{"meta":{"query_hash":"139a093ac6a2","filters":{"venue":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/139a093ac6a2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Golden+Gate+University+Environmental+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W100749789","doi":"","title":"Seeking a Regulatory Chill in Canada: The Dow Agrosciences NAFTA Chapter 11 Challenge to the Quebec Pesticides Management Code","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pesticide; Code (set theory); Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Business; Engineering; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.006504731875759722,"score_gpt":0.13732589013723487,"score_spread":0.13082115826147514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100749789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98078215,0.000033898286,0.0000022271554,0.01355267,0.00010484169,0.0001425805,0.000027733959,0.000004120402,0.005349765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976958,0.0001595967,0.000010660837,0.0009844019,0.00015363583,5.055964e-7,0.000004000153,7.869234e-7,0.0009906308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991123,0.00007944402,0.00013203105,0.00019272993,0.00019163535,0.00029182504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996447,0.00005261479,0.00009736002,0.000064491505,0.0000034586049,0.00013734997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025370807,0.00012352473,0.00010771846,0.00000970901,0.00087779283,0.0000684077,0.00059652183,0.000027147296,0.00020783229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000016907414,0.000041593143,0.000058205682,0.0000656085,0.000121413585,0.0001461703,0.00022882594,0.00015041053,0.000022786457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026245712,0.00049592496,0.16914925,0.000026597125,0.00030771253,0.0005662079,0.006688941,0.020281427,0.023194028,0.44486472,0.006067314,0.32809544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011097877,0.00004468421,0.66811323,0.000015819773,0.000011929762,0.00003279031,0.004706631,0.0001923803,0.000034299315,0.000114615505,0.32647693,0.00014570751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67573804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49896398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048920745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008866711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67513615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572312099","doi":"","title":"Endless Exemptions: An Environmental Justice Critique of the Ongoing Use of Methyl Bromide","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Bromide; Political science; Environmental planning; Law; Environmental ethics; Environmental science; Chemistry; Organic chemistry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0266353176770829,"score_gpt":0.2704576381486158,"score_spread":0.24382232047153288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572312099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99455166,0.0002678384,0.00034444942,0.00019189686,0.0002645492,0.0002313527,0.00013949651,0.000011594705,0.0039971466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993511,0.003921882,0.0012157235,0.0002843523,0.00012526699,2.5489467e-7,0.000009071743,0.000016225707,0.00091620634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977621,0.0004574939,0.0004003213,0.00021870829,0.00068997394,0.00047139966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987538,0.00026697232,0.0003920511,0.00025526123,0.0000072762855,0.00032464796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009293774,0.00016786293,0.00023513501,0.000088565546,0.0017262808,0.0000376575,0.0005232326,0.00015836727,0.0005931831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024105933,0.00016721566,0.00018164805,0.00009124216,0.0018293693,0.0014776035,0.00020012853,0.0004194922,0.000013632672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014822121,0.005723273,0.32238007,0.0008125815,0.00057677616,0.00056734664,0.09059132,0.0033109281,0.27964535,0.28321445,0.00062695873,0.011068743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019598913,0.00038260125,0.44637996,0.00044305978,0.0010785089,0.00011417928,0.45699686,0.000039149047,0.018172212,0.0005931508,0.07310199,0.00073842827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028841544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060230545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36640555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073412573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046299603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26627860","doi":"10.3168/jds.2015-10039","title":"Understanding Canada's Responses to Citizen Submissions Under the NAAEC","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Citizen science; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental protection; Public administration; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.031956167416580576,"score_gpt":0.21521048315953273,"score_spread":0.18325431574295215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26627860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5483056,0.000015021651,0.002889666,0.05509602,0.0008883074,0.00020727399,0.000039150087,0.000029911726,0.3925291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805334,0.00003848888,0.000108468164,0.0011040766,0.0001303651,1.0541739e-7,0.0000028835575,0.0000053994086,0.018076807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875367,0.00025807047,0.00008840027,0.000111561545,0.0005346107,0.00025366817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994781,0.00015250374,0.000059280195,0.0000672404,0.000009103828,0.00023378656],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045708643,0.000078460886,0.0000681176,0.000045504836,0.0029019767,0.00008578087,0.00038031355,0.000035934296,0.0009239666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019457098,0.00006693573,0.000045515444,0.00007320209,0.00021126629,0.00015544769,0.000097250195,0.00016814856,0.00004179764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010723565,0.000029930645,0.0055189403,9.3213947e-7,0.00007018248,0.00008100553,0.0030000843,0.0003017973,0.00043003962,0.97203195,0.018166646,0.00026125924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037736134,0.000032022162,0.029965641,0.000026937309,0.000022519753,0.000023837185,0.047280256,0.000022422126,0.00009096585,0.005611278,0.91633,0.00021680606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089374796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49885094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96642065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020762212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017366612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125712405","doi":"","title":"Fixing the CEC Submissions Procedure: Are the 2012 Revisions Up to the Task?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Nothing; Scope (computer science); Limiting; Commission; Task (project management); Political science; Process (computing); Task force; Business; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.006038660257412159,"score_gpt":0.17747662463616976,"score_spread":0.1714379643787576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125712405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8399406,0.00027560326,0.00017716021,0.069853246,0.00079692825,0.001405985,0.0001515968,0.00004397198,0.087354906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570016,0.00023976756,0.00006376344,0.0035616257,0.0001859703,0.0000057936786,0.000008065542,0.000020779436,0.038912617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980956,0.00021769023,0.0002272313,0.00027673002,0.0006993735,0.0004834151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894506,0.00012467954,0.00020047877,0.00043351363,0.0000042944985,0.00029198718],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033314098,0.00024516007,0.00013760004,0.00002057844,0.0036112876,0.000179015,0.0013597233,0.00006960641,0.01265102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015053225,0.00012840515,0.0001860946,0.00013930385,0.00078715995,0.00066642096,0.0009481607,0.00058593444,0.005935443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017889042,0.00057713373,0.045103896,0.000013881093,0.00039596803,0.00014952799,0.011845993,0.027679445,0.025950916,0.025833096,0.8537093,0.008561959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023502285,0.000047206668,0.0875021,0.00002756623,0.000051090217,0.0002508371,0.0057467525,0.00013897094,0.0002891641,0.00024571214,0.9052489,0.00021670583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012355772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055931794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11706101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005628791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007683586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99768585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}