{"meta":{"query_hash":"72556b6acd19","filters":{"venue":"Hegel Bulletin"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/72556b6acd19","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hegel+Bulletin"},"results":[{"id":"W2519821000","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.23","title":"Review - Ardis. Collins (ed.). Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Dialectical Justification of Philosophy’s First Principles. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7735-4060-6 (hbk). Pp. xvi+488. - Ludwig Siep. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Daniel Smyth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1-107-02235-5 (hbk). Pp. xxii+307.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Dialectic; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Art history; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02919295449377831,"score_gpt":0.21437945072718348,"score_spread":0.18518649623340516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519821000","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010772428,0.09335133,0.00059313216,0.44928893,0.0023262566,0.0069835084,0.013697091,0.0007869349,0.42220038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7786883,0.20748724,0.00011534765,0.0016590927,0.0008627952,0.000043998454,0.00015967908,0.00014539083,0.01083816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477863,0.00095885544,0.0012153436,0.0013712677,0.0006632966,0.0010126132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995203,0.0011386432,0.0010700555,0.0014269033,0.00069692195,0.00046445982],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129182,0.00084498024,0.0015597065,0.00016436058,0.0013385522,0.000066084445,0.0012913194,0.0005744996,0.00066556013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003263576,0.0006824534,0.00047460344,0.00017201003,0.004521532,0.0003468181,0.0006659623,0.0010425248,0.000094333984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000847012,0.0007102905,0.00004330127,0.0017676477,0.00043907142,0.0000670097,0.00067026453,0.0000272737,0.00017215514,0.88236415,0.11244563,0.00044619452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024374109,0.00047486744,0.00046153442,0.0010252704,0.0007867294,0.000026162159,0.00039299982,0.000059876867,0.00015668654,0.003654451,0.98972815,0.00079585414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066496683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003329983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036998434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031223276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556984348","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.61","title":"Insight and the Enlightenment: WhyEinsichtin Chapter Six of Hegel’sPhenomenology of Spirit?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Faith; Superstition; Intelligibility (philosophy); Morality; Political philosophy; Politics; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.020585858005597472,"score_gpt":0.19603030457915532,"score_spread":0.17544444657355784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556984348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2705845,0.007527765,0.000034063527,0.2094233,0.000469582,0.00056573306,0.00009668723,0.000040818875,0.5112575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614346,0.0006937913,0.000019717234,0.0025332922,0.00016510813,0.000014931341,9.855496e-7,0.00001696228,0.0004117398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988415,0.00012694094,0.0004299984,0.00021329224,0.00018244747,0.00020578069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988877,0.0005353112,0.00016766101,0.0002779242,0.00008584443,0.000045551576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005531709,0.00014976303,0.00036866326,0.00008734882,0.00008172774,0.00001465129,0.00019402285,0.000080816695,0.0027114146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008368083,0.00007716892,0.00007878708,0.000022343262,0.0020369443,0.00003574932,0.00013036515,0.00016372156,0.000067197245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020150105,0.000075491575,0.000043367818,0.00003845932,0.000031158626,0.0000053869503,0.005656749,1.626203e-7,0.00072333316,0.9915771,0.00008874843,0.0015585594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016201338,0.000109776374,0.000048426744,0.00011165047,0.000014999664,0.0000026759014,0.00018186976,0.0000018545197,0.0007843278,0.52366066,0.47336525,0.00009838154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018579909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015401062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.725559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009298226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012802132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580039521","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.62","title":"Embodied Meaning in Hegel and Merleau-Ponty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Hegelianism; Intuition; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Dialectic; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.042704463384978415,"score_gpt":0.31699023847803354,"score_spread":0.27428577509305513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580039521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24153142,0.000721177,0.000011934282,0.008009132,0.0007028072,0.00015544715,0.00000635274,0.000054331398,0.7488074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651694,0.000028008291,0.00020560616,0.0008479091,0.00022832147,0.000032667205,0.000004634201,0.000022349404,0.0021135348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987595,0.00011051382,0.00023699376,0.00041417402,0.000084908424,0.00039388821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903625,0.000059840124,0.0001365326,0.00065294805,0.000022591687,0.00009185573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