{"meta":{"query_hash":"73a9ad089616","filters":{"venue":"Government and Opposition"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73a9ad089616","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Government+and+Opposition"},"results":[{"id":"W1989134319","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00232.x","title":"Electoral System Reviews in New Zealand, Britain and Canada: A Critical Comparison","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Electoral reform; Political science; Public administration; Electoral system; Chose; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.031831723215804596,"score_gpt":0.3348844761503102,"score_spread":0.3030527529345056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989134319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54403704,0.26236287,0.0010123439,0.035743456,0.0032601727,0.0027142703,0.0035179523,0.00007857986,0.14727344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116592,0.06656713,0.0021331857,0.004808279,0.00085974805,0.0011950333,0.0014808507,0.000092227776,0.011204409],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95944476,0.016184168,0.0032629871,0.0010027329,0.017009255,0.0030961256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7644593,0.08824383,0.011619419,0.0034877092,0.12881668,0.003373005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04660169,0.0003864165,0.0012996311,0.032421615,0.008279463,0.007262142,0.0018293007,0.0013038005,0.003390101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14445564,0.0005814271,0.0006621586,0.03792437,0.0040809046,0.0023986925,0.0029955874,0.0016802698,0.00016995973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002563931,0.00031480187,0.14307962,0.028945593,0.0010620496,0.002301178,0.3384564,0.0012188635,0.0018665096,0.0565677,0.11708616,0.30653715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011847572,0.00038019873,0.38200924,0.010370986,0.00068991206,0.00034543782,0.13981305,0.00042963668,0.0007883102,0.0009818878,0.46393514,0.00013771068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91347677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9601005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09220143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08847578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6689713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001585585","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01309.x","title":"Trajectories of Multiculturalism in Germany, the Netherlands and Canada: In Search of Common Patterns","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Political science; Diversity (politics); Normative; Scholarship; Gender studies; Ethnic group; Sociology; Cultural diversity; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.007825438259835863,"score_gpt":0.25062010855781786,"score_spread":0.242794670297982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001585585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957253,0.00027663462,0.00006061009,0.0007371891,0.00000502835,0.000022864904,0.00021629431,0.0000048143297,0.002951383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895155,0.00017397199,0.00009576205,0.00003861009,0.0000010281315,0.000010812663,0.00016309571,0.0000035578423,0.00056149263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800605,0.00032257065,0.00007204879,0.00018062815,0.00044779928,0.0009708567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625874,0.00058108976,0.000636014,0.00015746175,0.0014266698,0.0009400148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023717734,0.00027512194,0.00057085435,0.0036391683,0.0069166394,0.0067663603,0.0015448873,0.0010924018,0.001819213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061149136,0.00035106257,0.00037718637,0.006072504,0.004973569,0.0026516998,0.0060601924,0.001626775,0.00010953512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002941677,0.00015173196,0.5922302,0.00009024119,0.00006538943,0.00054994336,0.3646139,0.0008303481,0.0006021289,0.01109745,0.0017983346,0.027676145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000763684,0.000037309626,0.52885264,0.00009389216,0.000011905648,0.00007713612,0.4648569,0.0007506531,0.00020793629,0.0008901195,0.0041605565,0.000053312033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96610695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97766316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042298913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042298913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03643222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3069015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011897555","doi":"10.1017/gov.2013.5","title":"Increasingly ‘Irrational’ Party Systems: Evidence that There Are Increasingly More Than Two Parties at the District Level","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Irrational number; Incentive; Electoral system; Political science; Third party; Work (physics); Political economy; Economics; Public economics; Public administration; Law; Market economy; Democracy; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.09539787613414794,"score_gpt":0.31770604459293766,"score_spread":0.22230816845878973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011897555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444479,0.0012184998,0.0027867241,0.003500454,0.00007576911,0.00002873198,0.00016812596,0.000020760004,0.04775309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981919,0.00024625642,0.00036553518,0.0003084053,0.00004773412,0.000013186356,0.000118203825,0.000008357397,0.0007005309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730243,0.013705159,0.0015605942,0.0041834447,0.0051462394,0.002380186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8888309,0.047641166,0.035068903,0.014432817,0.009337506,0.004688685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01786615,0.0002331801,0.000656183,0.0030474407,0.004326015,0.006000714,0.0021547382,0.001366788,0.010606862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057133798,0.00052463607,0.0002869843,0.0048724017,0.01095519,0.0057157576,0.0064158775,0.0031314685,0.0015337924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084661914,0.0002592229,0.7173943,0.00082162657,0.00024749638,0.0005353876,0.053014517,0.0004964164,0.0016633355,0.13114898,0.0054406174,0.08813154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001013777,0.00032654728,0.8383535,0.00045318663,0.00010193573,0.0014240615,0.052109405,0.001243615,0.0011807145,0.04551307,0.05910436,0.000088249326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025354102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003952684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01786615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015007427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095368526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094486356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036885288","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00241.x","title":"Comparative Theory and Political Practice: Do We Need a ‘State-Nation’ Model as Well as a ‘Nation-State’ Model?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Polity; Tamil; Nationalism; State (computer science); Political economy; Politics; Nation state; Political science; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Development economics; Economic system; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.037636699372689715,"score_gpt":0.3292813128464965,"score_spread":0.29164461347380677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036885288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050695755,0.027472267,0.15217209,0.3157772,0.0011239275,0.0001775623,0.00019836154,0.00008579603,0.45229712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96683574,0.0036954067,0.022108652,0.003770028,0.00055585144,0.00027028774,0.00007000625,0.000029441464,0.0026645828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97232956,0.024371188,0.00039416857,0.0011326857,0.0012084643,0.0005638318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96066046,0.032913677,0.0012532844,0.0022016098,0.001630061,0.0013408823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023252472,0.00055872777,0.001757219,0.004339093,0.0039350875,0.010161458,0.0033818833,0.004744468,0.009378426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026491543,0.00037375552,0.0006420155,0.0051356894,0.07336749,0.021158008,0.0047975504,0.00509747,0.00050942274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021598064,0.0000071333357,0.000097152195,0.000024392668,0.0000033080905,0.000008136959,0.00033932368,0.00015421759,0.0000034055379,0.99806625,0.00028092516,0.0010136567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071144354,0.0000074405784,0.00016376472,0.00008626939,0.0000016132697,0.000016409074,0.0011307225,0.000663852,0.000009423046,0.99214923,0.005760833,0.0000033116166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036211729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032144655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023252472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012044987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004018768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12297231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042685180","doi":"10.1017/gov.2013.45","title":"Turnout Rates in Closed Party Leadership Primaries: Flash and Fade Out?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Turnout; Political science; Mobilization; Politics; Public relations; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Voting","score_opus":0.06190339563914031,"score_gpt":0.3118154586370956,"score_spread":0.24991206299795526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042685180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903916,0.0002795733,0.0005361588,0.0003762183,0.000019234454,0.000014413594,0.00015564321,0.000027449456,0.008199674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989428,0.000030812982,0.00004635513,0.000025395017,0.000013088313,0.00000645672,0.00007311641,0.0000065606564,0.0008554441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979394,0.00072842865,0.000088417735,0.00037434947,0.00027153225,0.00059797714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97932225,0.009560561,0.0045938664,0.0018821084,0.0013238164,0.003317375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042011864,0.00015100391,0.0005100248,0.002049413,0.0008030881,0.0019709913,0.000739942,0.0007126942,0.012598526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021231275,0.00022762817,0.00028255323,0.000987123,0.0013714293,0.0012251922,0.0021814613,0.0010916933,0.001423805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010479477,0.00042472535,0.9050859,0.000107575936,0.00008078779,0.00024463268,0.0111988885,0.00038859044,0.002631862,0.006900781,0.0019734993,0.0699148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017894332,0.00015624207,0.9904207,0.000032611177,0.000013354275,0.00016075821,0.0042991946,0.00048021734,0.00052202994,0.0018249206,0.0020572694,0.000014798593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033521547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039113685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012598526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070986693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035254212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042146206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051076626","doi":"10.1111/1477-7053.00110","title":"Transformations