{"meta":{"query_hash":"d6df9d028c25","filters":{"venue":"Human Rights Quarterly"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d6df9d028c25","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Human+Rights+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1982770380","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0045","title":"Child Poverty in Canada and the Rights of the Child","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of the Child; Poverty; Convention; Political science; Child poverty; Law; Human rights; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.013050279412205571,"score_gpt":0.2836337892874637,"score_spread":0.27058350987525814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982770380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95738417,0.00014676407,0.000001284332,0.0024386067,0.0005441495,0.0009639159,0.000022395125,0.0000128284,0.038485885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965178,0.000003330502,0.0000044227836,0.0024950798,0.00014315164,0.00000610222,0.0000027133583,0.000010487185,0.0008169599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975414,0.00092794275,0.0005863714,0.00023557973,0.0002732532,0.00043543323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890244,0.00021985726,0.00024219076,0.00049754174,0.000035338253,0.000102620426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004490464,0.00016831193,0.00032350584,0.00004352393,0.0021613615,0.0000070001934,0.00024676646,0.00007795724,0.0002791034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010178531,0.000072230614,0.00005926123,0.00014179967,0.00014669918,0.000058020698,0.00001742974,0.00080115,0.000010385012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010130625,0.0001641277,0.048709355,0.00025289855,0.000035668578,0.000009405053,0.023824915,0.0000013058212,0.0000066286752,0.9072513,0.019452708,0.00019040753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008603569,0.00010207287,0.80791265,0.0014318752,0.00003267631,0.000015969415,0.0018116725,0.000021590826,0.000051625364,0.099746,0.07994583,0.00032449525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86418134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80750525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017646723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035424874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990371558","doi":"10.1353/hrq.0.0150","title":"Advancing the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada: A Human Rights Approach to Migrant Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Agency (philosophy); Transformative learning; Law; Migrant workers; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.010155922805997204,"score_gpt":0.27108355195879735,"score_spread":0.26092762915280016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990371558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87122244,0.0000055460355,0.00004830326,0.00027655734,0.0006806645,0.000675684,0.000039924154,0.000039981904,0.12701093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940097,6.731098e-8,0.0003475501,0.00011545924,0.00058217585,0.00007370354,0.00003122797,0.000017180419,0.0048229694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964868,0.00022020018,0.0007273859,0.00054743706,0.001129192,0.0008889851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.0001544832,0.00022779549,0.00055166055,0.00026594402,0.00032257425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007342827,0.00032725564,0.0004550789,0.00024945397,0.0027861567,0.00011426587,0.0010983165,0.00014801469,0.00046289735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051299494,0.00020599384,0.00014313133,0.00037671076,0.00037729405,0.00030756497,0.000027340378,0.00049583067,0.000044130506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002101358,0.00022373458,0.00032442284,0.00001246208,0.000044012784,0.000036823287,0.02688232,0.000009148379,0.0020494228,0.9660198,0.0043482715,0.00002853286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001655865,0.00045203723,0.023895118,0.00017233509,0.00006852772,0.000009853579,0.0009885823,0.0001285052,0.0028995383,0.3470568,0.62159735,0.0010755131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99976164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61896306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045143598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002976479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999893550","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0036","title":"Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Implications for NGOs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The North South Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.17276959462979788,"score_gpt":0.3368113273567523,"score_spread":0.1640417327269544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999893550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7732456,0.00009106,0.0616923,0.0050859847,0.0010762629,0.00495587,0.000049052454,0.0008972414,0.15290667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97467923,4.7350905e-8,0.014951576,0.00023131304,0.0006896538,0.00074837555,0.0000701343,0.000022599652,0.00860705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978217,0.00010157542,0.0004388427,0.00039443423,0.00033067958,0.0009127748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872106,0.0001133241,0.00011149886,0.00035830872,0.000106248815,0.00058955816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007490294,0.00024457255,0.00025036122,0.00022633816,0.0045755156,0.0001930369,0.00045508388,0.00013659136,0.0005241698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045315596,0.00018047358,0.000107509724,0.00021043107,0.00017226934,0.00035171505,0.000012145314,0.00009138,0.00054238195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008434111,0.00024669603,0.00033840287,0.000012013869,0.000026765261,2.9190758e-7,0.05534732,7.952936e-7,0.000033174387,0.93495405,0.006184647,0.0028473889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038423724,0.00010110839,0.013499103,0.000018134535,0.000016755424,4.1092494e-7,0.00029131272,0.0000025413626,0.00029115882,0.106723465,0.878252,0.0004197177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036815813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010212297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025218484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018671053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000113180","doi":"10.1353/hrq.0.0000","title":"The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Convention; International human rights law; Political science; Right to property; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Linguistic