{"meta":{"query_hash":"76f648cd4705","filters":{"venue":"Houston journal of international law"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/76f648cd4705","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Houston+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W102816895","doi":"","title":"Responsibility to Protect: An Explanation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Genocide; Crimes against humanity; War crime; International community; Law; State responsibility; Charter; Political science; Ethnic Cleansing; International law; Collective responsibility; Human rights; Incitement; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015524525659638452,"score_gpt":0.3287178840238012,"score_spread":0.31319335836416273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102816895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014790292,0.008487456,0.022689983,0.30879185,0.0052218214,0.00024554055,0.00028977668,0.0001214734,0.652673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29700196,0.021699376,0.018087368,0.28814593,0.011196428,0.0016837469,0.00055679365,0.00035558478,0.36127284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933862,0.0025635283,0.00025894816,0.0010706802,0.0015423856,0.0011782107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678683,0.0017937934,0.0001854563,0.0002742459,0.00068964553,0.0002700348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007397249,0.0014824768,0.000641853,0.0019352556,0.0053295786,0.007090182,0.0032278802,0.013996788,0.027707698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078265425,0.0004959551,0.0014368718,0.0013064762,0.03131222,0.0171218,0.0070264824,0.013485311,0.006918117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029282523,0.000007897488,0.000060456212,0.000023334613,8.216494e-7,0.000048792204,0.00070202065,0.000054634515,0.000012114037,0.9700548,0.02621741,0.0028148878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001239975,0.000016305197,0.00027344748,0.00032004257,0.0000029343491,0.00024784464,0.0012162916,0.00023607408,0.00007973341,0.528962,0.4686178,0.000015045839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049975375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027707698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008604778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007813357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09269148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106099222","doi":"","title":"Gene-Patenting and Access to Healthcare: Achieving Precision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Patent Act; TRIPS Agreement; Health care; Business; Law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Biotechnology; Patent law; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.09772565969263787,"score_gpt":0.2752054991477962,"score_spread":0.17747983945515833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106099222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044311113,0.24335815,0.014565443,0.5075079,0.004074476,0.0000718173,0.00024876685,0.0001995261,0.22554268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.386672,0.39788705,0.017618729,0.1357413,0.012003811,0.00019953916,0.00033011244,0.00009326188,0.049454253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956209,0.001298172,0.00023724564,0.0005540473,0.0017444158,0.0005451671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936985,0.0038974304,0.00070414826,0.00057183305,0.00075827347,0.00036991102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005886404,0.0006042358,0.00063523906,0.0016862378,0.0019522578,0.009753341,0.0015197188,0.008643267,0.017731989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010219091,0.0003538931,0.00069110835,0.0019391341,0.01988575,0.010728612,0.005144612,0.0055329786,0.003289918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028731016,0.00002842143,0.000568959,0.00073985144,0.000011570138,0.0001204411,0.0006442433,0.00044802992,0.0004958154,0.86417884,0.04734058,0.08539456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013139284,0.00006661984,0.0016164139,0.002246358,0.000020421367,0.00033053252,0.0010316605,0.00034519506,0.0009897988,0.5085582,0.48474413,0.000037518326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041268636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037233483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017731989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071726358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075323265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059319437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10843675","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6230","title":"Continental Cap-and-Trade: Canada, the United States, and Climate Change Partnership in North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"International trade; Climate change; Emissions trading; General partnership; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.018184228829217015,"score_gpt":0.27257094700641904,"score_spread":0.25438671817720204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10843675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10585655,0.0207636,0.0009774214,0.030487664,0.002435836,0.00015393864,0.041132435,0.0006667304,0.79752576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54029375,0.017037753,0.0042004962,0.008410468,0.00050735346,0.00015744951,0.026491757,0.00029079756,0.40261024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997123,0.00001933572,0.000008570057,0.00005401875,0.00010317287,0.000102553095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990362,0.000033888984,0.00006723977,0.000031420117,0.0005481331,0.00028301147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029946727,0.00032173147,0.00017285845,0.0015303706,0.0028156156,0.0031437802,0.0003363717,0.00057203247,0.032691132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055753934,0.000112824375,0.00015893979,0.0042475304,0.00056934514,0.0006911482,0.0010660839,0.0007680883,0.002649011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120408025,0.00009587195,0.21348484,0.0003256432,0.00010985013,0.0010946054,0.0015410038,0.0008148968,0.0016997308,0.023866562,0.47727314,0.27957344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007962514,0.0000070952437,0.20178476,0.00012972738,0.000018624612,0.00019086266,0.0022270079,0.00022296747,0.00022097422,0.00070316606,0.7944725,0.000014321104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90478545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96285605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095214546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010978624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024323128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1915505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171716517","doi":"","title":"Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11: Past, Present, and Future","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Arbitration; Political science; International trade law; Negotiation; Tribunal; Interpretation (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Free trade agreement; Commission; Sovereignty; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.013992694103444723,"score_gpt":0.22785150434722193,"score_spread":0.2138588102437772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171716517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031162344,0.06767305,0.009994396,0.07035986,0.0042002723,0.0002033724,0.0003036949,0.00012960291,0.8159734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6907679,0.057090178,0.013390858,0.023345558,0.00495617,0.0005257066,0.00074908335,0.000070298665,0.20910428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875031,0.0045009926,0.0008612731,0.0008082699,0.0052170744,0.0011092194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918839,0.0041893194,0.001006154,0.00032151438,0.0023888,0.00021028979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011554615,0.00030259177,0.00034435105,0.0016921818,0.0046760775,0.011036176,0.0017041424,0.00544097,0.009077206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015626417,0.00036877661,0.0005084157,0.0024538403,0.0069514015,0.004615319,0.0022767424,0.0035854334,0.0011207461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028690925,0.000025912332,0.0019185592,0.00023250637,0.000009339041,0.00034622193,0.005026716,0.0006833009,0.00025574357,0.895389,0.04905592,0.047028042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069974617,0.000040270297,0.0018837589,0.0013160356,0.0000151236445,0.00032431947,0.0030057463,0.00062107755,0.00032798664,0.07191719,0.92050165,0.00003974242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023610948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029416528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023610948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009133445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011764077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06626809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934496157","doi":"","title":"The Mexican Trucking Dispute: A Bottleneck to Free Trade. A Tough (Road) Test on the NAFTA Dispute Settlement Mechanism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Treaty; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.013904100210615018,"score_gpt":0.267969947774526,"score_spread":0.254065847563911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934496157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02911494,0.023663187,0.0036054098,0.69854784,0.0027004816,0.00012231691,0.00029567105,0.00013717865,0.24181302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254189,0.017888416,0.009237343,0.13670664,0.006023318,0.00038321404,0.0005596001,0.00015624771,0.10362629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990369,0.0023263218,0.0003978228,0.0008911687,0.0045305216,0.0014851049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910789,0.004359597,0.0009954659,0.00059776683,0.0018479571,0.0011203265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01681274,0.00041483107,0.000667022,0.0016411226,0.013208408,0.025219455,0.0034257732,0.014585176,0.020693053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024782851,0.0005876542,0.00078518246,0.001996553,0.010706594,0.01270934,0.006283128,0.010895059,0.0021561792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040522667,0.000046563397,0.00089508865,0.0001327065,0.0000065359927,0.00031820685,0.00381715,0.00013065244,0.00026163715,0.8542085,0.11145909,0.028683286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006161875,0.000041751427,0.002958957,0.0009155375,0.000020880205,0.00029081487,0.0090918625,0.0007359936,0.00030671328,0.188637,0.7968785,0.000060335267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078377195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067006364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078377195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014301023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022365423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15584195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229142946","doi":"","title":"Unrest in the European Commission: The Changing Landscape and Politics of International Mergers for United States Companies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Competition (biology); Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Business; International trade; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.032981845688208986,"score_gpt":0.23749301093421382,"score_spread":0.20451116524600482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229142946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061442193,0.08291524,0.0011280647,0.42529017,0.004628034,0.00003699554,0.00009086848,0.00008257462,0.42438585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79694015,0.018311681,0.000611407,0.1332168,0.003395847,0.000049928432,0.00007560056,0.0000825688,0.04731607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846972,0.007322251,0.0005160962,0.0012466691,0.0032655864,0.0029521734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403233,0.009002557,0.0023559676,0.00053652166,0.0021593203,0.001913244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013234306,0.0004079385,0.00046863663,0.003069179,0.014469595,0.031049713,0.0012582947,0.016755652,0.00906467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022614904,0.0004806579,0.0006224034,0.005550299,0.01567048,0.011071994,0.007870568,0.009059733,0.00073005026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056387566,0.00003956415,0.002660235,0.00009897865,0.000013974135,0.00079823256,0.011382269,0.0002803939,0.00018648535,0.784411,0.16245113,0.037621364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015573241,0.000052231353,0.0074330685,0.00090990827,0.000013653655,0.00044361223,0.025268395,0.00032685095,0.0002931368,0.050611116,0.9145566,0.000075818374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03205396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043661196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03205396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018090876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079875905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13125908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337972206","doi":"","title":"Bitcoin: The Napster of Currency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Cryptocurrency; Currency; China; Virtual currency; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.021143319385296115,"score_gpt":0.2660303835112224,"score_spread":0.24488706412592626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337972206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017690297,0.035256095,0.006443601,0.16982237,0.0056640916,0.00006751168,0.00014586098,0.00016496735,0.7647451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5688934,0.03495559,0.0030892133,0.09039176,0.0049885865,0.00022233449,0.00017827465,0.00033557552,0.2969452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742424,0.00091919134,0.00010333203,0.00029026016,0.00084309286,0.0004199044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861896,0.0003882465,0.00013626531,0.00020519953,0.00042334193,0.00022799696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028779102,0.00056641607,0.00032189902,0.001197647,0.0037238044,0.012682247,0.0007631258,0.004884115,0.011348455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062191403,0.0002162449,0.0003096832,0.0017366194,0.009771886,0.010500679,0.0039993683,0.0068179243,0.0021250611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037639475,0.0000066436164,0.00030190032,0.0000624673,0.0000040425666,0.00011415826,0.0013489175,0.0001211137,0.0002788923,0.94081885,0.04038037,0.01652507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012861797,0.000045856013,0.0010213766,0.0005128824,0.0000053467916,0.00019012556,0.0024087555,0.00037359854,0.0006971736,0.14650355,0.8482023,0.000026237461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009457641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005334194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012682247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005231186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037245578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037964344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243121698","doi":"","title":"The Impaired Dual System Framework of United States Drunk-Driving Law: How International Perspectives Yield More Sober Results","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sobriety; Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Criminology; Driving under the influence; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011733558702517596,"score_gpt":0.2780547868322283,"score_spread":0.2663212281297107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243121698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046246447,0.02105895,0.012580869,0.31349066,0.0030766868,0.00007563984,0.00015608856,0.00016454994,0.60315007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91932905,0.0075523625,0.008913093,0.035962675,0.0012551514,0.00016454146,0.00010216017,0.000121669844,0.026599191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98835665,0.0071816845,0.00032271136,0.00090725365,0.0018021663,0.0014294791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015874,0.0046166363,0.00091557886,0.0007926146,0.002558629,0.00095771835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012130639,0.0005774301,0.0004128467,0.0038646152,0.009099584,0.0213962,0.0016145464,0.0061648916,0.01013975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01550942,0.00035742542,0.0006259027,0.0026657232,0.044087257,0.011646159,0.0066293394,0.007722764,0.0009838495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008745212,0.000014038391,0.0012936343,0.00003103035,0.0000044331427,0.00013341171,0.005994974,0.000090434856,0.00004217174,0.97558653,0.009650724,0.007149884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016782504,0.000068000125,0.0058491644,0.0010617875,0.00003122023,0.00038430723,0.029417662,0.00099803,0.00033211237,0.742095,0.21968405,0.00006182272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01861451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024679448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0213962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009934515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01046996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072080314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W281238728","doi":"","title":"Pac Rim Cayman V. Republic of El Salvador: Confronting Free Trade's Chilling Effect on Environmental Progress in Latin America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Multinational corporation; Free trade agreement; International trade; Enforcement; Free trade; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Arbitration; Economic history; Environmental