{"meta":{"query_hash":"753ccf39cc4a","filters":{"venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/753ccf39cc4a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hastings+constitutional+law+quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W101281661","doi":"","title":"There's an Amendment for That: A Comprehensive Application of Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence to Smart Phones","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Jurisprudence; Law; First amendment; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.035894884713311266,"score_gpt":0.3193175211676829,"score_spread":0.28342263645437166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101281661","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48487294,0.00004360741,0.5018881,0.0030859418,0.0011630256,0.0024187944,0.00045123752,0.0001762896,0.0059000584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867768,0.000002487942,0.011910379,0.00035524345,0.0003141258,0.0005406386,0.00007217136,0.000007060118,0.00002106335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845004,0.00007181489,0.0002933877,0.00039397326,0.00047904105,0.00031172464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869627,0.00017861792,0.00021953046,0.00031987735,0.00037873004,0.0002069588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051740353,0.00015437203,0.00020201896,0.00007094054,0.00082250824,0.00010512411,0.0004345161,0.00010252557,0.0000603656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008889492,0.00015849716,0.00007457597,0.00015360543,0.0011979113,0.00048518664,0.00004243344,0.00015230702,0.000034984245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083307634,0.00019603243,0.0004310908,0.000024904824,0.00001610416,6.699888e-7,0.0031178286,0.000009634943,0.037709564,0.9494746,0.00021224958,0.008724026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022407055,0.0019941165,0.0027626073,0.00015994323,0.000109704175,0.000025102076,0.010181076,0.0010972515,0.01879861,0.14297998,0.81859887,0.0010520612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066901348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008009376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072182724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002513379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136017761","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On The Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Legislature; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Popular sovereignty; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Politics; Charter; Judicial interpretation; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy","score_opus":0.04084824629556707,"score_gpt":0.25498193038083716,"score_spread":0.2141336840852701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136017761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070141695,0.0044045458,0.00024002042,0.011656103,0.0009103121,0.0005318954,0.00008704016,0.000041482446,0.9119869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592483,0.0002565801,0.00008574695,0.0035219144,0.00015995941,0.000017892975,9.342475e-7,0.000002939574,0.00002919496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.0001950571,0.00029973,0.00024125802,0.00046890602,0.00022381237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893117,0.00056725607,0.0001596109,0.00010825629,0.00015358563,0.00008012606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070445257,0.00014387266,0.00023256824,0.000017030852,0.0014465656,0.000021771713,0.00016761087,0.00005974789,0.00034689796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003782185,0.00008649739,0.000088386376,0.00012591002,0.011001917,0.0001412484,0.00004357601,0.0002164948,0.000007570578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758032,0.00004035842,0.0012465459,0.000008022497,0.000034288914,0.0000024118058,0.0022232975,1.1254891e-7,0.000011773999,0.9950257,0.000697891,0.0006720115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043430278,0.00036706598,0.0035133506,0.0012121019,0.00015319874,0.000025338779,0.0036971353,0.000007027432,0.000041552827,0.78796315,0.20224518,0.0003405828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010253048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009500723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92578316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026094433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032451702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219763656","doi":"","title":"Alive Not Dead: The Revival of Redevelopment Post-Matosantos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Business; Law; Archaeology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.022846854984921675,"score_gpt":0.26711302357829364,"score_spread":0.24426616859337197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219763656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05479123,0.00031936466,0.019955486,0.015597003,0.0013290006,0.00082507636,0.000114700895,0.0002171595,0.906851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656665,0.0000075055486,0.0012107893,0.0011997566,0.00026904317,0.000025738453,0.0000110726905,0.000004326552,0.0007050905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982425,0.00019171945,0.0004002138,0.00022863943,0.0006495288,0.00028740175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828476,0.00071955135,0.00023060746,0.00014606125,0.0005315554,0.00008748509],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096198905,0.00013894033,0.00022632272,0.00003946463,0.0014790082,0.00007279793,0.0002627227,0.00006670554,0.00020097512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045288552,0.00010349901,0.00009652355,0.00016818182,0.0033320638,0.00019877344,0.00002274218,0.00011474507,0.00007269601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018457862,0.000029045606,0.0008766281,0.000008774174,0.00003730386,7.9861996e-7,0.010305668,0.000003311298,0.00029223922,0.9839238,0.00094079244,0.0035631827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011113079,0.00036993535,0.0065467185,0.00030473195,0.00011407836,0.000028114726,0.017211348,0.00014058758,0.00067128654,0.019828212,0.95303124,0.0006424278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016242483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011158378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052729414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003948355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279239915","doi":"","title":"Clearly Canadian--Hill v. Colorado and Free Speech Balancing in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Political