of Citizenship: The Case of Contemporary Europe","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Destinations; Countdown; Political science; Citizenship; State (computer science); World trade center; Law; Aeronautics; Geography; Engineering; Politics; Tourism; Terrorism; Computer science","score_opus":0.04035592652306282,"score_gpt":0.2620892899939571,"score_spread":0.22173336347089426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051076626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49423376,0.0031409997,0.0010123227,0.023913948,0.00038264733,0.000026814598,0.000029717958,0.000020452844,0.47723928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99148226,0.00037978968,0.000084094645,0.0017956726,0.00006199638,0.000011279318,0.000011509792,0.000013155217,0.0061601666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922042,0.0035308336,0.00014776438,0.0006634699,0.0005217761,0.0029320715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980869,0.00069611496,0.00022125979,0.0002646368,0.00017387282,0.000557258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004728203,0.00032132317,0.00051900477,0.001698504,0.024624847,0.019727554,0.0013511428,0.006234053,0.0057339123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053948355,0.00029675133,0.0007143609,0.0029993097,0.050714914,0.011339085,0.013653247,0.008823003,0.00039805725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002713868,0.000035859768,0.0029084196,0.000017504293,0.000011224264,0.0023137876,0.22153023,0.0001538011,0.000051423354,0.76622933,0.0024606206,0.004260718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039504892,0.00004026078,0.0068516247,0.00023655173,0.000016451308,0.0021098652,0.5084793,0.00040642294,0.00017663342,0.16865715,0.31292346,0.000062718835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03807036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03268253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03807036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009064365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034486644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07569754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084987019","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.00254.x","title":"Refugee Interdiction Before Heaven's Gate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interdiction; Refugee; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Convention; Heaven; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.011625484642988529,"score_gpt":0.25147411909946044,"score_spread":0.23984863445647192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084987019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4970502,0.0012954905,0.0019435586,0.025839912,0.0006201745,0.000049652706,0.0000686073,0.00004093199,0.47309136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98694056,0.00016667401,0.00015300704,0.0008656708,0.000018707995,0.000005635859,0.000010655399,0.0000075046914,0.01183164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986339,0.00043842898,0.000035555397,0.000095394134,0.00014102978,0.0006555708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.0002214537,0.000106659114,0.0000853938,0.00011867927,0.00028810985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009785957,0.0001621585,0.00030345126,0.0004458448,0.012524576,0.0051345495,0.0006614415,0.0016359657,0.011672682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027234373,0.0001232457,0.00023995806,0.000562008,0.008265115,0.002369662,0.007548799,0.004203641,0.0006253097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119503995,0.00007787895,0.0077084396,0.00012526014,0.000020352842,0.004580021,0.1754467,0.00046231542,0.00071078684,0.74952775,0.0256106,0.03561032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003733749,0.00009977166,0.010720245,0.0006154811,0.0000184448,0.0012612399,0.4539872,0.0003992216,0.00079262676,0.06014671,0.47187543,0.000046287292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048896957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13091207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048896957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048312945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006055148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09722471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120152952","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01308.x","title":"The ‘Us’ in Trust: Who Trusts Northern Ireland's Political Institutions and Actors?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Disenchantment; Politics; Faith; Northern ireland; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Geography; Ethnology","score_opus":0.00968360508850861,"score_gpt":0.2651887507142864,"score_spread":0.25550514562577775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120152952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115003,0.00061185914,0.0003383841,0.01452792,0.00007001876,0.000011956347,0.00004693182,0.000010145246,0.072882555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991536,0.00006822685,0.00002040199,0.00013593968,0.0000059886856,0.000001978403,0.000006501178,0.0000021420808,0.0006051775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905974,0.005069556,0.00030195276,0.00036437117,0.001010362,0.002656304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785523,0.0069757714,0.005060705,0.0014487869,0.0036089532,0.0043534776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008380521,0.00009640677,0.000357804,0.0013633156,0.0030529944,0.007607014,0.00082304684,0.00082710205,0.0047915024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024052685,0.00023749619,0.00017762605,0.0015505207,0.007643356,0.004936001,0.0031901833,0.0021005124,0.00035153714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025725382,0.00007438886,0.37681255,0.00012689985,0.00007459616,0.001307168,0.51399964,0.00022034702,0.00049815286,0.04556751,0.012519944,0.048541497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010380146,0.00005306498,0.29144403,0.0003155451,0.000023972747,0.00029726716,0.6614218,0.0004084341,0.00013575038,0.003404509,0.042433076,0.000052205527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19256102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21239701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19256102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012253123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064763417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3828804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167485490","doi":"10.1111/1477-7053.00031","title":"A House for the Future: Debating Second Chamber Reform in the United Kingdom","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Canadian Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Subject matter; Commission; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.022895122157333674,"score_gpt":0.27434429827083817,"score_spread":0.2514491761135045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167485490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16962978,0.09632534,0.0022100925,0.50106806,0.007897484,0.00012287569,0.000117200725,0.00006108226,0.22256806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84841263,0.011389658,0.00094557076,0.05800762,0.00083525584,0.000079708196,0.000047528352,0.000066091576,0.08021596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786245,0.009483701,0.0011121251,0.0014359489,0.003010464,0.006333284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803718,0.010024581,0.0018311099,0.0011668382,0.003801384,0.0028042216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017732952,0.0002807597,0.0005910013,0.0012198386,0.011421187,0.020835295,0.0013345603,0.0122258905,0.0065651014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031702045,0.0005835181,0.00048362082,0.0015578928,0.011506657,0.011331925,0.0076201637,0.0070325965,0.00090511405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020655173,0.000039728337,0.0028835458,0.00036690568,0.000025092217,0.0013439354,0.04248686,0.00044131925,0.0005144037,0.81765956,0.10101124,0.033020854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005297105,0.000079300255,0.0072299656,0.0009355645,0.000020716992,0.00027410573,0.02682724,0.00031225765,0.0007328736,0.022969259,0.94045126,0.00011444584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18981363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2921502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18981363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028872538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022173937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37741756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278227847","doi":"10.1017/gov.2015.21","title":"Rules, Prudence and Public Value: Public Servants and Social Media in Comparative Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Griffith University; University of Tasmania","keywords":"Public value; Social media; Prudence; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Public service; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.09443960022234732,"score_gpt":0.32037004683383485,"score_spread":0.22593044661148753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278227847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3755727,0.0060756705,0.0023353768,0.017294804,0.00015095483,0.000035967452,0.000034266715,0.00000924676,0.5984909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971559,0.0008554064,0.00014653703,0.00023120994,0.000021068547,0.000010633913,0.0000054329807,0.000003682869,0.0015701096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141544,0.0063789794,0.00015094574,0.00025106414,0.0008774465,0.00092614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890689,0.00893167,0.0008067076,0.00031046552,0.00046483663,0.00041744928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006328403,0.00027956362,0.00034953505,0.0045774677,0.008831217,0.014473962,0.0008919223,0.0028869978,0.0043647625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011146237,0.0002400354,0.00019193173,0.0053592073,0.050816774,0.0117921205,0.0047782804,0.0021329923,0.00015010468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020409292,0.000026668436,0.0026300568,0.00007941962,0.0000069558087,0.00036237555,0.21763863,0.0001376786,0.000071773466,0.7704812,0.000769062,0.007775868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011441931,0.000052433337,0.010307431,0.0005111188,0.000014775995,0.00033974322,0.7663352,0.00035823736,0.0001738112,0.13744465,0.084429696,0.00002141562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0249431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031015974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0249431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009849489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071463406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407221944","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.18","title":"A