{"meta":{"query_hash":"f6c2a533e6fb","filters":{"venue":"Hofstra law review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f6c2a533e6fb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Hofstra+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1661050030","doi":"","title":"Positivist Legal Ethics Theory and the Law Governing Lawyers: A Few Puzzles Worth Solving","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal ethics; Law; Legal positivism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal profession; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04481532221732027,"score_gpt":0.3895861595395608,"score_spread":0.3447708373222405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661050030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061867237,0.041543294,0.013711671,0.89519906,0.0015560098,0.000016544329,0.000051409104,0.00005372169,0.041681617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.680578,0.06723483,0.028525595,0.16900605,0.017715864,0.0003443038,0.00019439199,0.00030568155,0.036095247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344313,0.003683496,0.00018053445,0.00072560675,0.0014776151,0.0004896772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97816783,0.015759885,0.001109916,0.0015945717,0.0018490531,0.0015188305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014250464,0.0007212163,0.0013489646,0.002065425,0.005738865,0.011585861,0.00383104,0.0121337995,0.008921615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129082,0.0006299435,0.0009504398,0.0022873136,0.061665706,0.030767165,0.005026811,0.019830208,0.0020233218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008459187,0.000025020157,0.00013156442,0.0000719452,0.000006417556,0.000030154406,0.0011652304,0.00012646648,0.000026346303,0.98512036,0.008712654,0.0045753093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010505448,0.0000052358464,0.000093227376,0.000140175,0.0000015141376,0.000024845025,0.00086892163,0.00016344822,0.000018196799,0.9808218,0.017845055,0.000007073596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044963197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051664882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014250464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007130369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060361363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07536453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176921812","doi":"","title":"Conversations about Families in Canadian Courts and Legislatures: Are there \"Lessons\" for the United States?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05314811017678399,"score_gpt":0.34363492783819866,"score_spread":0.29048681766141465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176921812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06288919,0.08791492,0.00046442103,0.76228124,0.002514662,0.00007510394,0.00073039817,0.00003936004,0.08309068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7376489,0.055380777,0.0006662099,0.18949553,0.0008582198,0.00012126934,0.00029858155,0.00005747302,0.015473042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97662306,0.0067587043,0.0006128888,0.0012819212,0.006946712,0.0077767954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242745,0.031401977,0.0024127148,0.0008496154,0.02850436,0.012556843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02551288,0.00050417904,0.00097069616,0.0065366076,0.05830142,0.019560179,0.0051026572,0.012979712,0.008687543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068020195,0.00072576967,0.00081858115,0.009135513,0.02212921,0.007980656,0.0046672686,0.011677029,0.00037912352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013534667,0.00013244824,0.022352736,0.0010367977,0.00017143444,0.000729805,0.18747698,0.00051786244,0.00028296423,0.1794686,0.50101256,0.106682405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005886604,0.000046424313,0.0631889,0.0044487696,0.00027614992,0.00015967379,0.38619134,0.00023200372,0.00039741874,0.016563226,0.52817285,0.00026436357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99724054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20175675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20175675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42369425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624692811","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity and Environmental Obligations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Law and economics; Consequentialism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.016872546022729022,"score_gpt":0.2330125327782671,"score_spread":0.21613998675553808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624692811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011246551,0.004370687,0.03840313,0.02721293,0.00053694553,0.00010363728,0.00015044748,0.00006796213,0.9179077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8827942,0.004702708,0.011505649,0.007620931,0.00071217254,0.00039794575,0.00016986014,0.00013944,0.09195702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98296046,0.009459403,0.0007186044,0.0022513804,0.0029388443,0.0016712627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868276,0.006598876,0.0013080878,0.002126949,0.0023625093,0.000775855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120961,0.00059257774,0.0007029444,0.001295098,0.007018432,0.00789718,0.0014322577,0.0054723774,0.021563157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019624785,0.00047308207,0.00070291356,0.0012545813,0.032760642,0.011170597,0.009220153,0.004090874,0.0025105127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031055254,0.00000456592,0.00013979066,0.000025620173,0.000004214795,0.00003833622,0.00069190504,0.0001441042,0.000029889214,0.9943282,0.0015222746,0.0030680432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008869742,0.000014995516,0.0002888097,0.00013379665,0.000007674834,0.00014518395,0.00085521437,0.00020915002,0.000107797336,0.8508691,0.14734298,0.000016437685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046424693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004327062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021563157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046826648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062308074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072135925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990093633","doi":"","title":"Confronting Chaos: The Fiscal Constitution Faces Federal Shutdowns and (Almost) Debt Defaults","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Default; Government (linguistics); Statutory law; Cabinet (room); Revenue; Constitution; Debt restructuring; Debt service coverage ratio","score_opus":0.02602608522374035,"score_gpt":0.23395788796872927,"score_spread":0.2079318027449889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990093633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36167267,0.009637355,0.0025345024,0.49736673,0.0013677622,0.000033712455,0.000654019,0.00011235931,0.12662086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747779,0.0025585957,0.00023861305,0.016508332,0.0009257407,0.0000150930955,0.0001141299,0.00003037101,0.004831085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613,0.0009732814,0.00012364046,0.0003003233,0.00078586506,0.0016868709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927608,0.0031328967,0.0017523065,0.00035624887,0.00078590354,0.0012118251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058992337,0.00015962582,0.0004972507,0.0014766079,0.0069464296,0.010854651,0.0007967159,0.0063975686,0.0050002364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023024337,0.00026951128,0.00035736134,0.0015646338,0.005252711,0.0068223975,0.0038048576,0.007995049,0.00068136427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030804603,0.00009661011,0.03269221,0.00012631602,0.00006634661,0.0017943002,0.005454805,0.0028011089,0.00038593417,0.7088169,0.19637631,0.051081214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014576408,0.00008727925,0.0705254,0.0006553274,0.00007609192,0.000429554,0.015618916,0.0038083224,0.0005112247,0.6398796,0.26812598,0.00013663134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041839544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04578745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041839544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006417391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069184573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08319199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78552956","doi":"","title":"Forum Non Conveniens and the Warsaw Convention: Leaving the Turbulence Behind?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Convention; Turbulence; Physics; Mechanics","score_opus":0.016040309294714054,"score_gpt":0.3048623765301413,"score_spread":0.28882206723542725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78552956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05048719,0.044398043,0.0066192783,0.25113004,0.0036791135,0.00006134075,0.00014381167,0.00007379868,0.64340746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73140544,0.011358545,0.0026677453,0.044762485,0.0020666793,0.00010123663,0.00011855169,0.000095158626,0.20742422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712104,0.0009769367,0.000072041905,0.0003219126,0.00072936976,0.00077867095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892706,0.00045277362,0.00014917845,0.000117563126,0.0001866362,0.00016676247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038349528,0.00036381686,0.00024053002,0.0007323484,0.0058301794,0.010692391,0.0010385514,0.006315558,0.008659347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008016368,0.0002926426,0.00028404093,0.0012885506,0.009009464,0.008863573,0.003131184,0.005570773,0.00080797926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013321915,0.000009844693,0.0004273429,0.000024169733,0.0000024853593,0.00014408868,0.0024047543,0.000100626865,0.00016009832,0.938428,0.038070813,0.020214425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014636589,0.000020882215,0.002939082,0.00021563168,0.0000053639787,0.0001214499,0.004678164,0.00029151852,0.00037455643,0.102293044,0.88900346,0.00004225676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13571915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23538703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13571915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012701187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012310453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26985836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}