{"meta":{"query_hash":"0b44699414d1","filters":{"venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0b44699414d1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=History+and+Philosophy+of+Logic"},"results":[{"id":"W1970489865","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2013.865912","title":"Russell's Unknown Logicism: A Study in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History of mathematics; History and philosophy of science; Philosophy of mathematics education; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Connected Mathematics","score_opus":0.09148112898383175,"score_gpt":0.22901224594816302,"score_spread":0.1375311169643313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970489865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04125898,0.14259602,0.05030786,0.11555008,0.0013732224,0.00004271232,0.00019303233,0.00019624052,0.64848197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90993756,0.037140533,0.009882469,0.005358247,0.0021929347,0.000053848802,0.00006766648,0.00013776224,0.035229024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976279,0.0014433665,0.00006965839,0.00025462973,0.00047118778,0.00013329138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99208903,0.0066323187,0.0002873602,0.00033867848,0.00043200827,0.00022059078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037924228,0.00039500522,0.0005650384,0.0027316604,0.003879349,0.005642374,0.0011745672,0.0022570996,0.0028094023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005796338,0.00045048795,0.00048854796,0.003180961,0.030298898,0.015416762,0.0020477928,0.005371106,0.00033139013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046669243,0.0000030826072,0.00003796153,0.000016655173,0.0000014118173,0.00001585537,0.0014077462,0.00007499021,0.000015188197,0.9938969,0.0023460314,0.0021795298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008539959,0.00000925105,0.0002294073,0.00009551117,0.0000054220363,0.000075197204,0.00089825375,0.00034894023,0.000109312416,0.9354198,0.06279123,0.0000091902075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005008846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005508853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058337376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058337376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003163766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042326868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971038675","doi":"10.1080/01445340701550817","title":"Leśniewski and Russell's Paradox: Some Problems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Mereology; Distributive property; Philosophy; Element (criminal law); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Style (visual arts); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Law; Literature; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0763039453114484,"score_gpt":0.26109510269892866,"score_spread":0.18479115738748025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971038675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009179079,0.05026939,0.026478343,0.8383444,0.00467012,0.000039889022,0.00012854263,0.00017309791,0.0707171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6007765,0.069341786,0.046542697,0.18915074,0.03039981,0.0005771544,0.00025004195,0.0006164624,0.062344804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286014,0.0037896556,0.00038644936,0.0008040666,0.0016950571,0.00046464388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984177,0.01227696,0.00067805365,0.00078165135,0.0014680541,0.00061830203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01383584,0.00095661107,0.0023068837,0.0037752988,0.007605783,0.006917553,0.004623813,0.012534911,0.010614376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025005981,0.0008180423,0.001133838,0.0055661914,0.023760615,0.03761186,0.007224814,0.016687075,0.001677506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132611385,0.000018744538,0.000052653144,0.000049974806,0.0000054321345,0.000094831805,0.0006214141,0.00012730723,0.00001296089,0.98083615,0.013132886,0.005034386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012893132,0.0000026554135,0.00003981759,0.000040839615,0.0000012826605,0.00007768512,0.0004724814,0.00020926452,0.000016489465,0.98233,0.016788054,0.00000852418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062280674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044928077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01383584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006668682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045439047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073171735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042193072","doi":"10.1080/01445340902731802","title":"Psychologism and the Development of Russell's Account of Propositions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychologism; Proposition; Sketch; Relation (database); Epistemology; Determinative; Section (typography); Philosophy; Variety (cybernetics); Development (topology); Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06539431488709142,"score_gpt":0.2402142564717103,"score_spread":0.1748199415846189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042193072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021094413,0.017852029,0.2846087,0.051842388,0.0009324282,0.000093671115,0.00022616985,0.0004872065,0.622863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86360073,0.008002546,0.09353953,0.006514884,0.0013754684,0.00017570384,0.00013780754,0.00029197682,0.026361357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947784,0.0029128543,0.00020225078,0.0005999003,0.0011751254,0.0003314476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541795,0.0030949784,0.00025278528,0.00043351573,0.0005863359,0.00021453382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007732976,0.0005390566,0.00068265054,0.004222712,0.0036795924,0.007535328,0.0018631162,0.0031714223,0.0027149364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053887595,0.0008060264,0.0009630403,0.0021496539,0.04776935,0.011583869,0.0030184644,0.007026006,0.00064348994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016944281,0.0000018438734,0.000012197974,0.0000057005846,9.172847e-7,0.000009376964,0.00042225973,0.00008939319,0.000014876588,0.9985209,0.00031784622,0.00060303847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045799097,0.0000040612877,0.000037668546,0.000014465984,0.0000016107949,0.000026461892,0.000112778,0.0003593431,0.000043335403,0.98710686,0.012284132,0.000004575225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004511478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029071914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008401235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008401235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004789163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060955465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082097877","doi":"10.1080/01445340310001604707","title":"Aristotle's<i>Prior