{"meta":{"query_hash":"0b5b1491af5b","filters":{"venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal"},"cohort_total":22,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":22,"exported":22,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0b5b1491af5b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=ICSID+Review+-+Foreign+Investment+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2063858936","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/sis007","title":"Impregilo SpA v Argentine Republic1 and Hochtief AG v The Argentine Republic,2: Making Sense of Dissents: The Jurisprudence Inconstante of the MFN Clause","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Arbitration; Treaty; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Business; Payment","score_opus":0.025995678439048864,"score_gpt":0.2631250862451124,"score_spread":0.2371294078060635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063858936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360795,0.09743944,0.00049116043,0.03027149,0.0038338203,0.004590341,0.000060509832,0.000117801115,0.6295875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91484666,0.005648185,0.00022575124,0.077794604,0.0010458844,0.000038390386,0.000016386537,0.000038173024,0.00034599414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694335,0.00017274868,0.0012737665,0.00023562272,0.00091815036,0.000456367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963845,0.00010163171,0.0022123253,0.0006649476,0.0005814186,0.000055167613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029373204,0.00031643795,0.000427101,0.000108422355,0.0007762352,0.00032888394,0.00070125476,0.000062118386,0.00043316677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039604548,0.00015059588,0.0003575596,0.00056782743,0.00066353375,0.0017541068,0.00047005038,0.0004465936,0.000016371645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018691055,0.00014954801,0.0043961215,0.0004680135,0.00015506327,0.000002730011,0.00004830756,0.000002527863,0.0002265702,0.9886438,0.005786625,0.00010195512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008100988,0.00003878056,0.006257371,0.0036185489,0.00060283585,0.00049927365,0.00023239215,0.00049567677,0.0009729856,0.0348652,0.9512347,0.0003721301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008075007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044830507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036652036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055739092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6141122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091460939","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siv001","title":"Investment Treaty Arbitration 'Down Under': Policy and Politics in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Arbitration; Politics; Investment (military); Law; Law and economics; Compulsory arbitration; Business; Political science; International trade; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06061692117983002,"score_gpt":0.3024950449281869,"score_spread":0.24187812374835688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091460939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012002197,0.0059102825,0.00010658501,0.0065365867,0.0004438645,0.0009684977,0.000008517601,0.00007291666,0.97395056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2998709,0.0037976247,0.0014296148,0.6892577,0.003900186,0.000107237574,0.00019476996,0.00007129776,0.0013707022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973911,0.000078752135,0.0009724717,0.00032885032,0.0007051881,0.00052360597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867624,0.000028707198,0.0005468552,0.00024141138,0.00032218554,0.00018461318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010652266,0.00037569282,0.00044484847,0.00039085318,0.00028050577,0.0005648691,0.00027412738,0.00010465737,0.00020573275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001528912,0.00030914196,0.00014497925,0.00045713523,0.00022780763,0.0019855052,0.00010687039,0.00037396,0.0002381676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010814361,0.00014905576,0.0003896086,0.00024881016,0.000042584838,0.0000282637,0.000030378042,0.00004319979,0.000019726336,0.9895342,0.009457733,0.000045646033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013482521,0.000074235606,0.00039558872,0.00094162254,0.00009683413,0.00019219669,0.0000905096,0.00054638495,0.0000718991,0.6293199,0.3665777,0.00034484014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020681776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063620956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97257984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045424254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019206294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172491201","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siv018","title":"St Mary’s VCNA, LLC v The Government of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Arbitration; Law; Government (linguistics); Treaty; Privilege (computing); International arbitration; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025748097744641128,"score_gpt":0.22000544859851634,"score_spread":0.19425735085387522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172491201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007735957,0.0078034643,0.00005628746,0.0056648836,0.00078787893,0.00048457726,0.000015497339,0.000016641283,0.9843972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31290114,0.0032131672,0.0005198104,0.67892015,0.0024279132,0.00007049244,0.00006141337,0.000060623566,0.0018252806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969365,0.000037323334,0.0007636239,0.0001683697,0.0017874668,0.00030673746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839836,0.000031401403,0.000811203,0.00027149596,0.00040962396,0.00007791306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012921921,0.00022737515,0.0003128823,0.000030844043,0.00032997286,0.00016550314,0.0005294076,0.000033086195,0.0008119125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012271738,0.00014130371,0.00015631228,0.00019856809,0.00012978977,0.00074566226,0.00013583103,0.00024476662,0.000039771232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010717895,0.000048193342,0.00011099729,0.00015077651,0.00005340011,0.000013166881,0.000009156474,0.00003290164,0.000005147095,0.778476,0.22099102,0.00009851986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048732865,0.000026500576,0.000080455575,0.0007003571,0.00010868617,0.00006729436,0.00020810713,0.00043861754,0.00009792696,0.0772218,0.92038214,0.0001807916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153103825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029997267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030476626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029801807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99124676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306173994","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siv033","title":"Hesham