{"meta":{"query_hash":"a096e74e5d1f","filters":{"venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation"},"cohort_total":111,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":111,"exported":111,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a096e74e5d1f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Group+Decision+and+Negotiation"},"results":[{"id":"W129730029","doi":"10.1023/a:1008780324737","title":"A Cognitive Three-Process Model of Computer-Mediated Group Interaction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Group (periodic table); Communication source; Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Social identity theory; Human–computer interaction; Social group; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025668378007972798,"score_gpt":0.3182499032500469,"score_spread":0.2925815252420741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129730029","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027622255,0.0005218452,0.9043909,0.0021126296,0.00013496733,0.00038133742,0.00018087236,0.0003371941,0.064317964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169328,0.00091831904,0.16181593,0.00026396345,0.0001683263,0.0010231667,0.00023311716,0.00007461731,0.018569741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974612,0.0011198793,0.000106487045,0.00036615328,0.0006629974,0.0002832233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949174,0.003459125,0.00032913827,0.0003399151,0.0006407073,0.00031373004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002999267,0.0012738099,0.00082473713,0.001747285,0.0016773831,0.0056588324,0.0042189322,0.0035289845,0.010904215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011322633,0.0006464189,0.0015432561,0.0015899318,0.003368216,0.0071511297,0.0017613112,0.0020322187,0.0020466656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004678129,0.00010082762,0.00075852644,0.00008560296,0.00004853414,0.00024354592,0.002258171,0.04636558,0.0007375102,0.9388943,0.0007849656,0.009675714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006904832,0.00007990115,0.0006080182,0.00004586705,0.000056282548,0.00021503883,0.0004056301,0.32488573,0.00032702065,0.6687239,0.0045336164,0.000050062456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011738707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003828059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011738707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027717892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003652266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03647828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131320508","doi":"10.1023/a:1008712331820","title":"The Condorcet's Jury Theorem in a Bioethical Context: The Dynamics of Group Decision Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children","keywords":"Jury; Argument (complex analysis); Axiom; Group decision-making; Voting; Focus group; Politics; Condorcet method; Hierarchy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Medicine; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05001587489050694,"score_gpt":0.3790026745252,"score_spread":0.328986799634693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131320508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028129727,0.007639398,0.39825827,0.22072181,0.002395727,0.00021968782,0.00027874997,0.00009017182,0.3422665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89275753,0.0033013397,0.07125091,0.012977298,0.0029219072,0.0007930037,0.000072599694,0.00011182137,0.015813634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787557,0.012443113,0.00064567744,0.0025553654,0.0044539003,0.0011462438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91692984,0.07320081,0.002245683,0.0032687152,0.003266157,0.001088733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042155083,0.00077410013,0.0025776818,0.0019700704,0.005887353,0.009961875,0.0031475557,0.011900653,0.010960022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10584125,0.0007216202,0.0014017039,0.0021455258,0.04751054,0.019950552,0.004628439,0.013993847,0.0010040107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000686932,0.0000037733855,0.000031861044,0.000011708846,0.000005123046,0.000017334167,0.00020629413,0.00047463784,0.000007944019,0.9973195,0.00093565055,0.0009792629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009282578,0.0000019200475,0.000017446597,0.000013404954,0.0000018806921,0.0000081097,0.000026471058,0.0009115086,0.0000097948805,0.99766976,0.0013267697,0.000003707863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006430591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036859824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042155083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007070176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008567143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22294009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1429935938","doi":"10.1007/s10726-015-9450-x","title":"Managing Co-occurring Conflicts in Teams","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Task (project management); Team effectiveness; Psychology; Conflict management; Social psychology; Team composition; Group conflict; Conflict resolution research; Conflict resolution; Business; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0470116694149213,"score_gpt":0.34701514406882744,"score_spread":0.30000347465390614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1429935938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8024176,0.0011157214,0.16921565,0.0021363308,0.00024248197,0.00030955762,0.000023196286,0.000118916796,0.0244206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816081,0.00013411003,0.016894847,0.00004938561,0.000030169647,0.00008486994,0.000019128243,0.000010078665,0.0011691948],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147415,0.0061510145,0.00032450946,0.00044915793,0.00087411114,0.0007269156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717542,0.02107399,0.002823181,0.0007854996,0.0012685508,0.0022944673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009604213,0.00043305586,0.000637973,0.0013269661,0.0032118019,0.005960546,0.0016406962,0.002230457,0.002513238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034128267,0.0004280662,0.0004697449,0.0011526,0.0020836855,0.005039651,0.00507138,0.0019159866,0.0002927428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019193653,0.002115138,0.07894255,0.0010284337,0.00095246226,0.0048319357,0.06780852,0.23047677,0.009786271,0.18485212,0.0077099786,0.40957654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028200232,0.0009890263,0.012059517,0.0003157731,0.00033466605,0.0011184328,0.06223732,0.54707146,0.0038936962,0.3510418,0.020513466,0.00014297875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016376886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018002789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009604213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011020488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025134413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050792575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14743208","doi":"10.1023/a:1024879603397","title":"On-line/Off-line: Joint Negotiation Teaching in Montreal and Vienna","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Knowledge management; Personalization; Computer science; Virtual learning environment; Psychology; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.03751602158953461,"score_gpt":0.3112451074246364,"score_spread":0.2737290858351018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14743208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8354807,0.0022367192,0.0047769924,0.005572298,0.00032915978,0.0003056145,0.0005354089,0.00038273327,0.15038045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92738783,0.00019915265,0.0016298317,0.00014376419,0.000020340438,0.00004911683,0.0001029882,0.00005380017,0.070413165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977284,0.0009723316,0.000029656658,0.00031261018,0.00019511631,0.00076193444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737656,0.0005564383,0.00011386138,0.00009589927,0.00024344833,0.0016136863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023853092,0.00047802855,0.00026607042,0.00091405126,0.013421068,0.003969711,0.0019555683,0.0012567035,0.026988534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004245502,0.000376078,0.0002252058,0.0017229706,0.0031830447,0.0019826575,0.003385181,0.0015736889,0.0014076018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002179513,0.0023936431,0.0653908,0.00036881282,0.000097346245,0.0049350136,0.19773966,0.008445632,0.0077220052,0.18945904,0.08205993,0.43920857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031546282,0.0010515483,0.20074497,0.0002633081,0.00008019477,0.00044654074,0.18689469,0.0073626097,0.007355472,0.010299008,0.5848695,0.00031670413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8454369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95635056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040628485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035694625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3109467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486075422","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9248-4","title":"Arno R. Lodder and John Zeleznikow: Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037593043393858876,"score_gpt":0.2293356323867757,"score_spread":0.19174258899291682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486075422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03607398,0.05322214,0.32744277,0.24332231,0.0052840807,0.00042942291,0.0005573851,0.00072847394,0.33293945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51299596,0.059497062,0.21370837,0.008852994,0.0025565906,0.00049096346,0.00034987062,0.00035673927,0.20119154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742436,0.0010995354,0.000108282584,0.00016929614,0.0010249256,0.00017361758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216837,0.0058391425,0.00029301332,0.00034084308,0.0009780701,0.0003806229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00501848,0.00044441808,0.00039576378,0.0019810712,0.0019569257,0.006318725,0.0015170614,0.0027692348,0.016590588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016183287,0.00044887795,0.00034661838,0.002092666,0.001896356,0.010137821,0.0034414611,0.0016442515,0.003172096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021901936,0.00009916579,0.0009390888,0.0005094728,0.000042817854,0.00040000194,0.0030245504,0.0019569837,0.0014915332,0.6875779,0.17253959,0.13119991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021472458,0.00007789954,0.0027429718,0.00055196,0.00011946014,0.0005623852,0.0036612824,0.016918974,0.009681469,0.42215,0.54313,0.00018887006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006685548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120019615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016590588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014697186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017784279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055501044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494789798","doi":"10.1023/a:1023064720309","title":"Electronic Negotiations: Foundations, Systems and Experiments – Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.018577934376684084,"score_gpt":0.3109231648864594,"score_spread":0.2923452305097753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494789798","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045359517,0.4932497,0.2925112,0.039123032,0.02793586,0.00024765005,0.0006512609,0.0005036813,0.14124164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15359737,0.48691326,0.16347459,0.013506532,0.097470656,0.0013653213,0.001368493,0.0006538176,0.08164996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972211,0.0014876677,0.00019809933,0.00042749892,0.0005637408,0.00010191213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917018,0.006715003,0.00023910256,0.00069656706,0.00049019454,0.00015734266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038659244,0.0013396358,0.0018369673,0.0021005985,0.0012602583,0.0061172987,0.0018115176,0.0044351397,0.014778506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010050765,0.0010156579,0.0012688924,0.0029651541,0.006283417,0.009356747,0.0030109845,0.006423643,0.003530162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004104644,0.00020660293,0.00045009085,0.0008137236,0.00005911533,0.00009010007,0.00026376802,0.003339526,0.00046485264,0.7804342,0.083087154,0.13074985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014823461,0.00005404283,0.00055178703,0.00048825447,0.00001800597,0.00019493108,0.00011715978,0.002916019,0.00017873815,0.7975049,0.19792494,0.0000363952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095424015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008160181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014778506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012682558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049439013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155001031","doi":"10.1023/a:1024871921144","title":"Applying the Montreal Taxonomy to State of the Art E-Negotiation Systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05769474785710255,"score_gpt":0.3055760922131813,"score_spread":0.24788134435607878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155001031","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013868405,0.004710095,0.7582128,0.008127572,0.00035500166,0.00047622446,0.00086850574,0.0009806177,0.21240069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44825143,0.0065266513,0.4919932,0.00079700607,0.00029011903,0.000750329,0.0014009058,0.00027922698,0.04971117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951682,0.0017648895,0.00041376692,0.00049052393,0.0016613775,0.00050125853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522567,0.0015923425,0.0003433354,0.0010750383,0.0013330849,0.00043057854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043264893,0.000835421,0.0008630333,0.005919941,0.00485228,0.011490425,0.003910051,0.003050898,0.01725039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014087966,0.00069102366,0.0011327168,0.008332094,0.0053311987,0.016575081,0.003678107,0.0025130708,0.0022569988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009748058,0.000009375653,0.00031129457,0.00004677149,0.0000068428626,0.00002626394,0.0003435052,0.002065101,0.000081260965,0.97348166,0.0032364177,0.020381803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015063142,0.000029257782,0.0009173251,0.00015072737,0.000018742649,0.00009323935,0.0009952305,0.04487088,0.00034809334,0.8236173,0.12889107,0.000053025502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13884689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1420664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13884689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010423039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009138124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2760774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1646856192","doi":"10.1023/a:1008713120075","title":"Coalition Analysis in Group Decision Support","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Operations research; Computer science; Management science; Decision analysis; Decision support system; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05666481454648493,"score_gpt":0.37236245209305463,"score_spread":0.3156976375465697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1646856192","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026842833,0.0043049776,0.9443404,0.0029327678,0.00028679013,0.00010979713,0.00004980653,0.000094865485,0.021037774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419454,0.0022503224,0.1478373,0.00024745837,0.000322798,0.00035570515,0.00007909796,0.00006893372,0.006892997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99393255,0.004276844,0.00015060895,0.00028239636,0.001064884,0.000292794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853872,0.012684116,0.00047371344,0.00045014234,0.00073698757,0.0002677658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076292492,0.0008063283,0.0018575833,0.0019647605,0.0013937345,0.0035110782,0.0019132076,0.0024552296,0.004590237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022050302,0.0005829358,0.0009105348,0.0029409651,0.0043662465,0.0061869766,0.002523177,0.002444719,0.0004923149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010844897,0.00008771115,0.0004145721,0.00017935426,0.000089329,0.000076914,0.00053269794,0.085911095,0.00026027765,0.8648056,0.002053297,0.04548066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024843317,0.00002035511,0.000104627994,0.000036228088,0.000020756479,0.000018600062,0.0001793553,0.21450038,0.00017147316,0.78219706,0.0027135902,0.000012834781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041048466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023355193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076292492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002424845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021446722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040347815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1717026707","doi":"10.1023/a:1023072922126","title":"The Montreal Taxonomy for Electronic Negotiations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Electronic markets; Common value auction; Variety (cybernetics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Business; Industrial organization; Electronic trading; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Commerce; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; The Internet; Sociology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0568834372388296,"score_gpt":0.3341905950538993,"score_spread":0.2773071578150697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1717026707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031311966,0.009964544,0.37713596,0.009089045,0.0008564988,0.0003508742,0.0012170487,0.0005974771,0.59765726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3069025,0.022020651,0.40308282,0.002733133,0.00166177,0.0018954964,0.0028370977,0.00061860034,0.25824797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698097,0.0011244126,0.0002469192,0.00041335568,0.00083230314,0.00040194727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715316,0.00092600664,0.00023203832,0.00069667556,0.0007204426,0.0002715834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022042475,0.0012372136,0.0008947162,0.005286953,0.005666718,0.012971187,0.003845628,0.0044342577,0.04920096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009935865,0.001009332,0.0011655699,0.011431301,0.008350486,0.019498501,0.0039704912,0.0039460626,0.008046771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013256873,0.0000016179121,0.000021647114,0.000011554886,7.7373795e-7,0.000006222085,0.000070448295,0.00014669055,0.000009150044,0.99318117,0.0032155658,0.0033337872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000486703,0.000004053024,0.00008777174,0.00006111418,0.000003299412,0.00003942247,0.00019396188,0.0017859414,0.000038229326,0.8691854,0.12858412,0.000011868796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0623752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051450606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0623752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009281912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008402495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16459358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821366024","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9325-3","title":"Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Middle East; Conflict resolution; Psychological intervention; Business; Political science; Geography; Computer science; Psychology; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.09237089830353316,"score_gpt":0.2697234512947076,"score_spread":0.17735255299117442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821366024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753108,0.00040574782,0.00047105967,0.0012235271,0.000014176016,0.000048711492,0.00002391027,0.0000013286897,0.022500716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893147,0.00018027035,0.00023923225,0.000071316426,0.0000038841554,0.000014154299,0.000011645751,4.8343543e-7,0.0005473992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976705,0.0015124335,0.00008114878,0.000074789066,0.00021831725,0.00044283914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217427,0.0055888304,0.0011727691,0.0001607893,0.0005014981,0.00040194683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004581289,0.00024522212,0.00022970243,0.002994948,0.004795317,0.0029657206,0.00070100866,0.0011015802,0.0024143644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008407355,0.00016688161,0.00018162683,0.003683703,0.0061335443,0.0029536674,0.0021682282,0.001186146,0.00011434798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020707806,0.0009284393,0.15736447,0.0010059489,0.00024409531,0.0057781055,0.33679885,0.008108087,0.0046724635,0.38455558,0.0034791927,0.094994016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008397213,0.00032757557,0.12499561,0.0002581718,0.00006506959,0.00026868095,0.7942003,0.0040605115,0.001926907,0.056058142,0.017708912,0.000046104033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038063306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07255675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038063306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065855933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062333792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075683534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18362931","doi":"10.1023/a:1023025106197","title":"SmartSettle Described with the Montreal Taxonomy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Architecture and Computational Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.009360370701804224,"score_gpt":0.1698730228288526,"score_spread":0.16051265212704838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18362931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004653042,0.0014712993,0.43155104,0.0035664868,0.00056117703,0.00040251153,0.0015807356,0.003915154,0.55229855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18360306,0.0035326139,0.3839587,0.002141113,0.00026113112,0.0011814834,0.0042927405,0.0017288668,0.41930038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985953,0.0003412641,0.00011180877,0.00026797008,0.0004142592,0.0002694636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839455,0.00028382972,0.00011221824,0.0005684539,0.0004367279,0.00020429553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014221253,0.0010440681,0.0005117684,0.0032036633,0.0033666398,0.0058817687,0.0027702898,0.0025642382,0.06025775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00496371,0.00073627237,0.0010330348,0.004152504,0.004142809,0.0074957456,0.0040803016,0.0025832374,0.012865564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015867574,0.0000100854095,0.0003042582,0.000061258,0.000005423363,0.00004810181,0.00029752456,0.0017162355,0.00018691964,0.94302464,0.019550296,0.034779254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010234714,0.000022580312,0.00028243245,0.000107893466,0.00000991207,0.00013005614,0.00023198464,0.007875425,0.00083383516,0.18300115,0.8074571,0.00003741047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094478905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14872493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094478905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061836466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071385396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20158225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963657722","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9022-1","title":"Word from the Guest Editors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Natural language processing; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009375185397906924,"score_gpt":0.22795892132791193,"score_spread":0.21858373593000502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963657722","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011049155,0.007987621,0.0011542904,0.057187323,0.7606144,0.00009459148,0.00062679447,0.00045915812,0.17077087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008409315,0.0036992182,0.00038642727,0.010991284,0.15834448,0.000053283624,0.00036932976,0.00040084173,0.81734574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991916,0.00011059302,0.00006722189,0.00015122473,0.00039194385,0.00008747017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959418,0.00060362084,0.00026475973,0.00023942992,0.0018943202,0.0010561051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095181173,0.0008662422,0.0008729205,0.0016056387,0.0012367371,0.0050553,0.00073864846,0.0017573902,0.21043223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008466024,0.00023151684,0.00041274482,0.0011027666,0.0004129026,0.0021793314,0.001599053,0.0025330526,0.13930917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026603322,0.0000067931273,0.00004716255,0.000064928776,0.0000020387838,0.00008064873,0.000028075618,0.000014120094,0.00020635642,0.0008557348,0.97781926,0.020848246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056293334,0.00001451202,0.00016506169,0.000033612218,0.0000028186948,0.00009181769,0.000044186392,0.00004796273,0.00014724751,0.00041392344,0.9990289,0.0000043041405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000511352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009971154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21043223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006396037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000908301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7039659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964374874","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9052-8","title":"E-negotiation System Development: Using Negotiation Protocols to Manage Software Components","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Process management; Dependency (UML); Knowledge management; Software; Protocol (science); Software engineering; Business; Operating system; Political science","score_opus":0.04801926832809176,"score_gpt":0.3033785008969536,"score_spread":0.25535923256886184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964374874","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057651284,0.00014622802,0.9801215,0.00019725831,0.000085473424,0.00028674485,0.000062895124,0.0060529076,0.007281973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094851404,0.00043465063,0.88997227,0.00018141548,0.000049732924,0.0004844935,0.00052811636,0.0013890287,0.012108919],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982162,0.0008072964,0.00016002795,0.00016509157,0.00055864756,0.000092676266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741817,0.0011833532,0.00013899378,0.00065273716,0.00042657246,0.00018006645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036025434,0.00060223846,0.0005173876,0.0008596211,0.00083660276,0.0025528385,0.0023733026,0.0012710879,0.0071176803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008924224,0.00093734055,0.0005129786,0.00089715986,0.00093030324,0.0048416494,0.002190386,0.002005532,0.0023742747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049666606,0.0007169173,0.0034381489,0.00081012305,0.0001974036,0.00086637685,0.0016533982,0.031948544,0.028745726,0.15519814,0.02803943,0.74788904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041900386,0.00034653244,0.0015243116,0.0002952923,0.00015414131,0.0012938615,0.00039721446,0.57889944,0.094919465,0.095420174,0.22620495,0.00012558649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092090387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006806562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071176803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041901533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014078438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023811042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968974820","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9121-2","title":"Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bankruptcy; Dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Soviet union; Political science; Geography; Economics; Economy; Business; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05737976568253775,"score_gpt":0.22870524752469656,"score_spread":0.17132548184215882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968974820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8631705,0.00068017974,0.0710917,0.0033052857,0.00016622881,0.000071051494,0.00033347137,0.00010720059,0.06107438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98962724,0.00015300683,0.003347107,0.00005834664,0.000024194609,0.00003670798,0.000058062215,0.000017204142,0.00667804],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996494,0.00016995786,0.000010104064,0.00004055189,0.000034832356,0.000095127376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980161,0.0014485111,0.00016667461,0.000057647037,0.00012787309,0.00018314774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008980608,0.00053526834,0.0009969334,0.0005380712,0.0010786261,0.002626875,0.0014771832,0.0027022413,0.008750416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00527474,0.00044931757,0.0005920149,0.00064446917,0.001233909,0.0016686289,0.0011109435,0.0017691565,0.00040780552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006593524,0.000037094054,0.0011048653,0.000018893717,0.00001955346,0.000103702005,0.00012136648,0.9559767,0.00014708024,0.039825294,0.0006895514,0.0018898232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024222509,0.0000147250785,0.0002421148,0.000004277268,0.000008515966,0.000010397713,0.00009356121,0.98515576,0.00004626826,0.013912869,0.00048089333,0.0000064040983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06328152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033366453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002358664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002261041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12582642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973701472","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9143-9","title":"A Model of Bargaining over Hazardous Waste Cleanup","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Superfund; Hazardous waste; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Business; Liability; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Environmental planning; Waste management; Finance; Environmental