029624536,0.00016665837,0.00027295627,0.00008631808,0.00036611524,0.0000605101,0.00034174245,0.00018441884,0.0015962921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103411854,0.00016853653,0.000046761215,0.000026325248,0.0002960265,0.000052869764,0.00017453867,0.00032177602,0.00176571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009172693,0.00047335998,0.056027096,0.00005815007,0.00021901239,0.0006480624,0.005408685,0.000004477269,0.0006999878,0.90538126,0.01829082,0.011871813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005935476,0.0003127148,0.36497054,0.000103383536,0.000062450876,0.00013033612,0.0009131296,0.000020123238,0.00008022357,0.31789565,0.30876276,0.0008132242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005203402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117191856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7549856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020008318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000085649735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586210100","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2017.2","title":"Re-Hegelianizing Marx on Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Communism; Orthodoxy; Capitalism; Marxist philosophy; Politics; Capital (architecture); Relevance (law); Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Theology; History","score_opus":0.03939742080782544,"score_gpt":0.3151454662236057,"score_spread":0.27574804541578024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586210100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024908794,0.000024737357,0.000015076647,0.050574496,0.00057102233,0.000110343404,0.0000046825458,0.000076828306,0.92371404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97687185,0.000023111606,0.00020894216,0.002431308,0.0007100709,0.000010523427,9.4157747e-7,0.000007655108,0.019735608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989545,0.000082278406,0.00013026338,0.00022532031,0.00016551731,0.00044216742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909925,0.00015738292,0.000079318415,0.00041446878,0.000030264135,0.00021929447],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052191823,0.00009092536,0.00012882035,0.000029642537,0.0021520013,0.00022776704,0.0004564254,0.00011091029,0.0043034237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005423251,0.000084259525,0.000066373876,0.000017966468,0.00034718844,0.00007258893,0.00006949917,0.00014851679,0.006305517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001340973,0.00004257465,0.00043680333,0.0000048166853,0.0000071278428,0.000026763795,0.0006022849,3.3283078e-7,0.0000055379387,0.937215,0.05854905,0.003096332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001603346,0.000021180476,0.002062341,0.00002782579,0.000003979817,2.3000095e-7,0.00021647666,0.0000019022062,0.00016701185,0.030535897,0.9666809,0.000121955534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058713835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016647023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95196307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006641026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004690415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589061812","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.1","title":"Hegel on the Idealism of Practical Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Idealism; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Realism; Property (philosophy); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09831657327678317,"score_gpt":0.2700612110835483,"score_spread":0.17174463780676513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589061812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019363774,0.000079575584,0.000030582924,0.53912205,0.00030379565,0.000121076744,0.000046162113,0.000043082633,0.4408899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879644,0.00004143911,0.000016183782,0.009803107,0.0007287203,0.00001381781,9.358748e-7,0.00001660059,0.0014148115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901325,0.00015631861,0.00022456345,0.00015604535,0.00026796106,0.00018187825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764144,0.0017771893,0.00009723259,0.00030015007,0.00010011791,0.0000838459],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064814085,0.000108408254,0.00015040113,0.000029354136,0.000173538,0.000035818524,0.00016387779,0.00006393961,0.0147449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011554679,0.00004935761,0.00009377835,0.000013688488,0.00062917016,0.000018021154,0.000059996346,0.00022551819,0.0017996975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060645925,0.00006169888,0.0000013684614,0.000009601734,0.000019898502,0.0000047091917,0.00076472445,1.1986666e-7,0.0001211792,0.9834344,0.0153225865,0.00019909973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014410508,0.00006436446,0.000011468981,0.000047715614,0.0000063746706,0.0000010830946,0.00011966374,0.0000012198475,0.00019101413,0.51968205,0.47967163,0.000059279355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010433848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96860063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009708821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044151773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291145016","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2022.25","title":"Hegel and Formal Idealism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hegelianism; Idealism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subjectivism; Metaphysics; German idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Reductio ad absurdum; Perception; Subject (documents); Skepticism; Law; Political science; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.025956239766794637,"score_gpt":0.20624047937477924,"score_spread":0.1802842396079846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291145016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11510653,0.001476934,0.000016205086,0.07404792,0.0008947992,0.00022059832,0.00019019295,0.00017135941,0.80787545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908983,0.000025439867,0.00001852547,0.0060646343,0.00045103198,0.000040314597,0.000015078388,0.000017139006,0.0024695145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917346,0.00007659824,0.00014829202,0.00016568358,0.00020706089,0.00022887504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.00009894017,0.000042483043,0.00013569821,0.00002840656,0.0000722128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046647503,0.0000967515,0.00011915842,0.000045905254,0.0009451405,0.000078307196,0.00012784534,0.000024877489,0.017258674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025287089,0.00008943641,0.00004988137,0.000015081061,0.00022267141,0.000028008764,0.00027791839,0.00036675518,0.00016482826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026529482,0.000026627828,0.000002635716,0.000014179836,0.000009240827,0.000015362524,0.0039053576,0.0000035041433,0.000013184412,0.99112296,0.0042775567,0.00058287865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017103735,0.00005513037,0.000011284653,0.0000028136299,0.0000045672987,0.00000950638,0.0006163941,0.000021348254,0.000004632976,0.4209654,0.5780567,0.00008117896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015021485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020891648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8757918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015526915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015974112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98363966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322500980","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.2","title":"Gerad Gentry and Konstantin Pollok (eds.), The Imagination in German Idealism and Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. ISBN 13 978-1-1071-9770-1 (hbk). 978-1-3166-4786-8 (pbk). Pp. 280.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; German idealism; Gentry; German; Idealism; Art history; Art; Philosophy; History; Archaeology; Hegelianism","score_opus":0.012976165593044106,"score_gpt":0.21601038375127962,"score_spread":0.20303421815823552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322500980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8954293,0.009461548,0.000015623506,0.030795433,0.0008030857,0.0006006694,0.00012393748,0.00022655701,0.06254386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265773,0.0041863956,0.000036455775,0.0012829138,0.00036501282,0.0000070804467,0.00003330435,0.000027229658,0.067484304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818325,0.00013030859,0.00030762673,0.00046384448,0.00038649447,0.0005284664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991836,0.0001300219,0.00012736274,0.0002980879,0.000091303315,0.0001696277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007835836,0.00024067688,0.00028582296,0.0002172483,0.00078224856,0.00015403454,0.00027586694,0.000066458684,0.00020251142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059872804,0.00020109833,0.00005581926,0.00017024901,0.0011430138,0.00020144903,0.00015244464,0.00027552925,0.00021185915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060822065,0.00006286878,0.0010129715,0.00008975832,0.000022818029,0.00029434095,0.011033835,0.0000035612893,0.0010567098,0.22857922,0.7541646,0.0036185405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010166344,0.00005849334,0.027180588,0.00008098226,0.000039617204,0.000039738086,0.0032422564,0.0002559913,0.00004682885,0.00006647268,0.9677212,0.00025118372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005578541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004577614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22851275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006199409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007600639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84331226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382278414","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.15","title":"Nahum Brown, Hegel's Actuality Chapter of the Science of Logic: A Commentary. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2019. ISBN 978-1-4985-6056-6 (hbk). Pp. xxvii+97.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Theology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04141060046612947,"score_gpt":0.29672221636679186,"score_spread":0.25531161590066237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382278414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43435556,0.00071429583,0.000058698894,0.20855322,0.001634961,0.0013009416,0.0003088671,0.00032129808,0.35275215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98856735,0.00021623996,0.00013911384,0.0050363536,0.00018707084,0.000017773451,0.0000062251383,0.0000140891425,0.005815808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997341,0.00024385413,0.0005174417,0.00042169276,0.0006620944,0.00081392867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834496,0.0004522369,0.0002607016,0.0005469547,0.00015344768,0.00024170894],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026173089,0.00019136055,0.00036529615,0.00009414035,0.0007084575,0.00005601182,0.001050898,0.00013622346,0.002058322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006297879,0.00015023527,0.00019651938,0.00041946498,0.0029975977,0.0001334972,0.0005077802,0.0002577135,0.0006147314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073023504,0.00026507615,0.002317213,0.00010362996,0.000048797956,0.000008268753,0.0064977957,0.000012086121,0.0030456616,0.869205,0.11512187,0.0033015725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004447625,0.0000903649,0.0065978807,0.00009446124,0.000024237197,0.0000016613632,0.0018294243,0.000019457211,0.009608604,0.027710337,0.95329905,0.00027976453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015370185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054278964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118941745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023902993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384203592","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.16","title":"The