{"meta":{"query_hash":"82ecc873d10d","filters":{"venue":"Hasanuddin Law Review"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/82ecc873d10d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hasanuddin+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W3027036673","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v6i1.2136","title":"Letter of Credit Disputes from an Arbitration Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hasanuddin Law Review","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Arbitration; Perspective (graphical); Letter of credit; Arbitration clause; Business; Law; Law and economics; Federal Arbitration Act; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.059005734911435286,"score_gpt":0.28742399123440115,"score_spread":0.22841825632296586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027036673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026479168,0.030978864,0.022505768,0.09942469,0.0020524636,0.00013682255,0.00014152743,0.00003916224,0.8182416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87155503,0.012616627,0.007846172,0.020258456,0.003794325,0.00020399269,0.00010542456,0.000045059838,0.08357488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9691943,0.014333127,0.0020437662,0.002364569,0.008091845,0.003972466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485446,0.008853429,0.0013832222,0.0007978024,0.003493142,0.0006179289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013891042,0.00038978108,0.0007965868,0.0036941096,0.010553362,0.02671932,0.0024802596,0.017121125,0.013633641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027974248,0.00037248552,0.0010822177,0.005040952,0.013812566,0.014770854,0.0046835537,0.008130437,0.0024521134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012957799,0.000017216169,0.0001918606,0.00006278727,0.000004685598,0.00030659357,0.0015991565,0.00016740718,0.00009112818,0.98575747,0.006356066,0.0054325373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028181383,0.00005136454,0.0011171376,0.0002763167,0.000016879241,0.00087150914,0.0035003114,0.0011168858,0.0003559172,0.6788247,0.31378564,0.000055050117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051346347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003488521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02671932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011509847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053151716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08351022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580446","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v10i2.4844","title":"The Proportionality Test Models of Competing Rights Cases in the Civil and Common Law Systems: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hasanuddin Law Review","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Statutory law; Constitutional court; Political science; Normative; Common law; Constitution; Comparative law; Constitutionalism; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Democracy","score_opus":0.06222128390569034,"score_gpt":0.35073816140102093,"score_spread":0.2885168774953306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400580446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10937664,0.008811706,0.26763833,0.046155572,0.0006588553,0.0005240639,0.00025283243,0.00014907317,0.56643295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428402,0.0026710895,0.031439286,0.0016791271,0.0003045528,0.00044911416,0.00009509328,0.000059108992,0.020462366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902597,0.0057787835,0.00041402635,0.0009667083,0.0020599798,0.0005208889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98219806,0.01306812,0.001272085,0.001199357,0.0018235962,0.0004388195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011488925,0.00049210095,0.00095735193,0.0021621438,0.002040882,0.005959416,0.0021375094,0.0024971983,0.008233629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025770316,0.00041680704,0.0015599078,0.0016016718,0.011996534,0.012869931,0.0030369253,0.005079155,0.0007464503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051223215,0.000014987365,0.00047842553,0.000025305233,0.0000062359127,0.000120848,0.00025605145,0.0013475515,0.00002112056,0.992661,0.000863418,0.0041998248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009698947,0.00001571822,0.0007130685,0.00007855986,0.000010290876,0.00014310573,0.0003164879,0.014275747,0.00007055902,0.9769693,0.0073811286,0.000016283626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006748869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050473153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011488925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059806705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045336736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06076002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}