Talaat M. Al-Warraq v Republic of Indonesia","year":2015,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Treaty; Jurisdiction; Misconduct; Damages; Business; Law and economics; Restructuring; Investment (military); Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.041824160978811975,"score_gpt":0.2682170684768165,"score_spread":0.2263929074980045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306173994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012488903,0.10137536,0.0001028085,0.008219673,0.0021472457,0.0013101768,0.000018889656,0.00007851785,0.88549846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13076217,0.053407274,0.0015486404,0.7998542,0.005219824,0.00015993905,0.00060473836,0.0002942638,0.008148949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937316,0.00021622167,0.0026116285,0.00059526967,0.0020331563,0.000812106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99358934,0.00005456171,0.0031640118,0.0006792115,0.002181862,0.000331038],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032569023,0.0007539706,0.0012117417,0.00044834812,0.0005525753,0.00093501626,0.0010489981,0.00020702514,0.0032138205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034039337,0.00062789046,0.0007610512,0.000894818,0.00053457683,0.0039742836,0.00036390414,0.0008214904,0.0017268053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040516137,0.0003970158,0.00038584447,0.0015497175,0.0002825532,0.00006817199,0.00003381095,0.000005676084,0.00003499357,0.7303728,0.26668075,0.00014814439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019225616,0.00019362441,0.00013114617,0.006510299,0.0005237717,0.00042585874,0.00015056474,0.0003067757,0.00020938605,0.048270702,0.9407038,0.00065152405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000222495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006868442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030248144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041018787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312790337","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siu031","title":"Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: Will Barriers to Jurisdiction Inhibit an Emerging Trend?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Law; Respondent; Business; Generic drug; Intellectual property; State (computer science); Political science; Drug; Medicine","score_opus":0.07202241574399636,"score_gpt":0.2488650241150699,"score_spread":0.17684260837107352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312790337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47975686,0.03414409,0.0029080375,0.020419093,0.004142247,0.0068413843,0.00015317406,0.0001910311,0.4514441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206278,0.0050157006,0.00021195781,0.07338111,0.00050959806,0.000029541918,0.000043668162,0.000044952834,0.00013571224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977853,0.00014301093,0.0007107126,0.00015830575,0.00093923765,0.0002634895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848485,0.000027005179,0.00078151503,0.00032540655,0.00028516632,0.00009605128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012231962,0.00020812229,0.00032828934,0.000080274156,0.00041771925,0.00009035324,0.0004926262,0.000037987964,0.00027319306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022496744,0.00010457192,0.00015583915,0.0007635296,0.00018548293,0.00065722404,0.0002098319,0.0002650512,0.000015788743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012488412,0.0014856827,0.008716107,0.006632855,0.0016875586,0.00004501639,0.012766957,0.030385703,0.0013217664,0.5169508,0.35914436,0.05961436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056938705,0.00020358822,0.000069625545,0.0024374556,0.00034462492,0.000027550672,0.0028691576,0.0054798303,0.00067198614,0.011332871,0.9757359,0.00025801084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067288603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006540051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6165915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009122744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046508387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4264319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337703259","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siv053","title":"<i>CETA, the Investment Canada Act and SOEs: A Brave New World for Free Trade</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Investment (military); Free trade agreement; Closing (real estate); Foreign direct investment; Business; State (computer science); European union; International economics; Member state; Settlement (finance); Member states; Free trade; International economic law; Economics; Political science; Law; International law; Finance; Public international