{"meta":{"query_hash":"3b2538682e73","filters":{"venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal"},"cohort_total":51,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"exported":51,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3b2538682e73","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Global+Trade+and+Customs+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1011805438","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014014","title":"How <i>Canada Renewable Energy</i> Supports the Use of the Alternative Commercial Reasonableness Standard in Future Feed-In Tariff Disputes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Settlement (finance); Business; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Energy policy; Finance; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.011374136304471384,"score_gpt":0.18918718881218335,"score_spread":0.17781305250771198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1011805438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035122607,0.0026172227,0.016900713,0.1776404,0.00092759985,0.00022293138,0.0006265862,0.00015433834,0.76578766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86027694,0.0018977753,0.011742335,0.071221344,0.0005893166,0.00015168497,0.00026275055,0.00014606779,0.053711787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769,0.003743506,0.00048347205,0.0014380142,0.012561749,0.004873251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971705,0.008766006,0.001493229,0.0017009844,0.015464371,0.0008703493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014402445,0.0005079042,0.00064860226,0.002937103,0.014023629,0.018419005,0.0036182646,0.00867765,0.008433266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03559504,0.00036557816,0.0009315547,0.0038748223,0.01696703,0.0064159622,0.0033987483,0.0080912765,0.0010030082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022738552,0.000017899172,0.0014359262,0.000049841885,0.000017058348,0.00015148248,0.0021743742,0.00036365728,0.00016853014,0.9562943,0.033519756,0.0057843747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010020882,0.000093785304,0.014216049,0.00078168995,0.00023254428,0.00036873078,0.011148389,0.005212032,0.0032745984,0.36936724,0.5948654,0.0003394357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8327919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89823157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16720808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04377743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073849894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33638555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1016589838","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012030","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the EU","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.0253988167565704,"score_gpt":0.3306699392982921,"score_spread":0.3052711225417217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1016589838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712445,0.057698663,0.0138409315,0.02358172,0.0012772722,0.00041766983,0.000490112,0.00018883287,0.23126034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691242,0.00698501,0.0051750806,0.00668453,0.0003285528,0.00008218129,0.00015817686,0.000044904566,0.011417356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94951683,0.024443302,0.0058350763,0.0044392045,0.011036883,0.0047286414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8852458,0.07405642,0.011105596,0.0069710254,0.020791741,0.0018294192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041207056,0.00022144194,0.0007811561,0.0035452012,0.002999431,0.010260454,0.0017722355,0.0054624886,0.0010660416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068777174,0.00057971553,0.0005727461,0.0047227447,0.0034010378,0.00294165,0.0029491112,0.002804876,0.00023867047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005586922,0.00035687414,0.06945859,0.0021511286,0.00060834124,0.007040279,0.028548783,0.015353154,0.005197366,0.47558004,0.046753448,0.34839335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017195406,0.00076131884,0.12805511,0.0031911198,0.0005554939,0.002446895,0.016347412,0.008348265,0.014854067,0.040946703,0.78392774,0.00039390565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014668307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018402267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041207056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005429847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010232904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21792638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1023936531","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012035","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.027239675361011156,"score_gpt":0.3274331793685566,"score_spread":0.3001935040075454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1023936531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71314573,0.057138976,0.0070577054,0.025512716,0.0011606625,0.0002685868,0.0004971757,0.00012418705,0.19509424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96813935,0.011148126,0.0036962046,0.006747495,0.00029386298,0.00006126041,0.0002182424,0.000018934872,0.009676652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752143,0.010443714,0.0021450457,0.001608907,0.008085878,0.0025021865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9163149,0.048310578,0.011246191,0.0034512994,0.01933969,0.0013373299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018316772,0.00014980084,0.00045605,0.0031196629,0.0032735441,0.007367053,0.001154566,0.0032293734,0.0007249363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041671883,0.00055480684,0.00040064412,0.0044568516,0.0031476035,0.0017337566,0.001891132,0.0023236708,0.00018278041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005866093,0.00035985475,0.16115038,0.0017642817,0.000568892,0.0071324497,0.045945495,0.013273701,0.005974171,0.2872923,0.08339806,0.3925539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106750005,0.0007821189,0.23714526,0.0028451784,0.0006638523,0.002352349,0.019768827,0.0069356393,0.012906038,0.022760676,0.69329023,0.00044309566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061654553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.128434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061654553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072301147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011765052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12259138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1229773905","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012029","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; China; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.021375597773989608,"score_gpt":0.305536707373042,"score_spread":0.2841611095990524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1229773905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92717445,0.017380329,0.001975895,0.007076401,0.00030020456,0.00025868148,0.00023618694,0.00005635665,0.045541555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848311,0.004503088,0.0009827255,0.0010740132,0.00013108487,0.000054572698,0.00014167694,0.000008467338,0.008273201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885451,0.0022970652,0.0011099939,0.0010022463,0.005107323,0.0019382413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98083705,0.007456453,0.0039585577,0.0011442597,0.005628327,0.0009753665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010884796,0.00025131422,0.0005181079,0.0035557311,0.0033462546,0.0038525828,0.0015953325,0.0016631767,0.00067413494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01724508,0.00040332408,0.0004918761,0.0057998234,0.002341451,0.0010613716,0.0016214232,0.0010813305,0.00007390767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053843437,0.0002487074,0.34276062,0.002453409,0.0006481529,0.011308937,0.039086286,0.02189426,0.010023262,0.122459084,0.038389742,0.4101891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020271537,0.00080201414,0.64415544,0.001005482,0.0006777554,0.0018506278,0.01408192,0.01793505,0.019601008,0.011415575,0.2878502,0.00042223991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14754802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18090326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14754802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014959862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02786972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2933784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1426969286","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014035","title":"Administrative Protective Orders: Protection of Confidential Information in Canadian Trade Remedy Proceedings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Business; Balance (ability); Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Trade secret; Public information; Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Law; Intellectual property; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.01811891558399312,"score_gpt":0.2194980514629739,"score_spread":0.2013791358789808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1426969286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07691866,0.008996284,0.01948925,0.10569305,0.00073996326,0.00087178,0.0011756786,0.00039762812,0.78571784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84088504,0.008400201,0.02719952,0.01384438,0.00034239932,0.00020231928,0.00047750035,0.00014054224,0.108508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97059345,0.0028637804,0.0013381541,0.0017657629,0.018029949,0.005408903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641194,0.010650064,0.0022268568,0.002956574,0.017632721,0.0024143644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129520055,0.00050866144,0.000505202,0.0065198764,0.021127746,0.020119254,0.0044899764,0.0055610845,0.008679427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04570349,0.00096362765,0.00070497853,0.007303797,0.014822768,0.005236628,0.0051525272,0.0058964547,0.00070641603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053989752,0.00003887757,0.004722274,0.00021187753,0.000021715572,0.00062839716,0.010529952,0.001162978,0.0008657709,0.85978884,0.05537488,0.0666005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007529552,0.000053773372,0.023807397,0.00094784616,0.00015611894,0.0005138562,0.011145689,0.0034377729,0.0035011866,0.06439607,0.89163697,0.00032804065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98985624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1319497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3320095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483365100","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014007","title":"The Canada EU Free Trade Agreement Demystified: New Opportunities for Trade, Investment and Government Procurement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; European union; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Procurement; Government procurement; Trade barrier; Agricultural economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042329107811262534,"score_gpt":0.25420140994664275,"score_spread":0.21187230213538022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483365100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008277902,0.01953163,0.004955854,0.32749116,0.009676625,0.00019105434,0.0049066436,0.0007410921,0.624228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10745096,0.018807685,0.013872652,0.11368724,0.0010826077,0.00016339055,0.005043645,0.0006772712,0.7392146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896923,0.000556493,0.00020621839,0.00063868467,0.0056597493,0.0032465379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927291,0.0006426218,0.00014247333,0.00043169004,0.0033401733,0.0027138186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049586794,0.000980195,0.00068382296,0.0018677047,0.010517627,0.019826548,0.0020952786,0.010222313,0.029573783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010251195,0.0007342524,0.0009410484,0.0036897177,0.0055236802,0.006447375,0.00509926,0.008638206,0.005240025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003693921,0.000019656432,0.0005460035,0.0000770414,0.000008582593,0.00019963816,0.0005254052,0.00032730604,0.00022953202,0.31196564,0.65554774,0.030516507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007738145,0.0000032321188,0.00084962626,0.00008263353,0.000002606027,0.000027393948,0.000298709,0.00011169841,0.00010384732,0.0066010444,0.9918902,0.00002133929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9504384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08646066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08646066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27099925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6273189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508726722","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010029","title":"At the Cross-Roads of US and Canadian Trade Controls: The Cuba Conflict","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; International trade; Economic sanctions; Context (archaeology); Surprise; Control (management); Business; International economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02218779368063458,"score_gpt":0.24392512664848268,"score_spread":0.2217373329678481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508726722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31280434,0.019862343,0.0005807556,0.1670445,0.00066344393,0.00006558775,0.0007143856,0.000038145878,0.49822646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92713886,0.005160452,0.00061853643,0.017809762,0.000056592646,0.00003859828,0.0002500018,0.000041181098,0.04888598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977319,0.00030079737,0.000041549818,0.0001494538,0.0003756211,0.0014006472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983563,0.00024392534,0.00011149008,0.0000776892,0.000657762,0.0005527492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019500416,0.0002727406,0.00035275696,0.0015601759,0.020207914,0.0104899425,0.00095808046,0.0019438352,0.007554799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032866704,0.0002653545,0.00028722984,0.0026724974,0.004527452,0.0021783712,0.0028577663,0.0032726915,0.0002892844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000496042,0.00012083487,0.053787295,0.00032419994,0.00014285921,0.0021373378,0.06978183,0.0007884129,0.0007538479,0.5659735,0.18342023,0.12227365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004143776,0.000025274703,0.047606837,0.00085984776,0.0000988083,0.00047568817,0.14463091,0.0005646825,0.00047930607,0.012977557,0.7920852,0.00015454294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99027705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08044379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08044379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063453354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5836633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508754586","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012031","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Actions Country Study: India","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02949999778313416,"score_gpt":0.3379769030009114,"score_spread":0.3084769052177772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508754586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441297,0.014856524,0.0017234659,0.0067134164,0.0002899337,0.00035931158,0.0013696917,0.00006805092,0.1304899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762175,0.009265476,0.0013477703,0.0026802374,0.000164431,0.00013021774,0.000601685,0.000034208893,0.009558358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944354,0.0038838095,0.0009410614,0.0009405266,0.0029116143,0.0018794617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94286853,0.029156784,0.012527733,0.003815834,0.010045457,0.0015856659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005775185,0.00021798481,0.00046132194,0.005619818,0.0030369933,0.0052851355,0.001725805,0.0013431847,0.0015154991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02074613,0.0004912585,0.0006739862,0.01211029,0.0023962157,0.0017911649,0.0020733934,0.0028909994,0.00034152842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007466614,0.00095712894,0.49378738,0.0035224627,0.0009827332,0.0106783435,0.08757729,0.004534353,0.0055159605,0.12956017,0.05595586,0.20618165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073004,0.0006542673,0.7400671,0.0011948628,0.0006814628,0.004734396,0.0486351,0.0014383314,0.0074827885,0.0023454907,0.19241561,0.0002776195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064763024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10718106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064763024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009187887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010094283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12877208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521613312","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014028","title":"The Canada-European Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement and the Mining Sector: Key Issues and Opportunities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Capital (architecture); Member states; International trade; Key (lock); Capital investment; Goods and services; Industrial organization; International economics; European union; Economics; Finance; Economy; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.037006132024048934,"score_gpt":0.25659952489646476,"score_spread":0.21959339287241583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521613312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02696477,0.09925109,0.00206202,0.38457948,0.0013823048,0.00007026801,0.000505675,0.000051705272,0.4851327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206229,0.06777622,0.0039241994,0.06212542,0.00083093316,0.00008866246,0.000359258,0.000049302795,0.14422312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367803,0.00080543343,0.000108778375,0.0003344308,0.0018591719,0.0032141523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956358,0.0015410349,0.00023805717,0.00016435713,0.0012894408,0.0011312822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045229495,0.00047272714,0.00061499194,0.001747389,0.013055951,0.017599607,0.0019632033,0.008884408,0.00850551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067585865,0.00037250467,0.0005629931,0.006093356,0.014226263,0.0067190197,0.003937561,0.0040514255,0.00041594935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018629542,0.000017544819,0.00084399455,0.00008917985,0.0000070504193,0.00019801612,0.0011488823,0.00045283392,0.000049643924,0.9494787,0.03576564,0.011929898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002411961,0.000015056861,0.008724535,0.0010292922,0.000020159263,0.00016655328,0.010103225,0.0011778744,0.00021836821,0.22532941,0.7530975,0.00009386733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9615169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106017955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106017955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23821191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7692177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534094088","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010055","title":"An Overview of the Mexico-Brazil Strategic Agreement for Economic Integration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Negotiation; Globalization; International economics; Business; International free trade agreement; Framework agreement; Trade agreement; Economic integration; Market access; Goods and services; Trade in services; Trade barrier; Free trade; Economics; Economy; Political science; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.09776617269052837,"score_gpt":0.2897151945702118,"score_spread":0.1919490218796834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534094088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00562212,0.05809644,0.017958324,0.02592631,0.0021437763,0.0011050453,0.0010370803,0.00025798875,0.88785285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.218038,0.15431595,0.11007796,0.022341771,0.002771098,0.0048291124,0.0054298714,0.0007268456,0.48146942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955759,0.0011804599,0.00040721337,0.00038271764,0.0018269907,0.0006267761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878913,0.00038208213,0.00014027726,0.0001185017,0.0004062593,0.00016376506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007673979,0.00076883344,0.00056291994,0.0042315554,0.004272113,0.009118712,0.0015115876,0.004229655,0.012331302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006979625,0.00065701717,0.0008913297,0.0054144803,0.0019037087,0.005247417,0.0045117904,0.0038661137,0.003120759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230592,0.000029357363,0.00041710905,0.00044278274,0.0000082039305,0.0002505907,0.0010903856,0.0004895676,0.0002674134,0.9120811,0.03433813,0.05057301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003972318,0.000011351447,0.0008373909,0.00060364377,0.000005333601,0.00011885844,0.00031820821,0.0001730261,0.00009439718,0.020028478,0.9777908,0.000014571975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052291144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05224467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052291144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013286197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020951342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10397357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548138422","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012032","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Indonesia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Law; Political science; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02020546805075709,"score_gpt":0.31868428186160735,"score_spread":0.2984788138108503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548138422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7904137,0.037428595,0.0048562307,0.00977851,0.00073014415,0.000432022,0.00035837904,0.00010443952,0.15589805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692747,0.013452444,0.0030430618,0.0020737364,0.00020891133,0.000078804165,0.00014506861,0.000030186477,0.011693026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861696,0.0042159143,0.0019387591,0.0011340952,0.005004276,0.001537268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96396613,0.017932808,0.009242986,0.0014547493,0.0065335454,0.0008698012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010533061,0.00017237388,0.0004778789,0.0023074963,0.0027785632,0.007268047,0.0013831293,0.00163674,0.00078375876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022365173,0.00049841637,0.00030254273,0.0044785687,0.0022636522,0.0015839308,0.0018225558,0.0024445632,0.0002059365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059683213,0.00046593486,0.22357954,0.003752299,0.00036037117,0.019999804,0.05970753,0.009780167,0.013374368,0.11764421,0.0404601,0.5102789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009661825,0.0005774153,0.36777005,0.0028669622,0.00045423815,0.007616974,0.03559051,0.007960469,0.02312243,0.012957607,0.54058045,0.00040625344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030739933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052597053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030739933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007651103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010982513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584115084","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011063","title":"Canadian Transfer Pricing: Optimizing Canadian Expansion with a Unified Approach to Tax and Customs Transfer Pricing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transfer pricing; Internal revenue; Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax revenue; Economics; Investment (military); International economics; Foreign direct investment; Public economics; Finance; Economy; Macroeconomics; Service (business); Politics","score_opus":0.027316067796051377,"score_gpt":0.2326132024428399,"score_spread":0.2052971346467885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584115084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09712149,0.003961487,0.22877362,0.026530577,0.00050485076,0.0011396306,0.001250135,0.0008409482,0.63987726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543266,0.0023963617,0.098967016,0.0013849139,0.000120684024,0.00023231727,0.00042458504,0.00024274281,0.041904807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940864,0.0010802787,0.00012171694,0.00045576235,0.002636929,0.0016189443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972421,0.0002737619,0.000120583216,0.00010895635,0.0018721528,0.00038253752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034855818,0.0008777702,0.000684518,0.0026563862,0.00475678,0.0078951325,0.0021821898,0.0015895556,0.005000652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009494462,0.00046563102,0.0006899645,0.0051754466,0.0023652418,0.0030988231,0.0029186253,0.002572003,0.00031406467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005320169,0.00007002768,0.004316019,0.00009599008,0.000055964625,0.00023493129,0.00095006626,0.19045457,0.0008144293,0.67833173,0.03866562,0.085957505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010346351,0.000092487506,0.015459063,0.0003892505,0.00018851426,0.000263159,0.005177808,0.4995703,0.002358221,0.20465611,0.27140042,0.00034117978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088337235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088337235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14112616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64093447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587869027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012033","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Mexico","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.021492165410230444,"score_gpt":0.3243113300247242,"score_spread":0.3028191646144937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587869027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894444,0.02340054,0.0018060363,0.012246952,0.00023869697,0.00019934047,0.00043885343,0.000052685795,0.067172915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97419906,0.012318323,0.0020649445,0.0018637382,0.0002698037,0.00010229417,0.0002833017,0.000013416924,0.008885181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945716,0.0018444769,0.0004329142,0.00056770234,0.0016196019,0.0009637525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785331,0.009814573,0.006554021,0.00079376454,0.0038922997,0.000412346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00924257,0.00012364074,0.000315121,0.002431623,0.00314377,0.004585888,0.0010341327,0.0017031732,0.00080946967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987038,0.00034431394,0.00024735337,0.0037929148,0.0016822394,0.0012271707,0.0016275079,0.001555456,0.000064140324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090891466,0.0003407913,0.35092035,0.002990557,0.00050729886,0.010668688,0.05456885,0.008956858,0.007335066,0.16423278,0.053956296,0.34461355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001065484,0.00045384627,0.5411649,0.0016109092,0.00041985544,0.0017241198,0.018308418,0.0032211228,0.0076005347,0.0051574716