{"meta":{"query_hash":"6088ee016bea","filters":{"venue":"IIUM Law Journal"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6088ee016bea","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=IIUM+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1908306056","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i2.93","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Sanctions; Common law; Duty; Adversarial system; Political science; Civil litigation; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.010984879505898368,"score_gpt":0.26570876436968294,"score_spread":0.25472388486378456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908306056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21352889,0.00054611365,0.0017457501,0.15705359,0.0003447284,0.00048457127,0.0000024562964,0.000046575242,0.62624735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759483,0.00024037628,0.0001817057,0.0006868344,0.00047868845,0.000017068978,2.894657e-7,0.000003286469,0.0007968916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999384,0.000103262406,0.000120623474,0.000065389446,0.00017016346,0.00015659406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.000068967216,0.00007383644,0.00007724024,0.00008619134,0.00011280353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038976,0.000040611005,0.000053445616,0.000009521766,0.0015105603,0.00039962426,0.0001685035,0.000028875356,0.00035104726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037332324,0.00002560851,0.00003234213,0.0000846156,0.00043899918,0.00032475026,0.000026136406,0.00015327468,0.00010311923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017086188,0.0000058532946,0.00022069247,8.939687e-7,0.0000041077415,3.751614e-7,0.0032899464,0.0000074498626,0.00007464086,0.9908676,0.0006901907,0.004836523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005545872,0.000016653537,0.009744212,0.000025826894,0.00002071542,0.000031789557,0.0065146284,0.00055497815,0.00013549486,0.36549142,0.61676323,0.000146451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007228613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004301621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78406596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021759824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004387513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194517101","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v16i1.41","title":"REGIONAL PLANNING AUTHORITY IN MALAYSIA: LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Autonomy; Regional autonomy; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Local government; State (computer science); Politics; Central government; Federalism; Sustainable development; Traditional authority; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04504868726630062,"score_gpt":0.3436837866116739,"score_spread":0.2986350993453733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194517101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78501284,0.0052529615,0.00038464658,0.017257927,0.0017737962,0.000073420895,0.0000042018232,0.000025258285,0.19021498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518555,0.00015486774,0.0007045597,0.00061203865,0.003186817,0.00000187579,3.8933493e-7,0.0000033662743,0.00015054061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989832,0.00010316358,0.00014924676,0.00006700889,0.0002990968,0.00039830015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995706,0.00010548301,0.000057708992,0.000035410812,0.00003559888,0.00019519926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008007842,0.000071405724,0.00011104081,0.000036613503,0.0016393976,0.00014024053,0.000099465775,0.00009910107,0.0000794308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009725595,0.00006135934,0.000038366856,0.00012313775,0.00042523674,0.00059403706,0.000044274526,0.00049762445,0.000009242534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011064528,0.000027528191,0.09703151,0.0000021393976,0.000009918382,0.000014468417,0.011481739,0.000033021963,0.0000031435716,0.8891192,0.0017512408,0.0005149931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014765256,0.000014491802,0.086082354,0.00005348675,0.000005924392,0.00009081777,0.0027330671,0.000009566479,0.000002169854,0.008756368,0.9020058,0.00009832005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00817707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026545504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90025455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011130606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007992576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954447719","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v27i1.412","title":"Discriminatory Customary Practices Against Women’s Rights: An Account Of Intervention Strategies By Southern African Developing States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Legislature; Human rights; Legislation; Political science; International law; Customary international law; Law; Intervention (counseling); International human rights law; Girl; Subordination (linguistics); International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Public international law; Right to property; Psychology","score_opus":0.020999167753023757,"score_gpt":0.3125465536360403,"score_spread":0.29154738588301654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954447719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606397,0.0001656045,0.00013597624,0.00039446438,0.00047343,0.00012532479,0.000013309712,0.00003127048,0.038020886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982193,0.00007269539,0.00034950738,0.00012980415,0.00014577752,0.000007021652,0.000009430147,0.0000119760825,0.0010544579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981188,0.0003118741,0.00044040117,0.00018167973,0.000566046,0.000381153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986214,0.00006765573,0.0008176135,0.00011966816,0.00021115356,0.00016249357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015472613,0.00013579465,0.00020843917,0.00010788447,0.0007820266,0.00048476039,0.0003577596,0.00007302233,0.00089893176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018316949,0.00009623265,0.00006598061,0.000116285366,0.0002349413,0.002071288,0.00004150906,0.00023375641,0.00004821163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021586052,0.00066534674,0.0016369969,0.00017421896,0.00030375965,0.000050701412,0.5541205,0.00005340318,0.0014539931,0.42804325,0.002618399,0.010663598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005757228,0.00018435407,0.00086986943,0.00020173976,0.00001863453,0.0000065173967,0.5397796,0.000014049807,0.0003449581,0.06153964,0.39610574,0.0003591724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004143224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013771175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39348733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043071478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000361426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98426723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117068828","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v28i2.575","title":"DETERMINATION OF A CHILD’S HABITUAL RESIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION CASES: CHARTING THE WAY TOWARDS HARMONIZATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Harmonization; Convention; Law; European union; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Political science; Jurisprudence; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Human rights; International