law","score_opus":0.02326810616672014,"score_gpt":0.2291176593002497,"score_spread":0.20584955313352954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337703259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010224603,0.15700023,0.00086896395,0.13056569,0.0015744793,0.004501851,0.000056853365,0.00015884927,0.70425063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12738088,0.016918788,0.0019653987,0.84049743,0.0065621813,0.00021085762,0.000032578817,0.00013845232,0.006293437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805665,0.000044406144,0.00066176197,0.0002784894,0.0004964339,0.00046225812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854016,0.00013301994,0.00073846296,0.00035497342,0.00010414669,0.00012925461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007337977,0.00032578935,0.0004346539,0.00008107742,0.00061644585,0.00047957653,0.00052882446,0.00004146935,0.00042935464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020402129,0.00016413674,0.00018753923,0.00024462005,0.00014050445,0.0009982848,0.00012603341,0.0001982095,0.000023714936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023278,0.000017427517,0.00022956311,0.00028849771,0.00006464755,0.0000071613513,0.000015574864,6.672533e-7,0.0000136237495,0.64418364,0.35010573,0.005063212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010649065,0.000027865144,0.00019342611,0.001505943,0.00020819624,0.00004435882,0.000043881024,0.000017786171,0.000061087325,0.08305393,0.91353273,0.00024590155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044561744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27027327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70993173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012454823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025239392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562229172","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siw035","title":"Reforming Investor–State Dispute Settlement: The Need to Balance Both Parties’ Interests","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Tribunal; Appeal; Arbitration; European union; Adjudication; Investor-state dispute settlement; International trade; Transparency (behavior); Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Foreign direct investment; International investment","score_opus":0.023144663946757297,"score_gpt":0.2520544114976236,"score_spread":0.2289097475508663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562229172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008081678,0.009148573,0.0022653295,0.06360479,0.0026192444,0.002682984,0.00005660806,0.00026512286,0.9112757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16824085,0.005240247,0.00064511155,0.8205166,0.002628729,0.00023933558,0.000048972863,0.00009625027,0.0023439038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711144,0.00007594722,0.0010437234,0.00035802895,0.00078877935,0.0006220737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982921,0.000055849076,0.00076682196,0.00046079763,0.0002976021,0.0001268645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013854238,0.0003950801,0.00040136024,0.00015486334,0.0007384023,0.00053320226,0.0008251485,0.00004647221,0.000816081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014829102,0.00020252964,0.00026929978,0.00036011086,0.00021839813,0.0021930384,0.00029475492,0.00027738378,0.001164012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024787043,0.000054323507,0.00039780032,0.00020749183,0.00009028781,0.00001789272,0.00004223836,0.0000062738363,0.00024242041,0.9378419,0.059427995,0.0016466217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058315956,0.00005139972,0.00016651429,0.003178377,0.00007971195,0.000071421695,0.00005090202,0.00011914179,0.0003130871,0.08188312,0.9131652,0.0003379673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009096441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026059628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9089318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021516977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005482862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804718251","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/six014","title":"The WTO Appellate Body: Viability as a Model for an Investor–State Dispute Settlement Appellate Mechanism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Investor-state dispute settlement; Settlement (finance); State (computer science); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Finance; Computer science; International investment; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.038829603625146716,"score_gpt":0.29080676533386596,"score_spread":0.25197716170871926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804718251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072086263,0.0055408888,0.018573971,0.019881066,0.0029667297,0.008037145,0.00013942625,0.00028043383,0.93737173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42191538,0.01563445,0.0041863564,0.5468253,0.0043988666,0.0009320592,0.00045616718,0.00031533962,0.005336065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648434,0.00007998249,0.0012211219,0.00056063227,0.0008889827,0.0007649463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633086,0.000053803513,0.001781607,0.0010804487,0.0005812158,0.00017206775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002980135,0.0005400614,0.00055048463,0.00009170273,0.0044580586,0.0026789461,0.0014778265,0.000091768576,0.00015102408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018724786,0.00035714483,0.0004995862,0.00008447432,0.00040484584,0.003061073,0.0003500558,0.00040768366,0.00028252703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005672602,0.0001326973,0.000035967383,0.0004570388,0.00014460237,0.0000069655343,0.000026018291,0.00016024694,0.0001273893,0.98984563,0.008492307,0.0005144009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069072674,0.00007296828,0.000018711471,0.000470788,0.00015677413,0.000029150098,0.000016797147,0.07859882,0.00028371366,0.6058333,0.31349516,0.00033305906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017962322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005350575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9320356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017802042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011331236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889473210","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siy014","title":"Bear Creek Mining Corporation v Republic of Peru1","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Investment (military); Treaty; Population; State (computer