{"meta":{"query_hash":"80381e258916","filters":{"venue":"History of Political Thought"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/80381e258916","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=History+of+Political+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W2248717767","doi":"","title":"Schiller's aesthetic republicanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Emancipation; Politics; Reciprocal; Sociology; Aesthetics; Division of labour; Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art; Anthropology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05553145397013378,"score_gpt":0.2429609540478872,"score_spread":0.1874295000777534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248717767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026197387,0.003824826,0.004389896,0.027272217,0.0006987522,0.000019735078,0.00002328623,0.000045747016,0.93752825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89360446,0.0017200208,0.0019204648,0.004603576,0.0005727153,0.000045092034,0.00002312515,0.000052610798,0.09745798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.000516137,0.00002244352,0.0001265555,0.00032046848,0.00016080409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999595,0.00019676947,0.00004186089,0.00003606632,0.00008027237,0.00005010222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070619,0.00033323176,0.00016029985,0.000980006,0.004247853,0.003008708,0.00035254128,0.0011630738,0.005664824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019374414,0.000109287845,0.00017487268,0.0006685991,0.014204226,0.002666508,0.002245079,0.0021259896,0.0007852318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055266028,0.000003601439,0.000045280965,0.000008365008,4.864795e-7,0.00002643796,0.002384414,0.00004485324,0.000054184453,0.9871748,0.0055936133,0.004658305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008770064,0.000022151376,0.00035914677,0.00007555355,0.0000029187204,0.0001890716,0.002062248,0.00035989558,0.0003185641,0.6128115,0.38377866,0.000011548608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002498001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047486466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005664824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040846486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018086549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029636323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235682095","doi":"","title":"Guelpshs! factiones, liberty and sovereignty: Inquieries about the Quattrocento","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Ideology; Fifteenth; Context (archaeology); Empire; Politics; Law; Ancient history; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.042778567582625986,"score_gpt":0.24814745054046278,"score_spread":0.20536888295783678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235682095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.137676,0.09649004,0.0031317647,0.08791922,0.0013186027,0.000020630663,0.000118110445,0.000062375366,0.6732633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665735,0.009675467,0.00048640915,0.0029450695,0.00086575054,0.000021726786,0.000033963905,0.000029857696,0.019368254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994849,0.0002974554,0.0000075376843,0.000068516594,0.000056052962,0.00008556966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995863,0.00028934522,0.00004092961,0.000032625707,0.000020353618,0.000030473095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009240523,0.0003029113,0.00022607711,0.001026652,0.0043328884,0.0032598828,0.00029508932,0.0012341464,0.003791002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013336596,0.00016937862,0.00014767433,0.00085522846,0.015318232,0.0033003623,0.0017229199,0.0021142422,0.00030104944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024948986,0.0000052685423,0.0007425544,0.000081193284,0.000003561673,0.00021767193,0.051404152,0.000050268543,0.00012752281,0.92845476,0.007044293,0.011843708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016870146,0.00003052873,0.0053813304,0.0005222967,0.000007893129,0.00046706994,0.015437964,0.00013152117,0.0002580628,0.19475986,0.7829731,0.000013504306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008443463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010298274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008443463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032635708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008660425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023679018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386293548","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.3.577","title":"The Rhetorical Roots of Du Bois's Double Consciousness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Double consciousness; Oppression; Rhetorical question; Consciousness; Sociology; Power (physics); Injustice; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.045647966798203175,"score_gpt":0.3124755148046457,"score_spread":0.26682754800644254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386293548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117035136,0.013151756,0.029385962,0.10569113,0.001351489,0.000043203207,0.000041669144,0.00010180868,0.73319775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811374,0.0017653676,0.0017141413,0.0033828565,0.0003055401,0.000031227715,0.000006298172,0.00005585768,0.011601375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595827,0.0026043772,0.00007085702,0.00036049372,0.0005895566,0.000416396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885395,0.009139705,0.0007964098,0.00046436014,0.0006356567,0.00042443667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005379835,0.0004141329,0.00032825614,0.002375001,0.009099167,0.009902172,0.00070885394,0.0024972276,0.0030636964