{"meta":{"query_hash":"2e0eb3c46b1a","filters":{"venue":"History and Theory"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2e0eb3c46b1a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=History+and+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1968204610","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00634.x","title":"THE CONTINUING MODESTY OF HISTORY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Empiricism; Order (exchange); Identity (music); Causality (physics); Representation (politics); Sociology; History; Epistemology; Work (physics); Historical method; Aesthetics; Law; Social science; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02673979376839227,"score_gpt":0.18084106413364262,"score_spread":0.15410127036525034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968204610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010630515,0.05600136,0.00411025,0.4249462,0.008791359,0.000016303793,0.00012314046,0.00007901112,0.4953018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7863807,0.02911416,0.0029262602,0.043478847,0.016774494,0.000086222164,0.00014274931,0.00019101404,0.12090551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951208,0.0030181755,0.00010551464,0.00056541,0.00081673654,0.00037340127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920046,0.004875806,0.0003554346,0.001146478,0.0009799242,0.00063783437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057638986,0.00039816237,0.0004905274,0.0017640666,0.0058917613,0.012525649,0.001191323,0.0030985111,0.010734084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012011502,0.00024186335,0.00023061289,0.0012252236,0.034278996,0.0132001685,0.004602242,0.0073696063,0.0011694039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077440845,0.0000036692447,0.00010429152,0.00003359075,0.0000020292348,0.00003613694,0.0030606624,0.000046529163,0.00002227464,0.9647645,0.025829516,0.006089058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000590993,0.000008589374,0.00024531505,0.00032126927,0.0000030702158,0.00006126043,0.0032024663,0.0001470704,0.000044391236,0.37678978,0.61916333,0.0000075231087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070143226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068379235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012525649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008466557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004660349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06142944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971679413","doi":"10.1111/1468-2303.00208","title":"Beyond Cultural Imperialism: Cultural Theory, Christian Missions, and Global Modernity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Christian Theology and Mission","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Historiography; Globalization; Sociology; Cultural imperialism; Nationalism; Cultural globalization; History; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02951653296471686,"score_gpt":0.22454917207839495,"score_spread":0.19503263911367807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971679413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13933541,0.053417936,0.007813186,0.06607504,0.0007230217,0.00003688624,0.00003087706,0.000027526055,0.73254013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98218,0.008224883,0.0006260059,0.0014987778,0.0003807028,0.000024206618,0.000010751932,0.000012343102,0.0070423484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988691,0.00076077355,0.000021445068,0.000082940736,0.00010743683,0.00015834642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775213,0.0015572817,0.0001839136,0.00014679044,0.00014052683,0.00021950596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001855891,0.00040297338,0.0003911893,0.0019933148,0.0046382495,0.0064003877,0.0008416297,0.002058249,0.0032781933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002174842,0.0001449855,0.00026606026,0.0027429746,0.03909054,0.007019738,0.0034465643,0.0029332598,0.00019475685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004394047,0.000013972698,0.0003213053,0.00003979647,0.0000034326022,0.00006981314,0.012885071,0.00024596922,0.0000136408225,0.9815833,0.0010305634,0.0037887385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011908101,0.000021947388,0.0011966766,0.00023450523,0.000006193929,0.00013650772,0.027888091,0.0006909327,0.00005005042,0.9140998,0.055654943,0.000008427551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005777266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063439608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064003877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054499595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028741239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039542437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972620262","doi":"10.1111/1468-2303.00251","title":"The Verificationist in Spite of Himself","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexive pronoun; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03146210630232882,"score_gpt":0.20260680878086987,"score_spread":0.17114470247854105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972620262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007375404,0.06906527,0.015396528,0.18123092,0.0071338736,0.000051118306,0.00008063034,0.00017662012,0.7194896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4007683,0.018099556,0.0058693225,0.0312765,0.0068702977,0.00015857247,0.00007052828,0.00030627224,0.5365807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777657,0.0010305253,0.00006581416,0.00036626274,0.0006440648,0.000116812625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938512,0.004466737,0.00020989141,0.00069746963,0.00062540866,0.00014916668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034006338,0.00048996566,0.0007905075,0.0008697258,0.0042911307,0.007725732,0.0010540285,0.0049872175,0.011391561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011151846,0.00040144083,0.00034075437,0.000754213,0.020548739,0.013192469,0.0024758796,0.008946525,0.002742042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012573835,0.000011154556,0.00007655422,0.0000617359,0.0000049182117,0.00003822886,0.002316903,0.00004230331,0.00009043264,0.9416871,0.043698724,0.01195942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020439958,0.000022274224,0.0002108478,0.000261988,0.000009032084,0.0001894763,0.0018945119,0.00021768756,0.00035864743,0.54263884,0.45416328,0.000012997967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002849174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046620155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011391561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002030816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035136465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038108528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980035191","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00576.x","title":"1. DECENTERING HISTORY: LOCAL STORIES AND CULTURAL CROSSINGS IN A GLOBAL WORLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Fifteenth; Subaltern; History; World history; Globalization; Narrative; Ethnic group; Sociology; Anthropology; Literature; Classics; Ancient history; Politics; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029558999236821818,"score_gpt":0.255790615787269,"score_spread":0.2262316165504472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980035191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65621924,0.013922843,0.0020163136,0.02290874,0.0007998655,0.000047621,0.00013017734,0.00009647793,0.3038587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849582,0.0025281357,0.00021555087,0.0008257124,0.00017772106,0.000017287695,0.00003093408,0.00005213979,0.011194375],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973322,0.0019795334,0.000040848376,0.00017279318,0.00019035113,0.0002842457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980477,0.0011665681,0.00021989578,0.00016804165,0.00012461504,0.00027321387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030056343,0.00096556224,0.0006516768,0.0020924828,0.018078407,0.010734246,0.0013656671,0.0024202126,0.006348916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037581334,0.000320001,0.00024384471,0.0031283128,0.03222394,0.011354694,0.008855274,0.004945981,0.0004691379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771983,0.0000134330785,0.00055476703,0.000072387935,0.0000032494072,0.00058242417,0.9654908,0.000035188543,0.00013094768,0.026494628,0.0028415492,0.00376284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033923632,0.000028801996,0.0010100883,0.00033444536,0.000006187113,0.00052317453,0.8873317,0.00005321175,0.00018345476,0.0046128333,0.10590035,0.000012338043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063057714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014148901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018078407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010037248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035241246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992794953","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00600.x","title":"RETHINKING HISTORICAL DISTANCE: FROM DOCTRINE TO HEURISTIC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Temporality; Sociology; Intelligibility (philosophy); Politics; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Social