{"meta":{"query_hash":"753ccf39cc4a","filters":{"venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/753ccf39cc4a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hastings+constitutional+law+quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W101281661","doi":"","title":"There's an Amendment for That: A Comprehensive Application of Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence to Smart Phones","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Jurisprudence; Law; First amendment; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.035894884713311266,"score_gpt":0.3193175211676829,"score_spread":0.28342263645437166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101281661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03393513,0.007178547,0.060095925,0.34000233,0.0029469111,0.00041920578,0.00054382905,0.00023836974,0.5546398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7140653,0.0032419472,0.028889272,0.16814952,0.0022992424,0.0011160686,0.0002724972,0.00015327455,0.08181288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9524186,0.019164653,0.0031478137,0.0055287117,0.014828563,0.004911639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95424026,0.033494614,0.0013221774,0.0059237233,0.004086841,0.0009323476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042417422,0.0006963123,0.0017141323,0.0027342685,0.011971747,0.018147584,0.0044821487,0.02719462,0.0034928122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06211771,0.0013634592,0.0030266922,0.0025861901,0.04766132,0.01531493,0.010722804,0.020711122,0.0011006288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005200423,0.000012381861,0.00012917216,0.000015524218,0.0000059790545,0.000086358945,0.0015003186,0.00013484349,0.000084424595,0.990577,0.0057076355,0.0017412552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059773414,0.00006991893,0.0009208247,0.0006626996,0.00004675705,0.00023980293,0.0023468896,0.0012308491,0.00061827176,0.7630104,0.23066546,0.00012837867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030981103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026344918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042417422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009766849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021413298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22432745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136017761","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On The Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Legislature; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Popular sovereignty; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Politics; Charter; Judicial interpretation; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy","score_opus":0.04084824629556707,"score_gpt":0.25498193038083716,"score_spread":0.2141336840852701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136017761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116071805,0.016107392,0.009453831,0.059728272,0.00033157185,0.000038418737,0.00004835763,0.00004895034,0.7981713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97762454,0.0028883175,0.00093096483,0.0038608683,0.00025017542,0.000017016,0.000012048143,0.000018702289,0.014397226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953868,0.0020350611,0.00011230157,0.00050039135,0.00097533513,0.0009901273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317825,0.00519582,0.00040633322,0.000282026,0.00073083607,0.00020675814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070329527,0.0001322953,0.00024520344,0.0017020962,0.006534419,0.010461028,0.001040043,0.003683978,0.0022625807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007314689,0.00024828146,0.00019898893,0.0014643784,0.027714482,0.00474282,0.0019496982,0.00392029,0.00019847655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063143616,0.0000050342383,0.00029940504,0.0000097502325,0.0000016050714,0.0000658578,0.0058002225,0.00007543329,0.000064091364,0.98800105,0.0010779039,0.00459334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004762817,0.00007406105,0.0071173236,0.0006640991,0.00003505373,0.0004942558,0.01880947,0.002248472,0.0019834582,0.5148307,0.4536023,0.00009323196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067624055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10661683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067624055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01919793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011723084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13929135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219763656","doi":"","title":"Alive Not Dead: The Revival of Redevelopment Post-Matosantos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Business; Law; Archaeology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.022846854984921675,"score_gpt":0.26711302357829364,"score_spread":0.24426616859337197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219763656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.417433,0.0072753327,0.0030682187,0.14516877,0.008066316,0.0002550427,0.0004714348,0.00045323087,0.4178086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75907147,0.0028518257,0.0010605735,0.07380461,0.0016105724,0.0001664058,0.00025653106,0.00017487643,0.16100307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991147,0.0010220812,0.0004375368,0.0016313703,0.0035168524,0.0022452294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926858,0.003361801,0.0009591723,0.00059883273,0.0011939866,0.0012004529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073192613,0.00028030237,0.00042415338,0.0012718326,0.018291825,0.013365613,0.0030858403,0.008834624,0.0045350767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024995578,0.0009871357,0.000702711,0.00092258933,0.009756648,0.0042730663,0.005922001,0.018026093,0.00073824986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002645031,0.00031258538,0.014652591,0.00027553062,0.00007534348,0.008789075,0.07063949,0.0008597676,0.002276128,0.55576223,0.27032718,0.07576565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005456028,0.00018236433,0.025100634,0.00055076636,0.00006874895,0.0008107211,0.021836214,0.0005587982,0.0030005022,0.01060615,0.93706137,0.00016915493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09919951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18304406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09919951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012403213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018510045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19724417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279239915","doi":"","title":"Clearly Canadian--Hill v. Colorado and Free Speech Balancing in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Political