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010934435,0.00026179716,0.00023023764,0.0014489092,0.045863207,0.008118663,0.004688874,0.0061820415,0.00042344435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069596795,0.0000057130737,0.00016072828,0.000025790987,0.0000015114855,0.000067078545,0.033480793,0.000025432746,0.00009004987,0.96076715,0.0020039387,0.0033648058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016087159,0.000028822604,0.0008320014,0.00038434225,0.000009567983,0.00041032015,0.03563131,0.00039784922,0.0011207965,0.69256276,0.26858333,0.000022838422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037539687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009902172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005471106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031482067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03969586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386293840","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.3.530","title":"History, Filmerian Patriarchalism and Exclusion Royalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Monarchy; Scholarship; Power (physics); Constitution; Ideology; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06676622540193457,"score_gpt":0.2365307651850098,"score_spread":0.1697645397830752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386293840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14979754,0.026891148,0.002578764,0.0446712,0.00039186646,0.000013906108,0.0001128012,0.000016883647,0.77552587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737014,0.0041141654,0.00021104277,0.0009847844,0.0002930536,0.000010931942,0.000024780116,0.000014264603,0.02064551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989711,0.00059080904,0.000030423627,0.00013793755,0.00011707578,0.00015270377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821895,0.0010847975,0.00028075924,0.00010579733,0.0001167096,0.00019296703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013824939,0.00013649059,0.00018317856,0.0010613737,0.0047236593,0.0051428964,0.0003903029,0.0009109817,0.005830774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035748582,0.00011593603,0.00009403464,0.0013770354,0.021381514,0.0039940495,0.001971633,0.0018822746,0.0003369223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790973,0.000009852076,0.00058007415,0.00002539463,0.0000016427456,0.00007459015,0.007517481,0.000046948582,0.000028745,0.9844081,0.003161076,0.004128084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002087621,0.000027328022,0.0065078405,0.0002870319,0.0000060842467,0.0003079488,0.009816682,0.00025327154,0.00018495465,0.5036499,0.47892317,0.000014970865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013228628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013640949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013228628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006126749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016725933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044452846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389509010","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.4.676","title":"Liu Bei, Plato <i>et al</i>. on Kingship: A Microhistory of Seventeenth-Century Globalization and Political Thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Emperor; Microhistory; Monarchy; Politics; Reading (process); Philosophy; Globalization; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Humanities; History; Epistemology; Ancient history; Law; Art; Political science; Linguistics; Economic history","score_opus":0.032108883757353344,"score_gpt":0.30629706760163783,"score_spread":0.2741881838442845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389509010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15078183,0.07499989,0.0036272162,0.06396593,0.0019356492,0.00004487334,0.00010656497,0.00013682443,0.7044013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924837,0.01124351,0.000577607,0.0026129435,0.00039688582,0.000036910533,0.00003881013,0.000027698996,0.06022871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982446,0.00006146846,0.0000059441886,0.000024031324,0.000031694464,0.00005246061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998884,0.000044140343,0.000020496338,0.000010480812,0.000015687687,0.00002072752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047619396,0.0002306151,0.00012858109,0.0010424942,0.0029550833,0.0018058263,0.00018048106,0.0005818495,0.0022127957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041453633,0.000104001985,0.000112968635,0.0013046005,0.0070319036,0.0021517507,0.0011167848,0.0014455512,0.00023550917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003704811,0.000010091097,0.0025440184,0.000113461756,0.000006089864,0.0002994832,0.0676853,0.00015206783,0.00046472222,0.8785466,0.0147703355,0.03537078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021361273,0.00004996184,0.010744085,0.0003022666,0.000014844294,0.00021997115,0.016616132,0.0004429469,0.001015629,0.15064116,0.819907,0.00002463761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011475842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017604785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011475842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060881167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018915893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044172645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408138162","doi":"10.53765/20512988.46.1.1","title":"‘To Listen to Both Sides Equally’: Just Judgment in the