{"meta":{"query_hash":"f6239f85fc41","filters":{"venue":"ISSI"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f6239f85fc41","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=ISSI"},"results":[{"id":"W2293584438","doi":"","title":"Founding concepts and foundational work: Establishing the framework for the use of acknowledgments as indicators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Multidisciplinary approach; Credibility; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Publication; Value (mathematics); Data science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8371206012614246,"score_gpt":0.631173726372103,"score_spread":0.20594687488932162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293584438","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091007255,0.017947141,0.6730813,0.07562769,0.0014638746,0.002374977,0.00087398523,0.00060311623,0.13702065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6839466,0.0034977538,0.30496934,0.0016003137,0.00031570837,0.0035409457,0.00043598237,0.00019994813,0.0014933451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85762143,0.11050071,0.008948751,0.008829779,0.011480077,0.002619334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6608806,0.26666906,0.022705998,0.01991696,0.024478886,0.005348481],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1675246,0.0013974765,0.0016482922,0.04067468,0.010865757,0.023977965,0.005527372,0.004621838,0.0026999705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2442438,0.0011909623,0.0015776143,0.027764548,0.08946676,0.049810335,0.01636851,0.005505994,0.00050484383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002002371,0.0000322964,0.004041712,0.0005200057,0.000029192872,0.00010276978,0.08002224,0.0003024775,0.00013551583,0.8803556,0.0013302984,0.033107903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002195903,0.000039311675,0.0025792283,0.002323711,0.000040707164,0.0001481892,0.054430407,0.0014566325,0.0003115665,0.89159393,0.047000803,0.00005352566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004305369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032750554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017311295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020803427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8859654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394801617","doi":"","title":"Is there a gender gap in social media metrics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Citation; Visibility; Dissemination; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Data science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9068326217978037,"score_gpt":0.6403701424126986,"score_spread":0.26646247938510503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394801617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.859405,0.018365828,0.009848325,0.029151697,0.0012553668,0.00023199283,0.007835484,0.00016347441,0.07374286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199486,0.0017438855,0.0014911315,0.0012329037,0.00032504456,0.00014919463,0.0010803689,0.00007258543,0.0019100448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98510355,0.005646204,0.0013975401,0.0016087199,0.0052071577,0.0010368674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8865811,0.07018378,0.02078494,0.005299104,0.01438864,0.002762429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022029184,0.00031365652,0.00077344826,0.0055390066,0.0007460453,0.0039192946,0.0009134484,0.0007197017,0.0078053577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14017132,0.00020353173,0.0007333932,0.006296507,0.0014352669,0.004718226,0.0025418485,0.00061324274,0.0018846358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076061295,0.00016907959,0.7182458,0.0012334434,0.00052622095,0.00023200626,0.02030988,0.00016819393,0.0011035168,0.016563617,0.011009766,0.2296779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005037234,0.0005165804,0.8809584,0.0017690898,0.00026351342,0.0007335611,0.024936464,0.0009368745,0.0020304993,0.021149516,0.06656874,0.000086392225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027365203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027146782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011120108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013439294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11650282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395375875","doi":"","title":"Coming to Terms: A Discourse Epistemetrics Study of Article Abstracts from the Web of Science.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Metadiscourse; Adverbial; Framing (construction); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Data science; Psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07798617127179955,"score_gpt":0.3311430903026429,"score_spread":0.25315691903084336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395375875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91630274,0.009692752,0.035121012,0.002914486,0.0001841095,0.00036831928,0.0048473724,0.00015869536,0.0304106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697337,0.0027416523,0.018591462,0.00021860765,0.00018722306,0.00051292195,0.00439206,0.00011366499,0.0035085836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258876,0.0035976064,0.00082020334,0.0008035273,0.001979869,0.00021001878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9399558,0.04761338,0.0054510506,0.001857843,0.00390595,0.0012159795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008457203,0.00048342586,0.00055361306,0.024723366,0.003181107,0.0061171195,0.0007009626,0.0010151191,0.0024486517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06728952,0.00024715794,0.0005486327,0.032541268,0.0028790748,0.008058172,0.0041343668,0.0011831541,0.0006735441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008119792,0.00035413844,0.1639239,0.005369796,0.00030097287,0.0018958439,0.43078166,0.0020969426,0.015861068,0.087023936,0.010886662,0.28069308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009543185,0.00028001593,0.26591238,0.0021582218,0.00038694136,0.0024993217,0.32391647,0.01553336,0.009622871,0.08149334,0.297865,0.00023662312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045256037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006617715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029207726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024209714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04472649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399886288","doi":"","title":"Are scientists really publishing more","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Publishing; Research