{"meta":{"query_hash":"fb4d2d65c5a6","filters":{"venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fb4d2d65c5a6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Harvard+journal+of+law+%26+public+policy%2FHarvard+journal+of+law+and+public+policy"},"results":[{"id":"W106247267","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sanctions; Institution; Family law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Lesbian; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024278939390909367,"score_gpt":0.331284516279577,"score_spread":0.30700557688866764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106247267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3026725,0.0008183157,0.00077749,0.028699985,0.00205055,0.0005940291,0.00034730486,0.0000834807,0.66395634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807761,0.0010623877,0.0007755791,0.002794999,0.013956705,0.0000047489,0.000007903381,0.00006888852,0.00055271067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193025,0.0013234263,0.0032121753,0.00036603987,0.0017330351,0.0014350533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908932,0.0004591773,0.0046434468,0.00048158746,0.0017775433,0.0017450545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073997397,0.0005381692,0.001756417,0.0013580149,0.0010202348,0.0019400984,0.0017718828,0.00045478667,0.0006962397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006622178,0.0004606654,0.00073737476,0.00079861545,0.0015294018,0.0062296945,0.00017138798,0.0009892902,0.000030172481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006794651,0.0004699379,0.004921244,0.00008054595,0.0003231176,0.000057110505,0.0012188064,0.00003693764,0.00052584003,0.98489046,0.0044274083,0.0029806418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002097489,0.00080026797,0.0038690402,0.00016013866,0.000112862646,0.0006150948,0.0007405467,0.00002562907,0.00017205473,0.052639984,0.9383073,0.00045963255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15167114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015793307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93387985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010720983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010479822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219804546","doi":"","title":"Applying the Holder Standard to Speech That Provides Material Support to Terrorism in United States V. Mehanna","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil liberties; Terrorism; Verdict; Conviction; Political science; Habeas corpus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03616701957154553,"score_gpt":0.3136454666598135,"score_spread":0.27747844708826797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219804546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6665294,0.00022562915,0.00056680624,0.2687687,0.002627545,0.003713349,0.00036677794,0.00010509289,0.057096682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97002757,0.0004940333,0.0003893861,0.022052849,0.0064249565,0.00009036936,0.000007894401,0.00007179834,0.00044116733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921734,0.0011134263,0.0022175834,0.00036099754,0.0023209972,0.0018136282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241585,0.00041564385,0.0018548131,0.0004002964,0.0025818623,0.0023315225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007112794,0.00054792746,0.0013065587,0.002103999,0.0011252281,0.0045964024,0.0018290582,0.00033084312,0.00076976046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020949678,0.00037932763,0.00037389563,0.0022049274,0.0007668244,0.0050760605,0.00035947093,0.00097569934,0.000111168454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077048934,0.0005619713,0.006275479,0.00026306332,0.0007596683,0.00031315975,0.03839235,0.00006175038,0.0014137472,0.85844547,0.061975203,0.030767664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012423451,0.0007569355,0.0009273772,0.00029544713,0.000047429956,0.0005344715,0.0042173853,0.0000038643,0.0003826987,0.015437739,0.9757203,0.0004339976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16826272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010702794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9137451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007007476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004533054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251022075","doi":"","title":"Cumulating Policy Consequences, Frightened Overreactions, and the Current Surge of Government's Size, Scope, and Power","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial crisis; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment; Economics; Economic policy; History; Economic