protection; Law; Geography; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.008744262238543294,"score_gpt":0.22390761937188122,"score_spread":0.21516335713333792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W281238728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10708171,0.027507111,0.00043198414,0.41558233,0.0036888155,0.00007660315,0.00016276904,0.000090732225,0.44537798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6568853,0.015275403,0.00059772446,0.19494465,0.0029348575,0.00014848479,0.0001962646,0.00012161618,0.12889569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991467,0.00023869917,0.000028377617,0.00009179602,0.00017415191,0.00032032412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.00062715664,0.00012211381,0.00004650667,0.00026315125,0.00020938832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258373,0.0004271574,0.00025228702,0.00076332135,0.007198022,0.006825506,0.0012481784,0.0061659166,0.007750372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004574618,0.00019623502,0.00031333163,0.00082511484,0.00474985,0.002522409,0.0037804763,0.0070553822,0.00040893914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025760164,0.00012085608,0.011427866,0.0006499921,0.00010434077,0.009530236,0.028225597,0.00093482796,0.0023440507,0.46899292,0.42006066,0.057350986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071630115,0.000054921024,0.009470156,0.00051743677,0.000068370726,0.00034292237,0.014841709,0.00030898929,0.0010708914,0.013549159,0.9596521,0.00005172492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20444219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27661034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20444219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009270137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008111961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40650445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287418538","doi":"","title":"The Alien Torts Statute and the Search for Energy in Difficult Political Environments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy law; Statute; Politics; Law; Energy (signal processing); Business; Political science; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental law","score_opus":0.01173812754937469,"score_gpt":0.2329473484331023,"score_spread":0.2212092208837276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287418538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02035928,0.009985664,0.0031089652,0.079081446,0.0012682024,0.000047801565,0.00027812598,0.000082825034,0.8857877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72051626,0.016998913,0.0020257658,0.04156209,0.003147603,0.00025848695,0.00040545987,0.00008367927,0.21500163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969951,0.0010199962,0.0001428595,0.00022739536,0.0008713514,0.00074340537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638015,0.0022704543,0.00057340326,0.0001763945,0.00032201104,0.00027754004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021280118,0.00033795173,0.0002955139,0.0018029381,0.0058503654,0.0067948312,0.00074055925,0.0057176384,0.015643869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004478807,0.0003014616,0.0005108051,0.0020515332,0.017232059,0.0037786628,0.0048482087,0.0041707493,0.0015422602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060940934,0.000009311891,0.0005524927,0.000018942816,0.000002192926,0.00016474177,0.0009702159,0.00018175559,0.000031903706,0.9660465,0.027309857,0.0047058756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001631791,0.000027714797,0.0058121863,0.00071172667,0.000013020335,0.0005046999,0.00482122,0.0007959578,0.000106454565,0.28840855,0.698735,0.000047085196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024500074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026991088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024500074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050366437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004336648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05233395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293430674","doi":"","title":"Resale Price Maintenance and Leegin: Opening Kay's Kloset Opened the Lid on Pandora's Box in Global Competition Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Rights and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Competition law; European union; Politics; Resale price maintenance; Political science; Economics; Sociology; International trade; Market economy; History; Monopoly","score_opus":0.019998205805453174,"score_gpt":0.2950483449484478,"score_spread":0.2750501391429946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293430674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008361177,0.026308754,0.004222854,0.5201269,0.009686798,0.000047478912,0.000090694324,0.000169988,0.4309854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30594492,0.0099122785,0.0024947403,0.26628858,0.006884216,0.00017346417,0.00006836165,0.00021680024,0.40801662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970408,0.00096848275,0.00012744465,0.0006719141,0.0008114279,0.00037991742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970413,0.0018463021,0.0001890248,0.0002375841,0.00047107576,0.00021485888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033674175,0.00045375046,0.0005799162,0.0006162772,0.0041509755,0.008654584,0.001016218,0.011034975,0.009053485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011251762,0.00031930557,0.0005415177,0.0006482849,0.008220338,0.012318823,0.0028398428,0.013138306,0.0017724296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020385773,0.000014376241,0.00011058926,0.000032587806,0.000003462111,0.00015297484,0.0004977701,0.00012705036,0.000100131794,0.84274584,0.14705239,0.009142333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017781313,0.000040373303,0.00042657374,0.00034308652,0.00000950564,0.00012875423,0.0008588987,0.0005218459,0.00020064315,0.2320092,0.7653957,0.000047723555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014979887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015089082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014979887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042480486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037580174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03082192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293968321","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Foreign Tax Judgments: An Argument for the Revocation of the Revenue Rule","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Jurisdiction; Statute; Political science; Obligation; Federal common