{"meta":{"query_hash":"b6ff2d5093ac","filters":{"venue":"Griffith Law Review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b6ff2d5093ac","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Griffith+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2496543964","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2016.1203499","title":"Judging gender in tort thresholds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.0708364353783264,"score_gpt":0.36428694832983216,"score_spread":0.29345051295150576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496543964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70563865,0.0013629105,0.044709474,0.0059250956,0.00044988547,0.00059869373,0.00022261414,0.000085804444,0.24100697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929126,0.00010720453,0.003942394,0.00025766421,0.0000437694,0.0001057582,0.00003652923,0.000022666809,0.0025713253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523995,0.027503196,0.0020675457,0.002562649,0.013654726,0.0018123089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86529297,0.09384151,0.012584822,0.0048671933,0.021355784,0.0020576706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038129453,0.00046225093,0.0004942648,0.0057154805,0.004134791,0.007970605,0.0017661847,0.0015572646,0.013051232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17441273,0.00043276578,0.00040346273,0.0023993899,0.013703676,0.0071050753,0.0053340723,0.0018022071,0.000856353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008344459,0.00029323794,0.12656498,0.0004691192,0.00005740124,0.00083405804,0.20451593,0.0019966145,0.005691132,0.4656184,0.008579529,0.1845452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000760909,0.00072124775,0.2647443,0.0020909521,0.00011518392,0.00076030457,0.15970498,0.01932289,0.018187443,0.44577768,0.0882436,0.0002553311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059268284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075626504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038129453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008883212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002657205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2016502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121459830","doi":"","title":"Copyright, heritage and Australian Aboriginal art","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Appropriation; Law; Cultural heritage; Indigenous; Value (mathematics); Copyright Act; Legislation; Painting; Project commissioning; Sociology; Publishing; Warrant; Public domain; Copyright law; Intellectual property; History; Political science; Creativity; Economics","score_opus":0.01919140892356689,"score_gpt":0.24854930568423664,"score_spread":0.22935789676066975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121459830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29311627,0.02896515,0.0009792325,0.026559781,0.00046148003,0.00004584699,0.000025603524,0.000021720663,0.64982504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94701844,0.011094871,0.0005887114,0.001195383,0.00020829386,0.000027185986,0.000009838041,0.0000117813315,0.03984547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996603,0.0016088726,0.00019606286,0.0002255239,0.00090852164,0.00045803544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937617,0.0041346084,0.00070058793,0.00038676636,0.00061845186,0.00039775792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035393054,0.0002039603,0.0002866936,0.0028302989,0.012408104,0.010166692,0.0009325667,0.002656654,0.005723356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009356672,0.00019463526,0.00023472255,0.0034229432,0.02672275,0.0050016865,0.004507659,0.0023403605,0.00025845153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018164876,0.000045514058,0.0035774086,0.0002816118,0.000008757829,0.0016305593,0.3509609,0.0002782687,0.00028021753,0.5939098,0.0036004689,0.04540832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010889147,0.00012964936,0.048746448,0.0015196473,0.000044610726,0.0030256144,0.26365095,0.00076369103,0.0004864488,0.18134317,0.50019723,0.00008159488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11753661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16460359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11753661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010652114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070773303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23370492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169306674","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2021.1932646","title":"Communication and human rights within speech pathology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Law; International human rights law; Declaration; Linguistic rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Right to property; Democracy; Commonwealth; Bill of rights; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04318631376784103,"score_gpt":0.3730703516700529,"score_spread":0.3298840379022119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169306674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023244882,0.10703841,0.0008449569,0.16370626,0.004636734,0.000069595226,0.00025640687,0.000037535716,0.72108567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2141079,0.13605738,0.001409572,0.17433028,0.017231377,0.00040536036,0.00053724676,0.00008402274,0.4558368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996412,0.0012037971,0.00017144818,0.00027057424,0.0012360389,0.0007062354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751747,0.0013309093,0.00017889011,0.00013200496,0.0005879487,0.00025284273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028177516,0.00031467967,0.00036442987,0.0013678891,0.0033497803,0.006047281,0.00096955284,0.007127976,0.014686614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005937246,0.00024851924,0.00029917335,0.0015365272,0.008391175,0.003196148,0.002969362,0.0049785078,0.0043009887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066562798,0.000022013592,0.00018766004,0.0002809577,0.0000067554997,0.00019962425,0.0031794992,0.00009754438,0.00013755464,0.66782403,0.2860893,0.041968238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005177091,0.000014205435,0.0020051645,0.0008899069,0.0000041177195,0.00020679856,0.00095056975,0.000020493044,0.00004645495,0.04604567,0.9498019,0.000009559606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041645538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05303732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041645538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041925753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01397646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08280623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171933413","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2020.1861805","title":"The