{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab1775ad0da3","filters":{"venue":"Informal Logic"},"cohort_total":546,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":546,"exported":546,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab1775ad0da3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Informal+Logic"},"results":[{"id":"W1480704407","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.484","title":"Refuting a Standpoint by Appealing to Its Outcomes: Reductio ad Absurdum vs. Argument from Consequences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Proposition; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05017340762988765,"score_gpt":0.27161539873544205,"score_spread":0.2214419911055544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480704407","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120507084,0.006601078,0.47554946,0.0311881,0.0012608792,0.00036460505,0.00016948274,0.00040544118,0.3639539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506831,0.0011805478,0.038646925,0.0014219598,0.0004859586,0.00021532798,0.000096180665,0.00013873521,0.007131353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859152,0.009063203,0.0007918186,0.0008842646,0.0025634211,0.0007820498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98951703,0.007150254,0.0007612546,0.0014595172,0.00077994284,0.0003319542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012425499,0.000987718,0.0011146149,0.002990529,0.0034826663,0.0076048044,0.0019390067,0.0054543396,0.0031029312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023489593,0.0008227289,0.0019165019,0.001400619,0.020137273,0.013261664,0.007348821,0.0063222023,0.0006808544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023855298,0.00001559788,0.00018214398,0.000041479347,0.00001287992,0.00015381287,0.0021321531,0.00035716483,0.00018209917,0.99292505,0.0003097889,0.0036640514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021881324,0.000017232222,0.00021027587,0.00005654168,0.000019859073,0.0001620885,0.00073405355,0.0016216065,0.00035854202,0.9908199,0.0059626764,0.000015349298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016201022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010331456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012425499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032616246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012316117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480769715","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3398","title":"Critical Thinking and Informal Logic: Neuropsychological Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inference; Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Informal logic; Neuropsychology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Critical thinking; Cog; Computer science; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07553556736473438,"score_gpt":0.35941881060869474,"score_spread":0.28388324324396036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480769715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11629889,0.17535894,0.12984096,0.1351699,0.001420395,0.00014575911,0.0003042489,0.0005593031,0.4409017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91540784,0.04280041,0.02726126,0.004020341,0.0011043956,0.0001352294,0.00008225727,0.00006552138,0.009122868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991887,0.0003974846,0.000040355004,0.00012773236,0.00015534158,0.00009040227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941703,0.0037289665,0.0007056219,0.00038837976,0.00059550506,0.00041124213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002636566,0.000673983,0.0004415386,0.0042127226,0.0009403102,0.006765309,0.0020915908,0.0020751501,0.004877155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062628267,0.00025955462,0.00031820394,0.0016230921,0.026200876,0.013709567,0.0026135028,0.0037132208,0.00047705445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038305472,0.000080280966,0.0023958145,0.00035501536,0.000023761331,0.00057223806,0.0040312735,0.0010569827,0.00056044426,0.9300721,0.001664441,0.059149258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008412955,0.000012794991,0.0010341438,0.000092379254,0.0000034965485,0.00042981774,0.0009881189,0.00039164233,0.00021166925,0.9879274,0.0088867545,0.000013311451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023726851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016142557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006765309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028897254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023136279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02096653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481842717","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2990","title":"Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Advice (programming); Action (physics); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03376758596611559,"score_gpt":0.35899716338040316,"score_spread":0.3252295774142876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481842717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015644114,0.0062828446,0.076280944,0.6556482,0.0068302276,0.000054220054,0.00007947472,0.0002675067,0.23891252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.725117,0.003340391,0.04431549,0.13924347,0.008417073,0.00016298988,0.000084253516,0.0004293251,0.07888989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919566,0.0043733437,0.0002822858,0.0012616339,0.0017249624,0.00040119217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98177505,0.009960161,0.001569201,0.0022126134,0.0033895404,0.0010934894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008459099,0.00044572246,0.00065920677,0.0012885794,0.005060608,0.00820684,0.0018947005,0.008115933,0.009312471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03610192,0.00025903943,0.00059438363,0.000788867,0.02368033,0.015280387,0.005456086,0.010276849,0.003198966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014356349,0.000010956549,0.00035308098,0.00003703627,0.000010402944,0.00009022617,0.0025134177,0.00008361077,0.00008181059,0.96676606,0.023487434,0.006551664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014721137,0.000012812151,0.00017061604,0.00013728406,0.000009077624,0.000121015706,0.0014371382,0.0005149957,0.00023390453,0.8743294,0.123000994,0.000018079629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003169481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003334157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009312471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003151673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002198762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044736564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482543593","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.454","title":"Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Epistemology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.0541495122848967,"score_gpt":0.31378775309342377,"score_spread":0.25963824080852704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482543593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90424174,0.0005829079,0.0016298754,0.0042144665,0.0000764794,0.00006921736,0.00007483318,0.00010725085,0.08900326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687576,0.00010306681,0.00030859638,0.0002475757,0.000017575303,0.000017172282,0.00001851845,0.00001941748,0.0023921672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978741,0.009748934,0.0005478927,0.0012151209,0.0075509325,0.0021961182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8964681,0.06762059,0.010125882,0.0030408427,0.0134925,0.009252019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00900719,0.00028016343,0.00044994958,0.0019338211,0.0042519537,0.0063614603,0.00088279095,0.00092744647,0.00613824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06976203,0.0002661115,0.00033226167,0.0019498949,0.0063167373,0.0022219021,0.006213131,0.0028061233,0.00036472097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017463351,0.002043075,0.27809584,0.0006811701,0.00013373414,0.0013555331,0.2622115,0.002774779,0.008010202,0.12684703,0.009853402,0.3062474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004253897,0.0014397308,0.64441746,0.0011046914,0.00031896087,0.0005122814,0.13175249,0.0054044523,0.0106673585,0.061413582,0.14230825,0.00023540422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0661697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09286883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0661697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019556554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02723865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14189339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486649415","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.2965","title":"Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Key (lock); Domain (mathematical analysis); Process (computing); Work (physics); Informal logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Software engineering; Computer security; Engineering; Epistemology; Programming language; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.025748299750823052,"score_gpt":0.20080039885908632,"score_spread":0.17505209910826328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486649415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01314303,0.005708454,0.90457463,0.0122275,0.0003950638,0.00025631968,0.00006225723,0.0003473856,0.063285425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5232399,0.0037419396,0.46132302,0.0013723592,0.00049770204,0.00062935834,0.00011445132,0.00018011266,0.008901166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722191,0.020068757,0.002079137,0.0014811836,0.0033766103,0.0007753145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540289,0.036917455,0.0021148347,0.0039854124,0.0023063377,0.00064711104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02221579,0.0010418976,0.00084836525,0.00437861,0.0031284406,0.009003633,0.0021101616,0.0053556045,0.005936675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045451615,0.0009874856,0.0013280236,0.0028086477,0.022790581,0.020489851,0.0052731466,0.0061835563,0.0010969301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006273974,0.000007870414,0.000066658366,0.00005264333,0.0000054711827,0.000039837818,0.0003791332,0.0011827039,0.00009509412,0.9921921,0.00036723536,0.005604965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008941994,0.0000106694115,0.000035661942,0.000062666666,0.000005760922,0.00003824542,0.00013039225,0.003357989,0.00024668442,0.9862802,0.009811868,0.0000110149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012903344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000652573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02221579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051952624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00248078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117489696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486871773","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3893","title":"Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Warrant; Ceteris paribus; A priori and a posteriori; Intuition; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Inductive reasoning; Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08940304955744048,"score_gpt":0.29413801357619,"score_spread":0.20473496401874952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486871773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061724786,0.004900347,0.3764958,0.12219536,0.0015773696,0.00024865338,0.00032059476,0.0004782986,0.43205884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8266663,0.0015595859,0.13296348,0.012518886,0.001131228,0.00041538398,0.00015005881,0.00023072993,0.02436443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946719,0.0028513644,0.00020992356,0.00094741,0.00094869925,0.00037076138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141663,0.006156391,0.00041906437,0.0009122205,0.0007586339,0.00033702355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070350976,0.0008559781,0.0010301517,0.0035220643,0.003830964,0.0072111534,0.0027845427,0.008356517,0.00605454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020447474,0.00058640086,0.0017162282,0.0022502546,0.020749746,0.01294844,0.004502552,0.005576336,0.0008918475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013763045,0.0000068563118,0.000083656756,0.000019005376,0.0000040192135,0.000042404805,0.00059663533,0.00018229881,0.0000478768,0.9958905,0.0013023395,0.0018106363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012872668,0.000008700362,0.00013519167,0.000036011374,0.0000066662133,0.00005164672,0.0001531994,0.0006761148,0.00008381204,0.9885311,0.010294803,0.000009944514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037002482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008356517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042894236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021445488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037205577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487459737","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.483","title":"Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Balance (ability); Action (physics); Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1213658247406551,"score_gpt":0.27601683903559016,"score_spread":0.15465101429493505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487459737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054397665,0.007447118,0.28589857,0.055888094,0.0007837405,0.00030064405,0.00016165427,0.00021641923,0.5949062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94526345,0.0016948493,0.03287112,0.0021922523,0.00060218334,0.0005284709,0.00009041933,0.00011019496,0.016647093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95035815,0.03628377,0.0023599137,0.0027024697,0.006668178,0.0016274827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527149,0.03737879,0.0019636152,0.0027898422,0.0037826544,0.0013701958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03385403,0.00060377526,0.001033364,0.0029973055,0.009042958,0.013516907,0.002057247,0.007047907,0.0059094834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05464334,0.00083084544,0.00073927204,0.0028131746,0.03523795,0.022882622,0.011750037,0.007688903,0.0014107447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023762987,0.0000026254957,0.000025380927,0.000010597532,9.0840854e-7,0.000011909434,0.0014351622,0.000086622196,0.000018668286,0.9974607,0.00015758106,0.00078750117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067776305,0.0000022083839,0.000023550661,0.000027901433,0.000001486684,0.000016969863,0.00040567864,0.0003940495,0.00004638159,0.9886374,0.010433908,0.0000036447063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019023826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093100284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03385403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00885081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059875087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1790393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489834304","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.431","title":"Three Naturalistic Accounts of the Epistemology of Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Naturalism; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Naturalistic observation; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08681934052222458,"score_gpt":0.2591182896405862,"score_spread":0.17229894911836163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489834304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0114952,0.004523196,0.44471973,0.04486922,0.0009902635,0.00038570116,0.00037288226,0.00045616442,0.4921876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6025091,0.0049668397,0.33237407,0.0077100922,0.0013132755,0.0031395946,0.00048069382,0.00028455324,0.047221858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841462,0.007816799,0.0007348334,0.0009805626,0.005429109,0.00089246716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98623234,0.008083109,0.0013318325,0.0017923064,0.0016753655,0.00088516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015922545,0.0010780473,0.0010633472,0.008102294,0.0059200753,0.017228069,0.0054221894,0.006730929,0.010047359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019116918,0.0008778124,0.0021259654,0.0045829765,0.04114095,0.014471242,0.0077985614,0.0060166963,0.001689885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032610183,0.0000049083637,0.00003391629,0.000020245083,0.0000015575522,0.000016369471,0.00039860298,0.00006996764,0.000013436695,0.9979627,0.00054003444,0.0009349999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283249,0.0000062740087,0.0000765641,0.000087033535,0.000003993049,0.00008613531,0.0005144964,0.000901857,0.00007827459,0.9761836,0.02203791,0.000011132369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023424458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030516665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017228069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00876032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004869263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084207475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491477860","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2160","title":"Model Answer: An Evaluation of a Complex Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8183411544940141,"score_gpt":0.54089907330947,"score_spread":0.27744208118454416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491477860","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24485826,0.0010248508,0.54046553,0.039053455,0.0014747476,0.0015439044,0.0016716593,0.0011837712,0.16872393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8174278,0.00032936365,0.16929516,0.0027954092,0.0004119465,0.00080425164,0.0009737434,0.00036848796,0.007593806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97708637,0.01442814,0.0009983935,0.0011178426,0.005858756,0.0005105051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67417365,0.28531033,0.0047601024,0.013201421,0.0202862,0.002268287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026785621,0.0012260515,0.0010316378,0.0036758115,0.0021216867,0.0053128907,0.0033032042,0.00596448,0.057413295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25012603,0.00027955082,0.0012770942,0.0019236057,0.0042405785,0.011668822,0.006050188,0.0023974103,0.002780088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032010735,0.0014244254,0.00611424,0.0018484088,0.00022925044,0.0005837254,0.0037117894,0.013731711,0.0027012457,0.8169837,0.020765083,0.12870534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015921039,0.0014769805,0.0039271587,0.0015371129,0.00052318384,0.0006358075,0.005546614,0.22241636,0.006924156,0.7039088,0.051375087,0.0001367126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001232027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012586411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057413295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026296673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024663378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19206661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492216157","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2233","title":"Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06868165977470571,"score_gpt":0.26781529963186307,"score_spread":0.19913363985715737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492216157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016560665,0.24322009,0.017707359,0.45256025,0.013863885,0.000043772325,0.0001197319,0.00014050948,0.27068835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20492041,0.18759261,0.016428083,0.110095195,0.039811045,0.00031669065,0.0001862817,0.00041708033,0.44023263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789715,0.0011407938,0.00007653331,0.00022990744,0.0005726417,0.00008295799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951302,0.0036194343,0.00027276826,0.00017834715,0.0005622361,0.00023712259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002763602,0.00062987086,0.0004937029,0.0021563165,0.0033038226,0.008967108,0.00093265827,0.0045155184,0.009323295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007309612,0.00032563537,0.0002845231,0.0022447351,0.012084532,0.009976781,0.0015807841,0.007028043,0.0040394794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021017606,0.000023606584,0.00012871246,0.0003369176,0.000011851629,0.00008789381,0.004347731,0.0001736698,0.00018786763,0.66905266,0.28983036,0.0357977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012511992,0.000008501799,0.00023203933,0.0007095225,0.0000055279174,0.00013195306,0.0009968327,0.00013613352,0.00008327216,0.19662178,0.8010491,0.0000127496705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008253363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01002985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009323295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043207556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024695918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03134942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492321700","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3598","title":"Some Clarifications about the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning. A Reply to Santibáñez Yañez (2012).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Constructive; Analytic reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Psychology; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0388247195506904,"score_gpt":0.2898293096460925,"score_spread":0.2510045900954021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492321700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002507437,0.015171643,0.00079031376,0.970137,0.0094148265,0.000005194786,0.000050950413,0.000015753265,0.004163571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05095166,0.019766236,0.0035528915,0.8640736,0.03942116,0.00013461805,0.00012328038,0.0001607404,0.02181575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896242,0.0059599923,0.0005036053,0.001384053,0.0019555604,0.0005726289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96804416,0.022844173,0.0010798874,0.0010706485,0.0061245896,0.0008365304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012861526,0.0016978177,0.0012087962,0.0018697717,0.0064266436,0.008230394,0.0052292803,0.029094933,0.009979339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041655302,0.0007556605,0.002241623,0.002453978,0.015895842,0.017751832,0.0066832434,0.032617945,0.0036269012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007465671,0.000028945382,0.00024148542,0.00025157217,0.000033381955,0.00024226579,0.003928392,0.00018926905,0.00018884483,0.35887688,0.62613034,0.0098139355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009034134,0.00001854935,0.0010281841,0.00085455104,0.0000308664,0.0002671933,0.004471871,0.0005388591,0.0003513714,0.303752,0.68851805,0.00007809895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015084171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015188841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029094933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006989563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005053394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06801903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492826849","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2138","title":"Reasoning in Theory and Practice (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Contingency; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Best practice; Politics; Critical theory; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02006693239749318,"score_gpt":0.2923326665683617,"score_spread":0.2722657341708685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492826849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002324087,0.20148656,0.06399315,0.19158687,0.0151982745,0.00009945762,0.0007832028,0.00051143375,0.524017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24872476,0.13905306,0.07696447,0.059574347,0.028445944,0.00092931313,0.0018384781,0.0014474408,0.44302216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762815,0.0014668896,0.00012835673,0.0002637429,0.00041052065,0.00010233968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656665,0.0022938303,0.0001533197,0.00027688264,0.000560946,0.00014831148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043628793,0.0010653691,0.00088398746,0.0036062354,0.0035335168,0.00897167,0.00097065786,0.0054372973,0.03817302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070310785,0.00084908993,0.0013729824,0.004397822,0.011327641,0.011519454,0.0031922099,0.0066213184,0.009067783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029065224,0.000022687824,0.00023204717,0.00019537909,0.000027702323,0.00009661678,0.0014982515,0.0004565519,0.00011846646,0.71398354,0.25131246,0.03202731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016629403,0.000012208323,0.00048719655,0.0005146361,0.000017850462,0.00014797572,0.0007118017,0.00045923595,0.00008631348,0.41965842,0.57787323,0.000014451554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013532022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013022776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03817302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008580536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032273724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12770146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493131192","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1136","title":"Limits of Truth: Exploring Epistemological Approaches to Argumentation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.828222202449797,"score_gpt":0.49034824065344995,"score_spread":0.3378739617963471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493131192","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08759931,0.01662403,0.59763575,0.039609324,0.00054073223,0.00017109758,0.00008400754,0.0002007793,0.257535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320958,0.002291355,0.061778445,0.0006545862,0.0002905451,0.00031983442,0.000047060676,0.000065705695,0.0024566455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95215106,0.03930908,0.0014108542,0.0014715134,0.0046199905,0.0010375077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88549054,0.10126609,0.003552128,0.0039872117,0.003979967,0.0017239841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03641369,0.0011147966,0.0015407974,0.007929857,0.0060074213,0.019004777,0.0043542753,0.0062407237,0.0038515015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077085055,0.001047398,0.0017837222,0.0044421735,0.05245237,0.03510879,0.012631828,0.00868411,0.000510059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011740716,0.000016455468,0.00013752803,0.000058573452,0.0000131608085,0.000057295118,0.005068573,0.0008070038,0.000043250275,0.98988706,0.00013831483,0.0037610119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059055756,0.000003865506,0.000025579144,0.000047449037,0.000002857992,0.000019976362,0.00085771707,0.0016046407,0.000021845848,0.99584985,0.0015568509,0.0000034296952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011921506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080346013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03641369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072302376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032785034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19257629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493144150","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.419","title":"Argument Explanation Complementarity and the Structure of Informal Reasoning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Logical reasoning; Informal logic; Sociology; Cognitive science; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.012981263907303328,"score_gpt":0.24339327231801577,"score_spread":0.23041200841071244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493144150","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088093415,0.011983571,0.50658983,0.12635477,0.010935328,0.00020166772,0.00036060315,0.00059118925,0.2548897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94835943,0.0013563072,0.03718301,0.0028751248,0.0041270996,0.00012439155,0.000093199,0.00009438388,0.005786963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984463,0.010178642,0.0009781183,0.0009961333,0.002920512,0.0004635053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90184456,0.082148544,0.0038799094,0.0041805087,0.0072227134,0.000723849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103568705,0.00036596958,0.0005830497,0.004199086,0.0032696691,0.008407836,0.0010131312,0.0030169482,0.004689782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05603872,0.00042862073,0.0005537434,0.002344226,0.018509274,0.012119849,0.0037821736,0.0039056004,0.00031195904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017800878,0.0000048731677,0.00011752795,0.000059515012,0.000007500746,0.0000591646,0.0011469467,0.00020227897,0.000087339606,0.99264526,0.0018713376,0.0037804528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016575548,0.0000074496543,0.00018362977,0.00012143299,0.000015568494,0.00006825169,0.00038353336,0.0015011808,0.00026088677,0.9758497,0.02158213,0.000009604258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005767241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073790445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103568705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033309432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028247489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054773033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494295156","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.515","title":"Topics in Contemporary Legal Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Topical Nature of Legal Argumentation in the Continental Law Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Topos theory; Epistemology; Legal practice; Law; Context (archaeology); Sketch; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Literature; Algorithm; Art","score_opus":0.044204802939065015,"score_gpt":0.3122186965436982,"score_spread":0.2680138936046332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494295156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051439837,0.21831563,0.110487334,0.14137955,0.0032498532,0.00018361013,0.0002447861,0.00016937993,0.47453004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297516,0.091230504,0.028279025,0.009296756,0.009909255,0.0005216616,0.0003108393,0.00025826707,0.030442078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968256,0.002101945,0.00014901716,0.0002482839,0.00037227196,0.0003028552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497116,0.0037830337,0.00038319037,0.00017190096,0.0004572761,0.0002333792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005654037,0.0008175381,0.000927868,0.006981119,0.0060166596,0.014671786,0.0014347613,0.006085267,0.005774933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055822646,0.00051705877,0.00096824486,0.009293605,0.028181912,0.021253427,0.005228931,0.006166928,0.0011127071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008640832,0.000008571814,0.00019387613,0.00011182189,0.000004209169,0.00011345519,0.010608613,0.000102361955,0.0000823642,0.9837186,0.001649893,0.003397663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010711878,0.000028949613,0.0012587648,0.00051407283,0.000016014581,0.00024141512,0.009637501,0.0004762175,0.00014580574,0.87250954,0.11514113,0.000019879652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029378165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00262359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014671786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00546747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011913939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039669514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495251174","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.442","title":"Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Software; Empirical research; Data science; Management science; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.04427003261588465,"score_gpt":0.3392112641888877,"score_spread":0.29494123157300306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495251174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7851781,0.0013652118,0.20348082,0.0006105424,0.000035611964,0.00027417362,0.00053644896,0.0002708567,0.008248226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250182,0.00025435365,0.07370556,0.000047629106,0.000015999995,0.00017176651,0.00030688103,0.000026180389,0.00045341405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259925,0.005246959,0.00029462937,0.0006059428,0.001049922,0.0002032641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96545905,0.03072151,0.0015588301,0.0014284618,0.00059432595,0.00023781756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037081211,0.00038531554,0.0004489708,0.00237357,0.0015632899,0.0033834374,0.00081049587,0.0012300051,0.0016028662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022054195,0.00032131124,0.00033318062,0.0018641123,0.0031179653,0.00449162,0.0025311415,0.0010127125,0.00026277342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005894459,0.00095141225,0.087236136,0.0034360443,0.0003711729,0.0061948705,0.1388992,0.04265542,0.041998554,0.40131208,0.00378185,0.27257383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013757839,0.000363548,0.059026495,0.00078533404,0.00008484661,0.0035137704,0.0705654,0.08153607,0.019709198,0.6914494,0.072654285,0.00017402803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004938683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012236492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037081211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078367733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069452915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019610643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495983830","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3656","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05857822156908858,"score_gpt":0.239257830865886,"score_spread":0.18067960929679744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495983830","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038760565,0.013428741,0.4152032,0.23403525,0.006168049,0.00036796485,0.00047865827,0.0005060236,0.29105145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8145113,0.0054643215,0.11028603,0.042618908,0.0062492504,0.0008550983,0.0005311725,0.0005857228,0.01889811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94720656,0.03020469,0.00283173,0.0050919834,0.012608587,0.0020564578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7224338,0.22668833,0.012635573,0.012104968,0.02345862,0.0026787517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05540997,0.0013676839,0.0019753021,0.005768048,0.0036821126,0.01133287,0.003251564,0.012228488,0.012730628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23536806,0.0012638777,0.0016672584,0.0029091865,0.023994397,0.029062292,0.0065452494,0.011886235,0.0034500214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059967715,0.000021173566,0.0006945353,0.00029318937,0.00007948502,0.00018599264,0.0011565934,0.00056881004,0.00015707055,0.9804052,0.0062132473,0.010164796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042448253,0.000011350552,0.00017520705,0.0001623867,0.000019020603,0.00008555334,0.00024109795,0.00095618307,0.00020558224,0.9837998,0.014285044,0.000016292537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008014762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051648315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05540997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033756339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002010696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29303944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499385902","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2246","title":"Classifying and Analyzing Analogies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10003130450068803,"score_gpt":0.40196325531168026,"score_spread":0.3019319508109922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499385902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14017537,0.007289327,0.66411436,0.006578893,0.00034682994,0.0010403029,0.001292212,0.0009832298,0.17817946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6334085,0.0023972008,0.3517977,0.0008037693,0.0003633023,0.00075930357,0.0022962508,0.0002485579,0.007925466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860799,0.0060998034,0.0012183005,0.0022575215,0.0037490667,0.0005954795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97259235,0.017405635,0.0021589787,0.004474867,0.002738378,0.00062981463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006502014,0.00089017965,0.0011583169,0.01436733,0.0037429088,0.012685562,0.0026511475,0.0027703438,0.012742476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054247648,0.0006236563,0.0016562365,0.00993178,0.012240404,0.019532919,0.0067857816,0.0035297812,0.0010059424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003417216,0.000046527974,0.0030209275,0.00020836925,0.000055423112,0.0002250582,0.0034806607,0.0018462578,0.00041412824,0.9371469,0.0014953562,0.052026298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001196984,0.000017091834,0.0012341585,0.000108166394,0.000024948049,0.00015461631,0.0014168812,0.0051515163,0.0003440743,0.97030234,0.02121657,0.000017569993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027452216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001688248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01436733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041789804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020604734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04262787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500258600","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4133","title":"John Locke on Inference and Fallacy, A Re-Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Fallacy; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Toleration; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Rhetoric; Inference; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0582295715362343,"score_gpt":0.28651175291498754,"score_spread":0.22828218137875322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500258600","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00460181,0.42362604,0.01822963,0.42996657,0.010123386,0.000034860182,0.000101082944,0.000065617416,0.11325105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44831324,0.32692406,0.015253553,0.084925584,0.045289405,0.00019290565,0.00021802756,0.00037015797,0.07851312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894365,0.0051321005,0.000555388,0.000995291,0.0034210917,0.0004595853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97150886,0.022961294,0.00058073207,0.00086114457,0.0035635086,0.00052441837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008446921,0.00079360313,0.0010890897,0.005144548,0.005376272,0.010050921,0.0018051474,0.005277888,0.003635693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03130236,0.0005557818,0.0007097695,0.0033852502,0.035276216,0.02225327,0.0027647705,0.0097295595,0.0011878398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023143317,0.000013581635,0.00016388869,0.00022125535,0.000013036939,0.00010112607,0.002595746,0.0002688224,0.000051712,0.93836987,0.046677064,0.011500782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012643919,0.000009097048,0.00019259671,0.00073162816,0.0000067944275,0.000076393655,0.0011654687,0.00026401205,0.000083331935,0.7815467,0.21589683,0.000014486499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008624252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006211209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010050921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006733053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006115908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048852026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500651006","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2140","title":"Argument and Its Uses (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Assertion; Argumentation theory; Proposition; Epistemology; Argument map; Informal logic; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01677994550145826,"score_gpt":0.22092021098934245,"score_spread":0.2041402654878842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500651006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017389676,0.03161529,0.00968765,0.072319195,0.016066704,0.00009329378,0.0009093621,0.00023687496,0.86733276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12831266,0.02286424,0.010641152,0.0450645,0.021263508,0.0008139832,0.0016255394,0.00089835207,0.7685161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987166,0.00046021375,0.00014788772,0.00019795359,0.00036470278,0.000112729045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972625,0.0017470588,0.00014881074,0.00019106093,0.00056414166,0.00008650197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027804556,0.00094553526,0.0008005675,0.002425812,0.0038808105,0.00714723,0.00085239444,0.007382034,0.058016382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007026868,0.00057190954,0.00071243074,0.0027180044,0.0047097513,0.008152785,0.0022271327,0.0069394074,0.019921297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044465014,0.00002470441,0.00016671748,0.0001618741,0.000009662298,0.00007525332,0.0010960039,0.00007991675,0.00019660521,0.55172575,0.4225746,0.023844466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084244775,0.000013492584,0.0005266782,0.00021912648,0.000007884984,0.000088859415,0.0003144193,0.00010394248,0.00012299867,0.05458843,0.94399416,0.000011626532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007966802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01113101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058016382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039676335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017370111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19408417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501985841","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2147","title":"Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04404527886292283,"score_gpt":0.27994082837086837,"score_spread":0.23589554950794553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501985841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08371302,0.09832225,0.13458852,0.083149455,0.0017071927,0.000124481,0.00016983636,0.00032733366,0.59789795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610027,0.010475368,0.011086665,0.0028942777,0.0010936925,0.00013475881,0.00007059877,0.00006567507,0.013176242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338984,0.004644301,0.00031816066,0.0004572044,0.0007897709,0.00040065055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130064,0.0065166038,0.0008554567,0.0004403476,0.0005695207,0.0003175018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047652344,0.00066573627,0.00047580668,0.002234575,0.0023844875,0.009484132,0.0009148219,0.0037251844,0.0038891898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009085935,0.00018823234,0.00048380042,0.0015842499,0.02052046,0.009104689,0.003315177,0.0028184152,0.0007107462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016337968,0.000011147712,0.00023050614,0.000097929325,0.000007381051,0.00008888261,0.0039690644,0.0003858608,0.000116327334,0.98566574,0.0012774336,0.008133406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011788098,0.000008596496,0.00020078477,0.000113390284,0.000005366857,0.00008260458,0.001166474,0.00047387285,0.0000620489,0.971483,0.026385242,0.0000068612253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011998438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061353063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009484132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032962568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013260633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025201261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502525946","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2173","title":"Three Recalcitrant Problems of Argument Identification","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Wright; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Counterexample; Principal (computer security); Neglect; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02737763397754952,"score_gpt":0.24158599261892552,"score_spread":0.214208358641376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502525946","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018986879,0.0047933455,0.47672057,0.32224825,0.006246111,0.00058592926,0.00020797586,0.001404926,0.16880599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4226374,0.0024093715,0.4876999,0.036620207,0.0060900594,0.0014648334,0.00018518201,0.001060851,0.041832224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8899398,0.06593254,0.007577046,0.0116802,0.021572689,0.0032977078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84736305,0.09712831,0.009176677,0.018967472,0.024231717,0.0031327594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.076014504,0.0018872593,0.0023638727,0.00880335,0.012396336,0.023204694,0.00916588,0.01328898,0.009569454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19019261,0.0015221976,0.00260415,0.0044169836,0.050471056,0.03129808,0.018918717,0.025163889,0.0031891782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029958073,0.000026015443,0.00035218737,0.00017765447,0.000018945166,0.00015076577,0.0063745687,0.00014200543,0.00022287984,0.9541309,0.012739766,0.02563432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054552474,0.000023967692,0.00031751505,0.00035825875,0.000025394333,0.0006698084,0.0052137678,0.0018065678,0.00095223036,0.90866244,0.081854984,0.000060554892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024503807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019679833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076014504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074550165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00624183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40200794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504695408","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3898","title":"A List of Trudy Govier's Publications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019334904331239824,"score_gpt":0.21028989305745838,"score_spread":0.19095498872621855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504695408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080458896,0.15058693,0.0032018851,0.08431186,0.2474019,0.00014504143,0.0036301669,0.001062153,0.5088555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049967966,0.1020489,0.0030055682,0.012918555,0.070469834,0.0001462793,0.0030676052,0.0010523816,0.8022941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983834,0.00026931678,0.00013801371,0.00016865568,0.00090723514,0.000133256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98877525,0.0030312415,0.00054959435,0.00060524134,0.0054016756,0.0016369954],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021103395,0.0009212291,0.0008298027,0.014250967,0.0027015898,0.007330516,0.0011535204,0.0013474162,0.151097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012104375,0.00035183667,0.00050422037,0.012323691,0.0008904579,0.004348988,0.0020177125,0.0021895252,0.07927086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049616324,0.0000047985022,0.000041579708,0.00011167907,0.0000012493085,0.000022957196,0.000040244246,0.000012254257,0.000032061616,0.0042703743,0.9716006,0.02385741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012268656,0.0000019322008,0.00010289682,0.00018011534,0.000001127734,0.000034687382,0.00004934812,0.000010954819,0.000020342479,0.0008450318,0.9987495,0.0000028884529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036857738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009339001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002332265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035299573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5054698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505171067","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.596","title":"Mathematical Proof and Discovery <i>Reductio ad Absurdum</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Epistemology; Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Linguistics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.039017036203172734,"score_gpt":0.25849021220413376,"score_spread":0.21947317600096103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505171067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011037205,0.02048014,0.36339462,0.0445814,0.0015857172,0.00012454226,0.00021004594,0.00049059535,0.55809563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7730545,0.008495136,0.13990091,0.006315217,0.002307497,0.00032690924,0.00023504927,0.00041666877,0.068948224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952851,0.0027868596,0.00021773254,0.00054464216,0.0009648642,0.00020086448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315697,0.004807954,0.00037567088,0.0010694904,0.00047576986,0.00011407238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385952,0.0005569203,0.0006083246,0.0021038363,0.002152368,0.0056856726,0.0013312269,0.002369272,0.0047783367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008793873,0.00046145343,0.0011325269,0.001617101,0.025671663,0.0087840315,0.0026449212,0.0044446983,0.0014596845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022582813,0.000001319327,0.00001512709,0.000015433552,0.0000015754146,0.000013435439,0.00013680694,0.00009835338,0.0000254515,0.9970732,0.0010809081,0.0015361366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032469356,0.0000035669352,0.000046079458,0.00002556459,0.0000023548587,0.00005032985,0.000058223344,0.0007397483,0.00013416672,0.9777255,0.021207454,0.0000037379843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018824375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014027307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056856726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004856242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016201932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03523469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506123608","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2592","title":"Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Software; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Philosophy; Psychology; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.06039407464896068,"score_gpt":0.27259465419965995,"score_spread":0.21220057955069926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506123608","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025076486,0.08084833,0.67877823,0.014691407,0.0015690197,0.00040212457,0.0002370018,0.00039821325,0.19799925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84729373,0.021758094,0.104332216,0.0013975472,0.0014612364,0.0007551456,0.00021868803,0.00009650325,0.022686768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963482,0.002020364,0.00021840209,0.00034819206,0.0007696714,0.00029514424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730897,0.0018547588,0.00018868574,0.00016907036,0.00023738059,0.00024116157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002810327,0.0010896412,0.0013020657,0.0012510183,0.0018813405,0.005502877,0.0015935132,0.002967753,0.0045805406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058079786,0.0006569636,0.00075567747,0.001607524,0.006485402,0.0070072785,0.0025425293,0.0037153247,0.0007635793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000810544,0.000011733608,0.000044238786,0.00006688444,0.00000724973,0.00006949345,0.00025623073,0.0042227884,0.00009922375,0.9905585,0.0010786724,0.003576841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015804653,0.00001114673,0.000042926404,0.00003964338,0.0000055956243,0.00004504805,0.00009651241,0.010328776,0.00007667968,0.9740752,0.015253447,0.000009231943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028278427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018711772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005502877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003344709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001752934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024267733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509051045","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2594","title":"Argument Representation for Dependable Computer-Based Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependability; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Representation (politics); Certification; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.022330941509751318,"score_gpt":0.23294168385824915,"score_spread":0.21061074234849783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509051045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044382727,0.000809239,0.9708981,0.001936902,0.00017018773,0.00013820089,0.00035311875,0.0008951631,0.020360876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2202068,0.001688695,0.7657193,0.0006085614,0.0002807598,0.00062202703,0.0012898704,0.00031295148,0.009271041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569714,0.00236401,0.0005768923,0.00034332924,0.0008153794,0.00020331868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403113,0.004016179,0.0004660056,0.00074688747,0.0005931293,0.00014666915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004956675,0.000913431,0.00076486,0.00323626,0.0013287517,0.009149007,0.002039806,0.0027512999,0.009839096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014884142,0.0006204566,0.0017651435,0.0025084731,0.0039729984,0.011712289,0.00311747,0.0036573918,0.001990961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127346675,0.000009128317,0.00005295592,0.00009471995,0.000007273593,0.000084019324,0.00044308885,0.002101448,0.00035334093,0.9850455,0.0008826256,0.010913133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017545715,0.000016388909,0.000046678262,0.000114223716,0.000023347937,0.000116301875,0.00021117488,0.018994015,0.00085856236,0.9345271,0.045055047,0.000019574218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010170683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009466237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009839096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002483278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010915425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032915056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509384081","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4327","title":"Else Margarete Barth (1928-2015)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.08816343641949162,"score_gpt":0.33519203494801536,"score_spread":0.24702859852852374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509384081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014402475,0.13481365,0.00295081,0.7233879,0.07368911,0.000022059303,0.00020079107,0.00010703955,0.063388325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043177933,0.031938523,0.003019639,0.3078014,0.022626247,0.00007288536,0.00009498586,0.00030021335,0.59096813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913245,0.00023511394,0.0000401638,0.0002412905,0.00026316804,0.0000878178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879897,0.00056854374,0.00010864753,0.000054283653,0.00029480024,0.00017477816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013140298,0.0005413956,0.00035638394,0.0013372966,0.0031967422,0.0037254924,0.0005834158,0.004646938,0.015907407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006195241,0.00034037206,0.00027497433,0.00088954455,0.0045422227,0.006445268,0.0019057727,0.006515297,0.007977667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004249146,0.000011378253,0.0002212137,0.00007052367,0.0000067207857,0.0000931059,0.0012849208,0.00003970185,0.00011874268,0.13472812,0.833717,0.029666124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033477988,0.000004126039,0.00016489442,0.000113850234,0.0000018423178,0.000066306624,0.00031572,0.000020706004,0.000091298905,0.014068581,0.9851378,0.000011536966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01270605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023536585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015907407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027269672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019050853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053215563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512250334","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i4.2855","title":"Logic as (Normative) Inference Theory: Formal vs. Non-formal Theories of Inference Goodness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Inference; Epistemology; Criticism; sort; Philosophy of logic; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.016190786395965957,"score_gpt":0.27531697826798207,"score_spread":0.25912619187201613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512250334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046914633,0.013658797,0.53966963,0.084555924,0.001141478,0.00011493948,0.00032975513,0.00058041577,0.31303445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93566394,0.002627818,0.045190368,0.0047950116,0.0014344265,0.00028537182,0.00016126983,0.00025582415,0.009585999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99169123,0.0051775305,0.0003342036,0.0006587264,0.0016590485,0.00047918406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848733,0.010244231,0.0010460006,0.0020860205,0.0010801464,0.0006703156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011862909,0.0006234037,0.0010453709,0.0038850948,0.0020029405,0.011832184,0.0023525378,0.004339828,0.005220933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017059673,0.0004969446,0.0011345866,0.0027660078,0.029005308,0.022544,0.004205937,0.0047564297,0.0009579203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043717077,0.000003890726,0.000043937795,0.000010087032,0.0000027123438,0.0000050440617,0.00013905994,0.00013128515,0.000014990511,0.9986307,0.0002728182,0.0007410615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052062487,0.0000033964952,0.000059046277,0.000012552092,0.000003290097,0.000010471794,0.000062370054,0.00073428033,0.00002718675,0.99676883,0.0023112826,0.0000020896343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013245001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008356877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011862909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049323956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020517616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06273776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512788799","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2133","title":"Classification of Fallacies of Relevance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Argumentation theory; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Digression; Herring; Philosophy; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.03959861232946717,"score_gpt":0.26218911085198154,"score_spread":0.2225904985225144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512788799","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2884736,0.004802147,0.4989226,0.01103983,0.0007882831,0.0013831224,0.00065394357,0.002016581,0.1919199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726145,0.0008230286,0.11738167,0.0007369751,0.00021900792,0.0006420901,0.0006152835,0.0001557089,0.0068117953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96023786,0.016772697,0.0059438744,0.0028136622,0.012222901,0.0020091143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93885064,0.03338422,0.007367519,0.010000447,0.009015346,0.001381734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013706731,0.0009943102,0.001424161,0.013077787,0.0068480796,0.008246047,0.0023025726,0.0040063774,0.0038061228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07144732,0.00075303414,0.0011287018,0.00670893,0.0138531765,0.009029312,0.0063796914,0.004677114,0.0009012368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017109292,0.00011173521,0.010259435,0.00064719975,0.00007001645,0.0008570811,0.01588006,0.00141304,0.001767648,0.857369,0.0047353557,0.106718354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004170535,0.00010027614,0.00381724,0.00053494406,0.000048984075,0.0015304779,0.0045552496,0.008376692,0.0017302543,0.9382024,0.0409991,0.000062733256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010001223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009401396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013706731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031740342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021088116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07248896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513482339","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.3074","title":"Critical Thinking and Small Group Activities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Group (periodic table); Small group learning; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03259517605729282,"score_gpt":0.3255657859277022,"score_spread":0.29297060987040935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513482339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04993629,0.051106747,0.15421338,0.0607196,0.0029645858,0.00081662135,0.000043190656,0.00030332876,0.6798962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7984075,0.030841518,0.09900694,0.009943715,0.0024892571,0.0017521512,0.000051597002,0.00018195277,0.057325404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991339,0.0063668923,0.00020402441,0.00043666273,0.0012914863,0.00036202875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779896,0.017837303,0.0014111502,0.0009252123,0.00086182205,0.0009749698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053412137,0.0006074168,0.000243421,0.0016694838,0.0031552434,0.0046644006,0.0007827384,0.001943358,0.0065978584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018638443,0.00014480093,0.0002830596,0.0017936452,0.015348232,0.004647754,0.003927973,0.003689777,0.00074293255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072267125,0.00015986807,0.0014714828,0.0007483865,0.000015884036,0.0005031636,0.0317067,0.0007213475,0.0007982815,0.7614319,0.018423926,0.18394691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029987636,0.00020238131,0.0020261433,0.0014200825,0.000010987799,0.0009288412,0.012292367,0.00070694863,0.0013735587,0.62119365,0.3597828,0.00003216421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010193828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013160545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065978584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029858337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029669972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028247416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513875593","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4062","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Wild-Goose Chase for an Essential Distinction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Discipline; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06032515128667516,"score_gpt":0.2754074053714629,"score_spread":0.21508225408478776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513875593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028877618,0.058397762,0.1200941,0.48233065,0.0041714176,0.00007567514,0.00015153247,0.00027282335,0.30562848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975599,0.012390365,0.035482556,0.029711276,0.0044785575,0.00025951944,0.00008977532,0.00035413538,0.019673854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927108,0.0050951806,0.00015906525,0.00053638464,0.0010512733,0.0004473036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876183,0.009389067,0.00043502383,0.0012364497,0.00072599354,0.0005951264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009248414,0.00075538224,0.0012891816,0.0036054268,0.0064631198,0.014693081,0.0022674203,0.007491089,0.006055788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01325019,0.00049251225,0.0006576615,0.0022580826,0.072791725,0.031966496,0.0082999505,0.012914812,0.0011710296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007990073,0.00000446778,0.000043424898,0.000024825675,0.0000019540987,0.00001702247,0.001834259,0.000026841035,0.000029468149,0.99392635,0.0016033043,0.0024799625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009445552,0.000010694019,0.000099619494,0.00013458545,0.0000030683707,0.00004905246,0.0029693744,0.00022577068,0.000047901634,0.9685224,0.027920913,0.000007107954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033815939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037652457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014693081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049286033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035497807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048910916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515361935","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3530","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rationality; Epistemology; Normative; Heuristics; Dialectic; Defeasible estate; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14280636011229497,"score_gpt":0.32591763813883684,"score_spread":0.18311127802654187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515361935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017486328,0.030373398,0.17641333,0.12632091,0.0021274192,0.00019129418,0.00018608588,0.00019290338,0.64670837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782177,0.013212191,0.053501695,0.00959184,0.003614055,0.00053565437,0.00015283264,0.00018326454,0.04099079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634499,0.025686357,0.0015435665,0.002367854,0.005632815,0.0013194102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97624654,0.016464468,0.0015078502,0.0030715382,0.0018827684,0.0008268762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016241483,0.00072361215,0.00082292885,0.0019528563,0.0049572866,0.015128049,0.0014672183,0.007509987,0.004288184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026941905,0.0005563701,0.00073501543,0.0014800958,0.05015127,0.0118903965,0.0055832043,0.006931381,0.0017324993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034003347,0.0000033991284,0.000067439825,0.0000289767,0.0000044641342,0.000019823055,0.0006456675,0.00017008331,0.000036894464,0.99457693,0.0010978671,0.0033450406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042864513,0.000003210603,0.00006017335,0.00006979106,0.0000018642709,0.00003434337,0.00020038817,0.00026222502,0.0000442007,0.96250343,0.036812276,0.0000038343774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013725681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076403166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016241483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052411603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005712233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08589417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515375584","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3457","title":"Logic and Parables: Do These Narratives Provide Arguments?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05793630623058993,"score_gpt":0.2567522117937274,"score_spread":0.1988159055631375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515375584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13040932,0.0067442353,0.21714248,0.0717965,0.001100042,0.00024569788,0.0006305499,0.00023695713,0.57169425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543938,0.0020166107,0.025668755,0.0014286465,0.00021778473,0.00016679481,0.00016324084,0.00011504479,0.015829368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918174,0.006167358,0.0002452754,0.0004572748,0.00085966475,0.00045308928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666504,0.025735423,0.002998545,0.002006434,0.0017560824,0.0008531493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010202277,0.00077422074,0.0005163067,0.0027636546,0.0033484132,0.009779492,0.0014335999,0.003488929,0.010451752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036793597,0.00049771613,0.0005320317,0.0027265872,0.018024284,0.03255197,0.004919174,0.0034015488,0.0014301152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023305673,0.000009306107,0.00034681553,0.0000747621,0.00000491824,0.00015163852,0.014934356,0.00008662635,0.00009201184,0.9808764,0.0005912634,0.0028085255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024998093,0.000028123111,0.00049281586,0.00035842878,0.000018209737,0.0002441446,0.030341651,0.0014280956,0.0005263449,0.87124217,0.095279135,0.000015855332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014604277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010451752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019197783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053955436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516495875","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3032","title":"Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Adversarial system; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022198047673077415,"score_gpt":0.3097081608687018,"score_spread":0.28751011319562436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516495875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2618932,0.012719241,0.10391756,0.107753254,0.0009073878,0.00009386377,0.00010134692,0.00011905323,0.51249504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98598343,0.0011385705,0.004153756,0.0017594544,0.00015637082,0.000052065698,0.000015462489,0.00003976672,0.006701202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98230743,0.014010806,0.000322494,0.0009989879,0.0015028785,0.0008573538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96954983,0.024138864,0.00290349,0.0014642619,0.00074343797,0.0012002389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015587539,0.0006285225,0.0005853229,0.0024069108,0.00827737,0.010617876,0.001658437,0.0039782096,0.0063113435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0196008,0.00032597332,0.00052318786,0.002005028,0.074494466,0.014179709,0.01003912,0.0063731773,0.0005108363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000131605275,0.000010640425,0.0004452079,0.000043544685,0.0000047551807,0.00008294476,0.03482983,0.00007275302,0.00008416222,0.9601084,0.00090239896,0.003402289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012561077,0.000022713179,0.0005960105,0.00021613344,0.0000071433524,0.00026145013,0.034828387,0.000319106,0.00027687024,0.879483,0.08396267,0.000013939174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012552644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016101818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015587539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006129903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00343997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08243579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516596861","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2174","title":"Computational Agents as a Test-Bed to Study the Philosophical Dialogue Model \"DE\": A Development of Mackenzie's DC","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Test (biology); Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Computer science; Work (physics); Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07257964397651419,"score_gpt":0.3025658535435338,"score_spread":0.22998620956701965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516596861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071741566,0.000820648,0.8617609,0.002459888,0.00017707444,0.0015307419,0.00023684674,0.00046247288,0.06080985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43630323,0.00044127813,0.5562154,0.00042412037,0.00003486567,0.0015541005,0.00019511973,0.0001076744,0.0047242674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904075,0.007421368,0.0003877163,0.00069746556,0.00093538605,0.00015052316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98653215,0.008957198,0.00034230843,0.0023049468,0.0013023134,0.00056101324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009450683,0.00085618166,0.0008889447,0.0018061866,0.0016620196,0.0040673744,0.0026043814,0.0013036571,0.0029984957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024287062,0.0006369845,0.0006769187,0.0008057987,0.0052840374,0.00785276,0.0050530364,0.0033073416,0.00046488855],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001124742,0.00016683116,0.00097228884,0.00018352462,0.000020623633,0.000047179925,0.0016810253,0.009447602,0.0020106062,0.9610343,0.000805693,0.023517799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022299853,0.0006837496,0.000776553,0.00040275685,0.00005883723,0.0002592104,0.0026384853,0.3560029,0.014615023,0.53047407,0.09374998,0.000115412025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004760935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028717662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009450683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032361832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027751774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04998064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516702566","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.510","title":"Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Appeal; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Computer science; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10170842010581109,"score_gpt":0.2575299717280949,"score_spread":0.15582155162228378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516702566","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1123809,0.009408125,0.52291244,0.0919448,0.00095886376,0.00025334916,0.00022633058,0.0002975945,0.2616176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679741,0.0013883668,0.02326585,0.0026123098,0.0007141024,0.00016647877,0.0000803681,0.000068590816,0.0037297017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722453,0.014756577,0.002021709,0.0030815178,0.0061088237,0.001786176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358347,0.04086811,0.008752144,0.007993517,0.005279718,0.0012718692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027645573,0.00061180454,0.0014471669,0.0030074397,0.0030063319,0.01264555,0.003253,0.009272362,0.0062842835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0780868,0.0007919355,0.0017026261,0.0024409206,0.04751887,0.02679223,0.005320206,0.009569598,0.0011903329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011025873,0.000013919917,0.00026700002,0.00004243273,0.000011078744,0.000062228115,0.0015360424,0.00016886921,0.00010677653,0.99469286,0.00028707465,0.0028006379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010939668,0.000012795952,0.00027237742,0.00006232757,0.000008041473,0.000076752876,0.0004753827,0.00062919204,0.00011006574,0.9953329,0.0029970706,0.0000120409595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009522408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070197403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027645573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033684706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027190256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14620548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516963856","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i4.2853","title":"Vagueness: A Variant Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Vagueness; Predicative expression; Epistemology; Ignorance; Philosophy; Illusion; Recklessness; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Fuzzy logic; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.049579390681012254,"score_gpt":0.22715658829167357,"score_spread":0.17757719761066132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516963856","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043580774,0.013500997,0.4753199,0.042198695,0.0020801765,0.00011851685,0.0003294399,0.00030106783,0.42257053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92882866,0.0026093423,0.039346755,0.0043501365,0.0022597972,0.00013348994,0.00014252124,0.00017897303,0.022150278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574935,0.0017416885,0.00023819764,0.000879613,0.0011506832,0.00024033454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337256,0.003319807,0.00042465513,0.0014194177,0.0011011963,0.00036243664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056149997,0.00066890125,0.00095699984,0.0037060322,0.0025063953,0.008691301,0.0027238983,0.0034625907,0.007371308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011539098,0.0004631909,0.0017750544,0.0024235996,0.022086434,0.013089731,0.0047163074,0.0056423475,0.00096753665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035781736,0.0000019890595,0.000031304106,0.000011895327,0.0000037512102,0.000035124962,0.00023484328,0.00013452146,0.000044842385,0.9982497,0.0002839464,0.00096451346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062538775,0.000005348373,0.00005388818,0.0000182222,0.000007044774,0.00006905318,0.00014191539,0.0010303442,0.000048271573,0.99278075,0.0058327615,0.0000063087728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002423784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015953028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008691301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015655578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035259306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517175927","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.466","title":"Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Counterintuitive; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Defeasible reasoning; Proposition; Practical reason; Burden of proof; Element (criminal law); Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08425795611240479,"score_gpt":0.31091842300735095,"score_spread":0.22666046689494618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517175927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015137419,0.03220061,0.07662572,0.69030994,0.0026572808,0.000055374032,0.0001204929,0.00014770111,0.18274537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89489293,0.01669246,0.023877768,0.0477285,0.0047034672,0.00014619573,0.00017276047,0.00014037869,0.011645562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97774386,0.012688458,0.0012300133,0.0026084816,0.00455473,0.0011744539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9146772,0.069336176,0.0039746277,0.005638387,0.0046274033,0.0017462096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026656244,0.0004860494,0.0013243159,0.0021508294,0.004751595,0.0124943,0.0030028066,0.0068183052,0.007783787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08244687,0.00072899775,0.00079219555,0.0023899055,0.043690067,0.029593462,0.005242936,0.010186732,0.0018781126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003088779,0.000017693506,0.00032858897,0.000091802736,0.00001630954,0.00010964644,0.0021662007,0.0002270779,0.00005210732,0.9802183,0.007721837,0.009019666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143555,0.00000580102,0.00013056872,0.00013367947,0.000005215128,0.00007877535,0.00082668755,0.00033552063,0.000072757386,0.9730391,0.025346886,0.000010636305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030421445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020550918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026656244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00608623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036410033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14097333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517942169","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.3900","title":"The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07658551332007946,"score_gpt":0.24455823982460984,"score_spread":0.16797272650453038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517942169","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06639041,0.0025610398,0.5913866,0.060008388,0.0013699062,0.0004170454,0.00022737033,0.0007868132,0.27685252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8790549,0.0008007293,0.102740094,0.0034909372,0.00043331232,0.0005513547,0.00011938337,0.00041571134,0.012393591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775489,0.014862927,0.0009945297,0.0016967157,0.0038618783,0.0010350709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678408,0.018657414,0.0030887246,0.0051329033,0.0043987595,0.0008813915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019873435,0.0009938442,0.001461693,0.008534383,0.007071348,0.010345826,0.0036874255,0.005448781,0.008342805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060755793,0.0009014773,0.0015046863,0.0053075687,0.045951907,0.025754152,0.007648204,0.0068796095,0.0014895649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016208214,0.000006445363,0.00016793943,0.000020376416,0.0000039739184,0.00003902041,0.004405014,0.0001397664,0.00008356959,0.9913845,0.0009873051,0.002745813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014972179,0.000014302367,0.000115405725,0.00006307636,0.000008657748,0.000091789305,0.0014275203,0.0013136298,0.00021890343,0.9763741,0.020347679,0.000009841963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027722823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018464186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019873435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008678578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004525621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10510206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518192296","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3329","title":"Speech Act Rules for Burden of Proof in a Modified Hamblin Dialogue System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Burden of proof; Simple (philosophy); Phenomenon; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; Programming language; Medicine","score_opus":0.08018084699401462,"score_gpt":0.2634142577197066,"score_spread":0.183233410725692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518192296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033469673,0.00034434444,0.9151524,0.001458944,0.0002615538,0.00038109018,0.00027501432,0.0012856411,0.047371358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5730508,0.00021552511,0.40371647,0.0005351503,0.00019017441,0.00045853874,0.0002895696,0.00033393715,0.021209886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221295,0.0037474032,0.0009244137,0.0009977586,0.0016349816,0.00048247783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876988,0.00908833,0.000488377,0.0010557338,0.0013075607,0.00036118712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006766687,0.0007432937,0.00093621854,0.0015289387,0.001990505,0.005475542,0.0017001363,0.002663779,0.011307824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019187696,0.00084669684,0.0010402239,0.00059768476,0.0044136443,0.006364031,0.0034768146,0.0028543372,0.002836662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001578798,0.000032714182,0.00038499173,0.0000783626,0.000025941392,0.0006068241,0.0017619686,0.008401281,0.0025219258,0.96788454,0.0025952295,0.015548297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024061212,0.00007156461,0.00034526695,0.0001266192,0.00008176514,0.0005628145,0.00029429808,0.22877066,0.0059232307,0.7151182,0.048357766,0.00010719122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030978646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025744543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011307824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022912247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016471377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037828505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518980779","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2964","title":"Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Possession (linguistics); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04225190225435377,"score_gpt":0.263600631053002,"score_spread":0.22134872879864825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518980779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095716126,0.0044649984,0.10790384,0.09512998,0.0012548268,0.00006591276,0.00006202753,0.00013961585,0.69526273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97676384,0.0004499961,0.0071040303,0.0039907787,0.000566077,0.000070453956,0.000015986674,0.00004275091,0.010996067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041146,0.006883503,0.00021859157,0.0007571532,0.0011602045,0.0005691379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886154,0.007954891,0.0008423898,0.0010187125,0.0009519754,0.00061665627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009775864,0.00045740703,0.00064017787,0.002160071,0.00467387,0.0072055976,0.0013160688,0.0052673267,0.0062401616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013064205,0.00029028923,0.000651756,0.0009241011,0.04449466,0.011630636,0.0068573575,0.00575839,0.0007508204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007042279,0.000008997802,0.000103546154,0.000015676456,0.0000024546318,0.000044482265,0.0011968417,0.000033510376,0.000034789027,0.9967991,0.00059179513,0.0011617779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001155897,0.0000091994925,0.00013030272,0.000045896813,0.0000031981622,0.00006823588,0.0008668232,0.00040034926,0.00012432682,0.98722386,0.011109128,0.0000070340748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056104164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005747147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009775864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038674725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015896487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051700294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519328188","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.456","title":"Whately on Arguments Involving Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1307698772028859,"score_gpt":0.2664980630822711,"score_spread":0.13572818587938518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519328188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018428758,0.018471474,0.025588065,0.19584508,0.0026263099,0.000045248664,0.000097566764,0.000078604404,0.7388189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.805496,0.010687249,0.009444461,0.051282264,0.0027240778,0.00018021141,0.00009384181,0.000316837,0.11977516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054927,0.006541304,0.0001997839,0.000653456,0.0013274828,0.00072872255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98411,0.012565691,0.0006067705,0.00070556375,0.001563716,0.00044829826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007620146,0.00047883875,0.00058217574,0.0015725407,0.0065663643,0.00905538,0.00089967484,0.004873729,0.0073485663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02044133,0.00026070466,0.0006853483,0.0012122339,0.01931699,0.01365376,0.0037228703,0.0075288867,0.0015876157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007932584,0.0000037793511,0.000038776216,0.00002039053,0.0000020683988,0.000031154534,0.0015618049,0.000041159532,0.000021200029,0.99173355,0.0051826867,0.001355513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018157287,0.000013506931,0.000103676015,0.00025642666,0.000008558714,0.00007156548,0.0020662947,0.00019836653,0.00021687936,0.7665157,0.23051646,0.00001446492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022386166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020180284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00905538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043186494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026685442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040299654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519407843","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.4120","title":"Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016211963584499764,"score_gpt":0.23441591207153797,"score_spread":0.21820394848703822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519407843","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059410103,0.9180599,0.006907043,0.03952679,0.008673164,0.000018128718,0.00008743528,0.000041275078,0.026092103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038516317,0.8576037,0.011014852,0.0101986015,0.031531524,0.00011512364,0.00036710742,0.0002017204,0.050451085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985089,0.00061131956,0.00008788561,0.00036345245,0.00034275866,0.000085706575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939686,0.004521722,0.00016952922,0.00014387527,0.00087484904,0.00032142905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031913451,0.0016541256,0.0018264948,0.003389777,0.0018619851,0.004666356,0.0010197578,0.002612645,0.0076397946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006224996,0.0011835835,0.0011438401,0.005720179,0.004214481,0.008643655,0.0021972498,0.0061488147,0.0032971606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009282461,0.00009543492,0.00031353039,0.0015441662,0.00007190538,0.0001525114,0.0018712963,0.0014254209,0.00032657,0.18246993,0.69102687,0.12060956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003762499,0.000028517565,0.00070834963,0.0023668942,0.00003880649,0.00027679556,0.00055187824,0.0007231839,0.0001889263,0.20530887,0.7897297,0.000040448613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056127715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055867396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076397946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038534943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024970283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027959228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521777945","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2570","title":"The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0161589188497874,"score_gpt":0.24121651909642502,"score_spread":0.22505760024663762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521777945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016812153,0.035863273,0.3123785,0.3742048,0.006682319,0.00009625859,0.0003307306,0.00046620276,0.25316575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7700631,0.012679772,0.11727929,0.057013817,0.01710901,0.00045735177,0.00024130942,0.00048867095,0.024667637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98448074,0.008480616,0.00076361257,0.0018287794,0.0034173185,0.0010288958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837863,0.010709887,0.00089341536,0.0023783052,0.0014552809,0.0007768704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019108055,0.00082803966,0.0012998377,0.0021876155,0.004677203,0.0123325335,0.0036851694,0.0066084056,0.004349806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01769186,0.00072722003,0.0013396466,0.0013268263,0.045636263,0.028396485,0.006740707,0.012058448,0.0017540985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095788755,0.000005564884,0.00004758638,0.000035728932,0.000003061061,0.000011412043,0.0003435171,0.00004853285,0.00006672294,0.99560463,0.0017112516,0.0021125374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105594145,0.000007836695,0.00007359721,0.00004905129,0.0000045359593,0.000048005535,0.0001412915,0.00019593365,0.00013514889,0.97634107,0.022986399,0.0000066440066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008000527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000617108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019108055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042495923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027518196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10105425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521787408","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i1.684","title":"Dialectical Shifts Underlying Arguments from Consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dialogical self; Dialog box; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07583791883038277,"score_gpt":0.30481084002361003,"score_spread":0.22897292119322726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521787408","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19551115,0.00069406565,0.6416773,0.00446361,0.00017784719,0.00059018197,0.00022905477,0.0005140306,0.15614277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8457131,0.00015311166,0.14550012,0.00015579774,0.000032889584,0.00021111945,0.00009902201,0.00010338891,0.008031458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901321,0.005635759,0.00061003317,0.00080539886,0.0023211432,0.00049566594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861107,0.009224258,0.0006593824,0.0015670632,0.0020259432,0.0004127063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065878336,0.0007109359,0.00051641994,0.002172148,0.002899501,0.0043395236,0.0013032202,0.001971223,0.009695877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02590718,0.0005823622,0.000659912,0.0012110901,0.009093416,0.0078053577,0.0060643875,0.003101607,0.0010451757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103182974,0.000025633692,0.00059026864,0.00016707649,0.000013443017,0.000196776,0.0077340947,0.0013490428,0.002849582,0.94694436,0.0009813796,0.039045252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003443457,0.000036835958,0.00070602854,0.00013882852,0.000022345632,0.00021214658,0.0030857052,0.010067453,0.007903748,0.95358974,0.024174137,0.000028640581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007286497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00109265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009695877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028982162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012970947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034840226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523510547","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.511","title":"Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Teleology; Epistemology; Judicial opinion; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05173227049874057,"score_gpt":0.30530052203843694,"score_spread":0.25356825153969637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523510547","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059467934,0.00717527,0.6387554,0.028365882,0.0012398576,0.00048932695,0.00009663892,0.00019800164,0.26421165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8502449,0.0018625034,0.13719238,0.0011551594,0.0008410137,0.00037666823,0.000070794355,0.00008374334,0.008172806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9128926,0.06288514,0.0042662662,0.0038609223,0.013186024,0.00290913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138785,0.06943763,0.005286906,0.0045659044,0.0058436636,0.0009873096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411774,0.0014065311,0.0018703091,0.006695343,0.0064506694,0.013824953,0.0032429935,0.009722243,0.0061468654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10874478,0.00095283834,0.0016249137,0.0049245595,0.03803137,0.018372621,0.00625374,0.005870991,0.0008963016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013626554,0.0000069984394,0.00007984885,0.000048647275,0.000014040416,0.000044043012,0.0008486805,0.0012051937,0.000069658425,0.99139905,0.0003590806,0.005911163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010873374,0.0000066062457,0.00006362426,0.000056251334,0.000006972597,0.000016180744,0.00021090278,0.0020273516,0.00008491244,0.99431616,0.003189952,0.000010182911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019649437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022650592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04411774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071998625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052264584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23331964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523782963","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3363","title":"Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Normative; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Mathematics; Medicine; Geometry","score_opus":0.06832006801042236,"score_gpt":0.24905272826809566,"score_spread":0.18073266025767332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523782963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015063487,0.0041586948,0.6970365,0.013865354,0.00049344526,0.0001931839,0.00011368572,0.00015784873,0.26891774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70677865,0.00336209,0.26290008,0.0018928495,0.0006551961,0.0008146434,0.00018127295,0.00013717104,0.023278061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921394,0.0046351957,0.00046819437,0.0005591505,0.0019378894,0.00026013452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426574,0.0034523983,0.00038085334,0.000836935,0.0007843165,0.00027986398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009625798,0.0007608323,0.00069750444,0.0036490522,0.0036037827,0.0082221925,0.0021617222,0.0043498743,0.005168469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011592138,0.0004888225,0.0010968366,0.0022630568,0.019506682,0.017533649,0.0041054506,0.004455132,0.0010524999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016815823,0.0000016056025,0.000009558309,0.000008607742,9.671131e-7,0.0000045169463,0.00019044976,0.00015730195,0.000020677908,0.9989335,0.00008888544,0.0005823002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000570638,0.0000033751967,0.000015092317,0.000018770264,0.0000017559421,0.000014508077,0.00007510491,0.0008564714,0.000054265773,0.98973745,0.009214713,0.0000027430474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093608565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007435466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009625798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048787408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021445663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05090666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523849903","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3351","title":"The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Function (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.028194377758424916,"score_gpt":0.2753973512167284,"score_spread":0.2472029734583035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523849903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008009938,0.0069238576,0.014416314,0.9007638,0.006449469,0.00002195487,0.000031689964,0.00015732656,0.06322569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62246823,0.006022401,0.009405543,0.31729713,0.014380925,0.0002104072,0.00005369865,0.00032715462,0.02983445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.979763,0.01185906,0.0010337118,0.0029667069,0.003127117,0.001250406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9146148,0.0740695,0.0015748293,0.0038564503,0.0048138006,0.0010706587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02083587,0.00097425503,0.0014230873,0.0023042238,0.010588323,0.011467846,0.0027988022,0.026566325,0.0053813793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08263624,0.0006295048,0.0015833148,0.0028829267,0.03538541,0.017242366,0.007196748,0.027697217,0.0016496904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054761524,0.000015305195,0.00010259408,0.00005539092,0.000011809333,0.00020206047,0.0025778415,0.0001913716,0.000079350415,0.9533146,0.038261663,0.005133252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029068944,0.000011378895,0.00007146361,0.000093990646,0.000009022813,0.00012620208,0.000845807,0.00059419445,0.0002276745,0.91307104,0.084884174,0.000035973386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050117844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026703302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026566325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010694656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032746692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11019194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524747256","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4107","title":"Evidential Modals at the Semantic-Argumentative Interface: Appearance Verbs as Indicators of Defeasible Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Evidentiality; Argumentation theory; Defeasible estate; Linguistics; Modal verb; Meaning (existential); Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Epistemic modality; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Verb","score_opus":0.017808356219062623,"score_gpt":0.3236733954009673,"score_spread":0.30586503918190466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524747256","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2626187,0.00081703905,0.66282845,0.0046094297,0.0001798187,0.00007730256,0.0001250692,0.00040276538,0.06834142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96718585,0.000090870126,0.031487335,0.00011440028,0.000042947755,0.000036018595,0.000030016927,0.000052319752,0.00096018903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976591,0.0014861608,0.00011107051,0.00023171036,0.0003912114,0.00012077027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924676,0.0048221843,0.0009668948,0.00089429296,0.00059427234,0.00025487223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041214605,0.00035623004,0.0003473031,0.0019454911,0.0010539116,0.0059120776,0.001062525,0.0020715778,0.0040211487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015360465,0.00038979,0.00067518523,0.0010669205,0.007737764,0.013064875,0.0035615766,0.0025750496,0.00041819765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046420195,0.000024691533,0.0010473785,0.00006201812,0.000008325524,0.00015980801,0.0049240557,0.00049998215,0.0027570482,0.982907,0.00027396996,0.007289246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002335616,0.000043652904,0.002124223,0.00005707089,0.000022800386,0.00031414867,0.0020518394,0.010870701,0.0017608696,0.97843605,0.0042645354,0.000030775813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002933541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019040352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059120776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008877254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003840595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021796644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525845722","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4055","title":"Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Adversary; Balance (ability); Point (geometry); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07919431369611842,"score_gpt":0.274950669893693,"score_spread":0.1957563561975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525845722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07268039,0.0044378177,0.18356219,0.055248138,0.0028414808,0.00042297723,0.00009008264,0.00028324156,0.6804337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94364387,0.0012766428,0.023829972,0.008527615,0.0010391392,0.0004606792,0.00006655084,0.00026954248,0.020885976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759439,0.011901045,0.0011491288,0.0026135885,0.0065990267,0.0017933302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637655,0.024531951,0.0035806927,0.0035654798,0.0033633406,0.0011931614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018646147,0.001273628,0.0009810331,0.0034327984,0.0048347847,0.011511649,0.0025186492,0.009131844,0.010861807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056636397,0.0006889406,0.0011713861,0.0015200974,0.022831326,0.023754625,0.012043114,0.009865209,0.0017401378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021626674,0.000023212704,0.00031019803,0.00005431188,0.000021623933,0.00016315246,0.0023745669,0.0000880763,0.00025965765,0.99360985,0.0006763995,0.002397356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035761746,0.000037283386,0.00039149285,0.00021755016,0.000056595094,0.0002640398,0.003799679,0.0005718198,0.001248719,0.9236797,0.06966811,0.000029164405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050136395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007041965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018646147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003481379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029750313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098611474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526433626","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2260","title":"Six Steps of Critical Thinking","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03716238119784803,"score_gpt":0.35233222816606796,"score_spread":0.3151698469682199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526433626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075794864,0.01570003,0.50526446,0.1604051,0.0051760515,0.0046629687,0.00036107737,0.0017098049,0.29914105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09765507,0.006455108,0.838061,0.012283773,0.0007991038,0.0031816696,0.00030280807,0.0002670025,0.040994555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489847,0.028289266,0.0032375788,0.0027519786,0.014925331,0.0018112205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553072,0.020472873,0.0018065074,0.0049508996,0.0136957485,0.0037667798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04354983,0.0019486331,0.0009558312,0.005620943,0.008666255,0.01983564,0.003571276,0.006623326,0.0089710755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050344814,0.0010714368,0.001542526,0.0028001852,0.036548473,0.015053937,0.014138974,0.016125834,0.0044804383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042051142,0.000088089735,0.0003769215,0.00061293994,0.000020931247,0.00007344172,0.011157639,0.00038208682,0.000344546,0.88623136,0.022040095,0.07862988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032128602,0.000053059088,0.0002323182,0.0011395921,0.000009801624,0.00011349398,0.0043427986,0.0006083719,0.000566913,0.7925501,0.2003096,0.00004172527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036162417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038919286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04354983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008378678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027119292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23031622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526910648","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1041","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526910648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817032,0.022535656,0.17912947,0.22627833,0.0026230046,0.00026426202,0.00010066066,0.00024775215,0.4871176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96302915,0.0022912326,0.02060546,0.005741248,0.00076435006,0.00020837224,0.000040812578,0.00006904745,0.007250333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747546,0.01765665,0.00072091946,0.0017579128,0.0036549005,0.0014550673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791748,0.015783986,0.0016817764,0.0013111604,0.0014158048,0.0006324942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895528,0.0008426757,0.000823357,0.003336547,0.008391651,0.012730251,0.0021833656,0.008402225,0.003332818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024937779,0.00055577257,0.0008345414,0.0020182233,0.064792804,0.016561562,0.008352693,0.009633916,0.00052685937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130141,0.000009044382,0.000059753922,0.000027600267,0.0000065573327,0.000039336042,0.0027722565,0.00024037466,0.00002998739,0.99379224,0.0009930858,0.0020216894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009218529,0.0000020122745,0.00001902555,0.00002445281,0.0000018401643,0.000009050768,0.0005713348,0.0001917063,0.00003200756,0.99494547,0.004190345,0.0000036019499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021717295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013491496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037836996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527422774","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2141","title":"A Defense of Non-deductive Reconstructions of Analogical Arguments (AILACT Essay Competition Winner)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Strengths and weaknesses; Philosophy; Analogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03471161287276179,"score_gpt":0.2513523004739812,"score_spread":0.21664068760121943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527422774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04012452,0.0024136982,0.25401515,0.099676125,0.001473109,0.00021996922,0.00019021198,0.00034455143,0.60154265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172501,0.0006944583,0.04254837,0.007830723,0.00082978327,0.00032113478,0.00009655769,0.00015075936,0.030278055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883471,0.006664462,0.00039718786,0.0012279835,0.0027656127,0.000597625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837309,0.010319099,0.0010773358,0.0023368015,0.0020763024,0.0004595986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013629186,0.00071074185,0.000787284,0.0032551915,0.0042726565,0.00693076,0.003870141,0.006727713,0.010639412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033244956,0.0005527868,0.0012000535,0.0016332275,0.028354986,0.013436217,0.0068506585,0.0101665715,0.0016281278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059869362,0.0000069458088,0.000034692628,0.000011000315,0.000003013379,0.000019738558,0.0003095564,0.00011817726,0.000021186339,0.996965,0.0007574306,0.0017472606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130400695,0.000008003944,0.0000431994,0.000022480996,0.0000031240847,0.00004583521,0.00016866825,0.00087122497,0.000102457125,0.98907346,0.009642527,0.000005884659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016122014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012592629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013629186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039284583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024032898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07207888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527593050","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2151","title":"Is Argument for Conservatives? or Where Do Sparkling New Ideas Come From?