{"meta":{"query_hash":"d6df9d028c25","filters":{"venue":"Human Rights Quarterly"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d6df9d028c25","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Human+Rights+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1982770380","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0045","title":"Child Poverty in Canada and the Rights of the Child","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of the Child; Poverty; Convention; Political science; Child poverty; Law; Human rights; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.013050279412205571,"score_gpt":0.2836337892874637,"score_spread":0.27058350987525814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982770380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15722682,0.045205764,0.0006778568,0.2903052,0.0011786537,0.00006485563,0.0004756917,0.00003469688,0.5048305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8772404,0.025976319,0.0007916809,0.024358656,0.00022769421,0.000039722563,0.00011259338,0.00003619907,0.07121678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961409,0.0003958327,0.00006286345,0.00012574554,0.0010255151,0.0022491952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974589,0.00039909838,0.00020948675,0.000044329423,0.0007665565,0.0011216393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015673588,0.00016882636,0.00030405098,0.0011327307,0.023673639,0.005413656,0.0009913599,0.0024077685,0.006953854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003737545,0.00020892192,0.0002483146,0.0018523054,0.009670997,0.0015815241,0.0035172377,0.0040399726,0.00029532914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036389494,0.000053302774,0.022197772,0.00018606482,0.000016058762,0.0017393131,0.06758348,0.00047327357,0.00035178388,0.741272,0.10312712,0.06296349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020526473,0.000030399935,0.043551877,0.0009797683,0.000023285975,0.00055465125,0.05736649,0.0002864463,0.00022873453,0.029596837,0.8672915,0.000069445065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99714726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07343927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07343927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19802922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5328417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990371558","doi":"10.1353/hrq.0.0150","title":"Advancing the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada: A Human Rights Approach to Migrant Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Agency (philosophy); Transformative learning; Law; Migrant workers; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.010155922805997204,"score_gpt":0.27108355195879735,"score_spread":0.26092762915280016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990371558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36865073,0.006054735,0.0051205796,0.12187099,0.0004172861,0.00021817228,0.0001732073,0.000052312032,0.49744186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94595724,0.0019901663,0.0013717278,0.00782229,0.00005033685,0.00003373081,0.000031371146,0.000014647293,0.042728607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621934,0.00048004437,0.000064231244,0.00025478072,0.0006921928,0.0022893667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979873,0.0006447949,0.00014881058,0.00007866409,0.00050840655,0.000632078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248057,0.000301357,0.00028307392,0.0011633898,0.03289549,0.008539815,0.0017082683,0.0031661687,0.004251679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034572869,0.00022330415,0.00034149602,0.0012788238,0.015071488,0.001794968,0.0045282277,0.004822034,0.0001660885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028424205,0.00007354714,0.015547963,0.000107825785,0.000012706381,0.0021328435,0.10136194,0.00064380013,0.0010463325,0.81909716,0.018465495,0.04148199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056869023,0.000064302854,0.059283618,0.0006677741,0.000076084936,0.0007807517,0.24811557,0.0020529812,0.0019195393,0.07582299,0.6109815,0.00017798904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99068916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0749382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0749382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20263724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54371727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999893550","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0036","title":"Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Implications for NGOs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The North South Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.17276959462979788,"score_gpt":0.3368113273567523,"score_spread":0.1640417327269544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999893550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020387549,0.011382453,0.015600516,0.588961,0.0010814106,0.00025895247,0.000057786798,0.00003148094,0.36223885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116567,0.014706186,0.014205692,0.031071775,0.0014531785,0.0009057618,0.000059105547,0.000039139766,0.025902545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776822,0.017304461,0.00044314435,0.0007845245,0.0016568179,0.0021288057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440615,0.03881717,0.0026277965,0.0023366422,0.0052530575,0.006903779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030210381,0.0006690112,0.00062012905,0.0029478553,0.0135467155,0.0128074195,0.0028166051,0.006260088,0.012931935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037793547,0.00032199261,0.0005866306,0.0042385613,0.060331386,0.026974786,0.012243385,0.00788414,0.00072209485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007910648,0.00005615872,0.0007289218,0.000054875072,0.0000025031432,0.00009347686,0.0063837855,0.00026838013,0.000013864129,0.98220843,0.0027018005,0.0074798325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020563899,0.000019918445,0.0007016959,0.00044393505,0.0000035443054,0.000056157893,0.037103895,0.0003552715,0.000047637594,0.9188993,0.042336337,0.000011568628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013575323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015686994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030210381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01149711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021233106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15976965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000113180","doi":"10.1353/hrq.0.0000","title":"The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Convention; International human rights law; Political science; Right to property; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Linguistic