Athenian Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07263613690805638,"score_gpt":0.35861579120711584,"score_spread":0.28597965429905947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408138162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17389973,0.016393702,0.008274196,0.10447763,0.0012176966,0.000040402618,0.000022076003,0.000026104606,0.69564843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805894,0.0012712023,0.0011408539,0.0074631604,0.000357072,0.000019745008,0.0000046701543,0.000013671868,0.009140153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882748,0.008564852,0.0002372247,0.00097416394,0.001131165,0.00081778585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955018,0.0033451226,0.00031001813,0.00031510627,0.000312298,0.00021558706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011311722,0.00029053373,0.00050418574,0.0016043526,0.016494703,0.010124231,0.00089605735,0.0062784646,0.00249377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008428777,0.00046511999,0.0002457661,0.0010492671,0.080229014,0.010681149,0.0050614104,0.008636613,0.00054700254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010091621,0.000016393884,0.00016109542,0.000027951237,0.0000033608485,0.00010637019,0.042754605,0.000038498103,0.0000882019,0.95052034,0.0016969434,0.0045760726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031007607,0.000048449667,0.0013630602,0.00037698864,0.000008510511,0.000341991,0.031003928,0.00021134756,0.00034496756,0.7845057,0.18172872,0.00003532272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033526232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00530629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016494703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061188736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031865886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059822857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411501600","doi":"10.53765/20512988.46.2.233","title":"‘The Man Sterne, Strong, Bould . . . The Woman Weake, Fearfull, Faire’: Sir Thomas Smith’s Account of the Patriarchal Family","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Politics; Character (mathematics); Intervention (counseling); Gender studies; Prism; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0390922284019838,"score_gpt":0.23913325262028487,"score_spread":0.20004102421830106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411501600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14904998,0.06593735,0.00410621,0.38259017,0.0017196126,0.000025782923,0.00017570167,0.0000458055,0.3963494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303129,0.008704632,0.00039295392,0.008109265,0.000888159,0.000021200833,0.000021438513,0.000031917436,0.0515175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983935,0.0011669273,0.000017645541,0.000088245884,0.00015848444,0.00017517954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928564,0.00045245432,0.00007322071,0.000029494739,0.00006084056,0.00009830914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010693733,0.0002991046,0.00026497123,0.0006957173,0.0042803786,0.0035510832,0.000617173,0.0016416431,0.0036696556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002184358,0.00020050764,0.00014207618,0.0009774873,0.01583378,0.0038447238,0.0012390204,0.002074475,0.00040495524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024919433,0.000009936277,0.0006231201,0.000050685663,0.0000058051937,0.00037116322,0.16371943,0.00019450585,0.00008100488,0.7660363,0.06299417,0.0058890292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009187801,0.000023600693,0.0020307607,0.00016866051,0.000005739564,0.0004036532,0.06418613,0.0003396337,0.00012920654,0.108534224,0.82415384,0.000015378646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038510017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04649982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038510017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007186575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022581352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07657176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W50066032","doi":"","title":"Bentham’s Religious Radicalism Revisited: A Response to Schofield","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.031868003542759746,"score_gpt":0.33981437257460706,"score_spread":0.3079463690318473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W50066032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005554508,0.0073465235,0.00015859837,0.982219,0.0061967117,0.0000019611794,0.000011750009,0.000005580916,0.003504409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05643891,0.00890976,0.00040688808,0.8898004,0.033409636,0.000023105926,0.000018563987,0.0000930196,0.010899666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891025,0.0054145507,0.00049704104,0.0017603663,0.002076245,0.0011493616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506586,0.038825,0.001419837,0.0012472138,0.004688453,0.0031608178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018702833,0.0008516192,0.0017216738,0.0028597005,0.016643729,0.016376466,0.0042632762,0.043313496,0.009631251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04882073,0.00071888324,0.00092006114,0.0040967646,0.04698019,0.023136178,0.009968217,0.046904627,0.0016808178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052843367,0.000026171443,0.00028973442,0.00015717489,0.000019051407,0.0003009944,0.014460807,0.00008067547,0.00007075589,0.37335074,0.5993333,0.011857701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039209055,0.000014527856,0.0006790996,0.00064652174,0.00001750393,0.00018915317,0.016126215,0.00018067377,0.0001619367,0.18909682,0.7927703,0.000077928715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037266903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06131262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043313496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012345271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010975762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098911226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}