trade; Demography","score_opus":0.02993824471647548,"score_gpt":0.30355966327036743,"score_spread":0.27362141855389194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117068828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5578433,0.0004822541,0.015213632,0.3488126,0.0034015016,0.0006232311,0.000016738142,0.00009871269,0.07350799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743456,0.00018906406,0.0001778394,0.0006407249,0.0015211607,0.000003432146,0.0000029515552,0.000006617883,0.00002365418],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866056,0.00017949936,0.00036423677,0.00012593203,0.0005160882,0.00015367514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993057,0.00005327028,0.00029735093,0.000056964458,0.00021093528,0.00007577559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091688434,0.00007053158,0.00009871079,0.00006415137,0.00078303844,0.00014626251,0.00022867831,0.000059840535,0.0001624864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000533047,0.000058724272,0.00006323755,0.00026625488,0.00014082389,0.0006148525,0.000033474196,0.00029022692,0.000004598681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005153322,0.0003497649,0.016967189,0.000056831377,0.00007884375,0.00016063993,0.3399748,0.0010431145,0.0033872388,0.17272209,0.0008436234,0.46390054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005071495,0.0010713048,0.20433095,0.0015613079,0.00019207402,0.0014392034,0.0709932,0.038803734,0.012284877,0.006562429,0.6564303,0.0012591284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019886175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004143468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65558666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105315376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005437738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233698800","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i1.74","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Sanctions; Duty; Common law; Political science; Liability; Duty of care; Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018738665033643548,"score_gpt":0.29930311454728165,"score_spread":0.2805644495136381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233698800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18977456,0.0019679042,0.00252776,0.073419295,0.0007461777,0.00031431598,0.0000042661845,0.00004806881,0.73119766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748516,0.0002749852,0.00016257938,0.0005032362,0.0011171338,0.000006467752,3.13728e-7,0.0000033278088,0.00044677148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934447,0.000119534794,0.00010883112,0.000046908965,0.00017274795,0.00020750621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959266,0.0000695609,0.000072609284,0.00007022792,0.000045507928,0.00014942083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010214528,0.000039254646,0.00005113299,0.000009070311,0.0015442059,0.00017592775,0.00013611489,0.000028902474,0.00012192939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040326704,0.00002526275,0.000032712196,0.00008402664,0.00038116568,0.00036000583,0.000025374493,0.00015142674,0.000038421524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032749454,0.00000891565,0.0009561933,8.137859e-7,0.0000038143905,2.0196056e-7,0.0060947477,0.0000030578858,0.000035989164,0.9902213,0.00023454874,0.0024371473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003395845,0.000007507125,0.008464645,0.000014582464,0.000022514432,0.00003213129,0.0043543694,0.00006702574,0.00012734543,0.0544728,0.93200076,0.00009671368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014955112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020388388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025528609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035018656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312379132","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v30is1.697","title":"POLICY, LEGAL AND REGULATION RESEARCH IN THE SHARING ECONOMY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Sharing economy; Popularity; Bibliometrics; Political science; Systematic review; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04719949876983625,"score_gpt":0.3095124755151847,"score_spread":0.2623129767453484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312379132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6358178,0.21129087,0.000114861454,0.029713312,0.0004867722,0.0023028955,0.000012425675,0.000070231894,0.12019079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521846,0.0018567557,0.000013910286,0.0022355444,0.0005268609,0.00003707987,0.000011082419,0.0000071236814,0.00009320867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989446,0.0000634275,0.00035853157,0.00017646716,0.0002398226,0.00021719029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993613,0.00013967414,0.0002131813,0.00018315345,0.00008739269,0.000015338363],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065087266,0.00008839958,0.00026418857,0.026647432,0.0008752724,0.0022418797,0.00028984513,0.00002635231,0.00008701713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104655366,0.000060760376,0.000068065616,0.05833139,0.0000282619,0.001639586,0.00025897368,0.00054802955,0.0000046775876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049968665,0.00012632733,0.12211816,0.079911955,0.0006125644,0.00036732183,0.00063730817,0.00044630654,0.0000068219424,0.78632444,0.0034789315,0.00591989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029454462,0.00014613017,0.4029283,0.043048285,0.0023081908,0.005523317,0.0029387716,0.0495616,0.0000033862677,0.26009417,0.2290731,0.0014293077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006367827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028011363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5262303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000500827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017288156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987939},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4385961421","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v30i1.648","title":"IS THERE A PRIVATE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN MALAYSIA?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Tort; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Political science; Right to privacy; Trespass; Sources of law; Private law; Statute; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Liability","score_opus":0.02212602839253665,"score_gpt":0.3115844391723397,"score_spread":0.28945841077980305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385961421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96719545,0.00015344805,0.0002170685,0.006999697,0.00045811496,0.00007851782,0.0000036835636,0.000016573564,0.024877463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970105,0.000066013,0.00018756988,0.0012820889,0.00033304712,0.00001506991,4.5717852e-7,0.000007376959,0.0010978256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867904,0.00022486517,0.00020332974,0.00013761077,0.0004644324,0.00029074654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955434,0.000040591527,0.000076537515,0.00012706044,0.00005303295,0.00014844383],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007233533,0.00006878936,0.0001204937,0.00015426225,0.0017715568,0.00015615726,0.00038350865,0.000024338586,0.0072943773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036360074,0.000064594344,0.00011584632,0.0007720297,0.000042515607,0.00015815134,0.00011494314,0.00037352793,0.00007576643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043863538,0.0016738407,0.09878753,0.000038663773,0.00036534737,0.0020994844,0.5128364,0.011586732,0.0015935448,0.19631995,0.03092858,0.1433313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001856476,0.00008237694,0.0013949777,0.0000141483515,0.000071186754,0.00005839287,0.19445278,0.00010197018,0.0000626898,0.002542401,0.80088663,0.0001467918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015425724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020653538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7699581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027339085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089811285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}