{"meta":{"query_hash":"80381e258916","filters":{"venue":"History of Political Thought"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/80381e258916","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=History+of+Political+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W2248717767","doi":"","title":"Schiller's aesthetic republicanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Emancipation; Politics; Reciprocal; Sociology; Aesthetics; Division of labour; Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art; Anthropology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05553145397013378,"score_gpt":0.2429609540478872,"score_spread":0.1874295000777534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248717767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033619578,0.00060236413,0.00019437452,0.0012824635,0.00199685,0.000061624996,0.000006799911,0.000083840285,0.9924097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9114299,0.0000012761319,0.00031966108,0.0013483611,0.00072303787,0.000002100567,0.0000016981836,0.000013222898,0.08616074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855244,0.000036990787,0.00035314713,0.00022876507,0.00034601518,0.0004826127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991022,0.000086222535,0.00007396649,0.0002998486,0.000118701966,0.00031907958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046107074,0.00011887108,0.00020709417,0.0001340369,0.00013755263,0.000011602,0.00026477088,0.000054042976,0.002361968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108868095,0.00010359071,0.00013047254,0.000044221364,0.0016170571,0.00015771804,0.00003288098,0.00017319398,0.00017799812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009437777,0.00008937941,0.0000053493654,0.000009828405,0.0000023909104,0.000008368946,0.002791237,5.4048733e-8,0.00006245466,0.97047925,0.025984433,0.0005577963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010668578,0.00008687544,0.00006960885,0.000009327644,0.000008362726,0.0000080248,0.00019795177,0.000004184823,0.00004177423,0.04535614,0.9539784,0.00013263249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019194944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054993892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000626162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012149558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235682095","doi":"","title":"Guelpshs! factiones, liberty and sovereignty: Inquieries about the Quattrocento","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Ideology; Fifteenth; Context (archaeology); Empire; Politics; Law; Ancient history; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.042778567582625986,"score_gpt":0.24814745054046278,"score_spread":0.20536888295783678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235682095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003784819,0.013841074,0.00009059667,0.0007170304,0.0028038372,0.00012057665,0.000030672985,0.00006161001,0.9785498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77825135,0.00003442589,0.00008120223,0.0026488006,0.0019173265,0.000005956932,0.000012067017,0.000022849294,0.21702604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988085,0.000042155192,0.0003197778,0.00018572925,0.0002627663,0.00038106673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992345,0.0001644332,0.000084858344,0.0002300182,0.00010708419,0.00017910017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032139386,0.000153262,0.00022792646,0.00008334828,0.00022537337,0.000028361905,0.00012817167,0.00007169738,0.00207517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006304259,0.000104018654,0.00009230527,0.00001932258,0.0018085812,0.00017659814,0.00003471742,0.00021668816,0.00004071944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043421995,0.000038876882,0.00003004221,0.000064697284,0.000016797267,0.000003825631,0.018740153,1.0339628e-8,0.000051631414,0.9244288,0.056058973,0.0005227677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015552691,0.000059477334,0.0005474854,0.00002293333,0.00003916933,0.000006471525,0.0024734875,0.0000019319991,0.000050336028,0.00883522,0.9876738,0.00013412492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002058375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037609218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029888228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009808649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386293548","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.3.577","title":"The Rhetorical Roots of Du Bois's Double Consciousness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Double consciousness; Oppression; Rhetorical question; Consciousness; Sociology; Power (physics); Injustice; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.045647966798203175,"score_gpt":0.3124755148046457,"score_spread":0.26682754800644254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386293548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35203555,0.0012424168,0.00003595753,0.013458436,0.0069931694,0.0003532341,0.000027734111,0.00029379744,0.6255597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526975,0.000073461386,0.000023917839,0.00009261922,0.0005005883,0.000009522819,0.0000028761876,0.000007806943,0.046591718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865794,0.00014227367,0.00023378378,0.00011860896,0.0004262977,0.0004210709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903387,0.00043833634,0.00007337522,0.0001292988,0.00016303863,0.00016209378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042568918,0.00007315713,0.00018510582,0.000025790396,0.00031752515,0.000008144106,0.00028388193,0.00010757932,0.00007705763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003775625,0.000052353906,0.00013444034,0.0002706314,0.0016834078,0.00006041724