rights; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04466900483987171,"score_gpt":0.3080855070001181,"score_spread":0.26341650216024637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000113180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686279,0.000039114842,0.000028212487,0.00044865202,0.00028578303,0.0009395298,0.00004151123,0.00020403515,0.029385231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430016,0.0000015506987,0.00005000243,0.000009176006,0.0006121464,0.00011677958,0.000042828924,0.000022158221,0.056143705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562216,0.0008125476,0.0009311236,0.00068070524,0.0011103856,0.0008430722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971984,0.00088155083,0.00035438678,0.0009958397,0.00029185647,0.00027793893],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008060343,0.00044197787,0.00058543606,0.000074851174,0.016093662,0.00027249602,0.0007539029,0.00019650254,0.003411668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024159754,0.00021072594,0.0003294141,0.0002774799,0.012818394,0.0009939328,0.000022055898,0.00030836562,0.00008010643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012074476,0.00055542594,0.003147729,0.000046362205,0.00009061888,0.0000075437083,0.15765879,5.3532466e-7,0.000029378642,0.8351568,0.0031123485,0.00007369856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00201435,0.0036038957,0.023340194,0.00018685048,0.00017341832,0.000025413288,0.059595075,0.000011552902,0.00043368674,0.54030174,0.36910996,0.0012038377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03054862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5667496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.536201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030616412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011469031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011522479","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2013.0039","title":"Genocide: Beyond Definition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02017209733200804,"score_gpt":0.27552125974629227,"score_spread":0.25534916241428424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011522479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71592826,0.000025685144,0.00006880218,0.0005773227,0.00017522424,0.0002091584,0.0000039619777,0.0001235946,0.28288797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956374,0.0000020007715,0.00041176207,0.00035045305,0.00027502282,0.000020767422,0.00003210625,0.0000071731783,0.0032633066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988482,0.00011389038,0.0001793704,0.0001921744,0.00030618813,0.0003601555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994733,0.000029744408,0.000059716687,0.00017614165,0.000109046865,0.00015205005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016277017,0.000103866136,0.00011689431,0.000056658915,0.0012405245,0.00023738318,0.00022334157,0.00009701017,0.002362543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033532444,0.000091582064,0.000072145995,0.00010652474,0.00021046281,0.000472854,0.000006015965,0.00011171823,0.002891559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.469584e-7,0.000032502416,0.00009634675,0.0000033543233,0.000008390127,0.0000054984553,0.021502232,1.10659236e-7,0.0001261494,0.9625001,0.014198373,0.0015261035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016317678,0.00012897301,0.003035068,0.000006245205,0.0000091544425,9.731418e-7,0.0023048162,0.000010049388,0.0000040285167,0.9284461,0.065722905,0.00016849375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01670292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04319207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27970913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007011166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025274929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022739189","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0004","title":"Human Security: Undermining Human Rights?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Human security; Political science; Duty; Normative; State (computer science); International human rights law; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03947026842830562,"score_gpt":0.3307329491395519,"score_spread":0.2912626807112463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022739189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7211778,0.000051413364,0.000028412112,0.00012553114,0.0006053503,0.00039940307,0.0000047873496,0.00041833567,0.27718893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96742755,2.906072e-7,0.00016033761,0.00012457508,0.0023588904,0.00005057217,0.0000482265,0.000043601256,0.029785972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526006,0.00045769007,0.000798389,0.0006335681,0.0010823165,0.0017679658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980008,0.000066338405,0.00030169342,0.00063242216,0.00014559613,0.00085313444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013732854,0.000487411,0.0005390256,0.00035301747,0.01197108,0.00050151045,0.00076500373,0.00033775007,0.007346739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027773983,0.00037641765,0.00023113904,0.00026694543,0.0007828218,0.0011704612,0.00004713697,0.00045952707,0.0012378438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021797048,0.0002850009,0.0004978408,0.0000143504185,0.000053707965,0.000029983721,0.104698814,6.006192e-8,0.00016235397,0.8837618,0.0103451945,0.00014870228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067182933,0.00026582697,0.005554669,0.00006703587,0.00004929461,0.000005624451,0.0020152824,9.07637e-7,0.00014771064,0.44317272,0.5472534,0.0007957135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006782122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058718894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53690815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039520755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007461567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024881355","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2005.0023","title":"The Refugees Convention 50 Years On: Globalisation and International Law (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Law; Political science; International law; Immigration; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Immigration law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03360729559788538,"score_gpt":0.3426958484499678,"score_spread":0.3090885528520824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024881355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52512825,0.003998105,0.00038074268,0.01912653,0.0020239535,0.001326695,0.00003939225,0.0003687914,0.44760755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281156,0.00037148414,0.00007590121,0.000864253,0.0010389107,0.000013274571,0.000034031815,0.000006111875,0.004784481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999212,0.00016622372,0.00014831699,0.00013822013,0.00022396847,0.00011123899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968094,0.000038934686,0.000075543285,0.00011751064,0.000045297576,0.000041766918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004972904,0.000056800753,0.00005265135,0.000019444502,0.0009353006,0.00013245342,0.00015475503,0.000027339322,0.00014892913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008887176,0.000040706826,0.000028123352,0.00003312487,0.0001909241,0.00031584938,0.0000068742647,0.00007470419,0.00026092184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090395015,0.000019485706,0.0000027775338,0.000009994829,0.000007084465,0.000001339521,0.0012366216,1.1791293e-7,0.000019519433,0.9580433,0.0054207887,0.035229933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116749026,0.00012401605,0.0007224361,0.00009673908,0.00002092751,0.0000015443597,0.00034896797,0.0000047044755,0.0000066687844,0.015624514,0.98286897,0.00006375486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006022652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008566924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97744817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005214596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006730759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7193671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038776553","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0029","title":"Transgovernmental