{"meta":{"query_hash":"8ac9d9869e13","filters":{"venue":"Indiana law journal"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8ac9d9869e13","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Indiana+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1538175700","doi":"","title":"Humans, Computers, and Binding Commitment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Battle; Business; Law and economics; Product (mathematics); Software; Internet privacy; Computer science; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02357668986449379,"score_gpt":0.29312773633549705,"score_spread":0.26955104647100325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538175700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08006275,0.008925926,0.037531376,0.07227229,0.0005172847,0.00010084113,0.00007124969,0.00010449202,0.8004138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96438384,0.0027120435,0.0034449245,0.0036339879,0.00021590963,0.00009996379,0.000030175093,0.000035576555,0.025443627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864156,0.0069497977,0.00033866006,0.0009356283,0.002154318,0.0009800467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859595,0.010081526,0.0010938462,0.0012440239,0.00073185767,0.0008891779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075916154,0.00026703766,0.00042262633,0.0012414225,0.00496903,0.008933044,0.0011569539,0.0046474035,0.0096755335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016176281,0.0003268593,0.0003226939,0.0016973037,0.03223995,0.009127919,0.0062267045,0.004615019,0.0009553373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064827727,0.0000092056125,0.00016653887,0.000011638916,0.0000017163474,0.000021079999,0.0012715327,0.00027557462,0.000021544856,0.99368036,0.0008796213,0.0036546527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012502074,0.00001445057,0.0004119929,0.00006180461,0.000002409274,0.00004839368,0.0016099452,0.0007046583,0.000061661674,0.96732336,0.029737053,0.000011750012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005532926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023553867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096755335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004640326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043790694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040148795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567767256","doi":"","title":"Exotic Pets Invade United States Ecosystems: Legislative Failure and a Proposed Solution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Introduced species; Invasive species; Wildlife; Native american; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Business; Biology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.023638808803444985,"score_gpt":0.22422550842922226,"score_spread":0.20058669962577727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567767256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009088587,0.005948794,0.0020559628,0.90726674,0.0044237543,0.00014102928,0.00028344634,0.00026294973,0.0705287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0815665,0.004861967,0.005409927,0.83583575,0.003257607,0.00064875494,0.00039374217,0.00010590265,0.06791985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914982,0.002075965,0.00053813966,0.0012492961,0.0020275586,0.0026108634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848754,0.0069223787,0.0011431677,0.0008325949,0.0035032914,0.0027231467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013735885,0.0015077608,0.0006697844,0.0017346903,0.015375436,0.0102167,0.007171132,0.06632811,0.017243788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016932184,0.0010539849,0.001662727,0.0017103308,0.005804626,0.010808003,0.008269573,0.029674266,0.0028617843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003959477,0.00046766124,0.0048063495,0.00025421512,0.000036225803,0.0022266149,0.0024716405,0.0007174598,0.0007818587,0.28296942,0.662711,0.042517934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001134872,0.00024483935,0.00612771,0.0022693297,0.00010245872,0.0013608136,0.009015637,0.0024517903,0.0008534348,0.037838623,0.939413,0.00020887986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054417074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07882983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06632811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056304117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028582444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10820067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933742864","doi":"","title":"Reverberations of the Victim's \"Voice\": Victim Impact Statements and the Cultural Project of Punishment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Punishment (psychology); Legitimacy; Criminal justice; Narrative; Politics; Harm; Criminology; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Political