{"meta":{"query_hash":"3b2538682e73","filters":{"venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal"},"cohort_total":51,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"exported":51,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3b2538682e73","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Trade+and+Customs+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1011805438","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014014","title":"How <i>Canada Renewable Energy</i> Supports the Use of the Alternative Commercial Reasonableness Standard in Future Feed-In Tariff Disputes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Settlement (finance); Business; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Energy policy; Finance; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.011374136304471384,"score_gpt":0.18918718881218335,"score_spread":0.17781305250771198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1011805438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81060284,0.0004983345,0.0010028816,0.15308402,0.003973003,0.00038851408,0.00009586659,0.000023315859,0.030331241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983171,0.000052902265,0.000027229153,0.01572012,0.0008775684,0.0000032090977,0.0000074056043,0.000005913376,0.00013465129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895424,0.000054454777,0.00024277973,0.00012304643,0.00042513656,0.00020034442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995428,0.000032626816,0.00023760312,0.00009935717,0.000068646186,0.000018999306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025326284,0.00012952804,0.00015998872,0.000038468308,0.00018254614,0.00037982984,0.0002490783,0.000042238997,0.000022339002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004523831,0.00007481029,0.000054205062,0.0002477456,0.00007900001,0.00080818165,0.000059062666,0.00017381502,1.9788132e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030051847,0.00014961527,0.19920553,0.00004928583,0.000076013726,0.00004929607,0.00011032306,0.0034061926,0.00007879809,0.5998741,0.18591416,0.010786193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076255377,0.000013334265,0.08261932,0.00007882461,0.00001815402,0.000027167453,0.00021223303,0.0022213978,0.000098405486,0.0073614926,0.90646756,0.00011957447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099601224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40424716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7205534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009341325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009949402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1016589838","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012030","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the EU","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.0253988167565704,"score_gpt":0.3306699392982921,"score_spread":0.3052711225417217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1016589838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42511857,0.07950482,0.00017465964,0.37484628,0.0017722578,0.0007888909,0.000032168045,0.00005624447,0.1177061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883107,0.0093264105,0.000083788225,0.001883714,0.00038455595,9.190544e-7,6.1224057e-7,0.0000025304828,0.0000068006834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893594,0.0002590958,0.00023014747,0.00005043488,0.0003104015,0.00021400642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967635,0.000043026143,0.00011482448,0.000051941428,0.000027904402,0.00008594788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011119702,0.000052662795,0.000118404765,0.000027644433,0.00030708621,0.00004108419,0.00017199694,0.000035980287,0.00009603871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016647985,0.000039970695,0.000040028324,0.0005486124,0.00015616346,0.00031079078,0.00000998881,0.00013364408,0.000004368705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049727832,0.00032686154,0.18245819,0.00030665728,0.000035046112,0.000022218646,0.015385831,0.0000024547073,0.000076153694,0.74994683,0.014251611,0.037183188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029875594,0.000018071207,0.5374192,0.0009572336,0.00007024061,0.00021043785,0.0027981552,0.0000018032509,0.000020868009,0.0008034454,0.45726952,0.00013227122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043655706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007740902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74914336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045290006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008002174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.236189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1023936531","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012035","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.027239675361011156,"score_gpt":0.3274331793685566,"score_spread":0.3001935040075454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1023936531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82770795,0.025052028,0.00015639159,0.13364537,0.0006429325,0.0004030496,0.000029874835,0.000034467947,0.012327959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802824,0.01746229,0.00006552171,0.0019531506,0.00022391639,8.743227e-7,0.0000038476346,0.0000027375277,0.0000052554074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889475,0.0003105353,0.00023511554,0.00004833907,0.0002943957,0.00021687434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964255,0.00006037566,0.00011958393,0.000049142167,0.000040601404,0.00008773781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010334204,0.000056540637,0.000114418115,0.000049542585,0.0003084032,0.000045396766,0.00016226913,0.000033178145,0.00007649874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015282087,0.000041670944,0.000032544467,0.00092642417,0.00017144874,0.0002652326,0.000009645498,0.00013382883,0.0000028076208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011035067,0.0005537322,0.38714188,0.0005305965,0.000072473405,0.000035387267,0.04063341,0.000031574364,0.000060643524,0.52460134,0.021533068,0.024794871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040499633,0.000026831463,0.4485067,0.001206678,0.00009078885,0.00017056825,0.00763071,0.000012723407,0.000022428238,0.0013964331,0.540361,0.00017015667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001499379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010062089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52320486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004658068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23720193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1229773905","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012029","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; China; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.021375597773989608,"score_gpt":0.305536707373042,"score_spread":0.2841611095990524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1229773905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6054383,0.20967627,0.00020897156,0.096241914,0.0022551483,0.0005529422,0.000023211684,0.00008373102,0.08551953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744113,0.024455676,0.00009620962,0.00053533376,0.00048641633,4.6257892e-7,5.2996137e-7,0.0000043323835,0.000009729778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987208,0.00021354527,0.0002967865,0.00007286579,0.00039560854,0.00030036518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957967,0.000014316059,0.00013991528,0.00005045966,0.000026504755,0.00018911253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011112256,0.00007621427,0.00020609128,0.000038742062,0.0002158743,0.000032959833,0.0001348436,0.000053762822,0.00017327993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017718963,0.000068814355,0.000049668422,0.00049641344,0.00015711438,0.0003626204,0.000013829192,0.000162087,0.0000042264573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015851794,0.00029874066,0.707932,0.000462017,0.00006178853,0.000021702897,0.0062266365,0.000005784977,0.00022189262,0.23086296,0.009783803,0.044106852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003687634,0.00001594896,0.7735662,0.0015019111,0.00004652451,0.00009638591,0.0005302645,7.409663e-7,0.000056787776,0.00065835234,0.22300819,0.00014992975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001630516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113069174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36897302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008068736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111385016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28061682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1426969286","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014035","title":"Administrative Protective Orders: Protection of Confidential Information in Canadian Trade Remedy Proceedings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Business; Balance (ability); Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Trade secret; Public information; Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Law; Intellectual property; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.01811891558399312,"score_gpt":0.2194980514629739,"score_spread":0.2013791358789808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1426969286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98522913,0.000014293924,0.00029042506,0.002038334,0.00019232472,0.000542615,0.0000050648655,0.00002299657,0.011664824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.0000024747446,0.000024021083,0.00025358488,0.00039651254,0.000011987328,0.0000044624408,0.000004438742,0.0000054975326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907583,0.000009535436,0.00033785324,0.00011015305,0.00020578071,0.000260852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950397,0.0000029459034,0.0003188004,0.000038046557,0.00008356904,0.00005269437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032992498,0.00013140513,0.00017168451,0.00021071859,0.00021214827,0.00035017708,0.00010109206,0.00008829662,0.00003594308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028013621,0.00011263717,0.00004205688,0.00028361237,0.00007380438,0.0020430502,0.000011702853,0.00023250369,0.000007848022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088516367,0.00024876482,0.03302581,0.00081290194,0.00013828027,0.000036904523,0.0025066028,0.000067464985,0.00066363654,0.881327,0.0034375838,0.076849885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063239094,0.0005871312,0.45639092,0.0006581505,0.00017893083,0.00058534334,0.004442998,0.006481697,0.00042745515,0.27651572,0.24635977,0.0010479966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022688119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071563914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6048113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009974576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483365100","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014007","title":"The Canada EU Free Trade Agreement Demystified: New Opportunities for Trade, Investment and Government Procurement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; European union; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Procurement; Government procurement; Trade barrier; Agricultural economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042329107811262534,"score_gpt":0.25420140994664275,"score_spread":0.21187230213538022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483365100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02569882,0.0074538984,0.00034668038,0.93670326,0.0010493344,0.0010730141,0.00089213805,0.000023711496,0.02675915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94841206,0.00357999,0.0002883863,0.042930767,0.0018000142,0.00003594184,0.0000024132567,0.000015213185,0.0029352275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806786,0.000106698055,0.00029257662,0.00018056497,0.00081069156,0.00054160645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987981,0.000095120085,0.00018544336,0.00012399914,0.000008375058,0.0007889932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064574677,0.000165761,0.00016940778,0.000008316322,0.0013064616,0.0002765533,0.0002912861,0.000062661195,0.000011692652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010760673,0.00012588056,0.000057949655,0.00006523295,0.00022221521,0.00013211678,0.000025862333,0.00014604995,1.6910214e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039526145,0.000017010292,0.00018993825,0.000013461521,0.000058113474,0.000009108125,0.0009337962,0.000004219757,0.0000040798623,0.20862283,0.705271,0.08483692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007905935,0.00011017873,0.009876512,0.000035449153,0.000049542068,0.000042704567,0.0035106428,0.000025658712,0.00001609433,0.0069272323,0.9784499,0.00016553527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25442007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8767126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007923828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015316308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508726722","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010029","title":"At the Cross-Roads of US and Canadian Trade Controls: The Cuba Conflict","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; International trade; Economic sanctions; Context (archaeology); Surprise; Control (management); Business; International economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02218779368063458,"score_gpt":0.24392512664848268,"score_spread":0.2217373329678481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508726722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403781,0.0038604888,0.000037529506,0.010287157,0.0006742455,0.00008892997,0.00035648773,0.0000035756657,0.044313468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779713,0.00068172073,0.000021931002,0.00087093347,0.00019135315,0.0000040153104,0.0000027951744,0.0000051736183,0.00042493473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926376,0.000010697229,0.00038383994,0.0001288283,0.000030473226,0.0001824228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943644,0.00006067837,0.00021475981,0.00012492483,0.000013719545,0.00014947396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039178028,0.00008812967,0.00015820336,0.000050707717,0.00048772583,0.00016844024,0.00015972716,0.00008261344,0.00048373302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057787824,0.00006129521,0.00008386544,0.00007000059,0.00028522155,0.00015654911,0.000017619077,0.00029694362,0.000024920746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018080458,0.000021332493,0.4745292,0.0000026377961,0.00013954006,0.0000028242646,0.00026919835,0.00009116133,0.000037404254,0.5149837,0.0055120937,0.004392815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004089309,0.000022331627,0.5356385,0.000002704367,0.000008836162,0.00034676166,0.000052161915,0.00063716184,0.00000663495,0.0072265132,0.45558867,0.00006079787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004807298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015937285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5077572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007739051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051346848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508754586","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012031","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Actions Country Study: India","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02949999778313416,"score_gpt":0.3379769030009114,"score_spread":0.3084769052177772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508754586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8734783,0.042681098,0.00009252733,0.022918802,0.0033039951,0.0008142776,0.00006044947,0.00011564503,0.05653491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888749,0.009459815,0.000056073757,0.00070662866,0.00087648665,0.0000010938929,0.0000013059152,0.000005731688,0.000017968729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864966,0.00021131484,0.0002984788,0.00008488564,0.00045921176,0.0002964789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994121,0.00002568751,0.00019630589,0.000069830414,0.00005274268,0.00024330479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008314986,0.0000867748,0.0002095674,0.0000351608,0.00060416677,0.000057948055,0.00014425325,0.0000550203,0.0002823363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012614689,0.00008042184,0.00004720054,0.00065139646,0.00017131033,0.00047357276,0.000018673856,0.00019037804,0.000010354222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011475007,0.0008312536,0.8420174,0.0002780304,0.00020068699,0.00001887691,0.008056867,0.0000014804999,0.000089570196,0.12362006,0.016384259,0.008490035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042505865,0.00004235595,0.63667023,0.00059103395,0.00019323005,0.000119293894,0.0058124945,2.5829112e-7,0.00001651185,0.00013788874,0.3558283,0.00016337009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007475115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051549516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.339444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009617099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017170871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46468234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521613312","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014028","title":"The Canada-European Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement and the Mining Sector: Key Issues and Opportunities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Capital (architecture); Member states; International trade; Key (lock); Capital investment; Goods and services; Industrial organization; International economics; European union; Economics; Finance; Economy; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.037006132024048934,"score_gpt":0.25659952489646476,"score_spread":0.21959339287241583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521613312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4390932,0.024349926,0.000011470368,0.48995176,0.00051730237,0.0001896976,0.00017705912,0.000014080725,0.04569552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831343,0.008085292,0.00001647535,0.007454762,0.00067242136,0.0000010132328,3.6435657e-7,0.0000045387023,0.00063082104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868226,0.00043293522,0.00016299305,0.00010513041,0.00031055236,0.0003061097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930793,0.00017927145,0.000112953865,0.00009620192,0.000014378228,0.00028926085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006246972,0.00010446929,0.0001337433,0.00000878581,0.0017029399,0.00035498306,0.00021864432,0.00002757776,0.000009675503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008383922,0.00006369259,0.00002918636,0.000044135955,0.00082722906,0.00009668734,0.00003741427,0.0001514966,2.459243e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000720551,0.000008054123,0.0015860661,0.000013160239,0.000105394975,0.0000767323,0.01973506,0.0000040892733,0.0000040283035,0.25569198,0.59650224,0.12620114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064523384,0.0000261408,0.040875655,0.000025039375,0.000023981467,0.00013418202,0.009500119,0.000023368686,8.806545e-7,0.002450223,0.94620174,0.00009340671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37182263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7982415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000731291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021644616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534094088","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010055","title":"An Overview of the Mexico-Brazil Strategic Agreement for Economic Integration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Negotiation; Globalization; International economics; Business; International free trade agreement; Framework agreement; Trade agreement; Economic integration; Market access; Goods and services; Trade in services; Trade barrier; Free trade; Economics; Economy; Political science; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.09776617269052837,"score_gpt":0.2897151945702118,"score_spread":0.1919490218796834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534094088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98263437,0.002072653,0.00032242454,0.002327519,0.0017283406,0.0002415392,0.00052326487,0.000010247213,0.01013965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997964,0.00078581844,0.0005060695,0.0004360548,0.0002564242,0.000006602555,0.000007285608,0.000008933636,0.000028776361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988065,0.00001358868,0.0006495116,0.00023822274,0.000030161216,0.00026205787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991188,0.000013486118,0.000455786,0.00024978985,0.000012417585,0.00014970191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048010878,0.00015802658,0.00031381918,0.000042143864,0.00018715531,0.00015958588,0.00034866197,0.00012828823,0.0001815683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010582144,0.00013283697,0.00020563496,0.000060004448,0.00009355815,0.0003557305,0.000022001339,0.00023912746,0.000030149158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028292881,0.000086172724,0.019956006,0.000019455481,0.00005846253,5.568527e-7,0.000087406246,0.00015541018,0.00017340509,0.9749263,0.00082248286,0.0036860858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020063503,0.0004022552,0.10199184,0.000036066198,0.00005133184,0.00025685772,0.00056477194,0.0062907087,0.00056476827,0.8356527,0.051726606,0.00045576005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056045836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023419506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13927358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009420794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054636643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54169345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548138422","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012032","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Indonesia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Law; Political science; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02020546805075709,"score_gpt":0.31868428186160735,"score_spread":0.2984788138108503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548138422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8989298,0.038016133,0.00014139856,0.04144089,0.00095360464,0.00033093878,0.000014676113,0.000039797233,0.0201328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98875403,0.01022797,0.0001328199,0.0005476274,0.00032538813,8.4817674e-7,8.02672e-7,0.000003806214,0.000006730768],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894816,0.00016772114,0.00028860505,0.000063931344,0.00027970012,0.0002518679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959594,0.000025351217,0.00014065688,0.000045528344,0.000035957364,0.0001565524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069573795,0.0000644343,0.00016684768,0.000051326744,0.00022327463,0.000029901805,0.00011580572,0.00005270597,0.00009991329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011680478,0.00006218236,0.000039959312,0.00061743817,0.0001464021,0.00041725047,0.000013382332,0.0001321176,0.000004458595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044437666,0.0001881721,0.8232016,0.00025897258,0.000021969117,0.000015257476,0.0031644858,0.000001747809,0.00010072333,0.14659473,0.0020714484,0.024376458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033751116,0.000012603903,0.936954,0.0011180675,0.000043046068,0.00011630415,0.0006546556,0.0000016014822,0.000040950574,0.0003626885,0.06023169,0.00012686204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046276044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073354706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14623205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008128791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011631677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2535723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584115084","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011063","title":"Canadian Transfer Pricing: Optimizing Canadian Expansion with a Unified Approach to Tax and Customs Transfer Pricing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transfer pricing; Internal revenue; Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax revenue; Economics; Investment (military); International economics; Foreign direct investment; Public economics; Finance; Economy; Macroeconomics; Service (business); Politics","score_opus":0.027316067796051377,"score_gpt":0.2326132024428399,"score_spread":0.2052971346467885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584115084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86773247,0.0007933583,0.0029152676,0.01431833,0.0002597919,0.0007600625,0.00033643667,0.000043459666,0.112840846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476784,0.0002358859,0.00075902196,0.0036559491,0.0002129764,0.000007467385,0.0000018076902,0.000019109317,0.0003399644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780095,0.0001129905,0.0002607077,0.0003514225,0.00035888332,0.0011150499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965731,0.000014701945,0.000029660923,0.00012680018,0.000047844078,0.0032079115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045233706,0.00025008645,0.0002798913,0.00022242975,0.0013442298,0.00024460602,0.0002586963,0.00020040611,0.000049149952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002140199,0.00022275599,0.0000618423,0.00060965004,0.00021630562,0.0003974362,0.0000062101713,0.0003986572,0.000003570764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076227856,0.0002750237,0.024921186,0.00017460008,0.0005382085,0.0018551971,0.53965807,0.0007594009,0.00028610576,0.2553879,0.029947415,0.14543465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004696104,0.00092450535,0.1400656,0.000728546,0.00046298926,0.0032636432,0.05313837,0.00031802076,0.00020838587,0.0015761716,0.7918388,0.0027788565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97508854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99186015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7618914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008868707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023796652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587869027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012033","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Mexico","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.021492165410230444,"score_gpt":0.3243113300247242,"score_spread":0.3028191646144937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587869027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6204168,0.12223659,0.00052120676,0.15620565,0.0030148714,0.00086807355,0.00006873958,0.00011621091,0.09655184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865255,0.012238115,0.00018908411,0.0007264189,0.000302476,7.723204e-7,0.0000010787099,0.0000038191056,0.000012784161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989371,0.00016401707,0.00028841093,0.00006507863,0.0002871467,0.00025826594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995898,0.000026573436,0.00013617332,0.00004700283,0.000035860718,0.00016456911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007451903,0.00006427981,0.0001656218,0.000046485544,0.00022936198,0.000030077868,0.00011892942,0.000049785325,0.0001636082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017975777,0.000061702915,0.000043095093,0.00056819676,0.00015053536,0.0004161375,0.000013855569,0.00012833592,0.000005577425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059101067,0.00029313905,0.6807892,0.00034389843,0.00003664816,0.000019636916,0.0050692046,0.000004091048,0.00012138572,0.27041984,0.007660612,0.03523646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055928674,0.00002481116,0.6643311,0.002128912,0.0000808023,0