{"meta":{"query_hash":"76f648cd4705","filters":{"venue":"Houston journal of international law"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/76f648cd4705","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Houston+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W102816895","doi":"","title":"Responsibility to Protect: An Explanation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Genocide; Crimes against humanity; War crime; International community; Law; State responsibility; Charter; Political science; Ethnic Cleansing; International law; Collective responsibility; Human rights; Incitement; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015524525659638452,"score_gpt":0.3287178840238012,"score_spread":0.31319335836416273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102816895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85667616,0.000013573201,0.007594066,0.010116692,0.0011557285,0.00015877545,0.000008333975,0.000027749827,0.124248914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959294,0.000008628146,0.0020121739,0.0011056294,0.00055016985,0.000001473093,0.0000023296384,0.000004736947,0.00038546283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986357,0.00024993412,0.00026465787,0.0000939803,0.0006324751,0.00012322553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886495,0.00007463862,0.00017111986,0.00008846932,0.0006278535,0.00017297403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020538312,0.00005524711,0.00009800044,0.00010068111,0.00014717408,0.00009443443,0.00038574263,0.000054511253,0.00010093433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084649667,0.000051523595,0.00005978334,0.00009943423,0.00007233933,0.00045102046,0.000021106716,0.00013363792,0.000022704657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002485175,0.00011797749,0.0010094433,0.0000020645812,0.000016065784,0.000007752937,0.004430782,0.0005247974,0.000531423,0.98749316,0.0009723107,0.0046456894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000524799,0.00063118496,0.005876333,0.000055738674,0.000012790888,0.000029951849,0.0022989963,0.0009213036,0.00034193275,0.04639719,0.94271755,0.00019221424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062479515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050372584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001807242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093655704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28109083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106099222","doi":"","title":"Gene-Patenting and Access to Healthcare: Achieving Precision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Patent Act; TRIPS Agreement; Health care; Business; Law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Biotechnology; Patent law; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.09772565969263787,"score_gpt":0.2752054991477962,"score_spread":0.17747983945515833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106099222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430095,0.00012409217,0.008571685,0.010207369,0.0024203032,0.00014053145,0.0000014524259,0.00002812659,0.035496935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891395,0.000023182205,0.0006429616,0.008230458,0.0017451443,0.0000012723855,0.0000027777808,0.000016458604,0.00019822638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895483,0.000019078328,0.00038043535,0.00012885788,0.00036943145,0.00014736228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989951,0.00006103322,0.00031744785,0.00007055534,0.00052613765,0.000029712972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007125669,0.00010287199,0.00015191804,0.0002403563,0.00015045251,0.0005042791,0.00041365714,0.000039638344,0.000119024015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035019312,0.00007937815,0.00006162601,0.00011628584,0.000023252624,0.0012795383,0.000232194,0.00017125155,0.00006689359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034665652,0.0005719694,0.16512957,0.00057846913,0.0004822936,0.00015160293,0.00089438556,0.0059075197,0.025720544,0.2830092,0.031052677,0.4830352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002407438,0.00039427608,0.049807742,0.0015362783,0.00010271416,0.0003919844,0.00013988945,0.017034845,0.0072292844,0.01327282,0.9068648,0.0008178859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022264513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005565804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8758122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000299179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010580798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48627752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10843675","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6230","title":"Continental Cap-and-Trade: Canada, the United States, and Climate Change Partnership in North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"International trade; Climate change; Emissions trading; General