rights; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04466900483987171,"score_gpt":0.3080855070001181,"score_spread":0.26341650216024637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000113180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041515836,0.044491123,0.005037581,0.5058912,0.010058541,0.000033417182,0.00025528672,0.00005239282,0.43002892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41625133,0.045440715,0.007417329,0.24628377,0.011319,0.00033013677,0.00042142993,0.0002463304,0.27228993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993792,0.0029313827,0.000237629,0.0006190953,0.0013451447,0.0010748008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977452,0.0011384294,0.00019601708,0.00029211503,0.00031656452,0.0003115526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005095555,0.00065811764,0.0006008338,0.0011010226,0.005937578,0.010790633,0.0014649251,0.011742801,0.014011977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009792694,0.00021879231,0.0003782953,0.0015503538,0.01695866,0.017151514,0.005742871,0.010776243,0.0020645533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006403523,0.000009853982,0.00012430595,0.000034054665,0.0000018142501,0.000041282532,0.0019425964,0.000026128428,0.00006137824,0.90818346,0.07892808,0.010640713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009284703,0.000011092133,0.00061572803,0.00039721906,0.0000034216896,0.00012343249,0.0034467017,0.00005588734,0.000137259,0.22177766,0.77339536,0.00002689479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022795785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022594882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022795785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00476856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006644596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04687476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011522479","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2013.0039","title":"Genocide: Beyond Definition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02017209733200804,"score_gpt":0.27552125974629227,"score_spread":0.25534916241428424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011522479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007003384,0.21034272,0.006660452,0.24261118,0.009601861,0.000044411143,0.000096154385,0.00010352888,0.5235363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5528562,0.094418444,0.0032669941,0.12953216,0.01115068,0.00028902493,0.00025883675,0.00038842033,0.20783922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475056,0.0027904743,0.00016817314,0.0006209315,0.0009877658,0.00068204245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752945,0.0012747532,0.00021306942,0.00031735018,0.00039173508,0.0002736335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049394267,0.0006953706,0.0006880705,0.0014453055,0.006222796,0.01097279,0.001108614,0.0050216024,0.010599028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063303197,0.00032441667,0.00052050984,0.0013013565,0.0318535,0.010597784,0.00799832,0.008691411,0.0022691241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064254255,0.0000071045756,0.00016879324,0.000091544636,0.0000027132262,0.00007505907,0.009347371,0.00005739801,0.00007065492,0.9081163,0.06317059,0.018885978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036544013,0.000016601285,0.00041107924,0.00056729175,0.0000030989727,0.00017247493,0.005151916,0.00003612462,0.00006239067,0.20121142,0.7923553,0.000008599978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008333426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006872475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01097279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060541783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007067823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04392636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022739189","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0004","title":"Human Security: Undermining Human Rights?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Human security; Political science; Duty; Normative; State (computer science); International human rights law; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03947026842830562,"score_gpt":0.3307329491395519,"score_spread":0.2912626807112463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022739189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013257261,0.018031409,0.010658586,0.65934604,0.0032502944,0.000023838991,0.000029906469,0.00005067042,0.29535192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8520607,0.0143319685,0.0042411503,0.090543695,0.005957138,0.000121672354,0.00003637764,0.000082598475,0.032624647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98666406,0.008234406,0.00029260965,0.0012784712,0.0018521246,0.0016782574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907266,0.0052155885,0.00077264954,0.0011780532,0.001052454,0.0010547012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01555767,0.0007065325,0.00074608735,0.0015703749,0.0057079964,0.01510451,0.0015191892,0.008658942,0.007964711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013657858,0.00028087647,0.00050496054,0.0010743871,0.07580127,0.027687319,0.011095345,0.011589591,0.0011203453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000489771,0.000006313386,0.000082263075,0.000023900546,0.0000019850668,0.000018625413,0.0015314609,0.00003974403,0.000037954556,0.99136955,0.0023715321,0.0045118746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009589386,0.000028201737,0.00020190014,0.0004061984,0.0000063373877,0.000077895726,0.0049503413,0.00012449126,0.00019323223,0.84977496,0.14421463,0.000012280028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042506475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004032407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01555767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065462696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008982844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082277834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024881355","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2005.0023","title":"The Refugees Convention 50 Years On: Globalisation and International Law (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Law; Political science; International law; Immigration; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Immigration