Analytics</i>and Boole's<i>Laws of Thought</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of South Florida","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical logic; George (robot); Contradiction; Propositional calculus; Truth function; Philosophy of logic; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07488232201868612,"score_gpt":0.2656035892044067,"score_spread":0.19072126718572058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082097877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04534568,0.019252708,0.1635727,0.060267486,0.0027484647,0.00009095374,0.00047904966,0.00046427583,0.70777863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895751,0.0043395585,0.027421433,0.0040835384,0.0017990967,0.00009692731,0.00020955176,0.00017761409,0.066121385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976313,0.0009314854,0.0001005585,0.00037446737,0.00079193286,0.00017017308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965648,0.0016427235,0.0003767042,0.00038844292,0.0008183652,0.00020887027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027340231,0.00041979132,0.00039143697,0.0026433254,0.0024636795,0.006998531,0.0009787701,0.0019091461,0.0036724166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051618996,0.00033715862,0.0004901558,0.0013123032,0.026324524,0.0064964783,0.0020030024,0.004475829,0.00092355936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046199357,0.0000034579223,0.000039623035,0.0000073146716,0.0000012591092,0.000008351816,0.00034275625,0.00008523143,0.000036755322,0.9962476,0.0016878585,0.0015351793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066079792,0.0000075250464,0.0002128864,0.000050087503,0.000003455431,0.000023705667,0.00021000206,0.0005647314,0.0001777308,0.9505629,0.048171572,0.000008925857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006709686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043940633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007155681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007155681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029597033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051918387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092096394","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2013.817076","title":"Nineteenth Century British Logic on Hypotheticals, Conditionals, and Implication","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Sketch; Philosophy; Epistemology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Inference; CLARITY; Classics; History; Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03380008430535854,"score_gpt":0.22231336264635942,"score_spread":0.1885132783410009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092096394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09141119,0.06348556,0.047246385,0.07951934,0.0020879656,0.00002868643,0.0005146175,0.00023706471,0.7154691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592994,0.016151942,0.0071534663,0.006154972,0.001252927,0.000039303974,0.00017045227,0.00010129037,0.10967629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907947,0.00046816503,0.000040724895,0.000109508066,0.00017615693,0.00012595819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991314,0.00048156563,0.000053154374,0.00005534781,0.00022563273,0.00005303558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012765013,0.00024699938,0.00022529816,0.0009208509,0.0022283006,0.0025189584,0.00036919856,0.0010645726,0.0037858745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020616327,0.0002727531,0.0001725375,0.0014354939,0.008146264,0.0031422535,0.0009211496,0.0016149522,0.0005071626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020742127,0.0000031368595,0.00008323099,0.000022393562,0.0000014832744,0.000046885525,0.0014983179,0.00023367409,0.000117445605,0.9842717,0.007910707,0.005790125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021165488,0.000016902413,0.0016039683,0.00013288097,0.0000116017245,0.000097358825,0.0012058323,0.0013068313,0.0003409268,0.6050512,0.3901876,0.000023708651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10896667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09322727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10896667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124729015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024598024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21666485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100157366","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2013.806396","title":"Frege, Carnap, and Explication: ‘Our Concern Here Is to Arrive at a Concept of Number Usable for the Purpose of Science’","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Principle of