,0.42006898,0.00016335591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080842465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12562652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080842465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009633201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007391558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16074383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866314101","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012026","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.07860839744239517,"score_gpt":0.3779738723010165,"score_spread":0.2993654748586213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866314101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013007,0.01558708,0.002685508,0.0094362125,0.00025240745,0.00028631443,0.00009372186,0.000040332725,0.07031762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777363,0.0061578043,0.0025860467,0.001686993,0.000115121555,0.000069609334,0.000058419824,0.000013073271,0.011576546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97532225,0.010031236,0.002127344,0.0013646038,0.008651177,0.0025033776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94396424,0.024614586,0.010973384,0.0023488859,0.016347706,0.0017512094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01440522,0.00012059983,0.00031486392,0.0029528784,0.0036240022,0.0049491785,0.0012986888,0.0017809175,0.00060599047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044267494,0.00057427306,0.00031411677,0.0030523879,0.0027395475,0.0014797011,0.0027539046,0.0017555025,0.000118183736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044301312,0.00054677436,0.21225636,0.0029393393,0.00041175724,0.011232025,0.14673258,0.008513792,0.016421195,0.11453107,0.024208587,0.46176353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058156773,0.00077003014,0.608052,0.0013412163,0.0002466284,0.0030137722,0.04040422,0.0060233087,0.010045228,0.0063389083,0.32341698,0.00028960506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08313012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16353734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08313012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009835919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018284844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1652925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924666097","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012027","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Brazil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.032312565958478166,"score_gpt":0.36683390601108484,"score_spread":0.3345213400526067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924666097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462541,0.020590154,0.003554481,0.015523111,0.0002329722,0.0004221955,0.00040455555,0.00008241206,0.11293608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98872685,0.004710467,0.0015632587,0.0011077349,0.00006624299,0.000050980005,0.00006493423,0.000016024233,0.0036933953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98652285,0.0046130866,0.0013400211,0.0010592017,0.0044094594,0.00205542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95523083,0.020955257,0.009939138,0.0026799052,0.010059654,0.0011352681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01425778,0.00018432757,0.00037046286,0.0032938248,0.003390679,0.004893672,0.0012511505,0.0013778796,0.0006969685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044658445,0.0005664577,0.00043799717,0.0035972206,0.0029867368,0.0014432878,0.002335898,0.0015013996,0.000105669016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031616754,0.00023838533,0.22311729,0.0030362161,0.00047573578,0.010731332,0.13751638,0.0077895764,0.016987912,0.27299693,0.020790502,0.30600357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113851216,0.0004969064,0.4074871,0.0031603314,0.000667844,0.005086757,0.057213563,0.008023883,0.019007895,0.018365962,0.4799608,0.00041516326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13005106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21484227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13005106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013530022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019048743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2585882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191445368","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012028","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.015633908846891482,"score_gpt":0.28614463654167277,"score_spread":0.2705107276947813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191445368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67558897,0.034895778,0.0031640157,0.04210041,0.0009442731,0.00065945217,0.0013900527,0.00018382876,0.24107315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486888,0.012974093,0.0026716026,0.006380128,0.00017013616,0.00006746214,0.00044143054,0.000036597394,0.02856983],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98064363,0.0016431562,0.00094315526,0.0012098888,0.011086308,0.0044738944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94272697,0.015765209,0.00505552,0.0012439896,0.03193989,0.003268402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070714853,0.00024652225,0.000447029,0.004588812,0.011177905,0.008302604,0.0026209287,0.0024967277,0.0013391867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03708676,0.000684096,0.0004008737,0.008796018,0.0035416062,0.0012394435,0.002161861,0.00241166,0.00017054527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057590066,0.00033732085,0.18483014,0.002476905,0.0005609504,0.013427759,0.06200401,0.01352175,0.006499293,0.19018178,0.16309354,0.3624906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011231032,0.00026336694,0.24739945,0.0014706668,0.00042308576,0.0020113897,0.036095176,0.006294726,0.007788673,0.007505163,0.6900761,0.0005599088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97433215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101381004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101381004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1680353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7355741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198730501","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010016","title":"The EU Ban on Seal Products: Some Customs and WTO Open Questions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Legitimacy; Business; International trade law; Harmony (color); International trade; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.014272710309962413,"score_gpt":0.30444305226752794,"score_spread":0.2901703419575655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198730501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012425167,0.10454415,0.01080372,0.736773,0.009012331,0.00004787122,0.00032687114,0.00009870014,0.12596816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28142712,0.09560255,0.017954487,0.5512395,0.01917882,0.0002693788,0.00049512903,0.00030743907,0.03352559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98115176,0.0060092015,0.0016913078,0.0029440667,0.006412893,0.0017907488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791868,0.015042234,0.0014467445,0.0017334545,0.0018372387,0.00075365324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039678678,0.0011001748,0.002212844,0.0016975696,0.0043083625,0.01451324,0.005215616,0.041410245,0.006282557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03622017,0.00085223775,0.0022990545,0.0033292798,0.028398803,0.026820345,0.0063041137,0.025437152,0.0017324266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024452509,0.000041945306,0.00022549565,0.00015411382,0.000013602643,0.00023345824,0.00095675164,0.00035588865,0.0001909733,0.9518305,0.028614584,0.017358262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018684643,0.00004417893,0.00080356013,0.0011790462,0.000014749508,0.00032419272,0.0016209366,0.00055990805,0.00026517652,0.602281,0.39280915,0.0000794337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010827259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00430699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041410245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051028314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062236157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2098434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212860751","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011059","title":"Troubles along the U.S.-Canada Border","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Protectionism; Prime minister; Political science; Law; Political economy; International trade; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02515425206961983,"score_gpt":0.2696481748517336,"score_spread":0.24449392278211377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212860751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21433921,0.010943558,0.0012242263,0.34605786,0.0022057889,0.00008608729,0.0009002553,0.00015052871,0.4240925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78994226,0.007782331,0.001369962,0.08150507,0.00022435492,0.00003872712,0.00050883903,0.00012016781,0.11850833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592006,0.00034123418,0.000080451704,0.0003428876,0.0012245954,0.0020906597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663806,0.00028884664,0.0001647061,0.00011423371,0.001309568,0.0014845945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018222175,0.00032386815,0.00035877508,0.0010878402,0.038164906,0.010065601,0.0016593641,0.0054847132,0.01277117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006018747,0.00037400628,0.0004099591,0.0024915896,0.007470561,0.002823139,0.003757182,0.006392202,0.0008691401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010428122,0.00006943262,0.029571323,0.00015017111,0.000060589966,0.004745423,0.031741984,0.0010504696,0.0010003606,0.2785193,0.59126216,0.061724547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435281,0.000029059722,0.033330042,0.00041825554,0.000060453418,0.0008859702,0.11917088,0.0007634064,0.00057757535,0.018072685,0.82650936,0.00013791826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99604297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07314914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07314914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14826679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5307366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215259119","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011041","title":"Customs Audits, Verifications and Voluntary Disclosures in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Agency (philosophy); Business; Officer; Accounting; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Government (linguistics); Revenue; Finance; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.022029780322229325,"score_gpt":0.24208493979731266,"score_spread":0.22005515947508333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215259119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3567136,0.014840336,0.0040960144,0.08516252,0.0011937605,0.0005908013,0.0027398425,0.00040271485,0.5342603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93557984,0.0044186995,0.0020610883,0.004209243,0.00010424193,0.00006236084,0.0005183525,0.000054120144,0.052991994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819041,0.0019128431,0.00075393135,0.0010195536,0.008828875,0.0055806544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605083,0.008200609,0.004877195,0.0018364391,0.016092483,0.008484898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007105886,0.00028677066,0.00037300822,0.0025650288,0.013512431,0.008024726,0.0016527183,0.0021052845,0.0072534457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03990062,0.00068727485,0.0004115861,0.005968878,0.005915147,0.0017892546,0.0039683157,0.0029704561,0.00034331033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026908208,0.00020085594,0.11278802,0.0003812043,0.00008373037,0.0016526814,0.014169754,0.0050330153,0.0006453048,0.512801,0.18451276,0.16746265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011432901,0.00012209857,0.28694427,0.0010397179,0.000101561694,0.00074119616,0.016074648,0.007733303,0.0012250644,0.030671531,0.6548212,0.00041111113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99513394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99668354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16595441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16595441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3897527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219368199","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013029","title":"The Landmark Decision in <i>Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency</i>: Lessons for Compliance with Canadian Customs Valuation Requirements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Tribunal; Business; Transfer pricing; Documentation; Database transaction; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Multinational corporation; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03224238979258095,"score_gpt":0.2677250847679954,"score_spread":0.23548269497541444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219368199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095624335,0.0039538015,0.007609286,0.4939459,0.0028273677,0.00029291023,0.0006123479,0.00037277982,0.3947613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037159,0.0025786813,0.008424182,0.116693445,0.00059865776,0.00010463458,0.00024350737,0.00023878363,0.16740218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97624993,0.001805586,0.0006210385,0.001736647,0.014271114,0.0053157895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97502327,0.006020639,0.000651275,0.0010348846,0.0150243845,0.002245605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124413315,0.00044328754,0.00045726626,0.0013160814,0.020761779,0.012791921,0.0033507133,0.010714212,0.0051812264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032819364,0.0007969463,0.00080803124,0.0020881463,0.0100458935,0.0033344643,0.0022867033,0.014027198,0.00058626616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062390776,0.000031042327,0.0037088818,0.000076715114,0.000025181844,0.00057840574,0.0070405165,0.0008274214,0.0009775432,0.7704183,0.19433449,0.021919053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007187527,0.000056160672,0.012868683,0.00037501787,0.000073585354,0.00022869246,0.00720932,0.0017152377,0.0017710088,0.031879086,0.94338185,0.00036948765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11648522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11648522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24778768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8451634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299657596","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016015","title":"Canadas Sanctions Regime Regarding Iran: How Much has Changed in a Post-Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regulated Market?