{"meta":{"query_hash":"5dc8efedd616","filters":{"venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal"},"cohort_total":126,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":126,"exported":126,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5dc8efedd616","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Impact+Assessment+and+Project+Appraisal"},"results":[{"id":"W1497473710","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12959673796047","title":"A case study on visual impact assessment for wind energy development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Turbine; Representativeness heuristic; Computer science; Environmental science; Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Meteorology; Marine engineering; Geography; Statistics; Aerospace engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06841276669516808,"score_gpt":0.505626086374285,"score_spread":0.4372133196791169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497473710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94658136,0.00009159699,0.007874869,0.00079124526,0.000024558476,0.0008721117,0.00027844502,0.000059065736,0.043426618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98343486,0.00015022756,0.009486713,0.00004354648,0.000004489455,0.0001378208,0.00013181163,0.000011358706,0.0065992516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981331,0.001091626,0.00004666605,0.00009590057,0.00042265846,0.00021004058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716175,0.00161065,0.00013621512,0.00020967057,0.0006841,0.00019768688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098581,0.0003805183,0.00017456946,0.0006387797,0.0032639555,0.0010861031,0.0007105634,0.0008951733,0.0033173016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058809435,0.00016881396,0.0003802853,0.001071674,0.0010725248,0.00063977746,0.00083848904,0.0005737069,0.0002556045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014639593,0.004516866,0.27328855,0.0011224223,0.00015432293,0.035091206,0.09815675,0.25597712,0.017835287,0.033035606,0.023307867,0.25605017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051988935,0.004789278,0.26290622,0.0006494351,0.00020566754,0.006508708,0.2877545,0.19457555,0.022617491,0.011935084,0.20727639,0.00026179999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24414417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56268895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24414417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004192066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4854462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545257550","doi":"10.3152/147154602781766609","title":"Catalysing more debate on environmental impact assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.02599969824558375,"score_gpt":0.38530487902509214,"score_spread":0.3593051807795084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545257550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001391551,0.010621367,0.003273952,0.94970334,0.017125735,0.000021491669,0.00005056825,0.00003456136,0.017777529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084394455,0.010977597,0.008071266,0.8282103,0.0489351,0.00021558235,0.0001404895,0.00023329961,0.018821962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92637354,0.03032872,0.003109497,0.006178957,0.029691413,0.0043179244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68026173,0.26491058,0.008799312,0.012543963,0.024187716,0.0092967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10824397,0.0015904375,0.0037561597,0.0071807834,0.010229176,0.026347023,0.0077979057,0.07744158,0.025209319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2057399,0.0009384929,0.002741299,0.0063170753,0.041539095,0.0447046,0.024390176,0.073417656,0.003520796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000737699,0.000094279116,0.00023096478,0.0005976847,0.00006846541,0.00016669216,0.003287376,0.0005136604,0.0005651468,0.81920975,0.15036651,0.024825765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091657006,0.000025230473,0.00046441716,0.00083862065,0.0000463763,0.00007085075,0.0033049637,0.00031197385,0.00035085762,0.50833863,0.4861078,0.000048672868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067902277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007083039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10824397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012576219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015852323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57245564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1871264458","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811","title":"Good practices for environmental assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Best practice; Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0621692164262263,"score_gpt":0.4533310130022999,"score_spread":0.3911617965760736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1871264458","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054744408,0.02914391,0.6089725,0.14242418,0.004252073,0.00443115,0.000607887,0.002005242,0.20268857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051673483,0.015383865,0.9029459,0.011986366,0.00050443626,0.0028680905,0.0004572261,0.0005656375,0.01361505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8218236,0.10783222,0.016430788,0.0080166245,0.042981327,0.0029154876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78228456,0.113042824,0.0084740175,0.032797366,0.059192043,0.0042091836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12210195,0.0031660404,0.0021467898,0.014051539,0.008924499,0.01587204,0.0073381322,0.0078770835,0.0059404466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15349607,0.0016115637,0.0029139302,0.010920122,0.02697377,0.012331895,0.013825596,0.01696665,0.0049941554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048242047,0.00038273493,0.002855634,0.004951062,0.00014528254,0.00064511853,0.024883922,0.004674701,0.0017506338,0.51027197,0.081480876,0.36790982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025786068,0.0000811248,0.0019075844,0.007803658,0.000051930125,0.00057134504,0.008510845,0.0010665109,0.0010745319,0.33223996,0.64652944,0.00013733063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01766393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024881357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12210195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016350385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040702205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64574456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963956778","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2012.720417","title":"In full retreat: the Canadian government's new environmental assessment law undoes decades of progress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Environmental law; Environmental impact assessment; Government (linguistics); National Environmental Policy Act; Political science; Environmental planning; Law; Secrecy; Environmental science","score_opus":0.017880340057326395,"score_gpt":0.3691445659852049,"score_spread":0.3512642259278785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963956778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035258874,0.010369187,0.01776271,0.46477625,0.0046402807,0.0002202805,0.0006421723,0.0008345789,0.46549568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4282963,0.0057661347,0.02537904,0.17436774,0.0007292039,0.0001882093,0.0006282139,0.00063988566,0.3640053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96958345,0.002020707,0.000612209,0.0018587587,0.02245645,0.00346841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97610897,0.0036502827,0.0006594904,0.0021802417,0.014637082,0.0027639302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018487552,0.0005726577,0.0006986244,0.0018671091,0.017550034,0.014509368,0.004263855,0.00469057,0.009150134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030182552,0.0005419928,0.0008445193,0.0027025563,0.022157775,0.006009506,0.005879193,0.010801312,0.0013209004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084515734,0.00006800584,0.004484306,0.0002752212,0.000052836873,0.0003171112,0.019519042,0.0008588299,0.0018281987,0.47111845,0.3185775,0.18281595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015601627,0.000031868993,0.0057943286,0.00018895163,0.000023695222,0.00007532136,0.004735724,0.00029614609,0.00034246285,0.025744893,0.96266973,0.00008123384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96813947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26686344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66819185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965954627","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12913679730430","title":"Strategic environmental assessment and regional infrastructure planning: the case of York Region, Ontario, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Strategic planning; Environmental resource management; Regional planning; Key (lock); Land-use planning; Process management; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Land use; Urban planning; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Environmental science; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.04770825696261199,"score_gpt":0.3385388613908895,"score_spread":0.2908306044282775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965954627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67463756,0.005511657,0.0026867026,0.014964551,0.00011299064,0.00051168905,0.00087370747,0.00007449034,0.3006266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403804,0.0023724034,0.002121848,0.00051851396,0.000013418493,0.00009395671,0.00020042474,0.000024615578,0.05427428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812883,0.00036067472,0.000050458057,0.00011518394,0.00042682758,0.00091800734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799925,0.0005456159,0.000110252666,0.00006664814,0.00058452727,0.0006936953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010099083,0.00027383651,0.00022715553,0.0008622031,0.013565473,0.004470504,0.0014401692,0.0016197436,0.006354706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027692597,0.00039892035,0.00035355927,0.0031365976,0.0035705261,0.0011361549,0.0019309684,0.0013139454,0.00036319497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005616429,0.00037010378,0.12757805,0.0012906888,0.00023078859,0.04483258,0.15753959,0.055779535,0.0040740315,0.39468274,0.08634456,0.12671575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019499926,0.000205253,0.13078587,0.0007164861,0.0001718545,0.0024074533,0.2855932,0.018960895,0.0011842818,0.015674371,0.54383636,0.00026888607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99919933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11188809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11188809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1231799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8118087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966395818","doi":"10.3152/147154602781766636","title":"Provisions for more meaningful public participation still elusive in proposed Canadian EA Bill","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Statute; Public engagement; Documentation; Public participation; Political science; Public relations; Key (lock); Public administration; Public involvement; First amendment; Law; Politics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.052236163678264474,"score_gpt":0.4016952834435752,"score_spread":0.34945911976531074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966395818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43752486,0.0021341678,0.011105995,0.1878043,0.001610896,0.0026117952,0.0012501987,0.0003963017,0.3555615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91105926,0.0007733065,0.012432299,0.027898222,0.00017871572,0.0010869853,0.00032877937,0.00013302347,0.046109397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93195915,0.013444485,0.0024243777,0.0030322429,0.03030621,0.018833496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277565,0.037115563,0.002685575,0.0038458079,0.024948778,0.0036478562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04902508,0.0005272417,0.00081189844,0.0025841692,0.029925006,0.019291118,0.0037550817,0.008311529,0.006511672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113977514,0.00091282855,0.00092213094,0.004874076,0.010727726,0.006953393,0.0058115125,0.010828638,0.0005184045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024978645,0.0004726906,0.016706513,0.00072865945,0.0000635906,0.002111269,0.28591827,0.0024142843,0.0049300245,0.48026267,0.07337529,0.132767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065468776,0.00018594891,0.062443975,0.0009080633,0.00010472981,0.00021601927,0.26129475,0.0016620185,0.002495116,0.017232522,0.6530317,0.0003596678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92585045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95553005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86980486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13019514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32264087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969816098","doi":"10.3152/147154601781766916","title":"Improving the practice of cumulative effects assessment in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Cumulative effects; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.012894370751067908,"score_gpt":0.3700254697543543,"score_spread":0.3571310990032864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969816098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102979995,0.17068118,0.22128718,0.17721872,0.0042465604,0.012841585,0.0032199442,0.0033343493,0.30419043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6208885,0.050037757,0.29737756,0.009504622,0.00035567762,0.0035553267,0.0008365199,0.00061987044,0.01682424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8248724,0.06802426,0.014300201,0.007922879,0.07955263,0.00532766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4676337,0.15552759,0.014060874,0.017090483,0.33934474,0.006342543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19210206,0.0011731705,0.0017364342,0.03554162,0.014220219,0.015066505,0.00797678,0.0024624823,0.0035226298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3149758,0.0012321163,0.0014089517,0.024681613,0.009711438,0.005187259,0.009274956,0.003846026,0.0004533806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020507733,0.00012421451,0.012086648,0.008165454,0.00028226708,0.00070200785,0.056468874,0.0066510583,0.002093046,0.043503717,0.05449342,0.8152243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019693337,0.0002939668,0.04418994,0.021326132,0.00076888007,0.00045285778,0.044931673,0.005502264,0.0058518923,0.030517926,0.8452329,0.0007346777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95014966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9595204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17534293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45051175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973671232","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765156","title":"Pipeline risk assessment and risk acceptance criteria in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Pipeline (software); Pipeline transport; Gas pipeline; Environmental planning; Environmental risk assessment; Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Computer security; Petroleum engineering; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.013208319109909081,"score_gpt":0.3741594709003193,"score_spread":0.3609511517904102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973671232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84898186,0.0016664601,0.08246842,0.0026145652,0.00002701736,0.00030297815,0.00042690968,0.00020152557,0.06331029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906723,0.00023759685,0.008206587,0.000018267328,0.000004019008,0.00003997062,0.00006882173,0.000008673236,0.0007437733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953908,0.0018425294,0.00047882018,0.0002649496,0.0017433632,0.00027954835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689526,0.0067218426,0.002156742,0.0003692251,0.0035573246,0.00029960062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058386014,0.00040712036,0.00028869865,0.0038890108,0.001120934,0.002418393,0.0005896605,0.0005769215,0.0011836755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018923309,0.00029944812,0.00044622607,0.0018801043,0.0015325944,0.0012078902,0.0015304484,0.00047984323,0.0000994311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002626148,0.00020256097,0.33151263,0.0010237346,0.00021619727,0.0025551722,0.020412216,0.10552076,0.010891332,0.26185077,0.0043378687,0.2612142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007341075,0.00079236866,0.36252072,0.0018411732,0.00033243757,0.004906191,0.03397288,0.34005818,0.010475927,0.1704555,0.07422812,0.0003430539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04128192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046799093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04128192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030258289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036204967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082083225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973679888","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12959673796209","title":"Application of a contribution to sustainability test by the Joint Review Panel for the Canadian Mackenzie Gas Project","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Pace; Equity (law); Test (biology); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.04436771655261382,"score_gpt":0.38357150068032475,"score_spread":0.3392037841277109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973679888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04744562,0.035784908,0.043326385,0.48081005,0.04291623,0.057159927,0.006505312,0.001279641,0.28477198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33740175,0.019346606,0.17202465,0.19265257,0.01523124,0.053373322,0.006433328,0.0011912016,0.20234531],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6083067,0.11066518,0.03566554,0.009153505,0.22156094,0.014648111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2868967,0.13620716,0.02023667,0.02166671,0.5176158,0.017376963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.41886878,0.0013136814,0.0019901262,0.010993754,0.0103381295,0.012674171,0.0071710604,0.0149377715,0.00311794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42389423,0.001864477,0.0026844903,0.008234451,0.0056245285,0.00357123,0.0064399485,0.0075237653,0.0014422546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048990874,0.00020219514,0.009765898,0.004417319,0.0004525552,0.00092767214,0.0070446255,0.0016830572,0.0048089335,0.032561168,0.8138164,0.12383026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021305299,0.00026692473,0.01686971,0.0039568017,0.0005288145,0.00014805143,0.0014413048,0.0013991011,0.0026494137,0.003913403,0.968258,0.00035534322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3460697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49880618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6539303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04598936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29687837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71663827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974548048","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2013.833408","title":"Science requisites for cumulative effects assessment for wetlands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Cumulative effects; Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Natural (archaeology); Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Environmental planning; Function (biology); Habitat; Conceptual framework; Landscape ecology; Geography; Ecology; Political science","score_opus":0.022812872053358028,"score_gpt":0.40801177587980314,"score_spread":0.3851989038264451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974548048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021223845,0.0035578893,0.8862021,0.024820987,0.00061056647,0.0016211894,0.0021493703,0.0015702733,0.058243763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27733776,0.006410177,0.7028567,0.0038148803,0.00093954033,0.0017079399,0.0023291355,0.00020206443,0.004401883],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867235,0.004918166,0.0012122461,0.00106052,0.0057468154,0.00033882307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90023834,0.053647324,0.0055043,0.011799026,0.0266846,0.0021264157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034882966,0.0007844798,0.001477796,0.0038411021,0.0019591984,0.0042192866,0.0021871035,0.0031328218,0.0072361915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09146246,0.0006995575,0.0016706914,0.0022202125,0.0039083487,0.0073249517,0.0031529,0.0060825357,0.001666611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029069645,0.0011183565,0.034220036,0.0021129246,0.00023459292,0.0006433902,0.00084582897,0.07941673,0.015937785,0.30370355,0.030351864,0.5311242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010433476,0.00084625685,0.030170282,0.0011341607,0.00016833919,0.00041976958,0.0010544395,0.057061095,0.013314075,0.77133745,0.12416174,0.0002281625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073430035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011107474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034882966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029978002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013614943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18448097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976959358","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2014.941233","title":"First steps toward best practice SEA in a developing nation: lessons from the central Namib uranium rush SEA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Strategic environmental assessment; Baseline (sea); Environmental planning; Process (computing); Good practice; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental science; Environmental impact assessment; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.041975443834939966,"score_gpt":0.3902467384809496,"score_spread":0.34827129464600964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976959358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4785977,0.009801251,0.037593108,0.31202784,0.0006733242,0.00096255046,0.00010481084,0.00022400134,0.16001529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378718,0.0030300054,0.047417313,0.0067696664,0.000034015142,0.0003159347,0.00004247824,0.00005700622,0.004461699],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672636,0.026630072,0.000948757,0.0007335843,0.0022404506,0.0021836285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717121,0.017035156,0.0017417184,0.0017112629,0.0044256193,0.003374124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04602473,0.0006387831,0.000531222,0.0014241529,0.010340609,0.012146959,0.00285229,0.003986967,0.003427038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03727665,0.00047497108,0.00035434376,0.0021470555,0.010676368,0.009344482,0.010972159,0.0047982037,0.00051677006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015323695,0.00087739364,0.017747413,0.0016328074,0.00004666493,0.0051407707,0.5103661,0.002251805,0.0025620826,0.10647667,0.015276745,0.3374684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032260647,0.00028902196,0.008646349,0.0028772021,0.000013539838,0.000548186,0.7814561,0.0009770198,0.0014371277,0.056704637,0.14694753,0.00007097387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022208389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07208928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04602473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013120851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041761447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24340492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977649703","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2012.736761","title":"Taking a learning approach to community-based strategic environmental assessment: results from a Costa Rican case study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Adult and Continuing Education Topics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Saint-Boniface","funders":"","keywords":"Social learning; Natural resource; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Process (computing); Strategic planning; Natural resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Process management; Business; Knowledge management; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11254449290694839,"score_gpt":0.47197031057406763,"score_spread":0.35942581766711923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977649703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816151,0.000082644816,0.0010243296,0.0010406916,0.00000478816,0.0002912237,0.000019530858,0.00001705638,0.01590452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945397,0.00017696002,0.0020574466,0.00016868823,0.0000035477142,0.00017155183,0.000022574884,0.0000074742984,0.0028522064],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929016,0.005356618,0.00011568927,0.00028080004,0.000613985,0.00073133694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937541,0.0034089154,0.0004180769,0.00047418007,0.0010732439,0.000871522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008856744,0.00041448398,0.0002229882,0.0008752921,0.006777887,0.0022334538,0.0016559126,0.0014870528,0.0020316637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011053427,0.00020349836,0.0002539401,0.0010355746,0.0029464583,0.0014628001,0.004311483,0.0012717473,0.00032891965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001821597,0.0035805188,0.04653227,0.00036555543,0.000033275486,0.005978745,0.79322,0.0027640807,0.0017743763,0.0052583884,0.0029663027,0.13734433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007749059,0.000792497,0.040601473,0.00026895374,0.000034542165,0.0010881185,0.9104418,0.0038568766,0.0018898165,0.0021348195,0.038755905,0.00005770255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065808326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16616532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065808326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065309433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13085055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980728239","doi":"10.3152/146155107x205841","title":"Methods for addressing climate change uncertainties in project environmental impact assessments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Probabilistic logic; Task (project management); Hydroelectricity; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Uncertainty analysis; Computer science; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Political science; Engineering; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.09892865842511665,"score_gpt":0.5297106865921889,"score_spread":0.43078202816707223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980728239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010036143,0.000381842,0.9952172,0.0003256687,0.000028668097,0.00016221212,0.00006412712,0.00009900143,0.0027176873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.071229145,0.0019983635,0.92251176,0.00018347488,0.00015750773,0.0019989698,0.0001693207,0.00012213438,0.0016292686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97566956,0.018084198,0.0007307458,0.0007354642,0.0044898707,0.00029012223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9329182,0.059822414,0.0025955585,0.001714627,0.0026558184,0.00029338902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032545898,0.002420299,0.0013837899,0.008197705,0.0014139392,0.0038682423,0.0028912136,0.0020605116,0.006598946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08616674,0.0011263309,0.0020801025,0.0056109433,0.0028407206,0.0048916945,0.0037868565,0.0041107377,0.0006926695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052952175,0.000090760885,0.0016168549,0.00058670936,0.00028905517,0.00017269196,0.00085787504,0.33486274,0.00070665346,0.43759045,0.0036291324,0.21954413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004222323,0.00005938517,0.00064112496,0.00040722644,0.00007797551,0.00015343609,0.0004275479,0.37143108,0.0007602937,0.6120579,0.013833117,0.000108615146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044969367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005980531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032545898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026228253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035845325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17212123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982897901","doi":"10.3152/147154602781766852","title":"Citizen values assessment: incorporating citizens' value judgements in environmental impact assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Christian ministry; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Public participation; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Social impact assessment; Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02318428785223445,"score_gpt":0.3718999917146643,"score_spread":0.34871570386242984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982897901","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12031637,0.0008907467,0.7952341,0.0027240543,0.00022612295,0.0014278484,0.00069449836,0.00061211287,0.077874094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.527884,0.0004972922,0.4664213,0.00018038457,0.00004014914,0.0008249961,0.00037650196,0.000099720666,0.0036756783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821432,0.012972402,0.00078095245,0.00060282956,0.003103437,0.00039721414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705546,0.020826707,0.0018888391,0.001762542,0.0042553754,0.0007119371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017213333,0.0011130914,0.0008368906,0.0053813965,0.0019093897,0.008350181,0.001230445,0.0018845118,0.0046207397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058058847,0.0006204536,0.001067974,0.005989949,0.002819183,0.008288956,0.004754859,0.0024654544,0.0007259875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000325048,0.0008708617,0.026493313,0.0013031582,0.00028092088,0.00074269733,0.025753753,0.05263518,0.0033777908,0.15792201,0.009361677,0.7209337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015420906,0.0005934801,0.025802309,0.0020449662,0.0003111065,0.0009266249,0.02994465,0.34762457,0.0076291324,0.49412814,0.09032392,0.0005169213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007878592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015192366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017213333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030442711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045454446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091033876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991456340","doi":"10.3152/147154602781766564","title":"Strategic resolution of policy, environmental and socio-economic impacts in Canadian Arctic diamond mining: BHP's NWT diamond project","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Multinational corporation; Interdependence; Environmental impact assessment; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Diamond; Corporation; Process (computing); The arctic; Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Public administration; Environmental science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.031212046379266327,"score_gpt":0.34996803828355993,"score_spread":0.3187559919042936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991456340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38211855,0.015085252,0.010614114,0.25360492,0.0017453773,0.0021952386,0.00125217,0.0002660215,0.3331184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81132156,0.010492863,0.022499792,0.01302003,0.00016546379,0.0005607038,0.0009301851,0.000058808346,0.1409506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910568,0.0014282353,0.00019191239,0.00028318434,0.0040699583,0.0029699479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535584,0.00077015866,0.00013010217,0.00011767222,0.0022208476,0.0014054547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010301764,0.00044426916,0.00024057152,0.0017345721,0.024228027,0.006364137,0.0018768832,0.0038171639,0.0019583297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006542909,0.00038334788,0.00040846167,0.0022483382,0.0056028557,0.00093632477,0.004667422,0.0024545186,0.0002252155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029931302,0.00042845917,0.023007447,0.0011257123,0.00012084808,0.006771417,0.04629783,0.029490978,0.009497492,0.2858016,0.3224439,0.27471507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069310794,0.00009755456,0.036234677,0.00025885587,0.00004280058,0.00044266589,0.07569703,0.004239271,0.0033216127,0.021519484,0.8579025,0.00017424765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98331326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08671202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08671202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41131708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62914264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991784046","doi":"10.3152/146155109x465931","title":"The Victor Diamond Mine environmental assessment process: a critical First Nation perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Environmental planning; Government (linguistics); Environmental impact assessment; First nation; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental protection; Public administration; Archaeology; Law; Environmental science; Indigenous","score_opus":0.0199031780014601,"score_gpt":0.39446674290047795,"score_spread":0.3745635648990179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991784046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08919039,0.012823146,0.036646247,0.4554806,0.0012105528,0.0013506599,0.00015763851,0.00009192574,0.40304884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91777617,0.004838439,0.025098845,0.020449508,0.00018747714,0.0007037581,0.00007452647,0.000060539867,0.030810736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690142,0.020466147,0.0009455352,0.0014679244,0.0047417413,0.0033643611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169106,0.056579523,0.0024217335,0.0012708844,0.018194208,0.004623015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0563581,0.0005551258,0.0006091174,0.0031516878,0.027517699,0.027505096,0.003780652,0.008631402,0.0037716473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054582052,0.0006028708,0.000517919,0.0020431946,0.03638703,0.011861584,0.0072092894,0.008640918,0.0002703281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038376624,0.00009259687,0.004457767,0.0006910207,0.000020131369,0.002244109,0.27185285,0.0010723191,0.00071579224,0.6390828,0.033740323,0.045991957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135200435,0.000046860416,0.0030469764,0.0021351583,0.000022283344,0.00035578932,0.450416,0.00080780394,0.0011401784,0.1107299,0.431209,0.00007651019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.390766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4886481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.609234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0806899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15967937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77698296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992305533","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766518","title":"Are we on the verge of ecosystem failure?