{"meta":{"query_hash":"a096e74e5d1f","filters":{"venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation"},"cohort_total":111,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":111,"exported":111,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a096e74e5d1f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Group+Decision+and+Negotiation"},"results":[{"id":"W129730029","doi":"10.1023/a:1008780324737","title":"A Cognitive Three-Process Model of Computer-Mediated Group Interaction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Group (periodic table); Communication source; Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Social identity theory; Human–computer interaction; Social group; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025668378007972798,"score_gpt":0.3182499032500469,"score_spread":0.2925815252420741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129730029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8228287,0.000084252024,0.17530975,0.00002317564,0.000263369,0.00014265794,0.00002935447,0.000032402568,0.001286341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986065,0.00011705387,0.00081289775,0.00018634314,0.000068333975,0.000014131386,0.00011908863,0.000012540968,0.00006312787],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991133,0.000030303812,0.0002999054,0.00025487263,0.00016558949,0.00013601381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994275,0.0001998589,0.00012626746,0.00012215137,0.00006864241,0.00005556041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016754978,0.00011407419,0.00016097343,0.0001185296,0.00007024153,0.00002254687,0.000072905605,0.00011117927,0.0007265383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012445764,0.00010408067,0.000040587,0.00017501204,0.00003617035,0.00023229225,0.000015063392,0.00012729937,0.000102247344],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009677728,0.00024706466,0.007376514,0.000015023953,0.00003130687,0.0000015999487,0.002059927,0.0008735309,0.0001970467,0.0011523034,0.00020806494,0.9868699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014569385,0.00027751827,0.15214062,0.00007754584,0.000019203151,0.000010782792,0.00015512858,0.842862,0.000010680072,0.00269466,0.00015985788,0.00013506241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054309243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010279381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014189017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006013426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7955085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131320508","doi":"10.1023/a:1008712331820","title":"The Condorcet's Jury Theorem in a Bioethical Context: The Dynamics of Group Decision Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children","keywords":"Jury; Argument (complex analysis); Axiom; Group decision-making; Voting; Focus group; Politics; Condorcet method; Hierarchy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Medicine; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05001587489050694,"score_gpt":0.3790026745252,"score_spread":0.328986799634693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131320508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87486976,0.0012287473,0.119333036,0.001778796,0.0009099039,0.00076511956,0.000030405605,0.00004417765,0.0010400563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947292,0.00058277056,0.0035002853,0.0008471674,0.00009576465,0.000025164101,0.000008335195,0.00003182604,0.00017947328],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919379,0.0011805614,0.0023804614,0.0009782771,0.002993102,0.00052970037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96540946,0.031969134,0.0006617898,0.0014523383,0.00037000392,0.00013727463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013177559,0.00036511812,0.0006368104,0.00052627776,0.00081310625,0.0009820707,0.001677866,0.00035173993,0.0010036423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009474801,0.00019038824,0.00025783575,0.0017656164,0.00064208714,0.0006394196,0.0004287242,0.0006212914,0.00017806258],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011341972,0.000073017894,0.0027769643,0.0000022297536,0.000008467046,0.000008650035,0.00075607636,0.00013786487,0.00013862534,0.049574357,0.00083424256,0.9445553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026912175,0.0002342349,0.23000275,0.0003671925,0.000024794883,0.000074001386,0.0034915605,0.27233955,0.000037090373,0.47029972,0.020024518,0.00041337046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005815441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002404617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012870408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053425105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1429935938","doi":"10.1007/s10726-015-9450-x","title":"Managing Co-occurring Conflicts in Teams","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Task (project management); Team effectiveness; Psychology; Conflict management; Social psychology; Team composition; Group conflict; Conflict resolution research; Conflict resolution; Business; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0470116694149213,"score_gpt":0.34701514406882744,"score_spread":0.30000347465390614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1429935938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9025932,0.00029640552,0.011647879,0.0012376469,0.0006001705,0.00044938177,0.0000011267889,0.00012454968,0.083049655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984889,0.00023008858,0.0003055854,0.00043877144,0.00013335235,0.000008541974,0.000010539865,0.0000071099153,0.00037707915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882114,0.000107279695,0.00022074058,0.00021873802,0.0004232368,0.00020888931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947107,0.00015749599,0.00008184784,0.000107153704,0.00004888213,0.00013355682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013651762,0.00008469467,0.00011398183,0.00026563494,0.00018592617,0.00015681467,0.00010821458,0.00007224729,0.00006241933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032419848,0.00008842774,0.000023014885,0.00033729165,0.00004316824,0.00053786015,0.000043948556,0.000081465136,0.000062992636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012442953,0.000086478205,0.15188572,0.000011517783,0.000010000652,0.0000110561,0.041179392,0.00009619621,0.0001165103,0.07426117,0.0033652391,0.7288523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029276286,0.00009449133,0.19152316,0.00011056646,0.000019058027,0.0000012490082,0.013905935,0.009221711,0.00005181938,0.025025032,0.756709,0.00041036386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009750985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023546733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75334376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002518499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36059785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14743208","doi":"10.1023/a:1024879603397","title":"On-line/Off-line: Joint Negotiation Teaching in Montreal and Vienna","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Knowledge management; Personalization; Computer science; Virtual learning environment; Psychology; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.03751602158953461,"score_gpt":0.3112451074246364,"score_spread":0.2737290858351018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14743208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436137,0.0004188405,0.014626255,0.00029429357,0.00039756845,0.00032091563,8.8877783e-7,0.000047831756,0.040279705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980145,0.0005241897,0.0006285716,0.00017594539,0.00010017498,0.000008083902,0.000007555655,0.000008292733,0.0005326857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868834,0.00023011325,0.00027893204,0.00029709717,0.00029063204,0.00021491486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939686,0.0002892051,0.00009010807,0.00010783267,0.000025457017,0.00009052746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015821338,0.00011362165,0.00014915489,0.0002522621,0.00043275082,0.00017220591,0.000064141386,0.00009371424,0.000059217433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000993839,0.00010681408,0.000030973864,0.00021432743,0.00003668854,0.00038213702,0.00003676288,0.0001564096,0.000026356298],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006306847,0.00016149349,0.02332678,0.000013059434,0.000008642151,0.0000056402077,0.012744858,0.00026542458,0.000096869386,0.25326115,0.0008601778,0.7091928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005716583,0.0005146691,0.6507383,0.00039363944,0.000058349087,0.0000036690935,0.010644167,0.07713609,0.00007820146,0.2115985,0.042175036,0.00094281096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000340079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089382455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000708878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011077885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49877506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486075422","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9248-4","title":"Arno R. Lodder and John Zeleznikow: Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037593043393858876,"score_gpt":0.2293356323867757,"score_spread":0.19174258899291682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486075422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31647176,0.00026601495,0.6663946,0.001773511,0.00063402666,0.00063047325,0.000007684549,0.00019244157,0.013629502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552697,0.00037182058,0.0031219304,0.0007813858,0.00007461922,0.00001924049,0.000029198907,0.0000080509335,0.000066791115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915415,0.000012071701,0.00033845007,0.00015572997,0.00019337481,0.00014624634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992657,0.00006310819,0.00029480117,0.0002090486,0.00015651468,0.000010852874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001550784,0.00011602091,0.00012854842,0.00025970218,0.00026217662,0.00015378352,0.00009632511,0.000113407375,0.00007448283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020194765,0.00007700776,0.000036804544,0.00052878255,0.00011759928,0.0032874213,0.00012546204,0.000101950165,0.000050174363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021811377,0.00012674429,0.0025024982,0.000057347588,0.000033411536,4.68555e-7,0.00059920223,0.00005174216,0.0008839793,0.56076676,0.007331671,0.42742807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011933964,0.000056041394,0.18442008,0.00009766848,0.000094882584,0.000008276179,0.0011343473,0.016971005,0.00030512677,0.03424614,0.76119584,0.0002771737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000247363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119312775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75386417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015077717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000657734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31402853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494789798","doi":"10.1023/a:1023064720309","title":"Electronic Negotiations: Foundations, Systems and Experiments – Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.018577934376684084,"score_gpt":0.3109231648864594,"score_spread":0.2923452305097753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494789798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6582617,0.005846344,0.18692234,0.061355576,0.019821918,0.008544475,0.000012331163,0.0005316328,0.058703635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98724216,0.0015361827,0.00038641735,0.0005225694,0.006999126,0.00009981594,0.000027983477,0.000015632437,0.003170087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983728,0.00029825288,0.00027856772,0.0003413543,0.00043558795,0.00027346276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.00019922273,0.0001148861,0.00020118232,0.0000895188,0.00010039256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012728753,0.00012230099,0.000120878845,0.00019224192,0.0011753058,0.00047908394,0.00010721947,0.00007595974,0.0004220637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006282205,0.000104839935,0.00002815252,0.00050952093,0.000054943117,0.00054564513,0.000035761095,0.00009289592,0.00012294245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060475366,0.000076338176,0.002102003,0.000007599519,0.00003253999,3.4334403e-7,0.013519183,0.000101931546,0.00019558355,0.7516233,0.07835952,0.15392123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033003816,0.000058963138,0.006970279,0.000008762022,0.000022402217,0.0000015061536,0.0043594018,0.00030597637,0.000022690348,0.0025163312,0.9852735,0.0001301435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024580848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011575446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.906914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015466381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041889212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9039621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155001031","doi":"10.1023/a:1024871921144","title":"Applying the Montreal Taxonomy to State of the Art E-Negotiation Systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05769474785710255,"score_gpt":0.3055760922131813,"score_spread":0.24788134435607878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155001031","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23649247,0.0001899997,0.7526035,0.00059225474,0.0009954121,0.003533606,0.00002282233,0.00003561478,0.0055343295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964905,0.000018770455,0.00068545697,0.0003012559,0.000046832185,0.00096174906,0.0000025977176,0.000008200452,0.0014846633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974805,0.00043872627,0.0007013034,0.000361659,0.0008620755,0.00015572984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969306,0.0016141923,0.00044105595,0.00069260615,0.00023306442,0.00008849651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002978749,0.00012531038,0.00018887418,0.00014577985,0.0005309387,0.00022281584,0.00041214554,0.000051188465,0.0000732511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015961285,0.00006590028,0.00008858009,0.001038771,0.000077549106,0.0002789277,0.000082825,0.00011116043,0.00021486045],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011053506,0.00011709881,0.0075035566,0.0000058864102,0.000024293415,3.0815767e-7,0.0010119062,0.015812734,0.0022558714,0.13329397,0.023875026,0.81598884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065251015,0.00007327048,0.104080856,0.000041948435,0.000029982815,0.000022552698,0.0024126994,0.007962729,0.0014947677,0.13689084,0.74609995,0.00023791425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028509248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008925909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003219092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028266119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40836045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1646856192","doi":"10.1023/a:1008713120075","title":"Coalition Analysis in Group Decision Support","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Operations research; Computer science; Management science; Decision analysis; Decision support system; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05666481454648493,"score_gpt":0.37236245209305463,"score_spread":0.3156976375465697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1646856192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6126581,0.000063233434,0.38501891,0.0002790325,0.00014104329,0.00020351441,0.000011465427,0.000039202656,0.0015855171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371296,0.00022365962,0.005003825,0.00044164737,0.00007143468,0.000034865057,0.00009482813,0.00001213598,0.00040461507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960513,0.00028775434,0.0011714548,0.00085111684,0.0013233017,0.00031507426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956434,0.0028591948,0.00032155935,0.000782442,0.00018759965,0.00020581408],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047431528,0.00021126092,0.00044827763,0.0014993851,0.00027330493,0.00035143024,0.0004715744,0.00018028471,0.0020201004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014561597,0.00016969495,0.00020284047,0.0046495437,0.00008415927,0.00082156225,0.00014487396,0.00017747462,0.00065241655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045087418,0.00031946294,0.13731924,0.000001597033,0.000033666776,0.000018357614,0.0005125219,0.0006745962,0.00095921085,0.035936475,0.002778387,0.8209956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096417795,0.000102722064,0.70223176,0.000014837467,0.00006977978,0.00002089446,0.00052118755,0.0127410805,0.0000377806,0.25801367,0.025060602,0.00022150963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051812785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009884561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8207741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067482055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001764405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1717026707","doi":"10.1023/a:1023072922126","title":"The Montreal Taxonomy for Electronic Negotiations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Electronic markets; Common value auction; Variety (cybernetics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Business; Industrial organization; Electronic trading; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Commerce; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; The Internet; Sociology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0568834372388296,"score_gpt":0.3341905950538993,"score_spread":0.2773071578150697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1717026707","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033633474,0.00047115708,0.9596339,0.0010629396,0.00037630528,0.0008398929,0.00001193775,0.000047165893,0.003923263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946829,0.000156218,0.0023332848,0.00025593457,0.00009066569,0.00040814382,0.000009941405,0.000010567475,0.002052343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814516,0.00019044404,0.0005341504,0.00040975108,0.00043941272,0.00028109143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993942,0.0049939314,0.0002505048,0.00048270915,0.00023133658,0.00009947663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029220472,0.00012193889,0.00014222815,0.00012059242,0.0014501677,0.00037761612,0.0002919048,0.00007605451,0.00012024375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003211314,0.00007729912,0.00010840946,0.00053610094,0.000087843226,0.0003376379,0.000029157834,0.00010538041,0.0001354676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004426152,0.000030149742,0.00041868794,3.630618e-7,0.0000073418405,4.255107e-8,0.000068740446,0.00009300123,0.00008828556,0.6954574,0.009319338,0.29447237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000361308,0.000044164084,0.006204097,0.0000014096471,0.000008914054,0.0000053694757,0.0004345118,0.002274167,0.00009280859,0.4954473,0.4950521,0.00007385359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062556114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021318355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96104944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004320575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005377043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821366024","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9325-3","title":"Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Middle East; Conflict resolution; Psychological intervention; Business; Political science; Geography; Computer science; Psychology; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.09237089830353316,"score_gpt":0.2697234512947076,"score_spread":0.17735255299117442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821366024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98947656,0.000027895136,0.00050253654,0.0025138522,0.00005459969,0.00037368946,0.0000010635689,0.000012401918,0.007037422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992466,0.000018738243,0.00026072247,0.00032264463,0.000025663716,0.000019578309,0.000009707695,0.0000030806398,0.00009327654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991336,0.00015302628,0.0001835829,0.0001092969,0.00028943486,0.00013107545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997094,0.00007752023,0.000034433197,0.000105013634,0.000033726694,0.000039894312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005376366,0.000051505413,0.00006769868,0.00008637837,0.00018419001,0.00014435053,0.00013618272,0.0000384818,0.00017936809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023992518,0.000031072566,0.00001957574,0.00016033558,0.00013937936,0.00020752246,0.000017419827,0.000053007043,0.000053560954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030828927,0.00029098403,0.032395754,0.00004343695,0.0000222953,0.0000029920966,0.6494919,0.00024821915,0.0047027897,0.27588603,0.000903262,0.035981532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019479183,0.00019457126,0.5254544,0.00013795671,0.0000359071,0.00000209644,0.09722849,0.0019795082,0.00038420563,0.26882374,0.10343705,0.00037414982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022733945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023435056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5522634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015398302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008226989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34367076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18362931","doi":"10.1023/a:1023025106197","title":"SmartSettle Described with the Montreal Taxonomy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Architecture and Computational Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.009360370701804224,"score_gpt":0.1698730228288526,"score_spread":0.16051265212704838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18362931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12867588,0.00028590727,0.86573994,0.000068667905,0.000100943726,0.00016133647,0.0000012398995,0.000065586995,0.004900517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344724,0.000017879971,0.0062936107,0.0001274816,0.00003699428,0.000024687968,0.0000058086694,0.000009095728,0.00003717792],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962497,0.000023922428,0.00007475078,0.000087026354,0.000107232045,0.000082125625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970055,0.000157421,0.000013632954,0.0000801233,0.000015685211,0.000032584885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008661936,0.000071808696,0.00005662627,0.00003435082,0.00008744094,0.000034207278,0.000037215705,0.000024279814,0.00002576112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001048347,0.0000436224,0.000014968024,0.00009388343,0.000014562874,0.00006697645,0.0000047399485,0.000057762754,0.000015517566],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001052048,0.000037139413,0.0018781056,0.000013378585,0.000064001986,0.0000060829807,0.00088434294,0.08683197,0.000687349,0.014712093,0.032962143,0.8618182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003248752,0.00040881464,0.34177378,0.0000680814,0.00009323544,0.0001717519,0.00053247577,0.17672892,0.0012919368,0.043005086,0.43183878,0.00083838304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004613374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000596164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86477137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010578787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047983153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17788698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963657722","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9022-1","title":"Word from the Guest Editors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Natural language processing; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009375185397906924,"score_gpt":0.22795892132791193,"score_spread":0.21858373593000502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963657722","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26404878,0.0006071792,0.7268675,0.0018722299,0.0058822823,0.000088718516,0.0000017165905,0.000077524535,0.0005540841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816196,0.000049415426,0.013008776,0.00038834655,0.0047935895,0.0000032215937,0.000033062166,0.0000043564482,0.00009963956],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920213,0.000037051166,0.00017904006,0.00022184296,0.00026720559,0.00009270413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927235,0.0003506314,0.00007679263,0.00024537698,0.00002798845,0.000026872647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021848988,0.00006816785,0.000075607575,0.00004690434,0.0001801747,0.00027817348,0.00024374944,0.000035719422,0.00003133093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028359422,0.000044087017,0.0000424026,0.00024662717,0.000013939291,0.00030799236,0.00009323537,0.00004872154,0.00005763378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016982085,0.00009516697,0.05907157,0.0000010607117,0.00002602023,0.000003724951,0.0005806945,0.00010142429,0.0011447865,0.028404653,0.39871627,0.51183766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005786154,0.000029831821,0.70827305,0.00002902465,0.000017402735,0.0000015916299,0.0000854266,0.07034713,0.00038365228,0.017073838,0.20298855,0.00019187729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015426049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000563738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7175708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009864765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045224956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26824334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964374874","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9052-8","title":"E-negotiation System Development: Using Negotiation Protocols to Manage Software Components","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Process management; Dependency (UML); Knowledge management; Software; Protocol (science); Software engineering; Business; Operating system; Political science","score_opus":0.04801926832809176,"score_gpt":0.3033785008969536,"score_spread":0.25535923256886184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964374874","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26084083,0.000036979844,0.73296267,0.000050704046,0.0006956273,0.0049489746,0.000002893312,0.0003455661,0.00011572533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78390986,0.0000034852055,0.21518491,0.00023691804,0.00019072878,0.0003322135,0.000055024342,0.00003326827,0.00005360705],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590075,0.00016544021,0.001233259,0.0009509992,0.0011697244,0.00057985645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777305,0.00028947956,0.0006080251,0.00066637085,0.00029453365,0.00036852545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021078251,0.00039434433,0.00042206794,0.00082011276,0.00070317596,0.0005245712,0.0005625285,0.00024718296,0.000010647215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019748978,0.00038685146,0.00009149404,0.0010570826,0.000018318908,0.0016366311,0.00031740748,0.00016716865,0.00018156761],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051458203,0.0006740564,0.050859425,0.00082007813,0.0001403138,0.00006908047,0.012636095,0.0032013657,0.044508275,0.026696235,0.0010605692,0.8588199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003466004,0.0002488902,0.7496015,0.0012904528,0.00003632219,0.00009886217,0.0003933664,0.22106574,0.0067397514,0.00059116323,0.015206984,0.0012609409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009555437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106674386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85755897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005804588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044431028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968974820","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9121-2","title":"Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bankruptcy; Dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Soviet union; Political science; Geography; Economics; Economy; Business; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05737976568253775,"score_gpt":0.22870524752469656,"score_spread":0.17132548184215882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968974820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8298036,0.0013450732,0.16452111,0.0003614463,0.00047001638,0.00016537214,0.000016238677,0.000047610163,0.0032695422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985238,0.0002161203,0.00048102718,0.00028212307,0.00014811006,0.000011275772,0.000012188313,0.000013056657,0.00031230558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990688,0.00003212457,0.0004354047,0.0002539399,0.000051626677,0.00015811466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.00014420244,0.00012574959,0.00025048657,0.000026749522,0.000057809728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068711356,0.00009993658,0.00017359355,0.00011967411,0.0005255104,0.00006054624,0.00012530436,0.0000736784,0.00009302425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019948694,0.00008393724,0.00006310292,0.00020241739,0.000037422527,0.00023691828,0.00003542018,0.000110725676,0.0003408851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005740556,0.00010669104,0.10454014,0.0000149496145,0.000035932597,0.000006116936,0.005316376,0.007295749,0.000046749297,0.8688224,0.0016464896,0.01211103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010776819,0.00009071741,0.12512448,0.0000355796,0.000009700085,0.000112168455,0.00044212447,0.7211161,0.000015962094,0.1366349,0.014964914,0.00037563386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018454027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005058227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73218745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029737248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060321104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4381502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973701472","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9143-9","title":"A Model of Bargaining over Hazardous Waste Cleanup","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Superfund; Hazardous waste; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Business; Liability; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Environmental planning; Waste management; Finance; Environmental