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Negotiation; Status quo; Action (physics); Political science; Action plan; Economic sanctions; Business; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.10643751021424015,"score_gpt":0.2385340721965104,"score_spread":0.13209656198227027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299657596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.159803,0.012214789,0.0030708464,0.39311364,0.0043057883,0.00021720673,0.001424378,0.00022492079,0.4256254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297949,0.0067027165,0.0049660453,0.074273355,0.00077764405,0.00005598669,0.00079487875,0.00009803702,0.082536474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926006,0.0004209708,0.00013494461,0.00045198412,0.004670478,0.0017210557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921383,0.0007253845,0.0005260828,0.00024810917,0.005080084,0.0012819835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037557064,0.00026789858,0.00025942523,0.0013104242,0.0099570425,0.0071794847,0.002009133,0.0036246947,0.005273419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010771684,0.00024179049,0.0004567337,0.0018154527,0.0054736156,0.002119938,0.0013448182,0.005955107,0.0005334655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014650873,0.00017209657,0.028206082,0.00031767323,0.00007469679,0.0015304828,0.0067090504,0.0017701475,0.0014730893,0.52609175,0.32621977,0.107288666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005285827,0.000087888366,0.079643294,0.0005961685,0.00006731743,0.00036988594,0.010161368,0.0020030637,0.001317831,0.019472932,0.88592917,0.0002982435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97125846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06858474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06858474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15306766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49761945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233770138","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013020","title":"Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tariff; Market access; International trade law; Dumping; Free trade; Duty; Subsidy; Safeguard; Liberalization; Rules of origin; International economics; Business; World trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Geography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.06513871667867441,"score_gpt":0.367088721235281,"score_spread":0.3019500045566066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233770138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03309222,0.017823946,0.007394368,0.85479015,0.0067732083,0.000073008436,0.00025745845,0.00015767851,0.07963803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62043375,0.0183904,0.0040579555,0.3103538,0.011174794,0.0001245051,0.0003290843,0.00031494684,0.03482083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98136085,0.0068038874,0.0010089744,0.0023983177,0.0058818697,0.0025459717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95039475,0.022231614,0.011871019,0.0038904704,0.009680264,0.0019319083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024927163,0.00060410023,0.00056878646,0.0016691763,0.0029265468,0.010425671,0.0024992942,0.011109365,0.01418697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06567845,0.00036322093,0.0005713497,0.0040147314,0.013743433,0.018177608,0.0040766587,0.012016292,0.001773747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015370503,0.00016399407,0.020159805,0.0009352134,0.000119873184,0.0018514647,0.026801655,0.0005031822,0.001488825,0.48586747,0.30536205,0.15659279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036023474,0.00014139476,0.0121006025,0.0017163851,0.000048094436,0.0016259537,0.024822619,0.0008649601,0.0010881296,0.12138128,0.8360436,0.0001309114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056532887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004379556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024927163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035402388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003951973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13182902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340614765","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016029","title":"Trans-Pacific Partnership: Key Takeaways on Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); General partnership; Business; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Finance","score_opus":0.02160176687289279,"score_gpt":0.2596199635681542,"score_spread":0.23801819669526142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340614765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026785485,0.013408335,0.0008441104,0.8270888,0.0108195795,0.00031895758,0.001914443,0.00015779746,0.11866254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30412686,0.021213163,0.004849474,0.32409924,0.0020539272,0.00042574192,0.0015960762,0.00025824842,0.3413773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871471,0.00068150106,0.00018984615,0.00046869108,0.0034067775,0.008106192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812856,0.00086655136,0.00022771875,0.0002717422,0.003572514,0.013775877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006786248,0.0007826228,0.0007934221,0.0012840305,0.01999827,0.014704442,0.0028993299,0.018746886,0.033163752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081261,0.00061923254,0.0012197695,0.0026857788,0.0053369217,0.006819009,0.01136839,0.013188299,0.0020057142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027313523,0.00018420725,0.0047806273,0.0003902521,0.00005414898,0.0010818235,0.0024478936,0.0004773158,0.0007312246,0.121921025,0.82089436,0.046763938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011751767,0.00009818819,0.0139911305,0.0005551248,0.000048543447,0.00017272464,0.012734728,0.0004035675,0.00024245951,0.009006738,0.96250063,0.00012862493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06676767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06676767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46887234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48443562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423493607","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013040","title":"The Question of the Benefit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.007829631317478027,"score_gpt":0.2617525603438024,"score_spread":0.25392292902632435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423493607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01066934,0.006725248,0.01629558,0.18057388,0.0031184768,0.00013165387,0.00036956178,0.00004953267,0.7820667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75092965,0.004154568,0.0095590195,0.088540696,0.008803804,0.0005761808,0.00029262007,0.00033035164,0.13681318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97570837,0.005988037,0.0011384714,0.0051165204,0.009638168,0.0024103443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825042,0.009437375,0.00070917595,0.0021776953,0.004428938,0.00074268435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01958021,0.000741366,0.0016468412,0.001692574,0.005437065,0.013978203,0.0041734832,0.018484676,0.015481872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045674406,0.00074318534,0.0012575183,0.0014009252,0.028451873,0.018136697,0.006316456,0.016479742,0.003370227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011440022,0.000009328085,0.00010370174,0.000022412429,0.0000069798125,0.000024930941,0.0002332455,0.00005089104,0.000060097635,0.99062634,0.0056717,0.003178948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003700977,0.000035193796,0.00056919997,0.0002911455,0.000031081145,0.00015739571,0.00064877217,0.00033561717,0.00027386317,0.85581774,0.14177456,0.000028414477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013357582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010940918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01958021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009768223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013882037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10355133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503493334","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013053","title":"Demystifying the Trans-Pacific Partnership: An American and Canadian Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02365661709021259,"score_gpt":0.2978003832037697,"score_spread":0.2741437661135571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503493334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04912226,0.01448983,0.0024514138,0.38736764,0.0015288123,0.00008629453,0.00023869851,0.00007279602,0.5446423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997451,0.016621605,0.0034786963,0.040198945,0.00045057453,0.000083607905,0.00013792726,0.00007441108,0.039209154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112517,0.0012084845,0.00013337478,0.0004919891,0.0022546223,0.004786416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889753,0.0015481781,0.00043758165,0.00052622764,0.0035373473,0.00497531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006947687,0.00062074256,0.0007277775,0.003061549,0.031442,0.021900348,0.00362172,0.01073887,0.012549865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011114217,0.0003496152,0.00066832296,0.0061525255,0.026447803,0.010858523,0.010545179,0.014276921,0.0004242882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025802428,0.000038656242,0.0014890438,0.000086415894,0.0000124537955,0.00033549062,0.01778249,0.000570509,0.00015480453,0.93422467,0.025943022,0.019336658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003416626,0.00003551523,0.009503951,0.0006290586,0.000053568227,0.00028713763,0.11022533,0.0009306694,0.00026340364,0.18538128,0.69254524,0.000110681685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97145563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08502509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08502509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32194516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61690307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578906619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013028","title":"Modernization of the EUs Trade Defence Instruments and the Law of Unintended Consequences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Transparency (behavior); Modernization theory; Protectionism; European commission; Duty; International trade; Political science; Unintended consequences; Law; Subsidy; Business; Law and economics; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.011066725338626418,"score_gpt":0.24069834143783425,"score_spread":0.22963161609920785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578906619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036723915,0.021387797,0.089324035,0.12436361,0.0030431922,0.00023856535,0.00022766538,0.00020433987,0.72448695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8433379,0.007959177,0.03210679,0.063185535,0.0028072533,0.0006133575,0.0000926865,0.000119962184,0.049777362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97787094,0.007248144,0.0017783368,0.0036342132,0.007945183,0.0015232507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798004,0.011143193,0.0017941912,0.0042642383,0.0026975053,0.00030050555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023972949,0.00067022943,0.0008599308,0.0018176117,0.003827635,0.011737724,0.0024839493,0.017040772,0.0034922978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033354916,0.0007257845,0.0011576936,0.0012908624,0.035057828,0.012106543,0.006264545,0.019012343,0.00047400204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031984566,0.000004695096,0.000071697395,0.000014588049,0.0000024972423,0.000031165542,0.00017309413,0.00013284845,0.000053691394,0.9967014,0.00088485813,0.0019262527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020425534,0.000035057143,0.00044635663,0.00032682507,0.000010998088,0.00016944374,0.000189237,0.0008000918,0.00030546123,0.9097973,0.08786718,0.000031585103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004161876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003019264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023972949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007541903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007568594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12678254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595621542","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012034","title":"Anti-dumping