science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1621579981501755,"score_gpt":0.3174722539852836,"score_spread":0.1553142558351081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992794953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07156118,0.010766985,0.26172575,0.11069016,0.002884764,0.00015283193,0.00013946062,0.00021494931,0.541864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686165,0.0017710661,0.018925156,0.002780311,0.00066558784,0.00009546147,0.000049975348,0.00013335061,0.006962737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866665,0.009546209,0.00043862313,0.001276541,0.0014380869,0.00063398835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583154,0.0326754,0.0015010585,0.004185406,0.0024135702,0.00090915995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017881243,0.0006053128,0.00085271493,0.0054372633,0.0062063867,0.014736276,0.0044102203,0.0043039364,0.007953487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040634412,0.00046632078,0.0006400784,0.0033982254,0.089875065,0.025911307,0.011419276,0.009590501,0.0005612794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003794989,0.000003602981,0.000070439855,0.000019147546,0.000001959456,0.00003180355,0.004294706,0.00015428278,0.000016451275,0.9929181,0.00041787382,0.002067869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006329637,0.0000095015475,0.00009113064,0.00014154383,0.0000050430685,0.000042818112,0.0063123666,0.0008202439,0.00010022278,0.96732235,0.025140302,0.000008262633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005599608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054239207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017881243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011573844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052258535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09456617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993500918","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00611.x","title":"FOUCAULT, FIELDS OF GOVERNABILITY, AND THE POPULATION–FAMILY–ECONOMY NEXUS IN CHINA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Nexus (standard); China; Politics; Capitalism; Sociology; Rationality; Political economy; Development economics; Economy; Political science; Economics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.02180014051810361,"score_gpt":0.2517457849388244,"score_spread":0.22994564442072077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993500918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5981125,0.010910361,0.009457893,0.06011897,0.00026415198,0.00011378563,0.00008731363,0.000063235464,0.3208718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939803,0.00069500867,0.0006531904,0.00038586103,0.00004070993,0.000034437366,0.000005876488,0.0000051768316,0.004199491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877566,0.0006052385,0.00003470841,0.00017680443,0.00016603078,0.00024151763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988325,0.0006387694,0.00013477853,0.00011793783,0.00013132759,0.00014465446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032641368,0.0002012101,0.00026387785,0.0011782084,0.0069955657,0.0023905789,0.00063397654,0.001021619,0.0012209569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025474534,0.00014313043,0.00024397168,0.0011542387,0.03142246,0.0025904854,0.0016833977,0.0018897348,0.0000653806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063073735,0.0000066282255,0.0012819243,0.00001230006,0.0000018238749,0.000076069155,0.012232535,0.00024534453,0.000041694584,0.9810006,0.0005479928,0.0045468044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022514147,0.00004732158,0.01268613,0.0001305893,0.000011688341,0.00008744922,0.0088506425,0.0030033966,0.000368215,0.89562833,0.079128385,0.00003542712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111632936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073929705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111632936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021772228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011665022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22196633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022381597","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2007.00414.x","title":"HISTORY IN THE SIKH PAST<sup>1</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Reading (process); History; Relation (database); Sociology; History of religions; Literature; Transition (genetics); Politics; Epistemology; Gender studies; Anthropology; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.0281252043332768,"score_gpt":0.1936409046702251,"score_spread":0.1655157003369483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022381597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46238303,0.0150309345,0.0010246469,0.019782623,0.0012500295,0.000024193821,0.00008415443,0.00005488864,0.5003654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866001,0.0016177683,0.000112299706,0.00024860096,0.000133985,0.00000747284,0.000014489518,0.000008999158,0.0112563325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994473,0.00031250552,0.000021490187,0.000051563442,0.00007265359,0.000094511306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919206,0.00041255562,0.0001103417,0.000064756154,0.0001230993,0.000097322736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011526681,0.0002304186,0.00021721591,0.001059042,0.007926174,0.005536446,0.0005246234,0.0007757288,0.0056764307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010673149,0.0001924494,0.000098725344,0.0017350073,0.015065219,0.0026541145,0.0015827338,0.0021610733,0.00042636006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005247378,0.00004659083,0.002596812,0.00024935434,0.000005360013,0.00089550123,0.4162167,0.00017779318,0.0006454431,0.5521324,0.008190604,0.018790878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016418302,0.00015519142,0.015582107,0.001006765,0.000016426713,0.0010871901,0.22032078,0.0003423962,0.0009570257,0.048370734,0.7121076,0.000037328544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069851233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01080524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007926174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004531111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020394945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032875717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029857308","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00342.x","title":"MOVING BEYOND BIOPOWER: HARDT AND NEGRI'S POST‐FOUCAULDIAN SPECULATIVE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Telos; Philosophy of history; Philosophy; Hegelianism; Biopower; Continental philosophy; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Empire; Multitude; Teleology; History; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023887560105608163,"score_gpt":0.26058812870897013,"score_spread":0.23670056860336197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029857308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07760856,0.01495338,0.035942588,0.19135869,0.0014313775,0.000043595825,0.000035583802,0.000062713414,0.6785635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584839,0.0024549377,0.0043624523,0.0056331307,0.00060504937,0.00006413095,0.000010396996,0.000041919517,0.028344084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973018,0.0018938523,0.000035537847,0.00018309645,0.00042942012,0.00015621018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962909,0.0028371008,0.00022180476,0.00022706969,0.00024789292,0.00017525948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004975672,0.0003562219,0.00042271655,0.0015151376,0.0054559177,0.008547437,0.0010641473,0.0027543474,0.0030838843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055953404,0.00022558792,0.0002911865,0.00078244647,0.042253654,0.007995465,0.004263197,0.0053078732,0.0003608335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002969634,0.00000379776,0.000031100953,0.000004201208,5.5089885e-7,0.000018959232,0.0039195865,0.00005158463,0.000016898333,0.99411136,0.00073384785,0.0011050648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062505155,0.000008909049,0.000083663595,0.00005969772,0.0000017801824,0.000041823325,0.0023132458,0.00045390456,0.00008906887,0.9362806,0.060653575,0.0000073540355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003166176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044128504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009289351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009289351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029189456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06739932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032037086","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00460.x","title":"DIAGNOSING FROUDE'S DISEASE: BOUNDARY WORK AND THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORY IN LATE‐VICTORIAN BRITAIN","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Froude