Activism: Canada's Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Economic shortage; Government (linguistics); Law","score_opus":0.01818793404464711,"score_gpt":0.28439548771355955,"score_spread":0.26620755366891247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038776553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7162266,0.0000116583315,0.0000037701445,0.0001533984,0.00016738263,0.0003401509,0.00001594675,0.00007039188,0.2830107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888374,1.04139936e-7,0.00004886077,0.000051774008,0.00024247552,0.000029100054,0.000025217376,0.000020202475,0.010744837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965466,0.00047727028,0.0004796432,0.00047650287,0.0013304501,0.00068952923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911815,0.000089547044,0.00015537182,0.00022594362,0.00008390282,0.00032711012],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005681175,0.0002783529,0.00030674684,0.00016161131,0.004607338,0.00017899045,0.0004218826,0.00014911604,0.0026541273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048987436,0.00023627644,0.000102090846,0.00019426833,0.0002865362,0.0004246812,0.0000068534164,0.0003743052,0.0000462062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051895004,0.00035216048,0.0004618954,0.000008645963,0.000024028843,0.0000513603,0.03451927,7.92386e-7,0.00069265056,0.9614133,0.0023929505,0.000077757744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017241894,0.00027884243,0.011742148,0.000111646645,0.000023439574,0.0000067499204,0.0031639058,0.000017234637,0.0012775919,0.5500866,0.43079698,0.0007706361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4720215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52091867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010448478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040721436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065710752","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2004.0006","title":"Enacting Bills of Rights: Canada and the Curious Case of New Zealand's \"Thin\" Democracy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Bill of rights; Law; Indigenous rights; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Fundamental rights; Litmus; Politics; Linguistic rights; Indigenous; Ideology; Human rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.015500575267985456,"score_gpt":0.21193206296425388,"score_spread":0.19643148769626842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065710752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936,0.0005851739,0.00002531346,0.0006913511,0.00019602005,0.00017273665,0.000050218987,0.000010614804,0.004668536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799335,0.000016948165,0.00006054179,0.000060886156,0.0001395664,0.0000039822803,0.0000034138138,0.000009668345,0.0017116588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876267,0.000016505819,0.0007188761,0.00023833751,0.000031307623,0.00023231356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990382,0.000103757215,0.0005270848,0.00022468665,0.000024074669,0.000082199345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025993885,0.00015191671,0.00057999813,0.0000661006,0.0005355216,0.000029306451,0.00014480916,0.00006000842,0.00008599933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000704346,0.000106076135,0.00009443228,0.00006667255,0.00020150827,0.00012938515,0.000017210748,0.000115169445,0.000009873775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050131785,0.000068607085,0.0052885404,0.000035175635,0.0002913059,0.000107681226,0.041695673,0.000024697058,0.0000036557608,0.94782937,0.0040574386,0.0005477505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031757266,0.00014572135,0.0037169498,0.000024643197,0.000022806753,0.00006752523,0.0006823472,0.000014271685,0.000043618184,0.97881335,0.013080662,0.00021235152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89306396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06497122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094556424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049937873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43256593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066700929","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2006.0023","title":"Reproductive Choice: Screening Policy and Acess to the Means of Reproduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Reproduction; Reproductive rights; Politics; Fertility; Law and economics; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Business; Public economics; Reproductive health; Economics; Medicine; Biology; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.02561005009877401,"score_gpt":0.32727395148621913,"score_spread":0.30166390138744514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066700929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800842,0.0004458363,0.00035490442,0.014737919,0.0001113651,0.00085337524,0.0000042601096,0.00017968667,0.0032284937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939363,0.000002645145,0.0011457716,0.000067447945,0.0020378376,0.00004473942,0.000009908211,0.000016505863,0.0027388174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825436,0.0000581235,0.0003755889,0.00076574355,0.00025856527,0.00028764465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982728,0.0000396146,0.00016637621,0.0012160656,0.00023717017,0.00006799271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004802275,0.00016208272,0.0003005649,0.00029622117,0.00040921645,0.000021038351,0.00012472652,0.00007931311,0.0000132623045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014700979,0.00009897876,0.000051932926,0.000440514,0.00028529082,0.0001329727,0.000023327135,0.00021810032,0.000009739979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012913778,0.0014354942,0.05328512,0.0011463206,0.00044592153,0.00007295356,0.01964295,0.00008488982,0.07719584,0.5510046,0.038063835,0.25633073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013085658,0.0032344002,0.73586774,0.00018126094,0.00011580388,0.00020437078,0.0009347718,0.000011910119,0.040810265,0.07215817,0.14484277,0.00032994058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046720854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007280506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6825826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045855766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033958095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7062827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068897081","doi":"10.1353/hrq.0.0020","title":"National