{"meta":{"query_hash":"8262aeeccc8a","filters":{"venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8262aeeccc8a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hastings+international+and+comparative+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2766588972","doi":"","title":"The Reception and Processing of Minors in the United States in Comparison to that of Australia and Canada: Would Being a Party to the UN Convention on the Right of the Child Make a Difference in U.S. Courts?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1313900174322631,"score_gpt":0.3989942105164902,"score_spread":0.2676041930842271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766588972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.421355,0.047373544,0.00022169219,0.34797943,0.0021101085,0.00011058788,0.0008678143,0.000017884373,0.17996387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8991457,0.026501426,0.00021757424,0.055857953,0.0006910043,0.000044604458,0.00027682193,0.000021967075,0.01724296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969722,0.00068908074,0.000091269256,0.00017172821,0.0008832805,0.0011924065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938094,0.0010437223,0.00080032035,0.0001019391,0.002060412,0.002184242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023125294,0.00012721494,0.00015568353,0.0011300854,0.008475364,0.0048363935,0.0010419526,0.0019178714,0.00562567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009497934,0.00022832134,0.0001876451,0.0016484444,0.0061472184,0.0016279536,0.0022081179,0.003180232,0.00036763283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028115258,0.0002441564,0.19513226,0.0008834414,0.00006535291,0.0036824038,0.15054919,0.00031193282,0.0009074717,0.1403081,0.347638,0.15999651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000203388,0.00009927017,0.3324041,0.0030372965,0.000039904506,0.0010890043,0.25968385,0.00019332596,0.00049258553,0.0041047893,0.3987583,0.00007724543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8899637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9530524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11003631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026958672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07091617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22136861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888987638","doi":"","title":"A Moral Imperative: The Human Rights Implications of Climate Change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Human rights; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.1158296866413907,"score_gpt":0.35171973932693484,"score_spread":0.23589005268554414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888987638","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011135736,0.008170577,0.0070030987,0.5253377,0.0020635177,0.000029862293,0.000046225166,0.000018256369,0.44619507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7776721,0.0062780776,0.0033203415,0.16028716,0.004242389,0.00013979137,0.000034382476,0.00003443797,0.047991354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891214,0.0063828337,0.0002012334,0.000705394,0.0022088303,0.0013801886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919478,0.005749141,0.00040122116,0.00038819155,0.0010344689,0.00047914212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010608909,0.0002977222,0.00032209855,0.0006513697,0.0075653177,0.006250295,0.0011497216,0.009968636,0.0042865286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013346467,0.00021893108,0.0004522693,0.0005545933,0.034722075,0.006458589,0.004147634,0.010784985,0.0005010109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029418259,0.0000060390907,0.000068161535,0.0000116710435,0.0000016107675,0.00005266618,0.0009547329,0.00009510473,0.000045666664,0.98969346,0.007145216,0.0019227917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012997848,0.000013103941,0.00050108234,0.00013202943,0.000004750207,0.000099188284,0.002349275,0.0003735688,0.0001294065,0.8375449,0.15882556,0.0000141469445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008225783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073927096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010608909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039675636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072818804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05610597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889035615","doi":"","title":"Deportation of Human Rights Abusers: Towards Achieving Accountability, Not Fostering Impunity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Deportation; Accountability; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Immigration","score_opus":0.16757058521961707,"score_gpt":0.4298784140785733,"score_spread":0.2623078288589562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889035615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62111384,0.0076302327,0.038778573,0.14344521,0.0007300708,0.0003380631,0.00003386063,0.00015339673,0.18777674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782956,0.0013539203,0.0044183293,0.010061832,0.00012153273,0.00005788138,0.000008428122,0.000015568921,0.0056669204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97774327,0.010654353,0.0011621207,0.0015381405,0.0051519955,0.0037501657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97612846,0.010132666,0.006605262,0.0019446657,0.0035805593,0.0016084298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