law; Personal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.022048208523383246,"score_gpt":0.25632214872460024,"score_spread":0.234273940201217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293968321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0329928,0.0020395461,0.05639548,0.09922739,0.0040469416,0.00034386784,0.00020882809,0.00031327351,0.8044319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82894725,0.0013302898,0.018038068,0.047812786,0.005948916,0.00049610157,0.00013801767,0.00021118586,0.097077355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869305,0.0033863217,0.00064546603,0.0028751402,0.003874538,0.00228809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285425,0.009664064,0.0012874092,0.002378507,0.0030352352,0.00078045117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013712708,0.00078147254,0.001162468,0.0021763514,0.0064625866,0.010226946,0.006328898,0.022452323,0.013120962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030457849,0.00090480654,0.0026325502,0.0009327822,0.022179667,0.011739498,0.007006369,0.025345726,0.0039869444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016725995,0.000016764001,0.00013844554,0.0000138120395,0.0000053643244,0.00018801856,0.0002141105,0.00011538922,0.00008711631,0.99330693,0.004386315,0.0015109244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015286508,0.00006945474,0.00040167643,0.00023250197,0.000066224704,0.0005316022,0.0005457422,0.0037048638,0.0011852767,0.8589123,0.13411832,0.000079192825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008544961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005108184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022452323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005595043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006145421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072520554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30133502","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0201924","title":"Admirality Judges: Flotsam on the Sea of Maritime Law?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Appeal; Political science; Duty; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Common law","score_opus":0.03551756258416505,"score_gpt":0.2514686183299647,"score_spread":0.21595105574579965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30133502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072954506,0.0033483303,0.00055595685,0.55641335,0.016027048,0.00014909489,0.0006286073,0.00035615487,0.34956703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2982287,0.002988886,0.0006483389,0.24873616,0.0041307765,0.000076833414,0.00042475894,0.00027051772,0.44449502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988918,0.00019540604,0.000034188946,0.000110444125,0.00028689814,0.00048132983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955336,0.00027744946,0.00035016384,0.000114252594,0.0013265035,0.002397997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016297556,0.0002555124,0.0003110915,0.00061363826,0.011791738,0.002790185,0.0011756871,0.0029651385,0.1298498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009203124,0.00020879549,0.00021556597,0.00040958583,0.002467025,0.0026086594,0.0026502726,0.004789438,0.016534874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027082058,0.000060381728,0.01928613,0.000038487182,0.0000064783685,0.0010482029,0.004111725,0.000016081269,0.00015685758,0.0041417195,0.92336535,0.04774148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001791493,0.000044074066,0.031250328,0.0003003099,0.000011537421,0.0009988354,0.033625565,0.00013664209,0.00011875703,0.0014827842,0.93197656,0.000036710353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24881575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50794876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24881575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046418924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007546034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49473494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308739830","doi":"","title":"TRIPS Compliance: Dealing with the Consequences of Drug Patents in India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Patent Act; Principle of legality; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Patent law; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.0851516494275886,"score_gpt":0.2459004662222322,"score_spread":0.1607488167946436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308739830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21776468,0.0055350857,0.0020385955,0.33578297,0.0014638053,0.0001703704,0.00040696075,0.00040075765,0.43643686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86909795,0.0048703873,0.001157905,0.047279537,0.0010807256,0.0000739738,0.00027520984,0.000086408785,0.07607789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939015,0.0012638447,0.0003681086,0.00040643974,0.0027130607,0.0013470864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981778,0.009189814,0.003293886,0.0009867646,0.0025613622,0.0021901715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050784205,0.0001746722,0.00018432616,0.0019342748,0.0070679737,0.007849756,0.0024993715,0.007026762,0.010358122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018421648,0.0002298687,0.0005353173,0.0027921174,0.0039208545,0.004350318,0.0049115145,0.00705231,0.00084642903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012157539,0.00037645496,0.04848115,0.0007942374,0.00006406833,0.015206961,0.03508743,0.0021271359,0.0015170093,0.35615763,0.31144917,0.2286171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030237985,0.00029116316,0.06516434,0.0008385758,0.000074277086,0.0068600504,0.06645645,0.0032059315,0.0020567242,0.034279466,0.8205816,0.00016124304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040957063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050576862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040957063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007873681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015860872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08143735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320146868","doi":"","title":"Who Gets the Oil?: Arctic Energy Exploration in Uncertain Waters and the Need for Universal Ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Arctic; Ratification; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); International