law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03360729559788538,"score_gpt":0.3426958484499678,"score_spread":0.3090885528520824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024881355","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025231038,0.9920373,0.000018343402,0.0041289516,0.002454984,0.0000074875425,0.000020377778,0.0000042424163,0.0013030894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006627412,0.98565304,0.00004903209,0.007042921,0.002956234,0.000027941347,0.000079138495,0.000006804183,0.0035221304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812967,0.0005322577,0.00024441688,0.0001812713,0.0007223217,0.00019006671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574655,0.0014609818,0.00083049596,0.00011050725,0.0013909762,0.00046053165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020244266,0.0012593158,0.0021839724,0.004510195,0.0007935132,0.0051590754,0.0012858713,0.0032781418,0.019389955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008442066,0.00064318976,0.0012812165,0.00788833,0.0018392148,0.0058222776,0.0020346823,0.005053768,0.0072516366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003199515,0.0000218704,0.00026912717,0.012011688,0.00007649531,0.00010390204,0.00018952551,0.000072689734,0.000095132964,0.0025170564,0.7963105,0.18829998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014413283,0.0000335429,0.0011937015,0.02392839,0.00005145229,0.000279579,0.000258498,0.000013877189,0.00002944193,0.0011364865,0.9730449,0.000015609106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007389081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011353747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019389955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002997461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008880538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06486589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038776553","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0029","title":"Transgovernmental Activism: Canada's Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Economic shortage; Government (linguistics); Law","score_opus":0.01818793404464711,"score_gpt":0.28439548771355955,"score_spread":0.26620755366891247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038776553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1206774,0.007825207,0.0031729771,0.26738927,0.001207816,0.00018129968,0.00019569341,0.00013736475,0.599213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93148404,0.0028628465,0.0020011358,0.012559854,0.000092235154,0.00005017795,0.00008605719,0.000052517684,0.050811093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082774,0.0021661413,0.000120020326,0.0005027882,0.0022466662,0.004136683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848455,0.0035423187,0.00065381767,0.00043536976,0.0038741461,0.0066487337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006584511,0.00028250826,0.00023896489,0.0016467073,0.027274389,0.0123914555,0.001693126,0.003573554,0.008684577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012918557,0.00024696926,0.00029938077,0.0029668743,0.008023633,0.0025652691,0.0061158123,0.0048911814,0.00031937528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012545123,0.0001365098,0.022004142,0.00042024243,0.00003572524,0.0012452524,0.061069656,0.0016404431,0.0010101312,0.5750176,0.19737987,0.13991508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003685148,0.000037561793,0.02725259,0.0004754035,0.000035353845,0.00018599075,0.05961112,0.0010809855,0.0006224821,0.015462506,0.8951245,0.000074736105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119480565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119480565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27634043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8668962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065710752","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2004.0006","title":"Enacting Bills of Rights: Canada and the Curious Case of New Zealand's \"Thin\" Democracy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Bill of rights; Law; Indigenous rights; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Fundamental rights; Litmus; Politics; Linguistic rights; Indigenous; Ideology; Human rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.015500575267985456,"score_gpt":0.21193206296425388,"score_spread":0.19643148769626842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065710752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24240914,0.0038472223,0.0033203897,0.30829144,0.00044574623,0.00011515526,0.00023219679,0.00005346435,0.44128528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95987195,0.0014588255,0.0016272139,0.01090221,0.00007767572,0.00004899867,0.000048833943,0.000042689862,0.02592168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006605,0.0017644119,0.00020644703,0.00071389443,0.0037823438,0.003466911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212015,0.0026177235,0.0005271982,0.00064747647,0.0023426998,0.0017447412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00778567,0.00027207576,0.0005120497,0.0012888728,0.023315068,0.011588942,0.0016179773,0.0039009263,0.0037146078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018683486,0.00032029094,0.00040692478,0.0018417904,0.02597171,0.004354033,0.005510463,0.009266288,0.00017756033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002671337,0.000009941093,0.0017796919,0.000023148277,0.000007175366,0.000347679,0.01299868,0.0004124237,0.00019017253,0.96022576,0.013095409,0.010883231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011649232,0.000035870034,0.021516727,0.00040941036,0.000052668693,0.00033534114,0.04044487,0.0024750794,0.0005042809,0.36343774,0.5704455,0.00022611298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98395824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08641442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08641442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112031884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6269834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066700929","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2006.0023","title":"Reproductive Choice: Screening Policy and Acess to the Means of Reproduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Reproduction; Reproductive rights; Politics; Fertility; Law and economics; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Business; Public economics; Reproductive health; Economics; Medicine; Biology; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.02561005009877401,"score_gpt":0.32727395148621913,"score_spread":0.30166390138744514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066700929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033691145,0.024507988,0.0054811905,0.49539882,0.00094644126,0.000052677515,0.00023214931,0.000030867206,0.43965873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85962945,0.016353842,0.0024173236,0.062363356,0.00248512,0.00018559759,0.00010484874,0.000031589785,0.05642897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281186,0.0037577339,0.00018047619,0.0005919076,0.0016591018,0.0009989036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989915,0.0074729393,0.0007264833,0.00035514167,0.0006653888,0.00086499937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674467,0.00021564367,0.00031843368,0.0013845243,0.0028254353,0.0059900377,0.0008229653,0.007675642,0.0132501265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02005707,0.0002600411,0.0003155512,0.0015421647,0.015727835,0.0048966985,0.0024572567,0.0035103108,0.001001025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017055454,0.000019295056,0.00074264343,0.00002298444,0.0000017756164,0.00003481915,0.00038642384,0.00015218288,0.00004311145,0.98514044,0.0058544017,0.0075848848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038713995,0.000077364406,0.0063597853,0.00081843225,0.000019425395,0.0003614386,0.0014673914,0.0010929193,0.00032551322,0.76028347,0.22912398,0.0000315425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01975444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016115397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01975444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070596794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009000765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051221788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068897081","doi":"10.1353/hrq.0.0020","title":"National