partnership; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.018184228829217015,"score_gpt":0.27257094700641904,"score_spread":0.25438671817720204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10843675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447546,0.00012870853,6.5845865e-7,0.05213754,0.0002962673,0.000050894963,0.0001226442,0.0000020333516,0.0025066787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899074,0.0008449613,0.00001365991,0.008721433,0.0003552,0.0000016557184,0.000005015273,0.000004087633,0.00014657654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992897,0.00004957691,0.00016695214,0.0000566662,0.00027861877,0.00015851493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948394,0.00011418591,0.00018436482,0.000036048554,0.000055058383,0.00012642524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024500472,0.00005311944,0.00008243181,0.000051700736,0.00012620662,0.000053267027,0.00017127082,0.000023764334,0.000037776288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008760507,0.000041129766,0.00001878743,0.00011044611,0.00026240578,0.0001384274,0.000016944716,0.00024896942,4.1642951e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021532831,0.00007450443,0.34889844,0.000013112358,0.0000834053,0.00037047899,0.034694724,0.00006725097,0.000050654,0.5608529,0.04772371,0.0069554946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022283982,0.000016577378,0.15729398,0.000013766243,0.0000046961013,0.000035285477,0.0009797543,0.00006594545,0.00000631672,0.000113260736,0.8411942,0.000053390566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93269366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99822146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7934705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078539895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016351273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16772233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171716517","doi":"","title":"Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11: Past, Present, and Future","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Arbitration; Political science; International trade law; Negotiation; Tribunal; Interpretation (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Free trade agreement; Commission; Sovereignty; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.013992694103444723,"score_gpt":0.22785150434722193,"score_spread":0.2138588102437772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171716517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052977677,0.00020113126,0.001920623,0.021886881,0.003092868,0.00014483096,0.0000036188812,0.00002937852,0.919743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665463,0.00004654554,0.000562037,0.024117112,0.007780123,0.000002746558,0.000011954582,0.000020219215,0.0009129626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988443,0.000012432157,0.00040496074,0.00013218836,0.00048585274,0.0001202611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998906,0.000021801072,0.0004240715,0.000073813426,0.00054922554,0.000025094034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028697302,0.00013678776,0.00013063806,0.00020255648,0.00010353707,0.000282866,0.00018088667,0.000054435914,0.0010508726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012027947,0.00011441089,0.00009316141,0.00007158787,0.00007275529,0.001632662,0.000029163872,0.00015183275,0.00004793268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003884624,0.000065987515,0.0009857789,0.0000071097406,0.00005360189,0.000012064782,0.000014538461,0.000074733725,0.0006969881,0.99502105,0.0029251536,0.00010417299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072445144,0.000024720408,0.0016974363,0.000025884876,0.000025610707,0.000110862085,0.00010517805,0.0005013938,0.00069087715,0.03867195,0.9572879,0.0001337247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029748468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026990117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037010934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001619938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934496157","doi":"","title":"The Mexican Trucking Dispute: A Bottleneck to Free Trade. A Tough (Road) Test on the NAFTA Dispute Settlement Mechanism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Treaty; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.013904100210615018,"score_gpt":0.267969947774526,"score_spread":0.254065847563911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934496157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02585927,0.00019421561,0.0036009625,0.764333,0.0058156988,0.0008280365,0.00014565085,0.000088566034,0.19913456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922121,0.00009751333,0.00090262893,0.0044635246,0.00065173535,0.000009579259,0.0000017182235,0.000028279559,0.001632915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731135,0.00029433644,0.0005206441,0.00017717808,0.0013817248,0.00031476686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981004,0.0007947758,0.0003920405,0.00027304314,0.00024468772,0.0001950749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016130422,0.00016081969,0.00016246384,0.00007961968,0.0009670067,0.0003803076,0.0013505348,0.00005320073,0.0005213061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016581528,0.000099174256,0.00014717164,0.0003517669,0.00021871892,0.00023603303,0.00006689372,0.0003218149,0.000027848326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021158006,0.00008882923,0.0001947844,9.24062e-7,0.00006800193,0.000014688506,0.0014793441,0.00007060255,0.00023878476,0.9878529,0.009442822,0.00052721787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052651303,0.00020126185,0.0017511309,0.00009022948,0.00003316501,0.000044790915,0.0016362253,0.000027046783,0.0033739125,0.027665282,0.9644641,0.00018632677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098311204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012230346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034783327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019133014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74375314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229142946","doi":"","title":"Unrest