law; Oceanography; Politics; Geology","score_opus":0.02690097810458089,"score_gpt":0.2869453539809207,"score_spread":0.2600443758763398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320146868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026336461,0.028807761,0.00042681795,0.9326818,0.0067828773,0.000011133261,0.000034446122,0.000014722025,0.028606942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29852605,0.13189755,0.0039850525,0.47922218,0.02242176,0.000174522,0.0002245967,0.00020048807,0.063347846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365145,0.0032126934,0.000286023,0.00057136687,0.00119219,0.0010861816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835021,0.0118328575,0.00079265836,0.00023158641,0.0018765988,0.0017642368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014169681,0.0005874665,0.00087235385,0.0013902845,0.01531406,0.023110205,0.003008688,0.01953179,0.008984219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020381525,0.0005316338,0.0006605671,0.002316791,0.021482643,0.022263106,0.007123283,0.021379061,0.0017958235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004397046,0.00004308497,0.00090601074,0.00035434123,0.000009684836,0.0007887549,0.017567888,0.0003652888,0.00016573069,0.4854404,0.45909974,0.035215102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009633758,0.000026373964,0.0019116546,0.0030474202,0.0000108845325,0.00022428216,0.07736383,0.00057058973,0.00018967516,0.20180726,0.7147445,0.00009386674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06975765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12392115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06975765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013946344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029664174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13870323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343004315","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments in Brazil's Oil & Gas Industry: Brazil Appears to Be Stemming the Tide of Resource Nationalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petroleum industry; Economy; International trade; Economics; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.015843774201691998,"score_gpt":0.24253274371336855,"score_spread":0.22668896951167655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343004315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0864124,0.11834499,0.0014370499,0.51884973,0.001755701,0.000031984822,0.001731708,0.00011170296,0.27132475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7916648,0.12936354,0.0022083335,0.026643898,0.0018580555,0.000028199633,0.00089239125,0.000051327806,0.047289457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996805,0.000045387238,0.000017027178,0.000059122605,0.00012377057,0.00007407366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872285,0.00032973994,0.00030314468,0.00003755267,0.00041959947,0.0001871532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066673756,0.00016446326,0.00012145071,0.00073698076,0.0014207818,0.0025191477,0.00027896266,0.0014783954,0.007720444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018688152,0.00014606118,0.00018936861,0.002062294,0.0012588421,0.0019525514,0.0007557631,0.0014585895,0.00068625907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007415306,0.000055649896,0.03159998,0.0024311652,0.000037586397,0.0021784855,0.010822075,0.00088037486,0.0071563222,0.45117024,0.20970465,0.2838892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031329819,0.000017192287,0.028611816,0.0005612557,0.000011755593,0.00033216158,0.0031347591,0.00018105337,0.00054956775,0.007827658,0.9587508,0.000018808223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07660115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1457719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07660115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041843974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061306204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15231055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350034773","doi":"","title":"OVER THE RIVER AND (AROUND) THE WOODS TO GRANDMA'S HOUSE WE GO: LONG-TERM FIRM TRANSMISSION RIGHTS, TRANSMISSION MARKET POWER & GAMING STRATEGIES IN A DEREGULATED ENERGY MARKET-AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Electricity market; Competition (biology); Monopoly; Market power; Energy market; Economics; Transmission (telecommunications); European union; Business; Market economy; Telecommunications; Economy; Law; Electricity; International trade; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.017890938722818682,"score_gpt":0.31073030466416934,"score_spread":0.2928393659413507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350034773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41953084,0.008235941,0.002740456,0.0046318425,0.00012513335,0.00003601181,0.00019764165,0.000024360279,0.5644777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580418,0.0028404766,0.00055288174,0.00038644217,0.000049060473,0.000016255322,0.00010307135,0.000015801243,0.037994083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996474,0.00008921742,0.000008876334,0.000043041964,0.00008867674,0.00012283446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954885,0.00016230714,0.00008724573,0.000026283626,0.00009963803,0.000075650765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142512,0.00014591307,0.00014426508,0.0006149456,0.0010360527,0.0057802163,0.00052853127,0.00074281933,0.010877447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091764086,0.000072552815,0.00025009137,0.0012005052,0.0018375112,0.0048903367,0.00072526874,0.0007824282,0.00055291486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008374419,0.00012447813,0.004436213,0.000071125796,0.000014829113,0.00030779472,0.0036203081,0.0017870445,0.0003805327,0.9243702,0.007830802,0.056972925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000814126,0.00057210174,0.1172868,0.00079506816,0.00006711114,0.0007035981,0.049881693,0.013843878,0.0018054555,0.2786991,0.5361493,0.00011445902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014716523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020101378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014716523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025522765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013741546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036388755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41070819","doi":"","title":"International Student Athletes in the NCAA: Professionals or Exploited Children?