{"meta":{"query_hash":"1c416e5ef68c","filters":{"venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1c416e5ef68c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Jurist+Frontiers"},"results":[{"id":"W1978004145","doi":"10.2202/1535-1653.1167","title":"Cultural Relativism the American Way: The Nationalist School of International Law in the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Political science; Nationalism; Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015043765269880733,"score_gpt":0.24132490745831733,"score_spread":0.2262811421884366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978004145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18395555,0.0008050814,0.00030943763,0.12551534,0.0013196996,0.00038052656,0.00092127686,0.000061628685,0.68673146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98748004,0.00003683903,0.000075219905,0.0076765204,0.00038270463,0.000015008604,0.00014701244,0.0000045931993,0.0041820635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900717,0.0001340744,0.0002497155,0.00011194899,0.00032766824,0.0001694157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994964,0.00008212515,0.000116796255,0.00015661656,0.000108761174,0.000039310715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017522261,0.000105930885,0.00012110059,0.000023768225,0.0002785172,0.00011984891,0.0005060692,0.000017215403,0.00009467641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004771437,0.00004758668,0.00008442181,0.00012378671,0.0012582348,0.00016183975,0.00003654607,0.00018553401,0.000032021842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002566083,0.00004617769,0.0016280557,0.0000015351786,0.000035906694,0.000001266584,0.0034490363,0.00008864971,1.1987218e-7,0.8405744,0.15371227,0.00043696244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014542018,0.000022865463,0.0056947423,0.0000054029847,0.000013452242,0.0000015864612,0.007494113,0.002270453,2.0466659e-7,0.015887598,0.96838903,0.00007513705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077466522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026727226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82468677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020177782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025396283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013086187","doi":"10.2202/1535-1653.1065","title":"Concurring Visions: Human Dignity in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Human rights; Political science; Constitutional court; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; Constitutional law; Charter; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.014111007557912862,"score_gpt":0.2561454775212559,"score_spread":0.24203446996334302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013086187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645497,0.00088669796,0.00000798837,0.0007286171,0.00013103064,0.00042246244,0.000058184683,0.0000030327355,0.033212256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940646,0.0000117083355,0.000047709163,0.00048065366,0.000013319207,0.000004408921,0.000003929762,0.0000030206395,0.000028805753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999004,0.00020436522,0.0002778908,0.00012665297,0.00021135662,0.00017572158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993587,0.000040905947,0.00013647125,0.00032572297,0.000058334637,0.00007988044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004895956,0.00009795183,0.00027321157,0.00003625235,0.00024371991,0.000019376263,0.00016691505,0.00006479017,0.000009570037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009191687,0.000049657014,0.00006718863,0.0001666311,0.0010178379,0.00007132481,0.000033966673,0.00015152655,2.1235095e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024749344,0.00022132182,0.6759126,0.0001963408,0.00022279112,0.000014972038,0.00869672,0.0000015969406,0.00009631181,0.29891405,0.014612534,0.00086326123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006688833,0.00022925393,0.92440623,0.00028738898,0.000187424,0.000042241234,0.0015271904,0.00006134549,0.0004984178,0.045898315,0.019992897,0.00018043978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09312286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07639108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25301573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052830655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010004155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94046235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083999189","doi":"10.2202/1535-1653.1050","title":"The Common Core of European Private Law in Boxes and Bundles","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Frontiers","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Common core; Core (optical fiber); Common law; Law; Political science; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.020192630277444477,"score_gpt":0.2695499833522897,"score_spread":0.24935735307484522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083999189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32245815,0.0020762717,0.000012880646,0.00086443376,0.0002832617,0.00007775152,0.000017303732,0.000018663965,0.6741913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972181,0.00094075716,0.00012008281,0.00026919195,0.00006625012,5.923515e-7,0.0000012299498,0.0000044120648,0.0013794334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919206,0.00018128139,0.00016870753,0.00010220761,0.00018998333,0.00016574377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997135,0.000032415086,0.00007440947,0.000095046904,0.000029258135,0.00005541756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037710925,0.000060494564,0.000090890375,0.000011216284,0.00023416661,0.000072634626,0.00026792643,0.000019960671,0.000015197588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063321175,0.000047478694,0.000031188796,0.00009036645,0.0006475139,0.00010626779,0.000045010365,0.000064314,0.000017086068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016078391,0.00003103927,0.051863004,0.0000025322156,0.0000135941045,0.000010103434,0.00059458,0.0000020882069,0.0000065230997,0.9291108,0.011866397,0.006483265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020153928,0.000026838243,0.069333725,0.000017355178,0.0000052584273,5.82327e-7,0.00043464816,0.00005842372,0.000005651607,0.005089498,0.92475337,0.000073137686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010133844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026768327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055764252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000648439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2385792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}