centre; Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.8258740596986458,"score_gpt":0.6279488991770902,"score_spread":0.19792516052155562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399886288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012444034,0.039006703,0.00076809234,0.40213102,0.09598714,0.00017979245,0.013378503,0.0013856909,0.43471894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10095833,0.04950437,0.0030042704,0.11039687,0.10913581,0.00031746825,0.013649395,0.0013132103,0.61172026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825404,0.0032179975,0.0015692498,0.0022087821,0.008424887,0.0020386558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.890743,0.019306399,0.013912961,0.008300388,0.03236332,0.03537391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085001355,0.0007239432,0.0016879723,0.00559116,0.0028324812,0.028681612,0.0014652454,0.0069524776,0.29861155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05987032,0.0007457763,0.0010501787,0.01724833,0.002160692,0.015489266,0.0029021115,0.002536911,0.10707089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008230336,0.000042816144,0.0035619247,0.0008529697,0.000057397527,0.00010494603,0.0003186683,0.000040580173,0.00031824963,0.005196435,0.92813164,0.06129208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051538922,0.000043582164,0.005438671,0.00025414792,0.00005230054,0.00016808456,0.0006737092,0.00004196343,0.00023409788,0.0025431376,0.99046004,0.000038809867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003007893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069689746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99440885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039147716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009248274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404055720","doi":"","title":"Re-citation Analysis: A Promising Method for Improving Citation Analysis for Research Evaluation, Knowledge Network Analysis, Knowledge Representation and Information Retrieval.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Computer science; Data science; Weighting; Representation (politics); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.7525166480474529,"score_gpt":0.6656323923442183,"score_spread":0.08688425570323455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404055720","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048656226,0.017486207,0.9454556,0.0036144897,0.001822473,0.0013273063,0.003662436,0.007576772,0.014189077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0860462,0.013486425,0.87698996,0.00076117757,0.0021817973,0.0018557439,0.00403084,0.0027268422,0.011921011],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94640183,0.02804085,0.0049023246,0.0047454215,0.015252687,0.0006568615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8347558,0.089564234,0.019398447,0.025474349,0.029374419,0.0014327257],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052604057,0.003603956,0.00452878,0.07670572,0.0033058547,0.01257292,0.0054859566,0.003197546,0.014693068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20848875,0.0012356603,0.004018955,0.08386712,0.002533025,0.017243084,0.0042450805,0.004172037,0.010544672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112348855,0.00015022415,0.0065069865,0.0031764095,0.0013917545,0.00015156461,0.001469063,0.0049831048,0.0024281659,0.08821656,0.042886805,0.8485271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012708944,0.00022119773,0.016797042,0.0022166842,0.0012443529,0.0012140874,0.0014666711,0.12178738,0.011260894,0.52657604,0.316354,0.0007345415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057019265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008087749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038076637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056041395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2782002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406374727","doi":"","title":"Is paper uncitedness a function of the alphabet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Audience measurement; Presentation (obstetrics); Computer science; Information retrieval; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Order (exchange); Visibility; Citation impact; Product (mathematics); Advertising; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.03159327343030376,"score_gpt":0.2817840549621772,"score_spread":0.2501907815318734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406374727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070325464,0.01368707,0.022097645,0.07223521,0.0601772,0.00062990625,0.03172826,0.006773409,0.7223458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60230863,0.012517611,0.018710403,0.016339336,0.028688012,0.0009868316,0.018418688,0.008653187,0.29337722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554093,0.010352765,0.0070909373,0.006308326,0.018080933,0.002757802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5704872,0.21892329,0.053784363,0.054975227,0.084210396,0.01761954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017098503,0.0007131059,0.0018436015,0.009484405,0.003406112,0.028432857,0.0026679006,0.0022457105,0.20787105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26950178,0.0007006797,0.0007084885,0.02229665,0.0035270047,0.008887486,0.004557593,0.0021580502,0.11457037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011104727,0.00015986971,0.02947769,0.0022178076,0.00012858369,0.000597269,0.0031516862,0.0007744952,0.0024532485,0.07158465,0.53438646,0.35395786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010658871,0.0001611933,0.023074446,0.0016041864,0.00006310254,0.00078500895,0.0030700564,0.00071440433,0.0022367823,0.04161617,0.9264892,0.000078927755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014712429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007693509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042095734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00472378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.695398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406390257","doi":"","title":"Is the year of first publication a good proxy of scholars’ academic age?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Bibliometrics; Demography; Library science; Sociology; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.052212513415970496,"score_gpt":0.33115455055842813,"score_spread":0.27894203714245763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406390257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66293377,0.09823142,0.040731117,0.02140967,0.0071635423,0.000653282,0.052881815,0.0007544305,0.11524099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94592077,0.0146120675,0.015222124,0.0009618678,0.0026640643,0.0003296767,0.00863384,0.0001648051,0.011490804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894192,0.0038489916,0.0018955185,0.0012735409,0.002881739,0.0006809629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7851704,0.09573833,0.0695655,0.013885141,0.026234565,0.009406062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021928385,0.0003486081,0.0011691076,0.011415379,0.0011736203,0.006354062,0.0017627111,0.0010000898,0.011159168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11663342,0.00027608208,0.00083366834,0.026145006,0.0012356295,0.00633008,0.0016385175,0.0010033117,0.00438479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000469562,0.00012540637,0.815317,0.002482137,0.00049382896,0.0001944148,0.0038832247,0.00065872876,0.00082897674,0.012105066,0.022695826,0.14074588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035820238,0.00030127788,0.88751215,0.0009874909,0.00023045766,0.0005231182,0.0028814466,0.0010742352,0.0010050093,0.0071436423,0.09819388,0.00011144874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011727887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016254792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98858464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002459669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004493119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11596978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407021461","doi":"","title":"A Computer System for Automatic Evaluation of Researchers' Performance.