in the European Commission: The Changing Landscape and Politics of International Mergers for United States Companies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Competition (biology); Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Business; International trade; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.032981845688208986,"score_gpt":0.23749301093421382,"score_spread":0.20451116524600482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229142946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55917925,0.005568979,0.011356143,0.053903185,0.002333629,0.00026556285,0.0005395625,0.000017884327,0.3668358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976216,0.0007519063,0.00015271793,0.00071203365,0.00019519893,0.0000013755011,0.000021035192,0.000007170211,0.00053698977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992054,0.00004955792,0.0005004329,0.000067946734,0.0000885244,0.00008810829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991911,0.00016832509,0.00040057686,0.0000777195,0.00013435214,0.000027938418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498363,0.00006411591,0.00014876167,0.00035829982,0.000080643666,0.000058596666,0.00036130752,0.0000146443645,0.00037965304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006761339,0.000044339748,0.00009578813,0.00015626212,0.00006648854,0.0000953407,0.000030600844,0.00010556843,0.000005140654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002575609,0.00012907974,0.014608574,0.000010168585,0.00019949509,0.00000783125,0.0032869629,0.0043848464,0.0000081296175,0.9725503,0.0045922655,0.00019661452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016141972,0.00014191578,0.015501425,0.00011046887,0.000034888217,0.000085510925,0.0063655744,0.11069551,0.000054092692,0.014104947,0.8510934,0.0001980423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003697289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001568575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020130992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025895768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41569343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337972206","doi":"","title":"Bitcoin: The Napster of Currency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Cryptocurrency; Currency; China; Virtual currency; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Business; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.021143319385296115,"score_gpt":0.2660303835112224,"score_spread":0.24488706412592626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337972206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18903154,0.0021542814,0.6921979,0.051367596,0.0038543283,0.00020967003,0.000011412985,0.000085291074,0.061087944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99145263,0.000024008928,0.008010286,0.00033138576,0.00009526163,0.0000019121696,3.073281e-7,0.000002710701,0.00008147282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918395,0.000029249602,0.00031361717,0.000072672134,0.00032928746,0.00007119309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987478,0.00005344185,0.0003343454,0.00023368883,0.0005862042,0.000044514243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005085749,0.00005392865,0.00009781131,0.0000856262,0.00003399793,0.000028118742,0.0013903299,0.0000416747,0.000012618879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052146126,0.00003439249,0.00007010366,0.00014092623,0.0001223358,0.0001988862,0.00013776796,0.00019145565,0.000009702368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007466525,0.00006977892,0.00035305365,0.0000011601344,0.000025980187,0.00000514041,0.00025276118,0.000052572483,0.00012561526,0.9910634,0.0031676812,0.004875363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015177191,0.00055730535,0.0017849947,0.00008582503,0.000025918973,0.0014659328,0.00027499185,0.011037,0.01920717,0.33426365,0.6295352,0.00024427884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010954368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066655098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028819455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007171589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243121698","doi":"","title":"The Impaired Dual System Framework of United States Drunk-Driving Law: How International Perspectives Yield More Sober Results","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sobriety; Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Criminology; Driving under the