.00018231527,0.0013162104,0.0000044610615,0.00012675756,0.001143301,0.32986522,0.00023681398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004229263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097382785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36610863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086529326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110931214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2516172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866314101","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012026","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.07860839744239517,"score_gpt":0.3779738723010165,"score_spread":0.2993654748586213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866314101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148463,0.046280704,0.000039670067,0.027098257,0.00062732067,0.00032594972,0.000024173514,0.000025272731,0.010732329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870075,0.010639591,0.00011100073,0.00024019406,0.00028491777,6.1649354e-7,5.838693e-7,0.0000032632825,0.00001909775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885076,0.00020717405,0.00028497117,0.00008451617,0.00030701235,0.0002655496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954444,0.000023713354,0.00014080884,0.00003853674,0.000033805543,0.00021867684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008314865,0.00008376785,0.00020853293,0.000031548047,0.00018308524,0.000042649717,0.00008583816,0.000059766087,0.00012868544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014428073,0.00007615821,0.000031731346,0.00033416352,0.00026960275,0.0003588419,0.000011832389,0.00015460422,0.0000020382597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023490531,0.0002257615,0.7592181,0.00044547522,0.00007083579,0.000030165935,0.00648051,9.28121e-7,0.00025956196,0.21817307,0.004425626,0.0106464485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052045187,0.000051603038,0.8994456,0.0017664123,0.000079166544,0.0001867058,0.0019886657,3.7197273e-7,0.00014784932,0.0008754677,0.094729766,0.00020792325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015554728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026315014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21729761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055387365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010448514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3105642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924666097","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012027","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Brazil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.032312565958478166,"score_gpt":0.36683390601108484,"score_spread":0.3345213400526067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924666097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8582511,0.049334846,0.00009997855,0.05761758,0.00062924117,0.00040699265,0.000037465597,0.000033482993,0.03358933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865906,0.012521047,0.00018098802,0.00048619253,0.00020443328,8.1379306e-7,7.820196e-7,0.0000031048203,0.000012015905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908835,0.0001562914,0.00025472042,0.000072657385,0.00021754946,0.00021042011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958825,0.0000376458,0.00013239098,0.000035192166,0.00003384384,0.00017266079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005636052,0.0000673187,0.00016460815,0.00003655202,0.00024346162,0.000039160335,0.00007492789,0.000047395064,0.00008221319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016995247,0.00006404213,0.000026597185,0.00038865642,0.00024146016,0.00041858977,0.000013289127,0.00012102203,0.0000015732395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013534646,0.00032691087,0.5983022,0.00049346394,0.000051560015,0.000032122764,0.0096939495,7.488166e-7,0.00018126325,0.3460072,0.0027101298,0.042186912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051624025,0.000047351736,0.92713314,0.0015060944,0.0000677143,0.00023386232,0.0022121503,0.0000022985334,0.000088641005,0.0008968332,0.06710743,0.00018823515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034942404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015301481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34511036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051870156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013132014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26115623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191445368","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012028","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.015633908846891482,"score_gpt":0.28614463654167277,"score_spread":0.2705107276947813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191445368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83933437,0.05151228,0.0000693503,0.07280155,0.001880805,0.00036497775,0.000043672764,0.000025622996,0.033967353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99136853,0.0075055645,0.00007835139,0.0008058008,0.0002298,5.217469e-7,7.175274e-7,0.000002873721,0.000007832593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902266,0.00012195401,0.0002542602,0.00005343282,0.00030288502,0.00024481496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996168,0.000024846711,0.00011763115,0.000038931346,0.000031828204,0.00016993219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042632988,0.000055019525,0.000144778,0.00002564701,0.00019252059,0.00001784015,0.00010511377,0.000026426289,0.00014632124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012558405,0.000053628377,0.000024005758,0.00044806162,0.000075509495,0.00026600205,0.0000103284765,0.00010875998,0.0000013541577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032584155,0.00009380643,0.8736106,0.00028452303,0.000027107393,0.000029005683,0.001871426,0.0000055108458,0.00004501919,0.083968565,0.009791922,0.030269261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002744676,0.0000075801668,0.8174056,0.0010813116,0.000040574247,0.00010379464,0.0013366507,0.0000030422723,0.000038358066,0.00021062828,0.17935324,0.00014477645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14409614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4754249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33132875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032689588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008713324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8616034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198730501","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010016","title":"The EU Ban on Seal Products: Some Customs and WTO Open Questions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Legitimacy; Business; International trade law; Harmony (color); International trade; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.014272710309962413,"score_gpt":0.30444305226752794,"score_spread":0.2901703419575655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198730501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27668515,0.00070922635,0.0000038698918,0.69026756,0.001942255,0.00048694643,0.000034115117,0.00008395646,0.02978692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995998,0.0006731105,0.00019148814,0.0011438838,0.0011847833,0.000004025731,0.0000015065145,0.000010558758,0.00079260505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986176,0.00019301358,0.0002146918,0.00022448246,0.00037931761,0.00037093146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924505,0.000066404784,0.00011087929,0.00015837615,0.000066640074,0.0003526321],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088915264,0.00013073465,0.00013208875,0.000028004259,0.0027372162,0.0012831538,0.0004919337,0.00009753777,0.00006842321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027707615,0.000092305185,0.000027419892,0.0003756875,0.00064909563,0.0006596097,0.00007264789,0.00051926833,0.000025125151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019005933,0.00005518533,0.0021861778,0.0000023805483,0.000021085907,0.000011350276,0.0007704132,0.0000014083163,0.000109083725,0.9707585,0.0143408105,0.01172458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040356233,0.00005457509,0.042126376,0.000017395878,0.000026387412,0.00017134711,0.00089719315,0.0000035225157,0.000038660564,0.0053741676,0.95074177,0.00014504533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019233025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001385131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96538436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006519461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002845065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212860751","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011059","title":"Troubles along the U.S.-Canada Border","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Protectionism; Prime minister; Political science; Law; Political economy; International trade; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02515425206961983,"score_gpt":0.2696481748517336,"score_spread":0.24449392278211377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212860751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5574178,0.006821874,0.00007598776,0.12155009,0.0015122594,0.0002125895,0.00021179028,0.000030942243,0.31216663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318266,0.00048765657,0.00003352738,0.0050233477,0.00045842657,9.7317e-7,1.4131167e-7,0.0000026971748,0.0008105883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915224,0.00006939844,0.00011706124,0.000077415934,0.00026794654,0.00031590625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995787,0.00002005195,0.00006890291,0.000064986,0.000015706399,0.00025161426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023798586,0.00006689199,0.00007432521,0.000007104947,0.00077911525,0.00008607871,0.00021491294,0.000041239393,0.00027597987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004368024,0.000046891077,0.000038164224,0.00013346257,0.00020435765,0.0001451432,0.000010012283,0.00015426711,0.0000032933851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035740282,0.00002724727,0.027408276,0.000004142187,0.00006411986,0.00016968929,0.008580514,0.0000017317536,0.0000020358545,0.26843116,0.6056394,0.08963596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014271794,0.000010785513,0.13895735,0.000007884831,0.000012025238,0.000111963716,0.0017389498,0.000001063757,0.0000030375318,0.0034204721,0.85552263,0.00007113393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92156553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43576482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001475211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009110638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5992403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215259119","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011041","title":"Customs Audits, Verifications and Voluntary Disclosures in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Agency (philosophy); Business; Officer; Accounting; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Government (linguistics); Revenue; Finance; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.022029780322229325,"score_gpt":0.24208493979731266,"score_spread":0.22005515947508333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215259119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654971,0.002187011,0.000012360309,0.012301133,0.00031561364,0.00008461407,0.00022597307,0.0000073722545,0.019368863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973743,0.0009923748,0.000042630643,0.001178613,0.00018319362,0.0000018148347,6.675778e-7,0.0000030089072,0.00022338003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915963,0.00006530417,0.0001556498,0.000117241594,0.0001946084,0.00030758276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950045,0.000016814498,0.000070221824,0.000060033286,0.00001106741,0.00034139972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016066109,0.000077815865,0.000103904364,0.000024000043,0.00035575332,0.00004759791,0.00012992133,0.00004605707,0.00008231375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003801215,0.00007443824,0.000021009473,0.00017578017,0.00017459253,0.00019978585,0.0000089240575,0.00017041246,0.0000019014842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046110443,0.000051773495,0.67646873,0.000012662347,0.000034610082,0.0002706376,0.010799823,0.000003914257,0.0000103888915,0.08612419,0.17577556,0.050401594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020096521,0.000011369147,0.7764794,0.000015497479,0.00000964345,0.0000784119,0.0021247023,0.0000060013526,0.0000033046654,0.0020159131,0.21895528,0.00009950063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98425233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99659044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10001068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041707084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013284332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30355033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219368199","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013029","title":"The Landmark Decision in <i>Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency</i>: Lessons for Compliance with Canadian Customs Valuation Requirements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Tribunal; Business; Transfer pricing; Documentation; Database transaction; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Multinational corporation; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03224238979258095,"score_gpt":0.2677250847679954,"score_spread":0.23548269497541444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219368199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663295,0.001009328,0.00066136004,0.021738803,0.0012739421,0.0008455983,0.00014037653,0.000011246432,0.007989858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978773,0.00006762257,0.00014497028,0.0015447795,0.00025084824,0.00001537886,0.000018354089,0.000008468589,0.00007229128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985311,0.000014858145,0.00037830143,0.00016069188,0.0005348747,0.00038017434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924856,0.000063341206,0.00026013376,0.00010755283,0.00024574567,0.00007464827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002685333,0.00014651704,0.0001783712,0.000044804012,0.00043196694,0.00026961922,0.0003132094,0.00003648311,0.00003481011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044357763,0.00010097015,0.000026790283,0.00015720022,0.00006337254,0.00044930496,0.000025449566,0.00011243871,0.0000011293861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004896742,0.00020579156,0.6918139,0.00059581304,0.00045437913,0.00009571007,0.00022858958,0.007387189,0.00006551108,0.07213268,0.17019287,0.056337897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001282752,0.000024221023,0.89033824,0.00031963788,0.00005465479,0.000023421,0.00060881267,0.011398729,0.000007950724,0.009431342,0.08628673,0.00022353425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99426246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19852431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036197316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092913135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41174433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299657596","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016015","title":"Canadas Sanctions Regime Regarding Iran: How Much has Changed in a Post-Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regulated Market?