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.022643953407189405,"score_gpt":0.3447439421732535,"score_spread":0.3220999887660641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992305533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055073025,0.010400614,0.0018366842,0.97300714,0.0024654984,0.000008511532,0.000060838138,0.000044726337,0.00666863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61663306,0.059569433,0.009142711,0.28915182,0.010987253,0.00021844509,0.0002662291,0.00028893494,0.013742164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817594,0.0089213485,0.0007347335,0.0012098397,0.0039552427,0.0034194684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9054698,0.035384636,0.010107555,0.00400138,0.02216466,0.02287196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039792858,0.0007368831,0.0016024505,0.0021710661,0.00739033,0.017691461,0.002470695,0.014205735,0.01594392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17870633,0.00060569897,0.0006568381,0.0024847337,0.020696484,0.042726565,0.007316663,0.019681366,0.0048941784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003829221,0.00023789647,0.031220444,0.00065667025,0.00037694283,0.0014594871,0.010173134,0.00087931636,0.00039195758,0.14439273,0.48430762,0.3255209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042895328,0.00013331085,0.011854225,0.0018678802,0.00011484291,0.000826377,0.04612527,0.00065032416,0.00028314293,0.61645705,0.32145074,0.00019402127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015309819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039792858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040645073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0148345195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21044725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996209126","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765526","title":"Socio-economic effects monitoring: toward improvements informed by bio-physical effects monitoring","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Monitoring and evaluation; Data collection; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Ecology","score_opus":0.0195950242401423,"score_gpt":0.3971865903964389,"score_spread":0.3775915661562966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996209126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22021896,0.002111033,0.6593178,0.01876784,0.00016782258,0.0022438637,0.0017257294,0.0013047104,0.09414226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70146185,0.001199524,0.2931233,0.0006265173,0.000070377944,0.0008680324,0.0004927214,0.000055063607,0.0021026046],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914261,0.0056900936,0.00045390075,0.0004793057,0.001750984,0.00019962635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692273,0.017586425,0.005818822,0.0029125381,0.0040169843,0.00043785342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014870969,0.0010018327,0.00058098504,0.005416206,0.0007353987,0.0027094975,0.0015142558,0.0014864433,0.0022925963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038342293,0.00039062265,0.000370575,0.0026792893,0.0016796828,0.005177561,0.0029533822,0.0013050553,0.00055748486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035394635,0.00089782174,0.29132187,0.0014378437,0.00011923273,0.0009595172,0.004253832,0.050320797,0.007433475,0.052395746,0.0053667836,0.58513916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012138689,0.0006257762,0.5212622,0.0013785536,0.00019366959,0.0006630569,0.012401315,0.16302702,0.019294111,0.21777986,0.062995434,0.000257602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005443657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010749462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014870969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001657493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002816956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07864618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998248204","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2013.872849","title":"Strengthening impact assessment: what problems do integration and focus fix?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Witness; Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Environmental planning; Sustainable development; Engineering ethics; Political science; Process management; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Environmental resource management; Business; Law; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.017000830287150725,"score_gpt":0.37106046776711693,"score_spread":0.3540596374799662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998248204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025770908,0.037462376,0.15620226,0.7392133,0.003803888,0.000718323,0.00024612184,0.0012293366,0.035353456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5583016,0.028284801,0.2708312,0.12510276,0.003635431,0.0038718584,0.00037876985,0.0013191551,0.008274361],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7949998,0.12608862,0.011858866,0.010620303,0.04702744,0.00940499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59119296,0.25120032,0.03035718,0.03787248,0.07564527,0.013731768],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3046005,0.002999364,0.00408162,0.011986528,0.011983485,0.023189666,0.012529713,0.015224796,0.0062853345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3946177,0.0023860876,0.0023199508,0.009458472,0.031014906,0.07272559,0.030378278,0.013928165,0.003291751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002780383,0.0004452723,0.02683066,0.0059376042,0.00058610656,0.00049418537,0.0457767,0.0024658786,0.001721625,0.1527044,0.06283637,0.69992316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018945837,0.00044711155,0.018847123,0.014274696,0.0004679124,0.0009930165,0.06925574,0.004108085,0.0022241413,0.6823762,0.20625179,0.00056487456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023063464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017347217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3046005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018899938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04120424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8575514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001773702","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2012.731189","title":"Adaptation, flexibility and project decision-making with climate change uncertainties","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Regret; Adaptation (eye); Computer science; Climate change; Hydroelectricity; Minimax; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Management science; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.18276797419084226,"score_gpt":0.4250289897788029,"score_spread":0.24226101558796062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001773702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40424806,0.0036935434,0.5209447,0.010395201,0.00022800453,0.00024171814,0.00025172348,0.00016347328,0.05983361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838589,0.0005068623,0.0142628215,0.0001721469,0.000054506247,0.0000779183,0.000029918843,0.000015902966,0.0010210389],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99135685,0.006241643,0.00024216415,0.0006225853,0.00083203096,0.0007047254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985352,0.011465737,0.0015069018,0.0005902776,0.00048527922,0.00059983815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013153338,0.00078929344,0.00086713,0.00095862825,0.0010615861,0.0042748703,0.0011204627,0.0026317379,0.0019965873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027618002,0.0005701143,0.0009927952,0.0012383667,0.0037405465,0.0045238985,0.0026448974,0.002233291,0.00017484283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014751915,0.000038442726,0.002181655,0.00009876624,0.00012804434,0.00034330878,0.0003413947,0.85755295,0.00042492387,0.11821957,0.00061503815,0.019908309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035964516,0.00009825295,0.0032433218,0.00009613705,0.000043381155,0.0001349339,0.0005263218,0.39438885,0.00036428057,0.5974925,0.00349732,0.0000787845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029779703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027263097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013153338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002912383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014446863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069562376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002702948","doi":"10.3152/147154601781767140","title":"Virtual tools for complex problems: an overview of the<i>Atlas<sup>NW</sup></i>regional interactive sustainability atlas for planning for sustainable development.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Atlas (anatomy); Work (physics); Principal (computer security); Sustainable development; Computer science; Software; Gateway (web page); Environmental planning; Political science; Geography; Engineering; World Wide Web; Geology","score_opus":0.11083207834677196,"score_gpt":0.411668406908527,"score_spread":0.3008363285617551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002702948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050024725,0.13133971,0.53938293,0.0103943115,0.0014042371,0.00043368063,0.0018472383,0.008257419,0.30193803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05516413,0.1765101,0.60081035,0.0029866733,0.0009980217,0.0014753835,0.004681594,0.005031863,0.1523419],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876946,0.00045733337,0.00008262269,0.00009202042,0.0004916813,0.00010683354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977914,0.0013876053,0.000043742144,0.00024052146,0.00024992294,0.00028683586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023008161,0.0010439731,0.00052623247,0.002960224,0.001020616,0.0057567987,0.0019304997,0.001456328,0.026184767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003393747,0.0007760877,0.0009085576,0.004583307,0.0022726073,0.006824291,0.0031216952,0.0016008561,0.007845215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039526294,0.00012665131,0.0009489034,0.0027088956,0.00003124173,0.0003537511,0.0027991156,0.007037701,0.0023810314,0.16890934,0.24057887,0.57408506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061248656,0.00001749015,0.00051590067,0.00042367206,0.00000590784,0.00043982003,0.000475809,0.0018852185,0.0002611674,0.021190869,0.97475535,0.000022670469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01249517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030570915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026184767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020430526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028685248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087596774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004016325","doi":"10.3152/146155107x197913","title":"Cumulative effects assessments at Hydro-Québec: what have we learned?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; GDG Environnement","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Baseline (sea); Context (archaeology); Impact assessment; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.030447329914693608,"score_gpt":0.4229341934239487,"score_spread":0.3924868635092551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004016325","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22521377,0.38180178,0.058507945,0.2152928,0.0048179436,0.0010096176,0.01272309,0.0023357454,0.09829734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7508564,0.149883,0.053029027,0.01523059,0.00094966835,0.00030234686,0.0039024127,0.00025094626,0.025595594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685186,0.0006446469,0.000110416266,0.00041769375,0.0015165335,0.00045886103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97794014,0.0035836827,0.001010073,0.00080450164,0.014080475,0.002581227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007062932,0.0010259486,0.0006403124,0.0028103576,0.0021757798,0.0037785964,0.0030440483,0.0017384521,0.0063194344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012300247,0.00026139934,0.0008277466,0.00288758,0.0026798153,0.0029510958,0.0017947656,0.0018892401,0.00055326254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022910336,0.00019372694,0.06281161,0.002316781,0.00026166622,0.00045068815,0.0018132861,0.013885881,0.0023698094,0.009336415,0.05263115,0.8537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014347724,0.00074552273,0.3809538,0.0065684663,0.0005357553,0.00045575324,0.008378042,0.0086949775,0.006040529,0.013826974,0.5731256,0.0005311102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9632063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037683506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037683506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05563567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2734142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005274301","doi":"10.3152/147154600781767637","title":"Public involvement in environmental impact assessment: a case study of hydro development in Kullu District, Himachal Pradesh, India","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Public work; Business; Public participation; Impact assessment; Rock blasting; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.04758660532382856,"score_gpt":0.46546129621572047,"score_spread":0.4178746908918919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005274301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947761,0.000023940445,0.00020778297,0.00033195963,0.0000026510713,0.000079088764,0.000017665967,0.0000051469415,0.0045556133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987062,0.00005161639,0.00017050093,0.000038092945,0.0000024836947,0.000033346743,0.000008853096,0.0000017303502,0.0009871984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632794,0.0022064217,0.00007140494,0.00010952762,0.00031410324,0.0009705502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937785,0.004448406,0.00048696098,0.0002442584,0.00041840947,0.00062345533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028433397,0.00028142327,0.00021600997,0.0010700556,0.008591624,0.0020935922,0.0010729526,0.00097254023,0.0040950007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042596506,0.0003550153,0.00026090955,0.0013277403,0.0031599274,0.0008909586,0.0037679565,0.0014615915,0.00023005356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035442977,0.003630683,0.19413082,0.00046222232,0.000048909533,0.041516803,0.6915345,0.0024283906,0.0026773266,0.0068767993,0.003191642,0.05314754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003935345,0.00056703587,0.08448442,0.000060424267,0.000024427074,0.0016830146,0.901688,0.001115959,0.0011285743,0.0005606556,0.008617121,0.00003100415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0418831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093065426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040608356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003977699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083278656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005666718","doi":"10.3152/147154600781767547","title":"Reflections of an environmental assessment panel member","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Mill; Political science; Psychology; History; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04388709579160578,"score_gpt":0.43787032966398404,"score_spread":0.39398323387237827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005666718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026790582,0.0045176246,0.003774888,0.8991776,0.043473143,0.0001739197,0.00013439142,0.00013131707,0.02182652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28521648,0.007842838,0.006721844,0.58787924,0.022217315,0.00082935125,0.00026287834,0.00081943884,0.08821065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9585156,0.023705386,0.0011417698,0.003152284,0.0095814075,0.0039036947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368709,0.015652157,0.0028441062,0.0020466582,0.02586323,0.016722882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028981127,0.0009805878,0.0007495832,0.0013133266,0.017137358,0.011712521,0.0031065207,0.013112241,0.005085544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07483333,0.0011635504,0.0012000209,0.001162335,0.008305251,0.0074636093,0.011509566,0.03650133,0.0033650163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014558093,0.000273587,0.0024757045,0.0003324683,0.00006676759,0.0042810678,0.16159564,0.00057224033,0.0044257846,0.008087121,0.78284013,0.034903917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010678367,0.000092243055,0.00083627034,0.00028424972,0.000014889871,0.0007023654,0.11702448,0.00017196199,0.00085019664,0.0015224206,0.87838495,0.0001053284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081529785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076359315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028981127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067477697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008374492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1532687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005805455","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765264","title":"Towards a national strategic environmental assessment system in Lebanon","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Christian ministry; Sustainability; Mainstream; Environmental planning; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Environmental systems; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental impact assessment; Middle East; Strategic planning; Business; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.023133563706172835,"score_gpt":0.3678164069964494,"score_spread":0.3446828432902766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005805455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31277734,0.0061006015,0.19536725,0.07056845,0.0016565379,0.0034116544,0.0018447062,0.003522541,0.40475088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5972479,0.003599887,0.33593312,0.004131264,0.00025148547,0.0013115753,0.0024133893,0.00018637572,0.05492495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885373,0.0065164044,0.0011199152,0.0006319657,0.0021818522,0.0010126386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102646,0.0010105233,0.0006668768,0.00039129946,0.0058931615,0.0010117051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03171442,0.00048238022,0.00038487464,0.0053509553,0.00483487,0.011902756,0.0014948829,0.0017506458,0.004171213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009819947,0.00042692455,0.00029681783,0.003470961,0.0015620237,0.0059303893,0.0070260433,0.0017773878,0.0010006117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021895402,0.00047564015,0.023530602,0.00075702416,0.00006800017,0.0019255059,0.01974811,0.021915643,0.0066274544,0.32600677,0.05611972,0.54260665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009309901,0.00031216384,0.018926425,0.0016723141,0.00005480436,0.00048277676,0.031299625,0.032152645,0.006715879,0.07737213,0.83068806,0.00023006197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04167592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045870274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04167592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01583291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04221973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1677239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010694933","doi":"10.3152/147154602781766681","title":"Strategic environmental assessment of Canadian energy policy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental policy; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Business; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03579897882607014,"score_gpt":0.3620415772769312,"score_spread":0.32624259845086107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010694933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07618125,0.006058317,0.06949809,0.021948254,0.00034228724,0.0012358666,0.0027690877,0.000211722,0.8217552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8735399,0.0046420433,0.08628403,0.0010120254,0.00006294314,0.00047731074,0.00137539,0.000054004984,0.03255241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863008,0.0035734833,0.00032453184,0.0003242336,0.008358284,0.0011186919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421906,0.0006143991,0.00018900743,0.00014190334,0.004585454,0.00025015837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009513306,0.0009958309,0.00040347636,0.0066887056,0.0048154327,0.0066100745,0.001438897,0.0007923571,0.0046298057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010623854,0.00027296643,0.00053174124,0.006636242,0.0027931319,0.0013394802,0.0022135717,0.00089353125,0.00021184132],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005843511,0.000042919568,0.005126496,0.0004635844,0.0000799396,0.0001879268,0.0013721773,0.09856563,0.0011027805,0.7456324,0.033185024,0.11418261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047110756,0.0000981249,0.021066267,0.0016347119,0.00014071356,0.00012480114,0.011597335,0.10596334,0.0038037817,0.3394435,0.5158467,0.00023350526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91411805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95424753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08588195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078009106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.139257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5659983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015566308","doi":"10.3152/146155109x479459","title":"The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries: towards a better understanding","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Developing country; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Conceptual framework; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.02412784359048034,"score_gpt":0.34908476659601767,"score_spread":0.32495692300553736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015566308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81794506,0.005002384,0.0153049715,0.005425844,0.000054461005,0.00039223762,0.0004544004,0.000069001726,0.15535161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724483,0.00081850006,0.0015393313,0.000053409312,0.0000068568156,0.000045711688,0.000028186041,0.000005923947,0.00025713674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776954,0.014655586,0.0011477303,0.00079187425,0.0032353392,0.0024740077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94877815,0.033912867,0.0071878973,0.0018061876,0.006064858,0.0022500653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022808306,0.0009879665,0.0008973937,0.0046042544,0.0028308602,0.011436842,0.0009502279,0.0012263458,0.003111019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04844949,0.00050201337,0.000520553,0.0053197416,0.0075245663,0.01031029,0.007905657,0.0015390686,0.0002609469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005139635,0.0005351883,0.40788886,0.0036279694,0.00074475363,0.0014196457,0.041094486,0.06150052,0.0021013462,0.23693144,0.0028283529,0.24081345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010011809,0.0014639898,0.512948,0.005614301,0.0007738615,0.001096714,0.19949046,0.04041547,0.007509906,0.16027188,0.069801405,0.00051389507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010778658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009183279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022808306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010025736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007923033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12062323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023348403","doi":"10.3152/147154601781767212","title":"Into the fog? Stakeholder input in participatory impact assessment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Citizen journalism; Variety (cybernetics); Bottleneck; Public participation; Environmental planning; Project appraisal; Participatory rural appraisal; Stakeholder engagement; Participatory planning; Environmental resource management; Impact assessment; Participatory GIS; Stakeholder analysis; Plan (archaeology); Business; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Operations management; Geography; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.0662966634487145,"score_gpt":0.43343186303146797,"score_spread":0.3671351995827535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023348403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030329468,0.031655006,0.21384782,0.3303608,0.005342558,0.0008311278,0.00020156334,0.00032771923,0.38710395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82783586,0.017500559,0.08805568,0.037274115,0.0024672702,0.0021251498,0.00010033247,0.0004534593,0.024187548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8885718,0.09339012,0.0014841891,0.0037352706,0.009979005,0.0028396011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9139175,0.07325433,0.0024554743,0.004019524,0.004415249,0.0019380011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09586809,0.0009647134,0.0016685288,0.002460788,0.011954958,0.01915539,0.0032369536,0.009881301,0.011343149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12774886,0.0011749677,0.0008283412,0.003767799,0.045162145,0.039553475,0.021047724,0.009546704,0.0020444053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014866659,0.000086217646,0.0019193941,0.0009173983,0.000053981985,0.0006434152,0.04525729,0.0011374865,0.00031481872,0.81468415,0.02037054,0.11446658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040754057,0.00007898693,0.00043975151,0.0015815565,0.000018521223,0.00014598736,0.01679783,0.0013109789,0.00018444416,0.87811446,0.101244494,0.000042201995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006199879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009068058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09586809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007515438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.507005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024097429","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12913679730557","title":"A proposal for further strengthening science in environmental impact assessment in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Scholarship; Political science; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.022886969797324658,"score_gpt":0.35874806074706383,"score_spread":0.33586109094973915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024097429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008677649,0.0035332248,0.008766442,0.9066172,0.0042115473,0.00066575286,0.0002618494,0.00026878653,0.06699747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3573883,0.008704499,0.13339311,0.3757634,0.003196403,0.0016047604,0.000512566,0.000244503,0.11919248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544128,0.011087648,0.0025435414,0.0038230664,0.017065987,0.0110669155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89087117,0.017777052,0.0021936179,0.00491671,0.058008604,0.0262327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06019241,0.0009274269,0.0012177727,0.005789791,0.025175447,0.022931539,0.008030403,0.024858957,0.009557299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076398045,0.0008825669,0.0026866668,0.0068454044,0.026913065,0.011071919,0.014187383,0.016559707,0.0012139336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013041325,0.00021632855,0.006681735,0.0010421176,0.000089890054,0.0012241608,0.012305388,0.0034607223,0.0015044387,0.6509098,0.23022869,0.09220637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018349555,0.00017492527,0.011168638,0.0014699929,0.0001362982,0.00021870165,0.012038265,0.0026591262,0.0009398999,0.12338166,0.84731096,0.00031801395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9701975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97583675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14861317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.65172976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98748803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027029384","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12913679730674","title":"The controversy of transferring the Class Environmental Assessment process to northern Ontario, Canada: the Victor Mine Power Supply Project","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Arctic; Bay; Class (philosophy); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Government (linguistics); Operations research; Environmental protection; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Archaeology; Political science; Engineering; Oceanography; Geology; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015440821335685136,"score_gpt":0.3137723271029159,"score_spread":0.2983315057672308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027029384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63867086,0.002726685,0.016379982,0.12456661,0.00037365677,0.001826029,0.00072605256,0.00017784322,0.21455236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96290857,0.00086509244,0.008451847,0.0056620557,0.000028208795,0.0005357024,0.0001596766,0.000056953562,0.021331955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783651,0.0062315,0.001122474,0.0015585496,0.009780142,0.0029422329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667855,0.0103347,0.0018328673,0.0021148024,0.015824543,0.0031077368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021669723,0.000275192,0.00031011723,0.0012444165,0.019302264,0.008037057,0.002969019,0.0014315799,0.0018611611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045712184,0.0004179665,0.00027528516,0.0030006375,0.011426372,0.0025973418,0.0033690296,0.002612865,0.00021539563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003450037,0.00012974435,0.07098206,0.0009431139,0.000069557376,0.0014135415,0.43794972,0.002918491,0.00392449,0.17653146,0.05342354,0.25136927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009415807,0.00019909811,0.24603334,0.0010279188,0.00006895956,0.000353306,0.36694565,0.0029260614,0.0028080707,0.013559287,0.36575764,0.00022653415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15035611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29512796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032562793","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12959673796326","title":"Emphasising enhancement in all forms of impact assessment: introduction to a special issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Social impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Health impact assessment; Impact assessment; Context (archaeology); Resilience (materials science); Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Sustainable development; Public administration; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03507891698383583,"score_gpt":0.40963385447386097,"score_spread":0.37455493749002516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032562793","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037987884,0.16445677,0.040786568,0.19456248,0.48121133,0.0006374074,0.00039741732,0.00075086975,0.113398425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033009585,0.20119174,0.031048372,0.06256838,0.55025995,0.00075846515,0.00066522893,0.00084932876,0.11964893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963319,0.0009352911,0.0005635938,0.0004010278,0.0015588728,0.00020940499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98416346,0.008912611,0.00089517393,0.0009197373,0.004193754,0.0009152233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073355343,0.001689261,0.0013013621,0.0031596962,0.0026628836,0.008318307,0.0019960913,0.0070559466,0.011022274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014682972,0.0007717546,0.0014835818,0.0026292359,0.0048913276,0.009247091,0.005373801,0.011055877,0.0056290505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037641374,0.00016691833,0.0011367204,0.0013928877,0.000026663894,0.0004208187,0.0012538219,0.00046456163,0.0013712165,0.020916848,0.79541785,0.17739405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033408419,0.0000613969,0.0013348217,0.00057927467,0.00000941202,0.00046896058,0.0005087629,0.00018069302,0.00020007858,0.00881108,0.9878178,0.000024582863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001544036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002890212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011022274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018506258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025051557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038794458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033033778","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2014.929344","title":"Impact assessment: practical solutions to recurrent problems and contemporary challenges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.08929264400211939,"score_gpt":0.43675293771048807,"score_spread":0.3474602937083687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033033778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001679362,0.15994191,0.43246996,0.3545195,0.010525661,0.00023920297,0.00015071724,0.0014020719,0.03907164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067465656,0.22708406,0.60518897,0.054675013,0.015154209,0.00078159635,0.00027802723,0.00072573643,0.028646793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97181916,0.014379603,0.0016789965,0.0014864776,0.010059977,0.00057582185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681454,0.020276178,0.0010351582,0.0028933235,0.006818847,0.00083108037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049417026,0.0023642585,0.0020419979,0.0041817254,0.0036196555,0.015199673,0.006092467,0.010872724,0.006148197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04929148,0.0013251051,0.0011687496,0.0039608194,0.027996527,0.024251126,0.012744846,0.01847789,0.0033051153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024758772,0.00009302731,0.0004572367,0.0023502668,0.00007776126,0.00031957513,0.0055716247,0.0033358901,0.00084381405,0.42472535,0.23497574,0.32722494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013311669,0.000035518748,0.0002228404,0.0014882921,0.000013031374,0.00041703694,0.0024097275,0.0017989129,0.0002928467,0.60848206,0.38475293,0.000073587566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033051795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050082784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049417026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045870394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008283313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2613454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035160981","doi":"10.3152/146155107x217299","title":"Achieving