science; Law; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.01613081443318738,"score_gpt":0.22823171994782748,"score_spread":0.21210090551464011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973701472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83312935,0.00011206104,0.15482414,0.0005431431,0.00015455823,0.00033835502,0.0000010840924,0.00008094224,0.010816354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950528,0.000021430536,0.0021044486,0.002338784,0.0002531792,0.000004145603,0.000015072796,0.000014016435,0.00019609621],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986291,0.0000099343315,0.00038317588,0.00029808693,0.00046556862,0.00021415511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925953,0.00007340329,0.00024632266,0.0002648136,0.0001402018,0.00001575447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063980924,0.000146393,0.00020254847,0.00046600195,0.00012021162,0.00020273791,0.00016169349,0.0000634332,0.000072407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027305342,0.0001341997,0.00006618504,0.00043220347,0.000019492354,0.0010009524,0.00013602574,0.000074460935,0.000023077135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042608072,0.00023604053,0.006438937,0.00010265015,0.000031754313,0.000014697268,0.00036646155,0.0339162,0.0036641331,0.25211346,0.018743353,0.68394625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011282436,0.000032875316,0.024067452,0.00004474701,0.00003523856,5.1035465e-7,0.000792594,0.8038714,0.000040695235,0.16741471,0.0023794337,0.00019211587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030194627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013749559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7699552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033650693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066841344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5472505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977171261","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9178-6","title":"Ripeness and Grief in Conflict Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ripeness; Grief; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02135754255461978,"score_gpt":0.3402126141097057,"score_spread":0.3188550715550859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977171261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854326,0.0010164999,0.011667824,0.00035563487,0.00015782332,0.00015200676,0.0000033261622,0.000020967593,0.0011932715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834675,0.0002380262,0.00029520298,0.00091359136,0.00004135913,0.0000069244743,0.000035602443,0.000003306839,0.00011925753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991156,0.000075429445,0.00027808172,0.00026580057,0.00011703857,0.00014807053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951,0.000145715,0.00006950393,0.00015034302,0.000027156035,0.00009726223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000293775,0.00008407509,0.00017396268,0.00032934744,0.00007433535,0.000036119698,0.000039283575,0.00010161079,0.0002333989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037618705,0.00007531712,0.000029019526,0.00051416055,0.000014489769,0.00011718241,0.000006345917,0.00007668354,0.00002223913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041153881,0.00020951645,0.30694637,0.000007616802,0.00004763727,0.000009859034,0.008178317,0.000019569148,0.00012602544,0.030939357,0.0016313737,0.6514728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009750929,0.00010500446,0.9917187,0.000006259647,0.00003640663,0.0000037004322,0.00024261675,0.0008111952,0.000005343087,0.0034439992,0.0025739954,0.000077674646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023849515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015102053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6847724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012724457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057182497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3071343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977588943","doi":"10.1007/s10726-014-9382-x","title":"Special Issue: The Israeli–Palestinian and Related Conflicts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Arab–Israeli conflict; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01854403104210193,"score_gpt":0.27708456369653944,"score_spread":0.2585405326544375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977588943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8195861,0.0016934656,0.0007943932,0.004083697,0.0023454484,0.00036038845,0.0000027562107,0.00007945914,0.17105429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944437,0.0006247818,0.00010717169,0.00052449846,0.0025055548,0.0000036024842,0.0000029309554,0.000005490221,0.0017822563],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991506,0.00013101037,0.00015453516,0.00017308362,0.00023987108,0.00015092365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936783,0.0003415871,0.00007066354,0.00008993328,0.00004910169,0.000080910846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007455579,0.00007365234,0.000102099846,0.000037527974,0.0006511409,0.000116033705,0.000072946204,0.0000742738,0.00005808835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006110733,0.000051782084,0.000020810263,0.00013040465,0.00018874509,0.00014035442,0.000045391844,0.00007526725,0.00008910688],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023008854,0.0000114267805,0.017314274,0.0000022039708,0.000006928462,6.7737324e-7,0.0081202965,3.023259e-7,0.000015220872,0.045702215,0.0029078675,0.9258956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045266986,0.00006168428,0.23326515,0.00001987011,0.000014096201,0.00000299329,0.0032685348,0.00012356874,0.000002546463,0.00976601,0.7529356,0.00008730283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001203867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017176941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92580825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010853406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072132893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5008115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980896408","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-1403-3","title":"Getting to Yes in China: Exploring Personality Effects in Chinese Negotiation Styles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Collectivism; Personality; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Assertiveness; Scale (ratio); Variance (accounting); China; Political science; Business; Individualism","score_opus":0.02428110395232292,"score_gpt":0.31220548109067103,"score_spread":0.2879243771383481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980896408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901279,0.00023008532,0.004538419,0.0021707916,0.00024129836,0.00059059187,6.9967933e-7,0.00006908075,0.002031101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997424,0.00031977217,0.001419296,0.00032879788,0.00034860717,0.000062946085,0.000008667912,0.000011573204,0.000076322984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825794,0.00023039713,0.00037044578,0.0003689668,0.00046670294,0.00030553038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917424,0.00045253208,0.000105026615,0.00012825227,0.000034552722,0.00010541148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015205538,0.00015095892,0.00019853031,0.0005183121,0.0002644192,0.00015784687,0.0001306452,0.00008892791,0.000060491453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008915746,0.0001508079,0.00004404107,0.00089790986,0.000024516883,0.0012485367,0.00007292308,0.00013286939,0.000036685567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008936601,0.00011345009,0.35338703,0.000023506418,0.000004728103,0.0000025702338,0.04843666,0.0004968381,0.00073155714,0.007550916,0.000067337285,0.589096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078228815,0.00003498176,0.9887014,0.00011183032,0.0000049968576,1.9111569e-7,0.0014047782,0.0041495916,0.00003393941,0.0012830836,0.0033130164,0.00017990863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025311438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039011113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63531435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024942914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001831814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97852445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982012364","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9079-5","title":"You can’t shake hands with clenched fists: potential effects of trust assessments on the adoption of e-negotiation services","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Conceptualization; Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Negotiation theory; Knowledge management; Service (business); Business; Computer science; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.00590788906207023,"score_gpt":0.21558015779773806,"score_spread":0.20967226873566783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982012364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92328227,0.00003064179,0.07491867,0.00030748747,0.00025195652,0.00041284808,0.0000018087308,0.000034667635,0.0007596394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867624,0.000026792492,0.0003378475,0.0005848831,0.0002124655,0.000008913845,0.00008365603,0.00001688034,0.000052348223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985721,0.000024029503,0.0003773658,0.00026082146,0.0005830882,0.00018258559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894077,0.00020099695,0.0004589453,0.00023955315,0.00014397854,0.000015781206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008438832,0.00016982519,0.00020199109,0.0003004561,0.00017432806,0.00011920617,0.00014907215,0.00007930152,0.00003482119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052045343,0.0001145488,0.00005633917,0.0004075925,0.000038719587,0.0003853055,0.000071391696,0.00009378711,0.000008173556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056305444,0.0020792878,0.45810533,0.004511938,0.0005252015,0.000036718633,0.0029210646,0.013387194,0.011366342,0.048927266,0.002833447,0.44967568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032133337,0.0003376464,0.9374861,0.0005727791,0.00020601472,0.0000011284588,0.0018234607,0.05222994,0.0011736306,0.0017132304,0.00097376434,0.00026894937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023808195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021719809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4793808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033335808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059759163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46711645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982136260","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9069-z","title":"User Acceptance of Web-Based Negotiation Support Systems: The Role of Perceived Intention of the Negotiating Partner to Negotiate Online","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Construct (python library); Conformity; Technology acceptance model; Perception; Psychology; Knowledge management; Business; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Usability; Sociology; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.016241256080798943,"score_gpt":0.2829679506524384,"score_spread":0.26672669457163944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982136260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990221,0.00027243077,0.005127613,0.00024157451,0.000569583,0.00076431874,0.000017009546,0.000029871382,0.0027565542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00004891024,0.00031900333,0.00005170357,0.00013538341,0.000016695787,0.000026734342,0.000013920163,0.00041510127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977198,0.0003279163,0.0007707601,0.00025821704,0.00069720455,0.00022610495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822724,0.00035951775,0.00065944414,0.00031982793,0.00038490188,0.000049054077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011655334,0.00014637319,0.00027673715,0.0001794638,0.00033316138,0.000086114975,0.00037678704,0.00010459149,0.00006626576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043712315,0.00010025906,0.00013098691,0.0007247852,0.00014244555,0.0003252676,0.000119679986,0.000105336556,0.0000050996246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047252135,0.0007977583,0.74447185,0.000230964,0.00008914789,7.12602e-7,0.016969386,0.019081162,0.041347902,0.09780704,0.002754738,0.07597679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124627,0.00008285518,0.9395121,0.0002423934,0.000087281645,2.8064972e-7,0.011064956,0.038676582,0.0006337636,0.00119637,0.007206396,0.00017242048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034520086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1950402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006349909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062003535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4088446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986786931","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9053-7","title":"Content Analysis Through the Machine Learning Mill","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Automation; Decision tree; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Information retrieval; Natural language processing; Engineering","score_opus":0.03722862449492215,"score_gpt":0.25519642510223584,"score_spread":0.2179678006073137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986786931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1343662,0.00086644886,0.86320055,0.00068664475,0.00025062452,0.00016992052,0.0000018135828,0.00008033332,0.0003774626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919364,0.00012956781,0.0071443752,0.000253808,0.00008772785,0.000010107523,0.000035509493,0.000005915893,0.0003966008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985693,0.00015810909,0.00037132224,0.00034794165,0.00038782408,0.00016551178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905944,0.00028988122,0.00021314307,0.00032547556,0.00007597704,0.000036058856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005035102,0.00012809697,0.00018226613,0.00013805645,0.00042298064,0.00024333278,0.00025321826,0.00006205377,0.000027027927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006315881,0.00008224293,0.00011644161,0.0007222151,0.000019644463,0.0005050773,0.000098212804,0.00010975668,0.000032889056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120008575,0.00049261755,0.27487794,0.000038959584,0.0005359766,0.000020945086,0.0070662764,0.024054848,0.010864571,0.28896877,0.007062451,0.38589665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006868266,0.000060373568,0.41772974,0.000013767295,0.00007937192,0.0000077678615,0.00008288543,0.55908453,0.00023694443,0.0043547098,0.017480163,0.00018290525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012636455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000590293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000309696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006271179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33537695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991773119","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9001-y","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Graph; Sociology; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.02009217325215433,"score_gpt":0.27925780082492063,"score_spread":0.2591656275727663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991773119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033520304,0.000025435973,0.942729,0.021741793,0.00019371437,0.00065575656,0.000011826659,0.000036608235,0.0010855611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645819,0.000018001363,0.0057154032,0.0009184333,0.027932197,0.00012011683,0.000057397272,0.000013519713,0.000642996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921066,0.000043620956,0.00020225647,0.00023778965,0.00017524166,0.00013045702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934995,0.00018869444,0.00008055118,0.00027848303,0.00006700403,0.000035299825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046823954,0.00010142774,0.000101106816,0.000078156714,0.0003667224,0.00008801499,0.00012165492,0.000027382752,0.00027067875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028311297,0.000061072365,0.0000835446,0.0002043688,0.000019526517,0.0000966191,0.00003605667,0.00008710651,0.000045540153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104704086,0.000039741226,0.000053514592,4.7203667e-7,0.000014340965,7.769671e-9,0.00034464075,0.013715687,0.0001332644,0.08783802,0.47818702,0.4195686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001684221,0.000054339544,0.00086976256,0.0000059516565,0.000022641254,1.6934301e-7,0.00006801251,0.39807847,0.00022755054,0.017428681,0.5829971,0.00007889327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014327348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006425627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026352678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053691015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29637426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998299333","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9042-x","title":"The Effects of Cultural Diversity in Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Team effectiveness; Collectivism; Cultural diversity; Homogeneous; Psychology; Knowledge management; Individualism; Team composition; Virtual team; Psychological safety; Task (project management); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00989681300725125,"score_gpt":0.279373752656166,"score_spread":0.2694769396489147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998299333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99369156,0.00022966776,0.0035749727,0.00008384569,0.0013371785,0.0002310336,0.0000057604384,0.000016206195,0.00082978664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.0000703176,0.000064925676,0.000040837574,0.000050901697,0.00000649283,0.000012500231,0.0000053638278,0.0003982201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920285,0.00005885442,0.00019404275,0.00019110099,0.0001865225,0.00016662662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999159,0.0005228335,0.00008035636,0.00017224796,0.00002628915,0.00003929368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022393499,0.000095751115,0.00011862882,0.00007020219,0.00020896044,0.00002672761,0.0001442915,0.00008642086,0.000015461848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007158965,0.000067352834,0.000036014735,0.00019958658,0.000040256065,0.0001071548,0.00013005857,0.00010874343,0.000044410805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037198002,0.00040945364,0.19764476,0.000025305633,0.000049132686,0.000010796238,0.015050438,0.0012034426,0.0024916087,0.030610206,0.008987014,0.73979807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027319444,0.0005070931,0.9892779,0.000029098079,0.000011113128,0.0000018141966,0.0018523685,0.0024084756,0.00007388325,0.0005371828,0.0024405704,0.00012857026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064724043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080590183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049562128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004558111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27465686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000621378","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9179-5","title":"Negotiation over Costs and Benefits in Brownfield Redevelopment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Redevelopment; Shapley value; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Operations research; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Management science; Economics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Telecommunications; Political science","score_opus":0.023755830161397293,"score_gpt":0.22379146151859847,"score_spread":0.20003563135720118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000621378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99106866,0.0019958958,0.0032700156,0.00030109356,0.00026033135,0.00018008162,0.0000062016966,0.000023729395,0.0028939971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845606,0.00039837547,0.0005222557,0.0004343779,0.00004855882,0.0000044334847,0.000011865671,0.0000061124747,0.000117981916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901116,0.000019156767,0.00047020425,0.00030476236,0.00004655084,0.00014816957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952805,0.000112604226,0.00016548541,0.00012266009,0.000013289225,0.000057883582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007133507,0.0001056182,0.00020812337,0.00023351652,0.00007872265,0.00008559617,0.000055163535,0.000110783694,0.00006899002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015871659,0.0001146572,0.00002270247,0.0001790238,0.000010969712,0.00027249102,0.000021235315,0.000085767664,0.00003170632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012189663,0.000099570796,0.23023409,0.000010727972,0.0000071982568,0.000002194925,0.0013746739,0.000057379595,0.00011913473,0.44506142,0.0005818733,0.32232985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009224668,0.00008806814,0.94094,0.00006745433,0.0000014887086,0.000004925315,0.000057019002,0.0016618748,0.000038102127,0.05370534,0.0023582196,0.00015503468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006190195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069867776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71070594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006367552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000362221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4675585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001291551","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9290-x","title":"The Yonmenkaigi System Method: An Implementation-Oriented Group Decision Support Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Computer science; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Process management; Software engineering; Data mining; Business; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.055222717475924644,"score_gpt":0.39366215266636356,"score_spread":0.3384394351904389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001291551","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2335509,0.0002102529,0.759939,0.000110584195,0.0022524358,0.0006913622,0.000014069133,0.00011163595,0.003119731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375592,0.00014057015,0.06124517,0.00019806698,0.00035266,0.00008150513,0.00009132249,0.000021977516,0.0003095291],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950058,0.000504207,0.0012469229,0.000683048,0.0020319007,0.00052813505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621856,0.0018460416,0.0005476291,0.0008589892,0.000235368,0.00029341027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010645375,0.00027411632,0.00031389322,0.0004859458,0.0013303835,0.0007862985,0.0005722548,0.00012425246,0.00040076804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040721934,0.0001717065,0.0001274229,0.0012272331,0.00011608322,0.0026114564,0.00028650297,0.00018075808,0.00022428251],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016872208,0.00006147087,0.034147657,0.0000054644183,0.000016155844,4.524194e-7,0.0008943425,0.000015967868,0.000069859176,0.064640015,0.004329786,0.8956501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033386315,0.00046065595,0.39432585,0.00003394473,0.00010869974,0.00015751894,0.050458986,0.062381852,0.00016572507,0.008447694,0.47935668,0.0007637562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013679234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8948864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011007747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002443032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008052156","doi":"10.1023/b:grup.0000042894.00775.75","title":"A Distance-Based Collective Preorder Integrating the Relative Importance of the Group's Members","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Partially ordered set; Group (periodic table); Measure (data warehouse); Divergence (linguistics); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.055850662149653174,"score_gpt":0.3506103197598169,"score_spread":0.2947596576101637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008052156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5064834,0.00027268298,0.48925483,0.0013297395,0.000620952,0.0007109779,0.0000171553,0.0000272968,0.0012829789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837306,0.000011850168,0.0153471995,0.0006286296,0.000049605806,0.000036885755,0.0000034080285,0.00001925456,0.0001725526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995143,0.0005139901,0.0012461249,0.0007083633,0.0021213815,0.00026711565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99093014,0.006398311,0.0010525297,0.0009808753,0.00054820976,0.00008992656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037570419,0.000257258,0.00038953446,0.00024408728,0.0007285704,0.0003381315,0.0008831002,0.000138937,0.00019275783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01224532,0.0001264255,0.00023634177,0.0022088508,0.00032990845,0.0006670545,0.00024837904,0.00033353802,0.00001602961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028704642,0.00082580635,0.23833069,0.000030650142,0.00016008763,0.000021319956,0.030280484,0.012385956,0.009601687,0.29506308,0.006655211,0.40377456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033809748,0.0002065064,0.40174967,0.00034366635,0.00004528735,0.000014450634,0.0033661923,0.033450466,0.00080268894,0.55167216,0.004614475,0.00035342964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068321904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014994604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47724724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023141212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014794961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009614528","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9004-8","title":"The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Conflict resolution; Centrality; Psychology; Conflict analysis; Cognitive psychology; Isomorphism (crystallography); Negative emotion; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050857570474689556,"score_gpt":0.4357197137833725,"score_spread":0.38486214330868296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009614528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98977196,0.00052368594,0.0058022067,0.0013467362,0.0000136435865,0.00013472633,0.0000017923932,0.000005300551,0.0023999286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872494,0.0005127817,0.00045598042,0.00002621288,0.00001322155,0.000007767126,0.0000038110813,0.0000020930613,0.0002531852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822575,0.00067318056,0.0003290888,0.00015567578,0.00046010516,0.00015622635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971273,0.002507495,0.000101829726,0.00012004847,0.000098334574,0.000045012122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021877757,0.000055597004,0.00020302374,0.0005305106,0.00026682607,0.00006404901,0.00014034244,0.00004308746,0.00013148041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012555381,0.00003984411,0.00007699111,0.0016082047,0.00013957659,0.0002282934,0.000037350157,0.0000973833,0.00001761429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000308567,0.00010561194,0.759709,6.407973e-7,0.00006629984,2.5145016e-7,0.022125969,0.0010214687,0.0005232652,0.058984697,0.000063956824,0.15736799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023457414,0.00001472992,0.9550759,0.00000741061,0.000015451611,1.8762224e-8,0.010293401,0.01614989,0.00003473743,0.0067901323,0.011335299,0.000048455157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011335933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061507408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1953669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007922991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024186353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95561767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009939958","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-1245-z","title":"Fair, Efficient and Envy-Free Bargaining: An Experimental Test of the Brams-Taylor Adjusted Winner Mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Microeconomics; Economics; Bargaining problem; Complete information; Valuation (finance); Mechanism (biology); Mechanism design; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.04562426239485367,"score_gpt":0.3232036537252857,"score_spread":0.277579391330432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009939958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318541,0.00016225268,0.06620047,0.00063513534,0.00016574514,0.00029210365,0.000021518546,0.00003452344,0.0006340964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996454,0.000008351048,0.0028826613,0.00033302954,0.00009462402,0.000016734084,0.000004697911,0.000010253385,0.00019565593],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997918,0.00015537234,0.00055739126,0.0004548659,0.00076782855,0.0001465265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770945,0.0010331961,0.00029632464,0.0007070373,0.00012510654,0.00012889813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013048295,0.00013998183,0.0001859125,0.00014838245,0.00042139107,0.00013217605,0.00045924867,0.00009989928,0.00029771394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011809911,0.00008962396,0.00006397388,0.0004887512,0.00015054338,0.00034705465,0.00024752045,0.00010531314,0.00003682306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021283825,0.0009819723,0.0031601884,0.0000031060551,0.000013801501,7.228996e-7,0.0055411197,0.0010171273,0.1748203,0.3984323,0.0018791825,0.4139373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005522611,0.0008919306,0.18552434,0.0000687016,0.00007212077,0.0001070718,0.018327307,0.18899071,0.212619,0.37423462,0.012835728,0.00080585043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006562633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020276691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41313145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024689767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012987888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3654759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011033334","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9037-7","title":"Negotiators' Communication, Perception of Their Counterparts, and Performance in Dyadic E-negotiations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministry of Education, India; Ministry of Earth Sciences","keywords":"Negotiation; Outcome (game theory); Perception; Psychology; Cluster (spacecraft); Social psychology; Process (computing); Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.011043336673922842,"score_gpt":0.25945388619229254,"score_spread":0.2484105495183697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011033334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914347,0.00056832546,0.0021076652,0.0005943244,0.00011792992,0.00037210033,0.000004135446,0.000045665805,0.004755176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611527,0.0029500194,0.0005293904,0.00008544752,0.00006964366,0.000017949229,0.000055068405,0.000009739813,0.00016745017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998642,0.00017576295,0.00044722232,0.00023517822,0.00031121762,0.0001885704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911034,0.00031036334,0.00021061677,0.00020859909,0.000108502296,0.000051599734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000941428,0.00012440434,0.00018011138,0.00032947178,0.00040197108,0.00009725116,0.00013697868,0.00011394812,0.00010201105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008930005,0.0001241118,0.00003386754,0.00045642778,0.0001718164,0.0007631748,0.00006228839,0.00010118537,0.00000839879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009835355,0.00018854362,0.7687922,0.00003912159,0.0000105917425,3.4491373e-7,0.01376566,0.000075929165,0.0005199569,0.0665868,0.00074989,0.14917262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064920465,0.000049980044,0.9752999,0.000076361364,0.000014355649,7.2009226e-7,0.0023440572,0.004442482,0.000020713818,0.0042638555,0.01269764,0.00014072572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015788175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006545319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20650771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008641389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027144239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50611323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014317994","doi":"10.1007/s10726-010-9211-9","title":"How Much Do We Say? Using Informativeness of Negotiation Text Records for Early Prediction of Negotiation Outcomes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Political science","score_opus":0.03516884239572566,"score_gpt":0.3094135245962374,"score_spread":0.27424468220051174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014317994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8210311,0.0000818775,0.17498316,0.0009263984,0.0013665106,0.001066433,0.000041691575,0.00006222137,0.0004406354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944078,0.00037427535,0.0045856005,0.00004084409,0.0002299077,0.000032567896,0.00007170577,0.000019963973,0.00023734663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777186,0.00014138522,0.0007450764,0.00031806916,0.0007493784,0.00027423367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740416,0.0007194867,0.00093338254,0.00027295208,0.00056762394,0.000102420294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014361491,0.00021132718,0.00037202454,0.00055748766,0.00046385752,0.00022334712,0.00020773997,0.0002931197,0.00006627344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010800601,0.0002054939,0.00015934044,0.00064099836,0.00013073426,0.0022364152,0.000062141786,0.00015598655,0.0000026752978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004308159,0.00024028025,0.17164493,0.00019984957,0.00010520655,2.1423234e-7,0.028987538,0.00007204571,0.020135626,0.06593307,0.00043238766,0.71181804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004791505,0.00059729454,0.8794586,0.0002938139,0.0003110305,0.0000015407489,0.011092871,0.02643379,0.0042318115,0.028406566,0.043741453,0.0006397105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048072683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010376887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7111783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000841272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074040916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8379798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014786300","doi":"10.1007/s10726-013-9360-8","title":"“I am Disgusted by Your Proposal”: The Effects of a Strategic Flinch in Negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Negotiation; Distributive property; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021167766698284105,"score_gpt":0.2903755103098309,"score_spread":0.26920774361154676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014786300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913419,0.00036920275,0.0018551314,0.0023024827,0.0003066037,0.0013301248,0.0000018421363,0.00004465565,0.0024480894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985874,0.00049886544,0.00014373833,0.00014303642,0.00006182332,0.0000749697,0.0000227528,0.000008428368,0.00045897413],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862766,0.000186096,0.00033832635,0.00021812429,0.00041631423,0.00021346289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881905,0.000668362,0.0001802352,0.00017036003,0.00009644256,0.00006553643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052884896,0.00011169138,0.00014907373,0.00015968164,0.0003021758,0.00017220591,0.00018163104,0.00010052073,0.00014827916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037939337,0.00008369196,0.000044975266,0.00062718923,0.000097867836,0.0005559502,0.0000484749,0.0001092249,0.00003519733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014304403,0.0010300071,0.12191252,0.00021114052,0.00009321955,0.0000035401747,0.057293758,0.00005466678,0.027164945,0.2926715,0.022059275,0.4773624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028827586,0.00033007778,0.8951569,0.00020015822,0.000084048625,7.157212e-7,0.013592993,0.008498671,0.0006161677,0.06918934,0.008968632,0.00047954443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002607351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028007259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7732444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005341632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038154783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3941552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015983013","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9272-4","title":"Cultural Perspective Taking in Cross-Cultural Negotiation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Normative; Ethnic group; Construct (python library); Cultural diversity; Cross-cultural; Social psychology; Psychology; East Asia; Sociology; Political science; Social science; China; Law; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15257245602538244,"score_gpt":0.42886179718923595,"score_spread":0.2762893411638535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015983013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831092,0.00048370092,0.0006354508,0.000070610644,0.000767548,0.0002179442,0.000004930254,0.00006187273,0.014648751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984702,0.00007451681,0.0007092539,0.00012977161,0.00013739293,0.000021678437,0.000027599177,0.000010370007,0.00041923928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868065,0.00009469375,0.0003402083,0.000430137,0.00019973608,0.00025457225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.00008269495,0.00019389446,0.00015214153,0.00018970315,0.00007612402],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019350427,0.00018149182,0.00019111262,0.00011966557,0.00016102857,0.00015678926,0.00012164814,0.0001616799,0.0013949971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018226489,0.00012937654,0.000074396434,0.00026147775,0.00008304141,0.0008029541,0.000047610574,0.00017328127,0.00014534255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082711765,0.00034993747,0.52196336,0.000010671844,0.000054679116,0.000022218399,0.11371037,0.0000061712694,0.0019803343,0.212187,0.0014304285,0.14745769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010608268,0.00013801933,0.97585493,0.000031777476,0.000011648492,0.000019436275,0.012714458,0.0003255888,0.000065205735,0.009345622,0.00024060567,0.00019189641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017531214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056793424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45389155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096683565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000050566464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017408362","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9284-8","title":"Community of Practice Behaviors and Individual Learning Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Organizational Learning and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Psychology; Survey data collection; Repertoire; Community of practice; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.040943220149327046,"score_gpt":0.27780420078046997,"score_spread":0.23686098063114291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017408362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99722874,0.00015934024,0.0011849314,0.0005043707,0.00013262968,0.00006340938,5.570374e-7,0.000040151543,0.0006858635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984124,0.000012087784,0.00071595865,0.0006205321,0.00013977254,0.000001291072,0.000039507657,0.000011130799,0.000047372792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999356,0.00006660842,0.00016731574,0.00007589489,0.00022447245,0.00010973333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.00046146577,0.0001973537,0.000075065655,0.0000865622,0.000015257349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010638946,0.000078733516,0.00010848426,0.00014237006,0.0002873996,0.0000992559,0.0000576571,0.00005792262,0.000053190426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017573885,0.00006958106,0.00001707297,0.00019545342,0.000034584024,0.0013256668,0.00009691594,0.0002256327,0.000024440593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022154167,0.00010778901,0.9609487,0.000022914017,0.000010647865,1.6414828e-7,0.0011556728,0.0000110865485,0.00013017262,0.006168671,0.00017798462,0.031244023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003411549,0.00001554657,0.9848662,0.000017759021,0.0000636628,0.0000027118795,0.0034334285,0.000095704236,0.000010866959,0.00023985135,0.010831165,0.00008195116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017046793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010273658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031162072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059377053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027626977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28374332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020745337","doi":"10.1007/s10726-013-9365-3","title":"Transitioning From Dynamic Decision Support to Context-Aware Multi-Party Coordination: A Case for Emergency Response","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Task (project management); Decision support system; Dynamic decision-making; Knowledge management; Process management; Event (particle physics); Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.02486702755410657,"score_gpt":0.29584599735976436,"score_spread":0.2709789698056578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020745337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3986853,0.00006650921,0.5987061,0.00077112345,0.00071860675,0.00091957237,0.000043770102,0.00008458744,0.0000043987693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073847,0.000021275626,0.09169153,0.00032332368,0.00006261916,0.00024130911,0.00008592634,0.000020974792,0.00016833085],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975567,0.00018537829,0.0007825112,0.0007653809,0.00040365924,0.0003063733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776864,0.00083919975,0.00023992138,0.00048785907,0.00038797566,0.00027640848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008764969,0.00025504548,0.00029493886,0.00033054576,0.00052022026,0.0003034203,0.00028412623,0.00016986976,0.00026297697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000360755,0.00023649145,0.00012573987,0.00042255168,0.000014446997,0.0014347195,0.00009655767,0.00009764505,0.00017261897],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006562483,0.00026389366,0.0013761863,0.000027603575,0.0000397727,0.00006140101,0.005840558,0.00026563887,0.017972438,0.0011830744,0.011324944,0.9609882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038812244,0.00047341012,0.11914277,0.00012625211,0.000026911159,0.0001592424,0.00067930337,0.86678827,0.00045302388,0.003110653,0.0046221055,0.0005368176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002747232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009272443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011737486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034549463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96438414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026048849","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9323-5","title":"An Application of Focus Theory to Project Management Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Focus (optics); Project management; Knowledge management; Productivity; Focus group; Process management; Engineering management; Engineering; Systems engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.010187158785697871,"score_gpt":0.3110939285929831,"score_spread":0.30090676980728526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026048849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6441128,0.00010995489,0.35283095,0.00004833995,0.000088764384,0.0006391937,0.000003769194,0.000027263577,0.0021389138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994696,0.00004239021,0.004705705,0.0001222997,0.000031665106,0.00020423763,0.000016701306,0.000008740459,0.00017226045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993598,0.000032252567,0.00018304132,0.00021059593,0.0001162296,0.00009810173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995177,0.00006153629,0.00007682062,0.00023486439,0.00006846835,0.00004062253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021237195,0.00007018954,0.00008210164,0.00013798501,0.000046609668,0.000026387754,0.00010027069,0.000046768902,0.00010907266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011372359,0.000057836354,0.000012498181,0.00024847564,0.000012971714,0.00016254945,0.000023203727,0.00003327702,0.0001060985],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009445604,0.00011722138,0.0048575574,0.00002670514,0.000009468361,1.7613189e-7,0.0013687606,0.0000097441025,0.00043017115,0.031800307,0.00055849156,0.9607269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086772756,0.0005783416,0.93942994,0.000042389045,0.000024518044,0.000005226884,0.0016462354,0.005369822,0.0001666109,0.04162434,0.010012669,0.00023220979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115459334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004272849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96049476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009717772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040902164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23584981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026407262","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9081-y","title":"E-negotiations: bridging the practical divide—introduction to the special issue","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Negotiation; Computer science; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.01663531682492785,"score_gpt":0.2605388890420091,"score_spread":0.24390357221708125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026407262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35924882,0.0001833096,0.40114415,0.221142,0.0076622386,0.0013086699,0.0000036656884,0.00017645874,0.0091307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89636576,0.000044519467,0.0004676904,0.010527632,0.09204866,0.000013717729,0.000026159576,0.000020374517,0.00048545725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987006,0.000016207156,0.00030882124,0.00029248119,0.00045459985,0.00022728695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990772,0.0002645867,0.00022656978,0.00028566623,0.00012705776,0.000018918405],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014860028,0.00012927808,0.00010703703,0.000115620314,0.0006430591,0.000542334,0.00014727391,0.00005239169,0.00043806434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008174884,0.00007826365,0.00004919366,0.00060455553,0.00003740737,0.0011330235,0.00013948775,0.00015878306,0.0008091717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014965916,0.000044282566,0.0027563241,0.000006008321,0.0000086031105,0.0000034028944,0.0001448287,0.00007684213,0.00017173105,0.053797543,0.54992604,0.39291477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021637852,0.000010936902,0.15572229,0.000011508826,0.00002750666,0.0000073363117,0.00024560728,0.0011250544,0.00002711177,0.0041378704,0.8383643,0.00010410946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016583514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014051883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53711694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003748633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001046956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028717431","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9003-9","title":"Integrating Uncertain Preferences into Status Quo Analysis with Applications to an Environmental Conflict","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Preference; Decision maker; Status quo bias; Flexibility (engineering); Conflict analysis; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Uncertainty analysis; Management science; Graph; Operations research; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Theoretical computer science; Simulation; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.055977886046850486,"score_gpt":0.3686982426353608,"score_spread":0.3127203565885103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028717431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5870598,0.000059478018,0.41184673,0.00027048468,0.000011587241,0.00031614554,0.000023005432,0.00003282071,0.00037997923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518546,0.000037039055,0.047178157,0.0004269677,0.000068234556,0.00016031065,0.000095080926,0.000009140151,0.00017051055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975042,0.00017098851,0.0005756593,0.00070816267,0.0008129495,0.00022808243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978378,0.00088220095,0.00022772024,0.00063661276,0.00008469498,0.00033097583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011559525,0.00017922587,0.00026774174,0.00051369384,0.00044950016,0.0003692201,0.0003968136,0.00007251188,0.00051205925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018900936,0.00012260617,0.00006534446,0.0015164342,0.00010002891,0.00062082947,0.000087580265,0.00011694583,0.00026301196],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112647846,0.00019618327,0.020267814,8.464958e-7,0.00004243826,2.558616e-7,0.00396221,0.0030596165,0.0026562717,0.013954166,0.0001505815,0.955597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015588085,0.001142044,0.5471317,0.00003028197,0.0004267345,0.00001236816,0.022934662,0.06475242,0.0014600181,0.093595795,0.2659199,0.0010352568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009117802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002001957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069793576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022802406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.560669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029184649","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9002-x","title":"The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Management science; Computer science; Graph; Operations research; Conflict analysis; Engineering; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.0771669332564439,"score_gpt":0.36432862451707126,"score_spread":0.28716169126062735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029184649","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118034594,0.0024187122,0.8429049,0.034300294,0.00025769637,0.000810338,0.00003944496,0.00005802563,0.0011759739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98431504,0.000926931,0.009976913,0.00069937063,0.0018102035,0.00011993404,0.000013617002,0.000012832051,0.0021251682],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998477,0.00008465628,0.00041565413,0.00037780136,0.00046760714,0.00017730349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971106,0.0020278834,0.00016165318,0.00041248387,0.00017832684,0.00010907062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019690613,0.00011106994,0.00013247655,0.00009931383,0.0008928119,0.00033980215,0.00026449803,0.00008610781,0.000023566332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018044222,0.00006653899,0.00006553263,0.0002860908,0.00012070645,0.00034156005,0.000079564816,0.00008297632,0.00002629249],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017024188,0.00002896778,0.00014761525,0.0000010910053,0.000005666613,6.441307e-8,0.00055701414,0.0006938076,0.00016764896,0.1554948,0.04769513,0.795038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043268295,0.00002969785,0.0064622266,0.0000028143722,0.000008313461,0.0000048409775,0.00029692668,0.2408955,0.000023672597,0.20340508,0.5483649,0.00007334645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012268558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024093482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86628044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000107619135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010826623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68668777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031942401","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9336-0","title":"Agent-Based Reallocation Problem on Social Networks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource allocation; Optimal allocation; Computer science; Rationality; Sequence (biology); Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06773286717480637,"score_gpt":0.3471215817928376,"score_spread":0.2793887146180312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031942401","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27077043,0.000032855347,0.7227207,0.0028894912,0.0002755582,0.0005884798,0.0000040167665,0.000099569275,0.0026189343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957183,0.000014565154,0.002403463,0.0010573678,0.00019998832,0.00012070991,0.000034163604,0.000011647387,0.0004398105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978436,0.00019772357,0.0005542367,0.00047994446,0.0007416954,0.00018276459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979396,0.0010589521,0.00029236134,0.0003359105,0.0002588945,0.00011426696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013128772,0.0001390961,0.00016791896,0.00023624409,0.0005995678,0.000371485,0.00025162302,0.00013733542,0.0008665395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037331504,0.00010598451,0.00007866142,0.00069189194,0.0000731833,0.0004298177,0.000042112864,0.00013666005,0.0011855838],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007103308,0.00011814177,0.0007197041,0.0000013754322,0.0000044625767,2.2827918e-7,0.00015285342,0.0022729826,0.00048205486,0.06023688,0.029369133,0.90657115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014957357,0.0001758687,0.35752428,0.00003117102,0.000020734962,0.0000045788406,0.00067893934,0.16759552,0.000297047,0.43512836,0.03661603,0.0004317114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017797098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012123623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90613943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000407987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016187136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033098199","doi":"10.1023/b:grup.0000045751.21207.35","title":"Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Stability (learning theory); Conflict resolution; Mathematical economics; Graph; Decision maker; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Operations research; Epistemology; Combinatorics; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1912153315142716,"score_gpt":0.3808573237261959,"score_spread":0.1896419922119243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033098199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56645525,0.0000612028,0.43264294,0.00031742099,0.000026667696,0.00027600917,0.000016142356,0.000006381414,0.00019797983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939027,0.00005587084,0.0057844813,0.0001423596,0.000015422333,0.000050202296,0.000010479932,0.00000335071,0.000035173227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859023,0.000083153835,0.0004712603,0.0002635261,0.00047990246,0.00011191656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978501,0.0014574351,0.0001865379,0.00035065852,0.00012256557,0.000032681575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023235646,0.00007624133,0.00013623298,0.00018889514,0.00012742326,0.00006294657,0.00033357265,0.00006251811,0.000010239671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094417913,0.000047291604,0.000055572684,0.0005246133,0.00007179677,0.00022282377,0.000031753352,0.00006935413,0.000007755861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002863158,0.00024531607,0.0007847519,0.000005191787,0.0000038512494,1.8229484e-7,0.005296421,0.024596184,0.0027855944,0.84330046,0.000530299,0.12216544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009069798,0.000084317304,0.04277466,0.000019502957,0.0000066816606,0.0000017687214,0.0006762426,0.07857341,0.00027090457,0.8759085,0.0007107981,0.000066210116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013726727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015794634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42744738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013030842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022426118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19284956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035138425","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9117-y","title":"To Discount or Not to Discount: An Assessment of Perceptions, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Electronic Auctions with Discounts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Common value auction; Bidding; Forward auction; Business; Microeconomics; Vickrey auction; Database transaction; Eauction; Marketing; Auction theory; Perception; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07425441209913983,"score_gpt":0.42522645384808355,"score_spread":0.3509720417489437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035138425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57702196,0.000004547008,0.42084798,0.0013861153,0.00007879312,0.00051541004,0.000075905285,0.000023025037,0.000046252266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806349,0.00009431219,0.01696643,0.0007635228,0.000074830015,0.00016010817,0.000031564097,0.00001986312,0.001254469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668235,0.00018318475,0.0007388911,0.00081004127,0.001275929,0.00030958027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974639,0.0007316891,0.00019678996,0.00073212036,0.000428388,0.00044713705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013231708,0.00022711884,0.0003294138,0.00065764936,0.0009282132,0.00031126974,0.00032081333,0.00007398976,0.0003104241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076129654,0.00015240548,0.00005925048,0.0015554221,0.00014527468,0.001335234,0.00017166951,0.00015754481,0.00008623181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072058234,0.004269472,0.17689306,0.000034200195,0.00023394666,0.00001613705,0.032875083,0.014613897,0.073667735,0.36049262,0.021101372,0.30859664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049284205,0.0010406158,0.9808474,0.000051511077,0.00003328057,0.00007617914,0.0036262837,0.0010198043,0.00012697473,0.0043697744,0.00802769,0.00028760548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009943873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019701277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80395436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001312118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012327592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7139159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037011093","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9154-6","title":"Perceptual Graph Model Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Computer science; Graph; Conflict resolution; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Theoretical computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.08354642610346615,"score_gpt":0.3660137352203822,"score_spread":0.2824673091169161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037011093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5686886,0.00017217596,0.42719954,0.00042959122,0.00014332663,0.00017823426,0.000007744153,0.000057156085,0.0031236464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637806,0.000051096573,0.0023059521,0.00041374445,0.000068904774,0.000009393243,0.000008225405,0.000005407944,0.00075920735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979527,0.00010947592,0.0005155298,0.00044282767,0.0008080773,0.00017137386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984429,0.00063535117,0.00015145654,0.00047382904,0.00015316549,0.0001432912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016297759,0.00012502904,0.0001984442,0.00026119608,0.00028840813,0.0003356029,0.0003235963,0.00009581714,0.00009982726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000513959,0.00009123514,0.000074299205,0.0005616112,0.000052754753,0.00043407668,0.000039747396,0.00010029163,0.0003362695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010642814,0.00014231757,0.00046515578,0.0000012434684,0.000004551783,0.0000013536609,0.0011911893,0.008198723,0.0064358357,0.49891326,0.012432612,0.47210732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004783087,0.000113993454,0.04263498,0.000014032783,0.000011036085,0.000017250595,0.0009480597,0.18745399,0.000050616127,0.7635564,0.004530907,0.00019038137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034255293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035143198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47191694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015924537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001248158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43221763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037501514","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9293-7","title":"A Brief Outline of the Israel–Palestinian Conflict","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Jewish National Fund","keywords":"Nationalism; Judaism; Zionism; Christianity; Jewish state; Politics; Islam; Independence (probability