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Criticism; Generative grammar; Opposition (politics); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08390831101960212,"score_gpt":0.37085966794646447,"score_spread":0.28695135692686236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527593050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012751549,0.013242174,0.04083916,0.80141264,0.0030582226,0.000051966155,0.00006888292,0.0001750379,0.12840042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369253,0.011785474,0.027701965,0.08191192,0.0049626343,0.00037187044,0.00014594702,0.0005823746,0.035612546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966275,0.020219414,0.00119891,0.0036518807,0.006517801,0.002136972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93782085,0.038757477,0.0069758818,0.00657154,0.007241169,0.0026329674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037701614,0.0007365089,0.0016846257,0.0032228946,0.0070593418,0.021298228,0.0024452645,0.010771334,0.009888511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08295805,0.00046582145,0.0009982069,0.0026476511,0.07421982,0.05499753,0.006096496,0.0141558135,0.0032061967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022211801,0.000014832488,0.0002683621,0.000092196016,0.000013741824,0.000065335,0.006989331,0.000039414015,0.00007827312,0.97729343,0.0078116762,0.007311181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000139029335,0.000009082773,0.00014865052,0.00023422146,0.0000066820144,0.000054294953,0.0033128604,0.000116372656,0.00012763495,0.941528,0.054432932,0.000015324382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016925144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012034258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037701614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006604206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062292665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19938761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529854977","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3895","title":"Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politeness; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0448599772650792,"score_gpt":0.3185384132817765,"score_spread":0.27367843601669734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529854977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26724875,0.00485716,0.06600513,0.025061347,0.00038080878,0.00006552368,0.00006874981,0.00016463701,0.6361479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920414,0.00038227835,0.0017120155,0.00061950565,0.000074086485,0.000020868712,0.000017703229,0.000022263686,0.005109962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877781,0.009852951,0.00030613694,0.00055689324,0.0010383745,0.00046751372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859723,0.009773966,0.001673569,0.0011593722,0.00087669713,0.0005440441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059666964,0.00056022516,0.0004376478,0.001171943,0.0030678438,0.009533687,0.0006260936,0.002223243,0.0032159523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01318202,0.00028215643,0.0004828065,0.00071250135,0.021071637,0.0046606166,0.0062865973,0.0034005225,0.0006057471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003362149,0.000025859204,0.001474881,0.000046779354,0.000018993298,0.000141594,0.010070651,0.00044538965,0.00030381134,0.9806521,0.0011193304,0.005666978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002273101,0.00003446348,0.0014501747,0.00014092775,0.000020282518,0.00030351602,0.0057418845,0.0017608402,0.00036115918,0.95311314,0.037027907,0.000023030276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006763135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005254987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009533687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022804043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007919835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031555295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530082090","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2152","title":"Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.09082178350827413,"score_gpt":0.2956670442864488,"score_spread":0.20484526077817466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530082090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03855739,0.04257239,0.10316566,0.2385867,0.0021720272,0.00048129584,0.00008622184,0.000104561295,0.5742737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293072,0.00818599,0.018956224,0.0116981445,0.00093763863,0.00094929576,0.000048975893,0.00011094508,0.029805629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688793,0.024981825,0.00063583226,0.0009359294,0.0032796708,0.0012873891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97892463,0.017098663,0.00076960307,0.00091083517,0.0018282256,0.00046803354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02127057,0.0007828537,0.0006674487,0.003586977,0.007339438,0.016814861,0.0015546505,0.0041364795,0.003919989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031035468,0.00033026355,0.00051938725,0.003418681,0.061456244,0.015540729,0.0075118113,0.006923422,0.00045666707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044317176,0.0000071637573,0.00003319695,0.000027392804,0.0000015743382,0.000013060594,0.0026571157,0.00008003415,0.000021774604,0.99455583,0.0010894629,0.0015090244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011170422,0.000007071942,0.00006383641,0.00016097048,0.0000023684288,0.000017806486,0.0042646606,0.0003336916,0.00009201012,0.96234167,0.03269976,0.0000049811215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047335285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020233387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008217229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14680415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532964229","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2179","title":"Boone's Critical Thinking: An Applied Approach, 2nd ed.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047766901307731154,"score_gpt":0.3388704241782994,"score_spread":0.29110352287056823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532964229","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020698267,0.61840016,0.18191972,0.051529642,0.011193561,0.00034023944,0.00045750782,0.00086177787,0.13322769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09655362,0.57224804,0.22974296,0.012485114,0.00870856,0.0016981369,0.00046410758,0.000765549,0.077333935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958001,0.0021363099,0.00039483217,0.00036063007,0.0011499119,0.00015815948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230075,0.0059881373,0.00028792385,0.0002863526,0.0008306696,0.000306231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006874747,0.0019634455,0.0015694847,0.008809285,0.0024645634,0.008372876,0.0019697235,0.003497195,0.00920249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00954769,0.0010606571,0.00095553795,0.0056132693,0.019004395,0.0105041275,0.0029530101,0.005167457,0.0030158267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004286776,0.000054499018,0.00037306236,0.0028654386,0.00005081403,0.00021005403,0.007611162,0.00097084057,0.00040786806,0.66926485,0.122155726,0.19599278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016080572,0.000025887677,0.00053236133,0.0018475039,0.000024036264,0.00032504366,0.0014879483,0.00058990764,0.00031933637,0.6158233,0.3789723,0.00003617511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053058746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009555472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00920249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052262456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00623335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037919223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533468349","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2242","title":"Shaping the Adversary Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Rhetorical question; Adversary; Reflexivity; Presumption; Epistemology; Style (visual arts); Face (sociological concept); Rhetoric; Subject (documents); Sociology; Rhetorical device; Sensationalism; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Media studies; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Computer security; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.11290439190249243,"score_gpt":0.2664940580452732,"score_spread":0.15358966614278077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533468349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26176116,0.004293415,0.078457475,0.08897811,0.0012505965,0.00015973176,0.00006631684,0.00027475745,0.56475836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98134446,0.00048707708,0.002346024,0.0024794743,0.00016538965,0.000041812982,0.000014500858,0.00012369265,0.012997583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96841455,0.022207303,0.0007448264,0.0027483779,0.0040421234,0.0018427811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764764,0.014398644,0.0021511465,0.002251108,0.0023208598,0.0024017717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028424144,0.0007478252,0.000575084,0.002931605,0.018621627,0.023570325,0.002679823,0.003713569,0.006810112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036495645,0.00056057743,0.00048752473,0.0012865737,0.047073,0.019024495,0.021254698,0.009861224,0.0012935989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024094972,0.000021316164,0.0010052017,0.00005201314,0.000016154523,0.0003072257,0.17564762,0.00019696329,0.0009148325,0.8116196,0.002404827,0.0077901687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003346591,0.0001041735,0.0012690675,0.0005881328,0.00004687624,0.00063545187,0.17011964,0.0023233534,0.0031078255,0.35050493,0.47118953,0.000077628014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027229814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002419843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028424144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008622258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047574253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15032303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533813471","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2161","title":"Comparing Theories of CT in a Critical Thinking Course","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Course (navigation); Epistemology; Critical thinking; Psychology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05867849087240115,"score_gpt":0.3827827056020941,"score_spread":0.324104214729693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533813471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7628577,0.0008936008,0.032309294,0.0026345302,0.00014642233,0.0002980906,0.00014261408,0.00006606806,0.20065168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943796,0.00021273475,0.0027819646,0.00014252686,0.000017335215,0.0001095776,0.000094543364,0.000019096016,0.0022427684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954075,0.002766735,0.00017346491,0.0003108058,0.0008884839,0.00045293837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170651,0.068231024,0.0043916176,0.0033271622,0.004523909,0.0024612374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066788727,0.00071306684,0.0004105328,0.0038040173,0.0020935675,0.0054750564,0.0016231788,0.0016104945,0.010945662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043539077,0.0003836789,0.0007102259,0.0022182253,0.0066137225,0.0071393875,0.002965512,0.0033787505,0.0006288475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000944615,0.0005802109,0.031369757,0.00019729446,0.00006586471,0.00012309468,0.011821169,0.006179981,0.00041945867,0.9092444,0.0013021497,0.03775196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061025436,0.00079176546,0.056918543,0.0008826131,0.00030373145,0.0003070188,0.033667978,0.06191483,0.0034802118,0.8246006,0.016419718,0.00010280938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008322293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073000886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010945662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007933774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005686638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0575639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534260015","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4021","title":"Logic, Truth and Inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.07434115442370506,"score_gpt":0.24094128812515714,"score_spread":0.16660013370145207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534260015","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003501549,0.5836943,0.013981837,0.061298795,0.0034341698,0.000031138636,0.0003311539,0.00025702734,0.33347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43657914,0.21897471,0.012116724,0.01740846,0.01064854,0.0002379026,0.0006170435,0.00055131054,0.30286613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844223,0.0007761416,0.00007170771,0.0002609909,0.00032586863,0.00012306184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980946,0.0012227765,0.00014017665,0.00024387814,0.00020088053,0.00009774295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020055387,0.0009274419,0.0008537059,0.0022378392,0.0023048774,0.008230724,0.000843129,0.0019833907,0.01279026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004371614,0.00057059,0.0005966981,0.002361791,0.019775253,0.010593274,0.0032259186,0.0040794685,0.003453192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031662927,0.000014879666,0.00025380112,0.0003042238,0.000020156336,0.00007925071,0.0026556437,0.0003639743,0.00020950192,0.8519821,0.10691108,0.03717368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397485,0.000012511227,0.00035867532,0.00044066852,0.000006285577,0.00009783714,0.0010483508,0.00019706054,0.00007987794,0.64852804,0.34921128,0.000009864921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006185282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062051956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01279026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006219462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035386325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045125544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537723199","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2906","title":"Differentiating Theories from Evidence: The Development of Argument Evaluation Abilities in Adolescence and Early Adulthood","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Task (project management); Competence (human resources); Empirical evidence; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06631082466767106,"score_gpt":0.3518781653574582,"score_spread":0.2855673406897871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537723199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99857223,0.00026123656,0.000092868424,0.000047712205,0.0000030656124,0.00000597137,0.000025928308,0.0000049994687,0.0009859229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988955,0.00026245177,0.00032423183,0.000012117051,0.0000018621979,0.000010514934,0.000053906406,0.0000028671757,0.00043637902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994161,0.00009549516,0.00007937981,0.00009278245,0.00019603364,0.00012033972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901844,0.0037386254,0.003137541,0.0003864362,0.0017293281,0.00082357373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030664895,0.0002666296,0.00038284552,0.0020904616,0.00054464134,0.0026728802,0.00032701358,0.00071712025,0.0011962719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014992023,0.0005085138,0.00030711293,0.0006268205,0.0010852995,0.0016826325,0.0012941147,0.001128946,0.0003678609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014840205,0.0003251163,0.92493683,0.000069935966,0.000023767685,0.0006943167,0.03395159,0.00010126967,0.005626181,0.00074759463,0.00026221023,0.033112865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041983035,0.00017263324,0.9870091,0.000050396535,0.000017671506,0.0006764307,0.009040949,0.00021634709,0.0012143208,0.0006025688,0.0009796404,0.000015789656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035233616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005712146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035233616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044791002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000679016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016217351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541270524","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3502","title":"Introduction: Special Issue on Charles Hamblin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049076859372270035,"score_gpt":0.24359678403842483,"score_spread":0.1945199246661548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541270524","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022127078,0.040677894,0.00058828946,0.08720133,0.83632064,0.000052131956,0.00034775908,0.00013579405,0.034454938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020986479,0.023342207,0.00037487448,0.0346454,0.76219165,0.00006806168,0.0003735095,0.00025951915,0.17664613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986228,0.00020344,0.000116173476,0.0003862837,0.00055387814,0.00011736032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951834,0.0014063118,0.000312589,0.00024969038,0.0018011265,0.0010468218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015764319,0.0021510567,0.0017295617,0.0025283596,0.0018467903,0.0049723582,0.001751427,0.005548846,0.096959636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008146456,0.00057321327,0.0009674121,0.0012210179,0.0013284271,0.004869194,0.0024508564,0.0060654017,0.07692673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014223406,0.000009213559,0.00003206523,0.000071750444,0.0000029192117,0.00003994371,0.000011277734,0.00001974811,0.00005264932,0.00083747884,0.9895862,0.009322518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003930432,0.0000064767887,0.00010828478,0.00010851769,0.0000024696308,0.00010292765,0.000010785896,0.000023948027,0.00003724509,0.00078354584,0.99880767,0.0000041588687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013112456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026004023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096959636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024465828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017677164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32436228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542052916","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.541","title":"Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin’s Thesis on Deep Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.17176234708785432,"score_gpt":0.3072356358019974,"score_spread":0.1354732887141431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542052916","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07942264,0.008143274,0.15492833,0.4344418,0.0014012915,0.00020666783,0.00016654044,0.00032374827,0.3209658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95148927,0.0010998321,0.020366898,0.019191824,0.0013027429,0.0004065725,0.000063065745,0.00019837299,0.0058813905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729163,0.015119475,0.00094944687,0.0035595412,0.006009445,0.0014458192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92522675,0.060323697,0.0032118466,0.005428291,0.0040561254,0.0017533427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027749296,0.0008597325,0.0017103041,0.0057854387,0.01158429,0.014709382,0.006121345,0.018668665,0.0043375855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07525462,0.00085854344,0.001521344,0.004513536,0.07356581,0.031248637,0.014190732,0.017049072,0.0010093004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013131094,0.000007434204,0.00006651789,0.000025172169,0.0000068997133,0.00007211393,0.006828893,0.000111761074,0.000039303726,0.9892631,0.0012967763,0.0022688713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026889002,0.00000605758,0.00009731194,0.000083232066,0.0000072414123,0.000045122684,0.0014090785,0.0004881958,0.000085692016,0.9860902,0.011650503,0.0000104725805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004796289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025900614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027749296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012791156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008592116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14675409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544285175","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1134","title":"Introduction: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation--A Map","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026422900521133486,"score_gpt":0.2504741357314814,"score_spread":0.22405123521034792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544285175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031798114,0.26422197,0.14591052,0.064743735,0.02563145,0.00022473864,0.001804334,0.0008047263,0.49347872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1681679,0.2174385,0.1647699,0.025412526,0.052834164,0.0008416544,0.0038884464,0.001391926,0.36525497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991487,0.00026500528,0.000079366364,0.00017804209,0.00026933488,0.00005961581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987669,0.00068690855,0.000063040105,0.00007642058,0.00029323183,0.0001135993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084825046,0.0007773678,0.0006265712,0.0017334297,0.0015116753,0.0053551164,0.0012120191,0.0027818163,0.022909718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029317637,0.00039925153,0.00077243807,0.0027060052,0.0024845388,0.00896203,0.0017029649,0.004598729,0.009065731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003557474,0.000041735635,0.00021479394,0.0008357522,0.000018689609,0.00014257633,0.0010972866,0.00077675225,0.00053964957,0.717484,0.18975224,0.08906084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004689369,0.0000151008735,0.00019046241,0.00040049508,0.0000071620284,0.00025729928,0.00016546715,0.00039885988,0.00013986851,0.29097235,0.7074369,0.000011370271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088701054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066825986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022909718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014893664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013505875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076640666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545161136","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.544","title":"Hansen & Pinto: Reason Reclaimed","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinto bean; Agronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.06618858955671843,"score_gpt":0.26259461749197327,"score_spread":0.19640602793525486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545161136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025719027,0.031258542,0.009250355,0.18252847,0.048962366,0.00008907686,0.0005514893,0.0008914497,0.7238964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08985193,0.013007512,0.0058785244,0.027628979,0.0073115514,0.00017132565,0.00045680464,0.0014587234,0.8542345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973832,0.0010304089,0.000116315554,0.00049038563,0.0007956879,0.00018405926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977235,0.0012767413,0.00012259293,0.00025208708,0.000458409,0.00016664258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376467,0.0007384124,0.0005676643,0.0010826348,0.0043800985,0.009637147,0.0012589517,0.0042515076,0.031053217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009805732,0.0005073749,0.0006989617,0.0013581669,0.0068828524,0.0071999542,0.0034442164,0.0051867743,0.012396044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018585286,0.000005703764,0.00006641951,0.000107124055,0.0000053299455,0.00015459856,0.0027352362,0.000082701576,0.00008290484,0.23599583,0.74413157,0.016613975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002553634,0.0000032987882,0.00006972092,0.00015917857,0.0000026809726,0.00009861008,0.00094625284,0.000048400365,0.00008562304,0.012095461,0.98648006,0.000008098732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015105331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019970626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031053217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061108787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005472764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103883326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545548164","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4112","title":"Deduction without Dogmas:The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Schema (genetic algorithms); Criticism; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12934132883376576,"score_gpt":0.4932052969056455,"score_spread":0.36386396807187976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545548164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07443126,0.0038717727,0.34559613,0.08357905,0.00085757836,0.00022957691,0.00012205011,0.00032713026,0.49098545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435887,0.0006270647,0.045880802,0.0027930727,0.0004143716,0.00018707495,0.000043900778,0.00008386849,0.0063811303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594617,0.02830989,0.0012961028,0.0026877616,0.0063513527,0.0018931876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93660355,0.050203267,0.0023611991,0.007236544,0.0027284045,0.00086702436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029879063,0.00069900905,0.0014990201,0.00329374,0.0084694475,0.011486623,0.003691348,0.014200115,0.00770841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07424599,0.0010605803,0.0022174045,0.002416428,0.046815645,0.025880659,0.011193563,0.010339467,0.001073919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007577493,0.000006886711,0.00004366784,0.0000208283,0.0000052549713,0.00012876106,0.0018340087,0.00018802084,0.000031341977,0.99591225,0.00038910017,0.0014321882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016281998,0.00000350721,0.000022584542,0.000024233768,0.0000027416952,0.00008811312,0.00031804436,0.001002507,0.0000618527,0.99430215,0.004152935,0.0000050454187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015156477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010875921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029879063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005656488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028779719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15801746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547143664","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3563","title":"Pragma-Dialetics Epistemologized: Reply to Lumer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11064656407234613,"score_gpt":0.37502996710087283,"score_spread":0.2643834030285267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547143664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023053026,0.0016626545,0.00019156098,0.9880183,0.008877127,0.0000027257347,0.000013293151,0.000012395992,0.0009914917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017230075,0.0021287648,0.00044519274,0.9557296,0.02002997,0.000050919276,0.000016905702,0.00008922721,0.004279442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902075,0.0054736463,0.0005719608,0.0016276912,0.0015511429,0.0005680485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453248,0.045313377,0.0017518612,0.0014121374,0.0049619097,0.0012358942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014745847,0.0010965645,0.0022573113,0.0015494446,0.007951452,0.009002118,0.0037741421,0.03316135,0.0055796183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08514877,0.00084722706,0.0010555233,0.0022633774,0.022131136,0.01640391,0.005426287,0.0659807,0.003109381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052912907,0.000018514647,0.00010429692,0.00011691233,0.000014526134,0.00026035955,0.0041588875,0.00008983688,0.00008730722,0.07649211,0.9155498,0.00305453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008335518,0.000046207322,0.00085913076,0.0011449475,0.000035233938,0.00084323646,0.01265549,0.0008016148,0.00053915655,0.15667556,0.8261335,0.00018253457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008383478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005614659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03316135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050380896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07798439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549401724","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2139","title":"Figures of Argument (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Antithesis; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Humanism; Set (abstract data type); Rhetorical device; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Heuristic; Computer science; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.028899692536113217,"score_gpt":0.24284895915962154,"score_spread":0.21394926662350833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549401724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029621709,0.038579118,0.003524994,0.06808377,0.014425637,0.000049195216,0.0007749243,0.00015142099,0.8714488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11061899,0.01361554,0.002828553,0.02589277,0.012028839,0.00019013965,0.00087504985,0.00029961058,0.83365065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995865,0.00015238905,0.000025054349,0.00008930938,0.00009817232,0.00004857649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952304,0.00024795637,0.000038150254,0.000036260783,0.00012377703,0.000030776417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075558526,0.0007598273,0.00045396917,0.0017471088,0.0041309106,0.004959444,0.00064855587,0.0043778555,0.07426549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023726996,0.00035651337,0.0005645969,0.0015715903,0.0025329827,0.004570353,0.0018354353,0.004074686,0.019671448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040545357,0.00002070195,0.00022314585,0.00009209078,0.0000072247767,0.00010953221,0.0015445545,0.000074739946,0.00017445703,0.4139421,0.5602218,0.02354909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007027478,0.000007709414,0.00059737556,0.0001447595,0.000004437013,0.00009747866,0.00050195644,0.00007158539,0.00009143913,0.030688819,0.96778136,0.0000060080843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010247601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019840114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07426549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028093755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096097845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24844277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549433436","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4187","title":"Critical Thinking and Cognitive Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Hindsight bias; Metacognition; Critical thinking; Cognitive bias; Focus (optics); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive skill; Cognitive psychology; Confirmation bias; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.13832857104891907,"score_gpt":0.39273917997144797,"score_spread":0.25441060892252887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549433436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22082482,0.04105185,0.13799842,0.1348533,0.0018996764,0.00030369917,0.000092420385,0.0002704065,0.4627055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681728,0.004684939,0.015291918,0.0048352275,0.0005612651,0.0001549031,0.000019035671,0.00004285813,0.0062370463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991334,0.006599371,0.00041047705,0.0009835373,0.001577802,0.00051560387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937426,0.05035937,0.0056801415,0.002161251,0.002741398,0.0016317827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011688277,0.0004034054,0.000304862,0.0025378473,0.0013770197,0.0051634405,0.00070394593,0.0018805141,0.0033531983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03916765,0.00017885599,0.00028059995,0.0010826018,0.03137001,0.006132254,0.0038748113,0.003612917,0.0002837689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002415689,0.000044435215,0.003988789,0.00017943705,0.000020694766,0.00012505669,0.010846214,0.000363938,0.00037007532,0.9467833,0.0019680662,0.03528583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017696972,0.000028998586,0.0021928335,0.00021840479,0.000007788134,0.00019872616,0.0023739345,0.0003482926,0.0004271145,0.97263867,0.021531977,0.000015584566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001114132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010576164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011688277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036788373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032061324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06181425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549987018","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2142","title":"Toulmin's Model of Argument and the Question of Relativism (J. A. Blair Prize, 2005)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Relativism; Epistemology; Warrant; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04672540263891843,"score_gpt":0.26036375560586483,"score_spread":0.2136383529669464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549987018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016639376,0.009988226,0.2958319,0.13200106,0.0023844286,0.00024142824,0.00024824892,0.00023725358,0.5424281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8195982,0.0049616173,0.10826626,0.010874351,0.0028598886,0.0007117773,0.00010874127,0.00021591947,0.052403238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337983,0.0035062952,0.0002931426,0.00083307386,0.001539311,0.00044839588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381256,0.0035774924,0.0006940248,0.00074169727,0.0008739613,0.00030029775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010820873,0.00094453944,0.00090293563,0.004824215,0.004428956,0.008438957,0.0026430627,0.007275788,0.0055968473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115942145,0.00055515283,0.0014708212,0.0033037174,0.034407992,0.013554715,0.0035346365,0.0057587335,0.0011153887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003519073,0.0000024977749,0.000017152728,0.000009851532,0.000001911815,0.0000057847383,0.00016253178,0.00007510746,0.000010488842,0.99819833,0.0008027007,0.00071008806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006129221,0.000004456467,0.000030022446,0.00001587808,0.0000025251857,0.000016233937,0.000036584857,0.00021813475,0.000027130422,0.9885283,0.011111131,0.0000034744758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026136283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022460576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010820873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008942729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036983732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064884305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550985237","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2239","title":"Aspects of visual argument:A study of the March of Progress","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Demonstrative; Frame (networking); Argument map; Visual rhetoric; Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Human–computer interaction; Medicine","score_opus":0.0464284723339781,"score_gpt":0.3584031909180489,"score_spread":0.3119747185840708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550985237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44681266,0.001575531,0.054518186,0.008499203,0.00013268003,0.00009646659,0.00008503727,0.000109673936,0.48817062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178183,0.0003044264,0.00432495,0.0001791502,0.000033578024,0.000031459218,0.000025388843,0.00004048275,0.0032786778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767596,0.0015708319,0.000057184545,0.00016242877,0.0003828522,0.00015074528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883632,0.008884429,0.0013216939,0.00074519974,0.00043588225,0.0002495966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025415015,0.0002854322,0.00020915315,0.0019040982,0.002413742,0.0063698688,0.00095538684,0.0016228658,0.0051269312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01875785,0.0002478184,0.00039869035,0.0018021975,0.012328776,0.012955488,0.0032113835,0.0025583692,0.00034438586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000904391,0.00003917397,0.0022365926,0.000091701644,0.000009162807,0.0003522329,0.052157167,0.0004838542,0.0012610691,0.92544454,0.0012144063,0.016619606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008064933,0.00016960755,0.009500716,0.00025305097,0.000026630885,0.0011003485,0.054237705,0.0056564305,0.0018860081,0.8378891,0.08915969,0.000040104318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012262412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010076909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063698688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023958462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007521427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017383218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552040573","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1226","title":"Analogies and Other Minds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862112021793719,"score_gpt":0.2794089140838773,"score_spread":0.1931977119045054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552040573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086506255,0.0090460945,0.28604686,0.06401579,0.0012399356,0.00015522036,0.00020499348,0.00032617289,0.55245864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95413595,0.0013396873,0.028778307,0.0036728985,0.0006114846,0.00014506576,0.00009113357,0.00007467281,0.01115085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98862225,0.007184146,0.0004001488,0.0016065501,0.0017333236,0.0004535374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854854,0.009777546,0.0010003282,0.002266591,0.001047043,0.00042307551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008220086,0.0004906319,0.000856606,0.0027010234,0.0029672792,0.0056001735,0.0017264049,0.003195024,0.010367482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019905644,0.000338887,0.0011386187,0.001278414,0.025197575,0.013431382,0.005467317,0.0052223047,0.0008841458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000432229,0.0000046437303,0.000060448314,0.000018065552,0.000006087447,0.00002587719,0.00032610743,0.00011159097,0.000030232619,0.99746597,0.00030468445,0.0016419989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063255034,0.0000035545854,0.000064314576,0.000020213407,0.0000029584958,0.000028133773,0.00012055167,0.000267923,0.000038593294,0.9936494,0.0057950094,0.0000028434813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091104076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005934912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010367482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027149583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012379386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04347253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553635644","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.435","title":"Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Pragmatics; Identification (biology); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.29621758523628955,"score_gpt":0.45322481873468606,"score_spread":0.15700723349839651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553635644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050639793,0.1836985,0.08417194,0.113763355,0.0024682397,0.00016135727,0.0002089972,0.00015535657,0.5647324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542838,0.09139827,0.03316961,0.008674491,0.0026125766,0.0003448139,0.00020527568,0.000059420603,0.009251829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98618406,0.009612875,0.0006994775,0.0010664441,0.0020591142,0.0003780312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400137,0.051824506,0.0028458256,0.0020087473,0.0024604201,0.00084669824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009735475,0.0006638875,0.0007279446,0.0064588767,0.0021790212,0.008987254,0.0012406152,0.003557722,0.0046814005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0301608,0.0003620873,0.0005105396,0.006168097,0.03702125,0.010409379,0.0029060026,0.005069054,0.0007235831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013919049,0.000051621577,0.0010010907,0.00049600843,0.0000313354,0.00009048979,0.0029538095,0.0004166542,0.00009470623,0.972507,0.0014712871,0.020872066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014011361,0.000015833251,0.00096885324,0.000329398,0.00000929282,0.00011031451,0.0014556788,0.00020813839,0.000047998637,0.97283745,0.023991661,0.00001136469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014831059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001289889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009735475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003038459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05148673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553681044","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2278","title":"Wigmore's Chart Method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Rhetoric; Chart; Tree diagram; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03943531913906263,"score_gpt":0.33678029571594514,"score_spread":0.2973449765768825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553681044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002147981,0.00036435857,0.9317085,0.0017473564,0.00040535608,0.00055470585,0.0009873275,0.001443586,0.060640894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06266848,0.0007629481,0.9028816,0.0005525647,0.00018655029,0.0014012129,0.0008532578,0.00064482965,0.030048499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911805,0.0046538827,0.0005290569,0.0014467703,0.0018827827,0.000307004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98739725,0.006491408,0.0006012189,0.0028792638,0.0023610082,0.00026982877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077677397,0.000780424,0.00058464013,0.0051639914,0.002316975,0.006344556,0.002249333,0.001803751,0.024550037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034991577,0.00060781516,0.00092651014,0.0063215583,0.0054478226,0.011038368,0.0032461933,0.0024974057,0.005394797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030840405,0.000016305326,0.0002605712,0.00012558328,0.0000073405117,0.000028954399,0.0012395724,0.00051974744,0.00029835,0.86757034,0.01829693,0.11160542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038294595,0.00003097478,0.00034426074,0.00023448496,0.000021556429,0.00010199978,0.00063240423,0.007915136,0.00158369,0.56221014,0.42684427,0.000042785574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053322483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005870863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024550037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028184578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052515054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08212811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558336695","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2262","title":"Informal Logic: An Overview","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; sort; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Information retrieval; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.16255535349708566,"score_gpt":0.3147098564452695,"score_spread":0.15215450294818383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558336695","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006493606,0.37090132,0.3232702,0.024239829,0.002034912,0.00018253378,0.0003658193,0.000504712,0.27200708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36566755,0.4558652,0.12599829,0.013873413,0.008059173,0.00078078074,0.00086594623,0.00062231964,0.028267322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942139,0.0029297813,0.0004968457,0.000520634,0.0014502958,0.00038856018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992708,0.0057266415,0.0002907448,0.00046085825,0.0006297696,0.00018387563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006214554,0.0009749333,0.0009825719,0.007831542,0.0031320609,0.007829423,0.0018424751,0.00285736,0.007532786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068690977,0.00069164205,0.0011877115,0.0068567866,0.011128922,0.017800553,0.0038996025,0.0042186696,0.0018962513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104239725,0.000013071224,0.00015462634,0.00046475595,0.000008118035,0.000065713735,0.00064105197,0.00044980593,0.00006925692,0.96698684,0.004885888,0.02625054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074119803,0.00001761068,0.00017283975,0.0006811603,0.000009756412,0.0002773896,0.00045032226,0.0010433367,0.00011371009,0.7772407,0.21996787,0.000017870956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028114896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001316072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007831542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046199677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037542153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0335204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558811497","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4119","title":"The Use of 'No Evidence' Statements in Public Health","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Proposition; Heuristics; Public health; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.590110165758187,"score_gpt":0.4756637280515608,"score_spread":0.11444643770662616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558811497","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0971387,0.040879954,0.49569213,0.14459953,0.0072754733,0.0012523057,0.00076918985,0.00047082859,0.21192192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83707154,0.00782966,0.13562499,0.013983352,0.0016499427,0.0008983258,0.00022459889,0.00009394874,0.0026236419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.558464,0.3714328,0.026660196,0.0071546086,0.03357256,0.002715758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19506173,0.7268111,0.047407143,0.018142207,0.010754342,0.0018234494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25821236,0.0013909288,0.0015551664,0.009339102,0.0044328077,0.013806483,0.004367279,0.010256378,0.0031737625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44338325,0.0014543912,0.0010581289,0.007873558,0.05851356,0.025960082,0.011676188,0.00911154,0.00069439516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027203013,0.000067475725,0.0027962672,0.002461202,0.0001637542,0.0011031604,0.03398792,0.001248304,0.00082846824,0.8926986,0.0062770676,0.058095828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006778803,0.00018990315,0.0020401524,0.004558804,0.00013122655,0.0016386426,0.013731832,0.002839009,0.0025573338,0.8803669,0.09170208,0.00017642775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016377862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018177737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7417877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056279884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069608022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91475624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561055701","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.468","title":"A Bibliography of Douglas Walton’s Published Works, 1971-2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Classics; History; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.023779333588719812,"score_gpt":0.21505778652080365,"score_spread":0.19127845293208384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561055701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012189277,0.23474455,0.0024840145,0.018031966,0.015999908,0.000074082986,0.0034811886,0.00018828425,0.72377706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017827101,0.3065499,0.0038054166,0.009157149,0.010129159,0.00020442925,0.0046435324,0.00043285804,0.6472504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985662,0.00022784255,0.00012883788,0.00015053285,0.00082847924,0.00009809755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699354,0.0012024591,0.00016477083,0.0001554266,0.0013444702,0.00013937228],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010144748,0.0006952026,0.0005533403,0.019731442,0.0041323467,0.0061004553,0.000874319,0.0012719489,0.045150276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005145122,0.00035426256,0.0003487163,0.027754817,0.0028904413,0.0045864843,0.0018903725,0.0017294836,0.018640956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011542913,0.000013351503,0.00012856063,0.00056799554,0.0000040445466,0.000053229778,0.0010464307,0.00006252567,0.00007819176,0.06825617,0.86766356,0.06211438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.9887203e-7,8.625543e-7,0.00016531952,0.000484799,0.0000018340835,0.000018360168,0.00013627064,0.0000046466507,0.000021917524,0.0020558431,0.99710673,0.000002607539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02121964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044842154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98026854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009986761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009281224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15104276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561617563","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3159","title":"Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analogy; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Similarity (geometry); Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03699069433430508,"score_gpt":0.26425105325463455,"score_spread":0.22726035892032947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561617563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041356057,0.0016846047,0.8207295,0.0060792677,0.00030914714,0.00033370082,0.0001404419,0.00024073945,0.12912662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7997103,0.00064679235,0.18764679,0.0005376912,0.00018236892,0.00048505864,0.0003043916,0.00012109709,0.010365514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843589,0.010471541,0.0006762647,0.0012403349,0.0027589481,0.00049410993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801307,0.014779832,0.0013416914,0.0020904585,0.0011778363,0.00047950976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009395208,0.000893687,0.0010844361,0.004165176,0.0036640044,0.006752127,0.0025049662,0.005080772,0.012412668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03470661,0.00076238613,0.002397829,0.0028343713,0.010180276,0.027285114,0.007738617,0.0034499809,0.0011865693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124322305,0.000008450293,0.0001353834,0.000043327,0.000007808761,0.00008085399,0.00090530416,0.0014409975,0.000071533475,0.9934861,0.0002695575,0.0035382845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001481193,0.000020484038,0.000111767666,0.00004154897,0.000009460678,0.00013385505,0.0003171249,0.009868196,0.00016723218,0.98003894,0.009263984,0.000012564394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010939263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012412668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032588898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012519337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049687207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561788741","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.453","title":"Making Sense of “Informal Logic”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Mainstream; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Term logic; Epistemology; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computational logic; Description logic; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13198139527560715,"score_gpt":0.27898508574947234,"score_spread":0.1470036904738652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561788741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037341,0.0046464796,0.5648296,0.047577318,0.001590669,0.00009520627,0.00013419389,0.0006468978,0.3431387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294611,0.0016973361,0.047859762,0.0042441115,0.0008501014,0.0001593169,0.00010969182,0.00026463286,0.015353902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98269,0.01185202,0.00060983904,0.0016837345,0.002335627,0.000828792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779304,0.013977705,0.0015451199,0.004235676,0.0017444277,0.0005665645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017228344,0.0008988082,0.0006248006,0.0025428412,0.0044724164,0.0136380475,0.0020202575,0.0029232746,0.004756484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022900214,0.0005445077,0.00089910114,0.0017065209,0.045382217,0.030397737,0.0091101155,0.0051052454,0.00079970894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043912123,0.0000024363421,0.000049806597,0.000018952507,0.000003957804,0.000031543543,0.0033939457,0.0001118127,0.00006113569,0.99341655,0.0006113252,0.002294149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005846419,0.0000049859586,0.000036628877,0.000041474184,0.0000048431775,0.00003988263,0.0010890196,0.00041606184,0.00016255293,0.9718123,0.02637972,0.000006713361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012788025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011296435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017228344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037560954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034271064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09111333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564530973","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2845","title":"What Does an Argument Culture Look Like?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Negotiation; Contingency; Conviction; Subjectivity; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03986473648003297,"score_gpt":0.26340109997132033,"score_spread":0.22353636349128736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564530973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50651586,0.008267591,0.020685768,0.1981837,0.001802805,0.00010625499,0.00025235824,0.00022053257,0.26396507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309194,0.0007765066,0.0025069262,0.002329832,0.00009462367,0.00004196578,0.000041131214,0.000050777966,0.0010662776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775065,0.016394366,0.0008714654,0.0011064351,0.0026685412,0.001452673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96044517,0.021390466,0.005422358,0.0026436,0.005249556,0.004848889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015565101,0.00044252185,0.0006599775,0.0029496944,0.008269435,0.024073675,0.0013076445,0.0035755732,0.0029031052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03849299,0.00037233316,0.000558121,0.0026634422,0.024945403,0.0177775,0.0050536166,0.003935108,0.00077245204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017728376,0.00017175543,0.058787998,0.000877187,0.0001702554,0.0012914249,0.311845,0.00034843374,0.0020121548,0.5485741,0.012658321,0.0630861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044173194,0.00014142838,0.031965934,0.0015166851,0.00010609429,0.0012530057,0.55426323,0.000660555,0.0012467229,0.32447764,0.08417415,0.00015039057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020509681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024893023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024073675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038483979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082317114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564896744","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4165","title":"Meta-argumentation, An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Informal logic; AND gate; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Algorithm; Logic gate","score_opus":0.0759385134830571,"score_gpt":0.28163161447187723,"score_spread":0.20569310098882015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564896744","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040384894,0.287662,0.4209939,0.053188104,0.003804233,0.00018732501,0.00036658745,0.0005232671,0.22923614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39946133,0.12479115,0.3777095,0.008285445,0.008155827,0.0010203767,0.00077674305,0.0006161396,0.07918352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494743,0.0028959988,0.00033874094,0.0006867765,0.0009237095,0.00020725546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958553,0.003007172,0.00032051848,0.00029835207,0.00031535228,0.00020329008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054955306,0.0014974097,0.0014894153,0.004082535,0.0027537814,0.0121486,0.002271333,0.004000333,0.00686808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006789865,0.0011971011,0.002160106,0.004874155,0.01686742,0.0167828,0.004046134,0.0064371084,0.0019744365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019689925,0.000012873449,0.00006144233,0.00025685268,0.000027882888,0.00007003603,0.0008804024,0.0008661936,0.00013057029,0.9702247,0.008827165,0.018622138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001495568,0.000010125398,0.00006242954,0.00020772571,0.000010177764,0.00008528998,0.00016043398,0.001090979,0.00009996994,0.9280383,0.07021067,0.000008846737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026279981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027647323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005769566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003556757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041861296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566284763","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3620","title":"The Paradox of Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Informal logic; Point (geometry); Limit (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10705498735975393,"score_gpt":0.2826222878400397,"score_spread":0.17556730048028574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566284763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04851702,0.006291361,0.05096108,0.34404323,0.0026200009,0.000060754184,0.00009089676,0.00019100726,0.5472247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467205,0.0014632673,0.008435879,0.020950435,0.001310649,0.0001353956,0.000033999826,0.0002038811,0.02074611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749913,0.016812744,0.0005818991,0.002350717,0.0040128697,0.0012504201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96997607,0.021562126,0.0012198748,0.0030225264,0.0027921721,0.0014272449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021215046,0.00039708288,0.0009182058,0.0015924779,0.011198853,0.011866376,0.0016443549,0.007059021,0.007650604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042624798,0.00043966682,0.0008029232,0.0012999722,0.05051391,0.019718233,0.011788443,0.0149835525,0.0014282287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012428885,0.000006334096,0.00006415209,0.000023554769,0.0000031112243,0.000042180116,0.0024833675,0.00006405867,0.00003716951,0.9919418,0.0029372256,0.002384518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011797462,0.000004603724,0.000052056173,0.000044346958,0.0000026649388,0.00006200245,0.0008568423,0.00017174042,0.000070071415,0.97200996,0.026707636,0.0000062565573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015727937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011395643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021215046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005398601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005755093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11219728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567035606","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2575","title":"Wright's Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Analytical Reading and Reasoning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paraphrase; Subordination (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Taxonomy (biology); Sentence; Reading (process); Linguistics; Quine; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Interrogative; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053216212449543936,"score_gpt":0.27714908536749255,"score_spread":0.2239328729179486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567035606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004421715,0.13478003,0.3974953,0.072581835,0.011536174,0.00053697795,0.000374767,0.0006375324,0.37763566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22840342,0.1752022,0.37898785,0.019009165,0.023391558,0.0024507195,0.00050251913,0.001089407,0.17096315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966647,0.0020712186,0.00023838865,0.000222184,0.00065648905,0.00014706698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914219,0.007311948,0.00028003255,0.00032275997,0.00046080488,0.00020257238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00454019,0.0012741236,0.0008884536,0.0041762074,0.0024779944,0.0070382827,0.001823743,0.002911155,0.0072841514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074680303,0.0007734752,0.0010822435,0.0037485852,0.01663808,0.008857137,0.0025065646,0.005437944,0.0023024848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071236477,0.000027535925,0.000099657176,0.00035274937,0.000012487875,0.00009618107,0.0047819708,0.00052952766,0.00015286691,0.9208744,0.035923798,0.03714164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043976547,0.000012430403,0.00012980428,0.0004513698,0.0000036866352,0.000090728325,0.0007232065,0.00042072593,0.00008600887,0.75914454,0.238922,0.000011028891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019865204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024373494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072841514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003392536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021393215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024614632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567080196","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4019","title":"Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12153300483844601,"score_gpt":0.3028597746975162,"score_spread":0.18132676985907017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567080196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010087621,0.094442084,0.2080218,0.09495268,0.0065221516,0.00009661525,0.00073878415,0.00053974683,0.5845985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5669198,0.061725836,0.16258748,0.012866158,0.00722548,0.00032987044,0.00092751207,0.001253389,0.18616451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976025,0.0013171247,0.000112756104,0.00036229237,0.0004860282,0.00011934989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996223,0.00262948,0.00016924935,0.0005791312,0.0002817998,0.00011737522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034842072,0.00077057653,0.00066349434,0.0019673917,0.0018747422,0.009615617,0.0020243216,0.0033366645,0.009433611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010026417,0.00067349593,0.0005966995,0.0016758532,0.011629584,0.01448606,0.0032531915,0.004290098,0.0022756672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001229647,0.0000063390316,0.00004289635,0.00008641006,0.000007780325,0.000059042926,0.0007605362,0.00027165393,0.00008206654,0.9625089,0.018481798,0.017680269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005677195,0.00000367397,0.000054734923,0.00017755742,0.000003999033,0.00009428862,0.0002400405,0.0005808126,0.00013263796,0.84957874,0.14912204,0.000005819058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014168418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024124736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024769632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027716192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031558514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568614932","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.597","title":"Johnson, MacIntyre, and the Practice of Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Teleology; Dialectic; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038482417192970575,"score_gpt":0.2666514324578647,"score_spread":0.22816901526489414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568614932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03957084,0.024720378,0.07159615,0.11051287,0.0005905132,0.000099547855,0.000034342174,0.00017548288,0.75269985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511741,0.0043566693,0.012763334,0.004470347,0.00052488677,0.00012904075,0.000013221525,0.000057663117,0.026510797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886551,0.008092953,0.00039627554,0.0008417787,0.0014009478,0.0006129906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98578113,0.01015427,0.0013911786,0.0011332455,0.0009415946,0.00059856905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866373,0.00052354456,0.00051210314,0.0024699597,0.007837821,0.011977851,0.001394935,0.005220475,0.0034023004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01245293,0.00031823822,0.00056854694,0.0020658614,0.04879429,0.011721495,0.0047912705,0.0049650334,0.0006733346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003827426,0.000005552814,0.000043580112,0.00001654337,0.0000015182417,0.000025561221,0.0037531648,0.000091498274,0.000017188884,0.9934111,0.0006893942,0.0019410359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019024192,0.000016712162,0.00013020553,0.00012462368,0.000006439125,0.000121022895,0.002910868,0.00040362866,0.00010629245,0.90421563,0.09193551,0.000010080621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005001914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003978419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011977851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008579546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004290002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062249303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573554956","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2263","title":"Informal Logic and its Implications for Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Informal logic; Normative; Epistemology; Relation (database); Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.05685360908512763,"score_gpt":0.3305164286741749,"score_spread":0.27366281958904726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573554956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028572503,0.05537943,0.20188296,0.21697445,0.003578635,0.0001284133,0.00023394711,0.00038861608,0.49286103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8841518,0.017165398,0.0387723,0.021059532,0.0056456393,0.00036019122,0.00015243952,0.00026724237,0.03242553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936744,0.0040872428,0.00023423466,0.00049648207,0.0010905245,0.00041718053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807148,0.014880939,0.0011385448,0.0011585221,0.0013745291,0.0007326285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076656067,0.00069425616,0.00080823957,0.00281413,0.0048945267,0.011034652,0.0016090906,0.0039239153,0.008150044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013186264,0.00038935585,0.0010404176,0.0026302286,0.037162624,0.014187218,0.0044876626,0.00641596,0.0013722752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033564063,0.000005128125,0.000037386704,0.000023544917,0.0000021445956,0.000018484141,0.00037694903,0.000113516915,0.00001204802,0.9971102,0.0009924084,0.0013049291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003674709,0.0000020499292,0.000020474568,0.000025345678,0.0000010795376,0.000010608076,0.00011513842,0.0001602651,0.000008774473,0.9925309,0.007119885,0.0000018467239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023927027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011993073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011034652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007245227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003331347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052568078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575728999","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2277","title":"Belief and Negation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Negation; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Informal logic; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04564318697619385,"score_gpt":0.24231837800679357,"score_spread":0.19667519103059972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575728999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041749366,0.030556165,0.2928665,0.057003636,0.0024515232,0.00008475373,0.000357214,0.00030153646,0.5746293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439557,0.0068956427,0.02855109,0.004646476,0.0014038457,0.00015103222,0.00019762272,0.00010782768,0.014090848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928415,0.0046101296,0.0004105366,0.00077941275,0.0009682346,0.0003901675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98919606,0.008205599,0.0005452176,0.0008149581,0.0010151768,0.00022297102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005818826,0.00062182115,0.0007196948,0.0014544894,0.0029058272,0.0072792023,0.0011087566,0.003551964,0.007283297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012931697,0.00034038263,0.0008334396,0.0013576639,0.01758979,0.017975172,0.0035282585,0.004482014,0.0011015991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012518278,0.000003597066,0.00008316024,0.000036431084,0.0000042811976,0.000053302145,0.0011774715,0.00007781865,0.000066380526,0.9937756,0.0006711385,0.004038411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007591547,0.000008115451,0.00009208266,0.000059017715,0.00000530031,0.00009887529,0.00045152233,0.00030749626,0.00011153399,0.9801477,0.018702757,0.000008126983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027064981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012701367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007283297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032894772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011282488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030773282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576216411","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1040","title":"The Logic of Deep Disagreements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026788108025452367,"score_gpt":0.2643453754008185,"score_spread":0.23755726737536612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576216411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05941645,0.0040041665,0.7453968,0.049433924,0.00050411007,0.00012288024,0.0008765904,0.00045384493,0.13979131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202053,0.0013717164,0.06321361,0.00356377,0.0010884891,0.00027853774,0.000508107,0.00014942102,0.009621055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98507696,0.008112829,0.0009175299,0.0021092584,0.0028340316,0.00094941386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95249,0.03658583,0.0025458282,0.0037736334,0.0035161655,0.001088549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014702901,0.0007805389,0.0014286328,0.002840313,0.0043139136,0.010710302,0.0027836622,0.005229298,0.00814698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054616086,0.0012473875,0.0015968987,0.0031984642,0.016930597,0.026124015,0.0060842517,0.00958547,0.0009878903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008981004,0.0000045018287,0.00007749781,0.000017999293,0.0000070099186,0.000017411325,0.00019987738,0.00043241505,0.000036837107,0.99709046,0.0005765432,0.0015304196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000452185,8.3111695e-7,0.000014155807,0.0000055453766,0.0000023137611,0.0000061792975,0.000019537734,0.0009956759,0.000016554237,0.99837506,0.0005570373,0.0000025821423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022772385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014030194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014702901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004424333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020944981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0777573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576622714","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2135","title":"Eleven Ways to Critique an Article (Part II)","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04004458740729671,"score_gpt":0.3174018368780946,"score_spread":0.2773572494707979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576622714","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019665977,0.014084948,0.009671947,0.55774957,0.3546103,0.0001469198,0.00011616097,0.00025599563,0.06139758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07721015,0.019331729,0.01763122,0.4213935,0.22025245,0.00075202464,0.00030991682,0.0006577567,0.24246134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988644,0.0057306727,0.00068736734,0.00071520987,0.003649148,0.00057355716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95713395,0.02211194,0.0016201755,0.0019694702,0.015349846,0.0018145825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01417214,0.00095865113,0.0005354765,0.0040005003,0.005538502,0.014015978,0.0024581007,0.007791731,0.012539948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060585927,0.00036771485,0.000988864,0.001651611,0.010683945,0.006248835,0.0038836056,0.010180569,0.0053286706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003258599,0.000034832603,0.00032626555,0.00024351111,0.000023455998,0.00014440992,0.0025077288,0.00009813624,0.00033750085,0.117735736,0.85649043,0.022025438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008625376,0.000016722306,0.00028677084,0.00054016395,0.000014678304,0.00013838083,0.0022361379,0.00016866605,0.00024891808,0.03070156,0.96561563,0.00002382992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003972166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008816616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01417214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006009369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005671774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07495034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576669021","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3018","title":"Introduction: Reasoning for Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Argument map; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06267101690754583,"score_gpt":0.34321525046099405,"score_spread":0.2805442335534482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576669021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003054438,0.03681244,0.122820325,0.30519313,0.052647717,0.00030308258,0.0018801003,0.0009817567,0.4763071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21894039,0.041904587,0.09021663,0.09202574,0.08939257,0.0009870216,0.0042334013,0.0018672957,0.4604324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953902,0.0023315763,0.00034897102,0.00073661644,0.00095852657,0.00023412121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904309,0.0067006117,0.00040099633,0.000749501,0.0013745576,0.00034346757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005204374,0.00086142827,0.0006736539,0.001794048,0.0031798072,0.006987786,0.0018179787,0.0046379324,0.043779127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012030224,0.00038599494,0.0014389005,0.0017679419,0.008105338,0.010595539,0.0033765242,0.007270528,0.009995685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031307813,0.000019598694,0.00017155145,0.0003482108,0.000011311753,0.00009017119,0.0023557853,0.00040252434,0.00012781209,0.7030864,0.2513377,0.04201768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075511925,0.000015563586,0.0001504385,0.00036413778,0.000006520457,0.00014447675,0.000590544,0.00044701036,0.00013378721,0.26286998,0.7352536,0.000016396618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021350312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014189044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043779127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033267762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027334276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14645582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577370680","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3801","title":"Informal Fallacies as Cognitive Heuristics in Public Health Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Nottingham; Trent University; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Heuristics; Judgement; Cognition; GRASP; Resource (disambiguation); Public health; Psychology; Cognitive resource theory; Management science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06027199805731966,"score_gpt":0.34857428128352785,"score_spread":0.2883022832262082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577370680","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3625597,0.0022104825,0.47849566,0.02543418,0.00035149508,0.00062369957,0.00018425293,0.00058863114,0.12955184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95045644,0.00025755193,0.047268227,0.00056941836,0.000072487725,0.00013862358,0.000076972865,0.0000367611,0.0011234283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9563223,0.031562652,0.0021797554,0.0018032725,0.006277465,0.0018545463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8376092,0.13348451,0.012976891,0.008941148,0.0051517426,0.0018365863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028735844,0.00090851873,0.00077436207,0.0061734314,0.0026660124,0.013536077,0.0027335915,0.004426146,0.005103412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11663165,0.00084253075,0.0012867153,0.0027795646,0.026977297,0.018158685,0.008891246,0.00444277,0.0004903717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015208479,0.00011492922,0.0044244323,0.00028321473,0.00007756539,0.00045799147,0.023809629,0.0056817504,0.00045990452,0.93681556,0.00129459,0.02642846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031848656,0.000033650434,0.0009110085,0.00012125733,0.000021390986,0.00013146164,0.004808458,0.008842927,0.00027591633,0.9812511,0.003540321,0.000030571533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019222541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015416272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028735844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042598383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032563242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15197152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578100031","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.3124","title":"Book Review ofControversy and Confrontation, Relating Controversy Analysis With Argumentation Theory.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in MENA","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01792183921212522,"score_gpt":0.2736901392221451,"score_spread":0.2557683000100199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578100031","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038585422,0.8461145,0.0054212008,0.04185666,0.014936617,0.000032128784,0.00027553702,0.00010986844,0.09086759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012743624,0.7522139,0.0064853043,0.020278603,0.031238532,0.00013908645,0.00065194286,0.00028217016,0.17596678],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993326,0.00016462414,0.000041427676,0.00009360575,0.00033468896,0.000033080876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970515,0.0020444207,0.00012380925,0.00006623513,0.00060407846,0.000109959255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011115528,0.00065028516,0.00097541726,0.003936942,0.0007407731,0.0023592173,0.0013382356,0.0017606339,0.021910887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004163468,0.00034524413,0.00058346475,0.0058777384,0.0027449802,0.003787346,0.00081497134,0.0029446557,0.010863779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001330789,0.000025875115,0.000080330596,0.0010196676,0.000017983677,0.000053083935,0.0001447126,0.00027621005,0.0001410287,0.04667473,0.83855706,0.112995885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062073777,0.000009021214,0.00025861524,0.0005300558,0.0000071257855,0.00014740232,0.000052408006,0.000104470266,0.00004887703,0.022792073,0.9760369,0.000006762972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004276342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00967139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021910887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025760075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023327197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07329917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578187234","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2979","title":"The Question of Truth","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Argumentative; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015477978568294484,"score_gpt":0.26343187938773444,"score_spread":0.24795390081943997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578187234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014461755,0.024714485,0.0644594,0.3247427,0.005382928,0.00008257653,0.00046425321,0.0001619651,0.5655299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8859131,0.009151173,0.019320173,0.02546151,0.007972627,0.00022713417,0.00047234923,0.00023305818,0.05124896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98587275,0.007733768,0.0007046379,0.0026667258,0.0021429732,0.0008791646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824499,0.011798799,0.0007882826,0.0025272265,0.0018443496,0.00059138035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014480649,0.00064456195,0.001618411,0.0019541273,0.0064713364,0.015211618,0.0024292448,0.008214475,0.016230494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031852312,0.0005360326,0.0010806913,0.0016539651,0.053166192,0.032493375,0.0068972507,0.009758399,0.0041255355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089496825,0.0000030572842,0.00003603535,0.000031710835,0.0000040290474,0.000019417434,0.0008052856,0.000053753993,0.000027361644,0.9947831,0.0024427704,0.001784405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048836255,0.0000034185794,0.00001778533,0.00005016212,0.0000023836121,0.000025576655,0.00043912933,0.00009568082,0.000038459973,0.97757053,0.021748802,0.0000033417327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002011369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079561776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016230494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006294702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004139419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076581895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578193204","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1115","title":"Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Attribution; Identity (music); Function (biology); Positive economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.059782170620564186,"score_gpt":0.2602218745834,"score_spread":0.20043970396283584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578193204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20620294,0.007548186,0.04085783,0.121132575,0.0010869735,0.000085916385,0.00006094342,0.0000874756,0.6229372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932713,0.0004770389,0.0014691039,0.0008915486,0.00035554363,0.000051307987,0.000015345788,0.000029651123,0.0034391773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480968,0.03908878,0.0015725399,0.0025091053,0.006404849,0.0023279022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90648824,0.07790993,0.0063579786,0.003810931,0.0036518357,0.0017810563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037105262,0.00055819895,0.0010943422,0.0050855977,0.017123517,0.028866524,0.0020681364,0.009597873,0.0049535036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07696812,0.0005150764,0.00059197773,0.0036053136,0.08808519,0.0292261,0.012351866,0.008240294,0.00049739314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016149903,0.000014700168,0.0003009212,0.000031105094,0.0000043936493,0.00005805785,0.02132947,0.00008168734,0.0000605262,0.9748283,0.0006295407,0.0026451892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029640052,0.000015324793,0.0003889134,0.00012984152,0.0000072783214,0.000054454773,0.01273762,0.00037018492,0.00014010887,0.97072077,0.015394931,0.0000108176655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013226401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009863696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037105262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008389032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050773914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19623375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578643490","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.2948","title":"van Eemeren's Pondering on Problems of Argumentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.037459042047807214,"score_gpt":0.24816794421318578,"score_spread":0.21070890216537858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578643490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010671583,0.013819884,0.23290855,0.11342366,0.007156402,0.00020006337,0.0004931065,0.00028066634,0.6210461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6154439,0.007434654,0.112457804,0.017984875,0.0058113495,0.00061299966,0.00030227812,0.0006608421,0.23929125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98850596,0.007343472,0.00055355864,0.0011150733,0.0018507955,0.00063114526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860671,0.010767763,0.00033511617,0.00128341,0.0012278022,0.00031876497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064083464,0.0015564183,0.0014888077,0.004213351,0.0057371566,0.010470628,0.0035932118,0.009873584,0.015182218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022669764,0.0013235776,0.0021428312,0.0042446656,0.02876497,0.022376617,0.007608382,0.012321376,0.0022293536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008800786,0.00000474938,0.0000121972835,0.000032405555,0.000005583983,0.000027112597,0.0012176352,0.00022297972,0.00002902204,0.9924408,0.0037710853,0.0022277026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012588875,0.0000049137084,0.00002469224,0.00007759831,0.0000071994805,0.000029841874,0.0003017566,0.00044656938,0.000088148954,0.9503983,0.04859838,0.0000101674195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008556345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008612099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015182218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078068194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034497397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05664271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581285529","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2927","title":"The Structure and Evaluation of Planning Arguments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Management science; Process (computing); Process management; Computer science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042601381372615446,"score_gpt":0.3830631332940159,"score_spread":0.3404617519214005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581285529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15541819,0.0044291145,0.3517547,0.035693023,0.0018597852,0.0034792547,0.00044252086,0.0007722627,0.44615126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.856353,0.0010099318,0.12826802,0.0009477905,0.0003229879,0.0021125788,0.00026286743,0.00026338734,0.01045945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8714126,0.089850254,0.005868315,0.0042538685,0.025212191,0.00340278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68272936,0.2571487,0.015905166,0.013078941,0.028668115,0.0024697331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082189895,0.0012089555,0.0012007756,0.00934857,0.0052559534,0.01916934,0.0028236492,0.006020265,0.011850987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3339362,0.00096760667,0.00089209055,0.005259722,0.01695997,0.018828759,0.00726771,0.004948242,0.0013337198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025212768,0.000091548805,0.0014942059,0.00080399343,0.00004460894,0.0003495547,0.018599039,0.0024149278,0.0013548777,0.8870931,0.0038821287,0.08361992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017180595,0.00015656035,0.0019707044,0.0014729,0.0000703707,0.00014994787,0.0114074275,0.012134507,0.0040474096,0.8968557,0.07148678,0.00007587887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013006546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012041717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082189895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010488834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010740901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43466693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581876134","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1137","title":"Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argumentative; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07410902803833037,"score_gpt":0.2813987166423169,"score_spread":0.20728968860398655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581876134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005989561,0.014789646,0.15243281,0.6517662,0.0052062976,0.00013470472,0.00010516819,0.00018503767,0.16939057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7395963,0.009691062,0.105657466,0.098833635,0.015947618,0.0015635674,0.00014393752,0.00071055186,0.02785582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80873984,0.13610715,0.007252843,0.007660448,0.036758777,0.0034809348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7998903,0.14927036,0.007014059,0.013169371,0.026880108,0.003775759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10749986,0.0015056595,0.0023468235,0.008954079,0.014031596,0.022641849,0.009059437,0.024234172,0.004756538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15046369,0.0011944631,0.0028765504,0.0051064445,0.11217104,0.03440509,0.012994344,0.029209455,0.0021224844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005406521,0.000005516979,0.000022413788,0.00005739188,0.000006197933,0.00002328015,0.0013070357,0.000098788885,0.0000122330675,0.9941703,0.002827906,0.0014634965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016592392,0.0000034671648,0.000019646686,0.00011825349,0.0000040401073,0.00002653207,0.00037719155,0.00034592234,0.0000349556,0.9787185,0.020327026,0.000007901838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031379142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016631989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10749986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015347316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011986929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5685204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583054770","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4140","title":"Sensitizing Reasons by Emulating Exemplars","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07560061435547576,"score_gpt":0.35374861544563757,"score_spread":0.2781480010901618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583054770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.684211,0.00045948912,0.08338512,0.0066126785,0.00035045345,0.00022481229,0.00008082698,0.00021883099,0.2244567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96426266,0.00021100772,0.026896125,0.00043475462,0.000025314372,0.00008770738,0.000046975936,0.00007690953,0.007958497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663204,0.0023741014,0.00009510418,0.00027268563,0.00044606088,0.00018010358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254733,0.0055742515,0.0004680225,0.00071541674,0.00039564492,0.00029923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002959927,0.0005862352,0.00023183668,0.0005091502,0.0015354669,0.003649538,0.0009786064,0.0015393895,0.003948391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008663282,0.00022047956,0.00033984453,0.00028821215,0.009841145,0.0030444232,0.004263588,0.0028169733,0.0004898167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018644167,0.00029296277,0.004161552,0.00041901553,0.000032486074,0.002100249,0.34174857,0.002590966,0.024324242,0.59137833,0.004333311,0.028431827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012552094,0.00074722775,0.0051254462,0.0006921633,0.00009705965,0.0040741144,0.21670665,0.013421033,0.050685268,0.33171302,0.37643614,0.00017634456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032465183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000873148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003948391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011918576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045418277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01565373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583554234","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2163","title":"Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical theory; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Criticism; Informal logic; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037260885695353664,"score_gpt":0.2732579846752149,"score_spread":0.23599709897986124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583554234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078639634,0.022846289,0.28715307,0.20182818,0.002229997,0.00037551165,0.000080692844,0.00014791693,0.40669873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563028,0.004028986,0.028049525,0.003292312,0.0012977404,0.00043197145,0.000033351243,0.00007924633,0.0064840135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762699,0.018970039,0.000525451,0.00093996915,0.0025728336,0.00072175235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94626904,0.04639611,0.0025917755,0.0016148407,0.0022187794,0.00090950815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02225784,0.0009730342,0.0009334419,0.0052667293,0.008866292,0.023730312,0.0025131328,0.007390274,0.002406779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034752745,0.0006863846,0.0006613249,0.0035162887,0.114227995,0.031584483,0.006653121,0.010203187,0.00034306786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005869078,0.000006502787,0.000048194343,0.00002527293,0.0000018165056,0.000025551217,0.008293396,0.00014703709,0.00003405453,0.98915464,0.0004496806,0.0018079914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010181752,0.0000042469082,0.000040599236,0.00007456063,0.0000022956938,0.000019602796,0.00270405,0.00040459452,0.000055083838,0.98733485,0.009344799,0.0000051175252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017612451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00130736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023730312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010558726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068785707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11771208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584611275","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4234","title":"Freeman's Syntactic Criterion for Linkage","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.07404754499049605,"score_gpt":0.29827239263755334,"score_spread":0.2242248476470573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584611275","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015915595,0.0011926967,0.7274836,0.018949544,0.00075305015,0.00041996097,0.001251686,0.0011228475,0.23291108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60092324,0.001107949,0.34365824,0.0057883603,0.0015573157,0.0014550734,0.0014120416,0.0012358188,0.042862017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98555773,0.0047860183,0.0016884048,0.0023826917,0.004602822,0.0009823305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97429,0.01343549,0.00090981147,0.003506741,0.0072372425,0.0006207503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012425558,0.0010716757,0.0016678467,0.006365199,0.0068728398,0.0064071473,0.0027434833,0.00745958,0.017458247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047966465,0.0013405303,0.0029293909,0.004490767,0.013569941,0.022267729,0.009997615,0.006738023,0.0050022798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010950577,0.000009289267,0.0002019323,0.000046076708,0.000008923914,0.000045047178,0.00028314377,0.00025382682,0.00015556675,0.9901619,0.0035061622,0.005317101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014560066,0.000008517892,0.00013030772,0.00003563196,0.000013310882,0.000114540184,0.00011609233,0.00129594,0.00032578222,0.97913706,0.018789077,0.000019260995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021551894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020344018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017458247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044713295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00370131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065713406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584753526","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1140","title":"Missimer's Good Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, 4th Edition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical thinking; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02633819215705317,"score_gpt":0.3475406744429367,"score_spread":0.3212024822858835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584753526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085974135,0.3707222,0.06431567,0.09332433,0.0648168,0.0007328819,0.0016023237,0.0023764258,0.40124953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019241665,0.31664163,0.06799167,0.03209046,0.03813391,0.0026894144,0.0025680363,0.0029668775,0.5176763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661213,0.0012602435,0.00037539462,0.00029373067,0.0012580904,0.00020032066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101174,0.0061483537,0.00042882346,0.0004887667,0.0015667105,0.00035555224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037508372,0.0024115844,0.0014673029,0.006246484,0.0028279382,0.00923153,0.0025706517,0.004640641,0.038294602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014284713,0.0015477181,0.0015996393,0.00492771,0.0044884444,0.008015292,0.0033471466,0.008203655,0.03122183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014951762,0.000048567916,0.000064128544,0.0006843585,0.000010051521,0.000106726846,0.001016445,0.00035125323,0.00017372002,0.07238338,0.8397037,0.08544278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004842777,0.0000121811845,0.0001366355,0.001124538,0.000002556914,0.00013065232,0.00025976627,0.00010803686,0.000053378586,0.039407644,0.958747,0.000012757046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003016677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003928053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038294602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049255006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057842927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12810826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585861394","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2131","title":"Applying Soundness Standards to Qualified Reasoning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soundness; Ceteris paribus; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Process (computing); Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language; Medicine","score_opus":0.04761021898498224,"score_gpt":0.3078718082185359,"score_spread":0.26026158923355364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585861394","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024600852,0.0010497936,0.85140604,0.0070812963,0.00040408503,0.00027121435,0.00009121151,0.00035242704,0.11474314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65366286,0.00058350794,0.33351645,0.00245135,0.00038993513,0.00050527306,0.00017965486,0.00021311056,0.008497859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97067463,0.0133310845,0.0032284756,0.004045011,0.006944521,0.0017762466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95733744,0.023137264,0.0028591824,0.009661497,0.0060276184,0.0009769544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026690608,0.0010065559,0.0013786468,0.0041505103,0.003211692,0.008274509,0.003060625,0.004978182,0.004201783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058326185,0.0010326137,0.003041517,0.0016324414,0.04807692,0.016457697,0.009051957,0.00874822,0.000872476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054312704,0.000005751328,0.00007994258,0.00001773256,0.000007799838,0.000028745837,0.000353981,0.00048101877,0.00010374524,0.996003,0.00018142891,0.0027315174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006563811,0.000006958772,0.00003257338,0.000014623352,0.0000037127966,0.00001545745,0.000066740315,0.0009137639,0.00018338689,0.996949,0.0018003918,0.0000067823426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00336544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028510995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026690608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005856501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047024144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14115506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587538784","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3681","title":"Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Position (finance); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.10959721154376895,"score_gpt":0.29624302610621644,"score_spread":0.1866458145624475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587538784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026630362,0.004716974,0.7133707,0.02311756,0.0007389947,0.0002946637,0.00009284552,0.0010454071,0.22999245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7316703,0.0017666958,0.24989918,0.001607178,0.00073933846,0.00035434493,0.00010724139,0.00040804266,0.013447705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95420015,0.03331265,0.0019454032,0.0031518436,0.006360769,0.0010291334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93366337,0.04806277,0.00240894,0.011443398,0.0033770616,0.0010443954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044592734,0.0011649083,0.0018256736,0.004128516,0.006082063,0.013542045,0.004323524,0.007327771,0.0063493885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070716485,0.0014040339,0.0014659159,0.0021170538,0.030289162,0.021649288,0.012474288,0.007077035,0.001744022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029862686,0.000019740099,0.00019003314,0.00009803015,0.000021087104,0.00012850673,0.0065397355,0.00029370576,0.00042165682,0.97790384,0.00086811645,0.013485756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031043626,0.000028585586,0.00013629008,0.00028038,0.000059456524,0.00019958382,0.001004018,0.0029341315,0.00095610204,0.9586802,0.03566293,0.000027318627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014181662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044592734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036575813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002630299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23583174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587985520","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2264","title":"The Place of Informal Logic in Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Epistemology; Parallels; Informal logic; Foundationalism; Connection (principal bundle); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06053618799393396,"score_gpt":0.2578871470784355,"score_spread":0.19735095908450156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587985520","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032360576,0.016922433,0.5845244,0.09997885,0.0016937434,0.000079077225,0.00010947169,0.00044162097,0.26388988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90950793,0.005644982,0.062277302,0.008823276,0.0022894773,0.0002869013,0.00007099613,0.00023085732,0.010868351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988926,0.007953445,0.00038478157,0.00079963007,0.0014111552,0.00052507606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653954,0.024891473,0.0019008998,0.0049042506,0.0017667192,0.0011412455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014980843,0.00076645083,0.0009432952,0.0030887083,0.005230429,0.012711099,0.002159481,0.004325719,0.004512191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01739784,0.0005998419,0.0010242752,0.0024686065,0.04814741,0.020411031,0.0065428535,0.006868148,0.00097285945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042492175,0.00000378423,0.00006413279,0.00002031477,0.0000021868238,0.000017398197,0.00064253027,0.00017754319,0.000021402535,0.9970487,0.00022049507,0.0017773387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056922495,0.0000059865697,0.00003320268,0.000039911018,0.000002965634,0.00002013247,0.00015861336,0.000650467,0.000036599336,0.99113375,0.007908203,0.000004460686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024088211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001188039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014980843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006077764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003284411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07922721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588067599","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2571","title":"Are Some Modus Ponens Arguments Deductively Invalid?