Spiral of Distrust: A Panel Study on the Relation between Political Distrust and Protest Voting in Belgium","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Voting; Politics; Political science; Voting behavior; Proxy voting; Democracy; Political economy; Disapproval voting; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07245837086102822,"score_gpt":0.32102317690925086,"score_spread":0.24856480604822265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407221944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991603,0.00006347839,0.00009419464,0.00007517483,0.0000026942687,0.000005516299,0.0002280901,0.0000017155877,0.0003688131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991372,0.000037766,0.00005959881,0.00002693088,0.000003903737,0.000006585889,0.0004226271,0.0000021923515,0.00030307355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981862,0.0011268981,0.000067287976,0.00017939492,0.00012233552,0.00031800734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956916,0.001670077,0.001222949,0.00039652866,0.00042205624,0.00059675035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002397836,0.00018921393,0.0004000327,0.00094837183,0.0008644838,0.0012245359,0.0004276989,0.00076829444,0.0021939687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00401518,0.00026433056,0.00046630434,0.001366093,0.000530281,0.0006378022,0.0009818213,0.0009739445,0.0004197421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003711928,0.00030902054,0.9887862,0.0000167481,0.00018807109,0.0002328089,0.0040000356,0.00052265835,0.00031878674,0.00020289424,0.0007714588,0.0042802026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007761147,0.00011126562,0.99291635,0.000013627447,0.000032625263,0.000106950654,0.004524816,0.0010222433,0.0001213795,0.00008100862,0.0010470226,0.00001489909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09347335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09347335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011762617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054733973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18585855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473902863","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.22","title":"Understanding Power-Sharing within Political Parties: Stratarchy as Mutual Interdependence between the Party in the Centre and the Party on the Ground","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Autonomy; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Democracy; Public administration; Power sharing; Control (management); Public relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.11187232994491218,"score_gpt":0.32143485534629057,"score_spread":0.20956252540137837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473902863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49946943,0.0017809825,0.160027,0.008289184,0.00009699415,0.00014900567,0.000046717287,0.000043843655,0.33009693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953762,0.00016090213,0.0028968102,0.00006995475,0.00002879094,0.000027432112,0.00000985816,0.0000064166206,0.0014235658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905036,0.006145711,0.0002441636,0.0008681243,0.0013498836,0.000888541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917631,0.00418332,0.0015872354,0.0012470192,0.0005537278,0.000665561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008404374,0.000262795,0.00044306702,0.002843614,0.0042033154,0.008833813,0.0012736699,0.0014083962,0.0037768518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010850004,0.00031681333,0.00054382463,0.002267499,0.04303949,0.011306812,0.0068139564,0.0016756369,0.0003132444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002099393,0.000021696238,0.005408113,0.000044170465,0.000015759804,0.00011097657,0.036056064,0.0009831863,0.00037597568,0.94549006,0.00019528516,0.011277792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022107013,0.000050422997,0.010494344,0.00011536481,0.000015828955,0.00015945642,0.01987251,0.0038576352,0.00027706558,0.94670093,0.018410336,0.000024056464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047362545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038997226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008833813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003924857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033298435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044447124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536572907","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.37","title":"The Career Length and Service of Female Policymakers in the US House of Representatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); House of Representatives; Politics; Political science; Order (exchange); Demographic economics; Service (business); Lower house; Public administration; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economics; Economy; Parliament","score_opus":0.0341518486512592,"score_gpt":0.30495492187811724,"score_spread":0.27080307322685804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536572907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701868,0.0008194507,0.0002870968,0.0047354335,0.00009511621,0.00001978751,0.00047342142,0.000007645204,0.0233752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99039745,0.00033826308,0.000117422285,0.00038263906,0.000055229306,0.000018441002,0.00022114973,0.0000058277083,0.008463448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694985,0.001093359,0.0001083454,0.00019970097,0.0003630018,0.0012857693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908929,0.0021539028,0.0027137154,0.00026783306,0.0011937178,0.0027778812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028222708,0.00010320885,0.00016941059,0.0013708626,0.0026420325,0.001581442,0.00037296768,0.0006321974,0.010708791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011082398,0.00016172134,0.00018268981,0.0011145279,0.0005703051,0.0008645785,0.0010834205,0.0008940767,0.001505436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023916698,0.00021494516,0.8956046,0.00006464376,0.000018090594,0.0003409856,0.021097183,0.00011834195,0.0007189479,0.0055428003,0.0111794155,0.06486084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000860274,0.000111872505,0.92847,0.00010321364,0.000007988212,0.0003611094,0.038122937,0.00021743319,0.00035370386,0.0007264609,0.031501953,0.000014626137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020327268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06261385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020327268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015726374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019529986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04041791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553661545","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.36","title":"Comparing Same-Sex Marriage in Australia and Canada: Institutions and Political Will","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04514752763321838,"score_gpt":0.2827636946839993,"score_spread":0.23761616705078092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553661545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686386,0.000777211,0.00010597856,0.0025040226,0.00002102078,0.000030139232,0.0002944439,0.000003979637,0.027624484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614644,0.0005174517,0.00009264008,0.00020085013,0.0000049473324,0.000009025977,0.00017605686,0.000003827485,0.002848642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968726,0.00032791594,0.000065556174,0.00018174395,0.0009599211,0.0015922587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938545,0.0006843852,0.0009804987,0.00015243147,0.0022347558,0.0020935046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015006942,0.0001313756,0.0003632121,0.0030578063,0.009752457,0.0034749876,0.00091460673,0.0006227084,0.0031968546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007498072,0.00013811469,0.0002619245,0.005217999,0.003264264,0.0010298501,0.0032339718,0.0018382287,0.00014268851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019888554,0.0002336629,0.7599669,0.00008854199,0.00009034094,0.0005673817,0.1139995,0.00066998653,0.00042746484,0.06861912,0.006781661,0.04835653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084243775,0.00003398724,0.8964512,0.00009505894,0.000023227778,0.000081982114,0.08213156,0.00048987503,0.00018033564,0.0013823524,0.019076405,0.000045651857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059170365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059170365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059527367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42931306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573568149","doi":"10.1017/gov.2016.49","title":"When Some Are More Equal than Others: National Parliaments and Intergovernmental Bailout Negotiations in the Eurozone","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Bailout; Creditor; Negotiation; Conditionality; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Political science; Economic and monetary union; Politics; Political economy; European union; International economics; Finance; Financial crisis; Law; Debt; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03835582091798559,"score_gpt":0.3102364109685874,"score_spread":0.27188059005060183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573568149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7124166,0.004418349,0.0018312603,0.028584018,0.0004175056,0.000032635533,0.000028203514,0.000024851019,0.2522466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966017,0.00021082304,0.00010921877,0.0006233169,0.00002651332,0.0000073371866,0.000004519456,0.000004415689,0.0024121485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879873,0.007948487,0.0003417684,0.00060936454,0.0008209011,0.002292111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554884,0.0024983818,0.00080806727,0.00022895882,0.00023188538,0.00068382086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01032082,0.0002346402,0.00057555287,0.001147847,0.0097931195,0.013701613,0.0009267401,0.0049076243,0.0045410693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015053309,0.00035031047,0.00041487577,0.0018310159,0.017771082,0.0065164547,0.009676739,0.0038297374,0.00034423778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018692827,0.000088702865,0.004418027,0.000074835116,0.00002846609,0.0011563336,0.08047633,0.001185952,0.00032037028,0.898827,0.0025655425,0.0106715225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020676531,0.0001586347,0.030150073,0.0005609925,0.00007426102,0.0006208115,0.29512593,0.002119596,0.001023217,0.45726687,0.21257974,0.00011311204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009339636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013944515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013701613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00706708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040008137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054582417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588392528","doi":"10.1111/1477-7053.00073","title":"Fashioning