science; Gerontology; Audiology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011001466962115729,"score_gpt":0.21750728369628577,"score_spread":0.20650581673417004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279239915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93252116,0.00015609764,0.0008091551,0.012535029,0.00034331158,0.0003587111,0.00016142998,0.000039042654,0.05307605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971275,0.000027327269,0.000117738164,0.0023770072,0.00014505525,0.0000068054605,0.0000307595,0.0000038890194,0.00016397345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986618,0.00016797463,0.0001992653,0.0002097248,0.0003460622,0.00041518421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990393,0.0004383138,0.00005551617,0.00011040455,0.00011088803,0.0002455962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075395324,0.00011442418,0.00013152383,0.00007897663,0.0011711634,0.0002162899,0.00021554943,0.00007426944,0.000056358753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012649741,0.000092446535,0.000015232665,0.0002601298,0.010508966,0.00023119304,0.000009462503,0.0001756383,0.0000032589378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070150736,0.000008594668,0.011893548,0.0000034288066,0.0000063934162,0.00014396459,0.0043820343,0.000008222272,0.0000038568883,0.98133993,0.0017188676,0.00048415174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010185476,0.00013180835,0.0073604966,0.00008027528,0.000023375174,0.00020708928,0.018952642,0.0005348122,0.0000017700213,0.04764282,0.92365134,0.00039500883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021017282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013516007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99218386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267274023","doi":"","title":"\"Bring Your Own Devices\": A Cautionary Tale for Public Employees During Investigatory Searches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Advertising; History; Business","score_opus":0.04775836630640407,"score_gpt":0.2624044763976631,"score_spread":0.21464611009125906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W267274023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19173443,0.000043585176,0.7980401,0.0033123372,0.00041016017,0.00043348974,0.00004681559,0.00069150876,0.005287572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092113,1.3514942e-7,0.08934361,0.00082544074,0.00028416715,0.00012613287,0.000042193595,0.000015682184,0.00015135051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997545,0.000096718824,0.0005233469,0.0006716424,0.0005432062,0.0006200946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789083,0.0005045236,0.00022348406,0.00049877656,0.00060949265,0.00027290525],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007848976,0.00026948476,0.00025417117,0.00023818506,0.0013438895,0.0006636377,0.0008487825,0.00010849141,0.000018064935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044950188,0.00028849905,0.00012797254,0.00058043987,0.0013918563,0.0019829557,0.00015313482,0.00026504014,0.00011890217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042693946,0.000066171706,0.0034744083,0.000056941033,0.000031187312,0.0000050501494,0.00041902508,0.0000974721,0.0013594761,0.9925618,0.0002584649,0.0016657078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007725122,0.001954753,0.06947358,0.0012666937,0.00012747772,0.001933175,0.00097352185,0.060210995,0.0047128247,0.31680182,0.5300855,0.004734555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008004392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006122774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71747684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001519033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063410867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797551927","doi":"","title":"Striking the Right Balance: Hate Speech Laws in Japan, the United States, and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Law; Balance (ability); Doctrine; Legislation; Political science; Constitutional right; Marketplace of ideas; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; First amendment; Psychology","score_opus":0.0069795281344962115,"score_gpt":0.2018759241549634,"score_spread":0.19489639602046718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797551927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897693,0.0001295578,0.08159226,0.010149854,0.0015780489,0.0005406904,0.000044678083,0.00019243137,0.016003182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651265,0.000003864416,0.0011614125,0.0020202636,0.00015788367,0.00001320621,0.0000134336,0.000004059632,0.00011321126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986157,0.000099653196,0.0002544697,0.000313351,0.00036269677,0.00035417548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991135,0.0002462613,0.00010515793,0.00029468464,0.00016352242,0.00007685014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048746978,0.00015355328,0.000119189,0.000055819262,0.0009166123,0.0003188906,0.00048981624,0.0000452502,0.000019348681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032366093,0.00009639724,0.000022599192,0.00043395182,0.0011546715,0.00028312378,0.00005172736,0.00025837432,0.000010340281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010890094,0.00001371734,0.00065063767,0.000005346971,0.000013928576,0.00003753094,0.00053223956,0.00007253715,0.00019021232,0.9912495,0.0012474795,0.0059759906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014256026,0.00049771066,0.0066157966,0.0002585095,0.000024001882,0.0011354608,0.00083070877,0.097132914,0.0021985394,0.02660427,0.8625573,0.000719205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34806406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5569016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009680566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003670655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71613735","doi":"","title":"Thawing a Frozen Treaty: Protecting United States Interests in the Arctic with a Congressional-Executive Agreement on the Law of the Sea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Treaty; Agreement; Political science; Arctic; The arctic; Executive branch; Oceanography; Geology; Philosophy; Legislature","score_opus":0.030375795258119852,"score_gpt":0.29597146030326626,"score_spread":0.2655956650451464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71613735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905132,0.000063479674,0.001563019,0.06719034,0.00025616717,0.0021974412,0.00007819121,0.000057397938,0.33808073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971031,0.0000011621406,0.00009668912,0.0025181894,0.000104436745,0.000049296836,0.0000040394075,0.000004653316,0.00011842617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979931,0.0004869664,0.0002957832,0.00020189988,0.000647898,0.00037435227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968925,0.0024957492,0.00023568013,0.00016753106,0.00016101889,0.000047501515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019307578,0.00015967061,0.00016097812,0.000054771896,0.0022776427,0.00006414663,0.00034908156,0.000049361992,0.000025206979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030322865,0.00006901798,0.00007169526,0.00044596937,0.005723809,0.0001058811,0.000034370463,0.000383804,0.0000063294838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088353765,0.00007431884,0.006124918,0.000010083488,0.000052880387,0.0000088019915,0.049319007,0.000029540663,0.000008223782,0.94397795,0.00014424231,0.00016169238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037445729,0.0019438459,0.06253783,0.0068841046,0.00024978863,0.00013126196,0.7087051,0.00032117162,0.00059645687,0.12840389,0.08541555,0.0010664263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025759747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033856835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81557405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001268779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019808243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}