science; Rhetoric; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04279169543574837,"score_gpt":0.3611413490536276,"score_spread":0.31834965361787926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933742864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40585914,0.0030303034,0.016267642,0.04748102,0.0007969199,0.000055792178,0.000039157374,0.00007916777,0.5263908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947582,0.00028450505,0.0003754009,0.0007787387,0.000073607356,0.000014681106,0.0000042315146,0.000020697913,0.0036900048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866996,0.011120946,0.00017083988,0.0003982281,0.0010306155,0.0005798949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194473,0.005184932,0.0010972644,0.0006299221,0.0007610048,0.00038206723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075432956,0.0005034289,0.0002710525,0.0013222164,0.0084809875,0.009853819,0.0017086009,0.003089824,0.003067688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016893676,0.00030686794,0.0002475768,0.00064510154,0.048628204,0.007528695,0.0070551448,0.0057787285,0.00031585852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030398629,0.000029705152,0.0014455628,0.000054182834,0.000010645785,0.0005561343,0.48428905,0.00011038782,0.00040937163,0.5003072,0.0020521951,0.010705174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023550449,0.00010157346,0.0056758933,0.0005300875,0.000050917406,0.0013480104,0.66919595,0.000932499,0.0023785324,0.18525118,0.13442974,0.000082088445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041498877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005221376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009853819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036097066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022622342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03989321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103111902","doi":"","title":"Federal Constitutions, Global Governance, and the Role of Forests in Regulating Climate Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Decentralization; Corporate governance; Political science; Scholarship; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02244564847700056,"score_gpt":0.27270390464190586,"score_spread":0.2502582561649053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103111902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10836236,0.022553036,0.06329018,0.040144388,0.00091138046,0.00010937326,0.00014677749,0.00012824302,0.76435435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816675,0.0040903804,0.005098891,0.0020594976,0.00026292258,0.000059305326,0.000060163464,0.000024147448,0.006677267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951556,0.0021434939,0.00023312103,0.0005687571,0.000846593,0.0010525465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967559,0.0018094854,0.00046002964,0.0005165061,0.00028177394,0.0001762997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064857155,0.00024409407,0.0003189152,0.0017248852,0.0059333886,0.006754455,0.00082282175,0.0022293567,0.0029576863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066537773,0.00025377842,0.00052693946,0.0018512425,0.024840398,0.006437669,0.002683773,0.0034760335,0.0002016203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010192642,0.0000016453253,0.00015267124,0.0000047318326,0.0000012473408,0.000009998041,0.00028979153,0.00020546571,0.000019668309,0.9974942,0.00023317289,0.0015864234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006815543,0.000012879003,0.0025817105,0.00012669356,0.000015577874,0.000046799207,0.0009787967,0.00067556754,0.000201106,0.9214825,0.07385128,0.000020267391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018867055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026800353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018867055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070600035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058394126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051224172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22045861","doi":"10.1542/peds.2010-2720g","title":"The Changing Role of Labor Arbitration","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Arbitration; Labor disputes; Compulsory arbitration; Labor relations; Labour law; Law and economics; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012022820858706852,"score_gpt":0.28912502408760893,"score_spread":0.27710220322890206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22045861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033157088,0.0070200674,0.047402598,0.3160608,0.002427621,0.00015669123,0.000046453868,0.0001759502,0.5935527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86832434,0.0018078282,0.009346402,0.06646729,0.0025703548,0.000433154,0.000024085992,0.00021816388,0.05080836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515579,0.024657892,0.0018936704,0.00937555,0.0069138096,0.0056011365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540657,0.031942446,0.0024708032,0.004828527,0.004033974,0.002658537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05857905,0.00063569937,0.0010183011,0.0014481526,0.017216632,0.016346544,0.004196298,0.019050801,0.012303543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06483548,0.00080291176,0.0009466841,0.0012385601,0.06895954,0.022390584,0.014757156,0.019084001,0.0018597452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076231872,0.000008279115,0.0002465882,0.000012072375,0.00000252576,0.00012891504,0.002996247,0.000064866894,0.000055980916,0.9895371,0.002999771,0.0039400305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036960522,0.000032201282,0.00031553,0.00022222169,0.000012043682,0.0002886989,0.0039543603,0.0009033489,0.00023199432,0.8108925,0.18306081,0.000049203656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109119015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006400275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05857905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01311018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01663591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3097993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287593473","doi":"","title":"Beyond