science; Law; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.01613081443318738,"score_gpt":0.22823171994782748,"score_spread":0.21210090551464011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973701472","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09333886,0.0008497826,0.45895776,0.0136753805,0.00040352374,0.0003078592,0.00070715405,0.0002311208,0.43152842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8945354,0.00069895264,0.030322388,0.00052765204,0.0001779851,0.00028792684,0.00018892017,0.000049515307,0.07321128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980622,0.0010686433,0.000057018933,0.00022980341,0.00026942714,0.0003129248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968035,0.0022880072,0.00021520542,0.00017571256,0.00018582643,0.000331702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025321408,0.0009111766,0.0012318809,0.0010961994,0.0025656694,0.0065389248,0.0042090835,0.006865878,0.033856336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073797563,0.0008316681,0.0014199648,0.0022645623,0.004440963,0.0061259647,0.002404957,0.0029420909,0.0024307105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005972481,0.000059689275,0.00013709896,0.00003329837,0.000016927903,0.00015136633,0.0002524162,0.059006054,0.00015318769,0.9368832,0.0011834991,0.0020635778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014569922,0.00005287293,0.000103466184,0.0000244752,0.00002199492,0.00008620333,0.00028042292,0.24770805,0.00007267741,0.74702233,0.0044534835,0.000028281198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054716016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033856336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004154939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003277101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11326069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977171261","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9178-6","title":"Ripeness and Grief in Conflict Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ripeness; Grief; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02135754255461978,"score_gpt":0.3402126141097057,"score_spread":0.3188550715550859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977171261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60812914,0.0070119463,0.228479,0.012489368,0.00041209333,0.00028565142,0.00009529077,0.00006998541,0.14302754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98983043,0.00023388861,0.008411608,0.000103106235,0.000043955464,0.000072266164,0.000011335647,0.00000945544,0.0012837868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944926,0.009244581,0.00019184226,0.00021943724,0.0004571729,0.0004378087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525973,0.042554706,0.0015129508,0.0010225681,0.0011113896,0.0012010531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014609621,0.00043198466,0.00049032335,0.0030473713,0.004246369,0.0065393206,0.0010955924,0.0013142169,0.0070962273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050102025,0.0004164131,0.00041091788,0.0025584179,0.014091808,0.007936725,0.003439094,0.003214786,0.00021925948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026730087,0.00019387351,0.010274847,0.000165566,0.00006188042,0.000502477,0.054308757,0.003558562,0.0002535542,0.891102,0.0010900586,0.038221113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004053775,0.000086947686,0.0052803177,0.00012072124,0.000032557688,0.00036740542,0.04820938,0.014680199,0.00026656914,0.9249359,0.0059384117,0.0000410435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021989336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024344493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014609621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019888226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017664648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07726395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977588943","doi":"10.1007/s10726-014-9382-x","title":"Special Issue: The Israeli–Palestinian and Related Conflicts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Arab–Israeli conflict; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01854403104210193,"score_gpt":0.27708456369653944,"score_spread":0.2585405326544375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977588943","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000800585,0.014680334,0.00018592346,0.05983185,0.91524136,0.00006134872,0.00025730926,0.000052627795,0.008888691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030262016,0.008468266,0.00008880168,0.011317417,0.9582616,0.00009493508,0.00021461817,0.000044927285,0.018483168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813986,0.00038452784,0.0002526564,0.00028299357,0.00052517565,0.00041474449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99036235,0.0041474844,0.00105222,0.00063724804,0.0016855259,0.0021150233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004089262,0.0032187079,0.0031081275,0.004891608,0.0061457735,0.009434587,0.0035700814,0.017714124,0.058648024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010266034,0.0009084858,0.0020450251,0.0029734701,0.0028126957,0.005167251,0.0038848675,0.006519265,0.010917147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048524515,0.00006894823,0.00028808985,0.00031452958,0.0000128697275,0.0002385112,0.00009004525,0.00003599418,0.000105154664,0.0010119712,0.99083436,0.006951065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056690762,0.00008886073,0.0041162972,0.0009977932,0.000049118178,0.0008096114,0.0007868178,0.00018913922,0.0001350202,0.0029146695,0.98983204,0.000023901901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017839039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042984895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058648024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003030931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030851804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19619715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980896408","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-1403-3","title":"Getting to Yes in China: Exploring Personality Effects in Chinese Negotiation Styles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Collectivism; Personality; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Assertiveness; Scale (ratio); Variance (accounting); China; Political science; Business; Individualism","score_opus":0.02428110395232292,"score_gpt":0.31220548109067103,"score_spread":0.2879243771383481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980896408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99973375,0.000015778698,0.00000973657,0.000020510803,0.0000012953179,0.000002588938,0.0000050417607,1.8824085e-7,0.00021107578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.000029456634,0.000021027388,0.000020831681,0.0000015137236,0.000004796339,0.000016128979,6.5507146e-7,0.00018564136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992453,0.00021476309,0.000059130976,0.000098488155,0.00012587749,0.0002564758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766064,0.000533453,0.0005294769,0.000086760934,0.00020080642,0.0009889256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012412469,0.00042804194,0.0004699626,0.0015109363,0.0034389452,0.0016936468,0.0005084717,0.0005698655,0.0018574498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023981303,0.0004335346,0.00045702656,0.0026707556,0.0013130115,0.00096224685,0.0010701285,0.0009959139,0.00017501696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012369869,0.00019983012,0.95943314,0.000021903563,0.000065523935,0.00022588913,0.03417564,0.00011780267,0.0005840413,0.0003016191,0.000117700474,0.004633203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135902355,0.00007695752,0.97307193,0.0000093512435,0.000030511355,0.00006517997,0.025750883,0.00055303326,0.000077767894,0.00016539979,0.0001722144,0.000013043329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08532364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13738157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08532364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021167689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021200115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16965401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982012364","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9079-5","title":"You can’t shake hands with clenched fists: potential effects of trust assessments on the adoption of e-negotiation services","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Conceptualization; Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Negotiation theory; Knowledge management; Service (business); Business; Computer science; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.00590788906207023,"score_gpt":0.21558015779773806,"score_spread":0.20967226873566783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982012364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97957784,0.00013372152,0.0020862976,0.0026899122,0.000022260558,0.000047984275,0.000020271795,0.000024919875,0.015396802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932337,0.000027476435,0.00030463003,0.00006192412,0.000004199803,0.000007520972,0.0000036405863,0.0000047516487,0.00026261376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516405,0.011810686,0.00054400024,0.00039041686,0.0011968104,0.00089401327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64491963,0.31293786,0.020999625,0.007156099,0.01006927,0.003917462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01949455,0.00023854739,0.00026185205,0.00058237853,0.0017695879,0.003760648,0.00092501065,0.0025192208,0.008244928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20150627,0.00049122295,0.00044481942,0.00069947814,0.0020652127,0.005506785,0.0019575497,0.00358802,0.00064333755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017489202,0.007866486,0.43678418,0.0006602839,0.00047157568,0.003332497,0.061211474,0.012577888,0.008105974,0.06974618,0.0050872653,0.37666693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018020901,0.005588845,0.6369133,0.0005997021,0.0010855589,0.0014714937,0.102141716,0.1150048,0.013314256,0.102251165,0.01921537,0.0006117274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008541814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067567276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01949455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021268104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024429834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10309827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982136260","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9069-z","title":"User Acceptance of Web-Based Negotiation Support Systems: The Role of Perceived Intention of the Negotiating Partner to Negotiate Online","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Construct (python library); Conformity; Technology acceptance model; Perception; Psychology; Knowledge management; Business; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Usability; Sociology; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.016241256080798943,"score_gpt":0.2829679506524384,"score_spread":0.26672669457163944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982136260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961125,0.00006775085,0.00034854267,0.00018443023,0.000008620078,0.000013437311,0.00001618097,0.000010050433,0.003238434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995382,0.000025098647,0.00012667812,0.000036002006,0.000004473466,0.000008566864,0.000015913296,0.000005720565,0.00023920547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571395,0.0025304472,0.00031719764,0.00017037228,0.000992808,0.00027535728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8960569,0.08233747,0.007888467,0.0027777029,0.0070436615,0.003895815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072381822,0.00024111646,0.0003556186,0.0008732687,0.0006564835,0.0036968272,0.0005855946,0.0011904808,0.005317943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059949625,0.0002918822,0.0005727076,0.0005600503,0.0007324004,0.0017761514,0.00079997914,0.0014391684,0.00058408314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025002044,0.0021984975,0.9282728,0.00018023975,0.0003365498,0.00043529403,0.01908016,0.00062636146,0.0032049068,0.0012473125,0.0004458265,0.041471947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017050981,0.001728445,0.95865434,0.00010436683,0.00032565702,0.0005823563,0.021075362,0.012253513,0.0021493568,0.0015630716,0.0012933596,0.00009970423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002162828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001375133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072381822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036094224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061278377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038279593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986786931","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9053-7","title":"Content Analysis Through the Machine Learning Mill","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Automation; Decision tree; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Information retrieval; Natural language processing; Engineering","score_opus":0.03722862449492215,"score_gpt":0.25519642510223584,"score_spread":0.2179678006073137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986786931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016385155,0.0002871579,0.9689663,0.0005045758,0.000088634886,0.00048155105,0.000720115,0.002869281,0.009697229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2871114,0.00041295006,0.70183146,0.00013799734,0.00012895117,0.0007682266,0.0017241003,0.0005188226,0.007366066],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478805,0.0026352997,0.00037536348,0.00066457625,0.0012931807,0.00024348735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98255795,0.012721622,0.0007020239,0.0012667694,0.0025158457,0.0002358205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005628125,0.00070015574,0.0009191377,0.010043883,0.0013953401,0.0059410497,0.001649144,0.0010715036,0.013293219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027223043,0.00041256443,0.00091998844,0.0052049467,0.0015143134,0.0077332584,0.0023078937,0.0016209107,0.003834474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004203847,0.00030097726,0.0038347873,0.00041766054,0.00009701591,0.00014307944,0.0014249485,0.007358558,0.007896384,0.095951065,0.011140536,0.87101465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009704945,0.00017129503,0.005412186,0.00025907153,0.00014672922,0.00026714473,0.0024974255,0.6756562,0.027001008,0.24747206,0.04091851,0.00010134136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021101134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001460991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013293219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016381058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022010051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04447019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991773119","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9001-y","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Graph; Sociology; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.02009217325215433,"score_gpt":0.27925780082492063,"score_spread":0.2591656275727663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991773119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011035696,0.051637527,0.7513763,0.037571907,0.09813031,0.00018639387,0.0010599422,0.00076906465,0.05816499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04921072,0.11553576,0.38511688,0.030373126,0.2944708,0.0012010674,0.0035003189,0.0021610595,0.118430294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984168,0.00069714943,0.00011557935,0.00035625775,0.00034814246,0.000066082495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490935,0.0037527755,0.00015573739,0.00045664542,0.000519988,0.00020560218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025487742,0.0022919541,0.0024634523,0.0018941252,0.0009958341,0.0038439038,0.002858927,0.00459261,0.022112342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00808194,0.00094362063,0.002869372,0.0031577353,0.0023789576,0.0072518773,0.0019594007,0.008651814,0.009073026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036657682,0.00011672519,0.00022285945,0.0005660776,0.00012996077,0.0002704955,0.00013346043,0.009475613,0.00050249364,0.48886314,0.42139724,0.078285165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017635959,0.000035911988,0.00022048756,0.00020504581,0.00005407665,0.00027328986,0.000041291067,0.018709725,0.0001599966,0.58010143,0.40012664,0.000054484975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015818162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018973995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022112342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015735691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010603176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07397312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998299333","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9042-x","title":"The Effects of Cultural Diversity in Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Team effectiveness; Collectivism; Cultural diversity; Homogeneous; Psychology; Knowledge management; Individualism; Team composition; Virtual team; Psychological safety; Task (project management); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00989681300725125,"score_gpt":0.279373752656166,"score_spread":0.2694769396489147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998299333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967771,0.000105098545,0.00014017892,0.00007804417,0.000024132401,0.000008154437,0.000009838923,0.0000029275536,0.0028544522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999265,0.000039403156,0.00016217132,0.000037731337,0.000018103072,0.000015760834,0.000011202271,0.0000059285076,0.00044465443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943727,0.0042557353,0.00017954868,0.00032066915,0.00041138608,0.0004599024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.885579,0.09282778,0.0051014908,0.0026988303,0.0020179576,0.0117748715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051263743,0.00037507512,0.0006323017,0.00056584546,0.0018373731,0.0035214103,0.000799946,0.000999494,0.00604494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05977615,0.00029302816,0.00039739377,0.00048434053,0.0017684983,0.0019141582,0.0031533826,0.001534484,0.00040131458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15772122,0.02578279,0.37623063,0.0013266379,0.0018993843,0.0022847606,0.040536616,0.02150686,0.066600814,0.015572314,0.0030184567,0.28751948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036135975,0.022580788,0.87977695,0.0005064108,0.0010429783,0.0007697087,0.046859607,0.012485572,0.009652171,0.018810127,0.0036557536,0.00024632664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017764863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024274993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00604494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058589724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008650866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027111173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000621378","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9179-5","title":"Negotiation over Costs and Benefits in Brownfield Redevelopment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Redevelopment; Shapley value; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Operations research; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Management science; Economics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Telecommunications; Political science","score_opus":0.023755830161397293,"score_gpt":0.22379146151859847,"score_spread":0.20003563135720118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000621378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74315816,0.00094298663,0.038271166,0.0066837487,0.0001790952,0.00015703724,0.000045539076,0.000094489376,0.21046774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983433,0.00004391243,0.0021760175,0.00015415132,0.000019870691,0.000020681846,0.000006737986,0.000011039767,0.014134543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937552,0.003243174,0.00018033972,0.00055176555,0.0008161129,0.0014534225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98433924,0.01217917,0.00085844897,0.0008010932,0.00069120876,0.0011306881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010635123,0.00028079076,0.0005751975,0.0010152347,0.0031984642,0.0052958955,0.001767586,0.0036076151,0.018558744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032625545,0.00041748228,0.00038118908,0.00082842325,0.0034214046,0.004600047,0.0023250587,0.0030311963,0.0007218513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010834122,0.00051091384,0.010396518,0.00008062227,0.000046341254,0.000573807,0.004603154,0.03381831,0.002009726,0.8335153,0.0063955626,0.10696624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001518083,0.00022075321,0.018405806,0.00011043583,0.000062712956,0.00025056253,0.01007212,0.09066762,0.002603531,0.8482589,0.029085658,0.00011007958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013929462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024626238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018558744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004723038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002996948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06208515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001291551","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9290-x","title":"The Yonmenkaigi System Method: An Implementation-Oriented Group Decision Support Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Computer science; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Process management; Software engineering; Data mining; Business; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.055222717475924644,"score_gpt":0.39366215266636356,"score_spread":0.3384394351904389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001291551","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072105783,0.00006439752,0.98677886,0.00009213283,0.000030929612,0.00027410098,0.00006173136,0.0004252126,0.005061964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09425867,0.00013155003,0.9017038,0.000037669342,0.00001985192,0.00093242916,0.00010645538,0.00008817595,0.0027214605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656314,0.0023351423,0.00011864797,0.00023397365,0.0006118904,0.00013708114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974201,0.0019207015,0.000108762746,0.00013139237,0.00036268635,0.000056345034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038290627,0.00088618475,0.0012383637,0.0019288576,0.0011280914,0.0022327248,0.0016463569,0.0011449165,0.009920355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072594164,0.0005594637,0.0008711759,0.0020305242,0.000941612,0.0017769446,0.0017696789,0.001405664,0.001248588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000521941,0.0004899478,0.0033256342,0.0008838565,0.00038928015,0.00016679827,0.0021799519,0.1117888,0.005915061,0.26890826,0.0035668858,0.6018636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023075941,0.00044594446,0.0011836501,0.00014539178,0.00022812709,0.00010455093,0.0005786477,0.9069798,0.0031673172,0.06918232,0.01765532,0.00009820049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003978136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048376946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009920355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009772507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033776958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033186913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008052156","doi":"10.1023/b:grup.0000042894.00775.75","title":"A Distance-Based Collective Preorder Integrating the Relative Importance of the Group's Members","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Partially ordered set; Group (periodic table); Measure (data warehouse); Divergence (linguistics); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.055850662149653174,"score_gpt":0.3506103197598169,"score_spread":0.2947596576101637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008052156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060136978,0.0002974452,0.92436546,0.00055034325,0.00019297992,0.00038365467,0.0001361049,0.0002267949,0.013710321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5190612,0.0002593168,0.47146276,0.00013815571,0.00018150579,0.0005841833,0.00018343546,0.000077266006,0.008052206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903674,0.0027991661,0.0007719154,0.00081719714,0.004754384,0.0004899063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855532,0.0074375006,0.0012713165,0.0012427663,0.0033556258,0.0011395725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007870922,0.00119554,0.0019829622,0.0043904954,0.002438168,0.0052812863,0.002467104,0.0018317892,0.004504974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017098544,0.0005322714,0.0010895457,0.0029353243,0.0031548608,0.007374756,0.0028640507,0.002427086,0.0007759036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008602569,0.0008341256,0.0053480216,0.0009794473,0.00024209534,0.0002879832,0.0024062782,0.1791944,0.014615868,0.5003585,0.0042446326,0.29062852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011224128,0.0020620197,0.004285684,0.00022978113,0.00020568045,0.00036865092,0.001354022,0.6855339,0.007915623,0.2879424,0.009724217,0.0002658004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023332937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004727061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007870922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003161188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045720474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041625917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009614528","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9004-8","title":"The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Conflict resolution; Centrality; Psychology; Conflict analysis; Cognitive psychology; Isomorphism (crystallography); Negative emotion; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050857570474689556,"score_gpt":0.4357197137833725,"score_spread":0.38486214330868296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009614528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7854408,0.0026395218,0.099167004,0.0053021796,0.00016679698,0.00024187185,0.00007660835,0.000041517585,0.10692384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945697,0.00019997457,0.004711095,0.00007912267,0.000006885014,0.000104875406,0.000006447758,0.000013863773,0.00030793273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605498,0.03577944,0.00048090453,0.00069292396,0.001553677,0.0009433239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90292776,0.089481525,0.002876615,0.0016716106,0.0018461075,0.0011964232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031327352,0.0003858732,0.00040135952,0.002546076,0.0040699444,0.011277228,0.0017109179,0.0016713103,0.0030966734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085310005,0.0005502124,0.0004339766,0.0019955111,0.023532024,0.0118017765,0.004593822,0.0023889747,0.00013513354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031685224,0.00013563504,0.013766139,0.0006524825,0.00006317566,0.00042920423,0.40428293,0.0019402687,0.001413287,0.5336012,0.0004010651,0.042997867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011392886,0.00020915992,0.02735848,0.0009449355,0.00010302435,0.00074354955,0.3686129,0.00631436,0.0032879252,0.58076805,0.011402798,0.00014093595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022880645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021909936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031327352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038200608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022221284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16567683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009939958","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-1245-z","title":"Fair, Efficient and Envy-Free Bargaining: An Experimental Test of the Brams-Taylor Adjusted Winner Mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Microeconomics; Economics; Bargaining problem; Complete information; Valuation (finance); Mechanism (biology); Mechanism design; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.04562426239485367,"score_gpt":0.3232036537252857,"score_spread":0.277579391330432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009939958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92847294,0.00015791398,0.0305501,0.0011139744,0.0003972487,0.0007811366,0.0002794474,0.00012761644,0.038119603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801869,0.000115321745,0.010300708,0.0002930226,0.00008324481,0.00081854715,0.00014029605,0.00007030376,0.007991618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962404,0.0015851147,0.00021517147,0.00055347657,0.0011406183,0.00026526532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972329,0.018306825,0.0023618038,0.0053145355,0.00087656395,0.0008113539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008733198,0.00091091625,0.0011333968,0.0006504349,0.0010095407,0.0023086118,0.0023459117,0.0023174644,0.021983843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040934674,0.00044416526,0.00055908656,0.00050664414,0.0027424411,0.0040829843,0.0017596061,0.0023615272,0.0015215585],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05619361,0.040112108,0.009216206,0.0016529018,0.0013223945,0.00039723702,0.005304471,0.047890477,0.06873135,0.65252024,0.0077818604,0.108877085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026199883,0.030105336,0.012650617,0.00015633194,0.000766544,0.0003933663,0.0017006475,0.14799462,0.019373128,0.74746335,0.012924369,0.00027179572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006815971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003451548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021983843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006942529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013628211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07354325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011033334","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9037-7","title":"Negotiators' Communication, Perception of Their Counterparts, and Performance in Dyadic E-negotiations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministry of Education, India; Ministry of Earth Sciences","keywords":"Negotiation; Outcome (game theory); Perception; Psychology; Cluster (spacecraft); Social psychology; Process (computing); Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.011043336673922842,"score_gpt":0.25945388619229254,"score_spread":0.2484105495183697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011033334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966209,0.00007830388,0.0002143433,0.00011721601,0.00000825046,0.0000054015604,0.000008743024,0.0000040554746,0.0029428434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.000040643452,0.00010305348,0.000017317325,0.0000062976073,0.00000910082,0.000013263073,0.0000029203593,0.0003421536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569905,0.0031503562,0.00022857946,0.00022717082,0.00040223773,0.00029251518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96088415,0.029925596,0.004881389,0.00081167696,0.0011451852,0.0023519085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056302547,0.0002791662,0.00038689573,0.00086248445,0.001786574,0.004049583,0.0005373478,0.0013906943,0.0042092972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04759807,0.0003145639,0.00018137746,0.0006619094,0.0012000409,0.0020971529,0.0018524976,0.001520609,0.0005631759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005045265,0.0025221214,0.63006794,0.00027923743,0.00033507947,0.002915636,0.2674076,0.002723438,0.010755075,0.0042537693,0.0015749083,0.07211996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022458189,0.0019937966,0.7059294,0.00015265429,0.00022338037,0.0019739878,0.27123153,0.0070339986,0.0020770114,0.005655025,0.0033492025,0.00015539548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016626676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012273758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056302547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039420585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037599448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029775977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014317994","doi":"10.1007/s10726-010-9211-9","title":"How Much Do We Say? Using Informativeness of Negotiation Text Records for Early Prediction of Negotiation Outcomes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Political science","score_opus":0.03516884239572566,"score_gpt":0.3094135245962374,"score_spread":0.27424468220051174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014317994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97980356,0.0008432417,0.01301204,0.0012732485,0.00009690461,0.00012229756,0.000887567,0.00013318399,0.003827823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99434197,0.0002761921,0.004388173,0.00009310879,0.00008249454,0.00005305564,0.00051597314,0.0000106519665,0.00023842057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957634,0.002562683,0.0004481569,0.00039718515,0.0006358827,0.00019273574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82640755,0.14903095,0.013938957,0.003150921,0.005547597,0.0019239988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011850731,0.000500945,0.0005811141,0.0046606744,0.0004960501,0.0027675761,0.0007656008,0.0015146061,0.0016443087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10397693,0.000375486,0.00041342192,0.0017874228,0.0004958178,0.0045254943,0.000860621,0.0021750096,0.00092247326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015635433,0.00057698786,0.8522789,0.00021645983,0.00034996987,0.000237285,0.0016118776,0.0021908325,0.0023860103,0.0008293156,0.0016988046,0.13605997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016287128,0.0013799197,0.8478267,0.00039593788,0.0010408559,0.00077322253,0.0041106665,0.11991864,0.008645749,0.012335386,0.0031876306,0.00022242914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014156995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021959832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011850731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038670358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068444136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06267339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014786300","doi":"10.1007/s10726-013-9360-8","title":"“I am Disgusted by Your Proposal”: The Effects of a Strategic Flinch in Negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Negotiation; Distributive property; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021167766698284105,"score_gpt":0.2903755103098309,"score_spread":0.26920774361154676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014786300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7805639,0.00047741827,0.0030573846,0.01194016,0.00043970844,0.00010816022,0.00004207895,0.0000894593,0.20328182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934274,0.000119883225,0.0012025606,0.001880785,0.00011550694,0.00007558929,0.000015397884,0.00004768589,0.0031152084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98738515,0.009782092,0.0002152486,0.00044154396,0.0015643125,0.00061161345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92643636,0.063439555,0.0035870157,0.001697337,0.0017834915,0.0030562382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010048759,0.00042607705,0.0004343553,0.0012288978,0.0070090406,0.006167764,0.0014604867,0.0064965338,0.018829742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08057429,0.00053844193,0.0005327234,0.00081991527,0.010177244,0.0053685512,0.004486308,0.0061334977,0.0011182463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011311408,0.0063338527,0.03903962,0.0014169762,0.00044530505,0.0053160377,0.35290775,0.010152645,0.03425911,0.35663605,0.033444513,0.14873666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047139907,0.0033116196,0.16496724,0.00090745685,0.00086620543,0.0030318107,0.26635855,0.018527756,0.005939324,0.42389545,0.106551796,0.00092878705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031912571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032440373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018829742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018430356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016632788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06299174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015983013","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9272-4","title":"Cultural Perspective Taking in Cross-Cultural Negotiation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Normative; Ethnic group; Construct (python library); Cultural diversity; Cross-cultural; Social psychology; Psychology; East Asia; Sociology; Political science; Social science; China; Law; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15257245602538244,"score_gpt":0.42886179718923595,"score_spread":0.2762893411638535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015983013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6757568,0.0042398637,0.017349437,0.0063489275,0.00028724287,0.000067135974,0.000016760929,0.00001631219,0.29591748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998374,0.00022690519,0.0006214476,0.000099226185,0.000009159753,0.000012091313,0.000002579555,0.0000051134843,0.0006494402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825158,0.014987563,0.00024437945,0.00046769093,0.0009278238,0.0008566994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96714395,0.026209813,0.0019072873,0.001258189,0.0014849025,0.0019959228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015777482,0.0003992228,0.00038087976,0.001962361,0.0062909895,0.010577972,0.0011637172,0.002952335,0.0062554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038761415,0.0006043919,0.00043340444,0.0019831113,0.015051336,0.007634005,0.004547387,0.0033388853,0.00026766956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038710207,0.00027068213,0.018164024,0.00020472104,0.00016175643,0.002118301,0.38216034,0.0020898997,0.0006719859,0.54578155,0.001278315,0.046711355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018956188,0.0001754799,0.025925312,0.00055314053,0.00016848801,0.0013048603,0.39422992,0.005839092,0.0013227545,0.54828805,0.021851601,0.00015168327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008342632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007172986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015777482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033568495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029790052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083440304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017408362","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9284-8","title":"Community of Practice Behaviors and Individual Learning Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Organizational Learning and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Psychology; Survey data collection; Repertoire; Community of practice; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.040943220149327046,"score_gpt":0.27780420078046997,"score_spread":0.23686098063114291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017408362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930865,0.00007966086,0.0004493618,0.00022977215,0.0000067815376,0.00006412232,0.000044696342,0.000022268168,0.006016851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984906,0.000033668453,0.00033885936,0.000024248604,0.000006043183,0.00003538675,0.00004014864,0.000006964071,0.0010241213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945775,0.002323179,0.00044316959,0.00046337285,0.0014095523,0.00078312715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88111097,0.06731379,0.019532565,0.0046753,0.0092058,0.018161573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007833773,0.00023345459,0.00042654035,0.0033131517,0.0016934081,0.0030642513,0.0009116364,0.001438797,0.0075857365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06643081,0.00021037536,0.0004137322,0.0012323027,0.0012142828,0.002072191,0.003131717,0.0015477615,0.0006576822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007444198,0.0047853016,0.9055142,0.000062051644,0.00023714775,0.00023491457,0.0073493784,0.0008755363,0.0010395735,0.0013317723,0.00047398236,0.07735168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008711485,0.0018553978,0.97613066,0.00006228116,0.00009074463,0.00033850974,0.011798036,0.003259416,0.00064757676,0.0041404855,0.0015322099,0.000057614936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030797878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070020184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007833773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011593347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016074147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04142946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020745337","doi":"10.1007/s10726-013-9365-3","title":"Transitioning From Dynamic Decision Support to Context-Aware Multi-Party Coordination: A Case for Emergency Response","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Task (project management); Decision support system; Dynamic decision-making; Knowledge management; Process management; Event (particle physics); Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.02486702755410657,"score_gpt":0.29584599735976436,"score_spread":0.2709789698056578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020745337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40116096,0.0011442945,0.26651475,0.1220493,0.0013374166,0.0003943021,0.00014250228,0.00052757683,0.20672885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96452165,0.00018241747,0.029152546,0.0010136686,0.0000690053,0.00005520145,0.000024516106,0.00003600635,0.0049449145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721897,0.0014863483,0.00008375381,0.00022966313,0.00040143597,0.0005797987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521244,0.0024368905,0.00026778228,0.0005573605,0.0004821136,0.0010434327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004754985,0.0004643142,0.00043624372,0.00050951575,0.003725489,0.006181716,0.0016475682,0.005732353,0.0040308656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009702834,0.00038171362,0.0005072525,0.0006281398,0.004646301,0.0054364176,0.0044555506,0.00548165,0.00072435034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007591558,0.00065459614,0.006895762,0.0002788004,0.000082210565,0.024281174,0.028427344,0.040289953,0.009353173,0.7694056,0.018615779,0.10095644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002662233,0.00035514266,0.0027859043,0.00023383678,0.00007502523,0.006444688,0.04075816,0.19936667,0.0035143974,0.62646735,0.119573444,0.00015914698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004790432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036679753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006181716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012405844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018831688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02514708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026048849","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9323-5","title":"An Application of Focus Theory to Project Management Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Focus (optics); Project management; Knowledge management; Productivity; Focus group; Process management; Engineering management; Engineering; Systems engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.010187158785697871,"score_gpt":0.3110939285929831,"score_spread":0.30090676980728526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026048849","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043427266,0.0017605992,0.87210745,0.0047298092,0.0001876159,0.00025377166,0.00005727066,0.00015207543,0.077324025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78658,0.0018358841,0.20005266,0.0005658983,0.0001847609,0.0009529801,0.000055119734,0.00009842446,0.009674305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816966,0.001194158,0.0000452549,0.00011986421,0.00036608518,0.00010498924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98353577,0.014798358,0.00028479093,0.00046758432,0.0006502025,0.00026321656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00477155,0.00054807815,0.0006580583,0.0017729063,0.0016257896,0.0019481509,0.0013526235,0.0016519042,0.01022574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017690368,0.00050579634,0.0010307732,0.0013929397,0.0032999797,0.0053111673,0.0023658753,0.0015930891,0.0009640657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082355094,0.00011023568,0.0016141447,0.00016707386,0.000029710414,0.00018056999,0.009369465,0.0051172795,0.0009490579,0.91540205,0.0017932537,0.06518478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008801004,0.00013347687,0.0022431265,0.00017262551,0.000043075703,0.00019397114,0.0023782759,0.039004553,0.0007540584,0.9397867,0.015168044,0.00003427103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022719987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012960593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01022574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017215105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018199257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034208536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026407262","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9081-y","title":"E-negotiations: bridging the practical divide—introduction to the special issue","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Negotiation; Computer science; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.01663531682492785,"score_gpt":0.2605388890420091,"score_spread":0.24390357221708125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026407262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026045914,0.34087533,0.071079604,0.14896639,0.116603956,0.00021711118,0.000262789,0.00044919603,0.31894103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05418618,0.3115454,0.036777135,0.03843752,0.30529594,0.00046566795,0.00080469454,0.00085412816,0.25163332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980768,0.0009666492,0.00015706291,0.00022881044,0.0004366601,0.00013404114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949195,0.003615529,0.00019475562,0.0002845012,0.0006207729,0.000364992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027769303,0.0010156455,0.00091814593,0.002541324,0.0025147507,0.011379194,0.0018696381,0.007195985,0.031073522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006294076,0.00065990543,0.00083613576,0.0042388793,0.00429411,0.019859629,0.0038770975,0.009002573,0.008111359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031094263,0.00014400648,0.0004115769,0.00056877243,0.000012720393,0.00017771841,0.0007374827,0.00051881454,0.00027797464,0.32491714,0.4541204,0.21808235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057074585,0.000026303078,0.0003554185,0.0004723913,0.000004395434,0.00036754974,0.0004975889,0.00063599274,0.00011382772,0.06531829,0.93218386,0.000018686696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011593269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015816792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031073522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014244397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011280059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103951275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028717431","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9003-9","title":"Integrating Uncertain Preferences into Status Quo Analysis with Applications to an Environmental Conflict","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Preference; Decision maker; Status quo bias; Flexibility (engineering); Conflict analysis; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Uncertainty analysis; Management science; Graph; Operations research; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Theoretical computer science; Simulation; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.055977886046850486,"score_gpt":0.3686982426353608,"score_spread":0.3127203565885103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028717431","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028135035,0.00025901996,0.9630973,0.0006308377,0.00007439008,0.000052998108,0.000025047213,0.000039374372,0.0076860473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6942418,0.0008080775,0.29949614,0.00017635892,0.00015948527,0.00025627398,0.00004174742,0.000067112036,0.0047529917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796754,0.0014026831,0.0000713309,0.000116878226,0.00034765463,0.00009389387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892581,0.00931581,0.0003606449,0.00028753883,0.00056790997,0.00020995425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049503245,0.00079091213,0.0009465438,0.0009993345,0.001170787,0.0029323143,0.0015995564,0.0016513239,0.0049075666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01963457,0.00057018665,0.000967549,0.0020991506,0.0019083414,0.004473372,0.0021643136,0.0023360236,0.00030018506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007784098,0.00014281855,0.0015650728,0.00017600588,0.00007440982,0.00032731314,0.0009829443,0.31511566,0.0009038151,0.61171097,0.0013119236,0.06761114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012065994,0.000036047284,0.00019055197,0.000022085378,0.000021953836,0.000040910745,0.00022540707,0.73159444,0.00025303173,0.2662785,0.0013049518,0.000020031981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026216977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028039746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049503245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009590075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008945006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026180148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029184649","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9002-x","title":"The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Management science; Computer science; Graph; Operations research; Conflict analysis; Engineering; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.0771669332564439,"score_gpt":0.36432862451707126,"score_spread":0.28716169126062735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029184649","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018621515,0.0023956045,0.9463865,0.0059553143,0.00024261525,0.00011963536,0.00047200336,0.0002185411,0.025588242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6870706,0.0058722543,0.28714803,0.0013345674,0.0004338346,0.00063706766,0.0009125512,0.000230826,0.016360233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975817,0.0015892702,0.00006596806,0.00030857415,0.000301399,0.00015303786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957831,0.003089249,0.00028899603,0.00029787415,0.00024675706,0.00029398716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021339455,0.0013680591,0.0015687422,0.0021885065,0.0012316246,0.004396419,0.003589323,0.0038588645,0.009473853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008803001,0.00061542814,0.0012927756,0.0035844557,0.003564944,0.009315358,0.001650007,0.0028674558,0.0017098669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005024067,0.000035254125,0.0003158371,0.0001031619,0.000047813963,0.000098350414,0.00021949245,0.08821613,0.00022620302,0.8934905,0.0036365965,0.013560384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020508647,0.000011705897,0.00006080842,0.000017958417,0.000016948776,0.000047079353,0.00006071993,0.13661751,0.000039462597,0.8598899,0.0031994593,0.000017947596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074325614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006855624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009473853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027929181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021480783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03169322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031942401","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9336-0","title":"Agent-Based Reallocation Problem on Social Networks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource allocation; Optimal allocation; Computer science; Rationality; Sequence (biology); Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06773286717480637,"score_gpt":0.3471215817928376,"score_spread":0.2793887146180312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031942401","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15021512,0.0007749529,0.8351362,0.0021360763,0.00015047925,0.00025074484,0.0002934158,0.0001447813,0.010898244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92711943,0.00054970535,0.061528016,0.0001486636,0.00013539898,0.0003204882,0.00019945248,0.00004955583,0.0099493265],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973349,0.0015484773,0.00010245655,0.0004381463,0.00032364563,0.00025240087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99032414,0.0076559526,0.00093159865,0.0002795769,0.00033358933,0.0004751742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044978335,0.001140608,0.0026831976,0.0014910202,0.0012492654,0.0031802002,0.0033595294,0.004402008,0.004855984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012362178,0.00087921874,0.00093760627,0.0021840015,0.0020293333,0.006501365,0.0024763544,0.0014578286,0.000451937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000326333,0.00015247152,0.00073997636,0.00019095199,0.00015407428,0.00036948518,0.00018824992,0.8783622,0.0007151119,0.102904625,0.0018336994,0.014062848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006778151,0.000044718967,0.00016713789,0.0000136218505,0.000022383603,0.000065991466,0.00008469481,0.9316414,0.00019112154,0.06695703,0.00073090143,0.0000132039595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024864634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015463391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004855984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001783067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010534754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02378714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033098199","doi":"10.1023/b:grup.0000045751.21207.35","title":"Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Stability (learning theory); Conflict resolution; Mathematical economics; Graph; Decision maker; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Operations research; Epistemology; Combinatorics; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1912153315142716,"score_gpt":0.3808573237261959,"score_spread":0.1896419922119243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033098199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10161323,0.0005314605,0.8745803,0.0021896379,0.000110550965,0.0001117543,0.00029356574,0.00013719847,0.020432318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903934,0.0007907586,0.098586455,0.00032720595,0.00014593502,0.00024479823,0.0002504436,0.00010394612,0.00915707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969543,0.0021330593,0.000076228156,0.00026589853,0.0003544332,0.00021615256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988457,0.009669493,0.0004696047,0.00048640234,0.00046012533,0.0004573408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029038,0.001083852,0.0019072217,0.00255995,0.0012798553,0.0036718128,0.0027361014,0.0032411024,0.009238816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017144796,0.0007038453,0.001294548,0.003583085,0.0028884285,0.009510144,0.0015551487,0.0025672184,0.0010308842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014490285,0.00006745546,0.00060510327,0.000096235926,0.00006438389,0.00009791386,0.00023706515,0.12871663,0.00039566853,0.85542125,0.0013693643,0.012784035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003508225,0.000024357912,0.00014283878,0.000010582396,0.000025985524,0.000041055613,0.000060623228,0.30635127,0.00006992293,0.69258016,0.0006347782,0.000023411822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051282714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049772677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009238816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018998747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012065927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030906916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035138425","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9117-y","title":"To Discount or Not to Discount: An Assessment of Perceptions, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Electronic Auctions with Discounts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Common value auction; Bidding; Forward auction; Business; Microeconomics; Vickrey auction; Database transaction; Eauction; Marketing; Auction theory; Perception; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07425441209913983,"score_gpt":0.42522645384808355,"score_spread":0.3509720417489437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035138425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998033,0.000048281596,0.00034427486,0.00012066021,0.00000761317,0.00002397029,0.000022426386,0.0000028883908,0.0013969198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.00006156017,0.0004430471,0.000074016905,0.000007004743,0.000020376305,0.000045873105,0.000002548954,0.0002547382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793553,0.0008125101,0.00025445333,0.00015226712,0.0006112314,0.00023400421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522613,0.026316406,0.012560261,0.0028757895,0.0024555202,0.0035307568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009562573,0.0005099416,0.00036555028,0.00107174,0.0005700771,0.0029465873,0.0005713878,0.0018279508,0.0022033216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051364556,0.00053749664,0.00092657586,0.00055944803,0.0016593159,0.0023266233,0.0013447361,0.0028597955,0.0005070811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032683844,0.0033550141,0.94576645,0.00012268082,0.00060411566,0.00020957462,0.012608606,0.0022394124,0.0029253399,0.0021988037,0.0005041314,0.02619755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006464575,0.0045495075,0.9308723,0.0001604493,0.0006653953,0.0008427042,0.031002728,0.01847211,0.002491635,0.0076159,0.0024279847,0.00025287538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022137412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021070063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009562573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005573082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054524106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050572276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037011093","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9154-6","title":"Perceptual Graph Model Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Computer science; Graph; Conflict resolution; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Theoretical computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.08354642610346615,"score_gpt":0.3660137352203822,"score_spread":0.2824673091169161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037011093","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037164222,0.00044360626,0.8286278,0.001652699,0.00026484873,0.00021492332,0.0015918377,0.0016955921,0.12834442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75605655,0.00085754355,0.17014469,0.00051896117,0.000116272495,0.0003228895,0.0021869093,0.00047163304,0.06932453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995121,0.00014990906,0.000016962516,0.00017634704,0.000102734666,0.000042056126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.000361761,0.000066383785,0.00021991394,0.00016955024,0.00007998788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004036106,0.0006281093,0.00043686252,0.00094946264,0.00066101894,0.0027298022,0.0010253447,0.0013325657,0.027487984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003680792,0.00035351273,0.00055685104,0.00086542126,0.0010137237,0.0032606374,0.0013858237,0.0009106563,0.0036320693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007946725,0.00005105439,0.0005047646,0.000112032794,0.000032008065,0.00012832209,0.00027200914,0.08047595,0.0023695754,0.8722563,0.00870428,0.035014346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033422468,0.000035628964,0.0003180961,0.000020846825,0.000020799838,0.000066795394,0.0001323557,0.3672155,0.0009754705,0.60564166,0.025515849,0.000023634218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005821726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004042397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027487984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010995687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007012593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091956496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037501514","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9293-7","title":"A Brief Outline of the Israel–Palestinian Conflict","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Jewish National Fund","keywords":"Nationalism; Judaism; Zionism; Christianity; Jewish state; Politics; Islam; Independence (probability