Insecurity and Human Rights: Democracies Debate Counterterrorism , and: Security and Human Rights (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Torture; Law; Political science; Civil liberties; National security; Terrorism; International human rights law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.022214916977896782,"score_gpt":0.3048352595408617,"score_spread":0.2826203425629649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068897081","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028015102,0.9962053,0.00001895904,0.0019966178,0.0009740723,0.000005593885,0.000018302539,0.0000027844778,0.00075044984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005218529,0.9943131,0.000042639476,0.0027265423,0.0015519067,0.000016045697,0.000042697826,0.000002589301,0.0007825644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841416,0.00047660657,0.00021487156,0.00022730006,0.00054764975,0.00011945143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472517,0.0024913284,0.00089515425,0.000072502,0.0015211399,0.00029471517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001842512,0.0011326764,0.0024189085,0.0037312082,0.0007099904,0.0037253664,0.0015540511,0.0036207687,0.016295139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007505777,0.000572882,0.0011440711,0.008404327,0.0017180592,0.004582052,0.0012148266,0.0030392276,0.0038061193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092557966,0.000031802905,0.00026221893,0.06265529,0.00024953237,0.00009300471,0.0001804211,0.00014567564,0.0002086986,0.0030986127,0.41614285,0.5168393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004827317,0.00007293218,0.0018335672,0.06369775,0.0003150275,0.00042011376,0.00036271926,0.000042743683,0.00007751042,0.0019619893,0.9311335,0.00003376731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057878722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011192688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016295139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021132515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006619687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05451268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074071873","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2005.0006","title":"The Second Great Transformation: Human Rights Leapfrogging in the Era of Globalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University; St. Thomas University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Leapfrogging; Human rights; Redistribution (election); Political science; Capitalism; Politics; Political economy; Economic system; Development economics; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01861917712640729,"score_gpt":0.2905816694186675,"score_spread":0.27196249229226016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074071873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08964947,0.010794116,0.0126499925,0.30174,0.0015048513,0.000060090348,0.00004189689,0.000108726366,0.58345085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431782,0.0024853556,0.0024115085,0.01936028,0.00050832453,0.00004824413,0.000017120681,0.000045915123,0.031945087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967673,0.0013191507,0.000054960365,0.0003490576,0.00060529064,0.0009041574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981775,0.00060684455,0.0001753574,0.00031281624,0.00018514405,0.0005422322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043121874,0.0002696611,0.0003873271,0.0006156086,0.006846053,0.007846291,0.0005276813,0.00515861,0.0067167827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047726803,0.00018244366,0.00043667332,0.00059341535,0.032884736,0.01113203,0.0086369645,0.006739597,0.00042133263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015945718,0.000017526145,0.0004933322,0.000022542894,0.0000028173256,0.00021502921,0.006276872,0.00012162483,0.00016240236,0.97238094,0.0091430135,0.011148007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013915342,0.000035084966,0.0015688156,0.00011395719,0.000003845556,0.00041099163,0.00928428,0.00039118278,0.0002634034,0.7464329,0.24145752,0.00002415352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039328192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052124825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007846291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051063406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041120825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037049294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078343597","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0003","title":"Human Rights Dynamics of Abortion Law Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Reproductive rights; Human rights; Citizenship; Reproductive health; Liberalization; Abortion law; Political science; Criminal law; Family planning; Law; Accommodation; Business; Medicine; Population; Psychology; Politics; Environmental health","score_opus":0.015577098083916701,"score_gpt":0.29864963143911544,"score_spread":0.2830725333551987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078343597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061925944,0.0057741036,0.0075793196,0.3075688,0.0004330004,0.000085033185,0.00007452034,0.000039749182,0.61651945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656742,0.0017390955,0.00118065,0.010763861,0.0007435238,0.00010050733,0.000025332916,0.00002878617,0.019744001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909802,0.004908915,0.0001404641,0.0007190215,0.00145959,0.00179185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895644,0.0070828525,0.0007939933,0.00056134776,0.00084348116,0.001153853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01089729,0.00019489617,0.00042611893,0.0016776706,0.0070120613,0.0125192925,0.0013212557,0.007951881,0.01141369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02146767,0.0003568961,0.00046018502,0.001279887,0.04384201,0.00929746,0.0061134333,0.008519991,0.00074478023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028034067,0.000008826321,0.00005165421,0.0000041547005,7.418483e-7,0.000025181911,0.0011004761,0.00008569295,0.00002258149,0.99687445,0.00082868274,0.0009947622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024097071,0.00001668495,0.0004970235,0.00005625604,0.0000024557971,0.000041590327,0.002770833,0.0004964271,0.00007451137,0.92791605,0.06809397,0.000010060675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008211231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059905313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144335665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0144335665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010772792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104723334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090257058","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0044","title":"Human