Sociality of Madness: Hegel on Spirit's Pathology and the Sanity of Ethicality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Sociality; Subjectivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Soul; Politics; Objectivity (philosophy); Feeling; Dialectic; Psychoanalysis; Phenomenology (philosophy); Aesthetics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05220768926701285,"score_gpt":0.27327932196705157,"score_spread":0.2210716327000387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384203592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4726969,0.0006812969,0.000007206312,0.37587452,0.0006365601,0.00042875364,0.00020161686,0.00008931578,0.14938383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965023,0.0002331547,0.0000026181474,0.0026869325,0.00024408002,0.000018233612,0.000004072447,0.000010528604,0.00029811912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820465,0.00079682574,0.000360813,0.00017299409,0.00026971652,0.00019500425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627256,0.0030412388,0.00017239958,0.00032459997,0.00015164929,0.000037576978],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004356236,0.000112133,0.00028684756,0.000024886078,0.0005854634,0.000039099996,0.00024322448,0.00013221795,0.0003815552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010092565,0.0000592538,0.00012901178,0.00004499761,0.005209463,0.000010660643,0.00016382796,0.0005687486,0.00007088548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020993076,0.000048966453,0.000018938033,0.00006811188,0.000023694229,0.000003930378,0.0054129157,6.24141e-7,0.000024561054,0.9927872,0.0008821465,0.00051900727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046846623,0.000056758578,0.0008700463,0.000026026064,0.00001642423,9.860194e-7,0.0011664737,0.000009520356,0.00007818987,0.86316776,0.1340758,0.000063556436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003336352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018586346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074506706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003468587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705537","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.26","title":"Houlgate's Presupposition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Presupposition; Hegelianism; Reciprocal; Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Literature; Mathematics; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04793673610639717,"score_gpt":0.2395165995068494,"score_spread":0.19157986340045222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039713763,0.00009509323,0.000011283692,0.061307307,0.00069811265,0.00013445466,0.000054880442,0.00059869734,0.89738643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98750114,0.000033800425,0.000008897508,0.001920481,0.00082582835,0.000021137528,0.000042138367,0.000017718276,0.009628854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935967,0.000045355533,0.00011647952,0.00014343057,0.00014798531,0.00018709688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.00010350651,0.000026030719,0.00013956618,0.000046116584,0.000054256594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026086514,0.000078973484,0.00008470763,0.000060281032,0.0002390798,0.00008920826,0.00010236073,0.00004707273,0.010156299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004146723,0.00006805635,0.0000573591,0.000030558847,0.00016210754,0.000025867632,0.000050118044,0.00016672804,0.014392296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012377207,0.000019449899,0.0000020683356,0.000016839587,0.000008385667,0.000015078001,0.0018619698,0.0000035918,0.00007240187,0.96765214,0.02985031,0.00048538978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009425205,0.000023429233,0.00003576749,0.000012878314,0.000003959234,7.9346523e-7,0.00011645614,0.000028807797,0.000067309215,0.40631527,0.5932342,0.00006690342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046710065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000125269125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9477874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007856391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000908487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392291568","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2024.4","title":"American Hegelianism and its Impact Upon Indian Boarding School Policy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Thoreau and American Literature","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Indigenous; Surprise; Political