number; Boundary-work; Historiography; Professionalization; Narrative; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Psychology; Archaeology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019447336301295096,"score_gpt":0.18274523439883694,"score_spread":0.16329789809754186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032037086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69289976,0.027706036,0.0047935285,0.12071467,0.0009123751,0.00013414287,0.00003450934,0.00004839065,0.15275654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924258,0.0014455518,0.0007000008,0.0016968461,0.00006894461,0.000021447262,0.000006304665,0.000013125686,0.003621955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98583186,0.009657863,0.0004595125,0.0006269032,0.001803473,0.0016203881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97224754,0.019792737,0.0026845722,0.0007937791,0.0018383227,0.002643005],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015095646,0.0003279646,0.00064135954,0.006089199,0.022860924,0.014631976,0.0022011076,0.006768815,0.0020753704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029083809,0.0006712906,0.00020584169,0.0035969643,0.08813377,0.008398733,0.0144744385,0.0066593797,0.0001650069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013233158,0.000014875291,0.0022956342,0.000067270914,0.0000021574785,0.00072323496,0.86676717,0.00004291651,0.00017557298,0.1214299,0.0016190868,0.0068489504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008300688,0.00002952345,0.005763114,0.0009735727,0.0000058477985,0.00070784695,0.7974801,0.00027955123,0.00030253007,0.068787865,0.12562646,0.000035285037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17301619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23022507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97713906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03694997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023924122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34401822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044381617","doi":"10.1111/1468-2303.00248","title":"Another New Nietzsche","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030400680875138912,"score_gpt":0.19951333005681712,"score_spread":0.1691126491816782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044381617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002593769,0.08381417,0.004126546,0.088032484,0.015652373,0.000032786244,0.00015643398,0.000104753315,0.80548674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0485534,0.024204575,0.0025954242,0.020592907,0.005831618,0.00006358131,0.00012625435,0.00018085686,0.8978512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999421,0.00017649903,0.000018911554,0.00010720952,0.00022960616,0.00004678985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994209,0.00028370722,0.00002968295,0.00005330172,0.00015125713,0.000061118655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007609298,0.0005009832,0.00036630884,0.0023016909,0.0027201585,0.00372419,0.00066983263,0.002920674,0.03210118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029501,0.00024066167,0.0002720223,0.0014809206,0.0050283945,0.0062431106,0.002227919,0.0035049855,0.004468096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009774873,0.000015684047,0.00006866751,0.000089071844,0.0000036322929,0.000089319554,0.001360493,0.000057233246,0.00018339333,0.72021586,0.24937013,0.028536802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002825303,0.0000034319874,0.00009794764,0.0000837753,0.000002119227,0.00008554951,0.00031613032,0.00003101907,0.000048981037,0.052442525,0.946881,0.0000046113037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004794946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015638018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03210118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002281851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020148435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10738915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045929160","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00289.x","title":"Is a Picture Really Worth a 1,000 Words?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Literature; Linguistics; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.02171725912626542,"score_gpt":0.1896767962186007,"score_spread":0.16795953709233527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045929160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004232791,0.32644117,0.006068081,0.49143848,0.04151344,0.000028975212,0.00041672867,0.0005688541,0.12929152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1477695,0.31327432,0.014102377,0.09210839,0.031751797,0.000097346674,0.0008324256,0.0013930538,0.39867082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990097,0.0003905473,0.000054235596,0.0001060934,0.00036111666,0.000078334226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975592,0.001256434,0.0001841662,0.00014783388,0.0005560288,0.00029621346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015213208,0.00086069235,0.00047498374,0.0015907374,0.0029104205,0.00978926,0.0007444588,0.002539911,0.034317043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009573378,0.0005164598,0.000367469,0.0020242676,0.00695397,0.020217702,0.0022385463,0.0033811713,0.013061137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057830664,0.000009646573,0.00043657434,0.00034541966,0.000016637356,0.0002119368,0.0046723955,0.00007465666,0.00048246223,0.04063512,0.85459393,0.098463334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030332574,0.000011992477,0.0004396141,0.00042702036,0.0000079397605,0.00041773613,0.006734449,0.00007606895,0.00012587434,0.024730211,0.96701384,0.0000121186795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004134887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109866215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034317043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015760071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013902402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11480194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074604699","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00605.x","title":"GADAMER AND COLLINGWOOD ON TEMPORAL DISTANCE AND UNDERSTANDING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Mediation; Dimension (graph theory); Transposition (logic); Extension (predicate logic); Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11761242865756164,"score_gpt":0.2058538693459238,"score_spread":0.08824144068836218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074604699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0980144,0.026662672,0.14408705,0.056964237,0.000963936,0.0000908601,0.0001009899,0.00025851812,0.6728573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723555,0.0027054895,0.010869377,0.0025268681,0.00029639908,0.000054316723,0.000027998996,0.000092787304,0.011071316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929362,0.0047604213,0.00022094596,0.0009632309,0.00073119573,0.0003879879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933355,0.004781698,0.00041292852,0.0006950167,0.00055651995,0.00021830328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050001303,0.00063821475,0.00069621543,0.0026867534,0.0031424237,0.0082776155,0.0011935192,0.003711782,0.003042408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008916877,0.00041558352,0.00056036026,0.0019184594,0.053066123,0.014464346,0.00554524,0.005251234,0.00037651527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005622898,0.000001617527,0.000023171253,0.000012844162,0.00000107406,0.000020053352,0.004634149,0.000081981896,0.000028060354,0.9932213,0.0004490436,0.0015210622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009532867,0.000010383287,0.00009492166,0.00010323271,0.000005966187,0.0000983046,0.0025793156,0.0005082189,0.00015966185,0.9528556,0.04355958,0.00001548401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062013334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024910755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082776155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006381799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022506358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04630339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075580204","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00353.x","title":"A HISTORY WITHOUT THE HISTORY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Planet; Art history; History; Philosophy; Art; Astrobiology; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.03185897850196708,"score_gpt":0.22465829187849157,"score_spread":0.19279931337652448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075580204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007227824,0.08004764,0.003911353,0.13779321,0.0109521,0.000044774144,0.00028507144,0.00008017512,0.759658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43722415,0.06355447,0.0035554508,0.05040929,0.011437227,0.00012161769,0.00040141016,0.00028645413,0.43300992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982572,0.0008566958,0.00006788357,0.00027956683,0.00037510454,0.00016354086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791235,0.00069657393,0.00017919729,0.00046256243,0.00043047647,0.0003188468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019021553,0.00059039437,0.00047851523,0.0014286498,0.0062500667,0.0068366346,0.00070381287,0.002277065,0.01798615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005296099,0.00025386288,0.0002584348,0.0014123081,0.024517281,0.016920162,0.0038409908,0.0043243268,0.004329265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110372885,0.000008500389,0.00015474144,0.0000642557,0.000004101834,0.000079595826,0.0044358894,0.00003704523,0.00005602504,0.93886966,0.04489413,0.01138499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003129461,0.0000075278776,0.00013145608,0.00019653962,0.0000020851974,0.0000828997,0.0019632953,0.00001969093,0.000029088102,0.13848245,0.85907686,0.0000049701075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048847753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067818365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01798615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045740334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044231256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060169637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088825835","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2007.00390.x","title":"BERNARD BAILYN'S AMERICAN ATLANTIC","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; History; Genealogy; Library