{"meta":{"query_hash":"1a9492a278f4","filters":{"venue":"Harvard Law Review"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1a9492a278f4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Harvard+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W3124239048","doi":"","title":"Pseudo-Contract and Shared Meaning Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Severability; Frustration of purpose; Exclusion clause; Unconscionability; Contract theory; Law; Obligation; Law and economics; Contract management; Sociology; Political science; Privity of contract; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02490840732855197,"score_gpt":0.31745163871863824,"score_spread":0.29254323139008626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124239048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05148375,0.0023990895,0.6314699,0.021303324,0.00036639214,0.00044504402,0.000479766,0.000317006,0.29173574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86274385,0.000747666,0.121590294,0.0012824311,0.00025751314,0.0007892996,0.00034258925,0.00019202018,0.012054163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97255015,0.017142275,0.0010645774,0.002817514,0.0053421226,0.0010833103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982781,0.010603192,0.0013531246,0.0026626887,0.0020368884,0.00056301075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017795052,0.000678248,0.0009876522,0.004258103,0.006712798,0.009284521,0.0034923875,0.003414174,0.008672542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025798773,0.00046046756,0.001471942,0.0044508427,0.040165063,0.023746725,0.008678824,0.005523759,0.0007977057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004532097,0.0000034631782,0.00008579328,0.000012838451,0.0000025536604,0.000037688093,0.0021604693,0.00009853308,0.000026551375,0.9952586,0.0003340015,0.0019749682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036582758,0.000002939535,0.0000737827,0.00002595998,0.0000028450984,0.00003452066,0.0010562147,0.001133435,0.00007277096,0.9905255,0.0070629395,0.0000054678085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038787094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027404232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017795052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008574416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006064617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230203710","doi":"10.2307/1342538","title":"Separation of Powers. Foreign Affairs. Second Circuit Holds That the Revenue Rule Bars a Foreign Sovereign's Civil RICO Suit for Tax Revenue. Attorney General of Canada v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc., 268 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2001)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Revenue; Political science; Law; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03292282325789569,"score_gpt":0.23618552381226396,"score_spread":0.20326270055436826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230203710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002298985,0.036549594,0.0008376065,0.05714231,0.0028105632,0.00007541435,0.0015508421,0.0002103987,0.89852434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07892489,0.029347125,0.0011045254,0.12011786,0.0041538593,0.00032046126,0.0014965612,0.00017316958,0.76436156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980368,0.00016817577,0.000075619064,0.00025292853,0.00085624284,0.00061012275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988424,0.00036896332,0.00011995827,0.00010431591,0.00038728985,0.00017711495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011865834,0.0009089906,0.0004700851,0.0013543881,0.004262847,0.005404877,0.001245154,0.015515442,0.0692852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003146042,0.00064998027,0.00077654864,0.0015927887,0.00217963,0.0030149424,0.0017338317,0.007855324,0.02962352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029732466,0.00007650262,0.00052847,0.00012198962,0.000009696128,0.00029971488,0.00024512704,0.00010356314,0.00032070084,0.22932018,0.7354802,0.033464063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008337842,0.000048658556,0.004629774,0.00038455287,0.000028762892,0.00026239047,0.00017732146,0.00014117871,0.00030702868,0.03476795,0.95913917,0.000029803527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10126987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17538811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89873016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047530835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00777153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23178208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}