,0.0000490641,0.00009996611,0.000060843322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017437247,0.00002561028,0.0007009914,0.000009979827,0.000009111603,0.0000023285188,0.0024414295,4.591565e-7,0.00013220572,0.9686354,0.027698409,0.00032663977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023155972,0.000025142575,0.0056529036,0.000011124702,0.0000192011,5.175272e-7,0.0065793316,0.000028416838,0.000054740565,0.024729913,0.96256346,0.00010369975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002750968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009659602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005079148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003329116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6202586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386293840","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.3.530","title":"History, Filmerian Patriarchalism and Exclusion Royalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Monarchy; Scholarship; Power (physics); Constitution; Ideology; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06676622540193457,"score_gpt":0.2365307651850098,"score_spread":0.1697645397830752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386293840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045427643,0.040891144,0.0005093212,0.0041758814,0.0077023264,0.0002986599,0.000246623,0.00028475336,0.90046364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696406,0.00062399113,0.00035642175,0.00089964195,0.000642122,0.000028199851,0.00001988245,0.00004884715,0.12774028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985477,0.000030958203,0.0005697234,0.00035881356,0.00004930957,0.00044352582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992261,0.00012906016,0.00017736519,0.0002169393,0.000023764635,0.00022676347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042170734,0.00014936677,0.00055447617,0.00019677702,0.000088637025,0.0000036150109,0.00014989873,0.00014233675,0.0008551843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027239343,0.00017969694,0.00015070937,0.00008732367,0.00051837415,0.00008155473,0.00013128002,0.00013760867,0.00054351386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073883075,0.000023784736,0.00044446872,0.000035091765,0.000017664723,0.0000053197514,0.0018778391,2.5383093e-7,0.000011614097,0.877895,0.11942606,0.00025548975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028254229,0.00003918461,0.0054638083,0.0000072531147,0.0000067429137,0.0000010086194,0.00013025722,0.00012264529,0.0000019409867,0.04415861,0.9495954,0.00019064201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015760445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001878825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8337364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002612712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066471366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9363668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389509010","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.4.676","title":"Liu Bei, Plato <i>et al</i>. on Kingship: A Microhistory of Seventeenth-Century Globalization and Political Thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Emperor; Microhistory; Monarchy; Politics; Reading (process); Philosophy; Globalization; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Humanities; History; Epistemology; Ancient history; Law; Art; Political science; Linguistics; Economic history","score_opus":0.032108883757353344,"score_gpt":0.30629706760163783,"score_spread":0.2741881838442845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389509010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12751548,0.007944663,0.00010965512,0.020008197,0.0053188354,0.0007195338,0.00041534178,0.00048735947,0.83748096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868304,0.00012335536,0.00022977564,0.007196776,0.00040945984,0.000012719077,0.000047225032,0.00004035691,0.005109948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970513,0.00054265995,0.00053554174,0.00044733062,0.00074199645,0.00068120146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983225,0.0004792568,0.00018094038,0.00034182984,0.0001442339,0.000531261],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000861888,0.00024893828,0.0004722118,0.0002840215,0.00022282908,0.000010139268,0.00029373146,0.00020287524,0.0001209741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006364373,0.00026335727,0.00021658934,0.0003990161,0.0017394705,0.00018466394,0.00009246754,0.00027723756,0.000062959625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008545076,0.00019770299,0.00041421727,0.00009511123,0.000023537743,0.000014994198,0.0033828577,0.0000012515784,0.00043504307,0.9264074,0.06883726,0.00010519553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041415036,0.0001082964,0.0014604212,0.00012274324,0.000048922448,0.0000031502832,0.00029976293,0.000012871043,0.00010488924,0.039604727,0.95756584,0.00025425095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007654669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011900276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88872856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015101848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005491527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408138162","doi":"10.53765/20512988.46.1.1","title":"‘To Listen to Both Sides Equally’: Just Judgment in the