science); Expropriation; Corporation; Law; License; Foreign direct investment; Business; Law and economics; Political science; International trade; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0364139158185562,"score_gpt":0.2597204614904222,"score_spread":0.22330654567186603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889473210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005768276,0.003154948,0.0003570101,0.0011822155,0.0006850635,0.00046367946,0.0000042942274,0.00005678457,0.98832774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57938814,0.003171211,0.0068040183,0.4018993,0.0069124466,0.00006271527,0.0002327738,0.00009678608,0.0014325791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780226,0.00004229099,0.00096384226,0.00024176807,0.00066231604,0.0002875523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974447,0.000022768654,0.0012345342,0.00026108907,0.0009857571,0.000051168085],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011240141,0.00021586684,0.00035642745,0.00017147735,0.00051040115,0.0004729913,0.00035725982,0.00006256513,0.0029601108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001493033,0.00018811939,0.00021880571,0.0003812938,0.00030943754,0.0022887685,0.000090852816,0.00018496272,0.00030097886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011267798,0.00009572268,0.0003692653,0.00033633853,0.000058317084,0.000007787212,0.000017403661,0.0000017952207,0.00011156883,0.95386666,0.044796593,0.00032726084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006042236,0.00013253654,0.00029915897,0.0018000284,0.00013388538,0.00012139929,0.00007345948,0.0009994197,0.0003588295,0.0840876,0.9111044,0.00028508363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019204737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022335393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98689514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005848509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065766544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919197148","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siy020","title":"Bear Creek Mining Corporation v Republic of Peru:1Two Sides of a ‘Social License’ to Operate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"License; Tribunal; Obligation; Corporation; Indigenous; Political science; Business; Law; Corporate social responsibility; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03774142460722938,"score_gpt":0.27427059438654855,"score_spread":0.23652916977931918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919197148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08853355,0.0019386219,0.00036763898,0.0030102925,0.0006831389,0.0010631742,0.000016441933,0.00005838131,0.90432876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411223,0.0005715516,0.004152498,0.15083688,0.0025622072,0.000042441716,0.00008611701,0.000054173997,0.0005718098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762917,0.00005894781,0.0011405281,0.00024179796,0.0006503242,0.0002792466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705964,0.000023905217,0.0012384776,0.0001976157,0.0014241927,0.000056175548],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011439284,0.00022063963,0.00047056167,0.00021603779,0.0004587629,0.00033005746,0.00035270184,0.00006259164,0.0016201641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018602256,0.00019498589,0.0002189377,0.00052296283,0.0002542575,0.0015296536,0.000114735005,0.00015037817,0.00013774936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003183143,0.00012524685,0.00022698966,0.00046056343,0.00008390133,0.000005394654,0.00013889269,0.0000057779935,0.00090460305,0.97128975,0.026482575,0.0002444993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012772715,0.00044897725,0.0013019475,0.0035140857,0.00029652295,0.000093900984,0.0005467359,0.0009888699,0.0034122337,0.026904413,0.96063375,0.00058127247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025513693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031005015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055935376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007842174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010958233","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siz010","title":"Reverse Contributors? African State Parties, ICSID and the Development of International Investment Law ","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; State (computer science); Settlement (finance); International law; Exceptionalism; Political science; Investment (military); International investment; Sociology; Foreign direct investment; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016231047107388586,"score_gpt":0.22972829119579152,"score_spread":0.21349724408840293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010958233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036745404,0.0073491754,0.00017949095,0.003618153,0.0009740173,0.0015704768,0.000018249188,0.000048682694,0.9825672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37667596,0.00662535,0.0027038842,0.61109805,0.0010168047,0.00020809581,0.00022814028,0.000082625564,0.0013610576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968229,0.0000971411,0.0014002643,0.00031868156,0.000968325,0.000392675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766344,0.00008460931,0.0013187858,0.00030507974,0.0005493775,0.0000786913],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002164819,0.00035553356,0.00059252244,0.00013205875,0.00046466046,0.00040877645,0.0005636981,0.00005757514,0.0009152715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008738189,0.00023283396,0.00023273309,0.00021343355,0.00050631166,0.0013412338,0.0002793496,0.00033682998,0.00024077082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094918105,0.00010401615,0.00019436388,0.0003825237,0.00027672263,0.000005575339,0.00012946277,0.000020662166,0.00004234703,0.9941809,0.0044491435,0.000119360964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025505056,0.000032812004,0.000085178355,0.0011553701,0.00013062227,0.000043067805,0.00016438257,0.000584197,0.0003468525,0.09476874,0.8998479,0.00029034252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022112521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025618164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015914308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113383685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095077272","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa023","title":"<i>The