Insecurity and Human Rights: Democracies Debate Counterterrorism , and: Security and Human Rights (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Torture; Law; Political science; Civil liberties; National security; Terrorism; International human rights law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.022214916977896782,"score_gpt":0.3048352595408617,"score_spread":0.2826203425629649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068897081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95442617,0.00081689813,0.000006627251,0.00035155212,0.00023202357,0.00060782896,0.000060650244,0.0001832056,0.043315046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992703,0.000042582036,0.000045189357,0.00027321532,0.00076809735,0.00005241422,0.00010762564,0.000023635466,0.005984229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960647,0.00042263203,0.0007859861,0.0008691332,0.0012139579,0.00064358755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983315,0.00014267246,0.00033596612,0.00029930877,0.000490954,0.00039962988],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007697353,0.0005131533,0.0006444155,0.00028577397,0.011860387,0.00026974434,0.00045474642,0.00027740694,0.00082978664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000052760906,0.00040193315,0.00014050528,0.00009848637,0.0021720652,0.0011262102,0.00005890373,0.00046492164,0.000058992235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010201646,0.0001765637,0.00024467334,0.000100618905,0.00007307767,0.00009371799,0.016549157,1.9626588e-8,0.000041211704,0.9774852,0.005212065,0.000013535135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092389254,0.00038683208,0.009081324,0.00032634733,0.00006543246,0.00009790786,0.000059786456,0.00000900105,0.000036394482,0.8319092,0.15647559,0.00062829047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016546376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14556718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15126352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016915175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005460223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074071873","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2005.0006","title":"The Second Great Transformation: Human Rights Leapfrogging in the Era of Globalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University; St. Thomas University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Leapfrogging; Human rights; Redistribution (election); Political science; Capitalism; Politics; Political economy; Economic system; Development economics; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01861917712640729,"score_gpt":0.2905816694186675,"score_spread":0.27196249229226016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074071873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.848231,0.000060397222,0.00010538949,0.0014003281,0.00013880958,0.0005346456,0.000005043192,0.000058216392,0.14946613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951552,0.0000014872471,0.000051188945,0.00010114643,0.00032814895,0.000027032529,0.00001956311,0.0000068987893,0.0043092947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977443,0.00037271564,0.0006182239,0.00021815694,0.000640788,0.00040581825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927413,0.00009494177,0.00017346712,0.00029373405,0.00009634617,0.000067390916],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010954571,0.00017450009,0.0001947969,0.00008226297,0.004830174,0.00029115708,0.0005899517,0.00009981619,0.0013875994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000011779808,0.000088266825,0.000092443144,0.00023761847,0.0004159913,0.0005847183,0.0000054522447,0.00021277925,0.00007103051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000481549,0.0000563478,0.00004821655,0.00000775661,0.000012363435,0.0000032677704,0.1487176,0.0000025941758,0.000018117635,0.8472119,0.0020492722,0.0018677482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057451136,0.00012954263,0.0047920933,0.000048824037,0.0000121370085,0.0000024678889,0.0023860908,0.000025088651,0.0001506732,0.21624862,0.77541643,0.00021349103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019275845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41457048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77336717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001420854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004719062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078343597","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2003.0003","title":"Human Rights Dynamics of Abortion Law Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Reproductive rights; Human rights; Citizenship; Reproductive health; Liberalization; Abortion law; Political science; Criminal law; Family planning; Law; Accommodation; Business; Medicine; Population; Psychology; Politics; Environmental health","score_opus":0.015577098083916701,"score_gpt":0.29864963143911544,"score_spread":0.2830725333551987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078343597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89267445,0.000044250577,0.00016120297,0.00015540623,0.00018672079,0.00048197337,0.00000517986,0.00008046436,0.10621037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955761,3.544998e-7,0.00018494204,0.00006650033,0.00029463682,0.000025415966,0.00010130052,0.000018240113,0.0037325409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982764,0.00008658219,0.00058345555,0.00040058012,0.00032525053,0.00032772552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873394,0.0000073665615,0.0002333613,0.0006102005,0.00024204438,0.00017310838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002953475,0.0001921828,0.0003784268,0.00013287431,0.0005727357,0.000015817885,0.00007446594,0.00014613183,0.00039701944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001502571,0.00013852061,0.00011986065,0.00012317453,0.00017797921,0.00020093478,0.0000023127066,0.0002259593,0.00007736488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005207501,0.00032370162,0.00019169984,0.000117518226,0.000033905435,0.000017552153,0.0006492164,1.8308776e-7,0.004341493,0.9937263,0.00016429536,0.00038205346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008501168,0.012232545,0.10330638,0.0005053355,0.00040291046,0.00024187854,0.0006183665,0.00011554023,0.015880737,0.7609905,0.096239164,0.0009654803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025022393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011885086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23273581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028445604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002596917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090257058","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0044","title":"Human