and Judicial Review in South Africa: An Urgent Need for Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.08233373517147559,"score_gpt":0.332947398984342,"score_spread":0.2506136638128664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595621542","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025204567,0.1274921,0.0017807657,0.828188,0.0030380518,0.000080260455,0.000033159136,0.000032323856,0.014150739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5254153,0.17214274,0.0142116835,0.26197723,0.01062749,0.00025492525,0.000064641536,0.00014917097,0.015156814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594359,0.019672886,0.0038795755,0.0025129835,0.008042041,0.0064566024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87129015,0.08810039,0.01376363,0.0042543584,0.016372142,0.0062194103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050017584,0.00047948645,0.0011434996,0.0028614905,0.007439333,0.02089489,0.0034079414,0.01072723,0.0023428248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08026991,0.0008840818,0.0010274393,0.0043167225,0.017812805,0.014721639,0.006211724,0.014775034,0.00037298404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016648362,0.0002134001,0.013062326,0.006165425,0.00022373858,0.005051708,0.048403792,0.001307415,0.0021211687,0.4541312,0.10234954,0.36680374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009992739,0.00018881646,0.017702678,0.0070619714,0.00008437889,0.002490067,0.042755995,0.00058337266,0.0011490351,0.067333564,0.8603362,0.00021402031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023609772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042845752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050017584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014097878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06494355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26452142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606450338","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017018","title":"The Brexit Vote: Its Impact on the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and UKs Obligations Under Comprehensive Trade and Economic Trade Agreement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; European union; International trade; Negotiation; Trade agreement; Investment (military); Member state; Commission; European commission; International economics; Economic impact analysis; Economic integration; Customs union; Free trade agreement; Economics; Business; Member states; Free trade; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.03044590585871328,"score_gpt":0.2689096511603479,"score_spread":0.23846374530163458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606450338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098437026,0.005635729,0.0007586484,0.112703145,0.0021277957,0.000100056954,0.0009291295,0.00008333271,0.77922523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7455045,0.0027596098,0.0006427397,0.04768924,0.00036136355,0.00005725724,0.00039524268,0.00016060058,0.20242944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98047537,0.002464114,0.0004151769,0.0010694659,0.008874572,0.0067013446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881826,0.0038950276,0.0005143197,0.0006810368,0.0047740494,0.0019528811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008528442,0.00033407946,0.00066827994,0.0016318735,0.014322792,0.018766588,0.0019358211,0.0073064915,0.01299676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03302608,0.00044068965,0.0006750848,0.0033131784,0.009645493,0.0040006144,0.0069232355,0.009851591,0.0012198845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010465948,0.000031901476,0.0032199582,0.000079373356,0.000018280523,0.0004950867,0.0053177904,0.00055072043,0.00015721426,0.8626356,0.11191036,0.015479106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007214615,0.00004869633,0.024567822,0.0005878244,0.0000704026,0.00014316427,0.011976121,0.001078641,0.00072807237,0.035997923,0.9245604,0.00016876389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9592553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09294445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09294445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12506041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614194518","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017024","title":"The Obstacles to Concluding the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and Lessons for the Future","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Member states; Convergence (economics); Member state; International trade; Opposition (politics); European union; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Free trade; Economic growth","score_opus":0.031404914077037514,"score_gpt":0.26887980358336006,"score_spread":0.23747488950632253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614194518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033818822,0.014659437,0.0085885115,0.7358446,0.0036115039,0.00016018961,0.0004179194,0.00018705217,0.20271206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636749,0.012518114,0.026215788,0.19697225,0.0011607588,0.00024149049,0.0006262323,0.00022530693,0.12529105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732082,0.0037082236,0.0010039938,0.0017525908,0.01393177,0.006395234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97689545,0.005961052,0.0006894393,0.0010791209,0.010695332,0.004679635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026268966,0.00045878388,0.0008472755,0.0013809653,0.012406358,0.015946703,0.0036112869,0.01403271,0.005998618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041736953,0.00046240588,0.0011899809,0.0017468235,0.009272003,0.0069171274,0.006276472,0.0138044115,0.00086807524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038762402,0.000032219363,0.00074820087,0.000086285996,0.0000140332295,0.00032640545,0.0020093338,0.0016412501,0.00019364647,0.9255956,0.045451347,0.02386293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058992053,0.000037620925,0.0035939056,0.000632433,0.000028588653,0.00023010647,0.0069362004,0.0025520832,0.0005069669,0.18073408,0.8045248,0.00016424923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8985618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90351254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101438224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062672846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21374673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45472544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615207609","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017023","title":"Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, ISDS and the Belgian Veto: A Warning of Failure for Future Trade Agreements with the EU?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Veto; Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Settlement (finance); International economics; Investment (military); Trade agreement; Business; Economics; Free trade; Political science; Politics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.014130106856616729,"score_gpt":0.23538005081377814,"score_spread":0.2212499439571614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615207609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07711442,0.029645877,0.0057241395,0.57051635,0.0118642235,0.00004138724,0.0003154424,0.00028295847,0.30449522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8059792,0.0048293783,0.0028714316,0.11411882,0.002740134,0.000020279389,0.00019893287,0.00021615675,0.0690258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924092,0.0020189374,0.00031944684,0.00054272986,0.0029953585,0.0017142942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992595,0.0037599097,0.0010191863,0.000503328,0.0014175324,0.0007050237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007430785,0.00024000359,0.00042014165,0.0009271747,0.005587368,0.014253526,0.0009048881,0.01333401,0.003228962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01695269,0.0003264747,0.000582499,0.0016588911,0.00688235,0.0044380273,0.002153823,0.00889931,0.00070656586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009818635,0.000022970866,0.0028081168,0.00010950494,0.000021627011,0.0012838523,0.0064855246,0.00054561265,0.00041328464,0.7536788,0.19563854,0.038893893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014551069,0.000028568078,0.0038724998,0.0002799628,0.0000121912435,0.0006240267,0.0033637453,0.0005750745,0.00038999386,0.02940832,0.9613862,0.00004485406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082345694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11543747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082345694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009872283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011556841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16373277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772339027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017055","title":"Trade from the Trenches: Negotiating in Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Mandate; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); International trade; Curiosity; Globalization; Commission; Trade barrier; Investment (military); General partnership; Multilateral trade negotiations; Commercial policy; Business; Political science; Economics; International economics; Free trade; Law","score_opus":0.02496935044431364,"score_gpt":0.2669622107028202,"score_spread":0.24199286025850658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772339027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047036435,0.0069275564,0.24469456,0.0789792,0.00097645994,0.00069819624,0.000080448124,0.0003863193,0.6202208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85191566,0.0040435144,0.07612305,0.0072541065,0.0003034626,0.00077869673,0.00015097215,0.000583797,0.058846775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9173829,0.06188596,0.0022028727,0.0053597875,0.008063232,0.0051052007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96499044,0.02471743,0.0016146081,0.003505515,0.0024515616,0.0027204724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059027582,0.0010582998,0.0013197083,0.0026519394,0.027383626,0.036990684,0.005093261,0.013745481,0.017286126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06238458,0.0015727174,0.0013164982,0.004656135,0.06164855,0.036574543,0.02502712,0.013471832,0.004599464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002089389,0.0000735038,0.0006740526,0.00013219158,0.000020930349,0.0008694878,0.10047479,0.0016663801,0.00019996188,0.86511004,0.0084718065,0.022285884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017321207,0.00003901314,0.0002550552,0.0008531528,0.000009598402,0.00029599905,0.07009138,0.001976869,0.00020011554,0.6775542,0.24866182,0.00004547217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008644759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008937815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059027582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015358534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02825572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3121714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783009311","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018004","title":"Prior Judicial Involvement in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from the Courts Rhetoric in Opinion 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Majority opinion; European union; Concurring opinion; Member state; Court of record; Economics; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; International trade; Member states","score_opus":0.029875250674302117,"score_gpt":0.2714643232561439,"score_spread":0.24158907258184179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783009311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028890288,0.010062182,0.026597435,0.2157665,0.0024623438,0.00008870741,0.00009041018,0.00007081956,0.7159713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653839,0.0048881923,0.0070043304,0.062565744,0.004110459,0.0002355913,0.00007800276,0.00020311178,0.0555306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680439,0.017095864,0.0012251869,0.004033264,0.00657037,0.0030313518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9443856,0.04655038,0.0013232941,0.0019624562,0.0049358564,0.00084250903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03363509,0.00056516763,0.00096652773,0.0017781901,0.01592962,0.024264934,0.005356872,0.032825887,0.009046454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050663356,0.00092843926,0.0013235058,0.0019403056,0.037247393,0.023643063,0.0073214713,0.026121354,0.0015862263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053991007,0.000008437601,0.000045262757,0.000016493837,0.0000028490115,0.00010416626,0.003510007,0.000064685955,0.000029672126,0.9908668,0.0040005744,0.0013457587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075464195,0.000034948425,0.00045187064,0.0006291979,0.000048348506,0.00016475524,0.006081434,0.0013545122,0.00081594766,0.8049227,0.18534163,0.000079210186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032474726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030505769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03363509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01829168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011389803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17788148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784952832","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018005","title":"Unspoken Truths: The Hidden Logic of Decision 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Autonomy; European union; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Business; International economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03306527082140851,"score_gpt":0.32341289075968793,"score_spread":0.2903476199382794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784952832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033003356,0.003252315,0.02373587,0.6215808,0.0031892776,0.000074006675,0.00016437522,0.000099657074,0.31490037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9049797,0.0008946175,0.0050705676,0.07204771,0.0017204173,0.000103357816,0.00006431369,0.00013076022,0.014988547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680932,0.0182514,0.0011380677,0.0037795317,0.0055288943,0.0032090372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724655,0.019598575,0.0011743087,0.0018980826,0.003951668,0.000911728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03801929,0.00042118668,0.0007889971,0.0012502415,0.009892046,0.016246133,0.0031366649,0.016270086,0.0065844674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050037798,0.00047533927,0.0010907566,0.0010373959,0.052552246,0.015224938,0.006066972,0.014508556,0.0012876501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013642323,0.0000042758975,0.000090050584,0.000019153156,0.000005768975,0.000089354064,0.0041715465,0.00008546039,0.000046151956,0.98337597,0.0103916405,0.0017070397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002245768,0.00001041883,0.00013978142,0.00014958376,0.000011767886,0.000057639663,0.0037369812,0.00061219424,0.00021153115,0.9144014,0.08061861,0.000027521153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012244879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008170584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03801929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011930998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009982095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20106763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2856654253","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018027","title":"The Unreliability of Merchandise Trade Statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; International trade; Official statistics; Economics; International economics; World trade; Business; Statistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04090929531177531,"score_gpt":0.2359491890343322,"score_spread":0.1950398937225569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2856654253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4894139,0.025351241,0.15876898,0.08668501,0.0059659807,0.0003076094,0.048544876,0.0025036952,0.18245867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638786,0.005717747,0.014102163,0.002852411,0.0011133605,0.00009809077,0.008288134,0.0004713168,0.0034782502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94636405,0.020375587,0.0068791816,0.00507278,0.020139957,0.0011685482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71779907,0.16979776,0.032666966,0.029246178,0.049264174,0.0012258545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037638307,0.000609113,0.00092436356,0.011105688,0.0010103976,0.0059564398,0.0019521334,0.0011750578,0.0020196077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22273055,0.00086895,0.00043266243,0.014063271,0.004015128,0.008009762,0.0021856544,0.0034017959,0.0019583893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005723702,0.000112755086,0.2625372,0.0019050863,0.0006020361,0.0009829352,0.0069654267,0.02671927,0.00088041375,0.22825542,0.14855134,0.3219158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054785996,0.00016453065,0.14342737,0.004796655,0.00022309963,0.0016272444,0.009662336,0.035233714,0.005833319,0.41157648,0.38694185,0.00045864843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013782941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074585318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037638307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027203993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19905275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943319220","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019017","title":"The Effects of CETA on the Continuous Implementation of the Precautionary Principle within the European Union","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; European union; Negotiation; International trade; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criticism; Order (exchange); Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Biotechnology","score_opus":0.010149425890373497,"score_gpt":0.2900502765910667,"score_spread":0.2799008507006932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943319220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27056065,0.00955904,0.008203335,0.08778188,0.0019472349,0.00023793455,0.00014217901,0.00009333126,0.6214743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94569385,0.0018308525,0.0034225222,0.023352064,0.0005458149,0.00012394236,0.000045997127,0.00005574152,0.024929235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684876,0.012973002,0.0014676851,0.0029391784,0.0103565445,0.0037760246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611129,0.025237352,0.0038991778,0.0043970416,0.0040494064,0.0013041138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034398593,0.000403006,0.0005772801,0.0011640154,0.0061170557,0.015607307,0.0015997567,0.014901099,0.0037908885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06622573,0.00065520033,0.0013924834,0.001483519,0.017117964,0.00524729,0.009906394,0.013821183,0.0006516485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009531715,0.000073765324,0.0015526492,0.00006584919,0.000021211292,0.00029986078,0.0037454888,0.0011128724,0.0005118927,0.97321045,0.004634581,0.01467594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023179625,0.0005365035,0.031524304,0.0023606098,0.00013387999,0.00044139294,0.01086788,0.0043648197,0.004114806,0.47752374,0.4676543,0.00024590225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02183708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014199159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97816294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011206264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017734064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18191934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964685619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019028","title":"The New NAFTA: A First Look","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Enforcement; Free trade agreement; International trade; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Control (management); Business; House of Representatives; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Law; Engineering; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.02444598883753399,"score_gpt":0.19613511306974266,"score_spread":0.17168912423220867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964685619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010013688,0.09262472,0.0010013644,0.60498154,0.013313397,0.00004830578,0.0009817866,0.000092449794,0.27694273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28531846,0.1158774,0.005270012,0.32281312,0.0115627,0.00033427274,0.0022240384,0.00033690193,0.256263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964664,0.00076697924,0.00014701278,0.00040164846,0.0013950152,0.00082289963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966286,0.0010195989,0.00022554325,0.00017306182,0.0015626553,0.0003905284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056326897,0.0006180645,0.00075795036,0.002450088,0.0053800545,0.012918964,0.0016929714,0.010020385,0.024779381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127179595,0.00039757733,0.0008984014,0.0019717005,0.0036549482,0.019683773,0.0024402067,0.008457607,0.0029719127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013876948,0.00014529748,0.0026696923,0.00065909367,0.00003819135,0.0008569282,0.0032800233,0.0002385551,0.00046543856,0.5454167,0.36484855,0.08124264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010094478,0.00002702948,0.0018373999,0.0007399304,0.000009766229,0.00010656735,0.002455127,0.00006074046,0.00006679342,0.019152012,0.975514,0.000020569416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13017307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19909528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13017307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015015834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013466736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2588308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225245840","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022015","title":"The COVID-19 Pandemics’ Impact on Customs Valuation and Import Duties: An Israel Perspective, and a Wider Comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Valuation (finance); Business; Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Value (mathematics); International trade; Finance; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.062160548549147016,"score_gpt":0.3394570013454314,"score_spread":0.27729645279628434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225245840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34029192,0.014866568,0.0014847801,0.025928892,0.00046313283,0.000057036134,0.0010596369,0.000020026933,0.615828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97153634,0.006807033,0.00029219154,0.0031410197,0.00028844003,0.000020786447,0.0006766319,0.000026550924,0.017211072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873394,0.0002741547,0.000044894652,0.00008736935,0.0004933641,0.0003662338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984819,0.00046769253,0.00031473697,0.000059820326,0.0004983233,0.00017744236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020361664,0.00027500602,0.00023193043,0.00253392,0.00088802195,0.004797958,0.00045135772,0.00097071606,0.016917935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032061127,0.00012163823,0.00044052687,0.0024415825,0.002446137,0.003748979,0.0022024151,0.0017473482,0.0009321798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049560086,0.00044152458,0.15420096,0.0005022723,0.00020092413,0.002019734,0.010354147,0.0031642045,0.001270872,0.60582405,0.05410315,0.16742256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006121734,0.0002888684,0.41445673,0.0023576696,0.00015308049,0.0016826084,0.05442317,0.004069593,0.0018413499,0.073794104,0.44669324,0.00017840712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016500823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015796203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016917935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006027531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001963847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05659616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229647937","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010034","title":"Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Law and Practice: The Mexican Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Dumping; Jurisprudence; International trade; Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Settlement (finance); Free trade agreement; Free trade; Business","score_opus":0.01624115784412717,"score_gpt":0.32381903977370785,"score_spread":0.3075778819295807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229647937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48838148,0.019089734,0.0018740713,0.1131377,0.00039191011,0.000035651436,0.00013278595,0.000038577924,0.37691814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634759,0.011727081,0.00059559545,0.0053759348,0.00014773569,0.00001995851,0.00003748529,0.000024343619,0.01859601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987698,0.0004413375,0.000027081402,0.00013550557,0.00023504005,0.00039131255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988009,0.0005705882,0.00018386073,0.00010757147,0.00020351858,0.00013358242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033585809,0.00020051526,0.00022657754,0.00076213444,0.011251741,0.005620351,0.0009492302,0.0026954634,0.0033858616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004327572,0.000256387,0.0001902353,0.0020437613,0.014491255,0.003633716,0.0027510775,0.0043947203,0.00015748835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053527398,0.000083718274,0.0037945537,0.00011217979,0.000005763745,0.0010508965,0.19646892,0.00012896518,0.0005277421,0.750791,0.017731365,0.029251397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001891657,0.00005121375,0.015261274,0.0005562135,0.00001682335,0.00068914343,0.20392318,0.0002559713,0.0004375744,0.02101252,0.75772226,0.000054907974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26771224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34203064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26771224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015987836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00989532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229959763","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014010","title":"The WTO Seal Products PanelThe Public Morals Defense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Seal (emblem); Argument (complex analysis); Panel data; Technical barriers to trade; International economics; Panel discussion; Business; Trade