Trump Administration’s Impact on US Investment Policy</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Treaty; Administration (probate law); Bilateral investment treaty; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Legislature; Investment policy; Investment protection; International trade; Negotiation; General partnership; Open-ended investment company; Arbitration; Economics; Foreign direct investment; Business; Free trade; Political science; Finance; Return on investment; Law; Politics; International investment","score_opus":0.027418296247611707,"score_gpt":0.2778974774185679,"score_spread":0.2504791811709562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095077272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013915173,0.0053373273,0.000058165577,0.052559774,0.0005082344,0.0010815178,0.0000167631,0.0001212381,0.93892545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14346601,0.004286053,0.00016236425,0.8472402,0.0043970086,0.00008636929,0.000094292045,0.0000563038,0.00021140724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968177,0.00008665162,0.0010881096,0.00037330406,0.0010511682,0.0005830333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811596,0.00007358522,0.0009186124,0.0003467349,0.00033001165,0.00021509381],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008207059,0.00048552072,0.00044704624,0.00011700688,0.0012889815,0.0011979622,0.0007230115,0.000077690565,0.00065103965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000246125,0.00029615933,0.0005345044,0.0005206594,0.00023453656,0.0013133677,0.00012016111,0.0005294937,0.0013190771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007244619,0.000100302335,0.000093068855,0.00017290561,0.00011614357,0.000031834064,0.000010299984,0.000047853064,0.000023331588,0.90300095,0.09613807,0.0001927828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072439376,0.00025850508,0.0001442235,0.0005733573,0.00011243471,0.00011121217,0.000024170082,0.0008506098,0.00016609124,0.081188805,0.9155005,0.0003456874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012815824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006710237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024998537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026310634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110778620","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa033","title":"Performance Requirement Prohibitions in International Investment Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"International investment; Investment (military); Business; Law; International law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.04262453846104595,"score_gpt":0.2580176103126507,"score_spread":0.21539307185160475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110778620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010994276,0.0021403136,0.0000962036,0.014372501,0.00057623425,0.0010115316,0.0000090457015,0.00009670769,0.98059803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21437496,0.003365595,0.0009312715,0.77888495,0.001923004,0.00016861371,0.00019174017,0.000047861937,0.00011202063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966956,0.000053187894,0.001292177,0.00044028196,0.0010288925,0.00048990303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985367,0.000019632773,0.0007070251,0.00024014039,0.00036571187,0.00013081287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008018371,0.00039716513,0.00044197033,0.00018049889,0.00047083557,0.00051578984,0.00066955585,0.00007544118,0.0020243435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000774597,0.00033952444,0.00025427472,0.0004464958,0.00021632672,0.0030672792,0.00023026635,0.0005046644,0.0009094491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028036755,0.00021016858,0.00024369487,0.0005402749,0.00007421127,0.000045124947,0.00004076528,0.00011039077,0.000084324,0.9825939,0.015928574,0.00010051223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013593473,0.0000954185,0.00011018068,0.0021438033,0.00009302059,0.000077058925,0.000068519905,0.006817004,0.0002422446,0.04777897,0.9407589,0.0004555368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014277983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001588854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98048604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026140537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007493181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160296973","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa044","title":"<i>Taking Investors’ Rights Seriously: The Achmea and</i> CETA <i>Rulings of the European Court of Justice do not Bar Intra-EU Investment Arbitration</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Treaty; Political science; Common law; European union; Arbitration clause; Business; Compulsory arbitration; International trade","score_opus":0.02710789685501152,"score_gpt":0.23616037647721894,"score_spread":0.2090524796222074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160296973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008188827,0.008309312,0.00021565588,0.025375556,0.0008468648,0.0016499201,0.000022291913,0.00007155218,0.95532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49076355,0.0018522845,0.00060080073,0.50542384,0.0012424251,0.00002070933,0.00002059478,0.00004400478,0.000031761105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648917,0.0002787538,0.0014760481,0.0003679171,0.0010319944,0.00035610778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965267,0.00008381863,0.002355604,0.00041887525,0.0005039642,0.00011102856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018612231,0.00041752902,0.0005691233,0.00007742888,0.00088032323,0.00035647748,0.0009558792,0.000067114575,0.00024020266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024682534,0.00024363678,0.0003485858,0.00045375057,0.0006283485,0.0011601653,0.0003351173,0.00059570366,0.00005651865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002138052,0.0000823636,0.00012063597,0.0011574915,0.00013888888,0.000009227619,0.00022071404,0.00006179799,0.0009585522,0.98505485,0.012085771,0.000088328175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00159012,0.00014055446,0.0006716222,0.0037522148,0.0014846548,0.0001565893,0.00023207592,0.0019026874,0.0036053692,0.06788186,0.9179572,0.00062504644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014806174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050170216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95528823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005628702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009168789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174179936","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa055","title":"State