Rights in Canadian Domestic and Foreign Politics: From “Niggardly Acceptance” to Enthusiastic Embrace","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; International human rights law; Law; International relations; International law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.019248925192739765,"score_gpt":0.24261500494984223,"score_spread":0.22336607975710246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090257058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80265933,0.000114756556,0.000024516889,0.00013089488,0.0004436334,0.00032602935,0.00018388993,0.00007925772,0.19603767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837059,7.821232e-8,0.000058984522,0.00040279012,0.0014380184,0.000046434514,0.00008432009,0.000028179908,0.014235317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973802,0.00010216124,0.0005789088,0.00043406253,0.00025849688,0.0012461965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997957,0.00009857985,0.00007522977,0.00038261613,0.000063317646,0.0014232467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013866699,0.0003642543,0.00044435734,0.0003679733,0.0014243487,0.0002582942,0.00030332422,0.00012128052,0.0028750661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060474895,0.0002930477,0.00008926927,0.000059949558,0.0003131279,0.0005451517,0.000020491283,0.00028032126,0.00054150884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044418184,0.000107002415,0.00045227807,0.000016447775,0.000021429365,0.000052538435,0.031019816,3.4287143e-7,0.000012174835,0.96689993,0.0013342204,0.000079398174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069320033,0.0005364826,0.0099162245,0.00009572759,0.00005719578,0.0000072217713,0.0007888328,0.000067032845,0.0000037238644,0.38953468,0.5975397,0.0007599782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62653875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9063167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5962055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040108187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045868623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095219791","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2007.0034","title":"Do Human Rights Violations Cause Internal Conflict?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Human rights; Internal conflict; Political science; Social conflict; Politics; Democratization; Social psychology; Criminology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04476533346742091,"score_gpt":0.367207544867827,"score_spread":0.3224422114004061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095219791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7261037,0.000026997921,0.00036003397,0.00010611071,0.00025076413,0.00019103273,0.000030259409,0.00016425482,0.2727668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974837,3.6296078e-7,0.000034905934,0.00013934632,0.0011745013,0.000006350673,0.000016529335,0.000013903755,0.023777124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975977,0.00012803731,0.00048048655,0.00036992654,0.0006010801,0.0008227675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877876,0.000142342,0.00016420634,0.000306901,0.00015174164,0.00045602425],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006302456,0.00021810361,0.0002423769,0.00013429059,0.0029414012,0.0002769727,0.0005135114,0.00018714913,0.001652975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000898241,0.0001814342,0.00014397551,0.0001665123,0.00061056,0.00039808342,0.000016315935,0.00030575116,0.00055758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007562798,0.00007978974,0.0005576341,0.0000029004207,0.000026035259,0.000043540014,0.024746357,3.0036755e-8,0.00022662763,0.97305936,0.001096649,0.00015349657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061798026,0.00027701835,0.025112947,0.00006432253,0.00004465473,0.000002934574,0.0006656139,0.0000020053096,0.00032218848,0.18483795,0.7876256,0.0004267806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030768054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14290135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017401877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003372444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269993317","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2015.0067","title":"Human Rights and a Person’s Name: Legal Trends and Challenges","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Human rights; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International human rights law; State (computer science); Generality; International law; Identity (music); Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06459080832473864,"score_gpt":0.3140021061046347,"score_spread":0.24941129777989607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269993317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7500094,0.00040186208,0.0000018260765,0.0012045209,0.00022354789,0.00011148769,0.0000072507933,0.00012324082,0.24791683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130045,0.0000018520577,0.000053660016,0.00003440469,0.0008990826,0.000016117847,0.000012500691,0.000014302875,0.08596354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804085,0.00020590436,0.000244909,0.000488729,0.0005939948,0.00042563374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908566,0.000035972895,0.000109266686,0.00020556222,0.00016003617,0.00040350156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044320335,0.0002462752,0.0002816484,0.00024415753,0.0026078636,0.00038459885,0.00027410654,0.00016458478,0.000554427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000018478462,0.00018758533,0.0000728518,0.000042828146,0.0007267679,0.0006548316,0.00001536544,0.00019194075,0.00007551262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008141235,0.00006383714,0.00001333649,0.000008216583,0.000032252072,0.00004618724,0.047476836,2.7554092e-8,0.000008603523,0.9496238,0.0020395042,0.0006792582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009178536,0.0006898306,0.0037542712,0.00003496042,0.000032720985,0.00001695512,0.0009353226,0.000006611689,0.000008240578,0.52598304,0.46725792,0.00036228177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012385124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13310632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46521842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105414096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032458876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2389785034","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2016.0030","title":"Forced Marriage, Slavery, and Plural Legal Systems: An African Example","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; University of South Africa; Queen's University; University of Pretoria; York University; University of Hull; DePaul University","keywords":"Forced marriage; Legal pluralism; Law; Principle of legality; Human rights; Political science; Conflict of