barrier; Economics; Advertising; Chemistry; Geography","score_opus":0.024288474280046306,"score_gpt":0.2707641488351212,"score_spread":0.24647567455507488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229959763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005403556,0.0038425117,0.0026368955,0.4232664,0.0063170954,0.0001009439,0.000629088,0.0001084689,0.55769503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12641108,0.003049025,0.002812972,0.38908425,0.0045903698,0.00036713012,0.00055596256,0.00026427265,0.4728649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902416,0.002021662,0.0003038119,0.0012225162,0.0050085844,0.0012018194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389356,0.0025250253,0.0005026588,0.00091575936,0.0017272793,0.00043565265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01347926,0.0008961922,0.00054826937,0.0007537384,0.005067902,0.011161952,0.0016844743,0.02377611,0.016753254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024555642,0.00066845573,0.0010544971,0.0008709805,0.0070508104,0.0072550806,0.004586097,0.02183918,0.00734241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003823919,0.0000343298,0.00030468794,0.00005337451,0.000010129142,0.00013681412,0.0006296961,0.00013821854,0.00049668096,0.56642514,0.41971523,0.012017469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017266608,0.000016848944,0.0003004066,0.00016742466,0.000008402834,0.000050900413,0.00019219585,0.00015544498,0.00040529852,0.038142152,0.9605282,0.000015272439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01163619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008128591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02377611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004058636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010644353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07128602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235589513","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2021050","title":"A Canadian Border Carbon Adjustment? GATT Compliance and Underexplored Exceptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; International trade; Convention; Greenhouse gas; Carbon leakage; Order (exchange); Political science; European union; International economics; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Emissions trading; Economics; Law; Kyoto Protocol; Politics","score_opus":0.03066435155547819,"score_gpt":0.3090210329350418,"score_spread":0.2783566813795636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235589513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0520277,0.008183769,0.0028073406,0.601751,0.002911818,0.00008219102,0.00070199004,0.00016845632,0.3313658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6605742,0.0073053995,0.0038234685,0.26499787,0.0008500114,0.00006199414,0.00034315098,0.00017102496,0.061872832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.983688,0.0015679408,0.0005441646,0.002122651,0.008308812,0.0037685311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97692364,0.0063519143,0.0010641022,0.0010018165,0.012928181,0.0017303257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011372872,0.00040041844,0.00058590923,0.0018242395,0.024662405,0.014464837,0.0037116902,0.011084139,0.006148812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03304087,0.00045941383,0.00078059506,0.0035638586,0.01343233,0.004185168,0.0032248606,0.0139454,0.00046591114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049675178,0.000023722523,0.00481047,0.00014407202,0.00003550765,0.00070467556,0.010130745,0.00052148587,0.00040536333,0.74411875,0.20896135,0.030094141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044050466,0.000024492561,0.013864619,0.0006689964,0.00007228724,0.00028160174,0.0133151,0.0013770736,0.0007957928,0.04977791,0.91951203,0.0002661419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10457203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10457203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22058798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7587267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246045263","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019010","title":"The Court of Justice of the European Unions Judgment on Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; European union; Mutagenesis; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Parliament; Biology; Biotechnology; Genetics; Law and economics; Business; Mutation; Politics; Sociology; Gene; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.031086845306066653,"score_gpt":0.2744469337447521,"score_spread":0.24336008843868545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246045263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01320329,0.0087172445,0.004557074,0.7086642,0.01597763,0.00021732673,0.0003808827,0.0000955795,0.24818684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102194585,0.0028505705,0.0024897489,0.78864235,0.005617297,0.00026805638,0.00015270917,0.00012038071,0.09766436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97641003,0.0046017463,0.0016332517,0.0041893483,0.0070714005,0.0060942825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98433924,0.010353834,0.0006652452,0.0005999035,0.0028404116,0.0012014003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01939823,0.0011175477,0.0018702425,0.0012807681,0.021740625,0.01902139,0.0045648334,0.08915645,0.0069714957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037960786,0.0014688504,0.0029114198,0.0022589304,0.010890019,0.009360244,0.005872967,0.04463878,0.0020212596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080898026,0.00007062736,0.0006849118,0.0000851979,0.00003115653,0.0025912512,0.0029553026,0.0002779303,0.0005249218,0.674569,0.31212893,0.0059999004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008862811,0.00007087058,0.0008479433,0.0006191327,0.000094044815,0.00073042855,0.001974874,0.0006785727,0.0007929687,0.0791809,0.9147507,0.00017097271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063342206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08161195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08915645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014524927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025597835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12594706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249955464","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020023","title":"The New Paradigms for the Rule of Origin in México","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Rules of origin; Free trade agreement; General partnership; Negotiation; Treaty; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Automotive industry; Free trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.07487154724626409,"score_gpt":0.2409737764715516,"score_spread":0.1661022292252875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249955464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07921467,0.010723299,0.31237245,0.031007692,0.0008556942,0.00026969967,0.00045739676,0.00015233309,0.5649468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82587254,0.0051888702,0.119489856,0.0028703364,0.0010084802,0.00089024036,0.00024356546,0.00013113258,0.04430499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935469,0.0027830687,0.0003343854,0.001447904,0.0014336526,0.0004541725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348986,0.00348501,0.0009822368,0.0011782432,0.0006942154,0.00017033772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069844713,0.0003967094,0.0006969423,0.0024785344,0.0041912976,0.011951838,0.0017444652,0.0038927235,0.005474911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014112466,0.00042178872,0.00097259204,0.0022363353,0.014914074,0.010033178,0.0039861,0.006652028,0.00049396575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024548547,0.0000026753276,0.00009191258,0.000006185498,0.0000014623197,0.000014391579,0.00022196787,0.00009544607,0.000012123016,0.997209,0.00026662578,0.0020756728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015404888,0.000017439468,0.0008301348,0.00012954297,0.000010816595,0.000103026076,0.0005339226,0.001724112,0.00015755676,0.93723696,0.059223227,0.000017854447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009198573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006452567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011951838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007030472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036651448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051009893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253504090","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019064","title":"Measuring the Gender-Responsiveness of Free Trade Agreements: Using a Self-Evaluation Maturity Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Empowerment; Maturity (psychological); Momentum (technical analysis); Intervention (counseling); International trade; International economics; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05019680804747467,"score_gpt":0.29010920201932316,"score_spread":0.2399123939718485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253504090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60556555,0.0011833301,0.22311257,0.005975827,0.00014057827,0.0031939887,0.0004401494,0.00024919663,0.16013882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625379,0.00018417215,0.034807287,0.00018156617,0.000014839698,0.0008832806,0.00018589602,0.000018165649,0.0011869018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9414171,0.03827001,0.0032845163,0.0017383492,0.013365987,0.0019240568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9012094,0.046724558,0.01671433,0.0043408037,0.02702718,0.0039835866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07429989,0.0007092002,0.00051852607,0.008709992,0.0025396189,0.0067941174,0.0012294474,0.0017148865,0.0020840634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10269556,0.00035929604,0.0013462994,0.0043632584,0.005308057,0.009377606,0.005304013,0.002266057,0.00036509093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002660346,0.0013534203,0.32135788,0.0008584926,0.0003112301,0.00024480422,0.071879454,0.013644981,0.0026292228,0.33415717,0.0031291908,0.25016817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007958405,0.00251638,0.34845817,0.002175739,0.00020946459,0.00037242923,0.13650855,0.07286255,0.006729528,0.37705305,0.052512463,0.0005219934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004866863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005054322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07429989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011985585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008731754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39294004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256013541","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020022","title":"Proving FTA Preferential Tariff Eligibility: The Evidentiary Burden in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Tariff; Agency (philosophy); Rules of origin; Burden of proof; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; International trade; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.025070479928462036,"score_gpt":0.27559081992939805,"score_spread":0.25052034000093604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256013541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14343119,0.03509668,0.013994843,0.33644447,0.0017288589,0.00045954203,0.0014675342,0.00018054232,0.46719638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753297,0.018803058,0.011646028,0.036007836,0.00045301605,0.00012243226,0.00039350498,0.00008552564,0.057159003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977085,0.0026542435,0.0013790588,0.0021442266,0.0128500685,0.0038874352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92618036,0.03850828,0.0028704861,0.0023779187,0.026972005,0.003090963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02552185,0.0003253623,0.00075106765,0.0054242057,0.01789405,0.019878043,0.0034594135,0.007943166,0.0040158816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076842465,0.00084602466,0.0008045703,0.0055264025,0.013059662,0.0052529476,0.0039928225,0.008867616,0.00032785643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062377454,0.000031256513,0.006297068,0.00043653196,0.00006177062,0.001521261,0.00999318,0.0008238518,0.0009878014,0.8818144,0.053234465,0.044736017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013602151,0.000079729536,0.036673892,0.0034866051,0.00042190257,0.00092887366,0.012665519,0.004876561,0.0039579747,0.2070118,0.72926474,0.0004964118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98852706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111873455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111873455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2801582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81170255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816635","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022042","title":"Dispute Settlement in Indian FTAs’: Shaping the Future with Lessons from the Past","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Dispute resolution; Scope (computer science); Arbitration; International trade; Settlement (finance); Dispute mechanism; Political science; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Free