compositionality; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.0867136572106655,"score_gpt":0.25603150302090444,"score_spread":0.16931784581023895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100157366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034770116,0.06860781,0.15655524,0.34911498,0.005251674,0.00006512559,0.00016240745,0.00033675827,0.38513586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88083804,0.01253157,0.03088859,0.032330982,0.0036576644,0.00027563501,0.00010385708,0.00030187936,0.039071713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655414,0.0021446943,0.00012196,0.0004920921,0.0004516677,0.00023534671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673635,0.0023285947,0.0002112567,0.0003142032,0.00030917037,0.0001004615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006611743,0.00086447067,0.00090424553,0.0029642393,0.0052203513,0.006707446,0.001654061,0.007442981,0.003625199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009209926,0.00046449126,0.00078564836,0.0024819379,0.051087625,0.018929465,0.0038391193,0.0075112637,0.0007585208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004364609,0.0000013805394,0.000022464095,0.000018164726,0.000001877931,0.000017872846,0.0013038291,0.000042200998,0.000016041326,0.99474585,0.002139774,0.0016860875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047082376,0.000008161977,0.000079437195,0.00008178234,0.00000442077,0.000078560406,0.0007396671,0.00013299813,0.00006563022,0.9493237,0.049466707,0.000014243105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006205822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031270785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007442981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056949505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022748304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041319966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153924662","doi":"10.1080/01445340903445063","title":"Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Extension (predicate logic); Relation (database); Logical consequence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06011320210642194,"score_gpt":0.29064864051845374,"score_spread":0.2305354384120318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153924662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028080793,0.0827409,0.07490308,0.17018506,0.0052023465,0.000060713857,0.00022455883,0.0001152807,0.6384873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80633324,0.029366076,0.021120273,0.033425834,0.0049620303,0.00025719422,0.00014550639,0.00022700819,0.10416287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981871,0.00088907883,0.00006753104,0.00029026836,0.00042723407,0.00013870909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659866,0.0025013264,0.00016140238,0.0002246962,0.00042431662,0.000089550485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021614302,0.0005108731,0.00049693533,0.0015333564,0.0027046558,0.003071704,0.0006711957,0.0026989807,0.0037226668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006998356,0.00029798973,0.0005624568,0.0012778608,0.015736002,0.006653326,0.0029848379,0.004041844,0.0006267435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011321331,0.00000650143,0.000059034537,0.000024815328,0.000002860816,0.000029796518,0.00034159384,0.00011187721,0.000030840794,0.9902864,0.0060394746,0.0030555879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010411121,0.0000047388335,0.00014614806,0.000072995776,0.000003276411,0.00003689462,0.0001190185,0.00018501752,0.000083285515,0.94244736,0.056885432,0.000005484089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032403986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026620822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039009543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039009543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016209672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028303564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2432866249","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2016.1186884","title":"Fred Sommers’ Contributions to Formal Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Classics; Sociology; History; Mathematics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.049538383158090345,"score_gpt":0.2991883807602036,"score_spread":0.24964999760211326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2432866249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011666169,0.15386268,0.15089554,0.16259778,0.013986029,0.000051057832,0.000641587,0.00070857414,0.50559056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4816617,0.06709596,0.09188475,0.018378872,0.015752655,0.000117824195,0.0006284074,0.00047373062,0.32400605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967998,0.0011379223,0.00018923708,0.00053312926,0.0011339519,0.00020587286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941004,0.0043573105,0.00013406621,0.0003083818,0.0008857543,0.00021412341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034689596,0.0007644945,0.00049994997,0.0025381793,0.0023823278,0.0028779623,0.0007816081,0.0017704346,0.0066628475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010220104,0.0006180925,0.0009868216,0.0015188429,0.007929531,0.0048138923,0.0017599317,0.004224898,0.0016881371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000137274465,0.000012311168,0.0001498209,0.00005930718,0.000013471695,0.00006389072,0.0005854752,0.0010848632,0.00011895743,0.93298686,0.04471314,0.020198196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007360868,0.0000063495145,0.0001396005,0.000099520905,0.00000693777,0.000108787564,0.000081631806,0.0014216901,0.00020811088,0.6705482,0.32735506,0.000016799662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007746556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056925346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007839842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007839842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029727803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05688232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912929253","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2018.1554471","title":"Topos Theory in Montréal in the 1970s: My Personal Involvement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Topos