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Negotiation; Status quo; Action (physics); Political science; Action plan; Economic sanctions; Business; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.10643751021424015,"score_gpt":0.2385340721965104,"score_spread":0.13209656198227027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299657596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95926374,0.0016579339,0.0010484332,0.025804318,0.0008898366,0.00014601061,0.00034542073,0.000016740425,0.010827563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980354,0.0009063084,0.00014530485,0.00013501999,0.00014731563,0.000006122897,0.0000051961024,0.00000894666,0.0006104418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989826,0.000026235042,0.0005110055,0.00021681422,0.000048461454,0.0002148986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992494,0.000041671567,0.00042382922,0.00012172648,0.000053098676,0.000110272355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021857143,0.00012362623,0.0003006822,0.00028030464,0.00018340313,0.00007659829,0.00008771946,0.00010642754,0.00034533392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007673226,0.00011252121,0.00011231692,0.00019041696,0.000088591456,0.0004293437,0.000018499273,0.00016350858,0.00001300409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011665383,0.00074699754,0.33596686,0.0001310815,0.002073577,0.00012699512,0.00225123,0.00040351864,0.007867939,0.42337772,0.14759853,0.078289025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002882656,0.00017953488,0.8588557,0.00024130956,0.000025605377,0.00078780134,0.0014621153,0.00079644745,0.00015237606,0.02019842,0.11408677,0.00033121652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055647566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009013564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5228889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042277624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005462366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45884818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233770138","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013020","title":"Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tariff; Market access; International trade law; Dumping; Free trade; Duty; Subsidy; Safeguard; Liberalization; Rules of origin; International economics; Business; World trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Geography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.06513871667867441,"score_gpt":0.367088721235281,"score_spread":0.3019500045566066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233770138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40415618,0.0027811592,0.008069711,0.49203783,0.0057327137,0.0067365756,0.0008265901,0.00070463173,0.07895462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966116,0.0005751898,0.000492216,0.00046018677,0.0003766615,0.000024433197,0.0000044557833,0.000014850403,0.0014404306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865794,0.00014198807,0.00036192665,0.00019254547,0.00029799537,0.000347597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.000084587155,0.000269305,0.00009342816,0.00008420585,0.00029564256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031770245,0.00013601156,0.00020859143,0.000049008653,0.0006492392,0.00034590007,0.00024227891,0.00013647112,0.0011264374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017922944,0.00011405067,0.00008220881,0.00055874203,0.00025170163,0.001040037,0.000017347722,0.00017732274,0.0000023363173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064339436,0.0006103263,0.00678611,0.00011673496,0.00063825265,0.000012858597,0.006555837,0.000009919154,0.016356833,0.020045538,0.9053284,0.042895805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022593308,0.00027558356,0.010961732,0.00006198955,0.0002164583,0.00020559065,0.0051993085,0.00023668738,0.00084998016,0.0017821359,0.9776012,0.00035000633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068811054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015402994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5924554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023643099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024990304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340614765","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016029","title":"Trans-Pacific Partnership: Key Takeaways on Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); General partnership; Business; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Finance","score_opus":0.02160176687289279,"score_gpt":0.2596199635681542,"score_spread":0.23801819669526142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340614765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25172025,0.0014030953,0.000092627735,0.43135768,0.0012052748,0.00019973613,0.00073562056,0.000047427966,0.3132383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992823,0.00060133357,0.0000074228233,0.0028537624,0.0006316904,0.0000011542072,2.3835933e-7,0.0000042525385,0.003077115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987485,0.00008967568,0.00014560285,0.00013670433,0.00041236047,0.00046716892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920833,0.0000491863,0.00006973024,0.000074259544,0.000015464522,0.00058304885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022803922,0.00010100682,0.00011722137,0.000016515456,0.0005267395,0.000086377506,0.00016606698,0.00007154971,0.00016484241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060696795,0.00007184639,0.000055138236,0.00013708642,0.00019058054,0.00014847543,0.000003294804,0.00013045853,0.0000072553066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058152164,0.000023587821,0.0028892285,0.0000039412307,0.00002939795,0.00020641844,0.0017959008,0.0000018066185,0.000034584897,0.110137805,0.8028194,0.081999786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038893204,0.000036664875,0.013692782,0.000042807205,0.000008979505,0.000072616815,0.00062238576,3.9606402e-7,0.000013293773,0.002369977,0.982627,0.0001241812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4122895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9123735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74110276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004791386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011435115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423493607","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013040","title":"The Question of the Benefit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.007829631317478027,"score_gpt":0.2617525603438024,"score_spread":0.25392292902632435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423493607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6267569,0.0017537958,0.00006256823,0.32924485,0.001344594,0.000311943,0.0000062164977,0.00003793186,0.040481165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878216,0.00034373658,0.000039910596,0.00022660891,0.00019845675,9.317185e-7,9.518398e-8,0.0000024291123,0.00040565222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927264,0.00010844157,0.00013976025,0.00005024384,0.00027855372,0.00015036468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966425,0.000032850567,0.00009984912,0.000068294685,0.000053207834,0.00008154867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029694135,0.00004493595,0.000051816187,0.000006253779,0.000992614,0.00017077387,0.00022037282,0.000038222253,0.000096197255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007133996,0.000023873525,0.00003733083,0.0002452483,0.00031832617,0.00017703717,0.000016750259,0.00010973965,0.000010320323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002376192,0.00001669381,0.026240205,0.0000014822333,0.000015205849,4.3889432e-7,0.0008543036,0.00001084334,0.000064176085,0.93906826,0.0066055274,0.027120516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020487691,0.000017105325,0.61824006,0.000024574858,0.000022342947,0.000051042018,0.0019429785,0.000012415387,0.00008122409,0.03656615,0.34276354,0.000073671894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028323635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037927655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90250206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047384114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064650245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7634485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503493334","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013053","title":"Demystifying the Trans-Pacific Partnership: An American and Canadian Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02365661709021259,"score_gpt":0.2978003832037697,"score_spread":0.2741437661135571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503493334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68604654,0.0015396129,0.00001739926,0.26525596,0.00013673563,0.00021222646,0.000077589946,0.00001925711,0.04669468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963653,0.0005545094,0.000029183973,0.0024309335,0.00040733753,0.0000035670464,2.5573488e-7,0.0000043038303,0.00020460722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989292,0.00015903403,0.00010367824,0.00014218122,0.00018731707,0.00047855952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882716,0.000030355475,0.000062155064,0.00006721619,0.00003183463,0.0009812554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002709147,0.00009384208,0.00010896264,0.000030027597,0.0013011907,0.00043234252,0.00016374036,0.000049467577,0.00007232435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004880504,0.00007162101,0.00003774219,0.00023053613,0.0007508255,0.0003589971,0.0000039592646,0.00023017729,0.0000056594317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029887735,0.00005507092,0.03843006,0.000007683585,0.00013912309,0.000097293065,0.15845762,0.000011042307,0.000029832865,0.4371344,0.10538813,0.26021987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026846907,0.000108855646,0.28379714,0.00001843809,0.000034703753,0.00030765322,0.14036962,0.000034620567,0.0000015106474,0.019247135,0.5555657,0.00024610228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8561489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88537383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4501776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032210437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047241797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578906619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013028","title":"Modernization of the EUs Trade Defence Instruments and the Law of Unintended Consequences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Transparency (behavior); Modernization theory; Protectionism; European commission; Duty; International trade; Political science; Unintended consequences; Law; Subsidy; Business; Law and economics; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.011066725338626418,"score_gpt":0.24069834143783425,"score_spread":0.22963161609920785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578906619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84902054,0.0007415294,0.00012286672,0.13432184,0.00032085698,0.0004157532,0.000017888675,0.000018096358,0.015020644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.00034978677,0.000096491785,0.0004122175,0.00003725686,0.0000012905672,2.8831602e-7,0.0000031298603,0.000027551601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890774,0.00026759977,0.0002528966,0.00008462832,0.00034108642,0.00014604161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.0000386971,0.00023015766,0.000074734366,0.000051699848,0.000080822734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028617174,0.00007344955,0.00013532456,0.000013030262,0.0004703512,0.00009500739,0.0002475951,0.000051270374,0.000051598843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080916165,0.00004151389,0.000039295275,0.0002982515,0.003999079,0.00028583137,0.000026477817,0.00011807819,7.319917e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126680225,0.00002144648,0.012131641,0.0000066285183,0.000030025738,4.134203e-7,0.0034851287,0.000019853534,0.00028484687,0.981616,0.00017485896,0.0022164749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007393788,0.00017915668,0.46005374,0.00039369476,0.00039809677,0.0006688943,0.03762227,0.0008906388,0.006957091,0.4638255,0.021011828,0.00060531264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000793757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026819372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028953189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010724584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595621542","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012034","title":"Anti-dumping