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Modus ponens; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Inference; Medicine","score_opus":0.03863751782486054,"score_gpt":0.2567885819345742,"score_spread":0.2181510641097137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588067599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13897392,0.009941214,0.1711183,0.2861624,0.004233813,0.00025300897,0.0009863945,0.00096185534,0.3873691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233884,0.0033188032,0.030627321,0.025655583,0.0028852501,0.00019477471,0.0006361143,0.00044992458,0.012843876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97920734,0.009111729,0.0013867782,0.0029617376,0.005924936,0.0014075056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9194573,0.05777,0.0073706666,0.008255657,0.006202573,0.00094370166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020720543,0.0011324497,0.0021163588,0.0034604394,0.0064400123,0.009998696,0.005088542,0.010169619,0.009847573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09634676,0.0014005676,0.002841676,0.0030799415,0.022713216,0.01991488,0.0057122465,0.011505773,0.00301962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013665015,0.00005877435,0.0014559566,0.00028561938,0.00018929504,0.0008922129,0.002851964,0.0005314637,0.00027482235,0.9689191,0.0073144007,0.017089661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051483144,0.000013276841,0.00039466852,0.00011304316,0.000042001044,0.00033164767,0.0005045707,0.0009922544,0.0006361899,0.97448015,0.02242172,0.000018931338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094529346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009106541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020720543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032236944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020106635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10958201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588283721","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2238","title":"Evaluating arguments and making meta-arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14049111011011864,"score_gpt":0.39967178823249605,"score_spread":0.25918067812237744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588283721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053015545,0.008025113,0.81695616,0.019394014,0.00083335943,0.00053901854,0.00016722914,0.0006276559,0.1004419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48332986,0.002057364,0.50851583,0.0007195925,0.00037843382,0.0003971609,0.00022648717,0.00022262035,0.004152707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95347327,0.031741045,0.002496204,0.0028315221,0.008139544,0.0013184829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92168975,0.058199875,0.0059008948,0.0047676247,0.0077186446,0.0017232036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050855774,0.0023723398,0.0018341944,0.009605876,0.0038562007,0.02439612,0.004357303,0.0070988983,0.0077745533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11021049,0.0013138457,0.0024147928,0.0037897485,0.016345395,0.035622995,0.0072729033,0.005107433,0.0014117204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081118094,0.00005378068,0.0007893361,0.00034530982,0.000101218975,0.00020971958,0.0042740633,0.0035411015,0.0006013293,0.948982,0.001218952,0.039802097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002465187,0.00002442588,0.00019111879,0.00023718251,0.000036084548,0.00005786468,0.0010182275,0.0053295144,0.00071910577,0.98309106,0.009246684,0.000024149045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012086395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016104362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050855774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052636205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26895422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589129543","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.457","title":"Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Historicity (philosophy); Centrality; Epistemology; Sociology; Work (physics); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04988486963159874,"score_gpt":0.22105916610393692,"score_spread":0.17117429647233817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589129543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036217846,0.04978389,0.12537481,0.065247014,0.0012341928,0.000078535275,0.00015769668,0.00027170722,0.7216343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496351,0.00765,0.014421584,0.0030193054,0.00075912965,0.0001093023,0.000054313918,0.00010017563,0.024251107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997517,0.0014697919,0.00010457555,0.00032787013,0.0003812979,0.00019954226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579227,0.0030931716,0.00034435472,0.00042172894,0.00023311116,0.00011532952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035053187,0.00045044848,0.00039007992,0.0018624292,0.0037155112,0.006264189,0.0008964336,0.0028331007,0.0028891636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056569623,0.0003771515,0.00060855364,0.0016134476,0.029068906,0.011942015,0.0022411847,0.0037758565,0.0005504151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000418962,0.000002295777,0.000024871837,0.00001461599,0.0000017439454,0.000016026643,0.0008803443,0.00011794894,0.000014137664,0.99641764,0.0008309642,0.0016752746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056674885,0.000004155219,0.00005307229,0.000035837227,0.0000034599325,0.00002754804,0.00024351096,0.00012644623,0.00005874516,0.97916895,0.020269167,0.0000033921638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021618672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021100573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006264189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041891327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023609237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030394435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589639477","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.2967","title":"A Bayesian Approach to Absent Evidence Reasoning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Epistemology; Frequentist probability; Bayesian probability; Statistical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Bayesian inference; Computer science; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19069346870081977,"score_gpt":0.24495051956886543,"score_spread":0.054257050868045664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589639477","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005312873,0.0025664305,0.9484125,0.014379603,0.00027874828,0.000119846314,0.00031622095,0.00013576675,0.028477991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.469537,0.004557656,0.50904816,0.003860561,0.002383052,0.0005511551,0.00044711636,0.00012890142,0.009486365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977004,0.014366457,0.0011722955,0.0022265746,0.0044585224,0.0007721675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88826233,0.0975781,0.0035379631,0.0038263914,0.0054356665,0.0013595518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02729781,0.0014200108,0.002168253,0.005757604,0.0026538924,0.008015212,0.0052992245,0.0055790017,0.0069314134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096694365,0.0017000369,0.0025562698,0.003935091,0.011906441,0.015098247,0.0047303536,0.009080793,0.001077655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021756552,0.000025204848,0.00029086135,0.0001085469,0.00005689797,0.00014557353,0.0003017729,0.005938749,0.000092162896,0.9831587,0.0014608582,0.008398977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009888689,0.000004074349,0.000047626178,0.00003070034,0.000011412681,0.000036844485,0.000024711719,0.008586197,0.000043484353,0.9898,0.0013962681,0.000008751307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044890195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040565394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02729781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00510762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038131496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14436632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590091593","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3774","title":"A Serious Flaw in the Collegiate Learning Assessment [CLA] Test","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Rendering (computer graphics); Logical reasoning; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematics education; Critical thinking; Test validity; Validity; Computer science; Applied psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022408105744773383,"score_gpt":0.3322505504779639,"score_spread":0.30984244473319056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590091593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16398837,0.008643495,0.26783603,0.4302262,0.019605892,0.0013307431,0.0015604503,0.0053881607,0.10142073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7050834,0.0033501661,0.13285844,0.11896579,0.003092506,0.0011782887,0.0010401694,0.00078707584,0.033644076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9372035,0.01813234,0.006668051,0.0028191616,0.033926714,0.0012502016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79554,0.12863912,0.0118092,0.009650101,0.05053436,0.0038271314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0406902,0.00061489403,0.0006789322,0.0017596051,0.0013781722,0.0032036984,0.0024330749,0.0047162133,0.0028103068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2573174,0.00047780466,0.00082326453,0.0014214166,0.005645261,0.0031012224,0.0028604076,0.0064964695,0.00262291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003790221,0.00053922384,0.07399078,0.0007788039,0.00017908194,0.0007400609,0.006576465,0.0013783318,0.0048710606,0.09618074,0.19066194,0.6237245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004235055,0.0032385704,0.12664531,0.0050797765,0.00055579736,0.0141645465,0.0054947482,0.014187868,0.021756737,0.23487815,0.57281643,0.00075851934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054524983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069998302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0406902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002208782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006763246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21519291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590508207","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2154","title":"A Dialectical Tier Within Reason","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Dialectic; Epistemology; Core (optical fiber); Product (mathematics); Ecological rationality; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017520099801488904,"score_gpt":0.24203986795852422,"score_spread":0.2245197681570353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590508207","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04112519,0.0036008384,0.65687686,0.014314171,0.000313171,0.00010581337,0.00016006854,0.000572408,0.28293145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91609794,0.000842789,0.06624364,0.0014155802,0.00015724663,0.00014438792,0.00010201317,0.00018396937,0.014812414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429613,0.002473475,0.00030906792,0.0009005793,0.0014681008,0.0005525473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563366,0.0020397105,0.00023016188,0.0012502789,0.0005101271,0.0003360625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006121916,0.00051059603,0.0007665929,0.0017568733,0.0023702902,0.010275141,0.0010569149,0.002581875,0.0036659422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050312444,0.0005856356,0.0011349942,0.0014063783,0.023745602,0.017214326,0.0056460965,0.0044684093,0.0010135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042734696,0.0000021289718,0.00006639252,0.0000065813833,0.0000023787868,0.0000059357735,0.00048034536,0.00016188288,0.00007933416,0.99810815,0.0001246813,0.0009578853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049230252,0.0000049575788,0.00006622345,0.000013450482,0.000004244504,0.000019685998,0.00018046713,0.00083220063,0.00014750187,0.9898655,0.008856483,0.000004469421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029335204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025951096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010275141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006218581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044031804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045119166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592148062","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.1188","title":"Systematically Distorted Communication: An Impediment to Social and Political Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Rationality; Politics; Power (physics); Action (physics); Sociology; Political action; Rhetoric; Mathematical proof; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04082092452419672,"score_gpt":0.26420454706543944,"score_spread":0.22338362254124272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592148062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33880743,0.0025626423,0.19662268,0.11437038,0.0005853169,0.00026769243,0.00018022876,0.00041224118,0.34619144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936987,0.00021093692,0.0039748736,0.00056997087,0.000070506656,0.00005917257,0.000014165922,0.00003077885,0.0013707823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96786726,0.019855954,0.0013914987,0.0020144177,0.0069658686,0.0019050092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9359768,0.03838862,0.0076109315,0.013579343,0.0033592742,0.0010850201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014029803,0.00044630517,0.0006373036,0.0025787018,0.0053335684,0.012057079,0.0020117795,0.0047642146,0.0027485616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057978008,0.0005044785,0.0005399908,0.0023822756,0.056633264,0.013343932,0.012207293,0.0063291555,0.0004778457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003211073,0.000011592088,0.0009652297,0.000043654396,0.000008201557,0.00016227263,0.025457412,0.00047030617,0.00026855338,0.96256316,0.0007786918,0.009238772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002264993,0.00003396566,0.0008159599,0.00014265522,0.0000140993825,0.00040017723,0.013607246,0.0023968609,0.0012229772,0.9480918,0.033222396,0.000029153984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025863661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014973055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014029803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00699341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004494787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07419759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592566407","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3421","title":"Moral Hybrids, Moral Relevance and Moral Particularism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15081047697009806,"score_gpt":0.4514853407065988,"score_spread":0.30067486373650076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592566407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18770866,0.011449611,0.1118878,0.092387505,0.0005236698,0.00008180387,0.000098676275,0.00026641655,0.59559584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879431,0.0007014282,0.0044766185,0.002208524,0.00020627172,0.00004759508,0.00001760358,0.00003078833,0.0043681306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922069,0.005213448,0.00020670511,0.00097709,0.0008979939,0.000497893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937374,0.007869255,0.0006875097,0.0009891392,0.00064552244,0.0004349401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006393932,0.000373532,0.00060848723,0.0015685264,0.0031236396,0.006279509,0.0013028596,0.0040385495,0.0050441483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012177561,0.00037382127,0.00073420996,0.0010959061,0.031775586,0.010959153,0.007759975,0.0053215534,0.00050912035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010594475,0.0000068783397,0.00016063736,0.000034932724,0.0000047593553,0.00006163531,0.0013562343,0.000121446275,0.00012497262,0.9954152,0.00047706818,0.002225666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011739986,0.000008195323,0.00025507598,0.000030308634,0.0000057729694,0.00008033987,0.0004919143,0.00020752923,0.00010788337,0.98878676,0.010008582,0.0000057914035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009700412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089902565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006393932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004354443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011279753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03381473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594876765","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1225","title":"Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Analogy; Discipline; Multidisciplinary approach; Work (physics); Section (typography); Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.3054281408601613,"score_gpt":0.41537523063405213,"score_spread":0.10994708977389084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594876765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026728027,0.025949001,0.28881305,0.017613845,0.0023088015,0.017541258,0.11070142,0.014925856,0.519474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052460674,0.024145538,0.7412139,0.00515306,0.001043647,0.027936807,0.060268547,0.0073087467,0.12768368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268544,0.0023064571,0.002168196,0.00046432958,0.002083176,0.00029240263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95943224,0.025460506,0.0016875991,0.004074034,0.0077704964,0.0015750838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008402383,0.0023130565,0.003722087,0.031247303,0.0034067382,0.008251341,0.0059701796,0.00318851,0.2307471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527301,0.0035253677,0.0016898416,0.034633894,0.0022866912,0.016102746,0.009592693,0.004727025,0.14922236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060966624,0.00021167434,0.00025928946,0.0038637798,0.000016979346,0.0003135097,0.002604256,0.00052812387,0.0012452953,0.048642766,0.75256616,0.18968718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013050676,0.000011785954,0.00024489855,0.0010664713,0.000003878408,0.000120195735,0.00046280978,0.00011689891,0.000105099156,0.011929984,0.98590785,0.000017037613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003568508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00899101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2307471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027240978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077919895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7719259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595274314","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4109","title":"A Dialectical Analysis of the Ad Baculum Fallacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01772763326987384,"score_gpt":0.24235973076569567,"score_spread":0.22463209749582183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595274314","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0481428,0.0017701248,0.8109252,0.010511799,0.00038078567,0.0002712517,0.000121553865,0.00023602291,0.12764055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8032702,0.000468455,0.18721591,0.0007142146,0.00012289897,0.0002873102,0.000108895314,0.000074903575,0.0077372603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849675,0.009487572,0.0006773317,0.0011230763,0.0030160374,0.0007284906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98755205,0.008773779,0.000702722,0.00093200675,0.0016592072,0.0003802774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010685367,0.00067307375,0.0009754513,0.004772628,0.005445227,0.006689634,0.0017072993,0.0034437466,0.006611894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030624006,0.000523895,0.0010648613,0.0026462863,0.013976217,0.012205861,0.006739357,0.0044906456,0.0006244709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011436636,0.0000063143684,0.00012191599,0.00002394947,0.0000055214055,0.00004901755,0.0007468228,0.0006684961,0.00008671645,0.99369353,0.00027319466,0.004313105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004854788,0.000006764586,0.000055006847,0.00004056554,0.000004279901,0.000045677752,0.00039621873,0.005817349,0.00018006405,0.9882641,0.0051797573,0.0000053451586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002244705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012832694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010685367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005298645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030863287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05651033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595464383","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2572","title":"What Should We Do With Traditional Logic?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of logic; Epistemology; Term logic; Paraconsistent logic; Philosophy; Logical consequence; Higher-order logic; Computer science; Computational logic; Artificial intelligence; Description logic","score_opus":0.12343077637447435,"score_gpt":0.32156604426093227,"score_spread":0.1981352678864579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595464383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031370618,0.02331535,0.02814868,0.87558925,0.006602814,0.000030604213,0.0000764294,0.00024711696,0.0628526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45966366,0.053839304,0.06176322,0.32731616,0.032386344,0.00046187587,0.00026161547,0.0006699885,0.063637756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885982,0.0064214133,0.00033866992,0.0013313936,0.0022888698,0.0010213277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98300225,0.009238541,0.0010789635,0.002563874,0.0026930636,0.0014231774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020480666,0.0011292929,0.0015823457,0.0020937885,0.0062659793,0.013175341,0.0036970521,0.0077914214,0.009214149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029155174,0.00048136836,0.0012153683,0.0016613615,0.05106626,0.037751053,0.0037016862,0.0108357,0.005024689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052623607,0.000056193843,0.0004908384,0.00031869486,0.000061449704,0.00007950393,0.0018616008,0.0003250931,0.000094773735,0.92075557,0.047534175,0.028369537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019626259,0.000013053251,0.00011579146,0.00018148303,0.000012303604,0.0000401212,0.0006979157,0.00017956844,0.000060711798,0.93354017,0.06512764,0.000011689226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005294715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036352025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020480666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006420761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067079356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10831338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595493214","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2909","title":"Zenker's Ceteris Paribus in Conservative Belief Revision: On the Role of Minimal Change in Rational Theory Development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06895057278794707,"score_gpt":0.25334233865687683,"score_spread":0.18439176586892975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595493214","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19644316,0.002652505,0.51520145,0.062393215,0.00075413985,0.00020072966,0.00024401658,0.0004812793,0.22162956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96484697,0.00041178672,0.026842281,0.0009497781,0.0003107188,0.00014026179,0.000042747743,0.00008737487,0.0063681165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206465,0.0043714056,0.00039846878,0.0012980637,0.0012349968,0.0006324824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95371324,0.036268625,0.0016213462,0.0052217566,0.0021140634,0.0010609623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016341316,0.00052990456,0.0015867377,0.0014509582,0.0029563874,0.00439725,0.002206264,0.0038527327,0.007169071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044788696,0.0007879189,0.0015363619,0.001186792,0.018731866,0.0137137715,0.00492198,0.008092969,0.000579586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031239295,0.000011543042,0.00015495243,0.000019706456,0.000008178907,0.000018679524,0.0002531048,0.00039969222,0.000051979445,0.99609476,0.0003677263,0.0025885177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012659894,0.0000047671238,0.000050488645,0.00000408529,0.0000033700157,0.000006846182,0.000023045433,0.0013349586,0.00003890503,0.9982388,0.00027950382,0.0000026051775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015168923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001447147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016341316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032343115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027206037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086422145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596491580","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3889","title":"Govier's \"Informal Logic\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy of logic; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Argumentation theory; History","score_opus":0.0455844608288752,"score_gpt":0.3423178392393445,"score_spread":0.2967333784104693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596491580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019302404,0.0262346,0.2594912,0.16458979,0.003990158,0.00010808529,0.00018633514,0.0009622968,0.5251351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7745499,0.016309159,0.07847638,0.058872994,0.0041330894,0.0004632586,0.00022383824,0.00073864823,0.06623274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98752916,0.0072623617,0.000325575,0.0013079683,0.0029308181,0.0006440683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879711,0.007911289,0.0007936791,0.0009800792,0.0018718586,0.00047195304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008432041,0.0010250527,0.0006965047,0.0040543936,0.0046301093,0.008413538,0.00229695,0.005539581,0.0035231723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01770995,0.00040575245,0.0009847498,0.0028576807,0.03360979,0.008933542,0.0042477483,0.006393771,0.001078639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008036872,0.000002929574,0.00005622626,0.000028390006,0.000002227999,0.000026123289,0.0008764044,0.00010819111,0.000027621232,0.9906064,0.005903551,0.002353767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012525366,0.000021277898,0.00021458417,0.00028595675,0.000012214232,0.00018996786,0.00083905726,0.0006614021,0.00019124958,0.79971504,0.19783539,0.000021341426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051401574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008432041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006526088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036315052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047350287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596851013","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2902","title":"Argumentative Thinking: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychology and Argumentation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03233095517686486,"score_gpt":0.3831865307821221,"score_spread":0.35085557560525726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596851013","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012806858,0.2637941,0.05601252,0.1485857,0.3547839,0.00025668772,0.0003714126,0.00047614248,0.17443888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0240587,0.19211562,0.025432436,0.04615337,0.5943214,0.0010583729,0.0006561867,0.00106917,0.11513477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651116,0.0016897273,0.0003221105,0.00032049752,0.00093789946,0.00021854365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847305,0.012092676,0.00050504354,0.0005846621,0.0012950252,0.0007921504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004435102,0.0017094273,0.0018754124,0.0047630235,0.003469825,0.011285345,0.001510069,0.006510512,0.02020013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010508024,0.0008476186,0.0021626307,0.0044802935,0.007501775,0.0111613525,0.004284058,0.015221122,0.008762854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035065506,0.00012023407,0.00022651104,0.00057095906,0.00002859977,0.00015577648,0.0010979954,0.00041284654,0.0002985914,0.20172255,0.71321523,0.08211567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008477479,0.000034898894,0.0003220826,0.000565126,0.000007262322,0.00016918068,0.00027015436,0.00025354148,0.0000473501,0.088392615,0.9099118,0.00001749264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008141707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012725082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02020013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026537196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020823316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06757617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597492954","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4209","title":"Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.14301484125915587,"score_gpt":0.3319198136403934,"score_spread":0.18890497238123755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597492954","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28289405,0.011351202,0.33308917,0.07324914,0.00084456475,0.00035153402,0.0003409281,0.00038705012,0.29749247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770461,0.0005158443,0.019659558,0.00093130977,0.00024510353,0.00010674632,0.00005913166,0.00011827804,0.001317994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.936971,0.04266458,0.0040574805,0.0036955338,0.010679247,0.0019321238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63010454,0.3189756,0.013692813,0.016887572,0.01666871,0.003670799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0632002,0.0007119278,0.0022150488,0.009197053,0.005374385,0.01839279,0.002984636,0.00859065,0.009238834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24669723,0.0010535733,0.0015186166,0.005430138,0.04127612,0.032012746,0.010911382,0.008496668,0.000838684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073667325,0.000031365005,0.001620883,0.00013518633,0.000034472007,0.000057327536,0.0032758147,0.0007940316,0.000087612854,0.9852497,0.0005104468,0.008129564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022528897,0.000013930041,0.00048402097,0.000109869405,0.000013548009,0.000037948346,0.00061972195,0.002242083,0.00006400404,0.99514765,0.0012303247,0.00001433166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012460793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009836748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0632002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056075873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023646792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33423853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597725234","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4203","title":"Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","keywords":"Debiasing; Situational ethics; Taxonomy (biology); Critical thinking; Epistemology; Confirmation bias; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02358649599310291,"score_gpt":0.3352128984735683,"score_spread":0.31162640248046536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597725234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008059331,0.12900178,0.008395256,0.31036744,0.0975003,0.00017650829,0.00053313904,0.00045939392,0.4455069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10750684,0.04582815,0.005987719,0.017124329,0.033998728,0.00023187876,0.00040030188,0.00032589593,0.78859615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873024,0.00032102442,0.00006810812,0.00018233545,0.00052808283,0.00017013063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785954,0.000521206,0.00012325715,0.00011606233,0.00075807585,0.00062182255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027033621,0.00075526704,0.0004848551,0.0014813655,0.0027083135,0.0060365484,0.0007920767,0.0027659081,0.036107417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055464995,0.00021184172,0.0004945907,0.0013653348,0.0024873707,0.0028103963,0.0027127475,0.0032995106,0.007950705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000401478,0.0000842098,0.00029344496,0.000156985,0.000012088609,0.000053354026,0.00023525437,0.00026762584,0.00019644696,0.03821829,0.8197201,0.1407221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023347922,0.000052350082,0.0031207628,0.00061456056,0.000012073335,0.00014000513,0.0005379231,0.0007281198,0.00039402817,0.086930834,0.9074186,0.000027261185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069287526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013540917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036107417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066346484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00406938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120791376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597777519","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i1.682","title":"What is a “Real” Argument?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02570972426029476,"score_gpt":0.2664251485682671,"score_spread":0.24071542430797233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597777519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025562815,0.011553131,0.19372135,0.321671,0.004778596,0.00028398345,0.0003889097,0.00026895705,0.4417712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90019757,0.005726422,0.0552006,0.017111724,0.002947722,0.00041990838,0.00036137036,0.00019170558,0.017843004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97516143,0.015026106,0.0013573245,0.0027898129,0.0044796607,0.0011856874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680645,0.02003273,0.0035848627,0.0029463805,0.004008853,0.0013627142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021564221,0.0008420985,0.0015453972,0.0031579742,0.0042916546,0.014356835,0.0031187763,0.01185703,0.01525609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048375785,0.00066792115,0.0013970208,0.0024001729,0.026147177,0.031563792,0.0042229,0.007402327,0.0029451433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019760637,0.000018456709,0.00025868704,0.0001575303,0.000028016027,0.0001532119,0.0008943844,0.00008379402,0.0001233726,0.9907873,0.0026057267,0.004869861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021226417,0.000011504526,0.00017698694,0.00026374927,0.000025946081,0.0003140966,0.0018198655,0.00038312434,0.00021280462,0.9519165,0.044835526,0.000018698458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008063248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089912256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021564221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040395027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11404383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599243124","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.513","title":"In view of an express regulation: Considering the scope and soundness of a contrario reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Soundness; Epistemology; Appeal; Scope (computer science); Silence; Practical reason; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.030553505790209132,"score_gpt":0.2339176565947959,"score_spread":0.20336415080458678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599243124","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04995339,0.0053087776,0.4896103,0.055117007,0.00078352133,0.00016212047,0.00010531407,0.00017492262,0.3987847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89035296,0.0015414221,0.08775142,0.004496489,0.0012960761,0.00029715925,0.000117980024,0.000102523845,0.014044006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823637,0.008697484,0.0010232353,0.0022801992,0.0045344154,0.0011009176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689997,0.020839019,0.0021729602,0.003229587,0.0041539394,0.00060473185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020682171,0.000547964,0.0011026731,0.003170209,0.0038730833,0.010218213,0.0025008328,0.0098905,0.0041645076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03506801,0.00064697576,0.001669297,0.0018674602,0.033299543,0.020614417,0.006402838,0.007981446,0.00081582373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035560909,0.000003704993,0.000057658966,0.000011763523,0.0000029442929,0.00003869645,0.0005510469,0.0002053984,0.00008433369,0.9980599,0.00014658346,0.00083434564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067353485,0.000008401708,0.000066825036,0.000035740086,0.00000894057,0.000046357705,0.00023510415,0.0015815457,0.00021122427,0.9922002,0.0055930554,0.000005913167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016120571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020682171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038136933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027201222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10937905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600275594","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1138","title":"Useful Advice and Good Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04805469277669199,"score_gpt":0.26024519275710234,"score_spread":0.21219049998041034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600275594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044005048,0.012709538,0.06563611,0.7551502,0.006923042,0.00008469645,0.000069203874,0.00027363197,0.15475304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60075146,0.01318374,0.10699042,0.17616187,0.009476389,0.00047131415,0.0001648177,0.0007145126,0.09208548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94843566,0.038135797,0.001747002,0.0020779655,0.008008739,0.0015947836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8980055,0.07749439,0.0038471087,0.0047786627,0.013138961,0.0027353761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038772807,0.00083364296,0.0010564805,0.0030061575,0.007022082,0.00975622,0.0020564632,0.010742863,0.011237851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11379403,0.0005557055,0.0008633943,0.0021920926,0.031315207,0.019912967,0.005752046,0.011413673,0.0037960652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017194492,0.000009050376,0.0000849344,0.000094654526,0.000009887762,0.00006313016,0.0024997317,0.00016512499,0.0000412792,0.9504822,0.03903485,0.007497937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017580414,0.0000087915105,0.00004851493,0.00026250095,0.000005872146,0.000058063386,0.0019484368,0.0004046319,0.00012988284,0.86347705,0.13362102,0.000017647437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002692001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038772807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061693485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045771697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20505267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600870717","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3534","title":"Argumentation in Theory and Practice: Gap or Equilibrium?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relation (database); Reflective equilibrium; Line (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10142632431718962,"score_gpt":0.34787148445680494,"score_spread":0.24644516013961532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600870717","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059474263,0.011347189,0.56946015,0.14282736,0.0016833817,0.00028850298,0.00013698338,0.0004322779,0.2143499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95841974,0.001246109,0.034207456,0.0026246451,0.00046244133,0.00034175604,0.000058166523,0.00009759451,0.0025421106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8646447,0.09788937,0.007363046,0.00796424,0.017079195,0.00505944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84794825,0.11667723,0.006954102,0.011620613,0.013129095,0.0036707069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08367187,0.0011604042,0.0035299086,0.008263555,0.008931317,0.030162526,0.004992703,0.0118685905,0.00841357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10172763,0.0010531498,0.0020537544,0.0067310277,0.06782983,0.06754324,0.025049202,0.010588717,0.0014962038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015864647,0.000013108726,0.00017815283,0.000057601774,0.000013581325,0.00003196252,0.0022136176,0.00021476344,0.000028371505,0.994191,0.0002625839,0.0027793066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011512915,0.000007891045,0.000036237,0.000067788395,0.000005140416,0.000025352037,0.0011348514,0.0007212205,0.000042854637,0.9954202,0.0025219216,0.0000050845997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014104062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060681615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08367187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011282142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00836751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4425044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603968196","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2146","title":"Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Falsity; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Deontic logic; Informal logic; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.045659633876521305,"score_gpt":0.3730706715448779,"score_spread":0.32741103766835655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603968196","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041877054,0.0019731424,0.58129686,0.04139902,0.00027391574,0.00038362292,0.00026947624,0.0002672833,0.33225963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86055785,0.0011017697,0.11623176,0.0023097573,0.00031062722,0.0006578713,0.0001425112,0.00013030566,0.018557632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984665,0.0090891775,0.00063401175,0.0013018335,0.0035097506,0.0008003795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881479,0.0077387677,0.00081277464,0.0013925106,0.0012283666,0.00067962246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014325263,0.0009611364,0.0011971844,0.004451574,0.005140333,0.013006177,0.0038494586,0.009453412,0.0065264404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013441881,0.0009755191,0.0015138404,0.0030580477,0.02698675,0.017206987,0.007919458,0.005295049,0.0020336467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029527216,0.0000070842652,0.000025886859,0.00001073718,0.0000019243746,0.000023415661,0.00050221785,0.00022258151,0.000040465387,0.9985707,0.0001011997,0.00049082056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015201898,0.0000051409042,0.000022865346,0.000020073207,0.000003984695,0.00003401898,0.00018478544,0.0027939223,0.00006207319,0.9933374,0.0035157616,0.0000048247834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023268303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018969886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014325263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066612344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048338235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075760126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607463045","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1042","title":"Revisiting Deep Disagreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016928815428571078,"score_gpt":0.24567812148776666,"score_spread":0.22874930605919558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607463045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06690376,0.008525915,0.3950745,0.07316737,0.0013701965,0.00013638592,0.00029030666,0.00028771773,0.45424387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94718355,0.0015536591,0.031628117,0.0047361474,0.0006310886,0.0001289589,0.00012497407,0.00014830258,0.013865221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845195,0.009565313,0.0005724431,0.0015319298,0.0028111052,0.0009996985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851643,0.009195639,0.0009451791,0.00264989,0.0015268426,0.0005181961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013103494,0.00070685137,0.0009045195,0.003056272,0.0053356783,0.011387995,0.0024867994,0.005335023,0.007015535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021997543,0.0005112577,0.0013365542,0.0022374943,0.028991368,0.022206116,0.010123868,0.009155212,0.0011369728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005325304,0.000004458667,0.000076128665,0.000022777758,0.0000030811675,0.00003093919,0.0016155016,0.00015049517,0.000057501657,0.9952382,0.00048978126,0.0023057049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006237025,0.0000040467758,0.00005998852,0.000046640358,0.0000037787208,0.000022083448,0.0005213327,0.0005678291,0.000059004833,0.98357403,0.015130742,0.000004300423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026052191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002480937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013103494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069985446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031554818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069298744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608791421","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1135","title":"The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Function (biology); Principal (computer security); Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025871970033994482,"score_gpt":0.23430204422266906,"score_spread":0.2084300741886746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608791421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048576132,0.03285809,0.47878227,0.092555866,0.0050437963,0.00017355487,0.0002299211,0.00026514963,0.38523382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6436035,0.0347087,0.23167698,0.027547896,0.007775602,0.0013565299,0.00054462714,0.0004730749,0.052313074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98513436,0.01011699,0.00081361824,0.000994401,0.002446715,0.00049401534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858512,0.010153331,0.00074935926,0.0017444273,0.001094002,0.00040769688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012087396,0.0009947773,0.001684305,0.0026861746,0.003924292,0.016302945,0.0026832572,0.006924987,0.00695314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01984688,0.0006439099,0.0015101504,0.0032510816,0.034680005,0.022305747,0.0045180097,0.0073303175,0.0029345625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004254072,0.000005107817,0.000055696964,0.000092272705,0.000009297349,0.000031448923,0.00052219565,0.00015317126,0.000029402263,0.9926172,0.0017143581,0.0047656046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055619826,0.000004226518,0.000028428194,0.00012776478,0.0000049311125,0.000063660926,0.00027032048,0.00042127672,0.000051363975,0.9663666,0.032650035,0.000005723028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012462912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009159519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016302945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038309563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041994154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06392497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609079276","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.536","title":"Cogency, Compactness and Microstructure","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04873003567549325,"score_gpt":0.2642242689700556,"score_spread":0.21549423329456233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609079276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10688199,0.012712072,0.08798584,0.022892723,0.00054740533,0.00011960737,0.00046493034,0.00050261157,0.76789284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582951,0.0012376606,0.013508256,0.0012581848,0.0005701141,0.0001352627,0.00022246817,0.00013547274,0.024637405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.00090207503,0.000098653,0.00059507124,0.00037093286,0.00018260644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975044,0.0013988243,0.00023928015,0.0004785852,0.00026159958,0.00011736648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019548861,0.00043976243,0.00077442697,0.0015303858,0.002757545,0.004672202,0.0008830417,0.0018059355,0.008457639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045206593,0.00046529618,0.000837985,0.0013671585,0.021936482,0.007316868,0.0030416343,0.002074162,0.0011382478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056993554,0.000002523205,0.0000987167,0.000013017122,0.0000033688211,0.000012897506,0.00019627534,0.00012880255,0.000040002593,0.99733114,0.00079338124,0.0013742858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006812327,0.0000062808685,0.00028088255,0.000011237082,0.0000030949102,0.000031162806,0.00006487749,0.00023283096,0.0000561598,0.9870925,0.012211151,0.0000029978426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015242326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012573543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008457639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036394622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010660756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02829361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615233463","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2843","title":"Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03834399691533259,"score_gpt":0.3009816324172429,"score_spread":0.2626376355019103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1615233463","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0145718455,0.025329424,0.6781872,0.03923881,0.001088121,0.00037162311,0.0002985042,0.00025464877,0.24065988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7264186,0.009633155,0.23407418,0.0029082866,0.0019670534,0.001081373,0.0002771544,0.0003426064,0.023297662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725065,0.022574274,0.00078742555,0.0010858512,0.002458825,0.00058709405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981662,0.014341842,0.0011852032,0.0012255552,0.0010367185,0.0005486487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019076733,0.0016014101,0.0015576681,0.012920673,0.00859251,0.027204419,0.0049765054,0.008544052,0.0053059654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013559593,0.0007855143,0.0020494976,0.008538185,0.05985555,0.018872466,0.007358957,0.0059102676,0.0012195151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059913923,0.000007274115,0.000045224606,0.00008881103,0.00000816899,0.000077116,0.009141374,0.00028409422,0.000082048,0.9875732,0.00044196448,0.0022446723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013022774,0.000008355808,0.000062452105,0.00015090447,0.0000072198827,0.000090403555,0.0032359185,0.001220572,0.00014326561,0.95509064,0.039968286,0.000008981598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028936944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025467554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027204419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01129444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051985113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10088861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616088548","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2145","title":"The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Critical Thinking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Computer science; Section (typography); Class (philosophy); Computer-Assisted Instruction; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","score_opus":0.03466845958281332,"score_gpt":0.35108767952085806,"score_spread":0.3164192199380447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616088548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99848324,0.00013794133,0.00014894118,0.000054360302,0.000009346898,0.000028263492,0.0000105715335,0.00003273695,0.0010945869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980927,0.0001022015,0.0010382093,0.000039564893,0.000018336568,0.00004083433,0.000055326032,0.000003925589,0.0006088049],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867415,0.00069190806,0.00009040613,0.00014840686,0.0002905585,0.00010460475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923194,0.0050931056,0.0006108988,0.00040465506,0.0006342754,0.0009376378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011224455,0.000375751,0.00021477693,0.00041702148,0.00021832468,0.0004908092,0.00044656135,0.00042721484,0.0017174213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014092734,0.00016231008,0.00014593254,0.00029172836,0.00037754737,0.00031232447,0.00039568264,0.00036004905,0.00036644266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010658634,0.02268083,0.062180217,0.000350219,0.00021258452,0.0002589655,0.0021978884,0.0020846135,0.022032352,0.00026636422,0.002953019,0.8741243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008308751,0.08346548,0.8347972,0.00027314652,0.0003817881,0.002219738,0.0018061975,0.012449975,0.040847916,0.0017182006,0.013538495,0.00019315328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001027087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013398742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017174213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030239107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004463375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005936146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616217205","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.3395","title":"The Pragmatic and Dialectical Dynamics of an Illegitimate Argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dynamics (music); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03816774420360614,"score_gpt":0.23704771561142915,"score_spread":0.19887997140782301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616217205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09749562,0.0019456318,0.20530008,0.09396049,0.0005625887,0.00022079458,0.00011414399,0.0002150399,0.6001857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682644,0.00029129305,0.018533044,0.0019008191,0.00015423405,0.00017933588,0.000023294255,0.00012411647,0.010529561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755586,0.01661141,0.0005386875,0.0013563916,0.005102694,0.0008322288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977662,0.017318765,0.0010037747,0.0017052547,0.001677596,0.00063258334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019995935,0.0003882202,0.0005960808,0.0028832955,0.0065766308,0.014518464,0.0016657541,0.004131913,0.0049985712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03427901,0.000567979,0.00060971215,0.0017838182,0.057259727,0.022092713,0.008332736,0.0077266637,0.0006057864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070763617,0.0000047484077,0.00007465391,0.000014929087,0.0000024608607,0.000038182356,0.005952366,0.00007449098,0.00008957324,0.9922206,0.00042033772,0.001100657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012043997,0.000006919677,0.0001707422,0.00003449543,0.00000430444,0.000060706538,0.0034987149,0.0006999656,0.00017417358,0.9809429,0.014387498,0.0000075530156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002104385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018696621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019995935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008053827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039658984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105749905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1622591963","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3399","title":"“Reasonable Hostility”: Its Usefulness and Limitation as a Norm for Public Hearings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Explication; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Corollary; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.2847225877389229,"score_gpt":0.26489730686262597,"score_spread":0.019825280876296925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1622591963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37664384,0.0009984613,0.24404868,0.06126936,0.0006415982,0.0003539108,0.00014001675,0.00039294854,0.3155112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872935,0.000054787673,0.010423223,0.0009286667,0.00008522631,0.0001964411,0.000021629501,0.000040996834,0.0009557359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87400717,0.09906575,0.0061702323,0.004915807,0.0134865735,0.0023545262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75146925,0.16799706,0.02462948,0.032394916,0.01951407,0.003995299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05890464,0.00033825825,0.000656253,0.002825524,0.0069388123,0.011146983,0.001913149,0.004509022,0.002103339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18956025,0.0005068279,0.0005472706,0.0017682784,0.056195963,0.011231421,0.007296095,0.005967359,0.00028380082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004705701,0.00003995886,0.005035899,0.00006830841,0.000010981658,0.00011762768,0.057942156,0.00033710487,0.00046959304,0.9219083,0.0015642626,0.012458705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060013885,0.00020546459,0.01069081,0.00048263278,0.00004061916,0.000539248,0.0831748,0.006199989,0.0017679525,0.82875675,0.06792303,0.00015866477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037317788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027201972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05890464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051218965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051693763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31152117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1624665321","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2279","title":"The Lord Scroop Fallacy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.022825718122640858,"score_gpt":0.30025735022324473,"score_spread":0.2774316321006039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1624665321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013669751,0.009389936,0.07386743,0.3344261,0.009284891,0.00009328705,0.00020817944,0.00066961243,0.55839086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65217644,0.005762675,0.026285816,0.1593263,0.0061815456,0.00026478767,0.00021696047,0.001247361,0.14853808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99195683,0.002513665,0.00038075753,0.0014531378,0.0029794027,0.0007161362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026453,0.005268664,0.0005393787,0.0015654651,0.0017237994,0.00063823053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063186535,0.0006407519,0.0010004572,0.001795209,0.0071034334,0.006437291,0.0014699146,0.0056324494,0.017545465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027395757,0.0004790323,0.00073698245,0.0010565192,0.031586777,0.01143058,0.0074855606,0.014860437,0.0058893682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002375882,0.000008878412,0.00023090016,0.0000418297,0.0000065243416,0.00009123795,0.00084774935,0.00008283529,0.00005687038,0.9526778,0.036247894,0.009683763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015845177,0.000013635591,0.00017137273,0.000120218225,0.0000053010904,0.00017826165,0.00042304306,0.00029787968,0.00018740707,0.87867534,0.11989816,0.000013512856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038505686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035552601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017545465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039092717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003528547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058695436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1630653006","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1117","title":"The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Public sphere; Transactional leadership; Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.016406898815431125,"score_gpt":0.2624387704982772,"score_spread":0.24603187168284607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1630653006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11568328,0.0050401986,0.1562364,0.14603445,0.0010021342,0.00013683978,0.00013297326,0.00026820457,0.57546556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987421,0.0005789461,0.005620057,0.0015444702,0.00026062032,0.00012432152,0.000022633982,0.000068256806,0.004359895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94892555,0.03837409,0.0019294461,0.0026472139,0.0064804833,0.0016431643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87888515,0.08786148,0.009254312,0.015467359,0.0062522837,0.0022793715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033956375,0.00044157906,0.0007146158,0.002494297,0.00631525,0.022403134,0.0019779012,0.006407056,0.004707222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07961178,0.00067140645,0.00066020136,0.0022554102,0.08848862,0.027665146,0.0075499522,0.006697779,0.0009069463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007758314,0.0000062983045,0.00013065127,0.00001344147,0.0000025272927,0.000016534472,0.0023139697,0.00012798845,0.000026782103,0.99555546,0.0005361721,0.0012624118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016068432,0.000009287801,0.00012465515,0.00004266293,0.000002651763,0.00002278431,0.0016760051,0.0005208072,0.00009618321,0.98637086,0.01110952,0.000008420505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023749298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018300541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033956375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006959747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066968375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17958063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1631223529","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2846","title":"Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Pragmatics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028354455352918476,"score_gpt":0.3288622764609626,"score_spread":0.30050782110804414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1631223529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15635175,0.006006137,0.38556024,0.046609793,0.0010525694,0.00031092786,0.00031113136,0.00051097997,0.4032865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644274,0.00077772693,0.025993157,0.001361647,0.0005381488,0.00019131733,0.00011328066,0.00021470501,0.0063825776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98858005,0.006435788,0.00042239967,0.001247913,0.002551914,0.0007620206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98794776,0.009314555,0.0007082771,0.0009937879,0.0007950137,0.00024067152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012899854,0.0009085784,0.001007261,0.003048816,0.007747641,0.009280628,0.002648156,0.005851192,0.008312429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01977595,0.001344626,0.0013629678,0.0021171707,0.03893372,0.017976148,0.007051612,0.007447404,0.00077019446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002372881,0.0000061621645,0.00012801385,0.000057584704,0.000008007316,0.00017781678,0.006349057,0.00015714682,0.00045589847,0.9906459,0.00043806364,0.0015526306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027270607,0.000022932201,0.00060508004,0.00010602691,0.000024945617,0.00033546734,0.0037566514,0.0009828417,0.0007058781,0.97196555,0.021444203,0.000023236844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028814098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026180758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012899854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050436743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025354067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06822181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1633926454","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2130","title":"Mapping the Structure of Debate","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Contrast (vision); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.055940628033043206,"score_gpt":0.22791829979139186,"score_spread":0.17197767175834866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1633926454","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16608196,0.002792139,0.47596738,0.012660452,0.00041536643,0.0004013866,0.002571871,0.00091856584,0.33819088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89935434,0.0010986364,0.08719334,0.00037503982,0.000088222485,0.00027770936,0.0012091538,0.00037538563,0.01002809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941782,0.003615139,0.00019850014,0.0009689115,0.00070308574,0.0003362244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98620355,0.009439883,0.001070258,0.001875236,0.0010338492,0.00037715427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032694624,0.00049541506,0.00049030955,0.0056184055,0.0038738598,0.0116709275,0.0015040111,0.0020963915,0.014037667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022919765,0.0005506077,0.0007033378,0.0072211833,0.007926793,0.01845583,0.005269196,0.0022243601,0.0022815056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003870475,0.000013185228,0.0013073771,0.00009180004,0.000009930944,0.000075795695,0.011383762,0.0012852002,0.0005027381,0.9615894,0.0016207617,0.02208132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011276652,0.000011195397,0.0009562196,0.00010394847,0.000010762021,0.00007574797,0.0056450353,0.003245866,0.0005479199,0.94089997,0.04847917,0.00001287721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003484305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002200582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014037667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040972508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022662436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046960652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636038418","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3298","title":"Critical Thinking in Moral Argumentation Contexts: A Virtue Ethical Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Criticism; Deliberation; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09585343320322942,"score_gpt":0.3224022864574426,"score_spread":0.2265488532542132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636038418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021420708,0.010096535,0.40902933,0.11427248,0.002134996,0.00025046986,0.000048695565,0.00018081177,0.4425659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89802676,0.002086186,0.078886926,0.005864763,0.002441533,0.0005760356,0.000030363899,0.00012048848,0.011966885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96789604,0.026859254,0.00058703416,0.0009435078,0.0028821323,0.0008320244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656862,0.027170733,0.0015259596,0.0017301978,0.002384503,0.0015023556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02332071,0.000977932,0.0009666225,0.005199412,0.008501092,0.015240396,0.0025242823,0.009070334,0.0035452617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022054225,0.0006124732,0.0010222436,0.002129363,0.080130436,0.014524095,0.00882515,0.009262884,0.0008048302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024248013,0.0000062055556,0.000027585153,0.000017557884,0.0000017432009,0.000022727529,0.0011662486,0.00009670292,0.000017566877,0.99739516,0.0004036023,0.0008425728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102204085,0.000004301506,0.000024983268,0.000056577428,0.0000017641212,0.00002992756,0.00072604953,0.00052303466,0.00003291096,0.9854219,0.013163897,0.0000043971263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009399909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089199666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02332071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007320751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004800253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123333156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636256915","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2232","title":"Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Constructive; Philosophy; Metaphilosophy; Ordinary language philosophy; Argument map; Western philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.05550613182209997,"score_gpt":0.32654661092785064,"score_spread":0.2710404791057507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636256915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061344035,0.011580166,0.2577101,0.12676167,0.0016777789,0.00024980694,0.0001572212,0.00022784737,0.54029137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468802,0.0019840372,0.025448253,0.007135674,0.0007720809,0.0002890225,0.000043497428,0.00015055244,0.017296607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874263,0.008542927,0.00031195517,0.0007037514,0.0022166243,0.0007984407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98000926,0.01484351,0.00089586445,0.001395096,0.0022790728,0.0005772321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015174341,0.00060562557,0.0008573981,0.0040813773,0.005558709,0.01024645,0.0017683249,0.004702303,0.0047765053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026658878,0.0005290451,0.0011782494,0.001766279,0.045786295,0.013678396,0.006505952,0.006732275,0.0007112463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004712207,0.0000052204855,0.00004720584,0.000020989619,0.0000025915567,0.000023177001,0.0013758177,0.000057213227,0.000024106086,0.996854,0.00073924515,0.0008456921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009414227,0.000007663207,0.00008532167,0.000057002428,0.0000052764526,0.000031378513,0.00094518304,0.00039678262,0.00006996696,0.98554057,0.012845108,0.0000063989114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023341319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002052039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015174341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070262994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036249992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08025056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1637573926","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2270","title":"Tindale's Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1011740871062094,"score_gpt":0.2666673883782389,"score_spread":0.1654933012720295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1637573926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007982789,0.0056147263,0.13569583,0.03131481,0.0016800006,0.00012236451,0.00008248938,0.00012739073,0.8173795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6650393,0.008024941,0.110782616,0.010607117,0.0017410681,0.0008083263,0.00015651697,0.0002537642,0.20258646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463475,0.0037721407,0.0001422614,0.0003171308,0.0009105836,0.00022315384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542624,0.003314755,0.00027762094,0.00036599796,0.00040799894,0.00020744838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004446106,0.0008158626,0.0004991626,0.0026641695,0.004266291,0.010844953,0.0019791357,0.0047086943,0.003828315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008781379,0.00044879832,0.00082253217,0.002050604,0.024863558,0.0129281245,0.003179493,0.0070640864,0.000961473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022147722,0.0000028380746,0.000016021204,0.000012936596,9.270544e-7,0.000027876291,0.0017992342,0.00006880249,0.000028288507,0.99447256,0.0019161517,0.001652149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769482,0.00001722871,0.00009703482,0.00017008749,0.0000069299485,0.00014677623,0.0019001447,0.001599193,0.00018181956,0.8571857,0.13867171,0.000011598521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002689342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003988827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010844953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042122426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035933312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030562103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1643224460","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.594","title":"Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Deadlock; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06648932866527402,"score_gpt":0.25117269335870934,"score_spread":0.18468336469343533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1643224460","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22297047,0.013547585,0.53022075,0.033066407,0.00088182243,0.0002799752,0.0002193207,0.00027136435,0.19854234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96612865,0.0010144381,0.029353587,0.0005474012,0.00021862132,0.00022727081,0.00010603228,0.000087031236,0.0023169974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95392203,0.031591292,0.0027012299,0.0027291772,0.007846793,0.0012095391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92061985,0.061469633,0.005606027,0.005830377,0.0051772217,0.0012968444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030536663,0.0010940097,0.0012056838,0.0069142524,0.004432593,0.01886101,0.0027604604,0.006647939,0.004010539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10374902,0.0007938433,0.00088726415,0.005280174,0.037582237,0.044110917,0.01053164,0.006895634,0.00058753433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025502155,0.0000159803,0.00046627762,0.00010965481,0.000010955806,0.00008101809,0.01531217,0.00025305327,0.00019645732,0.9771895,0.00028554728,0.006053889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020172678,0.000015497226,0.00034156188,0.00017921849,0.000013664012,0.00016734483,0.0061137313,0.0014890615,0.0003173915,0.98092264,0.01039903,0.000020646685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044385222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003224737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030536663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036067017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017964303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16149527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644372274","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.475","title":"Dissent in the Midst of Emotional Territory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dissent; Mode (computer interface); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Emotional expression; Emotion work; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.0811437570006583,"score_gpt":0.2765939359898808,"score_spread":0.1954501789892225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1644372274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1795332,0.0016717741,0.0915627,0.013099415,0.0010766443,0.00010709311,0.000067109766,0.000108878594,0.7127732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97118247,0.00022447928,0.008201626,0.0007511277,0.00018545904,0.00005211339,0.000030691062,0.000037793845,0.019334272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99036145,0.0062747435,0.00028122962,0.00086056185,0.0015352655,0.00068673695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896708,0.006632116,0.0011398402,0.00085433206,0.0010715519,0.00063141977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076042134,0.00042127058,0.00037427447,0.0021017722,0.00498515,0.0065262667,0.0010743564,0.0018109427,0.0062365523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01830042,0.00015858283,0.0005046233,0.0010782075,0.013521014,0.0085401265,0.008430893,0.002690611,0.00090647326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056760375,0.000017067034,0.00065196323,0.000052172207,0.000007986656,0.0002438468,0.028650638,0.00019336247,0.00068128726,0.9558054,0.0015510522,0.0120884925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033713157,0.000059172045,0.002710841,0.0002182577,0.000019978575,0.0004834009,0.051777486,0.0027305288,0.003114574,0.8200151,0.11878365,0.0000534264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005268543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088713906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076042134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019177217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040215373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1646694252","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.487","title":"Harry J. Gensler - Historical Dictionary of Logic","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0919264655692047,"score_gpt":0.22355356220171838,"score_spread":0.13162709663251368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1646694252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014456026,0.1277103,0.020931857,0.04945261,0.012041032,0.00011856749,0.008749017,0.0015976247,0.77795345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03442877,0.10542564,0.024737585,0.020848133,0.006578723,0.0003050484,0.009736723,0.0019231592,0.79601616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989594,0.000240604,0.00013442567,0.00019329977,0.00039406156,0.00007821846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979038,0.00087545015,0.00016574589,0.0002942157,0.00061821594,0.00014254042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008083555,0.00080677326,0.0009716233,0.0041502425,0.0022571126,0.0068010315,0.0010950445,0.0015763066,0.08644876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039705685,0.00044985887,0.00055019086,0.005427322,0.002557262,0.0082681915,0.0017426478,0.0032768522,0.047310703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020984713,0.000012862488,0.0001259783,0.00031660192,0.000006376642,0.00009274231,0.0008617885,0.00019960826,0.0001921854,0.29932618,0.61529464,0.08355018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017942112,0.0000025447364,0.00009313965,0.0002281581,0.0000010075051,0.0000821583,0.00009301236,0.000059825612,0.000023469373,0.018050281,0.9813596,0.000004997199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004869797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008702717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08644876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003251621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040605636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658006387","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3099","title":"Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Tautology (logic); Philosophy; Key (lock); Terminology; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.039994743030757694,"score_gpt":0.24947606329092012,"score_spread":0.20948132026016242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1658006387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015750013,0.011584218,0.12306657,0.12970582,0.0040296065,0.00025719812,0.00047459517,0.00031198087,0.71481997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7691148,0.0074379398,0.057357702,0.05575791,0.004318844,0.001336294,0.00041141975,0.00057659345,0.10368854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946247,0.0026645977,0.00026389165,0.00097107084,0.0010468055,0.0004288723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332374,0.0039033953,0.00067231606,0.00066544156,0.0012214163,0.0002135961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054647946,0.001037565,0.0005183931,0.0035306634,0.0038165022,0.0055119502,0.0020947084,0.005424877,0.00628557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016332213,0.0004633205,0.0010811161,0.002389842,0.027145788,0.010902615,0.0027304876,0.0054894513,0.0016296493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010138853,0.0000046571054,0.00005278488,0.000033144584,0.0000034314169,0.000019824914,0.0011432049,0.000046092115,0.00004205216,0.9874851,0.009345237,0.0018143082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015420655,0.000016012129,0.00015841144,0.00016925161,0.000012913866,0.00011270083,0.00048546548,0.00046447146,0.00048054077,0.8043766,0.19369194,0.00001628606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031549553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023630476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007912777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007912777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036103176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057411432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658744261","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3493","title":"The Irrelevance of Relevance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criticism; Relevance theory; Epistemology; State (computer science); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Cognition; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.011024363025027918,"score_gpt":0.22095443507664947,"score_spread":0.20993007205162156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1658744261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0427359,0.013709615,0.25550285,0.1749676,0.0021462063,0.00015493392,0.00034423286,0.0007393556,0.5096993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938669,0.0028330672,0.02514716,0.012249802,0.0030259264,0.00028205663,0.00015655816,0.0003652901,0.017271124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9507263,0.022068705,0.002651117,0.0087555805,0.013802728,0.0019955307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9192719,0.0552377,0.0029946452,0.012550745,0.008313165,0.0016318694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033665884,0.0008239072,0.00214085,0.003935002,0.0066062054,0.012664664,0.0030845234,0.006664315,0.008836039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09835794,0.0011041884,0.002232845,0.0015632451,0.05744782,0.028525194,0.011897806,0.013385468,0.0019219411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015583662,0.000007960061,0.0001244407,0.00005388732,0.000012390916,0.00004744097,0.000656802,0.00016917204,0.00009902089,0.9942193,0.0016003161,0.0029937287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008097673,0.0000053117838,0.00005362947,0.000027147526,0.000005466977,0.000034983063,0.00007892906,0.00023080104,0.00007485014,0.9937477,0.005726604,0.000006443006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019935416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010753506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033665884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065109567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00320213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17804432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663699010","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2266","title":"How Philosophical is Informal Logic?