science; Classics; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.007914469445057304,"score_gpt":0.21634810893340592,"score_spread":0.20843363948834862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088825835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008515952,0.039608914,0.000417175,0.5549552,0.02817485,0.000014678896,0.00022620292,0.000048493213,0.36803854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13966833,0.021257715,0.0005086344,0.047395486,0.0038043149,0.000015613188,0.00008889863,0.00008069133,0.7871802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882525,0.00018474458,0.000017795175,0.00015434045,0.0003823943,0.0004354691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978399,0.00028323926,0.000045647063,0.00005533006,0.0009991495,0.0007766209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014080617,0.00040810925,0.0004370935,0.0015617306,0.021884605,0.0057361475,0.00074164796,0.0025574213,0.018237792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003660017,0.00019702132,0.00022007924,0.0017333373,0.0051838765,0.0027652306,0.0020812955,0.005536648,0.0017465218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021630143,0.000014418019,0.00066926115,0.000021599304,0.0000039891574,0.000051890343,0.0019262583,0.00004020776,0.0000441342,0.14266954,0.8376999,0.016837066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027817007,0.0000024526146,0.0007472402,0.00006345133,0.0000028066477,0.000021589172,0.0017768427,0.00002583489,0.000030240335,0.006892433,0.9904255,0.000008874589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8998396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9620427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10016042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035838522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031856127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2600279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097251817","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00385.x","title":"TRANSCENDING DICHOTOMIES IN HISTORY AND RELIGION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dichotomy; Opposition (politics); Faith; Sociology; Christianity; History of Christianity; Constructive; Epistemology; Religious studies; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.01380101250697295,"score_gpt":0.24842508534474533,"score_spread":0.2346240728377724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097251817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17595989,0.021887096,0.02889968,0.14145358,0.00293499,0.00007597452,0.00016590372,0.00011776606,0.6285052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840423,0.0019870207,0.002658631,0.0037367607,0.00060667266,0.00004407368,0.00003943941,0.00003828567,0.0068468945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951167,0.0035286287,0.00012541143,0.0003814406,0.00054450904,0.0003032725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914847,0.0052144174,0.00072979275,0.0010788044,0.0008577511,0.0006345231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061226184,0.00039349304,0.0006586425,0.0031142076,0.005130554,0.010462173,0.0018271548,0.0022391821,0.0044705183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074033607,0.0002170062,0.00026788964,0.0022994308,0.060320202,0.015445045,0.008383798,0.007436984,0.00042389607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076851475,0.000007161802,0.00023754296,0.000013948704,0.000001440217,0.000038435308,0.015541825,0.000022194363,0.000033005046,0.98134816,0.0006653441,0.0020833078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012219879,0.000027254811,0.001281429,0.0002700067,0.000005753905,0.00013142182,0.0358688,0.0003302051,0.00018215271,0.87462795,0.08724535,0.00001758837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035621368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054536103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010462173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005761061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023365016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041799605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105426166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00591.x","title":"CONNECTING THE NEW POLITICAL HISTORY WITH RECENT THEORIES OF TEMPORAL ACCELERATION: SPEED, POLITICS, AND THE CULTURAL IMAGINATION OF <i>FIN DE SIÈCLE</i> BRITAIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Realm; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Fin de siecle; Cultural history; Acceleration; Aesthetics; History; Social science; Anthropology; Literature; Art history; Art; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0339276319367294,"score_gpt":0.2448172315554305,"score_spread":0.2108895996187011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105426166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39707842,0.021952098,0.005244226,0.0862842,0.00056843075,0.000015619089,0.00009096788,0.000030915628,0.48873508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447685,0.0015696875,0.0001411549,0.00033571525,0.00010537438,0.000002930633,0.000008766551,0.0000063190087,0.0033531901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988279,0.0007307478,0.000029510651,0.000077356446,0.00018239033,0.00015203776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965341,0.0022748539,0.00034888793,0.00019938634,0.00042468708,0.00021802305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025614994,0.0001664868,0.00015349184,0.002235578,0.0019328293,0.004643351,0.0004989763,0.0010419228,0.0042268606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041650888,0.00015652349,0.00010231936,0.0016680404,0.02251937,0.0029411872,0.001380339,0.0014895408,0.00023617115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038646496,0.000012093144,0.0031194785,0.000075626485,0.000006140991,0.00012444204,0.04587644,0.00040608662,0.00014785076,0.9342849,0.0029832376,0.012924984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027377293,0.000045980007,0.03294309,0.00055533316,0.000020937478,0.0002937448,0.070583686,0.0026537373,0.00033493733,0.53031045,0.3621877,0.00004304938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037977647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04718331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037977647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008978731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017316197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075513184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139119950","doi":"10.1111/1468-2303.00217","title":"Reflections on Retelling a Renaissance Murder","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Renaissance and Early Modern Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Irony; Wife; The Imaginary; Literature; Pathos; Art; Anecdote; Art history; Contemplation; Narrative; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Theology","score_opus":0.15351919182068882,"score_gpt":0.26587119503129847,"score_spread":0.11235200321060965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139119950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4253945,0.017802173,0.005947824,0.16654451,0.016814666,0.00022805462,0.00019647428,0.00046712792,0.3666047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053511,0.0032483032,0.0012777622,0.015694907,0.0028798168,0.00008556066,0.00006849116,0.00050262694,0.17089143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105036,0.005856025,0.0001630376,0.0008097635,0.0011970998,0.0009237291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956333,0.0023879497,0.00035735656,0.0003192541,0.0007135362,0.0005885801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004719052,0.0012540395,0.00068395364,0.0016124302,0.02190892,0.009157942,0.002534393,0.005740979,0.00690372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019402716,0.0005716417,0.0004789362,0.00060905964,0.0214565,0.0054731457,0.010071704,0.014332583,0.002296063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003096601,0.0000396183,0.0004579678,0.00007430103,0.000006990871,0.0024198522,0.91128314,0.00006607576,0.0007620131,0.04280946,0.034836918,0.00721272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065173404,0.00005097843,0.0005327851,0.00024533813,0.0000071809195,0.0010281318,0.39887077,0.00008134375,0.0008742417,0.0031311081,0.59514016,0.000031347026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01218932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029721875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02190892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007509827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022302957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054487884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191429088","doi":"10.1111/hith.10781","title":"BETWEEN AFFECT AND HISTORY: SOVEREIGNTY AND ORDINARY LIFE AT AKWESASNE, 