{"meta":{"query_hash":"82ecc873d10d","filters":{"venue":"Hasanuddin Law Review"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/82ecc873d10d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hasanuddin+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W3027036673","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v6i1.2136","title":"Letter of Credit Disputes from an Arbitration Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hasanuddin Law Review","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Arbitration; Perspective (graphical); Letter of credit; Arbitration clause; Business; Law; Law and economics; Federal Arbitration Act; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.059005734911435286,"score_gpt":0.28742399123440115,"score_spread":0.22841825632296586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027036673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00747182,0.0494971,0.015102486,0.27932882,0.0023599546,0.0020911312,0.00026145283,0.000559632,0.6433276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7505876,0.0018284412,0.00078266684,0.23944937,0.0069468934,0.00002342726,0.00031561553,0.000028879424,0.00003713028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910736,0.0000145694485,0.00029775675,0.0002459593,0.00022813714,0.000106186824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994125,0.000035972793,0.00019783567,0.00014879084,0.00018803666,0.000016889324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010515515,0.0001221895,0.00026915202,0.000018150755,0.00004939981,0.00008253602,0.00023220731,0.00003233484,0.0012612377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018999186,0.00010496927,0.00010249533,0.00012180786,0.00012141382,0.00080174947,0.000046271798,0.00008704017,0.00020658321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009145924,0.000054660897,0.0002117266,0.000643961,0.000031656746,0.000003850989,0.000040991526,0.00000331952,0.00021799933,0.9434423,0.05493226,0.00040812665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022663194,0.000024682698,0.00073730014,0.0007473909,0.00014798906,3.4355193e-7,0.000030772466,0.0012059858,0.00019175162,0.01684141,0.97964966,0.00019609928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011351189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007367232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015681211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000090806125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580446","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v10i2.4844","title":"The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hasanuddin Law Review","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Statutory law; Constitutional court; Political science; Normative; Common law; Constitution; Comparative law; Constitutionalism; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Democracy","score_opus":0.06222128390569034,"score_gpt":0.35073816140102093,"score_spread":0.2885168774953306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400580446","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071970284,0.78446347,0.00012810221,0.0511461,0.0008013468,0.010083263,0.00015225325,0.00015761024,0.08109754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954084,0.003631508,0.000015942791,0.00045186284,0.00012610698,0.00023713286,0.0000029506216,0.0000066665775,0.000119397875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984792,0.00037606593,0.00040943435,0.00019370094,0.00031788365,0.00022374112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832016,0.0012923152,0.00009736366,0.00015492791,0.00009696346,0.000038270868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029488627,0.00011507572,0.00033934147,0.000015556767,0.0011665297,0.00013077617,0.00021171056,0.00004382223,0.0000027885083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058132246,0.00005614788,0.00008510351,0.00025949924,0.00060981186,0.00013074014,0.000039436614,0.00010824051,0.0000025274378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039857337,0.000025763504,0.00025353295,0.0021947569,0.000013646652,0.00000691464,0.0020211476,0.000012390222,0.0000020546063,0.9938798,0.00088127767,0.0007047176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008753105,0.000059490038,0.0003862299,0.0066486443,0.000070691836,0.000017490938,0.0012468896,0.00018299601,0.000008114568,0.00817517,0.9829677,0.00014910295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006963236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038001504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98570466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038124075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054957178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}