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Philosophy of logic; Epistemology; Proposition; Mainstream; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08901164352835382,"score_gpt":0.26421813869440863,"score_spread":0.1752064951660548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663699010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018086595,0.02362674,0.09289654,0.59542406,0.0035145497,0.00006685816,0.00016480935,0.00028098328,0.26593885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88265526,0.016872143,0.016453508,0.058489002,0.0048678275,0.00022594935,0.00015902678,0.0002327379,0.020044515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927583,0.0045062792,0.000256739,0.0006853638,0.0012135284,0.00057988166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98482877,0.010077367,0.0010726922,0.0010689932,0.0020741066,0.00087807624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092072515,0.00046450764,0.0005366998,0.0028528746,0.0047594174,0.013501865,0.0013977428,0.0050520827,0.008001897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025724575,0.000320113,0.0005539678,0.0025113598,0.03781256,0.024625517,0.0038581444,0.0049736584,0.0017127801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006139599,0.0000066183875,0.00013667262,0.000043855587,0.0000059698023,0.00003448067,0.0017638165,0.00007287941,0.000026948212,0.9895838,0.0043090875,0.004009784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005991395,0.000004097045,0.000105231156,0.000076860815,0.000003272264,0.000051558032,0.002228787,0.00017392424,0.000040518604,0.961601,0.03570295,0.0000057415837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048154504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026482833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013501865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004948803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039036514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04869318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1670752956","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.441","title":"Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Dialogical self; Philosophy; Humanism; Pragmatics; Political philosophy; Politics; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19647837320115435,"score_gpt":0.361436787770259,"score_spread":0.16495841456910465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1670752956","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00959692,0.025707401,0.44591922,0.09321003,0.0021912782,0.000402853,0.00023199827,0.00035209348,0.42238826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7129349,0.014934301,0.20590879,0.021107774,0.004468462,0.0019391879,0.00024730893,0.0003011738,0.038158104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98341054,0.00959472,0.00079017057,0.0011898614,0.0043359967,0.0006787204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985241,0.011047568,0.0008761723,0.0011638111,0.0012894612,0.00038190352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021075867,0.0008251761,0.0012268965,0.0037894913,0.0039063427,0.009889152,0.0024047226,0.00584376,0.0053843274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012765453,0.00061338744,0.0012746176,0.0016980682,0.055143807,0.007859283,0.0043814043,0.007484951,0.0023161033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022651145,0.0000045755787,0.000028792401,0.00005870368,0.000005409447,0.000018410852,0.0006478918,0.00022690649,0.000019632389,0.99673766,0.0007385251,0.0015111995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050168173,0.0000031663792,0.000023249218,0.000047088,0.0000013361824,0.00002012029,0.000077194454,0.00015935043,0.00002626399,0.98622185,0.013412691,0.0000027667788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013029869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000893888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021075867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049125287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038061047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1114611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1671099834","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2907","title":"Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Generalitat de Catalunya; Harvard University","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046309208453305294,"score_gpt":0.42664405091087193,"score_spread":0.38033484245756666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1671099834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795401,0.00036227496,0.003047768,0.0010357688,0.000025417448,0.00007652645,0.000017037735,0.000033392575,0.015861763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696004,0.00015302257,0.002123375,0.00011477433,0.000012684111,0.00010495186,0.000021020098,0.000031045256,0.00047907908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660244,0.02379919,0.001233464,0.0018034038,0.005786875,0.0013526711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6505126,0.31751946,0.017354818,0.0053338124,0.0037711083,0.0055082585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022873277,0.00062872976,0.0007523954,0.0017236049,0.0020785055,0.009766774,0.0014777558,0.0025688282,0.0036965287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19240132,0.0006050438,0.0007397097,0.0010628313,0.00900851,0.008127646,0.008036209,0.0058496194,0.00040122468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0084469905,0.015210425,0.1379036,0.002340829,0.0006888242,0.0009687562,0.30475733,0.010207048,0.02932672,0.14755808,0.0026234435,0.33996803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00285391,0.0064979284,0.31441283,0.0017416958,0.0012088076,0.0010048578,0.123631336,0.03432333,0.025171367,0.472112,0.016493054,0.00054892036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007841323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059687323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022873277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017530859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021898928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12096691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681065072","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2265","title":"The Significance of Informal Logic for Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Soundness; Dialectic; Dialogical self; Conformity; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Sociology; Argumentation theory; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036903429975967746,"score_gpt":0.25780920466722357,"score_spread":0.22090577469125583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1681065072","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014207595,0.055993155,0.44693315,0.13704288,0.0039591054,0.00013277761,0.00021890762,0.00067518227,0.34083718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75406086,0.029067295,0.13928999,0.027151642,0.011973799,0.00062413426,0.00029427322,0.00047272077,0.03706528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913611,0.0054150065,0.00044078325,0.0007915974,0.0015372087,0.00045432392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97475034,0.0191146,0.0011637701,0.0024012835,0.0016722983,0.00089765445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009835204,0.0007830447,0.0010140255,0.0024028565,0.004738831,0.012955957,0.0018556932,0.0038442672,0.006399769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014891303,0.0005009861,0.0011835345,0.0021819614,0.030854272,0.019754203,0.0052774777,0.008596792,0.0016325962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004587381,0.0000041439625,0.00003961555,0.000035936017,0.000002510149,0.000023086222,0.00029653663,0.0001582556,0.000029591016,0.9953093,0.0009765986,0.003119812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045536203,0.000003933118,0.000023962906,0.000036282356,0.0000019643744,0.000022646207,0.00006373839,0.00037131523,0.000026482814,0.98054916,0.01889163,0.0000042195793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015400948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006358699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012955957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064461417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052014112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689147215","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.462","title":"Walton on Argument Structure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Sound (geography); Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.04954695645961323,"score_gpt":0.2313382921791176,"score_spread":0.18179133571950437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689147215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019244326,0.014335696,0.13467686,0.121811405,0.002259457,0.00016181309,0.00019223974,0.00020401653,0.70711416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821974,0.0062078694,0.04248484,0.02686808,0.002263461,0.00048057607,0.00016234421,0.00027190548,0.09928689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937244,0.0038314224,0.0002116759,0.0007421985,0.0011884314,0.00030188332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920861,0.005773328,0.00033954356,0.0006618155,0.0009157108,0.00022342762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062245186,0.00057217426,0.0005798742,0.0032969746,0.004242008,0.0075365975,0.0011437867,0.00392963,0.010765842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016326813,0.0003857132,0.0007022661,0.0022167652,0.018501535,0.010514232,0.004475298,0.0055974526,0.0019565625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038774638,0.000002431806,0.000052392308,0.000017971272,0.0000023624784,0.000014569244,0.00071387633,0.00006641401,0.000026815167,0.99306595,0.0029386508,0.0030947186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008016462,0.0000074486993,0.000097906974,0.00011686581,0.000005203111,0.000028620496,0.00033382326,0.00030628176,0.00011129698,0.9268366,0.07214208,0.000005873342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020739825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00205356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010765842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057919016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025383665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04202342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689471221","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2905","title":"What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Production (economics); Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medical education; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Economics; Medicine; Epistemology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.026400168314241034,"score_gpt":0.32614158064133686,"score_spread":0.29974141232709584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689471221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8637109,0.012009256,0.042002082,0.010517621,0.00019234653,0.00014930943,0.00012855623,0.00022813238,0.071061835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076414,0.0013916219,0.0069338223,0.0002510651,0.00005547155,0.000032725125,0.000049856193,0.000021537813,0.0004997065],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918034,0.0043013613,0.0005985173,0.0013146584,0.0013521953,0.0006298915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233881,0.045142464,0.017405627,0.006115416,0.005490441,0.0024579698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009617384,0.00034656157,0.0004925463,0.0033179575,0.00095000066,0.0069105434,0.0010483804,0.0023297465,0.001791067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06164502,0.00042707313,0.00050067675,0.0016691962,0.0067598224,0.008180099,0.002579651,0.0016101771,0.00045520868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016472497,0.0005809963,0.32434174,0.0014879248,0.00017385786,0.0018391644,0.061549418,0.0007993199,0.0063649807,0.14319524,0.0024702116,0.45703238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046821173,0.0007314772,0.43280476,0.002275673,0.00022795316,0.012639385,0.03615192,0.005767229,0.0065460205,0.4605249,0.04206894,0.00021499589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010510915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083281635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009617384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010931715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017876994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050862193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1698395421","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2243","title":"Why Percy can't think: A response to Bailin","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Generalization; Epistemology; Psychology; Logical reasoning; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04178418691770262,"score_gpt":0.34212966921822574,"score_spread":0.3003454823005231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1698395421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020228334,0.0024130023,0.00012925199,0.99182266,0.0050526876,0.0000050469052,0.000008737803,0.000012046581,0.00035432036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004552358,0.002561334,0.0005797092,0.9833662,0.006175835,0.000053729247,0.000013018782,0.000044268563,0.0026535278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885825,0.0051946836,0.00087847747,0.0021024682,0.0024713015,0.0007706164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94343084,0.040813528,0.001854753,0.00079769193,0.008402281,0.0047007687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015585315,0.0017301983,0.0016484068,0.0015125053,0.011164252,0.011227779,0.0046182047,0.038361453,0.005683503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055194438,0.0011108483,0.0014005617,0.0020141168,0.015633145,0.022122145,0.006284882,0.06891486,0.0021567128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040173723,0.000022868608,0.00023161148,0.00010014676,0.000010274174,0.00020963943,0.0034138223,0.000037484653,0.00007426706,0.0131588215,0.9763861,0.0063148555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011083703,0.00008689416,0.0009063979,0.0011562543,0.000025878162,0.0010265537,0.020896962,0.00052233395,0.00047475396,0.042294286,0.9323336,0.0001652001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018827293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019985288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038361453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071754623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010713748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082424045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702479143","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2282","title":"Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049566897329281025,"score_gpt":0.2604724410737302,"score_spread":0.21090554374444917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1702479143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005895599,0.014370591,0.2097745,0.07778518,0.0018452442,0.0001725133,0.00029141913,0.00032768602,0.6895373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68349254,0.013838109,0.102890335,0.024790261,0.0044031343,0.0008878452,0.00025712381,0.00051213236,0.16892855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99123794,0.0046308185,0.00038284253,0.00097104255,0.0022028354,0.00057449663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940426,0.003988362,0.00035478538,0.00072956353,0.0006799198,0.00020470905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065051443,0.0009805985,0.0009413522,0.0024025126,0.0041116765,0.013091635,0.0017774437,0.005241168,0.0059955395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853878,0.0006238335,0.0011724008,0.0022801014,0.03302226,0.014066947,0.00331134,0.006093737,0.002007373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022295342,0.000002181013,0.000012758204,0.0000138771,0.0000019311926,0.000011396261,0.00019547642,0.000097344404,0.000014246766,0.9962,0.0023142612,0.0011343439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071961213,0.0000037872212,0.000023476392,0.000038273483,0.0000033988342,0.000024022143,0.00012835958,0.00033732803,0.000048355458,0.94807327,0.051306587,0.000005787189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057379785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004364404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013091635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006198806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05939859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1705572361","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2132","title":"Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Fallacy; Inductive reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Inference; Computer science; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Statistical inference; Artificial intelligence; Deductive reasoning; Bayesian network; Causal inference; Machine learning; Bayesian statistics; Frequentist inference; Mathematics; Philosophy; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02421553473010509,"score_gpt":0.2506493351318307,"score_spread":0.2264338004017256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1705572361","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031993505,0.012844283,0.716218,0.054853655,0.0008830975,0.0001876089,0.0005296683,0.00070614455,0.18178405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.801852,0.006523453,0.16581245,0.008272458,0.0018145909,0.0005959428,0.00061507645,0.00025496192,0.014259188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870936,0.0070384117,0.00076917006,0.0014611833,0.0029736531,0.0006639114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742561,0.02003306,0.0016577607,0.0015119901,0.001965918,0.00057516876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01294412,0.0008917553,0.0012769962,0.0048825946,0.0040263617,0.006936966,0.0019765566,0.0040765405,0.006757857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03564003,0.00069088844,0.0013816403,0.0031160598,0.019224359,0.013775581,0.0044813547,0.00638596,0.0011266915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038065034,0.000004173512,0.00006356328,0.000023552106,0.000004202404,0.00002860645,0.00017895596,0.00030584252,0.0000223384,0.99625576,0.00070247846,0.0024066383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002460999,9.090306e-7,0.00001751615,0.000012548671,0.0000015540419,0.00001163943,0.000015947586,0.00048350752,0.000010343827,0.99784577,0.0015958138,0.0000018974647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030696895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017816678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01294412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005406992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002761311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068455875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1708143966","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1045","title":"Knowing when Disagreements are Deep","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12744490325380614,"score_gpt":0.4776130059217621,"score_spread":0.35016810266795595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1708143966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12754364,0.005237429,0.13041434,0.2636902,0.0032996412,0.00039710954,0.00034998523,0.0005087476,0.468559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963084,0.0010770377,0.012677531,0.011643245,0.0007609264,0.00016935014,0.00015334597,0.00014985574,0.010284711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9316621,0.03944131,0.0046738754,0.0061633,0.01198117,0.006078363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89114326,0.06809022,0.014766255,0.011177962,0.0104649225,0.0043573705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041069992,0.00056001026,0.001210027,0.0032497223,0.007736091,0.019999824,0.0020695105,0.012250187,0.011659577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14799292,0.0008540607,0.0011958743,0.002035037,0.030380778,0.036525358,0.016578158,0.0147317,0.0024150307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012191912,0.000054771226,0.002870282,0.00020951312,0.00007335332,0.0007513594,0.08699608,0.00037646168,0.0009799724,0.8564824,0.0105463965,0.040537477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021716576,0.000021987154,0.0010874538,0.0002246243,0.000025785359,0.00018624742,0.022105558,0.0006056717,0.0005090753,0.9289227,0.046229403,0.00005972039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014935924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001350643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041069992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053843968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058780056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21720153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1725914369","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3327","title":"What Hamblin’s Book Fallacies was About","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Literature; Art history; History; Art","score_opus":0.07473956202576132,"score_gpt":0.30722229117635264,"score_spread":0.23248272915059132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1725914369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017516525,0.05103808,0.018570883,0.21124902,0.009742047,0.00007419172,0.00025692146,0.0003120081,0.6912404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5731023,0.02521823,0.011495005,0.059767365,0.0036211968,0.00024684446,0.0004454197,0.0008537182,0.32524994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973284,0.0013601428,0.000093617695,0.000515142,0.00043754236,0.00026524646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982192,0.0010166164,0.00014707823,0.00014900393,0.00029701242,0.000171059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018711567,0.0005192816,0.00049063633,0.0015950067,0.008016528,0.009727433,0.00066015264,0.0029635034,0.008353061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006225138,0.00046836538,0.00035759344,0.0018918882,0.017948197,0.009969629,0.0018909862,0.00660378,0.0023597616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030788346,0.000017623932,0.00038251473,0.00009514786,0.0000057031957,0.00011332131,0.013475695,0.000061874176,0.0001358513,0.87416255,0.090736374,0.020782627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007781515,0.000021134265,0.0005050867,0.00046455784,0.000005272306,0.0002548777,0.004168698,0.00011448765,0.00020990196,0.18059021,0.81364053,0.000017419821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009879864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012349767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009879864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009316202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003442572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06759411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1736649079","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3758","title":"Less Ado, More Done: Verbal and Visual Antithesis in the Media.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antithesis; Argumentative; Opposition (politics); Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05678531341418642,"score_gpt":0.2571573719619091,"score_spread":0.20037205854772266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1736649079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08761114,0.007922,0.037763357,0.03435945,0.0017350836,0.0000545608,0.00012225838,0.00017121484,0.83026093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775587,0.0007730149,0.0042633186,0.0010021345,0.00030033715,0.000044442335,0.00003569653,0.000084663996,0.015937718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957366,0.0029632237,0.00013498058,0.00029749973,0.00066184095,0.0002058069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893903,0.007861453,0.0009031329,0.00086687325,0.0007072589,0.00027091184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035601046,0.00042167556,0.00023381147,0.0022371314,0.0044687977,0.010790735,0.00068784197,0.002377271,0.0051320195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01594356,0.00026797928,0.00030472627,0.0014820294,0.029182918,0.013460131,0.0037199426,0.0031806824,0.00064696214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049421727,0.0000086497,0.00024153083,0.00006043842,0.0000034513394,0.00019592603,0.039461453,0.000049303802,0.0003506006,0.9480041,0.0022699137,0.009305075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056227873,0.000089695466,0.0017141927,0.0006919409,0.00003271686,0.0011133528,0.06210521,0.0011769234,0.0024477055,0.611305,0.31922784,0.000039215178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016344828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018996006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010790735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023880885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011377812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018827915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740547630","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.444","title":"Formal Logic for Informal Logicians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Modal logic; Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Calculus (dental); Modal","score_opus":0.03675715526480909,"score_gpt":0.25258832785109453,"score_spread":0.21583117258628542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740547630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00496442,0.055412658,0.7224747,0.03106472,0.0029648459,0.0002171366,0.0012677859,0.00196369,0.17967011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3104651,0.040615708,0.5711634,0.01189193,0.009563868,0.001420848,0.003168609,0.001110879,0.050599683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676454,0.0015202705,0.00033534295,0.00049960945,0.0006931345,0.00018718836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474335,0.0034464165,0.00027250857,0.00079765037,0.000551005,0.00018899028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005545379,0.0015508374,0.0011871317,0.0031549942,0.0022328089,0.007161734,0.0015061192,0.002123628,0.015601953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072097094,0.00086010614,0.0014207013,0.0033521517,0.007937067,0.012095473,0.0034231741,0.008303903,0.0053109983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051042357,0.000010720739,0.00004681943,0.000100465426,0.000008305339,0.000049643724,0.00028038153,0.00032166694,0.00020123184,0.98137707,0.005964859,0.011633679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010832883,0.000005535529,0.00004657452,0.00009205615,0.000005064769,0.00007373382,0.00005024902,0.00096418837,0.00008822131,0.9337627,0.06489362,0.000007075709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016935235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010273444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015601953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004420785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023826156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05219376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1760838892","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1039","title":"Introduction: Deep Disagreement Re-examined","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05390979412536434,"score_gpt":0.260394562558912,"score_spread":0.20648476843354768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1760838892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025968863,0.011622046,0.120144516,0.37851202,0.018245768,0.000225621,0.0011565557,0.0006035269,0.44352108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79704547,0.004398333,0.025995905,0.061232917,0.0123351,0.00043068142,0.000867773,0.0010307045,0.09666316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881612,0.005789499,0.0006021785,0.002068222,0.002539122,0.0008397955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527939,0.029734746,0.001880083,0.006518103,0.008082347,0.000990761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012057682,0.000751495,0.00081828714,0.0034261525,0.0060311635,0.0106648905,0.0031967028,0.006468967,0.031745993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045960065,0.00043074592,0.0010425404,0.0029972787,0.018785713,0.016288942,0.0066510383,0.013548059,0.0047329627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028704057,0.000011920436,0.00019681996,0.00014787783,0.000009346896,0.00004474401,0.0045968667,0.00010028536,0.00015780669,0.95771956,0.025229154,0.011756912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016766475,0.000012970046,0.00045486746,0.00055166695,0.00001522467,0.000120216784,0.0037973265,0.0006732199,0.0004749572,0.81189156,0.1819647,0.000026543967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025491829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021437735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031745993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059353695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004805742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10620093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1783745092","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4078","title":"The Virtues of Argumentation from an Amoral Analyst’s Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Duty; Lexicon; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.032270908990052694,"score_gpt":0.28723509559999183,"score_spread":0.25496418660993914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1783745092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1186489,0.0066159316,0.19703259,0.0928282,0.00063964486,0.000115274015,0.00017973766,0.0004659071,0.58347386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857099,0.00046001506,0.009453762,0.0010970943,0.00017546753,0.000054266045,0.000029976847,0.000060729315,0.0029588162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969086,0.025100188,0.0009106944,0.0010746662,0.0027970183,0.0010314237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97053033,0.02120035,0.0021305734,0.002557232,0.0027566175,0.0008249927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019960007,0.00046875325,0.00076339016,0.0039783283,0.0071702185,0.018339198,0.0012454257,0.0054054568,0.0026398217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021340128,0.00048839755,0.0008539586,0.0019906112,0.045325514,0.01447522,0.0043635443,0.003964094,0.0006127365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009192006,0.0000055566547,0.00024048811,0.000037373684,0.000005280891,0.000063990294,0.010494542,0.000087981534,0.0001639053,0.9864994,0.0005610797,0.0018312741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028088361,0.000024936035,0.0007607869,0.0001688917,0.000019651257,0.00044639618,0.012278805,0.0012350226,0.00053092313,0.9050484,0.07943,0.000028079254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033401058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025719674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019960007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005591987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038641104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105559826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784944028","doi":"","title":"Review of F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds) (2008). Controversy and Confrontation. Amsterdam: John Benjamis.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04287864016755116,"score_gpt":0.39562796665687755,"score_spread":0.3527493264893264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1784944028","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000381048,0.99268156,0.000115973555,0.004303583,0.0014865199,0.0000016903188,0.000058588426,0.0000047532694,0.001309254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009465156,0.9935727,0.0001631414,0.0015671959,0.00149337,0.000005389052,0.000113321825,0.000007779093,0.0021307208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886656,0.00028648242,0.00013431425,0.00016902496,0.00044976085,0.00009392801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475044,0.0027800535,0.00048625114,0.00016900354,0.0014982955,0.0003160556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025192772,0.0015291286,0.0022004177,0.0077317148,0.00088545255,0.002910812,0.0020388598,0.0023188265,0.017842228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063881692,0.0007913893,0.0008419986,0.010464537,0.0018375884,0.0039629475,0.001771672,0.002832247,0.009891827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051814033,0.00002391176,0.00026482562,0.008170669,0.00008459751,0.00010355046,0.00025427697,0.00023076672,0.00017091971,0.008495889,0.68188995,0.30025885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008227734,0.000014127468,0.0011174176,0.0051418166,0.00007159108,0.00036131547,0.00015398274,0.000045241493,0.000101818805,0.003672202,0.9892987,0.000013477939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010984058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024507787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017842228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002955367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00511577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05968821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785628550","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3146","title":"Scaring the Public: Fear Appeal Arguments in Public Health Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Fear appeal; Context (archaeology); Public health; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Medicine; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.16374594180265312,"score_gpt":0.41204267932287375,"score_spread":0.24829673752022063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785628550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06975729,0.0070840265,0.36128452,0.21328607,0.0016433998,0.0002586701,0.0001196521,0.0002770134,0.3462894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95045066,0.0012832342,0.0347094,0.007946678,0.00072197965,0.00021173476,0.000038792987,0.00009669161,0.0045407778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96282023,0.028096505,0.0010249391,0.0015907339,0.0051302435,0.0013373381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87008476,0.11671746,0.0045913775,0.003787668,0.0033994326,0.0014193259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03748173,0.0007395053,0.0010029108,0.0038272294,0.0047978438,0.010950024,0.0025391406,0.008500578,0.008791524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08206095,0.00062198,0.0019687542,0.0022181843,0.053097058,0.020539584,0.0069675692,0.009647414,0.0007278988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019727242,0.000014595133,0.00015847333,0.00004453411,0.00000806451,0.00006626854,0.0017462608,0.00023942362,0.000044694254,0.99470735,0.00074505596,0.0022055046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022623553,0.000007280695,0.00009053815,0.000054053624,0.000008578051,0.00003829333,0.00051155937,0.00077368564,0.00007595614,0.99436635,0.0040413765,0.000009723544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019372829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015337194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03748173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066775125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039055713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19822466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1789325687","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3332","title":"A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Analogy; Schema (genetic algorithms); Unitary state; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.041098690935689484,"score_gpt":0.3340418601028231,"score_spread":0.29294316916713364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1789325687","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013897653,0.0016335757,0.73131436,0.0075034588,0.00043229113,0.00026631844,0.00030853497,0.00069335615,0.24395044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62575144,0.0013046449,0.34980956,0.0017842001,0.000507942,0.0010536674,0.00047131974,0.00035059062,0.018966656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930734,0.0036198832,0.0004906311,0.0010527365,0.0013295596,0.0004338074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640346,0.001510458,0.00019751639,0.0011887817,0.00052856817,0.00017120341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068066968,0.00062861474,0.0010009854,0.0029858695,0.0029124885,0.007165577,0.0025468308,0.003583948,0.01083015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009797327,0.00065737107,0.0017333267,0.0020104072,0.011555867,0.016735215,0.0058681504,0.005006444,0.0021002155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013211696,0.0000019747288,0.000009468236,0.0000068401287,9.3742426e-7,0.0000058658848,0.00013031464,0.00004541621,0.000039808594,0.9987544,0.00015206065,0.0008514935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007514423,0.0000056476565,0.000031395914,0.00001500588,0.0000032055145,0.00003218636,0.000075081516,0.0007681205,0.00011504865,0.98944247,0.009499765,0.000004540561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090442086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065351493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01083015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021045904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014071957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036230505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1790529587","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4173","title":"Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lunds Universitet; Wake Forest University","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); License; State (computer science); Heuristic; Bayesian probability; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.10072867543743115,"score_gpt":0.24071898112441528,"score_spread":0.13999030568698412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1790529587","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03798443,0.42200518,0.19867095,0.11747347,0.0021629608,0.00008107572,0.00053727557,0.0006747691,0.22040986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7369453,0.17082706,0.05474646,0.015888343,0.011911024,0.00013477118,0.00051272515,0.0005102448,0.008524079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884288,0.00531027,0.0007485221,0.0025582188,0.0023835674,0.00057065574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9040315,0.077853546,0.003140558,0.010623726,0.0034182076,0.0009323527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021688838,0.0008948965,0.0022566637,0.002763104,0.0028622851,0.020500578,0.005501653,0.008754309,0.010487325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042392448,0.0013338254,0.0016912436,0.0040034694,0.04663435,0.02757477,0.005357474,0.008558513,0.0035176459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008477823,0.000033947646,0.00040812927,0.0010473074,0.000048934475,0.000054030923,0.0011347714,0.0006414541,0.000098334436,0.928461,0.002887722,0.06509962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001961166,0.0000139123995,0.0003610669,0.0008669532,0.00005242274,0.00006804014,0.0004294774,0.001587457,0.00023255497,0.9584345,0.037903193,0.00003070784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035609452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001935225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021688838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039537167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004677438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11470288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801104780","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3800","title":"Review of Giving Reasons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Media studies","score_opus":0.1258156924345989,"score_gpt":0.4046749205030641,"score_spread":0.2788592280684652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1801104780","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016233044,0.9564911,0.0015322182,0.014244927,0.004926449,0.000018755234,0.00007800221,0.000032945478,0.022513296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008904914,0.9582286,0.0018774135,0.011995683,0.005624205,0.000089456254,0.00027080977,0.00012716056,0.012881829],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920884,0.0034308368,0.0007708025,0.0006944507,0.0026739724,0.00034150862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630432,0.02782605,0.0013879086,0.0011935116,0.005902398,0.0006470225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008449134,0.00096945633,0.0021129157,0.005867705,0.0013051393,0.005070548,0.0024793383,0.0052809156,0.022691898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04689772,0.0006558726,0.0012935231,0.0073316083,0.0054514925,0.007996478,0.0026074192,0.0054411353,0.008893382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072321054,0.000025580117,0.00010509914,0.013086707,0.000059109814,0.00016813802,0.00090490165,0.00030952846,0.000115131006,0.10656038,0.35509333,0.5234998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061122314,0.000010149857,0.00012630624,0.0063038287,0.00001720743,0.00023057655,0.00016237776,0.000022007904,0.000040377217,0.011950672,0.9811203,0.000010076135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003977129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048777824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022691898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004344316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008350616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801473620","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2247","title":"Dialogue games as dialogue models for interacting with, and via, computers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Outcome (game theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03574404856459477,"score_gpt":0.2579029793246624,"score_spread":0.22215893076006762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1801473620","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00844253,0.0074041258,0.93703395,0.0037978562,0.0003681256,0.00052615313,0.0003585354,0.00040638933,0.041662294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44769946,0.0063564666,0.5215164,0.001312515,0.00044919757,0.002440627,0.000611117,0.00029165705,0.01932254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912378,0.0064236675,0.0005072881,0.0005254991,0.0010339065,0.0002717622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962921,0.0024477304,0.00035209185,0.00047435786,0.0002348094,0.00019891368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047445893,0.0019634296,0.0012032939,0.002097073,0.0019507906,0.00807024,0.0028676495,0.0032840865,0.006244084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109106805,0.0011037376,0.0016849467,0.0020143536,0.008363435,0.012642567,0.0044900873,0.003553485,0.0013003851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015649992,0.000011599757,0.000058139012,0.00011367455,0.000013341058,0.000040565046,0.0008211439,0.0037576014,0.00020385787,0.9904732,0.00066955294,0.0038215555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032727865,0.000029359568,0.000050213956,0.00010052551,0.000020504787,0.000069688256,0.00033529507,0.0162417,0.000251811,0.9496414,0.033205014,0.000021677064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003491002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003689805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00807024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032364922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018024448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025092065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808768081","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.3649","title":"The Authority of Citations and Quotations in Academic Papers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Argumentative; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Situated; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Adaptation (eye); Scheme (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03387149697010778,"score_gpt":0.29456773291646066,"score_spread":0.2606962359463529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808768081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34038317,0.023939976,0.108489946,0.044715956,0.0042830175,0.00032413867,0.0005909853,0.00054907403,0.47672373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98232347,0.001834016,0.007193585,0.00045403978,0.0016948874,0.000065608925,0.00009277789,0.00011802007,0.006223677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89284176,0.06523994,0.01072311,0.005233445,0.023871304,0.0020903905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4230765,0.47397688,0.03234514,0.019454822,0.047755353,0.003391222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066804774,0.0005195871,0.0010423934,0.027941303,0.008395719,0.019002587,0.002024387,0.004581254,0.0056833033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35961136,0.0005919193,0.0005572179,0.023181856,0.025260147,0.025345383,0.0074014617,0.003343247,0.0010426233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008890079,0.00002035368,0.005013673,0.00038294672,0.00003470678,0.00043668124,0.044050995,0.00054565066,0.0007554219,0.9171478,0.0024365138,0.029086398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006759623,0.00012231158,0.012852092,0.0013015909,0.00009908418,0.0011465311,0.028841142,0.004919337,0.0032273987,0.7781883,0.16906358,0.00017110385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028336693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002763694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93319523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072689345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043435036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35330164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808957944","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4121","title":"A Computational Model of Pragma-dialectics as a Tool for its Analysis and Evaluation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Computer science; Inference; Epistemology; Computational model; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1073896821952895,"score_gpt":0.33639923602423877,"score_spread":0.22900955382894927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808957944","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003302739,0.00014781479,0.9858627,0.0011163751,0.000038769973,0.00014997824,0.00013567806,0.0002590097,0.008986998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22733384,0.00029859378,0.76713914,0.00023239608,0.00009470553,0.0009871941,0.00034437326,0.00015333426,0.0034164037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912916,0.0053555756,0.0006548822,0.00078471727,0.001643829,0.00026929472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864178,0.008591744,0.0006880583,0.00273647,0.0012097355,0.00035623665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008631524,0.0010578134,0.0012600356,0.0031603856,0.0022824686,0.010260512,0.0038875109,0.0036690682,0.0127741825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02246221,0.000946717,0.002592546,0.0027033852,0.007716134,0.013654947,0.0052674767,0.004399062,0.002025203],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008374785,0.000016062782,0.00009261475,0.000045487108,0.000009604779,0.000028349154,0.00017375637,0.011623219,0.0001632863,0.98508966,0.00026494885,0.002484598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017772123,0.000020628413,0.00006501293,0.000061913255,0.000013192719,0.00005945605,0.00012452525,0.14289328,0.0004327647,0.84685385,0.009439276,0.000018382038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029288882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001959467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127741825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00385962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031904427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045648396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809953348","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4306","title":"The Argument Form \"Appeal to Galileo\": A Critical Appreciation of Doury’s Account","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Bourgogne","keywords":"Analogy; Fallacy; Appeal; Epistemology; Galileo (satellite navigation); Astrology; Galilean; Philosophy; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.09470143792074692,"score_gpt":0.3107143078415344,"score_spread":0.2160128699207875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809953348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05071239,0.010228487,0.04365547,0.20007099,0.001368153,0.00006537602,0.00014635571,0.000107816966,0.693645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545757,0.0016932636,0.00464476,0.014512136,0.00103541,0.00010190595,0.000049533588,0.00015653388,0.023230817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957644,0.0024133879,0.00008610704,0.0005866529,0.00068694225,0.00046261406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941856,0.0043552537,0.00023698293,0.0004458618,0.0005292064,0.0002470626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051312284,0.0006388358,0.0006886701,0.0038317044,0.0062237545,0.009988072,0.0022011956,0.0065170513,0.003991571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009831239,0.00035632515,0.00079658796,0.0020729583,0.031816438,0.011404542,0.006199964,0.0075219492,0.00050349947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003836213,0.000002716337,0.0000418685,0.000009761757,0.0000013793467,0.000027002678,0.001908316,0.000036120622,0.000021087306,0.9961743,0.0013354102,0.00043827813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018792622,0.0000055920887,0.00018350001,0.000101865924,0.000010377548,0.000074286785,0.0023526934,0.00069373084,0.0001382783,0.91422623,0.08218136,0.000013324809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01009285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009101717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01009285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00924281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021992382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06706166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814822231","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.467","title":"Lightening up on the Ad Hominem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Mistake; Epistemology; Philosophy; Dialectic; Face (sociological concept); Fallacy; Adversary; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.1065747294989697,"score_gpt":0.22638847407853654,"score_spread":0.11981374457956684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814822231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035132766,0.0040486385,0.028718112,0.04372594,0.0031730218,0.000045887624,0.00005782496,0.00015162549,0.88494605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92127866,0.0013380231,0.006390721,0.008078317,0.0014256792,0.000046848152,0.00002128228,0.00011334577,0.061307203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967434,0.0015439716,0.00009211583,0.00049778493,0.0008311736,0.0002915997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979011,0.0012131002,0.00012415298,0.00035935378,0.0002702459,0.00013195741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032329764,0.0005259369,0.0004885163,0.001658178,0.0063307397,0.0075582387,0.00083187217,0.0028359392,0.0069330684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007308152,0.00027151548,0.00039085714,0.0008829807,0.052514657,0.009942359,0.0066657546,0.007337896,0.0012536562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006933354,0.0000031101465,0.000057978566,0.000013184502,9.781659e-7,0.000037960734,0.0037923397,0.000015162654,0.00008792447,0.99158305,0.0014046787,0.002996808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000944478,0.000037001693,0.00039434968,0.00016998408,0.000006864811,0.000311378,0.008855965,0.00030669835,0.00049027626,0.71351963,0.27587998,0.000018396118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019360128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002306063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075582387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035141506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020165874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025497079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1816537332","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2235","title":"Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Empiricism; Informal logic; Philosophy; Odds; Sociology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0786768683797336,"score_gpt":0.2799231439869657,"score_spread":0.20124627560723213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1816537332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046359594,0.028965585,0.1339763,0.08913602,0.0033061167,0.00014750024,0.00011283618,0.0001451693,0.73957455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371276,0.026188495,0.104558006,0.04458013,0.0076088984,0.0016232472,0.00012008507,0.00037981593,0.17781381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98903286,0.0063175033,0.00045587576,0.0010161516,0.0026989493,0.00047865804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898583,0.0074614203,0.000557394,0.0005946361,0.0011239381,0.0004041686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007884935,0.00084631727,0.0009201058,0.0049013104,0.0046510044,0.013371947,0.0017209959,0.0072471653,0.003739687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012501273,0.0005433868,0.00074140803,0.00286227,0.048881095,0.011600127,0.0047775228,0.009175104,0.00156492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041439234,0.0000031741881,0.00001717448,0.000040607214,0.000002579617,0.000020234957,0.0013016883,0.00004388707,0.00003847941,0.99450195,0.0023175788,0.001708385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013103543,0.000013543085,0.000092925526,0.00018248813,0.0000064290975,0.000111821064,0.0005728512,0.000184344,0.00012997635,0.8478948,0.15078542,0.00001228596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036227903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035438957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013371947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067271623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053122686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04880917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850504143","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.2947","title":"Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Specialized Academic Research","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; University of Windsor; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Argumentation theory; German; Compromise; Law; Political science; Adversary; Position (finance); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Computer security; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.25833923941447323,"score_gpt":0.37806164659121305,"score_spread":0.11972240717673982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850504143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419004,0.00064548285,0.007385671,0.006219447,0.000051202456,0.00016777197,0.00013020418,0.000015377505,0.043484356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929317,0.00031063354,0.0033767528,0.0003842278,0.000030590494,0.000087419896,0.0000771341,0.0000193994,0.0027820976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737067,0.021046383,0.00048259346,0.0007826291,0.0025835831,0.0013980162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176103,0.0749247,0.0031221036,0.0014706684,0.002083572,0.000788566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018852282,0.00049867824,0.0007767329,0.0032532043,0.010458258,0.0071533504,0.0018597665,0.009098577,0.0038735983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032766324,0.0004051215,0.000677119,0.0045575476,0.010167973,0.0052317567,0.004561149,0.004583627,0.0004645572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007005768,0.0018040591,0.03200241,0.0005584015,0.00019244546,0.019535374,0.3207245,0.012194975,0.00386373,0.553937,0.009466731,0.045019813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039352104,0.00052167114,0.038485914,0.00090242055,0.00015872743,0.0022982052,0.6026477,0.03659308,0.004605194,0.18435262,0.12886554,0.00017548427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01058615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018265825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018852282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008288392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028764452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09970158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859258661","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2283","title":"Stanovich's Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2548337427983532,"score_gpt":0.420949601165849,"score_spread":0.16611585836749582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859258661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04112923,0.12061343,0.08975364,0.12257441,0.0033385498,0.00006283286,0.00038372513,0.00021227055,0.6219319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8373402,0.05167754,0.02075686,0.009816328,0.0031159562,0.00011477522,0.00024270355,0.00019046223,0.076745234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830234,0.00094605185,0.000069404334,0.0001684798,0.00042308928,0.00009065094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842838,0.013887708,0.00037151756,0.0005747137,0.00063143764,0.00025086044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035423841,0.0005180528,0.000731472,0.0013548357,0.0009655158,0.004720535,0.0009103262,0.001388196,0.0051940475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01274568,0.00036095068,0.00049840997,0.0016324905,0.010809905,0.0067270794,0.0008953703,0.0035552986,0.0010180392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015974445,0.000014589159,0.0004553963,0.000082971485,0.000015542968,0.00002380526,0.0011923132,0.000510133,0.00005156624,0.970198,0.013707254,0.013732467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005196338,0.0000053446806,0.0003011284,0.000058739563,0.0000057226475,0.000021683041,0.00025978725,0.00032101787,0.000038567963,0.9777711,0.021207416,0.000004301822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015986611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016723545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051940475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017074797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012071524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018734097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859359026","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.428","title":"A Normative Theory of Argument Strength","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03442538884530714,"score_gpt":0.23599609065230576,"score_spread":0.20157070180699863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859359026","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100387735,0.0013781695,0.5393821,0.028988011,0.00089694734,0.00015394208,0.00015490477,0.00020625124,0.41880095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8217065,0.0015460991,0.14885083,0.004947663,0.0021530997,0.0009855798,0.00024712543,0.00020581907,0.019357353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714785,0.01432852,0.0016952298,0.0025188632,0.009112319,0.0008665338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465854,0.03295007,0.003768788,0.0060251136,0.0091257915,0.001544841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029908255,0.0011854278,0.0012567024,0.005705336,0.0043109735,0.01174641,0.0033791936,0.0061517297,0.013530189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07051036,0.0009233587,0.0013623779,0.0027344117,0.023785094,0.024414286,0.0073598,0.0070727137,0.0023339386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020956813,0.0000036147953,0.000044621083,0.000016297177,0.0000035655269,0.000009451433,0.00009847952,0.00016529551,0.000021268886,0.99791974,0.0002827828,0.0014329923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000524253,0.0000039996994,0.00004060983,0.000028049295,0.0000034734915,0.000025402758,0.000049243543,0.0007600661,0.000041740153,0.99416864,0.004870021,0.0000035592254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076313404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008469958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029908255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037274612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030854926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15817183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868696530","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.542","title":"Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Dialogical self; Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.027115976177218996,"score_gpt":0.24257858222951653,"score_spread":0.21546260605229753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868696530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047603074,0.012179714,0.44103435,0.031694897,0.000771113,0.00035094353,0.00012777238,0.00023673671,0.46600142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93206733,0.0020209742,0.04971805,0.0016990871,0.0005850736,0.0005339378,0.000052547966,0.0000829632,0.013239996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98434365,0.010530837,0.0005556215,0.0012813937,0.0025264318,0.0007621317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416625,0.00438485,0.00028397856,0.0004097075,0.0004984768,0.0002567383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00976708,0.00084849226,0.001064092,0.0044263834,0.005206638,0.009347683,0.0016131963,0.0046630153,0.0038492447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013050342,0.0007918084,0.0012221582,0.002864737,0.028409297,0.016594423,0.007115204,0.004923321,0.00055841764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050545063,0.0000036040826,0.000025404448,0.000022821578,0.000002405342,0.00002137028,0.0018262819,0.00018831466,0.000034740722,0.9964855,0.00014136542,0.0012431673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010140254,0.000006758274,0.000042120348,0.0000328805,0.0000043306977,0.000024720432,0.00036704735,0.0006235061,0.00004867512,0.9917972,0.0070363963,0.0000061447877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015840748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010484718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00976708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008391516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029609094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060885012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884892599","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2588","title":"Informal Logic, Argumentation Theory and Artificial Intelligence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Informal logic; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Probabilistic argumentation; AND gate; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm; Logic gate","score_opus":0.10386861184421788,"score_gpt":0.3683984202542381,"score_spread":0.2645298084100202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1884892599","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04673763,0.3508559,0.18090886,0.09669815,0.0026031898,0.00018277454,0.00045871886,0.00022053157,0.3213342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88055843,0.056199014,0.031670585,0.0058683343,0.00519523,0.00044267054,0.00043743817,0.00009215287,0.019536184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925188,0.0049235704,0.00041495662,0.00057797245,0.0012257635,0.00033893995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97778785,0.019193998,0.0011345185,0.00066337484,0.00081971893,0.00040054688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065066763,0.0010720628,0.0017529055,0.004233103,0.0033342976,0.013829472,0.0017838359,0.008040334,0.00771968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014866519,0.0006273841,0.0007787874,0.007010009,0.028558303,0.018240517,0.0030632874,0.0050725834,0.0008394119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011152561,0.000028578528,0.00012503903,0.00020186484,0.000010021412,0.00004221571,0.0008281314,0.000578972,0.00004952873,0.99068016,0.0023123822,0.0051320135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009371266,0.0000042029974,0.000074985684,0.00006904955,0.000004224759,0.000027949645,0.00025290804,0.0003811141,0.0000134768625,0.9914863,0.0076709692,0.0000053608787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004690532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003331119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013829472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059527955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029202213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043190718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901770678","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4405","title":"Argumentation & Health, Rubinelli & Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.10742300895438578,"score_gpt":0.32456080583752517,"score_spread":0.2171377968831394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901770678","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065069593,0.9396959,0.0064032045,0.00432763,0.0034258966,0.0000366992,0.00030003174,0.0002456905,0.04491419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009773127,0.87964904,0.008744731,0.0008270652,0.0033327867,0.00014845909,0.0006377505,0.00030274794,0.096584216],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925596,0.00018814509,0.000066170585,0.00019445764,0.00025066055,0.000044718556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847716,0.0008981983,0.0001858298,0.000086875436,0.00020854767,0.00014348015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012135683,0.0030786917,0.002361809,0.0030419133,0.0008222723,0.0045061912,0.0010829174,0.0023725235,0.049639456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024371117,0.0016484634,0.0008076968,0.0042543667,0.001312967,0.0063332296,0.0020480354,0.0036033103,0.044813957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009643236,0.00008666181,0.00022020214,0.002193806,0.000041470972,0.00013097178,0.000683032,0.00071614905,0.0004479087,0.009318489,0.4138751,0.5721898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024431507,0.000031454103,0.000786022,0.00185915,0.00003914373,0.001031272,0.0003420211,0.00069681,0.00033418424,0.015956204,0.9788657,0.00003357791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030081845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041475967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049639456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013832557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001513981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16606057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905359712","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4286","title":"The Basic Slippery Slope Argument","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Scheme (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048176581565806904,"score_gpt":0.25522792303817327,"score_spread":0.20705134147236637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905359712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05091276,0.0034728013,0.56668717,0.008361792,0.0004256692,0.00046613894,0.00048126705,0.0005357782,0.36865667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7904756,0.0017668061,0.18525809,0.0010183501,0.00021407864,0.00036758927,0.0002788025,0.000108071144,0.02051265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954502,0.00200209,0.0003426258,0.0005341017,0.0013350372,0.00033606243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961498,0.0015643747,0.000461895,0.00073390023,0.0008153906,0.00027470442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038993114,0.0007109647,0.00060183933,0.0021065841,0.0019859665,0.0037829212,0.0013610836,0.0034714346,0.007460961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010136538,0.0004892141,0.00081827614,0.0012730586,0.006424887,0.009206621,0.004099166,0.0025009615,0.0019226475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025789117,0.000007250779,0.0001853568,0.00008427836,0.0000048660027,0.00007630337,0.00085456576,0.0004142857,0.00052061427,0.9864292,0.0012331482,0.010164273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024282543,0.000057942023,0.0005074466,0.00023116566,0.000013738333,0.0004022986,0.0006133695,0.0033323972,0.0006603862,0.9229154,0.07121771,0.000023737213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056422065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048910873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007460961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011761575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011230069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024959385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917912646","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2234","title":"Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05739613039954247,"score_gpt":0.30512835920797426,"score_spread":0.2477322288084318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917912646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048950436,0.10873026,0.05961089,0.5770351,0.011888301,0.0000801085,0.00016780902,0.00014391844,0.23744851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3789941,0.14718586,0.09990145,0.13577628,0.033506285,0.0005782792,0.00016615874,0.0003806975,0.2035109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929028,0.0027132363,0.00035469627,0.0010694778,0.0026124907,0.00034722962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98081106,0.015179844,0.0006501787,0.0010360499,0.001435164,0.0008877123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006977289,0.00057703373,0.0009393838,0.0021902723,0.0035730053,0.011251672,0.0017172333,0.005517434,0.003844722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018241242,0.00044733676,0.00058785273,0.0019015255,0.026733536,0.015856965,0.003287822,0.011566106,0.0022539394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018048526,0.000015174718,0.00010350406,0.00016218536,0.0000083115865,0.00006671783,0.002319908,0.00011963133,0.00011380507,0.9408429,0.04290653,0.0133232605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011636187,0.000010589364,0.00020238356,0.00026047262,0.000008336805,0.00015229348,0.00054898043,0.00020989399,0.000192914,0.6845925,0.31377944,0.000030588264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036649534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050126784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011251672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003558084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040467437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036899865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919497958","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2255","title":"Govier's Social Trust and Human Communities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04843933174929547,"score_gpt":0.2567183694153997,"score_spread":0.20827903766610426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919497958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13189636,0.001819959,0.07695146,0.02878751,0.0005837018,0.00010625252,0.00009095057,0.00022854573,0.7595352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670401,0.00021619195,0.007199173,0.00037243194,0.0000687245,0.000057458717,0.000022562399,0.000055035103,0.024968276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937283,0.0044520833,0.00017576554,0.00059500855,0.0005624685,0.0004863592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924906,0.004622183,0.00060752715,0.0009547404,0.00080362865,0.00052139885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005067042,0.00041630832,0.0004391973,0.0022084012,0.010952829,0.013002377,0.0012383473,0.0034724409,0.006554089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017722167,0.0003395699,0.0005067864,0.0018192494,0.024147747,0.00962163,0.005020919,0.0024706093,0.000480145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008278705,0.000004215746,0.00012758862,0.0000051647767,8.4386505e-7,0.000026329952,0.0044800933,0.000086849286,0.000011176374,0.9931744,0.0005689494,0.0015061059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013980285,0.000008935027,0.00028714,0.000060408573,0.000006398914,0.00008308017,0.006880931,0.0010230528,0.00009421842,0.9556108,0.035919666,0.000011454992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019258201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02024307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019258201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007140463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043403353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05180788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937457939","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2578","title":"Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Argumentation theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12100827948780749,"score_gpt":0.30743743939493345,"score_spread":0.18642915990712597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937457939","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18444498,0.0031743862,0.6104467,0.037611663,0.00043104505,0.0004467343,0.00010633601,0.0004975252,0.16284068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162678,0.0004254168,0.07948253,0.0006890343,0.000087760585,0.0002886057,0.000047904323,0.000083781124,0.0026272058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726078,0.018341817,0.0013650889,0.0020459886,0.0041348673,0.0015043534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417586,0.042099353,0.0041725603,0.0060989847,0.0036785195,0.0021919217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023877751,0.00075534516,0.0012159137,0.006181631,0.008500529,0.018234335,0.0028311051,0.005328666,0.0036489465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061991498,0.00085697504,0.0011628623,0.0033710762,0.074648045,0.031267446,0.014373173,0.007560357,0.00046743007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018663199,0.000017030496,0.00054364617,0.000045454126,0.000005772961,0.00014206224,0.01832153,0.00031474783,0.00014397019,0.97487426,0.000215357,0.0053575295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009281885,0.000012324523,0.0002072329,0.00006983376,0.0000058260575,0.00008757187,0.005173752,0.0014641855,0.00011563467,0.9881605,0.004681724,0.000012183028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027073014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026010394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063922624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005903335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12627918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1938710264","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2285","title":"Flow Charts for Critical Thinking","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Flow (mathematics); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mechanics","score_opus":0.07197582917784268,"score_gpt":0.3008067364438623,"score_spread":0.22883090726601962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938710264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015374903,0.0009660287,0.9736534,0.0014309154,0.00052544416,0.00019758614,0.0007762251,0.0029902896,0.017922549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14504874,0.0022830544,0.82259876,0.0009706165,0.0015814195,0.001746365,0.002352444,0.0017025055,0.021716164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357784,0.0030774083,0.00055775355,0.0010182349,0.0014148729,0.0003538292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650051,0.025468195,0.0016193845,0.004117413,0.003089618,0.00070038054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007961615,0.002176109,0.0013964422,0.011069153,0.00253823,0.010616354,0.002261725,0.0025473419,0.030935533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041230597,0.00115737,0.0018618044,0.008317281,0.0066047567,0.020454232,0.0032507202,0.005054224,0.00487205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018364854,0.000013686389,0.00006929753,0.00006709056,0.000006362067,0.000027130365,0.00026638052,0.0010934158,0.000053144973,0.96831065,0.0057353075,0.02433915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009888426,0.000006292273,0.000026384327,0.000055307748,0.0000074806585,0.0000134973525,0.000059876467,0.0052609853,0.0001647741,0.97786736,0.016517831,0.000010263859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003409012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012128887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030935533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030980748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032081308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10348964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941092281","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4115","title":"Steps Towards an Evolutionary Account of Argumentative Competence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Intentionality; Competence (human resources); Reputation; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.05740725527824255,"score_gpt":0.3350521106022462,"score_spread":0.2776448553240037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941092281","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05845735,0.0038620865,0.57754725,0.039092805,0.00039687892,0.000113130234,0.00007740657,0.00024103488,0.3202121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88826144,0.0012609271,0.09656364,0.0015908388,0.00036125784,0.0001536802,0.00010439061,0.00011694673,0.011586868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669254,0.0017950722,0.00011174332,0.00039173392,0.0006930084,0.000315886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554825,0.0024432486,0.00033702186,0.0006745733,0.0006289853,0.00036786712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00695393,0.0007397312,0.00059118384,0.0028337636,0.0018581022,0.0066341236,0.002767001,0.003743272,0.00805991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080190385,0.0003640571,0.00089086266,0.0012385554,0.013866386,0.018169163,0.0050669285,0.004596828,0.0010973185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026480118,0.000006841702,0.000105855404,0.000015899395,0.000003079832,0.00003805387,0.0006177345,0.00045793317,0.00006630196,0.9964161,0.00011836839,0.0021511163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033976125,0.0000048852653,0.00012149689,0.000018338578,0.0000016480294,0.00004164623,0.00022668298,0.0013637033,0.00004197783,0.9938158,0.004356215,0.000004191504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005746268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045278567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00805991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001817367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011984229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036776304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950405747","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.514","title":"Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Acquittal; Dilemma; Reasonable doubt; Law; Adversarial system; Hearsay; Epistemology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07507757489754922,"score_gpt":0.332331606111525,"score_spread":0.2572540312139758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950405747","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09172178,0.008421026,0.38007203,0.2540025,0.00097549177,0.00042460806,0.0001932512,0.00018619426,0.26400307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161932,0.0016199027,0.067663275,0.006530565,0.00091025553,0.0002671824,0.00007006396,0.000046252208,0.0066994037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668394,0.0234227,0.0017588167,0.0019525416,0.004905465,0.0011211259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92333513,0.0651792,0.0032164506,0.0037148118,0.003227486,0.0013268517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04218858,0.0008486624,0.0015301483,0.004435525,0.007029337,0.011569138,0.0036144448,0.011047933,0.0032769828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064407825,0.0008717701,0.0017442752,0.0024564397,0.05463378,0.024256745,0.0095372535,0.0101286,0.00043633857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001127094,0.000008100475,0.00007906879,0.00003203876,0.0000075958133,0.0001170773,0.0010359089,0.00039989012,0.000045507957,0.99525356,0.00045508565,0.0025549561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001451858,0.000004790798,0.000027454169,0.000027319164,0.000002903752,0.00004042527,0.00020042645,0.00079181755,0.000028172286,0.99697304,0.0018833558,0.0000057718216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022197044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017425283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04218858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006032687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053475783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22311723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956201883","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3778","title":"Analogical Arguments in Ethics and Law: A Defence of Deductivism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Normative; Inference; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Analogy; A priori and a posteriori; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07374823441558646,"score_gpt":0.28786238975247674,"score_spread":0.21411415533689027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956201883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020181753,0.0061399215,0.5910086,0.08290667,0.0014095784,0.00017029788,0.00016504215,0.00021371039,0.2978045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.859375,0.0022452988,0.1080823,0.011646168,0.0021877838,0.000503884,0.00013459426,0.0001842521,0.015640613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98873097,0.0067293025,0.00053803803,0.0010953116,0.0024996016,0.00040676305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98891,0.007399201,0.0006355181,0.0019059564,0.00083628594,0.0003130153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01384376,0.00075570587,0.0012086101,0.0030820023,0.003016928,0.007329658,0.0028047787,0.0061153458,0.0056171487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014447241,0.00068543747,0.0023440009,0.0016220222,0.03979356,0.013417981,0.0060985186,0.008493419,0.0010344702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022262363,0.0000032101123,0.000011936584,0.000009595258,0.0000023931818,0.0000072212583,0.00013472077,0.000099987075,0.00001817477,0.99896836,0.00022242735,0.00051970704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008225521,0.0000042962297,0.000015805876,0.0000121779285,0.0000016215,0.000009963413,0.000033288237,0.0003379422,0.00002625022,0.99661946,0.0029288651,0.000002195922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014393766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009340509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01384376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051835277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020629487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0732137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962641047","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1227","title":"Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standards of Proof","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Jumping; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Ignorance; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.017983002122984103,"score_gpt":0.2787240757650127,"score_spread":0.2607410736420286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962641047","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050360598,0.002614101,0.890203,0.020459777,0.0007246176,0.00029601043,0.00016452302,0.0011771843,0.03400029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6307922,0.0009553027,0.361792,0.0016646988,0.00036843444,0.00043368115,0.0002339077,0.0003872027,0.0033726555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.84103125,0.066989206,0.023519814,0.013786249,0.04959137,0.005082119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58549,0.26854965,0.024982711,0.08101325,0.035712685,0.0042517395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09822431,0.0011513798,0.0025832953,0.007993241,0.008178409,0.021556439,0.008148218,0.014134462,0.0038484256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32573497,0.001806436,0.0022828009,0.0059705474,0.04338968,0.032452423,0.015264375,0.013301076,0.0013959882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006345019,0.000037791455,0.0011035516,0.00015487787,0.000042615913,0.00030549034,0.0038225371,0.001362036,0.00034543872,0.9722654,0.001452129,0.019044654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016311149,0.000013934193,0.00011331353,0.00012493301,0.000016455077,0.00018846357,0.0005477993,0.0040871496,0.00064952776,0.98979,0.004429904,0.00002224305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019862594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008808744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09822431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056758067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063435216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51946604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095690048","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4141","title":"Critique of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test: The More You Know, the Lower Your Score","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Watson; Promotion (chess); Construct (python library); Psychology; Construct validity; Critical appraisal; Government (linguistics); Social psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03291475972431309,"score_gpt":0.3555261938659,"score_spread":0.32261143414158694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095690048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05495706,0.012580733,0.16357927,0.70609826,0.021794265,0.0012238814,0.0010703298,0.0009865622,0.03770971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6292261,0.0065769823,0.21148226,0.13386802,0.006995075,0.0034307064,0.00056402513,0.00050579524,0.0073510674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.76603824,0.10807067,0.02415207,0.0070469254,0.09323086,0.0014612608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45515493,0.40631348,0.012766911,0.008524929,0.112731256,0.00450852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.131872,0.0012668468,0.0014093199,0.0053220484,0.00286059,0.0071734516,0.006721703,0.004390377,0.0014648772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45492256,0.00070051814,0.0014950559,0.0041526575,0.020264676,0.0045436784,0.0055319476,0.011350349,0.0012037233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037013766,0.00026896416,0.028822577,0.0029838716,0.0005598856,0.000713866,0.031946346,0.00260315,0.0017551634,0.20412984,0.3118207,0.41402552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735043,0.00061637507,0.051492583,0.011360747,0.00039343972,0.0031181413,0.027120797,0.0170617,0.0073528825,0.5888742,0.2912839,0.00085175363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008591482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011876018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.131872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074358014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69741416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095987202","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3536","title":"Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Psychology; Confirmation bias; Deductive reasoning; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057087455808471334,"score_gpt":0.3796888305291928,"score_spread":0.3226013747207214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095987202","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059861388,0.10148364,0.46657765,0.10821454,0.001361743,0.00020935417,0.00016539561,0.00042838926,0.26169783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651545,0.025252586,0.094902545,0.0056551434,0.0014611006,0.00023276708,0.00011411077,0.00008666349,0.007140584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958182,0.0025430038,0.00021288634,0.00041072618,0.0008649503,0.00015030496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866376,0.010735807,0.0007846286,0.00084159576,0.00061759475,0.0003828282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007252546,0.0006968394,0.00088078587,0.0045448584,0.0014261378,0.006865527,0.0017299447,0.0040173214,0.002905573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013741442,0.00041200832,0.0012065759,0.0032049075,0.022698779,0.016343562,0.0029601,0.0044855005,0.0005743147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019488189,0.000031227035,0.00023906514,0.0001699627,0.000023074434,0.00007302724,0.0043576104,0.00049137895,0.00017219775,0.97962934,0.0017159734,0.013077833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019859348,0.000015555883,0.00039897088,0.000103750346,0.000010219655,0.000107690656,0.0005643211,0.00081120466,0.00011652546,0.97884184,0.018997936,0.000012112068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010040461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066799024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007252546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034481024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016370213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03835559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096056996","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3869","title":"John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Persuasion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Persuasion; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.03415072681443214,"score_gpt":0.3080317809869491,"score_spread":0.27388105417251696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096056996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011085634,0.017398728,0.09177198,0.058550365,0.0021029124,0.00016034795,0.000091955204,0.00016288752,0.81867516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76558137,0.012697118,0.035207957,0.018934797,0.0017685767,0.0005166606,0.0000651789,0.00019964458,0.16502866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932053,0.003560086,0.00026280162,0.0008221143,0.0018375602,0.00031214088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225277,0.0055291886,0.0004096709,0.00041871477,0.0009421721,0.00044755303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004770296,0.0008097848,0.00061671284,0.0024554036,0.0036027387,0.011097365,0.001164449,0.0037956256,0.00567296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008998048,0.00045586485,0.0005552735,0.0015255321,0.019625258,0.005035134,0.0017768323,0.0059936987,0.0018403856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013574467,0.000015562224,0.00012916919,0.00006131246,0.000008171868,0.00003807616,0.0027881474,0.00022597912,0.00006393863,0.9832235,0.006773729,0.006658715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023375856,0.000033050423,0.0004289925,0.00033454047,0.00001916566,0.00017227411,0.0010183676,0.0009670801,0.00035124485,0.6473429,0.34928104,0.000028001366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059954794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00481575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011097365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058310116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034551865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042307198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096129482","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2280","title":"New Dialectical Rules For Ambiguity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Grice; Argumentative; Epistemology; Conversation; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Argumentation theory; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Computer science; Pragmatics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05556845093921646,"score_gpt":0.34174667509680223,"score_spread":0.28617822415758576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096129482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023680755,0.0011639491,0.9081187,0.005687282,0.0007797613,0.00068210164,0.0002104985,0.0005219864,0.08046759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12781829,0.001102246,0.8505359,0.0014785313,0.0006557599,0.0025438785,0.00034618576,0.00051395915,0.015005241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9384263,0.03263204,0.008098513,0.006758128,0.012545871,0.0015390929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93234324,0.043667153,0.0029234737,0.009937289,0.00997118,0.0011577652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043137953,0.0020763187,0.0025886158,0.0076572895,0.0076649245,0.020305928,0.006303157,0.0070361034,0.009058602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084369175,0.0023694332,0.003830012,0.00440033,0.030370444,0.036667798,0.011741591,0.014164187,0.004193633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050995914,0.0000052247233,0.00004990011,0.000034839115,0.000007684557,0.000032515305,0.0015322458,0.0002688557,0.000053655578,0.9924988,0.0010080936,0.00450307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014917015,0.0000037845434,0.00002264781,0.00006849647,0.000009637608,0.00007056619,0.00029081682,0.0017058399,0.0001898232,0.97735834,0.02024624,0.00001885522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002236012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023798586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043137953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073095844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057383133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22813803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097702105","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2240","title":"Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Selection (genetic algorithm); Argument map; Computer science; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04348574095594171,"score_gpt":0.2649942197036246,"score_spread":0.22150847874768287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097702105","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034332995,0.026510458,0.79919434,0.022024345,0.0008678816,0.0013580828,0.0001714123,0.0005398032,0.14590043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19439472,0.02371896,0.7465599,0.0045996015,0.0019855918,0.0035736188,0.00031248992,0.00035281992,0.024502309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.965998,0.021314342,0.0019830621,0.0011493387,0.008709798,0.00084538135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96654594,0.02058492,0.0011383588,0.002036598,0.008885363,0.0008087365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040326964,0.0022409363,0.0025879338,0.017579386,0.0031409168,0.021525806,0.0043232553,0.0071902405,0.006544115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04091485,0.0011162078,0.0012575141,0.00793168,0.016857704,0.016120614,0.0057132,0.0058527235,0.0032091269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002949168,0.0000565915,0.0001853553,0.00072110415,0.000054857373,0.00013152824,0.002540328,0.0015198046,0.0003136203,0.8949967,0.01059235,0.08885829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029323162,0.000031296375,0.00024951922,0.0012120985,0.000035441597,0.00010082535,0.0013372445,0.004880608,0.00029742773,0.9269443,0.06484757,0.000034418597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012546877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016426899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040326964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006808918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008901177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21327192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098052878","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3938","title":"In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Virtue; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05033415478823391,"score_gpt":0.2871719785788954,"score_spread":0.2368378237906615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098052878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044619177,0.006129868,0.34723237,0.1320335,0.0027617083,0.00024175641,0.00012439628,0.00048579538,0.46637142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408834,0.0008125441,0.0457646,0.00291819,0.0012523521,0.00024256753,0.00006065374,0.00017355602,0.007892028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94364226,0.03793605,0.0024525388,0.0042598275,0.01035899,0.0013504145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7696859,0.18417889,0.009642144,0.019924602,0.013938537,0.0026299153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06227085,0.0007038842,0.0017833053,0.0060599428,0.004830079,0.019908527,0.0038015386,0.011619515,0.010321614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22450238,0.0007692571,0.0012290336,0.0024162026,0.039509807,0.024372457,0.010186337,0.010333817,0.0017446397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002946677,0.000010298443,0.0003104697,0.000076934266,0.000015586025,0.00006893167,0.0019995407,0.00028372926,0.00010899457,0.98829865,0.0016193971,0.007178011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027852317,0.000008335001,0.00013391559,0.000113965696,0.000008342779,0.00005481349,0.00030115407,0.0023092674,0.0001479112,0.9867098,0.010173367,0.000011296729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009772801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009318619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06227085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004453195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042530578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32932365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098116843","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.491","title":"Houtlosser and van Rees (Eds.) - Considering pragmadialectics: A festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistic research and analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0686893643724585,"score_gpt":0.2652641942049797,"score_spread":0.19657482983252123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098116843","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054283864,0.79406226,0.0062917587,0.11797427,0.008028908,0.000048253878,0.00015644281,0.0000787257,0.06793094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108230725,0.7896505,0.008924654,0.0071570626,0.0062068827,0.00013425092,0.00029728052,0.00021294712,0.079185754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984861,0.00076540327,0.000066548964,0.00021292317,0.00034947367,0.00011958429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976762,0.0014499532,0.00014399014,0.000081031314,0.0002718259,0.0003769501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003288066,0.00094240677,0.0009231247,0.0020935554,0.003702752,0.010839503,0.0010521144,0.0021750128,0.008975231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030427738,0.00070426334,0.00045619762,0.0041071335,0.004030948,0.012798613,0.0027376516,0.0041696406,0.0026943984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015834323,0.00013039785,0.0012469837,0.0011717178,0.000052409625,0.00042258177,0.04209746,0.0005418409,0.00057286053,0.22851846,0.49827486,0.22681217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015743948,0.000024115123,0.0015889425,0.0018067068,0.000031024374,0.0002188819,0.018496916,0.00017077294,0.00032554794,0.06931386,0.90797836,0.000029084174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010093316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029306404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010839503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038383007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033850006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030025184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098137601","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.432","title":"In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Fallacy; Subjectivism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07432956683130892,"score_gpt":0.2587859281955193,"score_spread":0.1844563613642104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098137601","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015337356,0.003164307,0.6289083,0.0526822,0.001295621,0.00012006431,0.00012039143,0.00016882185,0.29820302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84987456,0.0028622996,0.10513332,0.013110013,0.0026863876,0.00059654936,0.00014053748,0.0002469004,0.025349388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735231,0.014747844,0.0013729128,0.002214115,0.0072090635,0.00093291805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736007,0.01536121,0.002586891,0.0039899903,0.0035146016,0.0009465622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02495793,0.00089291245,0.0010674141,0.003107225,0.00457175,0.011231409,0.0032696708,0.007885734,0.0049241553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029883083,0.0005697466,0.0017579092,0.0018734087,0.024354741,0.015333567,0.008016862,0.011157605,0.0011766825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036012507,0.0000040107093,0.000060934068,0.000025155663,0.000006505537,0.0000112413,0.00029386245,0.0001923822,0.000023088714,0.99766433,0.00028855706,0.0014262042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010405549,0.000010207451,0.00007940823,0.000103265076,0.0000103399925,0.0000460162,0.00018082684,0.0010011286,0.00009118631,0.9817446,0.01671522,0.000007474043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010646096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013414532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02495793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003946756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039563486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13199168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099340309","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3033","title":"Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Politeness; Politics; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.021880985691730966,"score_gpt":0.2703296868811275,"score_spread":0.24844870118939655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099340309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48071018,0.0025827275,0.10385192,0.0134161925,0.00040895128,0.00008879662,0.00004300432,0.0001597271,0.39873844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949279,0.00015171226,0.0023484305,0.00016875776,0.00006344267,0.000022301587,0.000007748826,0.000029429084,0.0022802516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98068124,0.01617347,0.00042997114,0.0008241314,0.0012574896,0.00063379237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972901,0.021590754,0.002594349,0.001330779,0.0009182222,0.00066494197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008893793,0.00044924862,0.00042857067,0.0015631788,0.004538451,0.0119143985,0.0008886639,0.0030619563,0.004654021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0252365,0.0004197623,0.00037498915,0.00088797376,0.023724345,0.010862431,0.0070334924,0.0032349853,0.00049603335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010452014,0.00005175425,0.0024873675,0.00019930612,0.000021104097,0.00049839733,0.25118056,0.0003268406,0.0026108415,0.7220263,0.0010568117,0.019436315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109821,0.00022329231,0.0058255782,0.00068645424,0.0000605755,0.001575054,0.16251785,0.004215172,0.00458004,0.7093682,0.110748306,0.00008953367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043086213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048026955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119143985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016837737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010296671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047035396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100247070","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3890","title":"Govier's \"Invention\" of the Theory of Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Term (time); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.024048589127783643,"score_gpt":0.23399216883924723,"score_spread":0.20994357971146357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100247070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010075201,0.04523056,0.38193223,0.10402156,0.005116956,0.0002092301,0.00024160887,0.00049344456,0.45267925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6491698,0.03397038,0.21628998,0.029289888,0.0069139455,0.0011850105,0.00026569163,0.00070944545,0.06220587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98054725,0.012942617,0.0007081787,0.0022444208,0.0028742272,0.0006834262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97349024,0.021399975,0.0009947892,0.0015161881,0.0020027775,0.0005960711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014535757,0.0015090096,0.0018469723,0.010283894,0.005770075,0.0140054375,0.002677981,0.007781122,0.0048839315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022651887,0.0008557608,0.002841083,0.006365329,0.059381608,0.024230666,0.0063458844,0.010538027,0.002077138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059792274,0.0000028948941,0.000036106776,0.00003623496,0.0000033602728,0.000019541907,0.0006893031,0.00009212849,0.00001284813,0.9962521,0.0013409449,0.0015085544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013818693,0.000009107609,0.00004228431,0.00015378914,0.000008220125,0.000059371174,0.00031178453,0.00044767637,0.00006844413,0.9342323,0.06464175,0.000011537694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005241148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033897625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014535757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010732773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077976543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07787204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101053895","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.474","title":"Norms of Legitimate Dissensus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Action (physics); Political philosophy; Inference; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05418168153881438,"score_gpt":0.3258298747255297,"score_spread":0.27164819318671535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101053895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05931979,0.0018702485,0.35392186,0.057830878,0.0009781353,0.00035573964,0.00024739426,0.00030621933,0.5251697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475223,0.00035107756,0.03867395,0.0030499776,0.0005529555,0.0005936724,0.00014114336,0.000119726516,0.008995302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8766525,0.06888295,0.007924462,0.013663974,0.028240895,0.004635211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83752376,0.11163595,0.009193057,0.020616455,0.018158387,0.0028724072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060046174,0.00060988276,0.0014809078,0.0030079973,0.0069238422,0.012910891,0.0027552538,0.0061047357,0.00538019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124530554,0.00062525284,0.0012755436,0.002048279,0.046190683,0.013055305,0.010698647,0.007700077,0.0010819456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007099038,0.0000067906567,0.0001731909,0.000017808488,0.000006014812,0.000024471055,0.0011035894,0.00019261325,0.00004356708,0.99603736,0.00039303108,0.0019945637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009288528,0.000005101113,0.000078248326,0.000027544082,0.000003151333,0.000022557837,0.0002624644,0.00046037365,0.000092529466,0.9939422,0.00508983,0.000006757084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016315597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012991955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060046174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069663255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059241937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31755835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104283102","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.476","title":"Making it Public: Testimony and Socially Sanctioned Common Grounds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Rhetoric; Individualism; USable; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Public discourse; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.27491929196703513,"score_gpt":0.3082644806043631,"score_spread":0.033345188637327994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104283102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19877425,0.0059505673,0.090136416,0.13952595,0.0012755652,0.00020490699,0.00012206942,0.00021486708,0.5637954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873117,0.00070234167,0.004548738,0.0021365462,0.00025567817,0.000071813854,0.000019693629,0.000048044676,0.0049054343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9463314,0.04325166,0.0012169635,0.0020676153,0.005011583,0.0021207733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9118198,0.07300791,0.0049317875,0.005892978,0.003006733,0.0013407335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030229386,0.00052166363,0.0006167658,0.002918027,0.011708301,0.015229593,0.0020938783,0.009813495,0.0049904417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07435149,0.00057122286,0.00052345626,0.0024446598,0.05996036,0.014854178,0.012016127,0.0073948014,0.0006697084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016530435,0.000019933543,0.00030384285,0.00007812704,0.0000112243115,0.00040521286,0.040516865,0.00020111784,0.00020708528,0.95061725,0.001690015,0.0059327027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041183346,0.00003718924,0.00042317505,0.00043829496,0.00003116281,0.00033232247,0.02556103,0.0010313501,0.0007052635,0.91188204,0.05948647,0.000030550684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002134192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020737823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030229386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044058547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004775261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1598702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104914370","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3882","title":"Teaching