Transparency: The Semantics of Rulemaking for an Open Internet","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Net neutrality; Rulemaking; Transparency (behavior); The Internet; Internet governance; Public relations; Commission; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06105321184289738,"score_gpt":0.3497802418676091,"score_spread":0.28872703002471173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287593473","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030336792,0.0019160522,0.6856094,0.046479348,0.0012164717,0.0003350869,0.00034452858,0.0005662789,0.23319608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8610488,0.00080437213,0.12254663,0.0050837835,0.0009215086,0.00059156184,0.00022346748,0.00038025682,0.008399542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9410635,0.03606141,0.0042190677,0.005953603,0.009939211,0.0027631153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90490824,0.071018554,0.0053006387,0.010569489,0.007069808,0.0011332065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045523394,0.00081588514,0.0013868614,0.0042125266,0.009701776,0.021932866,0.0036177593,0.008013976,0.00494734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08810593,0.0010234076,0.002320281,0.003255908,0.05696308,0.034473542,0.007390754,0.012278901,0.0011362539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007944766,0.00000477472,0.000051688537,0.000019460327,0.000003480404,0.000034567976,0.0024180762,0.00032953973,0.00006888792,0.9950789,0.00043594846,0.0015468367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010868911,0.000005513699,0.00005255444,0.000057815174,0.0000063333378,0.000028127548,0.0007527828,0.001127472,0.00015338231,0.98752964,0.010261124,0.000014287051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009653526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043165996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045523394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008604831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01304171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24075359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2357740422","doi":"","title":"No Ordinary Fish Tale: Working Toward a Transnational Solution to the Cod Crisis in the Gulf of Maine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishing; Fishery; Skepticism; Administration (probate law); Geography; State (computer science); Oceanography; Political science; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.041392661278862986,"score_gpt":0.2710687694850234,"score_spread":0.2296761082061604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2357740422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07433545,0.0037939523,0.0017243848,0.85213876,0.0035241295,0.00008788765,0.000049198865,0.00008770847,0.06425856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42114487,0.006201978,0.004335833,0.4518762,0.00060579623,0.00022107117,0.00016199429,0.00010426332,0.115348004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861956,0.0004089931,0.000053579017,0.00012816684,0.00023807868,0.00055164384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970553,0.00036930063,0.00012635658,0.00013622071,0.0005330648,0.0017798058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004454017,0.0004940399,0.00018975306,0.00057850155,0.009599184,0.006827249,0.0015890592,0.009878871,0.0076338467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005417318,0.00022727164,0.00033386392,0.0004337059,0.004796847,0.006454022,0.012906219,0.008312999,0.00064394117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010212426,0.000337535,0.025809448,0.00044869073,0.00007056166,0.0057309577,0.058166906,0.00080415286,0.0036873145,0.23102376,0.5532611,0.1205575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004263205,0.0001345565,0.011004309,0.0006034293,0.000029126984,0.0004872238,0.12290438,0.0007465006,0.00068237993,0.025151242,0.83816355,0.00005068401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09249713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18304192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09249713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058242492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025886465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18391752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531259812","doi":"","title":"The Sons of Indiana: Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity and the Fight for Civil Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation; Temple University; North Carolina Central University; Johns Hopkins University; Loyola University Chicago; Indiana State University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Fraternity; Kappa; Political science; Law; Alpha (finance); Civil rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010257878196039894,"score_gpt":0.26609187308243254,"score_spread":0.25583399488639263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531259812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079496786,0.03062953,0.00030755304,0.1616092,0.0026952869,0.000014071924,0.0001557695,0.00004857673,0.72504324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6733427,0.016510947,0.00026695343,0.01650189,0.0006925133,0.000022546365,0.000053849686,0.000038808525,0.29256985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932075,0.00022312395,0.000011654123,0.0000548675,0.00010202371,0.00028767766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931264,0.00013785463,0.00006881686,0.000024135714,0.00008327794,0.0003732383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008209429,0.00027204485,0.00012789338,0.00059423974,0.016964518,0.007038776,0.0003156914,0.0012737663,0.010546369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013008714,0.00021139983,0.000082523205,0.00056356576,0.006152864,0.002844546,0.0029262826,0.0041951067,0.0012206255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006239693,0.000038250888,0.010466038,0.00007316065,0.000007917054,0.0010574799,0.069929056,0.00006168281,0.00025501137,0.514202,0.35862094,0.045226064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028631803,0.00001637602,0.0043442445,0.0003016831,0.0000037408854,0.00027765433,0.051626638,0.000023649258,0.00021172661,0.0068224636,0.9363586,0.000010444213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07842092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22613432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07842092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071871574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008973666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15592897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005739624","doi":"","title":"Arbitration and the Federal Balance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Compulsory arbitration; Federal preemption; Federal Arbitration Act; Law; Statutory law; Supreme court; Legislature; Preemption; State (computer science); Federal common law; Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Business; Statute; Economics; State law","score_opus":0.008095632416666484,"score_gpt":0.2042937648154664,"score_spread":0.1961981323987999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005739624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012483309,0.017186599,0.010678171,0.07600608,0.0012999325,0.00006942947,0.00018447709,0.00012090298,0.8819711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75370204,0.010312175,0.010697355,0.033414923,0.0027667766,0.00034658023,0.00030810788,0.00014351473,0.18830852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696106,0.0006677203,0.00012537552,0.00085024105,0.0006758744,0.0007196632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991086,0.00037071924,0.000112427515,0.00012992225,0.00018474096,0.000093514995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005406139,0.00049392995,0.00050788146,0.0015517562,0.0069051073,0.0070835417,0.00085514167,0.008704136,0.013923829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005294788,0.0004677904,0.0008771477,0.0011304477,0.010371494,0.0064253467,0.0035419415,0.007019017,0.002061162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043456553,0.0000028953,0.000035106394,0.000004363916,0.000001361185,0.000007640753,0.000054365966,0.00006612133,0.000020056066,0.99443144,0.0027255395,0.0026467573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029181987,0.000013047434,0.00043996432,0.0000740158,0.000008826011,0.000028253124,0.0000403146,0.0003108856,0.00012803136,0.8670525,0.13186279,0.000012260939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021772172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019971497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021772172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010853008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006639864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07874447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121274648","doi":"","title":"How Nations Share","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Globalization; Jurisdiction; Public good; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02713227404485525,"score_gpt":0.24084958531455714,"score_spread":0.2137173112697019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121274648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008921633,0.0050444882,0.003431297,0.054067124,0.0034121666,0.000050440598,0.00017868783,0.00017134182,0.9247229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32512614,0.0052089966,0.0027009088,0.04978567,0.0014418582,0.00022839908,0.0005368789,0.00066644436,0.6143048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535024,0.0016372508,0.00014555448,0.0006898673,0.0012319861,0.0009450321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986505,0.0003095181,0.00012288378,0.0003264539,0.00031435452,0.00027635353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028248148,0.00049056177,0.00045548257,0.0010427545,0.007553305,0.012819801,0.001012124,0.0045424723,0.04333429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008574226,0.00023288857,0.00044615203,0.001392567,0.00826043,0.014004214,0.00807552,0.0053256615,0.009100066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011664359,0.000010118198,0.00063108787,0.000029503215,0.000008289417,0.00010353439,0.0047160126,0.00010010856,0.00007379776,0.8988562,0.077778615,0.01768104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027086448,0.000005480235,0.00029792226,0.000076119606,0.0000030489828,0.000059549682,0.0032238015,0.000048148337,0.00008367752,0.06563687,0.93055457,0.00000812545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008748283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008813382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04333429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037710562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004316362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14496762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}