meaningful public participation in the environmental assessment of hydro development: case studies from Chamoli District, Uttarakhand, India","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Public participation; Environmental planning; Government (linguistics); Community participation; Local government; State (computer science); Scale (ratio); State government; Political science; Business; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Public administration; Geography; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04645217483259385,"score_gpt":0.42695527700406755,"score_spread":0.3805031021714737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035160981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958662,0.000037335074,0.00019359718,0.00023059292,0.0000022699212,0.00008123573,0.000012939278,0.0000033141407,0.003572561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905103,0.00007124468,0.00020017894,0.000035340323,0.0000019026484,0.000037849095,0.000009824515,0.0000013214009,0.00059127033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966619,0.0020632169,0.00007371187,0.000104092454,0.00024839872,0.0008487466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417263,0.0042861425,0.00041323,0.00023974034,0.00034975153,0.00053843466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002357041,0.00032244573,0.000252224,0.00086297985,0.00661372,0.0020447227,0.001189297,0.0012363372,0.001785422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036681395,0.00027550597,0.00024180456,0.0019026154,0.0033612829,0.00094573345,0.0028336209,0.0010109474,0.00015896722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029392782,0.0013207165,0.051669616,0.00053200213,0.0000353076,0.036307186,0.86573094,0.0014051292,0.003606257,0.007809104,0.0012940733,0.029995853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004940173,0.00050435914,0.054307315,0.00008065538,0.000036330315,0.0022595513,0.92945766,0.00082409754,0.0018422593,0.00064089184,0.009963145,0.00003434273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047620118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12971142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047620118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046630753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036150478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09468585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036448396","doi":"10.3152/146155110x12838715793084","title":"Cumulative cultural effects and reasonably foreseeable future developments in the Upper Thelon Basin, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Government of Northwest Territories","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Structural basin; Cumulative effects; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Environmental science; Geology; Ecology; Cartography","score_opus":0.009524205538451085,"score_gpt":0.3425634219492966,"score_spread":0.33303921641084555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036448396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604431,0.0025684994,0.00033135182,0.004785101,0.000022264607,0.000039748495,0.0003560792,0.000014328384,0.031439647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730885,0.000988536,0.00021188383,0.00012580487,0.0000021885817,0.0000070638916,0.00006795115,0.0000036865229,0.0012841402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975121,0.0005472588,0.00007777407,0.00011399529,0.000988645,0.00076025457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949812,0.0011551579,0.00041420612,0.000120789475,0.0025952898,0.0007333568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030594887,0.00026783778,0.00034156113,0.0015743274,0.0059530665,0.004245417,0.0010639273,0.00044544766,0.0017487586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00901465,0.00019912407,0.00030136015,0.0028227551,0.004717713,0.0012087995,0.0026379104,0.0010694738,0.000056466313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009269816,0.00016593195,0.6206004,0.0006817863,0.00044271947,0.0027669359,0.057935234,0.025576014,0.0018039265,0.033284325,0.010539248,0.24527645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035620862,0.000116580086,0.83689934,0.00058662234,0.00025312038,0.00017623897,0.118873544,0.00398946,0.0014050279,0.006271039,0.031252433,0.00014098002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07348555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07348555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08871015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5331775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038028526","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765101","title":"Sustainability impact assessment of trade policy and its application in the context of Latin America","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); European union; Political science; State (computer science); International trade; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.015404321775160995,"score_gpt":0.39959333459441027,"score_spread":0.3841890128192493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038028526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3247229,0.031369854,0.13006915,0.026579153,0.00034937318,0.00031967397,0.0005855307,0.00033593652,0.48566842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95013404,0.01538302,0.029210785,0.0004929932,0.00012911754,0.00021164042,0.00011164159,0.00003562683,0.004291148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966331,0.0024367238,0.00014051399,0.00014507341,0.0004461822,0.0001983904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967437,0.0021459113,0.0003129892,0.00010895134,0.0006278321,0.000060569466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054745786,0.00071641227,0.0006083487,0.0044909166,0.0012378767,0.00506645,0.000623317,0.0010092489,0.0021669765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008572386,0.00023776604,0.00056686735,0.007312934,0.0031372744,0.0023796866,0.0032727756,0.0011187616,0.00014969788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012665731,0.00012886051,0.026109634,0.0010603785,0.00014572567,0.0012738907,0.0086003,0.104830846,0.0017076024,0.5703675,0.0039848113,0.28166386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004194076,0.00026788368,0.0437952,0.001954482,0.00013028356,0.00071985455,0.03582849,0.101542056,0.003530914,0.66143185,0.15062475,0.00013233082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022869442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015007521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022869442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005954114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037367903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045472622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040494053","doi":"10.3152/146155107x210917","title":"Contextual phases in the institutionalization of the environmental assessment of road development in Cameroon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Context (archaeology); Summit; Political science; Environmental planning; Sustainable development; Poverty; Corporate governance; Process (computing); Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.024049529883959517,"score_gpt":0.39155775342820726,"score_spread":0.3675082235442477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040494053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487124,0.0013607669,0.012646861,0.004929793,0.000051475425,0.00028426116,0.00008236866,0.00003311996,0.03189901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981401,0.00015549512,0.0011415139,0.000062760795,0.0000047531066,0.000036579775,0.000011257198,0.0000033574324,0.00044422736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98636496,0.009614115,0.0005417729,0.0007190599,0.00066956575,0.0020904527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97906715,0.0143829705,0.0028173877,0.0011526732,0.0016293019,0.0009505977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016906003,0.0003293065,0.00023826394,0.0021475714,0.005742137,0.0067054857,0.0010072058,0.0008890633,0.0020081047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019715257,0.00059045514,0.00021235053,0.0024256676,0.01164077,0.0039642993,0.005767529,0.0021101034,0.00007571499],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027178606,0.00029528994,0.07579626,0.00077257433,0.000066564986,0.008778442,0.48216054,0.008349459,0.009015791,0.29260096,0.0017529019,0.120139375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030646323,0.00027717766,0.18776631,0.0013314023,0.000058397596,0.0013210467,0.63576716,0.0030235806,0.0066281627,0.03932341,0.124236494,0.0002362481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030745745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05471033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030745745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015830556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013196616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11485922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042560389","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12913679730755","title":"Getting back to basics: the Victor Diamond Mine environmental assessment scoping proce and the issue of family-based traditional land versus registered traplines","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Baseline (sea); Resource (disambiguation); Government (linguistics); Process (computing); Environmental planning; Treaty; Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Geography; Computer science; Law; Environmental science","score_opus":0.08079376383444241,"score_gpt":0.3753338715207307,"score_spread":0.2945401076862883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042560389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3395542,0.02999168,0.0317521,0.097916454,0.0012064519,0.0062216287,0.005218435,0.00022216301,0.48791698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89053017,0.0122139985,0.029799765,0.00547807,0.000108850385,0.002306147,0.0013845573,0.0001144706,0.05806402],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98858136,0.004698883,0.0012168038,0.00037638663,0.00427305,0.00085350795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9383787,0.028792026,0.0022693023,0.0018370072,0.027858663,0.0008642778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034726106,0.00027685123,0.00048598988,0.0041897655,0.0065161833,0.006233276,0.0015739189,0.0013874585,0.004038039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052865144,0.0003137199,0.0002992481,0.004613578,0.0052522724,0.0028089376,0.0030100201,0.0011102521,0.00028575378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027382592,0.00009140375,0.037722506,0.011040381,0.0001059925,0.0019053275,0.25644067,0.0036674768,0.005038933,0.09705999,0.1336298,0.4530238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025234736,0.00010348451,0.052736543,0.013003046,0.00012053996,0.0002597696,0.24770783,0.0009785158,0.004670959,0.01683624,0.66341805,0.00013973216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7392024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9110752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26079762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037246436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08404915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.524667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042629230","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765715","title":"Biodiversity assessment in the Oil Sands region, northeastern Alberta, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Petroleum industry; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Archaeology; Environmental engineering; Asphalt","score_opus":0.015240613543561926,"score_gpt":0.31102753149300527,"score_spread":0.29578691794944334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042629230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96281683,0.0026133833,0.001446109,0.0004890629,0.000012733996,0.00016176465,0.0032023967,0.00005476805,0.029202966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98077595,0.0011989666,0.002886275,0.000056266188,0.0000040770947,0.0000317254,0.0016422248,0.0000060880066,0.013398528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958664,0.00004210188,0.000009989817,0.00002758185,0.00025238012,0.00008131154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993716,0.000039288032,0.000055957313,0.000012570666,0.000413635,0.00010697402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005089913,0.00022100953,0.00010596476,0.002171033,0.0016134467,0.0008792078,0.0005556899,0.00012286704,0.001506538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058337965,0.00008525865,0.00013154683,0.0023821194,0.0003465632,0.00017749566,0.0005080594,0.00013760489,0.000085733795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004959911,0.00017689611,0.6906666,0.00041007207,0.00017564978,0.001162838,0.003652098,0.017550064,0.0073539615,0.0043555554,0.011237684,0.26276267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021820448,0.000068332214,0.9618146,0.00010026595,0.000045232297,0.00014793129,0.006795701,0.0051595634,0.0019889234,0.0005913776,0.023246262,0.00002005009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98127466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019040609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019040609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018562946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13814992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045092925","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766310","title":"Social impact assessments of large dams throughout the world: lessons learned over two decades","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadiana.org; Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Social impact assessment; China; Three gorges; Visibility; Social impact; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Perception; Compensation (psychology); Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Geography; Environmental science; Sociology; Psychology; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07634707739477758,"score_gpt":0.6271615240078862,"score_spread":0.5508144466131086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045092925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89620125,0.019375935,0.021462468,0.015451959,0.00023938704,0.00040362083,0.0006014816,0.000102455524,0.046161354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97279537,0.013292965,0.010883746,0.00045397767,0.00008128162,0.000092085356,0.00017940009,0.000018329005,0.0022027702],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975547,0.0014469216,0.0001295439,0.00016484894,0.0005598851,0.00014411217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98963165,0.0055718846,0.0006312674,0.0003520883,0.0035093564,0.00030368383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010352155,0.0005818856,0.00051808637,0.0019387936,0.00079352834,0.0013460667,0.0008451866,0.0006092181,0.0017339728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01091968,0.0001694972,0.00035080194,0.0023512589,0.0009968418,0.0022827901,0.0019935083,0.0006983315,0.00012034882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017346136,0.00053363206,0.06419389,0.00088756543,0.000115520204,0.00043029984,0.0075849146,0.021607343,0.0014825233,0.00709988,0.0031116183,0.8927793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017524908,0.0036649876,0.5214033,0.0071554636,0.00032327813,0.00072649674,0.11362512,0.056583647,0.011984731,0.07755378,0.20642076,0.0003831097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029606825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05833535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029606825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029992228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003435192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052197537","doi":"10.3152/147154601781767014","title":"Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions — findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact statement; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Process (computing); Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.01951856508600845,"score_gpt":0.37040572945784406,"score_spread":0.3508871643718356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052197537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65516967,0.012432427,0.027979838,0.24798253,0.0023823585,0.004589603,0.00055335526,0.000949465,0.047960725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92749727,0.008412194,0.03154135,0.013490597,0.0002622912,0.0022241182,0.00054209086,0.00029614143,0.015733924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96817756,0.022356454,0.0018992544,0.0012398415,0.0040619858,0.0022648894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8826517,0.07025868,0.0053319456,0.006027628,0.025730709,0.009999364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07916401,0.00047071846,0.0007127815,0.0014802128,0.008577064,0.006282113,0.003715088,0.0037061488,0.0021957816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13076387,0.000691365,0.00064951833,0.002130182,0.0024332497,0.0061964714,0.009678142,0.0063328934,0.00096665754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039223378,0.0017945453,0.024830854,0.0017652692,0.000062096806,0.0017888331,0.31243855,0.001182236,0.0028184878,0.002237189,0.06533568,0.58535403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000127045,0.0011885976,0.09597921,0.003463146,0.000068899484,0.0009746143,0.6173402,0.0019525866,0.0036745162,0.0050978456,0.2697827,0.00035062106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011976503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024673637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07916401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005927118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017456464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41866434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054259627","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766400","title":"Social impact assessment, impact management and follow-up: a case study of the construction of the Hibernia offshore platform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Social impact assessment; Context (archaeology); Social impact; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Submarine pipeline; Process (computing); Local community; Business; Engineering; Environmental science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.02817766018941976,"score_gpt":0.3964947721261075,"score_spread":0.36831711193668776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054259627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99450195,0.00004684813,0.0011505444,0.00033850616,0.000004334002,0.00019735938,0.000020094229,0.0000063902794,0.00373401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943427,0.00018648262,0.0030472716,0.000056021927,0.000006603789,0.00015430403,0.000030452436,0.000006485516,0.0021696175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563664,0.0029068473,0.00009959783,0.00015025765,0.0005666904,0.0006399804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451536,0.0034275812,0.00050882593,0.00027956688,0.000710648,0.00055804406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005904062,0.00061758107,0.00034037323,0.0012028905,0.00802749,0.0016456861,0.0011734628,0.0016723799,0.0014624622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009626022,0.0003394359,0.00042721507,0.0012972011,0.002672242,0.0010861058,0.002961888,0.0014889062,0.00020158764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094678975,0.008359571,0.13194361,0.00075340754,0.0001556063,0.06619849,0.5610858,0.013106827,0.0087959245,0.0070368773,0.0035174454,0.19809966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014242948,0.0053746863,0.13832173,0.0002816588,0.00012918678,0.006045995,0.8013685,0.009841115,0.0100817,0.0040643876,0.024184428,0.00016419787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030405367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105446585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96959466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004620163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035350984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060456812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056547729","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766455","title":"A square peg in a round hole: fitting impact assessment under the Antarctic Environmental Protocol to Antarctic tourism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Polar Research and Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antarctic treaty; Tourism; Treaty; Environmental impact assessment; Montreal Protocol; Argument (complex analysis); Protocol (science); Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Geography; Law; Chemistry; Meteorology","score_opus":0.025934861152535123,"score_gpt":0.42316233662018715,"score_spread":0.397227475467652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056547729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024946488,0.009786315,0.048217893,0.114605635,0.0049882154,0.0033458776,0.0011128812,0.0003741918,0.7926225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38597262,0.032353863,0.13847013,0.085300855,0.0028754584,0.0077832257,0.003120602,0.00055032095,0.34357294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859796,0.0064974716,0.0009087275,0.0004342776,0.005186551,0.0009933861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929103,0.0033443242,0.0003948693,0.00051518844,0.0024371233,0.00039820228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017696641,0.00060470705,0.00037584198,0.002287321,0.0044514444,0.0085729975,0.0018168248,0.006192752,0.007995797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036678042,0.00043290766,0.0006451181,0.0029772357,0.0057623032,0.008279624,0.0061006,0.005247297,0.0022307965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106656706,0.00007968808,0.0018079487,0.0003362277,0.000009914367,0.0008209539,0.0039339364,0.0023907966,0.0006610032,0.70511866,0.17582642,0.10890774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003093044,0.00012974898,0.0031738053,0.0014859694,0.000023998675,0.0002238838,0.006946867,0.0012235217,0.00065027236,0.10161324,0.88442326,0.00007440717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035683308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061747942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035683308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006141045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027562667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09358984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059028278","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765048","title":"NAFTA Commission for Environmental Cooperation: ongoing assessment of trade liberalization in North America","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Espace pour la vie","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Commission; Free trade; Liberalization; Environmental quality; Environmental policy; Process (computing); International trade; Politics; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Law","score_opus":0.05646032039256033,"score_gpt":0.36684264202421835,"score_spread":0.310382321631658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059028278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52216524,0.118737094,0.0051756483,0.0974048,0.0017764368,0.00061388384,0.033113435,0.00030233702,0.22071107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870281,0.04809258,0.016583476,0.004263683,0.00043366762,0.00058602885,0.022097273,0.00006618591,0.020849038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591404,0.0011006077,0.00017029216,0.00019239298,0.0024053266,0.00021733825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918596,0.0015942624,0.00052837026,0.00020446238,0.005571468,0.0002418038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009769081,0.0004355303,0.00048393023,0.006358724,0.0014444842,0.002965759,0.0008748285,0.0014951897,0.0013210054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012565386,0.00023305784,0.00037388757,0.012895295,0.0008301732,0.0029090731,0.0009328382,0.0010254361,0.00019410264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039285756,0.0003844563,0.2528519,0.0019577984,0.00053795724,0.00066081685,0.0049107852,0.013596976,0.0015990714,0.06564742,0.2653714,0.39208865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005294951,0.00018046676,0.5402991,0.0011134961,0.00026143168,0.00020772388,0.0057167094,0.005010322,0.0017862307,0.013745753,0.4315334,0.00009243413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24032535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24589036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75967467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009549373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013750351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47785294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060844082","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765174","title":"Native involvement in strategic assessment of natural resource development: the example of the Crees living in the Canadian taiga","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Natural resource; Context (archaeology); Hydroelectricity; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Strategic environmental assessment; Natural (archaeology); Environmental planning; Process (computing); Bay; Adaptation (eye); Boreal; Government (linguistics); Geography; Ecology; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Forestry; Computer science; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.03218692142693851,"score_gpt":0.3486606068289205,"score_spread":0.316473685401982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060844082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8200089,0.0013683415,0.001319168,0.018368108,0.00006643319,0.00007040605,0.00005607118,0.000015099487,0.15872741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904937,0.0008014842,0.0005144612,0.00042650616,0.00000926349,0.000011924611,0.000015616799,0.000004767827,0.0077223587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795866,0.0008401345,0.000020158728,0.000072335904,0.000342913,0.0007659239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984888,0.00051767397,0.000070887894,0.000042824464,0.0004463793,0.00043341646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021491016,0.00028511233,0.00014782407,0.0007648344,0.017077992,0.003521554,0.00081395195,0.0011836106,0.0022529305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002933363,0.00012012261,0.00020938338,0.0013157874,0.00739217,0.0012740982,0.002699896,0.0017357738,0.00011531012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013302096,0.00014819097,0.033531975,0.00017622145,0.000047938905,0.014036141,0.7882436,0.0024562047,0.0015265561,0.08526145,0.016186772,0.058252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016797072,0.00004467547,0.02926657,0.00014420676,0.000031068455,0.00082333025,0.83733624,0.0011906468,0.00042583107,0.004112347,0.12656136,0.00004695135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.949446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98539853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050553977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02293756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02996504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1664244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065785391","doi":"10.3152/146155107x190622","title":"Environmental assessment after the 2004 tsunami: a case study, lessons and prospects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Local community; Impact assessment; Political science; Geography; Economics; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.019689260223348194,"score_gpt":0.3990592043688683,"score_spread":0.3793699441455201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065785391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98389256,0.00051043543,0.0016236532,0.0026708099,0.00004582153,0.0002611735,0.00014711478,0.000049133174,0.010799222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98649967,0.0015094291,0.0044399803,0.00040084592,0.00004220274,0.00013121746,0.00015353638,0.0000174737,0.006805662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986952,0.000588185,0.00006589392,0.000084635125,0.00027829583,0.00028784078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874014,0.00042552777,0.00019491669,0.00008477327,0.0003502109,0.00020457743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025423465,0.00056042115,0.00042468825,0.0011981067,0.0051951613,0.0015635586,0.0012678492,0.0031081736,0.0015427264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027385876,0.00029382884,0.00056442694,0.0021532062,0.0010267715,0.0012191869,0.0015476665,0.0013886627,0.0002502996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011027858,0.011038698,0.21688096,0.0014265863,0.000198101,0.27887222,0.098681,0.028386727,0.015437644,0.005520814,0.015952308,0.3265022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022848167,0.006826571,0.29773825,0.000665475,0.00022118431,0.046216927,0.43849915,0.018358624,0.026115477,0.007210029,0.1574945,0.00042535822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03011809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09755537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03011809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034281637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029012647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05988556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067515718","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12913679730395","title":"Improving First Nations' participation in environmental assessment processes: recommendations from the field","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental science; Law","score_opus":0.031090405685843727,"score_gpt":0.3849521158454888,"score_spread":0.35386171015964507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067515718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05049575,0.0057126093,0.015765797,0.8369164,0.0014409027,0.002956364,0.00050989597,0.00061999465,0.08558238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51643157,0.020526651,0.22854337,0.1823654,0.0007083463,0.010070257,0.0017713386,0.0005257634,0.039057195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90453875,0.06947979,0.0033377502,0.0023380877,0.011662466,0.008643152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6673414,0.17069302,0.009012214,0.0123775415,0.08848715,0.052088644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.145397,0.0012116416,0.0010469636,0.003492258,0.012659293,0.017234836,0.0048025614,0.010028798,0.015234114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21629132,0.00088274386,0.0013710421,0.004013923,0.004733199,0.015898712,0.011871622,0.01032007,0.0019377947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003605197,0.0015556052,0.06292151,0.0041614533,0.00010610193,0.00077626016,0.15101868,0.0017436645,0.0017150183,0.041473463,0.288887,0.44528082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026783466,0.00048631814,0.057831347,0.011226028,0.00014798662,0.00037802468,0.34842312,0.0015550741,0.0020346115,0.020702122,0.5566196,0.00032792104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1685737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29042545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1685737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0139804315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18260913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.768942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077866254","doi":"10.3152/146155110x498816","title":"Case study of an integrated assessment: Shell's North Field Test in Alberta, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Shell (Canada); Golder Associates (Canada); Impact","funders":"","keywords":"License; Test (biology); Field (mathematics); Business; Process management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Engineering; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.013564105370766587,"score_gpt":0.3562709784971208,"score_spread":0.34270687312635423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077866254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035867,0.00038182674,0.0065002786,0.0021173712,0.00006534073,0.0017736614,0.0005021292,0.00013804274,0.08493463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96414775,0.00031098438,0.009705796,0.00043141452,0.000012897284,0.00016851297,0.00025548984,0.000044024808,0.024923181],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961475,0.0008046835,0.00013719029,0.0003112769,0.0017680328,0.0008313124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953158,0.0010641845,0.00013781199,0.00023059211,0.0023408106,0.0009108265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034976783,0.0005993216,0.0004409781,0.0017964585,0.010171904,0.0021851999,0.0024989995,0.0020921284,0.0035984789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004811972,0.00040182297,0.00035830907,0.0029191205,0.0025738727,0.00073400326,0.0023762092,0.0013514779,0.0004949138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025065613,0.0074387765,0.2042735,0.001571091,0.0002900099,0.08294265,0.18131147,0.053662498,0.03577881,0.023654902,0.026085861,0.38048393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005139445,0.0040626763,0.25386938,0.0007172715,0.00025656755,0.0050192047,0.42920282,0.033449337,0.017100235,0.0045629176,0.25085163,0.00039398746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93897873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98184437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06102127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036677945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04479446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26611835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078701244","doi":"10.3152/147154602781766654","title":"From Wreck Cove to Voisey's Bay: the evolution of federal environmental assessment in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cove; Bay; Sustainability; Hydroelectricity; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental science; Archaeology; Law; Geography; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.014217305301406405,"score_gpt":0.31872514643034106,"score_spread":0.30450784112893464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078701244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28968018,0.02662591,0.014731626,0.25987214,0.0017304393,0.0007297347,0.0018576282,0.0007715984,0.40400064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021975,0.0066808118,0.013444656,0.017447276,0.00013543403,0.00011901307,0.00062738784,0.00016824878,0.05917973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799217,0.0022396331,0.00071692484,0.0015478164,0.010858003,0.0047159507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506311,0.0053801825,0.0010804932,0.0011139208,0.03429074,0.007503561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014515355,0.0002946665,0.00062010513,0.00463985,0.021442553,0.013512374,0.0034351756,0.0031234806,0.004511527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029464828,0.0009288914,0.00059861684,0.005946242,0.008592148,0.0032636996,0.005065004,0.00468658,0.00029729703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003291736,0.00026986623,0.05996498,0.0006995236,0.00023774605,0.0011105854,0.023796031,0.01073637,0.0035949682,0.37124932,0.16469672,0.36331475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005392346,0.00010661167,0.1788449,0.0007933976,0.00010604614,0.00015843094,0.012947445,0.004315986,0.0018206227,0.015739312,0.78473157,0.00038175719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99758613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2883583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2883583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8254035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078847741","doi":"10.3152/146155110x12772982841122","title":"Illustrating integrated sustainability and resilience based assessments: a small-scale biodiesel project in Barbados","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Sustainability; Resilience (materials science); Scale (ratio); Suite; Environmental resource management; Alliance; Environmental planning; Business; Energy security; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Engineering; Political science; Economics; Renewable energy; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.017731434096603018,"score_gpt":0.38774619657147713,"score_spread":0.37001476247487414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078847741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837307,0.00005151438,0.0022657649,0.0005226285,0.0000065921295,0.00020013574,0.00012761146,0.000041218143,0.013053837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98601425,0.00017813894,0.0057430738,0.000031579828,0.0000019453419,0.00009323382,0.00010107636,0.000013967472,0.007822667],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990357,0.00044355384,0.000026011465,0.00007566776,0.0001832686,0.00023582997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992618,0.00023054944,0.000096295196,0.000057775662,0.00020054355,0.00015299152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013989673,0.00042850245,0.00024241072,0.0008849587,0.0048807715,0.0010685424,0.0009896788,0.0008512034,0.002099831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016993742,0.0002145305,0.00022253323,0.0008029478,0.0014083708,0.0005298925,0.0019234226,0.00074484374,0.00019738612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034222822,0.0031054118,0.22705297,0.001835853,0.0003327547,0.039923795,0.1477249,0.13159846,0.05388982,0.047199715,0.008660294,0.33525375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037490786,0.0035485781,0.4525918,0.00085868227,0.00030214924,0.0014888045,0.3523739,0.052128624,0.02769514,0.013442805,0.09491769,0.00027687717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39217225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7137958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39217225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064829662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006549049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7797791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080585548","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2012.746836","title":"Strategic environmental assessment in the electricity sector: an application to electricity supply planning, Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"SaskPower","keywords":"Electricity; Sustainability; Strategic environmental assessment; Operationalization; Mains electricity; Environmental economics; Transparency (behavior); Business; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Computer science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.021948455018493098,"score_gpt":0.3594338404804426,"score_spread":0.3374853854619495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080585548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33953333,0.0030977814,0.2452817,0.011097105,0.00022775395,0.005331118,0.008755036,0.0014472131,0.38522896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68520206,0.0035738347,0.27123567,0.00053953775,0.0000151575205,0.0010924614,0.002909424,0.00016283116,0.035269015],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862397,0.00044408068,0.0000798595,0.00010322984,0.0005143355,0.000234504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982236,0.00047918654,0.00005939725,0.0000676858,0.0010137436,0.00015643719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019583,0.00080822525,0.00040842374,0.0018881371,0.0036270425,0.0037433999,0.0012260784,0.000746757,0.0050347233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033664831,0.00047363553,0.0006382923,0.005506372,0.0013746165,0.00092069036,0.0018476194,0.0009974693,0.0004071904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013841155,0.00019096186,0.027506476,0.0005794338,0.00016308305,0.001377997,0.002099385,0.6010029,0.0036405239,0.09308692,0.02579238,0.2444215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002675914,0.0001863582,0.043133862,0.0007320598,0.00017850762,0.0003656348,0.017371673,0.7058596,0.0059677823,0.07724278,0.14834078,0.00035334736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99213725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05566206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05566206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12028553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40385836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081103255","doi":"10.3152/146155108x366013","title":"Transboundary environmental impact assessment as part of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Commission; Environmental impact assessment; Legislation; Work (physics); International trade; Trade agreement; Agreement; Political science; Environmental policy; Business; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Free trade; Geography; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.017638087339030474,"score_gpt":0.34625108591696185,"score_spread":0.32861299857793136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081103255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013638307,0.004502419,0.03185368,0.057871502,0.0023880138,0.0020107059,0.0010944234,0.00021157242,0.88642937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35977757,0.010699601,0.19695769,0.051906582,0.001260084,0.00765154,0.0031276795,0.00022742995,0.36839178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95157516,0.017121205,0.0027902115,0.0020258876,0.023397936,0.0030896624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710442,0.006945161,0.0013454388,0.0019134269,0.017133817,0.001617953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0454004,0.0007465442,0.001001365,0.0038525444,0.0071120486,0.01287393,0.0024768985,0.01089321,0.0074885543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028770406,0.0007519646,0.0010795302,0.0044284053,0.005174936,0.006665369,0.0079600895,0.009114184,0.0016080178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056731886,0.00013154617,0.0027178626,0.00027692574,0.000054739787,0.00043448282,0.0026678692,0.0036436128,0.0009166302,0.813216,0.119960666,0.05592302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000369645,0.00007349698,0.0067295344,0.0009083334,0.000048755788,0.0002062255,0.00199614,0.002827207,0.0010577365,0.16905826,0.81694293,0.000114426795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078494266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13170603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92150575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01416442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07505544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24010313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081276745","doi":"10.3152/146155109x413046","title":"Canadian Indigenous engagement and capacity building in health impact assessment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Nations University of Canada; Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Subsistence agriculture; Natural resource; Environmental planning; Cornerstone; Community engagement; Capacity building; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Public relations; Ecology","score_opus":0.03155972877090236,"score_gpt":0.40667763867078327,"score_spread":0.3751179098998809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081276745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114248164,0.008498785,0.014321861,0.15739505,0.0007173873,0.002470931,0.0007949506,0.00020707522,0.70134586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490343,0.0036012412,0.012486066,0.004592447,0.00014123612,0.001148822,0.00026521404,0.00004225353,0.028688435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96287084,0.020230291,0.0009449889,0.0012562554,0.006599156,0.008098501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95870453,0.017159913,0.00137052,0.0016219313,0.011333099,0.009810001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042474218,0.0005892779,0.00047823158,0.0039412733,0.018098475,0.008547377,0.0034446076,0.002072751,0.011298999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045252815,0.0005448568,0.0005667039,0.0036483728,0.009533416,0.0029094797,0.015104125,0.003288286,0.000501866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024378028,0.00048458824,0.039010648,0.0018445092,0.00018843512,0.0011844134,0.20910776,0.0069771972,0.0010166209,0.30524185,0.09961276,0.33508736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011779353,0.00015594024,0.066193596,0.0019842242,0.00012858122,0.00017540042,0.15011728,0.0036837049,0.0008306694,0.09131097,0.6850894,0.00021247387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9568121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97482556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8956371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1043629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28678444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75720936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081968725","doi":"10.3152/146155107x204491","title":"Evaluation of the assessment process for major projects: a case study of oil and gas pipelines in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Production (economics); Obligation; Business; Process (computing); Environmental impact assessment; Best practice; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Pipeline (software); Environmental economics; Environmental science; Computer science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.049443531907856705,"score_gpt":0.4362076906469996,"score_spread":0.3867641587391429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081968725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95173395,0.00030363403,0.024177747,0.0009695211,0.000016730923,0.0034157967,0.00026618468,0.000117282034,0.01899929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94610643,0.00043837196,0.048990205,0.00006738599,0.000005470212,0.00052484166,0.00018193836,0.000024026323,0.0036613138],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98210883,0.009108101,0.00068120315,0.00064437505,0.0054423595,0.0020150745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684171,0.015302802,0.0014914855,0.00082297774,0.012683063,0.0012825275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021223776,0.0011070368,0.000589352,0.0023423654,0.007181946,0.0036120673,0.0020173015,0.0013478069,0.001840842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035684045,0.00051236653,0.0007618854,0.0035957936,0.0021526243,0.0016213823,0.00234891,0.0013405501,0.00024550615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023558545,0.004095583,0.10185077,0.0020081245,0.00029685147,0.005839889,0.06630615,0.2711362,0.014783721,0.025080368,0.0061756447,0.50007087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095520046,0.007101294,0.17144611,0.0013546868,0.0006168949,0.0020459425,0.20383836,0.49569595,0.038608912,0.014470899,0.06312056,0.0007452081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6848363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83099264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31516367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04324541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053964466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63403946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083955065","doi":"10.3152/146155108x279939","title":"Contentious politics in environmental assessment: blocked projects and winning coalitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Politics; Public participation; Political science; Public administration; Scale (ratio); Environmental impact assessment; Public domain; Environmental planning; Business; Public relations; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03188016033853071,"score_gpt":0.3667634395195046,"score_spread":0.3348832791809739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083955065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63063264,0.0015540939,0.08317421,0.016845118,0.00012995997,0.00025022458,0.000036125322,0.00005722,0.26732036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403846,0.00017275747,0.0025246805,0.00016864631,0.000024851739,0.00009703245,0.000008312715,0.000017145238,0.0029480006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96766716,0.02491709,0.000584104,0.001325102,0.0025660316,0.0029404678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9294386,0.056739386,0.006415483,0.0033199682,0.0016635855,0.0024228955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021736236,0.00038322894,0.00060457335,0.0022998026,0.010994443,0.0107022,0.0015368843,0.0036300058,0.0051934584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05240311,0.0005444454,0.0006519448,0.0027034997,0.034196362,0.011407541,0.013893531,0.0041373284,0.00043891143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000764908,0.000077378136,0.005213825,0.0000621394,0.000016037318,0.00091104675,0.035733882,0.0014458683,0.0002949142,0.9423294,0.00069219735,0.013146815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005800734,0.000115295166,0.007839802,0.00020000656,0.000044687116,0.00082256686,0.06594277,0.010684379,0.000985406,0.8638274,0.049423594,0.00005606319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027500142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028431234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021736236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056325216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042248038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11495358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089506166","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2014.913347","title":"Bringing health impact assessment to the Mongolian resource sector: a story of successful diffusion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Health impact assessment; Institutionalisation; Resource (disambiguation); Government (linguistics); Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Equity (law); Impact assessment; Private sector; Environmental planning; Public relations; Business; Public administration; Environmental resource management; Public health; Sociology; Geography; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.015626259227248203,"score_gpt":0.35601644219808604,"score_spread":0.34039018297083784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089506166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52720463,0.010079355,0.011307377,0.36232677,0.0009739616,0.00033193012,0.00012594706,0.00014340789,0.08750665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98573387,0.0015021294,0.0025922235,0.005852417,0.00006809146,0.00007973021,0.000029792665,0.00004910266,0.0040926826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759517,0.01730762,0.00055575196,0.001232868,0.0020205635,0.0029315958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96793646,0.022573333,0.0016532943,0.002411945,0.0035977587,0.0018272606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0461711,0.0005534962,0.00044765775,0.001698952,0.021334592,0.011010092,0.0021273154,0.007025384,0.0019955349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03535992,0.0007494907,0.0005879998,0.0017819038,0.021399194,0.009827693,0.014508051,0.00901218,0.00027142826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006268112,0.0000716772,0.006016636,0.0002916368,0.000028946675,0.0031752787,0.86730015,0.0004454441,0.0011295392,0.07196915,0.006334999,0.043173842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003500125,0.00024142182,0.008683232,0.0008217498,0.00003837374,0.00095283054,0.5948421,0.00096640125,0.0014430556,0.033419203,0.35843703,0.00011963243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063561514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04822215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063561514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021397796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022461744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24417901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090012928","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765517","title":"Social impact follow-up in Quebec, Canada: 25 years of environmental impact assessment practice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Public administration; Public relations; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.015106377164789584,"score_gpt":0.3879735419542774,"score_spread":0.37286716478948784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090012928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7362069,0.09779019,0.012339824,0.038718365,0.00053478923,0.001982848,0.0095242215,0.0011743862,0.101728365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401017,0.02733385,0.008239493,0.0021872257,0.000067659006,0.0003228708,0.0030841106,0.00012650074,0.018536685],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937826,0.0012661817,0.00046703278,0.0006519227,0.0032276995,0.00060466724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97012043,0.005295369,0.0026206027,0.0015205075,0.017546434,0.0028967068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011578356,0.00048707347,0.00041356127,0.0037162001,0.004214111,0.002888033,0.002493227,0.00066994724,0.0025940891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017951224,0.00032624352,0.0003772797,0.007616123,0.0019994301,0.0011286357,0.0022162537,0.0010347186,0.0002635281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002461578,0.00022746735,0.17022952,0.0010803895,0.000114996605,0.00063392794,0.015593358,0.0021076207,0.0011125013,0.0019225102,0.026994158,0.77973735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027169432,0.00023458026,0.8224436,0.0015305502,0.00009927016,0.00025450074,0.015431464,0.0012200061,0.0013895395,0.00054100645,0.15669766,0.00013072755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98366576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063532844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063532844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099211805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46096522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091156840","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2014.992673","title":"Targeting the transitions: applying stage-gate <sup>®</sup> thinking in strategic environmental assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Strategic environmental assessment; Process (computing); Macro; Process management; Computer science; Product (mathematics); Stage (stratigraphy); New product development; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Business; Management; Epistemology; Geology; Economics","score_opus":0.04212147586427811,"score_gpt":0.3722641780897364,"score_spread":0.3301427022254583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091156840","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049456496,0.000940608,0.7587982,0.012773805,0.0002176645,0.00041612858,0.00009118872,0.00025762155,0.17704836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69895536,0.0010708844,0.28782603,0.0012205042,0.000041979787,0.00024836898,0.00006215647,0.00009557922,0.010479141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971102,0.0018947927,0.00009991594,0.0002054009,0.00042960627,0.00026008429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948291,0.003558604,0.0003585442,0.0002756494,0.00056074385,0.00041739194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046147495,0.0005564245,0.00021562682,0.0017282193,0.0020827905,0.0061097457,0.0012389395,0.0017289747,0.0031084097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068739364,0.00029903388,0.00064819964,0.0015891001,0.012274952,0.0059309117,0.00306011,0.0024709653,0.00040748453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003352236,0.000025839921,0.001925797,0.000113609814,0.000011315896,0.0002204399,0.009274196,0.012851839,0.0007102632,0.9186071,0.001653722,0.05457235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015638609,0.00009859258,0.0019303096,0.00039355448,0.000021702162,0.00015958607,0.015133894,0.035655484,0.00147523,0.88840926,0.056665305,0.000041364692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042045195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088414185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042045195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103936875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011078224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08360094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091266505","doi":"10.3152/146155109x479440","title":"A conceptual basis and methodological framework for regional strategic environmental assessment (R-SEA)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Cumulative effects; Futures contract; Environmental planning; Conceptual framework; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Political science; Process management; Management science; Business; Public administration; Environmental science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.12497111789897669,"score_gpt":0.46624913639684085,"score_spread":0.34127801849786416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091266505","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022134318,0.0015882783,0.9401359,0.010470773,0.00019593195,0.00090736797,0.0001910815,0.00024660735,0.044050545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092147924,0.0012880366,0.9006579,0.00076534005,0.000132285,0.0020466752,0.00017137556,0.00012045628,0.0026700615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9530959,0.03539046,0.002960326,0.0026755938,0.0047720713,0.0011055993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806474,0.011199871,0.0018774437,0.0017738126,0.003734177,0.0007672955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061958134,0.0016413766,0.0017124197,0.00800753,0.003457011,0.015730176,0.008164257,0.0050253994,0.0057292744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035567578,0.0011194022,0.0022316799,0.008723255,0.022507938,0.012381067,0.008698427,0.0059090494,0.001843799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027159667,0.000015643953,0.00015558486,0.00013534694,0.000011512346,0.000052598374,0.0014955003,0.0032993762,0.000074732765,0.9830815,0.0010197706,0.010655774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001617656,0.000038059443,0.00030309288,0.00064110267,0.000023368917,0.00009086744,0.003262057,0.011257354,0.00019235189,0.92735165,0.05678286,0.000041070325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016816871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017344926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061958134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011439738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024406826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32766986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091481524","doi":"10.3152/146155110x12881021614499","title":"Introduction to a special issue on cumulative effects assessment and management","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Impact assessment; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Public administration","score_opus":0.01111066697911897,"score_gpt":0.3843842842737987,"score_spread":0.3732736172946798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091481524","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003875433,0.104617305,0.017747154,0.0583962,0.7449885,0.00037673267,0.0011054198,0.00071201444,0.07166904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022902386,0.09254607,0.008195669,0.02146855,0.75494576,0.00034157647,0.0013085364,0.00080606324,0.11809752],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640477,0.00068997114,0.00044353434,0.00052855024,0.0017745317,0.00015860394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98346925,0.008713834,0.0010411897,0.0008884915,0.004385939,0.0015013621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004117204,0.00210609,0.0024500825,0.0044825166,0.0017650948,0.00786947,0.0020564466,0.0041641737,0.07810696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012767244,0.0008899804,0.0019719228,0.003857261,0.0018175003,0.005626451,0.002625315,0.0072010895,0.034703176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014122714,0.000038248203,0.00008853582,0.0003557244,0.000013867716,0.00003927341,0.000052907,0.00018744856,0.00014606267,0.002868863,0.9411855,0.055009544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035391124,0.000022883562,0.00021646194,0.00022785751,0.000006679748,0.000080312806,0.000028909162,0.0000806616,0.00002954977,0.0029167302,0.9963781,0.000008397599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011828763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020993722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07810696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018174951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027916448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26129383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092385521","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766301","title":"Social and economic effects from attitudes towards risk","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic risk; Economic impact analysis; Social risk; Risk assessment; Product (mathematics); Event (particle physics); Business; Public economics; Social impact; Actuarial science; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Environmental health; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04409350096744591,"score_gpt":0.4764686455481849,"score_spread":0.432375144580739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092385521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8642755,0.00027128216,0.0018642595,0.002353173,0.000046741512,0.00011484871,0.00024060205,0.000011632596,0.13082188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975496,0.00020107858,0.00040904983,0.0001317735,0.00002367129,0.000031530417,0.000058101145,0.0000049162572,0.0015902295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616927,0.000999403,0.0001649958,0.0001553563,0.002028092,0.0004829733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97700024,0.01336564,0.003399809,0.0007009148,0.0032532788,0.0022801284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038147313,0.00047663672,0.00031711702,0.002600297,0.001439171,0.003570112,0.0003185433,0.0006341545,0.012840603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01762004,0.00021530571,0.00070579967,0.0018120455,0.0044145035,0.0012781438,0.0031689345,0.0018288053,0.00040087834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061936333,0.002065527,0.74907076,0.00075733,0.00049988617,0.0014302803,0.06110899,0.005151676,0.0033119693,0.08708581,0.0036522248,0.08524623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002901449,0.00019114935,0.9411982,0.000113569135,0.00012588354,0.00015160881,0.022365429,0.0011989265,0.00074655935,0.025293382,0.008526609,0.000059673017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010006784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01725019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012840603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031645542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018055745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042956054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093135010","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765192","title":"Water assessment in the Netherlands","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Spatial planning; Environmental planning; Strategic environmental assessment; Process (computing); Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Water infrastructure; Environmental resource management; Government (linguistics); Environmental science; Business; Computer science; Water resource management; Water supply; Environmental engineering; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.01554304717260003,"score_gpt":0.37197249850010283,"score_spread":0.3564294513275028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093135010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027091796,0.05592731,0.042284872,0.027286813,0.0016680841,0.00041649592,0.0043839533,0.00047735564,0.8404634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4469737,0.05082627,0.05391403,0.0032645515,0.00045829365,0.00062347617,0.004924702,0.0006913742,0.43832353],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975309,0.0006656299,0.00017403235,0.00034280718,0.0011098546,0.00017679656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885404,0.0003320279,0.000097414035,0.00008486481,0.0005327035,0.00009888856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002519596,0.00034780242,0.00032869924,0.0017316674,0.0007905143,0.0046824757,0.00067368563,0.001038442,0.012001724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006416896,0.0002950747,0.00029463868,0.0031611717,0.00085226377,0.002407575,0.0017248014,0.0006192116,0.0023386301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038261514,0.000060979895,0.002724182,0.0006908616,0.000034155604,0.00059930206,0.0011754615,0.0125474,0.0023313279,0.35921857,0.15411574,0.4664638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008634948,0.000010684572,0.0015627429,0.00012649527,0.000006492528,0.00008380178,0.00031190942,0.001821591,0.00037768492,0.021536311,0.97414094,0.000012756979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088133514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07295261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088133514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048283213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010466246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17524105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093276343","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2013.872848","title":"A basic need for integration – bringing focus to the scoping process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Process (computing); Sustainability; Process management; Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Environmental planning; Management science; Business; Engineering; Law; Environmental science","score_opus":0.022881807672303703,"score_gpt":0.4043609451065919,"score_spread":0.3814791374342882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093276343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020003133,0.009523817,0.12206034,0.8260974,0.016716944,0.0008918804,0.000080152204,0.000650544,0.021978604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12280382,0.016836187,0.50942665,0.29475522,0.021970682,0.005478442,0.00064814487,0.0018080084,0.026272833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6757599,0.21280576,0.032545052,0.012964244,0.058872283,0.007052816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35007727,0.39470333,0.016400823,0.074912146,0.14653198,0.01737443],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.34208018,0.0011743618,0.0027238503,0.0073822304,0.011960332,0.036832664,0.0060127196,0.021154156,0.008840233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43764478,0.002206215,0.0026580605,0.0061437087,0.03013985,0.05633454,0.040287986,0.03935257,0.0062631085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001466702,0.00019037165,0.0013883755,0.0076760747,0.00019191636,0.0010071007,0.103110716,0.0004919445,0.0037662152,0.35391238,0.24660355,0.2815147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004736748,0.000113213864,0.00093701895,0.013339911,0.00006461463,0.0008575643,0.018470151,0.0006331229,0.00058453926,0.26907822,0.69572407,0.00015017335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004572592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005028199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34208018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011003961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057419255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8113323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093388913","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765066","title":"Environmental assessment of Canadian trade and investment negotiations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Investment (military); International trade; Government (linguistics); Business; Perspective (graphical); Promotion (chess); Trade promotion; Trade barrier; Foreign direct investment; Economics; Free trade; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0158777061781598,"score_gpt":0.3379082259328002,"score_spread":0.32203051975464037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093388913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1254984,0.007792554,0.00529816,0.012817533,0.00024003038,0.00064494135,0.013160775,0.00013391211,0.8344137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568544,0.011373738,0.019604929,0.0012591794,0.0000791447,0.00036601932,0.0070541715,0.0000669426,0.10334142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98980266,0.0010004414,0.00018184326,0.00025780938,0.0074937856,0.001263483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961836,0.00024907995,0.000113678776,0.00007403536,0.003196376,0.00018326794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036369716,0.0006624467,0.00038961446,0.007339087,0.00639765,0.0054775234,0.0012969188,0.0009957858,0.0056922375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006932044,0.0002582577,0.0005640876,0.009968646,0.0012454333,0.0012593709,0.0014121938,0.00088558503,0.00033130136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020290766,0.00013497016,0.039841183,0.00079242367,0.00019499272,0.0006189326,0.0047357893,0.098372206,0.0012659924,0.46000633,0.17397054,0.21986376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006802621,0.00009252155,0.17086677,0.00069911504,0.00017075974,0.0001551778,0.01194076,0.044503655,0.0020558296,0.048630416,0.7205244,0.00029257193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99231696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99664295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111572206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111572206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12071168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8095168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094463197","doi":"10.3152/147154601781766871","title":"Roles