Rights in Canadian Domestic and Foreign Politics: From “Niggardly Acceptance” to Enthusiastic Embrace","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; International human rights law; Law; International relations; International law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.019248925192739765,"score_gpt":0.24261500494984223,"score_spread":0.22336607975710246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090257058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26405036,0.003552814,0.00088211714,0.059747845,0.00042874468,0.00004688239,0.00014293501,0.000048153714,0.67110026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592033,0.001217338,0.00022476823,0.0023011668,0.000042966178,0.000010987018,0.000035468966,0.000030394976,0.036933508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954549,0.0007057855,0.000045058365,0.00034512984,0.001083857,0.0023651193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973495,0.00048245245,0.00013667803,0.00009145238,0.0009015191,0.0010382741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030669882,0.0003447245,0.00027981054,0.0023482319,0.03685285,0.012757331,0.001047398,0.0022097372,0.007977011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004527849,0.00029104188,0.00023797652,0.0034679049,0.028240537,0.00291079,0.0048821173,0.0044919443,0.00031906122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041554285,0.00004871183,0.0066884942,0.00006327516,0.000009394489,0.000493018,0.26641232,0.0002477859,0.0004698461,0.6638952,0.025698163,0.03593234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013418151,0.00002170624,0.023029821,0.00021118729,0.000021124095,0.00016907215,0.25711372,0.0003319535,0.00040823716,0.016469767,0.70212835,0.00008171874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99265444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99623615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18489586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17149638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94540524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095219791","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2007.0034","title":"Do Human Rights Violations Cause Internal Conflict?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Human rights; Internal conflict; Political science; Social conflict; Politics; Democratization; Social psychology; Criminology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04476533346742091,"score_gpt":0.367207544867827,"score_spread":0.3224422114004061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095219791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.739161,0.009867959,0.03007171,0.040553637,0.0004808683,0.00016878512,0.0005483195,0.00009556006,0.17905217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960367,0.0012089992,0.0008509357,0.0007555283,0.00012821199,0.000027907256,0.00006803335,0.000008883072,0.0009147998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951304,0.0023479431,0.00030213266,0.0005635071,0.0006996459,0.00095633545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97630626,0.008726507,0.010920646,0.0016673758,0.0011502727,0.0012289558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049350387,0.0002918193,0.0005934058,0.0024140726,0.0016129846,0.0045199124,0.0005836839,0.0012967119,0.007376774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028537236,0.0003076454,0.0005749881,0.0022495955,0.0065009366,0.004995952,0.003584047,0.0031278622,0.00045903365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020237167,0.00047424485,0.56149507,0.00044270398,0.00020580491,0.0023252121,0.015100778,0.0016842375,0.00042092288,0.25752676,0.0052331146,0.1548888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063950785,0.0003490581,0.33864853,0.0012517046,0.00018597407,0.012111754,0.044749673,0.0040765344,0.0017981916,0.5536835,0.042999703,0.00008138767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010024393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007510691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007376774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011239937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010726653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026099324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269993317","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2015.0067","title":"Human Rights and a Person’s Name: Legal Trends and Challenges","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Human rights; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International human rights law; State (computer science); Generality; International law; Identity (music); Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06459080832473864,"score_gpt":0.3140021061046347,"score_spread":0.24941129777989607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269993317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007257322,0.2000387,0.002605419,0.69287944,0.0021083564,0.000008583291,0.00008887181,0.000033404413,0.09497999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47981766,0.3295563,0.0064830906,0.13149887,0.030759046,0.000119024466,0.0002501463,0.0001969405,0.021318806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867986,0.0053081415,0.00086429744,0.0021038824,0.0038826365,0.001042488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966199,0.024577731,0.0019006268,0.0014141579,0.0037737824,0.0021348475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020878172,0.00046002824,0.001418622,0.0042011365,0.008243891,0.0227234,0.0036076084,0.0133504495,0.008876028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022061659,0.00051629293,0.0005270962,0.007161063,0.06035131,0.05679706,0.008870613,0.021356188,0.001370794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062721833,0.00001460003,0.00024732237,0.00009777308,0.0000020943687,0.00003478124,0.0027990653,0.000033487984,0.000021261647,0.96505076,0.011021414,0.020671187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078804005,0.000024394805,0.0010566292,0.00143288,0.0000049738237,0.0003127354,0.012581724,0.00022266751,0.00006851663,0.6799129,0.30434087,0.00003380127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126435375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010373345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0227234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011627276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010064937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11041564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2389785034","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2016.0030","title":"Forced Marriage, Slavery, and Plural Legal Systems: An African Example","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; University of South Africa; Queen's University; University of Pretoria; York University; University of Hull; DePaul University","keywords":"Forced marriage; Legal pluralism; Law; Principle of legality; Human rights; Political science; Conflict of