1929–1942","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Narrative; Indigenous; Colonialism; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04091897068934058,"score_gpt":0.27062102260105825,"score_spread":0.22970205191171766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191429088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88433975,0.0038013759,0.0004307106,0.00160579,0.00009466637,0.000011549531,0.000024770678,0.0000068634063,0.10968441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951681,0.000473218,0.000046985904,0.000036599253,0.000008624489,0.0000030236138,0.0000037387101,0.000002029126,0.004257642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995153,0.00020717624,0.000017827519,0.00006296905,0.000081791186,0.00011494522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996074,0.00021359003,0.000058296617,0.000024068855,0.000043722903,0.00005300425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007969919,0.00021636472,0.00025485523,0.0006947215,0.0071790195,0.0038191155,0.00032088693,0.00069574354,0.002614894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011665312,0.00016757172,0.000080666076,0.00085725717,0.015786836,0.0029795931,0.0028836436,0.0017212123,0.00016007501],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036361846,0.000027806147,0.0037028878,0.000057955753,0.0000055865426,0.0009590359,0.8744627,0.000117256306,0.0010046575,0.106086284,0.00057673483,0.01296267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076125675,0.00009418461,0.049588323,0.00038604272,0.00001688856,0.000989712,0.74879,0.00019607697,0.0011962074,0.023142809,0.1755269,0.0000651935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024717126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0466633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97528285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057274816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013950998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049146533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567441380","doi":"10.1111/hith.10827","title":"FOUCAULT'S ICONIC AFTERLIFE: THE POSTHUMOUS REACH OF WORDS AND THINGS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Michel foucault; Iconicity; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Noun; Foregrounding; Literature; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Linguistics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.017806510123646518,"score_gpt":0.25562948392936174,"score_spread":0.23782297380571524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567441380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0554998,0.040990923,0.029775068,0.2725479,0.011546946,0.00007598389,0.00008628812,0.00022993646,0.5892471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282395,0.004096629,0.005113881,0.016622541,0.0025230346,0.000081337974,0.000025858018,0.000228882,0.04306835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98969144,0.007999103,0.00015334852,0.00052639603,0.001109573,0.00052007416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886713,0.0073828115,0.0004345488,0.0011553903,0.0017959628,0.00055998814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010235513,0.00047416452,0.00045305074,0.002414083,0.009963551,0.008416793,0.0008166828,0.003363421,0.0034980907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022756336,0.0002790124,0.0003117292,0.0013606593,0.077268876,0.008580252,0.0050048274,0.0078373905,0.0007577058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010665422,0.000005606792,0.000042256936,0.000014064536,0.0000013082868,0.000060987906,0.013469206,0.00004190654,0.000041920088,0.9756973,0.0061783716,0.0044364585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009949932,0.000024056426,0.00015467408,0.00018741141,0.0000030074561,0.00012001893,0.006911993,0.00024691602,0.00031327104,0.61472327,0.37728724,0.000018258417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069177663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049418057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008970965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004786205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065089166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592000426","doi":"10.1111/hith.12002","title":"1. INDIA IN A WORLD: DILEMMAS OF SOVEREIGNTY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Sovereignty; South asia; Nationalism; Monarchy; Islam; World history; History; Historical anthropology; Central asia; Political science; Ancient history; Law; Economic history; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0404982937288518,"score_gpt":0.30284221985852117,"score_spread":0.2623439261296694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592000426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08680268,0.009314215,0.0025924612,0.10747405,0.00048913795,0.000017524699,0.000073250376,0.00004179392,0.7931949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804228,0.002518718,0.00036434556,0.004128814,0.00020052014,0.000013627008,0.000018234885,0.000016202177,0.012316827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986009,0.00079204846,0.00003259802,0.00015941681,0.00018746061,0.00022748679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850744,0.0008771438,0.00013015664,0.00015022284,0.00016756331,0.0001675141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001923603,0.00024161742,0.00028709677,0.0007643004,0.007927138,0.01177443,0.00062687224,0.0024189304,0.0056308024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026261865,0.00016524056,0.0001805332,0.0014795997,0.030444786,0.008379713,0.006584705,0.0045257905,0.000445673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000929995,0.0000068564896,0.00043594599,0.00002863701,0.000002553363,0.000149216,0.024450617,0.00008333611,0.00005197524,0.96532124,0.0052501396,0.0042100106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011016401,0.000029429393,0.0017474759,0.0003196225,0.000013389805,0.00051629636,0.07079212,0.0003636311,0.0001811636,0.6850049,0.2409879,0.000033021493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063009453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008716949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01177443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004069612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024005498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029527247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592491420","doi":"10.1111/hith.12009","title":"THE TRUTH HURTS: VERA SCHWARCZ'S HEARTFELT QUEST","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Relativism; Situated; Meaning (existential); Conversation; Epistemology; Hebrew; Literature; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0335248240370414,"score_gpt":0.28039077320680933,"score_spread":0.24686594916976792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592491420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02535855,0.046133257,0.0014195879,0.777559,0.009733836,0.000016933625,0.0000439322,0.0000657383,0.13966921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76653725,0.018247478,0.00086676545,0.1439606,0.006821908,0.000046214278,0.000039562925,0.00015373853,0.06332649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968079,0.0017333166,0.00006918091,0.0002696856,0.0006434248,0.00047651274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961522,0.0027508035,0.00012905865,0.00014200447,0.0004905861,0.00033527694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006255747,0.00046845357,0.0007436611,0.0012409561,0.013379801,0.011486856,0.0012321731,0.0070783957,0.0029927904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006925364,0.000319234,0.00029758146,0.0010625655,0.035344876,0.008873255,0.0042298418,0.010741333,0.0007676632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002239796,0.000024423724,0.00021317393,0.000043856173,0.000008302497,0.00045318602,0.033111498,0.000102734804,0.00012695458,0.81481016,0.14201936,0.009064007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016853632,0.000022220162,0.00034911546,0.00037937006,0.000007935699,0.0003437008,0.032604482,0.00046046323,0.00028182307,0.38679865,0.5787024,0.00003298076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014466502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019240534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014466502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063770167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00510785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0462687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011537477","doi":"10.1111/hith.12151","title":"LANDSCAPE IN ITS PLACE: THE IMAGINATION OF KASHMIR IN SANSKRIT AND BEYOND","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sanskrit; Realm; History; Literature; Kashmiri; Identity (music); Poetry; Politics; Rhetorical question; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Archaeology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017384357930128175,"score_gpt":0.23897435473869083,"score_spread":0.22158999680856264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011537477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.709187,0.011899518,0.0032075369,0.0120179495,0.00043166138,0.00003620839,0.000054577962,0.00005786387,0.26310775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996899,0.0005661778,0.00024179138,0.00021991455,0.000022932192,0.000005198414,0.0000049587534,0.000009826116,0.0020302543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975069,0.001939203,0.000041987132,0.00016921201,0.00014691513,0.00019583911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998694,0.00087471283,0.00009682229,0.00008121584,0.00011479743,0.00013858166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029742052,0.0009885489,0.00042854782,0.0011899729,0.013260135,0.0073679625,0.0008074589,0.0019104023,0.0024225253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00186336,0.00031877751,0.0002870984,0.0009501939,0.039226454,0.006624587,0.0039488096,0.0034926496,0.00028847164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012829903,0.000005239545,0.00029792907,0.000037754202,0.000002496801,0.0003396119,0.9435875,0.00006248984,0.00049038196,0.052955925,0.00051106134,0.0016967151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003162561,0.000028025912,0.00096509984,0.00013499385,0.000006220771,0.00050959556,0.9547063,0.00014992831,0.0002230066,0.009540249,0.03371416,0.000019317318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014541283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027837507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014541283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004368175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019216676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03169346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081588847","doi":"10.1111/hith.12167","title":"4. TECHNOPOLITICS