Gestio: Two Institutions Serving one Same Legal Concept ?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Political science; Constructive; Doctrine; Equity (law); Tort; Lien; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Liability; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.014031420408215221,"score_gpt":0.3074975607740451,"score_spread":0.2934661403658299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037793309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10719369,0.012443968,0.006524153,0.057081882,0.00036980936,0.000066380104,0.00025196784,0.00007855028,0.8159896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96702474,0.0021149223,0.0016310076,0.0018866066,0.00006175856,0.000031650245,0.00005916051,0.000023296401,0.027166778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180096,0.0012529677,0.00011744367,0.0006498231,0.002911793,0.0032670097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962586,0.0008515646,0.00053310336,0.0002545253,0.0013244554,0.00077775936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028541596,0.00043779617,0.00051733805,0.0033209533,0.011655313,0.014135239,0.0017578664,0.0040248,0.009439152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009902107,0.00031573145,0.00065463857,0.0038373326,0.021615827,0.0057690246,0.0035534697,0.0030339325,0.0005158763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015952917,0.0000031392524,0.0007485044,0.000018091114,0.0000051721104,0.00006301726,0.0025634102,0.00009541938,0.000048540125,0.98865896,0.0020083322,0.005771384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006875229,0.00007260693,0.04407705,0.00077322073,0.00013745378,0.0006066417,0.053975265,0.0020980889,0.0009675187,0.3439231,0.5530402,0.00026011583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9186745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93264693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08873666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08873666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09418236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64383256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038656131","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1205","title":"Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Agricultural biotechnology; Statutory law; Political science; Negotiation; Law; Agriculture; Biology","score_opus":0.013031990894257169,"score_gpt":0.2654687138125719,"score_spread":0.25243672291831476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038656131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02358084,0.038524833,0.008420252,0.05555728,0.00027855937,0.000027367309,0.00007576828,0.000026491658,0.87350863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406421,0.02709687,0.0051344284,0.011523195,0.00089131645,0.00012661693,0.00012019112,0.00004600536,0.014419244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867468,0.006010804,0.00055154687,0.0010503237,0.003923205,0.0017173336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98557323,0.010360148,0.0013688189,0.0006952204,0.0015528059,0.00044967764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037661,0.00052432966,0.0006570134,0.006010041,0.0070418054,0.017140964,0.0017804235,0.008304893,0.005531895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012485019,0.00033563,0.00079597335,0.0065003666,0.03287477,0.012927547,0.004623585,0.008674969,0.00037974966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029452951,0.0000059586996,0.00013798845,0.000021290727,0.0000023788116,0.000035517976,0.0010949889,0.00010864656,0.00004591255,0.99565923,0.0005780359,0.0023071778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014639953,0.00006515306,0.0031034043,0.0010068478,0.000052872,0.00044969408,0.010567314,0.0007535406,0.0007255041,0.76720107,0.21600474,0.00005520368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029716114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030446043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029716114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024271049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008049102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1760996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068997246","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1039","title":"North America as a Medieval Legal Construction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal history; Law; Core (optical fiber); History; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.009992982864664449,"score_gpt":0.2861688978961509,"score_spread":0.2761759150314865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068997246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019932555,0.010375358,0.0005255774,0.0104508605,0.00027416137,0.0000074440327,0.00007624841,0.000020689507,0.95833707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7270012,0.0072281198,0.000983404,0.0025682254,0.00028279767,0.000038462735,0.00012620192,0.000038963764,0.2617326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997017,0.00009573266,0.0000066594184,0.00007530944,0.000063963445,0.000056581957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99989986,0.000026553997,0.000012778737,0.000015401287,0.000025877991,0.000019548903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003222343,0.0001699808,0.00012663617,0.00073112844,0.0042288257,0.0033758439,0.00025132933,0.0007845141,0.008641199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044047774,0.000115545,0.0000742682,0.0010839795,0.005750759,0.002184466,0.0017695399,0.0012750451,0.00054950354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070656283,0.000009100185,0.000509941,0.000018782292,0.0000026103787,0.000082211314,0.0080985315,0.00006778014,0.00010035959,0.95033616,0.022686742,0.01808071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024926112,0.0000042600973,0.0021877612,0.000078714875,0.0000029571484,0.000091110094,0.00276779,0.000058134607,0.00006774066,0.05458038,0.94015527,0.000003348716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048142068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14094537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9518579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060598133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026153119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09572369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122377272","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1191","title":"Will Negligence Law Poison the Well of Foreign Aid? A Case Comment on: Binod Sutradhar v. Natural Environment Research Council","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Personal injury; Action (physics); Liberian dollar; Law; Natural (archaeology); Relation (database); Common law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.04863034106752313,"score_gpt":0.3402469417336626,"score_spread":0.2916166006661395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122377272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04080195,0.0074447407,0.0015099766,0.7959881,0.0016663134,0.000060364255,0.000069084315,0.00005286472,0.15240663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44925016,0.004263704,0.00071841123,0.48233998,0.001451178,0.00007438734,0.000035597237,0.000040610354,0.06182609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804235,0.0004758941,0.00010053558,0.00035735333,0.00044243463,0.0005813747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610364,0.0029231592,0.00030931341,0.00011208039,0.00031240188,0.00023944097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028910502,0.00041113805,0.0005858411,0.00060422946,0.01110793,0.0044077523,0.0020893638,0.02549969,0.005844918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064365654,0.000503248,0.00075662136,0.0007851584,0.009299582,0.0033407914,0.0029273052,0.02434142,0.0006841688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071427414,0.00008863569,0.0056025567,0.00014996229,0.000028761855,0.009036271,0.02303369,0.00036612412,0.00064161874,0.7150622,0.23562498,0.010293732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007959143,0.00020556647,0.009036497,0.0010965883,0.00012353006,0.0077644926,0.043495968,0.0013977006,0.002067886,0.13661583,0.79791707,0.00019932206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04290674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08573149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04290674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005015793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006003923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085313976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}