trade; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.017406170146749216,"score_gpt":0.23176192604442852,"score_spread":0.2143557558976793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09644825,0.034232963,0.012210686,0.3312509,0.0023018068,0.000080545135,0.00014468828,0.00011871896,0.52321136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626627,0.008527598,0.003405751,0.011035527,0.0006386146,0.000045510224,0.000050446135,0.000035376703,0.013598569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884371,0.0049023796,0.00058265275,0.0009716993,0.0023180095,0.0027881633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98787934,0.005238957,0.0013035325,0.0013806684,0.0020816068,0.0021159055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014572941,0.00033540625,0.0004990496,0.0021927883,0.020246554,0.036937747,0.0036191414,0.008833275,0.005581296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01439377,0.0003928935,0.00085269747,0.0043510143,0.033992857,0.018516522,0.007770328,0.01425579,0.0007120588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012651142,0.00003294815,0.00049129204,0.00007584079,0.000004051755,0.00025759995,0.014029679,0.0002914701,0.000084788015,0.96760446,0.0045678657,0.012547329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011437226,0.00003697648,0.002614407,0.00076822826,0.000018632969,0.0006583995,0.07743872,0.0012689591,0.00036146055,0.44805598,0.46865585,0.00011100092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030612841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043525804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036937747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024850907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018288275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18030679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816966","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022044","title":"Application of Dispute Settlement in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’): A Cross Country Analysis of Modern FTAs’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009823503543956655,"score_gpt":0.2896731883168665,"score_spread":0.27984968477290983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41820836,0.011682552,0.033412773,0.0055368226,0.0003088928,0.00046663443,0.00053221843,0.000047435886,0.5298042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795673,0.002967955,0.0044718273,0.00082850043,0.00010483054,0.00018681401,0.00029728105,0.000029291741,0.011546128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883421,0.0051048505,0.0008688161,0.00085068506,0.0031591414,0.0016744649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737066,0.018574229,0.003529825,0.0010934409,0.0027661906,0.0003297539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748088,0.0002106598,0.00031457888,0.0045563346,0.0045086606,0.009542096,0.0012822156,0.0026501832,0.0039056912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021409681,0.00030389364,0.00065421546,0.010163584,0.0064217285,0.0064374865,0.0036822383,0.0031463394,0.0003201618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026540254,0.00007502107,0.014605684,0.00023338692,0.000030638002,0.0007707276,0.033353545,0.0017485174,0.00023533317,0.9116766,0.003303045,0.033940993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032011565,0.00022608205,0.1338796,0.0026669493,0.00012032311,0.0022482353,0.119894445,0.01121546,0.002822135,0.21208504,0.5146576,0.00015219058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013570778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009823661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013570778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007814173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003918131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056696057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318826069","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022045","title":"Sanctions or No Sanctions: Enforcing Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; International trade; Business; Free trade; Dispute resolution; Economics; International economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024758721212221977,"score_gpt":0.31631327906801715,"score_spread":0.29155455785579515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318826069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053583086,0.006503145,0.09551955,0.025360467,0.0010742353,0.00043720836,0.00010969223,0.00014897883,0.8172637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159631,0.00382892,0.032676496,0.0052798293,0.0005520703,0.00031505647,0.00008375669,0.000087884066,0.04121295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749059,0.010340001,0.0015805693,0.0016990087,0.008210704,0.0032639047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98168784,0.011380438,0.0022687789,0.001851115,0.0019043611,0.00090747635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016496133,0.00044940112,0.0005651186,0.0017093867,0.0063411295,0.014258156,0.002356393,0.006556393,0.0042660097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03228032,0.0005764194,0.0007304512,0.0021604565,0.022957142,0.009381545,0.006763329,0.00760402,0.0007413286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149848875,0.000022500344,0.00035697644,0.00006212142,0.0000032635144,0.00010542769,0.0026285092,0.0007530608,0.00010676794,0.9847376,0.0009826412,0.010226187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029117311,0.000081695325,0.0019279426,0.0016463564,0.00002509083,0.00017729859,0.00497785,0.0016877655,0.0005134372,0.8432481,0.14561298,0.000072291405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021013325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033806574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021013325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007943531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018030496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087240934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320070132","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022038","title":"Binational Panel Review of Trade Remedies Determinations: Prospects for Exporting the USMCA’s Unique Procedure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Duty; Treaty; International trade; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Panel data; Business; International economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03879812744797095,"score_gpt":0.3274639800484329,"score_spread":0.28866585260046196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320070132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105827555,0.035184015,0.1246118,0.3327046,0.012320118,0.004269547,0.0013105025,0.0018981954,0.38187358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5055734,0.021205258,0.1343721,0.18158738,0.0071741454,0.0036100026,0.002340865,0.0006005667,0.14353628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.936944,0.021967541,0.005029123,0.006247338,0.02519904,0.0046128263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7585215,0.09727046,0.015258857,0.024251038,0.0981353,0.0065628653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.103387244,0.00043255705,0.00084811065,0.006371864,0.0078206565,0.012712787,0.0042657447,0.010063773,0.006622777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17031088,0.0010564347,0.0010121458,0.004684643,0.0044404063,0.0070708124,0.004845037,0.0076724505,0.0015539578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016017747,0.00021752446,0.009483985,0.0010544362,0.00011886642,0.0013874143,0.005121609,0.0017540292,0.004582095,0.4204585,0.2843009,0.2713605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012722488,0.0002185379,0.015611929,0.0015741062,0.00013648481,0.0007030512,0.0014372867,0.004135466,0.0027525306,0.036195967,0.9369067,0.00020071708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04684815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07067863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103387244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010678161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05672479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403432599","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024079","title":"Article: The Contribution of the Canadian-European Partnership to the Integration of Sustainable Development Issues into the Multilateral Trading System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Sustainable development; International trade; Political science; Regional science; Business; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.020101138418879762,"score_gpt":0.29065312601895804,"score_spread":0.27055198760007826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403432599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013312459,0.036113657,0.0040167035,0.4563917,0.018322743,0.00017645353,0.0013955103,0.00017003794,0.4701008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49778813,0.04086122,0.014583496,0.042712495,0.0027741718,0.0001029706,0.0012793157,0.00024349408,0.3996547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442923,0.0006033484,0.000079864694,0.00022375592,0.0035947207,0.001069012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227285,0.00095657544,0.00017962768,0.00026386592,0.003364037,0.0029630573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048755845,0.00036679074,0.00029100582,0.0016680437,0.008525604,0.008163361,0.0011868333,0.0029065402,0.0116474265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009617061,0.0001724186,0.00027239913,0.0030050043,0.003854415,0.0022996967,0.0042909593,0.0032326488,0.0009101198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048640522,0.00004453586,0.0018446164,0.00024105655,0.000017038905,0.00038491053,0.0027384628,0.00074299023,0.00036839378,0.30034328,0.57928556,0.11394047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052463547,0.0000045607558,0.0019060887,0.000100975645,0.0000045339893,0.00007937719,0.0011170337,0.00021070195,0.00009421458,0.0067037907,0.98975986,0.0000136606695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9317602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95798784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06823981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04475787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2290473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32474262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W859336493","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012024","title":"Promises Are Meant to Be Kept: A Case Comment on <i>Attorney General of Canada v. United States Steel Corporation</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Settlement (finance); Law; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Political science; Business; Finance; History","score_opus":0.029152459018214172,"score_gpt":0.23242913859443617,"score_spread":0.203276679576222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W859336493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0759011,0.0068796016,0.0013884704,0.6733613,0.002020592,0.0001349899,0.0005603934,0.00010255299,0.23965101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4721194,0.005053355,0.0011819552,0.4014427,0.0008339348,0.00008290553,0.00018700873,0.000110507535,0.11898826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885521,0.0012052569,0.00030338872,0.0008692436,0.0045068488,0.0045632557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947272,0.0021434815,0.00028663836,0.0001392131,0.0019855145,0.0007180411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005498701,0.0006358818,0.00057412474,0.0010022236,0.0422285,0.010337637,0.0047859806,0.028594531,0.0044634193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01188646,0.0010181702,0.0010467721,0.0020637666,0.010132119,0.0032967676,0.0026026147,0.025216555,0.00056885235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010597146,0.000060533104,0.0054100286,0.00016610709,0.00005786055,0.005570642,0.07230439,0.00090188946,0.0013376956,0.36743787,0.5356926,0.010954389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006213025,0.000052858402,0.009234786,0.00064004504,0.00016276799,0.0010106616,0.08776502,0.0010833327,0.0017519498,0.013396888,0.88447857,0.0003609234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99072486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07938042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07938042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12491747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W956576443","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012025","title":"Judicial Review of Trade Remedy Determinations in Ten User Countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Deference; Law; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.015440811325443286,"score_gpt":0.3102067800768424,"score_spread":0.2947659687513991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W956576443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93754125,0.012582225,0.003172783,0.0022100653,0.00012884467,0.00028044634,0.0002747106,0.00004743625,0.043762308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98780173,0.004701708,0.002800808,0.0008084148,0.000055024757,0.00008688849,0.00017679905,0.000016259051,0.0035524198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594201,0.019350609,0.0047572246,0.0022652654,0.010482007,0.0037247983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84397054,0.10064133,0.024711907,0.006253824,0.022143267,0.0022790863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0314704,0.00022842173,0.00060299254,0.0061679045,0.0041877185,0.0075335708,0.0017938765,0.002769751,0.0009020336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06155745,0.0008705242,0.0006393364,0.009479564,0.004075275,0.002409926,0.0034200586,0.0022301525,0.00016249405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000956686,0.00055041164,0.4416868,0.002564122,0.0006248242,0.009054405,0.07811583,0.013092797,0.009174894,0.12904094,0.014334028,0.3008042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014394033,0.0019783578,0.62623334,0.0025252956,0.0007720918,0.0054188585,0.052595332,0.0073617296,0.01966444,0.011961136,0.27073494,0.0006106124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022032777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043790884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0314704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009342262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009492233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1664334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}