laws; Plural; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Sociology; Legal realism; Comparative law","score_opus":0.031552486387658514,"score_gpt":0.2861221510320877,"score_spread":0.2545696646444292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2389785034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94792914,0.000028212771,0.00024774764,0.00025467953,0.00044565895,0.00042361254,0.000011781851,0.00022119934,0.050437983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96099555,0.0000015382457,0.00009320849,0.00003155074,0.00057107507,0.000037294514,0.0000072074854,0.000018202398,0.03824438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779844,0.00029452192,0.00036101567,0.0004815016,0.00048041122,0.0005840843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897236,0.000091793,0.00012282479,0.00032974925,0.000091446076,0.00039183896],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000539029,0.0002198581,0.00028035743,0.0001367428,0.0019595257,0.00046082534,0.00031726316,0.00011921752,0.001013104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033787048,0.00012329148,0.000054884786,0.00008324994,0.0004653825,0.0008489095,0.000016519301,0.00007897437,0.00014981619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015956455,0.00004649361,0.000101182886,0.000009515571,0.000026053736,0.000039290677,0.035306428,6.080417e-8,0.00044943587,0.9594162,0.0024849107,0.0021044884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014485939,0.0008968304,0.0057908823,0.000102152306,0.000028059068,0.000011220563,0.005084575,0.000010093605,0.00006992768,0.0987711,0.887053,0.0007335605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019990716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050079357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001417686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008776571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787058601","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2018.0005","title":"The “Quebec Values” Debate of 2013: Minority vs. Collective Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Charter; Reasonable accommodation; Minority rights; Political science; Commission; Government (linguistics); Interculturalism; Law; Human rights; Public administration; Accommodation; Sociology","score_opus":0.06424306548667226,"score_gpt":0.3665630440553193,"score_spread":0.30231997856864706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787058601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9465956,0.00004772957,0.000027924527,0.0010157267,0.0007163509,0.0005366977,0.000014756946,0.00009257975,0.05095262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85764515,0.0000017616201,0.00007590404,0.00015556166,0.0010098811,0.000017241982,0.0000071909103,0.000008245195,0.14107907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997466,0.0005579821,0.00045802747,0.00033530514,0.0005814191,0.00060125685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808836,0.00022805136,0.0002661418,0.00041955008,0.00080839696,0.00018950945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005940553,0.00020353086,0.00025238135,0.00007694384,0.0043862965,0.0002121079,0.00051846984,0.00015510456,0.00047503822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022179833,0.00012256882,0.00013475136,0.00016446042,0.002946426,0.00035418372,0.000014535294,0.0001349139,0.00023765628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038124195,0.00014362654,0.0005965477,0.000010683227,0.0001329496,0.0000043523623,0.43576682,2.4483833e-7,0.00025158518,0.43704242,0.12580393,0.00020872067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010468528,0.0008164729,0.05260763,0.000046794306,0.00012449443,0.0000029625648,0.010484388,0.00007185078,0.0029317182,0.18836655,0.7428748,0.0006254883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3097995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88608354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61707085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078169437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043732306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900752113","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2018.0058","title":"Disability, Human Rights, and Information Technology ed. by Jonathan Lazar & Michael Ashley Stein","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Human rights; Sociology; Disability studies; Information technology; Legislature; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014481337914313776,"score_gpt":0.31885074468023183,"score_spread":0.30436940676591806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900752113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585505,0.00007206936,0.00001639471,0.001645281,0.00019515037,0.00031962924,0.00003428574,0.00029275275,0.038873926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336946,0.0000017865208,0.00011746675,0.00011674561,0.00073364325,0.000022610315,0.00006171497,0.0000089051255,0.0055676913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982951,0.0001553272,0.0003953129,0.0002899694,0.00035893696,0.00050533464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991151,0.000040537496,0.00015210135,0.0003750711,0.0001351148,0.00018208486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037545798,0.00021705744,0.00025440476,0.00015421363,0.002797883,0.00027495282,0.00043126845,0.00029762828,0.0006694778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008159188,0.00016750365,0.000056047495,0.00023094378,0.0023677184,0.0014022986,0.00003634727,0.0002084584,0.0007589304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009250108,0.00013539905,0.0013642766,0.000022652905,0.000027132677,0.0000012007225,0.06700512,7.810275e-9,0.0006297094,0.8802115,0.048980005,0.001613792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029795765,0.0004005368,0.0008757002,0.000019740823,0.000013146944,0.0000016351388,0.0004042182,7.5665804e-7,0.00034296862,0.20524496,0.7921673,0.0002310682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037860896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16047573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7431873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008768469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001936226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947141757","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2019.0039","title":"The Right to Say No. Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi ed. by Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, & Patricia Nyaundi","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Law; Legislation; Publishing; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.007744389985617971,"score_gpt":0.23740637375255758,"score_spread":0.2296619837669396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947141757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167946,0.00077845954,0.0000024462051,0.0010210442,0.0004557646,0.0006098435,0.00004462084,0.000030044215,0.08026316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602027,0.000041739604,0.000016401491,0.0004529943,0.00021533725,0.00002331268,0.000020344305,0.000016765558,0.01319282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977166,0.00020754755,0.00036483025,0.00047186317,0.0005441191,0.0006950565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900705,0.00013986047,0.000094433315,0.00034131136,0.00009913197,0.0003182282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005907426,0.000252477,0.00032425218,0.00006870443,0.0014014207,0.00034332834,0.00040567518,0.00014047782,0.0005350629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051636675,0.00016942552,0.00005138608,0.00014433681,0.0002234429,0.00027400625,0.00003809467,0.00024275557,0.00013021215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042930228,0.00032746742,0.032700513,0.00014332765,0.00027244844,0.00013829918,0.14654344,4.4385217e-7,0.0006234282,0.68922955,0.12322886,0.0063628936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012819467,0.0003215103,0.01747338,0.000029557306,0.00002460684,0.0000041498943,0.0052371747,0.0000072853445,0.000019101388,0.009726463,0.9653696,0.00050526106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.924219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8421407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003605683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019096363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048350869","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2020.0035","title":"From Redress to Prevention: How the International Politics of \"No Safe Haven\" Became the Politics of \"Not in My Backyard\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Haven; Politics; Human rights; Enforcement; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Safe haven; Political economy; Immigration; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; International economics","score_opus":0.03938048998680223,"score_gpt":0.31130180671831775,"score_spread":0.27192131673151554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048350869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713727,0.000031258656,0.00033702044,0.017618764,0.000361251,0.0004080428,0.00010669561,0.000018860874,0.00974537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897167,0.0000026932116,0.00015203595,0.00038340886,0.0012041193,0.0000141954915,0.000047818317,0.0000070016317,0.00847199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983803,0.0002853755,0.00039878473,0.0001894284,0.00055615214,0.00018997588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990539,0.00013661826,0.00020582201,0.00023231597,0.0002880962,0.00008322266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003314668,0.00010717481,0.0001766235,0.00005693255,0.00039978535,0.00010419581,0.00059631787,0.00007894382,0.0006383695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067174304,0.000065691864,0.000104549814,0.00013828582,0.00026651143,0.0002139395,0.00001699039,0.00013532347,0.000034211345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017778837,0.00008496255,0.00035803416,0.000010248019,0.0000385701,9.4879573e-7,0.22266139,0.000003973039,0.0010119667,0.75679916,0.018730626,0.0002823358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010641676,0.0013702044,0.019857304,0.00024065623,0.000081370905,7.2046396e-7,0.049598802,0.00053593604,0.0056993226,0.32684362,0.5942825,0.0004253984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072689876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043620303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57555187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000734722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107888794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124948426","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0001","title":"Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Normative; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; State of exception; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029432322574848624,"score_gpt":0.3159791559848752,"score_spread":0.28654683341002657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124948426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55032593,0.00012005214,0.0000062473273,0.00007918077,0.00012893313,0.000112344664,0.0000046733644,0.000029012954,0.44919363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995158,5.859808e-7,0.000021880667,0.00012021009,0.00042589894,0.000009429438,0.000002949969,0.000004709797,0.0042563328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984461,0.00046666528,0.00025201027,0.00013598007,0.00022850657,0.0004707234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993218,0.0001474387,0.0000835301,0.00023376505,0.000042697156,0.00017077022],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009260969,0.00011159101,0.00022788778,0.000028644745,0.0026668203,0.000025659881,0.00026156043,0.00012979866,0.0015668264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049654295,0.00006420948,0.00008593262,0.000051872175,0.0035296462,0.00025537162,0.000015762154,0.00014678843,0.000068090296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066392104,0.000057176785,0.00007601382,0.0000042291035,0.000023191578,7.3903254e-7,0.014951151,7.45904e-9,0.000014932279,0.9846529,0.0001935272,0.000019543702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004369946,0.000069057,0.0027407403,0.0000064397204,0.000029649314,0.0000010138799,0.00039709263,4.770066e-7,0.00009711384,0.9393741,0.05674414,0.000103221144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009751451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028902143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4449373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019874002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009631522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161521050","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2021.0019","title":"Relocating Floating Communities in Cambodia: Kampong Chhnang","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Work (physics); Sustainable development; Duty; Vietnamese; Geography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Descent (aeronautics); Human rights; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03233913748049192,"score_gpt":0.3014194721682458,"score_spread":0.26908033468775383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161521050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8971644,0.00021135826,0.000027351034,0.0002109951,0.00028798493,0.00010908181,0.0000032940018,0.00011054249,0.101875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99375635,0.000004651549,0.00037339897,0.000138115,0.00036911352,0.000011462935,0.000026874483,0.000012925074,0.005307112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980447,0.0006874945,0.0003375168,0.00020484526,0.00029454974,0.00043086414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991372,0.00023429138,0.000097670985,0.00031490263,0.000106966385,0.00010895675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087031844,0.0001308708,0.00022574917,0.00007494226,0.0028901354,0.00015726508,0.00025116754,0.00014310009,0.00071185967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020791635,0.00014084013,0.00011137582,0.00026984667,0.00036393738,0.00035146787,0.000017826074,0.00037260586,0.000063784275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021529781,0.0000808902,0.004620308,0.000026064636,0.000012948943,0.000098151475,0.7080814,0.000003383957,0.0002309323,0.28409114,0.0013451537,0.0014074233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013333473,0.00016995578,0.012655476,0.00048666116,0.000035052908,0.000012068434,0.59477663,0.00009950565,0.00020780158,0.05083871,0.33831623,0.0010685679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019594945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.314066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3369711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031435594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014870599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388004980","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910490","title":"Trust, Legal