{"meta":{"query_hash":"3e0b0d32389f","filters":{"venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3e0b0d32389f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Justice+Theory+Practice+Rhetoric"},"results":[{"id":"W1663933440","doi":"10.21248/gjn.8.1.57","title":"Mobilizing Motherhood: The Use of Maternal Myths in Popular Development Discourse","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Ideology; Sociology; Critical discourse analysis; Gender studies; Psychological intervention; Discourse analysis; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Linguistics; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.06268450301386003,"score_gpt":0.35004632241198064,"score_spread":0.2873618193981206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663933440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95600736,0.0035210575,0.006777603,0.002524876,0.0040437025,0.0009833938,0.000020169384,0.00016614469,0.025955716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882171,0.00046355784,0.009248547,0.00059123355,0.00033121626,0.000038388585,0.0000032418757,0.00002271718,0.0010839892],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959542,0.0014984638,0.0005782308,0.00033476317,0.0010279402,0.0006063641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997891,0.00076470897,0.00043160835,0.00036178585,0.00028955733,0.0002613346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004622634,0.00023133788,0.0002806559,0.00007611556,0.0003432844,0.00016619296,0.00056242174,0.00013959252,0.000060640843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004539702,0.00017928847,0.000073758325,0.0006578264,0.00027117933,0.0011836308,0.00017293889,0.00025813744,0.00013328301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002315653,0.0016679718,0.011936885,0.00019676963,0.00047861048,0.00040540693,0.4773305,0.0036494879,0.000038904036,0.38618428,0.01215947,0.103636056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009991686,0.00008741802,0.007987089,0.00014904373,0.0004559039,0.000048454178,0.5139798,0.00008114304,0.000042419906,0.007718997,0.46790412,0.00054646574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035217425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008847272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45574465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010409051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012278927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7311171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934507504","doi":"10.21248/gjn.8.1.58","title":"‘Walking Wombs’: Making Sense of the Muskoka Initiative and the Emphasis on Motherhood in Canadian Foreign Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Gender studies; Scholarship; Reproductive health; Objectification; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Foreign policy; Colonialism; Political science; Feminism; Law; Politics; Population","score_opus":0.04646337065259844,"score_gpt":0.3534361602807061,"score_spread":0.3069727896281077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934507504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07123913,0.0011296942,0.000071702925,0.0071631926,0.00059932267,0.0005990812,0.000029924271,0.000029820561,0.91913813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947469,0.00023725073,0.0000618067,0.004433126,0.00039589073,0.000014626088,4.986992e-7,0.000011798198,0.00009806334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949424,0.003366342,0.0002731624,0.00025831396,0.00055677874,0.00060299126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649215,0.0023413538,0.0003266816,0.00033814754,0.00024902172,0.00025266362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005688525,0.00017894356,0.00023084867,0.000110634544,0.00058411347,0.00012106202,0.0004093245,0.00013610773,0.00001717144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018366467,0.00012276054,0.00007055194,0.0011486054,0.00053566915,0.00037656483,0.0001005027,0.0003018984,0.000016816417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002613285,0.000046306603,0.0004593404,0.000014676179,0.000041546456,0.00001630111,0.103347585,0.000038056085,5.1066553e-7,0.88974124,0.000082049606,0.00595103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017768247,0.00007852516,0.004164656,0.00009231381,0.00043737338,0.00004904705,0.6423622,0.00008983582,0.0000044829344,0.31172904,0.038942236,0.0002734993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2038815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1524521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010684832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002029169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98990226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747953720","doi":"10.21248/gjn.10.1.111","title":"Growing the Pie or Slicing it Differently - on the Need to Disentangle Two Aspects of Trade Agreements","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive property; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Negotiation; Order (exchange); Economics; Capital (architecture); Distribution (mathematics); International trade; Law and economics; International economics; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04600175268763422,"score_gpt":0.37018029499159216,"score_spread":0.32417854230395793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747953720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10799561,0.00010464479,0.00084492617,0.36298087,0.0042439196,0.001452901,0.00004099004,0.00015051864,0.5221856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923827,0.000067079156,0.00011033885,0.0057803118,0.0007680241,0.000015588983,0.0000016027551,0.000022600265,0.0008517737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964244,0.0013510792,0.00034777407,0.00033772996,0.0010276608,0.00051137316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422324,0.0039030288,0.0006164993,0.0009364482,0.00012463731,0.0001961419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002372968,0.00022581698,0.0002341666,0.000038457893,0.0032446994,0.00050754444,0.0016100759,0.00006467225,0.0004199752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017052218,0.00013493713,0.000084994615,0.000692932,0.0003816202,0.001071307,0.00022993365,0.00026903558,0.00019292624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002713489,0.00018200352,0.0001975484,0.000017685723,0.00010175823,0.000016284106,0.0073271184,0.000054243606,0.00018855707,0.9880635,0.0019438283,0.0016360956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038686753,0.00074080745,0.040436164,0.00073111075,0.0062714564,0.000052587984,0.4882349,0.00012520717,0.0018518359,0.057102192,0.3989464,0.0016386381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009141903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010179033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004532036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022576419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99805295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894370428","doi":"10.21248/gjn.10.2.147","title":"Should