perils of positivism in the NT Royal Commission into youth detention: the case for a post-positivist frame for First Nations justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commission; Positivism; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; International law; Royal Commission; Criminal justice; Public administration; Criminology","score_opus":0.03570221146866413,"score_gpt":0.33867131064004685,"score_spread":0.3029690991713827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171933413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061589576,0.098131806,0.0059310547,0.694763,0.0034726632,0.000075016396,0.000028394048,0.000044713965,0.13596375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92918324,0.013891825,0.0014030908,0.04667078,0.0012774373,0.00008991019,0.000011061204,0.000044777888,0.0074278032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93123317,0.04958033,0.0018388429,0.0026386506,0.009326635,0.0053824233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8999648,0.08405947,0.004421549,0.003417966,0.004921277,0.0032149923],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09076287,0.00034541122,0.0010066633,0.0020124374,0.01362586,0.018882979,0.0030602803,0.014476737,0.0015917275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07009426,0.0006805096,0.00065302,0.001699935,0.13668069,0.015556261,0.011500477,0.026485918,0.00021758964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008701056,0.0000142633835,0.00022987489,0.00014900454,0.0000042197357,0.000098248165,0.030914579,0.00009496484,0.000039667277,0.9601631,0.0029400142,0.0053434595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003914837,0.00009671699,0.0035494994,0.0036666386,0.000025871792,0.00028367693,0.06264608,0.0005167469,0.00043927736,0.59243274,0.3361893,0.00011433136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08547802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07732276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98637414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0362235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06833537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48000568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341785339","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2011.10854714","title":"Virtuous Racial States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Declaration; Political science; Virtue; Law; Project commissioning; Value (mathematics); Indigenous rights; Publishing; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.04210639146091716,"score_gpt":0.36754858860884276,"score_spread":0.3254421971479256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341785339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05835063,0.0012326025,0.012799657,0.008916443,0.0003007205,0.00003413688,0.000022716002,0.000039110884,0.9183039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96228313,0.00042457166,0.0022917513,0.0018500657,0.000105902225,0.000053228538,0.0000152452285,0.000022099372,0.032953974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973665,0.0012556845,0.000058348327,0.00041435874,0.00043381748,0.0004712708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853015,0.00044635692,0.00015358283,0.0003836037,0.00024919945,0.00023708944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044870274,0.00018320701,0.00020317768,0.0006433048,0.0067415596,0.004291758,0.00066530844,0.0014199249,0.005526109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046659396,0.00014486776,0.00027001512,0.0004817585,0.014913822,0.0034536056,0.005674066,0.002362064,0.0005696022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016714107,0.000002732853,0.000099677214,0.0000036926872,7.921816e-7,0.000011765008,0.0019525738,0.000019944306,0.000026088273,0.99555165,0.00047998282,0.0018494541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008280801,0.000019625635,0.00065007794,0.00008687633,0.0000056421923,0.0000841129,0.0043842783,0.00023725958,0.00023994966,0.8311489,0.16312718,0.000007740138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026018708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004010767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067415596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018229869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002415914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02372992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381106923","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2023.2223481","title":"Extraction and jurisdiction: forms of law and the Antarctic Treaty System*","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Polar Research and Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Treaty; Project