IN THE ARCHIVE: SOVEREIGNTY, RESEARCH, AND EVERYDAY LIFE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Subject (documents); Identity (music); Sociology; History; Media studies; Genealogy; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Library science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.10406930925757245,"score_gpt":0.23155339306788536,"score_spread":0.1274840838103129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081588847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3386008,0.010731321,0.013136546,0.036753766,0.00041240035,0.000056359655,0.00011979773,0.00012959303,0.6000594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914172,0.0007754936,0.0007324647,0.0004051251,0.00008625023,0.00001872539,0.000011910462,0.000027803797,0.006525017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914886,0.0063561033,0.00019601276,0.00048972334,0.000873147,0.0005965793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908727,0.0059004514,0.000651584,0.0014674127,0.00057763874,0.00053029414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008696339,0.00024140581,0.00046102784,0.003108389,0.014414099,0.024962341,0.00129942,0.0030584796,0.006677399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008845222,0.00025599325,0.00025835546,0.003427657,0.08821657,0.016994022,0.008488168,0.0038491713,0.00042516054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022797023,0.000020716265,0.0013910898,0.00006776996,0.000005681992,0.00023225881,0.25223577,0.00010185124,0.00018772979,0.73455083,0.0018411666,0.00934235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016341524,0.00005181023,0.002200436,0.0008154195,0.000018072416,0.0008199548,0.49336463,0.0004086204,0.00070918613,0.23739573,0.26416203,0.000037793532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008590207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008971915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006414327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056450204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046539426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082325703","doi":"10.1111/hith.12166","title":"3. FROM ENVIRONMENTAL CASE STUDY TO ENVIRONMENTAL KIN STUDY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Indigenous; Sociology; Active listening; Environmental ethics; Environmental communication; Work (physics); Ecocriticism; History; Epistemology; Social science; Ecology; Communication; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03789046268714618,"score_gpt":0.30049795911485844,"score_spread":0.26260749642771225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082325703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46366116,0.0035535088,0.015072526,0.013611771,0.00024012115,0.0005756544,0.00023525728,0.00004860738,0.50300133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759956,0.0020486002,0.0059189443,0.0010416785,0.0000430738,0.00020967853,0.00005784291,0.000011231876,0.014673423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946791,0.0036548337,0.00011770991,0.00022648621,0.00074718404,0.0005747048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997644,0.0013391206,0.00018365022,0.00019148979,0.00044554187,0.00019617373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198472,0.00017968466,0.00018700049,0.0013966718,0.006265658,0.0033570523,0.0009025898,0.0010073694,0.0049668974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004434338,0.00015549143,0.00015912903,0.0016651492,0.00794464,0.0024993394,0.0046325843,0.0009443109,0.00025569688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050077237,0.0002638943,0.033455007,0.0007374927,0.000023386518,0.0132965995,0.42711902,0.0010200253,0.0010818494,0.4311432,0.00876212,0.08304736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012834753,0.00005683713,0.015453018,0.0007347382,0.000021763612,0.0028442251,0.7105145,0.000812989,0.0013670879,0.032116428,0.2360322,0.000033360895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12104217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20394252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12104217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061404286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061121117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24067521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082459693","doi":"10.1111/hith.12165","title":"2. SOME KEYWORDS TOWARD DECOLONIAL METHODS: STUDYING SETTLER COLONIAL HISTORIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLENCE FROM TKARONTO","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonialism; Futures contract; Sociology; Refinery; History; Environmental ethics; Political science; Archaeology; Ecology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034400763297574424,"score_gpt":0.22411804503036675,"score_spread":0.18971728173279234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082459693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86218685,0.0044602063,0.0039189183,0.0062859077,0.00014851446,0.00026074247,0.0002648107,0.000021438675,0.1224527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96779346,0.0026378937,0.003991076,0.00061256025,0.000027626858,0.0002666392,0.00013431047,0.000043315675,0.024493149],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847406,0.0008659905,0.000080957485,0.0001507813,0.00016522416,0.00026303876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974694,0.0016222973,0.0002646406,0.00015147186,0.00032423213,0.00016791657],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029945537,0.00030462607,0.00034095618,0.0021561678,0.009031646,0.0060022324,0.00097634626,0.0010576905,0.0050640902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043395604,0.00025191926,0.00020891197,0.0036147973,0.010252792,0.0027558475,0.0040980917,0.0017114442,0.00037086516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014869446,0.00001915039,0.0070814737,0.00019353848,0.000002460555,0.00023532446,0.95772886,0.000039496852,0.00060117024,0.015830066,0.00050811644,0.017745564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002338161,0.000020029212,0.013030563,0.00026705797,0.000004287252,0.00020511128,0.93179744,0.000039236245,0.0006330734,0.0014454852,0.05254232,0.000013098102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11717954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28558332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99096835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009542827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005533312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23299497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169950524","doi":"10.1111/hith.12212","title":"6. PROXIMATE CAUSATION IN LEGAL HISTORIOGRAPHY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legal history; Historiography; Law; Legal realism; Variety (cybernetics); Causation; Legal formalism; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Empirical legal studies; History; Rhetoric; Legal research; Comparative law; Political science; Black letter law; Philosophy; Private law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018300063730922515,"score_gpt":0.2410568732754194,"score_spread":0.22275680954449686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169950524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41390046,0.04521467,0.02854619,0.02317007,0.0011538549,0.00027822412,0.0008902314,0.00023021988,0.48661602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799811,0.007503653,0.00325474,0.00071883673,0.0005411517,0.00006382279,0.00022861398,0.000058856218,0.007649369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98884916,0.006563076,0.00073249923,0.001025063,0.002317985,0.0005121802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88157785,0.09290166,0.01338644,0.004526476,0.0061759823,0.0014315799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012309386,0.00032744944,0.00040799254,0.027058618,0.003291479,0.014413381,0.001134121,0.0015623248,0.018196642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06882085,0.00049504096,0.00036014445,0.024678634,0.009503063,0.013552801,0.0053332825,0.0016477016,0.001200647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009959591,0.00010832956,0.112750076,0.0011227587,0.00007974667,0.00090528146,0.10597013,0.00055036065,0.00036856363,0.701633,0.004120219,0.07229202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047970378,0.00014214353,0.1588836,0.004637057,0.00016390129,0.0018379398,0.16842307,0.0020333927,0.0023888573,0.35270196,0.30864072,0.000099375706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003762776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044578905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027058618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004122179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002987089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06509906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198124109","doi":"10.1111/hith.12225","title":"GETTING BACK TO NORMAL: ON NORMATIVITY IN HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Probability and Statistical Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Enlightenment; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Empiricism; Modernity; Normality; Transcendental