science; Gerontology; Audiology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011001466962115729,"score_gpt":0.21750728369628577,"score_spread":0.20650581673417004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279239915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058649387,0.0071165618,0.0017641826,0.080349885,0.00058563333,0.00007939128,0.000562521,0.000039554066,0.8508529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.843322,0.0033465764,0.0014670328,0.025110992,0.00015140553,0.000062444844,0.00020717236,0.000025358038,0.12630704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612206,0.00038204013,0.00006497968,0.00036570654,0.0013751392,0.001690111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742943,0.0008047376,0.00013789184,0.00006878315,0.0011029269,0.00045620432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022028405,0.0002321302,0.00032831248,0.0013759263,0.019568743,0.007490345,0.0010768848,0.0057415753,0.009109272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065013985,0.00029061487,0.00038170672,0.0017789021,0.009138725,0.0020975322,0.0018843416,0.0035797753,0.0004196131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017899854,0.000009992887,0.0023399699,0.000045063447,0.000010968865,0.00020180768,0.0045123873,0.00024335226,0.00018770939,0.9450639,0.039874673,0.007492307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008396409,0.00004524105,0.02714884,0.00078408036,0.00014310643,0.00043065712,0.02246915,0.0014531678,0.0014275495,0.15663366,0.78912497,0.00025570084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98641324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99576014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062343106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062343106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09215462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45233303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267274023","doi":"","title":"\"Bring Your Own Devices\": A Cautionary Tale for Public Employees During Investigatory Searches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Advertising; History; Business","score_opus":0.04775836630640407,"score_gpt":0.2624044763976631,"score_spread":0.21464611009125906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W267274023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009556217,0.0034398595,0.005491509,0.93034995,0.002279754,0.00009680586,0.000037753533,0.00022277547,0.0485253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13441256,0.0020696474,0.0059114923,0.8169231,0.002934623,0.00031221923,0.000036580237,0.0001972367,0.037202675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9504484,0.02287649,0.0028739246,0.0056714714,0.011033397,0.00709633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073386,0.06595052,0.0044546486,0.007673913,0.010340274,0.0042419448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04373559,0.0007917873,0.0014802029,0.0012955411,0.026603857,0.022929836,0.006939184,0.059412736,0.004414778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097031474,0.0013713731,0.0018391125,0.0011074841,0.0327851,0.023791876,0.0084503,0.05694945,0.002761932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006478169,0.0001107695,0.0045057833,0.00023983781,0.000036191832,0.0034238514,0.091197774,0.00019478297,0.0012549142,0.34735903,0.5153453,0.036266893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007615671,0.000111877685,0.00282985,0.0017229293,0.00007684314,0.0027406432,0.057098992,0.00080150407,0.0014632508,0.0984736,0.8343331,0.00027127555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032893226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058142703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059412736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072114295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028539807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23129869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797551927","doi":"","title":"Striking the Right Balance: Hate Speech Laws in Japan, the United States, and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Law; Balance (ability); Doctrine; Legislation; Political science; Constitutional right; Marketplace of ideas; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; First amendment; Psychology","score_opus":0.0069795281344962115,"score_gpt":0.2018759241549634,"score_spread":0.19489639602046718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797551927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4000607,0.35378218,0.00068395527,0.026402894,0.00060157647,0.00009066808,0.0008749231,0.000028170392,0.21747492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8273269,0.1612355,0.0006035982,0.00396539,0.00007048548,0.000026175438,0.00032460512,0.000018951057,0.0064284937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997593,0.00021099673,0.00011481325,0.00015804869,0.0011373236,0.0007858447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469924,0.00079825567,0.0005005729,0.00008013827,0.0034002748,0.00052150124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341619,0.00028181958,0.00049917854,0.0059893103,0.008404811,0.005624195,0.0009869565,0.0014684127,0.0015883272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005712956,0.00024189841,0.0005032552,0.010874939,0.005222776,0.0025579042,0.0013714574,0.002112983,0.00006294458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034401056,0.00019379407,0.11506502,0.005426499,0.00033938914,0.003931597,0.15042101,0.0027475413,0.0019020974,0.41756517,0.039626665,0.26243722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042076612,0.00009856752,0.35171875,0.0058911154,0.00056416396,0.00051101495,0.18257236,0.0009439601,0.0009960978,0.009267242,0.44716707,0.00022766629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09806719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09806719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13525163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71153057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71613735","doi":"","title":"Thawing a Frozen Treaty: Protecting United States Interests in the Arctic with a Congressional-Executive Agreement on the Law of the Sea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Treaty; Agreement; Political science; Arctic; The arctic; Executive branch; Oceanography; Geology; Philosophy; Legislature","score_opus":0.030375795258119852,"score_gpt":0.29597146030326626,"score_spread":0.2655956650451464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71613735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025983462,0.01008463,0.0027790966,0.2125515,0.020416893,0.00008088403,0.00020879462,0.00010172936,0.727793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30793905,0.009983875,0.00502976,0.2011322,0.008598399,0.00020790612,0.00051921315,0.00022962599,0.4663599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753773,0.0009920781,0.00009506087,0.00022011694,0.00064030476,0.0005147589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981223,0.00069102633,0.00012708039,0.00015515253,0.00043375324,0.0004707164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004420434,0.00035789458,0.00021055376,0.0005881114,0.012677148,0.0105330115,0.00090096245,0.00540741,0.010350074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007597171,0.00026781633,0.00041926705,0.00071393413,0.0047210283,0.0036107718,0.0029490972,0.00952653,0.0023152428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076691496,0.000051826337,0.0011270152,0.00007214724,0.000011048194,0.000640011,0.004654599,0.0003526497,0.0007777128,0.46593848,0.49428526,0.03201246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012302788,0.000035697783,0.0014244507,0.00027195373,0.000011302987,0.000075677584,0.003405722,0.00014549724,0.00037617728,0.018501628,0.9757126,0.000026976184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04316025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106425546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04316025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045964243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016044045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08581805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}