theory); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0404703150303629,"score_gpt":0.3088685277023588,"score_spread":0.2683982126719959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037501514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028246762,0.13588318,0.05075756,0.08326075,0.006604088,0.002328342,0.0048140935,0.00024552707,0.6878597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3108201,0.25041986,0.0982924,0.032812938,0.010738893,0.0042722886,0.0048789745,0.00019213192,0.28757244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965644,0.00016122505,0.000033594446,0.00003696859,0.000044084085,0.00006772759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996935,0.00016264706,0.000047326266,0.000013541434,0.00003867394,0.000044257253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009007852,0.0010496125,0.0004951155,0.0022560852,0.0038913481,0.004970568,0.0012578927,0.0034793515,0.02471397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092626305,0.00043635454,0.00060141645,0.0029769978,0.0028104833,0.003390397,0.0021631422,0.0026977884,0.005178735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050531675,0.00020689535,0.0018126152,0.0006676899,0.0000064156993,0.0008196596,0.0039353697,0.001303354,0.0012030007,0.91165024,0.027663024,0.05068116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010533281,0.0001051854,0.006852781,0.0011698401,0.0000057011684,0.001137031,0.004147202,0.0011105333,0.00028198992,0.15852919,0.8266128,0.00003722699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011777138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013646608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02471397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038556675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002349326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08267647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050686242","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9095-5","title":"Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems: An Overview","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Negotiation theory; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Decision support system; Process management; Software; Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.047078392334281606,"score_gpt":0.31357891221394624,"score_spread":0.2665005198796646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050686242","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041341963,0.6250317,0.31462628,0.003072145,0.0011353843,0.00032765136,0.00013197916,0.0010142924,0.05052644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10873011,0.64612126,0.21616648,0.0017961313,0.0056396876,0.000738281,0.0006374139,0.00022921199,0.019941442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972561,0.0008544722,0.0003171964,0.00034705212,0.0010556689,0.00016955224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741757,0.0018362616,0.00013050501,0.00015137966,0.00034804258,0.00011615673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026532349,0.0012792874,0.0019617893,0.003272082,0.0009809213,0.008983335,0.0028459379,0.0044840677,0.005545566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033349777,0.0010271521,0.00085189304,0.0062950873,0.0013897377,0.010557321,0.0021515163,0.0022280228,0.0031815264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002013993,0.00039838426,0.0007860618,0.0050634365,0.00014441166,0.00037203697,0.0005330998,0.01074742,0.002304472,0.19523168,0.017007116,0.7672105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080722886,0.0002837879,0.0010333041,0.002101854,0.00018256027,0.0019181744,0.00057542045,0.061966244,0.003253429,0.24127848,0.6871875,0.00013847901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011427499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055857335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008983335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011148332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012023464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018551707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052924957","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9005-7","title":"The Pacific Salmon Treaty: A Century of Debate and an Uncertain Future","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Thompson Rivers University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Prosperity; Negotiation; Payment; Fishery; Fishing; International trade; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Economic growth; Biology","score_opus":0.00954737397147259,"score_gpt":0.2543451348748471,"score_spread":0.24479776090337452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052924957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035579677,0.017832002,0.0009357275,0.93794525,0.0041025016,0.0000063109132,0.000055086173,0.000014124113,0.035551086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29989794,0.048800774,0.003556098,0.57749176,0.027436111,0.00013698843,0.00017427797,0.00013056464,0.04237549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98226124,0.006229063,0.0004165123,0.0015572339,0.007868778,0.001667269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96869904,0.020141521,0.0024016225,0.0014980789,0.0035340085,0.003725841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027144711,0.0005868884,0.0010607429,0.0012955064,0.009599809,0.016285457,0.002886036,0.025196139,0.010352674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050256204,0.00042733722,0.00053222955,0.0034930697,0.036351617,0.015294624,0.0057162046,0.023653457,0.0011544257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008743395,0.00006731913,0.0012914776,0.00018248716,0.00004216136,0.00019212648,0.003892699,0.00042711568,0.00016305428,0.57157815,0.3490991,0.072976895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003220857,0.000026552805,0.0022218,0.0008659197,0.000021307656,0.000065781656,0.006783184,0.0002833819,0.000081040234,0.36681318,0.6227495,0.000056075485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037590403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061477616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037590403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009599646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02521952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14355671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054523327","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9168-8","title":"Deception and its Detection Under Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Synchronicity; Deception; Credibility; Asynchronous communication; Psychology; Computer-mediated communication; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Computer science; Communication; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.010673286039477196,"score_gpt":0.2733635771069566,"score_spread":0.2626902910674794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054523327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98710024,0.00022397311,0.0077787805,0.00034673742,0.000030189492,0.000021588257,0.00003096389,0.000017980508,0.0044494863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930596,0.00003125101,0.00041451666,0.000010473777,0.00001589401,0.00000716141,0.000008039742,0.0000017093554,0.0002050454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686074,0.0016404346,0.00015718244,0.00035611764,0.00067441986,0.00031110758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86520386,0.11027023,0.0147263585,0.0040114135,0.0038091664,0.0019789238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058953986,0.0002915401,0.00054694933,0.0008802246,0.00056244637,0.0021284148,0.0007102888,0.0012478604,0.0024211083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08450292,0.0003211495,0.00017509959,0.0005514327,0.0011856011,0.0025140846,0.0013733362,0.0013362317,0.00021012938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023737814,0.003168559,0.40819675,0.00090606103,0.0006016826,0.0023535986,0.014958386,0.08543876,0.05873851,0.1493527,0.0030180714,0.24952906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035418852,0.002152186,0.3467406,0.000087953114,0.00022117315,0.0010381724,0.0033183284,0.5267928,0.009335852,0.10866476,0.0011117446,0.00018230062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001145024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005640956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058953986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006356697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006386702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031178176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057403654","doi":"10.1007/s10726-014-9417-3","title":"Numerical Methods to Calculate Fuzzy Boundaries for Brownfield Redevelopment Negotiations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Redevelopment; Operations research; Mathematics; Civil engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07995154632963253,"score_gpt":0.2892740485479583,"score_spread":0.20932250221832577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057403654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070768204,0.0000879297,0.98971176,0.00006805854,0.00004159637,0.000048457474,0.000035344354,0.00025382783,0.0026762178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21360342,0.00010466632,0.78315175,0.000054373595,0.000027193786,0.00022778854,0.00011432396,0.00022997391,0.0024864392],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879223,0.0005276273,0.00008170878,0.00011299925,0.00040775223,0.00007769866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122566,0.0065159677,0.00037758634,0.00045994984,0.0011799524,0.00024088904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004407305,0.0005715191,0.0009308432,0.0023585733,0.0012969712,0.0021986605,0.0017424312,0.0015705865,0.008754843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026615348,0.0006137523,0.000665428,0.0015014774,0.0009880908,0.0022491682,0.0017209346,0.002158728,0.0010064859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015804406,0.00011057081,0.0008295579,0.00014210305,0.000027712094,0.00008452118,0.00033970037,0.7424068,0.0022448103,0.09910384,0.0023345328,0.15221782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011668296,0.000007893514,0.000066383174,0.000017175867,0.000003147105,0.000011633827,0.000023347908,0.9807011,0.00058666756,0.017795226,0.00076820987,0.0000076193837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074953693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055912314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008754843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014547679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001578208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029287875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059384236","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9160-3","title":"An Agreement Index with Respect to a Consensus Preorder","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Index (typography); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.023357741022663383,"score_gpt":0.25080412286548137,"score_spread":0.22744638184281799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059384236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2945847,0.00044370268,0.6483766,0.0009740373,0.0004213262,0.00034267234,0.0011997306,0.0006987409,0.052958593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935119,0.00015505619,0.09884168,0.00007743208,0.00023104035,0.00024486834,0.00074709754,0.0001021586,0.0060887104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945686,0.0018179218,0.00050990784,0.0008373524,0.0017860834,0.0004801236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97117805,0.015515767,0.0029180911,0.0028683278,0.0049031097,0.0026166583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00720229,0.0006230533,0.001246521,0.005973619,0.0014713858,0.0041688783,0.0013708182,0.0015381309,0.006824414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025833325,0.00023778032,0.0007529681,0.0037697542,0.0023509872,0.0063076126,0.0015125077,0.0016832958,0.0010037659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009799849,0.00038948108,0.008456099,0.00023965939,0.0001447747,0.00017050141,0.0005738768,0.0399471,0.009599929,0.8445104,0.006011689,0.0889764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008261541,0.00067604997,0.0054348935,0.00009069168,0.000094197734,0.0003110727,0.00050126464,0.35057506,0.008944792,0.6255689,0.007603232,0.00011722136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047828085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004879834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00720229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021359802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001619311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038089752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060080858","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9169-7","title":"See No Evil: The Effect of Communication Medium and Motivation on Deception Detection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Social media; Computer-mediated communication; Nonverbal communication; Cheap talk; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Communication; Linguistics; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013723599554853803,"score_gpt":0.30215616113373306,"score_spread":0.28843256157887925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060080858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946181,0.00015067388,0.0004717598,0.0003418528,0.000046043482,0.00002252911,0.00003484266,0.000015277576,0.004298942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982147,0.000068846944,0.00050760806,0.00009842835,0.000047441896,0.000033215816,0.000028193013,0.00003984191,0.0009615528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969409,0.0021593145,0.00011932523,0.00022168821,0.00033027414,0.00022845807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8118055,0.16869469,0.009338486,0.0035108675,0.0018088475,0.004841632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064148135,0.0003787395,0.00050919165,0.00087002123,0.00091200875,0.0038928196,0.0008570628,0.0015373044,0.011515328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109810136,0.00044635535,0.00033586365,0.0004418921,0.00098229,0.0021986952,0.0015596873,0.00252991,0.00086788385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11993212,0.024156047,0.5753011,0.00089944643,0.0012611956,0.0017194687,0.012102295,0.0059075747,0.057991106,0.016921474,0.0031951112,0.18061297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002821058,0.00892343,0.9188285,0.00034329476,0.0012431183,0.0011877324,0.0064373384,0.02566637,0.008534686,0.022820415,0.0029058405,0.00028822976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007514521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006330458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011515328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044817608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081025873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0385226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062515972","doi":"10.1007/s10726-010-9188-4","title":"Matrix Representation of Conflict Resolution in Multiple-Decision-Maker Graph Models with Preference Uncertainty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Graph; Matrix representation; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Representation (politics); Decision maker; Coding (social sciences); Stability (learning theory); Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Operations research","score_opus":0.10734779349256454,"score_gpt":0.3661427879976759,"score_spread":0.25879499450511134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062515972","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025304472,0.00022934012,0.9649879,0.00056324125,0.00005962196,0.00006004776,0.0001555159,0.00012349845,0.0085164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8158409,0.0004618611,0.1744067,0.00014533533,0.00008170227,0.00033434047,0.0002771899,0.000078667676,0.008373341],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984869,0.0009412815,0.000051009676,0.00015020913,0.00026253035,0.00010794156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962698,0.00281418,0.00030322402,0.00014831072,0.00029334344,0.00017112774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019226667,0.00089692394,0.0013509078,0.0013832597,0.0007093979,0.0029502807,0.0021672556,0.0017501486,0.008204104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006837205,0.0005718297,0.0007989401,0.0022602084,0.0010579918,0.003769897,0.0010510755,0.0015370359,0.0007280102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107534164,0.00007274939,0.00019263593,0.000103168124,0.000048711427,0.00010930625,0.0002575842,0.52629656,0.0007037767,0.4570283,0.0016295355,0.013450206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011058095,0.000013754843,0.000028783958,0.0000061995806,0.0000062218396,0.000011642832,0.00002812375,0.88444406,0.000080134225,0.114943296,0.0004184975,0.000008123713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005222018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003902139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008204104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014552168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011193894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027445436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064340659","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9263-5","title":"Strategic Behavior in Contested-Pile Methods for Fair Division of Indivisible Items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Alternation (linguistics); Preference; Division (mathematics); Adversary; Class (philosophy); Focus (optics); Simple (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16706845523757302,"score_gpt":0.43525087288654263,"score_spread":0.2681824176489696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064340659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53576213,0.00020492398,0.45449087,0.0004719166,0.000070484384,0.00042508822,0.000053361982,0.00016531347,0.0083559165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88775355,0.00005677764,0.10764704,0.00005727887,0.00002454114,0.000437118,0.000035296027,0.00006167353,0.0039266176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838785,0.012823807,0.00037693168,0.00064489344,0.001786413,0.00048948976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157985,0.073348984,0.0026787512,0.005886255,0.001225265,0.001062336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024226416,0.00075407216,0.0013239861,0.0009737279,0.0014850058,0.0036516609,0.0022114108,0.0019686962,0.0075349184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08280265,0.000901692,0.00079941296,0.0012116012,0.003206224,0.0059251008,0.0035083164,0.0021122391,0.00051824935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007202466,0.002624036,0.0062694135,0.00065738684,0.00026251396,0.00013938913,0.0030929022,0.2047173,0.010082223,0.6466861,0.0017254507,0.11654089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039146148,0.000503695,0.0014840636,0.00004245432,0.00004554762,0.000057262496,0.00030743354,0.78496265,0.0022195936,0.20935908,0.00055664696,0.000070078895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015197102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016421737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024226416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020501658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017656434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12812304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066727264","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9151-9","title":"The Role of Emotion and Language in Dyadic E-negotiations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Logistic regression; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.007705353453706061,"score_gpt":0.2819775833716088,"score_spread":0.27427222991790273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066727264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8791871,0.0015529543,0.024144124,0.002600152,0.00011173831,0.00006233507,0.000092966,0.0000650294,0.092183664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965699,0.00017497034,0.0022370275,0.00008186136,0.0000181601,0.000033540582,0.000012743057,0.000019397847,0.0008524799],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944289,0.0044114655,0.00013011124,0.00030022245,0.00042836546,0.00030089833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743604,0.021674827,0.0018141342,0.0005777393,0.00079463137,0.00077825884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287538,0.0003034822,0.00036647284,0.00091253244,0.0020720984,0.0061100614,0.00074875756,0.0012114818,0.0053706956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025955,0.0003802768,0.00024323771,0.0008308546,0.0036357052,0.004994252,0.002589304,0.0015868563,0.00036746552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026214484,0.00084348925,0.09540106,0.0012985565,0.00028841305,0.004997785,0.38667715,0.006409904,0.02602706,0.31344923,0.002186102,0.15979974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735624,0.0011520003,0.23888767,0.0009895765,0.000515638,0.004775364,0.26935747,0.033526264,0.007741495,0.41215003,0.029950524,0.00048044272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014427458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008242681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061100614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007391819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009131948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022674978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070730061","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9083-9","title":"Strategies and language trends in learning success and failure of negotiation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Pragmatics; Compromise; Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Natural language processing; Grammar; Task (project management); Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01100939733111548,"score_gpt":0.27744443368061544,"score_spread":0.26643503634949994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070730061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988154,0.0012165157,0.00070140697,0.0012771202,0.000018317782,0.000014394339,0.000103551705,0.000022588529,0.008492138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887496,0.00026386508,0.00019372578,0.000041476564,0.00001530866,0.000010735055,0.00004339371,0.000010922446,0.0005456122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751127,0.00083985674,0.00019116126,0.00038140846,0.0006601797,0.00041601906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92780155,0.050265193,0.009437919,0.0013062421,0.0072303773,0.0039587156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056517776,0.0001636531,0.0003708058,0.004715817,0.00073680514,0.004125404,0.0010320649,0.0012924081,0.0045614974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05981636,0.0002491287,0.00027290997,0.0028551721,0.0022033479,0.004752445,0.0011755544,0.0017561677,0.00087329483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013487622,0.00051834364,0.8828978,0.00014875748,0.0001299357,0.00043054792,0.011871473,0.0010172712,0.0018116039,0.013032687,0.0011058808,0.08568701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000578597,0.0005163829,0.95149314,0.00010450126,0.00011788788,0.0009548313,0.01986086,0.0040891445,0.0017945481,0.017280588,0.003666935,0.00006325737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030480204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032620057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056517776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009862671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010841877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029889762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074338258","doi":"10.1007/s10726-015-9438-6","title":"An Acceptable Consistency-Based Framework for Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Preference Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group decision-making; Preference; Context (archaeology); Group (periodic table); Aggregate (composite); Consistency index; Computer science; Operator (biology); Mathematics; Decision maker; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Econometrics; Information retrieval; Data mining; Statistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2063661242382024,"score_gpt":0.42159254124492884,"score_spread":0.21522641700672646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074338258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031689447,0.00014487698,0.98966146,0.000823423,0.0000627885,0.00010520862,0.00005138037,0.000054500844,0.0059274132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26546195,0.00025894953,0.7296212,0.00048865954,0.00025444498,0.0010753277,0.00019242508,0.000084159255,0.0025629273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96141917,0.023366421,0.0023424616,0.0025195172,0.009219421,0.0011329317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95715165,0.02742735,0.0024404489,0.0046277936,0.007448029,0.0009047254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03366566,0.0016929625,0.002457108,0.0035938672,0.0027834915,0.007398387,0.005955262,0.004160744,0.004743471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074191764,0.0013818601,0.0037271068,0.004332452,0.00673281,0.010200481,0.005968728,0.006474525,0.0010204708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038627,0.00003876339,0.00018859252,0.00009352912,0.000048487247,0.00007051739,0.00035205405,0.01158181,0.00021237154,0.9779081,0.00075321697,0.0087139085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003403827,0.000044009408,0.00008833901,0.000051717867,0.000032538945,0.000060488186,0.00007480258,0.06728133,0.00023922403,0.9299945,0.0020689878,0.000029976742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019402428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014294166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03366566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003087431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004697233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17804313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074715765","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9144-8","title":"Advances in Drama Theory for Managing Global Hazards and Disasters. Part II: Coping with Global Climate Change and Environmental Catastrophe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Global warming; Climate change; Politics; Coping (psychology); Natural resource economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Economics; Political science; Environmental science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.009692986291041593,"score_gpt":0.2338103167955787,"score_spread":0.2241173305045371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074715765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014761773,0.09439117,0.3447373,0.062965766,0.0040237033,0.00027875413,0.00024476944,0.00023695006,0.47835985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77213526,0.06934146,0.09878366,0.005104731,0.005550409,0.00087396253,0.000367532,0.00020816298,0.04763489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860054,0.0006825669,0.00006561822,0.00017583069,0.0002972571,0.00017824842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980471,0.0013166909,0.00018097373,0.00016143885,0.00015829413,0.00013554873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019516188,0.0009997055,0.00094789086,0.0017824041,0.0021192338,0.006141121,0.002501141,0.0033421428,0.014251155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038191427,0.000443767,0.0011118858,0.0015816423,0.009102887,0.0074253217,0.0025459707,0.0042022476,0.001656593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008029828,0.00003801545,0.00015232887,0.00017289458,0.000014120082,0.000041674706,0.00084139116,0.0027156025,0.00010210612,0.9768332,0.005144427,0.013936222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017604634,0.0000248825,0.00033805828,0.00019784147,0.000016129612,0.0000876739,0.0013430273,0.013173002,0.00011595061,0.900752,0.08391048,0.000023414303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026887346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020971438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014251155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036922737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002532796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047674835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075416390","doi":"10.1007/s10726-010-9195-5","title":"Formal Analysis of Multilateral Negotiations Over the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Tragedy of the commons; Outcome (game theory); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Political science; International trade; Business; Economics; Commons; Law; International law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04683219450918549,"score_gpt":0.3578468862963918,"score_spread":0.3110146917872063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075416390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30734134,0.0015867254,0.58891636,0.0076531093,0.00028488276,0.00022155956,0.0005785636,0.0002749974,0.09314236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686725,0.00030104452,0.0256548,0.00014749389,0.00010802436,0.00009002511,0.00019972086,0.0000462161,0.0047801924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981002,0.00089135056,0.000106014806,0.00016076525,0.00041905922,0.00032257495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923269,0.005538973,0.0006816842,0.0004314141,0.00078920723,0.00023166013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037436166,0.0005945873,0.0007024074,0.0014048638,0.0017696138,0.0048202495,0.0017778449,0.0013969636,0.008600125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013352522,0.00047158526,0.001249876,0.0010780442,0.0044631544,0.0042533325,0.0021556662,0.0025626458,0.00039744037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031673197,0.000044899552,0.00034305386,0.00003709037,0.000021409545,0.00015365923,0.00042451685,0.050961364,0.00027745872,0.943017,0.00060024025,0.004087625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024454439,0.000010813771,0.00020629472,0.00002234049,0.000015931864,0.000027198292,0.0002099002,0.13441776,0.00023502416,0.86294013,0.001877853,0.000012335495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019691227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013010756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019691227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044359905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004184109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03915322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077743017","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9245-7","title":"Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Trait; Perception; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychological safety; Team