number; Skepticism; History","score_opus":0.06931990254218307,"score_gpt":0.30070244706359567,"score_spread":0.2313825445214126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198124109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2393861,0.06834635,0.039211147,0.21054015,0.004236653,0.0000660423,0.00020296349,0.0001621397,0.43784845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98375064,0.00557086,0.0017067271,0.0029738226,0.00077245175,0.000026728552,0.000033981654,0.00006380407,0.0051009976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688334,0.010465553,0.00034083705,0.00072467816,0.0010988446,0.00048684055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97614425,0.018581508,0.001422682,0.0012873488,0.0019178771,0.0006464227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015862547,0.0003185527,0.00048592803,0.004330178,0.006320956,0.01295592,0.0011431648,0.002095853,0.0025405698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021355132,0.00022915249,0.00021911798,0.0034534577,0.07622461,0.018398572,0.005660131,0.0049567623,0.00021678183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092563105,0.0000059981517,0.00032171077,0.000029545146,0.0000019961024,0.000048650247,0.062295306,0.00008202479,0.000033295255,0.9319356,0.0013618261,0.0038747392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059270506,0.000022695216,0.0008505494,0.00073098973,0.000006000732,0.00015080812,0.061166592,0.0006043709,0.0003412313,0.7717946,0.164299,0.00002720651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065515093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004593338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015862547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010323426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002972574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08389014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220914135","doi":"10.1111/hith.12254","title":"DISENTANGLING PERSIANATE SELFHOOD FROM METHODOLOGICAL NATIONALISM","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Chorus; Politics; Identity (music); Power (physics); Deconstruction (building); Persian; Sociology; Literature; History; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0813972427149229,"score_gpt":0.30114188201517317,"score_spread":0.2197446393002503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220914135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7090761,0.0030917397,0.0138350725,0.01561603,0.00021118141,0.00003143218,0.00005644783,0.000027199641,0.2580548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855953,0.00015709184,0.00056126365,0.00010878186,0.000013774763,0.000009222187,0.000004379037,0.0000038682324,0.0005821263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710006,0.0022468558,0.00006743968,0.00019987662,0.00021591896,0.00016983204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230075,0.0050793504,0.00082144816,0.0008106715,0.0006983618,0.00028937706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066729034,0.00028826628,0.00028535412,0.0017335981,0.003921225,0.005227483,0.00074567576,0.0005640822,0.0022997076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008152384,0.00015097225,0.00020560631,0.0015281577,0.037027296,0.0060973912,0.005814984,0.0021768566,0.000121210986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016288921,0.0000151064405,0.003841862,0.000039727547,0.000007911272,0.00008221352,0.13543348,0.000083912055,0.000120777484,0.8539688,0.00040832302,0.0059816143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017772794,0.000042518594,0.009600614,0.00038190026,0.000024557747,0.00020433559,0.28818426,0.0012730069,0.00068175426,0.65689003,0.04267764,0.000021643633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004339793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008855743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066729034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003581289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003196823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035290122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293194793","doi":"10.1111/hith.12269","title":"PREDICTIONS WITHOUT FUTURES*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Ideology; Modernity; Epistemology; Sociology; Horizon; Aesthetics; Closure (psychology); Banner; Normative; Futures studies; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027755691015854324,"score_gpt":0.19880007233621969,"score_spread":0.17104438132036537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293194793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05841064,0.002986524,0.15970592,0.058696434,0.0018190058,0.00008627078,0.0005595107,0.0006022582,0.71713334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972021,0.0009584296,0.009383238,0.001175501,0.00020943533,0.00004159857,0.00013208328,0.00009967479,0.01597914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979559,0.0009420567,0.000066169894,0.00039076092,0.0004976462,0.0001474177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936646,0.0034311663,0.0005294671,0.0014156537,0.00069524365,0.00026393557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041328473,0.00047450178,0.00027627588,0.0008224612,0.001994781,0.0068699494,0.0010927041,0.0018343114,0.0129582435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013568505,0.00026461727,0.00038136044,0.0006455893,0.016775727,0.011822237,0.0032712964,0.003430696,0.0016719557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014356934,0.0000068005174,0.00024332221,0.00002136767,0.0000033019817,0.000045889687,0.0013584812,0.0010834042,0.00010000018,0.9895438,0.0018207072,0.005758582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049363684,0.000014087318,0.00017207739,0.00007153298,0.0000044827148,0.000042601325,0.00088458526,0.0027017784,0.00041423197,0.954144,0.041531514,0.000014118063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027631198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025243484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129582435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031829844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021792587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043349683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324371439","doi":"10.1111/hith.12295","title":"WITH SPLINTERS (OR STARS) IN OUR EYES: ON READING THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL WITH MARTIN JAY","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Instinct; Freudian slip; Praise; Scholarship; Psychoanalysis; Opposition (politics); German; Reading (process); Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; Politics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.032466078831479915,"score_gpt":0.29404739114260103,"score_spread":0.26158131231112114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324371439","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022070304,0.75717187,0.00066046196,0.15806028,0.010567648,0.000028222,0.000051971303,0.00004700086,0.051342215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43959367,0.4315645,0.0010389136,0.060029473,0.011274962,0.000119283744,0.0000851194,0.00017390608,0.05612015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973194,0.0017861876,0.000063028885,0.00019822412,0.0004531583,0.00018002887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962219,0.0026236323,0.0005053826,0.00006957833,0.0003360525,0.0002433263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025343313,0.00045120032,0.0006670134,0.0016168007,0.0028982714,0.0055838926,0.00077621895,0.003678895,0.0042168093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073963455,0.00021483672,0.00022996715,0.0014584262,0.0058133444,0.004854164,0.0028027643,0.003290026,0.001183308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015522401,0.000074643045,0.0012065622,0.0047470336,0.000052644158,0.002269868,0.17169298,0.00017486417,0.00094043405,0.1504721,0.45828995,0.20992364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008781806,0.00003696122,0.0013044348,0.0046748747,0.000014985571,0.00042011382,0.027718803,0.000018982635,0.00033835415,0.007082266,0.95836586,0.000015508947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005130515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011345143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055838926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037436206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003935583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027161956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378591351","doi":"10.1111/hith.12302","title":"WHAT, AT LONG LAST, IS HISTORICAL THEORY FOR? REFLECTIONS ON HISTORICAL THEORY IN A POST‐TRUTH WORLD","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Sociology; Law; Trope (literature); Intellectual history; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Politics; Political science; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06783919917718467,"score_gpt":0.2532796848355811,"score_spread":0.18544048565839644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378591351","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025759332,0.044013754,0.020663192,0.6715842,0.0054774294,0.000033805423,0.000108877524,0.000078897814,0.23228054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288823,0.019283967,0.005078746,0.01836615,0.00553676,0.000097522185,0.00007185015,0.00014190827,0.02254083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943506,0.0044862824,0.00011907514,0.00036962255,0.00039227944,0.0002821323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814457,0.015435484,0.0007086019,0.0008379643,0.0009831078,0.00058903836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010814178,0.00053352374,0.000638665,0.003874743,0.00950217,0.014303284,0.0017934863,0.004824781,0.005525417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013392396,0.00026505915,0.00044335745,0.0033707588,0.07401722,0.021136012,0.003017232,0.00793132,0.00050891266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029533105,0.000005210177,0.00007258281,0.000024479661,0.0000012369992,0.000029280525,0.009415295,0.00007200354,0.000012201354,0.98488647,0.0038029058,0.0016754894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062060276,0.0000135308,0.0003195537,0.00054598233,0.00000520854,0.000073330644,0.03341308,0.00041206618,0.00008000522,0.8251852,0.13993283,0.000013091758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075048604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009504809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014303284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011696967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004853768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084867835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399791360","doi":"10.1111/hith.12351","title":"LANGUAGE—HISTORY—PRESENCE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"History, Culture, and Diplomacy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Witness; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; On Language; Obstacle; History; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.023050537208455936,"score_gpt":0.21628815740764307,"score_spread":0.19323762019918714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399791360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03151322,0.05350922,0.0045422586,0.033231813,0.0016372433,0.000024658659,0.00011436385,0.00008620033,0.875341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95307934,0.017137913,0.0007756423,0.0018787909,0.0010398114,0.00003375041,0.00004311929,0.000041588766,0.02597015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807596,0.0013325552,0.000068405,0.00018248173,0.00019883037,0.00014181134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971033,0.0020107105,0.0002685063,0.00018107212,0.00022869934,0.00020769979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014187234,0.00038954947,0.00032128306,0.001901644,0.0033259538,0.0078594545,0.00080993265,0.0016527718,0.011276888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035573891,0.00021029214,0.00017789315,0.0022063314,0.02085885,0.00932685,0.0044537783,0.0020842508,0.0009717872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022759561,0.00002361268,0.0008483772,0.00022731483,0.0000064035416,0.00034217967,0.0237565,0.000077926044,0.0001639456,0.94485694,0.007547088,0.022126997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020490701,0.00006919683,0.0028985173,0.0011952891,0.000018964614,0.001292389,0.041896116,0.00025115395,0.0004061495,0.31378976,0.6381342,0.000027792456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029054736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002248735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011276888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035399862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014473026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03772497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406598062","doi":"10.1111/hith.12379","title":"“A GUESSER IN THIS VALE OF TEARS”: ON THE POLITICS OF HISTORY WRITING","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Boeing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Tears; History; Literature; Art; Political science; Medicine; Law; Surgery","score_opus":0.07772415608589683,"score_gpt":0.33252296645250995,"score_spread":0.2547988103666131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406598062","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05576123,0.020451566,0.010922429,0.5291321,0.006718994,0.000041389307,0.00004962702,0.00012308813,0.3767995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434509,0.004083892,0.0012717118,0.016814329,0.0025711146,0.000044023156,0.000014559224,0.00015758009,0.031591844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879628,0.010334222,0.00014538558,0.0003893537,0.0007051233,0.00046327955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781697,0.018335126,0.00085743534,0.00064701267,0.0011253289,0.0008653841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009752387,0.0003246484,0.00036060944,0.001985564,0.01222216,0.014468283,0.0010468628,0.0038636443,0.0074623595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021683658,0.0003157417,0.00016247948,0.0012586119,0.04541904,0.01425236,0.004664715,0.0065632355,0.00084648345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021694246,0.000014243521,0.00028869635,0.00005951992,0.000003751775,0.0002344816,0.13682856,0.0000721264,0.000113595386,0.81628674,0.037206423,0.008870172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014715362,0.00002767986,0.00043490107,0.00093593285,0.0000071169566,0.00022834339,0.1562271,0.00035428428,0.00051672384,0.29251295,0.5487135,0.000026715337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031159725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045010196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005497483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034307207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051576197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414664101","doi":"10.1111/hith.70012","title":"TEACHING SPANISH IN THE UNIVERSAL MONARCHY: TOMÁS PINPIN'S GRAMMAR FOR TAGALOGS (1610)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tagalog; Grammar; Colonialism; Generative grammar; Traditional grammar; Nahuatl","score_opus":0.018071439173031764,"score_gpt":0.2256878645376467,"score_spread":0.20761642536461494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414664101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10919471,0.0041947705,0.0042363764,0.018572228,0.00068428786,0.000053278745,0.0000719035,0.0001978051,0.8627945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365321,0.0006802206,0.00108563,0.000884084,0.00007717157,0.000024574674,0.000017743656,0.000106239415,0.060592312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.00040651442,0.000013966666,0.000118069926,0.00009040225,0.00012818007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994148,0.00031189603,0.000033360822,0.000038705282,0.000114794544,0.00008639699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015055228,0.00035866207,0.00025192453,0.0004430643,0.004787652,0.0046524573,0.00057023525,0.0010489563,0.0034341018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015779608,0.00021640702,0.00009081764,0.00051008404,0.009548132,0.0019310144,0.0018332911,0.0025337155,0.00041326255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001960857,0.000019593428,0.00077939435,0.000048122183,0.0000020277707,0.0008225547,0.21224307,0.00014954997,0.00029021336,0.74835175,0.02174506,0.0155290775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019489114,0.000032346696,0.0023589425,0.00018141452,0.000009695887,0.0006409244,0.06814532,0.00042913976,0.0006651695,0.06224092,0.8652506,0.000026030615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049589165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07036018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049589165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007454848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035669992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09860104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415375513","doi":"10.1111/hith.70010","title":"<i>HISTORY AND THEORY</i> AND PHILOLOGY NOW: TOGETHER IN THEORY","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History and Theory","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philology; Reputation; Movement (music); Discipline; Resistance (ecology)","score_opus":0.013335736558831763,"score_gpt":0.21628761035798763,"score_spread":0.20295187379915586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415375513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02666276,0.033006724,0.023080152,0.20063567,0.0037978413,0.00004298698,0.00006492147,0.00016729221,0.7125417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922198,0.00687368,0.0054844026,0.012635967,0.00272449,0.00008451949,0.000050962222,0.00012755844,0.049820464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959151,0.0030015016,0.0000951023,0.00030558842,0.00037749493,0.00030514316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524105,0.0028597899,0.0004948246,0.00050329085,0.00041350885,0.00048759408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048134606,0.00037568778,0.00048733354,0.0024910553,0.008947764,0.015315168,0.0012009065,0.0026900163,0.011791276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040287413,0.0002311681,0.0004321968,0.0020982497,0.06263584,0.012775457,0.0064252038,0.0065511963,0.0012373893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005389553,0.000011136422,0.00021771176,0.000034117937,0.0000023654504,0.00004706825,0.0072114486,0.00007415808,0.000042621927,0.9850113,0.0044275946,0.0029151354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071058744,0.000025135969,0.0004754979,0.0003946391,0.000007743174,0.0001366535,0.021755705,0.00046418188,0.00019125002,0.76119447,0.2153352,0.000012352227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050807837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005528114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015315168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007864639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004858261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05706221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}