theory); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0404703150303629,"score_gpt":0.3088685277023588,"score_spread":0.2683982126719959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037501514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98554605,0.0032506587,0.0015122237,0.00045015398,0.0006793991,0.0001746147,0.0000043768428,0.000020657924,0.008361874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869657,0.00020421865,0.00019484945,0.00026304228,0.00021619834,0.0000028184893,0.0000012291227,0.0000035604198,0.00041750263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999273,0.000079753874,0.00015368332,0.00008259497,0.00025783695,0.00015314523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995223,0.00015882854,0.00009636831,0.00009797278,0.000055773093,0.00006871684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053710653,0.000053528816,0.00009327915,0.00002852847,0.0002569186,0.000020769563,0.00008325778,0.00004817762,0.000011628617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045363008,0.000036344143,0.00003903712,0.00015158135,0.0001242437,0.00016329758,0.000051016836,0.000045292047,0.000013285841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016918048,0.00005390775,0.59031624,0.0000043493037,0.000007990582,8.785815e-8,0.008252917,2.527373e-7,0.00018789872,0.062263153,0.0002998451,0.33859646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037316445,0.00002407143,0.89503753,0.000031637417,0.000016963057,0.0000010642502,0.0048231953,0.00002074821,0.00007032925,0.0010033437,0.09852755,0.00007039722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033890415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010439756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33852607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001281759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012383237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19760363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050686242","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9095-5","title":"Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems: An Overview","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Negotiation theory; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Decision support system; Process management; Software; Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.047078392334281606,"score_gpt":0.31357891221394624,"score_spread":0.2665005198796646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050686242","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24561805,0.0018994974,0.7492973,0.00023908666,0.0015711319,0.0007447631,0.0000068620643,0.00027515757,0.00034815428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884056,0.000864809,0.009634989,0.00045460148,0.00033816387,0.000022328091,0.000105161766,0.000030455885,0.000143912],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964893,0.00023147097,0.0010143054,0.00093429635,0.0008570861,0.00047355887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977523,0.00039574475,0.00055314857,0.00068709283,0.0002375033,0.00037421018],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026081975,0.00035411812,0.00040169715,0.00050772633,0.00044504303,0.0006800061,0.00036074722,0.00028997075,0.000028445374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017114676,0.00033116507,0.000076091645,0.0006190569,0.000038602167,0.0031466922,0.00017416508,0.00018254698,0.00007093227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001611954,0.00042105094,0.03027579,0.00027101234,0.000066086526,0.00003063185,0.0050791055,0.0002803706,0.007908402,0.24611925,0.002355292,0.70703185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029389246,0.0007165824,0.75484973,0.00023064794,0.00006028768,0.0001970268,0.0005530255,0.21422878,0.00060283265,0.004313479,0.02036265,0.00094605546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021302696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002362405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74278754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014098309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040340285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052924957","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-9005-7","title":"The Pacific Salmon Treaty: A Century of Debate and an Uncertain Future","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Thompson Rivers University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Prosperity; Negotiation; Payment; Fishery; Fishing; International trade; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Economic growth; Biology","score_opus":0.00954737397147259,"score_gpt":0.2543451348748471,"score_spread":0.24479776090337452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052924957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865024,0.00020104281,0.0003387622,0.0007338478,0.00005723331,0.00015002218,0.0000026179598,0.0000111875715,0.012002882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584764,0.0030180912,0.0006616029,0.000058300266,0.000080040176,0.0000048773754,0.000008985441,0.000005298523,0.00031518808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992945,0.000050808943,0.00013302396,0.00016799789,0.00023078598,0.00012283752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.00009038483,0.000041297062,0.00015404326,0.0000070259266,0.00007453252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026320733,0.000065327615,0.00006915228,0.000020926904,0.00018005127,0.00005307835,0.00007835988,0.00004754299,0.0004149209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024806272,0.00004058827,0.000015826414,0.00012044483,0.000087532804,0.0002411773,0.00008822889,0.000063249674,0.000009235974],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821895,0.000025223528,0.05201061,0.0000015152108,0.0000017649417,6.9893605e-7,0.00033476064,0.0000047343115,0.0005156226,0.00021946846,0.0005832651,0.94621414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005859619,0.0002520078,0.5161365,0.0000044807757,0.000006802236,0.00001074633,0.0012347525,0.010318203,0.00011636872,0.0013509403,0.46986362,0.000119601034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009736734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046253184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9460945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025645124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024451404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45430928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054523327","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9168-8","title":"Deception and its Detection Under Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Synchronicity; Deception; Credibility; Asynchronous communication; Psychology; Computer-mediated communication; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Computer science; Communication; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.010673286039477196,"score_gpt":0.2733635771069566,"score_spread":0.2626902910674794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054523327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88826,0.0018088745,0.10898794,0.00022528437,0.00020645189,0.00022142693,0.00000458643,0.00006859807,0.00021683393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672276,0.0016129367,0.0011076577,0.00039388644,0.00006452278,0.000008309323,0.000060671922,0.00001061791,0.00001863454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990808,0.00008887827,0.0002536601,0.000296068,0.00012117169,0.00015947156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993518,0.00018333568,0.00012645771,0.00019998876,0.00004852551,0.00008990319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774691,0.00013955156,0.00014834608,0.00014715243,0.0002587663,0.00008553998,0.000061385,0.00016957225,0.000050059483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016689939,0.00013543501,0.000018775383,0.000141521,0.000035202564,0.00026808752,0.000036965917,0.00014945536,0.00003460782],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481635,0.00009636113,0.0026653188,0.000007813466,0.000014167157,0.0000010893788,0.000963054,0.000052626325,0.0017628752,0.0052881786,0.000064145745,0.9889362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012364659,0.00051176327,0.8625621,0.00003526492,0.00001838897,0.00007380332,0.00013540384,0.13230734,0.00002169775,0.0024910073,0.00043123603,0.00017553623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034652385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010147004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98876065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000450383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053972144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55228794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057403654","doi":"10.1007/s10726-014-9417-3","title":"Numerical Methods to Calculate Fuzzy Boundaries for Brownfield Redevelopment Negotiations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Redevelopment; Operations research; Mathematics; Civil engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07995154632963253,"score_gpt":0.2892740485479583,"score_spread":0.20932250221832577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057403654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1169917,0.00014994293,0.87864,0.0011011055,0.00056495896,0.0003206156,0.000014267117,0.000026138336,0.0021912884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78979266,0.00003672275,0.20846482,0.0011641443,0.00008863365,0.000060829436,0.00005074656,0.00001564951,0.00032579617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882567,0.000025354773,0.0005320121,0.0003941005,0.000038215956,0.00018462885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992619,0.0002550566,0.00017059158,0.0001843233,0.000014874182,0.00011325105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010147198,0.00012319518,0.00024879503,0.00014603251,0.0003333508,0.00017143655,0.000085182815,0.000095893665,0.00021614246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042325875,0.00013698125,0.00006716128,0.00011014425,0.000029348923,0.00022224446,0.000044402444,0.000056353787,0.00019842008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010852364,0.000118687596,0.051338397,0.000021746993,0.000055937537,1.329504e-7,0.0022012289,0.0016438345,0.00029588494,0.5262824,0.009239998,0.40869322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010396072,0.00022170634,0.50314283,0.000015073023,0.000011489511,0.0000024896228,0.00009969588,0.031186245,0.00022917372,0.20121518,0.26247093,0.0003655944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005742493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017679446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67280096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106187996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007846103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55859333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059384236","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9160-3","title":"An Agreement Index with Respect to a Consensus Preorder","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Index (typography); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.023357741022663383,"score_gpt":0.25080412286548137,"score_spread":0.22744638184281799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059384236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414252,0.0002351559,0.05360471,0.0004013898,0.00013134058,0.00027081164,0.000009685581,0.00003708575,0.0038845916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973356,0.000010054721,0.0017367968,0.0006049384,0.00006863168,0.0000059905983,0.0000054729444,0.00000780717,0.00022471772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909014,0.000028248242,0.00033873867,0.00033461457,0.00005457409,0.0001536944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.000065795604,0.0001368275,0.0002543217,0.000027469032,0.00011125317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069254555,0.0001046587,0.00019584715,0.00019574196,0.000101735604,0.00009716664,0.00008529586,0.00005778379,0.00009886597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080812475,0.00009622638,0.000022511445,0.00020544509,0.000014028901,0.00010980009,0.000010969249,0.000061680876,0.00015967376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016761661,0.00046933786,0.16382572,0.000016285761,0.000037654183,0.000015665883,0.003907857,0.0009309039,0.0006064518,0.6593744,0.0019818032,0.16715772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016611642,0.0016381298,0.89218265,0.000065382206,0.000005232109,0.000021202788,0.00025649692,0.004825401,0.00006625759,0.08488202,0.014058797,0.0003372938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037531834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005179852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003342962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045816846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3923998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060080858","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9169-7","title":"See No Evil: The Effect of Communication Medium and Motivation on Deception Detection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Social media; Computer-mediated communication; Nonverbal communication; Cheap talk; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Communication; Linguistics; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013723599554853803,"score_gpt":0.30215616113373306,"score_spread":0.28843256157887925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060080858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823055,0.0002179524,0.010670874,0.00040876164,0.001270947,0.00047723082,0.0000024856572,0.00008809041,0.0045581404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988653,0.0002117842,0.00010066978,0.0004643387,0.00013668805,0.000026603553,0.000021982396,0.000011248332,0.00016136894],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844176,0.00045477157,0.00039261128,0.00031636,0.0002491865,0.00014531275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980564,0.0010574901,0.00026815262,0.00043579133,0.000119976285,0.000062187704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009259778,0.00016436327,0.00020464274,0.00023585989,0.0002261345,0.00003597867,0.000105478466,0.00020883784,0.0003232044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005752683,0.00011642141,0.000058675872,0.00028689654,0.0001226281,0.00016669247,0.00002135297,0.00022238238,0.00014373298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018926878,0.00009094757,0.0047649136,0.0000062128042,0.000025620113,3.8565028e-7,0.0012258184,0.0000139863605,0.008207498,0.0020901808,0.0023159864,0.97936577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002354899,0.002951919,0.9841243,0.000047787686,0.000037348957,0.00002675855,0.0002070602,0.00064771954,0.0014373495,0.002104912,0.005918168,0.00014178726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011833903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023971255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002697341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026974672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47475272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062515972","doi":"10.1007/s10726-010-9188-4","title":"Matrix Representation of Conflict Resolution in Multiple-Decision-Maker Graph Models with Preference Uncertainty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Graph; Matrix representation; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Representation (politics); Decision maker; Coding (social sciences); Stability (learning theory); Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Operations research","score_opus":0.10734779349256454,"score_gpt":0.3661427879976759,"score_spread":0.25879499450511134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062515972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7291547,0.00004534435,0.26968756,0.0001177462,0.00012553082,0.00041134123,0.000019481266,0.000026746351,0.00041155584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839085,0.00007432019,0.015766865,0.000045852514,0.000033668985,0.000047193553,0.000024695775,0.000012339984,0.00008656195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670184,0.00020326744,0.0009898377,0.00070599234,0.0011771398,0.00022193679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356884,0.004524837,0.00048472756,0.00083670043,0.0004538771,0.0001310203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023145918,0.00018729955,0.00035682038,0.0006220045,0.00018866397,0.00013778717,0.0004140153,0.00018197612,0.00015050654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023938431,0.00013356036,0.00007904279,0.0016080289,0.00021161229,0.0008388275,0.00010683097,0.0002873062,0.000037221147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041173077,0.0006225167,0.06387081,0.000013647177,0.000025579544,0.0000063217167,0.0037032487,0.07933687,0.045184065,0.22905496,0.0010307977,0.57303387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021862756,0.00016101528,0.2433952,0.00007664446,0.000017212054,0.000017971064,0.0009366708,0.19799693,0.0010255586,0.55306464,0.0008729156,0.00024894235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016163934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014636343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57278496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021134263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039425762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54464334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064340659","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9263-5","title":"Strategic Behavior in Contested-Pile Methods for Fair Division of Indivisible Items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Alternation (linguistics); Preference; Division (mathematics); Adversary; Class (philosophy); Focus (optics); Simple (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16706845523757302,"score_gpt":0.43525087288654263,"score_spread":0.2681824176489696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064340659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903643,0.00041438357,0.005625832,0.000016354395,0.00027779277,0.00062581216,0.000009510272,0.000021417169,0.0026445687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97637725,0.00015172237,0.023296809,0.000019932831,0.000016083233,0.0000882942,0.000009199385,0.000008297521,0.000032437707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901867,0.00011559193,0.00036133878,0.00022294492,0.00011231008,0.00016914956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992805,0.00033329462,0.0001635526,0.00010047629,0.0000616617,0.000060475348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009822958,0.00009193618,0.00021094634,0.00015519332,0.00017313848,0.000031740365,0.000114184906,0.000100518395,0.000058213634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010625896,0.00008867385,0.000053812877,0.00016909838,0.00010870051,0.0003042575,0.000055484572,0.000055349035,0.000003515071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023533787,0.0007687764,0.5169309,0.0000175316,0.000013490495,0.0000015258948,0.034689642,0.0000017779078,0.0237089,0.090071835,0.000078718345,0.33348158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002602468,0.0010383859,0.89262116,0.00009391583,0.000047805523,8.169447e-7,0.032809477,0.00050033006,0.011658027,0.057488233,0.0007127139,0.0004266765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015527424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017799089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37569028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006737136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022743137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36160144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066727264","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9151-9","title":"The Role of Emotion and Language in Dyadic E-negotiations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Logistic regression; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.007705353453706061,"score_gpt":0.2819775833716088,"score_spread":0.27427222991790273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066727264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98881245,0.0015114171,0.0012422163,0.0014873301,0.0001007879,0.0002821263,0.0000010054672,0.000027629272,0.0065350463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980507,0.0015096519,0.00015472104,0.00008820964,0.000053351716,0.0000033064932,0.0000060574102,0.0000028197844,0.00013118584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991721,0.00010233537,0.00021763338,0.00013640168,0.00024146316,0.00013009748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941915,0.00030098995,0.00010381593,0.000097924276,0.000036391913,0.00004171003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007406523,0.000060824885,0.00008402598,0.00014221406,0.00033584653,0.000083864,0.0000746845,0.000058705333,0.000020444037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028965162,0.00005010871,0.000021486225,0.00031431182,0.00005798734,0.00029178147,0.000019013247,0.00005805231,0.0000037354043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028386341,0.00003273513,0.012475155,0.0000015754682,0.0000026920159,2.95966e-7,0.01387084,0.0000038844455,0.0009985678,0.115735635,0.00007055589,0.8567797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005543451,0.00007809102,0.92467827,0.000031858322,0.000013276109,4.4599787e-7,0.013258609,0.0024800415,0.000113548565,0.04181893,0.016870253,0.00010233005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003548025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022395086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91220313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030437046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012117214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070730061","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9083-9","title":"Strategies and language trends in learning success and failure of negotiation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Pragmatics; Compromise; Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Natural language processing; Grammar; Task (project management); Artificial intelligence; Knowledge management; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01100939733111548,"score_gpt":0.27744443368061544,"score_spread":0.26643503634949994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070730061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72365767,0.00046815426,0.27543226,0.00009063656,0.00008260373,0.00008224524,5.816064e-7,0.000029197487,0.00015665156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946982,0.0001048858,0.005088634,0.000021543823,0.000033848573,0.0000022652714,0.0000122318415,0.000006172888,0.000032170672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988188,0.000075330536,0.00038145136,0.0003167518,0.00024743978,0.00016023524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993184,0.00022568177,0.00020469286,0.00014044081,0.00004317052,0.00006760456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082792965,0.00012150531,0.00018299407,0.00047237842,0.000092531554,0.00019644285,0.000098051074,0.00010515375,0.0000086789105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051426086,0.0001098669,0.00002096006,0.00043152427,0.000026891668,0.0013003025,0.00007956877,0.00011100927,0.0000010294904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055760065,0.00006171819,0.12365966,0.00006112908,0.00000973148,0.000008996831,0.010834776,0.00017628125,0.02250828,0.02870178,0.000053565425,0.81386834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010580164,0.00011688294,0.9513324,0.00007031746,0.000005643208,0.000015137826,0.0025327394,0.0427215,0.0009978351,0.00079755945,0.0001964036,0.00015555284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021223802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010519627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8276728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020620408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008643284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44802424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074338258","doi":"10.1007/s10726-015-9438-6","title":"An Acceptable Consistency-Based Framework for Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Preference Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group decision-making; Preference; Context (archaeology); Group (periodic table); Aggregate (composite); Consistency index; Computer science; Operator (biology); Mathematics; Decision maker; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Econometrics; Information retrieval; Data mining; Statistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2063661242382024,"score_gpt":0.42159254124492884,"score_spread":0.21522641700672646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074338258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2186048,0.00015897422,0.778842,0.00018644873,0.00081651204,0.0008924757,0.00006976564,0.00012866879,0.00030039888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5924404,0.0000059310623,0.4068306,0.00039890528,0.000117106436,0.000076747114,0.00006408437,0.000035385507,0.000030773845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314654,0.0004348331,0.0015842103,0.0015068536,0.0027843504,0.0005432196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810246,0.014639027,0.0008228831,0.0014979969,0.0014892588,0.00052619225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005164567,0.00044324299,0.0006504017,0.00096338947,0.0009930246,0.002056783,0.00093700114,0.00039543907,0.00069210085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020104203,0.00033390697,0.00015259598,0.001607443,0.00020926302,0.0019705584,0.00018741334,0.00034990616,0.00020555836],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003754586,0.00054641743,0.014793208,0.000013012689,0.000025469684,0.000014401965,0.0010769225,0.007002377,0.00037862867,0.09330001,0.005073085,0.8740219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034427545,0.0010454137,0.07154906,0.00049954257,0.00006421496,0.000029921348,0.0010814305,0.20367566,0.00003967558,0.7120294,0.0059760395,0.00056690973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019533574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002914234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020272382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023619896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074715765","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9144-8","title":"Advances in Drama Theory for Managing Global Hazards and Disasters. Part II: Coping with Global Climate Change and Environmental Catastrophe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Global warming; Climate change; Politics; Coping (psychology); Natural resource economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Economics; Political science; Environmental science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.009692986291041593,"score_gpt":0.2338103167955787,"score_spread":0.2241173305045371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074715765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98861176,0.001564888,0.008965277,0.00024949314,0.00005744402,0.00029978514,0.00007123012,0.000016773003,0.00016332758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534833,0.002805275,0.0014427025,0.0003047926,0.00003585818,0.000017048873,0.000039745686,0.0000045839406,0.0000016375649],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.000013907473,0.00013067003,0.0002815307,0.00013004741,0.00021831763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997734,0.00003308891,0.000045632343,0.00007660447,0.0000011561336,0.00007015197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015821488,0.00012472695,0.000118111224,0.000017915158,0.00014911959,0.000047327125,0.0000405504,0.000035761914,0.000016784066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070768806,0.00010515447,0.000012404537,0.00008129425,0.00005456344,0.00051153544,0.00009544882,0.000031777647,0.0000016768752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002494703,0.00003774954,0.07526224,0.000016331162,0.0000019052595,0.0000048016395,0.0005946635,0.0001261192,0.00008060203,0.0010056407,0.000025386811,0.9225951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024604013,0.00073883135,0.9585879,0.00021264446,0.000031889267,0.000060545535,0.0015781354,0.021225186,0.000022144908,0.012288335,0.0024036623,0.00039032902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011265495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001888631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92220473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008903041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.563675e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42880747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075416390","doi":"10.1007/s10726-010-9195-5","title":"Formal Analysis of Multilateral Negotiations Over the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Tragedy of the commons; Outcome (game theory); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Political science; International trade; Business; Economics; Commons; Law; International law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04683219450918549,"score_gpt":0.3578468862963918,"score_spread":0.3110146917872063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075416390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96934944,0.00010611945,0.028390937,0.000103708226,0.0009876661,0.00026855897,0.00007657222,0.000010843125,0.0007061697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861175,0.000006815119,0.0009855211,0.00012321776,0.000064577216,0.0000052922046,0.000005267198,0.000008084816,0.0001894652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959489,0.00021724077,0.0013094479,0.00038645254,0.0018349019,0.00030306942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945892,0.002826936,0.0008880219,0.001093998,0.0004816602,0.00012015485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023437745,0.00016034904,0.00044527656,0.0006365253,0.0004440592,0.00027025476,0.0006699124,0.00011420076,0.0005658494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026763869,0.000078040204,0.00041718472,0.002728844,0.00016666493,0.0006402258,0.0003576102,0.00024064475,0.000010034772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018376645,0.00013463158,0.72669214,0.0000049815635,0.00020126563,0.0000013851773,0.002787021,0.0028336889,0.008798705,0.07512967,0.003107237,0.18012552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041704127,0.000031668584,0.8719524,0.000009140492,0.00011089494,0.0000048661614,0.00035209162,0.110416375,0.00010606973,0.004833024,0.011682612,0.00008378126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010254511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074879727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18004173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019877167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057051057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6195655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077743017","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9245-7","title":"Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Trait; Perception; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychological safety; Team