influence; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011733558702517596,"score_gpt":0.2780547868322283,"score_spread":0.2663212281297107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243121698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63032275,0.002266599,0.0024711192,0.08650429,0.009056348,0.0004775531,0.00023635781,0.00015331976,0.26851165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537504,0.00018326115,0.00025967893,0.00012210927,0.0025511659,0.0000021737033,0.000010145583,0.000016399581,0.0014800245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974123,0.0001582588,0.0007036555,0.00016045076,0.0013266964,0.00023861689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958105,0.00086843956,0.0010913789,0.00011482946,0.002024183,0.0000906375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013508144,0.0001426689,0.00024382421,0.0001526586,0.0005730112,0.00040576997,0.00066839694,0.00012380925,0.000027990262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008616117,0.000102382226,0.00019097532,0.00024548033,0.00058307446,0.00057750125,0.00006623874,0.00033986353,0.0000029798284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023521968,0.000097510514,0.0009923085,0.000012796455,0.0001986615,0.00004101365,0.009232256,0.0010873756,0.00015094767,0.9832096,0.0046362663,0.00010605725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017444371,0.00036578195,0.0041271527,0.0024893868,0.00010997482,0.00018473735,0.2085255,0.0011222826,0.0016391446,0.02352911,0.75559103,0.00057143765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017759264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005038309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035139528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016714538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W281238728","doi":"","title":"Pac Rim Cayman V. Republic of El Salvador: Confronting Free Trade's Chilling Effect on Environmental Progress in Latin America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Multinational corporation; Free trade agreement; International trade; Enforcement; Free trade; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Arbitration; Economic history; Environmental protection; Law; Geography; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.008744262238543294,"score_gpt":0.22390761937188122,"score_spread":0.21516335713333792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W281238728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91281426,0.000083330626,0.00004842196,0.00031465662,0.00035395645,0.00013199874,0.000046833233,0.00000922644,0.086197294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805975,0.00003269347,0.0011373318,0.00038761826,0.00012124321,0.0000060759153,0.000011207982,0.000026081694,0.0002179849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794227,0.0001029515,0.0006906116,0.00020883509,0.00081673457,0.00023859946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893785,0.000097536176,0.00066816184,0.0001897695,0.0000064988726,0.00010020212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003867026,0.0002069539,0.00029033856,0.00012749706,0.000060498016,0.000021113641,0.0006563148,0.000072904426,0.0018983809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036605474,0.00017696254,0.00018621082,0.0000716468,0.0004923075,0.000353627,0.00015918569,0.00032426455,0.000042556043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014293026,0.002046531,0.89542323,0.000026578968,0.00033218463,0.00023253595,0.0045022876,0.0030431515,0.017884005,0.05159183,0.0012217478,0.022266613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002702405,0.0024240545,0.90289456,0.00026447978,0.000048024544,0.00021926162,0.00030106044,0.00067032035,0.059312172,0.0013538332,0.029335674,0.00047413877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003893051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059581347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085979305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003529022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000082809875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287418538","doi":"","title":"The Alien Torts Statute and the Search for Energy in Difficult Political Environments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy law; Statute; Politics; Law; Energy (signal processing); Business; Political science; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental law","score_opus":0.01173812754937469,"score_gpt":0.2329473484331023,"score_spread":0.2212092208837276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287418538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569565,0.00020164941,0.0035233644,0.0075972513,0.0010924988,0.00017003156,0.000003979515,0.000006958479,0.030447735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964079,0.000025686282,0.00003672209,0.0012277015,0.0010420252,0.0000019904364,0.0000037802665,0.000008014156,0.001246127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912894,0.000009443848,0.00029763923,0.000071105314,0.00030628263,0.0001865821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994472,0.00020559596,0.00015864318,0.000058488957,0.00011302554,0.000017008031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007815316,0.00006875648,0.000094437666,0.00006692117,0.00016222704,0.00019443192,0.0002246749,0.00002371375,0.000021772805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013386689,0.000034797737,0.000053446514,0.000037242586,0.00020147885,0.00028490924,0.00006515077,0.000100598336,0.0000025173363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003808149,0.000033665885,0.00090915913,0.0000028839347,0.000024887513,0.00001813735,0.00002354032,0.000022398885,0.000056842066,0.9973132,0.00040162032,0.00081282464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003437197,0.00003645255,0.026915567,0.000046802776,0.000033062766,0.000049561084,0.00028558157,0.0007646146,0.00038877936,0.22319996,0.74470454,0.00013785221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017813462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007188437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7741133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049583432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000111732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18749115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293430674","doi":"","title":"Resale