the Fourth Party System: Canada 1993, 1997, 2000","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Telecommunications; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009209941613077175,"score_gpt":0.21663802878926516,"score_spread":0.207428087176188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588392528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5598784,0.0064838687,0.00064675615,0.021604827,0.0004991788,0.0005274184,0.106562056,0.00033167342,0.3034658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7406075,0.0030695125,0.0008552386,0.0017465388,0.00006913115,0.0001705911,0.01914215,0.00013348678,0.23420577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949562,0.00010162172,0.0001005951,0.0001909167,0.002628641,0.0020221085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241567,0.00038782926,0.00076195627,0.00020495408,0.0040309657,0.0021985208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012765026,0.00038580954,0.0006091949,0.0032027436,0.009784199,0.0048510116,0.002623045,0.0013410157,0.014322401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00672989,0.00045566412,0.0004282907,0.012712691,0.0017559438,0.0009959884,0.0016126443,0.0029075837,0.0016466092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007262669,0.00025498949,0.22528529,0.00059137587,0.0001315278,0.00061850273,0.016214387,0.0012540153,0.00055783964,0.048704937,0.5662696,0.13939124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004511498,0.000040229395,0.72288936,0.00013450437,0.00003401997,0.00006649553,0.012208853,0.00035735103,0.00035323834,0.0004180348,0.26341,0.000042806165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14509161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14509161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15619572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99157256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599877171","doi":"10.1017/gov.2017.4","title":"The Ethnic Implications of Preferential Voting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Voting; New guinea; Political science; Political economy; Turnout; Ethnic group; Ballot; Legislature; Instant-runoff voting; Presidential system; Politics; Proportional representation; Demographic economics; Development economics; Split-ticket voting; Economics; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04341300047061069,"score_gpt":0.32623360494908127,"score_spread":0.28282060447847057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599877171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7413149,0.0005032769,0.0042431224,0.005735762,0.0000853773,0.000043003012,0.00021889109,0.000016532986,0.24783921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996552,0.00006415607,0.00024794674,0.00024822901,0.000025394758,0.000011339782,0.000027220316,0.0000050088147,0.0028187581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945766,0.0027007519,0.00023796156,0.00069230725,0.00068381237,0.0011084805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892013,0.0041746637,0.0024047745,0.0022649337,0.0012296451,0.0007245907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005816766,0.00012374808,0.00022795744,0.00060758495,0.0026767128,0.0018416527,0.0006537458,0.0004646808,0.014510425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021655388,0.00014317669,0.00023627658,0.0011556459,0.0037854414,0.0017059832,0.0021382885,0.0010582323,0.00076028355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000934023,0.00012868729,0.39530826,0.00025769914,0.00017228056,0.00052627054,0.017396534,0.0019037701,0.0020446242,0.46082962,0.0046688374,0.115829356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000122059144,0.0002974097,0.6785425,0.0003292421,0.0001551199,0.00072156615,0.03327433,0.0024950088,0.0030688345,0.20315269,0.07778607,0.00005507169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057372493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013682127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014510425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013036596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094769493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0485422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807857558","doi":"10.1017/gov.2018.2","title":"Individual Predictors of the Radical Right-Wing Vote in Europe: A Meta-Analysis of Articles in Peer-Reviewed Journals (1995–2016)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Radical right; Supporter; Politics; Political radicalism; Social psychology; Variable (mathematics); Qualitative comparative analysis; Political science; Psychology; Positive economics; Inclusion (mineral); Feeling; Sociology; Economics; Law; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06812017501792342,"score_gpt":0.32286979901274704,"score_spread":0.2547496239948236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807857558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047690276,0.94818693,0.0005406388,0.0004188974,0.00018345022,0.000059253787,0.0022119028,0.0000131075385,0.000695509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6103759,0.38295847,0.0013566046,0.00082882674,0.0004786444,0.00027461554,0.003191515,0.000059514852,0.0004760128],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861546,0.005225428,0.004245246,0.0021995488,0.0017561478,0.00041900872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91827375,0.0629469,0.012694553,0.0020683394,0.0034323263,0.0005841633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016163046,0.0010178549,0.004391588,0.00908678,0.00046605416,0.003540454,0.0014614159,0.0013922282,0.0029127088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050544277,0.0006932545,0.011942646,0.014854785,0.00073300715,0.0025347858,0.0013131509,0.0010303564,0.0003219033],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026297015,0.000080087026,0.21168575,0.27779776,0.45082268,0.00047516375,0.0010971907,0.00066809205,0.0003235322,0.0008447267,0.0031132936,0.050462082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005150823,0.00042908837,0.31623635,0.083093554,0.580211,0.0008519861,0.0014652447,0.00039285567,0.0005681771,0.0012556608,0.014873608,0.0001073767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002885711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044199517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016163046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091022695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018291363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08547938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885792553","doi":"10.1017/gov.2018.16","title":"Explaining the Paradox of Plebiscites","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Fractionalization; Political science; Political economy; Communism; Ethnic group; Economics; Development economics; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03223531664857217,"score_gpt":0.32080244849620476,"score_spread":0.2885671318476326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885792553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5495395,0.0022965805,0.0073619653,0.055353943,0.0003671937,0.000052702926,0.0002787465,0.00013057642,0.3846188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659234,0.00011276446,0.00013111705,0.0005606071,0.000089020716,0.000010386303,0.000031448442,0.000020720481,0.0024515744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405366,0.0028622148,0.00022975609,0.00081922684,0.00093520334,0.0010999534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96714306,0.019816428,0.005509702,0.0034663565,0.002663312,0.0014011759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007937469,0.00018083333,0.00054189,0.0034783992,0.005649945,0.005184499,0.0012413309,0.0034603588,0.019852094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04938031,0.00029491662,0.00022309621,0.0047112447,0.011448823,0.006686647,0.0071758456,0.0032377387,0.0014956867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022563615,0.00008283846,0.017849784,0.0001539687,0.000032058335,0.00086285826,0.021777978,0.0005836735,0.00035671063,0.9120544,0.016409565,0.02961043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018338783,0.000101687125,0.06372842,0.00040928143,0.000032143835,0.0010441699,0.052079428,0.0034132397,0.00078714563,0.7035023,0.17464599,0.000072722636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003345383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038204363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019852094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028089494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011439234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06641191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891041685","doi":"10.1017/gov.2018.24","title":"Are the Supporters of Populist Parties Loyal Voters? Dissatisfaction and Stable Voting for Populist Parties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Voting; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Mainstream; Political economy; Populism; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02693095725754015,"score_gpt":0.28489232172461537,"score_spread":0.25796136446707524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891041685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984055,0.0000343321,0.000043296655,0.00022664093,0.0000048294896,0.0000022808326,0.000024953468,9.856383e-7,0.0012571624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981314,0.00001130071,0.000007987561,0.000011936508,0.000008480379,8.3698575e-7,0.000023298291,5.513919e-7,0.00012253421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843603,0.00064595934,0.00009859787,0.00016258506,0.00027435538,0.00038249762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97831064,0.009215574,0.007865929,0.00085343997,0.0009157677,0.0028387168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002570016,0.00011935181,0.00033803922,0.001478956,0.0010422658,0.0018651152,0.00040744455,0.0008365808,0.008650019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014852711,0.00013354322,0.0003591743,0.0013599596,0.0013960793,0.0007146758,0.0009876475,0.0011248345,0.00057123834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017540122,0.00006757729,0.9953181,0.000007937799,0.000036414072,0.00005980448,0.00063882704,0.00005081134,0.00013132335,0.00039004278,0.00011750213,0.0030062867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005283954,0.000060896207,0.99608827,0.000005264222,0.0000130679755,0.00005862371,0.0030347584,0.00024539905,0.00007009731,0.00022800291,0.00018700106,0.0000034149332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028974959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035286576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008650019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036482056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002873706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028937161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891482158","doi":"10.1017/gov.2018.22","title":"Heir