and Judicial Review in South Africa: An Urgent Need for Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.08233373517147559,"score_gpt":0.332947398984342,"score_spread":0.2506136638128664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595621542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293388,0.16518565,0.00018599548,0.09631648,0.0021178685,0.0018551293,0.00008597925,0.00012720599,0.0047868574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285656,0.004318068,0.00019249588,0.0014635241,0.0011439101,0.0000066081766,0.0000019506685,0.0000075776697,0.000009322254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988763,0.00013494272,0.00022528761,0.000120161276,0.00022215606,0.00042119154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925005,0.000018184212,0.00010602509,0.000049751754,0.000026273463,0.0005497398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084587885,0.00009944785,0.00021028685,0.000042733256,0.00041593492,0.000092971495,0.00009834327,0.00006575225,0.00007015738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014818688,0.00009111042,0.000037257407,0.00037574986,0.0001121136,0.0005908339,0.00001591286,0.00011974252,0.0000022878908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008141415,0.0006721835,0.48489985,0.00050209905,0.00012617993,0.00003998799,0.16498423,0.0000022277604,0.00015922557,0.24805301,0.009741118,0.09073846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015519313,0.00010506746,0.35005903,0.0007800373,0.0001873607,0.000115094284,0.010246387,0.000014096444,0.000013811876,0.0010360059,0.63538206,0.0005090964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003718113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000775063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.625641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007199034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007844514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37153754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606450338","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017018","title":"The Brexit Vote: Its Impact on the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and UKs Obligations Under Comprehensive Trade and Economic Trade Agreement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; European union; International trade; Negotiation; Trade agreement; Investment (military); Member state; Commission; European commission; International economics; Economic impact analysis; Economic integration; Customs union; Free trade agreement; Economics; Business; Member states; Free trade; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.03044590585871328,"score_gpt":0.2689096511603479,"score_spread":0.23846374530163458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606450338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975589,0.0026985265,0.000007725789,0.09651926,0.0004718707,0.0004238938,0.00009006376,0.00001612389,0.002213629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931966,0.0010640703,0.0000086777545,0.0050036316,0.0006619109,0.000007532426,0.000008204024,0.000015382808,0.000033955195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984995,0.000047149846,0.00042799057,0.00034636073,0.00023591451,0.000443059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989035,0.00011187033,0.00057248975,0.00025725222,0.000015958458,0.00013892431],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001954518,0.00036981466,0.0003486508,0.000057696972,0.002449034,0.002150079,0.00030656063,0.00008859702,0.000048913287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001435376,0.00023683654,0.00009328047,0.000041237578,0.00036503922,0.0007391421,0.00010290951,0.0003645477,0.0000075486632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014621278,0.0004140066,0.07608081,0.0004480124,0.0036948363,0.00025225832,0.0024614583,0.0059571033,0.0010179797,0.5781056,0.2262094,0.1038964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018341995,0.00006965229,0.8079662,0.000084153035,0.00015031364,0.00018857924,0.0023458912,0.0020045068,0.000027892233,0.0020361873,0.18295293,0.00033952028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03496284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055009224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7318854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029003996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019023137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614194518","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017024","title":"The Obstacles to Concluding the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and Lessons for the Future","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Member states; Convergence (economics); Member state; International trade; Opposition (politics); European union; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Free trade; Economic growth","score_opus":0.031404914077037514,"score_gpt":0.26887980358336006,"score_spread":0.23747488950632253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614194518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20755397,0.003304788,0.000075943826,0.7785737,0.0017564062,0.0004917073,0.000043255983,0.000009094093,0.008191113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683634,0.000559064,0.000020364852,0.029380057,0.0016069012,0.000009543878,0.0000016432585,0.000004670388,0.000054361743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994084,0.00000907934,0.00015871688,0.00011588126,0.00013411819,0.00017380391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958515,0.000075779855,0.00017835939,0.000106360916,0.000024980001,0.000029380652],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018364277,0.00011158836,0.00009177959,0.000009979584,0.0031092572,0.0015972849,0.00025826157,0.000022318969,0.000009915643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016424581,0.000054948418,0.000036411933,0.000016045196,0.00014641645,0.00034300753,0.0000787485,0.00010923347,0.0000015745771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060697086,0.000007554653,0.0014842167,0.000013304552,0.00013233026,0.000003915431,0.0000824582,0.00003416148,0.00003763902,0.88422,0.08880536,0.025118368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046132036,0.000010552906,0.09762337,0.000015456784,0.00004629342,0.000041188458,0.0017711265,0.0014604983,0.000007512876,0.0034024375,0.8950771,0.00008310754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029545574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88081753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004718929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041255826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615207609","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017023","title":"Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, ISDS and the Belgian Veto: A Warning of Failure for Future Trade Agreements with the EU?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Veto; Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Settlement (finance); International economics; Investment (military); Trade agreement; Business; Economics; Free trade; Political science; Politics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.014130106856616729,"score_gpt":0.23538005081377814,"score_spread":0.2212499439571614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615207609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77479434,0.0011487958,0.00015351166,0.21169595,0.00043907916,0.0007076381,0.00004514875,0.000015076107,0.011000442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896525,0.00017480756,0.00010039182,0.009045341,0.0009714523,0.000009248677,0.0000068800064,0.000007896621,0.000031446823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923015,0.000018652785,0.0002270582,0.0001617655,0.00017474285,0.00018762941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934775,0.000027536718,0.00045229177,0.00012015616,0.000023669909,0.000028574934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022400002,0.00016625105,0.00020104254,0.000030758132,0.001105002,0.00071770157,0.00024039963,0.000047424885,0.000022558039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000786205,0.00009049104,0.000069078975,0.000029117502,0.00040206392,0.0007394556,0.000054137778,0.00016697797,0.0000011655188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013537976,0.0001175343,0.021108653,0.00028354136,0.0010447572,0.00001887375,0.0017101498,0.000072076546,0.00037686562,0.9104432,0.045337345,0.018133242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008762623,0.00012575091,0.18161751,0.00012249887,0.00032891755,0.00023013727,0.005027058,0.003262518,0.00003078941,0.004857775,0.7953451,0.00028931902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005723152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011732851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9055854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021439364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019646779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84988934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772339027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017055","title":"Trade from the Trenches: Negotiating in Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Mandate; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); International trade; Curiosity; Globalization; Commission; Trade barrier; Investment (military); General partnership; Multilateral trade negotiations; Commercial policy; Business; Political science; Economics; International economics; Free trade; Law","score_opus":0.02496935044431364,"score_gpt":0.2669622107028202,"score_spread":0.24199286025850658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772339027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35882354,0.0011039171,0.00016163236,0.13844351,0.0017600427,0.00020731422,0.000016091562,0.000042406347,0.49944153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720675,0.00008499069,0.0001286629,0.025861403,0.0018220976,0.0000022251277,0.000005309093,0.000004848202,0.000022991195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922115,0.000018471566,0.0002247071,0.00012378303,0.00024388719,0.00016799611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946046,0.000046420093,0.00033437044,0.00011963302,0.000021425789,0.000017680231],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002971772,0.00010451315,0.00009581959,0.000023396533,0.00067243865,0.0019115811,0.00031000873,0.00004271341,0.000058981233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023989895,0.000070946415,0.000046771438,0.000055722758,0.00007861913,0.0023714793,0.000047578167,0.00024242153,0.000028614375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011290733,0.00020531802,0.07528789,0.000009800826,0.00012206552,0.00013622118,0.0004180731,0.00011232134,0.000105773746,0.87479484,0.029390737,0.019304035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011619887,0.000011203407,0.4129636,0.000066027686,0.00006898385,0.00008305114,0.0015985444,0.004312399,0.000005788726,0.013221272,0.5663394,0.00016779247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087202707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014517058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8615736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003509142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020766112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783009311","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018004","title":"Prior Judicial Involvement in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from the Courts Rhetoric in Opinion 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Majority opinion; European union; Concurring opinion; Member state; Court of record; Economics; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; International trade; Member states","score_opus":0.029875250674302117,"score_gpt":0.2714643232561439,"score_spread":0.24158907258184179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783009311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406134,0.0005381154,0.0001670744,0.03594614,0.0024949117,0.00033673522,0.00005368785,0.00003216174,0.019817783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97277725,0.00016159122,0.000057829806,0.024430212,0.00249525,0.000008214038,0.00003826261,0.00000871962,0.000022675915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871236,0.000033150933,0.0004013181,0.00020262672,0.0003703175,0.00028023738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999609,0.000017766051,0.00020283856,0.00008873552,0.000050111663,0.000031526542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041212293,0.00015844346,0.00014713782,0.000093584225,0.0002596468,0.00037820614,0.00022779385,0.00004755228,0.00014548659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026302085,0.000117186544,0.000049915347,0.0002744628,0.00012041161,0.0008045899,0.00007942463,0.00022695142,0.000059459268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034454375,0.0005803852,0.21863903,0.000037848014,0.00014018355,0.000081938655,0.0014890722,0.00008719059,0.00035062013,0.6762766,0.08527485,0.016697718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023817627,0.000050174935,0.46916837,0.00020972911,0.000024561716,0.000014524831,0.00042533237,0.0027249055,0.000039031784,0.070235595,0.4544464,0.00027961127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008243058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026578484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.606041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016073491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005372184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47787285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784952832","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018005","title":"Unspoken