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; Amateur; Athletes; Club; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.023235260451744715,"score_gpt":0.3853870945880636,"score_spread":0.36215183413631885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W41070819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010071453,0.03905582,0.0002980185,0.7858167,0.046452053,0.00007700173,0.0007784401,0.00009676998,0.117353685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112157844,0.11456573,0.0012583771,0.53892756,0.030267362,0.00038833392,0.0018244673,0.00018806093,0.2004223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988165,0.00027015893,0.00008835125,0.00013357254,0.000317006,0.00037444735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776995,0.00043268062,0.00023066213,0.000056296412,0.00073408714,0.00077637576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015800105,0.00041522435,0.00038785307,0.001250724,0.005371111,0.0050062137,0.0009489078,0.0048913322,0.024495281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005879257,0.000280137,0.00024724065,0.0016939758,0.0031155918,0.007128917,0.0022218176,0.00572386,0.0040398096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017133287,0.00004051206,0.0044841142,0.0002766544,0.000003256678,0.00038035156,0.00997062,0.000009836961,0.000069109665,0.013565701,0.90901977,0.06216296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035261405,0.00002424897,0.008526086,0.0015065161,0.0000039138313,0.0004832695,0.041702516,0.000013641465,0.000042774696,0.0024457169,0.94523,0.000017809289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04419782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09666946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04419782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030923984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074336026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08788115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41821280","doi":"","title":"Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009: A \"Fit\"-Ing Policy for North America?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Tariff; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Energy policy; Emissions trading; Feed-in tariff; Economy; Business; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; International trade; Renewable energy; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.027236281452057826,"score_gpt":0.2800089532955212,"score_spread":0.2527726718434634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W41821280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019118215,0.013319289,0.00046218876,0.8453119,0.016460529,0.0001107823,0.0026141212,0.00016848813,0.11964089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01869126,0.013628793,0.003115961,0.6933663,0.003358955,0.00035999416,0.0014454913,0.00015739299,0.26587588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972161,0.0003227521,0.00015529667,0.00035862287,0.0012705472,0.0006767358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967265,0.00068372255,0.000213412,0.000099145334,0.0018883253,0.0003889067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002647932,0.0008819052,0.00065499527,0.0008623658,0.0075696115,0.007181678,0.0027345042,0.023318179,0.015021921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006120921,0.0005260996,0.0007038604,0.0021777858,0.0039571435,0.0042192405,0.0015432604,0.011889859,0.0056239474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013047764,0.00002521086,0.00040753043,0.000105644525,0.000002927445,0.00011232371,0.0006330513,0.00004891771,0.00017275271,0.032743305,0.9598052,0.005930169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085592255,0.000006916694,0.0028110733,0.0003323696,0.0000061793353,0.000019567127,0.0010154949,0.000055465396,0.00007024969,0.0028854238,0.9927614,0.000027354907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7972178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91445476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031657204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079236686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40795285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W842500435","doi":"","title":"\"This Does Not Matter in Mexico\": Mexico-U.S. Competition Law - Conflicts and Resolutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Competition (biology); Competition law; Political science; Common law; Economics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.018847762253643378,"score_gpt":0.2731447789627447,"score_spread":0.2542970167091013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W842500435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048341982,0.049163964,0.0020394784,0.44896656,0.0028395506,0.00009117033,0.00070211285,0.00008251011,0.44777268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7629959,0.02318363,0.0031467786,0.07053227,0.0029245508,0.00027777837,0.00065136974,0.00005667254,0.13623111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986313,0.0004299237,0.000052064664,0.00025742647,0.00031183587,0.00031750233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.00031820883,0.00021236086,0.000040289997,0.00014110457,0.0000711936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020230985,0.000282595,0.00025137654,0.0011286922,0.0066960407,0.008288431,0.0008825437,0.004985145,0.01072929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034918762,0.00019951709,0.00026932813,0.0019352748,0.0056898636,0.0038541788,0.0023162265,0.0041378764,0.00048559325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021635817,0.000016278234,0.0018545201,0.00009974206,0.000009152273,0.00021810885,0.0044943527,0.000088197085,0.00010945583,0.86927,0.10395378,0.019864721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021953463,0.00002690287,0.017549163,0.0009483711,0.000025755893,0.00022130615,0.009571625,0.00027439566,0.00027562727,0.07131368,0.8997342,0.000037022117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1006409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099082775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1006409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010242988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072272364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2001102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}