laws; Plural; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Sociology; Legal realism; Comparative law","score_opus":0.031552486387658514,"score_gpt":0.2861221510320877,"score_spread":0.2545696646444292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2389785034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83308756,0.006880697,0.0017838542,0.035580717,0.00020132482,0.00006713973,0.000022874952,0.000005604828,0.12237028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984729,0.0034171455,0.0006570041,0.0020864492,0.00006753177,0.00004340857,0.000006543035,0.0000061072187,0.008986844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995906,0.0029330708,0.00006675637,0.00010581191,0.0002478442,0.00074048934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99276286,0.005684355,0.00046068418,0.00020077282,0.00030228632,0.0005890095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070487144,0.0002861218,0.00033549548,0.00157809,0.030226534,0.0042880164,0.001109955,0.0033229538,0.0046991613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092356,0.00021484247,0.00030133026,0.0022338203,0.022515947,0.0055319923,0.006235214,0.0043111946,0.00016738231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003668649,0.0002232821,0.004063653,0.00011824454,0.0000073497713,0.0030335556,0.5673653,0.00009566133,0.00037524177,0.4029477,0.0032183395,0.01851494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045642217,0.00011620343,0.012201912,0.0011692819,0.000019705876,0.0025297215,0.7837251,0.00046847944,0.00077212474,0.06210323,0.13681489,0.000033606353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01528974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04843411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030226534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034470784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047568814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03727758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787058601","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2018.0005","title":"The “Quebec Values” Debate of 2013: Minority vs. Collective Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Charter; Reasonable accommodation; Minority rights; Political science; Commission; Government (linguistics); Interculturalism; Law; Human rights; Public administration; Accommodation; Sociology","score_opus":0.06424306548667226,"score_gpt":0.3665630440553193,"score_spread":0.30231997856864706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787058601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10577196,0.015097452,0.0019231595,0.4271898,0.0029886193,0.000041660212,0.00050576514,0.00005278221,0.4464288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653426,0.002220032,0.0005434825,0.047589503,0.0004274325,0.000035537436,0.00008742662,0.000048135455,0.08370583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432474,0.0014426204,0.00006644432,0.0005029799,0.0019258094,0.0017373235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952596,0.0014420204,0.00021825002,0.00015582934,0.001884641,0.00103963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004291212,0.00035841734,0.00045160027,0.001009169,0.0253607,0.010537167,0.0015733774,0.005599018,0.007688936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063067395,0.00021626076,0.0004907056,0.001778665,0.019900743,0.0025572742,0.0023073491,0.0062966202,0.00034754883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009664675,0.000028665227,0.0045355414,0.00011195107,0.000023733823,0.00040281075,0.04462542,0.00031301173,0.0004808474,0.7938688,0.13136764,0.024145052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004101974,0.00003652103,0.02063039,0.00053612114,0.000025732294,0.00015196894,0.04104974,0.00029426478,0.0006719555,0.01888016,0.91757506,0.00010713152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12845096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12845096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11937757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9319813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900752113","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2018.0058","title":"Disability, Human Rights, and Information Technology ed. by Jonathan Lazar & Michael Ashley Stein","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Human rights; Sociology; Disability studies; Information technology; Legislature; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014481337914313776,"score_gpt":0.31885074468023183,"score_spread":0.30436940676591806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900752113","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027970082,0.7559746,0.00087625807,0.074794106,0.044121396,0.00006336857,0.00020028777,0.00016988318,0.123520456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004390789,0.6832888,0.0009465509,0.014591717,0.017468043,0.000121141275,0.0002583019,0.000210486,0.27872416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878484,0.00023503684,0.00007547862,0.00022555878,0.0005759543,0.0001031274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848205,0.00057148666,0.00013219927,0.000051994466,0.0004261166,0.00033618032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001498774,0.0024504438,0.001427663,0.002621112,0.0019911057,0.006938714,0.0010379654,0.003561695,0.057092417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032745963,0.00081747543,0.0004858449,0.0025201328,0.002156172,0.007577937,0.003748653,0.006739373,0.05070052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059081053,0.000011455106,0.000050805673,0.00024703195,0.0000022558893,0.000027557602,0.0002674241,0.000052385436,0.00004855893,0.004560948,0.9381697,0.056556046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018491513,0.000004944458,0.0001741086,0.0007001156,0.0000017014106,0.00011766708,0.00020501041,0.00001704772,0.000015004625,0.0013876099,0.99736756,0.000007514267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071618524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010093092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057092417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024299163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004831331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19099313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947141757","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2019.0039","title":"The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi ed. by Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Law; Legislation; Publishing; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.007744389985617971,"score_gpt":0.23740637375255758,"score_spread":0.2296619837669396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947141757","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015058533,0.8158941,0.000077593344,0.10648187,0.009364017,0.0000519375,0.00016391677,0.000027524173,0.06643318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03102411,0.725442,0.0002864735,0.018259665,0.003654485,0.000076646924,0.00032033434,0.0000796872,0.22085665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874794,0.0002112257,0.00004290058,0.000075706885,0.0005327307,0.00038951408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998288,0.00034625272,0.00014219145,0.00003901038,0.0005886532,0.00059589255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011964166,0.00089703157,0.0009983886,0.0018863452,0.00808895,0.009108884,0.0011300112,0.0036354614,0.02491556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035628816,0.00058306474,0.00033538145,0.004656955,0.006439829,0.0046033496,0.0021619166,0.00489091,0.0032542928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013441634,0.00002263672,0.00039590875,0.00041584804,0.000005281575,0.00012689024,0.004445667,0.000069554924,0.000059204824,0.018909244,0.92294306,0.052593306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035199103,0.0000057011644,0.0020952213,0.0012232044,0.0000034733791,0.0000652661,0.00489953,0.000019926081,0.000020395813,0.0012193988,0.9904336,0.000010713883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6815489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8460724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96696013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033039887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061325584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.640653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048350869","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2020.0035","title":"From Redress to Prevention: How the International Politics of \"No Safe Haven\" Became the Politics of \"Not in My Backyard\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Haven; Politics; Human rights; Enforcement; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Safe haven; Political economy; Immigration; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; International economics","score_opus":0.03938048998680223,"score_gpt":0.31130180671831775,"score_spread":0.27192131673151554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048350869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37550595,0.004508765,0.0069983895,0.1078009,0.0006574532,0.00006305901,0.00006340575,0.000026171989,0.50437593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909971,0.00085567683,0.000471054,0.0025902004,0.000033786368,0.000016539881,0.000014491147,0.000026788359,0.00499449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98694104,0.009146668,0.00018497538,0.00082611514,0.00087266875,0.002028564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415696,0.0031536592,0.0008963604,0.00049376494,0.0005339473,0.0007653418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013368633,0.00025766547,0.0004184864,0.0019563148,0.013597855,0.018823087,0.0011120896,0.0028863857,0.003772156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012397473,0.00030508588,0.000334481,0.0020378334,0.04599322,0.009421174,0.008073413,0.007333535,0.00019745367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024902154,0.00004826888,0.0043054563,0.000038874157,0.000009967213,0.00013620507,0.097051576,0.0001736892,0.00010019196,0.8824912,0.0024500785,0.013169527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032578922,0.000079079895,0.020437859,0.001403497,0.000063908396,0.00040476216,0.6374728,0.00052713166,0.0009321102,0.122423716,0.21613455,0.00008797987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07322969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13281381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07322969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015727976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018416699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14560694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124948426","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0001","title":"Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Normative; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; State of exception; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029432322574848624,"score_gpt":0.3159791559848752,"score_spread":0.28654683341002657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124948426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044767022,0.019590842,0.0340476,0.14195307,0.0010358738,0.00005020552,0.0001098967,0.000071071394,0.7583745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96714664,0.0049270657,0.0038404993,0.0065549524,0.0007505638,0.00008132261,0.00005427094,0.00002580175,0.016618915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962915,0.001921885,0.00013188901,0.0004843701,0.0007344612,0.0004359422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964328,0.002455206,0.00030302294,0.00033534484,0.00028734189,0.00018626697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00531561,0.0002637287,0.00038106207,0.001014486,0.003960955,0.006742668,0.0007406309,0.003847119,0.003335071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006214486,0.0002081447,0.00030597547,0.00086102984,0.05242027,0.006006311,0.0033929308,0.0056340387,0.00038559738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2261977e-7,0.0000021590665,0.000032223346,0.0000039130855,5.8686516e-7,0.000008058981,0.0003208822,0.00007223634,0.000010746316,0.99821544,0.0004152453,0.0009176974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004572766,0.0000042187808,0.000099463825,0.00003626829,0.0000011971647,0.000014579904,0.00036681956,0.00012289149,0.000029767492,0.97450405,0.024812648,0.0000034258956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068383673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042586834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068383673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004241561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005717928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030774772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161521050","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2021.0019","title":"Relocating Floating Communities in Cambodia: Kampong Chhnang","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Work (physics); Sustainable development; Duty; Vietnamese; Geography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Descent (aeronautics); Human