commissioning; Publishing","score_opus":0.017200519888405198,"score_gpt":0.2811863664243315,"score_spread":0.26398584653592627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381106923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03390338,0.121647276,0.008220133,0.12187979,0.0014784815,0.00003396355,0.00010059758,0.00002908641,0.71270734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8748159,0.05069487,0.0019186334,0.030886536,0.00255151,0.00010474497,0.000102387276,0.00006928649,0.03885607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99094754,0.0046156785,0.00038167334,0.0007034651,0.0020981396,0.0012535448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423593,0.004071558,0.00056354696,0.00040601427,0.00051876635,0.00020416352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007871726,0.00027572748,0.00040302525,0.0018674684,0.005141123,0.010068324,0.0014435634,0.005437893,0.0034954073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010353909,0.0003207527,0.00055928907,0.0038503378,0.035903037,0.011457531,0.0055322205,0.0069607394,0.00048044583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023528764,0.000002085983,0.00013571368,0.00002078896,0.0000020328494,0.00003626973,0.0011628576,0.00008643029,0.000024850653,0.9934407,0.0022943635,0.0027915826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001620227,0.000024396735,0.0019594058,0.0006669283,0.000012171054,0.0001476732,0.0036101304,0.00027201424,0.00011684273,0.57775533,0.4153848,0.00003413463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03352684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033372175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03352684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009234304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009851484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06699991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408530773","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2025.2477943","title":"Deportation of aliens from South Africa: state practise and state power","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; State (computer science); Power (physics); Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing; Criminology; Immigration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01741128857335231,"score_gpt":0.3074194299291228,"score_spread":0.29000814135577047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408530773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34466517,0.18346508,0.001832961,0.10778866,0.00041266248,0.00007571571,0.000092302434,0.000016251892,0.36165124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91857433,0.06078105,0.00033232765,0.0037298582,0.00013767145,0.000032411095,0.000019269864,0.00000627735,0.01638687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998701,0.0006018676,0.00007588048,0.00010891115,0.00021773434,0.00029463106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732155,0.0018586513,0.00043409425,0.00011323679,0.00016528703,0.00010727118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032530557,0.00013162062,0.0001826278,0.0012427097,0.0040369025,0.0039574686,0.00062723766,0.0015528573,0.0033663039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043991837,0.0001972104,0.00014788937,0.0021305922,0.010461604,0.0024914583,0.003505074,0.0021143025,0.0001728156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001510638,0.000021115302,0.0035045596,0.00069196225,0.000010974488,0.0011761743,0.06700067,0.0003078802,0.00047143124,0.86482227,0.006387362,0.05559045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019397035,0.00010176316,0.03735564,0.007306322,0.000040021805,0.0015914832,0.10151188,0.00042353445,0.00093584746,0.09052701,0.7601349,0.000052252562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03058384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055991124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03058384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061459686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008950517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06081164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416328886","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2025.2590231","title":"Colonial recognition on trial: Keith Boucher and the structural violence of Indigenous identity adjudication in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"New Caledonia Indigenous Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Indigenous; Colonialism; Identity (music); Project commissioning; Publishing","score_opus":0.018722058640328183,"score_gpt":0.31417372451802394,"score_spread":0.2954516658776958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416328886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18119723,0.062729575,0.0008629061,0.3873002,0.0019590165,0.00017762628,0.00015630746,0.000052286785,0.36556488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8466495,0.018279396,0.00042136613,0.063244574,0.00036197208,0.00004846381,0.00004238011,0.00004983987,0.07090244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928687,0.0007664735,0.00012774607,0.0005218592,0.002618904,0.0030962809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931392,0.0027594669,0.00033104917,0.00018108056,0.0021658798,0.0014234073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043629394,0.00023742467,0.00047955656,0.0012477861,0.040527325,0.010152977,0.003261099,0.008143609,0.0032755595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011309765,0.00042914812,0.00029802806,0.002276228,0.022518216,0.0022752578,0.0037965758,0.008318386,0.00022082627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000665973,0.000099203186,0.012083648,0.00033463968,0.000049454768,0.0036182713,0.07428382,0.0010186277,0.00075070513,0.6478014,0.20075141,0.059142288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006932492,0.000059018996,0.035527952,0.0012204484,0.00011644856,0.00080629066,0.07760147,0.0009486556,0.0009239242,0.03679467,0.84561795,0.00031376307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99297416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99609596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13099797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13099797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27568004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95046127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}