{"meta":{"query_hash":"b00f39ec6927","filters":{"venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b00f39ec6927","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Indian+Journal+of+Legal+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W4416991948","doi":"10.65393/ofkc4097","title":"GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN INDIAN LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR MEN","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Harm; Domestic violence; Gender inequality; Gender discrimination; Economic Justice; Gender equality; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.04295046396589832,"score_gpt":0.4022160536511549,"score_spread":0.3592655896852566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416991948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2063902,0.03953142,0.0068220445,0.06814961,0.0017956604,0.00032449613,0.00011208021,0.000038133734,0.67683625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754632,0.0069773826,0.00093700417,0.004163651,0.00073627813,0.0000783728,0.000026033826,0.000021951088,0.011596063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929945,0.0031739033,0.00018760252,0.00038261202,0.001537201,0.0017241408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890976,0.007818083,0.0009537704,0.00036552848,0.0013231642,0.00044186666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009078231,0.0005590669,0.0006121586,0.0059349337,0.020587487,0.013045068,0.0021336582,0.0036116967,0.0046932665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011960366,0.0003758445,0.00073749083,0.0051441165,0.036325637,0.008698309,0.00529114,0.0061502396,0.00028991638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013973921,0.000029358907,0.0015093319,0.00010973683,0.0000055733526,0.000437276,0.16357759,0.000057749476,0.00008349898,0.8193069,0.002982379,0.011886627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009599609,0.00010753919,0.015045729,0.00153686,0.00005597478,0.0006985017,0.48577788,0.00051145285,0.0005767417,0.1565677,0.3390515,0.000060418555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038338434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04331427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038338434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019526884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013732301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1416781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416993015","doi":"10.65393/elwy7299","title":"PUBLIC LEGAL EDUCATION: A KEY TO JUSTICE FOR ALL","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Key (lock); Bridge (graph theory); Legal research; Legal profession; Public policy","score_opus":0.09832075091890358,"score_gpt":0.4556871435625759,"score_spread":0.3573663926436723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416993015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032758545,0.03299262,0.005298573,0.834577,0.0026397523,0.000106541214,0.00006634203,0.00012867682,0.12091464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5159949,0.07286687,0.013484659,0.32883182,0.008168407,0.00033495395,0.0002513263,0.00021932811,0.0598477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835867,0.0077783465,0.0004984598,0.0010194879,0.0040606046,0.003056456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97246605,0.013444483,0.0018179207,0.0018517405,0.0040773177,0.006342502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013601433,0.00039199524,0.0009791263,0.0015465638,0.009057455,0.01235545,0.001924265,0.013732779,0.012825095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026575759,0.0004130097,0.0006761927,0.0016497461,0.021513093,0.016163409,0.014964915,0.022249913,0.0022631472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009825121,0.00013276543,0.00042102727,0.00071783335,0.000017735669,0.00017130961,0.0049552047,0.00021027599,0.00015474054,0.81049925,0.10915718,0.07355293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014871778,0.000049366667,0.0009446018,0.0023011884,0.000018481365,0.00025010735,0.005301364,0.00012039497,0.00024710016,0.29314354,0.69758135,0.0000276933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016193585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016743746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016193585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082054315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055688947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07193214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118160689","doi":"10.65393/qcpr1945","title":"PATENT LINKAGE: NEXUS BETWEEN INNOVATION, ACCESS, AND REGULATORY AUTHORITY","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Discretion; Patent infringement; Linkage (software); Incentive; Generic drug; Biosimilar; Premise; Pharmaceutical industry","score_opus":0.12608247779494702,"score_gpt":0.3632457093283946,"score_spread":0.2371632315334476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118160689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32721037,0.0073440187,0.12248424,0.035640046,0.0001595729,0.0001988003,0.00019501633,0.00014436475,0.50662357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936707,0.00065484946,0.0022835673,0.00038107415,0.00008328829,0.000041102034,0.000012060801,0.00000615187,0.00286724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897188,0.003881007,0.0004928548,0.0014767853,0.0028098496,0.0016206573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735478,0.018741434,0.00417279,0.0012275832,0.0014578217,0.0008525664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009789944,0.00019767351,0.00057915004,0.003547225,0.0028056484,0.010411644,0.001272261,0.0038929416,0.009844198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02559362,0.0003366948,0.0007949493,0.0025437847,0.015454111,0.0153768165,0.0063607134,0.0035568194,0.0005064288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014947538,0.00001527853,0.00087059685,0.000026973985,0.0000055060023,0.000068648005,0.00040315924,0.00074768777,0.00013292303,0.992515,0.00014942614,0.0050498247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035145946,0.00009425262,0.004111218,0.00013654478,0.00003927063,0.00020514775,0.0012084693,0.0029450194,0.00061404443,0.97357,0.017009156,0.000031655327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029089774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015781305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010411644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055938596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008282459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0517748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151977261","doi":"10.65393/ijlrv6i467","title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EXPERT OPINION UNDER EVIDENCE LAWS : INDIA AND DEVLOPED COUNTRY","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Statutory law; Gatekeeping; Judicial opinion; Accreditation; Scientific evidence; Perspective (graphical); Expert elicitation","score_opus":0.05447021032477979,"score_gpt":0.37103994656945183,"score_spread":0.31656973624467205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151977261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6293153,0.022103997,0.0021518474,0.009979286,0.0003084899,0.00015801651,0.0003405821,0.000031932253,0.33561048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874653,0.0061984574,0.00043535195,0.0012983489,0.00009291126,0.00002153167,0.0001013616,0.0000106400985,0.0043761497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986217,0.004638815,0.0010390963,0.0008750835,0.0053595193,0.0018705266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481073,0.03733143,0.005157759,0.001207294,0.0072203963,0.00097575976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009716076,0.00013738163,0.00037483688,0.006019415,0.0025332165,0.006043353,0.0010614429,0.0013653426,0.0043527354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034123946,0.00020224974,0.00043349742,0.010520858,0.004666101,0.0022907003,0.0020458086,0.0018169847,0.0003413593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033158055,0.0003498852,0.09602508,0.0026210626,0.00021702105,0.006857698,0.09382889,0.0014569877,0.0016111918,0.5607113,0.017856566,0.2181326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004374657,0.00059411174,0.51757145,0.002868879,0.0004223426,0.0036003797,0.11859615,0.0016651821,0.0022250153,0.023626199,0.32861286,0.00017376833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021491447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03922509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021491447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007701213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007272056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055876493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}