{"meta":{"query_hash":"3e0b0d32389f","filters":{"venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3e0b0d32389f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Justice+Theory+Practice+Rhetoric"},"results":[{"id":"W1663933440","doi":"10.21248/gjn.8.1.57","title":"Mobilizing Motherhood: The Use of Maternal Myths in Popular Development Discourse","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Ideology; Sociology; Critical discourse analysis; Gender studies; Psychological intervention; Discourse analysis; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Linguistics; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.06268450301386003,"score_gpt":0.35004632241198064,"score_spread":0.2873618193981206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663933440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7966524,0.0072092777,0.03089641,0.041031264,0.00077313546,0.00011032167,0.00007464388,0.0001012023,0.12315126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429977,0.0009444179,0.0016534325,0.00059909205,0.000087861845,0.00004940801,0.000015972199,0.000034792527,0.0023152102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906288,0.007699169,0.00016956427,0.00037605202,0.0006630876,0.0004633479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728693,0.023670845,0.0014267782,0.0009289395,0.00063934334,0.000464859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015477657,0.000702051,0.0004699048,0.0028262134,0.008028929,0.0075679566,0.0013552642,0.002609799,0.0023202135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021296717,0.0004048499,0.000316698,0.0013328829,0.042795975,0.00857948,0.009927308,0.004667807,0.0002297344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021164418,0.000009337123,0.0006980396,0.000098567834,0.000005502959,0.00030199718,0.88889456,0.000049986054,0.00049658143,0.1026974,0.0005813642,0.0061454647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012423818,0.000069167065,0.0015506664,0.0010037295,0.000016045387,0.00078528177,0.8453863,0.0004949466,0.0019478895,0.043781877,0.10492294,0.000028723643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00110268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015477657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036920551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021401565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08185464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934507504","doi":"10.21248/gjn.8.1.58","title":"‘Walking Wombs’: Making Sense of the Muskoka Initiative and the Emphasis on Motherhood in Canadian Foreign Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Gender studies; Scholarship; Reproductive health; Objectification; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Foreign policy; Colonialism; Political science; Feminism; Law; Politics; Population","score_opus":0.04646337065259844,"score_gpt":0.3534361602807061,"score_spread":0.3069727896281077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934507504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17575966,0.024106609,0.0027810594,0.25654012,0.0019311385,0.000065409615,0.00013998714,0.00007571254,0.5386004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95920736,0.0037342198,0.00088271085,0.013345116,0.00013515951,0.0000256604,0.000023726696,0.00005957955,0.022586454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942478,0.0018368104,0.0000821197,0.0005010636,0.0014084132,0.0019238156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954543,0.0022735738,0.00023337256,0.0001738268,0.0010396679,0.00082522194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007793888,0.0007187969,0.0005312476,0.0025851007,0.05092727,0.013417779,0.0023503632,0.005307999,0.0044695595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009107838,0.00036550272,0.00035835258,0.0034060827,0.067653775,0.0048082233,0.006192039,0.0072099203,0.00020724938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024953637,0.000008442218,0.0009532377,0.000093318995,0.0000065159675,0.00032308162,0.40084633,0.00013450987,0.00021704455,0.5680612,0.019464185,0.009867177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012033968,0.000020661875,0.0040638885,0.00070577377,0.000031062413,0.00018193318,0.41594797,0.00028073086,0.00044211684,0.039422475,0.538807,0.00008437706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.984029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1446692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1446692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12827228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747953720","doi":"10.21248/gjn.10.1.111","title":"Growing the Pie or Slicing it Differently - on the Need to Disentangle Two Aspects of Trade Agreements","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive property; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Negotiation; Order (exchange); Economics; Capital (architecture); Distribution (mathematics); International trade; Law and economics; International economics; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04600175268763422,"score_gpt":0.37018029499159216,"score_spread":0.32417854230395793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747953720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03663571,0.0031226266,0.064911865,0.10569766,0.0010525828,0.000073036135,0.00008754979,0.000079532976,0.78833956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320707,0.0021003592,0.015094842,0.018029314,0.0006249822,0.00014243436,0.000046262045,0.00016869264,0.031722464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640757,0.001852305,0.00010704417,0.00046034934,0.0007439166,0.00042884282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967422,0.0020047955,0.0002439731,0.0004937137,0.00031724252,0.00019807275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060803974,0.000407217,0.00053199875,0.0013899329,0.005981075,0.012319612,0.0010959248,0.005535556,0.00784326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009262638,0.00025738875,0.0006303852,0.0014212223,0.03155727,0.018726442,0.0052990518,0.009199694,0.00092898344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002003021,0.0000015714157,0.000028428583,0.000004845456,5.9726807e-7,0.000012727698,0.00071222836,0.000050538692,0.000025342506,0.9977095,0.00044660573,0.0010056846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039188544,0.000007892114,0.00012843114,0.000088444875,0.000003098934,0.000055095446,0.0017776346,0.00040088926,0.00012801771,0.95455325,0.042842925,0.00001043973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023025956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030616638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012319612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031189749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024640746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032156646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894370428","doi":"10.21248/gjn.10.2.147","title":"Should