Rational Entitlement and Responsibility: A Socratic Exercise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Obligation; Socratic method; Moral obligation; Rationality; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.1519706868791274,"score_gpt":0.41126543320826536,"score_spread":0.25929474632913796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104914370","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21900265,0.0002685598,0.49946865,0.028442407,0.00069242506,0.0004316497,0.0000292577,0.00029194166,0.2513725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96605366,0.00006411645,0.02674241,0.00084782444,0.00008469185,0.00020933547,0.000012758663,0.0000552102,0.005930111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9188673,0.06740317,0.0016511767,0.0036909715,0.0058550914,0.0025322607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441667,0.03937903,0.0036745304,0.006767103,0.00335459,0.0026580873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039848436,0.0006940501,0.0006299069,0.00072174123,0.006306757,0.0073882807,0.0016309789,0.0026900903,0.0063428273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053554717,0.0004955541,0.0006478531,0.0005619713,0.040482946,0.00867971,0.009718664,0.0068506105,0.0011057709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095159776,0.00023611172,0.0009293848,0.0000962982,0.000018267488,0.0001343921,0.05357752,0.0009799165,0.001752918,0.9227515,0.0014747726,0.017953774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011959602,0.00021832887,0.0007395161,0.0001507322,0.000023270695,0.00018244705,0.020594873,0.0072133373,0.0030430236,0.8967604,0.07087807,0.00007645748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000850402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011013446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039848436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040397407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045837206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21074116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106163222","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3035","title":"The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Epistemology; Informal logic; Adversary; Authoritarianism; Fallacy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.041463758869733615,"score_gpt":0.31932288061602115,"score_spread":0.2778591217462875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106163222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017035887,0.008158021,0.44410065,0.056435693,0.0016230708,0.00019252398,0.00006701763,0.0003457974,0.4720414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86503565,0.003998768,0.09656807,0.005263477,0.0020252385,0.0005886046,0.000069996546,0.00033381098,0.02611637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9403097,0.039172366,0.0022597902,0.0028831635,0.0142625375,0.0011123698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93826175,0.042073395,0.0031234357,0.0062450813,0.009036728,0.0012596422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03282978,0.00087111915,0.0011975213,0.007074362,0.0044544106,0.013757912,0.003072161,0.0051801302,0.006108171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08130733,0.00062272797,0.0010819127,0.002919659,0.055238377,0.020817656,0.0075291046,0.009847889,0.0017698692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008526638,0.000007089016,0.0000685739,0.00003508657,0.000004232714,0.000012926574,0.0009374273,0.00015009889,0.00003024063,0.9922504,0.00090018247,0.0055951383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012605774,0.00001156815,0.00005470808,0.00006444263,0.0000038622197,0.000035250043,0.00024764406,0.00059300195,0.00010387711,0.98729205,0.011574358,0.0000066448542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013034026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012620492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03282978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007996202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004947704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17362255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106800433","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2164","title":"The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rationality; Epistemology; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Morality; Discourse ethics; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01782479360331115,"score_gpt":0.3270627110829669,"score_spread":0.3092379174796558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106800433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05315671,0.013329731,0.37097564,0.08715295,0.0007331516,0.00027924252,0.00027153632,0.00037704158,0.47372395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92236793,0.002501236,0.05673909,0.002494209,0.0004967724,0.00038897086,0.00009162692,0.00009210282,0.014828113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752186,0.016602842,0.0010819497,0.0020862706,0.0036093479,0.0014008788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857867,0.010291463,0.0009615348,0.0011594779,0.0013708099,0.00043011233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020470485,0.0009154241,0.0013712145,0.005455892,0.006479607,0.013521569,0.002721956,0.007758946,0.004633829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021591568,0.00069938414,0.0013720439,0.0036180138,0.049861796,0.020529322,0.0057754335,0.0049326816,0.0009864672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037174095,0.000002834888,0.000023689232,0.000010042664,0.0000015715109,0.00001054553,0.0009519369,0.00016124632,0.000013469659,0.99777466,0.0002616096,0.00078453723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011519533,0.0000032505882,0.000030447336,0.000023453278,0.0000033745628,0.000011747879,0.00030497194,0.0008218194,0.00005003156,0.99052215,0.008211351,0.000005980092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061073434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024307221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020470485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011239823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055146273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10825956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113061902","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1116","title":"Norms and Functions in Public Sphere Argumentation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Public sphere; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Informal logic; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Politics; Library science","score_opus":0.02972089284550115,"score_gpt":0.24290576427185998,"score_spread":0.21318487142635884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113061902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033249106,0.012424961,0.17948268,0.18552487,0.0028642497,0.0000767226,0.00008839606,0.0002296224,0.58605933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95745885,0.0029447875,0.013278459,0.005812057,0.0018891888,0.00018707429,0.00004857104,0.00015972878,0.018221362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95846057,0.033591103,0.0010673748,0.0013306416,0.004137553,0.0014126496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616784,0.029283926,0.0020351186,0.0023365617,0.0036247992,0.0010412271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022263175,0.00077736226,0.00079911284,0.0034468311,0.006907605,0.017036723,0.0020609305,0.00837644,0.0037042636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03987725,0.0004778297,0.00081635563,0.0027644918,0.047391996,0.024340639,0.0052779554,0.005880634,0.0010873238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005101325,0.0000019007979,0.0000227559,0.000011793486,0.0000012170595,0.000011063096,0.0015836527,0.00014539566,0.000011576105,0.9961985,0.00081349764,0.0011935259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075655867,0.0000046361965,0.000050400773,0.00006020992,0.0000024019284,0.000013651187,0.00088132976,0.0004188163,0.000053964315,0.9745033,0.02399721,0.000006435837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004180771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031160421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022263175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008693729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052668694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11774027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113518045","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.455","title":"Evaluating Inferences: the Nature and Role of Warrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Inference; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14724920243985806,"score_gpt":0.32551370930484225,"score_spread":0.17826450686498418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113518045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15222265,0.014350658,0.68608075,0.07012465,0.0008162578,0.00042825032,0.0005787864,0.0007450606,0.07465287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90508264,0.0022278535,0.088300765,0.0011149243,0.0008883832,0.00017793609,0.00011449479,0.00015480658,0.0019382322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9307364,0.041768793,0.0062544807,0.0058482317,0.013689219,0.0017028548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44978526,0.4892911,0.024856033,0.017873233,0.016185254,0.0020091229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08939313,0.0010168809,0.0020638392,0.007170137,0.003532486,0.01404586,0.0034986523,0.006750058,0.0046883817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4254003,0.0018862778,0.0015259592,0.00437358,0.026750805,0.04062075,0.0064049684,0.005472188,0.000602241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014401082,0.000027557648,0.0027653992,0.00030197523,0.00009552106,0.00024496648,0.0034777676,0.0031142195,0.0002950934,0.9543368,0.0012675024,0.03392922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003105493,0.000031848118,0.0006617193,0.00017592892,0.00005614163,0.0000931133,0.0005749015,0.0056442074,0.00039754115,0.98912674,0.003170126,0.000036644447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037796285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030394257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08939313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004343986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031251768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113569866","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3139","title":"The Curious Silence of the Dog and Paul of Tarsus; Revisiting The Argument from Silence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Notice; Philosophy; Tarsus (eyelids); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023461468101838738,"score_gpt":0.2854504810680133,"score_spread":0.26198901296617455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113569866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12417401,0.009117465,0.072830886,0.2018096,0.0042477124,0.00011903668,0.0001148142,0.00013121511,0.58745533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97841555,0.0010188237,0.0020737462,0.005897801,0.00072262774,0.00006963943,0.000030664487,0.00011997895,0.011651043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905567,0.006922982,0.00017951702,0.00069608697,0.0011018062,0.0005428871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98671174,0.0107487645,0.00073119655,0.0006831503,0.0007887954,0.00033638874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583883,0.0009656441,0.00077004475,0.0016672934,0.0069007003,0.008491103,0.0022394431,0.007091286,0.0043435656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017702073,0.00034096837,0.0005922418,0.0009825812,0.054147836,0.014637421,0.007084427,0.01055508,0.0010119983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018328648,0.000008580804,0.00011071737,0.00006425209,0.000003487179,0.00023644652,0.05784591,0.000041156796,0.0002580051,0.93868256,0.0012673493,0.0014632454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031266656,0.000056694244,0.00038760708,0.00064401043,0.00001810421,0.00044406622,0.077112556,0.00070493337,0.0013587856,0.73631585,0.18289669,0.000029502791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020030616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015905102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008583883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004426144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023749413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045396507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115206405","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3891","title":"Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054675651937541724,"score_gpt":0.24272749440630823,"score_spread":0.1880518424687665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115206405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07489486,0.011915894,0.24799491,0.118387364,0.0035270664,0.0002788233,0.00031118307,0.0005973436,0.54209256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285497,0.001750533,0.04381938,0.007562749,0.0018302676,0.00037022642,0.0001608704,0.00035878492,0.015597479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97354275,0.017300824,0.0011046806,0.0030405528,0.0035980598,0.001413088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564823,0.03216127,0.0015647488,0.002898482,0.0059300815,0.00096315873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016028546,0.00080773607,0.0018065975,0.004294175,0.0079574995,0.010747277,0.0028201821,0.0073494054,0.006604134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05181746,0.0008419417,0.0024079492,0.0020918099,0.027633835,0.011335071,0.0066397884,0.010107009,0.0013335643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036846082,0.000010635978,0.00023419868,0.000055529694,0.000013927949,0.00009174414,0.0015134977,0.00023971323,0.000078140896,0.99347067,0.0020083294,0.0022467158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029802028,0.000015929041,0.00015594,0.00011268329,0.000018164026,0.00007484623,0.00051107357,0.000641946,0.00016389116,0.97923744,0.019021941,0.000016429465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046046106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027117792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016028546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005446637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002417627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115641323","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2166","title":"The Public Metonym","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Bourgeoisie; Conceptualization; Politics; Epistemology; Counterfactual thinking; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08829527627529442,"score_gpt":0.2686905461985331,"score_spread":0.18039526992323868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115641323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028618492,0.004618383,0.2731282,0.033334006,0.0040934384,0.0002850371,0.0006758236,0.0017266766,0.65351987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031998,0.0015539661,0.033116296,0.004178849,0.0019684385,0.000641652,0.0005242575,0.0010911049,0.053725626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867454,0.007487779,0.0007780061,0.002139371,0.0019360157,0.0009133873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934564,0.0029640945,0.000642543,0.0012898113,0.0012981391,0.00034896418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006438395,0.000918096,0.0012225966,0.0036908325,0.006961966,0.012139224,0.0017138174,0.004433603,0.009858999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010549688,0.00047455676,0.000774548,0.0030536824,0.020610904,0.022409918,0.0072359727,0.006562552,0.0029066647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010369992,0.0000032043654,0.000037513397,0.000043554497,0.000002275831,0.000036510937,0.0032470822,0.000042480686,0.00013665909,0.9907644,0.0025693774,0.0031065906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022290855,0.000057434365,0.00013672878,0.00022316324,0.000017973798,0.00049208675,0.005651663,0.0006806929,0.00080639217,0.4981826,0.4937029,0.000026110376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011746751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008726078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012139224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005369096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030538524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03895569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115843254","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3401","title":"Arguments as Abstract Objects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ambiguity; Object (grammar); Argument map; Epistemology; sort; Product (mathematics); Linguistics; Term (time); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.046379504268419136,"score_gpt":0.2985493773909435,"score_spread":0.25216987312252437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115843254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026673744,0.011884176,0.5203517,0.016242642,0.0015715221,0.00021788044,0.00054717076,0.0006070154,0.42190412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78578216,0.0060098395,0.16767703,0.004001521,0.0016593081,0.0008624487,0.0010318129,0.0006980048,0.032277916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99192,0.0041809804,0.00072802446,0.0011682981,0.0015552837,0.0004473447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916367,0.0048450036,0.00090089,0.0014423865,0.00082948856,0.00034551392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068555335,0.0013596041,0.0010799129,0.0050334954,0.0035845612,0.019199938,0.00206624,0.0050378554,0.010771273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010780184,0.00093963457,0.0017539056,0.0031907612,0.026022492,0.03456574,0.0064898683,0.0060673915,0.002585809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030350202,0.000001982965,0.000022034332,0.000026187612,0.0000020672046,0.0000131459865,0.00054819393,0.00004124375,0.00006179563,0.9980405,0.00023321784,0.0010066568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059289914,0.000004382208,0.00004175692,0.00003421358,0.0000043170376,0.00004148174,0.00018856073,0.00022855443,0.0000889915,0.97929895,0.02005797,0.0000049632536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005835952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004054263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019199938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028503623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012286818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036255956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119583573","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4079","title":"The Virtues of Reason and the Problem of Other Minds: Reflections on Argumentation in a New Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Analogy; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Modernity; Sociology; Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.050331563233670294,"score_gpt":0.27744907201247676,"score_spread":0.22711750877880646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119583573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08145081,0.04910752,0.037335373,0.21462944,0.0022270738,0.000056666435,0.000036509602,0.00008455288,0.6150721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96432805,0.0061898385,0.0051264176,0.0067566796,0.0011885912,0.00006918503,0.000014748757,0.000091191774,0.016235296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98913175,0.008350523,0.00025333965,0.0005497175,0.001106244,0.00060833676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97886765,0.01859076,0.0006688949,0.0006834613,0.00064992224,0.00053929875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128625175,0.0004982373,0.00074886816,0.002759325,0.011909,0.017218651,0.0018586806,0.011360766,0.0031289759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012599789,0.0003880071,0.0006731908,0.0019352048,0.10226362,0.020572769,0.006821978,0.011109837,0.0005343879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008044552,0.000013544282,0.00005493785,0.000030121377,0.000002597441,0.000099186866,0.042149696,0.00007065551,0.000045229834,0.9543205,0.0010330128,0.0021724456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000227842,0.000013409528,0.00015261422,0.00024508292,0.0000037787474,0.0001873617,0.01803027,0.000311592,0.000095034535,0.85955864,0.12136432,0.000015108173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032688954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036653695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017218651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009996227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038530072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072528005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121763187","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4124","title":"Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rationality; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Psychology of reasoning; Analytic reasoning; Dual (grammatical number); Cognition; Psychology; Principle of rationality; Ecological rationality; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Process (computing); Cognitive science; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Verbal reasoning; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05786137500224731,"score_gpt":0.3637557087690261,"score_spread":0.30589433376677877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121763187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13303874,0.028455226,0.3107989,0.05237243,0.00068242435,0.00011484599,0.00013738465,0.00059514306,0.47380492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650917,0.002822932,0.027063746,0.0010317406,0.00023281663,0.00008168674,0.000059855298,0.000046983427,0.0035686041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485046,0.003535822,0.0001778709,0.00041746063,0.0007366995,0.0002815885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934994,0.004725696,0.00055234943,0.0005961507,0.00038746643,0.000238835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005237589,0.00061369035,0.0005223737,0.0024304653,0.0016243444,0.0066990703,0.0013295201,0.0027426695,0.0029991942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078302715,0.00030425165,0.0007333058,0.0013846107,0.025892768,0.008585145,0.0026144686,0.0029311867,0.00054820825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013023834,0.000015993486,0.00019394384,0.00004388357,0.000008434568,0.000034300505,0.00092852005,0.00088370556,0.000106911146,0.9925211,0.00042758585,0.0048224973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000850214,0.0000042864285,0.0001363903,0.00002127633,0.00000268067,0.000023525385,0.00018663084,0.00063061697,0.000031252683,0.99540174,0.003549376,0.0000037068503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014280805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007814781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066990703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029927876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001918015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027699351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122225311","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i1.683","title":"Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Newspaper; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Media studies","score_opus":0.013400877473480257,"score_gpt":0.2619267581770227,"score_spread":0.24852588070354245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122225311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16444145,0.0013350513,0.74263626,0.005437669,0.00023619458,0.00046445354,0.0013156424,0.0009315992,0.08320173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80988663,0.000520736,0.18072201,0.00023741223,0.00007748979,0.00035263604,0.0011411664,0.00035825977,0.0067036315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998314,0.0010028493,0.00007080219,0.00026823973,0.00025535224,0.00008864363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992176,0.0055638854,0.00030914717,0.00135553,0.0005142117,0.0000811793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033704482,0.00047060856,0.0005032257,0.0034502724,0.0025401008,0.0057897135,0.0019323161,0.0017378333,0.009100718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014204894,0.000719664,0.0005423966,0.0030486188,0.007445634,0.010140315,0.0035154351,0.0033825934,0.0010882211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017359706,0.000065879205,0.002473375,0.00028102417,0.000033525386,0.0011142474,0.041081402,0.0026976995,0.0029292551,0.8801031,0.002842865,0.06620401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098283024,0.000091952184,0.005245657,0.0005663586,0.00009764036,0.0016575413,0.042060755,0.08183695,0.010168279,0.7161026,0.14197859,0.00009541774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031527772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041237413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009100718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020723636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013583442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03044492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123122802","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1044","title":"Emotional Backing and the Feeling of Deep Disagreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Feeling; Psychology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03980210751325378,"score_gpt":0.2675602829507883,"score_spread":0.22775817543753454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123122802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3364438,0.01533126,0.061140228,0.09808192,0.0028203293,0.00017656846,0.00006894265,0.0002448484,0.4856921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985413,0.0014389094,0.0020233314,0.0041164495,0.00057060266,0.00009223249,0.000018335426,0.000046935955,0.0062802755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314743,0.004513808,0.00018833291,0.00035663552,0.00112717,0.0006665371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907164,0.0060166414,0.0018868315,0.0005334698,0.00041301324,0.00043361294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00460768,0.00058770966,0.000472964,0.0019080144,0.0063042715,0.008884534,0.0016056615,0.005365359,0.0041872095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015250082,0.00025183664,0.000698087,0.001490715,0.033307612,0.010993167,0.009536397,0.0065073795,0.0006683956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005859321,0.00004575497,0.00087705225,0.00015270025,0.000019834146,0.0008045019,0.30955324,0.00018430816,0.0009620994,0.6747911,0.0033127666,0.00923808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050816394,0.00015097825,0.001887338,0.00050306047,0.000030831285,0.0027488172,0.16553941,0.0009420604,0.00088926556,0.6756392,0.15154779,0.000070468996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005661376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029718678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008884534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023327863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073770375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024368048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123858720","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2253","title":"Reification Fallacies and Inappropriate Totalities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Identification (biology); Doctrine; Ontology; sort; Conjunction (astronomy); Set (abstract data type); Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.015490676401537142,"score_gpt":0.22033394613027807,"score_spread":0.20484326972874092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123858720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105840325,0.004449737,0.22416013,0.025968878,0.00076745625,0.00013138208,0.00032162666,0.0015216358,0.6368389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406432,0.0011159163,0.027365224,0.0021407169,0.00031102812,0.00015449282,0.0001850833,0.0007346609,0.027349675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887567,0.0047417646,0.0008571435,0.0023214463,0.0024597526,0.0008631209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915718,0.0027430295,0.0005830975,0.0034363489,0.0013891674,0.00027654675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077119414,0.00084233365,0.0011697421,0.0027711345,0.0049298266,0.007320938,0.0015623658,0.0025785596,0.0074684755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015298968,0.00078544964,0.0012571382,0.002017198,0.023913505,0.018125145,0.008509995,0.0060726847,0.0016010168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008058476,0.0000034674379,0.00006501784,0.000012865575,0.0000036392366,0.00004577073,0.0013198227,0.00008340594,0.00009150859,0.995195,0.0007414593,0.002429915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011026989,0.0000032896862,0.000053395834,0.000022225731,0.000005869104,0.00007567136,0.000510539,0.00038998056,0.00028027542,0.9828813,0.015760653,0.0000057306097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029619597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032172152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077119414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004394929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018047162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040785134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124662483","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2868","title":"Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Heuristics; Appeal; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Jump; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Computer science; Positive economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical optimization; Physics","score_opus":0.06121604731127619,"score_gpt":0.2623205485938987,"score_spread":0.2011045012826225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124662483","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24241759,0.008466164,0.36041036,0.1258648,0.004206429,0.000381191,0.0003459142,0.001468872,0.25643882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92562467,0.0009624747,0.056224104,0.0063474462,0.00047824997,0.00018481415,0.00017039897,0.0006015189,0.009406374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96804464,0.016756492,0.0020622693,0.0028468815,0.008140527,0.002149193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247356,0.04458953,0.0119872,0.009430048,0.007417548,0.0018400972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021549048,0.0011921921,0.0016101236,0.0054170513,0.0059202216,0.012335839,0.0019581888,0.008434545,0.012820875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10389365,0.0010947791,0.0011204783,0.002936258,0.02050979,0.028174605,0.0074878493,0.008322718,0.00274217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011437294,0.000047533315,0.0017136557,0.0003183043,0.00007698859,0.0004028078,0.006881809,0.00055698305,0.0008007475,0.97088,0.0038097475,0.014397011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041498926,0.000026565443,0.0007925964,0.00017480568,0.00003562244,0.0003109987,0.0032533007,0.0013770803,0.00068691396,0.9666135,0.026654642,0.00003237712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00109274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014037777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021549048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033835066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022600116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113963604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128146492","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.1237","title":"The Value of Genetic Fallacies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.028469031667915336,"score_gpt":0.209510541999259,"score_spread":0.18104151033134366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128146492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102253534,0.01365184,0.11608616,0.29989165,0.0030208603,0.000060356906,0.0001384299,0.00034006935,0.4645572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663757,0.0020928856,0.010070018,0.009654876,0.0013081166,0.00008374009,0.00003376656,0.00016652372,0.010214327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767835,0.015501057,0.0005140353,0.0021321385,0.0040894365,0.0009798029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95905954,0.029042907,0.0020716996,0.004976384,0.0039442834,0.0009052437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021462081,0.0006240306,0.0008903816,0.0030136555,0.007936713,0.009401378,0.0025245298,0.006221855,0.0044586267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05861332,0.00039396825,0.00042583465,0.002000102,0.08638357,0.015020899,0.007330381,0.0084792115,0.0006473702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053890185,0.0000029177315,0.00011829909,0.000012472034,0.0000033299873,0.000034658453,0.0014410639,0.00011677567,0.000022193342,0.99560577,0.00067072763,0.0019663696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065393656,0.000003857766,0.000054521515,0.00004004025,0.0000035096393,0.000032890104,0.0005472329,0.00015982502,0.000048179627,0.9868685,0.012230336,0.000004430313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003130422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029255687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021462081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008300103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003977395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113503695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129530350","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.463","title":"About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Dialogical self; Epistemology; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09924219443778998,"score_gpt":0.2313452211963879,"score_spread":0.13210302675859792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129530350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090554535,0.04511499,0.20558822,0.090463795,0.0018283332,0.00018021878,0.00017435713,0.0002177552,0.56587785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523477,0.008946085,0.018642992,0.003714009,0.0008634497,0.00023287199,0.00006893616,0.00013833812,0.015045619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770744,0.009239737,0.00032456292,0.0007458283,0.001369099,0.00061327964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887755,0.008698013,0.0007070547,0.0006287697,0.0006470132,0.000543606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01258092,0.0006490237,0.00086015824,0.0033508055,0.007469349,0.015809849,0.0014568266,0.004135792,0.004341479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145135885,0.00026595072,0.0006176588,0.0035505702,0.043212283,0.029206442,0.0062973127,0.0067530707,0.0008045374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073062615,0.0000056163963,0.00010250228,0.000030460733,0.0000026346072,0.000039649327,0.017798644,0.00006185196,0.00005433756,0.9783198,0.0006251293,0.002952105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006820257,0.000015623282,0.00017525879,0.00013532079,0.000004176733,0.00019458859,0.019474128,0.00046363665,0.00015496965,0.9263401,0.05302046,0.000015034825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013824543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011822314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015809849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004865805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002107731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066535056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129816778","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i4.2854","title":"Confrontation and Ridicule","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Perspective (graphical); Persuasion; Psychology; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Epistemology; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02598441041879077,"score_gpt":0.33630257567469807,"score_spread":0.3103181652559073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129816778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18592502,0.012396731,0.18651646,0.03396332,0.0016730548,0.00018460088,0.00005996567,0.00080751826,0.5784734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729591,0.0009251465,0.008136105,0.0019842957,0.00028073174,0.000081549384,0.000025163083,0.00020652004,0.015401488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95979893,0.028770015,0.0011520118,0.0036643886,0.0048399717,0.0017746874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972713,0.016729029,0.0030096304,0.0047912477,0.0018583502,0.0008987479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013278423,0.0010126613,0.0011703444,0.003424295,0.010167689,0.010075765,0.0020588376,0.005743416,0.0060890373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042491306,0.0006784839,0.00077616464,0.001708004,0.060216323,0.01639428,0.019252924,0.007528456,0.0012371647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050163027,0.000028581435,0.0010770572,0.00021550122,0.000046997062,0.0008889346,0.14356272,0.000262852,0.001058878,0.8296129,0.0030603367,0.020135114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047788177,0.0001380907,0.0012921657,0.00074089796,0.0000564138,0.0038975673,0.07239286,0.0014556708,0.0028232846,0.6470368,0.26999846,0.00012001076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081753545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007013067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013278423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027626914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001431689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07022387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130107788","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2241","title":"Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.029106701376946296,"score_gpt":0.25603876793574365,"score_spread":0.22693206655879736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130107788","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020383665,0.048241932,0.6635404,0.06019135,0.0016513391,0.0004283546,0.00037712298,0.00026910854,0.20491673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6098823,0.018173961,0.34345856,0.0054707094,0.0026218325,0.0014083292,0.00042725285,0.00012858282,0.018428478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96980333,0.018151715,0.002828974,0.0023159143,0.006021355,0.00087859866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619036,0.026448455,0.0041014836,0.003919032,0.0024236632,0.0012038794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028300656,0.0014669969,0.0013519935,0.006844011,0.0039633317,0.016516577,0.004504138,0.010085468,0.00502471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05258243,0.0012530306,0.0015541362,0.005665085,0.041417893,0.029968979,0.009752286,0.009194337,0.0011615471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008649957,0.000007148874,0.000062690255,0.000060072496,0.000003897023,0.000021581718,0.00058111956,0.00019196761,0.000028183727,0.9947713,0.0004304899,0.0038328574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010968161,0.000007035802,0.000063898275,0.0000961334,0.0000046676923,0.000053842803,0.00028148378,0.0005850861,0.000059215843,0.98760843,0.011222168,0.0000070291558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010108135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010624572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028300656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053742374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026724772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14966995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132547821","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.3057","title":"The pragma-dialectician’s dilemma: Reply to Garssen and van Laar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Normative; Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Dilemma; Dialectic; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012632179538151392,"score_gpt":0.2442340935455214,"score_spread":0.23160191400737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132547821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009945593,0.005287031,0.0013906973,0.98697364,0.002570822,0.0000066439216,0.000012954351,0.0000141825685,0.002749355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20218037,0.016773976,0.009556508,0.72813594,0.026427045,0.00028543605,0.00006915357,0.00019317087,0.016378378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849887,0.010363506,0.00059546984,0.0012084928,0.002178822,0.00066503434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453418,0.04657289,0.0013831704,0.001103467,0.004435221,0.0011634047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027554289,0.00091890816,0.0015538578,0.0021136648,0.006808889,0.011022087,0.0046943915,0.03826777,0.0038583644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07305537,0.00090444373,0.0012484328,0.0032034,0.026058435,0.023004524,0.007853076,0.038922347,0.001825087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008055446,0.00004739808,0.00013072573,0.00017524778,0.000035014007,0.0003623435,0.008255194,0.000482646,0.00009012436,0.6847205,0.29402342,0.011596812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008524589,0.000020019264,0.00015146993,0.00034500298,0.00001853488,0.00022232365,0.0042127944,0.0011097287,0.00016887445,0.79229635,0.20130883,0.000060756898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005520781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053396584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03826777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008404978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052561807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14572275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132900127","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2254","title":"The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":873,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Psychology; Disposition; Systematic process; Cognition; Convergent thinking; Character (mathematics); Curriculum; Process (computing); Cognitive skill; Empirical research; Epistemology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Creative thinking; Creativity; Work in process; Computer science","score_opus":0.08520723245864432,"score_gpt":0.36159897230624505,"score_spread":0.27639173984760074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132900127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98823535,0.0006009057,0.0034241315,0.00037794735,0.000020606993,0.000052052546,0.000046148645,0.0000229983,0.0072199204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982297,0.00014474346,0.0014011823,0.000030299801,0.000011639057,0.000027550897,0.000030963514,0.000003703814,0.000120148616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699664,0.0014835107,0.00035304445,0.00025981173,0.0007693461,0.00013771337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9028104,0.06482083,0.021479545,0.0031741105,0.0049090446,0.0028060556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042880187,0.00014771335,0.00017356433,0.0021136599,0.00041539277,0.0014239515,0.0002559137,0.0005594275,0.00092746894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062146213,0.00016732056,0.00018309194,0.0013653621,0.0020557842,0.0010809653,0.0011758102,0.0011490581,0.0001752202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010733357,0.00025695955,0.9485056,0.000071796116,0.000061145685,0.00006900398,0.0023494817,0.00044565473,0.0019646331,0.0044235135,0.0002012069,0.041543722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008792674,0.00025820997,0.98742115,0.00007108681,0.000019643887,0.0006498118,0.0015213011,0.0016642624,0.0009760983,0.006563706,0.00082616555,0.00001970154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041224342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047223753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042880187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006221881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068829046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022677481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134720723","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2236","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Immortality; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Fallacy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12089603935311828,"score_gpt":0.31216809696240516,"score_spread":0.1912720576092869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134720723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09384816,0.03465444,0.19092162,0.3370685,0.0024796894,0.0000843899,0.00006151135,0.00017851625,0.34070316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692348,0.0040394426,0.010823071,0.0060331244,0.002016456,0.00010997393,0.000024109826,0.00011945222,0.0075996695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97019243,0.024345553,0.0005894076,0.00096050865,0.0025746892,0.0013373621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150765,0.07481225,0.0017099896,0.0036760704,0.00343977,0.0012853458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032826167,0.0006263503,0.0013367516,0.0038883605,0.008423099,0.019388631,0.0026657854,0.0108794905,0.0036612463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045762308,0.00067217567,0.0011466084,0.0029050508,0.079285726,0.048032407,0.011026604,0.013899536,0.00053007127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070719693,0.0000065059885,0.000047049827,0.000024976895,0.00000223041,0.000053312557,0.010357871,0.00011222804,0.00003596241,0.9871022,0.0006092961,0.001641329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007462329,0.00000793391,0.00003733888,0.00008532352,0.0000025679196,0.00004841512,0.0038563123,0.00033567642,0.00006111257,0.97940135,0.016148312,0.000008199213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016965679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013455099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032826167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005261476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003723652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17360348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135045205","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.472","title":"Natural Normativity: Argumentation Theory as an Engaged Discipline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Dialectic; Informal logic; Context (archaeology); Situational ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03527115943626872,"score_gpt":0.2777098203818924,"score_spread":0.2424386609456237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135045205","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076417224,0.0071453946,0.7639151,0.014269171,0.0011490778,0.00017152651,0.00008943498,0.00026014246,0.20535843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76161045,0.006106693,0.19637433,0.0039881193,0.0027761161,0.0010890904,0.00019859902,0.00025500983,0.027601605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98707354,0.008536093,0.00059391,0.0010134821,0.0022804511,0.00050264003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034625,0.006352623,0.0006632406,0.001232196,0.0009408041,0.00046484277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011840851,0.0006827742,0.00094903214,0.0026714862,0.0027249865,0.011245521,0.0025337792,0.004281899,0.004400094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01370095,0.00039004907,0.0012456926,0.0022771736,0.025312506,0.015297883,0.0044811144,0.0044436455,0.0012958698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031068637,0.000003999799,0.000022889939,0.000026545704,0.0000031587317,0.0000145051745,0.00035667245,0.00018611475,0.000040918425,0.9971578,0.00030629465,0.0018778862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050919652,0.000004427838,0.000015438822,0.000028225973,0.000002219372,0.000017275299,0.0000809923,0.00066641736,0.000054436103,0.99039286,0.008729161,0.0000032943015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081269565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044650343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011840851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033749905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027201767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062621176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135187704","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2891","title":"A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Objectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Medicine","score_opus":0.06646282060450644,"score_gpt":0.28877686783745976,"score_spread":0.22231404723295334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135187704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019533873,0.0038131364,0.3499095,0.53708094,0.0029425449,0.00016941332,0.000119793054,0.00036611222,0.08606471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8035567,0.0016804794,0.12770157,0.042771123,0.003751341,0.0011983187,0.00010565915,0.00045938283,0.018775366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9188988,0.056722075,0.0029859897,0.0061255996,0.013195973,0.002071571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9209855,0.056471862,0.0035041375,0.008519907,0.008549065,0.0019694539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07299986,0.0014730253,0.0023692956,0.0048022876,0.010434648,0.018531442,0.0064396826,0.022249654,0.006392378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09269166,0.0013339422,0.0023148993,0.0031715143,0.086606435,0.033693206,0.018797742,0.032019913,0.0016396068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008144745,0.000008125581,0.000020447123,0.000021892485,0.0000053157914,0.000030414798,0.0017826018,0.000119364704,0.000062842024,0.9960769,0.0010744443,0.00078951026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013614362,0.0000037093023,0.000012699594,0.000029494455,0.000002052942,0.000025980851,0.00043376436,0.0004295976,0.00009162737,0.9908568,0.008094072,0.0000065098175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010924835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008606357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07299986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011955733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006372951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38606477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135933060","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4077","title":"Virtue, In Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.057326803594014195,"score_gpt":0.2504277423336299,"score_spread":0.1931009387396157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135933060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010090527,0.010622657,0.013389786,0.020670258,0.0010130393,0.000023362523,0.000076590346,0.00007014906,0.9440436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913407,0.0037068909,0.0062635927,0.0053549646,0.0010708148,0.000089129266,0.0000871904,0.0001063031,0.06991402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734664,0.0016167957,0.0000714485,0.00039519693,0.0003311461,0.00023872357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988397,0.0004537863,0.00009728776,0.0002377735,0.00018415604,0.0001872549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024916916,0.00038668662,0.0005140944,0.0011266115,0.005574261,0.01010916,0.0007619874,0.002618357,0.009913478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037160253,0.00020060841,0.00030962183,0.001126222,0.02082698,0.0063391137,0.0043408093,0.0038040173,0.0013549422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000298955,0.0000018366952,0.000070231385,0.00001023238,0.000001087514,0.000022317989,0.0011280663,0.000026931391,0.000019995416,0.9944563,0.0022139347,0.0020460351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000617775,0.000007772822,0.000260542,0.00009575868,0.000004457724,0.00013531005,0.0017080815,0.00012480476,0.00006748667,0.732473,0.26511088,0.0000055461874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024675427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029355437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031456503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029955478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033163905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136637821","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3036","title":"Feminist Epistemologies of Situated Knowledges: Implications for Rhetorical Argumentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positivism; Code (set theory); Informal logic; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0826821687398541,"score_gpt":0.3915879571860329,"score_spread":0.3089057884461788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136637821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03546302,0.012703745,0.20282768,0.28533036,0.0020978248,0.00017398677,0.00014775898,0.00016960704,0.461086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316483,0.002980677,0.033125963,0.010312798,0.0016832267,0.0006149526,0.000059576538,0.00020161307,0.019372841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97370344,0.020942455,0.0005015774,0.0013509233,0.002590953,0.000910773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368268,0.055315778,0.0021683888,0.0021575892,0.002231589,0.0012998681],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03174425,0.0011194891,0.0013527219,0.0044939513,0.011078166,0.01640798,0.0037025604,0.008435797,0.00810658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035122383,0.0005832866,0.0011069351,0.0027442074,0.10520576,0.029176543,0.010246213,0.011024822,0.0009699769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043685986,0.0000053775084,0.000040357285,0.000026315112,0.0000019983686,0.00004805393,0.011751373,0.000071215036,0.000025530475,0.98614293,0.00069680647,0.0011855718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010381528,0.0000052455716,0.00004346354,0.00013472758,0.000001983762,0.000045759258,0.0073905676,0.00025900267,0.0001055639,0.96315056,0.028845675,0.0000070276565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024884806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023742036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012165035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005039529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16788167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136857883","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3143","title":"The Paradox of Analogy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054567972928305584,"score_gpt":0.2442323144040067,"score_spread":0.1896643414757011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136857883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08100514,0.004928832,0.27453104,0.10673399,0.0020508538,0.00009203134,0.00020710904,0.0004603064,0.5299907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94821084,0.0011716797,0.027041353,0.006040795,0.0005639646,0.00009453862,0.000058560137,0.00012402219,0.0166942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188614,0.004849949,0.00023247306,0.0010682273,0.0014993029,0.00046397297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989431,0.0066513265,0.00049281516,0.0021689914,0.00090907485,0.00034683154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008282933,0.000354851,0.0007451146,0.001243757,0.004589326,0.00550085,0.0018239929,0.003767745,0.012440605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028905159,0.00034141933,0.0010580744,0.0010270297,0.018026901,0.017228158,0.006176375,0.0063231727,0.0016127402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008812844,0.0000038223952,0.00007495818,0.0000137182415,0.0000037209245,0.000036007266,0.00043678674,0.00011969606,0.000053648524,0.99575657,0.0013441108,0.002148131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007587938,0.0000047381827,0.00005606492,0.000016593935,0.0000032822184,0.00006588157,0.00021336142,0.0005135941,0.000077607765,0.98878175,0.010254723,0.0000047920967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014907313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010639075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012440605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021594204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016115408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043804824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137064426","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3610","title":"Arguments Whose Strength Depends on Continuous Variation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Variation (astronomy); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Ignorance; Symbol (formal); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.026387358559803648,"score_gpt":0.21788137428387164,"score_spread":0.191494015724068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137064426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16980916,0.0056521394,0.35199812,0.066677906,0.0014058289,0.0001895552,0.0004067802,0.00048262137,0.403378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672945,0.0010813451,0.022930266,0.0025212972,0.0007528013,0.00010875955,0.00013112703,0.00010796239,0.0050720023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97735244,0.009605839,0.001155984,0.0036634393,0.0068620546,0.0013602886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82501733,0.13969639,0.006619553,0.014378912,0.011236499,0.0030513764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02559531,0.000830034,0.0019402881,0.0066002314,0.0028949,0.010666847,0.0036670694,0.0067805904,0.012043868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13024172,0.0010787377,0.0022531033,0.0026859308,0.02208839,0.024947815,0.010421471,0.009979084,0.0016047346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003484411,0.00001438754,0.0004670044,0.00007097259,0.000053998963,0.00010385688,0.00019576041,0.0007213387,0.00018861714,0.99402606,0.0006427643,0.0034804323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002168635,0.00001286729,0.00018224462,0.00005139303,0.000018694482,0.00006683829,0.00008798523,0.0020545092,0.00019795488,0.99511224,0.0021838595,0.000009856459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005511816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039682252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02559531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003337164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015686809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13536257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137487617","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2577","title":"The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Informal logic; Epistemology; Begging; Test (biology); Grice; Sociology; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Argumentation theory; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.02657904061724747,"score_gpt":0.2099473469438889,"score_spread":0.18336830632664142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137487617","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114580244,0.000769799,0.52158225,0.023584947,0.00032589593,0.00030911018,0.00017889804,0.00068100326,0.3379879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430272,0.00013765786,0.047467258,0.0014096736,0.00010608402,0.00014805212,0.00008042901,0.00006893637,0.007554714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803437,0.009701904,0.0011751994,0.0024590015,0.0045336396,0.0017865918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736612,0.014529106,0.0032878725,0.004683695,0.0032454485,0.00059272355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015530001,0.0007379034,0.0010028984,0.0044568344,0.004877181,0.007680554,0.0037588154,0.0048848726,0.007430581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033687778,0.00062297046,0.0022693088,0.002616394,0.037982464,0.017143471,0.0054988,0.006884094,0.0010328601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115385255,0.000012446553,0.0001937788,0.000014334176,0.000005451723,0.00007080449,0.0017623279,0.00049474585,0.000043951473,0.9943082,0.00032967568,0.0027528694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017903818,0.000009189643,0.00013984223,0.000024041381,0.0000061884384,0.00006400417,0.00045602166,0.0025210066,0.00011757729,0.9927382,0.003897249,0.000008633439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004302657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026850353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015530001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061561447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048315693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082131505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137883463","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.1192","title":"The Metaphoric Fallacy to a Deductive Inference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Analogy; Inference; Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Rule of inference; Computer science; Inductive reasoning; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.01801547841746032,"score_gpt":0.279019675044014,"score_spread":0.26100419662655366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137883463","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04672954,0.0015562442,0.8265889,0.041112587,0.0017128454,0.00019525288,0.00021418622,0.0011366279,0.080753714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78541386,0.0009919569,0.1998504,0.006038173,0.0006613213,0.00027068323,0.0002741669,0.0003815531,0.006117946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97484076,0.011689399,0.0018804885,0.002237097,0.008361138,0.0009911968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96413445,0.023622189,0.0016831494,0.0064744907,0.0036607431,0.00042491732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017330317,0.0009158637,0.0013973482,0.0032121532,0.0058933925,0.0058834474,0.0028973208,0.0056103133,0.004777711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068965636,0.000989484,0.0015232575,0.0017607195,0.027933495,0.01585355,0.008453029,0.011276787,0.0011856948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003450963,0.000024244298,0.00031847093,0.00010835284,0.000022759428,0.0005248736,0.0021241654,0.00062312477,0.0004709111,0.98679835,0.0018799225,0.007070302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012453095,0.00001155728,0.00007890153,0.00004214568,0.000012180024,0.00035501458,0.00028831683,0.0020161052,0.0004732273,0.9880477,0.008649184,0.000013260816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015716105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009133466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017330317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027395359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023223415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09165257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139794519","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2931","title":"Truth and Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Logical truth; Criticism; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0797422625294547,"score_gpt":0.2921479428081424,"score_spread":0.21240568027868767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139794519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070382487,0.020441681,0.09966189,0.05477362,0.0019595555,0.00022322839,0.00015832979,0.00024310098,0.8155003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221781,0.010468398,0.058548275,0.012817902,0.004271163,0.0006203785,0.00035826626,0.0006458819,0.09009155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96462506,0.023401344,0.0015862964,0.0029645034,0.005599697,0.0018230877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741132,0.018711427,0.0011558919,0.0022605162,0.003144885,0.0006141285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02352624,0.0011310445,0.001565516,0.0038175213,0.005461007,0.015668355,0.0027493734,0.007525891,0.022431118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04853089,0.0007026979,0.00158551,0.0022582235,0.03301964,0.022944465,0.0078088287,0.0072939377,0.0031725033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010572839,0.0000064146348,0.00006852261,0.0000645692,0.0000068834083,0.00002753723,0.00062600465,0.0001384088,0.00003216878,0.99064445,0.0022824486,0.006092041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011816692,0.000008326944,0.00005602815,0.00010568687,0.0000053944445,0.000041308784,0.00023831717,0.0002849252,0.000103698265,0.96346915,0.035669703,0.0000056281697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019596198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011147748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02352624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010724356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040143314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12442011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141098873","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.465","title":"Argument Has No Function","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Pragmatics; Dissent; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Function (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.044770427918596124,"score_gpt":0.26928381262016915,"score_spread":0.22451338470157303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141098873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016835997,0.007958042,0.2150459,0.094858706,0.0035266348,0.00007992481,0.0001467301,0.0007879942,0.66076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555623,0.002370736,0.05068607,0.015966438,0.0016133907,0.0003631033,0.00019660512,0.0006936775,0.072547585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880242,0.006941147,0.00054740714,0.0019151253,0.0018923532,0.00067972887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98613316,0.007859705,0.0006925771,0.0027338548,0.0018828055,0.00069791824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010783972,0.0009788582,0.0011824437,0.0018523734,0.005231744,0.01422173,0.0015557943,0.0065392093,0.012782916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01671514,0.00079609285,0.0013316199,0.0009974873,0.045286212,0.02806187,0.0062479675,0.0061642104,0.004619264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011491316,0.0000049810933,0.00006227468,0.000035331366,0.0000040336736,0.000010916354,0.00056463503,0.00003511668,0.00005970888,0.9948166,0.0017248322,0.0026700268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019922576,0.000025249039,0.0000900768,0.00008913007,0.000013752536,0.00008189072,0.00037692982,0.00030001096,0.00027749283,0.9095462,0.08916383,0.00001554338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009505416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079128717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01422173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005087813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031053778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05703175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141509767","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.485","title":"Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Informal logic; Foundation (evidence); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03237957088350588,"score_gpt":0.30028361755840804,"score_spread":0.26790404667490214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141509767","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01268889,0.05801046,0.65648514,0.05479891,0.0020712966,0.00014405097,0.000107951346,0.0002011806,0.21549208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5910126,0.051941928,0.3171678,0.0052198414,0.0067041996,0.00063572434,0.00019694369,0.0002705611,0.026850367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880769,0.0072921035,0.00071492133,0.0010424327,0.0024492163,0.0004244246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954145,0.036981642,0.0017075824,0.0039376044,0.0024756577,0.00075251836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017284019,0.0013967755,0.0013102344,0.0056568924,0.0036650945,0.011342449,0.0027872424,0.006065997,0.008106408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027842628,0.0008647743,0.0015611923,0.005297496,0.029564809,0.031730175,0.0056791524,0.009867869,0.0015423424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030786528,0.00000544888,0.000032093027,0.000048250862,0.0000017770952,0.000008613462,0.00046664698,0.00022410003,0.000018610206,0.994753,0.00033312532,0.0041051325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005291094,0.00000543976,0.000028966508,0.000069605034,0.0000021232656,0.000020149864,0.0001337594,0.00086505694,0.00003075026,0.9744012,0.0244326,0.0000051129214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016810361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011226343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017284019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073427917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038896867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091407716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141961202","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2579","title":"Critical Thinking in the Schools: Why Doesn't Much Happen?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Parallel thinking; Critical theory; Sociology; Critical systems thinking; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05035368384930244,"score_gpt":0.3649866247988576,"score_spread":0.31463294094955513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141961202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055713918,0.12914594,0.007889004,0.74538577,0.005406762,0.0001380557,0.000035355486,0.00009600817,0.0561893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85525596,0.055217795,0.0072577624,0.06659704,0.0034585,0.00029010873,0.00004078075,0.00005878435,0.011823219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98974997,0.0073920367,0.00030086524,0.00053492404,0.0012975873,0.0007245934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97346604,0.018006166,0.003201658,0.00067094556,0.0020444982,0.0026105803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008740649,0.00039676786,0.00053084665,0.0024284534,0.0058294116,0.013915204,0.0012417353,0.0044859415,0.0028476827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026452098,0.00024468265,0.00033547214,0.0026426835,0.03318095,0.012918642,0.004959517,0.008531773,0.00056802173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008559396,0.00018815098,0.007664344,0.0012836123,0.000041078885,0.0005374003,0.115427606,0.00029630665,0.00040034697,0.6507896,0.08310871,0.14017726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040825726,0.00013481814,0.006368845,0.003119309,0.000026878599,0.00038160043,0.118466094,0.00036651146,0.0005785959,0.6703147,0.200148,0.000053807587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038677226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054983147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013915204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00860625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009094185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062443018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142254252","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.3078","title":"Diagramming Objections To Independent Premises","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Arrow; Argument (complex analysis); Premises; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03932603295168866,"score_gpt":0.23968911017331745,"score_spread":0.2003630772216288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142254252","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014221192,0.00048040875,0.9338008,0.0032571994,0.00065947126,0.00023526598,0.00013851178,0.0014360704,0.045771167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2533862,0.0008961759,0.7193735,0.0016301573,0.0004925814,0.0009393684,0.00046800278,0.0014469858,0.021367088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986842,0.008350569,0.00077122386,0.0016996732,0.0019796025,0.00035684745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465644,0.03917511,0.0022685595,0.0067131952,0.0044053006,0.0008735115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015737522,0.0010818683,0.00075769285,0.0029936756,0.0031483863,0.007370349,0.0024622818,0.0032029217,0.015580516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048493493,0.0010331032,0.0014835853,0.0015440718,0.007831468,0.015949158,0.0078444285,0.0066803764,0.0023578305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008561815,0.00002485346,0.00037245598,0.00020328193,0.00002014586,0.00032015005,0.008139513,0.0007494953,0.0017686235,0.9585928,0.0029788068,0.026744317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062115876,0.000038078593,0.0002191673,0.0002446868,0.00005016289,0.00021843384,0.0014183843,0.005435659,0.0038199893,0.8791916,0.10927179,0.000030020235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007264453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076666276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015737522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002350324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017576881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083228946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142621508","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.3063","title":"Do Squirrels Eat Hamburgers?: Intellectual Empathy as a Remedy for Residual Prejudice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Empathy; Injustice; Epistemology; Sociology; Residual; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12055312449552753,"score_gpt":0.3566505104062681,"score_spread":0.2360973859107406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142621508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3074846,0.010757403,0.09544684,0.2516364,0.0020536846,0.00017617214,0.00003907741,0.0001563774,0.33224943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655889,0.001265016,0.011323709,0.010978409,0.00017012481,0.00010706303,0.000009450094,0.000024387657,0.010532986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547416,0.0034566752,0.00007513665,0.0003256624,0.00035626214,0.00031210593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952636,0.0032932549,0.0006442621,0.00028447885,0.00030622666,0.00020824454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067066643,0.00044481267,0.00029893185,0.0006771645,0.0033249964,0.002372342,0.0010027632,0.0026677777,0.0027001502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011576637,0.00012554013,0.00028434006,0.00027722865,0.02032344,0.0035949482,0.0037668594,0.0033983868,0.00034797372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011352695,0.000111887195,0.004655675,0.0002947267,0.000041435786,0.00043404187,0.13638797,0.00031423048,0.0014244741,0.7839,0.012208785,0.060113266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007465356,0.0002621149,0.0072073555,0.0007069368,0.00007653346,0.00081395824,0.114115566,0.001210769,0.0032310586,0.7030217,0.16922124,0.00005813864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087698846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017092908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067066643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012130268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001245476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035468698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142636695","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3531","title":"What a Real Argument Is","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05494259938175779,"score_gpt":0.3590992580294191,"score_spread":0.30415665864766134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142636695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023785144,0.011083877,0.14375827,0.22830704,0.012385647,0.0003896407,0.00061570294,0.00034516864,0.57932943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83712375,0.004827245,0.061265156,0.0349934,0.0035244173,0.00062971207,0.000882475,0.0005078767,0.056245975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805951,0.012335861,0.001210192,0.0021937625,0.002860401,0.00080455374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198146,0.010879555,0.0014791607,0.0018115056,0.003212513,0.00063582923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013114524,0.00096949283,0.0009223493,0.0024409413,0.0045752926,0.01379388,0.0018729441,0.010200958,0.014188131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03436561,0.00048572494,0.0011705562,0.0015383133,0.023939934,0.024107313,0.005100866,0.0069242422,0.0033429656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026442025,0.000017850156,0.00028636615,0.00015796538,0.00002156658,0.00019076481,0.0064168773,0.00006165693,0.00024274646,0.9800862,0.008131579,0.004359836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002547379,0.000025132582,0.0004067535,0.0007026975,0.000035571124,0.00047381426,0.008971,0.0005352342,0.0006837653,0.7239721,0.26412258,0.000045930505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001581765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012443495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014188131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039946223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034515893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0693571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143080384","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4211","title":"Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argument Structure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Dialectic; Informal logic; Analogy; Epistemology; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06898946727387348,"score_gpt":0.2784988722347673,"score_spread":0.20950940496089385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143080384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0559179,0.0037898608,0.80746424,0.014461131,0.00036789823,0.00017130522,0.00009619373,0.00018609196,0.11754542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534928,0.0010394154,0.13806665,0.00078344904,0.00020983916,0.00024103628,0.00009986108,0.00006498071,0.0060019563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828956,0.011006133,0.0010621558,0.0014488269,0.003016175,0.00057105353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96149135,0.027414098,0.0031942222,0.0048080087,0.0023509024,0.00074141496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014657642,0.0007225902,0.00089145114,0.0038156027,0.003241568,0.007471311,0.0026876582,0.0044915285,0.009196639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044031393,0.0006078615,0.0012714415,0.0029220767,0.0204861,0.026000023,0.0074091484,0.004243255,0.0007981076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028863817,0.000004254436,0.000049663966,0.000017649845,0.000003353291,0.00001526673,0.000304043,0.00039192734,0.000029618142,0.99729306,0.00008466861,0.001803636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052586006,0.0000033114693,0.000037672904,0.000020837637,0.000002021639,0.000025468065,0.000086722954,0.0012909968,0.00004853849,0.99562824,0.002847095,0.0000037842844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066543405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050058606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014657642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003906727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001690681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07751799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144144446","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2175","title":"Three Potential Problems for Powers' One-Fallacy Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Counterexample; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.07424296417331332,"score_gpt":0.2579567446520901,"score_spread":0.1837137804787768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144144446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028139867,0.005626712,0.2553006,0.31573543,0.0026436874,0.00032493434,0.00018977244,0.00054529565,0.39149368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840466,0.0032864597,0.09310059,0.0283942,0.0037461207,0.0012241624,0.00012849252,0.00040165192,0.029252253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97039187,0.015080461,0.0015460072,0.0030443054,0.008265062,0.0016721714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94100976,0.04464964,0.002638592,0.0057401326,0.0044205757,0.0015413141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027105933,0.0012488972,0.0018323638,0.004251877,0.008713745,0.010964494,0.0043857167,0.011874665,0.01051845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07400986,0.00095356756,0.0019406066,0.0025819635,0.062238496,0.02543323,0.010916785,0.017945256,0.0020297214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070591386,0.0000065850063,0.000057090016,0.00001571487,0.0000027198876,0.000043799828,0.00041008883,0.0000761393,0.000009062816,0.99632794,0.0012952819,0.0017485498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081282315,0.0000031751301,0.000015124544,0.000021512597,0.0000013468292,0.00003522674,0.0001347856,0.00025469033,0.00003260101,0.9955715,0.0039170044,0.000004778555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002250971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015185232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027105933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005900308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037669651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14335155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145855346","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.692","title":"Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Heuristics; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Analogy; Computer science; Inference; sort; Subject (documents); Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.05435871230586371,"score_gpt":0.25239604860623904,"score_spread":0.19803733630037534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145855346","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019772602,0.0033868332,0.7463093,0.035836723,0.0006513718,0.00023213199,0.000404392,0.00029897722,0.19310777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458333,0.0022178935,0.32818785,0.0067946315,0.0009777423,0.0007235731,0.0007775372,0.0002460892,0.014241378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97538054,0.015624857,0.0015797794,0.0023556778,0.0040020635,0.001057082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95555997,0.029476399,0.003587716,0.00675798,0.0036983772,0.0009195468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026787749,0.00089638267,0.0011940013,0.0061690267,0.00439744,0.011910862,0.0036063811,0.006050908,0.00723425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04895095,0.0010308429,0.0016947468,0.0043045618,0.02511769,0.028739769,0.008188022,0.0074945316,0.0014422506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034553025,0.000002025333,0.00004431586,0.00001825235,0.0000030488022,0.000022550255,0.000351535,0.00017251265,0.00001844151,0.9973591,0.0005527656,0.0014520168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034497657,0.0000019075558,0.000029179399,0.00004289949,0.0000029763155,0.000026991012,0.00013872526,0.00076356187,0.000061719795,0.99059135,0.008333511,0.0000037436926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014813669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001570443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026787749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004935387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023269064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1416688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146285180","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2903","title":"Argument Content and Argument Source: An Exploration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Bayesian probability; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08683420969472098,"score_gpt":0.2725883723733077,"score_spread":0.1857541626785867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146285180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4236661,0.020505251,0.22342317,0.022534577,0.00015073545,0.0005585372,0.00039539285,0.00029260412,0.3084736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97383636,0.0029805724,0.020376734,0.0002495782,0.00009879708,0.00015880748,0.000101377926,0.00015607962,0.0020417224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785402,0.015408718,0.000676116,0.00093322503,0.003940526,0.0005013521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.804561,0.18005982,0.0043684645,0.0033769596,0.006548567,0.0010852927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029177919,0.0010139719,0.0015179508,0.0076854727,0.002588665,0.01595326,0.002285086,0.0032231507,0.010636536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114298224,0.0012942083,0.0010837343,0.0061334744,0.009442354,0.02629893,0.006433797,0.0037343395,0.0010581964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049762917,0.00030940326,0.022812989,0.0011552953,0.00017757565,0.0010166962,0.030048212,0.0017665282,0.0017414079,0.8517827,0.0010404591,0.08765111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105317115,0.00015764653,0.020286532,0.0014049262,0.0001670879,0.0018068396,0.017964186,0.015164254,0.001118239,0.9263799,0.015381896,0.000063099724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089384324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079768867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029177919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037717156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003020233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15430945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146615740","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3892","title":"Debts, Oligarchies, and Holisms: Deconstructing the Fallacy of Composition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Composition (language); Positive economics; Debt; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Social science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023883342143656502,"score_gpt":0.19975974508407393,"score_spread":0.17587640294041743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146615740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26223102,0.005511117,0.2728489,0.09833938,0.00083823863,0.00010624459,0.00011734337,0.00021560222,0.35979214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982014,0.00053650787,0.011928283,0.0014299675,0.00025347454,0.000058048987,0.000022454726,0.0000707113,0.0036865717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457943,0.0033741023,0.0001916736,0.00063827954,0.0007939038,0.00042263872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936179,0.003741326,0.00069347635,0.001122362,0.00046772131,0.0003571541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009359347,0.00054524443,0.00075777806,0.002228026,0.0046246643,0.010181885,0.00148581,0.003117743,0.0034004205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013471608,0.0003814015,0.00064093544,0.001611243,0.05449123,0.019972773,0.0095181465,0.0051578125,0.00032453457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005937124,0.00000245235,0.00014984554,0.000005165962,0.0000015205538,0.000010688271,0.0012259885,0.00008775576,0.000023481558,0.9972752,0.00015567539,0.0010562201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005270038,0.0000027777905,0.000113808994,0.00001785538,0.0000020428222,0.000013243758,0.0005911182,0.00042911948,0.000054103086,0.99522686,0.0035411052,0.0000026916234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029903755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027814766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010181885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004233718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002987332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049497545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150078957","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1043","title":"Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Common ground; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13516825870943205,"score_gpt":0.3132166242604163,"score_spread":0.17804836555098424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150078957","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12057348,0.0021200583,0.52888817,0.11621931,0.00063786685,0.00041703784,0.00008429061,0.000630839,0.23042902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196205,0.0006383522,0.067417674,0.0028534953,0.00024432447,0.00019354143,0.00008103185,0.00018472185,0.008766401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712452,0.02082028,0.0009148901,0.0022859226,0.0029758287,0.0017578717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508256,0.03089749,0.0038240035,0.007332951,0.004185689,0.0029343609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034309354,0.0008328394,0.0009823855,0.0031986937,0.008874257,0.014225427,0.0040933364,0.007537999,0.008594281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08753565,0.0006760081,0.0013847814,0.0021310821,0.056689285,0.02809905,0.01782191,0.009331028,0.0017048458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008660334,0.00004371404,0.0007650798,0.00004870662,0.000016737857,0.00022410133,0.015133349,0.0016403189,0.00023143367,0.9580653,0.0036241356,0.020120542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186597,0.000013251258,0.00014274502,0.00006466113,0.0000060776506,0.000044633776,0.0035503916,0.0030961852,0.00020913535,0.9823418,0.010498201,0.000014151513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029289634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032371308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034309354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054028756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065235407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18144739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150092490","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3679","title":"The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises. Presumptions in Enthymemes.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Fallacy; Proposition; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024294662204071928,"score_gpt":0.28989051130446986,"score_spread":0.2655958491003979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150092490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078238316,0.0068062325,0.41895354,0.019145373,0.0010626349,0.00013944533,0.00031117146,0.0005983704,0.47474492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613019,0.0007785219,0.026684124,0.00075159164,0.00015396258,0.0000676092,0.00009074251,0.00012361076,0.010047931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947725,0.003694373,0.00017496033,0.0005035248,0.00065492943,0.00019977972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173903,0.0060674655,0.0006198947,0.0009521051,0.00044222313,0.00017924022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004896357,0.0005619209,0.0004267457,0.0011075257,0.0024685771,0.0059025264,0.0015079252,0.0030036147,0.00822327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01563627,0.0006236976,0.00068346784,0.00065932045,0.017862035,0.014549363,0.004936224,0.0045390953,0.0014531278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034576526,0.000008180916,0.0001464176,0.000103770995,0.0000060376847,0.00019540294,0.009260331,0.00012745062,0.0007969904,0.98311967,0.0006196322,0.0055814837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024858726,0.00004405195,0.0005314488,0.00016654993,0.000017745173,0.000639872,0.0057271887,0.002059412,0.0014849665,0.95117843,0.038099397,0.00002605674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084840815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010955438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00822327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015960619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000919629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02750957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150102685","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3896","title":"Govier on Trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Social trust; Politics; Express trust; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Blind trust; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.07036793476111594,"score_gpt":0.25225399418691247,"score_spread":0.18188605942579653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150102685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015255034,0.013758133,0.061240822,0.18408939,0.0017578097,0.000074012045,0.00016297869,0.00014321253,0.7235186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87689435,0.0071501043,0.009230272,0.023744715,0.0017645329,0.0002134118,0.000084489475,0.00023129076,0.08068688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98970276,0.006059218,0.00033084195,0.0012876673,0.0015226845,0.0010967841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878535,0.008309073,0.00069829053,0.0012620988,0.0013684041,0.00050857244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007609822,0.0006684612,0.0008420512,0.0017745711,0.0075211553,0.010268679,0.0011792284,0.008608045,0.008621316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022558123,0.0003905039,0.0008971192,0.0017246463,0.028970568,0.012114124,0.0053701457,0.008461351,0.0016181892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003804097,9.88248e-7,0.000032992546,0.0000076071024,0.0000011302969,0.000021591299,0.0003884791,0.000055431512,0.000005428241,0.997209,0.0015318332,0.0007416696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008500113,0.0000068372856,0.000056871275,0.00010363388,0.000004637621,0.000056224737,0.0003280603,0.00020565114,0.000043948014,0.94294876,0.056229863,0.0000070088386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014370524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064809485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014370524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009943824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004942753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072147846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150143572","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3345","title":"The Coherence of Hamblin’s Fallacies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07515332941461389,"score_gpt":0.2460258901198267,"score_spread":0.1708725607052128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150143572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13354617,0.0123876,0.4684337,0.11672584,0.0018691352,0.00037224748,0.00028681726,0.0005954557,0.26578304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534084,0.0012027047,0.03591493,0.0026823548,0.00036419832,0.00022790731,0.00010254734,0.00014608049,0.0059509333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9611063,0.02516497,0.0023460714,0.004278887,0.005486903,0.001616786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96135527,0.02572892,0.002947246,0.0047686393,0.0043409946,0.0008589024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024882786,0.00072387763,0.0016300636,0.0046877437,0.009409024,0.01359957,0.0022939632,0.0070141237,0.004992558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06376656,0.00093322847,0.00088345446,0.0038918029,0.045172505,0.023839101,0.010140625,0.009039472,0.00097538426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002190728,0.000007731506,0.00016911764,0.000034469856,0.0000069467023,0.000048739705,0.006041499,0.00018003715,0.0000658861,0.9879497,0.0010343629,0.004439566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014624612,0.000008459411,0.00008892412,0.000059132493,0.000005212558,0.000047754198,0.0010127425,0.0005760423,0.00008632387,0.98663217,0.011458772,0.000009812556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024607514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016566782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024882786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069480776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035817216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1315943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150745872","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.595","title":"In Defense of Analogical Reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Analogical reasoning; Rebuttal; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Analogy; CLARITY; Inference; Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Logical reasoning; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07993744814897633,"score_gpt":0.23093895555534583,"score_spread":0.1510015074063695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150745872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01686726,0.006291646,0.2842703,0.3138018,0.003799082,0.00016918771,0.00023500681,0.0004064866,0.37415928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84636533,0.002974934,0.06705294,0.04587769,0.007464458,0.00075319683,0.00019010883,0.0002400683,0.02908126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815724,0.009969162,0.0008880473,0.002400874,0.0044277348,0.0007418335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740562,0.01666318,0.0019896007,0.0040105586,0.0025218548,0.00075861183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021364667,0.0009159942,0.0011450764,0.0042042215,0.0057417387,0.009314707,0.0048855585,0.009018451,0.0101975445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040150803,0.0006332579,0.0020838382,0.0017217933,0.05019236,0.01783191,0.008086747,0.016238611,0.0020110004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028703212,0.0000034470665,0.000024648012,0.00001118026,0.0000028615884,0.00001177478,0.00014280181,0.00009432325,0.000011230197,0.99850464,0.0006455014,0.00054476503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007652016,0.0000036298459,0.000017344693,0.000020371506,0.0000025124273,0.00001830475,0.00006113548,0.0004261768,0.00002682359,0.99211496,0.0072981217,0.0000028870738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001616319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001042618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021364667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006378902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036005531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11298853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154121373","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2281","title":"The Origin of the Justification of the Two-Wrongs Argument: A Conjecture","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Doctrine; Conjecture; Philosophy; Mill; Mathematics; Theology; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.03557146476488321,"score_gpt":0.2251281143757557,"score_spread":0.18955664961087249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154121373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07442422,0.0028915852,0.16364127,0.31700626,0.0020666332,0.00012278289,0.00025830217,0.00029070288,0.43929824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96697724,0.00058842596,0.011974727,0.004794001,0.00086509885,0.00009145311,0.000057136098,0.00010462736,0.014547338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907883,0.0041023833,0.00044703804,0.0014582968,0.0023160456,0.00088798214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96914256,0.018331205,0.0022680843,0.004877285,0.0043784273,0.0010024944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017404843,0.0005325449,0.001131801,0.001837388,0.0039895186,0.0074248053,0.0027963412,0.007937014,0.01476491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040388197,0.00043126135,0.0012598988,0.0011438755,0.031882763,0.019991092,0.004439184,0.007984844,0.0019187836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016495154,0.000008044004,0.000098055854,0.000020115927,0.0000037599943,0.0000427926,0.00055127137,0.00011489579,0.00003362621,0.99657613,0.0010494196,0.0014853661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001188549,0.0000034433565,0.00007044402,0.000024928657,0.0000021640153,0.000032689102,0.00021271278,0.0003762581,0.00005032079,0.9953774,0.0038328872,0.0000049122514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019724502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017404843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038158423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033658447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09204668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154127350","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4295","title":"Inference, Circularity, and Begging the Question","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Begging; Inference; Semantic reasoner; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1490930985878663,"score_gpt":0.3231040273235812,"score_spread":0.1740109287357149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154127350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053754594,0.004552994,0.66873264,0.061321214,0.0012870693,0.00022026195,0.00021261923,0.0004010576,0.20951751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784167,0.0013657005,0.102579795,0.005628241,0.0009944878,0.00037302132,0.00017512083,0.00029849762,0.01016839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98604935,0.008368339,0.0010258527,0.0018608763,0.0018697343,0.0008259152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618814,0.027188428,0.0022433545,0.005756537,0.0024177886,0.00051251595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020311909,0.00066211284,0.00095886673,0.0025131055,0.004458684,0.00853279,0.0027988527,0.0059116436,0.0064799385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040015966,0.00084906473,0.0016216116,0.0018804157,0.041221566,0.024424715,0.0077794055,0.0074070375,0.001169855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059681006,0.000003881688,0.000077544886,0.000023409619,0.000003848958,0.000036637928,0.0009503269,0.00010599777,0.000048455044,0.9972301,0.000322592,0.0011912361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005254945,0.000004018078,0.00003856978,0.00005754421,0.0000067381457,0.00004511853,0.0003493466,0.0005917582,0.00023182775,0.99017674,0.008485624,0.0000074953405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001647325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009974536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020311909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038232957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031822354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10742092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154311707","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.3886","title":"Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Expert opinion; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06019313579507564,"score_gpt":0.2553742799430113,"score_spread":0.1951811441479357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154311707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121123575,0.0118551385,0.110029325,0.5417331,0.0017846001,0.00012172822,0.00007855482,0.00019127101,0.21308275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96716726,0.0016483224,0.008133132,0.019995186,0.0009074995,0.00006711393,0.000023901606,0.00008178173,0.0019758358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94872355,0.0328034,0.002302435,0.0041707675,0.0101244515,0.0018754546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75214213,0.20921801,0.010642143,0.014007248,0.011445272,0.0025452257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056814708,0.0005405059,0.0011834708,0.004193591,0.006236431,0.015357026,0.0032827614,0.016485237,0.004752531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16546303,0.00062050094,0.0010426596,0.0023592308,0.091803946,0.027410131,0.010771598,0.016946573,0.0009291955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041667885,0.000014287524,0.00076305645,0.0001278955,0.000031692878,0.00025106888,0.015056729,0.00024584113,0.00015512251,0.97156197,0.0038307828,0.0079198275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031187243,0.000018949097,0.00053245894,0.0005880038,0.000021887934,0.00010622705,0.0057996125,0.0006897904,0.00038584849,0.9753924,0.0164019,0.00003170654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028315063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017850116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056814708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006409683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047502625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3004685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154754503","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2844","title":"Argumentation and the Force of Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Argumentation theory; Normative; sort; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014548594880289027,"score_gpt":0.24427925918055393,"score_spread":0.2297306643002649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154754503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14013821,0.015117607,0.33610612,0.059451167,0.00084122317,0.0002325391,0.0002280998,0.00035329576,0.44753173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628396,0.0016135209,0.024474235,0.00087861496,0.00037001248,0.00012864349,0.00008270816,0.00006466325,0.0095479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758296,0.014982851,0.0012899726,0.0023091396,0.0041537345,0.0014347108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958002,0.031469755,0.0025558984,0.0036048207,0.0032427844,0.0011248683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021425862,0.0007620956,0.00096463173,0.0041571655,0.0054363324,0.011184668,0.0013526478,0.006312818,0.0070857727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037512038,0.0005919808,0.0015668194,0.0016378969,0.030161371,0.019233655,0.0075114984,0.0039779507,0.00089376495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012194824,0.000007376199,0.0001851834,0.000024728659,0.0000079930705,0.00004377338,0.0011304494,0.00025973198,0.000093482646,0.9947601,0.00025097522,0.0032241396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022363403,0.000007922865,0.00014060283,0.000043973683,0.0000072232538,0.000061477105,0.00034458688,0.0009851892,0.00012630149,0.9872629,0.010989366,0.0000082233255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015045912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080150174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021425862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004427855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025208162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113312125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155620277","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.440","title":"The Philosophy of Error and Liberty of Thought: J.S. Mill on Logical Fallacies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Mill; Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Morality; Doctrine; Argumentation theory; Socratic method; Politics; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Theology","score_opus":0.08706685823113056,"score_gpt":0.32384441198747294,"score_spread":0.23677755375634238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155620277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02812275,0.17315154,0.027017822,0.39328575,0.006979221,0.0000655973,0.000070731294,0.000090765614,0.37121582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8157727,0.07069427,0.01040814,0.0340915,0.009688661,0.00019123044,0.000047502926,0.0001811174,0.058924768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611783,0.0020410267,0.000119994176,0.00033114175,0.0011113868,0.00027858085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044037,0.007854857,0.0004143895,0.0002614155,0.00077068247,0.0002583423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046300893,0.0005781584,0.0007150092,0.0017067044,0.0049230056,0.008332874,0.0008773754,0.0035637398,0.0015627808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011459151,0.0005282953,0.00040590778,0.0028768473,0.024754286,0.010132277,0.0021815838,0.005777233,0.000522352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018338189,0.000018435174,0.00010240353,0.00003657566,0.0000033219426,0.000044375436,0.0038000694,0.00019780027,0.00004172393,0.9695059,0.020077499,0.006153539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019890962,0.000019458595,0.00027019467,0.00021044447,0.0000049471078,0.000035340978,0.001073251,0.00036769343,0.00007548242,0.89457,0.10333937,0.000014010585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042860443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048615425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008332874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00369656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003509835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02682054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155747790","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3326","title":"The Presumptions of Meaning. Hamblin and Equivocation.