Price Maintenance and Leegin: Opening Kay's Kloset Opened the Lid on Pandora's Box in Global Competition Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Rights and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Competition law; European union; Politics; Resale price maintenance; Political science; Economics; Sociology; International trade; Market economy; History; Monopoly","score_opus":0.019998205805453174,"score_gpt":0.2950483449484478,"score_spread":0.2750501391429946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293430674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14449832,0.00032770858,0.0003465169,0.04588423,0.0012501671,0.000283536,0.0000148409335,0.000017507244,0.80737716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280953,0.00031674642,0.00028417847,0.004605778,0.00044582275,0.0000014841887,0.000002201362,0.0000048151414,0.0015294462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986373,0.00017091287,0.00031731254,0.00012378192,0.00054565206,0.00020499292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918723,0.00014599206,0.00021154335,0.00007217467,0.00028981807,0.00009322808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010679251,0.00009608251,0.00016200554,0.000045309487,0.00028426948,0.0001997814,0.00043183117,0.000057218807,0.00015736635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021507987,0.0000566969,0.00005870073,0.000115759256,0.00029843854,0.00040517643,0.00002997304,0.0002713441,0.000013791233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042214265,0.000082497514,0.0001257817,0.0000016117757,0.00001674659,0.00006687161,0.0021078773,0.00008540241,0.00010658165,0.9930314,0.0021032502,0.0018498657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018953864,0.00079270185,0.0034363435,0.0006021196,0.000016714095,0.0001950418,0.0023076697,0.00018368546,0.0007343473,0.03322615,0.9563767,0.00023319786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084132334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030402953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95980525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024673878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010844432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23120324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293968321","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Foreign Tax Judgments: An Argument for the Revocation of the Revenue Rule","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Jurisdiction; Statute; Political science; Obligation; Federal common law; Personal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.022048208523383246,"score_gpt":0.25632214872460024,"score_spread":0.234273940201217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293968321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75736076,0.0007844383,0.0044819117,0.020217214,0.0041092075,0.0010734657,0.000065300716,0.000037825208,0.21186991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376124,0.0000369525,0.00047989166,0.0019970762,0.0012564687,0.000007420292,0.0000068248974,0.000010888866,0.002443246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991863,0.000013626432,0.00035143914,0.00006843878,0.00030438922,0.00007585348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877906,0.00004685674,0.00064630096,0.00011071641,0.00040954846,0.0000075338194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004995938,0.00006733062,0.00009219739,0.000054986664,0.00013600817,0.00011145501,0.00038830363,0.000024545905,0.00042641503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010466691,0.00004007258,0.000111792324,0.000088368004,0.00004240434,0.00075381517,0.000021992033,0.000093537165,0.000010631559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008134409,0.00056084886,0.0069800997,0.00011576996,0.0003756229,0.00000429843,0.00065391586,0.005214212,0.0032939056,0.7994028,0.046622626,0.13596249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065052655,0.00003192149,0.00539255,0.00017281654,0.0000671752,0.000010356633,0.00029474488,0.0015119322,0.0013087029,0.010675778,0.9798037,0.00007981876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027124266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010886437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93318105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035119934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000149190555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46689457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30133502","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0201924","title":"Admirality Judges: Flotsam on the Sea of Maritime Law?