Apparent Prime Ministers in Westminster Democracies: Promise and Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Prime (order theory); Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Narrative; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013980922155688585,"score_gpt":0.25760329950747324,"score_spread":0.24362237735178466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891482158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433635,0.00034711926,0.00009861004,0.004156097,0.00006204229,0.0000124785065,0.00004205829,0.00001191422,0.051906057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953258,0.000085856205,0.000030896386,0.0000891006,0.000013917251,0.000002390177,0.000010817802,0.000003737848,0.0044374587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940048,0.002591514,0.00016704011,0.00041020312,0.00082591746,0.0020005272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873214,0.003186381,0.0021127923,0.0006405684,0.0010945292,0.0056444868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009016542,0.00018609015,0.0003784403,0.0011479334,0.0048667546,0.006863196,0.0006200372,0.0008851312,0.007638352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02080722,0.0002703281,0.00015077658,0.0015768771,0.0060737096,0.0022678368,0.0050520226,0.002620738,0.0012056574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00181559,0.0007542673,0.36927995,0.0002889445,0.00009016637,0.0012057594,0.31985706,0.00077722536,0.0023261788,0.18146057,0.018087557,0.104056805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011140871,0.00075235206,0.63485444,0.00025297076,0.000045600813,0.0003995624,0.24242924,0.00077775744,0.0022437053,0.011595207,0.10641835,0.000119353805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025466183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07568795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025466183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060080932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036706093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050635874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902227858","doi":"10.1017/gov.2018.42","title":"Polarization, Partisan Preferences and Strategic Voting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Polarization (electrochemistry); Favourite; Democracy; Split-ticket voting; Disapproval voting; Political science; Business; Politics; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04953073866635433,"score_gpt":0.3131723197187145,"score_spread":0.2636415810523602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902227858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904054,0.00005208955,0.0005680326,0.00013266236,0.0000038902454,0.000009085847,0.00007423679,0.000002749898,0.008751826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960953,0.000019638026,0.000052037,0.000009382676,0.0000035146738,0.0000021248647,0.000035168854,7.6171324e-7,0.00026783659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861324,0.0006612668,0.000037482612,0.000113346265,0.0002879852,0.00028669072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913803,0.0041868105,0.0022578537,0.00052570546,0.00077414134,0.0008752228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021841044,0.00012640345,0.00026877687,0.0009615967,0.0012127247,0.0015967337,0.00019979617,0.00033156996,0.0052059074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009667112,0.00010309052,0.00018178952,0.0011656559,0.0011607447,0.00050489005,0.00072507345,0.0006046598,0.00037333494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003090727,0.00020837912,0.9649889,0.000032949112,0.00010895697,0.00008801199,0.0015834661,0.0018910354,0.0011661396,0.010735404,0.0006121163,0.018275635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016885637,0.000071151684,0.98292494,0.000016698845,0.000030782965,0.000084164974,0.0023341877,0.0026012894,0.00042725465,0.009572589,0.0019059301,0.000014053768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017798461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025815384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017798461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089557294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007035885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03538972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904227296","doi":"10.1017/gov.2018.47","title":"Government Responsiveness under Majoritarian and (within) Proportional Electoral Systems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Veto; Ideology; Incentive; Conceptualization; Congruence (geometry); Economics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Subsidy; Public economics; Political economy; Public administration; Microeconomics; Market economy; Politics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.028121222792013307,"score_gpt":0.3058562451434821,"score_spread":0.2777350223514688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904227296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892485,0.000028028699,0.00024112518,0.00021703615,0.0000047610515,0.000009261732,0.000114029564,0.0000055761157,0.010131666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951255,0.0000063688503,0.00002476412,0.000010199109,0.000003754344,0.000004230029,0.000042212174,0.00000123414,0.00039465298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968094,0.0015145749,0.00014250554,0.00032828064,0.0003123851,0.00089277636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938008,0.0025982163,0.0018389636,0.0004888212,0.0005635405,0.0007095721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003589311,0.00013754993,0.00042246014,0.001027776,0.0007557451,0.0021444785,0.0003536194,0.00039381935,0.00812615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009323484,0.00010829692,0.00030590722,0.0014676899,0.0014933129,0.001035507,0.002116218,0.0006158453,0.00061397435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003385419,0.0006733757,0.747552,0.000259961,0.00036800737,0.0007151659,0.014645724,0.028994374,0.004654104,0.14386001,0.0043035974,0.05058821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015374944,0.00076988,0.914261,0.000055318138,0.00009081518,0.00017910055,0.026229577,0.013885006,0.0018485168,0.029607736,0.012864012,0.0000552818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003945673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055667036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019328402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007372129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027184665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926092690","doi":"10.1017/gov.2019.7","title":"Autocracies and the Control of Societal Organizations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Authoritarianism; Political science; Dissent; Politics; State (computer science); Political economy; Public relations; Civil society; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.004550526733634205,"score_gpt":0.2333918182546156,"score_spread":0.2288412915209814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926092690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80512077,0.00074897317,0.011810965,0.004769197,0.00003264131,0.00004059458,0.000025686712,0.000034360623,0.17741679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.000034042576,0.00011681614,0.000034857218,0.000004999992,0.0000033897907,0.0000022243155,0.0000011379494,0.00033414474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957638,0.0026843667,0.00012399167,0.00047135894,0.00054168655,0.00041480025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888603,0.0054268767,0.0029547429,0.0013254078,0.00071869715,0.00071392587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045431284,0.0001926183,0.00019100867,0.0014945029,0.002186631,0.00397264,0.0005866222,0.00077062467,0.0040961537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006208934,0.00015354702,0.00018968395,0.0007875046,0.021860136,0.0019017129,0.0035651,0.000971522,0.00016251668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049643095,0.0000973694,0.014101184,0.000076058204,0.000041937445,0.00013888323,0.02357449,0.003050802,0.0012747652,0.936975,0.0007150212,0.019904919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008313571,0.00015939506,0.033431306,0.0002950519,0.000037469024,0.00021812541,0.02899929,0.010438186,0.0018804527,0.8768666,0.04754363,0.000047344914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002372773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022619609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045431284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002574169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001799884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024026632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959654772","doi":"10.1017/gov.2019.20","title":"The Evolution of Party Policy and Cleavage Voting under Power-Sharing in Northern Ireland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Bristol; Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Voting; Cleavage (geology); Moderation; Political economy; Political science; Politics; Nationalism; Survey data collection; Power (physics); Public administration; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.007185675641059313,"score_gpt":0.2432322234350543,"score_spread":0.23604654779399498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959654772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98927885,0.000050074425,0.00005735671,0.00021701527,0.000005330519,0.0000058090145,0.00016456693,0.0000035749138,0.010217481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980557,0.000019653535,0.000021770149,0.000020911204,0.0000041508893,0.0000051853717,0.00012452492,0.0000036206843,0.0017444195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977943,0.00058397715,0.00010368769,0.0002752852,0.0003332136,0.0009096424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413353,0.0013933362,0.002122424,0.00051765784,0.0011762937,0.0006567033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032022656,0.00008057244,0.00039231637,0.0010962037,0.0007268279,0.0019047408,0.0005498097,0.00034070597,0.005993324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504268,0.00012524553,0.0002732625,0.0014356237,0.0015398939,0.0007780215,0.001927183,0.0008289101,0.0008584465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082638103,0.00008501359,0.9279821,0.000079598874,0.0000709151,0.0002811321,0.027541688,0.0011722555,0.0013185842,0.005012804,0.0028852841,0.032744326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004889132,0.000037614926,0.9882195,0.000021572007,0.000005110351,0.000018443054,0.008472659,0.00019088469,0.00011037554,0.00021275826,0.0026942969,0.000011810388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16395994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23013242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16395994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063759047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001629097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32601112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985465754","doi":"10.1017/gov.2019.29","title":"Not