composition; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.05303997572674886,"score_gpt":0.3283969082856282,"score_spread":0.27535693255887933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077743017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908107,0.000046380897,0.0010362738,0.00020101802,0.0002016855,0.0003224727,0.00001584615,0.000010147759,0.0073554697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992461,0.00006470688,0.00018524322,0.0003430498,0.000023160326,0.000024211107,0.0000027129702,0.0000055391283,0.00010525987],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913186,0.00010637368,0.00030139138,0.00017487216,0.0001874175,0.00009805957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985679,0.0007672655,0.00022369466,0.00032988912,0.00008951154,0.000021742466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060685835,0.000085076885,0.00012201741,0.00006352268,0.000115138195,0.000019038222,0.00017459033,0.00009644495,0.00022666255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002610549,0.000044799097,0.000034947607,0.0003647355,0.000106574385,0.00011058783,0.000026373946,0.00012352724,0.000021931462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030097405,0.0023168542,0.19908474,0.000028844779,0.00008721459,0.0000037059647,0.038700406,0.00022655544,0.01793417,0.34917825,0.012748365,0.37668115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039166395,0.00065827864,0.99232405,0.000022675107,0.0000081869375,0.0000036537472,0.0003566259,0.0004468887,0.00021568967,0.0047561433,0.0007591497,0.000057014273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003464492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033367414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7932393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000101817695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007304703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2481796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078270699","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9038-6","title":"Modeling e-Negotiation Processes for a Service Oriented Architecture","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Process management; Architecture; Service-oriented architecture; Service (business); Software engineering; Knowledge management; Business; Web service; Programming language; Sociology; Marketing; Art","score_opus":0.013355613251461737,"score_gpt":0.2217117350160083,"score_spread":0.20835612176454657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078270699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33205777,0.00026089227,0.6660398,0.0010039564,0.00012439654,0.00019810129,0.0000036608722,0.00013592624,0.00017545593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923188,0.0000239019,0.0050390004,0.0011798617,0.0009820967,0.000052643725,0.00033788462,0.000030973988,0.00003483664],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871504,0.0000052197706,0.00037567402,0.00041750722,0.0002618076,0.00022475899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877644,0.00007969423,0.00018237875,0.00014970165,0.0007986548,0.000013115485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000267969,0.00019958343,0.00021219537,0.00036911387,0.00038049556,0.0003541946,0.000114458846,0.00010664167,0.000011786914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002479745,0.00017277178,0.00006037761,0.0010865985,0.00001135847,0.0010273079,0.000055325545,0.00007677058,0.000016289032],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087256584,0.0005193395,0.011255757,0.0025403036,0.000072208975,0.0000020377402,0.0002713704,0.70973706,0.0029685174,0.03659913,0.0014984789,0.2336632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096079154,0.000007794188,0.0018555424,0.00011349026,0.000111398134,0.0000015679733,0.00008654275,0.9252662,0.000020093463,0.067695454,0.0036269382,0.00025420726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006738451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010034853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66100085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017763346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019079796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7045429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079267563","doi":"10.1007/s10726-013-9353-7","title":"Multi-attribute Auction and Negotiation for e-Procurement of Logistics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Procurement; Reverse auction; Business; Database transaction; Task (project management); Computer science; Process management; Transaction cost; Process (computing); Vickrey auction; Microeconomics; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Industrial organization; Operations research; Auction theory; Marketing; Bidding; Economics; Database; Finance","score_opus":0.025199545700602732,"score_gpt":0.232555998142046,"score_spread":0.20735645244144327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079267563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14412628,0.00011956765,0.8535111,0.0009004699,0.00039974521,0.00081272074,0.000003890199,0.00005772796,0.0000684985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894728,0.000059305283,0.009472325,0.00045756527,0.00027245583,0.0000559905,0.00009164666,0.000015276948,0.00010261835],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898934,0.0000096385,0.0003472459,0.000270159,0.00021972756,0.00016386896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925876,0.00010949898,0.00025277783,0.00013882857,0.00022259963,0.000017554503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043254043,0.00013854026,0.00017560663,0.000233628,0.0001782644,0.000208644,0.00006734864,0.00007399699,0.000048626716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027195175,0.00012309314,0.00004307219,0.00017695887,0.00003277228,0.00066323,0.000086313754,0.00005025894,0.000023638824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032569337,0.00082978775,0.26773632,0.0017958044,0.00017683468,0.00000175106,0.00086317596,0.006355148,0.01304254,0.029669717,0.04489956,0.6343037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030757347,0.00009473522,0.4817336,0.000108917586,0.00013583891,0.0000012159843,0.0008568996,0.48375234,0.000121795834,0.009166784,0.020601481,0.00035068273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022104883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050633163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8453465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002411427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034145683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50195926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081629587","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9145-7","title":"Advances in Drama Theory for Managing Global Hazards and Disasters. Part I: Theoretical Foundation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Military Strategy and Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Conflict resolution; Drama; Construct (python library); Emergency management; Risk management; Natural disaster; Risk analysis (engineering); Decision analysis; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Business; Engineering; Microeconomics; Management; Geography; Law; Social science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.00415879131724817,"score_gpt":0.23778736633882785,"score_spread":0.2336285750215797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081629587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57162964,0.0020361568,0.42335355,0.00021521727,0.00018274487,0.00019336784,0.000003918137,0.00010761006,0.002277813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713075,0.0011419673,0.0016020999,0.00006575171,0.000028028386,0.00000756031,0.000017480219,0.000004055954,0.0000023223133],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949855,0.000018347644,0.00015313401,0.00014884984,0.000059875463,0.00012121747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975324,0.00011833413,0.000014024426,0.000076600845,0.0000094507,0.000028337561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021002207,0.00008248641,0.00009756933,0.000055992645,0.0000475416,0.000026437718,0.00003830531,0.00007946662,0.00001565411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005006335,0.00007523217,0.000015376903,0.00009287612,0.00004951537,0.00027669116,0.000008630877,0.00005414749,0.0000021087087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000524247,0.0000060661023,0.00028221402,0.0000071482373,0.0000012554979,5.55236e-7,0.000041146654,0.00013500759,0.000019502888,0.44157434,0.0000120454,0.5578683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054147065,0.000114381735,0.02087217,0.000032779004,0.000006559584,0.0000061173146,0.00016071237,0.06617314,0.000027467431,0.91087323,0.0010994317,0.00009253672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.732327e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026253187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55777574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000231966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022589509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3067879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086418944","doi":"10.1007/s10726-005-0317-4","title":"GSS for Multi-Organizational Collaboration: Reflections on Process and Content","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Process (computing); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Norm (philosophy); Organizational culture; Conceptual framework; Face (sociological concept); Process management; Business; Political science; Sociology; Public relations","score_opus":0.07993964755803365,"score_gpt":0.4006874146477211,"score_spread":0.32074776708968744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086418944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89376146,0.00018857777,0.103250094,0.0012094596,0.0005006725,0.00041994936,0.000043680717,0.0000434999,0.00058260316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169254,0.000060534407,0.0065118014,0.0007428764,0.0001910013,0.000059267084,0.00007660384,0.000012398401,0.00065298623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993631,0.000017275288,0.00019192426,0.00022475503,0.00010412283,0.00009877235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995113,0.00010748467,0.000074685835,0.00009095016,0.00016390538,0.000051656076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014175106,0.000083236555,0.0000847401,0.0000911265,0.0002350812,0.000056525303,0.000036338242,0.000081717284,0.000101582256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006363678,0.000074860705,0.000013627649,0.00018261668,0.000020663065,0.00015150166,0.000008654482,0.000055222685,0.00002413503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019948948,0.001355798,0.04964328,0.000058324476,0.000108184984,0.0000016502574,0.017624175,0.0010169966,0.0024395008,0.35253346,0.008101426,0.5651223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009658692,0.0012237008,0.79961634,0.000075564094,0.000055083477,0.000049623537,0.004323637,0.117117725,0.00029678884,0.003437752,0.06355295,0.00059215276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042479624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019344165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74997306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028149534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013331365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3052731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086515875","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9149-3","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Disaster Risk Reduction in the Post 9-11 Security Environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Disaster risk reduction; Reduction (mathematics); Computer security; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015122389012690866,"score_gpt":0.3238480773682595,"score_spread":0.30872568835556863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086515875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382999,0.000020280215,0.0017239489,0.05410376,0.0015068387,0.001453446,0.000009204193,0.000020603728,0.0028620453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826017,0.00014732195,0.00009919749,0.00582727,0.010411367,0.00007358079,0.0000385971,0.000008894708,0.00079205807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794894,0.0007675734,0.00035317944,0.00033125043,0.00037619084,0.00022284884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991743,0.00021172602,0.00012821089,0.00041299022,0.00002027208,0.000052503827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015245422,0.00012779406,0.00011720696,0.00014121277,0.00054985384,0.000042909905,0.00014514178,0.00007683242,0.0005983494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017781887,0.000073349605,0.000036327187,0.00020147744,0.000018414974,0.00016394873,0.000057648424,0.000295308,0.00090349675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016659425,0.0003609888,0.0008104289,0.000008922426,0.000007723134,0.000002425428,0.05807673,0.00019596038,0.00014592541,0.008966045,0.42880496,0.5009539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005393347,0.0003506735,0.20443545,0.000029777662,0.000016637754,0.0000017819305,0.010793096,0.00009286583,0.000006596778,0.003173491,0.78047264,0.00008764267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009037756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035980108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5008663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106906635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007356284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091246538","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9285-7","title":"Negotiating with the Chinese: Are They More Likely to Use Unethical Strategies?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Context (archaeology); Globe; Public relations; Business; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.0284554973908096,"score_gpt":0.32711574996364956,"score_spread":0.29866025257283996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091246538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96202195,0.00014185489,0.028062763,0.0068668714,0.00038818532,0.00058091234,0.0000026651533,0.00010094716,0.0018338552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725145,0.000094281575,0.00063323096,0.0012303746,0.0004385671,0.000026097929,0.000010553399,0.000015312322,0.00030015653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983043,0.00020536513,0.00020494041,0.00023845231,0.0006807465,0.00036618047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998476,0.000829776,0.00016280088,0.00021730097,0.000116916475,0.00019714757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011232988,0.00015963435,0.0001471889,0.000120703684,0.0009099984,0.0007254578,0.00018664695,0.00011603998,0.000059275833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004861462,0.00009876871,0.00003857197,0.0005551641,0.00007876679,0.0014559731,0.00008485862,0.00018908744,0.00004012178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003733052,0.0001907339,0.5940787,0.000017653878,0.00006145509,0.000003438316,0.106553204,0.00075143186,0.00026868514,0.1754363,0.0058497153,0.11641532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003136622,0.000049660634,0.9388221,0.000027855065,0.000025959112,9.75928e-7,0.011453431,0.000572718,0.0000020763762,0.0005238316,0.048033454,0.00017425843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009840671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041228407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34474337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005435639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028193617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091510336","doi":"10.1007/s10726-007-9085-7","title":"Antecedents of attitude towards online mediation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Social psychology; Variance (accounting); Phenomenon; Attribution; Service (business); Business; Marketing; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.018825522037906394,"score_gpt":0.2787451963492249,"score_spread":0.2599196743113185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091510336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90212286,0.00012077692,0.08764007,0.0003152342,0.00065993814,0.00014753158,0.0000048790425,0.00006971637,0.008919024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804044,0.000093976916,0.0008217712,0.0004998094,0.00037960624,0.0000016259031,0.00009404188,0.000009005517,0.00005971355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990521,0.0000042632223,0.00031830237,0.00016166565,0.00032998266,0.00013369393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994792,0.000051678242,0.00020203415,0.0001130259,0.00013626674,0.000017837267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039785175,0.0000890644,0.00012011216,0.00029993476,0.000100004334,0.000066269946,0.00007968188,0.000070097725,0.00014718105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001674683,0.00007995751,0.000048072838,0.00038170017,0.00002636288,0.0006529549,0.00006215015,0.00006132605,0.000047857706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018031488,0.0004920742,0.044581104,0.000068603666,0.000025854084,0.0000029560442,0.000063445135,0.000028464856,0.005511923,0.0643237,0.0028407448,0.8818808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007555381,0.000015645108,0.94048804,0.00003536133,0.000023403736,0.0000017842863,0.00021653224,0.004447973,0.00009852377,0.0018834461,0.051921625,0.00011215714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010690237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005263419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024217143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063827456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32605726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098640548","doi":"10.1007/s10726-012-9320-8","title":"Community-based Decision Making in Japan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Emergency management; Government (linguistics); Citizen journalism; Participatory planning; Business; Environmental planning; Public relations; Disaster response; Urban planning; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.035833358714477126,"score_gpt":0.34297284993632404,"score_spread":0.3071394912218469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098640548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96521467,0.000121487166,0.023364041,0.00017943709,0.00039409465,0.00016946462,4.936875e-7,0.00003445533,0.01052183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969477,0.000045512857,0.002355635,0.00046990556,0.00007327787,0.0000054222296,0.000004249081,0.00000514064,0.000093122355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998838,0.00027901356,0.00018270868,0.00010403367,0.00035552718,0.00024068232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914646,0.0005477625,0.00006192107,0.00014634171,0.000021109796,0.00007638413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017817181,0.00007131484,0.00008997815,0.0001947367,0.00050399394,0.000108434455,0.00016982625,0.00006909483,0.00009179822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026092332,0.00006367228,0.000026421254,0.0003673518,0.00007674752,0.00055077585,0.000069255366,0.00012678896,0.000045274264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006819293,0.00018360034,0.23697871,0.000008456366,0.0000017367288,5.0428673e-7,0.0134782335,0.00003629981,0.000054310287,0.015374206,0.0009429295,0.7328728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062085234,0.000041071587,0.94564474,0.00016360609,0.0000071837753,2.6905042e-7,0.008868195,0.0007358137,0.000007109333,0.008553162,0.035199918,0.00015810259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021083745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020053906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7327147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052392377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010575583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38763648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105943574","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9242-x","title":"Emotional Change in International Negotiation: Analyzing the Camp David Accords Using Cognitive-Affective Maps","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Memoir; Cognition; Conflict resolution; Human settlement; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09935864741748891,"score_gpt":0.3485318701310959,"score_spread":0.24917322271360698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105943574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606699,0.00024824648,0.028177569,0.0009494459,0.0014173526,0.0008881921,0.0000122113215,0.00007115433,0.007565964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803823,0.0004263993,0.00048822886,0.00035303284,0.0005054097,0.000035767243,0.000057299585,0.000011893039,0.00008376364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983241,0.00027643255,0.00031456878,0.00033549246,0.0005085043,0.00024090339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901235,0.00041652218,0.00021481974,0.00011676265,0.00016951263,0.000070004855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012280942,0.0001435482,0.00014117196,0.0003739722,0.00056374824,0.00017262124,0.00021069343,0.000111846515,0.0006731868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042487038,0.00012577629,0.00006599608,0.00063808163,0.00010793901,0.001196374,0.00010992046,0.00015246327,0.000032824828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024288164,0.00019178401,0.41500998,0.000007666375,0.00005976912,0.000006743986,0.073578425,0.000010071713,0.00009469686,0.033416934,0.00014971542,0.47723135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009544749,0.000043673084,0.9788187,0.00010704245,0.000040982573,0.0000019151503,0.0049655833,0.006428465,0.00002008182,0.005067003,0.003349658,0.00020242174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027526957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005884358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56380874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017450965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034599972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7370923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109728195","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9502-x","title":"Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Property (philosophy); Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Multi-objective optimization; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0233627466619331,"score_gpt":0.20666433837449197,"score_spread":0.18330159171255886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109728195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055554,0.0009883964,0.08975147,0.00016739934,0.00048019903,0.00014801353,0.000069938884,0.00003061235,0.0028085245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985099,0.00016376405,0.00077284285,0.000041384843,0.000056350633,0.000005565311,0.000005255056,0.000013335106,0.00043163582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988351,0.000030800056,0.00061014,0.0002989616,0.000068886235,0.00015613259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882716,0.00034017503,0.00036709046,0.0003750476,0.000026225895,0.00006431433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011303297,0.000108485125,0.00028055685,0.00025717643,0.0000727488,0.000033757027,0.00019168475,0.00010623928,0.0002507174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005274223,0.00008495194,0.000067038745,0.00017103618,0.000041979805,0.00028321464,0.00009715776,0.00004689586,0.00023728791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009758325,0.000123769,0.2510255,0.00003789908,0.000022968801,0.0000012708774,0.0006528699,0.000004421431,0.002226327,0.4942802,0.001401991,0.2501252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024203688,0.0002661789,0.561129,0.00022092831,0.0000055272276,0.0000055579108,0.000073661366,0.0005247803,0.0010497741,0.41530904,0.018714093,0.00028108642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033093536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008907055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3101035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026344123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003413462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34642395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129543361","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9163-0","title":"An Argumentation-Driven Model for Flexible and Efficient Persuasive Negotiation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Protocol (science); Simple (philosophy); Argumentation theory; Negotiation; Set (abstract data type); Programming language; Software; Theoretical computer science; Distributed computing; Software engineering","score_opus":0.022266470052222983,"score_gpt":0.29990732744433124,"score_spread":0.27764085739210825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129543361","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2701225,0.00010338762,0.72850984,0.00037214995,0.0001975119,0.0005404457,0.0000058322157,0.00011218141,0.000036163732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234151,0.000073392606,0.0758172,0.0004691072,0.00008175692,0.0000308803,0.000055145487,0.000009585694,0.000047827758],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836975,0.000059681355,0.00039221748,0.00059072755,0.0003566933,0.00023091846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998989,0.00015195023,0.00022190013,0.00032146194,0.00015275586,0.00016296378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004025455,0.00018737635,0.00019456143,0.00023449249,0.00037571025,0.00034472038,0.00020042474,0.00011195134,0.000004439124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064387015,0.00017446207,0.00005419302,0.00022081904,0.000017240176,0.0010360257,0.000035932728,0.00006466738,0.0000070282176],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024851895,0.0006201046,0.0021484615,0.00005691638,0.000031049745,0.0000020065886,0.015129327,0.102962404,0.039556492,0.19726591,0.0012111674,0.64076763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013247399,0.00030538518,0.036628213,0.000027999164,0.000013506723,0.0000058266614,0.00012812452,0.95324254,0.0004857707,0.007555385,0.00008413037,0.00019835765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012072729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014081243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85028017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068478825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002587379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7114357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132130844","doi":"10.1007/s10726-006-9024-z","title":"Comparative Analysis of Text Data in Successful Face-to-Face and Electronic Negotiations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Negotiation; Vocabulary; Face (sociological concept); Generalization; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Similarity (geometry); Face-to-face; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.0173132733298819,"score_gpt":0.31303933452525046,"score_spread":0.29572606119536854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132130844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33696297,0.0015377984,0.6610184,0.00022145903,0.000018795841,0.00013676641,0.00001012809,0.00004924167,0.00004444739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188471,0.000053828582,0.080924265,0.00007465903,0.000008841765,0.0000049043674,0.00006982927,0.0000029383677,0.000013676686],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874115,0.00006580894,0.00032045174,0.00044816046,0.00025321433,0.00017118838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989622,0.00027527835,0.00014743791,0.00050678645,0.000066058055,0.00004223328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039361438,0.000111473186,0.00027074074,0.0006700332,0.000071757684,0.00013537133,0.0005446312,0.000061593135,0.0000051646193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008198005,0.00009898367,0.00002239205,0.0020221528,0.00002723867,0.00085372204,0.00037699984,0.000109303466,0.0000020029076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020043041,0.0006604695,0.13549986,0.0000613912,0.00030967843,0.000010603708,0.00869232,0.004657774,0.024306707,0.32938898,0.0024253055,0.49378645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046625576,0.00011011462,0.4596409,0.00004563242,0.00009392892,0.0000037302914,0.00014970917,0.505534,0.002202768,0.031099511,0.0003908476,0.00026260896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034171448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022160609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5818841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042574582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024142328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142556848","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9147-5","title":"Enhancing National Security and Energy Security in the Post-911 Era: Group Decision Support for Strategic Policy Analysis under Conditions of Conflict","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Energy security; National security; Population; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015624824619667976,"score_gpt":0.31296117916074834,"score_spread":0.29733635454108037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142556848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8001153,0.000093060786,0.19805716,0.00027931604,0.000021565307,0.00021169265,0.00011367362,0.000020025758,0.0010882224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972597,0.000050948864,0.001434992,0.00039045766,0.0001277736,0.000026652337,0.0006970369,0.0000066856633,0.000005776656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984607,0.00010531245,0.0005421739,0.00033389183,0.00037005893,0.00018783167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847424,0.00078991,0.00024507853,0.00019975191,0.00022812292,0.0000628726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000722361,0.00017119107,0.00033807836,0.0005728293,0.00019150517,0.00010205806,0.00013815024,0.00007596494,0.000095306146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034905053,0.00013980092,0.0001865401,0.0009411164,0.00004757069,0.00023650572,0.000036838683,0.0001197679,5.247222e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013833892,0.00041901856,0.006118451,0.000006732578,0.00018569919,5.913984e-7,0.0009950477,0.0003852491,0.0019278233,0.9676629,0.0003610823,0.021799108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086863217,0.00023872107,0.1316095,0.000025993462,0.00020307902,0.0000021466317,0.0007800285,0.03066089,0.00021228587,0.834801,0.0004026352,0.00019505915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054143113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012973205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1971444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042269097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050849678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5700916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164458174","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9142-x","title":"Remote