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Meaning (existential); Presumption; Fallacy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11768392159311643,"score_gpt":0.24221173324142367,"score_spread":0.12452781164830724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155747790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03385576,0.06473229,0.09985529,0.19248798,0.0032956097,0.00010357687,0.00018100427,0.00019602405,0.6052925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434735,0.0054969266,0.013652204,0.011179331,0.0009966419,0.00020335498,0.000046225807,0.00017033744,0.02478154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873793,0.009474922,0.0003577969,0.0011550883,0.0011754545,0.0004573969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859875,0.010872788,0.00069906266,0.0012394935,0.00086778175,0.00033336182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009152344,0.00097338,0.00065462705,0.0025202206,0.007945222,0.009275565,0.0014424407,0.008121558,0.0038335777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019659888,0.000859185,0.0009165307,0.0015569606,0.07324673,0.024713079,0.0069018146,0.010097119,0.000992112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015662472,0.00000335034,0.00007754925,0.00002602524,0.0000035236249,0.000067120964,0.008602068,0.000049942613,0.00005048585,0.9869486,0.0017934303,0.0023624566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001196671,0.000007396766,0.00008731456,0.00011025055,0.0000055096675,0.00010288562,0.002817843,0.00021340832,0.00017348916,0.96570575,0.030752795,0.0000113014175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047592954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040424275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009275565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007591813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00304591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05508274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157635154","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2589","title":"Towards Computational Rhetoric","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Bridging (networking); Argument map; Computer science; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.048923211204574914,"score_gpt":0.25141847753683955,"score_spread":0.20249526633226464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157635154","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011940229,0.010379476,0.7980703,0.016909223,0.00095103605,0.00012702036,0.00030017114,0.0006045908,0.16071789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42387113,0.007106757,0.54006076,0.0022943001,0.0013525572,0.00055617304,0.000794622,0.00030037883,0.023663353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558264,0.0027557802,0.00021967255,0.00049538404,0.0007837213,0.00016274421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516404,0.0031758365,0.0002400577,0.0007804269,0.00046067018,0.00017887223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041879974,0.0008622417,0.00096407806,0.0032022626,0.0023563437,0.010624049,0.002038593,0.002930203,0.0068140347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011741823,0.00058296585,0.0016594693,0.0022941618,0.010033984,0.012727985,0.005077131,0.0043043164,0.0022598247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041630515,0.0000045555043,0.000037931943,0.00005465133,0.0000041534745,0.000016443124,0.00031084986,0.0008908496,0.000065778644,0.99170434,0.0010172074,0.0058891107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041174753,0.0000031867216,0.000021817013,0.000044472767,0.00000233994,0.00001998814,0.000100905,0.0044333935,0.00007668356,0.9702452,0.025044505,0.0000033948465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000851917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008944205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010624049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023800987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016813138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0227952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157908040","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.3098","title":"Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Ambiguity; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Subject (documents); Argument map; Ontology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06479982507607242,"score_gpt":0.2736057414594977,"score_spread":0.20880591638342527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157908040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03738345,0.013291832,0.34870586,0.22331505,0.0036015678,0.00014072275,0.0001534178,0.0003213885,0.3730867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93669116,0.005534816,0.03353437,0.011134036,0.0036500362,0.00027535475,0.00015625375,0.00029673253,0.008727158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97060037,0.016844697,0.0018828742,0.0037449386,0.005258504,0.0016685509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565019,0.026271071,0.0050041624,0.006890554,0.0040687663,0.0012635924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03039314,0.0007275049,0.002545973,0.00437792,0.0061219893,0.02918879,0.004184552,0.01681475,0.008237951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067453764,0.0010332223,0.0018383914,0.0051825885,0.054528337,0.06556149,0.006355495,0.011564673,0.0025907725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013041165,0.000006461598,0.00015909801,0.00004810545,0.000009996624,0.000076409626,0.0012513056,0.00004858814,0.00004719408,0.9946725,0.0008051646,0.002862365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010476274,0.000005995868,0.00016042356,0.00008366369,0.000013792567,0.00016945526,0.0008350909,0.0002895461,0.00010902295,0.98438084,0.0139313815,0.000010313825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013398111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073777157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03039314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047435514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004051428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1607362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157989973","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3588","title":"Getting Your Ad Banned to Bring the Message Home? - A Rhetorical Analysis of an Ad on the US National Debt","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argumentative; Modalities; Computer science; Linguistics; Debt; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.05918136925967567,"score_gpt":0.30499382305496237,"score_spread":0.2458124537952867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157989973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5866595,0.0024610204,0.07286303,0.024742197,0.0010273858,0.0002725264,0.0014300485,0.00032779964,0.31021646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95528436,0.00053754775,0.023220105,0.0008653568,0.00020426695,0.0000844669,0.00036675006,0.000091434114,0.019345613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983633,0.0010427388,0.00005030144,0.00012608415,0.00033999115,0.00007749971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937065,0.005252106,0.00031966166,0.00021902722,0.00041366345,0.000089085624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025567135,0.0002233316,0.00024616878,0.0020643864,0.0037606515,0.0033596156,0.0005158672,0.001376657,0.0054905633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008660497,0.00012922443,0.0002444863,0.0020793234,0.0039892,0.00404782,0.0015072878,0.0020309978,0.00043084266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028989394,0.0001960964,0.006691672,0.00047662316,0.000034081644,0.001132927,0.09387549,0.0010788266,0.006229393,0.7762435,0.022397853,0.091353685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666508,0.00018780542,0.023142358,0.0008063641,0.00008542807,0.0008360091,0.14231189,0.014654839,0.014576363,0.27465454,0.52856565,0.00011211074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057557314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012655365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057557314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002283003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014497126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018367767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159274653","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2165","title":"Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sketch; Sociology; Communicative action; Action (physics); Discipline; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Social science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06547906983314049,"score_gpt":0.4059171181064266,"score_spread":0.3404380482732861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159274653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045973096,0.065220065,0.41486543,0.15527311,0.0023773692,0.0004909484,0.0000714153,0.00021916634,0.3155094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84493333,0.015492305,0.115411244,0.006251752,0.0016130878,0.0012771533,0.00005002274,0.00013962567,0.014831352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9552474,0.038141053,0.0010475822,0.0016682026,0.0029566677,0.0009391706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95625585,0.03660222,0.0024136968,0.0018766669,0.0016250549,0.0012264124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036921155,0.0015104775,0.0015704683,0.010794258,0.0102704195,0.018286316,0.003307329,0.010080551,0.0033518982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031092234,0.0005847984,0.0010987694,0.006808119,0.1004594,0.026060656,0.011956281,0.008561779,0.0006633846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007644355,0.000009479086,0.000070856106,0.00005380033,0.0000039473807,0.000036697314,0.016704112,0.0001236856,0.000033784465,0.97832936,0.00056517066,0.004061399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012530033,0.000011665295,0.000059630143,0.00013657159,0.0000030717824,0.000039453622,0.0063808872,0.00026349907,0.0000911273,0.96679246,0.026200874,0.0000082453425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002214469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00164135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010738495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067073954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19526011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160720308","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3899","title":"Why We Still Do Not Know What a “Real” Argument Is","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Subclass; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06304576164918829,"score_gpt":0.25805975060471364,"score_spread":0.19501398895552535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160720308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026419625,0.028279994,0.095879376,0.6206686,0.0028506715,0.000047544756,0.00023784986,0.00025745528,0.22535878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779686,0.00786959,0.024223097,0.06831215,0.0022334424,0.00015323202,0.00021684403,0.000405278,0.018617727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866223,0.007139723,0.00047486115,0.0022007758,0.0025848516,0.0009775386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96812683,0.021519067,0.0025255503,0.0021413125,0.0046685226,0.0010187459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017604422,0.00068748486,0.0011864642,0.0022912137,0.0049959607,0.011530052,0.001929054,0.008975473,0.01094849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039537475,0.00043470485,0.0009273907,0.0014694058,0.045535848,0.029782427,0.0035305978,0.013197809,0.003390336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016060525,0.000009692857,0.0002616239,0.00011186107,0.000019294479,0.000044933753,0.0025511195,0.00008184852,0.000101724756,0.9847419,0.006823963,0.0052358275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012752562,0.0000055428713,0.00020287409,0.00017900571,0.000009811739,0.00007722088,0.0024339515,0.00014834393,0.00022200293,0.94900745,0.047677554,0.000023420547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030020245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028344793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017604422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046382206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025560316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09310222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165982645","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2593","title":"E-motion: Moving Toward the Utilization of Artificial Emotion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Robot Interaction and HRI","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Balance (ability); Task (project management); Motion (physics); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.15774101021593065,"score_gpt":0.3911313836363696,"score_spread":0.23339037342043897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165982645","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018557955,0.012515776,0.8900864,0.005993641,0.0004942017,0.00013311995,0.00011656905,0.0016383819,0.07046391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3644783,0.011202723,0.5953836,0.0024263237,0.0007967632,0.00025509126,0.00032223808,0.0003964693,0.024738532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998949,0.00054422783,0.000045265875,0.00019232742,0.0002135259,0.00005568531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800783,0.0011697985,0.00012692594,0.00036797288,0.00020352792,0.00012393759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018257787,0.0006631662,0.00048040418,0.0007314392,0.0004905227,0.0034092227,0.0019664837,0.0016575648,0.007406305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040248632,0.00034347153,0.00072924164,0.0007256496,0.004279777,0.0073231976,0.0022949807,0.0014034945,0.0017333861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023408128,0.00011826961,0.0022410466,0.0013565758,0.00008406478,0.00024703878,0.0022283553,0.0072979447,0.027626658,0.56525373,0.008652806,0.38465944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009782339,0.00046781846,0.0031447334,0.0007538749,0.000105804786,0.00083507685,0.0016703226,0.097902,0.013879186,0.46650672,0.41451246,0.00012422595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010837591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008402414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007406305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007888809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004873521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024776518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166139333","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2153","title":"An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09099506718038776,"score_gpt":0.2969452559415837,"score_spread":0.20595018876119597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166139333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029239124,0.012142529,0.3840885,0.058294084,0.0022406422,0.0002119829,0.00018663197,0.00019473564,0.5397171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5482918,0.012531111,0.32697418,0.012970214,0.0052272454,0.0014942049,0.00034985162,0.00030345327,0.09185791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98005235,0.013473085,0.0011240068,0.0014169378,0.0031578415,0.00077581947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875964,0.0079222275,0.00076176017,0.0014998768,0.0015875666,0.00063225895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013852297,0.0011856519,0.0012251653,0.0049338187,0.007477852,0.0162109,0.0036000009,0.0069168196,0.00877088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436513,0.000731018,0.0019176789,0.0034767846,0.041070763,0.018023541,0.007203153,0.008490846,0.0020766063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001353229,0.0000037559557,0.000013544032,0.000023300996,0.000002837549,0.0000140834445,0.0003599463,0.00008051261,0.000014686913,0.99766314,0.0006009492,0.0012218965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044877575,0.0000029861883,0.000012286907,0.000048147685,0.0000021441308,0.000025800347,0.00019191895,0.00027031454,0.00002339961,0.97294235,0.026473051,0.000003158408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001953508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016758649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0162109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007681262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064229635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07325882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166637659","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.3013","title":"Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06267104608860875,"score_gpt":0.22423442883786868,"score_spread":0.1615633827492599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166637659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043851875,0.015272217,0.37164176,0.10161646,0.0014650943,0.00006818488,0.00010532991,0.00021337863,0.4657657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95069104,0.0021026486,0.026619842,0.005441976,0.00089368393,0.0001701861,0.000051053637,0.00013161742,0.013897885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913564,0.0061334204,0.00026064907,0.00070963986,0.0010849396,0.0004549537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881849,0.009068274,0.0006571962,0.0009746961,0.0007434924,0.00037146357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009758994,0.0008379047,0.0008244963,0.0022353511,0.004182403,0.0077486373,0.0016520229,0.004890664,0.0044026207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010426885,0.00037103405,0.0009713374,0.0018082708,0.053336393,0.016525734,0.0042810086,0.0058685616,0.0006552625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028542522,0.0000018556563,0.000025238474,0.000009322211,0.000001422785,0.000007406086,0.00041870814,0.000048540405,0.00001534212,0.99836785,0.00029896054,0.0008024845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030484919,0.0000047353046,0.000031026484,0.000020191417,0.0000011322919,0.00001936425,0.00018195792,0.00018833319,0.00004443593,0.9921284,0.007374573,0.0000028586605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013342148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010367315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009758994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004555701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002064627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051611125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166781827","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2252","title":"A Preferred Treatment of Mill's Methods: Some Misinterpretations by Modern Textbooks","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Misrepresentation; Presentation (obstetrics); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; History; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04812645516469246,"score_gpt":0.388681522075549,"score_spread":0.3405550669108566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166781827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010866051,0.041428998,0.49106053,0.27809414,0.013570581,0.00013301033,0.00038035624,0.001116377,0.16334999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4504801,0.036594737,0.32252547,0.07815074,0.033403523,0.0010799567,0.0003717279,0.0028280634,0.07456563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788072,0.012698012,0.0011156544,0.0011553167,0.0056480165,0.00057577295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96542627,0.023069782,0.0020645303,0.0030968012,0.005852758,0.00048982154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023807386,0.0012527752,0.0013641813,0.008128829,0.0050573368,0.011611922,0.0041775997,0.004607348,0.005997998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051727414,0.0008245422,0.001065829,0.009328599,0.028431151,0.01685018,0.004314182,0.011672182,0.0027048425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012400069,0.000011274197,0.00007616665,0.00006369676,0.0000061133055,0.000021228356,0.0016975026,0.00012170107,0.000044905424,0.96964943,0.01837232,0.009923173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018205583,0.000019337962,0.00014837517,0.0002513968,0.000008601676,0.000103091596,0.0008598003,0.0015320847,0.00026591463,0.8504787,0.14628564,0.000028826124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014902728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016138515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023807386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005599688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002450516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.125907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168458288","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3608","title":"Virtue and Argument: Taking Character Into Account","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044226886786066295,"score_gpt":0.25235894873701714,"score_spread":0.20813206195095085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168458288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042504273,0.006661957,0.21371344,0.041884784,0.0011172644,0.00012152096,0.00006743887,0.0001876959,0.69374156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575689,0.0010275138,0.02371972,0.0026188886,0.0005865825,0.00017788376,0.00003980192,0.00010742932,0.014153197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886473,0.008357018,0.00034749106,0.00074946234,0.0013241578,0.000574696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873137,0.007788488,0.00096119515,0.0016837611,0.0012786557,0.0009742279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011146899,0.00056153355,0.0010296347,0.0023014457,0.004783149,0.013910323,0.0014428006,0.0070465854,0.006143345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013770092,0.00039628267,0.0009461575,0.0013455426,0.043047808,0.020734007,0.006565017,0.0065878117,0.0010000294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005125968,0.000004589562,0.00011131143,0.000017284989,0.0000029742973,0.000022955694,0.00045971893,0.000066291286,0.000032733926,0.998111,0.00021191982,0.0009540626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007907656,0.000008952502,0.00010789664,0.000036593727,0.000003577705,0.000074314215,0.00036039363,0.00046648923,0.000056135985,0.9868198,0.012052816,0.0000050717613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000544645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000582842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013910323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002531853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023086558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05895114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170164284","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2248","title":"Ambiguity in a Dialectical Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Dialectic; Fallacy; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Constraint (computer-aided design); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024231981693972355,"score_gpt":0.27727046776489134,"score_spread":0.253038486070919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170164284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032578062,0.020058706,0.3645599,0.10920699,0.0013383535,0.0001783971,0.00015173857,0.00021364678,0.47171417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241868,0.004968322,0.04646214,0.005686125,0.0010156948,0.0003285334,0.00007035644,0.00016262295,0.017119313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97731745,0.016168553,0.0008363086,0.0014178263,0.0031809926,0.0010789691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854655,0.010798362,0.00076294236,0.0011719164,0.0012149177,0.00058631203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017603368,0.0011555512,0.0013455086,0.0053153355,0.008682686,0.020818686,0.0025536632,0.0066685337,0.003824818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015346985,0.0008874163,0.0011402919,0.0028885056,0.051464397,0.025519887,0.008741326,0.009196748,0.0007093803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002963037,0.0000022375182,0.000015022423,0.00001341391,0.0000018594948,0.000015893722,0.0016134962,0.00013275721,0.000023256005,0.9974874,0.00017636635,0.00051520765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065564427,0.0000029916757,0.000011941839,0.00004045948,0.0000026442822,0.000016992777,0.0010482933,0.00037889788,0.00006237647,0.98572356,0.012701449,0.000003955676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022933085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014498389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020818686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013671732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048162113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09919584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170441435","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2172","title":"Against the \"Ordinary Summing\" Test for Convergence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Generalization; Convergence (economics); Test (biology); Mathematics; Epistemology; Applied mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018095908422299578,"score_gpt":0.2676428179057791,"score_spread":0.24954690948347952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170441435","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111934535,0.0016014833,0.48691225,0.047626246,0.0015160884,0.0005112199,0.0008782617,0.0013721198,0.34764782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86984307,0.0005512208,0.1033956,0.011948473,0.0013637472,0.000946839,0.0006514114,0.00057713035,0.010722453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.954043,0.024059812,0.0029361628,0.005511354,0.011570757,0.0018789228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8259529,0.12949717,0.005428159,0.014738671,0.02107997,0.0033031413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03956764,0.0013189153,0.0029115153,0.0051740645,0.0050862804,0.0054938365,0.004016486,0.0053419815,0.017307408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19025211,0.0005932067,0.0031567449,0.0032373478,0.0273167,0.022574889,0.011684378,0.0096817445,0.0035789316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021962302,0.000040891424,0.0025937844,0.0001434928,0.000067264176,0.00013426336,0.00072687067,0.0006400663,0.0002924867,0.9688676,0.004805339,0.021468354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009718419,0.00006592412,0.000903659,0.000103912804,0.000030608862,0.00019780624,0.0005688972,0.0037606074,0.0007245715,0.9867877,0.006727106,0.000032026248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013200645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085896126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03956764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00230975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037226123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20925617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171108596","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1114","title":"Assessing the Cogency of Arguments: lbree Kinds of Merits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Public discourse; Law; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06483145228242188,"score_gpt":0.3016563798888918,"score_spread":0.23682492760646995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171108596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7504066,0.0011650405,0.061880723,0.015592694,0.00024099105,0.00038067452,0.00025385027,0.00017520855,0.16990414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076676,0.00008113375,0.007776368,0.00029851584,0.000106311774,0.00017407641,0.00008493278,0.000042746815,0.00066917326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9309498,0.029270055,0.0058820574,0.006146656,0.02456272,0.0031887246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69044197,0.24800944,0.018142963,0.022224104,0.017808823,0.003372739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051394038,0.0005506198,0.001402883,0.013722436,0.0057951617,0.019447848,0.0027364683,0.0066607394,0.0068088183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29360533,0.0006254969,0.0009266788,0.005372818,0.025052993,0.027264435,0.012659573,0.004294023,0.0005207456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007676418,0.00032377787,0.05302432,0.000479394,0.00016858896,0.0005233514,0.024019713,0.0017128307,0.0020136975,0.8491493,0.0012454864,0.06657198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011460023,0.00018848779,0.022312194,0.00024124148,0.000082676284,0.00042782832,0.021963371,0.0079854615,0.0015671765,0.93662006,0.008446115,0.00005074459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000648052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008633442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051394038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005185923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027282462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27180088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171666222","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.464","title":"The Contextuality of Fallacies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Kochen–Specker theorem; Normative; Dialectic; Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Quantum; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05304850682439037,"score_gpt":0.2540606301036091,"score_spread":0.2010121232792187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171666222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30318338,0.0082126185,0.21521425,0.020012535,0.000718285,0.00028453462,0.00056601444,0.0008733787,0.45093507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897092,0.00042801976,0.0072968984,0.0002921413,0.00007731213,0.00009761004,0.000100921,0.00008904599,0.0019088197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844902,0.008549646,0.0009127592,0.0031750614,0.0014291217,0.0014432924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98678535,0.006945219,0.0014403912,0.0027429345,0.0014750569,0.0006110315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072743692,0.00066658633,0.0010460224,0.0043210327,0.0077726888,0.010583178,0.0017006018,0.0029289802,0.0081712445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02559368,0.0010345313,0.00072583527,0.0029618274,0.027907008,0.015777186,0.009492701,0.0035094784,0.000764205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048682108,0.0000137014895,0.0009989287,0.00008634234,0.000014739012,0.00016423837,0.013115071,0.00037218715,0.00030859638,0.9786456,0.0005191961,0.0057127806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026252566,0.000024693823,0.0010906961,0.00020152869,0.000027060223,0.0001705441,0.012426715,0.00081829086,0.00042704798,0.95358074,0.031186191,0.000020301295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037623027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003228999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010583178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004643521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020411275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038471043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171823291","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.430","title":"Applied Epistemology and Argumentation in Epidemiology","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Epidemiology; Social epistemology; Causal reasoning; Sociology; Causal inference; Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine; Cognition","score_opus":0.07565957776028776,"score_gpt":0.35967247807376496,"score_spread":0.2840129003134772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171823291","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02295502,0.037355125,0.57038933,0.18919562,0.0027808228,0.0003376189,0.00015823398,0.00018916267,0.17663908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7958831,0.012650848,0.16096164,0.013895036,0.0038627016,0.0010972207,0.00018559214,0.000093140115,0.01137073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.926503,0.062107738,0.0034192158,0.0021350228,0.0042213867,0.0016135621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86196536,0.122046456,0.005550745,0.004520634,0.0041436977,0.001773114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042203285,0.0010529316,0.0018499108,0.0067322906,0.005428658,0.014279377,0.0029239224,0.011734936,0.005811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0695286,0.0007011099,0.0018719246,0.00511744,0.060998887,0.020129457,0.009761114,0.009819901,0.00081966846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004286038,0.000008650244,0.00012293238,0.00008469874,0.000007416692,0.00006476673,0.0012062028,0.00035618478,0.00002173622,0.99555224,0.00042548223,0.0021453812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000678134,0.0000035052292,0.000035257188,0.00006294841,0.0000016446205,0.00003277277,0.00027786702,0.00036170371,0.000019033563,0.99483585,0.0043584798,0.0000042242973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018298458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095674174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006717578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054433863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22319502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182859523","doi":"","title":"A pragma-dialectical default on the question of truth","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05861650614167141,"score_gpt":0.2945879025731903,"score_spread":0.23597139643151888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182859523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018754125,0.0042189937,0.4280869,0.08789279,0.0015354581,0.00018087933,0.00041774017,0.00044653623,0.4584666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85612524,0.0019789005,0.080130875,0.011958718,0.0015625835,0.0005863277,0.00028551547,0.00023703293,0.04713483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988139,0.006827687,0.00064953516,0.0018342232,0.002053541,0.0004961067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779476,0.0077580074,0.0005245354,0.0021980454,0.001342997,0.00038170608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014304178,0.0006291595,0.00092049694,0.0022088364,0.0043865745,0.0075826007,0.0024031855,0.0072356267,0.011527134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02417532,0.00045722286,0.0010979647,0.0018979876,0.040671088,0.019496929,0.0069540488,0.008840759,0.0030569183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005689994,0.0000021477324,0.000013764711,0.000013905825,0.000001496726,0.000012137358,0.00039857044,0.00007095512,0.000028257959,0.9977329,0.00074949476,0.000970665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006961442,0.0000035064338,0.000020135036,0.000029379118,0.0000017916387,0.000025428224,0.00014761997,0.0002823338,0.00006543403,0.9906731,0.008740725,0.0000035496616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016668919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009919996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014304178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067014857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035177376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075648606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189861499","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4335","title":"Formalizing Informal Logic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Computer science; Epistemology; Theoretical computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08350979533523059,"score_gpt":0.2820720715384595,"score_spread":0.1985622762032289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189861499","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005468238,0.0013055046,0.947328,0.0022215354,0.00029176023,0.00019768406,0.0004036627,0.0008166036,0.04196705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31632718,0.0029202776,0.65866053,0.0018599237,0.0008446079,0.00071409246,0.0015444885,0.000508182,0.01662073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943224,0.0020569973,0.00064885704,0.0009236271,0.0014507945,0.0005972827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993316,0.0037206134,0.000505965,0.0010477923,0.0011375976,0.00027203502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005916437,0.0014739801,0.0007291749,0.0029975807,0.002611573,0.0059958324,0.0027479723,0.0020457134,0.010918686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010424539,0.00091091875,0.0023124546,0.0017562706,0.008355522,0.012205809,0.005786761,0.00467081,0.0021737348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052099745,0.000011057615,0.00006555285,0.0000639231,0.0000047732597,0.00006361325,0.00033173795,0.0013191383,0.00028043322,0.9926784,0.0006277966,0.0045482963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018406852,0.000015756472,0.000052260406,0.00013587468,0.000015360942,0.0001439174,0.00014145099,0.0072984835,0.00076823,0.94439006,0.04700189,0.000018303957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027829835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017984222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010918686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003180197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027951542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03652662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190741863","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4333","title":"On Novels as Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Narrative; Philosophy; Term (time); Linguistics","score_opus":0.14198497969348653,"score_gpt":0.2922095148641722,"score_spread":0.15022453517068565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190741863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043348044,0.013049796,0.043081563,0.03175442,0.0019650334,0.00009361752,0.0002225252,0.00013896788,0.86634606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9348547,0.0048752446,0.011319759,0.0033350673,0.0018101287,0.0001841014,0.00017270894,0.00018830341,0.043259937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947791,0.0035890853,0.00015359491,0.00062687317,0.00053256756,0.0003187679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918183,0.005717456,0.0006954806,0.00096248684,0.0005468118,0.00025950134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044450043,0.0006846756,0.00046366843,0.0021347022,0.004345868,0.011853199,0.001060255,0.0033024144,0.009425741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00982799,0.00031359136,0.00058029464,0.0015777932,0.032429237,0.018206459,0.0047456007,0.0035610215,0.0012745102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005667591,0.0000037902641,0.000029931418,0.000026353971,0.0000013302795,0.000041747197,0.003222805,0.000041991247,0.000051334653,0.9943222,0.00084907655,0.0014038357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014830665,0.000019192345,0.00016663526,0.00018534825,0.0000052929913,0.00017775504,0.004133027,0.0002838757,0.00023434078,0.82722145,0.16754979,0.000008325193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065218686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075541745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011853199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003401216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011776099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031532228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192421421","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4386","title":"Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Confusion; Epistemology; Key (lock); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.16153640127224797,"score_gpt":0.28933537933286396,"score_spread":0.127798978060616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192421421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05124502,0.0717567,0.12023871,0.4752932,0.0059020594,0.00009688353,0.00014163955,0.00031378935,0.275012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188465,0.0069675855,0.01546942,0.03812144,0.0030355637,0.00012073745,0.000039406146,0.00009952423,0.017299837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98269457,0.012133893,0.0007339731,0.0012580479,0.0024270955,0.0007525584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614531,0.030250324,0.0025265962,0.0016860141,0.0033084557,0.000775605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016067043,0.0005697248,0.0005707662,0.00362672,0.0056558093,0.007628837,0.0013433556,0.0083943615,0.0046510664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05167904,0.00046446224,0.00053476344,0.0022425107,0.030682877,0.017484875,0.0065496755,0.005622222,0.0010175698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291124,0.0000058806722,0.0005317953,0.00010999001,0.000012095066,0.00018362577,0.02324318,0.00011983472,0.00015218873,0.9470655,0.015611833,0.012931282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025995529,0.000028633263,0.001324202,0.00045894075,0.000032579625,0.0005808771,0.017204635,0.0010150941,0.00082888774,0.81641746,0.1620326,0.00005019192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026860829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036458517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016067043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049784603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029916356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08497167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194365097","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4330","title":"Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemic virtue; Appeal; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.19395576315062887,"score_gpt":0.30317661237687565,"score_spread":0.10922084922624678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194365097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08454268,0.010769207,0.16788977,0.10046121,0.001730245,0.000116961855,0.00016656781,0.00021370157,0.6341097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96265924,0.0010395121,0.022954432,0.0026122085,0.0005658746,0.00009914607,0.000040863837,0.00004807696,0.00998063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866887,0.008839994,0.00063221,0.0010472364,0.0021807386,0.0006111541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622327,0.029356645,0.0023700849,0.0026447496,0.0023917374,0.0010040457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016179971,0.00042091132,0.00082676834,0.0032070836,0.003976526,0.009273518,0.0015025744,0.005627377,0.007076358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033548634,0.00044791427,0.00070240133,0.0016826238,0.040319286,0.013339124,0.005484409,0.0057022134,0.00077866565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005908771,0.000005743802,0.00010084096,0.00002602752,0.000003452737,0.000034486715,0.00035204957,0.00006218778,0.00003103779,0.9972395,0.0005905076,0.001548324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007653959,0.0000049084756,0.000115282644,0.000051026273,0.0000031128009,0.000039538943,0.00021964814,0.0003383702,0.000077604505,0.9904248,0.008711927,0.000006062175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059977075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007787736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016179971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002880614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021390966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085568845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195988402","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4332","title":"Arguing as a Virtuous Arguer Would Argue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Argumentative; Focus (optics); Rhetorical question; Virtue; Perspective (graphical); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19648223612850496,"score_gpt":0.506461509326517,"score_spread":0.30997927319801205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195988402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169038,0.0026099063,0.39136174,0.11778721,0.004933193,0.0007657215,0.00009218298,0.0005060871,0.44025362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8066659,0.00096744834,0.118004404,0.01792395,0.0015032642,0.0006692799,0.000089459885,0.00036000865,0.05381629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571512,0.030216845,0.0018005649,0.002799826,0.006604364,0.0014272257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95379937,0.028386408,0.0031857637,0.0057950434,0.0066332016,0.0022001893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041542646,0.0008396347,0.0010947196,0.0018526978,0.0046997457,0.013240485,0.0017576054,0.0071169664,0.00605384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05425964,0.0006066548,0.0016094415,0.0009761168,0.02231279,0.008754462,0.0072684386,0.007528139,0.004058738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033819048,0.000028612594,0.00035234846,0.00008119456,0.000030289188,0.00014305262,0.004154571,0.00022465964,0.0005068172,0.98738945,0.003254315,0.0038008846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004414996,0.00007740502,0.00021836326,0.00022592314,0.00004312945,0.00040736457,0.0024582604,0.0021674465,0.0009577515,0.8748158,0.11854328,0.000041229127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016895714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016562434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041542646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002092212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002770984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21970117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203789101","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2134","title":"Lipman's Thinking in Education","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.026724716186284598,"score_gpt":0.33598885441992654,"score_spread":0.30926413823364196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203789101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028336816,0.007122586,0.15234108,0.03766258,0.0010867567,0.0001549425,0.0000971149,0.00020539628,0.7729928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047395,0.0022087258,0.032112427,0.0027684509,0.000689229,0.00034095012,0.000045096305,0.00011306125,0.056982614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969983,0.0019484276,0.0001515507,0.00031397212,0.00040955702,0.0001782328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901934,0.007992764,0.00034288326,0.00047057885,0.000702271,0.00029812832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005105374,0.0007117565,0.000526584,0.0032173328,0.0034630483,0.0069177374,0.0011025165,0.002205244,0.0097906785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009620486,0.0003181166,0.0004803105,0.0018904085,0.028071053,0.012660394,0.0032141916,0.0042975675,0.0008449366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040084733,0.000004776474,0.00004020037,0.000018172628,0.0000014954621,0.00001266146,0.0015089036,0.00007616354,0.000012480875,0.99390864,0.0010807872,0.0033317287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008749207,0.000005484678,0.00004903241,0.00004321214,0.0000026880602,0.000025193813,0.0006513235,0.0002257826,0.00007829844,0.98646253,0.012444701,0.0000030140695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020918308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097906785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005358948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034244955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038882077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216342738","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2158","title":"Fogelin's Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal by Robert Fogelin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019796373330791473,"score_gpt":0.2034388104588036,"score_spread":0.18364243712801212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216342738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021457192,0.049692914,0.026012082,0.5737977,0.005545052,0.000030119008,0.00011999308,0.00014064298,0.3232043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7869328,0.02678827,0.014319196,0.058097012,0.006499539,0.00008889037,0.0000811733,0.00027154834,0.106921606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988931,0.00058097835,0.0000259311,0.0001977608,0.00018711014,0.000115131836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765354,0.001720719,0.00012181912,0.00015580992,0.00020033003,0.00014793995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020047764,0.00034618363,0.0005533851,0.00094327546,0.002904189,0.0036470105,0.0006519954,0.0030193473,0.0033495892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006762887,0.00025697678,0.00034416333,0.00075763365,0.019120585,0.007309726,0.0015983012,0.005710324,0.0007330459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090644435,0.000006693735,0.00007853864,0.000015260035,0.000004694067,0.000034383967,0.0010785697,0.00024443594,0.000035029112,0.9613345,0.031573907,0.0055848816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042125416,0.000003912865,0.00008684975,0.000046612822,0.0000032080166,0.000042270472,0.00030304436,0.00020511872,0.000046149755,0.8625069,0.13674067,0.000011018417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006637147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050838315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006637147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027878853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014729139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020227611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254235657","doi":"","title":"Wigmore's Chart","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Premise; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetoric; Humanities; Argument map; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04691223052577434,"score_gpt":0.3771612344128916,"score_spread":0.3302490038871173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254235657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011430098,0.0021977653,0.31918085,0.018469233,0.0028769744,0.0006408604,0.001487244,0.0024627692,0.64125425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18635827,0.0034340434,0.34475738,0.002832304,0.00055790367,0.0009161358,0.0011620572,0.0012705078,0.45871148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971796,0.00087497086,0.0001364114,0.0006085694,0.0010076191,0.00019277696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620736,0.0012901786,0.00025332178,0.0009217457,0.0010984761,0.00022890868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029595867,0.0005325563,0.00027477462,0.0026150332,0.003301167,0.0070441035,0.0014396784,0.0021460769,0.02822044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014512073,0.0003867473,0.00044149172,0.0028455118,0.0043919883,0.00896235,0.0026550551,0.002467597,0.005492118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027541137,0.000014914583,0.00031127364,0.00009138948,0.0000027547298,0.00006513553,0.003068698,0.0003249712,0.0004824072,0.84078014,0.061097153,0.09373356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009116664,0.00002208697,0.00031414823,0.00016156699,0.000005144627,0.00007553826,0.0007123492,0.000932938,0.00085901294,0.08204179,0.9148443,0.000022034457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012075319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01822182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02822044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037491485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062116063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09440678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278750021","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2231","title":"The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Empiricism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Focus (optics); State (computer science); Sociology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.039946165174666974,"score_gpt":0.2382752332215505,"score_spread":0.19832906804688352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278750021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067838533,0.09860961,0.0587318,0.41120398,0.010949199,0.000036352438,0.00016193853,0.00013287587,0.41339037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71802825,0.045241762,0.04055548,0.08373896,0.028202042,0.0003020288,0.00018453885,0.00053064554,0.08321622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908255,0.005612709,0.00032415954,0.000821439,0.0017960909,0.0006201435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044913,0.007078204,0.00041030248,0.00065094326,0.0010073658,0.0004040777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008231398,0.0006348832,0.00072723493,0.0022667462,0.004155295,0.012367645,0.0015508949,0.0036785523,0.004126519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012204602,0.0005147075,0.00065965235,0.0019192657,0.047505766,0.015867945,0.0033077537,0.009414875,0.001218509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009098073,0.0000041850076,0.000032518685,0.00004254483,0.0000025103905,0.00001251996,0.0012640378,0.000030561183,0.00005613958,0.9837839,0.010694138,0.004067826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010670414,0.000010221736,0.00014829548,0.00018601662,0.0000037114992,0.000071333336,0.00064657483,0.00010178483,0.00010987402,0.84512675,0.15357706,0.000007747462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001888777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022616242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012367645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061021587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004412048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04427445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287465508","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2159","title":"ModelAnswer: An Evaluation of Language in a Complex Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.0885107311913469,"score_gpt":0.30112027045093753,"score_spread":0.21260953925959064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287465508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16119209,0.0003929947,0.7542802,0.005360604,0.00024121108,0.00032346757,0.0012980482,0.004343634,0.0725678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84466517,0.00012733084,0.143862,0.00034129032,0.00007248267,0.00014688376,0.0006686494,0.0010149381,0.009101215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940743,0.003030457,0.00022480519,0.0005111639,0.0018518134,0.00030745755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885257,0.007207606,0.0004557598,0.0020506189,0.0013426489,0.00041761846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058793738,0.0010415313,0.0009292353,0.0020610138,0.00209004,0.0064242356,0.0021836348,0.0026773494,0.018465795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026258837,0.0004899706,0.0011459079,0.0016646255,0.0042118803,0.014561947,0.0058839656,0.0023425338,0.0012510456],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038114376,0.0001737688,0.0019408157,0.00021466016,0.000038053742,0.00016441905,0.0015712596,0.008280569,0.0022207182,0.9458448,0.005748026,0.03342177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013614834,0.00015941783,0.0009846623,0.000105525025,0.00011241075,0.00018251216,0.0015685502,0.2371756,0.007863193,0.73177785,0.019882735,0.000051465395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040737265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059145195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018465795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030570708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016803617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061774194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312472471","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4357","title":"Developing Critical Thinking with Debate: Evidence from Iranian Male and Female Students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Test (biology); Psychology; Inductive reasoning; Significant difference; Inference; Descriptive statistics; Research design; Mathematics education; Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07519460514203974,"score_gpt":0.3747493998220001,"score_spread":0.2995547946799604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312472471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99728525,0.0005205075,0.000061972874,0.00014990766,0.00001197921,0.0000087848375,0.0000115916955,0.0000010601585,0.0019489132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986021,0.00049340393,0.00007064784,0.00010297214,0.000016048014,0.000009503972,0.000013223718,0.0000019746597,0.00069007167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866927,0.00036798435,0.000084881234,0.00012453161,0.00051530695,0.00023810346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994162,0.0024949086,0.0013586904,0.00017719995,0.0011905013,0.0006167375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002319207,0.00027129092,0.00036064608,0.0015731518,0.0011725649,0.0015304922,0.00042589536,0.0005251952,0.004082665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009677068,0.00018459384,0.00022465509,0.00078692846,0.0013120121,0.0009652693,0.0006342131,0.0005427227,0.00058022665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006605237,0.0018896232,0.6428173,0.00046621286,0.000060466034,0.002181186,0.21573488,0.000068523594,0.0033103218,0.0012071222,0.0013777515,0.13022609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007586972,0.0021853398,0.6688971,0.00046922773,0.000090647394,0.004716041,0.30249402,0.00022005972,0.002815514,0.0010171956,0.016974939,0.000043922086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016128079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026934466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004082665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040307693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010436872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013657808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320740178","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4522","title":"Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Editors Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015; pp. 289. $139.00 eBook, $179.00 hardcover.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Publishing; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0279833873614627,"score_gpt":0.362615676583186,"score_spread":0.3346322892217233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320740178","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005578547,0.5547943,0.0030247378,0.4080297,0.01328348,0.000021085265,0.000080280566,0.00003411042,0.020174507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0432917,0.81453574,0.0073550288,0.05199907,0.028856749,0.0002685476,0.00035678706,0.0001786817,0.053157657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847971,0.0108503895,0.00070786127,0.0007907626,0.002361353,0.0004925652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94385314,0.047371984,0.0010725198,0.0009689178,0.0055159302,0.00121762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023289038,0.001586817,0.0019284362,0.0041173506,0.003424445,0.012066625,0.0041050822,0.008549644,0.020721043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03078145,0.0012315853,0.0011933157,0.0066513503,0.016733244,0.023272812,0.004746801,0.01683073,0.0069776196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009186351,0.00008067431,0.00016704472,0.0021992214,0.000029958323,0.00019463965,0.013564341,0.0004775501,0.00016128655,0.18921845,0.6713065,0.122508526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002605324,0.000021564525,0.00026699825,0.004145108,0.000011312723,0.00020632832,0.006996124,0.00019822406,0.00008684017,0.188303,0.79971254,0.000025829102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007827493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008236798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023289038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010245952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007198983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12316567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323968434","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4606","title":"In Memoriam: Richard Paul","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Jewish Identity and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.026538135935764467,"score_gpt":0.30003552280015444,"score_spread":0.27349738686438996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323968434","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022060747,0.008390934,0.00011467477,0.42236513,0.5640829,0.00001679885,0.00019677659,0.000047699315,0.004564485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011634059,0.006530852,0.00020464674,0.38723546,0.45782608,0.000115504066,0.00021925343,0.00017040434,0.13606375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751675,0.00061338017,0.00022490532,0.00053611415,0.0007733913,0.00033550785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354315,0.0015649358,0.0007343368,0.00023644885,0.002693132,0.0012281056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002849537,0.0018779257,0.0021242364,0.001537986,0.0073063294,0.006996663,0.0025186052,0.009782744,0.030250546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025986297,0.0004963895,0.001432291,0.0009096417,0.0032358323,0.0046190596,0.0066094697,0.01870103,0.016024012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010737726,0.0000030415229,0.000056856763,0.000021778129,0.000006005623,0.00008446923,0.00013260428,0.000006571864,0.000012732446,0.0005717685,0.99814165,0.00095176446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014447106,0.00001175689,0.00048213682,0.00021014454,0.00002531651,0.00014918612,0.00090429845,0.000039355964,0.000079270474,0.0011224143,0.99693704,0.00002460786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01208126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025574202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030250546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064675175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003417771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1011982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324823836","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4294","title":"Being a Correct Presumption vs. Being Presumably the Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Correctness; Presumption; Epistemology; Modal; Order (exchange); Speech act; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055784847355519786,"score_gpt":0.261305293653185,"score_spread":0.20552044629766522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324823836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08998393,0.0029164753,0.44988158,0.066333756,0.001616189,0.00027154933,0.0005461561,0.00037460157,0.3880757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95012337,0.0008400115,0.037710454,0.0022196446,0.0006063488,0.00016695342,0.00014952212,0.0001494611,0.008034246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910856,0.0050822543,0.0011869567,0.0018543316,0.0019111501,0.0008567693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680136,0.020226648,0.004269009,0.004141566,0.0025476906,0.00080160296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0141021395,0.00061259547,0.00082242116,0.0019318803,0.003161131,0.0072246916,0.0030735487,0.005579465,0.011930205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033119544,0.0006801646,0.0011237715,0.0012493916,0.02551454,0.016633298,0.005680752,0.0062492318,0.002510157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644648,0.000009565154,0.00039795847,0.00003771967,0.0000073683636,0.00010291328,0.0018544162,0.00009614728,0.00022664006,0.9941414,0.00064923224,0.002450179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021121796,0.000043399665,0.0014169439,0.00017791163,0.000046399426,0.00044230392,0.0026740665,0.0018352529,0.0017848987,0.9648769,0.026642162,0.00003875782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016303842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013388091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141021395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025823899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018137435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07458019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326566256","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4575","title":"An Early Exchange on the Interpretation of Arguments in Texts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; COPI; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017593260104257887,"score_gpt":0.25088355818317093,"score_spread":0.23329029807891305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326566256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018118165,0.03537456,0.07894604,0.45538396,0.030116202,0.00006682783,0.00037957868,0.00033805385,0.38127676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69846934,0.017394941,0.046966214,0.04757514,0.04424965,0.00020468314,0.0003253381,0.0012401011,0.14357454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856995,0.009432866,0.00047134658,0.0013010827,0.0023940036,0.00070122915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9317464,0.056753997,0.0015697395,0.0038669433,0.0048469547,0.0012158308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012075381,0.0009065264,0.0008440724,0.003214227,0.008071691,0.011862848,0.0019396279,0.0065944586,0.0102457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046804767,0.00063118956,0.0006358299,0.0034786258,0.021964764,0.02238544,0.006097802,0.014351174,0.0015721845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077924575,0.000012256082,0.000049560505,0.00006647836,0.0000065481254,0.00008303837,0.007935462,0.00007836315,0.00019749759,0.95733505,0.026544396,0.0076134773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028622171,0.000030475932,0.000262672,0.0003622397,0.0000118065,0.00013891763,0.0021158042,0.000597662,0.00074379623,0.48966956,0.5059967,0.000041637784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024890583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003040443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012075381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007862924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024744845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06386149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335090607","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4469","title":"Denying the Antecedent: The Fallacy That Never Was, or Sometimes Isn’t?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); sort; Section (typography); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13073839555469155,"score_gpt":0.27912212409223525,"score_spread":0.1483837285375437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335090607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18697529,0.00620802,0.2374031,0.1409183,0.004403195,0.00022395658,0.00028809754,0.00047758548,0.4231024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722137,0.0008757303,0.009671773,0.004769461,0.0008438385,0.00006340872,0.00007789704,0.0001411214,0.0063352627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646975,0.0064942013,0.0007902205,0.0025085823,0.003073531,0.00066372723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96898806,0.021431485,0.0020436805,0.0040883357,0.0028136095,0.00063485024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014860131,0.000486115,0.0011109742,0.0017510602,0.006224831,0.0065353904,0.0023850526,0.0061495313,0.0070749577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040947948,0.0007508204,0.0005160922,0.0013196127,0.044622857,0.016522968,0.005909934,0.012377476,0.0010760429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058022688,0.00002481345,0.0006205925,0.00009086386,0.000015583106,0.00021004396,0.008028579,0.0001144654,0.0003550072,0.9829648,0.0018054873,0.005711575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000358415,0.000037479807,0.0009660395,0.00045513114,0.000050663333,0.00035707778,0.0066302298,0.0012373823,0.001639295,0.94744253,0.04111251,0.000035745514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030401857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014860131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039750836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003625578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07858884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338011633","doi":"","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338011633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817032,0.022535656,0.17912947,0.22627833,0.0026230046,0.00026426202,0.00010066066,0.00024775215,0.4871176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96302915,0.0022912326,0.02060546,0.005741248,0.00076435006,0.00020837224,0.000040812578,0.00006904745,0.007250333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747546,0.01765665,0.00072091946,0.0017579128,0.0036549005,0.0014550673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791748,0.015783986,0.0016817764,0.0013111604,0.0014158048,0.0006324942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895528,0.0008426757,0.000823357,0.003336547,0.008391651,0.012730251,0.0021833656,0.008402225,0.003332818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024937779,0.00055577257,0.0008345414,0.0020182233,0.064792804,0.016561562,0.008352693,0.009633916,0.00052685937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130141,0.000009044382,0.000059753922,0.000027600267,0.0000065573327,0.000039336042,0.0027722565,0.00024037466,0.00002998739,0.99379224,0.0009930858,0.0020216894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009218529,0.0000020122745,0.00001902555,0.00002445281,0.0000018401643,0.000009050768,0.0005713348,0.0001917063,0.00003200756,0.99494547,0.004190345,0.0000036019499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021717295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013491496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037836996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480000991","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4641","title":"Criticism without Fundamental Principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Criticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05631132883433282,"score_gpt":0.28335237095204174,"score_spread":0.22704104211770892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480000991","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015324344,0.0072633843,0.3404441,0.2965274,0.0077350424,0.00021304545,0.00020693219,0.0004507435,0.331835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7879884,0.0034017016,0.0846561,0.06827327,0.007782085,0.001082107,0.00027262483,0.00062590104,0.045917783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9546255,0.02488868,0.0020786931,0.0061206263,0.011122726,0.001163826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.924332,0.047771275,0.003518051,0.013488459,0.009642876,0.0012473429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044078264,0.0008181277,0.0012542934,0.002345994,0.0050772275,0.009773759,0.0036139027,0.008514982,0.0068321233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091974854,0.00057451864,0.0013606688,0.001175003,0.04261861,0.017581668,0.007809679,0.015164645,0.0026769966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061663427,0.0000049756586,0.00005612771,0.00003903449,0.000007084365,0.00001037308,0.0008167091,0.000094524796,0.0000419813,0.99375397,0.0027116388,0.0024573405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092476075,0.000008793307,0.000041076473,0.0001032502,0.0000046434834,0.000025248433,0.00031241812,0.0003684476,0.00014013318,0.9598808,0.039098486,0.0000073107444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008697792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067852275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044078264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054900604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041530575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2331109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487530731","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4664","title":"Latin American Philosophers: Some Recent Challenges to Their Intellectual Character","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Skepticism; Latin Americans; Character (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Originality; Critical thinking; Philosophy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.18349011745280766,"score_gpt":0.3510881769608235,"score_spread":0.16759805950801585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487530731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043998505,0.063742705,0.0013472944,0.8947468,0.0023227148,0.0000060880025,0.000025716066,0.00002299379,0.033385836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43296617,0.18599886,0.009013265,0.31204507,0.026424948,0.00020239784,0.00016253958,0.00027807264,0.032908592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105084,0.0049249954,0.0004095293,0.000983712,0.0018758768,0.00075507304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687071,0.019009504,0.0017634921,0.0016234805,0.006911729,0.0019847245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040051445,0.0005693433,0.0009470585,0.0027898545,0.00940842,0.019084947,0.0025913133,0.007768093,0.008329229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026995521,0.00040598828,0.0004888223,0.004552646,0.04227956,0.015532707,0.0083363615,0.017549748,0.0010702794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058106583,0.00005728237,0.001575444,0.000460957,0.000023527207,0.00015588362,0.028648835,0.000107463056,0.00015067763,0.82651675,0.066528246,0.0757169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030526753,0.000017521348,0.0030084148,0.0015732076,0.00001800134,0.00016337371,0.034015715,0.00028984528,0.00013168686,0.3544519,0.6062524,0.000047418303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017845605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027707681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040051445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011734056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007823321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21181482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488488091","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4661","title":"Employing and Exploiting the Presumptions of Communication in Argumentation: An Application of Normative Pragmatics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Grice; Implicature; Normative; Pragmatics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04086990217938726,"score_gpt":0.3337801653594461,"score_spread":0.29291026318005886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488488091","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038743228,0.005978311,0.69788116,0.0358619,0.00071010966,0.00023569148,0.00006689934,0.0002453554,0.22027735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7644518,0.0029971509,0.22478981,0.0016213341,0.00057635864,0.0004893029,0.000053747335,0.00017177672,0.004848675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733708,0.021212487,0.0008968877,0.0012778697,0.0025733698,0.0006685251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95501,0.03638289,0.0020898408,0.0035602876,0.0022367288,0.0007201937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027063899,0.0010106061,0.0012087126,0.0041648815,0.0053914418,0.012031574,0.0031727247,0.0061012595,0.0029752988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042059306,0.0010090095,0.0019382926,0.002290952,0.055683993,0.026817663,0.009897853,0.0053174132,0.0006574976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012814553,0.000015664524,0.0001447372,0.00006715799,0.0000118865455,0.0001353402,0.008182586,0.00045503903,0.00016246988,0.9846502,0.0003345006,0.005827622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013820222,0.000008852917,0.00010408713,0.000085748194,0.000008252456,0.00010112031,0.0013453308,0.001999903,0.00013423467,0.9892061,0.0069792815,0.000013284214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023193527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015101978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027063899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004218433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004237036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14312923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491923398","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4723","title":"Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Law; Refugee law; Refugee; Political science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Criminology; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07858435713754199,"score_gpt":0.3548801888245751,"score_spread":0.27629583168703314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491923398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2910802,0.0069963876,0.5556939,0.029986449,0.00034337188,0.00062062667,0.00052770576,0.00024454773,0.11450685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635666,0.000861093,0.13194369,0.0005800689,0.00006536706,0.00025628632,0.00015812562,0.000035313165,0.0025334628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95885,0.033542503,0.0018207959,0.0015042339,0.003593164,0.00068934483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83299714,0.14839667,0.0065796585,0.006557214,0.004045616,0.0014236065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03739504,0.000969268,0.0007628098,0.0072512827,0.0026853597,0.012061919,0.0026576119,0.0044573825,0.0054127527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11312681,0.0007578152,0.0008786333,0.0037089493,0.02079131,0.026338939,0.0097584035,0.0029850632,0.00043720144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012453055,0.000070763715,0.0066195666,0.0006984728,0.00008196781,0.0017442455,0.029190745,0.0025439712,0.0006940151,0.90883577,0.0010529945,0.04834302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005997913,0.00008845019,0.0018284387,0.0011209911,0.00006110544,0.0010906616,0.031130344,0.011970884,0.0018455818,0.9128578,0.037894133,0.00005149217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010971847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017155462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03739504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030714865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023403773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19776624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496029585","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4670","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.08802790957842942,"score_gpt":0.28870144220549887,"score_spread":0.20067353262706944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496029585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036460338,0.0021337345,0.00665453,0.9748532,0.0032963853,0.0000070578253,0.000019348965,0.0000365671,0.009353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28108272,0.004628206,0.00986976,0.68068266,0.014899556,0.00011973736,0.000059257676,0.00022333156,0.008434709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9598718,0.021361576,0.0025928388,0.004407788,0.010238938,0.0015270347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.606111,0.3286809,0.010172464,0.010579464,0.04106905,0.0033870158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06729632,0.0009355708,0.001676964,0.0033929937,0.0061102267,0.011031431,0.004372432,0.03244431,0.0038432518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2707306,0.0007909566,0.0011730286,0.002857534,0.038422037,0.022514531,0.008868114,0.037299216,0.0021441195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400249,0.000030238529,0.0009075721,0.00026099716,0.0000843442,0.00044429873,0.014952177,0.00041779326,0.0002634494,0.78260046,0.18366514,0.016289541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068045134,0.000037351358,0.00052817096,0.00081530714,0.00005243929,0.00029776926,0.0062269787,0.0011333387,0.00079030945,0.8262174,0.16371024,0.00012269894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003216249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023845227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059472765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005515969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35590118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498543166","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4662","title":"Enhancing Rationality: Heuristics, Biases, and The Critical Thinking Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Heuristics; Rationality; Irrational number; Cognitive bias; Ecological rationality; Rational planning model; Critical thinking; Decision field theory; Psychology; Management science; Focus (optics); Cognition; Bounded rationality; Behavioral economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Economics; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Decision analysis; Decision engineering; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Management; Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1018061235548303,"score_gpt":0.4434657774391438,"score_spread":0.34165965388431346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498543166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36106512,0.008845311,0.33781302,0.03706009,0.00051820034,0.00043769277,0.00009639123,0.0004058948,0.2537583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411034,0.0012048712,0.054952286,0.0008323361,0.000067718174,0.00015031388,0.0000218694,0.000040105475,0.0016270804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98389155,0.012906801,0.00036114673,0.0005118754,0.0018232752,0.0005054258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170793,0.070040956,0.004070795,0.0037151254,0.0036011145,0.0014926826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019894173,0.00054470316,0.00032916744,0.0023639314,0.001232567,0.006010261,0.00073266955,0.0011188841,0.0023038425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04909891,0.00026860804,0.00036767224,0.0014203822,0.012598769,0.0068823462,0.00425927,0.002232352,0.00022542969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013716114,0.00020376095,0.005463834,0.0003704241,0.0000590961,0.000073696756,0.0083778305,0.003615883,0.0003988605,0.8656002,0.003221325,0.1124779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004086218,0.000038972605,0.0011815923,0.00022040227,0.000022902335,0.00004817672,0.0013871377,0.004196442,0.00084511994,0.983835,0.008166243,0.000017073218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009256794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000970336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019894173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028524352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041900976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105211675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504893451","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808630.005","title":"Criticisms of irrelevance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Positive economics","score_opus":0.037987103153389504,"score_gpt":0.2500416098310899,"score_spread":0.21205450667770043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504893451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005996232,0.015045239,0.0544614,0.17166573,0.004335162,0.000099228535,0.0000629167,0.0003725772,0.74796146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7147016,0.009444304,0.018233337,0.10265038,0.0113236895,0.00068379997,0.000104683466,0.0015531048,0.14130506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9191695,0.038673952,0.003161948,0.008117523,0.027750695,0.0031263588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90286595,0.071977094,0.0030370834,0.011376433,0.009517966,0.0012255238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056958262,0.0014567025,0.0017713417,0.0041646757,0.009850056,0.015080692,0.0053973356,0.01953184,0.010615022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12978245,0.0011554704,0.0022445621,0.0028642903,0.083558135,0.025329676,0.01516592,0.033599567,0.004179812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049037567,0.0000037084785,0.00003775505,0.00003588156,0.0000051422307,0.00004165197,0.0017117882,0.00007298501,0.000023880853,0.99058867,0.005193338,0.0022802402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118256285,0.000007056114,0.00004668517,0.0001748529,0.0000065646764,0.00012502943,0.00040575946,0.00018629635,0.00010910806,0.8971863,0.10172804,0.000012542994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00244504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001546123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056958262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013163734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005455822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3012277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505854629","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808630.009","title":"Appeals to authority","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05216900343267786,"score_gpt":0.2674259119534945,"score_spread":0.21525690852081666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505854629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035739369,0.0026945518,0.012695871,0.00830465,0.00052205066,0.000026991323,0.000031970987,0.00004919699,0.97210073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6041642,0.0048703863,0.008769322,0.007671092,0.0025566625,0.00019377717,0.00012872618,0.00028645564,0.3713595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941755,0.0023543162,0.00021016564,0.0007981307,0.001976538,0.00048536615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158996,0.005109073,0.00046057018,0.0010792525,0.001253812,0.0005074284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041590747,0.00059813436,0.0004895693,0.002578465,0.0037748073,0.008802505,0.0010797025,0.005255595,0.016573425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016037272,0.00030580486,0.0007352053,0.0016632956,0.01269414,0.009741806,0.0049333433,0.005453398,0.0038374912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043779783,0.0000035046276,0.000049115246,0.000020830228,0.0000021454664,0.00004046368,0.0007982751,0.000064710555,0.000040091818,0.9913458,0.004035543,0.0035950742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011408727,0.000009534686,0.00013895614,0.00011336674,0.000008233299,0.00015025801,0.0003523374,0.00039370943,0.00010768339,0.8082147,0.1904917,0.000008011709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016032966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015970196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016573425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048375134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015180144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055443645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509172424","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4672","title":"Studying Rhetorical Audiences – a Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Conceptualization; Empirical research; Empirical examination; Sociology; Rhetorical device; Visual rhetoric; Persuasion; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.36684443306193315,"score_gpt":0.4265013016066305,"score_spread":0.05965686854469737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509172424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4176331,0.019892298,0.2330091,0.1374872,0.004086322,0.0060458854,0.0014000206,0.00035931126,0.18008672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299204,0.0036152075,0.03472006,0.010962495,0.000659761,0.005672412,0.00033465715,0.0002933283,0.013821608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87827706,0.108875014,0.0022201575,0.002970997,0.0055762744,0.0020804878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70915914,0.25476417,0.009061541,0.0104517555,0.012402656,0.0041607963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1305289,0.000703687,0.0014263014,0.00577265,0.009317105,0.01408147,0.0034165746,0.0038095016,0.012824945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12935504,0.00079746975,0.00089279126,0.0047729816,0.029718699,0.02608027,0.011020517,0.0053621694,0.001542153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101338126,0.00023678479,0.0026755051,0.0014313759,0.000024819981,0.00033850028,0.82669955,0.00014209261,0.0016756124,0.1286038,0.0038840296,0.034186635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006564813,0.00017895746,0.0027484286,0.0036556425,0.000019379546,0.00041378965,0.75410235,0.0006023909,0.0009051734,0.12522838,0.11199735,0.000082507526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016663634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025313993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1305289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063956073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005945326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6903111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510825718","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4423","title":"Considering Carneades as a Framework for Informal Logic: A Reply to Walton and Gordon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Logic model; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.04319752763102309,"score_gpt":0.2915213436358697,"score_spread":0.2483238160048466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510825718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022922747,0.0063569634,0.013641783,0.96842647,0.0018920394,0.000015873602,0.000023914039,0.00004244489,0.0073082075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3319795,0.02234007,0.047328986,0.5504846,0.013007235,0.00044506212,0.000088754816,0.0003938319,0.033931967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851836,0.008998816,0.0005631403,0.0016402556,0.0029969772,0.00061719236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9367947,0.051212862,0.0016324631,0.0022897688,0.0065093343,0.001560885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024789052,0.0009950125,0.0017484275,0.0021561629,0.005739793,0.009133799,0.004615093,0.017975256,0.0066248127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05128796,0.00067818403,0.0013445901,0.0028131038,0.04009912,0.044562157,0.00912287,0.02929323,0.0014125878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002932183,0.000014915179,0.0000619467,0.00009168313,0.000010145866,0.000069426984,0.0034902059,0.0002871084,0.00007965736,0.9516108,0.038933814,0.0053210785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029697747,0.000016364156,0.000069190326,0.00020456727,0.000009385895,0.00007221975,0.0025168676,0.00070272275,0.00018671379,0.88029724,0.1158547,0.00004034616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010233097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077108904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024789052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010339066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007037889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13109857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510917024","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4621","title":"The Real Struggle: An Objective Notion of Expertise?