{"meta":{"query_hash":"1c416e5ef68c","filters":{"venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1c416e5ef68c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Jurist+Frontiers"},"results":[{"id":"W1978004145","doi":"10.2202/1535-1653.1167","title":"Cultural Relativism the American Way: The Nationalist School of International Law in the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Political science; Nationalism; Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015043765269880733,"score_gpt":0.24132490745831733,"score_spread":0.2262811421884366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978004145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04518624,0.03594119,0.0020399874,0.12807232,0.002419914,0.0000098695855,0.000023920837,0.000021409887,0.78628516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940247,0.019038882,0.0010858446,0.019130614,0.0020820845,0.00003571348,0.000026996697,0.000034262353,0.018318707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971642,0.0019954275,0.000041785708,0.00021053648,0.00039560537,0.00019240317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784195,0.0012467467,0.00020050647,0.00016407396,0.0002864444,0.00026018062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003500565,0.00023214635,0.00023587009,0.0017157552,0.008407164,0.007902344,0.0005644237,0.0019873872,0.0020838908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038475336,0.00015390746,0.00016664372,0.0022415272,0.015918795,0.00607949,0.0031785984,0.005616419,0.00019814339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004086106,0.000016065911,0.0005685822,0.00001741847,0.0000027056853,0.00003848822,0.02511186,0.000065086926,0.000021476104,0.95628273,0.0091363285,0.008735097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007952374,0.000020083151,0.0037227217,0.00054277235,0.000014011236,0.00013176777,0.041378215,0.00045146624,0.000094420444,0.36754966,0.586062,0.000024914756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025381181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035486273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025381181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075568296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050037014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054828882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013086187","doi":"10.2202/1535-1653.1065","title":"Concurring Visions: Human Dignity in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Human rights; Political science; Constitutional court; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Constitutional law; Charter; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.014111007557912862,"score_gpt":0.2561454775212559,"score_spread":0.24203446996334302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013086187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09337404,0.025690021,0.011276583,0.37387964,0.0037358042,0.00023824019,0.0006254416,0.00011397983,0.49106628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89990073,0.0044850637,0.003907648,0.03689606,0.0003440357,0.000053608168,0.00010368761,0.00003429578,0.05427499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257255,0.0010997619,0.00018062876,0.0011633161,0.0030093745,0.0019743582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975349,0.000753025,0.00011666478,0.00007960066,0.0010768849,0.00043891362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005072538,0.0005515119,0.00047186902,0.0016528355,0.02046182,0.010724726,0.0017686666,0.0065998905,0.002615986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075855283,0.00032334245,0.00040237262,0.0018778918,0.020488784,0.0025781142,0.0028717932,0.0069120815,0.00023607166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011323329,0.000006272449,0.00046537223,0.000024208764,0.0000056330796,0.00015903659,0.011144945,0.00028269555,0.00019471359,0.95311695,0.027408544,0.0071802973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003672909,0.000029351088,0.0064124907,0.00035367842,0.00006878584,0.00024650546,0.027302356,0.0015525992,0.0010251753,0.22325051,0.7394235,0.00029836126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09981711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09981711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11963763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7242272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083999189","doi":"10.2202/1535-1653.1050","title":"The Common Core of European Private Law in Boxes and Bundles","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Common core; Core (optical fiber); Common law; Law; Political science; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.020192630277444477,"score_gpt":0.2695499833522897,"score_spread":0.24935735307484522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083999189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11738768,0.0058827694,0.1548082,0.022483585,0.0005503991,0.00010107784,0.00024403419,0.00013748684,0.6984047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642598,0.0015471722,0.011355137,0.0015604092,0.00030779745,0.0001712143,0.00011698315,0.00013192139,0.020549506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882075,0.006117975,0.0005348106,0.0015387452,0.0021450832,0.0014558568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99121463,0.004157732,0.0008327672,0.0021674875,0.0010592745,0.000567957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007607324,0.00043146554,0.00086998224,0.0024944132,0.0047923443,0.012218653,0.0010667731,0.004997111,0.0075134146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018843258,0.00060692866,0.00083509146,0.0039366693,0.032721605,0.02844265,0.009782306,0.004649729,0.0009697741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000276316,8.3561366e-7,0.000018569575,0.000003167752,4.948124e-7,0.000003423602,0.00029353498,0.00003225387,0.0000058023056,0.9987483,0.0002675905,0.0006232432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007844198,0.00000587807,0.00018528267,0.00004351187,0.0000020692098,0.00002026957,0.00045193158,0.00020962505,0.000027726943,0.98066574,0.0183763,0.000003989264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032362216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023104774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012218653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003815389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035524971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040231884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}