composition; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.05303997572674886,"score_gpt":0.3283969082856282,"score_spread":0.27535693255887933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077743017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968065,0.00003317196,0.0007085342,0.0001126829,0.0000051342886,0.000011554981,0.000012742582,0.000008114716,0.0023016278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960285,0.0000124113585,0.00022153417,0.000012664808,0.0000037683292,0.000005432338,0.000010093232,0.000005280963,0.00012591759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933535,0.0045086504,0.00032546272,0.00029751004,0.0011160048,0.00039895086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89386314,0.076407716,0.016000707,0.00383547,0.0038988788,0.00599412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066603576,0.0001895245,0.00023216472,0.00091731787,0.0007935313,0.0027045181,0.00035094243,0.0005779689,0.0015989275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049319614,0.00022417172,0.00029663846,0.0005521449,0.0010661539,0.0010498016,0.0018132593,0.0011839945,0.00015835465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016818908,0.0014314837,0.91609025,0.000112249945,0.00040371902,0.00028624115,0.022377117,0.001295144,0.006046134,0.0018604083,0.0003968206,0.04801848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004438925,0.0006529518,0.98247164,0.000032556556,0.00011354926,0.00024898176,0.009795301,0.0029075667,0.0011054687,0.0018803102,0.0007072998,0.000040011728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013511158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014369786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066603576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047594143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010343904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035223782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078270699","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9038-6","title":"Modeling e-Negotiation Processes for a Service Oriented Architecture","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Process management; Architecture; Service-oriented architecture; Service (business); Software engineering; Knowledge management; Business; Web service; Programming language; Sociology; Marketing; Art","score_opus":0.013355613251461737,"score_gpt":0.2217117350160083,"score_spread":0.20835612176454657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078270699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07630434,0.00020211165,0.9098973,0.00063064496,0.000054391334,0.00019962157,0.00012438624,0.00061231526,0.011974822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67621213,0.00048174817,0.31095788,0.0001158414,0.00003818864,0.00035089097,0.000311129,0.00013071099,0.011401539],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926704,0.0002903475,0.00006569847,0.000083401144,0.00017725429,0.00011617838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.00046130645,0.000069633374,0.00006834062,0.000113773734,0.000048556234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044564,0.0005984363,0.00051660015,0.0007829555,0.0011799481,0.003486647,0.0015217817,0.0021692717,0.005343834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002927262,0.0007428302,0.0012409892,0.0011028611,0.001397681,0.0031525719,0.0011800858,0.0016819672,0.00083284534],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008927599,0.00009036125,0.00088999746,0.00006986713,0.000038099548,0.0002160645,0.0004768097,0.659616,0.001964733,0.32473302,0.00048759795,0.01132827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020739946,0.000011196451,0.00006975429,0.000008104439,0.000017419905,0.000019257765,0.000052755684,0.95999014,0.00047317275,0.037386887,0.0019436879,0.0000069246876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020459555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014792154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020459555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021690198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002530466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040680945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079267563","doi":"10.1007/s10726-013-9353-7","title":"Multi-attribute Auction and Negotiation for e-Procurement of Logistics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Procurement; Reverse auction; Business; Database transaction; Task (project management); Computer science; Process management; Transaction cost; Process (computing); Vickrey auction; Microeconomics; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Industrial organization; Operations research; Auction theory; Marketing; Bidding; Economics; Database; Finance","score_opus":0.025199545700602732,"score_gpt":0.232555998142046,"score_spread":0.20735645244144327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079267563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05698575,0.0015725067,0.93219817,0.0006690149,0.00023317299,0.00013677187,0.000046866076,0.00008966185,0.0080681015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87980425,0.00073587016,0.11245931,0.000052333176,0.0001268146,0.000106437015,0.000051701532,0.000027712633,0.006635618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942919,0.003980349,0.0002670892,0.0002862199,0.0008358228,0.0003386558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949837,0.0038346206,0.00029348236,0.00033550794,0.0003303338,0.00022243775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007688954,0.00055108964,0.0014652552,0.0009767625,0.0013546022,0.003910362,0.0018047446,0.0015544705,0.004005061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012323424,0.0005464327,0.0014892217,0.0019368154,0.0017652627,0.005515611,0.0019695773,0.0024769597,0.00036018135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000691187,0.00035551106,0.0009686962,0.0002453562,0.00016327351,0.0003309906,0.00049491454,0.34099692,0.0015501289,0.5891535,0.0013400977,0.06370945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043260814,0.00006251822,0.00021672861,0.000015647483,0.000027412185,0.000071567185,0.00008280463,0.8388098,0.0004926703,0.1591479,0.0010015435,0.000028132585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030214477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016238736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007688954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020471653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00203207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04066354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081629587","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9145-7","title":"Advances in Drama Theory for Managing Global Hazards and Disasters. Part I: Theoretical Foundation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Military Strategy and Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Conflict resolution; Drama; Construct (python library); Emergency management; Risk management; Natural disaster; Risk analysis (engineering); Decision analysis; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Business; Engineering; Microeconomics; Management; Geography; Law; Social science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.00415879131724817,"score_gpt":0.23778736633882785,"score_spread":0.2336285750215797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081629587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021416366,0.046169847,0.30685195,0.04045638,0.0016471382,0.00021607864,0.00017017739,0.000120467324,0.58295166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88980997,0.025054332,0.0535769,0.0021586816,0.0018318468,0.00053795415,0.00016192273,0.00008664026,0.02678172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986167,0.0006579012,0.000059545895,0.0001669318,0.00031822643,0.0001806911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980805,0.0013572604,0.00018211172,0.0001433161,0.00013451403,0.0001021523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022263625,0.00075362466,0.00078549,0.0017071059,0.002096191,0.005222288,0.0023579348,0.0031521705,0.0136688715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037644962,0.0003854647,0.0007564058,0.0015128669,0.009772933,0.00698221,0.0026417682,0.0033037567,0.0014871754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033884771,0.000017553883,0.000080669895,0.00007757223,0.0000047994226,0.000020239957,0.00041868494,0.0016075355,0.000043567892,0.99103594,0.0013480636,0.0053418567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012893534,0.000020985832,0.00019790893,0.00013378308,0.000008381402,0.000061582636,0.00096734305,0.008733517,0.00009824645,0.939248,0.050504547,0.000012840794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001975411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012696027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136688715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035381163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019649093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045726895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086418944","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-0317-4","title":"GSS for Multi-Organizational Collaboration: Reflections on Process and Content","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Process (computing); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Norm (philosophy); Organizational culture; Conceptual framework; Face (sociological concept); Process management; Business; Political science; Sociology; Public relations","score_opus":0.07993964755803365,"score_gpt":0.4006874146477211,"score_spread":0.32074776708968744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086418944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072048716,0.022776982,0.1655801,0.46245974,0.003591682,0.00068021944,0.00023094643,0.0008727846,0.27175882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8363284,0.014389653,0.11116356,0.012703335,0.0013624167,0.00087046775,0.00018918402,0.0009624771,0.022030596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97886765,0.01571163,0.00060760113,0.0005155571,0.0029261692,0.0013713777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87352824,0.10903345,0.0017288411,0.0057571405,0.0065982807,0.0033540677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042524,0.0009127768,0.000675489,0.001723613,0.0045985756,0.012740323,0.0035283421,0.0073665264,0.013544872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06204482,0.0005276408,0.0010965504,0.0017592048,0.017205762,0.022530703,0.008249074,0.010312314,0.0020982139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014629566,0.00040376434,0.001349889,0.0008692288,0.00002512059,0.0004999994,0.07389608,0.0018630957,0.0008647153,0.72517276,0.03052593,0.16438304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058975547,0.00019900338,0.0019060947,0.0019839406,0.000023336326,0.00055591797,0.082214355,0.002514805,0.0018996064,0.5775049,0.3310806,0.00005846355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004995188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046995296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007169078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01049723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22489107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086515875","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9149-3","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post 9-11 Security Environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Disaster risk reduction; Reduction (mathematics); Computer security; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015122389012690866,"score_gpt":0.3238480773682595,"score_spread":0.30872568835556863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086515875","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000515788,0.040999632,0.0026916428,0.10536339,0.8297331,0.00014810615,0.0003029519,0.00012893334,0.020116588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027841055,0.04013669,0.0015003404,0.038931556,0.8527029,0.00017715535,0.000417245,0.00014916724,0.06320083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985838,0.00032581348,0.00017879994,0.00020737102,0.0005372948,0.00016689191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333304,0.0031191392,0.00041649689,0.00024024207,0.0016739728,0.0012171537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030023968,0.0017929758,0.0020609538,0.0019291871,0.0016998847,0.0044990266,0.0018217283,0.006986648,0.04805427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005944413,0.000538021,0.0014646252,0.0010777474,0.0013587666,0.0033823748,0.002851707,0.0076958286,0.015116773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026716913,0.00006521907,0.00012889151,0.000323699,0.00000883547,0.000091382855,0.0000711778,0.00008893747,0.00018047103,0.0012296803,0.9638848,0.03390031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013059603,0.00007607788,0.0010220502,0.00040982288,0.000010602023,0.00021093259,0.00018256558,0.000120312376,0.000064782755,0.0020588362,0.99581283,0.00001805833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016513986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004549015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04805427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012603292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019318481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1607576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091246538","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9285-7","title":"Negotiating with the Chinese: Are They More Likely to Use Unethical Strategies?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Context (archaeology); Globe; Public relations; Business; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.0284554973908096,"score_gpt":0.32711574996364956,"score_spread":0.29866025257283996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091246538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979461,0.00011641395,0.000020235073,0.00040068163,0.000015532047,0.000012517945,0.000020622432,7.387191e-7,0.0014672073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983126,0.00022020726,0.000040980194,0.00042760617,0.000021129748,0.000013472013,0.00003206982,0.0000024112032,0.0009294612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986603,0.00029896514,0.000095870724,0.00012044096,0.0002810956,0.0005432991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287415,0.0011223683,0.0033030955,0.00026865542,0.00055655226,0.0018752551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017749082,0.00031793438,0.0005098828,0.0014817506,0.0027509741,0.0029478946,0.0006902941,0.0013788687,0.007849236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008716484,0.0003723321,0.00038432103,0.0022710336,0.002482462,0.0016031441,0.0009952598,0.0017585995,0.0007194699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024419703,0.00037367584,0.95798194,0.000052985564,0.000092665185,0.0011239751,0.027394755,0.00004851335,0.0005742039,0.00077180937,0.0006653581,0.010675971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057219037,0.000285032,0.92099506,0.000074609125,0.000115862975,0.0009637559,0.0738926,0.00042416013,0.0002351486,0.0009097014,0.0019958518,0.00005098309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03415576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032630667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03415576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008902237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019278646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06791389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091510336","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9085-7","title":"Antecedents of attitude towards online mediation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Social psychology; Variance (accounting); Phenomenon; Attribution; Service (business); Business; Marketing; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.018825522037906394,"score_gpt":0.2787451963492249,"score_spread":0.2599196743113185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091510336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99035054,0.00008370805,0.00014501462,0.00050176715,0.00002150305,0.00001981513,0.000038506678,0.0000040846166,0.0088350745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989215,0.00006652442,0.00011989559,0.000082353305,0.000020165848,0.000010324775,0.000031452455,0.0000029998248,0.0007448982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977182,0.0011600124,0.0001699806,0.00015201811,0.00046322393,0.0003365236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9177687,0.04943361,0.016794201,0.0031225176,0.004007217,0.0088736275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033690198,0.0002184944,0.00021780924,0.001398906,0.0014103894,0.0032620123,0.0004912337,0.0017645034,0.013336733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02531558,0.0003082881,0.00036792085,0.0011367119,0.001505218,0.0009229084,0.0007383065,0.002472047,0.00093857246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050069165,0.0022573615,0.98324734,0.000044282002,0.00009049868,0.0003771498,0.004544765,0.00023738993,0.0007793912,0.0015397097,0.00041355647,0.005967957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006012929,0.00029316318,0.9804906,0.00005304099,0.00009111266,0.00041775947,0.013704543,0.0012527383,0.0004599638,0.0018214134,0.001333975,0.00002163061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043664556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060431496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013336733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007605434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007968256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044615865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098640548","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9320-8","title":"Community-based Decision Making in Japan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Emergency management; Government (linguistics); Citizen journalism; Participatory planning; Business; Environmental planning; Public relations; Disaster response; Urban planning; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.035833358714477126,"score_gpt":0.34297284993632404,"score_spread":0.3071394912218469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098640548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97530746,0.00051128917,0.0033359688,0.0011664025,0.000056196048,0.0000658365,0.000032194872,0.000011505958,0.019513104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975376,0.000104606544,0.001004039,0.000026608037,0.000008991846,0.000022683003,0.000015071597,0.0000025203408,0.0012778456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755245,0.0011573072,0.00018090333,0.00027919313,0.0002803364,0.00054995035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956007,0.0017819136,0.0005864922,0.00017396049,0.00067734864,0.0011795508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003266446,0.00035759446,0.00053555105,0.0015966714,0.0052690282,0.0032533836,0.0008896861,0.0009460891,0.0029002263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056377077,0.0003205271,0.00051492004,0.0018083845,0.0028382393,0.0025772806,0.0022287928,0.0008626086,0.00014310655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002105169,0.0027456593,0.24639833,0.0010435554,0.0007143819,0.00807059,0.17726873,0.04838043,0.004972176,0.29971638,0.010215169,0.19836935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057575747,0.0008540252,0.24590373,0.00039350812,0.000794773,0.0007728443,0.30207512,0.15001027,0.002363128,0.25067607,0.04506571,0.00051508093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058292393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064689875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058292393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004986037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007895686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11590618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105943574","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9242-x","title":"Emotional Change in International Negotiation: Analyzing the Camp David Accords Using Cognitive-Affective Maps","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Memoir; Cognition; Conflict resolution; Human settlement; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09935864741748891,"score_gpt":0.3485318701310959,"score_spread":0.24917322271360698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105943574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846808,0.000077131255,0.005605014,0.00017465728,0.000015724821,0.000028131159,0.000051794686,0.00002482777,0.009341908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.000013684747,0.0006877295,0.000004056112,0.0000024609076,0.0000080790305,0.000020214755,0.0000051796305,0.00020457264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994512,0.00030597203,0.000015335676,0.000038492966,0.00010739246,0.00008156464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964218,0.0028193374,0.00021202107,0.00010785739,0.00027750692,0.00016148952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013506159,0.00015567656,0.00023683367,0.0018434655,0.0010755473,0.0031209206,0.00047368702,0.0005859975,0.0025734713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009561468,0.0001404568,0.00032290656,0.0019195334,0.0013817528,0.0022419505,0.0011791448,0.0006749433,0.00015441138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022415735,0.0007245137,0.37925264,0.00044164655,0.0004185605,0.0020347727,0.13117458,0.10577085,0.008658626,0.13985533,0.005627123,0.22379978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057475612,0.00017550442,0.4980951,0.00009209443,0.00013081182,0.00025156394,0.12202604,0.29749876,0.0017385879,0.07025397,0.009553519,0.00012659591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007261499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077197063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007261499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009768473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031342756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01443845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109728195","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9502-x","title":"Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Property (philosophy); Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Multi-objective optimization; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0233627466619331,"score_gpt":0.20666433837449197,"score_spread":0.18330159171255886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109728195","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.252866,0.0004920404,0.695096,0.0022614773,0.00008823715,0.0003611267,0.00027156653,0.00016306574,0.04840047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104041,0.00021172491,0.068753354,0.00023871573,0.000070974376,0.0003364751,0.00015496169,0.00005476076,0.019774977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355775,0.0036936975,0.0003254548,0.0007537443,0.00086127874,0.000808074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98770696,0.008772937,0.00092750235,0.0013964244,0.00051746384,0.00067878875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007795891,0.0009937178,0.002493603,0.00095104123,0.0016301855,0.0046984367,0.0030626203,0.0033533627,0.0077033415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023832066,0.00087020657,0.0011096923,0.0015096909,0.0039719,0.0070198514,0.0033457885,0.0025407157,0.0009719659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004149052,0.00015507881,0.00075952406,0.00013678246,0.000075114825,0.000113999406,0.0005914683,0.075074516,0.0017509975,0.8993517,0.0016789661,0.019897042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074002026,0.000068974325,0.00037172236,0.000021877566,0.000014981009,0.00004414259,0.000087264,0.14417097,0.00052544684,0.8535155,0.001088163,0.000016904092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016208884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015447747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007795891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024829167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021863698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04122907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129543361","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9163-0","title":"An Argumentation-Driven Model for Flexible and Efficient Persuasive Negotiation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Protocol (science); Simple (philosophy); Argumentation theory; Negotiation; Set (abstract data type); Programming language; Software; Theoretical computer science; Distributed computing; Software engineering","score_opus":0.022266470052222983,"score_gpt":0.29990732744433124,"score_spread":0.27764085739210825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129543361","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008206321,0.00014595345,0.9772266,0.0006812313,0.00010744715,0.00015237102,0.00012794684,0.00035552724,0.012996656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52452064,0.00037994908,0.4537681,0.00025587346,0.00011739579,0.00082280126,0.00039665846,0.00017809977,0.019560553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784565,0.0010864508,0.00013115832,0.0002163066,0.0005982524,0.00012223105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974247,0.0015954174,0.00012847234,0.00025274282,0.00044059329,0.00015809498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023292613,0.00068507827,0.0010205932,0.00089598267,0.0011379735,0.0033286694,0.003059054,0.0032491323,0.008278082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083713485,0.0006350248,0.0012530604,0.0010236601,0.001099255,0.0039251833,0.0019394277,0.001997566,0.00201446],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025603498,0.0002145046,0.0003710314,0.0002037434,0.00009538194,0.0005007255,0.00071403815,0.265445,0.0039900746,0.6628297,0.004002411,0.06137736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077512166,0.000041151325,0.000055813838,0.000015576128,0.000025223044,0.000086404216,0.000031882213,0.8359018,0.0006143555,0.15822898,0.0048992885,0.000022015376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002606359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016735651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008278082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011686194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019837723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027692914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132130844","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9024-z","title":"Comparative Analysis of Text Data in Successful Face-to-Face and Electronic Negotiations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Negotiation; Vocabulary; Face (sociological concept); Generalization; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Similarity (geometry); Face-to-face; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.0173132733298819,"score_gpt":0.31303933452525046,"score_spread":0.29572606119536854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132130844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96886665,0.00076354237,0.016147166,0.0006789765,0.00011922297,0.00023081533,0.003739123,0.0003549625,0.009099632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98263043,0.00025272628,0.009039586,0.0000693206,0.0000735876,0.00024455157,0.0052339467,0.0001353682,0.0023204442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143785,0.0050437623,0.0007569334,0.00055875536,0.001904006,0.0002987434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69671386,0.2815628,0.0061753327,0.0036696768,0.011139312,0.00073892495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072700256,0.00033247587,0.0005614148,0.004834551,0.0011052544,0.0030240456,0.0009605143,0.0012638867,0.0056151035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101162314,0.00021280476,0.0004006002,0.005524377,0.0010771563,0.0036527694,0.0010716476,0.0010643825,0.002054024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021621397,0.0032822092,0.19439319,0.0055885795,0.00071675313,0.005399357,0.039307177,0.024100624,0.06085574,0.027856667,0.019977676,0.5969006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005287653,0.001994454,0.51249534,0.0009013579,0.00090112496,0.0033728713,0.045285836,0.2763295,0.06687828,0.048421185,0.04234282,0.0005484025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013479784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016105484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072700256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007565021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000616395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038448036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142556848","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9147-5","title":"Enhancing National Security and Energy Security in the Post-911 Era: Group Decision Support for Strategic Policy Analysis under Conditions of Conflict","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Energy security; National security; Population; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015624824619667976,"score_gpt":0.31296117916074834,"score_spread":0.29733635454108037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142556848","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34065598,0.0019939328,0.5401872,0.041696798,0.00045728474,0.00041336354,0.000097553275,0.00012274433,0.07437517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551707,0.00043553507,0.0426556,0.0002690286,0.000087449815,0.0001551192,0.000017783781,0.000013035148,0.0011958247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875871,0.009955989,0.00024362231,0.0004332315,0.0011325252,0.0006476151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96832097,0.0258998,0.002658092,0.0009300238,0.0011865862,0.001004587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02410281,0.00085183745,0.0010153798,0.0017563602,0.0031714812,0.008799103,0.0018936772,0.004008905,0.0043379124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049694642,0.00042924404,0.0006400305,0.0018286173,0.005136235,0.013617171,0.006090102,0.004564213,0.00026603235],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032569258,0.0002540869,0.003156349,0.00020627568,0.00014088259,0.00029656218,0.0052364985,0.088701494,0.00051965186,0.8309088,0.0021033369,0.06815042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007521362,0.0000700373,0.0009559439,0.000104791376,0.000030143732,0.0000463253,0.0036754552,0.18532787,0.00028603093,0.8044434,0.0049478807,0.000036922447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030318925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033795119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02410281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041448576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060999207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12746936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164458174","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9142-x","title":"Remote