All Experience is Created Equal: MP Career Typologies and Ministerial Appointments in the Canadian House of Commons, 1968–2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Cabinet (room); Politics; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Legislator; Public administration; Political science; CONTEST; Legislative assembly; Law; Sociology; Legislation; Engineering; Parliament","score_opus":0.07870929433170597,"score_gpt":0.3399379774672925,"score_spread":0.2612286831355865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985465754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96071774,0.00069107214,0.00034334767,0.0022875692,0.000049723818,0.000033631954,0.0015623079,0.000014540398,0.034300096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962747,0.0001320446,0.00010293475,0.000057206646,0.000006986551,0.000009867088,0.0002799888,0.0000073980896,0.003128858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968381,0.00035175838,0.00009541366,0.00021860763,0.0009960573,0.0015000394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906625,0.0010847935,0.0013562933,0.0003330576,0.0029809428,0.0035823376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029058245,0.00017680008,0.0002961592,0.0048660915,0.008747939,0.0038975838,0.0012058326,0.00044871282,0.006646434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010936497,0.00019258745,0.0002475343,0.007555696,0.005023702,0.0012580035,0.0037816346,0.0011770586,0.00035612175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026518985,0.000063839725,0.5764965,0.0001995293,0.00004228588,0.0003907155,0.2975958,0.00049752695,0.00057623937,0.04355281,0.01975311,0.060566474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005581428,0.000018573044,0.76255596,0.00019721348,0.000008728294,0.00008964253,0.18220526,0.00029681312,0.00018047725,0.001245486,0.05315292,0.000043336062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04854734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042796385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35223728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107779161","doi":"10.1017/gov.2020.27","title":"Does Class Shape Legislators’ Approach to Inequality and Economic Policy? A Comparative View","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Political science; Salient; Politics; Class (philosophy); Economic inequality; Survey data collection; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06400878255253502,"score_gpt":0.3324332499841828,"score_spread":0.2684244674316478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107779161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362755,0.0013382311,0.0005116628,0.0043365513,0.000054670294,0.000009303949,0.00006230481,0.0000040567907,0.05740784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876714,0.00019793208,0.000030431345,0.00018412879,0.000025372517,0.0000035097266,0.000013521584,0.000002731025,0.000775379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652207,0.001905272,0.00006974222,0.00024268181,0.00043809388,0.000822104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947425,0.0024631135,0.0013689682,0.0002729346,0.0004140544,0.0007384121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036985644,0.00008001541,0.0003077812,0.0022620524,0.0024074307,0.0042469315,0.00040726532,0.00069438585,0.008223363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007058891,0.00013230652,0.0002815196,0.00158288,0.00396234,0.0020188496,0.0021071706,0.0010272885,0.0003163072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000325356,0.00033961496,0.6536927,0.00016142367,0.0001908921,0.00031800772,0.13511793,0.00037490416,0.0010308941,0.14786784,0.0023082367,0.05827216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025304276,0.00015195487,0.8724172,0.00029076103,0.00006124988,0.00011390275,0.09013106,0.00047831482,0.0003579421,0.007863406,0.028080031,0.000028784518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009303176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016150054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009303176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018602401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009509637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027509868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125226240","doi":"10.1017/gov.2014.28","title":"Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Accountability; Politics; Executive power; Power sharing; Political science; Public administration; Northern ireland; Political economy; Comparative politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.019535806035951484,"score_gpt":0.25253052521213426,"score_spread":0.23299471917618278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125226240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32895502,0.0026244037,0.0012988729,0.12246969,0.00043569697,0.00007638517,0.0003786098,0.00013448374,0.54362684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98496,0.00033761814,0.00025220864,0.0025074414,0.000085856074,0.000026889707,0.000084172745,0.000042315187,0.011703533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880242,0.0032686426,0.00045369938,0.0012966632,0.002093903,0.004862821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807568,0.004151799,0.0030113203,0.0026968494,0.0052396036,0.0041436977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010675315,0.00014443329,0.00036974714,0.0024313119,0.0051273154,0.01654565,0.001639578,0.0023896713,0.013165847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028186655,0.00041319558,0.00035745028,0.0023854077,0.017089995,0.008428123,0.0052453317,0.0025293494,0.0016979058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031468095,0.000057440597,0.05147583,0.00041143617,0.00005551285,0.0006868671,0.04801047,0.00090641517,0.0007225662,0.7677831,0.05745089,0.07212473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013872092,0.00013255348,0.21009384,0.00080482336,0.000040382176,0.0003977039,0.11295898,0.0007823812,0.0007941443,0.11616968,0.5575304,0.00015644348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13241264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16473784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13241264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0357501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016639851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26328385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132948749","doi":"10.1017/gov.2021.4","title":"The Perception of the Legitimacy of Citizens’ Assemblies in Deeply Divided Places? Evidence of Public and Elite Opinion from Consociational Northern Ireland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Elite; Legitimacy; Ideology; Public opinion; Political science; Politics; Perception; Power (physics); Public relations; Public administration; Deadlock; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.027912934764363413,"score_gpt":0.28296196411758484,"score_spread":0.25504902935322143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132948749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98790085,0.00006908428,0.000054112512,0.0007650678,0.0000123308055,0.0000056478234,0.000018691388,0.0000018582853,0.0111723365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936634,0.000029209517,0.0000123247,0.000108291526,0.000007853827,0.000004716493,0.0000121571475,0.0000021654844,0.00045694184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876639,0.006177796,0.0006356784,0.000696581,0.0019205549,0.0029054931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94752,0.026892148,0.01140281,0.0028718598,0.0062195538,0.0050935354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016770663,0.00022388334,0.0006503756,0.0025709611,0.004482461,0.0075813294,0.0011280451,0.0015377991,0.0063617616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034369987,0.000461603,0.0003073062,0.0020190284,0.011117006,0.0025099623,0.00521138,0.002569175,0.000616951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005700215,0.00016217129,0.3645758,0.00016851522,0.00007832278,0.00069072424,0.6096854,0.00015350585,0.001014903,0.0049577015,0.0018512129,0.016091764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020996566,0.000111303314,0.27496785,0.00018080912,0.000019204921,0.00009352909,0.7160554,0.00017658007,0.00022043122,0.0007246047,0.0073787523,0.00005061193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08417452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089079574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08417452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006921967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026967993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16736913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174464826","doi":"10.1017/gov.2021.24","title":"Democratic Accountability in Times of Crisis: Executive Power, Fiscal Policy and COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Pandemic; Public administration; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Power (physics); Political economy; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.017950049746003463,"score_gpt":0.2524046131058348,"score_spread":0.23445456335983134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174464826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.960079,0.0003283654,0.00028105083,0.0051155393,0.000034202512,0.000019117924,0.00015707337,0.000007886693,0.0339777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933344,0.00006241935,0.000034563644,0.000060725273,0.000009653809,0.0000031363218,0.000025516469,0.0000015722751,0.00046898707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995522,0.0016070555,0.00018082738,0.00013189678,0.0009151235,0.0016431047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97150415,0.0062614265,0.014144093,0.0005142815,0.0037601194,0.003816034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058258423,0.00018321768,0.00032494072,0.001595347,0.0015099326,0.0043291007,0.00029214862,0.0006125674,0.0027532617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02550708,0.00009349771,0.00018638902,0.0024646197,0.0037960296,0.0022774162,0.0023853942,0.001509816,0.00023765747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005147599,0.00028065458,0.9057945,0.000110446825,0.000103148435,0.00041291435,0.010957223,0.0070224935,0.00035875427,0.040019628,0.0065420456,0.0278835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019812556,0.00013488493,0.9655536,0.00008810063,0.00002259614,0.00005349161,0.016918426,0.0024868508,0.000323235,0.0069505097,0.0074143503,0.00003414522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08807575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119119786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08807575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060115224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1751262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205308555","doi":"10.1017/gov.2021.31","title":"Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right: Creating the Hating?