and stakes in environmental impact assessment follow-up","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Cumulative effects; Process (computing); Key (lock); Political science; Environmental resource management; Process management; Business; Computer science; Environmental science; Computer security","score_opus":0.021145834036832095,"score_gpt":0.37974193036688425,"score_spread":0.3585960963300522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094463197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55941397,0.004019398,0.09957413,0.13376981,0.0014686733,0.002159231,0.00011548392,0.0004820543,0.19899726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827042,0.00040739216,0.00800471,0.0014497401,0.000110228,0.00045052805,0.00003057286,0.000026147462,0.0068164566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92897284,0.047513757,0.0021961853,0.003352061,0.0072897063,0.010675369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8679408,0.103709996,0.00614352,0.005543669,0.0058492874,0.010812652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094045885,0.0006504541,0.0006884555,0.0021176825,0.01590004,0.012266688,0.0032480345,0.006972246,0.010883843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13231525,0.0010833745,0.00075697,0.0010739015,0.0074021593,0.012525408,0.018683752,0.010270197,0.0009985989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007439633,0.002173007,0.0814713,0.00084841496,0.00008540916,0.016171135,0.21647473,0.0041330564,0.0063167117,0.26290718,0.011934245,0.39674094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022460532,0.0017264938,0.063563004,0.0034429203,0.00013587115,0.008226129,0.3556472,0.01285114,0.00785557,0.33824307,0.20757505,0.0005089971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033387186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00418783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094045885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073221577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009153243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4973681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094986318","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2014.981023","title":"The significance spectrum and EIA significance determinations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Statistical significance; CLARITY; Clinical significance; Process (computing); Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.031496437841527156,"score_gpt":0.3858885386442155,"score_spread":0.35439210080268835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094986318","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018504523,0.0028764722,0.80524814,0.01858534,0.0011295758,0.00078199187,0.00046877225,0.00092408375,0.15148112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3938371,0.0021089974,0.5915716,0.00277492,0.00058442116,0.0013474331,0.0002609964,0.00036850595,0.0071459985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95835644,0.026123796,0.0023813858,0.0025222166,0.009718008,0.0008980316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9083043,0.06768688,0.00446683,0.007283848,0.010678979,0.0015792226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036927994,0.0010501522,0.0012005818,0.008117511,0.0038846314,0.009474138,0.002426703,0.003695979,0.009037388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12441189,0.0008455278,0.001350475,0.004381269,0.01939384,0.010553317,0.0069799647,0.006918546,0.001597602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005616614,0.000024226361,0.0016216858,0.00029123205,0.000025781275,0.00020118646,0.002193465,0.0026413891,0.00078727276,0.9231426,0.004970521,0.06404446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016330732,0.000040219467,0.0010846137,0.00028275335,0.000021030799,0.00018830388,0.001151627,0.0034610315,0.00047108778,0.9564873,0.036755446,0.00004028265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024817667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002432515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036927994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041621984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006231917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19529623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095159432","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12913679730359","title":"A potential role for EIA in Finnish forest planning: learning from experiences in Ontario, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental protection; Environmental science","score_opus":0.030827642054701204,"score_gpt":0.32846012178233785,"score_spread":0.2976324797276366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095159432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83918935,0.0031909705,0.0017730253,0.028171701,0.00024091084,0.000376275,0.00029052052,0.000059347203,0.12670797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746269,0.002217466,0.0024677676,0.0013722064,0.00002015238,0.00008333324,0.00013621985,0.000038754923,0.019037187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198806,0.0030275048,0.00024010126,0.00049883354,0.0014772438,0.0027683787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908214,0.002989209,0.00036295343,0.00026835807,0.0018421129,0.0037160069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007672853,0.0004461601,0.00047101677,0.0010763074,0.04260806,0.008762613,0.0026181804,0.0018850341,0.0049394146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087195365,0.0004964385,0.0004960844,0.0035518645,0.011597755,0.0030276969,0.0052705556,0.0030029435,0.00034642563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100134486,0.0002479676,0.018244687,0.0002548216,0.000028154032,0.0029412967,0.90066457,0.0014770797,0.0006371753,0.010131224,0.020136958,0.04513594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018205228,0.000074138654,0.01694145,0.00030707137,0.000020616602,0.0002479445,0.8260236,0.0007214114,0.00029210222,0.0015456665,0.15372927,0.000078506724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13388826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13388826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20678137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97143185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095656484","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2015.1039382","title":"Selection of valued ecosystem components in cumulative effects assessment: lessons from Canadian road construction projects","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Context (archaeology); Cumulative effects; Process (computing); Environmental resource management; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Environmental planning; Operations research; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.04562866131505549,"score_gpt":0.3849727119913425,"score_spread":0.339344050676287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095656484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83456445,0.0062312842,0.03195483,0.012457442,0.00008218983,0.0007868094,0.0007002731,0.000101039885,0.11312167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96522,0.00361256,0.026811209,0.0002932953,0.000010411537,0.00015477538,0.0002495311,0.00004541526,0.00360282],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98807764,0.004988829,0.00046518454,0.00053434726,0.004782001,0.0011520489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96281177,0.017367141,0.0014356013,0.0018193292,0.015185734,0.0013805107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024627974,0.0005567786,0.00042381304,0.0034733717,0.005753887,0.006182525,0.002065474,0.00067826477,0.0014344048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040830314,0.0003481315,0.00041457213,0.007407872,0.004163845,0.003175068,0.0038700418,0.0014764091,0.00015677279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021186087,0.00018100746,0.12914006,0.001280235,0.000093651965,0.001616368,0.17008087,0.010175278,0.002113522,0.03827651,0.011047209,0.6357834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050060822,0.00028424192,0.37916338,0.003272246,0.00021300862,0.0007396539,0.3714487,0.014523427,0.003907557,0.03292404,0.19314384,0.00032992946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91331977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97094023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08668023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048193477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060710017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3496698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111642833","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2014.885638","title":"International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislation; Diversity (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Process (computing); Political science; Value (mathematics); Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Process management; Management science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Law; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.02204837419362227,"score_gpt":0.394321437510987,"score_spread":0.37227306331736476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111642833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008672401,0.06077256,0.047578737,0.62159884,0.0047289324,0.00009878638,0.00005104605,0.00012644216,0.25637227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72399765,0.088604726,0.0538929,0.10901331,0.0066487286,0.0006836968,0.00014261245,0.00032479575,0.016691547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90777206,0.06135109,0.005113595,0.0048125135,0.014634518,0.006316182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86713386,0.09396843,0.0070872675,0.00914795,0.017178895,0.00548353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12803239,0.0014707386,0.0013427697,0.0049647717,0.006501232,0.023408964,0.0034645118,0.012491875,0.007642372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07119869,0.0008299806,0.0018747876,0.006196181,0.049267005,0.03299693,0.024849584,0.02171983,0.0007967724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044606026,0.00006134692,0.0008710549,0.0009904635,0.000033822882,0.00020451116,0.023328997,0.0007440147,0.0005179344,0.89893633,0.011848329,0.062418655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020494754,0.00014506433,0.00243289,0.004623313,0.000056711553,0.00048525704,0.038937934,0.00046495642,0.00094284094,0.47419137,0.47760433,0.000094882904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003829832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033310147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12803239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010498905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018792303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67710805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113661939","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765273","title":"Conceptual frameworks for SIA revisited: a cumulative effects study on lead contamination and economic change","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Lead (geology); Resilience (materials science); Conceptual framework; Psychological resilience; Preference; Conceptual model; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Social science; Geology","score_opus":0.031020619393647746,"score_gpt":0.3763494990004966,"score_spread":0.3453288796068488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113661939","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2664258,0.0141796125,0.41590974,0.089000314,0.00068977376,0.0013460066,0.00026721795,0.00018865397,0.21199293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639293,0.0023450009,0.030106856,0.0010419786,0.00006344582,0.000674135,0.00003917262,0.000032233125,0.001767962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814477,0.014329833,0.00052293995,0.0008042241,0.0019626815,0.00093265384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505398,0.039819594,0.0024614984,0.0018595945,0.0041759536,0.0011435568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031069214,0.0017275779,0.0017600643,0.009769145,0.007911864,0.011063277,0.0048566107,0.00408112,0.004612378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028796745,0.00083689095,0.0025684885,0.008186992,0.052052885,0.016772052,0.01252736,0.008711915,0.0002740972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025252826,0.00006697893,0.0022472434,0.00027018986,0.000024714704,0.00036449952,0.028738776,0.0029902542,0.0001216888,0.953772,0.0005071909,0.010871168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004045426,0.0002761785,0.0059107263,0.0011391549,0.0001050423,0.00051943876,0.08700108,0.013674952,0.00043369288,0.8534718,0.03731706,0.00011034983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017647944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019948738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031069214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020591816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012374661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1643117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113886841","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765508","title":"Cumulative effects assessment and EIA follow-up: a proposed community-based monitoring program in the Oil Sands Region, northeastern Alberta","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03509962826628716,"score_gpt":0.4039744707945686,"score_spread":0.36887484252828145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113886841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96897036,0.0001287065,0.006054863,0.0015466021,0.00002569617,0.004663526,0.0005197295,0.00028705777,0.017803462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676839,0.00011246393,0.014719653,0.00031866285,0.000013669941,0.0013794608,0.00053908327,0.000012220349,0.015220907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811965,0.0005358164,0.000055257602,0.00017878997,0.00065504946,0.00045550108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945707,0.00096313044,0.0004186919,0.00034948817,0.0022327325,0.0014652984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684968,0.0003016798,0.00016708652,0.0016174098,0.0052925632,0.0009769971,0.0021310071,0.00066915754,0.0022453738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069499635,0.00024179374,0.00017012707,0.0009217146,0.0008511198,0.00042877684,0.0018109942,0.00077608327,0.00019617703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022116557,0.00813167,0.47435325,0.00026401418,0.000090025766,0.004540811,0.01963824,0.01497126,0.020567827,0.004601541,0.0138022015,0.43682757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005346615,0.0048945043,0.9102359,0.00010107689,0.00011227558,0.0003819542,0.023815636,0.015682291,0.013308017,0.0014497574,0.02935243,0.00013147392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8013812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9294665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19861883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015903495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03682995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39957702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124213228","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765580","title":"Learning from experience: emerging trends in environmental impact assessment follow-up","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.021679603933070772,"score_gpt":0.39696691672211976,"score_spread":0.375287312789049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124213228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18894175,0.19481106,0.017593274,0.35857087,0.005128803,0.00033044102,0.0005755502,0.00047102396,0.23357733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86085546,0.081213996,0.0076520946,0.024079109,0.0020102132,0.00039243506,0.0004287197,0.00026326597,0.023104614],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98120064,0.007944682,0.0008846964,0.0023300864,0.0060254317,0.0016144209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93493706,0.043224297,0.003939797,0.0021825812,0.009647309,0.0060690083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022697408,0.00036233108,0.00063422095,0.0037132776,0.003607461,0.016631573,0.0032638935,0.0041124886,0.011059772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063018344,0.0004449509,0.0005845407,0.0063920114,0.009940241,0.030194955,0.010610595,0.0065804077,0.0015889942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008599854,0.00018792425,0.01594086,0.0024890949,0.000028869925,0.0009708729,0.16557288,0.00021467949,0.00021724778,0.07527635,0.06221411,0.6768011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024329205,0.00025206487,0.032124497,0.005673394,0.00002306582,0.0022108902,0.32276222,0.00054518465,0.0003941033,0.040379755,0.5954888,0.00012172449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005571296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058522574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022697408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007807765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008351567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12003678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129255159","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766527","title":"Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Environmental planning; Political science; Stakeholder engagement; Relation (database); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Business; Process management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03245550484531987,"score_gpt":0.42428336869574157,"score_spread":0.3918278638504217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129255159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33684427,0.010184734,0.11782189,0.38643047,0.0032513035,0.004413784,0.00008061916,0.0018900686,0.1390829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90462583,0.0043815067,0.06633843,0.009084027,0.0003189239,0.0019422174,0.000071437535,0.00027054438,0.012967109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.934167,0.04562833,0.002559853,0.0028123613,0.008015206,0.0068172016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91031224,0.05068715,0.004580367,0.0063554663,0.009757482,0.018307421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06484643,0.0010025469,0.0008998022,0.0019046703,0.013558061,0.011507569,0.0043700826,0.009944655,0.007330124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13956101,0.0010833791,0.0010472953,0.0015387381,0.008769317,0.013635701,0.023014825,0.011528471,0.0019427865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114381626,0.0014007816,0.009728083,0.0017438412,0.00005088963,0.005196424,0.3956371,0.0011278645,0.0012990892,0.029369911,0.044496737,0.50983495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118495635,0.001151921,0.013920104,0.006086861,0.000039717386,0.0033753389,0.60302216,0.0016645489,0.0016295569,0.093740255,0.27503777,0.00021325372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003100954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054710335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06484643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059789927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018103013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3429448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161776421","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2012.667238","title":"Environmental impact assessment process substitution: experiences of public participants","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Emera","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Process (computing); Session (web analytics); Public participation; Government (linguistics); Pipeline (software); Public relations; Action (physics); Test (biology); Political science; Business; Public administration; Environmental planning; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Environmental science; Advertising","score_opus":0.05540213634116886,"score_gpt":0.43442765807230743,"score_spread":0.37902552173113857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161776421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809445,0.00041027978,0.0022709135,0.0055472855,0.00010874043,0.00018698945,0.000041635816,0.000057681045,0.01043188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950938,0.0002914571,0.000636096,0.0010148052,0.000032793963,0.00013802048,0.000028753499,0.00004183071,0.0027224682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587567,0.029449103,0.00071790256,0.001439945,0.0032480266,0.006388444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618815,0.024641193,0.0024922777,0.0014678035,0.004459066,0.0050581233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025072956,0.0011593247,0.0011911483,0.001569841,0.025997179,0.009372164,0.0030164476,0.0061972435,0.00436015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04252689,0.001102336,0.0008113914,0.002084461,0.019348387,0.007815171,0.013397582,0.006856225,0.00064800197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049583185,0.00008531845,0.0014697593,0.00004855655,0.000004667071,0.00092348334,0.99252445,0.000048467584,0.00050666614,0.0010240328,0.0005610498,0.002753902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009258544,0.00009049916,0.00035982757,0.00004984924,0.000006380958,0.00026742104,0.98650986,0.00008525251,0.00029951733,0.00029738378,0.012002725,0.000022034837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037200753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03195084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037200753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073215617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010468207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13260007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169474039","doi":"10.3152/146155111x12959673796281","title":"Enhancing benefits in health impact assessment through stakeholder consultation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder; Health impact assessment; Livelihood; Empowerment; Impact assessment; Stakeholder analysis; Business; Public relations; Process (computing); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Medicine; Nursing; Public administration; Public health; Economics; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.08532082045095338,"score_gpt":0.4200789917643576,"score_spread":0.33475817131340424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169474039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19220561,0.0020302816,0.27277955,0.053337213,0.00057266996,0.0061132293,0.00027382415,0.0010496312,0.471638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095134,0.0007824677,0.08039852,0.0027964544,0.00013831358,0.0013924937,0.000084139654,0.00007643262,0.004817717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90746045,0.07466108,0.0015311581,0.0015008729,0.011280867,0.0035655096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9316061,0.051974088,0.00318067,0.003814857,0.006998792,0.002425553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058672544,0.001251734,0.0007733606,0.0028973978,0.004381646,0.005576709,0.0019149939,0.0036251666,0.009932709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06469958,0.00052032457,0.00089213264,0.0018230885,0.004041429,0.0056024767,0.016300421,0.002411059,0.0014557469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010868941,0.0025892348,0.025290225,0.0051000305,0.00036373528,0.004138031,0.047010608,0.018053565,0.025117466,0.15892686,0.021419326,0.690904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086642493,0.0038242247,0.044688433,0.0047984095,0.00048095902,0.0032453854,0.06845245,0.03048243,0.02994876,0.55230045,0.26029798,0.0006141091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021460494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038742372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058672544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037257953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008581412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3102938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170556475","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765075","title":"Impact assessment of trade-related policies and agreements: experience and challenges","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Sustainable development; Impact assessment; Strategic environmental assessment; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Poverty; Free trade; Trade barrier; International trade; Economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.029019581765111047,"score_gpt":0.3980968578410925,"score_spread":0.36907727607598145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170556475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.388678,0.083470225,0.0631802,0.05560241,0.00097555475,0.00036057516,0.0005192886,0.00025853253,0.40695524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88863164,0.068341665,0.024121128,0.002561941,0.0006858029,0.00015349005,0.0003394292,0.00013905353,0.015025769],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97762156,0.012493729,0.0010251713,0.00045831752,0.007476953,0.0009242151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660271,0.025319925,0.0009309573,0.0010930356,0.0058903275,0.0007387794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034044206,0.00086923654,0.0010449109,0.0027991747,0.0023081824,0.008298699,0.0022948552,0.0027520077,0.0029970363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04044714,0.00031096043,0.0007077529,0.005678552,0.0047748145,0.009029632,0.0043428605,0.003602901,0.0006266019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030172503,0.0008509835,0.014172803,0.0021608903,0.00015794138,0.0017686293,0.071391724,0.03561174,0.00144225,0.16601053,0.04686415,0.6592667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090694826,0.0007822675,0.012734444,0.0029109411,0.0000894795,0.0016820424,0.092458166,0.018475708,0.0043827263,0.30394003,0.56222594,0.00022755806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005963892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004867856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034044206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003963612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035273717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18004513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301112057","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2015.1118956","title":"Connecting the strategic to the tactical in SEA design: an approach to wetland conservation policy development and implementation in an urban context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Wetland conservation; Environmental resource management; Strategic environmental assessment; Urban planning; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Business; Strategic planning; Land-use planning; Land use; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Geography; Political science; Civil engineering; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0758700446944359,"score_gpt":0.4296900848499606,"score_spread":0.3538200401555247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301112057","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08592024,0.00069972564,0.722891,0.012118689,0.00013940147,0.0009114674,0.00014855548,0.00021335206,0.17695767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6293614,0.00086234545,0.3600428,0.00057040405,0.000022798213,0.00065516436,0.000081941515,0.000054282693,0.008348854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346703,0.0048299697,0.0001638192,0.0002951897,0.0007177814,0.0005262812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968364,0.0017023082,0.00029279987,0.00020404927,0.00058846804,0.0003759051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006770748,0.0009009955,0.0005185903,0.0040378035,0.004408922,0.011271594,0.0020128894,0.0020362302,0.0041063065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00617699,0.000718836,0.0006297829,0.003094772,0.010343248,0.004561043,0.005940053,0.0021410394,0.00034170022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004501813,0.0001482361,0.005655207,0.0004280874,0.00005759131,0.0005256163,0.014008776,0.058570724,0.0012209849,0.82994485,0.0031946255,0.086200245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028279901,0.00025796768,0.0050698533,0.00071305654,0.00006525542,0.000360583,0.0927037,0.121160604,0.0032885952,0.62083656,0.15539894,0.00011658259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02266639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06712526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02266639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01260682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02421153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09146929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301607506","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765147","title":"Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":528,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Work (physics); Attractiveness; Sustainability organizations; Strategic environmental assessment; Key (lock); Management science; Business; Process management; Environmental impact assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.025221044035060043,"score_gpt":0.4028004067066425,"score_spread":0.3775793626715825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301607506","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056577395,0.010117286,0.7023724,0.050666034,0.0005313489,0.0018547863,0.0002164825,0.00062065315,0.22796327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22174789,0.013354561,0.73462325,0.0039041373,0.0011230932,0.0028104773,0.00034482864,0.00023045955,0.021861255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612136,0.0071452674,0.0010038884,0.0008350705,0.0044557694,0.0004385723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98757046,0.0071767624,0.000492075,0.0015955229,0.0025903983,0.00057480036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02036655,0.0020730046,0.0013813857,0.0045281607,0.0035243463,0.014047999,0.0043342113,0.006949176,0.008940329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02397957,0.0012987475,0.0009017706,0.002872233,0.02184949,0.012576111,0.009482466,0.006823781,0.0035797074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002075608,0.00015698826,0.00090876163,0.0008296849,0.000026497984,0.00015699632,0.0019498712,0.0063922596,0.00074961147,0.91268796,0.006100296,0.07002041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009460775,0.00003151496,0.00036363257,0.0004799847,0.000008310339,0.00008328241,0.0009770149,0.002862989,0.00035075683,0.9248112,0.07000038,0.000021568312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034011237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027484335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02036655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005847454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011457342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107709885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317417430","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2016.1140995","title":"Lessons learned: a framework methodology for human rights impact assessment of intellectual property protections in trade agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"National Human Rights Commission; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; European Commission; Health Resources in Action; World Health Organization","keywords":"Intellectual property; Human rights; Right to health; Business; International trade; Law and economics; Contradiction; Public economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.26877229519136575,"score_gpt":0.5717657301455606,"score_spread":0.3029934349541949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317417430","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022206837,0.00049249205,0.96514475,0.0054855123,0.00013223541,0.0012249314,0.0002416628,0.0001417517,0.02491599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064698204,0.00035960705,0.92969084,0.00050830306,0.00007327799,0.0029701667,0.00015596555,0.00006839919,0.0014752819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92506075,0.06194783,0.0031161886,0.0023236023,0.0061123767,0.0014392402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305775,0.056121025,0.0024206508,0.0036305883,0.0061412863,0.0011089302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07679506,0.002454188,0.0018821241,0.010648221,0.005223886,0.0136737,0.005270121,0.005516016,0.010644212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063886136,0.0011059701,0.003453878,0.007707111,0.020352665,0.011287605,0.008383953,0.00675899,0.0012464978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012156539,0.00004092309,0.00033322736,0.00035777997,0.000033685952,0.00017199744,0.0044468706,0.002303405,0.0001360621,0.972202,0.0014147254,0.018547218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046890753,0.000043579043,0.00025740062,0.00076819287,0.000043318287,0.00013273208,0.0043124766,0.00992136,0.00029708963,0.95104104,0.03310284,0.00003312784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009117328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012810228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07679506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011661445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016907444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40613592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398871119","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2016.1176405","title":"Unconventional shale gas development: challenges for environmental policy and EA practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Unconventional oil; Environmental planning; Aquifer; Environmental impact assessment; Cumulative effects; Shale gas; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Groundwater; Business; Oil shale; Petroleum engineering; Geology; Political science; Ecology; Waste