Leadership, Communication Effectiveness and Leader Performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Transactional leadership; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Leadership style; Popularity; Social psychology; Shared leadership; Workforce; Applied psychology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.043301959100110504,"score_gpt":0.24121979719780023,"score_spread":0.19791783809768973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164458174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99320084,0.0004109049,0.005236779,0.0003656065,0.00013308003,0.00017243705,4.7241963e-7,0.000078930294,0.000400922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800956,0.0003341172,0.00061287207,0.0008313014,0.00010088029,0.0000032265696,0.000031346484,0.000015292006,0.000061428735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993132,0.00002069418,0.00016648264,0.0001933378,0.0001951828,0.00011111726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995384,0.00011658946,0.000083350606,0.00014166131,0.00010509709,0.000014898816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025103975,0.00010721726,0.00011229525,0.00016034106,0.00043778648,0.0000876243,0.00006438363,0.00007050774,0.00010187266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009568705,0.00009993375,0.000018293838,0.00026805184,0.000068758236,0.0011326936,0.00006346772,0.000096372736,0.00011278659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014876873,0.000049266157,0.75206256,0.00010235402,0.000009039777,0.0000022223783,0.00021397074,0.000032740114,0.0017796529,0.0058367644,0.0008026749,0.23895998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000718234,0.000010363819,0.99223197,0.0000530675,0.000015551257,0.000018788029,0.00013414636,0.0027734071,0.0001060045,0.0006084834,0.003203231,0.00012674637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006193158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025781414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24016942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020479407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005473681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.407518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167299403","doi":"10.1023/a:1024867820235","title":"Towards a Structured Design of Electronic Negotiations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Common value auction; Management science; Knowledge management; Information exchange; Data science; Engineering; Sociology; Telecommunications; Economics","score_opus":0.05431526046719338,"score_gpt":0.3443676951976901,"score_spread":0.29005243473049674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167299403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10958723,0.00022179332,0.8884427,0.00016093659,0.00018390533,0.00029113807,0.000007788093,0.000032222928,0.0010723034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482966,0.0000696036,0.014672406,0.00012477027,0.000029262626,0.00002246883,0.000005983789,0.000009756033,0.00023606114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755603,0.00039132233,0.00068598334,0.00041403197,0.00074078835,0.00021182228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975031,0.0012945548,0.0003584935,0.00047228645,0.00026874198,0.00010281498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023641938,0.00013582154,0.0002375485,0.00031332285,0.00026992496,0.00010229054,0.00026076828,0.00010792913,0.00082739687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028465579,0.000105538355,0.00008299442,0.0010695246,0.00008859339,0.0003663318,0.000034749886,0.0001228822,0.00007941459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083856576,0.00008145251,0.0009054288,0.000001770514,0.00001575061,2.699566e-7,0.0004612585,0.002042413,0.0049923407,0.8246471,0.0014885602,0.16527978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061097596,0.00012293822,0.02084571,0.0000065579165,0.000020323201,0.00001982389,0.0005181602,0.0044150553,0.0033367772,0.9543753,0.015577856,0.00015048383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004747022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011817243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003696229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009034468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90594155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299316531","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9471-0","title":"Competition, Transparency, and Reciprocity: A Comparative Study of Auctions and Negotiations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Common value auction; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Verifiable secret sharing; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Purchasing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reverse auction; Winner's curse; Social exchange theory; Economics; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Computer security; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11190938666681614,"score_gpt":0.38482463002858647,"score_spread":0.2729152433617703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299316531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7944873,0.0001014865,0.2038679,0.0007089198,0.00009663796,0.00039334994,0.00003494915,0.000028982071,0.00028050397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983456,0.00016559844,0.0011544116,0.00004731303,0.000037750142,0.00004788411,0.0000045095276,0.0000060951975,0.00019083162],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978687,0.00025381998,0.00071954937,0.0005176656,0.00052015414,0.00012009089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683726,0.002087389,0.00031831453,0.00032866152,0.00029696964,0.00013142623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010334614,0.0001409366,0.00030652195,0.00031615945,0.0004999447,0.00009753722,0.00013909864,0.0000704682,0.0001906118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045833612,0.0000921737,0.000035364686,0.0006094422,0.0002439121,0.0005972488,0.0000678448,0.00007338018,0.00002283845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048468163,0.00154465,0.117428005,0.000013032995,0.00010411969,0.0000013511981,0.024250431,0.000065120206,0.011205991,0.33430067,0.0018712071,0.5087307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002535432,0.0005776768,0.71168035,0.000052611795,0.00006450259,0.000027836273,0.014174815,0.00068431534,0.00033505572,0.26510155,0.004527092,0.00023873907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021275097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027572925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59425235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016332122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015196746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3845221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299855051","doi":"10.1023/a:1011262625052","title":"Logrolling Procedure for Multi-Issue Negotiation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Representation (politics); Order (exchange); Management science; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04527662436173564,"score_gpt":0.3043787912152973,"score_spread":0.2591021668535617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299855051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07506935,0.0003896119,0.9219172,0.0005811266,0.0009145768,0.0008456744,0.0000033932881,0.00019545967,0.00008362292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8746898,0.0003044499,0.123624876,0.0005168032,0.0003756247,0.00009839123,0.000048226844,0.000023252076,0.00031857868],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809515,0.000065664266,0.0005196032,0.00063417124,0.00037105955,0.00031434596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877053,0.00024888403,0.0002822646,0.00036899513,0.000187229,0.00014210212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063487765,0.00022103402,0.0002415724,0.00025529854,0.000379305,0.00030588935,0.00030933166,0.00017864378,0.000023673338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002573317,0.00019966843,0.00009457259,0.0004400015,0.00001632153,0.0011930927,0.00008255702,0.000097595206,0.00006573075],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031317878,0.00051839784,0.0258087,0.00016120297,0.000057199322,0.000009348009,0.0035604688,0.0011004325,0.0096345,0.033448726,0.005502386,0.91988546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002706856,0.00023817873,0.07757258,0.00008893058,0.000018523653,0.000037838363,0.00010190804,0.8900325,0.00051370356,0.0027074374,0.025611367,0.00037021982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029093258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076164375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91951525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006453348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002595754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81422424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472597128","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9491-9","title":"Negotiation and Collaborative Technologies in Organisations and Supply Chains: Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Collaboration in agile enterprises","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Namur; Universidade de Pernambuco; Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; University of Cape Town; Universitat Politècnica de València; Concordia University; Universidade de Coimbra; Technische Universiteit Delft; Indian Institute of Technology Madras; Carnegie Mellon University; Indian National Science Academy; University of North Florida","keywords":"Negotiation; Supply chain; Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Supply chain management; Computer science; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.005452484145097142,"score_gpt":0.21827827094814908,"score_spread":0.21282578680305195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472597128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87276953,0.00026228064,0.02402832,0.099831015,0.0012858603,0.001159459,0.000015272735,0.0001908734,0.00045736323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499893,0.00034629344,0.0005075555,0.00053424545,0.00340978,0.00005473312,0.0000150513315,0.0000130141,0.00012042482],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990117,0.000023777791,0.00027595524,0.00034977891,0.00020424317,0.0001345317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930745,0.00017829651,0.00014076724,0.00017147516,0.0001898992,0.000012121278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034661873,0.00013527251,0.00013409561,0.00043622224,0.00026229327,0.0003627158,0.000084023624,0.00007841472,0.0001345693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011147001,0.00008871664,0.000009727098,0.0010315779,0.000071242015,0.0012487884,0.00015834218,0.0000638175,0.000058015623],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026342322,0.00007148907,0.08272234,0.000025161378,0.000013987037,0.0000016591305,0.0018818538,0.000046554498,0.0039515807,0.04626319,0.07120974,0.793549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019505743,0.00008367619,0.3908737,0.00012210353,0.000033556735,0.000005473715,0.009836598,0.0014167669,0.00039781278,0.016074017,0.57882303,0.00038270038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003282317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012728528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79316634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058383986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012852779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36177596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527289360","doi":"10.1007/10726.1572-9907","title":"Group Decision and Negotiation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Région Normandie; Stockholms Universitet; Universidade de Pernambuco; Uniwersytet Warszawski; Michigan State University; Sichuan University; Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Harbin Institute of Technology; Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; Ohio State University; Griffith University; Guangdong Ocean University; Nanyang Technological University; Hohai University; University of Bristol; Fudan University; Western Washington University; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; Dartmouth College; Université de Franche-Comté; Thammasat University; University of International Business and Economics; Universidade de Coimbra; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem; North South University; City University of Hong Kong; Nanjing University; University of Waterloo; University of Minnesota; National University of Ireland; Dalian University of Technology; Lingnan University; Boise State University; Creighton University","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Negotiation; Group decision-making; Computer science; Business; Process management; Knowledge management; Chemistry; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019355273695564924,"score_gpt":0.30151896265637795,"score_spread":0.282163688960813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527289360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41869777,0.024657687,0.24130248,0.0055513326,0.028943261,0.010345473,0.00017385598,0.0008782691,0.26944986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7492023,0.102400035,0.0075495625,0.0026380783,0.005888022,0.0003824614,0.0026444502,0.0002822982,0.12901278],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955856,0.000391447,0.00091958645,0.0011107655,0.0013722805,0.000620307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690527,0.0012443312,0.00071186945,0.0004844913,0.00028156544,0.0003725006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001436474,0.00056237064,0.0006455166,0.000824093,0.0013208153,0.0011846188,0.000390613,0.0009448195,0.004729939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006229617,0.0005524403,0.00016601547,0.0007206991,0.00020979898,0.0015202556,0.00030580233,0.00045734193,0.003208412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348775,0.00009623536,0.0005755191,0.000063165164,0.000051399584,0.0000022465274,0.003214922,0.000008678711,0.00013692315,0.01332541,0.2996541,0.6827365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014958763,0.00018475678,0.026578423,0.000353146,0.00013412716,0.0000026025448,0.0009981934,0.0013279318,0.000010382733,0.007662416,0.9604618,0.00079037534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016841977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025187465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68194616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026220395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007843169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528417518","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9511-9","title":"Drivers of Durable Peace: The Role of Justice in Negotiating Civil War Termination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Durable good; Economic Justice; Spanish Civil War; Law; Peacekeeping; Political science; Human settlement; Transitional justice; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01046681009612157,"score_gpt":0.27948213702358976,"score_spread":0.2690153269274682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528417518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863252,0.0004296988,0.0021531791,0.00071608025,0.00017130765,0.00015020864,0.0000070980477,0.000009753399,0.010037444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891835,0.00069490605,0.00010541944,0.000044443866,0.000047931477,0.0000027828846,6.365017e-7,0.0000029524545,0.00018256724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991066,0.00010273963,0.00022583168,0.00010631856,0.00031800458,0.00014049943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987178,0.0009070144,0.00016665932,0.000089507295,0.000080074096,0.000038987022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062285934,0.000049247934,0.000097779965,0.000052719013,0.00012109577,0.000011806029,0.000110051995,0.0000597268,0.000039044804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012859856,0.00003091547,0.000024623158,0.00018349681,0.00012992312,0.00028109283,0.000026991593,0.000042122938,0.0000036085075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087015615,0.0000950438,0.07186117,0.000025508574,0.000007579116,8.4729396e-7,0.02058346,0.000023782304,0.02076779,0.44992107,0.00038036052,0.4362464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013759363,0.000105640094,0.90141267,0.0002922517,0.000043995904,8.0964634e-7,0.013650539,0.0026978573,0.0029260523,0.032126922,0.045177065,0.00019028055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010214389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012067241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82955146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004363739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031800704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15441169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553981758","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9515-5","title":"Group Decision Methodology to Support Watershed Committees in Choosing Among Combinations of Alternatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Voting; Group decision-making; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Operations research; Management science; Group (periodic table); Process (computing); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.19367032027145675,"score_gpt":0.4408018048375745,"score_spread":0.24713148456611772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553981758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5670931,0.00004049102,0.4313127,0.00044380373,0.000600126,0.0003418309,0.000017312648,0.000027337024,0.00012327009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212979,0.00008312558,0.07808356,0.00027594008,0.000055514087,0.000029204875,0.000009927468,0.000029463217,0.0001353856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928188,0.0012168539,0.0022656324,0.0011449155,0.0020719587,0.00048185184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98012227,0.017387373,0.00070474803,0.00095309777,0.00053823757,0.00029429045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009812105,0.00034201096,0.00085932843,0.002428186,0.00021755592,0.00029039453,0.0010185596,0.00023808141,0.0006835831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016722681,0.00022068036,0.00017666607,0.00151541,0.00021501436,0.0013966812,0.0006652497,0.00017854219,0.00017700886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044076113,0.0002446446,0.12053107,0.0000033055605,0.000011230156,0.000012025542,0.0015757262,0.00004056607,0.02694789,0.0046655587,0.0012452268,0.844282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043101143,0.00041050452,0.83296615,0.0002724098,0.000012896419,0.000015453517,0.000708137,0.0020646409,0.003152864,0.15300556,0.0027405026,0.00034075067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010264182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074829545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8439413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013444886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028264696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99155986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562158640","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9516-4","title":"Toward the Automated Detection of Individuals’ Rationales in Large-Scale Online Open Participative Activities: A Conceptual Framework","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Syracuse University","keywords":"Argumentative; Computer science; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Data science; Conceptual framework; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03489777471174557,"score_gpt":0.30271326192916487,"score_spread":0.2678154872174193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562158640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54554117,0.0000427309,0.45373774,0.00037827072,0.00009331256,0.00014638419,0.000007955189,0.000042088872,0.00001036772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934245,0.000031794516,0.010390567,0.00016175988,0.000031273146,0.000022170878,0.0000039204315,0.0000054410157,0.000010611063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879414,0.00020413862,0.000313567,0.00026935615,0.00025877065,0.00016005718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816126,0.001301764,0.00018407979,0.0002507114,0.00006084041,0.000041371593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006801798,0.00009778334,0.00016512662,0.00009986961,0.000129713,0.00012797523,0.0003106755,0.00008581942,0.000012712123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039436662,0.000058569207,0.00002945891,0.0003455605,0.00008373515,0.00061944185,0.0002440598,0.00009239033,0.0000034627533],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023165249,0.0006570813,0.02920932,0.000019955276,0.000055134005,0.0000050190743,0.090084024,0.00051719224,0.035222396,0.03340903,0.00032039484,0.8102688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003286331,0.00046928963,0.68071055,0.00081583316,0.000021697584,0.000018126066,0.009921581,0.24968813,0.022916753,0.030625938,0.0011125716,0.0004131999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027245787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023393334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8098556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031856165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2388383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566978476","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9520-8","title":"Symmetric Sequential Stability in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Multiple Decision Makers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Probabilistic logic; Conflict resolution; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Graph; Computer science; Combinatorics; Machine learning; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.13007635231850964,"score_gpt":0.35653551218420587,"score_spread":0.22645915986569623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566978476","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47115973,0.000045678116,0.5275851,0.0004764359,0.000055659435,0.00054748723,0.000034785062,0.000016684333,0.000078460616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900184,0.0000566311,0.009436946,0.00022773446,0.000039569677,0.00014452265,0.000011052323,0.000010986062,0.0000541517],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997035,0.00028213466,0.0006985494,0.0006697086,0.0010430495,0.00027155186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844665,0.010209743,0.00025616647,0.00071418926,0.0002788462,0.000094381496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058941985,0.00017242144,0.00023567797,0.0004754686,0.00035184054,0.0001965408,0.000480704,0.00011968847,0.000043319284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038294324,0.000081195874,0.00010165813,0.0013332451,0.00016604802,0.000539611,0.00006948398,0.00009957852,0.000032679574],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004095306,0.00039240415,0.02400564,0.000006925114,0.000014625965,0.0000017653426,0.0021238073,0.0023245714,0.006681004,0.096682265,0.0023317498,0.8613399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054763416,0.00033911646,0.16451386,0.00007106408,0.000031554697,0.000015516309,0.0010512603,0.2693327,0.0005120281,0.5534147,0.0049055875,0.00033624563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017400074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046944476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006183555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003633938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4584465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901229908","doi":"10.1007/s10726-018-9597-3","title":"A Value-Focused Multiple Participant-Multiple Criteria (MPMC) Decision Support Approach for Public Policy Formulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Management science; Participant observation; Value (mathematics); Policy analysis; Public policy; Computer science; Operations research; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Data mining; Political science; Engineering; Machine learning; Public administration","score_opus":0.2638552533490503,"score_gpt":0.4288093007490322,"score_spread":0.16495404739998187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901229908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3489913,0.000063775864,0.6477025,0.0004295786,0.0010055022,0.0012297196,0.000090502304,0.00014914198,0.00033796867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7731283,0.000024602365,0.22465295,0.0007337546,0.0009205166,0.00015151642,0.0001444606,0.000072786395,0.00017114881],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046093,0.0005168145,0.0027674772,0.0020173322,0.0030844216,0.0011530179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843231,0.010429712,0.0010618933,0.0017097188,0.0017747516,0.0007008278],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008635021,0.0006243204,0.0009762729,0.0021106661,0.0012990967,0.0022075183,0.0012220773,0.0005005881,0.00062758586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049178142,0.00049537345,0.00040898344,0.002329736,0.00023400986,0.0027048145,0.00063804124,0.0002421597,0.0003891263],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020201234,0.00042846508,0.016995287,0.000016185459,0.000036991125,0.0000031506665,0.0016709244,0.00012814191,0.009457007,0.0063857306,0.012432613,0.9504254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070383414,0.0007265213,0.11219074,0.000059483013,0.000050707655,0.000030546216,0.0004925385,0.76110536,0.00090092624,0.07462574,0.04206382,0.00071527355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088209024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019604327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94971013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021107958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021102089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909527879","doi":"10.1007/s10726-018-09610-5","title":"Design Theory for Generating Alternatives in Public Decision Making Processes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Plant Biotechnology Institute","funders":"Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et Lettres","keywords":"Decision theory; Management science; Computer science; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1552329035018692,"score_gpt":0.39449329238029807,"score_spread":0.23926038887842888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909527879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34126133,0.0010119763,0.65590733,0.00004736554,0.00063032954,0.00077736215,0.0000047901217,0.000035288165,0.00032424362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90817255,0.000028532962,0.09104655,0.00025815863,0.00014209098,0.000062767074,0.0000030489766,0.000028042776,0.0002582625],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477065,0.00050382345,0.0015052748,0.0011124299,0.0016749039,0.00043290612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97250265,0.02543886,0.000633297,0.000631033,0.00067293,0.000121203266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009652504,0.00028619118,0.0005589735,0.0011645643,0.00033461026,0.0013281397,0.000681507,0.00015536012,0.00036145386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015990814,0.0002086174,0.00011640286,0.0014602356,0.00004100677,0.0013456373,0.00028028648,0.00015647596,0.00014409026],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066831463,0.000083781815,0.01693786,0.000021343938,0.000010732921,0.0000043343994,0.001196622,0.0038538345,0.0015013391,0.03291335,0.001175973,0.9416325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022565683,0.00027544823,0.03086617,0.00041891503,0.0000070494457,0.000027365886,0.0016016754,0.27520576,0.00010579666,0.6827811,0.006025456,0.00042869474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046105374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000935113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94120383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008329847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009686591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914823220","doi":"10.1007/s10726-019-09612-x","title":"Strategic Analyses of the Hydropolitical Conflicts Surrounding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Toronto Metropolitan University; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Surprise; Geopolitics; Negotiation; Political science; Conflict resolution; The Renaissance; Downstream (manufacturing); Development economics; Law; Sociology; Business; History; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05176494126885706,"score_gpt":0.2874655367378307,"score_spread":0.23570059546897365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914823220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99459475,0.000044419096,0.00047502937,0.00024626756,0.00015831356,0.00017066507,0.0000035260286,0.000005358541,0.004301645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961144,0.00001813956,0.00006861345,0.00012788927,0.0000141153805,7.269126e-7,0.0000018387062,0.0000021338985,0.00015512525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917895,0.000089421774,0.00016527841,0.0001574577,0.00030263863,0.00010623588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994211,0.00021988731,0.0001056005,0.00020742042,0.000007916111,0.000038030586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041925517,0.00006593738,0.000102397986,0.000013173866,0.0001845659,0.000032643256,0.00015257444,0.000050727256,0.00028052428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004588202,0.00003292081,0.000045255834,0.00015179529,0.00012624677,0.00011385136,0.00010758023,0.00007807468,0.00008298091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000795196,0.000085896216,0.9533922,0.000027324744,0.000025802745,0.0000012443769,0.0011350771,0.00034124483,0.023921875,0.01716245,0.001052429,0.0027749152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005757699,0.00007854305,0.98110306,0.00005268539,0.00003141722,0.0000058985124,0.0005358831,0.0074618305,0.002039276,0.0058431705,0.0021599683,0.0001124804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004759569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027053794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027710857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030414152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003519226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30715442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991065550","doi":"10.1007/s10726-019-09645-2","title":"Management