science; Tribe; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.005056829606023786,"score_gpt":0.278045371388054,"score_spread":0.27298854178203025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392291568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85800654,0.018872745,0.011965354,0.087691225,0.0013129311,0.0007402059,0.00016517259,0.0023066634,0.018939141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919998,0.00013715054,0.004214358,0.0019160584,0.000535857,0.000013095157,0.000004556714,0.00002730403,0.0011518074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984709,0.00008556027,0.00018376364,0.00054882903,0.00022256022,0.00048840226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990864,0.00007788665,0.000054458418,0.00035542873,0.000032310494,0.00039355017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018815673,0.00023652226,0.0002408293,0.00034963578,0.00012698368,0.00081968453,0.0004438346,0.000059156588,0.00011024738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007985484,0.00019221782,0.000110390945,0.0010132726,0.000062234816,0.00021347709,0.00017610683,0.00035659326,0.00073805376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006879845,0.00016293947,0.0019683053,0.00043792973,0.0003527595,0.0025497144,0.012607662,0.00010142272,0.03399681,0.24432808,0.16977751,0.5336481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003484342,0.00049825246,0.010047579,0.00042128068,0.00001817149,0.00075343373,0.0002944866,0.0042822505,0.002460786,0.0021638682,0.9777944,0.0009170429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032771376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029719201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8080169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009843655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019203554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94864345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392372980","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2024.7","title":"Reconciling Hegel with the Dialectic: On Islam and the Fate of Muslims in Hegel's Philosophy of History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophy and Historical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Dialectic; Philosophy; Islam; Epistemology; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.036227184322533426,"score_gpt":0.19766313901033392,"score_spread":0.16143595468780048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392372980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11946165,0.02258068,0.000014550383,0.03669875,0.0013983928,0.0007119291,0.000052285926,0.00010050108,0.8189813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958493,0.0002605638,0.000017420094,0.00084868754,0.00062394026,0.00003763632,0.0000020556383,0.000026153046,0.0023342427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988406,0.00017006244,0.00032078064,0.00025014475,0.00023755046,0.00018089544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988509,0.0006829901,0.000112030204,0.00026601224,0.000056494944,0.00003159464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049909804,0.00017568542,0.00033239217,0.00011580305,0.00014522459,0.000030776417,0.00019060019,0.00004838896,0.0005315026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053666387,0.00009221197,0.0001120001,0.00006955129,0.0011025055,0.00004299533,0.0000422493,0.00036037757,0.000037387417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005131589,0.000096907395,0.0000075591097,0.00027864712,0.00006963327,0.000020482157,0.0680688,0.000019038665,0.00008091082,0.9240648,0.005701888,0.001078133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009411772,0.00029088111,0.000029057608,0.0003795538,0.00006062352,0.000006134292,0.0013636275,0.000059715207,0.0001185017,0.04806417,0.9485027,0.00018383813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034754758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028910628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112423244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051741736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58195806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404358001","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2024.39","title":"F. H. Bradley's Feeling as Hegelian Phenomenology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Feeling; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.02850122300267389,"score_gpt":0.2283212069895191,"score_spread":0.19981998398684522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404358001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020561745,0.0072268336,0.000015016685,0.015805403,0.003696007,0.0001145321,0.000021962007,0.00044038924,0.9521181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92074114,0.000091056005,0.00006667143,0.0025532518,0.0024156075,0.000020002812,0.000009031601,0.00003253186,0.07407073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988209,0.000035845587,0.0002128968,0.00038207034,0.00019798879,0.00035029108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953383,0.00006590794,0.00002996498,0.00022557189,0.00004161595,0.00010309264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020983818,0.00016227979,0.00017055158,0.00021284854,0.0004514179,0.00027614782,0.00025835124,0.000043456337,0.02154832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023151375,0.00014470445,0.000098702105,0.000055129683,0.0004768428,0.000085727836,0.000055357126,0.00022738289,0.020218324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008890946,0.000037539638,0.000003561516,0.000054966134,0.000019816494,0.00007684419,0.017525233,0.000003986849,0.00011400373,0.8749541,0.10430188,0.002899174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009288953,0.00007258963,0.000005222096,0.000048167116,0.000013878692,0.000016763937,0.0011469759,0.000052747248,0.00002069974,0.024210827,0.9741239,0.00019534079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003943122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017644161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9001794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007476011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007918827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98054457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409648897","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2025.8","title":"On Gaps. Is There a Politics of Absolute Knowing?