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Competition (biology); Data science","score_opus":0.9069353518281346,"score_gpt":0.6606327712208294,"score_spread":0.24630258060730514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407021461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03212789,0.0020702584,0.54979396,0.0007757474,0.000816331,0.0037968098,0.03370402,0.35967183,0.01724307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27829677,0.0009281566,0.6600962,0.00067939394,0.00058363355,0.007923979,0.031289313,0.003265426,0.016937021],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332774,0.002005911,0.0009240725,0.0015284583,0.0020172612,0.00019644809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711,0.00571883,0.001438018,0.0016669923,0.003632474,0.00043381544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066541834,0.001529385,0.0016997877,0.010989892,0.000803938,0.0022384718,0.0012318669,0.0011870617,0.021716118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020918652,0.0005427545,0.0006421118,0.006819513,0.0004081616,0.0025984182,0.0016945992,0.00093542325,0.014972459],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015666186,0.00041874475,0.016149597,0.0011567186,0.00040763363,0.0002476886,0.00042920356,0.0039731613,0.022764012,0.00419027,0.13388816,0.81480813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327444,0.0016143741,0.11062307,0.00062864664,0.00071816426,0.0017981627,0.00053784024,0.48221466,0.090180196,0.02464083,0.28501996,0.0006966658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026644063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019927307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012646139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017116357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07264763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595390790","doi":"","title":"Factors Influencing Research Collaboration in LIS Schools in South Africa.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Medical education; Library science; Productivity; Population; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.25248562943239067,"score_gpt":0.44592799755904416,"score_spread":0.1934423681266535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595390790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922226,0.0010713651,0.00057345006,0.0025427444,0.000021793905,0.00012458034,0.00005523961,0.000020857979,0.0033674217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850357,0.00034913083,0.00059747335,0.00015149462,0.000010341154,0.00005409167,0.000017002674,0.0000029897005,0.00031399037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739838,0.015959976,0.0027084104,0.0012315873,0.0029323718,0.0031837414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90856737,0.035446126,0.03465307,0.0019871227,0.0041612117,0.015185122],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017593747,0.00034349365,0.0007055999,0.004137055,0.00946603,0.0056892885,0.00087514037,0.0011922948,0.0046444596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05523145,0.00054087286,0.00041292034,0.0046151215,0.002863713,0.0026810456,0.0064313067,0.00094455155,0.00036987726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025368718,0.00030792967,0.6681789,0.0009998352,0.00011555812,0.0021809945,0.26919547,0.00024883013,0.0013873305,0.0017453624,0.0013994926,0.05398665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006300249,0.00056048797,0.543893,0.00076712045,0.00008087905,0.0013580864,0.43181884,0.00044529658,0.00071134546,0.0021700428,0.018063001,0.00006888616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006179575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011271153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98240626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005162581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022104569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09304571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962952465","doi":"","title":"When is an article actually published? An analysis of online availability, publication, and indexation dates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Citation; Computer science; Proxy (statistics); Library science; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Information retrieval; Data science; Political science","score_opus":0.5826787799852704,"score_gpt":0.5603896212238578,"score_spread":0.022289158761412575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962952465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92705333,0.01896864,0.005518388,0.0016589491,0.0009076111,0.00024094986,0.016585799,0.0002787483,0.028787535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727156,0.0071929656,0.006628253,0.00010642006,0.00063745625,0.00015402347,0.008502096,0.00019192895,0.0038711862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98053074,0.0041107372,0.0038410802,0.0015179515,0.009144267,0.00085517723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72961926,0.18267171,0.046863437,0.008257637,0.028122686,0.0044653285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01767483,0.00040193732,0.0010042628,0.028515458,0.0017803869,0.009609266,0.001256888,0.0008994379,0.0038161867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16211875,0.00035890818,0.0010173275,0.043133408,0.001590795,0.0067790076,0.0027795872,0.0011834939,0.0024196059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037521205,0.0003173577,0.736861,0.003734993,0.0009357313,0.003052899,0.006092428,0.0032063227,0.00544795,0.022124877,0.011942669,0.20253173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050334416,0.00038361835,0.9130961,0.0007168284,0.00048530338,0.00263874,0.0074158,0.0051594866,0.0039231866,0.0083226105,0.057642326,0.00016572043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020046302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018124484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015359451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015816528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09347457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}