International Organizations Include Beneficiaries in Decision-making? Arguments for Mediated Inclusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Representation (politics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017884050897375433,"score_gpt":0.3804303517161047,"score_spread":0.36254630081872924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894370428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49081415,0.0015367994,0.1980188,0.023872614,0.02324401,0.0029413535,0.0009816152,0.0008142812,0.25777638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892359,0.00047871828,0.0067813913,0.002387392,0.00093508663,0.000020119052,0.000063639076,0.000018817425,0.000078963436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971735,0.0004735646,0.0004587743,0.0004146642,0.00094090024,0.0005386183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388415,0.0039699282,0.00031627435,0.00025844254,0.001419094,0.0001521175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030475848,0.00020405714,0.00021830433,0.00014566386,0.0018466386,0.0002211121,0.00084268046,0.00028236624,0.0002687505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05487537,0.00021451028,0.0000560661,0.0017469381,0.00020261499,0.0012244442,0.0008108442,0.00021086528,0.00018124942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082639273,0.00050154683,0.00068206486,0.00001765746,0.000066141045,0.00001557725,0.018272169,0.00032160134,0.000023901359,0.9658796,0.0017670892,0.011626223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013709627,0.00021870711,0.0007781552,0.000188913,0.0005477752,0.000014838765,0.047440547,0.005764588,0.0000061558794,0.46817404,0.47488263,0.0006126855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065018533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013747153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49842173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012971805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005337165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184022964","doi":"10.21248/gjn.13.01.188","title":"Armstrong's Resource-Egalitarianism Theory and Attachment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Positive economics; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03775585978396848,"score_gpt":0.3774614933620805,"score_spread":0.339705633578112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184022964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040133623,0.0043296344,0.0051906463,0.022018958,0.0015122028,0.00021006333,0.00005328302,0.00019595612,0.9624759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790901,0.0009934616,0.0017085058,0.010798424,0.0021242136,0.000017007134,0.000013933912,0.000023788114,0.0052305595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158156,0.0060472926,0.0003238893,0.0005119633,0.0007551726,0.000780151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057496,0.00798537,0.00015778498,0.0004262526,0.00031028147,0.0005453647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008513164,0.00022705756,0.00025893468,0.000030401829,0.0011623215,0.0002529814,0.00031255806,0.0003070383,0.00034544713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026493354,0.00023226373,0.0000965201,0.0004984593,0.0007998141,0.0007674888,0.00021987151,0.00059943495,0.00026721635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028503573,0.0001811792,0.000016028574,0.000054699383,0.00008910653,0.00015441944,0.00502963,0.0000073870556,0.000011867033,0.9903741,0.00082571106,0.0029708315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024507058,0.000041472726,0.0000954555,0.000024879342,0.00068800367,0.00005360816,0.05312907,0.0000021381275,0.000012094421,0.63709605,0.30840373,0.00020840623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029213494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005465094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97507674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000592894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006715327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313189573","doi":"10.21248/gjn.13.02.256","title":"Responding to the Tragedies of Our Time - The Human Right to Health and the Virtue of Creative Resolve","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Stockholms Universitet; Queen's University; Concordia University; University of Massachusetts Boston; City University of New York; Freie Universität Berlin; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Virtue; Tragedy (event); Right to health; Human rights; Law and economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.04671022920342095,"score_gpt":0.4646617005017367,"score_spread":0.4179514712983158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313189573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023898602,0.0062905955,0.006402783,0.6160669,0.0054896576,0.0074317707,0.0004900403,0.00014975073,0.33377993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93574226,0.00036444425,0.0013430165,0.05405293,0.0010528456,0.00054905674,0.000007782814,0.00004865369,0.006839009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94209677,0.053968363,0.0011932617,0.00048071062,0.0015933512,0.00066755805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8958971,0.099826135,0.0019246379,0.0013246812,0.0006615853,0.00036586632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.073657595,0.00026875126,0.0006010431,0.00016131833,0.0074678254,0.000028522763,0.0013469367,0.00013734575,0.00033332643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15832931,0.00014136144,0.00010350776,0.002233372,0.0005297946,0.0003104848,0.0015231291,0.004563678,0.00013939958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005546204,0.00014167125,0.000015320602,0.00024427666,0.00018305397,0.000008634948,0.0754999,0.0001690893,0.00008451281,0.87852126,0.038785387,0.00080070185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013087798,0.0009388636,0.00019606555,0.0002989735,0.0010718751,0.000050093124,0.68560344,0.000052484207,0.000011625737,0.058687136,0.2515723,0.00020831231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008402377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000753943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91184366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006620172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096615637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}