Truths: The Hidden Logic of Decision 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Autonomy; European union; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Business; International economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03306527082140851,"score_gpt":0.32341289075968793,"score_spread":0.2903476199382794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784952832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5181259,0.0028006507,0.0003482792,0.008406046,0.0010284637,0.00008778228,0.000018611969,0.000021418296,0.46916285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971238,0.0011326579,0.0002195978,0.00052910874,0.0007758083,2.7946874e-7,1.6580412e-7,0.000002148986,0.00021643663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916583,0.00010426616,0.00016619381,0.00007690134,0.00033852327,0.00014829365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996335,0.000067046414,0.00009043735,0.000054729826,0.000081148544,0.00007313624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004886976,0.000057742272,0.00008787259,0.000014480828,0.00060678,0.000073678886,0.0002595833,0.000029462806,0.00015531747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012155603,0.000033377473,0.000057565798,0.000118280885,0.0005951061,0.00010794873,0.000025408224,0.00008882073,0.00003085704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013426063,0.000080990045,0.015271428,0.0000033028134,0.00011053315,0.000031858974,0.0059628105,0.0000016692815,0.000076421085,0.7627009,0.06276436,0.15286148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048555722,0.0002766521,0.11381694,0.000067615045,0.00003880231,0.00011626962,0.0063013737,0.000012260311,0.00004297793,0.06432351,0.8143937,0.00012433829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065515815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015840228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75162935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003533187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004299722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46669224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2856654253","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018027","title":"The Unreliability of Merchandise Trade Statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; International trade; Official statistics; Economics; International economics; World trade; Business; Statistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04090929531177531,"score_gpt":0.2359491890343322,"score_spread":0.1950398937225569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2856654253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9270112,0.0125908535,0.0074013025,0.010474291,0.0032095942,0.000350538,0.002573446,0.000044504504,0.03634428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662524,0.0018257918,0.00089296454,0.00028311918,0.00031541465,0.0000018378752,0.0000031543734,0.000008966348,0.000043497315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854237,0.000026636726,0.0007603851,0.0002293648,0.000053600677,0.00038764873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910986,0.000059003847,0.00037979826,0.00022317428,0.000019679082,0.00020846681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070795,0.0001553411,0.00033042915,0.000034179237,0.00039907522,0.0001313402,0.00028822597,0.00009945894,0.000090150796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009210792,0.00012912393,0.00011393489,0.00015239794,0.00049087015,0.0001734959,0.000037607144,0.0002046212,0.00006263767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015714558,0.00016061428,0.08607628,0.00003323856,0.0002020736,0.000010265442,0.0004939208,0.000016398639,0.000017546148,0.86623746,0.023531253,0.023063824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001192932,0.0004616809,0.26362878,0.000020415602,0.000035422538,0.0002843647,0.000438962,0.00083860144,0.000072052055,0.40808043,0.3246161,0.00033027993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055366265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004862537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45815703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010015025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037378722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5265521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943319220","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019017","title":"The Effects of CETA on the Continuous Implementation of the Precautionary Principle within the European Union","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; European union; Negotiation; International trade; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criticism; Order (exchange); Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Biotechnology","score_opus":0.010149425890373497,"score_gpt":0.2900502765910667,"score_spread":0.2799008507006932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943319220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617829,0.00015842581,0.000025375992,0.0135372095,0.000619432,0.00047890574,0.000004068323,0.0000062904546,0.023387404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872905,0.00042055355,0.0000040462096,0.00029251774,0.00009192107,0.0000021645733,3.286756e-7,0.000002537946,0.0004568971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979472,0.0013211165,0.00018381614,0.000065318025,0.0003632106,0.000119312914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994729,0.000106801475,0.00023144639,0.00013240763,0.000026457737,0.000029976214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022377553,0.00005661175,0.000063531814,0.0000076226665,0.0007391487,0.00006695742,0.00031212083,0.000017476626,0.00003204966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040858446,0.000021839784,0.000067105626,0.0001235008,0.00023328372,0.00006225811,0.00004834549,0.00012894072,0.0000058522237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006949882,0.00015459511,0.06805585,0.00004482798,0.00021586633,0.0000031919615,0.035587043,0.00017267569,0.0012223369,0.62641877,0.022200856,0.2458545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049475813,0.00014757842,0.84192085,0.00005562724,0.00004556916,0.000008378838,0.02771077,0.000014597093,0.00014710828,0.0022951555,0.1271031,0.00005651949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012448487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026141814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.773865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003957548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004662616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5685009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964685619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019028","title":"The New NAFTA: A First Look","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Enforcement; Free trade agreement; International trade; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Control (management); Business; House of Representatives; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Law; Engineering; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.02444598883753399,"score_gpt":0.19613511306974266,"score_spread":0.17168912423220867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964685619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74129426,0.03812923,0.0005210183,0.037510376,0.0041947355,0.0003860881,0.00014134932,0.000069001435,0.17775394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180377,0.0045777857,0.00017569632,0.0010851335,0.00048958085,0.0000018618324,0.0000018236125,0.000013616329,0.0018507607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986853,0.000008852933,0.00052426755,0.0002682009,0.000043715358,0.00046965413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991876,0.00003183488,0.00025254584,0.00022575093,0.0000076272736,0.0002946313],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035205443,0.00017288592,0.00029539742,0.00003505962,0.00037236064,0.00043529767,0.0003370434,0.00010793394,0.00024625057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002419373,0.00014465395,0.00016332846,0.00013749237,0.00006531857,0.0003230793,0.00004888898,0.00027474252,0.0013649559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008462788,0.0000645582,0.20856279,0.000019070187,0.00021510127,0.000023946006,0.00023955794,0.00017851482,0.0000027574663,0.6740057,0.10356619,0.013037181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009158383,0.00008965882,0.047870748,0.000013416869,0.0000066314524,0.00044847903,0.00018521868,0.00024439592,0.000002560622,0.07631168,0.8737049,0.00020645863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006921254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006027477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77013874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004459146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225245840","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022015","title":"The COVID-19 Pandemics’ Impact on Customs Valuation and Import Duties: An Israel Perspective, and a Wider Comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Valuation (finance); Business; Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Value (mathematics); International trade; Finance; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.062160548549147016,"score_gpt":0.3394570013454314,"score_spread":0.27729645279628434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225245840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734673,0.00205417,0.0005268486,0.017442899,0.0006465102,0.00032209975,0.00005383342,0.000065813045,0.0054205633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323195,0.00031343402,0.00002368598,0.005633964,0.0007136269,0.000011099931,0.000014742676,0.000011998295,0.000045496694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985472,0.00006346258,0.00032631253,0.00027197204,0.0005008074,0.00029027343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993392,0.00009165565,0.000278786,0.00010776759,0.00007627079,0.000106317515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792077,0.00020250399,0.0002096896,0.00008471235,0.0015464139,0.0008428943,0.00019419324,0.000052426065,0.00006558672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016981516,0.00014082981,0.000073981646,0.00015584199,0.00028729675,0.00068902684,0.00010719072,0.00038443386,0.0000029414832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067401514,0.00033226222,0.5647792,0.000043747743,0.00027986645,0.000059823902,0.0009826896,0.0020222263,0.000033092867,0.39037606,0.029340485,0.011076544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038219295,0.00060850295,0.46398297,0.000027620908,0.00028896835,0.001776207,0.036807068,0.047570225,0.0000015690301,0.24485762,0.19955304,0.0007042623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010943497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011957108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17021255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003155762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008656403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229647937","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010034","title":"Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Law and Practice: The Mexican Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Dumping; Jurisprudence; International trade; Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Settlement (finance); Free trade agreement; Free trade; Business","score_opus":0.01624115784412717,"score_gpt":0.32381903977370785,"score_spread":0.3075778819295807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229647937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90640754,0.0010021471,0.00006143338,0.07276703,0.00056263554,0.0001157687,0.000005581776,0.000037811173,0.019040072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960974,0.0008256572,0.00037924034,0.0022840796,0.00038397385,9.579728e-7,2.3748487e-7,0.00000541682,0.000023057775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896574,0.00015322528,0.00016948709,0.00015864211,0.0003046521,0.00024825815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.00013954233,0.00011503995,0.000077878394,0.000047465288,0.00022386442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000811113,0.000095029856,0.00011290443,0.00001306664,0.0017222288,0.000661708,0.00014979702,0.00007058883,0.000050685972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026782145,0.00006970847,0.000019580997,0.00019283938,0.0010411653,0.0007396857,0.000036679998,0.00034350084,0.0000016165509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027790165,0.00005865507,0.03742864,0.000010407737,0.00004809647,0.00005733672,0.031660177,0.000002407945,0.0019359598,0.9204611,0.0006538295,0.00765557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005680777,0.0000368796,0.07375376,0.000037933212,0.000070194845,0.002115229,0.03419872,0.00004180389,0.00012900899,0.0019913616,0.8867994,0.00025765193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003132628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082590466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022735825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068943045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229959763","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014010","title":"The WTO Seal Products PanelThe Public Morals Defense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Seal (emblem); Argument (complex analysis); Panel data; Technical barriers to trade; International economics; Panel discussion; Business; Trade