rights; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03233913748049192,"score_gpt":0.3014194721682458,"score_spread":0.26908033468775383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161521050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847777,0.0014311501,0.000054011292,0.0018534735,0.000047136815,0.00004143852,0.000041007497,0.000002863534,0.011751214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406296,0.0012231612,0.00009027347,0.00038288257,0.0000073117217,0.00003029587,0.00003923674,0.0000022640227,0.004161545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998311,0.000041285646,0.0000040130467,0.000014618708,0.000008930563,0.00009994161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997938,0.000040526586,0.000036450296,0.000009039909,0.000011606101,0.00010854883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032570586,0.00021963903,0.00012370796,0.0004950235,0.0054140077,0.0012040042,0.0005458882,0.0008038289,0.0060859937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000375012,0.00020827772,0.00007073431,0.0007995703,0.0033705027,0.0015116653,0.002992203,0.0010295915,0.00017134544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018790172,0.00017502191,0.10805844,0.0012531888,0.000030409727,0.03158412,0.71298444,0.00040759752,0.006996736,0.031745072,0.01110563,0.09547138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019652824,0.00012350685,0.24059942,0.0008758227,0.0000135444525,0.0025330146,0.6849065,0.00018200374,0.00042403504,0.0012670436,0.06902761,0.000027904283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119037464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28437614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119037464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035609894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038891437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23668915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388004980","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910490","title":"Trust, Legal Elites, and the European Court of Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.023158624710522893,"score_gpt":0.2867771199123283,"score_spread":0.2636184952018054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388004980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79176503,0.0017442283,0.0021813526,0.012459561,0.0000824255,0.000028340657,0.000019455729,0.000009439488,0.1917102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935263,0.00005771576,0.000035862544,0.00016225624,0.00000752689,0.0000018092862,0.0000016443116,0.0000011024047,0.0003794467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97560877,0.015691597,0.00088938966,0.0010505909,0.003715136,0.0030445247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594428,0.027069982,0.0074831326,0.0013314375,0.0025440648,0.0021286206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021309095,0.00014062258,0.00033462964,0.002675443,0.007271412,0.012605224,0.00066325563,0.0018813135,0.0034419158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037815176,0.0001740403,0.00014896129,0.0026359917,0.02319581,0.0053650844,0.0058313105,0.0024595265,0.00013507801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008696628,0.00009947957,0.028339203,0.000073409996,0.000037089583,0.00051555946,0.15421386,0.00035165294,0.0002911213,0.79263955,0.0020064316,0.021345695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011706446,0.00023802283,0.106116004,0.0012961884,0.00008170195,0.0005959999,0.4519897,0.0026981994,0.0010015331,0.31016418,0.12556858,0.00013277798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013835007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013137155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021309095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009231848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005491181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11269462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396706058","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2024.a926223","title":"Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom in Higher Education in England","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Free speech; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Higher education; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033352069020419255,"score_gpt":0.331287316852653,"score_spread":0.29793524783223374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396706058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7967342,0.008305208,0.00061917596,0.033491496,0.00039783018,0.00003844657,0.0001610654,0.0000117274985,0.16024083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916372,0.00035514374,0.00004295146,0.0003413168,0.000053815478,0.00000584853,0.000010689229,0.0000020014106,0.007551049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936052,0.0026769538,0.0005080581,0.00035920105,0.0011482086,0.0017024811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876687,0.0070694354,0.0019709885,0.00031237534,0.0010581902,0.0019203087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041904617,0.000115855255,0.00035174712,0.0015318489,0.008879006,0.008424254,0.00051587995,0.0016546588,0.009463244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008564066,0.00022638579,0.00018675336,0.001699617,0.012223784,0.0032786045,0.00680119,0.0032184247,0.00046157968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015047034,0.00015396916,0.039811987,0.00042105513,0.000011067641,0.0024935799,0.38501722,0.00037956235,0.0005150246,0.53773314,0.007994945,0.025317997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007856145,0.00015730708,0.23661652,0.0013226243,0.000020059711,0.0015985711,0.29734945,0.0006802036,0.0009954975,0.06827355,0.39273334,0.00017435022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1276266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16506088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1276266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02424236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011014495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25376743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412614767","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2025.a965923","title":"Know Your Rights: The State and Human Rights Education in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Human rights education; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03139507224900921,"score_gpt":0.3481938321732388,"score_spread":0.31679875992422957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412614767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39838657,0.004243088,0.0010493019,0.15772256,0.0005053797,0.000086167034,0.00030143975,0.000043964676,0.43766144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96222985,0.0013336253,0.0002815244,0.0036951134,0.000021955033,0.000009945209,0.000040189658,0.000013543646,0.032374214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606365,0.0005782941,0.00005682206,0.00022928922,0.0009811107,0.0020907647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359024,0.0013419671,0.00034027896,0.00012101674,0.0016549367,0.002951586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026549487,0.0001687768,0.00026855504,0.0010347585,0.03126483,0.008147176,0.0009988924,0.0017620736,0.013196325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063436506,0.00019144863,0.00019805046,0.0020883349,0.0125601515,0.002488398,0.0042462097,0.0044572833,0.00031304173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000824352,0.00016085048,0.04381921,0.0001922369,0.000021655216,0.0008038181,0.1916538,0.0007212288,0.00058026443,0.5908473,0.06908106,0.102036126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028380546,0.000049047005,0.06966578,0.0008471142,0.000037829523,0.00019024377,0.30239403,0.0010978017,0.00064823945,0.028169682,0.5967539,0.00011796123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14390437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14390437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32259548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}