growth; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.024385870989713756,"score_gpt":0.26138732005976084,"score_spread":0.23700144907004708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251022075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84093165,0.0067315977,0.00032252152,0.041899625,0.0016565573,0.00051492994,0.0015712345,0.000028889683,0.106343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813802,0.011366958,0.0004811053,0.0036572337,0.0028319706,0.0000061328014,0.0000045403476,0.0000590497,0.00021281016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412906,0.0003145128,0.0036544872,0.00043199724,0.00042689138,0.0010430603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031603,0.0012260057,0.0061682076,0.0005934059,0.0005948867,0.0011014431],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005496562,0.0005828718,0.0021395993,0.0012742403,0.00070586876,0.0011306447,0.0008934698,0.0003172274,0.0003118853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038245204,0.0004687557,0.0007567443,0.0008703511,0.0023752183,0.0030657295,0.00030432735,0.0015258474,0.00002408232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019927054,0.00019732754,0.01144063,0.000078670964,0.0006578607,0.000011761748,0.00059845496,0.000003958906,0.00019847477,0.9813058,0.0011673067,0.0041405293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048527806,0.00027739155,0.013501854,0.00013740084,0.00013507454,0.0015701993,0.0000837775,0.00006768037,0.00014241021,0.15205336,0.82666975,0.0005083065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015499592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00119481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8292524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032874584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016833893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327146077","doi":"","title":"Why Conservatives, and Others, Have Trouble Supporting the Meaningful Enforcement of Free Exercise Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free Exercise Clause; Establishment Clause; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Doctrine; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics; Supreme court; First amendment; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02843444887499543,"score_gpt":0.311693913125607,"score_spread":0.2832594642506116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W327146077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4670496,0.0009155377,0.00067372684,0.11356872,0.0029300074,0.0016296573,0.00028532048,0.00009780972,0.41284963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98710763,0.0008157073,0.0015686112,0.006511609,0.0034123424,0.000008725722,0.0000037026234,0.000059078484,0.0005126035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926891,0.0007602813,0.0027139524,0.00033230637,0.0020649622,0.0014394042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894046,0.0007780129,0.0051967953,0.00068766216,0.0023141424,0.0016187449],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009996175,0.00052408286,0.0013563085,0.0009825504,0.0014609525,0.0014525991,0.0020264369,0.00037796996,0.0011946937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027378965,0.00037220577,0.00055500347,0.0007566263,0.0032816725,0.0038383594,0.0003789186,0.0015321679,0.0000074057416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013808336,0.00021194889,0.004374909,0.00005753866,0.00039261524,0.000060598104,0.010695801,0.0000032888809,0.00046434609,0.9705209,0.0113458345,0.0017340922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022345902,0.0003551056,0.0010932296,0.000269119,0.00015556505,0.001044789,0.0017211182,0.000009866919,0.00048649358,0.06450728,0.92776495,0.00035786317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059140872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118505405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91641915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027345098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039702915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W346350779","doi":"","title":"Or for Poorer? How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Religious Liberty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Cohabitation; Legalization; Religious organization; Federal law; Sociology; Sex offender; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation","score_opus":0.04083509558818509,"score_gpt":0.32697521222981163,"score_spread":0.28614011664162653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W346350779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06662523,0.0015425587,0.009563766,0.2372548,0.003702058,0.0013934128,0.0010854776,0.0002053761,0.6786273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94918317,0.0029406152,0.00341277,0.025277797,0.014890706,0.0000067936608,0.000012333829,0.00008877445,0.00418703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225825,0.00069762993,0.0022612575,0.00039891485,0.0019430422,0.0024408775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98778623,0.0019988755,0.0030963456,0.00048070517,0.0032871952,0.003350664],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007654545,0.000661837,0.0015894829,0.0014242824,0.001688223,0.0017571677,0.0016573906,0.0005548589,0.00024359701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050147376,0.00050463347,0.0010561496,0.0011654211,0.0036372112,0.0032954088,0.00020718097,0.0011653769,0.00002639869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044564228,0.00027117005,0.0009952609,0.000050752293,0.00056363177,0.00023630097,0.0017567234,0.0000022886677,0.00008464055,0.9718411,0.017115792,0.0066367253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025747619,0.0009234793,0.0005203396,0.00012878986,0.00018387297,0.0031772426,0.0011809597,0.000002889107,0.00008169051,0.035167683,0.95551276,0.00054553256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018093942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051549245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010534828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017380198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}