{"meta":{"query_hash":"bfe243b859fd","filters":{"venue":"Industry Studies Working Papers (University of Pittsburgh)"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bfe243b859fd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Industry+Studies+Working+Papers+%28University+of+Pittsburgh%29"},"results":[{"id":"W1596280701","doi":"","title":"Is Working for a Start-up Worth It? Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industry Studies Working Papers (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Risk aversion (psychology); Sample (material); Charter; Labour economics; Variance (accounting); Demographic economics; Unemployment; Business; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Accounting; Expected utility hypothesis; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.20858260430228817,"score_gpt":0.2848386065009417,"score_spread":0.07625600219865356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596280701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99718636,0.0006160723,0.00007386807,0.0005138707,0.000005389668,0.000004142333,0.00021204661,0.0000016310029,0.0013866468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979486,0.00073917524,0.000040669333,0.000094485746,0.000012609963,0.0000022522338,0.00037822098,0.0000011995461,0.0007828043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995957,0.00007858196,0.00002255724,0.00009377461,0.00007945489,0.00012995735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153405,0.0034645777,0.0030866873,0.00032251127,0.00042214582,0.0011700792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011154169,0.00013011058,0.00023607166,0.00074636855,0.0007462857,0.00095039257,0.00044057265,0.0006232603,0.0030101144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005156063,0.0001295242,0.0003228527,0.0009832559,0.0005409675,0.00045275997,0.00072342117,0.00075523293,0.0003940548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035073567,0.00018544274,0.9854974,0.00004577881,0.000055662807,0.00019587667,0.0011488259,0.00027854717,0.00015674766,0.00037466182,0.001057326,0.010652896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018974339,0.0001071227,0.9955232,0.000033551627,0.000029214192,0.000050755018,0.00251693,0.00018228912,0.00008116896,0.00016375391,0.001286575,0.000006504397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04381894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095614016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04381894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052525534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062686444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087127805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123616299","doi":"","title":"The Fight for the Middle: Upgrading, Competition, and Industrial Development in China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Industry Studies Working Papers (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Competition (biology); Domestic market; Business; Market share; Aggregate data; Indigenous; International trade; Industrial organization; Market economy; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.14714032425812976,"score_gpt":0.22357550098114695,"score_spread":0.0764351767230172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123616299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903706,0.0007785989,0.00020748732,0.0017631813,0.000003990009,0.000007783813,0.0002144566,0.0000075091434,0.006646367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992939,0.0001483935,0.000042041935,0.00005037585,0.0000051359207,0.0000019496247,0.000057938578,5.561668e-7,0.00039967004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996346,0.00006573932,0.000018852024,0.000053359512,0.00009191349,0.00013555992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827707,0.000464025,0.000584726,0.00006430796,0.00019098337,0.00041886137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008569317,0.00016004845,0.00049969624,0.0015928601,0.00093367894,0.002131021,0.0003492992,0.00039799354,0.0029911147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001315277,0.00009218533,0.00030851894,0.002741518,0.0016956192,0.0011190589,0.0011837363,0.00057507167,0.000095368254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015703963,0.00012230525,0.88233525,0.00014347494,0.00015314775,0.00110808,0.0022180662,0.012705523,0.00096494384,0.06434782,0.003930636,0.031813752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002746055,0.00011116719,0.93805933,0.00006319888,0.00007768873,0.000097216376,0.0047317506,0.018427072,0.00058310834,0.03040554,0.007358902,0.00005744684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12852536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11301963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12852536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004078076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002754696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25555456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7048144650","doi":"","title":"Innovation Pathways in Bureaucratic Organizations:\\nA Process Study of Technology Infusion at NASA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Industry Studies Working Papers (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Superconducting and THz Device Technology","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Goddard Space Flight Center; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Process (computing); Maturity (psychological); Key (lock); Technology development; Technology innovation; Capability Maturity Model; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02422554353183464,"score_gpt":0.2516754943122273,"score_spread":0.22744995078039265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7048144650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863224,0.00022340959,0.0032398375,0.0008276063,0.000012006276,0.00010367527,0.000023626308,0.000016600497,0.00923074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741435,0.00013128678,0.0012461746,0.000046913774,0.0000057644015,0.00006442272,0.000016446642,0.0000043642813,0.0010703524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871,0.008724868,0.00028261775,0.0004916388,0.000870999,0.00091988116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660238,0.023754064,0.004710801,0.0011721661,0.002261993,0.002077217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015377964,0.00021300491,0.00019459908,0.0020971198,0.0063103717,0.0060007875,0.0009398498,0.0011423815,0.0016694186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023051564,0.0002520293,0.00020805403,0.0020929866,0.006054884,0.0042328616,0.003736093,0.0016560788,0.00020510916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016396146,0.001017922,0.07634659,0.00017851734,0.000014582635,0.0015260932,0.8065354,0.0012854408,0.0015508954,0.060291395,0.0009842295,0.05010493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005364106,0.00062165555,0.061448157,0.0002614876,0.000017531882,0.00037744205,0.8886062,0.004647999,0.0019047627,0.012359483,0.02964346,0.00005815922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011369125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012583877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015377964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068728817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00692888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08132744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}