management; Engineering","score_opus":0.022073426465698605,"score_gpt":0.35631431329921076,"score_spread":0.33424088683351216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398871119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009567734,0.033445932,0.0086187,0.91215384,0.0009445789,0.00002932559,0.00004006644,0.00009066516,0.03510912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.705056,0.12047805,0.031110957,0.11884644,0.0024289563,0.00024355495,0.000112131005,0.00013746416,0.02158639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922301,0.0038003628,0.00042064593,0.00059376564,0.0016568975,0.0012982214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97907126,0.011838737,0.0012253671,0.0009931031,0.003939969,0.0029315578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020532612,0.00058478647,0.0007453471,0.0017892987,0.0035407566,0.013798784,0.0030584754,0.011228196,0.0073640547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022452991,0.0002525332,0.0004976516,0.002172945,0.010379978,0.01332896,0.011635423,0.007721105,0.0010311175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059967664,0.00019861697,0.0021116985,0.0013601045,0.000046122503,0.0005270523,0.007374946,0.005186731,0.00085085904,0.63543105,0.050635543,0.29621726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014088759,0.000071573326,0.0011280825,0.0031811066,0.000012819534,0.0001623724,0.027300524,0.0018942431,0.00045566465,0.570652,0.39507705,0.000050516468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077473833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012114706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020532612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006780478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036030725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413925716","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2016.1176412","title":"Challenges to integrating planning and policy-making with environmental assessment on a regional scale – a multi-institutional perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Transactional leadership; Perspective (graphical); Scale (ratio); Plan (archaeology); Regional planning; Knowledge management; Environmental resource management; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Regional science; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Urban planning; Engineering","score_opus":0.044323754540111567,"score_gpt":0.42189672712043014,"score_spread":0.3775729725803186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413925716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23302327,0.013917647,0.14547895,0.418494,0.0006497589,0.0009266298,0.00025407557,0.00061242114,0.18664323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354938,0.0030581255,0.054490134,0.0039935126,0.00015346843,0.00026760646,0.00005961656,0.000103661754,0.0023800903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91957945,0.05760936,0.0029182713,0.004720637,0.008494651,0.0066775884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169097,0.053474497,0.0051120333,0.0069514993,0.0095006265,0.008051632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08921545,0.00080328376,0.0013854093,0.003932184,0.01301527,0.032808885,0.007286352,0.0062030493,0.0036802392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05487746,0.0013474899,0.0011939672,0.00476101,0.033889905,0.019288296,0.028687153,0.011786792,0.0007961896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010826815,0.0006724795,0.03027584,0.0020504785,0.0007075061,0.0025781493,0.18757349,0.042034365,0.0034321763,0.42607823,0.013331894,0.291157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041222833,0.00014491698,0.017977623,0.0027743366,0.00016851854,0.00051783107,0.3835333,0.016480055,0.0017350671,0.3833251,0.19297594,0.00032618485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1169148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12454772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1169148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025295688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0781745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47182202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486982898","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2016.1176409","title":"Towards a home-grown approach to strategic environmental assessment: adapting practice and participation in Kenya","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Kenya; Strategic environmental assessment; Context (archaeology); Environmental planning; Adaptation (eye); Environmental resource management; Developing country; Political science; Business; Geography; Environmental impact assessment; Economic growth; Environmental science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.03605441880418629,"score_gpt":0.3981606371355382,"score_spread":0.36210621833135187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486982898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893795,0.0005401285,0.010609452,0.015536019,0.00009215295,0.0012677565,0.000025209993,0.000071976894,0.08247786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797121,0.00050379016,0.012411655,0.00089981215,0.000010249629,0.00033490587,0.000023754792,0.000027001575,0.0060766204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97868514,0.017432312,0.00032666573,0.0006205784,0.0010626174,0.0018726385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954916,0.005430623,0.0006727771,0.00071366294,0.0013605008,0.002273366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029055424,0.00035138684,0.00028109745,0.0014190172,0.014212428,0.006269148,0.0020494324,0.0017024761,0.004378398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149857355,0.0004890784,0.0002840634,0.0009883953,0.010190545,0.005912459,0.0107487785,0.0024414686,0.0005602014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008231136,0.00075737684,0.024587689,0.00037399735,0.000019986312,0.0015489036,0.8076646,0.00053425884,0.002382783,0.02321553,0.0043603503,0.13447218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036800448,0.00034720512,0.018168287,0.00070065196,0.000016509395,0.000371671,0.88804245,0.0009408869,0.0012430473,0.009248681,0.08080908,0.00007462549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019782223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057000156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029055424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010433117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029955251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15366167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541026502","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2016.1239496","title":"Automated content analysis as a tool for research and practice: a case illustration from the Prairie Creek and Nico environmental assessments in the Northwest Territories, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Aurora Research Institute","keywords":"Public engagement; Scripting language; Sustainability; Content analysis; Public participation; Interpretation (philosophy); Environmental impact assessment; Politics; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Environmental science; Computer science; Law; Ecology; Social science","score_opus":0.17230422399094839,"score_gpt":0.5347691330615204,"score_spread":0.36246490907057205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541026502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8223684,0.0021779432,0.042583134,0.03367357,0.00023585041,0.0040063397,0.00094639114,0.00020721472,0.09380115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319166,0.0018585984,0.049855117,0.0018913351,0.000055682627,0.0015482752,0.00030950006,0.00013385457,0.012431087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677549,0.021954063,0.0010013692,0.0011643802,0.0053259465,0.0027993661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94036883,0.04258337,0.00167532,0.0023313235,0.010792357,0.0022487873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025318103,0.0007082451,0.000522596,0.004975379,0.03079807,0.008937883,0.003747832,0.0026255758,0.0021223035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036309216,0.000537891,0.000436376,0.008278129,0.01383593,0.0026928,0.0064524724,0.0027458665,0.0003390158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004610146,0.00012558834,0.008817047,0.00049864704,0.000017845285,0.006725075,0.90449715,0.0008054408,0.0017649581,0.016015256,0.007292944,0.053393934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013674271,0.00003624612,0.007723625,0.0005773055,0.000022293965,0.0007223269,0.90691966,0.0017995691,0.0012244955,0.0031985247,0.0777085,0.000053632037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8358366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9417961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16416341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06395447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08968672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46402436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765942933","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2017.1390873","title":"Closing the regulatory gap: revisions to the conventional practice of ex-post plans for EIAs to protect the valued components of Aboriginal peoples in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Context (archaeology); Plan (archaeology); Political science; Environmental planning; Pipeline (software); Environmental resource management; Geography; Law; Engineering; Archaeology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.033570743817467955,"score_gpt":0.41254328124488754,"score_spread":0.3789725374274196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765942933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5862005,0.0049699675,0.033326738,0.23033534,0.0010035518,0.0015702489,0.00020943889,0.00037129418,0.14201298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96030754,0.0017139898,0.020464843,0.006345419,0.0000610171,0.00022853859,0.00004352008,0.00006930178,0.01076598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94709086,0.022410754,0.0030928357,0.0029262963,0.018133003,0.0063462835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8894561,0.04141448,0.005825728,0.0067155985,0.051659185,0.004928999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07001909,0.00041796712,0.00042310217,0.0017141904,0.020584987,0.015525599,0.006626872,0.0034142113,0.0017484124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09825301,0.00067999936,0.00039578998,0.0025831624,0.020968303,0.0038913167,0.006465964,0.007773384,0.00016861352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016134718,0.00035582008,0.036732685,0.0010619519,0.000053318934,0.0039093434,0.47062197,0.0051751086,0.005909725,0.14399204,0.03108759,0.3009391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003947899,0.00029552032,0.07652922,0.0024793975,0.00010153698,0.0007598081,0.5717424,0.004438167,0.004944574,0.019664954,0.31863713,0.00036775257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93027556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9642469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11097404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11097404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37408575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8051768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766634428","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2017.1390874","title":"Impact assessment and indigenous self-determination: a scalar framework of participation options","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Naturvårdsverket; University of Leeds","keywords":"Aotearoa; Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Politics; Public administration; Political science; State (computer science); Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Geography; Law; Economics; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.028102378166564954,"score_gpt":0.45170705496707,"score_spread":0.423604676800505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766634428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1448575,0.0027709291,0.26084056,0.02117194,0.00023128091,0.0008761777,0.00018900287,0.00010881898,0.5689538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752998,0.00032195495,0.020589167,0.00027454743,0.00004378472,0.00037753663,0.000032495744,0.000017768283,0.0030429205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625511,0.028332993,0.001536606,0.0019621223,0.0035220892,0.002095056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97660714,0.014774739,0.0024688442,0.0019948657,0.002523179,0.001631286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034406196,0.00077652675,0.0005124327,0.0043362384,0.0050300723,0.0106887445,0.0018514548,0.0023976956,0.004519462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027061407,0.00042393367,0.000856384,0.0021747374,0.053761285,0.009646408,0.010625368,0.0033261736,0.00029579352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002628442,0.000040529125,0.0023456637,0.00012632401,0.00001676837,0.0001343433,0.018372713,0.0013104345,0.00026122478,0.9650159,0.00027418212,0.012075704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002056839,0.00012933774,0.00395925,0.00046662433,0.000027612201,0.00024412095,0.026012622,0.003047258,0.00041419786,0.92410004,0.041518647,0.000059764137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039316667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00452835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034406196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068299556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006866115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18195957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767887515","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2017.1364026","title":"An adaptable Health Impact Assessment (HIA) framework for assessing health within Environmental Assessment (EA): Canadian context, international application","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Intrinsik (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Health impact assessment; Context (archaeology); Environmental impact assessment; Process (computing); Impact assessment; Health assessment; Scale (ratio); Environmental planning; Strategic environmental assessment; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Political science; Public health; Business; Environmental science; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.037590925790806355,"score_gpt":0.4752414409980074,"score_spread":0.43765051520720105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767887515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009212641,0.0074366075,0.5964321,0.020277401,0.0005825448,0.005205942,0.008163229,0.0014458315,0.3512437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12825057,0.005792375,0.8361562,0.0012611914,0.00009865696,0.002086576,0.0022182951,0.00019201853,0.023944207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98312956,0.005091199,0.0014142671,0.0013819734,0.0076717967,0.0013112318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98496115,0.002465021,0.0005625902,0.00081691885,0.010441399,0.000752998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022499105,0.0022778735,0.0009956004,0.011811089,0.005861047,0.009939768,0.006094239,0.0019616298,0.008197232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020664403,0.0007906699,0.0019055207,0.011584344,0.008618264,0.0029109519,0.0057100994,0.0037166781,0.0014229125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043232358,0.00011843503,0.00618464,0.001625523,0.00011595193,0.00059202895,0.0056208028,0.03132011,0.0018548684,0.743252,0.034323588,0.17494877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004810035,0.00015031424,0.020833576,0.002999727,0.00027562253,0.0006220758,0.0071052434,0.041504826,0.0023152034,0.22145723,0.7022744,0.00041364398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92782444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94122833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09114925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09114925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17925188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66133714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809173004","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2018.1487504","title":"Human health, development legacies, and cumulative effects: environmental assessments of hydroelectric projects in the Nelson River watershed, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hydroelectricity; Indigenous; Environmental planning; Context (archaeology); Health impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Social determinants of health; Geography; Political science; Public health; Environmental science; Health care; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.021912268162407975,"score_gpt":0.36973766878249115,"score_spread":0.34782540062008316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809173004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974051,0.0044960026,0.0016303285,0.00169053,0.000011889419,0.00020156371,0.0017397045,0.000017035729,0.016161947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938076,0.003034787,0.0015154526,0.00006343072,0.0000041275894,0.00003307844,0.00032060157,0.0000035473347,0.0012172324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981719,0.000438199,0.00007417245,0.000089070956,0.0010092865,0.00021740742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966434,0.0006918293,0.00033831978,0.00006413687,0.0020202324,0.00024199764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028762494,0.00034928505,0.00026284257,0.0029806304,0.0018758079,0.0019389883,0.0007242388,0.00024331565,0.00054292317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00439634,0.00014565534,0.000279335,0.006566772,0.0014400204,0.00054023066,0.0019239418,0.0004502662,0.00002837173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011261056,0.00012082895,0.81043404,0.0010527837,0.00033335513,0.0007122958,0.01959622,0.014135741,0.00086724886,0.0047914726,0.0026676639,0.1451758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037914979,0.00005174918,0.9616288,0.0003719994,0.00007309784,0.00006781587,0.023134848,0.002931264,0.0005132637,0.0010106376,0.010176632,0.000036199657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97576535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032817774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032817774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041902296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23811072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886905187","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2018.1507111","title":"Social impact assessment in the Russian Federation: does it meet the key values of democracy and civil society?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Democracy; Civil society; Legislation; Corporation; Political science; Social impact assessment; Public administration; Environmental impact assessment; Russian federation; Law; Sociology; Politics; Regional science","score_opus":0.02340133003224087,"score_gpt":0.41349396844516173,"score_spread":0.39009263841292086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886905187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57628727,0.01731656,0.034941953,0.028862888,0.00065797527,0.0004907807,0.0006376579,0.000313789,0.34049112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859855,0.002659426,0.007525579,0.0005336717,0.0000588519,0.00009112458,0.00012034124,0.000021947015,0.0030035847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260783,0.00345202,0.00075856206,0.00034130065,0.002238536,0.00060172065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930314,0.0022388306,0.0011715735,0.00081336306,0.0025330544,0.00021177129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01156561,0.00033667652,0.00051504443,0.0024359296,0.0034572955,0.0054873903,0.00075107225,0.0012001102,0.0010512067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011630094,0.00022963999,0.0006584941,0.0021508837,0.004344884,0.0026706108,0.002756774,0.0011500326,0.00031138735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015788194,0.0003143265,0.15262257,0.0027271826,0.00022963001,0.0014500293,0.027599597,0.01790292,0.0070268386,0.43254232,0.010974548,0.3464522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003729893,0.0004536657,0.4850084,0.0030055575,0.00028728324,0.00090170075,0.04096555,0.007846828,0.007439951,0.10491987,0.34895566,0.0001782019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048018783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0421962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048018783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069609242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023188936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095478594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947203848","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2019.1601432","title":"Introducing SEA effectiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011915260972628813,"score_gpt":0.3704230304747605,"score_spread":0.3585077695021317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947203848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027147108,0.01982507,0.01635177,0.43159875,0.03791789,0.00031449235,0.00020380272,0.0005408917,0.49053267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2207692,0.040118247,0.04295393,0.27543715,0.027523188,0.0024009068,0.00069514033,0.0028266,0.38727567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96868896,0.021973304,0.0009040421,0.0016139688,0.004797082,0.0020225716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686469,0.01988468,0.001134304,0.0016532491,0.004720618,0.003960252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022971077,0.0013232512,0.00076942344,0.003299288,0.0076178457,0.02229507,0.002731011,0.007956938,0.05873812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044240527,0.00051742507,0.0011622953,0.0020415802,0.01786042,0.029232882,0.014985362,0.011828482,0.013243875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020140886,0.00007319364,0.0005010466,0.00070051284,0.000016355803,0.000095285686,0.013841105,0.00011769656,0.00008680717,0.48181355,0.409228,0.09350633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073791957,0.000025575358,0.00020090964,0.0009409519,0.0000063343005,0.00006050348,0.010249842,0.000060768558,0.000070022536,0.06831834,0.9200456,0.0000137702655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023348338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003852049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05873812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008945578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012028837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19649857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981637144","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2019.1677089","title":"Gearing up impact assessment as a vehicle for achieving the UN sustainable development goals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Sustainable development; Sustainability; Process management; Suite; Impact assessment; Key (lock); Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Environmental economics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Environmental science; Public administration; Computer security","score_opus":0.015773736044987514,"score_gpt":0.38706959434140337,"score_spread":0.37129585829641587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981637144","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018581696,0.013358928,0.6636569,0.052111886,0.0015966696,0.0008855046,0.00016524144,0.0010883472,0.24855484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5570872,0.0117170205,0.41208854,0.0075312555,0.00092277024,0.001179616,0.00022118569,0.0003988814,0.008853561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94157684,0.031747174,0.0039008386,0.0027279963,0.017929781,0.002117353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94674987,0.029775806,0.004510567,0.0077018193,0.008941601,0.002320382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08656241,0.0021613047,0.0015149963,0.009824678,0.0027174188,0.021141231,0.0026296498,0.004155178,0.0030430588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07397069,0.00094532315,0.0015638169,0.004048614,0.021521328,0.022412729,0.02398838,0.010349019,0.00075943064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020068392,0.0000682961,0.0015155426,0.00054025813,0.0000634547,0.00011435318,0.0034021426,0.004526201,0.00094723393,0.8948907,0.00347849,0.09043332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009916401,0.00012313975,0.0017494452,0.001342576,0.000049473038,0.00017971263,0.0037091158,0.002508717,0.0012235583,0.9235381,0.0654886,0.00007773121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027017184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024185874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08656241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066215503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01308879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45779127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085357145","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2020.1786763","title":"The central role of Inuit Qaujimaningit in Nunavut’s impact assessment process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Polar Knowledge Canada; Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust","keywords":"Indigenous; Traditional knowledge; Process (computing); Impact assessment; Arctic; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; The arctic; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Political science; Geography; Environmental science; Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04116162092281501,"score_gpt":0.4954611339708268,"score_spread":0.4542995130480118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085357145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8063805,0.0038606075,0.01644271,0.027717117,0.00035102086,0.0011950836,0.000107240216,0.00012603083,0.14381956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912895,0.00044106468,0.0040033604,0.00063633325,0.000009330057,0.00008727914,0.000015906116,0.0000176155,0.0034995927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98021424,0.012391433,0.00086985505,0.001505033,0.0020771467,0.0029423533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97183704,0.015599296,0.0015927259,0.0011729937,0.006190965,0.0036069057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03148121,0.0003665111,0.00033476143,0.0016846043,0.019288195,0.012188271,0.002287208,0.001476966,0.0033477908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032885753,0.0005064945,0.00029678526,0.0021091308,0.012004855,0.0035280185,0.008512043,0.0022678175,0.00031036037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010673142,0.00011055824,0.035071366,0.0004266863,0.000024250177,0.0013132747,0.8473805,0.0005868832,0.0022374128,0.024739811,0.002111458,0.08589102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010599533,0.00009214098,0.038365297,0.0010703665,0.000037327653,0.0002788359,0.88281167,0.0012757739,0.0012043018,0.008310416,0.06644672,0.00009662556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61622393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7319181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38377607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034366503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083877556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7720724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089036784","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2020.1820848","title":"Leveraging impact assessment for satisfactory project outcomes: benefits of early planning and participatory decision-making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nuclear Waste Management Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Transparency (behavior); Stakeholder engagement; Impact assessment; Process management; Stakeholder; Business; Citizen journalism; Process (computing); Project sponsorship; Project stakeholder; Project planning; Environmental planning; Social impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Project management; Project charter; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Public administration; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0854557402074166,"score_gpt":0.4534847357742922,"score_spread":0.3680289955668756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089036784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033715606,0.0014999097,0.7726506,0.029515794,0.00038696273,0.0041907723,0.00007835219,0.00073897524,0.15722299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48924825,0.0012221592,0.49881792,0.0015423931,0.00015715523,0.0029752501,0.00008365282,0.00022247124,0.0057307784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.827792,0.122824565,0.005249771,0.0059424248,0.032570858,0.005620348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7804903,0.1704402,0.011051224,0.018737517,0.015019832,0.004261043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12569922,0.0026356832,0.0012584704,0.0056399773,0.010814,0.017734414,0.0047588684,0.0065604323,0.004944543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12782256,0.0016464548,0.0015809768,0.0025529612,0.022177381,0.014177163,0.0243839,0.009861354,0.0014401164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022360752,0.001260216,0.0073726973,0.002266702,0.00018041965,0.0019115825,0.07025693,0.018463776,0.007481337,0.45609957,0.007460934,0.4270222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014655756,0.0006190657,0.0048395474,0.003184318,0.00010477774,0.00068330445,0.02655735,0.010445415,0.009338182,0.82332903,0.120327964,0.00042454273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005107707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009544228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12569922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009456087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04087601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66476893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154983862","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2021.1911752","title":"Rural water sustainability index (RWSI): an innovative multicriteria and participative approach for rural communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Water Resources and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Sustainability; Delphi method; Index (typography); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental Sustainability Index; Geographic information system; Rural area; Geography; Business; Computer science; Environmental science; Cartography; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.029299786373582864,"score_gpt":0.3991313139161135,"score_spread":0.3698315275425306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154983862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26471788,0.0009514137,0.63733035,0.0049243122,0.00028845086,0.011704988,0.001462359,0.0010579791,0.07756227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5844727,0.0004799332,0.4030187,0.00029574765,0.000043087715,0.007852738,0.00043604168,0.0000906524,0.0033103647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9624672,0.028438693,0.0018156212,0.0013962999,0.0052021546,0.0006800734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777244,0.012729249,0.003024856,0.001551609,0.004169694,0.0008003208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03258876,0.0012699328,0.00089403114,0.008361723,0.0031932069,0.00335628,0.001604167,0.0010162479,0.002425048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02890526,0.0005185144,0.0012478366,0.004957557,0.0023681936,0.0038568948,0.008513803,0.0013344593,0.0003302522],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027712944,0.0006520298,0.040703256,0.0026989568,0.00045485797,0.00031667607,0.07165188,0.008673404,0.008776256,0.03855673,0.0066236793,0.8206152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037310895,0.0040230397,0.15520568,0.004159734,0.00089892047,0.0017681306,0.20585988,0.078615725,0.02538365,0.2057348,0.31677118,0.001206175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026481196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006048462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03258876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004309729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008088066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1723479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193724558","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2021.1968264","title":"Book review for impact assessment and project appraisal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Project appraisal; Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental science; Business; Public administration; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.18081582872529664,"score_gpt":0.6164587424993604,"score_spread":0.4356429137740637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193724558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034595077,0.7454893,0.0064532952,0.04128843,0.049591612,0.00034194495,0.0011009916,0.00075014576,0.15463828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031331175,0.5163939,0.0074342554,0.01881801,0.017545162,0.00047765428,0.0022557897,0.00044388897,0.43349826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967595,0.00050336606,0.00015014618,0.00018498827,0.0023022152,0.000099764366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902114,0.0030770916,0.0004332599,0.00026644886,0.0056001097,0.0004116597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023435315,0.0010954469,0.0015380732,0.0048723533,0.0008710614,0.0030217478,0.0014746591,0.001896363,0.060265068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01145819,0.00052143,0.00096043665,0.005392158,0.00087565166,0.0028266232,0.0012118944,0.0041214274,0.047413737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067664787,0.000008540956,0.000020645168,0.0004364016,0.0000065518257,0.00001748542,0.000016680902,0.000049298942,0.00007270038,0.0010352599,0.9136596,0.084670015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044861845,0.000009900919,0.00018924172,0.00067280896,0.000008220653,0.00011082388,0.000010976096,0.00005620658,0.000054411918,0.0009041024,0.9979722,0.0000065824265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004630316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01009894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060265068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025664554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006469301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20160675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214632854","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2035646","title":"A roadmap for ESIA policy change in Ethiopia should address wide-ranging governance reforms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Civil society; Legislature; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Natural resource; Business; Sustainable development; Public