barrier; Economics; Advertising; Chemistry; Geography","score_opus":0.024288474280046306,"score_gpt":0.2707641488351212,"score_spread":0.24647567455507488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229959763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21760231,0.0012684627,0.00007155033,0.7401418,0.0012988216,0.00024867238,0.000008260736,0.0001312625,0.039228827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968057,0.00045304484,0.00009432143,0.0009153116,0.0011919062,0.0000016957083,9.508775e-7,0.000009076253,0.0005279427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812603,0.00047344962,0.00022862648,0.00017336816,0.0005105264,0.00048801908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992062,0.00008293613,0.00012884515,0.00014608374,0.00009333775,0.00034259207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012429329,0.00011876967,0.00012955158,0.000022862232,0.0022040622,0.0008284586,0.00034716981,0.00007257478,0.000059417274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005141632,0.000077307224,0.000047173988,0.0005045116,0.0005073455,0.0003602225,0.000029334746,0.00023454629,0.00003564734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011146166,0.000042061118,0.010870869,0.0000040824343,0.000032276894,0.0000085439415,0.0010874904,0.0000040738023,0.00004457264,0.94113135,0.024136659,0.022626897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027336754,0.00003094616,0.02108134,0.000007139646,0.000020624695,0.00015443152,0.0010591483,0.000008512931,0.000029122093,0.0051032156,0.9721108,0.00012133268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031034688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003532902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94797415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094464325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018662612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235589513","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2021050","title":"A Canadian Border Carbon Adjustment? GATT Compliance and Underexplored Exceptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; International trade; Convention; Greenhouse gas; Carbon leakage; Order (exchange); Political science; European union; International economics; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Emissions trading; Economics; Law; Kyoto Protocol; Politics","score_opus":0.03066435155547819,"score_gpt":0.3090210329350418,"score_spread":0.2783566813795636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235589513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47702235,0.013089891,0.0001540502,0.3922092,0.0017207,0.00033621668,0.000110063294,0.0001337119,0.1152238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996188,0.0014965507,0.0002629022,0.0011733219,0.00032284585,0.0000015268361,0.000004517322,0.000007523388,0.0005428273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989658,0.00012392087,0.00015348679,0.00016984109,0.00023252072,0.00035441256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917185,0.000016125723,0.000049252903,0.00007346641,0.00006483013,0.0006244784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000121787285,0.000098553595,0.00012294276,0.00003554664,0.0007971726,0.00023493802,0.00009166009,0.000075376505,0.0003634977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004070774,0.000103618026,0.000028459039,0.00045250636,0.00020323163,0.00018827117,0.000016151622,0.00016813955,0.000006649624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023098939,0.00023903335,0.1815867,0.00004786297,0.00030176778,0.000652983,0.014893462,0.000051589566,0.00036174402,0.7195355,0.021704737,0.0606015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000995364,0.00003209364,0.39736816,0.00008538035,0.000088922156,0.0007535878,0.013000428,0.000045449855,0.000019410607,0.00644733,0.5808143,0.00034958444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014390739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22866282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7130882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031120592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007282283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99217254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246045263","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019010","title":"The Court of Justice of the European Unions Judgment on Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; European union; Mutagenesis; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Parliament; Biology; Biotechnology; Genetics; Law and economics; Business; Mutation; Politics; Sociology; Gene; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.031086845306066653,"score_gpt":0.2744469337447521,"score_spread":0.24336008843868545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246045263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98808086,0.00074202195,0.00001540966,0.009352973,0.00033626775,0.00024642143,0.0006013294,0.000006146578,0.0006185908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978732,0.0016837273,0.0001248259,0.00009373415,0.0001440222,0.0000028321401,0.0000071997397,0.0000044560124,0.00006598723],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794513,0.0003396647,0.0006344395,0.00032139532,0.00050583517,0.00025350734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989177,0.00032972987,0.00036854076,0.000113481416,0.00006641263,0.00020413814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825499,0.00022191253,0.00029552402,0.00005192703,0.0002595238,0.00010248229,0.00047715634,0.00009971072,0.00009086504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095790274,0.00009890052,0.00013588367,0.00023155009,0.0005263809,0.000118190466,0.00020859062,0.00022884637,4.4755714e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011632256,0.0014570464,0.043594524,0.00023354693,0.0014856342,0.001166745,0.0024086954,0.00039629015,0.2651119,0.006917003,0.0010120111,0.67505336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002946201,0.0012630204,0.93596274,0.00023856811,0.0004792491,0.02952732,0.011117064,0.0016552316,0.011831199,0.0006570449,0.0038643877,0.00045796394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015082535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001670581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044444878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003993888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4033046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249955464","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020023","title":"The New Paradigms for the Rule of Origin in México","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Rules of origin; Free trade agreement; General partnership; Negotiation; Treaty; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Automotive industry; Free trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.07487154724626409,"score_gpt":0.2409737764715516,"score_spread":0.1661022292252875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249955464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6495467,0.08203986,0.008090328,0.23688363,0.002317038,0.0009765112,0.00073782826,0.000036797723,0.019371318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993971,0.0037936587,0.00026453717,0.0015098704,0.00038901975,0.0000046428086,0.0000015731877,0.000008202926,0.000057533653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895865,0.000008501303,0.00055039936,0.00016387984,0.00002916762,0.0002893971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993947,0.00007814897,0.00024648433,0.000112147,0.0000059370495,0.00016256644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033577252,0.00011255394,0.00026030347,0.000018452867,0.00017850981,0.00013154627,0.0003273891,0.00006457786,0.000027978134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059476755,0.00007882721,0.00013696784,0.00015782037,0.000075721764,0.00014104754,0.00002381228,0.00018116714,0.000021763626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021043397,0.000051244537,0.113693275,0.000024036595,0.00016195714,0.0000063193183,0.0008353426,0.00078487344,0.0000073486576,0.8292112,0.027292028,0.027721984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012767637,0.00011515805,0.056175437,0.000008808457,0.000013097369,0.000057321933,0.00035467453,0.0022246253,0.000012397644,0.07351009,0.86611617,0.00013546926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075487114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003568861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83882415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053039443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044469893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32144803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253504090","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019064","title":"Measuring the Gender-Responsiveness of Free Trade Agreements: Using a Self-Evaluation Maturity Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Empowerment; Maturity (psychological); Momentum (technical analysis); Intervention (counseling); International trade; International economics; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05019680804747467,"score_gpt":0.29010920201932316,"score_spread":0.2399123939718485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253504090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99328727,0.0011661013,0.00028764116,0.0017182436,0.0007784928,0.0005184329,0.000015087492,0.00004076926,0.002187937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981777,0.000048257625,0.0002211634,0.0007221397,0.0008095188,0.0000025352904,0.0000025385107,0.000013852046,0.0000022709157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977119,0.0001568703,0.00045277612,0.00025094041,0.00095357466,0.00047392052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899524,0.00006008634,0.0004055895,0.00030717332,0.0001802257,0.000051697465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017314671,0.0002512629,0.00033570075,0.000086910324,0.0004901167,0.00044902856,0.00045220848,0.00017552532,0.000065330976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036024684,0.00018819318,0.0002118534,0.0005540904,0.00011555427,0.0010287227,0.00012446627,0.000417009,0.0000058695327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016744618,0.0020887451,0.83436507,0.0028665774,0.002027324,0.00011591847,0.013660322,0.0060632527,0.0010300755,0.086733714,0.0032038349,0.046170678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026743147,0.00006673915,0.78695756,0.00030026844,0.0010535836,0.00015102391,0.027087238,0.004111778,0.000044868888,0.17277779,0.00420507,0.0005697802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019099863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000146014845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08604407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029875818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015517656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76742953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256013541","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020022","title":"Proving FTA Preferential Tariff Eligibility: The Evidentiary Burden in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Tariff; Agency (philosophy); Rules of origin; Burden of proof; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; International trade; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.025070479928462036,"score_gpt":0.27559081992939805,"score_spread":0.25052034000093604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256013541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7819427,0.002048163,0.000010980682,0.21072544,0.00034699248,0.00019199993,0.000117807926,0.000009964441,0.004605951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937357,0.00033179938,0.000006152481,0.00492788,0.00090336247,0.0000015757525,6.2425465e-7,0.0000030050453,0.00008991931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987634,0.00015062136,0.00020080987,0.00014533655,0.0003867189,0.00035311593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994502,0.000035297056,0.00008641311,0.00006478248,0.00001410798,0.00034919387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026483365,0.00008326319,0.00012002058,0.000008841461,0.0003988941,0.00017563257,0.00028833438,0.00004544999,0.00009927497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015625806,0.00006518662,0.000037957358,0.0002102881,0.00010694306,0.00020818738,0.000030545616,0.00031865048,0.0000029194637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017849311,0.000046779467,0.103264324,0.00006451709,0.00011834697,0.0004668663,0.02368177,0.00023256842,0.00005801524,0.020883847,0.6776758,0.17332871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052237604,0.00002568906,0.12765591,0.000045090794,0.000027753142,0.000057859896,0.003995432,0.00014121302,0.0000053527433,0.0019451354,0.8654003,0.00017788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98516595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21179298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005249257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002618313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4644775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816635","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022042","title":"Dispute Settlement in Indian FTAs’: Shaping the Future with Lessons from the Past","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Dispute resolution; Scope (computer science); Arbitration; International trade; Settlement (finance); Dispute mechanism; Political science; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Free