Immunity as a Defense to Resist the Enforcement of ICSID Awards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Sovereign immunity; Convention; Enforcement; Law; Treaty; State immunity; Business; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Sovereignty; State (computer science); International law; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.03219109404754546,"score_gpt":0.261730057532032,"score_spread":0.22953896348448655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174179936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024273642,0.005693486,0.0003433262,0.015141858,0.00036339692,0.0012953094,0.000022107604,0.000060896116,0.97465223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28388375,0.0035185583,0.00048467558,0.7107834,0.0008998534,0.00007029265,0.0000689463,0.000045106153,0.0002453658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973062,0.00009061349,0.0010774236,0.00024253245,0.00092196674,0.0003612632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811584,0.00004532076,0.0008257127,0.0003368991,0.00055786467,0.00011836501],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010707823,0.0003041376,0.00045223717,0.00009806982,0.0005959733,0.00034629396,0.0007321126,0.00003920034,0.0020229989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002501607,0.00020176856,0.00032943083,0.00047390064,0.00017154672,0.00081403455,0.00028120383,0.0003820796,0.0006406903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057008885,0.00007352494,0.000052214506,0.0005131175,0.00012538457,0.000015794822,0.000095943775,0.0001042176,0.000096158044,0.96503067,0.033591937,0.00024402158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005697519,0.00014400815,0.000058473437,0.00094083213,0.000185893,0.000040224615,0.00014354533,0.00039168668,0.00059708883,0.089226164,0.907437,0.00026528325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050215895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096582284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008267178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097070784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179397632","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa054","title":"Dual Nationality of a Private Investor in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Potential Barrier to the Exercise of Jurisdiction Ratione Personae?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Political science; Treaty; Nationality; Law; Convention; International trade law; Interpretation (philosophy); International law; State (computer science); Immigration","score_opus":0.02456932886034087,"score_gpt":0.24342527849401227,"score_spread":0.2188559496336714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179397632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16976005,0.025294557,0.004776834,0.09810528,0.0023721857,0.012387485,0.00022664871,0.00024304863,0.6868339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.691263,0.0016656304,0.0018131256,0.3033897,0.001401934,0.00020527277,0.00015392048,0.000043021468,0.000064379536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967579,0.00011224785,0.0014496737,0.00032819252,0.0010794846,0.00027249337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998001,0.000029938014,0.0010489578,0.00024378856,0.000566539,0.000109781686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011480104,0.00030467776,0.0005313537,0.00020636628,0.00029795527,0.00014410658,0.00037597463,0.00007649543,0.00052734214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001850019,0.00022461955,0.0002652685,0.0007489525,0.00023499633,0.0013168994,0.00011756261,0.00031446223,0.000073170966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012970701,0.00021524678,0.00023998626,0.00064639,0.000084675135,0.000011329031,0.0002822525,0.0004964079,0.0008863868,0.99004084,0.006846121,0.00012066014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006946122,0.00082069874,0.007459116,0.0072840704,0.0012609588,0.00018000194,0.0010476434,0.019094631,0.008116423,0.18918836,0.7569774,0.0016245905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017215051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012485805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011994555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001507142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91597193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189523898","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siab001","title":"Rand and Sembi v Serbia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Montenegro; Transparency (behavior); Arbitration; Political