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06397860815651764,"score_gpt":0.27931182389956416,"score_spread":0.21533321574304654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510917024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030121816,0.01466272,0.1648334,0.36887154,0.0021571042,0.00006289195,0.0001405213,0.00020449392,0.4189456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492812,0.001953322,0.010458516,0.017318137,0.0021414557,0.00012432628,0.00005483914,0.00016781095,0.01850033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98590475,0.008969353,0.00047931416,0.0020006502,0.0017293356,0.0009166687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830132,0.012281314,0.0015221022,0.0014077018,0.0010978791,0.00067773904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099561075,0.0007101335,0.00073397736,0.0025400708,0.00535211,0.010812036,0.002592123,0.008954477,0.011042419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024841255,0.00044667968,0.0007275077,0.001899709,0.049713075,0.028605606,0.008737282,0.0077228295,0.0017416849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006141083,0.0000030142016,0.00009054238,0.000026092423,0.000002720628,0.000022928989,0.002955004,0.00004430372,0.000024183082,0.9935416,0.0017929332,0.0014905459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010208585,0.000013017242,0.00019909543,0.00012785492,0.000006486261,0.00009421039,0.0024045012,0.00036524353,0.00010804169,0.951119,0.045539007,0.000013294013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012828129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011951585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011042419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049602347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002128751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05265355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521535665","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4720","title":"An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06811105210042746,"score_gpt":0.28864140674621463,"score_spread":0.22053035464578719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521535665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010085843,0.0029416252,0.57955843,0.03347534,0.00079306564,0.00017711632,0.00019816084,0.00020252392,0.37256792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249097,0.001999071,0.13436924,0.0031496764,0.0016267878,0.00085827213,0.0002244125,0.00016765903,0.03269521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905191,0.0060448498,0.00045563086,0.0007016952,0.0017362486,0.0005425285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883543,0.008514321,0.000700388,0.0010996625,0.0009507207,0.00038049903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011475276,0.0009631031,0.0009749913,0.0038968914,0.005826328,0.012308331,0.0033722923,0.008499248,0.0094234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015907764,0.0006572251,0.0021887773,0.0024777905,0.025145072,0.016945276,0.0050753276,0.006557698,0.0014695801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9260334e-7,0.000002446693,0.000007909788,0.000007868709,0.0000012801349,0.000010643682,0.00013904962,0.00018927724,0.0000072514003,0.9990777,0.00019208217,0.00036352407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005194783,0.0000021249257,0.000011481588,0.000018365155,0.0000017088333,0.000016950557,0.00006921894,0.0012042596,0.00001708593,0.994865,0.0037857986,0.0000028843124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015213737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012034929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012308331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064138444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038535786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06068778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522053720","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4726","title":"Apologie de la polemique","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.030708891502939952,"score_gpt":0.30121335036925,"score_spread":0.2705044588663101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522053720","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010905806,0.64540476,0.0020624055,0.1090608,0.042536274,0.000035488538,0.00023111,0.000109443514,0.19946925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048714068,0.5640411,0.0013790082,0.03612489,0.077052675,0.0001861496,0.00045679326,0.00035667056,0.2716888],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987649,0.00045452893,0.000050382034,0.00011069158,0.00054957264,0.000069961134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526644,0.0030789187,0.0002074214,0.0002803755,0.0010174968,0.00014934847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018911075,0.00050439505,0.0007663815,0.0040558823,0.0014138321,0.005190166,0.0012014632,0.0023722765,0.028067723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007966742,0.00026915845,0.00028589,0.003630025,0.004834007,0.0045092534,0.0017064956,0.0044511803,0.0071485504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014954883,0.000016452223,0.00004518409,0.0009178037,0.000010995766,0.000096461416,0.0005983885,0.0000936771,0.00008064081,0.18922585,0.73632014,0.07257949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037853647,0.0000029854057,0.00007640207,0.000645149,0.0000039153783,0.000104192695,0.00011263489,0.000022348815,0.000033136836,0.011870081,0.9871224,0.0000030311726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003765294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004482306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028067723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036373981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046274443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09389591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522061514","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4725","title":"Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08521820864784566,"score_gpt":0.2969468926641764,"score_spread":0.21172868401633074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522061514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06628631,0.0048455093,0.72348493,0.089729525,0.0015844848,0.0002704526,0.0003443662,0.0004017576,0.113052614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914293,0.0012244208,0.07549269,0.0027140402,0.00094366376,0.00026686306,0.00013788344,0.00019372236,0.004733796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96139634,0.028608976,0.0016046682,0.0032020647,0.0041404217,0.0010476237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79287374,0.17968772,0.005404299,0.013416855,0.007308886,0.0013085129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04240375,0.001311674,0.0013218682,0.0050659697,0.0051622917,0.01362666,0.004673347,0.0055647874,0.005538888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15149811,0.0010688774,0.0012051006,0.0020100265,0.06906512,0.030105362,0.0063765487,0.008987666,0.0004928328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029901086,0.000011638948,0.00022270529,0.00006515301,0.000013832445,0.000049508402,0.0024294301,0.0010302758,0.000067423825,0.99283147,0.0009742956,0.0022743652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009682415,0.0000023268374,0.000038445123,0.000026369755,0.000005182411,0.000015978669,0.0004230983,0.0011873042,0.00013536762,0.99597245,0.0021791202,0.000004557847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046462673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04240375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068872604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070855613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22425508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522855291","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4721","title":"Defining Marriage: Classification, Interpretation, and Definitional Disputes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028401602770812277,"score_gpt":0.3046576216162169,"score_spread":0.2762560188454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522855291","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18297634,0.0096335085,0.38441378,0.06674272,0.00075388036,0.0003364293,0.0002520376,0.00015386009,0.35473752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738738,0.00087799213,0.020342344,0.001047568,0.00015974151,0.00015195255,0.00007240721,0.000039798888,0.00343429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.961099,0.029736856,0.0018342823,0.0016768472,0.0040489347,0.0016039333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98267937,0.012027333,0.0016128452,0.0016599753,0.0014629908,0.0005574687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030342018,0.00063970796,0.0010264898,0.00653554,0.008708898,0.01853986,0.0028633769,0.0057853456,0.002931751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03262109,0.0005765985,0.0008568562,0.0058901724,0.08880794,0.022663523,0.013037046,0.006904852,0.00028921076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035974074,0.0000033321733,0.00010649403,0.000011343601,0.0000013329296,0.000022807066,0.0077510457,0.00006726988,0.000026217449,0.990507,0.000172986,0.0013265933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068706845,0.0000050746744,0.00021679486,0.00008085209,0.000003167139,0.00006534633,0.009039191,0.0006197647,0.00012593684,0.9796784,0.010146088,0.000012530723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074554337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051555987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030342018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011530302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005156738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16046584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522944671","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4717","title":"Preface: Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.5567466499763101,"score_gpt":0.577572407979279,"score_spread":0.02082575800296893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522944671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024440556,0.030730112,0.25798848,0.058102973,0.09191601,0.0012296382,0.008043868,0.0017560518,0.5477888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07829639,0.041330565,0.16423292,0.018003097,0.1242955,0.0032319606,0.015112917,0.0047923247,0.5507044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856794,0.00072932726,0.00014212582,0.00019007077,0.0003238224,0.00004673494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867027,0.0075792046,0.0005113595,0.0014746457,0.003134891,0.00059719646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380805,0.0010460354,0.00073370495,0.0038452498,0.0031746468,0.0060435166,0.0015802807,0.0019126548,0.10620726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019954821,0.00057594135,0.0007280237,0.005044404,0.0024170098,0.0075371154,0.0021139213,0.0052780635,0.036840513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001701129,0.000037018137,0.00014056565,0.0005407268,0.000008237459,0.000051969088,0.0009006357,0.00024628406,0.0003363774,0.22459385,0.7070662,0.066061154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001177887,0.00001917136,0.0005329646,0.00069714,0.000008336507,0.00012796986,0.00060027227,0.0003506358,0.00015459287,0.13729668,0.86018145,0.00001892471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002856303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028808261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10620726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024227018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020564008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35529864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523565836","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4724","title":"Redundancy of Redundancy in Justifications of Verdicts of Polish The Constitutional Tribuna","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Doxa; Tribunal; Politics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04529802480962788,"score_gpt":0.31830429247437847,"score_spread":0.2730062676647506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523565836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974342,0.00081096526,0.0064552156,0.0007032653,0.00004422299,0.00016960167,0.00021093906,0.00004666266,0.017217128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974718,0.000093740244,0.0015876137,0.000027096396,0.000017662118,0.00004360125,0.00011028608,0.000015202048,0.0006329833],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94955605,0.026837032,0.0041585853,0.0023911786,0.015098998,0.0019581695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6416042,0.29915747,0.026416153,0.01059475,0.02063221,0.001595196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026134863,0.0003579678,0.0007801073,0.006305431,0.0028438792,0.0033705186,0.0010069823,0.0013471716,0.0038876215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28685006,0.00045918967,0.00044272759,0.0039501,0.004008153,0.0030227234,0.002836685,0.0022276859,0.00036027975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024489844,0.0005792005,0.26335597,0.0025631187,0.000764291,0.004385571,0.132271,0.0080358945,0.008267479,0.18817912,0.008625107,0.3805243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002215155,0.0010138537,0.67099583,0.0017525365,0.00071508397,0.003325318,0.061604545,0.029250856,0.01223368,0.1593895,0.05914029,0.0003570317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031855316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005964152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026134863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035011536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022760567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13821602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523706814","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4722","title":"Administrative Judicial Decisions as a Hybrid Argumentative Activity Type","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Task (project management); Presentation (obstetrics); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14837381276895004,"score_gpt":0.4268070866641011,"score_spread":0.27843327389515105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523706814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16564679,0.0010262829,0.3050107,0.0040577115,0.00020275521,0.00057085796,0.00026715366,0.0002001248,0.52301764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925814,0.00033413267,0.051923104,0.00024038045,0.00008014834,0.0003748014,0.00013712607,0.00009202681,0.021004397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97198784,0.019382464,0.0012977052,0.0016849756,0.004379275,0.0012677017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747774,0.0175857,0.0019042842,0.0030208987,0.001607267,0.0011042793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011645061,0.0005749234,0.000576745,0.00434185,0.002919183,0.017522572,0.0018186452,0.0037421447,0.0075881495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018070804,0.00063660456,0.0012115586,0.0033498867,0.0118267555,0.012481879,0.005923211,0.0028248953,0.0015334229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035195284,0.000037923088,0.0012932406,0.00007296953,0.000017676199,0.00030669154,0.01137448,0.0006811677,0.0007779587,0.9762132,0.00039961265,0.008789941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009456978,0.00014132765,0.002698469,0.00041839152,0.000059235652,0.0012606997,0.021698609,0.011497201,0.0021008053,0.83791715,0.122023806,0.00008975308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011313014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016615401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017522572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030344604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022771626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061585724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565213933","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4586","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03438545534219384,"score_gpt":0.25798263082187695,"score_spread":0.2235971754796831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565213933","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010393471,0.0010049132,0.89997476,0.004011663,0.00034600444,0.00026495225,0.0003476864,0.00053310115,0.08312339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65103704,0.00073926104,0.32973492,0.00067807,0.0003466712,0.0006962636,0.0005489351,0.00040044417,0.015818423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844915,0.009517298,0.00095053465,0.002608437,0.0018926025,0.0005396716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97846687,0.01234053,0.0011066648,0.0044968235,0.0025702731,0.0010187605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009292872,0.0011878716,0.0011924958,0.0038636243,0.004970226,0.009490418,0.0019369583,0.003954511,0.016126772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04397183,0.0009903357,0.0016023315,0.0022277886,0.008716912,0.028727807,0.0072463383,0.0048533003,0.003155536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014762628,0.000005617333,0.00011352721,0.000031652948,0.0000043134037,0.000022579528,0.00079140114,0.0005731065,0.00010300557,0.99241054,0.00047527673,0.0054543153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013394887,0.000017409984,0.00009430473,0.00006178253,0.000010211988,0.00007239902,0.00033695047,0.007122532,0.0002824536,0.9659067,0.026063012,0.00001884728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011502304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016126772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003736714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023560522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053949475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573666881","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4347","title":"Clarifying our Ideas in Persuasion Dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Epistemology; Accidental; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10135079636543842,"score_gpt":0.2871500701404811,"score_spread":0.18579927377504268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573666881","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054588906,0.010343821,0.5152632,0.19496317,0.0048350217,0.00054255483,0.00012470206,0.0005469885,0.21879162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652682,0.0018070559,0.11007389,0.008630142,0.000946431,0.0008245834,0.00008696808,0.00028284354,0.012079925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9130316,0.072327904,0.0025751516,0.004189957,0.005458109,0.0024172678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94581985,0.041967217,0.0030394092,0.0041236267,0.0038114663,0.0012384834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05707463,0.0019180924,0.0014664507,0.0042689294,0.010960952,0.020723287,0.0040851976,0.016545959,0.00614788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057378028,0.0011453987,0.001772168,0.0028546127,0.06863461,0.04271672,0.013185909,0.02019814,0.0014770734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002314006,0.000012626203,0.000061065846,0.000088825545,0.0000057545312,0.000105789804,0.049486283,0.00015904363,0.0002128383,0.9465014,0.00062059483,0.0027225823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003736565,0.000031356143,0.00009734532,0.00023959363,0.000011566412,0.00015902157,0.01675729,0.0009297996,0.000673462,0.920939,0.060091212,0.000032957618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013811041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005696798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05707463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067857467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040439367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30184305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575064023","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4796","title":"A Searchable Bibliography of Fallacies – 2016","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Argumentation theory; Phrase; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028621393933764745,"score_gpt":0.25002361193010425,"score_spread":0.2214022179963395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575064023","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004119401,0.5475802,0.006158144,0.009343807,0.019793374,0.00025914825,0.025460022,0.0012003819,0.38608554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04008976,0.711387,0.01385947,0.0036909608,0.008118511,0.00056973746,0.07340629,0.0014748089,0.1474035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968726,0.00048305443,0.0008351034,0.0003414656,0.0012785352,0.00018931065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918161,0.003408311,0.000879305,0.0007148372,0.0026289956,0.00055236893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019388683,0.0010745842,0.0017138167,0.041161355,0.002534974,0.008170619,0.001339126,0.0017698659,0.08744724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016702777,0.0005864467,0.00082229316,0.06298247,0.0017376926,0.008291081,0.003711029,0.002270175,0.04143804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012165485,0.000045226974,0.00046766904,0.0095944535,0.000033690223,0.00029578843,0.0022114792,0.00040496624,0.00052469334,0.04940067,0.5332996,0.40360007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030440601,0.0000068367103,0.0003033671,0.006876478,0.000007992603,0.00013468716,0.00028280562,0.000033097855,0.00006605662,0.0041992916,0.9880782,0.000008007268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003654651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054040416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08744724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031259377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006425743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2925402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578291748","doi":"","title":"[Review of: D. Walton. Scare Tactics]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Mathematical and Computational Methods","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1755629661947317,"score_gpt":0.3871370690372428,"score_spread":0.21157410284251113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578291748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016246403,0.87509835,0.0010249009,0.085988,0.019525765,0.000011718369,0.00021238225,0.00004696668,0.01792949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041236556,0.89622694,0.00079920323,0.04123028,0.034869496,0.00004184497,0.00045534596,0.00009638852,0.022156794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988863,0.0003197149,0.000092550996,0.00021837953,0.0004074769,0.00007558533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127746,0.004792165,0.0004601011,0.00033490785,0.0026204672,0.0005149832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024515954,0.0009313276,0.0014475962,0.0065710256,0.0008739296,0.003418343,0.002521254,0.0040158415,0.023296665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012648962,0.0005559985,0.00060365157,0.008205707,0.0028776652,0.007285214,0.002048505,0.0048781484,0.016057217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016485352,0.000010669618,0.000093843984,0.0010778599,0.000016579175,0.00004306726,0.00006388756,0.00006820891,0.000028219105,0.015415068,0.87607056,0.10709545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005082112,0.0000065692693,0.00033317195,0.00095763284,0.0000123359905,0.00017906008,0.00004321171,0.000023033832,0.000029345358,0.0038103776,0.9945897,0.000010657182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004802607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009073999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023296665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002844109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024526007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0779351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578629365","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4610","title":"How to Disagree About Argument Schemes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Analogy; Inference; Argument map; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02713903951692292,"score_gpt":0.244779492223708,"score_spread":0.2176404527067851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578629365","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056217365,0.0052191033,0.5488939,0.15928648,0.003756584,0.00072184525,0.00029391912,0.00074624,0.22486451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7552838,0.0020900213,0.21614599,0.011965821,0.0016343629,0.0010208881,0.000397182,0.0006255389,0.0108364625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8399349,0.11651039,0.011691773,0.009430446,0.018150803,0.0042817187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82663244,0.120339066,0.0075586652,0.02245596,0.019807708,0.0032062118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10510159,0.0013082436,0.0018093935,0.0046600793,0.01006909,0.01877502,0.004999494,0.017115917,0.0073695085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24478444,0.0015404534,0.0022465214,0.0026812507,0.038231276,0.046689928,0.013816186,0.01415594,0.0029427316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049499933,0.000013509771,0.00027442814,0.00010214777,0.000028968876,0.000121281046,0.005874113,0.0003831329,0.00025958926,0.97946733,0.0032293363,0.010196587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040663363,0.000009780114,0.00011344238,0.00015060742,0.000016081927,0.000097020755,0.0018542431,0.0009855534,0.00025402004,0.9717106,0.024743708,0.00002419009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011330788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080974976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10510159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004672934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037797904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55583704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583894427","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4527","title":"Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Windsor; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025830404566766264,"score_gpt":0.23672021036982963,"score_spread":0.21088980580306335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583894427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020790277,0.016927822,0.15151827,0.42548388,0.0060101026,0.00011092133,0.00022459569,0.00026471008,0.3786694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84459543,0.00979135,0.031292215,0.061739374,0.0058057765,0.00025992005,0.00023487934,0.0005158564,0.04576523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871597,0.0068663224,0.0005146509,0.0013359019,0.003062558,0.0010609018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97228503,0.018199343,0.0022574058,0.002665584,0.0035429816,0.0010496691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017275145,0.0006882344,0.0007992549,0.002166901,0.0048223315,0.015024716,0.0022787428,0.0095599955,0.011646439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043300357,0.00033776183,0.0010935465,0.002460905,0.03218045,0.032917205,0.005388287,0.011377681,0.0037494616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010171254,0.000006829543,0.00013559863,0.00004662448,0.000006348017,0.00004214742,0.0014825872,0.000045187237,0.000070682,0.98864007,0.004944692,0.004568982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077908135,0.000010118646,0.00012566052,0.00017998322,0.000009145603,0.00009369912,0.0019254143,0.00015955517,0.00017297184,0.92357475,0.07373094,0.000009962379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011563104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012237797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017275145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035134193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026688448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09136075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599474270","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4468","title":"The Role of Quasi-Logical Arguments in Critical Dialogue: A Pragma-Dialectical Redefinition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rhetoric; Logical analysis; Logical consequence; Sociology; Logical conjunction; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08020592866659729,"score_gpt":0.3164677178851709,"score_spread":0.23626178921857363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599474270","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05783418,0.007131816,0.6277903,0.05265597,0.0017210245,0.0002890491,0.00008079934,0.00024019912,0.25225672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93473506,0.001150163,0.056517083,0.0010714018,0.00036274106,0.00029569434,0.000025375151,0.000121279016,0.0057212347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724878,0.023014639,0.0005982094,0.0012115466,0.002087745,0.0006000468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96853113,0.025294052,0.0012269133,0.0027483443,0.001520165,0.0006794742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02112753,0.0007667007,0.0008622162,0.0039911503,0.0063122227,0.013274294,0.0023776465,0.004740264,0.002947303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028931959,0.0005772785,0.00074688153,0.0027174035,0.070049115,0.024351293,0.009273939,0.007884237,0.0006281766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049408595,0.0000039869005,0.000035915455,0.000026790167,0.0000016317452,0.0000358556,0.009001644,0.00007478138,0.000088561006,0.98911977,0.00018247183,0.0014235792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012981254,0.000021305535,0.000093717266,0.00013681922,0.0000062616177,0.0001743383,0.0069578183,0.0017968551,0.00036902982,0.9563107,0.03410571,0.000014513935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007992869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068710133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02112753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057113045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034451298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11173445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599553930","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4821","title":"Critical Review of Arguing With People by Michael Gilbert","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.051809800228486344,"score_gpt":0.33429746891570616,"score_spread":0.2824876686872198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599553930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011045146,0.16821387,0.0011439737,0.7516684,0.064896405,0.00006498115,0.000109098946,0.000027650614,0.012771038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19082811,0.2526248,0.003704323,0.34884793,0.13322306,0.0007121184,0.00028779276,0.00033488547,0.06943696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982556,0.01270915,0.0006574119,0.0008462099,0.0027528799,0.0004783553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89552695,0.07441079,0.0039456557,0.0025418426,0.021427767,0.002146899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021227028,0.00059273763,0.0010523655,0.004166046,0.00378599,0.004374803,0.0019539702,0.00481067,0.010952436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1078956,0.0003306993,0.0006489837,0.0022233583,0.007536569,0.005664389,0.0024421355,0.007213089,0.0024806405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848969,0.000006536856,0.00008138954,0.0017275595,0.000034740875,0.00013273742,0.0028863435,0.000065061104,0.00009259993,0.044879954,0.93228817,0.017736394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024025949,0.000019099776,0.00036045918,0.006563104,0.00003660237,0.0001377749,0.003472377,0.00008181737,0.00026783452,0.018887702,0.97012043,0.000028690103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061155166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008300477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021227028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007051595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008001412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11226064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600687278","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4523","title":"Argument or Explanation: Who is to Decide?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06307956560992599,"score_gpt":0.3175833967711396,"score_spread":0.2545038311612136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600687278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018530227,0.022741187,0.16497166,0.5662401,0.0065971697,0.00017826207,0.0003881593,0.00026600313,0.22008723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731783,0.010117811,0.051896982,0.037543647,0.0050353445,0.00025431067,0.0003691475,0.00037816653,0.021226317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98249024,0.009803416,0.0010974092,0.0024590143,0.0027370092,0.0014128273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96706957,0.022237623,0.0019369178,0.0036333126,0.0036150739,0.0015075749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031879555,0.00065578474,0.0020555349,0.0027369005,0.005188851,0.013067046,0.0031492035,0.0103929825,0.010256911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0479079,0.0006893848,0.0011447748,0.0021228218,0.05408811,0.042104524,0.0046408502,0.008694049,0.0026646687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032133612,0.000012528335,0.00045233275,0.000113709495,0.00002238253,0.00011855035,0.0023588587,0.00008063526,0.00009783217,0.9755148,0.008809823,0.012386379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010992316,0.0000047491108,0.00015484075,0.00017196269,0.000012896709,0.00010456138,0.0028836078,0.0002954225,0.00012252557,0.9609828,0.035240304,0.00001538414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037149854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028255817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031879555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045260014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059785447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16859722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603318167","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4696","title":"Conductive Argument as a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Electrical conductor; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.09421506125148042,"score_gpt":0.31969895795954545,"score_spread":0.225483896708065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603318167","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045688488,0.0011699272,0.58387357,0.0098361205,0.00046986362,0.00018500435,0.000057650286,0.0003341958,0.3583852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384238,0.00045603648,0.04683309,0.0008309973,0.0001474053,0.00019723993,0.000031490563,0.00012140746,0.012958561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765206,0.008494461,0.00039989603,0.00081859506,0.001998045,0.00063696277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841891,0.011471241,0.0010665155,0.0015123558,0.0012765517,0.00048424694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011280142,0.0007065574,0.0006239488,0.0029355409,0.0029600298,0.009465936,0.0016168908,0.0052445102,0.008103444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023412356,0.00043207157,0.0009414635,0.0016459823,0.016605228,0.021710455,0.007369972,0.004485045,0.0013256524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068427726,0.0000049334985,0.000055235574,0.000021044185,0.000002766991,0.000062047024,0.0011934293,0.00017857914,0.00013996335,0.9966899,0.00015430247,0.0014908715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014343921,0.000027712305,0.00006761675,0.000074700874,0.000011101928,0.00021508281,0.0011024982,0.0019770688,0.0006198702,0.9780872,0.017789481,0.000013330676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002666812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021632056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011280142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018910087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016317547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059655786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620589543","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4775","title":"Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06384779590266558,"score_gpt":0.3608316463736511,"score_spread":0.2969838504709855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620589543","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023199987,0.0037838756,0.7395372,0.017346207,0.00044812923,0.00021999974,0.00006892684,0.0002265125,0.21516922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8435845,0.0010265402,0.14356218,0.0011830492,0.00033798508,0.00045509764,0.00008127415,0.000108932465,0.009660523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97321385,0.018875139,0.0012851671,0.0020697117,0.0037301062,0.00082607276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734929,0.018779827,0.0020356479,0.0032188313,0.0018089842,0.0006638682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019390266,0.00073934713,0.0010147904,0.0034336809,0.0039315997,0.010202768,0.0023213173,0.005206082,0.004594561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023340164,0.0005609045,0.0015858322,0.002147467,0.039128747,0.018909644,0.006005178,0.0047018942,0.00075762713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025087147,0.0000024157707,0.00002455086,0.00001621967,0.0000019846852,0.000012280411,0.00067154074,0.00018177654,0.000031484476,0.9981084,0.000074927644,0.0008719717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008140317,0.0000071310615,0.000028857368,0.00004950117,0.000003639322,0.000036086338,0.00022835801,0.00090082287,0.00009182957,0.9888333,0.009807703,0.0000047296435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006580264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046752338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019390266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048068613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025039527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10254675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620705614","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4769","title":"Others and Imagination in Reasoning and Argumentation: Improving our Critical Creative Capacity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04429160259314795,"score_gpt":0.37812391927707684,"score_spread":0.3338323166839289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620705614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4440081,0.014157551,0.17856142,0.11699476,0.00062594056,0.00033966143,0.000076465476,0.0008898812,0.24434616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95314735,0.0015581439,0.040724017,0.0011623974,0.00011307423,0.00013454341,0.000022422599,0.00010347864,0.0030345994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789594,0.015953882,0.0007277155,0.0017423065,0.001753076,0.00086356315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9057884,0.07277518,0.004636831,0.0091446,0.0029960007,0.004659078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027758474,0.0007572691,0.0005914335,0.0032319853,0.0041132113,0.01693509,0.0021419015,0.0031449685,0.006120214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050066147,0.00051176525,0.00082463614,0.0011763604,0.035780046,0.026603473,0.016426321,0.0046283402,0.0008534758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000187305,0.00044829646,0.005774539,0.0008263193,0.00007274637,0.0005629456,0.29585186,0.0017676055,0.004673854,0.5172427,0.004816638,0.1677752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011666049,0.00013734565,0.0021193973,0.0008261828,0.00006735199,0.00064702536,0.051403258,0.004088814,0.0045175315,0.8394092,0.09655687,0.00011031707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012279991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094958657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027758474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035291607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005454552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1468026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620736329","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4818","title":"Steering into the Skid: On the Norms of Critical Thinking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Critical thinking; Critical systems thinking; Focus (optics); Cognition; Vertical thinking; Parallel thinking; Metacognition; Cognitive bias; Psychology; Epistemology; Convergent thinking; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Creative thinking; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05827330696616093,"score_gpt":0.3730733906668486,"score_spread":0.3148000837006876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620736329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11082878,0.012576605,0.2980484,0.26329577,0.0025921888,0.00021410035,0.00006588525,0.00038773855,0.31199053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495579,0.002584201,0.037322327,0.0050636292,0.00048459016,0.00020312615,0.000025291863,0.0001293057,0.004629757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714245,0.021821303,0.0011980599,0.0013436604,0.0034676932,0.00074475264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86854136,0.103369266,0.006342792,0.0071376897,0.011732113,0.0028767511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036428683,0.00043375095,0.0004299351,0.0023472647,0.0032335033,0.012230561,0.001592431,0.0024452321,0.0019112545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084266245,0.00030700344,0.0003177868,0.0010373179,0.06386946,0.014918747,0.0067149447,0.0066830693,0.00048750293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019862115,0.000016859685,0.0005257868,0.000044427405,0.0000033310064,0.00004203623,0.015459658,0.00045136502,0.00011070055,0.96276987,0.002002548,0.018553533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000749565,0.000011604751,0.00017872645,0.00014624,0.00000222284,0.000028532186,0.0034263434,0.0007413185,0.00023386363,0.980645,0.014563528,0.000015123821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028210739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002209609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036428683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004781828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070817545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19265556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621191120","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4925","title":"Rethinking Rhetorical Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy: The Living Art of Michael C. Leff","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Rhetorical criticism; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10375970710132104,"score_gpt":0.320933486726976,"score_spread":0.21717377962565498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621191120","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006311467,0.84477115,0.0023954038,0.107652605,0.011697721,0.000014280779,0.000028776223,0.000038485254,0.03277042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022575695,0.85158,0.0026984662,0.03838247,0.026054673,0.000086554806,0.00007159732,0.00018067843,0.05836981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816304,0.0007557071,0.00005349082,0.0001230368,0.0008150389,0.00008962975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934233,0.0082797,0.000331769,0.00022643007,0.0015976815,0.0002220253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031011782,0.00058170926,0.0009992265,0.003571968,0.001684415,0.0063453247,0.0013120126,0.0027062537,0.006433803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373315,0.00035612565,0.00033817827,0.003902676,0.008026746,0.008562216,0.0019339914,0.0059150322,0.002668166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019073896,0.000025827094,0.00013278336,0.0018425231,0.000021466085,0.00011553021,0.0021075543,0.00036246347,0.00024557288,0.26031786,0.5788796,0.15592979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006051412,0.000009724109,0.00015589617,0.0020262212,0.000008495629,0.0001336557,0.0005947605,0.00010259287,0.00012202565,0.04007906,0.95674795,0.000013605306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063803624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006433803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004451667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00503765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03229922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265966170","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2582","title":"Pinto's Argument, Inferences and Dialectic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0688627130124364,"score_gpt":0.25771830160705134,"score_spread":0.18885558859461493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265966170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061552096,0.054553058,0.047324296,0.09003921,0.0031942083,0.00009228989,0.00015606801,0.0001874115,0.79829824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70474446,0.04253078,0.02861895,0.030202495,0.0058785854,0.00060798286,0.00023756285,0.00031254816,0.18686664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625045,0.00204313,0.00009271906,0.0005196685,0.00081743597,0.00027660187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973495,0.0020308027,0.00013808819,0.00019111331,0.00019259166,0.00009791526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028918474,0.00080912915,0.00056469673,0.0026868798,0.004500315,0.010032596,0.0012024856,0.0037300044,0.0055061765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806604,0.00042689484,0.0005118333,0.0029588197,0.019349169,0.010186004,0.0037846107,0.0057487884,0.0010204522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005235908,0.0000025760503,0.000029358782,0.000031017218,0.0000020149773,0.000019881085,0.00088601926,0.0000719449,0.000012058418,0.98720235,0.008633373,0.0031041438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007084297,0.000006298687,0.00014148015,0.00017157117,0.0000054417305,0.00006680717,0.0006403658,0.0002172162,0.00006249578,0.8213178,0.177357,0.0000064553037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004545829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035016546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010032596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050449716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026971432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036603987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753979396","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4947","title":"Précis of The Concept of Argument. A Philosophical Foundation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical and Historical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Pragmatism; Hegelianism; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.072907862517752,"score_gpt":0.32785812691765004,"score_spread":0.25495026439989804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753979396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065198475,0.07094066,0.124809004,0.16261876,0.008733877,0.00013467309,0.0003180914,0.00018024188,0.6257449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73659825,0.03292871,0.09319024,0.03181369,0.016933173,0.0010379186,0.00040294687,0.000372281,0.08672277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848104,0.0065601696,0.0005523313,0.0014458451,0.0025463223,0.00041431267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872278,0.0084921755,0.0008251298,0.0017683153,0.0011888653,0.0004976694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009735355,0.0011012864,0.0011744217,0.004044171,0.005019985,0.014568052,0.0020812924,0.007885502,0.006320633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127828615,0.000612046,0.0010280698,0.0025434084,0.080820516,0.01808676,0.004944454,0.012828313,0.0022551988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002682941,0.000002658277,0.000016285258,0.000027947743,0.0000016991278,0.000009046329,0.00035027706,0.000029543484,0.000016004104,0.9965006,0.0012990155,0.0017442878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007059675,0.000008597169,0.00004811726,0.00014174519,0.0000026812681,0.000064312466,0.00023310419,0.00017084529,0.00004277361,0.9206005,0.07867583,0.000004602733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015383946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010303187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014568052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006017059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054018125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051486135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755085426","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4698","title":"Does Rhetoric Have a Place in Wohlrapp’s Theory of Argument?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Happening; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Work (physics); Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.026522504754625066,"score_gpt":0.3008078491970462,"score_spread":0.2742853444424211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755085426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031932317,0.005897324,0.07797964,0.45868403,0.0028435935,0.00004343018,0.00013463046,0.00016010726,0.42232502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246312,0.0033088366,0.012398988,0.02524983,0.0035209467,0.00015070102,0.000075238524,0.00016232453,0.030501971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945314,0.003181327,0.00012835074,0.0005693816,0.0011880983,0.0004014598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826668,0.013638091,0.0009426894,0.0009221092,0.0014591223,0.00037120163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066136164,0.00054001005,0.0007432615,0.002027259,0.004356407,0.0063139903,0.0020276825,0.0070660496,0.0067820577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021310287,0.00023131825,0.00088794075,0.0016321681,0.03158156,0.019357419,0.0036937199,0.007850124,0.0014623522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065025633,0.0000037560553,0.000051323994,0.000017527243,0.0000017742638,0.000039407052,0.002679862,0.00003154555,0.000035209967,0.993891,0.002060977,0.0011810357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011208293,0.000013429008,0.00015509147,0.00006725995,0.0000045388147,0.000091645365,0.0019132283,0.00026710733,0.00010667325,0.95776457,0.039595813,0.000009271366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014350421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001462227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070660496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029063744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021699055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034976542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755107964","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4936","title":"Wohlrapp's concept of justification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Foundation (evidence); Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13700339787255736,"score_gpt":0.3094114464042696,"score_spread":0.17240804853171224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755107964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01206944,0.01341629,0.07750672,0.17740414,0.0025067916,0.00011856042,0.00022446802,0.00016199138,0.71659166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940572,0.0058263494,0.033168077,0.016927414,0.003650136,0.00055455614,0.00011185545,0.00014120972,0.04556321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898873,0.0059203412,0.0003498387,0.0010886863,0.0022038824,0.0005498869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960334,0.0075495704,0.0006589372,0.000855504,0.0010071058,0.00032549992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007435344,0.0005175393,0.000593425,0.0029216518,0.004704162,0.0070223347,0.0015056052,0.006220093,0.0065068644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01700062,0.00036310425,0.00069522223,0.002116523,0.039752338,0.012041389,0.004429118,0.007542203,0.0010817817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017590617,9.0767907e-7,0.00001037179,0.000008967933,5.9030805e-7,0.000009480495,0.00048791373,0.000018713165,0.000006934351,0.99712557,0.0016306782,0.0006980452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006945376,0.00000407208,0.000053641845,0.00006183596,0.000002327224,0.00004259524,0.00030237762,0.00015084323,0.000044833374,0.9297599,0.06956497,0.000005637608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002321322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018515139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007435344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004421893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039214655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039322317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755214255","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4832","title":"Issues of Logicism and Objectivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.10860358335288248,"score_gpt":0.31582165329602374,"score_spread":0.20721806994314126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755214255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015152395,0.015900806,0.18052824,0.3332311,0.0024909915,0.00010200993,0.00020874981,0.00027542814,0.4521103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8268804,0.007504222,0.06608886,0.042801768,0.0072054956,0.00078289467,0.00016086214,0.00047065783,0.04810483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809239,0.012569091,0.00062082434,0.0018104679,0.0030489345,0.0010268092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97490704,0.020308876,0.00080818345,0.0019669663,0.0014559918,0.0005529627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022817113,0.0008068363,0.0012139544,0.003096701,0.0069260327,0.014638418,0.0028009643,0.0076360684,0.0068307063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024419453,0.00065376604,0.0016312794,0.0019814398,0.07052891,0.023088511,0.006895954,0.014157465,0.00141436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017313071,0.0000022711204,0.000011732235,0.000007612733,0.0000015356356,0.000008058542,0.00034588636,0.000034574932,0.000010647862,0.99834025,0.00066603534,0.0005696168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003904884,0.000001653711,0.000011188923,0.000016745655,8.9709516e-7,0.000008962499,0.00011566,0.00008216366,0.000023389968,0.9922936,0.00743921,0.0000025902273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020684416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001142517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022817113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008577194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037774155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1206699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755429351","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4952","title":"Arguing with People","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05979987672591862,"score_gpt":0.3168351917202865,"score_spread":0.2570353149943679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755429351","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006682973,0.69180197,0.0019714772,0.110821575,0.009024501,0.000023751314,0.00008771287,0.000041037965,0.18555966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044661127,0.65379614,0.0019298234,0.062331177,0.014757715,0.000113059265,0.00020206667,0.00016139608,0.22204751],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989334,0.0005155145,0.00003344827,0.00008447829,0.00037401612,0.000059180315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980527,0.001273895,0.00009462447,0.00006938115,0.00037726937,0.00013216904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015564848,0.00053813204,0.000528814,0.0026625798,0.0019360497,0.0036936689,0.0008522621,0.0030118779,0.010706649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004084051,0.00028167237,0.0003353319,0.00329462,0.006781869,0.0051638247,0.001366475,0.0047009303,0.0047555496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001262061,0.00002259224,0.00009414925,0.0005378183,0.000009202508,0.00007637647,0.0012875337,0.0001319321,0.000082399434,0.22579913,0.6878025,0.084143825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003630921,0.000005498193,0.00020871633,0.00090190704,0.0000031133688,0.00014625014,0.00040662408,0.000028371494,0.000043563883,0.037048828,0.9611979,0.0000054406087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137648685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010706649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046704104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034966266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035817385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756336057","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4831","title":"Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13724992406290487,"score_gpt":0.31345534933186914,"score_spread":0.17620542526896427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756336057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052733294,0.0018176372,0.0014848888,0.9876078,0.0038704383,0.0000087288945,0.000029246012,0.000020204445,0.004633647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07250252,0.010164698,0.0066950573,0.8389024,0.051984947,0.00028655876,0.00007497858,0.00019319581,0.019195598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820854,0.008948147,0.00087591255,0.0024731723,0.0048893676,0.00072803895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85890394,0.11690907,0.0022001748,0.0029453079,0.017108683,0.0019328976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019028775,0.00086442044,0.0012383973,0.00158981,0.006163139,0.0063628647,0.0049738567,0.01981331,0.0095190955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10659288,0.00053583644,0.0009574695,0.0029793696,0.02460217,0.022155624,0.004297098,0.034008164,0.0030999074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047663587,0.00002098325,0.00024006297,0.00017817215,0.000010316844,0.00049909676,0.003945358,0.00028554563,0.0001788782,0.5154509,0.4704147,0.008728384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004517642,0.000026542708,0.0005234718,0.00064591516,0.000010808695,0.00033738802,0.0034082637,0.0010790204,0.00030312713,0.4196222,0.5738839,0.00011411235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016787441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008110499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01981331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007936271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046669496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10063493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772945850","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.4794","title":"Critical Thinking, Bias and Feminist Philosophy: Building a Better Framework through Collaboration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Context (archaeology); Argumentation theory; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08604922485623656,"score_gpt":0.4057764351434814,"score_spread":0.3197272102872448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772945850","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014642633,0.051087525,0.39639825,0.38115266,0.005071229,0.00052527874,0.0001145182,0.0005291749,0.15047874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58959746,0.02417348,0.33780977,0.026646059,0.0041852193,0.001736065,0.00012502707,0.0007449716,0.014981883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93626934,0.053400878,0.0012960419,0.0031231705,0.0042864936,0.0016241781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9308599,0.054230064,0.0026840302,0.004272734,0.004414865,0.0035383818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09332212,0.0026701689,0.0026636058,0.010965632,0.017204551,0.034342382,0.0054481197,0.013625161,0.0083734505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03497345,0.0012010353,0.0015883038,0.0056520025,0.111603186,0.06889371,0.029592823,0.0201663,0.0019809222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013485855,0.000033563007,0.00021823368,0.00020051874,0.000012707206,0.00011432059,0.039381202,0.00034242758,0.00009926114,0.94478667,0.0034892973,0.01130824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020049798,0.00002523866,0.000074022384,0.00094895647,0.0000062639965,0.00009292052,0.017310722,0.0004689227,0.0001254857,0.884983,0.09592218,0.000022251657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043669846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034981305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09332212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017124945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025825208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49354047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773386742","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5004","title":"Replies to Commentators on The Concept of Argument: Clarifying Themes, Answering Questions, Settling Objections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07314665647232202,"score_gpt":0.29741403196889993,"score_spread":0.2242673754965779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773386742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031796403,0.0023934827,0.0046591093,0.8349346,0.14815944,0.00013875493,0.0005272144,0.00037108426,0.005636727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06213256,0.003343129,0.0038260089,0.7825499,0.11459121,0.00086316204,0.00044621437,0.0018545311,0.030393273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706664,0.015322672,0.0029934929,0.0031844606,0.006163596,0.0016693855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7886035,0.14432645,0.011241542,0.0052702012,0.047056105,0.003502154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024693498,0.0034262142,0.0018043709,0.0026362776,0.011022138,0.007007949,0.0047924416,0.021690007,0.013105128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21667528,0.0011033472,0.0026362361,0.0037310238,0.011990895,0.008688893,0.0076655843,0.043607745,0.0060859905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011152504,0.000018545985,0.00028954304,0.0003313918,0.000031376665,0.0009643634,0.028919743,0.00018793836,0.0011402698,0.010499714,0.95388806,0.0036175493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003243008,0.000044220305,0.00072252663,0.000709923,0.00004239182,0.00047143103,0.02397323,0.00058098766,0.0010452159,0.006443508,0.9657777,0.00015645125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010076089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006311843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024693498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011984749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005763582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1305933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773477493","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5002","title":"Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1239838527647903,"score_gpt":0.36335270645482604,"score_spread":0.23936885369003574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773477493","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042951167,0.08156916,0.45546833,0.15336087,0.0021691266,0.00019604116,0.00012660876,0.00022846449,0.2639303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523488,0.022900624,0.10861156,0.0047430736,0.0021225265,0.00043543984,0.000102100465,0.00019792824,0.008538037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95016664,0.04010425,0.001721157,0.0022099502,0.004674852,0.001123239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91172206,0.077204876,0.0026469538,0.004386362,0.0025303375,0.0015094868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027788114,0.0011125396,0.0019037277,0.0077973655,0.0067679337,0.027397461,0.0032570162,0.008805992,0.0050764573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035073414,0.00090367877,0.0011210265,0.008206495,0.068513386,0.03662912,0.008602374,0.0122064585,0.0010980996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006535614,0.000014072287,0.00011753649,0.000105167885,0.000013274544,0.000051647716,0.0036302789,0.00031849064,0.00005016693,0.98999643,0.0003787292,0.005317652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008149596,0.000009047429,0.000100251265,0.00015469267,0.000003831062,0.00006710498,0.0014578797,0.00053053536,0.00004338134,0.9832894,0.01432593,0.000009903658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001709901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011702464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027788114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007348101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054347706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14695936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785825067","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.5169","title":"Informalizing Formal Logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Deductive reasoning; Logical consequence; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Non-classical logic; Informal logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Classical logic; Theory; Epistemology; Automated reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02538945278425951,"score_gpt":0.24697318777810867,"score_spread":0.22158373499384915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785825067","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048092734,0.0036544057,0.9049661,0.0071456037,0.000756895,0.00015437859,0.00029386487,0.0006440332,0.07757537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43601185,0.0077108266,0.5198613,0.0049880315,0.0029378028,0.00075499434,0.001179947,0.0006244295,0.025930779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276686,0.0033489473,0.00073599943,0.0010067981,0.0016108409,0.0005305362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107283,0.0052724904,0.00056375697,0.0015732514,0.0012888119,0.00022881736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008165396,0.0013327491,0.0008458364,0.002888879,0.002647821,0.0067441147,0.0024792687,0.002041784,0.0077179275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014343407,0.0006836968,0.0021263498,0.0016114855,0.01263623,0.014300615,0.0058132126,0.005417359,0.0015416075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037070145,0.000004958244,0.000025471949,0.000047539423,0.0000047303956,0.000024043355,0.00031063284,0.0005514473,0.00012237279,0.99540025,0.000683183,0.002821648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007971049,0.0000058458763,0.000017044795,0.000063789164,0.000007395083,0.000036954898,0.00007622675,0.0015776455,0.00020559665,0.9712172,0.026776955,0.0000074249756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002189392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014158646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008165396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042276373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021679644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043183208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789852890","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5071","title":"The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Audience reception; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Media studies","score_opus":0.041919641714042985,"score_gpt":0.3335044616917954,"score_spread":0.2915848199777524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789852890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015750324,0.058108866,0.23455207,0.099959835,0.003196487,0.00013161739,0.00007676522,0.00016574522,0.5880583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87045914,0.036848433,0.044103578,0.0076972838,0.004698847,0.00047532498,0.00009694654,0.00032168292,0.035298705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817345,0.014306515,0.00042825344,0.00072362425,0.0022287283,0.00057844137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727728,0.023496918,0.0010966499,0.0011950443,0.0009943157,0.00044434276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013537281,0.0009037003,0.0009499599,0.0049972576,0.005763437,0.01694075,0.0021764538,0.006037865,0.0054783756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017492462,0.00048706535,0.0010104029,0.004278054,0.059360035,0.022339946,0.0065589403,0.007200081,0.0011246412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006808424,0.000009497179,0.00008781006,0.00009879711,0.000004587288,0.000063793625,0.008250896,0.00013043918,0.00005736371,0.98464715,0.0016653492,0.0049775955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095048335,0.000015929294,0.0002505405,0.0004178844,0.000005465751,0.00014912468,0.0050038625,0.00049628556,0.00019013025,0.89711714,0.096330166,0.0000140080365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001711112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022198723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01694075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005913664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003675607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07159287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790117762","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5067","title":"The Bullshit Doctrine: Fabrications, Lies, and Nonsense in the Age of Trump","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Doctrine; Nonsense; Collusion; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Economics; Theology","score_opus":0.03645614700779369,"score_gpt":0.3229511440454775,"score_spread":0.2864949970376838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790117762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56956685,0.007679723,0.019934202,0.086948596,0.0007035011,0.0000483144,0.00005711267,0.0000916722,0.31497005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950649,0.00049665413,0.0005597359,0.0013789299,0.0001455587,0.00001118337,0.0000046516366,0.000022523607,0.0023158663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262154,0.005135586,0.00015813892,0.00052590854,0.0009072191,0.00065161707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762921,0.017690776,0.0030363426,0.0017207525,0.0007582912,0.0005018484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010774103,0.00039440882,0.00038096527,0.0017767223,0.010031227,0.010841799,0.0009449205,0.0052151456,0.0030296217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026259486,0.0003597171,0.00025658385,0.0011130457,0.06009063,0.016012603,0.007292899,0.008444401,0.00040599663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036974678,0.000014563108,0.001700807,0.000037365382,0.0000051323364,0.0003511119,0.16674985,0.00012261316,0.00022156604,0.8221582,0.0016761573,0.0069256327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034435885,0.00012660785,0.0038545956,0.0007640452,0.000031828557,0.00092452875,0.16593525,0.0014208218,0.0019906207,0.66163176,0.16321105,0.0000744326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023794838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029325706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010841799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039252504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020713767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056979597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790829410","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5068","title":"Fake News: A Definition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":456,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Fake news; Phrase; Presentation (obstetrics); News media; Internet privacy; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Social media; Law; Business","score_opus":0.09240612773996595,"score_gpt":0.33929819352687574,"score_spread":0.24689206578690978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790829410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05215516,0.11016465,0.21231255,0.11072465,0.0048738895,0.00043018465,0.0007040829,0.0002522855,0.5083825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9048693,0.029191991,0.034280162,0.008487398,0.0053450074,0.0009420477,0.00050472,0.0001533969,0.016225956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874457,0.006435933,0.0010269885,0.0011104648,0.0032961925,0.0006846861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96839035,0.020513993,0.0043185726,0.0033016135,0.0028094763,0.0006659953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071962234,0.0013532548,0.0011040643,0.008816575,0.0049615297,0.0124966595,0.0019648897,0.0074643763,0.0038688432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021392783,0.00052316894,0.0006991296,0.0061937207,0.03910267,0.016272567,0.005526659,0.0062046517,0.0011432709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015082571,0.000016165843,0.00042751522,0.00015023835,0.00000583517,0.00013369844,0.0055099325,0.0001436546,0.000110136025,0.9814667,0.0030331332,0.008987876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020845155,0.00007775123,0.0011383077,0.0010037132,0.000022764123,0.001614142,0.005329481,0.0012006608,0.00036546294,0.69038475,0.29878572,0.00005632278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093981007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000318156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124966595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041857366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022399523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038057685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792140173","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5070","title":"Critical Review: On Reasoning and Argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Sociology; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.08499954083385157,"score_gpt":0.31517669242290136,"score_spread":0.23017715158904978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792140173","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003295292,0.74782926,0.009282362,0.20760189,0.025043467,0.0000807036,0.000060745217,0.000043512046,0.009728592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047575977,0.7265613,0.0134608345,0.12382113,0.08089349,0.0005984917,0.00015376387,0.00018291318,0.0067520943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9120112,0.06602555,0.0042391955,0.0035563756,0.012721874,0.0014457874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69475436,0.2688797,0.00722437,0.0063686385,0.020889824,0.0018830633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0610131,0.0018452624,0.0026982902,0.010867454,0.003334548,0.010805526,0.0031420963,0.011395884,0.005092981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21460804,0.00077282795,0.0013993764,0.006229573,0.02623769,0.014944734,0.005274287,0.010567373,0.0018694594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011647141,0.000026135673,0.00020868825,0.010290424,0.00035466647,0.00027224893,0.0027569835,0.0005642697,0.00019880278,0.5885218,0.3137182,0.082971305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090124435,0.00004053539,0.0002464985,0.016382083,0.00010208465,0.00018059956,0.0009793759,0.0002484695,0.00021711778,0.47181413,0.50964385,0.00005513759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036088852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035331354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0610131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00899475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01299273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.322672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793411805","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.4959","title":"Trump, Snakes and the Power of Fables","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Immigration; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Narrative; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04332035917595582,"score_gpt":0.24120870936498154,"score_spread":0.19788835018902573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793411805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07785619,0.018930783,0.03166814,0.1323836,0.0017119796,0.00008993867,0.00005200765,0.00031864384,0.73698884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312737,0.0024451183,0.00568171,0.005419181,0.00044521206,0.00007145982,0.000019899071,0.00019533152,0.054448526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647313,0.0026935758,0.000044749646,0.00020243465,0.0003134918,0.00027255632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955836,0.0032058528,0.00037809872,0.00024253027,0.00037305104,0.00021686807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004235477,0.0006180692,0.0003658381,0.0023156395,0.011937644,0.008383231,0.00091099343,0.0027236652,0.0064659095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008869326,0.00035311107,0.00029133118,0.0010577126,0.032747515,0.01150924,0.00438876,0.0049552713,0.0009870623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016391914,0.0000065780373,0.00008580348,0.000034338693,0.00000179584,0.00011248041,0.04890106,0.00004105514,0.00011423374,0.93767136,0.008133882,0.004880976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033584438,0.000041889605,0.00029047302,0.00033674642,0.000010497069,0.00032602306,0.047234047,0.000496508,0.0007704109,0.39885482,0.5515799,0.000025088872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043309736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005882588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011937644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059145615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014794053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042913318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793839647","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5069","title":"Donald Trump as a Critical-Thinking Teaching Assistant","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Rhetoric; Section (typography); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041633542909469086,"score_gpt":0.37929798252933267,"score_spread":0.3376644396198636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793839647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016846582,0.01893075,0.09983886,0.71715426,0.025256071,0.00026384098,0.00014764344,0.0017678386,0.119794086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28345323,0.023621256,0.15912937,0.18004005,0.008531009,0.0010086002,0.00021970028,0.0016150805,0.34238166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916276,0.0035640094,0.00031085336,0.0010988375,0.0029166446,0.00048204444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656659,0.013586055,0.0014491874,0.0009249968,0.008073558,0.010300312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007757622,0.0006598422,0.0006078308,0.0015877949,0.0043499405,0.005265483,0.0013114362,0.0021373234,0.011583334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029610617,0.00044130968,0.0003608691,0.0009526305,0.0044961595,0.0063194614,0.0030508384,0.010131268,0.005762123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047582056,0.00030589508,0.0010984568,0.00023571533,0.000013763997,0.0006698308,0.00863812,0.00036748915,0.0016870841,0.05114802,0.8112583,0.1245298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025621623,0.00008582345,0.00038347844,0.00039360614,0.000008608785,0.0015751957,0.006979867,0.0014347682,0.0013199616,0.039930355,0.9478074,0.000055335215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013062423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031318672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011583334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030716236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007639093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04102671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798608906","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.429","title":"Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rebuttal; Demonstrative; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.13417846293780228,"score_gpt":0.26761529086573543,"score_spread":0.13343682792793315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798608906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09503306,0.003933221,0.5294783,0.060362805,0.0006041548,0.00027100663,0.00028163678,0.00027155742,0.30976424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550223,0.00083034666,0.035076756,0.0020655624,0.00057169935,0.00030723476,0.000063944826,0.00008267724,0.0059794174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852437,0.0070463,0.00091907295,0.0021463546,0.0036835528,0.0009610789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93309635,0.04883096,0.0058317403,0.0062099006,0.004272853,0.0017581936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018914673,0.0008497083,0.0014955527,0.005565701,0.0032682023,0.0070292046,0.0027618036,0.0056045777,0.007656464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05561219,0.00081322284,0.0018808623,0.00250396,0.028839951,0.02067472,0.0076908604,0.0056780623,0.0009642104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008294766,0.0000050630765,0.000108221146,0.00002742155,0.000006333695,0.00002465292,0.00019270845,0.00020215944,0.000043126704,0.9981846,0.00024915364,0.00094822585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009442527,0.000005511239,0.00007759092,0.000019680534,0.0000069549633,0.000032521973,0.000069835194,0.0007641611,0.00008018144,0.9971733,0.0017556131,0.000005072826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085964735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007721952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018914673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005539978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002271576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100031555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805271339","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4805","title":"Analogical Arguments in Persuasive and Deliberative Contexts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Analogy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Humanities; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02370223664687113,"score_gpt":0.2755125901704127,"score_spread":0.25181035352354153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805271339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05578478,0.007551424,0.7842982,0.0081652505,0.00094743894,0.00029552105,0.00011236383,0.00031412128,0.14253095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78193927,0.0018027461,0.20355147,0.00061069196,0.00026545255,0.0005118654,0.00009719554,0.0001692815,0.011052003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95551515,0.03614251,0.0014530006,0.001469369,0.0046833926,0.0007365569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95456874,0.039303467,0.0018728684,0.0022269748,0.0014933645,0.0005346595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016555754,0.0012036699,0.0008348281,0.0071693496,0.0044093723,0.010906221,0.0020941175,0.0046488727,0.008478939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048338,0.00085473235,0.0013296949,0.004280358,0.017232502,0.01989069,0.0068334625,0.0032067634,0.0007933004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001988343,0.000011326849,0.0001226628,0.00013093899,0.000012639654,0.00013604831,0.0056751687,0.001098557,0.00018936576,0.9849132,0.0002953802,0.0073949075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024993502,0.000025996913,0.00019204483,0.00017982145,0.000014330034,0.0002260641,0.0027785234,0.003766846,0.0005102548,0.9493203,0.04293625,0.000024450363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010644946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010047418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016555754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004312558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016524941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08755624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811066564","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4966","title":"The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Monash University","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Humanities; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.048758547514344705,"score_gpt":0.2748051771569413,"score_spread":0.22604662964259659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811066564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09485241,0.00776911,0.26593965,0.07640996,0.0014563408,0.00021820627,0.000282652,0.00027474272,0.5527969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776324,0.0011071971,0.011332981,0.0020730156,0.00076580315,0.0001812586,0.00007008932,0.0000905054,0.006746775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9433858,0.035037432,0.0029637818,0.0053182933,0.009927909,0.0033668743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83680326,0.12911354,0.0096548395,0.012683896,0.008488779,0.0032555994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036902048,0.0009634418,0.0014889204,0.0037195664,0.008378048,0.01514383,0.002680723,0.010361148,0.008938893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123304464,0.0010561565,0.0017762496,0.003303708,0.03783203,0.032830425,0.022607565,0.012522447,0.001027992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032733835,0.000010308952,0.0004053065,0.000079028854,0.000019330284,0.00011021402,0.0030849418,0.00051514787,0.00009492856,0.98949593,0.0005514134,0.0056008333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083083,0.000005731996,0.00008739206,0.0000500096,0.000008532379,0.000046828478,0.0005021711,0.00060514105,0.000057171444,0.99515945,0.0034604236,0.00000877975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090766646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065518037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036902048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006093142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032096056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19515908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883212704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4849","title":"Teaching as Abductive Reasoning: The Role of Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Humanities; Philosophy; Defeasible reasoning; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019336360398957936,"score_gpt":0.34437514950171616,"score_spread":0.32503878910275824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883212704","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045046646,0.028501054,0.62023085,0.036445417,0.0017737874,0.00045720278,0.000088246095,0.0009129962,0.26654384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7121922,0.013447136,0.2430494,0.0030794041,0.00084631296,0.0004183371,0.000135668,0.00023679047,0.026594823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716232,0.021099541,0.00097635144,0.0017451211,0.0038886035,0.00066714664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760717,0.01663234,0.0017070469,0.002558159,0.0018109502,0.001219719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014880612,0.0009921107,0.000747797,0.0024048027,0.002521724,0.01493286,0.0023513562,0.004464909,0.005417362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024616046,0.00046048823,0.00087507156,0.0021338826,0.014501999,0.011540229,0.0049117175,0.0051995693,0.0013808236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037950398,0.000106139654,0.0010123933,0.00058085046,0.000028408223,0.0002863457,0.01758906,0.0014957553,0.0017034687,0.8742818,0.00262017,0.10025773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047038495,0.00010460659,0.0008605085,0.0013204338,0.000034113218,0.0007331358,0.007832901,0.006415326,0.0022516209,0.73813206,0.2422134,0.00005486429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013153685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009917383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01493286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040162494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043462575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078697145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883283813","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4697","title":"On Arguments from Ignorance","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05066091741788435,"score_gpt":0.27722849165826985,"score_spread":0.22656757424038548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883283813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018936023,0.031135047,0.1932233,0.21187496,0.004768126,0.00009719281,0.00019441871,0.00020307649,0.5395679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207668,0.017572781,0.044695344,0.041624025,0.007438875,0.000527619,0.0002886733,0.0005744146,0.066511445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809544,0.012722239,0.0005637524,0.0013010624,0.0033469205,0.0011116011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702482,0.024800686,0.0011433634,0.0016024727,0.0017026865,0.00050261046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016588487,0.0011337985,0.0012187121,0.004339964,0.0057253395,0.010278599,0.0024585638,0.00784922,0.011777643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03210213,0.0005907462,0.0021230339,0.0029478217,0.029800592,0.022759706,0.00897303,0.012779361,0.00176152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054875604,0.000003712382,0.000022475278,0.00003340867,0.00000429028,0.00003587007,0.00078733603,0.00014196485,0.00002428336,0.99608326,0.001376336,0.0014816117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048024417,0.000004166556,0.00002892387,0.00007074731,0.0000031369552,0.000022330289,0.00020341047,0.0002771217,0.000036780206,0.98107696,0.018266892,0.00000476222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019440813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011187497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016588487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074594114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026096846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087729394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890699443","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5120","title":"Response to Groarke : Figuring Sound","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Music Technology and Sound Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sound (geography); Figuring; Position (finance); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Acoustics; Economics","score_opus":0.026911985796171406,"score_gpt":0.26233640676762304,"score_spread":0.23542442097145164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890699443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007831309,0.0011318286,0.00023728238,0.98294157,0.010032358,0.000011269311,0.00004709112,0.000038591523,0.004776986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013587417,0.0008415148,0.00028098404,0.95192176,0.0050387783,0.000049761173,0.000027865612,0.00008468318,0.028167263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965553,0.001484099,0.00018237808,0.00057387503,0.0007741439,0.00043026818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909073,0.006221169,0.00035672553,0.00034220793,0.0013052243,0.00086739956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035592117,0.0008974767,0.0008567823,0.0006399302,0.009222318,0.0047568274,0.0017816459,0.032393813,0.015056581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021333393,0.00067826995,0.0008055553,0.00071520655,0.007869287,0.008231106,0.005586634,0.05061212,0.005921656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044912314,0.000010920168,0.00017010992,0.000054157288,0.0000046503046,0.00044555048,0.0034362446,0.00004693247,0.00016871594,0.012643654,0.979079,0.00389524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019006467,0.000029104769,0.00045522657,0.00021519113,0.0000067731207,0.0005512414,0.008272873,0.00011211769,0.0003614261,0.009060504,0.98086894,0.000047746908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011966791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020489192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032393813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004984769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028067492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050369263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890742554","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5223","title":"Can we translate sounds into words? A response to Leo Groarke`'s \"Auditory Arguments: The Logic of ‘Sound’ Arguments\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Sound (geography); Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; sort; Computer science; Function (biology); Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.02304738437153613,"score_gpt":0.30708243176281136,"score_spread":0.2840350473912752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890742554","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000702604,0.0013009567,0.0009960051,0.9918541,0.001896227,0.000004398989,0.000024221456,0.000022497912,0.0031990318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07658509,0.0032572218,0.0032237854,0.88620096,0.009420963,0.0000934452,0.000045993733,0.00015829092,0.021014307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947003,0.0032350982,0.00019935072,0.00072839047,0.00081264187,0.00032432424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733042,0.020515436,0.0011955044,0.00072430767,0.0032680484,0.0009925618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067258077,0.0009236412,0.00068547536,0.0008173535,0.0058072153,0.0058289804,0.0025718268,0.022241943,0.008144839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02131915,0.0005450415,0.0008516057,0.0009998407,0.019115036,0.014173079,0.004440558,0.028803121,0.0030654343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009111204,0.000024925752,0.0002479707,0.00019051632,0.000015018962,0.00069656415,0.022232115,0.00017269823,0.00056274247,0.30470234,0.661086,0.009977997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037116275,0.000036029192,0.0006296968,0.00043713872,0.000012247635,0.00087750517,0.017345898,0.00043721756,0.00061971974,0.21285805,0.76661193,0.000097526834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007216702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009239745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022241943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003957057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021873894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035569847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890924417","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5050","title":"On Appeals to Nature and their Use in the Public Controversy over Genetically Modified Organisms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Externalism; Natural (archaeology); Genetically modified organism; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.05638102254125447,"score_gpt":0.2573590903537078,"score_spread":0.20097806781245334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890924417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11512682,0.020706968,0.09151055,0.115508765,0.0021888048,0.00012916542,0.0001311143,0.00013544904,0.65456235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978508,0.0031814552,0.0047424235,0.00479841,0.0010504039,0.00012037114,0.00004669453,0.00012830194,0.00742401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.973704,0.01834426,0.00080337544,0.001594916,0.00431843,0.00123503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91713214,0.07289193,0.004239103,0.0020856257,0.002894707,0.000756512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023838434,0.00080466614,0.0009815234,0.0053943037,0.008893671,0.014457503,0.0019878745,0.012935624,0.006342401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05766062,0.0004908576,0.0009858537,0.0046113357,0.051606737,0.023360364,0.009018553,0.00909612,0.0007978908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019237315,0.000009316736,0.0002514414,0.00008488856,0.000009397019,0.00017279718,0.020890383,0.0000746718,0.00012214316,0.97434264,0.0010104058,0.0030126665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003045699,0.000026646407,0.00071332336,0.00065955677,0.00004209587,0.0003000352,0.016612872,0.0007038973,0.00034123438,0.9075176,0.07300872,0.000043608114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011737813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009138968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023838434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005378261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016304532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12607116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891342704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5325","title":"Where Do Sounds Fit Within Informal Logic?