Athenian Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07263613690805638,"score_gpt":0.35861579120711584,"score_spread":0.28597965429905947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408138162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031626914,0.000519596,0.00019439169,0.21746375,0.0009725502,0.00054661115,0.000014980122,0.000055991874,0.74860525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88563955,0.000009261464,0.00051565614,0.013328319,0.00028134827,0.000044657656,5.604014e-7,0.0000074476293,0.10017322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980929,0.00030954936,0.00029749723,0.000244816,0.00048422447,0.00057100126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987418,0.00070255867,0.000031825104,0.00025361084,0.000066756744,0.00020342671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089175726,0.00011531006,0.00027172302,0.00012672546,0.00017483663,0.000018029747,0.00047195205,0.000071646864,0.00008113001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013420406,0.00008961714,0.00010008508,0.00028488456,0.0006470151,0.000045461165,0.0001556825,0.00014713728,0.00006369847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013592617,0.00011917982,0.0002961997,0.000020893202,0.000008320366,0.0000070339165,0.015489511,8.5979565e-7,0.00005707326,0.8662517,0.11705168,0.0006839328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009863347,0.00005244567,0.0072312905,0.00006833495,0.0000202648,1.5308156e-7,0.0075278054,0.000002083562,0.000026277647,0.008051274,0.9768158,0.000105621904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025304896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011059297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85976416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013705749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035054664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61713475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411501600","doi":"10.53765/20512988.46.2.233","title":"‘The Man Sterne, Strong, Bould . . . The Woman Weake, Fearfull, Faire’: Sir Thomas Smith’s Account of the Patriarchal Family","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Politics; Character (mathematics); Intervention (counseling); Gender studies; Prism; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0390922284019838,"score_gpt":0.23913325262028487,"score_spread":0.20004102421830106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411501600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053362828,0.041442756,0.0007192845,0.01374612,0.005373925,0.0006512352,0.00027302676,0.00005016525,0.88438064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8856018,0.00022699026,0.000044621454,0.0009988636,0.00027401885,0.0000372854,0.0000013706547,0.0000221867,0.11279286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799633,0.00009937468,0.0009144992,0.00033205046,0.00010330927,0.00055443327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983878,0.00042617798,0.0003849686,0.0006464352,0.000063684776,0.0000908952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072246284,0.00020523579,0.0005850019,0.00006937374,0.00044791034,0.000020508833,0.0008270799,0.0001513981,0.000058529287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033836643,0.0001378751,0.00043009472,0.0001704646,0.0015302933,0.00007612522,0.0002714522,0.00036148579,0.000055049706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002232792,0.00005854743,0.003406339,0.000035898393,0.00008749182,4.774591e-7,0.0006438812,0.0000016435479,0.0000035478427,0.93116665,0.06426919,0.00030397446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030575442,0.000036161142,0.036119163,0.000016702363,0.000027025528,3.432304e-7,0.0007828161,0.000051515868,0.00000886932,0.03717739,0.92533684,0.000137422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012935018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021769395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89398926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018023807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022750378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56384295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W50066032","doi":"","title":"Bentham’s Religious Radicalism Revisited: A Response to Schofield","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.031868003542759746,"score_gpt":0.33981437257460706,"score_spread":0.3079463690318473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W50066032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048718985,0.001740341,0.0007558603,0.07379536,0.0019309111,0.0003282614,0.000013540492,0.00020998722,0.87250674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587427,0.00050511514,0.0012203137,0.014790467,0.00067131367,0.000018888448,0.0000024409999,0.000019132647,0.12402959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998012,0.00045548097,0.00032355034,0.00022790224,0.00047480586,0.0005062624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998308,0.000536186,0.000058777605,0.0003010207,0.0001449908,0.0006510101],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077723066,0.000105311265,0.00022567301,0.00011834263,0.00017992833,0.000018206338,0.00026738516,0.00017599607,0.0009281314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022470923,0.000109502194,0.00022628262,0.00025883853,0.0004543805,0.000099213205,0.000035780708,0.00023914377,0.00040696515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249645,0.000065629596,0.00010855459,0.000004756555,0.000009519133,0.00001867866,0.0069031008,3.017461e-7,0.00038001468,0.51357746,0.47861922,0.00018779204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014933107,0.00006247667,0.00043097744,0.000041594398,0.000014591315,0.00000704787,0.002112814,0.0000028495115,0.000026538133,0.0024522997,0.9945746,0.00012490255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027003265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008375129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8100237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012854602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004317067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}