Elites, and the European Court of Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.023158624710522893,"score_gpt":0.2867771199123283,"score_spread":0.2636184952018054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388004980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6058523,0.0001248926,0.000004404151,0.0008707102,0.00015642923,0.00018005498,0.000008847069,0.00010978838,0.39269254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944045,0.0000048930524,0.000005194449,0.000034079152,0.0006059133,0.00000843606,0.000008083014,0.0000054007387,0.0049235253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844664,0.00040426187,0.00026899276,0.00020354826,0.00038310626,0.000293465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994777,0.00011467555,0.00009860175,0.00014544671,0.00008756462,0.000075997516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010496305,0.00011875676,0.00021773424,0.00007215949,0.004680255,0.000092707334,0.00026300843,0.000037225756,0.000111099456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006277971,0.000070160015,0.00008649857,0.00020983133,0.0024771108,0.00014738183,0.000026742631,0.00010856589,0.00014102929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007874443,0.00002124258,0.000147554,0.0000031142306,0.000034109606,0.000018028855,0.012029675,1.1202322e-7,0.00004640716,0.98272663,0.0046229637,0.0003422636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083325844,0.00013566964,0.020319322,0.000035743265,0.000042006784,0.0000014322986,0.0014433448,0.0000027768622,0.000014713835,0.6746874,0.30232057,0.00016379937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031401988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046932656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38855213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002104233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021887916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396706058","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2024.a926223","title":"Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom in Higher Education in England","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Free speech; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Higher education; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033352069020419255,"score_gpt":0.331287316852653,"score_spread":0.29793524783223374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396706058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95501643,0.0015526593,0.000003740399,0.0009546259,0.0012495405,0.00020667077,0.000008513456,0.000045281202,0.040962566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842615,0.00003197546,0.00009758838,0.000030238794,0.0018495133,0.000009886151,0.000006822949,0.000010198949,0.009537652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871296,0.00015533422,0.00036408627,0.00023718114,0.00023570191,0.0002947292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954736,0.00016180112,0.000051715015,0.0001178861,0.000027767152,0.00009344674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005342007,0.00011488976,0.00018856488,0.00030793872,0.00010974914,0.000042539697,0.00020893768,0.00030686415,0.0003750896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072439693,0.00009958838,0.000030925738,0.00024893828,0.00042155824,0.00028725588,0.0000096158155,0.0004733503,0.000028035116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004794385,0.000032472355,0.0069123385,0.000056118075,0.0000058365586,0.000010321556,0.04294204,8.8091844e-7,0.00018846715,0.94246405,0.0023792754,0.0050033834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006815521,0.0001626478,0.040208317,0.0004371344,0.000020633252,0.000004012595,0.00153121,0.00007117095,0.000035843113,0.5144419,0.44211334,0.00029226032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018961048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029071143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43973407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009652103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018470381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412614767","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2025.a965923","title":"Know Your Rights: The State and Human Rights Education in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Human rights education; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03139507224900921,"score_gpt":0.3481938321732388,"score_spread":0.31679875992422957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412614767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87619644,0.00028213108,0.0000034194488,0.0011611709,0.0010937701,0.00022890368,0.0000041299277,0.000032765158,0.120997235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407041,0.0000012031766,0.000016487133,0.00013435895,0.00028541117,0.00002953835,0.0000075590883,0.000005853636,0.058815487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983027,0.00030443174,0.0003414378,0.00034559934,0.0002919916,0.00041382306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992486,0.00013426776,0.0000986311,0.0002842308,0.00008025482,0.0001539987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034144195,0.00016703652,0.00021724126,0.00016879081,0.0033214088,0.00013102998,0.00036081966,0.000073187766,0.00031771942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003943958,0.00011483392,0.00003803943,0.00025529106,0.0003377508,0.00015335206,0.000008801049,0.0002792405,0.000021963035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000700735,0.00019244349,0.0025601618,0.000018785786,0.0000247594,0.000010618696,0.08896117,5.961725e-7,0.000017680155,0.8443963,0.059604973,0.004205516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001995565,0.000060332364,0.011926886,0.00005341337,0.000014620531,4.7051319e-7,0.0054605445,0.0000014069662,0.000005903182,0.27931058,0.702801,0.00016528252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64319605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009115941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018004418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}