{"meta":{"query_hash":"5c7c23a9df7c","filters":{"venue":"Hastings law journal"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5c7c23a9df7c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hastings+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W219836483","doi":"","title":"Teaching Legal Ethics a Quarter of a Century After Watergate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030421778966431567,"score_gpt":0.35889865140448973,"score_spread":0.3284768724380582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219836483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28589752,0.00006411104,0.00020021497,0.11508304,0.0007754718,0.000079221056,0.0000036511701,0.000038695154,0.5978581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317414,0.000028111186,0.0012353889,0.0024017917,0.0006796763,0.000002605791,8.5471163e-7,0.000007176486,0.0024702728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986113,0.00038375,0.0003038912,0.00008528861,0.00038607427,0.00022974306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999221,0.00021275408,0.00017109927,0.0000715561,0.00021276048,0.0001107979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002243792,0.000066206,0.00008939585,0.00005102625,0.0012954002,0.00036589775,0.00014419646,0.00008970858,0.006043583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004018539,0.000057682697,0.000059022168,0.00013583341,0.00017568939,0.0011043207,0.000007888115,0.0016956492,0.000079298006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015027446,0.00034352895,0.0009954184,0.000027336606,0.000057142974,0.00003429578,0.49708578,0.00002890943,0.0004800983,0.46090496,0.005020026,0.03487224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015344155,0.00002143558,0.00025465386,0.000057412737,0.000011419549,0.000053335003,0.009525795,0.000009937429,0.000030879473,0.0021318607,0.98766565,0.00008416878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015943585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002664885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98264563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047645364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039675942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209051954","doi":"","title":"If the Hat Fits, Wear It, If the Turban Fits, Run for Your Life: Reflections on the Indefinite Detention and Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Political science; Law; International human rights law; National security; Fundamental rights; International humanitarian law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06000476004544464,"score_gpt":0.3270714866705445,"score_spread":0.26706672662509984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209051954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908058,0.00034457204,0.001890639,0.06337446,0.0012958561,0.0007487995,0.000043226075,0.000070894195,0.041425772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475205,0.000041972777,0.00035625888,0.0010586586,0.0017147566,0.000011297925,0.0000034882519,0.000012888254,0.0020486093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858886,0.00019684437,0.00033614037,0.00013911811,0.00046513602,0.00027392092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984956,0.0006022247,0.00037170193,0.000108396,0.0003442493,0.00007782973],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013073442,0.00011758963,0.00011944649,0.0000508455,0.004801204,0.00033637375,0.00034275014,0.00007372423,0.00019648412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004022219,0.000058572077,0.00012446313,0.000109286586,0.000354332,0.00020951395,0.000027092272,0.00043750857,0.000007769872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006219409,0.000046783247,0.00008881943,0.000003906123,0.00006888437,9.646177e-7,0.013856285,0.00019151576,0.00031312276,0.9828214,0.0021221994,0.00042390102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016076611,0.00044968684,0.0085457,0.0005491603,0.00023291694,0.0000952537,0.014856414,0.0038551441,0.001523915,0.17600532,0.79177034,0.0005084964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005598803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005435824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8068161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008107102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008967791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254199577","doi":"","title":"Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Proscription; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Constitutional law; Scrutiny; Proportionality (law); Public law; Dignity; Autonomy; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05859160456954537,"score_gpt":0.332146196155907,"score_spread":0.27355459158636164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254199577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11718527,0.00032329632,0.0011920509,0.006317331,0.00034451348,0.00009345868,0.0000120034665,0.000025463605,0.8745066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973532,0.000032268024,0.0015093153,0.0006137575,0.00041540235,7.569189e-7,5.0089557e-7,0.000002767156,0.00007200805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991794,0.00003825507,0.00019223223,0.00007746647,0.00029929736,0.00021329863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949193,0.000052882035,0.00011494772,0.00003708417,0.00012036736,0.0001827818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047301027,0.00006413601,0.00011481689,0.000023852612,0.0008687347,0.00010171864,0.000102624734,0.0000452363,0.00013023784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007938327,0.000057914098,0.00005115335,0.000057388388,0.0019040314,0.00018750304,0.000026353388,0.00015163925,0.000007783698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114186505,0.000031470914,0.0000682495,0.0000076988,0.000008869944,0.000015971153,0.004001196,0.000008726022,0.0002169011,0.9951489,0.000091684306,0.00038892293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016347164,0.00023960695,0.0006204822,0.00029448842,0.00008358769,0.00088596455,0.0056505124,0.0000021945248,0.0025523761,0.3212448,0.6665061,0.00028514906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012772737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016645934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88016796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006893612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024591593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255057608","doi":"","title":"Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition Among International Economic Law Tribunals is Not Working","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Competition (biology); Plaintiff; Business; Order (exchange); International economic law; State (computer science); International arbitration; Law; International law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Public international law; Finance","score_opus":0.02324239378390523,"score_gpt":0.23294959020965797,"score_spread":0.20970719642575275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255057608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17528865,0.000019569477,0.0037720466,0.008387339,0.0033218956,0.00016049873,0.0000109602815,0.00010877894,0.8089303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438183,0.000006199163,0.00070823793,0.050644137,0.0044033914,0.0000044576113,0.00008434079,0.000025220063,0.00030577212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979978,0.000014504034,0.00072514557,0.00031931713,0.00056211173,0.00038108625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867535,0.0000744666,0.00071951014,0.00010367281,0.00035644506,0.0000705675],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009861408,0.00024024224,0.00019988274,0.00029225403,0.0009073593,0.0025586868,0.00045554637,0.00009384413,0.0022311741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003899454,0.00022870314,0.0001295468,0.00009165664,0.00028173512,0.003799831,0.00018360774,0.00037725444,0.00019453505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000631962,0.000065518965,0.0027165061,0.00000706782,0.00010238674,0.000023845725,0.00004433077,0.000018425202,0.00032698762,0.99474776,0.001651753,0.00023220059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013856441,0.000013956947,0.0017033892,0.00015114428,0.0000271963,0.00011553385,0.00005828461,0.004975025,0.0009481838,0.093819305,0.8964844,0.0003179538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047948994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021894011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013001478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256007795","doi":"","title":"Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon - the Spirited Debate About Geographical Indications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Certification; TRIPS architecture; State (computer science); Monopoly; European union; International trade; Economy; Geographical indication; Business; Political science; Geography; Law; Economics; Regional science; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.00658658870422012,"score_gpt":0.18164700937898817,"score_spread":0.17506042067476804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256007795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705813,0.0010849839,0.000005444785,0.024312,0.00009284524,0.0000856605,0.000013319132,0.000047430323,0.0037770488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980901,0.000062268635,0.000060819,0.0005995173,0.0010427526,0.0000026724767,0.000012253032,9.5054105e-7,0.00012870673],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990701,0.000052109113,0.00022474084,0.00015862416,0.00021192375,0.00028246577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953145,0.00009869739,0.0001582835,0.000031484837,0.000067972236,0.00011210906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002642914,0.00012402063,0.00011437391,0.00000874847,0.001462513,0.00033259246,0.00020221023,0.00008913352,0.00021254203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028498096,0.00003325602,0.00007849509,0.00032407505,0.000169903,0.000118982134,0.000049172326,0.00037419397,0.000010999483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007245259,0.00082523475,0.06361232,0.000022625667,0.00014029564,0.00010106968,0.00054285856,0.000015724585,0.61143446,0.102188244,0.05869001,0.16235472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020519635,0.00016082296,0.8133021,0.000043045147,0.000029848623,0.0008979814,0.00023701019,0.000018387933,0.0008309275,0.0041420525,0.17993909,0.00019351208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008146436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029875617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7496898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038944077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278285628","doi":"","title":"The Public Health Case for the Safe Storage of Firearms: Adolescent Suicides Add One More 'Smoking Gun'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun violence; Suicide prevention; Accidental; Gun control; Criminology; Occupational safety and health; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medical emergency; Suicide rates; Medicine; Forensic engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental health; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.142580595323169,"score_gpt":0.39257992939351044,"score_spread":0.24999933407034144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278285628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6527202,0.019139681,0.0061511244,0.2997719,0.001308451,0.00279908,0.00008462871,0.00014072075,0.01788419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703395,0.0012044938,0.00015236963,0.00048536484,0.0006494004,0.000012057114,8.095525e-7,0.000013753515,0.00044777253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973118,0.0004290384,0.0004007444,0.00014779092,0.0008259165,0.000884764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997808,0.0010829562,0.0002795863,0.00017967698,0.00031382247,0.00033599703],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008354308,0.00010597955,0.00017813813,0.000040533978,0.0067639695,0.00048159805,0.0005734794,0.000060664614,0.0006037905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081276265,0.000060485516,0.00014745838,0.00028795036,0.00079871964,0.00025221004,0.000039180944,0.0005505272,0.0000052872765],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011541891,0.00021880261,0.0024547009,0.0000693759,0.0000988567,0.00009442231,0.02088478,0.00013519902,0.000028921188,0.03298833,0.008020634,0.93489057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012291672,0.00041527048,0.0033919192,0.00080895494,0.000046551144,0.0009043319,0.105770975,0.0014943393,0.000060975497,0.0024477204,0.88310665,0.0003231472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074200095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011230239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002121225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057231536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787705115","doi":"","title":"Lifting the “American Exceptionalism” Curtain: Options and Lessons from Abroad","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.027412261043468167,"score_gpt":0.32967615658423916,"score_spread":0.302263895540771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787705115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7829137,0.0015042002,0.008883472,0.1089592,0.0009755339,0.00017518674,0.00006504217,0.00015541055,0.096368276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194264,0.0007939289,0.0024267414,0.0014071981,0.002078699,0.0000050313074,6.9465614e-7,0.0000140000075,0.0013310618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860144,0.00027235827,0.00020792487,0.00018158898,0.00039549576,0.00034118348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985358,0.0006194924,0.00039100353,0.000106641906,0.0001321583,0.0002149026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096534775,0.00010400266,0.00015986626,0.000020875888,0.0044986825,0.00019924984,0.0002560636,0.000035139907,0.0003718658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035568478,0.000063818385,0.00011050283,0.00017387059,0.0027781306,0.00027717755,0.00003983874,0.0002512394,0.00002960298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004536451,0.00014824225,0.020477496,0.0000049252667,0.0002057301,0.000028918817,0.12683116,0.000019046485,0.008542949,0.33403248,0.07281438,0.43684933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031361688,0.00003874457,0.015922448,0.00009431213,0.00003910766,0.000029105484,0.037783183,0.000013606782,0.000011454239,0.0076658768,0.93786836,0.00022018525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006833735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018862933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86505395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014177412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012845895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791270191","doi":"","title":"Two Wrongs Don't Make a Patent Right","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10039033219989037,"score_gpt":0.22381984591080353,"score_spread":0.12342951371091317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791270191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2729228,0.0002829993,0.0021783647,0.004440145,0.0015909522,0.00023248342,0.0000018940798,0.00021749847,0.71813285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98299575,0.000008023338,0.00078442856,0.007767715,0.0062163672,0.0000036840825,0.0000051866546,0.000035606667,0.0021832453],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846613,0.000014293902,0.00041266828,0.0002131541,0.0003843261,0.0005094497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924594,0.00002782859,0.0002861309,0.00012958795,0.00027116216,0.000039366303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056055683,0.00021675629,0.00019866045,0.00013339333,0.0009789026,0.000856427,0.00032539482,0.0000609789,0.005167821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091862705,0.00015771405,0.00014474984,0.00020784195,0.000075443124,0.0010481591,0.00013440286,0.00048801198,0.0025968514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014667787,0.0017940133,0.013600399,0.00048782953,0.00058989413,0.001319372,0.0018152149,0.0044141486,0.008321893,0.31609794,0.19796243,0.45213008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014692994,0.000029065126,0.00026794747,0.00018792861,0.000066343964,0.000366064,0.00013553032,0.008864602,0.00051019003,0.0030223308,0.9847002,0.00038051765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092583813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084629626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78673774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050467712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014243203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794975037","doi":"","title":"Note – “Between” a Rock and a Hard Place: Martin Marietta v. Vulcan and the Rise of the Backdoor