{"meta":{"query_hash":"6088ee016bea","filters":{"venue":"IIUM Law Journal"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6088ee016bea","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=IIUM+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1908306056","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i2.93","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Sanctions; Common law; Duty; Adversarial system; Political science; Civil litigation; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.010984879505898368,"score_gpt":0.26570876436968294,"score_spread":0.25472388486378456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908306056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10639346,0.033010207,0.0014801737,0.40473363,0.0028698896,0.00003438636,0.000013497367,0.000021927954,0.45144284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87734824,0.006003588,0.0005811301,0.048935436,0.0010954741,0.00002183588,0.000004346202,0.000011520293,0.065998465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959734,0.0016949284,0.00013604216,0.00029458845,0.00095561147,0.00094534695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721247,0.0011197187,0.00051421777,0.00011923418,0.00038713048,0.0006471362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045508724,0.00022543634,0.00016873736,0.00076019776,0.008943143,0.0067467242,0.0008072451,0.0053269677,0.0035350549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007518647,0.0002838858,0.00020538039,0.0004701548,0.01122466,0.003609405,0.004128826,0.0068750954,0.00071289256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020144113,0.000036092355,0.0028086596,0.000065530316,0.000004286431,0.001174784,0.029691665,0.0001057932,0.00017380132,0.91944724,0.026838962,0.019633181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020239931,0.000091120564,0.004891631,0.0009580148,0.000016199683,0.004429136,0.025817981,0.00075015455,0.00044368426,0.11806945,0.8444606,0.00005184294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007737566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019884208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008943143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005928787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007059074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043016553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194517101","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v16i1.41","title":"REGIONAL PLANNING AUTHORITY IN MALAYSIA: LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Autonomy; Regional autonomy; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Local government; State (computer science); Politics; Central government; Federalism; Sustainable development; Traditional authority; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04504868726630062,"score_gpt":0.3436837866116739,"score_spread":0.2986350993453733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194517101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079917446,0.0047436366,0.030815076,0.024259297,0.00012797995,0.0003870292,0.0005213046,0.00014309843,0.859085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95889366,0.0017361788,0.010556483,0.00071454933,0.00007615661,0.00020051148,0.00010097303,0.000013868356,0.027707651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963505,0.0017110726,0.00028012015,0.00037863204,0.00059784896,0.00068190467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652666,0.0012076045,0.0008340309,0.00023704152,0.0006959258,0.0004986999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032898197,0.00027233709,0.00023454159,0.0022231827,0.0029326696,0.008581595,0.0015326644,0.0022513408,0.004873745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00431282,0.00041620497,0.00032156252,0.001891528,0.011258162,0.0043732375,0.0027581064,0.002234341,0.0006190083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016168273,0.0000055334126,0.00055697275,0.000018088629,0.0000013397936,0.00011202693,0.00076328154,0.00092123036,0.000021931204,0.99536645,0.00061818375,0.0016133249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003555875,0.00008122621,0.0137167405,0.0014751315,0.000041320924,0.0011240052,0.01269269,0.022719005,0.0006467324,0.67651224,0.27080628,0.00014908219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06873323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06901317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06873323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01427282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019273909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1366663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954447719","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v27i1.412","title":"Discriminatory Customary Practices Against Women’s Rights: An Account Of Intervention Strategies By Southern African Developing States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Legislature; Human rights; Legislation; Political science; International law; Customary international law; Law; Intervention (counseling); International human rights law; Girl; Subordination (linguistics); International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Public international law; Right to property; Psychology","score_opus":0.020999167753023757,"score_gpt":0.3125465536360403,"score_spread":0.29154738588301654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954447719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8800751,0.0061915484,0.0016192598,0.017373681,0.00007940251,0.00013873648,0.000021246873,0.000013490349,0.09448753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388736,0.0020941182,0.00034195546,0.0007166293,0.000010711974,0.000038576774,0.0000044931217,0.000002866551,0.002903315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981211,0.0010566928,0.000041778047,0.000074738906,0.00014098882,0.00056475773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989004,0.0006081105,0.00024603461,0.00004849641,0.00008271284,0.000114152426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025679974,0.00026811013,0.0001617508,0.0012794549,0.0083807465,0.0029218018,0.0007140076,0.0011387678,0.0024676414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032785514,0.00019336521,0.00017956649,0.0018232169,0.009643561,0.0017842649,0.0044311834,0.0017167781,0.000102100654],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033822835,0.00016712116,0.020094115,0.0003870372,0.000015150487,0.0019248456,0.6708423,0.0003187357,0.0022953153,0.23943603,0.0019772367,0.06250832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026665448,0.00019208241,0.052270666,0.0016660271,0.000051379,0.0006656769,0.7311684,0.0005634063,0.0025030684,0.017812043,0.19304304,0.000037494585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030222133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048362955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030222133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006089274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007892392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06009239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117068828","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v28i2.575","title":"DETERMINATION OF A CHILD’S HABITUAL RESIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION CASES: CHARTING THE WAY TOWARDS HARMONIZATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Harmonization; Convention; Law; European union; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Political science; Jurisprudence; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Human rights; International