{"meta":{"query_hash":"8fea5b6be457","filters":{"venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8fea5b6be457","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Indian+Journal+of+Constitutional+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1544802020","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2009.03.1.09","title":"Judicial Review of the State’s Anti-Terrorism Activities: The Post 9/11 Experience and Normative Justifications for Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Terrorism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legislation; Judicial activism; Normative; Supreme court; Competence (human resources); Human rights; State (computer science); Psychology","score_opus":0.020671360037597702,"score_gpt":0.3301918417934683,"score_spread":0.30952048175587055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544802020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40367952,0.013028494,0.009054952,0.2838507,0.0025845747,0.0002729601,0.00015267254,0.00014518137,0.287231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94926864,0.002698939,0.001102746,0.029209958,0.0016806284,0.00011230414,0.00004592105,0.000062454164,0.015818289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.922072,0.037880406,0.0047846674,0.0070431316,0.017711483,0.010508331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7744242,0.15439123,0.023293933,0.010141319,0.029940452,0.0078088106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0634322,0.00024008781,0.0006747288,0.0019759322,0.01774397,0.020826591,0.0032478587,0.0153522175,0.0034100732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16742395,0.0011180536,0.0006607468,0.0017479272,0.022500908,0.0077540698,0.0067506786,0.019388407,0.00081207324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670949,0.00049328106,0.023740167,0.00039635808,0.00008121939,0.0072252904,0.16683558,0.0011264035,0.0029589199,0.6336761,0.085961446,0.0773382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015334712,0.00059452903,0.050245408,0.0012752776,0.00009348497,0.0042178147,0.061380196,0.0015680896,0.004559321,0.095173776,0.7801947,0.00054413587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025624443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04330837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0634322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013092344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024559896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33546555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165390870","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.03","title":"Proportionality and Burden of Proof: Constitutional Review in India","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Burden of proof; Deference; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Skepticism","score_opus":0.02619840040560061,"score_gpt":0.3051970979898971,"score_spread":0.27899869758429646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165390870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1527266,0.09754749,0.042834703,0.22069134,0.0027745045,0.0004184521,0.00032051632,0.00018794938,0.48249844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587895,0.011419948,0.0060626282,0.012145909,0.000943522,0.00013743901,0.000045029483,0.000036170823,0.010419722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96283793,0.017793186,0.0032005082,0.0032075378,0.010885277,0.0020755834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91383386,0.069165796,0.004065653,0.004339106,0.0072177704,0.0013778877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026194429,0.00017321846,0.00060769875,0.003649713,0.005895564,0.014979816,0.00172811,0.0053159785,0.0018534844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07468004,0.0006326965,0.0004997603,0.003969124,0.020127034,0.007123027,0.006513137,0.0067118667,0.00023757637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014722107,0.000007693192,0.0005786442,0.00012929416,0.000013286737,0.00023613895,0.00227325,0.0003791025,0.00022715412,0.9816036,0.003046783,0.011490185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051366813,0.000097635064,0.0070860554,0.0010384945,0.00009500415,0.0010107205,0.0030060255,0.0021999232,0.0018617042,0.6585606,0.32481638,0.00017617337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01638036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016898103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026194429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013344383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021348057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13853103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165400790","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.05","title":"Government Copyright in School Textbooks and the Fundamental Right to Education","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Data Privacy and Cybersecurity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Right to education; Inequality; Digital divide; Pandemic","score_opus":0.008646942087978218,"score_gpt":0.273284606827271,"score_spread":0.2646376647392928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165400790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08128741,0.0055651865,0.0052114744,0.08438892,0.00090604485,0.000055291257,0.00030645516,0.00009619214,0.82218295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93196154,0.0018055167,0.0012508732,0.006507085,0.00052140997,0.000039901533,0.00010982236,0.000041388874,0.05776243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927468,0.002358007,0.00053810404,0.00077794126,0.0026245026,0.00095468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770572,0.011213419,0.0034894668,0.0047306954,0.0022868132,0.0012223851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044909143,0.00017157433,0.0003224445,0.0013607233,0.0042124507,0.01209287,0.0011003556,0.0056254407,0.01693051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027142022,0.00032409516,0.00032723596,0.0019049395,0.024256982,0.00823403,0.005171061,0.0048657088,0.0020708218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001220069,0.000027822094,0.0015573575,0.00003978879,0.0000033345925,0.00012734854,0.0041575837,0.00008506775,0.00014156067,0.9746746,0.0055017923,0.013671614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002481396,0.00006164858,0.010563501,0.0007962993,0.000025367883,0.0006046556,0.0063373707,0.00032225452,0.0010744758,0.5338335,0.44629902,0.00005712784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009226293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008640427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01693051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041729067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007040086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05663824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}