{"meta":{"query_hash":"fb4d2d65c5a6","filters":{"venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fb4d2d65c5a6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Harvard+journal+of+law+%26+public+policy%2FHarvard+journal+of+law+and+public+policy"},"results":[{"id":"W106247267","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sanctions; Institution; Family law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Lesbian; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024278939390909367,"score_gpt":0.331284516279577,"score_spread":0.30700557688866764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106247267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19467181,0.0073541068,0.053516615,0.012881049,0.0005590168,0.00039341045,0.0005953865,0.00005756428,0.72997105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724639,0.0030761075,0.0044106906,0.00078872585,0.00041759977,0.00017042074,0.00019579481,0.000026552332,0.018450169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963517,0.0012773895,0.00010380572,0.00018742695,0.0016298998,0.00044975194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890326,0.007785447,0.0010388856,0.0005250608,0.0011161735,0.0005018297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005320034,0.00047400792,0.00069745525,0.0033560488,0.0018148732,0.0056888866,0.0015305249,0.002303242,0.01312633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021247456,0.0003248447,0.0011033762,0.0020259656,0.004236863,0.0052921567,0.002232963,0.002898295,0.00041651196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029953793,0.00006733475,0.0025681495,0.000034550467,0.000014164751,0.00008891977,0.0000728497,0.0067031477,0.00003848451,0.9800047,0.0017705865,0.008607213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037385966,0.00015547624,0.007718151,0.00024430917,0.000046334128,0.00028368508,0.0010942825,0.06311526,0.00020685288,0.88925534,0.037793607,0.00004923506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042266417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029650133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044045667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024206939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043911994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219804546","doi":"","title":"Applying the Holder Standard to Speech That Provides Material Support to Terrorism in United States V. Mehanna","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil liberties; Terrorism; Verdict; Conviction; Political science; Habeas corpus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03616701957154553,"score_gpt":0.3136454666598135,"score_spread":0.27747844708826797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219804546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30936813,0.004909531,0.010432018,0.15402304,0.00642731,0.0007819641,0.00057166955,0.0003165063,0.5131698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541934,0.0010813451,0.004305082,0.11075851,0.0015095449,0.00064264593,0.00014688366,0.00007890132,0.027283652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785685,0.008099583,0.0014478103,0.0025020847,0.005368756,0.0040133023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699972,0.02296094,0.0016506052,0.0015688617,0.0027581158,0.0010642239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032092284,0.00075200445,0.0007270822,0.0023020732,0.013346467,0.011041809,0.003166491,0.02780788,0.004847367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059127163,0.0011347024,0.0010852447,0.0011238004,0.012210393,0.007651064,0.009644058,0.023887772,0.001010013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003424068,0.00020734835,0.006776478,0.0002800804,0.00008049224,0.0051884525,0.029863404,0.00043773244,0.002776949,0.87411356,0.056606192,0.023326954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006237513,0.0017392846,0.035521295,0.0035647904,0.00069617113,0.0021849861,0.043844935,0.0026564768,0.015656173,0.2844425,0.60837585,0.0006938238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041236255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06445377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041236255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053978637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010990156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16972226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251022075","doi":"","title":"Cumulating Policy Consequences, Frightened Overreactions, and the Current Surge of Government's Size, Scope, and Power","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial crisis; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment; Economics; Economic policy; History; Economic growth; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.024385870989713756,"score_gpt":0.26138732005976084,"score_spread":0.23700144907004708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251022075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1928232,0.00989519,0.0005932505,0.4834938,0.0018919338,0.000023068998,0.00028518378,0.00006319523,0.31093124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691869,0.0040244986,0.0001872787,0.017283652,0.0006292353,0.000019348088,0.000055864642,0.000016790524,0.008596601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970138,0.001167668,0.00009363826,0.00022543942,0.0004813871,0.0010180416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539834,0.0015846859,0.0010057451,0.00020150402,0.00084978034,0.0009600091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002907133,0.0001905428,0.0001178866,0.0011374371,0.0041676788,0.007680554,0.0005637436,0.0026130814,0.007909226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008580811,0.00012669656,0.00016955007,0.0013858725,0.008894541,0.004097146,0.0025610426,0.002889548,0.0006122651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016544606,0.00015628099,0.038335957,0.0002494351,0.000023529174,0.00094439083,0.038822033,0.00080033264,0.0007473461,0.6224593,0.17878146,0.11851451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025408475,0.000117135416,0.12136559,0.0012196895,0.000018625493,0.00041294412,0.16518164,0.0006213758,0.0007623445,0.15919496,0.55101013,0.00007017526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017393854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027769754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017393854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010810828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006748211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0784384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327146077","doi":"","title":"Why Conservatives, and Others, Have Trouble Supporting the Meaningful Enforcement of Free Exercise Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free Exercise Clause; Establishment Clause; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Doctrine; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics; Supreme court; First amendment; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02843444887499543,"score_gpt":0.311693913125607,"score_spread":0.2832594642506116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W327146077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0765606,0.0045190277,0.0035634376,0.7887784,0.0020588494,0.000031893298,0.000047196594,0.00010827533,0.12433229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534538,0.0021083213,0.0016543124,0.12659703,0.0015341515,0.000053458007,0.000025405183,0.000067596724,0.01450598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891277,0.0042914283,0.000249352,0.0011977619,0.0027550978,0.002378649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841561,0.0071853427,0.0019554207,0.001372074,0.0030076983,0.0023233134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012789199,0.0001934694,0.0005177465,0.0011088812,0.011551125,0.011566156,0.0015151837,0.010406846,0.0041692364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028303947,0.00040433055,0.00027784015,0.0011200929,0.028543979,0.009220719,0.0036439332,0.009925308,0.0012556082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037692153,0.00008084945,0.006296346,0.00011562245,0.000026119997,0.00045057663,0.037327766,0.00014738215,0.0006638161,0.78419334,0.13715802,0.033502474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007691194,0.000057637677,0.00791031,0.0005302037,0.000029262024,0.00034013094,0.06503857,0.00041468116,0.00093220896,0.3227092,0.6018442,0.000116691095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148306945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017522277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0148306945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031032541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06763661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W346350779","doi":"","title":"Or for Poorer? How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Religious Liberty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Cohabitation; Legalization; Religious organization; Federal law; Sociology; Sex offender; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation","score_opus":0.04083509558818509,"score_gpt":0.32697521222981163,"score_spread":0.28614011664162653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W346350779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045036282,0.013257498,0.0013077051,0.44228587,0.002776345,0.000036070465,0.00022028635,0.00003661694,0.4950433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84969354,0.00992556,0.00047900592,0.05506595,0.0021517375,0.00004952343,0.000085290994,0.000049032245,0.08250038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983724,0.00070839014,0.00003060724,0.00018988227,0.00024441758,0.0004543308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870276,0.0004896416,0.00017532507,0.000100383404,0.00014398678,0.0003878897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199682,0.00017515454,0.00025939755,0.00048218164,0.0065226103,0.0049702567,0.0007902947,0.0030369097,0.036231194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055220695,0.0001274923,0.00028316272,0.000512537,0.013338377,0.0054390687,0.0033920638,0.004910723,0.0025386454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017504151,0.00003668011,0.0017229308,0.000041722313,0.000005697357,0.0002732934,0.009459831,0.000072857845,0.00006680266,0.9136697,0.053457092,0.02117587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001647393,0.000041104446,0.004922428,0.00055298925,0.000010006564,0.0005279177,0.03357781,0.00023172301,0.00010342028,0.40299907,0.5569984,0.000018596564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008966485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01245211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036231194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003949926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021728696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12120539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}