trade; Demography","score_opus":0.02993824471647548,"score_gpt":0.30355966327036743,"score_spread":0.27362141855389194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117068828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50384504,0.0045387344,0.027362963,0.01850946,0.00016780791,0.00015648668,0.000047668967,0.000051064388,0.44532076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925897,0.00054949726,0.0025244162,0.0012531818,0.000041430907,0.00004899328,0.000015545424,0.0000132405985,0.002963958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846383,0.008478758,0.0012964127,0.0012734322,0.002434488,0.0018785194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867166,0.007891962,0.0019808826,0.0013101167,0.0014957223,0.00060462044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013797856,0.00015478462,0.0003808164,0.0017066541,0.0053763534,0.008586804,0.001835762,0.0035551921,0.0010389314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023256922,0.00035508774,0.0003482201,0.0019312358,0.028563105,0.005310495,0.009991042,0.0055873226,0.00013581963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015248067,0.000012878042,0.004805438,0.000028843451,0.000004187811,0.00064949994,0.034152683,0.00028764794,0.00034812206,0.94584334,0.0010809138,0.012771253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000633091,0.00035818847,0.058490016,0.0019680576,0.00009778955,0.00432613,0.14869262,0.004162216,0.008441032,0.51413524,0.25896665,0.00029869511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015578914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029353818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015578914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075960755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009793207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07297087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233698800","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i1.74","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Sanctions; Duty; Common law; Political science; Liability; Duty of care; Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018738665033643548,"score_gpt":0.29930311454728165,"score_spread":0.2805644495136381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233698800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11480933,0.027683755,0.0015510861,0.3502637,0.0018403556,0.000034540677,0.00001434847,0.00002240991,0.5037804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077969,0.004685032,0.00056039135,0.042319722,0.00066810456,0.00002161283,0.0000041163535,0.00000954941,0.04393456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521697,0.002153262,0.00016277631,0.00036705585,0.0011278606,0.00097202364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972579,0.0011742003,0.0005115729,0.00012652745,0.00036773636,0.0005621643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004479851,0.00022198056,0.00018295583,0.0007623142,0.008807016,0.007126083,0.00089419936,0.0062372824,0.002592154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00768728,0.00030667754,0.00023952832,0.0004975285,0.0144217955,0.0038472232,0.004216677,0.007491632,0.0005977523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014653607,0.00002507885,0.0021726147,0.000051522,0.0000037255627,0.0011085498,0.022606252,0.00009457323,0.0001407822,0.9465726,0.015017586,0.012192089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030070712,0.00011840843,0.0071556815,0.0011687173,0.000025516569,0.0063223597,0.027501678,0.000921521,0.0005764993,0.20439842,0.7517074,0.00007372002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010601054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024046237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010601054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067047747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007990995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048646808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312379132","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v30is1.697","title":"POLICY, LEGAL AND REGULATION RESEARCH IN THE SHARING ECONOMY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Sharing economy; Popularity; Bibliometrics; Political science; Systematic review; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04719949876983625,"score_gpt":0.3095124755151847,"score_spread":0.2623129767453484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312379132","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14071208,0.80463856,0.0056526475,0.0057040732,0.0004622997,0.0057931948,0.024139747,0.00017802599,0.012719312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3170583,0.6523689,0.012889944,0.0008038209,0.00031197435,0.0051660417,0.010323662,0.000054623077,0.0010227836],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688075,0.0082226945,0.010494338,0.0016599301,0.009978514,0.00083702593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86338025,0.09722049,0.019591244,0.0031527462,0.015518545,0.0011366914],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023474235,0.0010515352,0.0037468548,0.21985385,0.0023489571,0.0058014756,0.0013167855,0.0016561387,0.0036185568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095987685,0.0010462462,0.0035592604,0.239777,0.0019988983,0.0055068634,0.0038250324,0.00075071707,0.0005749303],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024794263,0.0002137395,0.08109001,0.5404996,0.0058180597,0.0017678804,0.008514889,0.0013760391,0.0014429013,0.0065055825,0.011568825,0.34095448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017724944,0.00050636835,0.2333546,0.5180535,0.034137107,0.002620384,0.028070116,0.0024354004,0.002477837,0.005907566,0.17190287,0.00035695435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009361181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01869024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9765258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006407281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0319459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12414509},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4385961421","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v30i1.648","title":"IS THERE A PRIVATE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN MALAYSIA?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Tort; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Political science; Right to privacy; Trespass; Sources of law; Private law; Statute; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Liability","score_opus":0.02212602839253665,"score_gpt":0.3115844391723397,"score_spread":0.28945841077980305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385961421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2741132,0.040517565,0.004240319,0.31467637,0.0016653627,0.00006761045,0.00033537304,0.0000970745,0.36428717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484063,0.012100223,0.0011846425,0.011530324,0.00019196865,0.000018826166,0.00004025075,0.000016374326,0.02651116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978788,0.00079176226,0.000116166666,0.00025238105,0.00051415816,0.00044676202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863607,0.00047011304,0.00041091812,0.0001404571,0.00018065773,0.00016166973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016061333,0.00024696265,0.00022631262,0.00060903176,0.004333187,0.009036329,0.0005899576,0.0027330024,0.0031697915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035976341,0.00028721776,0.00018784721,0.0008172169,0.010972703,0.007244102,0.0026286058,0.0037251934,0.0005955373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031609485,0.00003128705,0.00596336,0.00028077097,0.000010930032,0.0012781837,0.022127375,0.0003182796,0.0005922564,0.8968634,0.015892725,0.05660979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013332227,0.00010439034,0.024724856,0.002411251,0.000036733643,0.0036592388,0.052539445,0.0012041563,0.0019635046,0.29168487,0.6215032,0.00015499239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028148394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029310461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028148394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055948333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009131974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05596906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}