policy; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Geography; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.05206408368404798,"score_gpt":0.3989347436183208,"score_spread":0.34687065993427285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214632854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10322727,0.024516497,0.04910784,0.6637168,0.0055630854,0.0024945932,0.0011144835,0.0010317239,0.14922775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74675083,0.018959206,0.122508965,0.061467133,0.00074891344,0.0018273806,0.0008610723,0.0001333462,0.046743214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957053,0.0018366992,0.00019453785,0.00020352502,0.0004003579,0.0016595592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917715,0.0020239314,0.0006597225,0.00042103737,0.0021456538,0.0029781216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010022381,0.0006596869,0.00048042976,0.0018388316,0.0021385185,0.008687669,0.0017277909,0.004934088,0.014297771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077900696,0.00033150768,0.0009182483,0.0012130938,0.0019571763,0.0046052905,0.004465026,0.004158376,0.0015127842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002759156,0.0017224995,0.017609015,0.003719776,0.00020544766,0.0028669434,0.0046359254,0.019942414,0.00933923,0.5735542,0.106103666,0.26002496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015075372,0.00044633765,0.019509181,0.0040323,0.000098217795,0.00065784255,0.03402216,0.005265439,0.004097491,0.11046456,0.82107896,0.00017669072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077365595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009844519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014297771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053413757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05262825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053004086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221107508","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2041160","title":"Addressing climate change in EIA legislation and the climate-proofing of dams: a comparative analysis of Canada, Oman and Portugal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Climate change; Environmental planning; Relevance (law); Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental protection; Geography; Environmental science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.06420268107635232,"score_gpt":0.41923860458734785,"score_spread":0.35503592351099555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221107508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8774613,0.012513967,0.001438866,0.006717182,0.00014488041,0.00021944052,0.0021541854,0.000043693406,0.09930651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879711,0.0053036013,0.0010251134,0.0005517253,0.00001550958,0.00004784774,0.0006183239,0.000028935921,0.004437778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923288,0.0010195195,0.00030760776,0.0003854803,0.0039160075,0.0020425327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98231,0.005674275,0.0019724641,0.0004958353,0.008186524,0.0013609489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006447082,0.000295987,0.0005161515,0.0035892446,0.0060449373,0.0046305973,0.0010700108,0.00091178797,0.0031563113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017944248,0.00022419737,0.00064417196,0.010108888,0.0032010863,0.0014445193,0.0027344,0.0010891074,0.00012747954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008068456,0.00024888242,0.4557892,0.005360842,0.00054119923,0.0035137085,0.15100257,0.0046947845,0.002835596,0.12254047,0.016781082,0.23588482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015369258,0.000071511975,0.7045058,0.0026281169,0.00022384168,0.00030274197,0.14900137,0.0009549627,0.0008710131,0.0014259521,0.1399015,0.00009779955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97227895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98959315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08405414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08405414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13382457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60985833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239611969","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765418","title":"Books","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03875139556825602,"score_gpt":0.45876659157159794,"score_spread":0.4200151960033419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239611969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002784622,0.004550377,0.0014034082,0.0009263635,0.0009055233,0.000057795216,0.0014537479,0.0007357248,0.98968863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003618305,0.0012134649,0.0004286787,0.00017581349,0.00008480933,0.000015650923,0.00060472614,0.00013558127,0.9969795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958116,0.00003069534,0.000016304768,0.00007236402,0.0002645734,0.000034985176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993813,0.00011476201,0.000023428323,0.00011550976,0.00025943562,0.000105408406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035127465,0.001192305,0.0010522858,0.0035852734,0.0016898939,0.0056440467,0.0014577778,0.0013626134,0.71588296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016158889,0.0006670328,0.0005676359,0.004566209,0.0006243524,0.004077145,0.0019215872,0.00188983,0.6412439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017085364,0.000034006862,0.000095815216,0.00014456356,0.00000292108,0.000036200116,0.00007758087,0.0000969586,0.00027377048,0.009753538,0.7880832,0.20138432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026944156,0.0000046826904,0.00014574567,0.00007981886,0.0000016633503,0.00003769833,0.000038905502,0.00004323512,0.00008367641,0.002255654,0.9973031,0.0000031047484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042372053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01264646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28411704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013406472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015314149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242039017","doi":"10.3152/147154605781765616","title":"Books","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03875139556825602,"score_gpt":0.45876659157159794,"score_spread":0.4200151960033419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242039017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002784622,0.004550377,0.0014034082,0.0009263635,0.0009055233,0.000057795216,0.0014537479,0.0007357248,0.98968863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003618305,0.0012134649,0.0004286787,0.00017581349,0.00008480933,0.000015650923,0.00060472614,0.00013558127,0.9969795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958116,0.00003069534,0.000016304768,0.00007236402,0.0002645734,0.000034985176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993813,0.00011476201,0.000023428323,0.00011550976,0.00025943562,0.000105408406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035127465,0.001192305,0.0010522858,0.0035852734,0.0016898939,0.0056440467,0.0014577778,0.0013626134,0.71588296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016158889,0.0006670328,0.0005676359,0.004566209,0.0006243524,0.004077145,0.0019215872,0.00188983,0.6412439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017085364,0.000034006862,0.000095815216,0.00014456356,0.00000292108,0.000036200116,0.00007758087,0.0000969586,0.00027377048,0.009753538,0.7880832,0.20138432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026944156,0.0000046826904,0.00014574567,0.00007981886,0.0000016633503,0.00003769833,0.000038905502,0.00004323512,0.00008367641,0.002255654,0.9973031,0.0000031047484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042372053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01264646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28411704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013406472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015314149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245323674","doi":"10.3152/147154600781767420","title":"Books","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.014000230416489363,"score_gpt":0.36022154592287453,"score_spread":0.3462213155063852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245323674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026020827,0.0052646743,0.0010640549,0.0010969688,0.0012099436,0.000047639198,0.001449538,0.0006008076,0.98900604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000317736,0.0012936784,0.0003474182,0.0001880089,0.00010187066,0.000013902685,0.0005835647,0.00012269303,0.9970311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995473,0.000033629563,0.000016770637,0.00008124137,0.00027917713,0.00004185115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994405,0.00009603983,0.000022676913,0.00010090539,0.00023328899,0.00010663639],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037595592,0.0011345439,0.0009662598,0.0034007258,0.0014163206,0.0054271566,0.0014808275,0.0014027214,0.72983897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015361945,0.00059334125,0.00054123567,0.0043229163,0.0006080116,0.0036762727,0.001987813,0.0017593992,0.6706561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019124653,0.00003084419,0.00009858222,0.00015002648,0.0000031282605,0.000038751456,0.00006823675,0.00009558753,0.00027956237,0.010447619,0.7785856,0.210183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025432353,0.000004085018,0.000121051904,0.00006563339,0.0000012568224,0.000034800694,0.000031339285,0.00003569191,0.00005331841,0.0017609177,0.99788684,0.0000025403383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038786102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107145365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27016103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012763184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013737404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253422678","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765354","title":"Improving quality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dynamic Systems Analysis (Canada); University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental impact statement; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Law; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02231168152036001,"score_gpt":0.4032500225856879,"score_spread":0.38093834106532787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253422678","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025355125,0.036990285,0.3356764,0.32625526,0.021836564,0.017155971,0.016434157,0.007588981,0.21270731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29368177,0.029351223,0.40771183,0.08809489,0.0072318898,0.01527646,0.026889738,0.005159081,0.12660305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.64675874,0.14559594,0.054676104,0.0252391,0.12147821,0.006251919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22364159,0.1331834,0.052215613,0.12671891,0.45075393,0.013486513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2747257,0.0010054116,0.0030990825,0.013142461,0.0049312115,0.017587878,0.0069733653,0.004449125,0.0675248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46459904,0.001559005,0.0027771548,0.016127279,0.005376313,0.012388462,0.010252385,0.006415358,0.0153422225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034356746,0.00019032332,0.013761329,0.0086501045,0.00021501482,0.00037378637,0.009070174,0.00048781914,0.0022962007,0.028814953,0.28973818,0.64605856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011491012,0.000187607,0.014239448,0.0056898966,0.00014779862,0.00035274745,0.0040379455,0.0006994058,0.001962284,0.01352118,0.9589499,0.00009681239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015537645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011861145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2747257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016099898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06079395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8943923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292712520","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2099728","title":"Treatment of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: A global survey of current practices and common issues","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Parks Canada; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Perception; Computer science; Data science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Psychology; Cartography","score_opus":0.06782728553241443,"score_gpt":0.469251213876376,"score_spread":0.40142392834396157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292712520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5357044,0.21267895,0.06618077,0.116697855,0.0007662973,0.00047923118,0.00066951127,0.00025805953,0.066564925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89523417,0.074882865,0.024077712,0.0040661828,0.00026112926,0.0002169006,0.00027908495,0.00012002243,0.00086202426],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680342,0.019346302,0.0040956046,0.002254047,0.0052870964,0.0009826901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8466623,0.116098754,0.012167194,0.005387846,0.017116508,0.002567377],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056419406,0.00054853753,0.00087150023,0.008199837,0.0021797067,0.0054471768,0.001769913,0.0015759764,0.002491618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07699363,0.0005365159,0.00074542634,0.012781472,0.010208202,0.012481567,0.0071192877,0.0026648461,0.00021077711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011654889,0.000098512806,0.09185104,0.006854964,0.0001609289,0.00037442645,0.073719,0.001926233,0.002022355,0.030082485,0.006840574,0.785953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024088908,0.00046979266,0.2847379,0.023715122,0.00023373759,0.0032536532,0.28150782,0.0039234064,0.0015639212,0.05605447,0.34422356,0.00029246946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072719557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01051663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94358057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004393481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007426896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29837787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307642983","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2139468","title":"Impact assessment for renewable energy development: analysis of impacts and mitigation practices for wind energy in western Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Renewable energy; Wind power; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Environmental impact assessment; Social impact assessment; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Economics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.020982704255304435,"score_gpt":0.37840182214912105,"score_spread":0.35741911789381664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307642983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636839,0.00074996136,0.001493674,0.00057462667,0.000011572936,0.00025116222,0.0029934067,0.00005542806,0.030186197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825807,0.0011135407,0.0019953477,0.000062587496,0.000002287631,0.000063263025,0.0014375849,0.000027906979,0.012716774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888104,0.00009471566,0.00004421884,0.00007055632,0.0006515217,0.0002580169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976082,0.0002422677,0.0001541615,0.000055060787,0.0016751772,0.00026521413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008883355,0.00027912256,0.00023877175,0.0027743499,0.0026183508,0.0019095716,0.00060765847,0.00018567948,0.0020467397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002881744,0.0001667604,0.0003918766,0.005803581,0.0008217636,0.0005612722,0.00083758746,0.00036138948,0.00018370872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029193732,0.00021504854,0.73033994,0.0007466354,0.00020720378,0.0010205407,0.023801588,0.015293109,0.004305296,0.009190011,0.009504802,0.2050839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007574248,0.000042288975,0.94339556,0.0001564338,0.000060230534,0.00006682093,0.029801399,0.00529103,0.0012028005,0.00050440937,0.019428916,0.00004255948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99604285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064966485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064966485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0769351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47136706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308627936","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2135232","title":"Lack of consideration of ecological connectivity in Canadian environmental impact assessment: Current practice and need for improvement","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Current (fluid); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Impact assessment; Ecology; Political science; Oceanography; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.03779447672258558,"score_gpt":0.43042281057410026,"score_spread":0.3926283338515147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308627936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23232225,0.097969964,0.05763686,0.35766506,0.0021389541,0.0024031417,0.0044586523,0.0014937962,0.24391143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8405332,0.043943543,0.09500563,0.01195931,0.00027812328,0.00083428115,0.0014799477,0.00039290814,0.0055729738],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8938666,0.023038063,0.009875209,0.0071597616,0.058987636,0.0070728194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55250114,0.11108523,0.020444188,0.012507348,0.28813025,0.015331914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.131703,0.0012237412,0.001812036,0.022626005,0.017207535,0.020919299,0.0094201425,0.0016977304,0.0037445612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2385856,0.0012563445,0.0017278593,0.031887606,0.013416927,0.011278169,0.014211533,0.0046402025,0.00043128827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013171807,0.00016570537,0.14034432,0.006781423,0.00046538812,0.00056468707,0.04680079,0.005896895,0.0009626898,0.046035174,0.049619995,0.7022312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787153,0.00019463511,0.3997432,0.029942151,0.0006584434,0.000619426,0.13348271,0.011435752,0.0016045949,0.047105215,0.37420022,0.00093574025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97562534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8590763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14092368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36250156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308628128","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2134619","title":"Advancing the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: Synthesis and next steps forward","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.019070552699911578,"score_gpt":0.3523895423434966,"score_spread":0.33331898964358503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308628128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004537243,0.8344957,0.032782882,0.11725036,0.0031866245,0.00019452107,0.00037782578,0.000047719746,0.0071271434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.115791656,0.7910356,0.064924315,0.020926803,0.0054506725,0.0006186233,0.0003055256,0.00006658785,0.0008802884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.973504,0.018357469,0.0029556153,0.0015488894,0.0030862004,0.0005478145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64258754,0.31933883,0.009270864,0.007134732,0.019030487,0.002637434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09325206,0.0021870087,0.0053572357,0.0070614778,0.0014304115,0.014426859,0.004576268,0.0059464644,0.010880501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15696421,0.00091855414,0.0023792498,0.010743973,0.0073268665,0.022134097,0.008002271,0.008763653,0.00078037125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003430819,0.00024834374,0.0073242197,0.06972122,0.0025139493,0.00015513426,0.0031269602,0.0073212306,0.0008045546,0.1508864,0.0169829,0.74057204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001502367,0.00061731506,0.014741758,0.13874355,0.004379129,0.00035196485,0.011681972,0.0074717207,0.0009893392,0.5533398,0.26728112,0.0002521973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013273838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033378724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99313563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068643885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024880985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49316996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310534956","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2099730","title":"Indigenous experiences of impact assessment and development projects: lessons from the Aashukan exchange","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Craft; Environmental planning; Community development; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04376174089045104,"score_gpt":0.40474149131528553,"score_spread":0.3609797504248345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310534956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8853301,0.0019420735,0.002796771,0.011535928,0.00041330696,0.00014687932,0.000047947076,0.000045450695,0.09774161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762797,0.0010833924,0.0015192195,0.00089315884,0.000054993547,0.00008877561,0.000024184046,0.000051329476,0.020005189],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98943543,0.006496838,0.00019325076,0.00045464476,0.0013248083,0.00209501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934343,0.0032086757,0.0003139275,0.00033859338,0.0007900172,0.001914447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010885218,0.00059436465,0.0008484368,0.0013431822,0.03686569,0.0076610376,0.002231061,0.0028687583,0.005365329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009685472,0.00054640276,0.00049872365,0.0017227484,0.018683087,0.006072823,0.01779587,0.005525438,0.00039802922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001527412,0.000032637778,0.0006193462,0.000049380607,0.0000033114352,0.00073651836,0.99234855,0.000029712615,0.00019875976,0.0025166185,0.0005151968,0.0029347234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030522976,0.000025765496,0.001229114,0.00011050084,0.000005655649,0.00025058002,0.95935625,0.000051137165,0.0000945528,0.0008652377,0.0379906,0.000017569519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2015862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38823006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2015862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01167418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015500722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40082562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318829606","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2169460","title":"A saliency mapping approach to understanding the visual impact of wind and solar infrastructure in amenity landscapes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Amenity; Vineyard; Renewable energy; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Computer science; Environmental science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.05159590938204612,"score_gpt":0.4328512423434418,"score_spread":0.3812553329613957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318829606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55346525,0.0010389008,0.41340372,0.0009845927,0.000081168655,0.00053308846,0.0010363888,0.0006469222,0.028810022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92699087,0.0002324512,0.07124087,0.00003270183,0.000029141587,0.00011053374,0.00017291006,0.00003370613,0.0011567444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998047,0.00007497071,0.000006104805,0.0000416446,0.000041915897,0.000030733812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999374,0.00036518395,0.000058366717,0.00004133377,0.00011817689,0.000042967855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038912,0.0003963592,0.00018789648,0.003848709,0.0004929834,0.0014074075,0.00034010757,0.00037924896,0.0026752697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021482215,0.00019179488,0.00042628183,0.0015378923,0.0007165966,0.0010875978,0.0008885425,0.0003740596,0.00018272117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006651328,0.00035776632,0.045359604,0.0017961652,0.0003002575,0.0010524848,0.0387803,0.029142026,0.11134679,0.043807767,0.0067494544,0.7206422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076544304,0.00045150614,0.36220562,0.00045858353,0.00040516697,0.0012404749,0.039794676,0.44919023,0.023329038,0.079897806,0.042762242,0.0001880803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012371369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01933337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012371369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009405464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046544612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024598718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318948384","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2170093","title":"Improving cumulative effects assessment: alternative approaches based upon an expert survey and literature review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Squamish Nation; Burnaby Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Omnipresence; Cumulative effects; Impact assessment; Key (lock); Environmental impact assessment; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.059476322853788954,"score_gpt":0.42080365439943285,"score_spread":0.3613273315456439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318948384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04641663,0.16117896,0.6587496,0.023832636,0.0020957016,0.045679957,0.010503402,0.0011862982,0.050356865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105796844,0.07286658,0.78707606,0.0033386026,0.00040081787,0.02573032,0.002644949,0.00013118764,0.002014504],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8359087,0.101668335,0.029206317,0.004759073,0.027247423,0.0012101626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6078962,0.28068936,0.016326668,0.016563755,0.07724362,0.0012803973],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22299741,0.0028317932,0.0034530524,0.079474226,0.0021915555,0.011455171,0.0044864337,0.0026637765,0.005636214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25354627,0.0014636709,0.0036605943,0.050127972,0.003680276,0.018071925,0.0072837314,0.0024411608,0.0013652646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021726632,0.00022530156,0.007339973,0.11770601,0.0021293473,0.000763327,0.020912679,0.003571729,0.0029900898,0.027718369,0.012686783,0.8037392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051297754,0.0016606404,0.037028883,0.36295253,0.0133728115,0.0022540702,0.099770464,0.017299252,0.00519421,0.11760616,0.3411676,0.0011804375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062995898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025857426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22299741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008774039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022497548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319788239","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2175503","title":"EA simplification: Canadian processes and challenges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05684810281050792,"score_gpt":0.3879131808377645,"score_spread":0.3310650780272566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319788239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090628766,0.032531813,0.047548223,0.46726227,0.0029205543,0.0016455152,0.0027067792,0.0016682792,0.3530879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62104887,0.04185128,0.12103802,0.06564202,0.00090668636,0.0007607086,0.0033432995,0.00099103,0.14441812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93728197,0.009033549,0.0034085296,0.0049196025,0.035282843,0.010073505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88336396,0.015528955,0.0034564368,0.00525031,0.086089596,0.0063106846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042853888,0.001067702,0.001155187,0.008151042,0.023376253,0.01833713,0.008291806,0.0044129994,0.01140545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08056569,0.0012517906,0.0017566292,0.013371475,0.010962715,0.008132436,0.009989562,0.0079028485,0.001205011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001133628,0.00016670613,0.009786801,0.0013717666,0.00008997599,0.0005649753,0.011088317,0.016719699,0.0014860537,0.395515,0.17063718,0.3924602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003888285,0.000048302096,0.024340529,0.0010960202,0.00006219022,0.00020773236,0.009743201,0.0068781245,0.0012967217,0.030981844,0.92500716,0.0002992824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7631813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23681864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43420026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8851822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385580093","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2243019","title":"Moving to next generation community-based environmental assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental planning; Work (physics); Globe; Environmental impact assessment; Community engagement; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Business; Computer science; Process management; Political science; Public relations; Environmental science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.07754093535579859,"score_gpt":0.414326000481572,"score_spread":0.3367850651257734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385580093","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16573949,0.00816298,0.36744723,0.10850685,0.0016851402,0.0032172387,0.00042879704,0.0012088577,0.34360346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72360194,0.004239992,0.24042593,0.008885426,0.00021080226,0.0021531624,0.0004159441,0.00018494533,0.019881813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858795,0.009785711,0.00035224424,0.00083636947,0.002333031,0.00081317517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967823,0.015289205,0.0013417323,0.0027758726,0.0092239445,0.0035462666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027321996,0.00050142274,0.0004209649,0.0028829228,0.00289094,0.0067506754,0.0031536152,0.0030644846,0.011028103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031216832,0.00032905542,0.0006465437,0.0016421551,0.0028617026,0.009122878,0.012484913,0.0033905602,0.0014909166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000674216,0.0009540064,0.014445312,0.0011580343,0.00008685087,0.00070010725,0.03492137,0.003808296,0.0027394495,0.123450294,0.023723861,0.7939451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050850238,0.0003776362,0.0117069,0.003753408,0.000051325165,0.00052551937,0.085478984,0.012194395,0.0023343721,0.29294908,0.590422,0.00015548247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072678817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018185185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027321996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004758961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014785692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14449424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385637583","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2239586","title":"Advancing the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment – Part 2 of the special issue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Generalitat Valenciana; European Commission","keywords":"Tenacity (mineralogy); European union; Marie curie; Work (physics); Political science; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Engineering; Chemistry; Biology; International trade; Mineralogy","score_opus":0.019562778300399822,"score_gpt":0.37186541167173315,"score_spread":0.35230263337133333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385637583","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032903794,0.14477487,0.02691761,0.35169646,0.41399238,0.00017328806,0.00023515831,0.00020952584,0.058710355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045674525,0.18975496,0.023085719,0.059184097,0.6563205,0.00022468033,0.0003248955,0.0005661816,0.024864534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994453,0.00235844,0.00051451277,0.00054847193,0.0018605004,0.00026502815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95308757,0.029662851,0.0019997794,0.001622705,0.0111271,0.0025000295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015147463,0.0007489542,0.001229708,0.0031926348,0.0029225647,0.011031411,0.0021984566,0.005664072,0.012838317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049275443,0.0005998036,0.00087356864,0.00246596,0.0070890537,0.011000475,0.0050518955,0.01101167,0.0032284218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003167649,0.000062013285,0.0022961206,0.0011776311,0.00007319735,0.00018879188,0.00071730436,0.0013527771,0.00040474086,0.05771552,0.7482772,0.1877031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008246476,0.000048888658,0.0026481021,0.0022316007,0.00005926403,0.0004769901,0.0006539724,0.0014874119,0.0002837085,0.07340321,0.9186553,0.00004325652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004738658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009420262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015147463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022017413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058047026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080108404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386255162","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2246727","title":"Pathways for improving the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: lessons from five case studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Government of Canada; University of Saskatchewan; Parks Canada; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Scale (ratio); Mainstreaming; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Environmental science; Cartography; Social science","score_opus":0.07520058937664281,"score_gpt":0.42473326130323646,"score_spread":0.34953267192659365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386255162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543194,0.004639177,0.14585581,0.04689974,0.00033678094,0.0023061358,0.00029123249,0.00020385065,0.14514785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932539,0.0018161113,0.060302388,0.0009642732,0.00001769947,0.00050302665,0.000080408114,0.000061558094,0.0037157014],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9485175,0.041878875,0.0017249946,0.0010840091,0.0032819544,0.0035126854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9115703,0.06613499,0.0030033574,0.003397941,0.012137549,0.0037559157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044921465,0.0008887127,0.00071478,0.0031840769,0.012255743,0.009598734,0.003450446,0.004481642,0.00511174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06395895,0.00069312105,0.0009270771,0.004726729,0.009884115,0.012411903,0.010777972,0.004564146,0.00032960236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030734684,0.0011424778,0.06934011,0.0026195222,0.00014397029,0.03181105,0.38995817,0.025806539,0.0017251937,0.25941265,0.018036468,0.19969651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079577454,0.00033512898,0.011290106,0.0041178428,0.00012883307,0.004967325,0.68164957,0.010656561,0.0024070828,0.10261765,0.18155551,0.0001948212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071776666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20534904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071776666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021170836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021073405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23757029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390537674","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2299619","title":"A