science; Pledge; Law; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.028650786895564755,"score_gpt":0.23533391506714796,"score_spread":0.2066831281715832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189523898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00127525,0.018015636,0.00021207263,0.014335636,0.00029323503,0.0005713326,0.0000039121687,0.00008685863,0.9652061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08861238,0.00857845,0.0007342571,0.89951676,0.0022885585,0.00002598253,0.000044676624,0.00004048253,0.00015844626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984084,0.000030035579,0.0005855938,0.000251967,0.00045300406,0.00027103146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914795,0.00001887784,0.00040735584,0.00012210074,0.00020194118,0.000101778365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046774116,0.00024519354,0.00034706882,0.000059559432,0.0004255523,0.00053163565,0.00025265632,0.000048298214,0.0012073165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007633595,0.00019117063,0.00015857672,0.00021155985,0.000122019715,0.0015443743,0.00011446991,0.0002858367,0.00044570657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001614332,0.000030851195,0.00014573874,0.00065014086,0.000054947497,0.000028377732,0.000015090367,0.0000038008682,0.00006418322,0.95910776,0.039629154,0.00025384265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091847277,0.000039190298,0.00006128881,0.0007951759,0.00013617775,0.000121093035,0.000030741943,0.0010980779,0.000084660765,0.064191744,0.9322653,0.00025807795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041928615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020684096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026479052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000257036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382046912","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siad014","title":"Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Towards an Integrated Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec; McGill University","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Settlement (finance); Law and economics; Function (biology); Business; Backlash; Sociology; Engineering; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.04168413851725707,"score_gpt":0.27420349194409194,"score_spread":0.23251935342683486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382046912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002850513,0.002775887,0.00034064957,0.0018621365,0.0007551822,0.0012501772,0.000012471405,0.00028951545,0.98986346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10253011,0.008271905,0.0037424646,0.87819666,0.0032322442,0.00059550797,0.0023552163,0.00017638352,0.00089949154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634206,0.00012081694,0.0013176843,0.00052034366,0.0010548314,0.00064426084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838305,0.000022262422,0.0006279996,0.00040970766,0.00043678825,0.000120223194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021485526,0.00048495026,0.0005868347,0.00055990973,0.0004880041,0.00083134347,0.00067757996,0.0001322858,0.0008095162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085923086,0.00038777475,0.00026340556,0.0013948327,0.00020696239,0.0033903986,0.0001362202,0.00063521723,0.00084584526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021561415,0.00029342124,0.00014271996,0.00049455307,0.000060039023,0.00006939425,0.000046267196,0.00017555898,0.000037718917,0.97858226,0.019766042,0.00031043566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013897436,0.000104427956,0.00041783857,0.0017495623,0.0001175975,0.00018086372,0.00036827513,0.018890748,0.00007908743,0.16758254,0.80845284,0.00066650234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049015996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037034406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98896396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027935675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016395393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391357651","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siad032","title":"The 2021 Canadian Model FIPA: More Than Meets the Eye","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Library science; History; Political science; Law; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027503973115566856,"score_gpt":0.26189031400769563,"score_spread":0.23438634089212879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391357651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039440842,0.011793762,0.000033149267,0.06623684,0.00085033796,0.0008357269,0.000013854703,0.00006841721,0.9197735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09871861,0.045559492,0.00022612637,0.8419339,0.0043004323,0.00031445624,0.00025742428,0.00012032454,0.008569249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976654,0.00005325415,0.0006501167,0.00024173704,0.0007618917,0.00062760036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986657,0.00005596831,0.0004238782,0.00040541528,0.00034362753,0.000105415216],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017037337,0.0002864024,0.00025187488,0.00014070637,0.0026309814,0.00100681,0.00087779,0.0000613563,0.0004690777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012147276,0.00015320441,0.00030087974,0.0005730007,0.0002551992,0.0009870834,0.00014320642,0.00041884277,0.0013515074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031267143,0.000012237307,0.000058013957,0.000069753216,0.00006655663,0.00002242569,0.000014793968,0.00029316652,0.0000045950637,0.8673533,0.13178824,0.0003137522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019332138,0.000007688099,0.00010488126,0.00045540923,0.00008828578,0.000023950992,0.00008988125,0.024309658,0.000010038951,0.1182362,0.8562918,0.00018892948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004876441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020937864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9112043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013881204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018700538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392019252","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siae001","title":"EU Investment Protection Law: Chapter Eight of CETA, the Vietnam and Singapore Free Trade Agreements and EU Regulations 1219/2012, 912/2014 and 2019/452. Article-by-Article Commentary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment protection; Investment (military); Law; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Free trade; International trade; Business; International