theory; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.135058688402539,"score_gpt":0.24014462293724087,"score_spread":0.10508593453470186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912929253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22039331,0.026963107,0.006829289,0.09922114,0.00085493445,0.00007967616,0.000710393,0.00017892258,0.6447692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484975,0.007369799,0.001229201,0.0014618716,0.00015012111,0.000028787757,0.0000870586,0.00010811374,0.14106756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985012,0.00043568853,0.000025949319,0.00020921466,0.00030908544,0.0005188592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789596,0.00085151044,0.00011901986,0.000084193925,0.0004903662,0.00055894646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017410384,0.0003917326,0.0004002635,0.0013684024,0.012383703,0.0057469243,0.0010856041,0.0013970834,0.016234772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048347064,0.00042680046,0.00023479506,0.003091646,0.012587556,0.003987304,0.0024770799,0.0027042108,0.00062746607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056182736,0.000038177324,0.002966614,0.000085815795,0.00001321907,0.0004991542,0.0378406,0.0011201864,0.00030895084,0.8813888,0.03817758,0.0375047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022026761,0.000028502789,0.013549495,0.00021457364,0.000025000447,0.00014619916,0.030665299,0.001593758,0.0011496741,0.062290594,0.89024323,0.00007163571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9600378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11359949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055280488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82422584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002744517","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2019.1693246","title":"The Principle of Contradiction and Symbolic Logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Law of excluded middle; Philosophy; Mathematical logic; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Translation (biology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.09184441441257152,"score_gpt":0.22745766480063614,"score_spread":0.13561325038806463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002744517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009217012,0.025716135,0.05018892,0.04740875,0.0035450328,0.000053759606,0.0004374685,0.00022991913,0.86320305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6885937,0.025657296,0.0310781,0.012207714,0.0053648697,0.00034926107,0.0007450952,0.0005173567,0.23548658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902415,0.00038964947,0.00006200886,0.00013764604,0.00027952288,0.000106997824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896884,0.0006355208,0.00006800729,0.00009995557,0.00018398042,0.00004367031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009236258,0.000483067,0.0004421325,0.0011602588,0.0014996163,0.0043603303,0.0006689191,0.0013951004,0.012203522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032171707,0.00026221483,0.00046453107,0.0012080813,0.008084876,0.005332547,0.001919558,0.0029924603,0.0028247111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046234923,0.0000019073453,0.000016945323,0.000046902576,0.0000017589144,0.000025841144,0.0005542567,0.000042915704,0.000052240586,0.98338807,0.009900767,0.0059638326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089863415,0.000011397521,0.00020437063,0.0001087266,0.0000037537711,0.0001317469,0.00035368724,0.00034343006,0.00018718975,0.6452815,0.35335732,0.000007927621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002271989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021700428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012203522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035386193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017015947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04082483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172612205","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2021.1924570","title":"A Pragmatic-Semiotic Defence of Bivalence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Notation; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Intuitionistic logic; Linguistics; Computer science; Propositional calculus","score_opus":0.06448543821641771,"score_gpt":0.23405360660316846,"score_spread":0.16956816838675076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172612205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029405117,0.0026171152,0.2795782,0.042057693,0.00094399945,0.00008522047,0.0001492524,0.00023916953,0.6449242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260776,0.00060750934,0.03406918,0.0041335183,0.00043034842,0.00022349744,0.00006431283,0.00016737588,0.034226745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191874,0.0047473465,0.0002858332,0.00096159114,0.0016039133,0.00048260117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607146,0.0018754228,0.00025587238,0.000824563,0.00073279906,0.0002399718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069521326,0.0007334156,0.0006667731,0.0016134359,0.00472957,0.008189122,0.0016366427,0.0036874623,0.0054915003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086403005,0.00059334753,0.0009907853,0.0011720659,0.027457554,0.010915431,0.007867006,0.006335282,0.0011272888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020487364,0.0000015060863,0.000012271159,0.000004428255,6.5325116e-7,0.0000070268234,0.00027402866,0.000020165784,0.000045411158,0.99907947,0.00019131122,0.00036165986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009676017,0.000012717029,0.000045041557,0.000023578008,0.0000030987374,0.0000535389,0.00027738253,0.00042559355,0.00024264258,0.9755104,0.02338893,0.000007469213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017904217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013904903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008189122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038807273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022878512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036766827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396512806","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2024.2336404","title":"Ruth Barcan Marcus on the Deduction Theorem in Modal Logic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Modal logic; Normal modal logic; Modal; Mathematics; Sequent calculus; Calculus (dental); Philosophy; Geometry; Medicine; Materials