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Appeal; Political science; Duty; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Common law","score_opus":0.03551756258416505,"score_gpt":0.2514686183299647,"score_spread":0.21595105574579965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30133502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074751064,0.000089987734,0.0013627483,0.009381721,0.002898534,0.00013808724,0.000030706866,0.000026404376,0.91132075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892825,0.00001720954,0.00023280336,0.008657276,0.0012202818,0.000002108253,0.000008913957,0.000017703622,0.0005612329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984119,0.000035009525,0.00056513,0.00012195584,0.0007210835,0.00014495032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982048,0.00020581829,0.0006202896,0.00014784788,0.00080201024,0.00001922896],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082203816,0.00013501549,0.00019740993,0.00011733839,0.00009892668,0.00015017306,0.0005630729,0.000053665834,0.0015802812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005773168,0.00009419477,0.0002032754,0.00009231916,0.00033750036,0.00058808166,0.00004924567,0.00024213074,0.000086254884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082704406,0.0001803297,0.0044549643,0.000017429913,0.000104761246,0.000017204442,0.0000117943655,0.00024124129,0.00008452999,0.98563266,0.009110306,0.000062072955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014238091,0.00014519217,0.007444199,0.0002417181,0.000096616604,0.00008886001,0.0001938601,0.00066473597,0.003444478,0.17208162,0.8138599,0.00031504242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016338492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006168929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9145314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007149267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032326785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308739830","doi":"","title":"TRIPS Compliance: Dealing with the Consequences of Drug Patents in India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Patent Act; Principle of legality; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Patent law; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.0851516494275886,"score_gpt":0.2459004662222322,"score_spread":0.1607488167946436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308739830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95606595,0.00014328767,0.0003325075,0.002744141,0.00047128522,0.00009662343,0.0000023694447,0.0000063731604,0.040137436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981398,0.00002365074,0.0001547441,0.001360929,0.00021797579,0.0000010743634,0.0000021026972,0.0000079709525,0.00009178342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991294,0.00000987778,0.00033331732,0.00006724229,0.00036064326,0.00009952576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904495,0.000037895898,0.00045703302,0.000050155133,0.00040249465,0.000007479202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037704263,0.00008151652,0.00013825121,0.00014331355,0.00006325099,0.00006988202,0.00035316203,0.00002208037,0.00013450436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004515324,0.000045902234,0.000053925774,0.00013605387,0.00015831817,0.00047016004,0.000033361248,0.00019081909,0.000022170734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041766427,0.000761527,0.07697827,0.00024965144,0.00055015425,0.0006550794,0.002137732,0.038268536,0.0076513947,0.86301374,0.0015686784,0.0039885887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05704384,0.0018075901,0.28066215,0.023676345,0.00080475607,0.0029083802,0.019702012,0.006046071,0.13279413,0.21880375,0.2519552,0.0037957544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060633273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013814542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037157737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036285575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18718389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320146868","doi":"","title":"Who Gets the Oil?: Arctic Energy Exploration in Uncertain Waters and the Need for Universal Ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Arctic; Ratification; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); International law; Oceanography; Politics; Geology","score_opus":0.02690097810458089,"score_gpt":0.2869453539809207,"score_spread":0.2600443758763398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320146868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32005137,0.00006348011,0.0006745645,0.6372705,0.0015512076,0.00047620895,0.000031600113,0.0000065418644,0.03987449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997869,0.00018475163,0.000025820513,0.00082324474,0.00014120672,0.000009885244,0.0000018644957,0.000004638768,0.0009395494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874467,0.00042325904,0.00029933164,0.00005921976,0.00039042422,0.000083108534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979112,0.0010190582,0.0005174184,0.00011840193,0.0004173803,0.000016529175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012561188,0.000063641935,0.00009715287,0.000101618854,0.00068845565,0.000036175254,0.0004384272,0.00004088974,0.000008706672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053172867,0.000024486882,0.000108325425,0.00027967844,0.0014383012,0.00016222295,0.000040502557,0.00018830682,2.0150243e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103702085,0.000025810954,0.00030041044,0.0000034053342,0.000051238498,9.1074355e-8,0.008558205,0.0004397394,0.00019936652,0.9898701,0.00033413616,0.00011384404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006862073,0.0002988987,0.019551156,0.0008465963,0.00039047268,0.000026088439,0.10674913,0.008804105,0.016258528,0.33012372,0.50970036,0.00038886204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072981794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01641909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67781764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059798822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008501164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343004315","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments in Brazil's Oil & Gas Industry: Brazil Appears to Be Stemming the Tide of Resource Nationalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petroleum industry; Economy; International trade; Economics; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.015843774201691998,"score_gpt":0.24253274371336855,"score_spread":0.22668896951167655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343004315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92101246,0.00083401444,0.00044369302,0.0058750375,0.001095043,0.00008094236,0.000016278229,0.000041850548,0.070600666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604595,0.0006642671,0.0014505994,0.0006483554,0.00021869453,0.000004985787,0.0000049215732,0.000026036583,0.0009362058],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986602,0.000022316774,0.00053100655,0.00008163903,0.00054978457,0.00015502397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993904,0.00010452562,0.00011819827,0.00008671594,0.00023694285,0.00006320585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035592762,0.00012829666,0.00019686829,0.00023332615,0.000051448504,0.000015524285,0.00034542585,0.00006836121,0.0000450041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013689559,0.00010542731,0.000058149246,0.00022220664,0.000043599903,0.00012038566,0.00007359825,0.00042041807,0.0000036845274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002966665,0.00027481676,0.028135184,0.00013857121,0.0012546825,0.00048003934,0.008773125,0.743265,0.0025909296,0.030909479,0.10911268,0.07476888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055635767,0.00004254791,0.019292526,0.00022614976,0.000009787605,0.00025738467,0.00021818804,0.0006461295,0.0024343105,0.000046674355,0.9760958,0.00017411975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026952008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008734212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001769269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000473199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42992008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350034773","doi":"","title":"OVER THE RIVER AND (AROUND) THE WOODS TO GRANDMA'S HOUSE WE GO: LONG-TERM FIRM TRANSMISSION RIGHTS, TRANSMISSION MARKET POWER & GAMING STRATEGIES IN A DEREGULATED ENERGY MARKET-AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Electricity market; Competition (biology); Monopoly; Market power; Energy market; Economics; Transmission (telecommunications); European union; Business; Market economy; Telecommunications; Economy; Law; Electricity; International trade; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.017890938722818682,"score_gpt":0.31073030466416934,"score_spread":0.2928393659413507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350034773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94730335,0.0009867902,0.0055184225,0.010223912,0.0005421036,0.00016290529,0.000011999529,0.00003359838,0.035216905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493897,0.0019957032,0.00029248965,0.00055461517,0.00034898904,0.0000041897338,0.0000034948357,0.000019806159,0.0018417628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732643,0.0005400059,0.00063590484,0.00021831873,0.001005811,0.00027352685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871594,0.0003525822,0.00031610086,0.00015234173,0.00024843944,0.00021458522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010265121,0.00020325073,0.0002845292,0.00023648022,0.00065063353,0.0002641577,0.0008580296,0.00013070059,0.0012283042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027823042,0.00012219867,0.00020399908,0.00026434404,0.00050646276,0.00094029825,0.000037496357,0.00034858598,0.0000019207282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009244488,0.0027611265,0.16524419,0.000057252575,0.00260497,0.001146401,0.22850351,0.00785292,0.0021572039,0.48904595,0.034126617,0.057255358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025455456,0.0003304489,0.32246554,0.000585177,0.0001526524,0.00030901624,0.0029004496,0.004427107,0.0003441807,0.00774685,0.6576529,0.0005401231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035369887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048204446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6235263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015941377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014165232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41070819","doi":"","title":"International Student Athletes in the NCAA: Professionals or Exploited Children?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; Amateur; Athletes; Club; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.023235260451744715,"score_gpt":0.3853870945880636,"score_spread":0.36215183413631885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W41070819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85108864,0.00017046666,0.000048175116,0.043767285,0.0048107523,0.00043275338,0.00000610924,0.000019190682,0.09965664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992133,0.0002595951,0.0008259402,0.0019598748,0.001954992,0.00003654091,0.000009173564,0.000011865383,0.0028090035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972692,0.00032324012,0.0005846827,0.0001348045,0.0014862233,0.00020185264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979587,0.0003805644,0.0004568505,0.00012276502,0.0010006292,0