trade; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.017406170146749216,"score_gpt":0.23176192604442852,"score_spread":0.2143557558976793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6145975,0.0008907296,0.000084376275,0.36365527,0.0009963793,0.0002944053,0.00012678992,0.000028911036,0.019325634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454857,0.000032289707,0.000021487924,0.05245711,0.0019204267,0.000014205776,0.000039904175,0.000005786099,0.000023050416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991356,0.000030756324,0.00016907146,0.000121584184,0.00036544807,0.00017753473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997441,0.0000142608715,0.00013421667,0.00007618531,0.000016768823,0.000014466472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002686653,0.00010393432,0.00007695438,0.000031420434,0.00083039777,0.00045097488,0.00027482846,0.000016424783,0.00034058228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000029342114,0.000054943597,0.0000406845,0.0002368439,0.00005115846,0.0003885436,0.00009525044,0.00034757447,0.000009649881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018508254,0.0001968134,0.15881938,0.000012644411,0.00017592154,0.00018035191,0.0009850524,0.0006918389,0.000027501885,0.74064547,0.085643575,0.0124363955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007800313,0.00001852027,0.2488446,0.00002227403,0.000032154185,0.00009681605,0.0050447364,0.00053881726,9.6589e-7,0.0070719384,0.73742944,0.00011971725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015584605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056663115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7335735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000697719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025431153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6386832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816966","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022044","title":"Application of Dispute Settlement in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’): A Cross Country Analysis of Modern FTAs’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009823503543956655,"score_gpt":0.2896731883168665,"score_spread":0.27984968477290983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96513027,0.0027108144,0.0036891932,0.021785343,0.0004419037,0.00054500066,0.0026570524,0.000035737903,0.0030046797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935436,0.0001613475,0.00016620397,0.00017564083,0.000055342938,0.000007745955,0.000041329153,0.0000057849247,0.000032221455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980174,0.00020155574,0.0005014958,0.0001815459,0.000838043,0.0002599883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993233,0.000024705183,0.0003399413,0.00016152956,0.000027558812,0.00012294423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071469066,0.000099119134,0.00026351243,0.00015521498,0.00036207816,0.000051842297,0.00038702757,0.000048335172,0.00022151232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022728676,0.00010634683,0.00009308381,0.0020731208,0.00021798405,0.0002047961,0.00007032085,0.00018406595,3.7941183e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010323245,0.00080813834,0.84674114,0.000038252907,0.0008932968,0.00002179108,0.010207651,0.014935631,0.00037653194,0.10200156,0.0024688523,0.021403909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019357395,0.00008875149,0.9146335,0.00001661737,0.0006004517,0.000022795097,0.0034085892,0.003012003,0.000059141734,0.0064471504,0.06952986,0.00024538362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004792224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013318631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09555441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029301745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012848547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4336698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318826069","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022045","title":"Sanctions or No Sanctions: Enforcing Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; International trade; Business; Free trade; Dispute resolution; Economics; International economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024758721212221977,"score_gpt":0.31631327906801715,"score_spread":0.29155455785579515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318826069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6130505,0.002824114,0.0004696187,0.08515117,0.012241992,0.0010583901,0.0013001901,0.0002115239,0.2836925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912007,0.0005459407,0.00026899608,0.0015411895,0.0006954131,0.000032274784,0.000006918366,0.000007726593,0.0057008695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838954,0.00017960327,0.00028482798,0.00015933742,0.00061745394,0.00036925497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995858,0.000037205726,0.000093163886,0.000085298416,0.000027986893,0.00017054364],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051743473,0.0001021357,0.0001219837,0.00008933895,0.0017977468,0.00015046808,0.00028541268,0.000049783448,0.0021326682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048789,0.00009273374,0.00007151301,0.0004855389,0.00009716339,0.00042814005,0.00006581165,0.000393104,0.000011583946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004398505,0.0010141796,0.03781936,0.00002358991,0.00019384587,0.00035140108,0.008151828,0.0010203876,0.000102559025,0.74131274,0.17182097,0.037749287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010327752,0.0001927592,0.02228557,0.000030674684,0.000020562135,0.00018131522,0.0064603807,0.000043912303,0.0000027106819,0.007565982,0.962032,0.00015136565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016825328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035949657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.790211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049160875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002822332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320070132","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022038","title":"Binational Panel Review of Trade Remedies Determinations: Prospects for Exporting the USMCA’s Unique Procedure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Duty; Treaty; International trade; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Panel data; Business; International economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03879812744797095,"score_gpt":0.3274639800484329,"score_spread":0.28866585260046196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320070132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25570425,0.07344681,0.001955866,0.6040364,0.0037719456,0.0064028627,0.0009626775,0.00024888586,0.053470287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462456,0.003077949,0.00027730752,0.0013850838,0.00031885228,0.000079124344,0.0000136060735,0.0000042216056,0.00021929716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987424,0.00013112722,0.0003174086,0.00009659757,0.00056052295,0.00015193979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993916,0.000082074184,0.00034405995,0.000038164588,0.00009557162,0.000048542228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012638608,0.0000664315,0.00011068232,0.000025936448,0.0012222605,0.00004462422,0.00018554318,0.000026913958,0.000046948073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038040642,0.000050249673,0.00008665623,0.00018335618,0.000105920684,0.00018368455,0.000019632862,0.00015143977,1.9658023e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005222373,0.00018394641,0.0057357326,0.00059273734,0.00007518211,0.000009795287,0.0050467607,0.00003841745,0.0000901901,0.93573296,0.026343366,0.026098697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015523044,0.0006455427,0.082774565,0.0022635148,0.00024623307,0.00089283654,0.01384907,0.00066533324,0.00020778005,0.1259434,0.7704322,0.0005272596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023795545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066232715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80978954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015920587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003203936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94007635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403432599","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024079","title":"Article: The Contribution of the Canadian-European Partnership to the Integration of Sustainable Development Issues into the Multilateral Trading System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Sustainable development; International trade; Political science; Regional science; Business; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.020101138418879762,"score_gpt":0.29065312601895804,"score_spread":0.27055198760007826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403432599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8519995,0.002395075,0.00008184502,0.14038888,0.00034664094,0.00039009054,0.000017001832,0.000010706305,0.0043702275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860835,0.000027090642,0.00000762505,0.000603876,0.00024704955,0.0000035384976,2.5774045e-7,0.0000028327142,0.00049935956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883574,0.00034958718,0.00020447987,0.00007299323,0.00026684857,0.00027036268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960566,0.0000509672,0.00007476632,0.00008534261,0.00005677578,0.0001265022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016455458,0.00006504291,0.00007441408,0.000019200144,0.0013343582,0.0002835475,0.00029497116,0.00003102672,0.0000056098747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014218932,0.000028162243,0.0000525336,0.000368146,0.0002065778,0.00011336851,0.000016546883,0.00017436141,0.0000023563932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023191862,0.00000828558,0.0013850444,0.000025843674,0.000064927815,0.000030866453,0.21800083,0.000094978765,0.00008741806,0.71969455,0.034618914,0.025965149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012684311,0.00002279093,0.06311959,0.00023636497,0.000041982104,0.00005847536,0.059190866,0.00036351502,0.0004743823,0.0013353649,0.8749456,0.000084214844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2393172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66513157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84032667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005712821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065045926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W859336493","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012024","title":"Promises Are Meant to Be Kept: A Case Comment on <i>Attorney General of Canada v. United States Steel Corporation</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Settlement (finance); Law; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Political science; Business; Finance; History","score_opus":0.029152459018214172,"score_gpt":0.23242913859443617,"score_spread":0.203276679576222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W859336493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490903,0.000064431726,0.000066911874,0.03163623,0.0006432123,0.00022499822,0.0001043408,0.000018264709,0.018151296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87039596,0.000008542139,0.000087871005,0.12881614,0.0005513793,0.000004840661,0.00004714245,0.000006443252,0.000081709644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899006,0.000017538036,0.00030919127,0.00009607108,0.00035392985,0.00023323449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994382,0.000011073499,0.00028037632,0.00006403151,0.00011989439,0.00008640423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019138824,0.00013610344,0.00013718139,0.00007822299,0.00022875542,0.00015640023,0.00008719734,0.000027291522,0.0000864638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022568363,0.00010879683,0.00003692828,0.00019849095,0.000029403485,0.00048548708,0.000028877339,0.000099393474,0.000004646648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021787715,0.00038182302,0.019429166,0.00005980787,0.000121997124,0.00024413427,0.00020970877,0.0010178152,0.00013632343,0.4089673,0.5688905,0.00032354763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091194396,0.00006200013,0.007896393,0.000059858867,0.000051813673,0.0004467485,0.0012013632,0.0017868009,0.00022329646,0.00062466634,0.98651147,0.00022363524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023566984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014531127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41762096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012369524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060384522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W956576443","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012025","title":"Judicial Review of Trade Remedy Determinations in Ten User Countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Deference; Law; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.015440811325443286,"score_gpt":0.3102067800768424,"score_spread":0.2947659687513991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W956576443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29329324,0.17210443,0.00025674715,0.44222394,0.0035520983,0.0015477639,0.00017465114,0.00017966035,0.08666748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795941,0.018448904,0.00018645423,0.0012850218,0.000431256,0.0000018399758,0.0000016876818,0.0000060331645,0.000044670403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858564,0.00020151358,0.00037621515,0.000084981315,0.00043032167,0.0003213354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994819,0.00004367927,0.0001684301,0.00006541503,0.000034603603,0.00020593338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085426157,0.00009076132,0.0002106165,0.000052351777,0.00027411003,0.000045878714,0.00016019687,0.00006582982,0.00021744432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019014176,0.000083074716,0.000052174437,0.0005528614,0.00027369714,0.0005432206,0.000013148058,0.00016375065,0.0000065747195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027025517,0.00041821128,0.44707406,0.00055930513,0.00007151388,0.000034078937,0.009483465,0.0000024165424,0.00005642753,0.46952087,0.036779314,0.035973337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036527074,0.000021571608,0.3909542,0.0008139807,0.00006822417,0.00011085624,0.0006369407,8.4480996e-7,0.000035601483,0.0005759383,0.6062738,0.00014281702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054043765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029958945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6863009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001312106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018183498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33876884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}