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophy and Historical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; Northwestern University","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024338405543178294,"score_gpt":0.236603075546263,"score_spread":0.21226467000308472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409648897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066205706,0.0017562065,0.00000917024,0.009162267,0.00053923874,0.000077866964,0.000056960234,0.00004947381,0.98172826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82137084,0.000047855196,0.000041522155,0.004500959,0.0004351418,0.0000085308775,0.0000032194976,0.000012468303,0.17357948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993288,0.000026668833,0.00019723036,0.0001488662,0.00012260603,0.00017583327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952435,0.0001048691,0.000049355338,0.00022104924,0.00006229295,0.000038056463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000066927016,0.00010762481,0.00018242141,0.00008047144,0.00021993063,0.000026877133,0.00014485593,0.000045844277,0.0065317834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003354882,0.00009267246,0.000116574585,0.000034219618,0.00014908581,0.000013979209,0.000035661767,0.0001287717,0.0006372376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150118585,0.00008727834,0.0000028162267,0.00005276056,0.000021873127,0.0000028224943,0.0019266406,4.411881e-7,0.000007769189,0.7778803,0.21980824,0.00019402486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018173236,0.00005829256,0.000032565014,0.00009910554,0.000016878988,2.0217502e-7,0.00011480347,0.0000032797677,0.00018216656,0.13202617,0.8672033,0.000081500155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014968323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012266032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81475025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040688574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025575917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99437636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412382044","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2025.3","title":"The Two of Disjunction or the Two That Makes One? Hegel and Badiou on Love","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03941171891161001,"score_gpt":0.3378420161016665,"score_spread":0.2984302971900565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412382044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090288445,0.0044046757,0.0005366328,0.13401318,0.0034443268,0.0007778719,0.0000897263,0.00007735042,0.7663678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519923,0.0002554162,0.00003696863,0.004822369,0.0004124182,0.000027495125,0.0000068088766,0.000020728992,0.042425524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846464,0.00032040273,0.0003210549,0.00033097898,0.00021879509,0.0003440984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979652,0.0010600821,0.00014423033,0.00071532273,0.000059805472,0.000055363933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048301104,0.00020120283,0.00027402467,0.00009747254,0.0002161869,0.000053993845,0.0002893024,0.000087372944,0.0011698194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008416376,0.00010246086,0.00013684505,0.00021459052,0.000330666,0.000013783075,0.000053512416,0.0002862619,0.0006756959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025866614,0.0007826762,0.0140592065,0.00010924135,0.001606719,0.000020879274,0.0029324666,0.000034442637,0.0001642062,0.62829816,0.3288484,0.02055695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001706111,0.00018123933,0.020818828,0.00008694816,0.0002722379,0.000013692667,0.0012825481,0.000036683756,0.0002582459,0.029349858,0.9457945,0.00019910026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032453678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017075428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030424888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028119797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412883641","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2025.10067","title":"Apriorism and Scientific Cooperation in Hegel","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018456059371942717,"score_gpt":0.2170721147086723,"score_spread":0.19861605533672957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412883641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3199549,0.0033651718,0.000028854136,0.008430619,0.0028233782,0.00025987296,0.000014041625,0.00008456974,0.6650386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93562794,0.000018864437,0.000035616245,0.0006812714,0.00015529103,0.000012605456,0.000005174808,0.000004441125,0.06345881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993,0.000029904444,0.00015411351,0.00025077842,0.000108761305,0.00015644285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997137,0.000028128994,0.000024203135,0.00014394826,0.000055534936,0.000034468776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025560308,0.00008037182,0.00010502453,0.00022576335,0.00052181527,0.00027683814,0.00010891962,0.000024124121,0.0008351207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029618928,0.0000749716,0.000021100224,0.00007141576,0.0005372592,0.000073956944,0.000038561164,0.00009815491,0.0002781164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012725391,0.00007272816,0.00021660727,0.00003577259,0.0000033177325,0.0000054432157,0.0098549435,0.0000043560112,0.0004602687,0.9063708,0.0809918,0.0019712364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022648936,0.000013396501,0.00043937072,0.00003449849,0.0000037271807,5.574783e-7,0.00046088966,0.0000646848,0.000039888713,0.0059424113,0.99268544,0.00008866811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024117665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011101853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91169363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004183005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006020086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91439855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}