.00008044552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013870822,0.00011365956,0.00015052577,0.00021030432,0.00017986384,0.0002994265,0.0015082875,0.0000766754,0.0027436172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006709498,0.00007084428,0.000089754314,0.00026127842,0.00020006034,0.0011479321,0.00007465178,0.00036102135,0.00010200935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003000047,0.004231476,0.25258297,0.000010061653,0.0005834193,0.000103669976,0.14633149,0.00031429558,0.0007623663,0.49707535,0.08402649,0.013678402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016520146,0.00021232804,0.4823911,0.00043905491,0.000034729666,0.00015667197,0.05876484,0.00003839515,0.00023357567,0.006650164,0.4490711,0.00035604212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015635148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000573953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4904252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034184378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022796555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41821280","doi":"","title":"Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009: A \"Fit\"-Ing Policy for North America?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Tariff; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Energy policy; Emissions trading; Feed-in tariff; Economy; Business; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; International trade; Renewable energy; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.027236281452057826,"score_gpt":0.2800089532955212,"score_spread":0.2527726718434634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W41821280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17227805,0.0010709468,0.0045882496,0.08858594,0.0014762148,0.0003845801,0.0012716878,0.000053399803,0.73029095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780941,0.00024060959,0.000742383,0.010671391,0.002202319,0.000004716152,0.0000025414668,0.000013759042,0.00802818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992438,0.000031969943,0.0002548511,0.000094871095,0.00017595573,0.00019852776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990616,0.0000773522,0.0003836671,0.00005674088,0.00021119458,0.00020945357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016554573,0.00007901045,0.00014021182,0.00013614251,0.00015990443,0.00004729765,0.00032088684,0.0000408562,0.00010965582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009236114,0.000077895784,0.0000978689,0.000087573426,0.0002129444,0.00042323957,0.000025016769,0.00007508989,0.0000026700416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015269393,0.000050767903,0.0026177284,0.000007350639,0.00013507187,0.000031927266,0.0077257063,0.000013955944,0.000010163027,0.93761665,0.012690513,0.03894745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030408852,0.000086035834,0.0021637476,0.000018508736,0.000010939739,0.000033356235,0.00015354327,0.00003462247,0.000034310913,0.012379064,0.9846891,0.000092637216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30988508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20367026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97199863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017298812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034208162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8108607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W842500435","doi":"","title":"\"This Does Not Matter in Mexico\": Mexico-U.S. Competition Law - Conflicts and Resolutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Competition (biology); Competition law; Political science; Common law; Economics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.018847762253643378,"score_gpt":0.2731447789627447,"score_spread":0.2542970167091013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W842500435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19900714,0.00021133268,0.0004784786,0.14589635,0.0023161569,0.0002562694,0.00006505119,0.00006435577,0.65170485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102306,0.00024842,0.00076101883,0.0040619,0.00031726746,0.0000018333327,0.0000059768763,0.000015227984,0.0035652926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842876,0.00015297164,0.00046366372,0.00013478762,0.00064206234,0.00017774223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898815,0.00013882936,0.00028018383,0.00007886729,0.00038290094,0.00013107488],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004645518,0.0001002169,0.0001751738,0.00017880718,0.00036226213,0.00008446283,0.0002767613,0.0000797039,0.0025285129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007419364,0.000088020635,0.000059172333,0.00017375748,0.00073361926,0.00065519195,0.0000371314,0.00024374561,0.00008238005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037822614,0.00008753697,0.016917842,0.000002702982,0.00003117361,0.000059304526,0.002654618,0.00005049713,0.0005939352,0.97774893,0.0018037756,0.000011865795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203891,0.000056379988,0.031725295,0.0001246183,0.000022022048,0.00030885194,0.000342602,0.00003554333,0.004335408,0.0028047988,0.9588123,0.00022829474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010442075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030490495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020250317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008815623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}