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Partenariat Canadien Contre Le Cancer; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Antipathy; Populism; Ingroups and outgroups; Radical right; Mainstream; Psychological nativism; Political economy; Outgroup; Polarization (electrochemistry); Politics; Political science; Comparative politics; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.006457773810337772,"score_gpt":0.2462640474888826,"score_spread":0.23980627367854482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205308555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98657435,0.00008330478,0.0003858603,0.0003771419,0.00001308749,0.0000048759493,0.000020892378,0.0000019438965,0.012538494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.000018312607,0.000029586876,0.00003826439,0.000006187998,0.000001249523,0.000006470307,9.5161926e-7,0.0001791328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989967,0.00052130624,0.000023393857,0.00008504821,0.00017034147,0.00020331462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965522,0.001151979,0.0011920508,0.00024052673,0.00028506437,0.0005780919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011846573,0.00013237858,0.00020897533,0.00066845573,0.0011306803,0.0019997263,0.00016156828,0.00037594806,0.004628378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038853956,0.00012159602,0.00017517857,0.00048215684,0.0022619953,0.0007248545,0.0018083518,0.00095289055,0.00025248723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006350963,0.00043738133,0.9183944,0.00011191154,0.00010596976,0.00055642234,0.01511804,0.00028297005,0.0069025387,0.018336128,0.00084641424,0.03827276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012976336,0.00011241211,0.96762365,0.000039927487,0.000023676384,0.00018970802,0.020936398,0.00039897993,0.0008288702,0.0065956837,0.0032211926,0.000016655751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091393595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013484458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004628378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043212244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030213746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015483499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232828391","doi":"10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.00257.x","title":"Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Refugee; Sovereignty; Political science; Forced migration; Politics; International relations; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Immigration","score_opus":0.010903282966089651,"score_gpt":0.2356163508608572,"score_spread":0.22471306789476755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232828391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015782908,0.006008021,0.003171636,0.039387457,0.056373555,0.000254628,0.007848913,0.0014069125,0.8839705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009269749,0.004344234,0.0016849844,0.009366446,0.010256783,0.00017937191,0.0071838424,0.0006099622,0.9571048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987232,0.00014102088,0.000082702114,0.00028471978,0.00060250063,0.00016569842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977837,0.00025809254,0.000097281634,0.0002588498,0.0012016167,0.00040043867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010485447,0.0008166085,0.0006511832,0.001624888,0.0019815613,0.006778818,0.0016031205,0.0027648243,0.551268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041574063,0.0002928737,0.0006755444,0.0015078606,0.0006654169,0.003677714,0.003069059,0.0026708192,0.36825794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031402127,0.00002741874,0.00026257872,0.0001706442,0.0000030339463,0.00006819557,0.00023771245,0.000057293728,0.00019991696,0.011428841,0.90519893,0.08231405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023324826,0.000007813215,0.0002515645,0.000093639865,0.0000010208265,0.000035232588,0.00011448437,0.000014946216,0.00004425445,0.001278931,0.9981527,0.0000031574746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032779316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002708132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44873202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017684106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025145796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64006174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236460187","doi":"10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00019","title":"Being Canadian","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Immigration; National identity; Gender studies; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Collective identity; State (computer science); Political economy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.005331334454256007,"score_gpt":0.1874356883091478,"score_spread":0.1821043538548918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236460187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034178555,0.0030730616,0.00045787654,0.04779752,0.0014452346,0.00003091269,0.0004211749,0.000034994948,0.91256064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68698937,0.0039619952,0.00059109577,0.01639812,0.00021815531,0.000028377466,0.00029626765,0.000059528287,0.29145718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965593,0.00031460013,0.000044027965,0.00035022825,0.0011542105,0.0015775587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977187,0.00012760039,0.000094566465,0.00007315465,0.0009833662,0.001002705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012441996,0.00027803017,0.00028166806,0.0012938405,0.028979743,0.008689053,0.00079426856,0.0014984795,0.030621588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023402972,0.0001301951,0.00024629483,0.0024259998,0.008409012,0.002180132,0.0030419147,0.0026830214,0.001849673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027533391,0.00002080503,0.006393304,0.00006931188,0.000009506941,0.00040399452,0.07795622,0.00009377172,0.00051019405,0.6130167,0.2539046,0.047593974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018374088,0.0000058354376,0.0032174652,0.00006542879,0.000004817826,0.00015344002,0.02804084,0.000020384567,0.00008361028,0.0032200392,0.9651684,0.000017911254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9531732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9701882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048194613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048194613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06572789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34967804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289523079","doi":"10.1017/gov.2022.26","title":"What Do We Know about Power Sharing after 50 Years?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; McGill University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Operationalization; Power (physics); Power sharing; Redress; Political science; Boom; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Data sharing; Positive economics; Public relations; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010770266477159313,"score_gpt":0.26354843678824,"score_spread":0.25277817031108074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289523079","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0999045,0.8023045,0.0026684322,0.061906736,0.0028500338,0.00004343075,0.0026332086,0.00003254147,0.027656619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71986187,0.26713914,0.00068088254,0.006802488,0.002441473,0.00009218558,0.0012867512,0.00004645884,0.0016487585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949785,0.0018774328,0.0005425276,0.0010260533,0.001060119,0.00051528955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94096404,0.040685322,0.009186175,0.0020014856,0.0050881687,0.0020747406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009700453,0.0003128579,0.0010406654,0.004809917,0.0012333808,0.0065776617,0.0008750228,0.0014430473,0.010270332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06037622,0.00024389445,0.00076228625,0.008703848,0.003400571,0.009670664,0.0020708072,0.0025391828,0.0009824772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046017542,0.00012433478,0.07356792,0.020195236,0.0009885159,0.0005771662,0.031013066,0.000964507,0.00028474658,0.08760934,0.03927722,0.74493784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000541109,0.00030052222,0.20096771,0.06181554,0.0008165521,0.00157118,0.05342641,0.0006745771,0.00062844105,0.113157265,0.56635433,0.00023341613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041509597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004202278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010270332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002158619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042056656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05130148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292371224","doi":"10.1017/gov.2022.31","title":"Gendering Cabinet Reshuffles in France and Spain","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Case Western Reserve University","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Praise; Parity (physics); Prestige; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Economics; History; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.016385403054839338,"score_gpt":0.26527322858850616,"score_spread":0.2488878255336668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292371224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889283,0.00025979703,0.0001983314,0.00035751812,0.000019043018,0.000015618012,0.000054221044,0.000015736934,0.010151512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681073,0.000035065666,0.000080852384,0.000025973863,0.000007434159,0.0000044156004,0.000024408377,0.0000049091645,0.003006108],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976822,0.00086707686,0.000041890467,0.00024277582,0.00027968385,0.0008863752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956631,0.0016282158,0.0010570526,0.00039379625,0.00050410995,0.000753708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032155092,0.00018855171,0.0002876801,0.0012142869,0.0030477145,0.002192975,0.00066659495,0.000942965,0.00666535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053862818,0.00016149221,0.00020955497,0.0010368293,0.002557138,0.00085847883,0.0017685377,0.0007745816,0.00047813586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025612959,0.0006794403,0.32570618,0.0003129986,0.00006366877,0.004505508,0.37576514,0.00227351,0.010753834,0.05392039,0.009924355,0.21353367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042624757,0.00039672642,0.6317425,0.00013800284,0.000010571741,0.00046897546,0.26393008,0.000818742,0.0015001749,0.0029877564,0.0979054,0.000058486377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023167657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043004084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023167657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005402299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012533076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04606563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367844743","doi":"10.1017/gov.2023.11","title":"Age