Leadership, Communication Effectiveness and Leader Performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Transactional leadership; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Leadership style; Popularity; Social psychology; Shared leadership; Workforce; Applied psychology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.043301959100110504,"score_gpt":0.24121979719780023,"score_spread":0.19791783809768973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164458174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901063,0.00020905446,0.00036837245,0.00021621202,0.000019088535,0.000015858006,0.000019913246,0.000016103724,0.00902903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897027,0.000046280158,0.00011854241,0.000040276598,0.000031674608,0.000009389169,0.000016286756,0.0000061044934,0.00076125993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842656,0.00088943803,0.00006396843,0.00012603898,0.0003298924,0.00016417871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676876,0.022931406,0.0040687737,0.0006282457,0.0006047262,0.004079287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002476684,0.00032497605,0.00031515164,0.0007340816,0.00091438316,0.0021521389,0.00043724728,0.00100757,0.012556935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016714966,0.00020228849,0.00017171967,0.00042937073,0.0009308946,0.0013076046,0.0011273936,0.0011191143,0.00089209387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006508555,0.011867952,0.83662176,0.00035468276,0.0005219783,0.001157982,0.007896417,0.005046369,0.013938794,0.0043638004,0.0017924285,0.109929346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029674987,0.0020538236,0.98452526,0.00005612346,0.00013934541,0.0004828265,0.0036474918,0.0036617361,0.0015761199,0.0026639241,0.00086565653,0.00003091771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007642501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001068261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012556935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031979298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005785746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04200715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167299403","doi":"10.1023/a:1024867820235","title":"Towards a Structured Design of Electronic Negotiations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Common value auction; Management science; Knowledge management; Information exchange; Data science; Engineering; Sociology; Telecommunications; Economics","score_opus":0.05431526046719338,"score_gpt":0.3443676951976901,"score_spread":0.29005243473049674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167299403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031559034,0.0000426476,0.99251103,0.00016424635,0.000018816583,0.00013392592,0.000017484908,0.00010984469,0.00384608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12900795,0.00015512257,0.8662823,0.000115316776,0.000030472418,0.0007127912,0.000114135706,0.000095217096,0.0034867602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904559,0.0062145977,0.0005575704,0.00078328,0.0016435165,0.0003450887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990105,0.0047577405,0.0005769606,0.0026514665,0.0014303261,0.00047854852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008428697,0.00076996547,0.0009129729,0.0011287944,0.0015243553,0.005542414,0.0030086609,0.0022523347,0.008220549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022171188,0.0012786052,0.0016199773,0.0009319729,0.0046805427,0.007792675,0.0047608153,0.0027603987,0.0018076098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007577076,0.000097305136,0.00026120216,0.00013626958,0.000031877218,0.00005934573,0.0010261917,0.03370685,0.0019372486,0.9330041,0.00070566806,0.028958172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087955996,0.00008635444,0.000082250575,0.00010448609,0.000033416818,0.000054807526,0.0003833988,0.18494147,0.0026903294,0.80050194,0.011013138,0.000020395952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006689267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009286671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008428697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011317553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028380044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04457569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299316531","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9471-0","title":"Competition, Transparency, and Reciprocity: A Comparative Study of Auctions and Negotiations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Common value auction; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Verifiable secret sharing; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Purchasing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reverse auction; Winner's curse; Social exchange theory; Economics; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Computer security; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11190938666681614,"score_gpt":0.38482463002858647,"score_spread":0.2729152433617703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299316531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9164315,0.0045484887,0.013367815,0.0016682468,0.000041658328,0.00009095406,0.000042103104,0.000013051544,0.06379625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973538,0.0006579678,0.0009861724,0.000041749114,0.000021067202,0.000025939531,0.000016126816,0.000006365151,0.0008909124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881782,0.009049487,0.0002851703,0.00032297758,0.0015142558,0.00064991106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85578865,0.13094182,0.006766823,0.00262107,0.0028771495,0.0010045207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016665766,0.00028381273,0.000761901,0.0021089853,0.0016109954,0.005339119,0.0009430081,0.0016226032,0.006002497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075809896,0.00028541315,0.000716682,0.0031824354,0.0047745993,0.007480634,0.0014502965,0.0018824885,0.00032095183],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002374883,0.0011297519,0.054252125,0.0010245522,0.00043384047,0.000561593,0.02204443,0.015134033,0.0014856543,0.81882894,0.0017312623,0.08099895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008925038,0.0017985213,0.11397029,0.0007872341,0.00070816284,0.00142153,0.038863834,0.061738037,0.0016812533,0.7556606,0.022245672,0.00023246808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026451428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022989647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016665766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015095702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022196074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0881381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299855051","doi":"10.1023/a:1011262625052","title":"Logrolling Procedure for Multi-Issue Negotiation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Representation (politics); Order (exchange); Management science; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04527662436173564,"score_gpt":0.3043787912152973,"score_spread":0.2591021668535617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299855051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014839638,0.00006316254,0.97272485,0.00022735812,0.0001100287,0.00035151103,0.00014269057,0.005859493,0.0056812246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36356336,0.00008229797,0.61575943,0.00021038704,0.00009254297,0.0005504646,0.00073826493,0.00066381367,0.018339437],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981981,0.00065366935,0.00016096269,0.00030262125,0.00045200673,0.00023258294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705756,0.0013239062,0.00018642376,0.0007648266,0.0004758659,0.00019139129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019934021,0.00042393725,0.0008820246,0.0010760394,0.0024420319,0.0016855467,0.0013361349,0.0010072725,0.015912663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064438516,0.00033478218,0.00058461115,0.0008132294,0.0009363707,0.0021225056,0.001377583,0.0020016076,0.0039159562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015570113,0.00095992495,0.0014820305,0.00028464443,0.00005295991,0.0004395842,0.0012151217,0.015895791,0.034473043,0.121585906,0.022991387,0.79906267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006457264,0.00064646767,0.001953115,0.00008887206,0.00012609843,0.0007317416,0.00057906285,0.6282999,0.09968112,0.19069067,0.07634289,0.00021439021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001629654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014273981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015912663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059430546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018502938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053233147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472597128","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9491-9","title":"Negotiation and Collaborative Technologies in Organisations and Supply Chains: Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Collaboration in agile enterprises","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Namur; Universidade de Pernambuco; Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; University of Cape Town; Universitat Politècnica de València; Concordia University; Universidade de Coimbra; Technische Universiteit Delft; Indian Institute of Technology Madras; Carnegie Mellon University; Indian National Science Academy; University of North Florida","keywords":"Negotiation; Supply chain; Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Supply chain management; Computer science; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.005452484145097142,"score_gpt":0.21827827094814908,"score_spread":0.21282578680305195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472597128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080166524,0.68472284,0.021049326,0.039713535,0.21174236,0.000079935926,0.00012772458,0.00013079813,0.04163188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0094590625,0.3935818,0.0072144778,0.015576916,0.527507,0.00017452535,0.00023364987,0.00024700267,0.046005614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975031,0.0008444599,0.00030293298,0.00044931937,0.0007140508,0.00018602319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929503,0.0049577504,0.00027178347,0.0003692492,0.0009817339,0.00046918544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029917136,0.0015438956,0.002156877,0.0045981067,0.0022617918,0.009689676,0.0022181398,0.007984308,0.011078872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005583207,0.0009380459,0.0017270895,0.006139078,0.005452651,0.015362557,0.0043467856,0.012264683,0.0038505099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000512565,0.00019279025,0.0005717367,0.0018924283,0.00008254038,0.00043376113,0.0010119537,0.00092195556,0.00057132135,0.18074752,0.6235511,0.1899716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005653888,0.000039020942,0.00058241456,0.000854349,0.000017539274,0.0004370376,0.00029558066,0.000640219,0.00009273481,0.032882012,0.9641214,0.000032086977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019902722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033978396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011078872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024884227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019121106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037062466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527289360","doi":"10.1007/10726.1572-9907","title":"Group Decision and Negotiation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Région Normandie; Stockholms Universitet; Universidade de Pernambuco; Uniwersytet Warszawski; Michigan State University; Sichuan University; Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Harbin Institute of Technology; Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; Ohio State University; Griffith University; Guangdong Ocean University; Nanyang Technological University; Hohai University; University of Bristol; Fudan University; Western Washington University; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Dartmouth College; Université de Franche-Comté; Thammasat University; University of International Business and Economics; Universidade de Coimbra; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem; North South University; City University of Hong Kong; Nanjing University; University of Waterloo; University of Minnesota; National University of Ireland; Dalian University of Technology; Lingnan University; Boise State University; Creighton University","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Negotiation; Group decision-making; Computer science; Business; Process management; Knowledge management; Chemistry; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019355273695564924,"score_gpt":0.30151896265637795,"score_spread":0.282163688960813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527289360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032384747,0.006767334,0.05543978,0.0071189837,0.0008598208,0.00008516578,0.00021130702,0.00015235413,0.9261268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36951533,0.013671745,0.042611185,0.0014516249,0.0016182732,0.000687764,0.0006562027,0.0002881341,0.5694997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976941,0.0013677123,0.000088831046,0.00022075146,0.00055300223,0.0000755673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743146,0.0015390924,0.00013022039,0.00037852247,0.00035004967,0.00017063378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024221162,0.0007701717,0.0005704279,0.0013748752,0.0015197592,0.006472952,0.0007709158,0.002169024,0.0659553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008506846,0.00021610864,0.0002872953,0.0024289375,0.0052395524,0.0052808956,0.002096553,0.0023060015,0.008999784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053418903,0.00000782536,0.00005730572,0.000036195175,0.0000022787476,0.000015376409,0.0002943516,0.00026253427,0.00002439091,0.96074075,0.012758918,0.025794843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049885143,0.000008996041,0.00013063429,0.00007178801,0.0000028627949,0.000057740686,0.0002839953,0.0009787364,0.000057200832,0.83085257,0.16754656,0.000003866711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017670173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001824315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0659553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021974933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002385737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2206425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528417518","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9511-9","title":"Drivers of Durable Peace: The Role of Justice in Negotiating Civil War Termination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Durable good; Economic Justice; Spanish Civil War; Law; Peacekeeping; Political science; Human settlement; Transitional justice; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01046681009612157,"score_gpt":0.27948213702358976,"score_spread":0.2690153269274682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528417518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93969846,0.0003334183,0.004805825,0.002923289,0.00002879001,0.00008076623,0.00006851018,0.000015615135,0.05204525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992061,0.00006116534,0.00021452295,0.000025772537,0.000009211636,0.000009969524,0.000015320864,0.0000035650742,0.000454371],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940094,0.0028315957,0.00031075664,0.00043238487,0.0009794462,0.0014363843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96767163,0.015417463,0.010329593,0.0013759367,0.0022991577,0.0029062554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075947023,0.00020801832,0.00045408538,0.0022486132,0.0035871102,0.0063950527,0.0010514931,0.0012762054,0.0060666753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035531152,0.00026399788,0.00045500998,0.0014929405,0.005498779,0.0061260345,0.0053582718,0.0024653065,0.00033326066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038712446,0.00075629906,0.63347226,0.00018580556,0.00021705103,0.0011334905,0.04291658,0.003858521,0.0010725169,0.23359361,0.0009517686,0.0814549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047609174,0.00044713827,0.7462326,0.00019272082,0.000109968096,0.00055602484,0.08119443,0.0077080354,0.0009199871,0.14736857,0.015124228,0.00009866204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039551575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050448924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075947023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002577385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028611734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040165126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553981758","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9515-5","title":"Group Decision Methodology to Support Watershed Committees in Choosing Among Combinations of Alternatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Voting; Group decision-making; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Operations research; Management science; Group (periodic table); Process (computing); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.19367032027145675,"score_gpt":0.4408018048375745,"score_spread":0.24713148456611772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553981758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010091616,0.000049799455,0.98750883,0.00020138644,0.00005060197,0.00013717863,0.000018320285,0.000094284194,0.0018479034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20814013,0.000096119016,0.7888618,0.00015784524,0.000048997277,0.00063057104,0.0000696067,0.00004807108,0.0019469243],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542433,0.003452842,0.0001307258,0.00021275159,0.0006415156,0.00013780796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987631,0.010277143,0.00040997204,0.0003547532,0.00097648636,0.0003505986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009571914,0.0007612108,0.0010820295,0.0019333739,0.0013809366,0.0014800867,0.0015674902,0.0016633571,0.008753229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017186139,0.00046351636,0.0010572064,0.0016727764,0.0009169211,0.0024294655,0.0019711787,0.0019957912,0.00074162846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003791633,0.0007593539,0.0019465783,0.00037673482,0.00033715766,0.00032570306,0.0012113437,0.5306459,0.004111697,0.15806715,0.00463096,0.2972081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067812594,0.00015895322,0.00014472565,0.000037365015,0.00004097616,0.000039850143,0.0001667031,0.93643177,0.001031451,0.058669623,0.003193265,0.000017475892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014670925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026161787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009571914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010262023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019194513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05062169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562158640","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9516-4","title":"Toward the Automated Detection of Individuals’ Rationales in Large-Scale Online Open Participative Activities: A Conceptual Framework","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Syracuse University","keywords":"Argumentative; Computer science; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Data science; Conceptual framework; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03489777471174557,"score_gpt":0.30271326192916487,"score_spread":0.2678154872174193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562158640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022481771,0.00020914868,0.97027594,0.0015924725,0.000019698327,0.00030119278,0.00020677315,0.00025694392,0.00465612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47388113,0.00019254355,0.52328515,0.00016005224,0.000040230858,0.00048555518,0.00038491233,0.000058084617,0.0015123537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98508936,0.007877475,0.0009292566,0.0029204867,0.0025394545,0.00064406625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333267,0.04655006,0.0076732906,0.0065684887,0.004468206,0.0014131914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02007184,0.0011329715,0.0012297672,0.007425396,0.0024867544,0.010041015,0.005619258,0.004700141,0.0033039453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055695668,0.0015744944,0.0022075053,0.00442615,0.009418874,0.014210043,0.008555273,0.0031412663,0.0009466034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013000605,0.0005289958,0.018298274,0.00039389767,0.00019922222,0.00042007514,0.008165872,0.0344618,0.004038901,0.8422788,0.0016700346,0.08941418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044277618,0.00006988857,0.0030328245,0.00015193842,0.000069419,0.00019534338,0.00295282,0.42197296,0.0020245197,0.5634084,0.0060002245,0.00007737605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011136345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008499782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02007184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002373752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005995258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10615128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566978476","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9520-8","title":"Symmetric Sequential Stability in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Multiple Decision Makers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Probabilistic logic; Conflict resolution; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Graph; Computer science; Combinatorics; Machine learning; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.13007635231850964,"score_gpt":0.35653551218420587,"score_spread":0.22645915986569623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566978476","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104266755,0.00029390762,0.8795378,0.0011808522,0.00008154355,0.00011319624,0.00020650093,0.000121262914,0.014198031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936411,0.0004048199,0.052037876,0.00015144971,0.00008694811,0.00025454967,0.00020904184,0.0000842738,0.010360058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977162,0.0013512756,0.00006965745,0.00037265394,0.0002811152,0.00020898899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206513,0.0057820934,0.00080955075,0.00033337125,0.00063203886,0.0003778456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033656352,0.0010875666,0.0019949367,0.0015932446,0.0014716506,0.0028649538,0.0026100609,0.002239668,0.007955305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013258539,0.0006640602,0.0012938424,0.0016859006,0.0028457227,0.0044778246,0.0017531911,0.002040135,0.00076609163],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016627426,0.000064129075,0.0004981551,0.000105450425,0.00008804892,0.00018411642,0.00032944573,0.28417635,0.0008687498,0.70381266,0.0015051999,0.008201448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000312269,0.000025023604,0.00010829095,0.000009060624,0.000018887187,0.000022688953,0.00005121116,0.5921775,0.00013465877,0.40694755,0.00045796158,0.000015917609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006622356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044035255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007955305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024701534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00230828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026613176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901229908","doi":"10.1007/s10726-018-9597-3","title":"A Value-Focused Multiple Participant-Multiple Criteria (MPMC) Decision Support Approach for Public Policy Formulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Management science; Participant observation; Value (mathematics); Policy analysis; Public policy; Computer science; Operations research; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Data mining; Political science; Engineering; Machine learning; Public administration","score_opus":0.2638552533490503,"score_gpt":0.4288093007490322,"score_spread":0.16495404739998187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901229908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029942458,0.000100344136,0.9916291,0.00071855215,0.000048237285,0.00018364408,0.00003649008,0.000063243475,0.0042260787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23007125,0.00021122495,0.7661803,0.00028663076,0.00010504769,0.0009532297,0.0000792448,0.00003959393,0.0020734752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899192,0.0069453563,0.00027611348,0.00054314645,0.0020068279,0.00030935457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746383,0.0100500025,0.0004951941,0.00033601405,0.001248437,0.0004063865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012886019,0.0010969834,0.0017638861,0.0026481636,0.0017008408,0.0037107752,0.003527702,0.0030930147,0.008249179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024793787,0.0007686627,0.0015708595,0.002641232,0.0019123525,0.004548521,0.003961497,0.0032609103,0.0006294585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014534473,0.00034669135,0.0006297396,0.00047124177,0.00018519333,0.00027630237,0.00087252347,0.4106661,0.0010211656,0.43421176,0.0033707465,0.14780325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042998006,0.00009324596,0.000072381554,0.00007648983,0.000039185426,0.000044006214,0.00014619606,0.78253955,0.0003257861,0.2128298,0.003764245,0.000026084956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003583761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005018468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012886019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028948078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053196205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06814861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909527879","doi":"10.1007/s10726-018-09610-5","title":"Design Theory for Generating Alternatives in Public Decision Making Processes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Plant Biotechnology Institute","funders":"Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et Lettres","keywords":"Decision theory; Management science; Computer science; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1552329035018692,"score_gpt":0.39449329238029807,"score_spread":0.23926038887842888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909527879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009664367,0.00009149798,0.9962627,0.00022098327,0.00002587831,0.00008090502,0.00002726585,0.00004077843,0.0022833694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15738124,0.0003946834,0.83596295,0.00035084208,0.00009713832,0.0018291262,0.00019874338,0.000104524755,0.0036806979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859772,0.010221746,0.0005850744,0.00081667624,0.002010106,0.00038916565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97432125,0.022424873,0.0005561532,0.0012485089,0.0012227865,0.00022640165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013529037,0.0016680238,0.0015940784,0.0027314734,0.0014487705,0.0041006007,0.0024717872,0.0030720558,0.012131107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035377134,0.0011689807,0.00234314,0.0019047825,0.0049344394,0.004244732,0.0024198522,0.002839512,0.0013590183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055909328,0.00004766706,0.00021516776,0.00020434914,0.000037725917,0.000041636024,0.00028384977,0.06584981,0.00029402794,0.9056877,0.00088182685,0.0264004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048407182,0.000046235586,0.00003736289,0.000071951436,0.000027334676,0.000026990154,0.00005880345,0.15718728,0.00038410988,0.83893126,0.0031638686,0.000016442014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017607119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012586676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013529037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003769609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031367198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07154924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914823220","doi":"10.1007/s10726-019-09612-x","title":"Strategic Analyses of the Hydropolitical Conflicts Surrounding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Toronto Metropolitan University; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Surprise; Geopolitics; Negotiation; Political science; Conflict resolution; The Renaissance; Downstream (manufacturing); Development economics; Law; Sociology; Business; History; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05176494126885706,"score_gpt":0.2874655367378307,"score_spread":0.23570059546897365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914823220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93047315,0.00023600749,0.0009956529,0.0025363686,0.000047234327,0.000087093234,0.00013417377,0.0000034472462,0.06548694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966524,0.0001461827,0.00042217315,0.0000992211,0.0000048365196,0.000020583819,0.000027335054,0.0000020593568,0.0026252156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982838,0.0008541749,0.000032429278,0.00005294684,0.00018336851,0.0005931663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972121,0.0018414743,0.00026199222,0.00004200339,0.00032125102,0.0003212106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002886147,0.0002791766,0.00022418646,0.001549987,0.004005063,0.0038729692,0.00057657546,0.0010303977,0.005909999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004663389,0.00016983468,0.00029340724,0.0022984028,0.0020300306,0.0013714841,0.0014784749,0.0013139079,0.00016600174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022100797,0.0009437477,0.09158153,0.000718974,0.00034901738,0.009506527,0.06966798,0.07562709,0.004404897,0.637985,0.017672487,0.08933269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114930954,0.00056246103,0.13608067,0.000358513,0.00015646702,0.00042596826,0.6343933,0.03418285,0.00263494,0.09980683,0.09116664,0.00011644242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026395794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07625381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026395794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077712545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006578884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056384683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991065550","doi":"10.1007/s10726-019-09645-2","title":"Management