of Interpersonal Conflict in Negotiation with Chinese: A Perceived Face Threat Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negotiation; Politeness; Guanxi; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Conflict management; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; China; Law","score_opus":0.011407718550560567,"score_gpt":0.299555589793907,"score_spread":0.28814787124334645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991065550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755106,0.00016896761,0.004604047,0.0005679598,0.00017066585,0.0008507745,0.0000023667244,0.000038416274,0.01808621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784255,0.0005691511,0.00056634465,0.00007400955,0.00003753241,0.0000168271,0.000016907343,0.000011144025,0.0008655375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853057,0.00010532144,0.00027039534,0.00035539657,0.0005378297,0.00020050482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932766,0.00016755146,0.00016861157,0.0001612215,0.0001161339,0.000058851183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004953508,0.00014906387,0.00021744717,0.000291345,0.00012222576,0.0000723897,0.00014001166,0.000084554675,0.0003082502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003990248,0.00012572035,0.00004953847,0.000583766,0.00007153448,0.00054191105,0.000056648973,0.00009806547,0.000034400255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015275893,0.00038378278,0.5281775,0.00011232329,0.00016336676,0.000013392348,0.1599023,0.00030193926,0.00095880614,0.19194832,0.00013308981,0.116377585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019859958,0.00017189478,0.9548426,0.00017855663,0.000027739361,7.613152e-7,0.036904257,0.0027464593,0.000009849556,0.0014813924,0.0014655525,0.00018494294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090247707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018838432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4266651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018122555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020915733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995283531","doi":"10.1007/s10726-019-09648-z","title":"The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Management science; Preference; Realm; Conflict analysis; Tracing; Computer science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Social science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.18533767148109556,"score_gpt":0.41633001726068225,"score_spread":0.2309923457795867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995283531","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40315485,0.00011662346,0.59413147,0.00049301336,0.00017105599,0.0005071473,0.000009593489,0.000020159368,0.001396082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878963,0.000049782186,0.010807795,0.00015457103,0.000027514374,0.000077718614,0.0000070568776,0.0000074279073,0.00097180816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982838,0.000059037975,0.0005706485,0.00034130918,0.00059528556,0.00014994445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573815,0.003216071,0.00025191903,0.0004746699,0.0002586915,0.000060521794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023390919,0.00010204953,0.00015824648,0.00018300967,0.0006020562,0.000112654394,0.00032286617,0.00007645233,0.000031953816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006555968,0.00006257556,0.00008126779,0.0004638946,0.00007956132,0.00015450956,0.000056034212,0.00007942814,0.00008775943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056795595,0.00009764599,0.0011179302,0.0000039849374,0.000019267074,4.3509484e-8,0.0011585269,0.006193648,0.0030505483,0.7220692,0.0028003592,0.26292092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009303455,0.00019546026,0.038178388,0.0000336119,0.000013204403,0.0000026400517,0.00055922836,0.13079607,0.0014004734,0.73802906,0.089692175,0.00016932415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001858591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113298745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5847415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022818602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042862208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46305907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012291359","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09666-2","title":"A Voting Mechanism Designed for Talent Shows in Mass Media: Weighted Preference of Group Decision Makers in Social Networks Using Fuzzy Measures and Choquet Integral","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Choquet integral; Voting; Group decision-making; Preference; Weighted voting; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Population; Hierarchy; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04500628173461837,"score_gpt":0.27929517652007796,"score_spread":0.23428889478545958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012291359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54780084,0.000056289915,0.45172316,0.000036130157,0.0000791001,0.00027096632,0.000016551345,0.0000059853132,0.0000109710345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861255,0.00003001709,0.013570992,0.00005982424,0.00013832968,0.000021531183,0.00003877686,0.000014482133,5.3539327e-7],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986517,0.00008588726,0.00049679907,0.0003284932,0.0002249853,0.00021216889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919575,0.00037993092,0.00020910506,0.00005945935,0.00007327491,0.000082452876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045209168,0.00016464885,0.00032059505,0.000115785995,0.00013109528,0.00006656481,0.00009675719,0.00012793839,0.000010564889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007169096,0.00015722436,0.00006385907,0.00028219103,0.000038656028,0.00022090747,0.00006184535,0.00016937302,2.142511e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014862617,0.00023592278,0.112247385,0.000073247735,0.00004753118,0.0000029316343,0.007006272,0.0021761737,0.017366655,0.23903356,0.000053801698,0.62027025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037448385,0.00018505698,0.056682393,0.0002831013,0.000028307035,3.916041e-7,0.0017049658,0.75848293,0.00021756622,0.17830797,0.000017306842,0.00034516517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012299963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018759677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75630677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043943295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023177881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64114237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042636191","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09688-w","title":"Comparing Structured and Unstructured Facilitation Approaches in Consultation Workshops: A Field Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Facilitation; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06838425345135848,"score_gpt":0.30571189124002784,"score_spread":0.23732763778866936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042636191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686768,0.0005064549,0.029685175,0.0004108697,0.00018531215,0.00023764178,0.000003778255,0.000025305888,0.00026868156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715805,0.000036341997,0.0023925372,0.00030100366,0.000036633868,0.000017868348,0.000042438143,0.0000064301103,0.000008686985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992008,0.00005083468,0.00024660074,0.00027795567,0.0001113459,0.0001124244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.00019181948,0.00007560998,0.00008306104,0.000015875026,0.00006558879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010940094,0.00010424596,0.0001450972,0.00007774465,0.00006137364,0.000050661012,0.000044888173,0.000104047605,0.000063361535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000825467,0.00009691187,0.000015225437,0.00016314622,0.000023096254,0.00013798314,0.000026466963,0.00012328815,0.000004599483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011259813,0.000044522098,0.10395231,0.00003540472,0.000023672235,0.0000034443392,0.068265736,0.00051961915,0.0018597331,0.0135486815,0.00027621552,0.8103447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002715444,0.00018186668,0.84450215,0.000030007934,0.000009055958,0.000006891634,0.0072652604,0.14243107,0.00012342054,0.002102454,0.0004399659,0.00019242657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040983858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009948479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81015223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016603837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004301845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39519513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119395891","doi":"10.1007/s10726-020-09719-6","title":"Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Operations research; Statistics","score_opus":0.09060253877963814,"score_gpt":0.4046849358571534,"score_spread":0.3140823970775153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119395891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8936093,0.00058152084,0.10209562,0.0005434285,0.00038726642,0.00025697277,0.000007616852,0.000046094196,0.0024721667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849866,0.00008845442,0.014102389,0.0005257941,0.00008672303,0.000022619883,0.000020982983,0.000019573581,0.00014684486],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940703,0.0005067213,0.0013618709,0.0012686765,0.0024018893,0.00039056427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562293,0.002522944,0.00028094306,0.00081130926,0.0005163608,0.00024553595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00400965,0.00024993875,0.0005638291,0.0012885659,0.00020425997,0.0007708892,0.00049549056,0.00022416216,0.00028015545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008321361,0.00019705929,0.00016088776,0.0039170813,0.00009698255,0.00079206476,0.00028128386,0.0003413977,0.00010966052],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005480179,0.0008152875,0.09475469,0.00003160037,0.000022507924,0.0002912314,0.0030692497,0.0015105641,0.002826285,0.017809322,0.0023976155,0.87592363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002741247,0.00007725537,0.36923438,0.000106088264,0.000018466155,0.00021389833,0.0025356645,0.11187332,0.00016676993,0.50980663,0.0027464044,0.0004798553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008329231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009236412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87544376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005511294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008544075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99620473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31257076","doi":"10.1023/a:1023016804379","title":"The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Multimedia; Purchasing; Construct (python library); The Internet; Affect (linguistics); Computer-mediated communication; Psychology; World Wide Web; Communication; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.007164708854747214,"score_gpt":0.22816209302183085,"score_spread":0.22099738416708364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31257076","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33136463,0.0018594827,0.6613021,0.00051125576,0.0020120025,0.00091432076,0.0000019920258,0.00014908638,0.0018851688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98799103,0.00015503819,0.011562758,0.00021663969,0.000019224823,0.000022030948,0.000008101901,0.0000059370573,0.000019237774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986901,0.00032583566,0.0002879719,0.0002094842,0.00034836587,0.00013820353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962477,0.0027743934,0.00020573831,0.0006156349,0.00009143462,0.00006511216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007260111,0.00010352736,0.0001225518,0.0001099412,0.00025010735,0.00011174432,0.00030881085,0.0000766296,0.0000023325385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011663637,0.000072815215,0.000047913072,0.0003047744,0.000039055714,0.00022994276,0.00003440702,0.00008175447,0.000026809941],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016875743,0.0003224853,0.0055903695,0.0000661301,0.000025176374,0.0000024172402,0.0009449056,0.00018893232,0.015294327,0.19747855,0.005589667,0.7743283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013494435,0.0019690439,0.3318688,0.0007126446,0.00004878403,0.000015953341,0.00020138346,0.46845406,0.087422244,0.056342803,0.03858369,0.0008861356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015521622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003715274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77344215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032009862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003611469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29693183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134203175","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09727-0","title":"A Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Bargaining Approach for Multi-objective Optimization of Contamination Warning Sensors in Water Distribution Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Stakeholder; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Bargaining problem; Compromise; Negotiation; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.015672703585622335,"score_gpt":0.21904281033706346,"score_spread":0.20337010675144113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134203175","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2016233,0.00018614999,0.7973275,0.0000031808988,0.00023591996,0.00046051657,0.000024535018,0.000051834835,0.00008703108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783467,0.000050959025,0.019715935,0.0000028597983,0.000043492433,0.00008068412,0.0017074308,0.000024149733,0.000027790747],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988131,0.00008890055,0.00050127733,0.00026138188,0.00016061608,0.00017472282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999402,0.00011275262,0.000086770866,0.000117835334,0.00024132433,0.00003932173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044845423,0.00014273547,0.00025547825,0.00013645872,0.00007434301,0.00006912691,0.00003851442,0.00010355352,0.0000026622615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020145664,0.00012748431,0.000041601263,0.00016528359,0.000013312016,0.00030667518,0.000020623382,0.00007351959,7.17341e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030716463,0.000039786406,0.000619895,0.0001536397,0.000013206737,0.0000012383043,0.0007267088,0.99556404,0.0008509999,0.00053853745,0.000030299423,0.0014309371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013020427,0.000038012106,0.00329222,0.00011790664,0.000019608502,0.000012322474,0.0005022726,0.99173206,0.0027204286,0.000087653316,0.000027723074,0.00014774202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019913392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017257871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7776116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014316665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000088134575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51986593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135355984","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09728-z","title":"Group Decision-Based Construction of Scenarios for Multicriteria Analysis in Conditions of Uncertainty on the Basis of Quantitative and Qualitative Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Vale Canada Limited","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Basis (linear algebra); Group decision-making; Data mining; Qualitative analysis; Complete information; Management science; Qualitative research; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.10536392321985671,"score_gpt":0.4351156819622394,"score_spread":0.32975175874238266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135355984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6593481,0.00005751912,0.33941317,0.00023179082,0.00014918586,0.00039158593,0.00038341788,0.0000051050997,0.000020169087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922273,0.000039345723,0.07740399,0.0001218191,0.0000070631568,0.000031953256,0.00011283686,0.0000071240943,0.0000028953957],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950439,0.00086823845,0.0021741895,0.00045724248,0.0012855567,0.00017088039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614319,0.034896415,0.0013425257,0.00052920263,0.0017265055,0.00007343877],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052830474,0.00020311878,0.00076128956,0.0016647349,0.0001697492,0.00013306041,0.00025094723,0.0001481955,0.00021607158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02395565,0.00014390041,0.00024821915,0.0027464065,0.00033676397,0.00070044695,0.00009652627,0.0001177592,0.0000032185667],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008292145,0.0011377827,0.034788385,0.00020257724,0.00057588815,0.000004313589,0.046702333,0.048144154,0.04829023,0.23582335,0.00067663006,0.5753622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005154455,0.0006314393,0.19906777,0.0005209057,0.00025464737,0.0000041913886,0.059877153,0.6089148,0.006822151,0.11821051,0.00020505408,0.00033694992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007820933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005107294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57502526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052031268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079271194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164439675","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09743-0","title":"The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Operationalization; New product development; Knowledge management; Exploratory research; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Task (project management); Process management; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Management; Sociology","score_opus":0.03472541758267618,"score_gpt":0.2508239966186287,"score_spread":0.21609857903595253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164439675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99176025,0.0001239698,0.0038480803,0.0016526895,0.00009700786,0.00018887124,1.2047518e-7,0.00002235469,0.0023066557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785286,0.000013256478,0.0008375457,0.00031073074,0.00020398379,0.0000070006017,0.000030625586,0.000007908206,0.00073606335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916625,0.00001642931,0.00029599023,0.00017910931,0.00024144526,0.00010075802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991362,0.0001736653,0.00024655505,0.00014972722,0.000288133,0.0000057236666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086713786,0.00008927624,0.00008894573,0.00015660493,0.0006136817,0.00024223822,0.00007254705,0.000025846022,0.000008151371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033922368,0.000052792457,0.00000877973,0.0013015482,0.00004195517,0.00040960507,0.00011780253,0.00010750052,0.000011252073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041106727,0.000012862694,0.6001955,0.000051340496,0.00001225188,2.3569758e-7,0.0002205804,0.0000055264622,0.0001277549,0.11736193,0.0006631392,0.28130776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037212367,0.00001096493,0.94736147,0.000060436967,0.000016689919,9.463596e-7,0.00048752397,0.00055492995,0.00016460993,0.0014535099,0.049432803,0.00008400979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007713726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006407049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34716594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017071046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031594464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4720005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194511393","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09755-w","title":"An Integer Programming Approach to Solving the Inverse Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Two Decision Makers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Integer programming; Conflict resolution; Resolution (logic); Graph; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Inverse; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.10282520826118534,"score_gpt":0.37297834936538826,"score_spread":0.2701531411042029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194511393","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26701623,0.00005787648,0.731484,0.00035759763,0.00008107624,0.0006837248,0.000010934321,0.00004445832,0.0002641443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7901349,0.000015969275,0.2085818,0.00075952086,0.00006588098,0.0001948673,0.00004124916,0.00001916573,0.00018661571],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708563,0.00020893307,0.00060242694,0.00086332794,0.0009277062,0.0003119815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996197,0.0018394424,0.0002209641,0.00089661,0.0006121185,0.00023388659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034924997,0.00020639895,0.00025746977,0.00026708547,0.0008042311,0.0006953887,0.00047427748,0.00009869537,0.000019528927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014046006,0.00012649242,0.00010803896,0.0012692733,0.00011766484,0.0006260556,0.00012674578,0.0001653749,0.000026421587],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011815846,0.00037540123,0.00074584165,0.00000687493,0.00002485016,0.0000017225501,0.0058637774,0.0995137,0.003911627,0.080507085,0.0044979374,0.8033696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001295496,0.0001663568,0.0025678994,0.000044137396,0.00003911887,0.00002931212,0.004254272,0.87633735,0.0002390244,0.101328164,0.013449052,0.00024984128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001279988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004288421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8031198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042859177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006401785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67056495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197614320","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09753-y","title":"A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; Management science; Multidisciplinary approach; Decision support system; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Process management; R-CAST; Computer science; Decision engineering; Project management; Knowledge management; Business decision mapping; Operations research; Engineering; Sociology; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.3550754410882115,"score_gpt":0.4607599748638513,"score_spread":0.1056845337756398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197614320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29728425,0.004110665,0.6968243,0.0003056968,0.00028190383,0.0011029167,0.000050234947,0.000018998175,0.000021018797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8418164,0.00008416318,0.15764053,0.00017101677,0.00013104797,0.000111375535,0.000017114418,0.00001827343,0.000010058416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475145,0.0007013363,0.0010855796,0.0010038664,0.0022437172,0.00021401963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636692,0.029888809,0.00067452743,0.00077321474,0.0049076458,0.000086636064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073883887,0.00022774943,0.00043987267,0.00027511903,0.000579763,0.000694722,0.00036064128,0.00017559438,0.00008550959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047626223,0.00015170555,0.000112056456,0.0012181046,0.00008866438,0.00057372625,0.00020871496,0.00013152827,0.000008167683],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009847701,0.00015347947,0.00253809,0.00002157837,0.000046328183,0.0000015051567,0.008764069,0.0009954282,0.01256244,0.03469135,0.0017543209,0.93748665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016028372,0.00013624743,0.04093184,0.0002588977,0.000091841386,0.000015436319,0.016935803,0.20808364,0.00065889873,0.72996974,0.0011050715,0.00020977063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001452742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002413732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087979875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024799746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96039605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200811419","doi":"10.1007/s10726-021-09760-z","title":"Using the Shapley Value to Mitigate the Emergency Rescue Risk for Hazardous Materials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Facility Location and Emergency Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Shapley value; Hazardous waste; Axiom; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Construct (python library); Game theory; Operations research; Business; Engineering; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Waste management","score_opus":0.045555797003217345,"score_gpt":0.2864007334762434,"score_spread":0.24084493647302604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200811419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8059456,0.00025369794,0.18650569,0.0039031242,0.0016651758,0.00095442735,0.00002285949,0.00005981286,0.000689616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937427,0.0001842864,0.0019697242,0.0026228428,0.00073561305,0.00008455673,0.00008514362,0.000022323791,0.0005528197],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987088,0.000051292845,0.00041065525,0.00033695766,0.0002854647,0.00020684558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992285,0.000059385522,0.00009337932,0.00037259416,0.00022862545,0.000017562024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011127074,0.00014434056,0.00014027512,0.000089241,0.0007649768,0.0003346059,0.00020003926,0.00004671073,0.0007196138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006078055,0.00009163139,0.000079165526,0.00045686387,0.000020448955,0.0003772096,0.00020909893,0.00005824032,0.00014270746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012323358,0.0006037596,0.006129437,0.0007407444,0.0003796746,0.000007143323,0.0021844646,0.076520234,0.038330458,0.31186536,0.15754269,0.4044637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015819167,0.00004522355,0.12365789,0.00009291049,0.00041009948,0.0000048151387,0.002369098,0.3476768,0.0010022926,0.033305123,0.489148,0.00070583104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007046256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007712704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40375787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002203364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009795811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7879267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234719607","doi":"10.1023/a:1024833722130","title":"Electronic Negotiations: Foundations, Systems and Experiments – Introduction to the Special Issue 2","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.01819879901410248,"score_gpt":0.3104065695738451,"score_spread":0.2922077705597426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234719607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581499,0.00595503,0.1842732,0.061863884,0.020160977,0.00864248,0.000012647918,0.0005390186,0.060402866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696107,0.0015714467,0.00038830918,0.0005294956,0.007165835,0.000101247635,0.000029020517,0.000015851248,0.003237716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983703,0.00029878443,0.00027901563,0.0003418418,0.00043616313,0.0002739231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992944,0.00019866266,0.00011520178,0.00020147234,0.000089657005,0.00010061381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012685045,0.0001225374,0.0001211088,0.00019250678,0.0011766655,0.00047964585,0.00010742832,0.00007612182,0.00043299678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006284161,0.00010505328,0.00002821283,0.0005101659,0.000055070683,0.00054629263,0.000035851277,0.00009309911,0.00012356069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060435555,0.00007662511,0.0020537507,0.000007631786,0.000032705477,3.4847767e-7,0.013534872,0.00010266938,0.00019162692,0.74781907,0.0810488,0.1550715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032947754,0.00005889033,0.006840477,0.00000867424,0.000022378941,0.0000015107541,0.004325737,0.00030285242,0.000022410219,0.0025045546,0.98545307,0.00012997795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024605467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011511516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9044043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015490215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041893654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9050079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248464018","doi":"10.1007/s10726-014-9406-6","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0069321251052386085,"score_gpt":0.23329234471067223,"score_spread":0.22636021960543362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248464018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306555,0.000068450914,0.16594616,0.0006927744,0.00075794844,0.00013919472,0.0000022447462,0.00019786424,0.0015398542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472654,0.000019311736,0.003945813,0.00015853031,0.00094222056,0.0000055061146,0.00003763839,0.000023187291,0.00014123862],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905926,0.00008143119,0.00019026392,0.00028423435,0.0002577765,0.00012705971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.00012933929,0.00008123012,0.00022248107,0.00005851548,0.00007272351],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650035,0.00009123301,0.000102239595,0.0001555623,0.00012289757,0.00006859326,0.000053830416,0.00006091146,0.00028005184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051712524,0.000081097394,0.00002600304,0.00023630196,0.00002538005,0.00032743596,0.000030401521,0.000070238006,0.0024381296],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017582561,0.00006870598,0.0035679764,0.000005236672,0.000007033572,3.0525135e-7,0.0001768726,0.0000658541,0.03413514,0.035980117,0.07265625,0.8531607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015305472,0.0002087789,0.41003785,0.000015803655,0.000025338617,0.00002920621,0.000059901417,0.025107337,0.0016372539,0.027083492,0.5339949,0.00026958933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075943026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002063983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003517429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029016644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254058566","doi":"10.1023/a:1011252808608","title":"Fallback Bargaining","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Majority