investment; Politics","score_opus":0.017230847447045727,"score_gpt":0.22844068306945148,"score_spread":0.21120983562240575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392019252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056447476,0.2978798,0.0010075715,0.24273627,0.0016707927,0.009503118,0.00022047461,0.00029039689,0.39024413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5334465,0.014795673,0.00090218196,0.44922823,0.00095922366,0.00021613535,0.00013163805,0.000084406536,0.0002360232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979679,0.00007827985,0.00079467247,0.00033751826,0.00052342704,0.0002982185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990947,0.00004286512,0.00040085442,0.00027525873,0.000094760886,0.00009151677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093421596,0.0003082073,0.00032939704,0.00010988797,0.00071640057,0.00058299553,0.00020411488,0.00006806937,0.0002955279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002236691,0.0002107046,0.00011730819,0.00016747271,0.00048160017,0.0019727764,0.00018033224,0.00031893176,0.000024502244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016611595,0.00010582832,0.0000959196,0.00060820585,0.00016990288,0.0000065753043,0.000095063915,0.0000034990144,0.0010226248,0.9431589,0.053911876,0.0008049411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011752348,0.0001327308,0.0004519269,0.0020118882,0.00047580572,0.00017481422,0.00012422496,0.0052404413,0.00097068434,0.15523838,0.8336549,0.00034900344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021619652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014178622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7879206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053764503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014318249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85922843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408764610","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siae039","title":"International Investment Treaty Compliance in Canadian Federalism: A Multidimensional Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Compliance (psychology); Federalism; Investment (military); International investment; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Economics; Psychology; Foreign direct investment; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04643543364276993,"score_gpt":0.284959660698877,"score_spread":0.2385242270561071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408764610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042088583,0.016104186,0.00006088796,0.012379009,0.00162928,0.0007016809,0.000024261306,0.000097875985,0.9685819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3034723,0.01624309,0.0018628868,0.6721117,0.00394203,0.00029672406,0.00061816414,0.00013802153,0.0013150866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970292,0.000053871456,0.000967678,0.00048435002,0.00080537755,0.0006595082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989985,0.000037750404,0.0002673308,0.0002337154,0.0002745456,0.00018812687],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009888465,0.00041718554,0.0004130784,0.00054589816,0.00045987818,0.0008057047,0.0004924887,0.00010175662,0.0023465205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058656326,0.00034612766,0.00029277898,0.00040655665,0.00016151187,0.0020615682,0.000112004374,0.00054238323,0.001132075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009861766,0.00012770582,0.0001338351,0.00046927974,0.00011039875,0.00039716932,0.000039058057,0.000043277156,0.000026093168,0.97649187,0.021764064,0.000387403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005844145,0.000027175052,0.00015968438,0.0042368094,0.000060832925,0.0002661881,0.000043520315,0.014069459,0.000021331869,0.06464828,0.9155108,0.00037155705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036698002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08032357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96726686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000850609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026185016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415299329","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaf020","title":"Gabriel Resources Ltd and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd v Romania:<i>According Fair and Equitable Treatment to an Environmentally, Socially and Culturally Controversial Project</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Culturally appropriate; Immigration","score_opus":0.0099805516205859,"score_gpt":0.25566589775129517,"score_spread":0.24568534613070928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415299329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48792478,0.02425662,0.00008374103,0.0039257314,0.00019749516,0.00231399,0.00011843345,0.00006214198,0.48111707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84146327,0.07133537,0.0058684917,0.065821394,0.0005852527,0.00026348376,0.00007514815,0.00011456524,0.014473005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974911,0.0002093978,0.0005942976,0.0005755888,0.00052049075,0.00060913066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990066,0.000081540624,0.00027478515,0.00023212717,0.000011075856,0.00039385085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005806803,0.00045996183,0.0005497909,0.00007160797,0.0012138339,0.00036720588,0.00030086687,0.00010998979,0.00023590722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025454056,0.00035699623,0.00012782893,0.00012058853,0.0007122622,0.0007094492,0.00055009854,0.00023256002,0.000024390672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007980798,0.0012905204,0.031711463,0.00094367913,0.0012709294,0.00028785417,0.012358103,0.00026153828,0.024265656,0.86927634,0.028323539,0.029212264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019781603,0.0012964668,0.0044812253,0.00094048836,0.0004000405,0.00053862063,0.0023111063,0.00007772595,0.0007364847,0.0077056764,0.9788849,0.00064913183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002027246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084001914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95056134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005434216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029836014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}