International Organizations Include Beneficiaries in Decision-making? Arguments for Mediated Inclusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Representation (politics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017884050897375433,"score_gpt":0.3804303517161047,"score_spread":0.36254630081872924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894370428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040799007,0.004299017,0.10809861,0.17158554,0.0010676065,0.00016010669,0.000039540544,0.00009759397,0.67385304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684863,0.00114376,0.00934179,0.00833994,0.0006551543,0.00030001145,0.000025246163,0.00007995228,0.011627771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95852697,0.02977734,0.0010922115,0.0027123522,0.0056559504,0.0022352326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657102,0.024704926,0.0021491342,0.004027545,0.0022734827,0.0011347382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041425467,0.000787305,0.0009542015,0.0029194092,0.010120132,0.01726028,0.0026325053,0.010714062,0.0063640983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04686557,0.0006889406,0.0012386227,0.0018901186,0.07404781,0.03236365,0.019596914,0.011784538,0.0011276159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043769683,0.000007271495,0.00012420751,0.0000189785,0.0000036708789,0.000025575971,0.004471272,0.000053990625,0.000031098672,0.9930757,0.0005144214,0.0016693525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016482627,0.000013911092,0.00015068921,0.0001952596,0.000012874162,0.00004599576,0.0039885775,0.00030738546,0.00020024685,0.96157974,0.033479664,0.000009334942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015085678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013835765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041425467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006307618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060926112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2190814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184022964","doi":"10.21248/gjn.13.01.188","title":"Armstrong's Resource-Egalitarianism Theory and Attachment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Positive economics; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03775585978396848,"score_gpt":0.3774614933620805,"score_spread":0.339705633578112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184022964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019481279,0.0027191837,0.065911,0.032099392,0.0003511369,0.00007965644,0.000046451765,0.00004389358,0.8792681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144674,0.0027515136,0.014407962,0.0064032567,0.00032272853,0.0002599027,0.000045687466,0.0000636987,0.061277963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697363,0.0014679963,0.0001017343,0.0005026485,0.00064231316,0.0003117419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786973,0.0013224573,0.00018929267,0.00031134943,0.00018655034,0.00012066314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037969458,0.00064222567,0.00045969355,0.0017581827,0.0037379533,0.004988971,0.0014266049,0.005454736,0.007369826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005462895,0.0003230602,0.0005617386,0.002298626,0.025034975,0.009996373,0.0048232973,0.004798297,0.000898577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016935968,0.0000020005025,0.000025084712,0.000004530969,7.21236e-7,0.000014783715,0.00048131013,0.000057416193,0.000009713492,0.9978473,0.0004749964,0.0010804224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000405488,0.0000064867463,0.00014801366,0.000045952347,0.0000025978343,0.000043844815,0.00027951138,0.00023389755,0.000042813102,0.9745199,0.024668667,0.000004312887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038851444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036662975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007369826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058513223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020328804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04245454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313189573","doi":"10.21248/gjn.13.02.256","title":"Responding to the Tragedies of Our Time - The Human Right to Health and the Virtue of Creative Resolve","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Stockholms Universitet; Queen's University; Concordia University; University of Massachusetts Boston; City University of New York; Freie Universität Berlin; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Virtue; Tragedy (event); Right to health; Human rights; Law and economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.04671022920342095,"score_gpt":0.4646617005017367,"score_spread":0.4179514712983158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313189573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009095334,0.00728287,0.013588087,0.71798754,0.004950727,0.000057111967,0.000012720368,0.000055852102,0.24696973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68346804,0.004841418,0.008112482,0.24484299,0.004643787,0.00017531904,0.000016841777,0.00019726016,0.053701874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9614145,0.02851761,0.0007977675,0.0018732685,0.0051658126,0.0022310566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9516018,0.037393454,0.0027704996,0.0025829535,0.0027533392,0.0028979369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036140107,0.00064964744,0.00068470684,0.0018283468,0.017453136,0.017440302,0.0017808634,0.015938796,0.006142384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038914908,0.00044048717,0.000712847,0.00090320455,0.12904462,0.018127067,0.01248041,0.018791365,0.0019074134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000928376,0.000018448829,0.0001318718,0.000063676474,0.0000041897893,0.00009052263,0.022185208,0.0000630478,0.0000856039,0.95706767,0.015484345,0.004796214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029733552,0.000034436962,0.00019007518,0.00054356403,0.000008288108,0.0002610573,0.02113254,0.00023622347,0.00032035096,0.64436084,0.33285177,0.000031044816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002995159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041540815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036140107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007298088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010076626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19112939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}