rule; Settlement (finance); Bargaining problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Condorcet method; Computer science; Voting; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.035788373848755946,"score_gpt":0.23071989224523393,"score_spread":0.194931518396478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254058566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.883628,0.0015642743,0.07442498,0.000106131665,0.00046171257,0.00010992489,0.0000062609174,0.000058935286,0.039639793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980294,0.00020349488,0.0007388593,0.0002239776,0.00011678468,0.0000042155552,0.000007558347,0.000010732731,0.00066497293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921286,0.000017006056,0.0003572324,0.00024163468,0.000030862513,0.00014041203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952126,0.000115317904,0.0001400074,0.0001519374,0.000012864648,0.000058645233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073348935,0.00008102532,0.0001712766,0.0001274745,0.0001121884,0.00007528271,0.00007464797,0.00006994379,0.00030528195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016190395,0.00008622334,0.000039620518,0.000156109,0.000016050348,0.00020827811,0.000027139044,0.00006554667,0.00075689616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004826439,0.00003766174,0.1617286,0.0000049832,0.000009402745,0.0000035999497,0.0005512857,0.00002270272,0.00007265261,0.782527,0.0005876892,0.054406088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014230654,0.00014139085,0.3739456,0.00005810111,0.0000045928805,0.000045686862,0.00028334055,0.009033482,0.000023973356,0.46799448,0.1466837,0.00036258835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027518374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009444841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31453258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020755613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017297178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321222075","doi":"10.1007/s10726-022-09812-y","title":"The Quality-Signaling Role of Manipulated Consumer Reviews","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Spam and Phishing Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pooling; Economic surplus; Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Profitability index; Microeconomics; Product (mathematics); Pricing strategies; Profit (economics); Economics; Marketing; Business; Welfare","score_opus":0.04535607365386315,"score_gpt":0.311223157708606,"score_spread":0.26586708405474285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321222075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7170299,0.004481512,0.27641115,0.00037037046,0.0009308058,0.00032347004,0.0000011074521,0.0002080519,0.00024358412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964778,0.0015756184,0.0017797152,0.000074028176,0.000031373787,0.000007029261,0.000003908189,0.0000039749434,0.000046579433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999055,0.0001396833,0.00032373247,0.00016922552,0.00021223786,0.000100117744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989811,0.000526919,0.00015569634,0.00025549703,0.000048318983,0.000032442626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015332759,0.000060581722,0.00010879035,0.00007879872,0.00021593942,0.00010898142,0.00019494766,0.000043803666,0.0000043973337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028746037,0.00004108886,0.00004211706,0.00052481884,0.000017529388,0.00021817845,0.00007459887,0.00006114187,0.000062689855],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019453244,0.000009724396,0.0014203116,0.00000878333,0.000006430735,4.1418016e-7,0.0006036604,0.00003323587,0.02204676,0.023153504,0.0009810848,0.95171666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014531187,0.0002464474,0.35778868,0.0002825509,0.00003092406,0.000019038276,0.00043969965,0.22518614,0.015555499,0.19244802,0.20602724,0.0005226253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034413315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021671223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009127204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056108734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16755551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384130953","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09844-y","title":"Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies in South Asia: A Comparative Study of India and Pakistan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Tribalism; Collectivism; Emerging markets; International business; Political science; South asia; Development economics; Sociology; Social science; Business; Economics; Law; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.17426272135677126,"score_gpt":0.45266249518651663,"score_spread":0.27839977382974535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384130953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99209213,0.000096594566,0.0062820115,0.00037217993,0.00032637894,0.00041625695,0.0000064201663,0.000036238747,0.0003717902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907374,0.00009201318,0.00063730514,0.00004252169,0.000043464195,0.00002854058,0.000021603428,0.000007880952,0.0000529405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968245,0.00040368835,0.00090394466,0.00052175665,0.0011653632,0.00018072549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952245,0.00352974,0.00038883212,0.00029450434,0.0004858585,0.00007659524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004492793,0.00015019027,0.0003449815,0.0008370514,0.00022069691,0.00038678577,0.00019303289,0.00019255908,0.000040381816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002172777,0.00012087825,0.000027434911,0.00201013,0.000111145775,0.0007894579,0.00011859541,0.00028645137,0.000028704755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004143165,0.00073033,0.66175896,0.000046061446,0.000026404095,0.000008576334,0.1741612,0.0031194068,0.0007579548,0.11725202,0.00081849983,0.040906277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072392257,0.0001774908,0.801255,0.00004785271,0.000007388914,0.0000013367347,0.08160855,0.0037043525,0.000013099434,0.11229438,0.000066138295,0.000100525314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016808913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014078488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.139496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037397327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011970177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4929272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390505268","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09868-4","title":"Correction to: Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies in South Asia: A Comparative Study of India and Pakistan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; South asia; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.021183397839632703,"score_gpt":0.3627656877287492,"score_spread":0.3415822898891165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390505268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99055606,0.00021194045,0.0063104853,0.00019506317,0.0005759791,0.00048407877,0.0000052849323,0.000044856217,0.0016162667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950683,0.000087934146,0.00024026669,0.000036906153,0.000045481353,0.000012039304,0.000011124632,0.0000044032877,0.000054985838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987056,0.00023343277,0.00029236125,0.00026332928,0.00037137393,0.00013390147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928313,0.0004077881,0.00006473128,0.00006836814,0.000099508245,0.000076451746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082413823,0.00009202057,0.00016635064,0.00023246858,0.00018272935,0.00027427927,0.000058416168,0.00011023925,0.0000121902085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020504369,0.000088692104,0.000018840212,0.0006092153,0.000058015525,0.0004770199,0.000031737687,0.00018927216,0.0000057166144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029170554,0.00047153668,0.061582573,0.000045167275,0.000032926502,0.0000118099115,0.6796084,0.0012269332,0.0002457745,0.22320518,0.0010962076,0.03218178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061133545,0.0005927843,0.6784974,0.00021272666,0.000024872073,0.0000014900229,0.28887308,0.014898952,0.0000043747873,0.015101016,0.0010037048,0.00017826741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023317626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038731016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6169148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009286708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088477405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97880965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391899445","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09870-w","title":"Concept Design Evaluation of Sustainable Product–Service Systems: A QFD–TOPSIS Integrated Framework with Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Quality function deployment; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Product-service system; Service (business); Process management; Knowledge management; New product development; Business; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.03978333416077059,"score_gpt":0.273596491594833,"score_spread":0.23381315743406242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391899445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13377294,0.0018370998,0.85767627,0.0008741328,0.0017918088,0.002894682,0.0000062256518,0.00042189116,0.00072493555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99622655,0.000020150057,0.0023440444,0.0004979648,0.00049492175,0.00013724621,0.00016995324,0.000027056845,0.00008209356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975779,0.00014512439,0.00063433853,0.00038810805,0.0010234333,0.00023110959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964836,0.00049116305,0.00035382895,0.00033245079,0.0023184253,0.000020522686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038967915,0.00022447095,0.00024643217,0.0006550472,0.00018543065,0.0008647244,0.00013879653,0.000104369145,0.00015189072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003379266,0.00017822601,0.000034861423,0.0020312925,0.000042650274,0.002736744,0.00005499783,0.00017770604,0.000094806666],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026852007,0.00044954356,0.0032920958,0.006151159,0.00047127504,0.000028934099,0.008837839,0.12067663,0.00053273153,0.5145093,0.031010559,0.3113547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001767771,0.00017638833,0.00412595,0.0017831989,0.00078527327,0.000016193062,0.0077814804,0.889172,0.0003053474,0.047516145,0.045942724,0.00062751165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062069227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013265344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86245364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017504029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013768746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83385575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393865923","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09884-y","title":"Correction to: Concept Design Evaluation of Sustainable Product–Service Systems: A QFD–TOPSIS Integrated Framework with Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Chongqing Municipal Education Commission; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"TOPSIS; Quality function deployment; Computer science; Product (mathematics); Service (business); Process management; Knowledge management; Linguistics; Management science; New product development; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.034597264460093986,"score_gpt":0.2761084198400696,"score_spread":0.24151115537997564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393865923","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088326,0.00063942303,0.90173274,0.0007015248,0.00482193,0.0027833,0.0000039648803,0.00037175443,0.000619332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996128,0.000011410912,0.0020840769,0.00065410516,0.0005875792,0.00018701945,0.00014397537,0.000028318367,0.00017551114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975875,0.00014615404,0.00062234874,0.00042002814,0.0009908254,0.00023315022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623805,0.0005917739,0.00031050894,0.00031560086,0.0025166245,0.000027461192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003646511,0.00022688878,0.00024118202,0.0008100726,0.00020262435,0.00086341274,0.00012709394,0.00008835638,0.000120722376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054527936,0.00018717698,0.000034148765,0.002606895,0.000028529188,0.0023987438,0.000055383385,0.00018755357,0.00012831637],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034061808,0.00041107245,0.0028708011,0.0033251832,0.00034598817,0.000017382677,0.009984102,0.28872445,0.00076440757,0.13284428,0.11761844,0.4396877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011114294,0.00022789172,0.004964291,0.001929009,0.0005360812,0.000015657166,0.0068290317,0.92959005,0.00040069554,0.01271898,0.04114781,0.0005290794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010692743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034380766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002484035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013673598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8325909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394927090","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09885-x","title":"Two-Person Fair Division with Additive Valuations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Universität Wien","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Arithmetic; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03395908741372207,"score_gpt":0.24856721885162664,"score_spread":0.21460813143790458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394927090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6918279,0.0037604696,0.2865954,0.00035890343,0.0009912592,0.00035261447,0.00012443619,0.00018292485,0.015806103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980595,0.00006552871,0.0010390991,0.00008660278,0.000119752905,0.000019933017,0.000047844962,0.000018693243,0.00054305687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909985,0.00003175974,0.00028273888,0.0003792098,0.00006719289,0.00013924496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993575,0.00030716715,0.00009473785,0.00015400776,0.000026255191,0.000060324535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079937046,0.0001159452,0.00018166123,0.00024895015,0.00015661794,0.00020285041,0.00006690852,0.00006028956,0.00029330235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011058769,0.00010131756,0.000049250277,0.0002966975,0.000030546737,0.00038904476,0.00001860812,0.000105983636,0.0006116011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051089002,0.00004993454,0.0074136048,0.000026446596,0.000039611557,0.0000063380367,0.0022808856,0.0001145626,0.00008297732,0.8670073,0.0014868282,0.1214404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003583376,0.0011135262,0.37627438,0.0010921912,0.00006279472,0.00007586027,0.0026393742,0.18190639,0.00022852662,0.3430464,0.08878323,0.0011939511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042831052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025750787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048924747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007849113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78610986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396934089","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09882-0","title":"A Novel Consensus and Dissent Framework Under Grey Preference Based on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Two Decision Makers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Dissent; Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Theoretical computer science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.29011607344459783,"score_gpt":0.426973462304629,"score_spread":0.13685738886003118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396934089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14532909,0.00046032295,0.8482858,0.0030260999,0.0009618213,0.0016079717,0.00020040784,0.000084745494,0.00004375196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8506422,0.000052282066,0.14744237,0.0013653148,0.00011832505,0.00019118807,0.000024027968,0.000042921303,0.00012133498],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951466,0.00017648614,0.0011650032,0.0013914786,0.0016818256,0.0004386552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95758855,0.04049395,0.00029728122,0.0008668441,0.00053627376,0.00021708844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052973167,0.00039084093,0.0004470892,0.00074832066,0.0007311097,0.0016203207,0.00047588965,0.00027511216,0.000060245653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011795043,0.00024408726,0.0002566431,0.0008444648,0.00020481393,0.0003232501,0.00016145984,0.00028759762,0.000022105958],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005155703,0.00023214126,0.0002264799,0.000047165697,0.00005076453,0.000004278067,0.0012853817,0.057583105,0.0064392923,0.2505294,0.018171638,0.6602746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013956039,0.00015680061,0.002892688,0.0003639792,0.0000327009,0.000009391587,0.00024791606,0.7056808,0.00006155864,0.2860203,0.0029183156,0.00021997691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013787836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009583566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70531315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090147754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008990606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408974151","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09923-2","title":"A Biform Game Approach to Store Brand Introduction and Production Mode Selection in a Platform Supply Chain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Production (economics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Human–computer interaction; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012103711020833493,"score_gpt":0.24066223682054455,"score_spread":0.22855852579971106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408974151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97744745,0.00010921708,0.019328704,0.0011161302,0.0004575439,0.0006084161,7.798109e-7,0.00007293266,0.00085880415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828815,0.00006208851,0.0006630008,0.00028060595,0.00044152065,0.000050770388,0.00003634777,0.000011511722,0.00016598849],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889976,0.000011880902,0.00028333341,0.00044850496,0.00017820517,0.00017832956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996765,0.000036984427,0.00008343979,0.00010760518,0.0000791182,0.000016336064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005805841,0.00015046535,0.00017455693,0.00094665214,0.00016950144,0.0002416196,0.00005395957,0.00008770994,0.000015758766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019642473,0.0001435068,0.000024512543,0.0010781775,0.000018289282,0.0011377531,0.000079643316,0.00013963958,0.000005673788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075307186,0.00016201333,0.15635462,0.00014986783,0.000011064146,4.691352e-7,0.00043213612,0.00035278188,0.0046625263,0.0061744903,0.0024911193,0.8284558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014066184,0.000027278096,0.9268638,0.00011848054,0.000063139385,0.000010241559,0.00044568724,0.046760947,0.0001418391,0.0055158986,0.018357838,0.00028821663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005191658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009656622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8281676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006570077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012549102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5852037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414036856","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09942-z","title":"Supply Chain Conflict Study Based on Graph Model with a New Integrated Preference Structure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Supply chain; Preference; Graph; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Theoretical computer science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.01793173904255429,"score_gpt":0.24068958146761665,"score_spread":0.22275784242506236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414036856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.819404,0.0000512453,0.1771593,0.00067398086,0.00018713839,0.0010359078,0.0000042062456,0.00011558405,0.0013686105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957889,0.000018662651,0.00072183734,0.002872247,0.000070118025,0.000024033774,0.0000614094,0.0000131381485,0.00042967816],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986762,0.00001480265,0.000247789,0.00046582337,0.0003967873,0.0001986238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936306,0.00008639329,0.00012253014,0.000306558,0.000099085024,0.000022346256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021048386,0.000228228,0.00020342309,0.0006447535,0.00021977202,0.00035683977,0.00020887407,0.00007043936,0.000101062964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007003451,0.00015334216,0.00003625981,0.0009114371,0.000030016541,0.0004314432,0.00007836485,0.00014680924,0.0000120809755],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035835463,0.0011374244,0.38103727,0.00016201012,0.00013365988,0.000022384107,0.0007252324,0.12235878,0.00042182946,0.036433768,0.03370647,0.42027763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004002242,0.00019597165,0.26427954,0.00023915531,0.000108711225,2.950321e-7,0.001353969,0.71534765,0.000033120585,0.00919264,0.004918031,0.00032867937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005099802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010361152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59298885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000278046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035844165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6253112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417030628","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09956-7","title":"Majority Stability of Coalition Structures Under Decentralized Preferences of Autonomous Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Disjoint sets; Outcome (game theory); Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.047863454554541315,"score_gpt":0.27250822118067136,"score_spread":0.22464476662613003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417030628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604896,0.00078680116,0.036795676,0.000030965726,0.00037399595,0.0001780671,0.00006725452,0.000013166591,0.0012644902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992023,0.00010890723,0.0005983391,0.000027007567,0.000008987919,0.0000035618787,0.000019003899,0.0000032737944,0.000028579683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989374,0.000059473274,0.00064698694,0.0002174927,0.000044579512,0.000094052935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991984,0.00019224023,0.0003593826,0.00018243857,0.00003996287,0.000027596378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007292957,0.00008058799,0.00029918444,0.00014161861,0.000051030118,0.000020747424,0.00009183989,0.00009055543,0.00021151494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018065027,0.00007999206,0.000056283596,0.00016873764,0.000054323362,0.0001229121,0.0000326161,0.000050806026,0.000003384627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001499301,0.00009896652,0.21099187,0.00011937969,0.000031223604,6.752651e-8,0.00044559306,0.000041151856,0.00043975178,0.7784998,0.000084883344,0.009097413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005865353,0.000040809307,0.5657873,0.000038534592,0.0000069931593,2.7300976e-7,0.00016640426,0.0008165445,0.0016712494,0.43048072,0.00034472492,0.00005990627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019072044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004218408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35479543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034874596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011184705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32619816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55691372","doi":"10.1023/a:1011257109771","title":"A Distance-Based Collective Weak Ordering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Axiom; Binary relation; Axiomatic system; Mathematical economics; Group decision-making; Mathematics; Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.09888483062954825,"score_gpt":0.37756462514866596,"score_spread":0.27867979451911773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55691372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3501348,0.00021918475,0.64492214,0.00044486535,0.00068764854,0.0002903927,0.0000070222677,0.000079847574,0.0032140878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98058945,0.000057141773,0.017481763,0.00051055686,0.0001282157,0.000026259455,0.00000732107,0.000025677467,0.0011736349],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953899,0.00027434118,0.0010093696,0.00094167655,0.0020144135,0.00037032415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406815,0.004125425,0.00037566476,0.00073288917,0.00046775633,0.00023014264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026275304,0.0002635361,0.0004217797,0.0007680295,0.0005230095,0.00086923747,0.0005198202,0.00015256379,0.0011382687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061237747,0.00020568674,0.00013683997,0.002080011,0.00008664798,0.0007086041,0.00018059323,0.0001795201,0.0003393943],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093694957,0.00015325437,0.038664244,0.0000033079423,0.000011244667,0.00003315375,0.00057204603,0.00075522135,0.0023936436,0.0025686286,0.0081282,0.9457801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004314123,0.00025888777,0.36955467,0.0001492465,0.000022202676,0.00006276045,0.001033603,0.27637434,0.00028603527,0.11585973,0.23141778,0.0006666295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021955875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000224912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015973579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007945082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116780730","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09955-8","title":"Investigating Limited-Move Stabilities in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Unknown Preference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Preference; Conflict resolution; Graph; Graph theory; Conflict analysis","score_opus":0.15392849835903863,"score_gpt":0.36647879713809983,"score_spread":0.2125502987790612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116780730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5541777,0.00010592447,0.44324023,0.00095046783,0.00003454707,0.0005091772,0.000012555763,0.000019275489,0.0009501379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167293,0.00003192952,0.0070001916,0.0007488327,0.000015665555,0.00018320442,0.000014858856,0.0000047300864,0.0003276482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981984,0.0002088406,0.00050539675,0.00042251535,0.0004929682,0.00017189381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943933,0.0047165835,0.00016896655,0.00045260516,0.0002260168,0.000042549953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031025743,0.0001224569,0.00017231818,0.00028900694,0.00035030817,0.000259726,0.00037162198,0.00007835065,0.000009696636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00225327,0.00007185004,0.000043776385,0.0010222973,0.00016879653,0.00035032726,0.0000562382,0.00013113742,0.000004481282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022130545,0.000094999574,0.005708628,0.000012898985,0.000006973986,1.3479813e-7,0.006183755,0.009685852,0.0006489638,0.8623961,0.0013135754,0.113726795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060295657,0.00006736502,0.055948332,0.000059452836,0.000011455129,0.0000011515825,0.0023553919,0.29774052,0.00008630009,0.64110947,0.0019266446,0.000090969836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017663635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035665193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43749523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024079229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051906638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29299596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85344031","doi":"10.1023/a:1011829229592","title":"The Role of Leadership in Group Support Systems Failure","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Transactional leadership; Transformational leadership; Psychology; Alliance; Leadership style; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.035109270755805,"score_gpt":0.2763247743944841,"score_spread":0.2412155036386791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85344031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925365,0.0017053331,0.0019680082,0.00028485287,0.00049617636,0.00020035378,0.0000038561093,0.000017401171,0.0027875518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915105,0.0002532984,0.000054817385,0.000074749354,0.000057320634,0.000016058517,0.000015211485,0.000008645317,0.00036882344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999119,0.00006533758,0.00029950545,0.00016674257,0.00015874891,0.00019067935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939555,0.00021791398,0.000113009504,0.00021095212,0.000025125879,0.0000374691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055628776,0.00008065297,0.000119336604,0.00009426916,0.00007921011,0.00003596058,0.00011368635,0.000105206746,0.00007760001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002294524,0.000057957535,0.000029151095,0.00019879449,0.00003490062,0.000102953825,0.000019795873,0.00011440011,0.000042842054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003557534,0.00011372691,0.33280703,0.00001376381,0.00001596849,0.000006554279,0.002314258,0.0000410824,0.0004530958,0.06925513,0.00149959,0.59312403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010721157,0.00022852521,0.88635516,0.000046540525,0.00000804652,0.000051039173,0.0082407165,0.010866699,0.000005537569,0.002304939,0.09068013,0.00014056248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016973131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009330873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5929835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017819708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004960822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23634396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}