science","score_opus":0.04270484688803463,"score_gpt":0.23177493038561464,"score_spread":0.18907008349758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396512806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030021127,0.13396715,0.17941165,0.19789386,0.005535369,0.000086366745,0.00020172639,0.00063909055,0.45224366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78152806,0.048358887,0.075466916,0.023078779,0.008364756,0.00019642961,0.0001310719,0.0003401222,0.062534995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982932,0.0007984204,0.000049153146,0.00026355902,0.0004656277,0.00012999128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962225,0.0031163376,0.00011545629,0.00014445641,0.00031351126,0.00008776233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002459373,0.00035784254,0.0005325716,0.0015202052,0.003087921,0.0027098814,0.00074322463,0.0014696886,0.003361559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005366449,0.00039874561,0.0005057872,0.0011426928,0.010769282,0.006529638,0.0020617777,0.003730311,0.0010572069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133012,0.000007166391,0.0000468919,0.000040569557,0.0000030716508,0.000048760463,0.00037530946,0.00044457306,0.00012807746,0.9840188,0.007650919,0.007222495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012514947,0.000012377155,0.00012576871,0.00008603411,0.000006724512,0.00006886714,0.0000833903,0.0015614583,0.00040745467,0.9019929,0.09562179,0.000020758655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071035414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003736792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071035414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033943793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001744115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024628043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407039891","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2024.2448793","title":"Is Aristotle’s Syllogistic a Logic?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Axiom; Sequent; Sequent calculus; Natural deduction; Mathematics; Linguistics; Mathematical proof; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.09481924021408294,"score_gpt":0.2531865053071748,"score_spread":0.15836726509309185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407039891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038752563,0.016191185,0.09300313,0.20545669,0.0024431108,0.000044150693,0.00040104566,0.0003302812,0.6433779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88350856,0.007407652,0.03139183,0.020061074,0.003651519,0.000086149266,0.000219967,0.00014595527,0.053527303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830234,0.0005905428,0.00005616837,0.0002583799,0.0005729272,0.00021965256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986601,0.0006254552,0.00011578494,0.00013894589,0.0003264228,0.0001332412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019889418,0.00025214753,0.00051660015,0.0013647167,0.0032583661,0.0045536165,0.00084401766,0.0019361969,0.005544735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036353527,0.00022170474,0.00041673597,0.0012904971,0.013564886,0.007088111,0.0011062977,0.0020378665,0.0012930429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004467791,0.0000026142936,0.00006277292,0.000008731725,0.0000017533637,0.000016286489,0.00030803206,0.000044690543,0.000023873152,0.9924304,0.003547754,0.0035486324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043916325,0.0000043267555,0.00023225545,0.000026411057,0.0000021067224,0.000031363787,0.00027958956,0.0005271254,0.000051097126,0.9492639,0.04957076,0.0000066743164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012030883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01155139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012030883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004313197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034205497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031294584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201811","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2025.2506332","title":"Venn and Existential Import: Development of the Modern Doctrine of Categorical Propositions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Philosophy of Logic","topic":"Education, Law, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Venn diagram; Existentialism; Categorical variable; Development (topology); Doctrine","score_opus":0.047801838932557524,"score_gpt":0.29685115441162013,"score_spread":0.24904931547906262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042279698,0.016209241,0.18205394,0.056435183,0.0010469034,0.000057448866,0.00018609298,0.00014710388,0.7015844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384147,0.0041537024,0.027720606,0.003906894,0.0010064685,0.00010308168,0.00008631873,0.00011438112,0.024493797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965612,0.002189008,0.000109192886,0.00044651589,0.0005061731,0.00018783446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942496,0.003959115,0.0002589869,0.00072492496,0.00063397456,0.00017336197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063297166,0.00042976055,0.0006795459,0.0026771163,0.0029368224,0.0064407233,0.001651927,0.002698534,0.004499629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082454905,0.00048507028,0.00066468574,0.0017376,0.04147197,0.013098124,0.004828583,0.0072280406,0.00053009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014158751,0.0000012729643,0.00001663521,0.0000046374134,4.682536e-7,0.0000037247564,0.00030258586,0.000033536973,0.000007874105,0.99879265,0.00015447929,0.00068069226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023873463,0.0000024352198,0.000036021756,0.000022883789,9.0933577e-7,0.000014140292,0.00012252356,0.00022760719,0.00002725719,0.9917144,0.0078265425,0.0000027091319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028363478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032134098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064407233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005342534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003966708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038762927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}