game theoretic decision-making approach to reduce mine closure risks throughout the mine-life cycle","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Stakeholder; Sustainability; Game theory; Reputation; Computer science; Key (lock); Nash equilibrium; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental economics; Business; Process management; Management science; Engineering; Economics; Computer security; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03276208989266533,"score_gpt":0.410800400436535,"score_spread":0.37803831054386966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390537674","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009524138,0.00014391013,0.97530895,0.00074282574,0.000056165914,0.00033803986,0.000056029494,0.000053554653,0.013776343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5880193,0.0004684087,0.4026413,0.00029268063,0.000048128164,0.0010449851,0.00007541896,0.000041828873,0.007368],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617,0.0024623494,0.000116578725,0.00034304018,0.00067748234,0.00023054605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810034,0.0012334473,0.00019506604,0.000063349275,0.00024937387,0.00015850214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004720396,0.0015091829,0.0012996304,0.0014931329,0.0012119181,0.003038826,0.0029058077,0.0018076109,0.0043911086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048448853,0.00078628457,0.0015317234,0.0011956152,0.0022468655,0.0025747162,0.0023209588,0.0021380943,0.00032190146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046264067,0.00013395533,0.00042455326,0.00017487105,0.00010190251,0.00016504829,0.00036524475,0.7976863,0.0011256834,0.1860613,0.0008066512,0.0129082035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044877663,0.00018139367,0.00016198424,0.00005822586,0.000051005907,0.00006556556,0.00022820599,0.8802062,0.00046095139,0.11447072,0.004038268,0.0000326477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051445654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00936452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051445654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043383306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00635517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031476915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390541547","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2299605","title":"A highly informative and enjoyable introduction to road ecology: “A Clouded Leopard in the Middle of the Road: New Thinking about Roads, People, and Wildlife”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Leopard; Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Landscape ecology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.01819758694980522,"score_gpt":0.3312040652682155,"score_spread":0.3130064783184103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390541547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031063135,0.09037612,0.023617849,0.15487768,0.086578526,0.00022611565,0.0006077979,0.00078111736,0.63982856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03681599,0.07467721,0.014061568,0.06283678,0.038323335,0.0002465392,0.0005315898,0.00075108756,0.77175593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993499,0.00028826197,0.00001888431,0.000049797436,0.0002410863,0.000052020707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832934,0.00107939,0.00006991909,0.000044546647,0.00029329796,0.00018352525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007346425,0.0011300881,0.00047873653,0.0010383511,0.00359685,0.0047035837,0.0010630718,0.0022348503,0.018417869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024406442,0.0004351452,0.00041121355,0.0011569567,0.0035886732,0.0048262393,0.0020677673,0.005096708,0.008603895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069543275,0.000010017795,0.000093354174,0.00016224945,0.0000036576903,0.00013598298,0.0019664827,0.00010027856,0.00012078843,0.01656548,0.9577084,0.02312629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012874726,0.000012507953,0.00017915458,0.0002253237,0.0000019992713,0.00023450055,0.001676369,0.00005167403,0.000059581747,0.0038209748,0.99372995,0.000006683351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032744438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012406533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018417869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011506057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010924006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061613917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391229349","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2306757","title":"Tools for Indigenous-led impact assessment: insights from five case studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operationalization; Indigenous; Environmental planning; Process (computing); Work (physics); Resource (disambiguation); Corporate governance; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Geography; Business; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.03838217146049753,"score_gpt":0.4463092445177232,"score_spread":0.40792707305722564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391229349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74926627,0.0041388078,0.06692683,0.01201444,0.0001330486,0.004534351,0.0007783103,0.00027968967,0.16192822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259032,0.002363426,0.06382345,0.0005649381,0.00001957946,0.0013679373,0.00028890642,0.000098503224,0.0055699726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9351627,0.05143643,0.0021765067,0.0009683539,0.006717396,0.0035385836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8910555,0.08023796,0.0034390695,0.0057902206,0.017168231,0.002308957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06951725,0.0007242896,0.00066881353,0.0050150524,0.013835039,0.008150213,0.0036454222,0.0019839194,0.0028464252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067573816,0.0006287387,0.00076820876,0.0082347775,0.0068499194,0.0046644583,0.008040604,0.00238244,0.00032085727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022370227,0.00097634655,0.038250394,0.0020943747,0.00010564751,0.008893379,0.6865849,0.0072015044,0.0016624498,0.08375891,0.00930938,0.16093896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005684835,0.00029321815,0.019242488,0.0022690394,0.00013046415,0.0016302997,0.795532,0.006998598,0.0028853447,0.017027281,0.15379913,0.00013525847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3269302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5723191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3269302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042843856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04384193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65005445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399943246","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2369454","title":"Identifying and promoting qualitative methods for impact assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Qualitative research; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10079376293560292,"score_gpt":0.5940002064737004,"score_spread":0.4932064435380975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399943246","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0117975725,0.0030607814,0.9035151,0.013749492,0.0012088584,0.04036514,0.0011875267,0.00060774677,0.024507865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04282775,0.0027568205,0.88135815,0.0025654228,0.00020820033,0.066094354,0.0004328146,0.00025585544,0.0035007317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5884101,0.36925566,0.0113918185,0.006534647,0.021556059,0.0028517053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48711437,0.41667756,0.014238743,0.025556305,0.05297427,0.0034387754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.33848464,0.0016782273,0.0014488568,0.010520753,0.0059035616,0.009603336,0.0040751663,0.0035679177,0.009550667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3316213,0.0014827492,0.0017698263,0.00872559,0.009895993,0.008580948,0.012576804,0.006078378,0.0029940857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039704927,0.00026238235,0.002564214,0.01479999,0.00008400376,0.00094971113,0.41135228,0.0025349732,0.011869867,0.14471138,0.020802954,0.38967124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003352771,0.0004368186,0.0022786886,0.023816925,0.00009300839,0.00087807217,0.18078385,0.0043008965,0.009129832,0.17445195,0.60323334,0.00026130525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028748442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005414113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33848464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009729395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028659763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8157662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400953904","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2383816","title":"Reversing the gaze: understanding how community members are negatively affected by impact assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reversing; Gaze; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Environmental science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.053552323787492924,"score_gpt":0.4104874373091588,"score_spread":0.3569351135216659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400953904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8916745,0.0013167935,0.014529119,0.016695458,0.00016837027,0.00008235762,0.000046880872,0.000118920245,0.075367615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969145,0.00028653265,0.0011180254,0.00051540334,0.0000144071955,0.000022632803,0.000011489299,0.000017635155,0.001099442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910024,0.00589746,0.0001833543,0.00068206916,0.0012890805,0.00094561913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793763,0.010394724,0.00376326,0.0011281493,0.00395803,0.0013795167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021668,0.00052547787,0.0004100435,0.0023532026,0.010303743,0.008323603,0.0017109864,0.0034298042,0.0034969905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036553793,0.00040480224,0.00047825873,0.0010293424,0.015592516,0.010344698,0.01090462,0.003921607,0.00045060882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007897094,0.00006695954,0.051056378,0.00013212071,0.000027118575,0.00072951044,0.89003414,0.0004418363,0.002145962,0.016503403,0.0019107533,0.036872856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001045337,0.00009094452,0.027046433,0.00025054376,0.000040013434,0.00027727772,0.9156845,0.0018730317,0.00075128616,0.028085712,0.025800642,0.000089131674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06648891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0631559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06648891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069483244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004656747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13220382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401673314","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2383818","title":"Toward a common categorization for valued components: using a review of valued components and indicators in the lower James Bay Region of Ontario and Quebec, Canada, to support cumulative impact science in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Impact; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Deliverable; Bay; Computer science; Impact assessment; Environmental impact statement; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Engineering; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence; Public administration","score_opus":0.07502976367390983,"score_gpt":0.4184647665383883,"score_spread":0.3434350028644785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401673314","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009139082,0.9547578,0.007216814,0.007405951,0.0007235485,0.001308005,0.0036549915,0.00009317099,0.015700653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075376466,0.8861608,0.029736087,0.0021598283,0.00014960943,0.0010958888,0.0031822687,0.000055322613,0.002083765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884121,0.002389702,0.0022723197,0.0007978594,0.005571792,0.00055613945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498682,0.013508486,0.00479427,0.0010427769,0.029459473,0.0013267533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023493525,0.0011253711,0.0020455567,0.042587638,0.0025116547,0.0073640374,0.002483961,0.0008179449,0.0013030773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045557324,0.00058794377,0.0016624596,0.049933635,0.0028776885,0.0037782358,0.0022631923,0.0016279814,0.00024795192],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010530296,0.0000396637,0.014503899,0.13293757,0.00078497565,0.00027598115,0.010657119,0.00067829515,0.001364854,0.019541945,0.03094021,0.78817016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034230092,0.00009422019,0.05706327,0.2380237,0.0028376065,0.00031095112,0.009156281,0.0006480079,0.0008072145,0.0045792935,0.6862698,0.0001753862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70115465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8832265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29884535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053630155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13617253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6012106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402680240","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2400458","title":"Informing public interest determinations in impact assessment using a multiple account evaluation framework","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact assessment; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.0897072627998213,"score_gpt":0.4861356678884815,"score_spread":0.3964284050886602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402680240","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011878035,0.0016902213,0.9031354,0.014441106,0.0002214424,0.0011527115,0.00015329685,0.00017619808,0.06715162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6332102,0.0011057791,0.359867,0.0013012497,0.0002619173,0.0018775509,0.00012403232,0.00006817404,0.0021840832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82043636,0.15143918,0.0055012396,0.0042528333,0.01442841,0.003941985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83474666,0.13100435,0.010608741,0.007157371,0.0142106395,0.0022722194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14577028,0.0028153586,0.0032005704,0.010379925,0.0044283527,0.01984699,0.0046144403,0.00740669,0.004416946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13096197,0.0017033053,0.0026505387,0.006788996,0.012688451,0.022509824,0.011814351,0.008795048,0.00059594103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006650947,0.00017672275,0.0029336235,0.00060537906,0.00017386317,0.00027035136,0.0032933687,0.04981724,0.00035573315,0.8785752,0.0021668335,0.06156523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054525877,0.0001597039,0.0012742319,0.0011402491,0.00012478218,0.00014893197,0.0033839024,0.09753647,0.00077209086,0.86806333,0.027199252,0.0001425117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008274059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010157411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14577028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01792749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023842296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77091616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402832370","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2407687","title":"Mining, the sustainable development goals and impact assessments: a review of governance and local impacts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Royal Roads University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporate governance; Sustainable development; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.030919030045783863,"score_gpt":0.41822469083946434,"score_spread":0.38730566079368045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402832370","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011710311,0.9981185,0.00012186462,0.00070662296,0.00012949937,0.000010699708,0.000017511551,0.0000025686545,0.0007757176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001545575,0.99767286,0.00023843937,0.00030617154,0.00006267317,0.00001562359,0.000020055557,0.0000017150131,0.00013687745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552506,0.0015816957,0.0009380393,0.00037789918,0.0014201694,0.00015715547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98317313,0.012074812,0.0015239964,0.0002857124,0.0027098,0.00023268384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065174955,0.00090870436,0.0017554557,0.008999953,0.0008848429,0.0033279366,0.0012365963,0.0018389839,0.0027062627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017042186,0.0006777831,0.0010359979,0.013556812,0.0017597543,0.0042079487,0.0016469638,0.002006776,0.0006072955],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043690365,0.00006497304,0.00068589783,0.20552869,0.0003321014,0.0002012081,0.0017685499,0.00062700146,0.00062855205,0.021509081,0.035702284,0.732908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007919463,0.00007869851,0.003134324,0.17067605,0.00048391876,0.00039587537,0.001501414,0.00011363461,0.00023630021,0.0043565547,0.81898326,0.000031991924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009963259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024760878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009963259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003658581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015388741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034468234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404104066","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2421031","title":"Developing international guidance to make impact assessment follow-up happen – reflections on an interactive design process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Winnipeg; Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Process management; Developing country; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.07391677921037128,"score_gpt":0.5068080980102643,"score_spread":0.432891318799893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404104066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13230543,0.0021586777,0.6308663,0.091354154,0.0028686526,0.010151274,0.0002558036,0.0023458945,0.12769395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46085426,0.0019450241,0.49404824,0.00672644,0.0002444185,0.0099173095,0.00031771496,0.0010793583,0.024867266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.77737415,0.19232285,0.0057778927,0.0048702667,0.013624551,0.00603027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.796027,0.15605828,0.0059208185,0.012044973,0.021963852,0.007985139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20517416,0.0025283836,0.0010376198,0.0033875578,0.009036478,0.017192487,0.005753841,0.008354194,0.007873696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19131958,0.0018999495,0.0022008365,0.0023372588,0.015886817,0.019953018,0.023989763,0.016038708,0.0032630109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013524457,0.0005308491,0.0012615916,0.0010654969,0.00004039966,0.0010452945,0.79842806,0.0028926714,0.0034468954,0.061588828,0.016514806,0.11304981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011545335,0.000597384,0.0016315037,0.0042350735,0.000055492364,0.001034307,0.49427256,0.003747346,0.004548738,0.06924384,0.42021608,0.00030227684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028280376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002910776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20517416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013679862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02605792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404141882","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2024.2414161","title":"On the underestimation of the significance of environmental impacts in Peru: an approach using homogeneous units","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dillon Consulting","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Homogeneous; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04631559242876903,"score_gpt":0.3758964765612073,"score_spread":0.32958088413243825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404141882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85461336,0.0020839288,0.117634855,0.00088595564,0.000044592616,0.0007476976,0.00075906666,0.0001818814,0.023048637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735778,0.0005032072,0.023967134,0.00009317883,0.000028016126,0.0004845605,0.0004376754,0.000029612154,0.00087886147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665873,0.023931306,0.0016372586,0.0029990429,0.004166269,0.00067888957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9200571,0.0590083,0.009068806,0.004864871,0.006635459,0.0003653873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03356057,0.0007260495,0.0009824352,0.008897059,0.0016384411,0.0029154299,0.0016225837,0.0007742521,0.0021462566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115092374,0.00042153936,0.0008855501,0.009807256,0.0024288613,0.0016407407,0.0048843604,0.00080375874,0.0002982094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004525484,0.00011813617,0.7514388,0.001168915,0.0008993685,0.0013536864,0.02385639,0.01014124,0.002344433,0.011810177,0.0015405953,0.19487576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071467824,0.0011374499,0.8266776,0.0014674646,0.00093431835,0.0015595225,0.04902094,0.058720075,0.0053535714,0.023662526,0.031242572,0.00015244026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020227268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018193798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03356057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017844577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001933593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17748737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406937486","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2025.2456885","title":"Applying next-generation community-based environmental assessment: case studies from Kenya","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.08351140873248211,"score_gpt":0.4318750497178692,"score_spread":0.3483636409853871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406937486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95812035,0.00055309694,0.006997958,0.0017382297,0.000032184955,0.002376073,0.00014086609,0.000017537364,0.030023742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754018,0.0010047843,0.01818765,0.00032916886,0.000010814162,0.0010185629,0.00007834,0.000015130982,0.0039537614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922444,0.0058001555,0.0002316475,0.0002776074,0.0006474436,0.0007987073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921225,0.005330523,0.0004794996,0.00036274648,0.0011620647,0.00054268684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00967345,0.0006077804,0.00040544468,0.0012045021,0.008547781,0.0026964033,0.0018969418,0.0027360104,0.0029179854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011542177,0.00040370485,0.000413918,0.0016708251,0.0030141927,0.0026353963,0.0036747777,0.0016370666,0.00037693387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009159597,0.0075293756,0.09931116,0.003401443,0.00020003604,0.043115266,0.5502401,0.017046377,0.009350263,0.04513589,0.009314586,0.21443957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003527598,0.0023294406,0.047671374,0.003127804,0.00016606897,0.005677555,0.7776197,0.010711672,0.010057932,0.010390984,0.1315976,0.00029711032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036294475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12525666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036294475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00551897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006190874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07216638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407009796","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2025.2460316","title":"Analysis of EA as an instrument for wetland protection: insights from the mining sector in western and northern Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Mining engineering; Business; Geology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02342050089615651,"score_gpt":0.33147036013042064,"score_spread":0.30804985923426415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407009796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914597,0.0003327417,0.00035038675,0.0003772403,0.0000024527276,0.00005772707,0.00068311545,0.00000850773,0.0067281025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946985,0.000555523,0.0007961788,0.00009670174,0.0000014570187,0.000018359822,0.0004832358,0.000008779534,0.003341295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987319,0.00014016866,0.00004928865,0.00009617229,0.00047900504,0.0005034956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964037,0.00046864542,0.00026296588,0.00007689659,0.00232486,0.00046292122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011168694,0.00029188054,0.00030302684,0.0021101655,0.0032774408,0.0021830073,0.00072022795,0.00026171852,0.001073924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003537814,0.00019510665,0.00031694627,0.0055375304,0.0012565749,0.0005263908,0.0014333042,0.0005040942,0.000120050485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012346546,0.00008860706,0.9163555,0.00015935727,0.00007558781,0.00094623683,0.02211261,0.002054689,0.0018446959,0.0022117842,0.00228042,0.051747017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032214791,0.000026183063,0.94538075,0.00006504592,0.000021685166,0.00008369259,0.047175787,0.0017838482,0.00035026835,0.00018529697,0.004906745,0.000017443142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99616855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042362936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042362936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053775936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30736607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408041075","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2025.2471609","title":"Chekhov’s Gun and Occam’s Razor: improving impact assessment efficiency for renewable energy developments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Occam's razor; Renewable energy; occam; Environmental economics; Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.013849829628304437,"score_gpt":0.38308160759130266,"score_spread":0.3692317779629982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408041075","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094510145,0.042753674,0.45773485,0.16995296,0.0044091977,0.0006380043,0.00058074144,0.0015362308,0.22788417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6955168,0.014196563,0.253963,0.0067482674,0.0008270331,0.00030286034,0.000337359,0.0007485314,0.027359582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880321,0.0059833513,0.00044385454,0.00064091856,0.004405477,0.0004944147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864842,0.006831501,0.0008078418,0.0013177315,0.0039540255,0.0006046233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025308,0.000763965,0.0010917016,0.0035384293,0.0022290684,0.0078509515,0.0019435078,0.0016419736,0.007796986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044987623,0.00035380336,0.00084377686,0.003797669,0.004594245,0.007991207,0.0048253234,0.0041270326,0.0013380916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022273653,0.000080282676,0.0056357803,0.0006437079,0.00012810662,0.00023083559,0.0020457085,0.009662851,0.0012487599,0.5735587,0.03923752,0.36730513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006583037,0.00015820208,0.011297792,0.0014491677,0.00011152754,0.00045978662,0.004114243,0.03767424,0.0040501007,0.7517428,0.18867809,0.00019829936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012829907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016786126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005155056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008156345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13384306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411222088","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2025.2515776","title":"Needs and pathways for strengthening the contribution of qualitative methods toward more effective impact assessment practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Qualitative research; Process management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Management science; Business; Sociology; Environmental science; Economics; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.05853920049817314,"score_gpt":0.5430307485140422,"score_spread":0.4844915480158691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411222088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019093117,0.011349262,0.33913615,0.5810911,0.0023442549,0.0137111265,0.00042669012,0.00048447255,0.032363836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23481289,0.011331666,0.6910622,0.031877585,0.000608651,0.027231535,0.00028958824,0.00020769887,0.0025782231],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.30108777,0.6458086,0.021871388,0.006417876,0.01947462,0.005339673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.12533808,0.7675109,0.01544934,0.031187112,0.05215667,0.008357794],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6410036,0.0016975737,0.0030376532,0.007856023,0.012796402,0.028415293,0.006526669,0.009862318,0.012459423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6021059,0.002322136,0.0025022347,0.0061607063,0.034687575,0.03753766,0.030318055,0.017810443,0.0023777855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027279256,0.00081368035,0.006767572,0.01525442,0.00015815058,0.0006024443,0.46733516,0.0020688388,0.0017485835,0.21758372,0.01574089,0.27165386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023149709,0.00039047425,0.0023956944,0.034822877,0.000115260285,0.0004986256,0.38384366,0.0029765961,0.0013623796,0.43623355,0.13681164,0.0003177344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01003208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011573789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3589964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024022067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121228516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44270653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106696596","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2025.2593204","title":"Sustainability assessment: the state of the art in 2026","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Politics; State (computer science); Sustainable development","score_opus":0.009519996208872594,"score_gpt":0.3887430659098744,"score_spread":0.3792230697010018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106696596","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015705051,0.88610387,0.013956816,0.0648304,0.0049269013,0.000028113987,0.0002646459,0.00011011501,0.028208666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052395955,0.89334834,0.023237858,0.02057163,0.0054429746,0.00008217689,0.00062283466,0.00021616131,0.004082011],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766376,0.009845621,0.0023517148,0.0022485487,0.008295612,0.00062084774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564427,0.02644061,0.0017426105,0.0028472806,0.011469072,0.0010577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03778802,0.0014096254,0.0018705496,0.0061291885,0.0025249994,0.017243149,0.0031341997,0.006399141,0.006994178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04361158,0.0008431721,0.0017800608,0.0078927465,0.01339847,0.025461372,0.006701686,0.010495294,0.0028955226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006045751,0.000055108754,0.0017001139,0.005235416,0.0000844861,0.000104439096,0.0013440687,0.002457249,0.0006244256,0.27909902,0.05262954,0.6566058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002479431,0.000024677978,0.0009012284,0.008900546,0.0000268088,0.00013277997,0.0012608583,0.00061989424,0.00031321793,0.0820298,0.90574265,0.00004505285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013691396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009294088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03778802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011881919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015951471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19984454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7109939820","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2025.2590383","title":"Impact assessment as planning (not permitting): factors affecting its potential to influence project design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Project planning; Project appraisal","score_opus":0.03342840742923577,"score_gpt":0.4446145877251055,"score_spread":0.41118618029586973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7109939820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57696,0.0018137734,0.08497271,0.0116571,0.00014371634,0.0022718532,0.00020376056,0.00032690418,0.32165003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856639,0.00047556314,0.009801988,0.00039328533,0.000012201695,0.0003463285,0.000027726723,0.000039131013,0.0032398317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.90766025,0.05629007,0.0036189612,0.0030539474,0.024481876,0.0048949514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.771245,0.17095757,0.014677128,0.009444624,0.028760917,0.0049147448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08359279,0.0005870786,0.00056586944,0.0031457476,0.00827901,0.012634314,0.002209179,0.0013037223,0.0043928954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1822021,0.0008872046,0.0006882964,0.0051823547,0.011437268,0.005086541,0.0071523925,0.0030499045,0.0005169853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004576395,0.00044408508,0.23286588,0.0019137231,0.0001857532,0.0007161687,0.19461724,0.01655137,0.0068285083,0.11179406,0.0069615785,0.42666402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014029081,0.0008153971,0.47164622,0.0029856125,0.00022582,0.00057136844,0.21938306,0.014803794,0.0057759634,0.08538789,0.19773495,0.000529654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17369491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28215632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17369491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023055334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055986956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44208622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}