of Interpersonal Conflict in Negotiation with Chinese: A Perceived Face Threat Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negotiation; Politeness; Guanxi; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Conflict management; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; China; Law","score_opus":0.011407718550560567,"score_gpt":0.299555589793907,"score_spread":0.28814787124334645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991065550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443201,0.0007626811,0.0038091023,0.0021948277,0.000050276194,0.0000633463,0.000015781561,0.0000064987844,0.048777368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921334,0.00007691005,0.00024528432,0.00004198606,0.0000079535275,0.000008417039,0.0000030180124,8.3486503e-7,0.00040208024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979042,0.0011391265,0.00005923447,0.000106691514,0.0003855161,0.00040524878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976622,0.00093459536,0.00069780304,0.00006763755,0.00020504848,0.00043275027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025771519,0.00035193766,0.00028463406,0.001556196,0.0036267755,0.004726146,0.00089263136,0.0010147812,0.0025157458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051788036,0.0001715681,0.0002989461,0.0009624009,0.0032220325,0.0021764238,0.0018919656,0.0012360075,0.00008259241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009505974,0.0013025468,0.23874691,0.0005583327,0.0003859573,0.005945452,0.31539008,0.007937817,0.007648347,0.31390306,0.0023299546,0.10490085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025644267,0.0008131766,0.4073087,0.0004068088,0.00036214257,0.0025090447,0.3694132,0.049058475,0.0034390176,0.14869326,0.017495625,0.00024418623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009598186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059771705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009598186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033124795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029960945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024033844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995283531","doi":"10.1007/s10726-019-09648-z","title":"The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Management science; Preference; Realm; Conflict analysis; Tracing; Computer science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Social science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.18533767148109556,"score_gpt":0.41633001726068225,"score_spread":0.2309923457795867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995283531","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0126615055,0.1304354,0.2885645,0.44615784,0.0030703829,0.00015202317,0.00044539743,0.00024328359,0.11826964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.556055,0.15186577,0.21712409,0.047569167,0.0048348866,0.0009301987,0.0005641768,0.00061390037,0.020442838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904032,0.0064480416,0.0003311298,0.00080994685,0.001533202,0.00047449252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9271975,0.06263667,0.0009526866,0.003731611,0.0042147124,0.0012667769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023573123,0.0013417387,0.0027041477,0.0041588657,0.0026937681,0.01313989,0.006295314,0.010565258,0.014874895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03882742,0.0009857147,0.001591063,0.0053072916,0.042993538,0.03641624,0.005272066,0.011904282,0.0020882664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015714477,0.00002634673,0.000092461065,0.000117924916,0.0000129174905,0.000015264875,0.00038600565,0.0024553358,0.00001540079,0.9834063,0.0044898754,0.008966491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112826965,0.00000781774,0.000049554514,0.00016793584,0.0000038268718,0.000015127693,0.00035551388,0.0027114742,0.000025561492,0.9668591,0.029777752,0.000015056765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019538455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010765137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023573123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014507131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00891882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12466806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012291359","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09666-2","title":"A Voting Mechanism Designed for Talent Shows in Mass Media: Weighted Preference of Group Decision Makers in Social Networks Using Fuzzy Measures and Choquet Integral","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Choquet integral; Voting; Group decision-making; Preference; Weighted voting; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Population; Hierarchy; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04500628173461837,"score_gpt":0.27929517652007796,"score_spread":0.23428889478545958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012291359","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05035078,0.00010133769,0.9474565,0.00020670895,0.0000960583,0.00019600752,0.000043660508,0.00014365786,0.0014052187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.809947,0.0000821336,0.18752956,0.000078774596,0.00007651278,0.00035569957,0.000055726483,0.00002447077,0.0018501567],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955022,0.002475374,0.00026378792,0.0007469812,0.0006590332,0.0003526419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934862,0.003574543,0.0005303832,0.00047377383,0.0014744069,0.00046083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008873778,0.0007310772,0.0017650074,0.0014535928,0.0012442552,0.0021051343,0.0038039049,0.0019665107,0.0026437365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01166775,0.0004134446,0.0010623711,0.0013109129,0.0012665066,0.002777201,0.0011812515,0.0009664136,0.00027761667],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021593862,0.001414524,0.005426367,0.0006204139,0.0009735315,0.0005033855,0.0011761677,0.44802323,0.029213088,0.2882877,0.004540983,0.21766119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010186916,0.0002293075,0.00037390608,0.0000131647885,0.00009989169,0.000051264862,0.000054502925,0.97949445,0.0020986265,0.016742356,0.0006935425,0.00004710371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002300698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019976955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008873778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017167855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019048279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046929598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042636191","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09688-w","title":"Comparing Structured and Unstructured Facilitation Approaches in Consultation Workshops: A Field Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Facilitation; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06838425345135848,"score_gpt":0.30571189124002784,"score_spread":0.23732763778866936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042636191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947313,0.000021769722,0.0015669934,0.00004055601,0.000040536903,0.002489831,0.00005689366,0.000029073713,0.0010229683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97334605,0.000093103445,0.013371769,0.00020211094,0.000112815156,0.009998288,0.00017451322,0.000032058073,0.002669315],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855359,0.00820276,0.0007744922,0.0020503975,0.0018588745,0.0015776235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.857413,0.12151245,0.0036420657,0.0055896025,0.004342841,0.0074999467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022286793,0.002092648,0.00202219,0.0012594351,0.0040307506,0.0021934374,0.0036200183,0.0034203986,0.005834407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058468215,0.0018676192,0.00082863995,0.0009867164,0.0026639933,0.0025772757,0.0026159885,0.004213559,0.0008553059],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.20038085,0.6441351,0.0075917486,0.0017504637,0.00027930987,0.00044235386,0.034501236,0.0057942,0.040754326,0.0023625088,0.001054769,0.060953178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11434436,0.8014445,0.031156003,0.00032150387,0.0005627994,0.00021403523,0.012108144,0.011276096,0.021034053,0.0043667685,0.0027323035,0.00043953676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003769301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037498837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022286793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00156338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052236207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117865205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119395891","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09719-6","title":"Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Operations research; Statistics","score_opus":0.09060253877963814,"score_gpt":0.4046849358571534,"score_spread":0.3140823970775153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119395891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00275588,0.00015245627,0.99237,0.00027088632,0.00004536092,0.000057793626,0.00009442909,0.00020488897,0.0040483004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.208204,0.0004794231,0.7873645,0.00015525763,0.00007064211,0.00030099918,0.0001945674,0.000081735,0.0031489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973145,0.0018466309,0.00010000115,0.00016091269,0.00046859295,0.000109424545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974292,0.001848407,0.00015287341,0.00014170661,0.00032867966,0.00009917445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027498312,0.00073442765,0.0010095128,0.0025236486,0.0008562278,0.003261361,0.0011370709,0.0012532598,0.0077484944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007940886,0.00045259728,0.0013529577,0.0022580686,0.0012179787,0.002293349,0.0015847597,0.0012637603,0.00110589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014782754,0.00008507346,0.00033722504,0.00035005546,0.00012361858,0.00027655694,0.00045361885,0.18188727,0.0028936893,0.72344005,0.0033856477,0.08661941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006401509,0.00006370103,0.00016326757,0.00009409061,0.0000788964,0.00007219325,0.00011845175,0.6128027,0.0013106164,0.3767421,0.00845135,0.000038689243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039668363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036116692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077484944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011989293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016968708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025921285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31257076","doi":"10.1023/a:1023016804379","title":"The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Multimedia; Purchasing; Construct (python library); The Internet; Affect (linguistics); Computer-mediated communication; Psychology; World Wide Web; Communication; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.007164708854747214,"score_gpt":0.22816209302183085,"score_spread":0.22099738416708364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31257076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564657,0.0011287208,0.00280101,0.00045955507,0.00013946678,0.000069101,0.0001017434,0.00010297993,0.038731813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594104,0.00036595383,0.0011241351,0.0000742379,0.0001069814,0.000040989264,0.000044851455,0.000039225335,0.002262615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.000971633,0.00004227294,0.000074854834,0.00025998653,0.00013391781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93663764,0.05946795,0.0011424245,0.00077175605,0.0011670823,0.0008132271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020264555,0.00041518788,0.00028944193,0.0010328951,0.0008543647,0.0023258885,0.0007198516,0.0013822233,0.01917716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039222203,0.0003277021,0.00034516567,0.00079321954,0.00067750184,0.0026349726,0.00084793207,0.0007859056,0.00091648084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04983969,0.009472496,0.044915438,0.0021287603,0.00057337084,0.0033486253,0.013574607,0.05148279,0.12803033,0.05261729,0.008685126,0.63533145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057291305,0.015755065,0.3772415,0.0011045468,0.0033447868,0.0033374187,0.025251979,0.27682263,0.11642654,0.13442197,0.039835006,0.0007295048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025471323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014510426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01917716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006620763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040407202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06415403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134203175","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09727-0","title":"A Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Bargaining Approach for Multi-objective Optimization of Contamination Warning Sensors in Water Distribution Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Stakeholder; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Bargaining problem; Compromise; Negotiation; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.015672703585622335,"score_gpt":0.21904281033706346,"score_spread":0.20337010675144113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134203175","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00912876,0.0001904856,0.9875915,0.00018249387,0.000053088188,0.00004657636,0.000013042641,0.000029825702,0.0027641675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.806048,0.00038838873,0.1874113,0.00018604693,0.000118632976,0.00032555833,0.000047535148,0.00005756802,0.0054169707],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840975,0.00086852384,0.000053977397,0.00015927995,0.0003380471,0.00017040838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978415,0.0016950631,0.00011972348,0.000043534375,0.00021760215,0.00008272158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048053316,0.0010995913,0.00219647,0.0010347663,0.0010589926,0.0020644325,0.0026084275,0.0028513165,0.0036316742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047969352,0.0010086587,0.0015423659,0.0011768932,0.0014984517,0.0022179806,0.0021084554,0.0017573995,0.00028171804],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038886865,0.000025761028,0.00006948217,0.00003529574,0.000031494787,0.00003992184,0.000033907956,0.9823046,0.0004994144,0.010921236,0.0001738499,0.0058262977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051913908,0.000014691746,0.000014748643,0.0000031833545,0.000004368026,0.0000041887483,0.0000062777385,0.99726355,0.00006558395,0.0025382494,0.00007621981,0.0000037617629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004124092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028711462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048053316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001482661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025413275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135355984","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09728-z","title":"Group Decision-Based Construction of Scenarios for Multicriteria Analysis in Conditions of Uncertainty on the Basis of Quantitative and Qualitative Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Vale Canada Limited","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Basis (linear algebra); Group decision-making; Data mining; Qualitative analysis; Complete information; Management science; Qualitative research; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.10536392321985671,"score_gpt":0.4351156819622394,"score_spread":0.32975175874238266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135355984","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02103678,0.00004515759,0.9760389,0.000112824724,0.000013723973,0.00022260715,0.00008177897,0.00007804252,0.002370207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40871948,0.00008859145,0.58950686,0.000029888655,0.000013932561,0.0008503826,0.0003105195,0.00004516294,0.00043519432],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443626,0.0042831046,0.00020901255,0.00027831356,0.0006092081,0.00018414833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031866,0.0077723623,0.0004405407,0.00055764336,0.0006071923,0.0003035607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074161617,0.001098033,0.0012491109,0.0030936925,0.0012391442,0.0022657025,0.0016168507,0.0013530821,0.0049372637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780594,0.0007838036,0.0021511335,0.0021302486,0.0017918753,0.003149238,0.002866709,0.0015399702,0.00034160932],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018048353,0.00010890464,0.001253306,0.0001958865,0.00011204277,0.00035230044,0.0008637534,0.7329651,0.0018181517,0.2291724,0.0006083071,0.032369442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001902773,0.000040015864,0.00011382741,0.00003709346,0.000019983874,0.000038719736,0.00011206567,0.888283,0.0005430679,0.10999748,0.00077880884,0.000016894941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012388958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013763806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074161617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013747155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017059962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164439675","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09743-0","title":"The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Operationalization; New product development; Knowledge management; Exploratory research; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Task (project management); Process management; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Management; Sociology","score_opus":0.03472541758267618,"score_gpt":0.2508239966186287,"score_spread":0.21609857903595253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164439675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987789,0.000018856013,0.00012251633,0.000031027947,0.0000010491835,0.000006412463,0.0000067047504,0.0000023822497,0.0010321485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998072,0.000010389504,0.00006727934,0.0000034150555,0.000001932392,0.00000580555,0.000008479132,9.549108e-7,0.00009452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953063,0.0019444533,0.00050374545,0.00038608882,0.0012519627,0.0006073862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9156055,0.042498976,0.02610009,0.004342498,0.004853903,0.006599023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059727463,0.00025941932,0.00028565436,0.0017188314,0.0008414596,0.003206111,0.0005800193,0.0005199118,0.0023781452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03829657,0.00020442677,0.00024299062,0.0009968252,0.0017237795,0.0014818825,0.0031195187,0.0011738238,0.0003058197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015580375,0.0007066752,0.97473764,0.000029981034,0.00006528269,0.00011926684,0.0059164925,0.0012258654,0.0011108643,0.0006417996,0.00007050764,0.015219827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010194154,0.0003020202,0.9900309,0.00001964304,0.000013767878,0.00011349815,0.005280488,0.0020191818,0.0006520862,0.0011966869,0.0003385425,0.000023103694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000766605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007805292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059727463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075373525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000787413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031587243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194511393","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09755-w","title":"An Integer Programming Approach to Solving the Inverse Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Two Decision Makers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Integer programming; Conflict resolution; Resolution (logic); Graph; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Inverse; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.10282520826118534,"score_gpt":0.37297834936538826,"score_spread":0.2701531411042029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194511393","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003579487,0.00012110143,0.9884531,0.00039141672,0.000058782007,0.00007655579,0.00007053585,0.000053560532,0.007195339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17088683,0.0004719847,0.8191946,0.00028763013,0.00014344796,0.0006160213,0.00027208222,0.000120756486,0.008006675],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980438,0.0011371768,0.0000642175,0.00023829793,0.00031714764,0.00019926036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606484,0.0033597234,0.0001613941,0.00007838806,0.00021636684,0.00011931114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033572786,0.0018680255,0.002109223,0.0017455628,0.0011569958,0.0030501222,0.0035899915,0.0028816096,0.009348013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008258028,0.001442734,0.002331077,0.0022513182,0.0019372524,0.003605615,0.0020221618,0.004524912,0.0006841335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045279474,0.000116089686,0.0001797187,0.00012940691,0.000052855245,0.000091097594,0.00013953126,0.79903567,0.00026360693,0.18332374,0.0018935965,0.014729374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001704943,0.000015817019,0.000022773616,0.000014022273,0.000013233257,0.000011135148,0.00003256084,0.9426459,0.000081883794,0.056285966,0.0008507843,0.000008768515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011100448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008844775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011100448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023233537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033703106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031272173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197614320","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09753-y","title":"A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; Management science; Multidisciplinary approach; Decision support system; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Process management; R-CAST; Computer science; Decision engineering; Project management; Knowledge management; Business decision mapping; Operations research; Engineering; Sociology; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.3550754410882115,"score_gpt":0.4607599748638513,"score_spread":0.1056845337756398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197614320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029694359,0.000113751164,0.992695,0.00025647672,0.000019795096,0.00047902015,0.000041842166,0.00022505318,0.0031996868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097281344,0.00010128598,0.9006863,0.000051860545,0.000013051754,0.0010906231,0.00007375666,0.00004090014,0.0006608299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788932,0.015213869,0.0012836634,0.0012317728,0.002711657,0.0006659098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97821075,0.015194405,0.0013985499,0.0012108082,0.003378272,0.000607282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030063536,0.0016693972,0.0014148443,0.0037325465,0.0017649092,0.0060638413,0.0030526824,0.0027549108,0.0056671584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0323981,0.00072282297,0.0016790177,0.0026420082,0.0037374205,0.0048172036,0.00377376,0.0018685545,0.00084294064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023686411,0.0003522033,0.0015449672,0.00072923495,0.00015207108,0.0002778979,0.0030477867,0.14956072,0.0030050364,0.700064,0.0018424353,0.13918683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014345006,0.0003970925,0.00061608263,0.00049307785,0.000111813984,0.00017982445,0.0013376258,0.72587234,0.0029302281,0.2490106,0.018808302,0.00009964679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005800318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053435857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030063536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042858445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009166487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15899307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200811419","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09760-z","title":"Using the Shapley Value to Mitigate the Emergency Rescue Risk for Hazardous Materials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Facility Location and Emergency Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Shapley value; Hazardous waste; Axiom; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Construct (python library); Game theory; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Waste management","score_opus":0.045555797003217345,"score_gpt":0.2864007334762434,"score_spread":0.24084493647302604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200811419","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08805193,0.0008540933,0.85938346,0.0016103736,0.00030812674,0.00014803383,0.000058556354,0.00011096487,0.04947444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484466,0.00037322124,0.04738218,0.00014258195,0.00011712096,0.000058108162,0.000027599546,0.00003760923,0.0034149217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681723,0.0021760103,0.00007577275,0.00018911141,0.00051477534,0.00022702591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291223,0.0054012197,0.00040720336,0.00048869324,0.00043315953,0.000357516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006063902,0.0009164835,0.0010968607,0.0010680457,0.0009852786,0.0029887683,0.0014872829,0.0013436357,0.0045885635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01445245,0.0004195473,0.00065852515,0.0010374389,0.0020227088,0.0049147904,0.002074716,0.0022850565,0.00028053895],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026000678,0.00018389722,0.00080887094,0.00015264397,0.0001816832,0.00010902712,0.0002421387,0.3405602,0.0012712486,0.5885097,0.0032810813,0.06443953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005060347,0.00013519339,0.0002329674,0.000038292772,0.00004494679,0.00004491059,0.00010606644,0.44465604,0.00044672,0.5521338,0.0020823472,0.000028083778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011715697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015225034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006063902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023724132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002177017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032069385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234719607","doi":"10.1023/a:1024833722130","title":"Electronic Negotiations: Foundations, Systems and Experiments – Introduction to the Special Issue 2","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.01819879901410248,"score_gpt":0.3104065695738451,"score_spread":0.2922077705597426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234719607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004916446,0.42563903,0.34990674,0.038698804,0.02457945,0.00027600717,0.0006674474,0.00057801884,0.15473802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18086217,0.43188074,0.19164434,0.012919568,0.08564192,0.0014981942,0.0013829218,0.0007715158,0.0933987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970124,0.0017026144,0.00018859887,0.00041923733,0.0005674023,0.00010970837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154437,0.0068447976,0.00023979529,0.0007119354,0.00050648703,0.00015260612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042006797,0.0014760366,0.0019831925,0.002146364,0.0011721166,0.0061938376,0.0018309087,0.004578182,0.014986925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010224948,0.001107272,0.0015498807,0.0028011042,0.0065043434,0.008872374,0.003040174,0.0060880706,0.003486592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046545876,0.0002049181,0.00044948063,0.00077752373,0.000059419635,0.00010766939,0.00028840062,0.0041024564,0.0004994506,0.8018636,0.07452975,0.11707079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015916019,0.000059921225,0.0005634027,0.00051546155,0.000019081874,0.00021334692,0.00011345627,0.003689477,0.00018140569,0.82424,0.17034712,0.00004147219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010105507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008717743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014986925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019268264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012662931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05013627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248464018","doi":"10.1007/s10726-014-9406-6","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0069321251052386085,"score_gpt":0.23329234471067223,"score_spread":0.22636021960543362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248464018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019494026,0.0022803554,0.025433766,0.011027232,0.0044777803,0.00019621932,0.0014607831,0.00079413137,0.9523805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03361293,0.0034788183,0.015530992,0.006345809,0.002383867,0.00032047243,0.0023346306,0.00039103467,0.9356014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877065,0.00028044434,0.000046493675,0.00028038176,0.00048390354,0.00013817579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978713,0.00050714746,0.00010830745,0.0003789065,0.0008124674,0.0003219632],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015535591,0.00068397546,0.00032204142,0.0012839608,0.0015495827,0.004804449,0.0016807993,0.0019310887,0.31389573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053417254,0.0002075286,0.00046247264,0.0013257376,0.0012323093,0.0028620376,0.0025666053,0.0017658958,0.15896994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007407181,0.00007811673,0.0006011647,0.0002697327,0.0000059209233,0.00010076494,0.00062978844,0.0003446657,0.000709044,0.37404767,0.3381647,0.28497425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044063504,0.000014976299,0.0002661127,0.000115114926,0.000002490424,0.00006849569,0.000174406,0.00015153363,0.00024881476,0.026723126,0.97222406,0.000006479641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020719771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018831446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6861043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016301832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022163603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254058566","doi":"10.1023/a:1011252808608","title":"Fallback Bargaining","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Majority rule; Settlement (finance); Bargaining problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Condorcet method; Computer science; Voting; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.035788373848755946,"score_gpt":0.23071989224523393,"score_spread":0.194931518396478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254058566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03644319,0.0017181557,0.24571851,0.0056905993,0.0010300394,0.00023137416,0.00027638092,0.00041633335,0.7084755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59133536,0.00077187933,0.032244086,0.001555969,0.00041111442,0.00029355564,0.00029291242,0.00013111703,0.37296394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705315,0.0012318802,0.00010705103,0.00052267674,0.0006884262,0.0003968282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976211,0.0011416944,0.0001428955,0.000577926,0.00034133098,0.00017497006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00295055,0.0008786827,0.0012687765,0.0015381727,0.003342456,0.005295971,0.0017961817,0.0035451353,0.072583854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009926104,0.0003991587,0.0007592461,0.0013313125,0.0024030108,0.0057862042,0.0022985754,0.003984478,0.009213774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029356284,0.000028684999,0.000050411145,0.000015386353,0.0000045412407,0.00002247997,0.00013453129,0.00042923604,0.00013089692,0.98361224,0.0033443607,0.012197725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012150758,0.000014880167,0.00005774517,0.000017337252,0.0000039291954,0.000043237917,0.00007244649,0.0040295254,0.00022095533,0.982451,0.013072233,0.000004568208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007637245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006526227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072583854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019235975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011474212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24281716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321222075","doi":"10.1007/s10726-022-09812-y","title":"The Quality-Signaling Role of Manipulated Consumer Reviews","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Spam and Phishing Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pooling; Economic surplus; Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Profitability index; Microeconomics; Product (mathematics); Pricing strategies; Profit (economics); Economics; Marketing; Business; Welfare","score_opus":0.04535607365386315,"score_gpt":0.311223157708606,"score_spread":0.26586708405474285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321222075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70904857,0.0026347209,0.0904116,0.013721559,0.00070366176,0.00034335427,0.00043719503,0.00037236538,0.18232706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993757,0.00016213501,0.002679731,0.00027134048,0.00013304125,0.000025194877,0.000027868591,0.000027941269,0.0029156178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989472,0.0062051713,0.00035858463,0.0010588755,0.002367451,0.00053793564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87108546,0.09319185,0.01704163,0.00911755,0.0072900513,0.0022733873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011503533,0.0005033099,0.00063439383,0.0013500738,0.0011828616,0.0074889907,0.000981978,0.0027988076,0.008537996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119707644,0.0006488511,0.00048002056,0.00080943265,0.0019755391,0.0065975487,0.0013560576,0.0023945738,0.0008355054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004613894,0.0013029516,0.09598481,0.001138803,0.00076100585,0.0014500875,0.008697775,0.018678514,0.05769878,0.6129916,0.010003967,0.18667778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008497277,0.0016622049,0.12436675,0.00037284225,0.0010405503,0.0016414865,0.004415297,0.24957632,0.026962647,0.55574065,0.032918427,0.00045323218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011884262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007776672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011503533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017133068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010541505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06083721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384130953","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09844-y","title":"Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies in South Asia: A Comparative Study of India and Pakistan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Tribalism; Collectivism; Emerging markets; International business; Political science; South asia; Development economics; Sociology; Social science; Business; Economics; Law; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.17426272135677126,"score_gpt":0.45266249518651663,"score_spread":0.27839977382974535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384130953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960012,0.00012114853,0.000064175176,0.00018076798,0.0000039987117,0.000010917487,0.000005333505,7.4433643e-7,0.003611769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948454,0.00014421853,0.000038221617,0.000042354222,0.0000012666443,0.0000064548144,0.0000042269376,0.0000011009887,0.0002776107],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966581,0.001993757,0.00012604165,0.00012728923,0.00026152824,0.00083332794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830736,0.012454827,0.0021401746,0.00029454354,0.0008861915,0.001150727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040287985,0.00026265343,0.00045083143,0.001573542,0.009108673,0.0058183735,0.001112672,0.0013009618,0.004430067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012751621,0.00038910558,0.00027818687,0.0032731753,0.0059540514,0.002436225,0.0026925195,0.002277817,0.0003402444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002676218,0.00057811325,0.09909355,0.00013611236,0.00003822985,0.0034857607,0.8760137,0.00010941285,0.0003600915,0.006878395,0.00034876098,0.01269036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013687287,0.0001371425,0.032220166,0.000063605956,0.000022444185,0.000445761,0.9641529,0.000088854445,0.00011327012,0.0005106044,0.0022199422,0.000011616227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035298787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056066506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035298787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044932067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061747627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070186675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390505268","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09868-4","title":"Correction to: Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies in South Asia: A Comparative Study of India and Pakistan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; South asia; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.021183397839632703,"score_gpt":0.3627656877287492,"score_spread":0.3415822898891165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390505268","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053248566,0.00064902735,0.00045386303,0.11979912,0.87348396,0.000037733236,0.0012438707,0.00023123495,0.0035688183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075336546,0.0069805784,0.0046671745,0.18333893,0.36333114,0.0008060264,0.002986764,0.0019216374,0.36063135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940812,0.0013064949,0.00090639474,0.0007346308,0.0021120443,0.00085908466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92696327,0.02115447,0.00311126,0.005107863,0.040683005,0.0029801005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00446142,0.0018847845,0.0025058256,0.0028664838,0.0072690723,0.006341222,0.00553826,0.011143567,0.061298337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09800341,0.00096650195,0.0010457822,0.003989528,0.005212275,0.0034400926,0.0037746155,0.015509479,0.026949972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024989897,0.000003819638,0.00007323934,0.00009114514,0.0000053526533,0.0001449185,0.0002059189,0.000023833887,0.000014566431,0.00061909045,0.9973641,0.0014290006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044780776,0.000014823755,0.0014238617,0.0003936764,0.00002336982,0.00035043183,0.0019028598,0.00023255267,0.00016963288,0.001110321,0.9942842,0.000049529048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054052014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053251375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061298337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008462143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011874771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2050634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391899445","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09870-w","title":"Concept Design Evaluation of Sustainable Product–Service Systems: A QFD–TOPSIS Integrated Framework with Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Quality function deployment; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Product-service system; Service (business); Process management; Knowledge management; New product development; Business; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.03978333416077059,"score_gpt":0.273596491594833,"score_spread":0.23381315743406242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391899445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02433094,0.00013253448,0.97018707,0.00021391071,0.000016245984,0.0005199744,0.00006972923,0.00007988154,0.0044497023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29736456,0.0001607858,0.7006764,0.000046452446,0.000007584737,0.00071110815,0.00015082261,0.000023766122,0.0008584595],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871887,0.006290879,0.0006936667,0.00064093753,0.003359717,0.00029601864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479383,0.0032158685,0.00046602456,0.00017572998,0.0012378241,0.000110680456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01224368,0.0012322412,0.00095659774,0.0044528753,0.0010728156,0.0037595246,0.0018153172,0.0010993063,0.003653193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013082909,0.0006535455,0.0015751934,0.0025608805,0.001991486,0.0034751347,0.0019124702,0.00072476774,0.00024010887],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040602346,0.00048727557,0.0045082946,0.002733419,0.0004808483,0.0005968506,0.0050407345,0.34259358,0.016183509,0.28171954,0.0017237561,0.3435261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011359234,0.00046758231,0.0012851428,0.0004670168,0.00020091074,0.0001585588,0.0017257753,0.8763969,0.00759637,0.10463512,0.0068702986,0.00008277995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043376903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029451123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003749738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075325724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064751506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393865923","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09884-y","title":"Correction to: Concept Design Evaluation of Sustainable Product–Service Systems: A QFD–TOPSIS Integrated Framework with Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Chongqing Municipal Education Commission; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Quality function deployment; Computer science; Product (mathematics); Service (business); Process management; Knowledge management; Linguistics; Management science; New product development; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.034597264460093986,"score_gpt":0.2761084198400696,"score_spread":0.24151115537997564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393865923","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032681317,0.00063191133,0.0022694485,0.044635132,0.9479088,0.00005202955,0.001537556,0.00060022244,0.0020381198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0617262,0.007118285,0.029811593,0.11956929,0.40178218,0.0009773502,0.0067946925,0.0040864185,0.36813396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911374,0.0016650704,0.0016448573,0.0011676463,0.003735848,0.0006492853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89948297,0.018925216,0.0034876468,0.005545185,0.070250295,0.0023086402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005677629,0.0023442775,0.0028816715,0.0053994614,0.004314766,0.0051461128,0.004587958,0.007946741,0.07850494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116134875,0.0013097073,0.0017704564,0.004863527,0.0036438243,0.002976947,0.0034419456,0.01137366,0.02882168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047336718,0.000007654358,0.00006983175,0.00018132801,0.000014235837,0.00014984328,0.0001059677,0.0001301032,0.00008290219,0.0014112161,0.99309653,0.0047030644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056601726,0.000019835943,0.00080017146,0.00030375022,0.00003400182,0.00029236736,0.00026446534,0.0009495875,0.0004256923,0.0020475036,0.9947519,0.00005421286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042260498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040873643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07850494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007415695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009673482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26262522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394927090","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09885-x","title":"Two-Person Fair Division with Additive Valuations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Universität Wien","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Arithmetic; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03395908741372207,"score_gpt":0.24856721885162664,"score_spread":0.21460813143790458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394927090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27035686,0.00013178618,0.6853939,0.0009820927,0.00006246756,0.00020928793,0.00011340513,0.00014837863,0.04260186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617475,0.00003812426,0.034708172,0.000053731223,0.000016472837,0.00011693514,0.000029398654,0.000014828869,0.003274895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174374,0.0054264786,0.0003159736,0.0007031442,0.00096096913,0.00084971916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868241,0.0085714385,0.0011890451,0.0019801105,0.0007948599,0.000640359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160258,0.00047566363,0.0012324337,0.00081226986,0.0011478323,0.0041827424,0.0013701029,0.0014044738,0.010491428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02802101,0.0003540578,0.0008857155,0.0010790736,0.0028060046,0.004421333,0.0020422458,0.001207961,0.00069269846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023857322,0.00012411896,0.0011740476,0.00005520925,0.00004245767,0.00008875942,0.00042912725,0.13161314,0.0010724983,0.84639865,0.0007021619,0.018061267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008626184,0.00006705559,0.00044204516,0.000022687935,0.000014033529,0.00004855895,0.00020706761,0.34183273,0.00077680097,0.65419734,0.0022819075,0.000023423067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012488788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076611206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010491428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017877581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012932325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043156087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396934089","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09882-0","title":"A Novel Consensus and Dissent Framework Under Grey Preference Based on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Two Decision Makers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Dissent; Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Theoretical computer science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.29011607344459783,"score_gpt":0.426973462304629,"score_spread":0.13685738886003118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396934089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067854286,0.00016271257,0.9884071,0.00038133145,0.000057216606,0.000053815675,0.00004542201,0.000059024856,0.004047962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6118509,0.0006552483,0.37912506,0.0003621349,0.00016596068,0.00041349884,0.00022323965,0.00012017927,0.007083863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623007,0.0021010737,0.00013966775,0.00053859246,0.0007313169,0.0002592945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967097,0.0022592684,0.00021436771,0.00015238642,0.00046422452,0.00020008441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041004084,0.0012246018,0.0019868691,0.002137904,0.0012103239,0.0027170377,0.0035393003,0.002812368,0.004573467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008128114,0.00052649464,0.0018766125,0.0026710401,0.0024982782,0.005728997,0.0026043183,0.0024071168,0.00051680696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074807096,0.000056080527,0.00027249914,0.00016627382,0.00011241115,0.00018662961,0.0003741985,0.28665924,0.0009839357,0.68885577,0.0018232034,0.020434976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016027183,0.000024758723,0.00005694965,0.000012517482,0.000020473135,0.000025667141,0.000053376636,0.7296084,0.00012411101,0.2691859,0.00084863836,0.000023128809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059137708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044236043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059137708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023626012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026262538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021685302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408974151","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09923-2","title":"A Biform Game Approach to Store Brand Introduction and Production Mode Selection in a Platform Supply Chain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Production (economics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Human–computer interaction; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012103711020833493,"score_gpt":0.24066223682054455,"score_spread":0.22855852579971106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408974151","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085231416,0.00007511468,0.88734853,0.0006574941,0.000060685623,0.00025409032,0.00011779741,0.0001210451,0.026133845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7971489,0.00011288611,0.1841777,0.0001298387,0.000027038537,0.00029672246,0.000081313316,0.000022790044,0.018002804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843174,0.0010282504,0.000046827732,0.00011965021,0.0001982375,0.00017532296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780935,0.0016189973,0.00012150014,0.00007524191,0.00020554847,0.00016938249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002882617,0.0006001081,0.0008025966,0.0010371623,0.0009901659,0.002010721,0.001719897,0.0015238959,0.008602017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005083229,0.00051133713,0.0006939552,0.0008335428,0.001477936,0.0025252672,0.0014802903,0.0012520106,0.0003449137],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021210444,0.0003009809,0.0015036364,0.000069239395,0.00005621286,0.00019949993,0.00052143296,0.4239579,0.0019738236,0.5471243,0.0012415522,0.022839291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002015814,0.000064626125,0.00012743766,0.0000072395187,0.0000111336785,0.000019652609,0.000109792134,0.95245093,0.00015327631,0.0463656,0.0006586712,0.000011526836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01953263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020279104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01953263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021996233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024001675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03883785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414036856","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09942-z","title":"Supply Chain Conflict Study Based on Graph Model with a New Integrated Preference Structure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Supply chain; Preference; Graph; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Theoretical computer science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.01793173904255429,"score_gpt":0.24068958146761665,"score_spread":0.22275784242506236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414036856","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31222695,0.0005017027,0.6722645,0.0007906376,0.00011496773,0.00014704876,0.00026569102,0.00007469928,0.0136137735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95419765,0.0003017979,0.041075036,0.000056324396,0.000044823533,0.000074237185,0.00013138085,0.000026000422,0.004092706],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858356,0.0009028055,0.000035572186,0.00018206282,0.00014391742,0.00015206842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443984,0.0043763486,0.00033744186,0.00018864132,0.000381095,0.00027668857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019564535,0.00072109746,0.0010966674,0.0018548243,0.0008753359,0.001769245,0.0016448817,0.0013167133,0.0051111295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065758084,0.00043775653,0.0013784013,0.002502469,0.0010620503,0.0050916523,0.001014944,0.0012818982,0.00017660667],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026982607,0.00017729562,0.0021769314,0.00013329707,0.00016500948,0.00041659805,0.00027480608,0.7145168,0.0009784907,0.26851386,0.0011715732,0.011205595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012421031,0.000025373094,0.0001784006,0.0000053102185,0.000027934904,0.000021388716,0.00007624829,0.96991414,0.000085085936,0.029414095,0.00022768267,0.000011852729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009578588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005905333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009578588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017028238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001091505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019045651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417030628","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09956-7","title":"Majority Stability of Coalition Structures Under Decentralized Preferences of Autonomous Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Disjoint sets; Outcome (game theory); Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.047863454554541315,"score_gpt":0.27250822118067136,"score_spread":0.22464476662613003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417030628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190058,0.00026279787,0.16475995,0.001503644,0.000036455174,0.00007074369,0.00018276481,0.00008471531,0.014093103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941005,0.00006573736,0.0039596166,0.000032955417,0.000027665468,0.000041459753,0.00006503373,0.000015328833,0.0016916886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972203,0.0013037112,0.000121447985,0.00046186952,0.00041846186,0.00047414683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96777356,0.022155417,0.0044176932,0.0017306997,0.0023311607,0.0015916037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005194538,0.00040145157,0.001562205,0.00110709,0.0016870302,0.0042441273,0.0021927487,0.0016413642,0.0038303267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034903213,0.0005725774,0.00068575505,0.0009649295,0.0032277005,0.005091797,0.0021473926,0.001718563,0.00036396447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005718613,0.00014710498,0.002979673,0.00009594384,0.00010311646,0.00021954185,0.0010870624,0.09886156,0.0026388713,0.8814285,0.001534364,0.010332432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007196319,0.00005966846,0.0011916969,0.000012222554,0.00001536689,0.000035378835,0.00036179952,0.2779537,0.000607968,0.7193192,0.00035047904,0.000020512756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031833323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002306863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005194538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021323236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016317173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027471721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55691372","doi":"10.1023/a:1011257109771","title":"A Distance-Based Collective Weak Ordering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Axiom; Binary relation; Axiomatic system; Mathematical economics; Group decision-making; Mathematics; Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.09888483062954825,"score_gpt":0.37756462514866596,"score_spread":0.27867979451911773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55691372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032063328,0.00020222898,0.95206636,0.00053045904,0.00013986688,0.00013948802,0.00014277535,0.00016494308,0.014550521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5260913,0.0003014208,0.46016616,0.00017372014,0.00016402928,0.00029514768,0.00035574086,0.00013057714,0.012322014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950754,0.0020829802,0.00028282247,0.00049466203,0.001735989,0.0003281255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98873514,0.0055204486,0.0005428431,0.0016377363,0.0027424227,0.0008214191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056947805,0.0007040596,0.0014982241,0.002961774,0.0023823911,0.0032590276,0.0022460802,0.0013922409,0.0068585305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018291954,0.00048009882,0.0009536785,0.0034151298,0.002677832,0.0059315814,0.0039679254,0.0021774005,0.0009448351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037917093,0.00020145395,0.0014725544,0.0002528795,0.00007572325,0.00009075895,0.0007903626,0.1059541,0.0031621347,0.71866333,0.0041939206,0.1647637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057682242,0.00024162413,0.0005026116,0.00004862189,0.000043404565,0.00006886865,0.00021872767,0.48215115,0.0013391692,0.5094909,0.0057831486,0.00005407326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028813358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032891363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068585305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021957564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027263267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030117214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116780730","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09955-8","title":"Investigating Limited-Move Stabilities in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Unknown Preference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Graph theory; Conflict analysis","score_opus":0.15392849835903863,"score_gpt":0.36647879713809983,"score_spread":0.2125502987790612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116780730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52189183,0.0004903582,0.46115455,0.0017278511,0.000060255035,0.00015800972,0.00023382483,0.00018394475,0.014099332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98112744,0.00020894036,0.014251996,0.00007987149,0.000021748303,0.000095150084,0.00011776267,0.000056733108,0.004040407],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863535,0.0007763259,0.00003733955,0.00022281171,0.00011961654,0.00020850296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617076,0.032836594,0.002411669,0.0008640398,0.0009367219,0.0012433194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035989697,0.0011005438,0.0022492968,0.0020643717,0.0014655294,0.0032413,0.0027862445,0.0028031347,0.007750397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03433084,0.0009872053,0.0016221412,0.0016330765,0.0038237115,0.0060093864,0.0029968696,0.00323103,0.0005566661],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035775808,0.00017968767,0.0014305473,0.00020614738,0.00016884893,0.00031533,0.00067707285,0.64841187,0.0015959585,0.3398263,0.0011065509,0.0057240063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004058473,0.0000503354,0.00020030416,0.00001531569,0.000021069602,0.000019939987,0.0001491615,0.8547575,0.00018134601,0.14438014,0.00016410284,0.000020150997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008243485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056539457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008243485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019772067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016081701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025927663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85344031","doi":"10.1023/a:1011829229592","title":"The Role of Leadership in Group Support Systems Failure","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Transactional leadership; Transformational leadership; Psychology; Alliance; Leadership style; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.035109270755805,"score_gpt":0.2763247743944841,"score_spread":0.2412155036386791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85344031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87068397,0.004759207,0.0063058957,0.03469056,0.0005818281,0.000038298887,0.000024673749,0.000038004433,0.08287754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989054,0.00022630031,0.00020684912,0.00016584375,0.00005592332,0.0000074205823,0.0000020141292,0.0000034737338,0.0004267077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656063,0.0023875688,0.000052086394,0.00009521487,0.00039248468,0.00051204424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97857887,0.01378826,0.0020841751,0.00047835676,0.0014687285,0.0036017105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006706988,0.00017981595,0.0002276377,0.0006864229,0.0026241327,0.0035370307,0.00059094385,0.0012378921,0.0031647421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023290949,0.00022013443,0.0001701871,0.00036583163,0.0050096354,0.0021122713,0.0013399943,0.0019201675,0.0003065869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020240296,0.0027956006,0.27249402,0.00066241506,0.00020102983,0.0028348383,0.107210204,0.0053958655,0.0043899445,0.25389522,0.023022361,0.32507446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006291645,0.0017862285,0.48884547,0.0007052997,0.00015477843,0.0026787973,0.124548875,0.01654896,0.0017397488,0.31071454,0.05146688,0.00018120767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017632516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020682004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006706988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011140864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025521102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035470366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}