Inequalities in Political Representation: A Review Article","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Representation (politics); Politics; Globe; Harm; Voting; Appeal; Political science; Youth studies; Inequality; Population; Political economy; Youth work; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.19933664008814792,"score_gpt":0.440573765484275,"score_spread":0.2412371253961271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367844743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012454955,0.9993316,0.000013427334,0.00015584353,0.0000926479,0.0000014532102,0.000013020711,8.585716e-7,0.00026668387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001462518,0.99826056,0.00001740259,0.00008379909,0.00009068588,0.0000027041624,0.000012513307,4.4058774e-7,0.00006936801],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942976,0.00017091059,0.00009522692,0.00010979005,0.00014554142,0.00004873609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790335,0.0015670075,0.00025799725,0.0000236737,0.00019162326,0.000056272216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010309048,0.000651624,0.0016348291,0.0029672186,0.00035106472,0.0016298044,0.00049281586,0.0010515847,0.0063019665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003605437,0.00027374853,0.0009145649,0.0048711766,0.00059766136,0.0011465717,0.00086537685,0.0010956383,0.00066761853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251547,0.00006121307,0.0013103624,0.14136365,0.0005899288,0.00012079454,0.00038161676,0.00027603682,0.00024132163,0.0075840666,0.026511101,0.82143474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033060314,0.00014069828,0.012915524,0.20740129,0.0024063431,0.0010773026,0.0008325197,0.00010653706,0.0002528457,0.004733148,0.77004904,0.000051595398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037796895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060438714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063019665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089756504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025602437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021082163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381621458","doi":"10.1017/gov.2023.15","title":"Sour Grapes? Party Donors and Canadian Leadership Primaries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Citizen journalism; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Campaign finance; Public relations; Donation; Primary election; Public administration; Political economy; General election; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0813351665506467,"score_gpt":0.29627732061449924,"score_spread":0.21494215406385253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381621458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96073747,0.0004947806,0.00018612393,0.0033307548,0.00007311804,0.000031507352,0.006016543,0.000021401605,0.029108394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324566,0.00016090891,0.000083883366,0.00013174964,0.000017600945,0.000008076857,0.0013835379,0.0000060101893,0.0049625468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858165,0.00013852352,0.000027575437,0.00015998824,0.00038259174,0.00070966367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946538,0.00054094754,0.0011591912,0.00024952515,0.0013967056,0.0019998588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015228043,0.00016576496,0.00037815183,0.0015680991,0.0047764597,0.0030738392,0.0007600355,0.00036003377,0.011285089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076549347,0.00010704413,0.00020263752,0.0035693422,0.0009610183,0.0005514898,0.0014888097,0.001032749,0.0007033304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013453407,0.00005753915,0.9494578,0.000034689285,0.000029232235,0.00008653819,0.0032925524,0.00017395646,0.00007694649,0.0037839767,0.023519885,0.019352354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022761122,0.000019510995,0.9419319,0.00007649654,0.000028660852,0.0000608194,0.016955022,0.0007051447,0.00017869832,0.00082004844,0.0391759,0.000025048528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96648896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98421174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033511043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015647981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017240563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11353457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382982164","doi":"10.1017/gov.2023.18","title":"From Gender Equity to Gendered Assignments? Women and Cabinet Committees in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Prestige; Equity (law); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06107540725994532,"score_gpt":0.3109236506352062,"score_spread":0.2498482433752609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382982164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92578316,0.0020551777,0.00030519578,0.007630189,0.000085891144,0.00005796447,0.00056409853,0.000020764339,0.063497595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151003,0.00040102724,0.00009699262,0.00046413243,0.000008974949,0.0000112270245,0.00010920867,0.000014592699,0.007383825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873553,0.0017289391,0.0002757111,0.00082644605,0.00347251,0.0063411435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819901,0.0031641107,0.0022802956,0.0004817146,0.0052079437,0.0068758884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004765825,0.00030470797,0.00066487456,0.003754668,0.01721593,0.008441391,0.0017297784,0.0012749096,0.006359028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013768481,0.0004939592,0.00031252345,0.0074235997,0.010864517,0.0015905065,0.0044492097,0.0017172251,0.00045781425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007454613,0.00011752877,0.42391628,0.00041039143,0.00012297356,0.0031590625,0.37743333,0.0015170017,0.0020927496,0.064182065,0.03902606,0.087277055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027827597,0.00004541671,0.5027374,0.00047118188,0.000030240899,0.0002429285,0.3680621,0.00048473512,0.0007421368,0.0014365446,0.12559846,0.00012101932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12611234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12611234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0978898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9150134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399294982","doi":"10.1017/gov.2024.11","title":"Political Dynasties in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economic history; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013388273500861515,"score_gpt":0.26903310015362264,"score_spread":0.2556448266527611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399294982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96441424,0.0012565077,0.00014992668,0.0015019343,0.000038366496,0.000039337134,0.012644341,0.000030224288,0.019925216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99224937,0.0005728506,0.00009470536,0.000103766004,0.000008585968,0.000018059689,0.0030379174,0.000009823032,0.0039048148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976725,0.00015269926,0.00007948783,0.00024981934,0.00063978636,0.001205754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947929,0.00045648572,0.0011236259,0.00017262135,0.0021297596,0.0013245819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010789246,0.00019311592,0.00045770057,0.0042594722,0.0059788334,0.0028687664,0.0009334823,0.0003725844,0.0051634014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048289313,0.00025397132,0.00030731794,0.012296361,0.0012796859,0.0005131261,0.0018495859,0.001063135,0.00035816373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091657734,0.00003693706,0.9295512,0.00010509843,0.000066526794,0.00022150553,0.024540627,0.00036785373,0.00032343407,0.005905282,0.013158784,0.025631098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040632262,0.00000774528,0.95239115,0.00006251439,0.000013790321,0.00005176016,0.0131882895,0.00030857997,0.000112326576,0.00016871272,0.033669677,0.000021227665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04861992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04861992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06450408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35276383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412842972","doi":"10.1017/gov.2025.8","title":"To Oppose or Not to Oppose? Strategies of Opposition Parties’ Parliamentary Support for Government Legislation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Legislation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Political economy; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.041194948462139495,"score_gpt":0.3584735898867201,"score_spread":0.3172786414245806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412842972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682444,0.00007745857,0.00051494903,0.00036392635,0.000010991337,0.000008517693,0.000019471401,0.0000028391862,0.030757483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990145,0.000018803477,0.000051018138,0.000018441808,0.0000025062316,0.0000028694267,0.000009460745,0.0000014260287,0.000880898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809676,0.0009337856,0.00006463189,0.0001513356,0.00029170534,0.0004617978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578613,0.0018650176,0.0012211608,0.0001826082,0.00041463273,0.00053045235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024556594,0.00008707906,0.00021455156,0.001245129,0.0017260228,0.0025029571,0.00033345103,0.00048157788,0.0049755652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007470742,0.00009848792,0.00017458778,0.00094104465,0.0016795947,0.0008565403,0.0017706772,0.0007783537,0.00047152728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007247663,0.0003361512,0.70968914,0.00018374292,0.00013815504,0.0011714795,0.11234194,0.00095352123,0.0059994706,0.0774361,0.0026236868,0.08840186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036605725,0.00021395685,0.7684267,0.00012645962,0.00004875453,0.00062543724,0.1644239,0.002127637,0.0014731815,0.012657457,0.049785122,0.000054830827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004448912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0098073855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049755652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010362392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072910433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016644895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}