017819488,0.0003028319,0.00040244666,0.0012417862,0.0073089167,0.007448207,0.0017745289,0.0035123527,0.0009391857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036634564,0.00028829047,0.00034683838,0.0010799669,0.01426942,0.0045175767,0.0065538716,0.0049304487,0.00016539978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005235198,0.00023484825,0.058574043,0.00036091806,0.00008210533,0.0017057972,0.054783158,0.0018223692,0.004537964,0.6514633,0.0139579065,0.2124251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013703546,0.0011339046,0.12977727,0.0026814728,0.00040844062,0.0049285395,0.100495204,0.0064271046,0.024485823,0.20291594,0.52621955,0.00038978472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04930101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1102927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04930101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006140405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020512186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098028064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889269012","doi":"","title":"Protection against Trademark Dilution in the U.K. and Canada: Inexorable Trend or Will Tradition Triumph","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.11804710965657171,"score_gpt":0.3084717085637911,"score_spread":0.19042459890721936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889269012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47511944,0.02441849,0.0013648014,0.08013412,0.0001661562,0.000042751177,0.00051534065,0.000059632202,0.41817927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841441,0.0040648314,0.00031330777,0.0046068574,0.000039147024,0.0000044803187,0.00006394146,0.000008901548,0.0067543914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933348,0.00039528156,0.00019544226,0.00054199,0.0033377197,0.0021948519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884631,0.0025658042,0.0021354689,0.00062362954,0.00479037,0.001421545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032867817,0.00017895509,0.00038975786,0.0024302239,0.009289689,0.0095726,0.0015604672,0.0025848905,0.0033252651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012041748,0.00020363365,0.00037032872,0.0051162993,0.010625127,0.0028067974,0.0029718818,0.0029380093,0.00017607365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021694221,0.000068582915,0.09736431,0.00037025593,0.00012534595,0.0008674479,0.028889356,0.0009630885,0.0022381174,0.6811551,0.019273333,0.16846819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065469045,0.00016409218,0.4776754,0.0015979289,0.00019990756,0.0007812901,0.04423173,0.0014405581,0.003804131,0.0814591,0.38832104,0.00025934854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95272505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97919446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059143957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059143957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084842786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4291215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889348091","doi":"","title":"Queer Refuge: A Review of the Role of Country Condition Analysis in Asylum Adjudications for Members of Sexual Minorities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Queer; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.09497017729308828,"score_gpt":0.429325594545431,"score_spread":0.33435541725234275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889348091","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011474779,0.9984668,0.00007197566,0.00050651195,0.00008853612,0.0000115115245,0.000017550352,0.0000017274197,0.00072062225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010633165,0.998374,0.0001734299,0.00018202513,0.00005307549,0.000010575488,0.000017206441,0.0000013722533,0.00012496953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735105,0.0012038049,0.0005047024,0.00021482931,0.0006498752,0.00007575349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824629,0.013436808,0.0013038705,0.00018977455,0.0023974737,0.00020927723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090460135,0.00050766126,0.0020935524,0.008283294,0.00077123183,0.002153825,0.0013607362,0.0015462141,0.0035455008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02151988,0.00042601614,0.00092834147,0.011037113,0.001654135,0.0026569928,0.0010017888,0.0013558245,0.0007540068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068692476,0.000041927207,0.0008730247,0.050498284,0.00017333173,0.00016087216,0.0007123174,0.00015871812,0.00008572936,0.0049932515,0.022119783,0.92011404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049827027,0.00022598311,0.008822434,0.13477364,0.00085627177,0.001117441,0.0019063547,0.00014002911,0.00021894828,0.0032853521,0.8485457,0.000058069927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025640622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057016365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025640622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030070965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009655172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050982714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889657405","doi":"","title":"A First Look at the Interim Merits Award in S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada: It Is Possible to Balance Legitimate Environmental Concerns with Investment Protection","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Balance (ability); Investment (military); Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.059272684346199415,"score_gpt":0.2546440200283591,"score_spread":0.1953713356821597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889657405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04078196,0.006484135,0.0014678574,0.45558167,0.0014069147,0.00010940887,0.00037910836,0.00006271078,0.49372616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5546085,0.0064965296,0.002093335,0.16407637,0.0009905477,0.000088153705,0.00019643047,0.00009850823,0.27135164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992857,0.0006174614,0.000116518466,0.00030014495,0.0033455435,0.0027633905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698204,0.0011070564,0.00016121397,0.00006122471,0.0012684779,0.00042002412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003916276,0.00041865377,0.0005256537,0.0014993565,0.022626454,0.010440912,0.002709826,0.01651067,0.010511758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011546143,0.0005395601,0.00068490393,0.0017190318,0.0066442313,0.0035628036,0.0025979225,0.012234248,0.0007189456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057758574,0.000047002064,0.0043736203,0.00011417564,0.000020552507,0.0016962613,0.0127613675,0.00027405497,0.0008081196,0.69537,0.26719144,0.01728561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058690657,0.00007571797,0.014574021,0.0004236459,0.00009449704,0.00042844372,0.027413437,0.0007182822,0.0010792442,0.05258316,0.90235615,0.00019469265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93623424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063765764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04580615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06892324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33234847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890436551","doi":"","title":"Fragrant or Foul? - Regulation of the Global Perfume Industry and the Implications for American Sovereignty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Business; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11229655547616604,"score_gpt":0.3325529671373665,"score_spread":0.22025641166120044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890436551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020434685,0.03385819,0.001280026,0.3127306,0.0021537878,0.000016314052,0.00008371275,0.000035470086,0.6294072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6536862,0.023994375,0.0014157253,0.14878826,0.0019327477,0.000050474227,0.00007477506,0.000050471102,0.17000698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820817,0.00055250566,0.000042738346,0.00030850503,0.0004429859,0.00044505126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990927,0.00035648298,0.000095574396,0.00009793759,0.00025935352,0.0000979516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024215472,0.00027839543,0.00028787626,0.00060341024,0.0042762347,0.008277127,0.0007647083,0.0063074124,0.006612429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017451778,0.00017812126,0.0005574126,0.0007996506,0.012165477,0.006014376,0.0020288117,0.0051425477,0.0008963178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100403095,0.000014661126,0.00036584862,0.000030022265,0.0000030360327,0.00008697111,0.0011670203,0.0000622122,0.00036127784,0.9595516,0.026307158,0.01204027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000827654,0.000033861594,0.0023568443,0.0003601981,0.000018534956,0.00015981628,0.0036864784,0.0002289697,0.00090030633,0.22109176,0.77112424,0.000030660125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0319363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04248634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0319363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00669209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005157154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06350082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892243596","doi":"","title":"Immigration, Crime, and Public Perception: Victimization Legislation in The United States and Canada - Can the U Visa Serve as a Model?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Legislation; Illegal immigration; Political science; Criminology; Perception; Illegal immigrants; Deportation; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07944239488140997,"score_gpt":0.3173381366291408,"score_spread":0.23789574174773082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892243596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6836239,0.029430179,0.00028906894,0.19010243,0.0008265686,0.00014601048,0.0014296254,0.00002882909,0.09412334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745393,0.00892937,0.00018129683,0.009195496,0.00018432912,0.000044556888,0.00026946407,0.000015366702,0.006640873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466777,0.0010739121,0.00014389423,0.00023859287,0.0015648102,0.0023109375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98778653,0.0029631753,0.0014605889,0.0002571856,0.004232818,0.003299749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051750857,0.00030658164,0.0007522632,0.0048880097,0.010764315,0.010624741,0.0025993253,0.0033459442,0.0063667884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013879388,0.0004090651,0.0011840678,0.006611311,0.009119934,0.002826212,0.0032432047,0.0041087996,0.0002201611],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032969748,0.0013038768,0.56527054,0.00047018734,0.0003389469,0.00052130583,0.033227336,0.0011974418,0.00028346665,0.19697592,0.079270385,0.12081098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006292773,0.00013887757,0.82718295,0.0018031021,0.0005030573,0.00008239021,0.112292014,0.000964551,0.00035767147,0.0065960684,0.04989315,0.00012323108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08178227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08178227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.206689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5933746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893331575","doi":"","title":"Better