{"meta":{"query_hash":"b00f39ec6927","filters":{"venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b00f39ec6927","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Indian+Journal+of+Legal+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W4416991948","doi":"10.65393/ofkc4097","title":"GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN INDIAN LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR MEN","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Harm; Domestic violence; Gender inequality; Gender discrimination; Economic Justice; Gender equality; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.04295046396589832,"score_gpt":0.4022160536511549,"score_spread":0.3592655896852566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416991948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059216768,0.3545029,0.014462648,0.2637588,0.00983106,0.012624708,0.0007550178,0.00003690214,0.2848112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98854077,0.008350178,0.00031756007,0.00053574296,0.00042901764,0.000045232235,0.0000064486194,0.000011166101,0.0017638801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959843,0.0006805812,0.0018319684,0.0003498815,0.00077752274,0.00037573208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663985,0.0003714628,0.0009437922,0.00022663805,0.0016600111,0.00015823585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003705922,0.00022323741,0.0011060484,0.0012307684,0.000443211,0.00016950637,0.0005428588,0.00015332317,0.00042656632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015033,0.00017074098,0.0010400267,0.002085698,0.0007950301,0.0010345307,0.000042404932,0.0005797632,0.0000029676542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064246364,0.00042816275,0.00014119902,0.0024557854,0.0013765397,0.00008302815,0.005495734,0.000043972042,0.000022011753,0.98324686,0.0006618381,0.0059806197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018071403,0.0010962996,0.0113747325,0.03049968,0.01295031,0.00013383149,0.0075914813,0.00020113682,0.0005419072,0.09942912,0.8334794,0.0008949325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012076899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043932945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92932403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044997752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012361691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6962615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416993015","doi":"10.65393/elwy7299","title":"PUBLIC LEGAL EDUCATION: A KEY TO JUSTICE FOR ALL","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Key (lock); Bridge (graph theory); Legal research; Legal profession; Public policy","score_opus":0.09832075091890358,"score_gpt":0.4556871435625759,"score_spread":0.3573663926436723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416993015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019946416,0.11062625,0.0009802864,0.7462012,0.011707854,0.0013627564,0.00002105407,0.000010371376,0.12889074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25454682,0.1756945,0.013911952,0.44375184,0.00961601,0.00033797236,0.000029477873,0.00007470096,0.10203672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953637,0.0007720909,0.0021349443,0.000332952,0.000772057,0.000624259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910625,0.0010565642,0.0018087138,0.000417755,0.0048563075,0.00079813856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062417914,0.0003047444,0.00078867056,0.00079137774,0.00087243476,0.0016304018,0.0012353591,0.0001794951,0.001660188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02266776,0.00029303305,0.00052397605,0.0041296287,0.00017310314,0.0037889597,0.000061386425,0.0012093189,0.00022594014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025921989,0.00040421693,0.000018889601,0.0022986745,0.00015651686,0.000009513214,0.003053732,6.6699425e-7,0.000004581202,0.34117904,0.51930475,0.13354349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028734753,0.0002128578,0.000059964663,0.0077841533,0.0011007275,0.00013637295,0.0037561196,8.5200514e-7,0.0000070339024,0.0014283381,0.98496133,0.0002648801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032582862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032159314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46565658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006365847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041638397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118160689","doi":"10.65393/qcpr1945","title":"PATENT LINKAGE: NEXUS BETWEEN INNOVATION, ACCESS, AND REGULATORY AUTHORITY","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Discretion; Patent infringement; Linkage (software); Incentive; Generic drug; Biosimilar; Premise; Pharmaceutical industry","score_opus":0.12608247779494702,"score_gpt":0.3632457093283946,"score_spread":0.2371632315334476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118160689","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0939615,0.8112371,0.0005546017,0.07293612,0.00274201,0.00071226346,0.0003735007,0.000009303007,0.017473623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6502569,0.3369635,0.00009879763,0.011343837,0.0007510286,0.0000047632493,0.0000065871736,0.000023885596,0.0005507433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461097,0.00012400052,0.004251786,0.00042504715,0.00008581468,0.0005023989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554026,0.00019271701,0.0030895614,0.00043382708,0.0003557877,0.00038783337],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044850465,0.00036777917,0.0018543967,0.001047269,0.00021424194,0.0005468798,0.0008631281,0.00027002217,0.00046695422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010665961,0.00040826757,0.0003735151,0.001542306,0.00021780777,0.0012659795,0.0002878566,0.0013183887,0.00008061532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043125227,0.0001954863,0.110935755,0.011886808,0.0011288153,0.00014320534,0.00021947632,0.000012839952,0.0000022260917,0.5540546,0.04104926,0.28032836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092020934,0.00011603718,0.06360267,0.0057311095,0.0002129464,0.000065224085,0.000006601574,0.00004817532,0.000021164547,0.05810414,0.87080115,0.0003705893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029430514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032284538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82975185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003231372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007584207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151977261","doi":"10.65393/ijlrv6i467","title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EXPERT OPINION UNDER EVIDENCE LAWS : INDIA AND DEVLOPED COUNTRY","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Statutory law; Gatekeeping; Judicial opinion; Accreditation; Scientific evidence; Perspective (graphical); Expert elicitation","score_opus":0.05447021032477979,"score_gpt":0.37103994656945183,"score_spread":0.31656973624467205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151977261","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14887314,0.82986856,0.000033700817,0.007062514,0.0021457379,0.001300387,0.000070484,0.00001122832,0.010634252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7614457,0.23445791,0.00003921769,0.0031405485,0.00031254484,0.000010206317,0.0000014061437,0.000019041787,0.00057344156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966481,0.00041235858,0.0010818715,0.00037743905,0.0011480635,0.0003322186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985958,0.00040046335,0.00044926917,0.00021589598,0.000023782082,0.00031481974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012874934,0.00038692777,0.00073701795,0.00012259357,0.00018505836,0.00032351696,0.00047927213,0.00008161384,0.002025111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006472671,0.00029373853,0.00020011645,0.0003234161,0.0004176853,0.0012390764,0.00017375831,0.00076364505,0.0006445607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025653623,0.011664762,0.028515117,0.0180977,0.008327343,0.020704241,0.20734818,0.0017570661,0.0066891694,0.122743264,0.19622858,0.3753592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050313753,0.0033666375,0.03995371,0.054173328,0.00017711573,0.0018398,0.0019886552,0.000030227684,0.0002287125,0.00015409596,0.8970394,0.00054516864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015244681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031872063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70081085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005818475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015546283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}