Standstill","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backdoor; Geology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.019632331935467862,"score_gpt":0.2777221952549317,"score_spread":0.2580898633194638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794975037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265598,0.00074700895,0.0019095865,0.04339748,0.00038803334,0.0003184314,0.00001222311,0.000025131423,0.026642328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983891,0.00006468619,0.0002819016,0.00026920065,0.00041744203,0.0000016680979,7.489764e-8,0.000007620899,0.00056828954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.00043608216,0.0002841103,0.0001394339,0.0004436459,0.0002833789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846005,0.00081461814,0.00030956353,0.00012719388,0.00012732786,0.00016122048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033266505,0.00010404025,0.0002135732,0.000016791719,0.0017405815,0.00026986617,0.00029203945,0.0000610404,0.00006342097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014097505,0.000057151825,0.00007067669,0.00011574366,0.0009658742,0.0001910351,0.00012899285,0.00034852873,0.0000029823066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022608705,0.00011982668,0.17193608,0.00033204918,0.00019508043,0.00002285492,0.11303538,0.00015811068,0.0012493472,0.58027625,0.030922724,0.09949141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038130046,0.00025595998,0.037740752,0.000796451,0.00039225208,0.00019425488,0.00777291,0.0022709502,0.00031817766,0.029320372,0.9166782,0.00044671888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002550439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039470065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000267735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007337996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808252237","doi":"","title":"Towards and Explicit Balancing Inquiry - R.A.V. and Black through the Lens of Foreign Freedom of Expression Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Through-the-lens metering; Expression (computer science); Lens (geology); Law; Political science; Computer science; Human rights; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.037026988190689294,"score_gpt":0.24862478103902824,"score_spread":0.21159779284833896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808252237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674571,0.00025113422,0.008409466,0.00015411024,0.00016006708,0.00010310422,8.552099e-7,0.00001635355,0.023447793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975954,0.000030152221,0.0010268535,0.0002319937,0.0010752613,6.0859884e-7,8.742319e-7,0.000014294725,0.000024550589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888176,0.000008791183,0.00043566248,0.00015082567,0.0002926735,0.00023028837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989288,0.00008456061,0.00063257845,0.00012977734,0.00020759703,0.000016695572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073450396,0.00013990578,0.00023026804,0.00006466181,0.00042781854,0.00016497466,0.00018201693,0.000055170058,0.00005776927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031022228,0.000088111155,0.000050939783,0.000118976524,0.0003811791,0.0010665667,0.00018158396,0.00020948004,0.0000017977143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001363673,0.00005868587,0.0066654496,0.0003207645,0.000029611158,0.000026903746,0.002790093,0.000053972915,0.020819128,0.9658485,0.0011191745,0.0021313264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047423244,0.00025795653,0.08803712,0.0037479422,0.0003858135,0.00035104537,0.015108372,0.0021880039,0.024726052,0.8219705,0.037380245,0.0011045834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040670816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021937798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14387798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000083557425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011670223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35930684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971682184","doi":"","title":"Algorithmic Discrimination Is an Information Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Information sensitivity; Disparate impact; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer security; Business; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0329633058088814,"score_gpt":0.33143775571067435,"score_spread":0.29847444990179295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971682184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24499051,0.000024478422,0.0021357336,0.02064194,0.0009687218,0.00034065646,0.0000074552945,0.00009009443,0.7308004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943502,0.000035337547,0.0025513258,0.002010932,0.00050289626,0.0000012319099,0.0000043106947,0.000006377997,0.00053737196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988146,0.00009400996,0.00022175882,0.00006538602,0.0005421224,0.0002621309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989394,0.000047256657,0.000233549,0.00006014036,0.00053735083,0.00018228801],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016744849,0.000067052875,0.00008870459,0.000050453076,0.0013721703,0.0009986499,0.0001855524,0.000114477276,0.00035295734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018477227,0.000061737584,0.000049082126,0.000114198105,0.00011388074,0.0048478586,0.000018359451,0.0003710273,0.00013698528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083774,0.000048957132,0.0007793019,0.000021433034,0.0000151730665,0.000001663821,0.21593772,0.000025272264,0.00018127817,0.7254447,0.0016238044,0.0559099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014796094,0.0006008957,0.003778879,0.0003130132,0.0000509464,0.000045880544,0.111558795,0.0015894627,0.0003084881,0.3621394,0.5174388,0.00069581246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037827229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013162098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7493597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010511311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015972737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}