Late than Never: A Critique of the United States' Asylum Filing Deadline from International and Comparative Law Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Deportation; Immigration","score_opus":0.107095315365673,"score_gpt":0.35639983442800116,"score_spread":0.24930451906232814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893331575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01709582,0.043858293,0.005331268,0.30396232,0.0066259988,0.000034474357,0.00015469854,0.00006911379,0.62286806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7138678,0.032862395,0.0061998656,0.17493162,0.006969068,0.0003994188,0.00017021029,0.00025738467,0.06434235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834087,0.008495207,0.0009082114,0.0016703195,0.0032821107,0.0022353986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827587,0.011976396,0.0011770984,0.0007450414,0.0026952352,0.00064760295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016710218,0.0006656332,0.00080649,0.0041315663,0.01889416,0.021619286,0.0034584124,0.015267715,0.005012586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024628969,0.0005476145,0.0011546275,0.004655293,0.022116445,0.010773021,0.0062450194,0.019261962,0.0006259854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006004398,0.0000071304735,0.00010645994,0.000025450143,0.0000019174508,0.000041787436,0.0029595103,0.00006238935,0.000015969563,0.97783196,0.013808622,0.0051329187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023879289,0.000060321654,0.0012249205,0.0014035495,0.000027382597,0.00015210196,0.012103733,0.00035797746,0.0002148886,0.19794378,0.7864218,0.00006568017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059579063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061028253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059579063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016513262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016397871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11981261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893922313","doi":"","title":"Electronic Medical Records and the Challenge to Privacy: How the United States and Canada are Responding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Confidentiality; Business; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.44050240863088186,"score_gpt":0.48616500462191337,"score_spread":0.04566259599103151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893922313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02344102,0.020152954,0.0007184862,0.87988657,0.0012516596,0.00004733332,0.00011239096,0.000023770994,0.07436582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6704908,0.046876892,0.0024652828,0.23999773,0.00084192585,0.00007270636,0.00014859591,0.000093289345,0.0390128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95470196,0.012716412,0.0013899223,0.0022234232,0.018984005,0.009984314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95173633,0.016296478,0.0018040836,0.0010224095,0.020042744,0.009097926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023726024,0.00034043405,0.00075145817,0.0034223397,0.04140582,0.034194473,0.003601645,0.016024169,0.0041570454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05977694,0.0005970232,0.00089943875,0.0072877835,0.03147117,0.006965619,0.007870661,0.012310587,0.0004001313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007654957,0.000056522877,0.009205879,0.00020182038,0.000063566855,0.0010446477,0.049974322,0.0008545286,0.0002420346,0.71784514,0.15136358,0.06907133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077603145,0.00004228047,0.015703233,0.0013823726,0.000098707205,0.00033251187,0.12870343,0.0009598043,0.0003687907,0.098324664,0.7537109,0.00029570155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20788366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20788366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44173706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91874266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940703761","doi":"","title":"Pharmaceutical Industry Funding to Patient-Advocacy Organizations: A Cross-National Comparison of Disclosure Codes and Regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.47374952338591836,"score_gpt":0.5916903761806579,"score_spread":0.11794085279473954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940703761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22953868,0.13970163,0.0056421827,0.054050166,0.0006641757,0.00033835295,0.0003509131,0.00005154073,0.5696624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514009,0.028754648,0.0013578765,0.011364189,0.00036115487,0.00032992352,0.00018327119,0.000026156906,0.006222007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9278976,0.038410455,0.00307831,0.0023133866,0.023291837,0.005008415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8963452,0.075357825,0.014032225,0.0028843966,0.010024802,0.0013555494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0363107,0.00021427088,0.0005919698,0.006505977,0.00377283,0.008900209,0.001099873,0.0033894465,0.0024195656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07435861,0.0003182085,0.0008829357,0.0073876237,0.009001719,0.0058405283,0.004107116,0.0034519876,0.00027512168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023741701,0.00011078212,0.019127449,0.0006954039,0.00010619405,0.0002399235,0.011031325,0.00067365315,0.00044647217,0.8691096,0.008797548,0.089424275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026600529,0.0010800873,0.3058202,0.0077577173,0.0004897474,0.0013310569,0.03423378,0.0018874637,0.0025897755,0.126655,0.5176522,0.00023694542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015175652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017840391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0363107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010406772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014202316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19203162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7057415200","doi":"","title":"Investment, Environment and Dispute Settlement: Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter Eleven","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Government of Canada; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Arbitration; Legislation; Dispute resolution; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); International arbitration; Negotiation","score_opus":0.04445511764244782,"score_gpt":0.29479866694721746,"score_spread":0.25034354930476965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7057415200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076548815,0.10406716,0.0063830763,0.24072489,0.0035443378,0.00020026178,0.000612567,0.000058678168,0.5678602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.780433,0.04855938,0.0045222514,0.053890493,0.003678065,0.00055966596,0.0004118623,0.000039895294,0.107905485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896611,0.0033820749,0.00081340777,0.0009095906,0.0035114964,0.0017222824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830852,0.013342934,0.0009820801,0.00036988454,0.001977415,0.00024256614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019948944,0.00041010292,0.0007792057,0.002620905,0.008165331,0.0135194175,0.0022789661,0.016542926,0.004118383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02770797,0.00057392067,0.00068291376,0.0025515666,0.008080564,0.005653265,0.002196346,0.0069599156,0.00039188692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005083271,0.00004579128,0.0014495144,0.00019679105,0.000033113643,0.00024893213,0.0023587951,0.0005042445,0.00017878786,0.93150544,0.04525294,0.0181748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011507191,0.0001413562,0.0110597005,0.002409183,0.00028762672,0.00036733918,0.0055631828,0.0018545392,0.0011187305,0.41446668,0.5624661,0.00015053117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075994864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13201377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92400515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008880752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019582326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15110505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W855929572","doi":"","title":"Awards in Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Government of Canada: Introduction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings international and comparative law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023857114069235238,"score_gpt":0.23668906032126774,"score_spread":0.2128319462520325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W855929572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022435192,0.011833466,0.0013192595,0.07574724,0.004433102,0.0006206309,0.006787629,0.00028833983,0.8765352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28050584,0.0135156065,0.0017793521,0.051103555,0.0015049021,0.00030792615,0.0029504204,0.00017849734,0.64815384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98786163,0.0004024761,0.00025173248,0.00045673543,0.0075891055,0.0034382541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914757,0.0010348639,0.00023035353,0.00020430412,0.005918813,0.0011360403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036638477,0.0007581977,0.00069989485,0.005583832,0.012194643,0.01007645,0.0030669458,0.009272213,0.020007672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013459092,0.0006611667,0.00072942587,0.0068592387,0.0036233258,0.0024053082,0.002482332,0.0048172907,0.0025673637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024224197,0.000063052794,0.002809732,0.00021603276,0.000020126454,0.00022546008,0.0015392706,0.00025112918,0.0002183936,0.21472007,0.7555023,0.024410289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030151974,0.000024871193,0.02443578,0.0003824384,0.000044032073,0.00008522216,0.002262587,0.00026168564,0.00039040757,0.011444418,0.96054924,0.000089305664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98798054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05561476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05561476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12182293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40351516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}