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sound (geography); Process (computing); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.08279806609179577,"score_gpt":0.2761235432991167,"score_spread":0.19332547720732093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891342704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022852954,0.004642394,0.04004016,0.84191394,0.0060646245,0.00006339409,0.000119720215,0.00022446665,0.08407833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8834698,0.0045676692,0.008048488,0.08543876,0.0052243504,0.00017398947,0.000098722216,0.00032576328,0.012652421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850639,0.009916373,0.00069543923,0.0014403001,0.0017405973,0.0011433829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92710346,0.0574977,0.004437676,0.0025418964,0.0074138986,0.001005469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016416155,0.00061299204,0.00070314074,0.0021054207,0.006292901,0.015497303,0.0026387246,0.008710705,0.01171706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07614098,0.00040152238,0.0008520607,0.002418354,0.027349882,0.04056081,0.006971622,0.0111187,0.002588879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081095706,0.000034094715,0.0012926995,0.00027603857,0.000015360338,0.0006447712,0.09318543,0.00015407705,0.00028818616,0.8441954,0.03855556,0.021277258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027661259,0.000041756583,0.0015269007,0.0010158565,0.000018033355,0.00058608974,0.15098894,0.00074162276,0.00080714177,0.60823715,0.23593275,0.0000761233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039369348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004054153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016416155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00319894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026419456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08681792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892164305","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5040","title":"Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Common sense; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04200780743109701,"score_gpt":0.262437827132096,"score_spread":0.220430019700999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892164305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13837416,0.0070002032,0.22417988,0.120573334,0.0010128516,0.00015445727,0.0001502813,0.00037796787,0.5081768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856608,0.00046028267,0.009157328,0.0016323917,0.00029989236,0.00011311803,0.000021592577,0.00007700455,0.0025776427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94844335,0.032537185,0.0027054716,0.004360497,0.008999517,0.0029539408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8904156,0.07979198,0.006412627,0.014964228,0.006191215,0.002224447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046702567,0.0007022868,0.0012931068,0.0036278304,0.0071231215,0.01608196,0.003118656,0.00892151,0.0040673823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0871528,0.0009730871,0.001202756,0.0022554658,0.08253251,0.029138485,0.016354451,0.0096946405,0.0007465606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018729475,0.000006748369,0.00014261964,0.000035836234,0.000010462829,0.00005698872,0.0032285526,0.00017421343,0.0000641231,0.9940519,0.0003640399,0.0018457737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011744032,0.000002879476,0.000046433,0.000029250792,0.0000036992956,0.000031519037,0.00041648405,0.00024673992,0.00006557733,0.99626285,0.002877449,0.0000055147625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009703472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006120122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046702567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004968484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00358331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24698973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892296476","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.4954","title":"Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Informal logic; Argument map; Scope (computer science); Sound (geography); Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.028688946484547288,"score_gpt":0.30371640309501113,"score_spread":0.27502745661046385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892296476","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04079394,0.0029501743,0.5675011,0.018323876,0.001084189,0.00009721162,0.00018528734,0.0004977097,0.36856642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93354505,0.0008873773,0.048992313,0.0016618979,0.00058438943,0.00012640309,0.00011626421,0.00018288381,0.0139034055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923104,0.0047603874,0.00029320063,0.00063404156,0.0015856505,0.0004162945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870864,0.0094298525,0.0009824262,0.0010020747,0.0011588236,0.0003404374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00595997,0.00072569627,0.0004944385,0.0023027654,0.0027170416,0.009732772,0.0015516446,0.0038523744,0.010504108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023920378,0.00043015034,0.0011974102,0.0013658056,0.015932193,0.016958881,0.0045715356,0.0038456076,0.0015948268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019929983,0.0000064245296,0.00008050641,0.00005202894,0.000006681772,0.000060254268,0.001385889,0.00022319959,0.00018734517,0.9934308,0.0006655577,0.0038814545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013542301,0.000010770351,0.000098174416,0.000045541623,0.000008805129,0.00007575082,0.00042626137,0.0010816673,0.00023571581,0.9865507,0.01144435,0.000008776876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007477568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006215219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010504108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022431926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012252645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03513968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903834446","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5029","title":"The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative Inferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Dialogical self; Conversation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Premises; Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Anonymity; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.04082199326469757,"score_gpt":0.3103028636653924,"score_spread":0.2694808704006948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903834446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95237535,0.00039796677,0.036532618,0.00032840887,0.000019219828,0.000060888215,0.00023336077,0.00009857774,0.009953631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854842,0.00012704541,0.013272739,0.0000272061,0.0000059049244,0.000053743082,0.00016455942,0.000050416704,0.0008141657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930855,0.0033690308,0.00050186465,0.0010972683,0.0016027737,0.0003436072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447976,0.04352223,0.004719275,0.0037123775,0.0028256935,0.0004228312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084832935,0.00036419838,0.00035218435,0.0014973546,0.0009309864,0.004132135,0.00092098734,0.0010875579,0.0031149832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044091187,0.0006275956,0.00041389707,0.001156256,0.0031107808,0.0055074925,0.0038641891,0.0022915942,0.00056088204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005014201,0.00016851955,0.13149147,0.00078299956,0.00009876481,0.0037100725,0.63708895,0.0018221543,0.041762188,0.07974024,0.0010332618,0.10180003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106850195,0.0005153879,0.36728573,0.00109899,0.00034160673,0.010748839,0.29827723,0.022435091,0.10510628,0.10887712,0.08489692,0.00030980157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013607731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014433016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084832935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011387527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010274486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044864476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904608130","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5052","title":"Arguing with Images as Extended Cognition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Cognitive science; Order (exchange); Politics; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02017987513203168,"score_gpt":0.29787435326773987,"score_spread":0.2776944781357082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904608130","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2596243,0.0050662956,0.37559593,0.016632557,0.0004812145,0.00010012002,0.00008561841,0.00029827358,0.34211576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803315,0.00039725917,0.016093617,0.00036715664,0.000095383395,0.000044556367,0.000027932458,0.000031469946,0.00261105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585414,0.0026940291,0.00013402852,0.00038181464,0.00068080035,0.0002551721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942531,0.0037906645,0.00058179034,0.0006453505,0.0004240275,0.00030493998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004332806,0.00057264237,0.00038032027,0.0022090487,0.0018393032,0.007881485,0.0010251318,0.0025471675,0.0045953942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007921928,0.00022525027,0.0008975262,0.0010850556,0.017354745,0.014373517,0.004170094,0.002734464,0.00040155146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012568054,0.000009380875,0.0001901391,0.00005301532,0.000007726748,0.00009656598,0.0061184065,0.00028331345,0.00042979754,0.98857224,0.0002647858,0.003962038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014535801,0.00002015936,0.00028521926,0.000064683234,0.000009342627,0.0001752614,0.0025775216,0.0011840762,0.00028865537,0.984597,0.010772554,0.000011044953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040015267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002585277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007881485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015660371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005602909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02291435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905115839","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5077","title":"The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute; McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Epistemology; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.052289089651204525,"score_gpt":0.3782583810100003,"score_spread":0.32596929135879577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905115839","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014760968,0.008282404,0.85776824,0.03906286,0.0007045053,0.0001526178,0.0000901605,0.00022518997,0.07895302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6381869,0.004607053,0.3471736,0.0029694138,0.0015756608,0.00056396425,0.00009987143,0.00023585782,0.004587641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.903393,0.07466412,0.0041725175,0.0054909727,0.010641925,0.0016375445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8283233,0.14081967,0.004789968,0.019484207,0.0053101326,0.0012727703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09485225,0.0012583265,0.0018149794,0.005910817,0.006194675,0.014331108,0.0050134896,0.0059459936,0.0034551157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10201872,0.001622654,0.002336147,0.0033881457,0.081081934,0.028168954,0.011778337,0.010397367,0.0009154187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007216858,0.000007515525,0.00010318767,0.000064126,0.00001386736,0.000018784845,0.0009338165,0.00036721744,0.00004692198,0.9955511,0.0002682973,0.002617984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010039662,0.0000071117693,0.000024956935,0.000036338803,0.000004264346,0.000020947655,0.00011724526,0.0007380135,0.00013870776,0.9952614,0.0036344868,0.0000064120077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015946287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09485225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047266055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50163263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905498512","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5065","title":"Two Types of Argument from Position to Know","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Position (finance); Point (geometry); Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04554174471056073,"score_gpt":0.28244212796945395,"score_spread":0.23690038325889323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905498512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015569014,0.0023592438,0.23286483,0.09699934,0.0032508622,0.00039004412,0.0003573867,0.00023703171,0.6479723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75260293,0.0026112327,0.10474763,0.035976376,0.004553658,0.0020821597,0.0007450825,0.0005237997,0.09615711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798779,0.0083211195,0.0008739837,0.0026788826,0.0065595745,0.0016885949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411531,0.044600148,0.00249249,0.0051794006,0.004924716,0.0016500091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019223288,0.001147818,0.0013281343,0.005487528,0.0041346005,0.009598018,0.0053055324,0.0147063695,0.024034766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07360316,0.0009766816,0.0025438343,0.002996794,0.024396358,0.03289958,0.013631878,0.01367289,0.004194326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771362,0.00001817801,0.00009087628,0.00005971868,0.0000060643756,0.000055902103,0.0006256295,0.000042316122,0.000048117654,0.995538,0.0013413344,0.0021561547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005054039,0.000024611038,0.00016438033,0.00018258046,0.000016440641,0.00016047279,0.00081787136,0.0005024452,0.0003910964,0.9689326,0.028739344,0.000017554816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004419382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042736085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024034766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038987412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023507567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10166365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921887360","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5116","title":"Argumentation As Critically Oriented Pedagogical Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argumentative; Critical thinking; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05872043937979131,"score_gpt":0.3869222871635544,"score_spread":0.3282018477837631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921887360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06349239,0.020846378,0.29545766,0.02017458,0.0014583771,0.000612732,0.000096275566,0.00036596818,0.59749573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92180145,0.0044781477,0.053199764,0.0012251912,0.000572997,0.0007125312,0.00006879969,0.00010473117,0.017836459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779244,0.018000646,0.0006040687,0.0009608797,0.0018888627,0.00062109716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98788935,0.008934608,0.0010323201,0.0008083924,0.000824876,0.00051050086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086032525,0.0009302199,0.0005229558,0.0029345388,0.0031035375,0.014166284,0.0013051138,0.0045649866,0.002649432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011973874,0.00035327303,0.00063346373,0.001807283,0.03297036,0.011879707,0.0060522356,0.0035492242,0.0006341469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001007725,0.000008641654,0.000069878784,0.00008091636,0.000004736514,0.00008898424,0.0122914715,0.00026967234,0.00031288152,0.98110723,0.00039422137,0.005361235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026664798,0.000032711672,0.00013606643,0.00025380973,0.000010370313,0.00021058448,0.00375384,0.0011374957,0.000479302,0.91387814,0.080064744,0.000016396714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000529943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029911232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014166284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025705318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045498908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921916127","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5080","title":"A Dialectical View on Conduction: Reasons, Warrants, and Normal Suasory Inclinations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sun Yat-sen University","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Extant taxon; Scholarship; Preference; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.025915304095070354,"score_gpt":0.26431839522206113,"score_spread":0.23840309112699076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921916127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05806395,0.004879889,0.68960994,0.027769247,0.00040643296,0.00010260605,0.00015941511,0.00034801138,0.2186605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9048452,0.0017183326,0.083136775,0.0012177931,0.0002945615,0.00016750477,0.00010122868,0.00019078304,0.008327842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451977,0.0030837278,0.00037948808,0.000623877,0.0010461797,0.00034702776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910547,0.005552758,0.0006614117,0.0012376762,0.0009759805,0.0005175144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008640276,0.0006485679,0.0007015313,0.0036671846,0.0034434162,0.00942433,0.0014939607,0.0041024415,0.0046021305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012076445,0.0005841044,0.001032468,0.0028417015,0.02942548,0.028021166,0.0054109967,0.005293818,0.00075290713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046222835,0.0000024854533,0.000039633676,0.000007976626,9.5221975e-7,0.000014178666,0.00079679355,0.000061079554,0.00004408463,0.99801505,0.00014325052,0.00086992595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053833996,0.0000040959353,0.000039182083,0.000022192753,0.0000026905666,0.00003223719,0.0003628896,0.0003996959,0.00009712329,0.9939997,0.0050303745,0.0000043031805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00115046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008923418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00942433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038253851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020074444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04569471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922018101","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5340","title":"Rhetoric and Logical Reasoning as Engagement with Being","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Conviction; Argument (complex analysis); Existentialism; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Logical form; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03817517719170175,"score_gpt":0.2441166542721782,"score_spread":0.20594147708047647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922018101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05963887,0.0076812413,0.30285922,0.048468236,0.0009910637,0.00024345382,0.000087061395,0.000293593,0.5797373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588676,0.0014246599,0.027128568,0.0018754725,0.00036618224,0.0001707419,0.00005614304,0.00012275146,0.009987793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725389,0.021279698,0.00082144665,0.0015352624,0.002653942,0.0011706838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97646934,0.018695185,0.0017667977,0.0013618554,0.0010499555,0.0006568113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018440407,0.0008124274,0.0007629883,0.0039125877,0.007302737,0.01434464,0.001955183,0.005301201,0.0048440876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018307142,0.00054075534,0.0011521769,0.0024734195,0.07673735,0.020638634,0.008497597,0.0060257516,0.0010116975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005837424,0.000004528458,0.000058241927,0.00003687262,0.0000031011994,0.000048260677,0.013325952,0.00013755074,0.00011343148,0.9846044,0.0002345666,0.0014272573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015589549,0.000019783603,0.00010645449,0.00012661958,0.000008125983,0.000108149885,0.0063086255,0.0005340944,0.00025272754,0.9620685,0.030436479,0.000014840356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015374676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085097755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018440407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005096843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035928155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09752339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922307189","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5719","title":"You Will Respect My Authoritah!? A Reply to Botting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Appeal; Epistemology; Defeasible estate; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05664282117680272,"score_gpt":0.27781461651055406,"score_spread":0.22117179533375134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922307189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027692597,0.001486269,0.0004828698,0.9865997,0.0087895375,0.0000039335096,0.000020051364,0.000036895755,0.0023037803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011135107,0.0010389792,0.00068504515,0.9690856,0.010581055,0.000028754168,0.000015863363,0.000085723834,0.007343874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979235,0.003866129,0.0008954098,0.0025357266,0.002199386,0.0007109906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948587,0.038732056,0.0017576066,0.0022825345,0.006698194,0.0019425917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289518,0.0012728603,0.0016788427,0.0017071838,0.00947827,0.010460085,0.0037633984,0.04059538,0.010072898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06580681,0.0008874138,0.0012841809,0.0024500135,0.016356293,0.018506153,0.004469596,0.04578854,0.0063661216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003766997,0.0000146582215,0.000259292,0.00005909134,0.000008911407,0.00018686969,0.0016038973,0.000047754696,0.00011398445,0.057877626,0.9349846,0.0048056548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003421748,0.000032125714,0.0007382564,0.00029490405,0.000021907079,0.00047828475,0.0028029045,0.000396141,0.00047388818,0.07224018,0.9223297,0.00015763353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007804389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079159485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04059538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072993594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004364031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06819707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943196159","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5739","title":"Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Viewpoints; Negotiation; Argumentation theory; Sanctions; Outcome (game theory); Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025064924890414546,"score_gpt":0.29782811240255513,"score_spread":0.27276318751214057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943196159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37375733,0.009060085,0.067001686,0.062165476,0.00084122416,0.00023743344,0.00011367437,0.00019910691,0.48662397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395305,0.0006247482,0.0023948555,0.0005118576,0.0002721864,0.00007426409,0.000016413216,0.000031437656,0.0021211863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96271604,0.02781013,0.0013868285,0.0019840798,0.004137258,0.0019656492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.889542,0.09237818,0.009966672,0.0023510077,0.0031349596,0.002627192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022349376,0.0007144024,0.001086203,0.004816447,0.0072691957,0.019962592,0.0015473753,0.0077876775,0.008850709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07952906,0.0007509023,0.0009522603,0.0035001806,0.033241376,0.016751999,0.0088253,0.005076081,0.000783718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010074143,0.000081894555,0.001566825,0.00020917674,0.00003785706,0.00036129798,0.01730093,0.0012859192,0.00045934544,0.96820784,0.0011045284,0.009283577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008466956,0.000052479354,0.0018819075,0.00016271685,0.000027194972,0.00011525486,0.005858492,0.0027302855,0.0003386873,0.9739556,0.014751413,0.00004131194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001525588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010238342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022349376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00518428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036934232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11819619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948551323","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.5101","title":"Is an Appeal to Popularity a Fallacy of Popularity?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Mistake; Epistemology; Condorcet method; Fallacy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Voting; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06467047197338276,"score_gpt":0.29503152103600555,"score_spread":0.23036104906262278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948551323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12261163,0.0032369674,0.18883449,0.15094356,0.0014935354,0.00026131351,0.0002519603,0.00028409986,0.53208244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768977,0.0005839703,0.008529351,0.0062663,0.00086198124,0.00014684843,0.00005313478,0.00008074857,0.0065798303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97831786,0.008390378,0.0012357038,0.0034913444,0.0067463727,0.001818276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92132854,0.05535864,0.0074559846,0.006340724,0.007333935,0.0021821677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023601705,0.00049841544,0.0015820845,0.0032756238,0.0045291646,0.008592238,0.0024003796,0.009876371,0.016331477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09050961,0.00062629866,0.0014988418,0.0018589611,0.036277004,0.023901086,0.0065758736,0.008056057,0.0013038986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031272408,0.000012415553,0.00062317436,0.000041445728,0.000021902479,0.00009642764,0.00062821264,0.000102067235,0.0001129401,0.9934524,0.001378404,0.0034993722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021889085,0.00002301929,0.00059725577,0.00005131116,0.00002079334,0.00014147267,0.00052042556,0.00072129385,0.00014431031,0.9916157,0.00612679,0.000015604399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019516179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023601705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045083477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022432148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12481928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948887261","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.4940","title":"The Appraisal of Conductions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Dimension (graph theory); Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Balance (ability); Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07020105457511219,"score_gpt":0.29186607081554206,"score_spread":0.22166501624042986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948887261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07852388,0.004020423,0.33909932,0.05160896,0.0022725349,0.00030495317,0.00033987605,0.0005167751,0.5233133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95884323,0.0008989737,0.025946047,0.002033007,0.0012686619,0.00018589731,0.00011519259,0.00026775646,0.010441289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713212,0.013284617,0.001735658,0.0031505954,0.008620254,0.0018875621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91098315,0.060855016,0.0052549015,0.0075218086,0.013147462,0.0022375947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030757895,0.00089389866,0.0011673248,0.0058932723,0.004325559,0.0115477815,0.0024072828,0.005732815,0.010589521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11315132,0.00063219713,0.0015482435,0.0025217624,0.033265453,0.027696114,0.008529906,0.009023921,0.0015314587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026354302,0.0000055008672,0.00025468122,0.000064948574,0.000007742737,0.000063727224,0.0015978682,0.0002448379,0.0001450402,0.9918609,0.00084320985,0.0048851795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008747176,0.000015304937,0.0002999848,0.000117791984,0.000010705171,0.000067170215,0.0011526822,0.0011778845,0.00021233619,0.9868715,0.010054482,0.000011470697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010450438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080890715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030757895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005280044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031945654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16266519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953012294","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.6015","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03459110295401766,"score_gpt":0.21634585223094446,"score_spread":0.1817547492769268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953012294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001240368,0.03980402,0.0005718876,0.015538758,0.08148787,0.00010793391,0.006050357,0.00068677147,0.85451204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00066573813,0.0027800251,0.00009930467,0.0009710114,0.002159515,0.000010301398,0.0009175536,0.00010138687,0.99229527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923813,0.0000680421,0.00003642233,0.00015922067,0.00040843876,0.00008965434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976731,0.00036517397,0.0000885092,0.00021140806,0.001151872,0.0005099647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007537356,0.0009293438,0.001564905,0.0047818506,0.00202371,0.006160403,0.0011526726,0.0017510643,0.73504156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00373427,0.00047894282,0.0008335404,0.0067552044,0.0006158101,0.0032143688,0.0021432391,0.0019052713,0.53895307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032634838,0.000016563788,0.00008607341,0.0001768569,0.0000044806816,0.000043440374,0.000031256295,0.00003239669,0.00013856908,0.0021267706,0.96249026,0.03482074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004411753,0.0000070266833,0.00029516753,0.00007688736,0.0000021315827,0.000031480267,0.0000277951,0.0000125254855,0.000029730967,0.00026958584,0.99924064,0.0000026456273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004668075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01596728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73504156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014827945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014570575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37793106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978151455","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5100","title":"Educating Students to Consistency via Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade de Lisboa; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore","keywords":"Argumentative; Reductio ad absurdum; Argumentation theory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Norm (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Epistemology; Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02827418914085004,"score_gpt":0.3761712352610462,"score_spread":0.3478970461201961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978151455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7449997,0.0008033444,0.17236064,0.011548962,0.00036252948,0.0010428133,0.000042308555,0.0008853739,0.06795428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92151904,0.0006298712,0.06803378,0.001048597,0.000116424264,0.0005840436,0.000055970824,0.0000622424,0.007950053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917917,0.0055689192,0.00029767922,0.00053699716,0.0012527052,0.0005519638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783733,0.014843972,0.0024148377,0.0014893105,0.0016663643,0.001212277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008848384,0.00066426303,0.00058325514,0.0013048074,0.0022355833,0.005260705,0.001434706,0.0027387452,0.0045110728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028556505,0.00038207276,0.0005576903,0.00052439165,0.0034079058,0.003390536,0.006094595,0.004723491,0.0015120979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003594201,0.005383333,0.03684916,0.0017306851,0.00008524691,0.0026069637,0.3032054,0.0031234063,0.041028086,0.13603464,0.011885944,0.45770776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006705118,0.003083694,0.031017726,0.002517906,0.0002664526,0.003425513,0.12457561,0.018291926,0.041704804,0.34135443,0.4327819,0.00030953586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019561929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024774493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008848384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091244717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020176778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04679531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978897034","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5493","title":"Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Emotive; Presupposition; Argumentation theory; Connotation; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Epistemology; Politics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychotherapist; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023753198669325237,"score_gpt":0.2728871743126417,"score_spread":0.24913397564331646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978897034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3795269,0.01750457,0.08492832,0.05908007,0.0014909436,0.00013640296,0.000091155765,0.00013885525,0.45710286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908461,0.0011563764,0.003784741,0.00065759686,0.00017593095,0.00005679497,0.000014382109,0.00003598167,0.0032721094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99092007,0.0078008627,0.0001618707,0.00030855834,0.0005868003,0.00022179482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99041194,0.00798899,0.0005804509,0.0002661396,0.0005765982,0.00017589747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056586764,0.000342138,0.00030503323,0.0018124888,0.003707975,0.008057855,0.00072973,0.0022196018,0.0017515126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609816,0.00028067676,0.0002452876,0.0015382137,0.019600557,0.007789774,0.0036851433,0.0023066478,0.00027826222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045178855,0.000024643867,0.00048898393,0.00013453921,0.000011768941,0.00022018909,0.082389325,0.00030721136,0.0006428664,0.8999528,0.001990199,0.013792347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032940403,0.000040978033,0.002058652,0.00040467788,0.000016910566,0.00024984797,0.04274437,0.0021066063,0.0008839947,0.83726525,0.114150055,0.000045747358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010366194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009841243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008057855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029567275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010237558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0299263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994738575","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6033","title":"Emotive Figures as \"Shown\" Emotion in Italian Post-Unification Conduct Books (1860-1900)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Emotive; Unification; Rhetorical question; Cluster analysis; Motion (physics); Psychology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06362397002295854,"score_gpt":0.2830519612487453,"score_spread":0.21942799122578677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994738575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433037,0.0045891567,0.0018243493,0.0013630992,0.00018893382,0.00005216935,0.012166941,0.00015731878,0.13635437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642125,0.0021258057,0.0019178898,0.000118060045,0.00020342997,0.00008414317,0.010320612,0.00017776164,0.020839836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999539,0.00015973118,0.000030324965,0.00008365584,0.00013053512,0.000056595898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868053,0.00070661167,0.0002648071,0.00011282037,0.00017158927,0.00006375178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072134926,0.00025842863,0.00020873437,0.005032397,0.0010449314,0.0017553028,0.00023947396,0.0003242936,0.0050288932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024786852,0.00013846677,0.00011649978,0.006559173,0.0019129788,0.0011048387,0.00078192283,0.00059826294,0.0012513143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046430246,0.00008151738,0.0619064,0.0022758688,0.00004428622,0.002610984,0.5746415,0.0005083419,0.010248997,0.052772563,0.076224096,0.21822111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012678719,0.000036763515,0.5091469,0.0005406588,0.000023616005,0.0011098365,0.037344914,0.00033281554,0.0019830028,0.0013186889,0.44811222,0.000037844737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012453341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028169764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012453341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025207216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000519784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024761736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995317210","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6046","title":"The Rhetorical and Argumentative Relevance of \"Extreme Consequence\" in Advertising","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Exaggeration; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Psychology; Relevance theory; Cognition; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034604655264190216,"score_gpt":0.30771554908000054,"score_spread":0.27311089381581033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995317210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78167796,0.0014874372,0.08855092,0.0058028237,0.00026602604,0.0000849713,0.000105687395,0.00015794393,0.121866226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956067,0.00011618548,0.0034954362,0.00009761039,0.00005304556,0.000013520743,0.000027196702,0.000024054878,0.00056620396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960907,0.0025247952,0.00017128015,0.00024951555,0.0007936487,0.0001699936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97842616,0.017640261,0.0013977257,0.0012615374,0.0010170822,0.00025714352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004092623,0.0002800043,0.00024900594,0.0023205236,0.0013589762,0.0033912675,0.00047986247,0.001188476,0.0024520631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016203312,0.00020124733,0.00032222876,0.0013535608,0.0080862995,0.004559571,0.0018270114,0.0015629237,0.00019276344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032071755,0.00013357121,0.012440505,0.0005368422,0.00005452627,0.0009133866,0.060042616,0.0007168847,0.011094834,0.87613034,0.0014902517,0.0361255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012210685,0.00027414315,0.072424255,0.000416423,0.000196002,0.0032627801,0.036879614,0.010027113,0.010458801,0.82783484,0.038003195,0.0001007625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026456328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033891806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004092623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010975255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006632203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021644115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995714616","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6037","title":"Argumentative Strategies and Stylistic Devices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Leiden; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Identification (biology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024072700619630447,"score_gpt":0.3093085103261368,"score_spread":0.28523580970650636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995714616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042744942,0.01188242,0.50442225,0.012595693,0.0006200432,0.00031551678,0.0002765834,0.00042438685,0.42671815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8475534,0.0044093016,0.13302112,0.00085776194,0.0004704704,0.00070942566,0.0002053311,0.00020977821,0.012563434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880284,0.008067106,0.00075322844,0.0008974381,0.0018424098,0.00041138643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893204,0.0069064037,0.0010932229,0.0015715214,0.0008172844,0.00029107314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008467598,0.0012053777,0.00074467267,0.005846634,0.002803264,0.013300326,0.0017116007,0.0025491272,0.0039623454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01594778,0.0006185442,0.0007060072,0.0039020532,0.031855486,0.014350621,0.005235262,0.0030749005,0.0012031747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030784356,0.0000032908358,0.000038744045,0.000025651247,0.000002830333,0.000027746457,0.0011226657,0.00013110181,0.0001032953,0.9966608,0.00015191738,0.0017287525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009300212,0.000009288547,0.00008303722,0.00006808493,0.00000432035,0.00010268721,0.0010359772,0.0006324448,0.00020132425,0.9770891,0.020757392,0.000007009838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004732882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048032857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013300326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030653675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015484815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044781506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995773050","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6036","title":"Old Delivery and Modern Demagogy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.020052022164361766,"score_gpt":0.2775076998258982,"score_spread":0.25745567766153643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995773050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13752294,0.010461397,0.0028226478,0.018331362,0.00046450685,0.000035198555,0.000053906628,0.00005121765,0.8302568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94874316,0.001891171,0.00035403503,0.00091563206,0.00021824158,0.000012106097,0.000013108664,0.000027630962,0.04782485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827886,0.0009783229,0.00006328318,0.00015933502,0.0002553223,0.0002649213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984968,0.00070142915,0.00021979657,0.00020114555,0.00016248038,0.00021836351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023610608,0.00022176057,0.00017898223,0.0016603897,0.004055775,0.005269558,0.00052279234,0.00064141426,0.008244745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003953726,0.00013394891,0.00008806251,0.001507277,0.01929637,0.0044276714,0.004280553,0.0020514121,0.00054471585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029058394,0.000025718886,0.0010469594,0.00006259886,0.0000029058322,0.00016279954,0.03992389,0.000060318725,0.000101923404,0.9425145,0.00233379,0.013735557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053290627,0.000106474225,0.0057389587,0.00037619084,0.0000088037405,0.00041172322,0.054221593,0.00024264074,0.0005545356,0.22797479,0.7102847,0.000026279902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039925436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00717105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008244745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070536523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024721092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051178098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996404137","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6035","title":"Emotions in Argumentative Narration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Psychology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.02408531498602858,"score_gpt":0.30727972758506716,"score_spread":0.2831944125990386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996404137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64108384,0.008209304,0.111143395,0.005484683,0.00044121483,0.00010579829,0.00011631032,0.00023665735,0.23317881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934042,0.0004965041,0.0039733322,0.0001041416,0.000060258,0.00002894347,0.000024379446,0.000040874955,0.0018673344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948651,0.004023866,0.00008310917,0.00029457847,0.0004957011,0.00023762755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928617,0.0059412746,0.00052863726,0.00027230452,0.00026725678,0.000128873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027017493,0.000517502,0.0002842392,0.0011938262,0.0019868654,0.006115499,0.0007782851,0.0018233723,0.002777621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012058925,0.00027822427,0.00036187665,0.0008497058,0.0076374887,0.006977864,0.0030230312,0.0018781474,0.0004433577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021581382,0.0000881355,0.0024088807,0.0005622361,0.000051333438,0.0013829062,0.30965823,0.001961421,0.010470727,0.6393573,0.0015221589,0.03232087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010794497,0.0002566747,0.014116935,0.0008346394,0.00010424767,0.002518839,0.16068971,0.013311964,0.011504115,0.6410184,0.15538192,0.00015460087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033838194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025115782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006115499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012649087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035854688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014288366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006942597","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5969","title":"Adversariality and Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Argument map; Variation (astronomy); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1232533442587925,"score_gpt":0.27046581143204734,"score_spread":0.14721246717325484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006942597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03144888,0.0119194565,0.4158602,0.074324034,0.0010436437,0.00024229095,0.00011498051,0.00018129732,0.46486515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94665533,0.0026645926,0.03331113,0.0037222197,0.00082041067,0.00029895615,0.00005216158,0.0000927126,0.012382612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96728075,0.023540488,0.001316525,0.002733355,0.0036036216,0.0015252744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657438,0.025459647,0.002798092,0.0032880483,0.0015934961,0.0011169201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019940242,0.000833353,0.0009932313,0.0025619015,0.00665096,0.01303863,0.0021682975,0.007465338,0.005076847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026954196,0.00051995175,0.0014055336,0.0015979009,0.054908726,0.015618431,0.009956313,0.007645169,0.0007863464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021214105,0.00000249193,0.000031674026,0.000012789754,0.000004013999,0.000015069711,0.00034016115,0.00017586909,0.000018290188,0.998553,0.00016931306,0.0006752008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046499867,0.0000033671367,0.000028523331,0.000033007276,0.0000023754453,0.000026676804,0.00014218115,0.0003632948,0.000034787605,0.99173015,0.007626829,0.000004108858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013575436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076524017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019940242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066474257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003093457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10545534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007814168","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6160","title":"Review of Truth in Fiction: Rethinking its Logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fiction theory; Philosophical logic; Non-fiction; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Literary fiction; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Literary criticism","score_opus":0.08173305572992969,"score_gpt":0.32263427061565514,"score_spread":0.24090121488572547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007814168","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028797311,0.6508504,0.011627596,0.24134925,0.018179372,0.00003069062,0.00010992262,0.000088652996,0.07488434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25597084,0.5400419,0.010047955,0.09683842,0.06903135,0.00015073727,0.0003471627,0.0006149162,0.026956744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898874,0.005460434,0.00058902154,0.0007307374,0.0029408303,0.00039156547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93756044,0.052115727,0.0012424287,0.002006901,0.0065589226,0.00051572284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010385633,0.0006827072,0.001203341,0.008428434,0.003289821,0.008975307,0.0021842457,0.005504691,0.0051933406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04371877,0.00042735413,0.0005848539,0.0047546495,0.02307536,0.014831712,0.0033923457,0.0069274306,0.0016151521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022429509,0.00000914733,0.00015324615,0.0018233827,0.000031806092,0.00010885315,0.005790605,0.00024218118,0.00016066448,0.78323287,0.10802916,0.100395694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067465944,0.000019471066,0.00033458226,0.0037196463,0.000019800811,0.00019235075,0.0015065093,0.0001720184,0.00026057492,0.17229144,0.8214523,0.000024527595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046673706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060520982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010385633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006355787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004310994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054925144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008054396","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5997","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Amphiboly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Normative; Computer science; Linguistics; Sentence; Natural language; Natural (archaeology); Natural language processing; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical computer science; History","score_opus":0.10710944389011678,"score_gpt":0.2549060210918069,"score_spread":0.1477965772016901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008054396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020497529,0.00024476918,0.9447564,0.0017985957,0.00015657357,0.00029124916,0.00072365406,0.009604997,0.02192634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46819562,0.0001807656,0.5239266,0.0003460213,0.000070694645,0.0003326033,0.0010031544,0.0009594443,0.004985154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902451,0.006005134,0.00071762525,0.0012065205,0.0014803831,0.0003451946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98049635,0.0134063,0.0010410977,0.0025797489,0.0017304046,0.0007461637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00728066,0.0008304007,0.00069211447,0.003672216,0.0020976157,0.0068277107,0.0016909449,0.0019407388,0.012893354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037206087,0.00060665683,0.0011895043,0.0015196024,0.0041457396,0.0131982695,0.006683744,0.0028731741,0.0022125745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030446087,0.000070337155,0.002006006,0.00027797616,0.000026105361,0.00031149996,0.010373312,0.0030145885,0.002502221,0.86524284,0.0075646723,0.10830601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035288132,0.00012310075,0.00085480226,0.00047180091,0.000032447067,0.00058927084,0.0032230075,0.055928625,0.0048780106,0.7993669,0.134409,0.000087743705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024411853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022210144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012893354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019488494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017964501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043132544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008265809","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6159","title":"Review of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10639799537616593,"score_gpt":0.4144290276880948,"score_spread":0.30803103231192885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008265809","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002745921,0.97629136,0.0029388315,0.013439505,0.0018113577,0.000007717109,0.00001784175,0.000011029807,0.0052078525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018612582,0.9645944,0.0029336321,0.005542464,0.0060907775,0.00007049346,0.00007982183,0.00002933089,0.0020464999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98880744,0.0060936837,0.00086670555,0.0011508896,0.0026954177,0.00038585116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96441823,0.029801646,0.0012886958,0.00067799626,0.0032105558,0.00060289004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009773602,0.0013513223,0.002797481,0.01020025,0.0020313042,0.008612908,0.0032610232,0.0067158923,0.0043981187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026334755,0.00064489554,0.0014112648,0.014718273,0.009119478,0.011294473,0.0032078612,0.0068248473,0.0019728916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008390535,0.000088667104,0.0003190736,0.02134468,0.00020364486,0.00023569928,0.0020768833,0.0013113044,0.00026539268,0.43280977,0.08448414,0.45677674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026154374,0.000054594988,0.000699547,0.016295737,0.00008683846,0.00048674393,0.001145019,0.00055920595,0.00012353208,0.24138954,0.7390931,0.000039834205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023641258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022184004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01020025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056705987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077995947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051688313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008500248","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5082","title":"Proposal of a Classification of Analogies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Mythology; Archetype; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05789007182313207,"score_gpt":0.3105599975672599,"score_spread":0.25266992574412783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008500248","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040414736,0.0037881078,0.49938908,0.020261832,0.0027226778,0.0009334224,0.0006022704,0.000799546,0.4310883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6405909,0.0016940144,0.33002877,0.0037943292,0.0015327742,0.0017011898,0.0010367649,0.00025489143,0.019366328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918435,0.0034325325,0.0007796372,0.0014644542,0.0019226716,0.0005571898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137324,0.002842502,0.0006319888,0.0017521251,0.002629243,0.0007708398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066411854,0.0010513674,0.0009958157,0.009951751,0.0044824593,0.010134023,0.003382989,0.003454571,0.013622553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015489607,0.0004937196,0.001398595,0.0035659147,0.018454608,0.017911842,0.005036479,0.006228419,0.0018818849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008710143,0.000014079859,0.00014802563,0.000029899107,0.000004451656,0.000018293158,0.0003238241,0.00015935677,0.00006999956,0.9917419,0.0009086875,0.006572791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023021445,0.000024932124,0.0002557731,0.000047899386,0.000008268662,0.00008540341,0.0004841779,0.002189122,0.00009497329,0.97341883,0.023352297,0.000015304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014458982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085916213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013622553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037045982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002702312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045571983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008733909","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6024","title":"Come Now, Let Us Reason Together","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Debiasing; Rationality; Heuristics; Doxastic logic; Individualism; Sociology; Dialogic; Laziness; Ideal (ethics); Methodological individualism; Critical thinking; Externalism; Metacognition; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.053368084653736596,"score_gpt":0.3271676012146058,"score_spread":0.2737995165608692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008733909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018278323,0.026911821,0.22321607,0.47544593,0.015444725,0.00021718923,0.0005186556,0.001127489,0.23883991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4941895,0.011776638,0.17520763,0.15519144,0.0050788303,0.0005914586,0.0008012239,0.0014063581,0.15575692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964856,0.0010979744,0.00023468326,0.00087172294,0.00079626165,0.0005137102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509794,0.0014630156,0.0004574085,0.0010050745,0.001322949,0.00065368204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053230454,0.0013220223,0.001394154,0.002443845,0.007322463,0.0118340235,0.0025212036,0.0059143337,0.017886443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013383867,0.0005787751,0.001815046,0.0010173314,0.023630321,0.024665445,0.009371655,0.014277933,0.008346017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007404508,0.000048177597,0.0015685423,0.00021249069,0.0001090307,0.0005989821,0.019822223,0.0006880786,0.000730309,0.9025991,0.03765272,0.035896264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009985334,0.00002794123,0.00024761277,0.00016534697,0.000027713138,0.00019867213,0.006458284,0.00032007493,0.00030909857,0.7651195,0.22707236,0.000043407585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068685547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060748844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017886443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002889302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031192417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05983609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015240314","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6043","title":"Tense Arguments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Epistemology; Radicalization; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Terrorism","score_opus":0.03915595272738473,"score_gpt":0.2660954263661293,"score_spread":0.2269394736387446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015240314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040614817,0.0027478954,0.33399338,0.015533023,0.00093651103,0.0004005043,0.0005769616,0.0005182945,0.6046787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90201306,0.0010148255,0.05458908,0.0014160096,0.0007717492,0.0004422326,0.0004417567,0.0004342458,0.038877018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915298,0.0043070023,0.0005505163,0.0012740195,0.0017802324,0.00055838184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828835,0.012291996,0.0012666376,0.0018780971,0.0012724557,0.00040733823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010073059,0.0008773329,0.0008206915,0.0026053516,0.0043010684,0.009723621,0.0017190964,0.003420049,0.022209233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025487486,0.0006064868,0.0010069846,0.0018328461,0.011165736,0.020833686,0.0064893547,0.0041839243,0.00275906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015032013,0.000008870199,0.000117284944,0.00005253072,0.000008328174,0.0000810991,0.0032350384,0.00007526034,0.00031691772,0.9912676,0.0009015549,0.0039204997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151404565,0.000021702273,0.0002315728,0.00009647473,0.000015372625,0.00024265869,0.0024405723,0.0008618124,0.00074516877,0.930485,0.064828984,0.000015477435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024866834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024003793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022209233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024941082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090447516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07429725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016768704","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6028","title":"Frozen","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Agonistic behaviour; Argumentative; Dissent; Framing (construction); Epistemology; Mediation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.039877582383781224,"score_gpt":0.2609257063379207,"score_spread":0.2210481239541395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016768704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011650686,0.0009422299,0.009935265,0.00535949,0.0015524363,0.0003207978,0.0013749653,0.0004190005,0.96844524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14389554,0.0013003761,0.012508726,0.006206609,0.00031468112,0.00051273056,0.002451493,0.0005931547,0.8322166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977182,0.00047473932,0.00012042216,0.0006427883,0.0007190787,0.00032482744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836713,0.00030653368,0.0001351949,0.00042902838,0.0005588596,0.00020326381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020677124,0.0005004444,0.0003447764,0.0010150408,0.003664286,0.004430437,0.0016274577,0.0019175182,0.23681793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064815106,0.00025422158,0.00057219114,0.0010058758,0.0022923748,0.0039814096,0.003959935,0.0016949727,0.07143694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020692831,0.00010823936,0.0044197217,0.00032706626,0.000019457171,0.0010786308,0.0095769735,0.00027955964,0.0017608609,0.6492997,0.16352959,0.1693933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009648666,0.000029546522,0.0011646219,0.00015078249,0.000007689074,0.0004234942,0.00199531,0.00009833645,0.00047351792,0.020244919,0.97539026,0.000011913035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042861137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045742984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23681793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018582818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023758544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029758781","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6689","title":"Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Virtue; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Power (physics); Politics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051573007410098064,"score_gpt":0.28711575886308616,"score_spread":0.2355427514529881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029758781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506489,0.007439809,0.1748662,0.15907025,0.002130724,0.00013161838,0.000081457605,0.00024548479,0.5053855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873546,0.00046692704,0.0054221256,0.002380515,0.00030414425,0.00005394819,0.0000118673115,0.00005332151,0.003952686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96635365,0.025578277,0.001160906,0.0020027827,0.0032701667,0.0016342213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433214,0.041344646,0.0050068703,0.005342508,0.0025286428,0.0024559943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0250964,0.00055315153,0.00090718054,0.0019723405,0.008124686,0.017195145,0.002033631,0.007198322,0.0048409645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048483636,0.0005105267,0.00095179945,0.0016691112,0.07283927,0.02952772,0.01586111,0.009257879,0.00071763573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016386475,0.000010470045,0.00022739642,0.00004133861,0.000008611061,0.00009195886,0.008521321,0.00012828186,0.00008877846,0.9878439,0.00063234026,0.0023892175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142832705,0.000014220436,0.00015918852,0.00008043443,0.000004931922,0.000099489655,0.0028179947,0.00034515775,0.00011761413,0.9799619,0.016370643,0.00001407142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042496054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042425242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0250964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031464577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002634712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13272405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030518148","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6312","title":"On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Deontic logic; Function (biology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.11392229568995417,"score_gpt":0.27014979179833964,"score_spread":0.1562274961083855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030518148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037417166,0.015737843,0.41323385,0.09033454,0.0008328208,0.00021259736,0.00042027974,0.00018780037,0.44162315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069351,0.0067234943,0.057898954,0.007657615,0.0021985997,0.00067187694,0.00022856073,0.0001996217,0.017486138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706139,0.01737827,0.001567636,0.0022889932,0.0066184932,0.0015327965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9312465,0.054221343,0.0036061232,0.006781507,0.0030196954,0.0011247698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026930304,0.0012867446,0.0013877851,0.0043200273,0.005798608,0.013054464,0.0038909803,0.008852391,0.010418943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055368233,0.0012151101,0.0010841438,0.0034230032,0.072907366,0.03369072,0.009567209,0.009523889,0.0015295569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002791351,0.0000018622482,0.000020920565,0.000008119573,0.0000011920717,0.0000083501645,0.00019454889,0.00008867119,0.0000097459415,0.9989968,0.00015371572,0.0005132974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051793377,0.0000018649616,0.00003273277,0.000031218577,0.0000017092922,0.000010978302,0.00008562439,0.00017403392,0.000020495716,0.99702734,0.002605588,0.0000031762481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004123839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022899737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026930304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010038442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004904612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14242274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033382224","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6327","title":"Should Climate Scientists Fly?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Argument map; Epistemology; Climate science; Work (physics); Action (physics); Climate change; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Engineering; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.21233637359910273,"score_gpt":0.3018732965723466,"score_spread":0.0895369229732439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033382224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039262094,0.009326843,0.030940136,0.73898166,0.004570138,0.00008538565,0.00011123449,0.000093148155,0.17662941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795667,0.0047842944,0.007859644,0.08728871,0.0018811737,0.00019180872,0.00008503339,0.00013726344,0.018205436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885527,0.0072972355,0.0003448739,0.0014785862,0.0013885442,0.00093803596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583626,0.032721423,0.002888966,0.0015501046,0.0032273605,0.0012496881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02440394,0.00041722888,0.00054459675,0.00126271,0.007458772,0.011735035,0.0018818993,0.008435594,0.011913556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04849012,0.0002769587,0.00066170754,0.0014719471,0.01932174,0.015866313,0.005275908,0.012231852,0.0019322028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038248807,0.0000264823,0.001660787,0.00015565402,0.000029222016,0.00014043313,0.021783872,0.0001839418,0.0003478579,0.9488328,0.019889036,0.006911616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002545171,0.000038813036,0.0014101791,0.00064502045,0.000037897596,0.00013639731,0.041170537,0.0007978236,0.00086240255,0.6460034,0.3088415,0.000030560204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017674378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018391651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99254125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050065108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038774898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12906194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038220352","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6328","title":"The Role of Trust in Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Credibility; Fake news; Authoritarianism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Media studies","score_opus":0.028775369238201103,"score_gpt":0.30914636367017717,"score_spread":0.28037099443197605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038220352","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112201706,0.011317406,0.411278,0.084708646,0.0011902963,0.00030041067,0.00017516632,0.00030150675,0.378527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811654,0.0011747233,0.013415141,0.00070049637,0.0003134753,0.0001031582,0.000024553587,0.000038663376,0.0030642925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94685477,0.04052538,0.0023641654,0.0030663332,0.005222895,0.0019664643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.902567,0.07364359,0.008763359,0.0070658242,0.005703096,0.002257021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02721786,0.00080236874,0.0011145375,0.0030544694,0.006355161,0.01490455,0.0016904556,0.00703647,0.005173797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079417676,0.00073895435,0.0011477394,0.0020057687,0.03252216,0.022754142,0.008268031,0.0052864216,0.00089705596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029045623,0.00001391502,0.00049041957,0.00012447515,0.000027110727,0.00013473164,0.0048377397,0.00092758,0.00014972159,0.9858937,0.0005411719,0.0068304334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026739162,0.00002421162,0.00027101912,0.00012950411,0.000025362699,0.00010913621,0.00095980626,0.002512275,0.00017474445,0.98491675,0.01082945,0.00002104445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024518277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010656158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02721786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053091696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033657504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14394355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038512320","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6329","title":"Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Diversity (politics); Supreme court; Theme (computing); Law; Focus (optics); Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1090334188746578,"score_gpt":0.29694606258841155,"score_spread":0.18791264371375377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038512320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02186216,0.080382206,0.0046309023,0.7685816,0.0042486694,0.00008530169,0.00022234299,0.00003595538,0.11995087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83804905,0.048177335,0.005649089,0.09073766,0.005430018,0.00021399024,0.00022068805,0.00010292745,0.011419137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9271843,0.04195279,0.0032579987,0.0038257292,0.0197559,0.0040232604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6168258,0.34626433,0.0059164604,0.008341331,0.018462524,0.0041894917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090935476,0.0006530695,0.0017012754,0.008682632,0.007511417,0.025201363,0.0029323979,0.007614361,0.010995652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22189699,0.00058584835,0.0007310093,0.005986379,0.046907566,0.019779727,0.012500678,0.010918701,0.0005684941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093202696,0.000057948575,0.0037335712,0.001866484,0.00012803327,0.0003428448,0.033360224,0.00034029485,0.00026850222,0.7702189,0.05196936,0.13762066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000672197,0.000057765476,0.0068817283,0.014838133,0.00008845137,0.00020134886,0.04540187,0.00037548208,0.0005771097,0.5001361,0.43125236,0.0001224863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071116135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06791539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090935476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02111489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0222007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48091853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081594041","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6309","title":"Review of Narration as Argument, edited by Paula Olmos","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Latin American Literature Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Narrative; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019821555470122564,"score_gpt":0.3132947290992612,"score_spread":0.29347317362913866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081594041","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004722438,0.9196681,0.0011406742,0.043691766,0.00944971,0.000009791059,0.00006643003,0.000029809447,0.025471538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030971816,0.9205452,0.001464698,0.011908252,0.015349436,0.00005917672,0.00019577277,0.00014555355,0.01936014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750143,0.0015931505,0.00015059751,0.00018785252,0.00045960338,0.00010741032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931925,0.0047555235,0.0003903136,0.00018950354,0.001288774,0.0001833945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034934594,0.0008291167,0.0009572753,0.0040172264,0.0019308344,0.0057043657,0.0010142631,0.0021151276,0.008368574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010415379,0.00036354832,0.00035612442,0.0059901,0.0066665024,0.0060298857,0.0025027643,0.0035906737,0.0032203898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053793698,0.00003394363,0.00024353333,0.0051782746,0.000025744735,0.00019470732,0.010627023,0.00027677038,0.0003515482,0.22057356,0.52832186,0.23411919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024686765,0.000006339938,0.00024120603,0.0024574967,0.0000037582774,0.000117333,0.0013388564,0.000027651044,0.000063471154,0.008450366,0.98728395,0.00000716658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006441147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072652083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008368574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045931246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004490224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033325553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081735501","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6205","title":"Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Virtue ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059708128957152884,"score_gpt":0.2543450000964259,"score_spread":0.19463687113927303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081735501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06876873,0.008551375,0.23514996,0.031767663,0.0010582802,0.00008275865,0.00005203027,0.00016009893,0.654409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736988,0.0009993253,0.01671979,0.0012762534,0.00026842434,0.000072839146,0.000023370816,0.000040830502,0.0069001997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119884,0.0064584115,0.00026136855,0.0005718358,0.0009978983,0.00051164697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877985,0.008193429,0.0009783551,0.0009685138,0.0009901784,0.0010710764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012022639,0.00042338623,0.0008382905,0.0026296498,0.005604655,0.009122024,0.0012765415,0.0037197538,0.0041322173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009348927,0.0003089684,0.0010142651,0.0014953271,0.03902815,0.010847353,0.0055009644,0.0050115823,0.00068704726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033061453,0.000004571065,0.00008316529,0.000013365879,0.0000021609465,0.000018145483,0.0010184855,0.000057449128,0.000016821195,0.99761164,0.00014529093,0.001025562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008763991,0.000009121716,0.00012334897,0.00006153176,0.00000418762,0.00005097257,0.00074073364,0.00067077304,0.00004884294,0.98930794,0.008966768,0.000007168011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008135456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009373463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012022639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002425034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023455236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0635826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081761332","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6243","title":"CAT Scan: A Critical Review of the Critical-Thinking Assessment Test","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Critical thinking; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12104992679618652,"score_gpt":0.4612182262484039,"score_spread":0.3401682994522174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081761332","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017182242,0.9890354,0.0029994242,0.004259384,0.0015106242,0.0005451275,0.00023451813,0.00008270881,0.0011609185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026869187,0.9792331,0.012150868,0.002481427,0.00066735485,0.0015128165,0.0005379393,0.000065631015,0.0006640114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96772575,0.014912626,0.007060458,0.001348462,0.008690386,0.00026217097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8526777,0.09413751,0.0088836765,0.0029146085,0.04010182,0.0012847536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04880449,0.0017784178,0.004470521,0.014376083,0.0012813086,0.0032280323,0.0050598187,0.0025452296,0.0038375114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121339254,0.0010799076,0.0033482732,0.008200687,0.0025249287,0.0033373954,0.0028082095,0.005099968,0.0022372548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014342835,0.00006493344,0.00045894526,0.092767105,0.0007413443,0.000083246756,0.00039219315,0.0002608376,0.00022530103,0.0045908713,0.0668667,0.8334051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017815472,0.00029841904,0.0033049602,0.3220845,0.0022234695,0.0009249175,0.0005201506,0.0005247566,0.0006283264,0.008997318,0.66008604,0.0002290108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006976192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014660452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04880449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057737255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021925904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25810593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082164080","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6002","title":"Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Modal; Argumentative; Cognition; Interpretation (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Sociology; Relevance (law); Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05021629641667193,"score_gpt":0.32025123156349333,"score_spread":0.2700349351468214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082164080","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16390806,0.0074520675,0.42904127,0.025869094,0.00059992535,0.00015109437,0.00014863702,0.00037477227,0.37245506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565388,0.0008057187,0.035390493,0.00063400465,0.000098682714,0.000069781396,0.000024313942,0.000046703673,0.0063914913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976674,0.0015230564,0.00009553912,0.00019748368,0.0003171732,0.00019939525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968278,0.0019637481,0.00034161555,0.00029407677,0.0003619021,0.00021074603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034571225,0.00051429536,0.00036006808,0.0030416672,0.0025626803,0.0046219043,0.0007211974,0.0018052711,0.0022520188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007710072,0.00030688927,0.00069294113,0.0017471578,0.017044032,0.013048966,0.004666673,0.0017241677,0.00035022933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005399917,0.0000019626184,0.00010837472,0.000016904272,0.0000016433124,0.00003367345,0.0028963166,0.000117179115,0.00007085237,0.994293,0.00025410674,0.0022006158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038430444,0.0000058825926,0.00011446071,0.00002442428,0.0000037923323,0.00010085172,0.0011649773,0.00079630886,0.000087730274,0.98939776,0.008291582,0.000008480988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014419546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014727048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046219043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002585746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013186825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01876092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082371789","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.5994","title":"Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Judgement; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Practical reason; Analytic reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06630570841419381,"score_gpt":0.3038539489600181,"score_spread":0.2375482405458243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082371789","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1046515,0.003146748,0.55699044,0.037651356,0.00075147237,0.00038036998,0.00022895393,0.0005161436,0.29568306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197899,0.00063424045,0.072587885,0.0021755453,0.00026211044,0.00012461106,0.00009417833,0.000082582876,0.0042490955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795786,0.010779335,0.001137145,0.003889099,0.0032816713,0.001334002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97083056,0.019638728,0.0015990807,0.0052895355,0.0021726375,0.0004695238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020007065,0.0006389746,0.0012716897,0.0023345295,0.005309948,0.005496094,0.0027960287,0.006028777,0.006819742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037521783,0.0006740848,0.0019200589,0.0015459374,0.038149778,0.014247713,0.008816874,0.0065350933,0.0006162408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047008493,0.0000054411016,0.00010255411,0.000033173055,0.000008972417,0.000067041205,0.0011161979,0.00030113827,0.00009231204,0.995387,0.00039894663,0.0024825411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010139519,0.00000992544,0.00013788146,0.000066055385,0.000010929307,0.00005868491,0.00044817914,0.00079228065,0.00025018593,0.986427,0.011777039,0.0000117292375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037703433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043131863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020007065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004744533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037224249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105808735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082480730","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6294","title":"An Unlikely Source of (Absurd and Effective) Case Studies for Introductory Informal Logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Sketch; Informal logic; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm","score_opus":0.06460547192058676,"score_gpt":0.28107440899790626,"score_spread":0.2164689370773195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082480730","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044391613,0.0028123895,0.7768391,0.028853465,0.0014926236,0.00094323896,0.00032723797,0.00090449606,0.14343579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5230439,0.001790022,0.42737567,0.004459369,0.00072198175,0.0016993074,0.0003512878,0.00086535007,0.039693154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97555643,0.01654848,0.00097392814,0.0014812017,0.00479708,0.00064286095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91838175,0.05761658,0.0029895778,0.014783713,0.004462328,0.001766147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016344197,0.00061919005,0.00056952046,0.0021522054,0.004970122,0.0073471586,0.0023615013,0.0035771313,0.017777177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074154004,0.0007681484,0.00063653453,0.0014834583,0.007349746,0.010240828,0.006371813,0.005710018,0.0048177154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007056572,0.00017120942,0.0015238025,0.0004948436,0.000018052364,0.0012565168,0.01623428,0.00082450965,0.0016432587,0.88698375,0.018173695,0.072605565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007358685,0.00016548393,0.0006844005,0.0017535712,0.000023079865,0.0022620428,0.011691334,0.0045315884,0.003815716,0.44609046,0.52885395,0.000054841057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048501734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011055908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017777177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023239297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002278127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086437464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082531842","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.5984","title":"Source Related Argumentation Found in Science Websites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Trustworthiness; Computer science; Sample (material); World Wide Web; Epistemology; Fake news; Information retrieval; Internet privacy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04485946343163591,"score_gpt":0.32832698770613206,"score_spread":0.2834675242744962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082531842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8241637,0.0043491456,0.035126038,0.0045862747,0.00013540967,0.00020238383,0.00071646785,0.000272687,0.13044797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840515,0.0007276052,0.011019007,0.00024593837,0.00005623556,0.00006937679,0.000631794,0.000079924794,0.0031185914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784182,0.011462956,0.0014803619,0.001213347,0.006826512,0.00059868954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8076994,0.1555386,0.0169729,0.007859576,0.0099463845,0.0019831758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012601575,0.0004998885,0.00061803975,0.018655572,0.004464958,0.009525603,0.0009447977,0.0023752102,0.005413633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106076084,0.00043803302,0.00048372644,0.014401443,0.004278641,0.009657735,0.0050212047,0.0023558047,0.000923859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070152665,0.0004782881,0.116674215,0.0026739351,0.0003453162,0.0039156326,0.3326881,0.0021101914,0.006995158,0.32629,0.0086360425,0.19849153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019146953,0.00025582765,0.10009473,0.003969078,0.0004668397,0.005249698,0.21321033,0.014194481,0.0086895935,0.29324043,0.36017329,0.0002642835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015768816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017197325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018655572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028004555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001578588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06664425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082735929","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6214","title":"What is Wrong with Deductivism?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09978874048651296,"score_gpt":0.2585445522149686,"score_spread":0.15875581172845563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082735929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009625265,0.016640738,0.08642563,0.8093446,0.006085385,0.000046316032,0.00016239143,0.00035793774,0.07131177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.680829,0.017953493,0.049941584,0.21061228,0.020612426,0.00041614106,0.00027866277,0.00095361075,0.018402807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795585,0.01171358,0.0010723552,0.0022338752,0.0044773524,0.0009442632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94693315,0.04003839,0.001780583,0.0046538585,0.0056415973,0.0009524514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035884827,0.00092545635,0.0018462262,0.0028884767,0.006052038,0.01283761,0.0038525737,0.012813883,0.006504211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05340666,0.0006229779,0.0019749796,0.0023356257,0.055750426,0.032473225,0.005572355,0.018395305,0.0027593132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026909303,0.000022490813,0.00018558408,0.00010983817,0.000031526688,0.00005648444,0.00206114,0.00017607567,0.000055420678,0.9794567,0.010852654,0.006965141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017924125,0.0000072856224,0.000043687523,0.00006295774,0.0000047426765,0.000034724962,0.00034764127,0.0002379261,0.000069520924,0.9885725,0.010591006,0.000010047833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002860854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018722374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035884827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00542021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036148364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1897794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082914421","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6172","title":"Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Common ground; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11829525222959104,"score_gpt":0.26951155422027623,"score_spread":0.1512163019906852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082914421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0360967,0.00677178,0.4114479,0.25369972,0.0042867716,0.0002257021,0.00011630132,0.0004220722,0.28693303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8694852,0.0017421389,0.08534941,0.01778131,0.0016613018,0.00031150167,0.00012562146,0.00027811315,0.023265315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580897,0.026486637,0.0017633353,0.004792214,0.006819809,0.0020483062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94742316,0.030363876,0.004807881,0.009326025,0.0053727687,0.0027062315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039009377,0.00062464556,0.001421531,0.0025137234,0.007239951,0.013622176,0.0032245282,0.00961346,0.00662342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08000265,0.0005534147,0.001069271,0.0016827536,0.03188575,0.02872965,0.015141241,0.01178165,0.0018191532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002159414,0.000012091505,0.0001599168,0.000085003856,0.000030882453,0.00007479533,0.005512948,0.00032903042,0.00019948179,0.9803462,0.004868288,0.008359877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123739555,0.0000065928066,0.000040436516,0.00007637188,0.000006487444,0.000025212097,0.0011418202,0.0004346715,0.0001722819,0.9755342,0.022537988,0.000011458125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010256134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011057584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039009377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041103116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047023473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20630378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115494046","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6311","title":"Is it Permissible to Teach Buddhist Mindfulness Meditation in a Critical Thinking Course?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Critical thinking; Mindfulness; Buddhism; Metacognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Mindfulness meditation; Cognition; Pedagogy; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10429846753704532,"score_gpt":0.4155374931503654,"score_spread":0.3112390256133201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115494046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42107517,0.011219507,0.010860672,0.45783123,0.0080673015,0.00024206612,0.00007561465,0.00014465778,0.09048378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94165504,0.0034311803,0.0062667704,0.03915621,0.0013376118,0.0003018222,0.00005030298,0.000047484224,0.0077535105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404883,0.0032920567,0.0002984583,0.0005100758,0.0011588885,0.00069167634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790481,0.013663788,0.0020724172,0.00056637253,0.0019665095,0.0026828854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008415639,0.00019374855,0.00030662902,0.00035502578,0.0031290536,0.005028123,0.0011422645,0.002999722,0.004836538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028922597,0.0001914461,0.00030994168,0.00030326733,0.0045298617,0.003430411,0.002773928,0.006272182,0.0010096957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010081371,0.001822373,0.044355605,0.0023808184,0.0001445815,0.0011127227,0.13732693,0.00069749187,0.011535933,0.20877169,0.10901585,0.48182788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030426422,0.0014744679,0.07894086,0.009157504,0.00017342572,0.0012381595,0.19344208,0.0018021612,0.0131375985,0.1664556,0.5336464,0.00022749254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013706433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021160708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008415639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023585227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004696031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04450667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116304264","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6310","title":"Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Construct (python library); Public health; Compliance (psychology); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Computer science; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Disease","score_opus":0.06257653265293545,"score_gpt":0.3442094983523258,"score_spread":0.28163296569939034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116304264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43406278,0.0022577646,0.1629407,0.13328281,0.0010483176,0.00038543023,0.0002024401,0.00032703692,0.26549268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843419,0.00026810056,0.0118531715,0.001698784,0.00006989194,0.000056829165,0.000054061788,0.00004997801,0.0016072033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90852296,0.06612735,0.004583614,0.0037826593,0.013063503,0.003919881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83303744,0.13205008,0.013206446,0.009789268,0.009282692,0.0026340436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061391857,0.0008965437,0.0009468321,0.004127936,0.0108509,0.013824686,0.0026380068,0.00882974,0.0026340506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12450664,0.00073696347,0.0012162392,0.0022776101,0.051592313,0.019369425,0.009677997,0.009798036,0.0004744299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496832,0.00004433731,0.004197329,0.0001833419,0.000053827414,0.0008347865,0.1265552,0.0012809896,0.0005642983,0.85486716,0.0026003337,0.008723449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003494167,0.000038842692,0.0013449508,0.00048620946,0.00004841123,0.0004389287,0.081716485,0.004297006,0.0011892474,0.8740049,0.03631654,0.00008347888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004598901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034003786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061391857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008630002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007034348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32467508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116995137","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6070","title":"Putting Reasons in their Place","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11057870179605298,"score_gpt":0.2589531819822904,"score_spread":0.14837448018623742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116995137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019901838,0.019737387,0.23304112,0.3092175,0.013239827,0.00016229323,0.00025118433,0.00054002024,0.4039088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84236336,0.005787595,0.08341754,0.026530022,0.0039556543,0.00036882426,0.00020822123,0.00063185615,0.03673684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97475636,0.016437095,0.0012926945,0.0026093281,0.0035111008,0.0013934483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527115,0.031416196,0.002361932,0.0064854687,0.005417081,0.0016077288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02899926,0.0013717075,0.0016727399,0.004859861,0.008200632,0.02188488,0.002794338,0.013416509,0.0090444535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053235687,0.0011145603,0.0017451297,0.0019953668,0.07654931,0.042263027,0.011110125,0.013457547,0.0026447212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012175654,0.0000051202665,0.0001025667,0.000042332213,0.000011102267,0.000052839026,0.0028658588,0.00010414762,0.000039601106,0.9912423,0.0023613663,0.0031605545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012088219,0.0000066651633,0.000060035007,0.00016491774,0.000010410168,0.000039670536,0.0020765716,0.00018888035,0.00010805765,0.9369341,0.06037983,0.00001885142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002422341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002959785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02899926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057984763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069158175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15336454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117295765","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6034","title":"Exploring the Effect of a Scaffolding Design on Students’ Argument Critique Skills","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Task (project management); Scaffold; Mathematics education; Test (biology); Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10482706211520039,"score_gpt":0.35995646369878387,"score_spread":0.2551294015835835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117295765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99826616,0.00002511897,0.0012683058,0.000017661996,0.0000059476447,0.00007066045,0.000011051119,0.000033849945,0.00030115512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916455,0.000027746382,0.007859954,0.000011866737,0.0000071213426,0.00016133323,0.000028357192,0.000010140289,0.0002480148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927262,0.003862169,0.0008374497,0.00087015034,0.001264975,0.00043896429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84241325,0.13315167,0.010971987,0.006032392,0.003950217,0.003480518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008552308,0.001013487,0.0007172108,0.001240158,0.0006069657,0.0022183307,0.00089989946,0.0008350334,0.0012356938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072002396,0.00039811648,0.00047238136,0.00062001235,0.0009982465,0.00087451603,0.0011719554,0.00070588436,0.0001930859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010188894,0.026634075,0.4392436,0.0015969247,0.0008181246,0.0010659631,0.039532818,0.011298651,0.15757155,0.0012196737,0.0006732595,0.3101564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002063146,0.0661837,0.8137191,0.00033416128,0.0011052307,0.0006826857,0.011027891,0.018593248,0.07918995,0.0024003063,0.0043991264,0.00030152788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092603225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017906033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008552308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073009974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011050676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045229495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121796051","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2904","title":"Belief-Overkill in Political Judgments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Position (finance); Politics; Social psychology; Adversary; Psychology; Phenomenon; Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.04405389901281902,"score_gpt":0.35689316373343605,"score_spread":0.312839264720617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121796051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97451437,0.00023217963,0.00441483,0.0007898742,0.000034716966,0.00007669567,0.0001258988,0.000047722406,0.019763649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785185,0.00007606161,0.0010236147,0.00029855108,0.0000408112,0.000041655476,0.00010467882,0.000022206383,0.00054070103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906448,0.004344484,0.00045727767,0.0016345934,0.0024243728,0.0004944405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84439623,0.11357402,0.024374502,0.010850474,0.004874734,0.0019299776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011269234,0.00035043826,0.0005876536,0.0013665896,0.0011292149,0.0031261588,0.0004651865,0.0013965972,0.0056201327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12188045,0.0007554744,0.0004504139,0.0014310157,0.003988092,0.0030516554,0.0022830584,0.0026667311,0.0004483331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066362857,0.0030961533,0.7107289,0.0010344194,0.000899363,0.0007062305,0.04590043,0.0049417606,0.034363348,0.06425745,0.0051547685,0.12228095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002795437,0.00060352887,0.93783516,0.00008259175,0.00013871463,0.00028568914,0.0038312043,0.005468974,0.0034733769,0.045312397,0.0025444166,0.00014440336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034470998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029010605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011269234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001466985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064140355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05959809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123720998","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.657","title":"Quotations and Presumptions: Dialogical Effects of Misquotations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore","keywords":"Dialog box; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Articulation (sociology); Equivocation; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.040700388292869066,"score_gpt":0.23705683448492104,"score_spread":0.19635644619205198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123720998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79500514,0.003253947,0.07379113,0.0069654235,0.0006562877,0.00028030248,0.0002729353,0.0010218853,0.11875302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179196,0.00024230924,0.0057858317,0.00041566038,0.000087793494,0.00007027574,0.000043680826,0.00011991906,0.0014425311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790795,0.014171954,0.0008303718,0.0011673174,0.0042195306,0.00053131726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8177546,0.1627813,0.007333408,0.007836523,0.0032409201,0.0010531821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010548761,0.0007333911,0.0006822285,0.0013501695,0.0028120806,0.0051208786,0.0014267816,0.003144746,0.005856476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11678616,0.000675923,0.00055323855,0.0010748872,0.005564851,0.00743671,0.005768872,0.0041921055,0.00059986423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057620504,0.0007334873,0.01892369,0.0025422254,0.00044272444,0.0070274333,0.25501546,0.01160234,0.09722403,0.40080085,0.0076289093,0.19229677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009401338,0.0016946198,0.057485912,0.0013440147,0.00073753536,0.005332093,0.06789143,0.081714146,0.06030999,0.65353584,0.06836044,0.0006538259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009861379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007328692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010548761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013098938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007194836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0557878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123886083","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.543","title":"Tu Quoque Arguments and the Significance of Hypocrisy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Sincerity; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Adversary; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06841100786804294,"score_gpt":0.31363317025062304,"score_spread":0.2452221623825801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123886083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027003985,0.008592259,0.07146037,0.27455413,0.0032660565,0.00009926736,0.000074072515,0.00014039037,0.61480945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111233,0.0018915738,0.00942374,0.038105916,0.0030613586,0.0002634577,0.000031839754,0.00015576578,0.03594312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811793,0.012497775,0.0005576881,0.0012576339,0.003115403,0.0013922856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525443,0.038144622,0.0027619705,0.002626478,0.003008466,0.0009142391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017509049,0.0005949014,0.0008956638,0.002862206,0.008393,0.011991832,0.001970257,0.011249466,0.010261941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05657391,0.0005189496,0.00091411534,0.002265211,0.06192798,0.013315128,0.0063358494,0.013004887,0.0008570387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000402468,0.0000034558132,0.000045310397,0.00001704187,0.0000024517542,0.00002907963,0.001039144,0.00005014916,0.000016895063,0.99606735,0.0019019414,0.00082326937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017568416,0.000010833283,0.00012407865,0.000108692715,0.000005087055,0.000059409496,0.00069511513,0.0002963995,0.000099351484,0.9532106,0.04536239,0.000010417929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002818383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020948837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017509049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074158562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030722471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09259778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123960466","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4719","title":"Anything Goes: An Apology for Parallel Distributed Legal Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal realism; Legal science; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Legal profession; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06997384762087296,"score_gpt":0.4117177567235346,"score_spread":0.34174390910266167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123960466","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012332684,0.004083167,0.12084859,0.71001893,0.0062211184,0.00010721158,0.00008311956,0.0003995172,0.14590566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7742832,0.0028854036,0.0803693,0.0767685,0.008454973,0.00061529834,0.00013143831,0.0005993907,0.05589254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980243,0.0082946345,0.0008573754,0.003395916,0.0062450804,0.0009640159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586972,0.021968372,0.0019264523,0.010463482,0.004775259,0.002169274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02823608,0.0005547315,0.0009142251,0.0017862703,0.0067161024,0.01245275,0.003592056,0.01134616,0.010938097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05711021,0.00046828296,0.0011852483,0.0012571525,0.0420607,0.033884432,0.011081642,0.023159862,0.0019932978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114741,0.0000122496685,0.000060144455,0.000020051948,0.0000038305297,0.000037700807,0.0004846767,0.00016770247,0.000039332248,0.99079037,0.00539738,0.0029754054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022453778,0.000009516009,0.000055909008,0.00004372257,0.0000036611286,0.000048111575,0.00026626364,0.001145868,0.00006395125,0.9665023,0.031831294,0.0000067911733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002098234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018984899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02823608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008546488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007163504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14932841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126028283","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.550","title":"Arguing from Definition to Verbal Classification: The Case of Redefining 'Planet' to Exclude Pluto","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Pluto; Style (visual arts); Computer science; Planet; Classification scheme; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Philosophy; Astrobiology; History","score_opus":0.11669377442459032,"score_gpt":0.2723813201979014,"score_spread":0.15568754577331106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126028283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3232102,0.0023324648,0.12487496,0.08160244,0.0011739498,0.00021643957,0.0001312228,0.00016894232,0.46628934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649629,0.00029985845,0.021804133,0.002662242,0.00015624757,0.00010240519,0.000056868983,0.00005310918,0.009902273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781181,0.016229162,0.00048192719,0.0010957677,0.002700849,0.0013741738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636604,0.019187083,0.0011363991,0.0014242592,0.0012609948,0.00062517123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01762212,0.0007507184,0.0009588704,0.0021395832,0.014445816,0.008418827,0.002485891,0.014577147,0.0033691335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035536904,0.0005684746,0.0014350845,0.0028081082,0.024429861,0.013147762,0.007007743,0.010663241,0.0004938711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009707794,0.000023756984,0.00042498656,0.000051235234,0.000012835918,0.0016976935,0.030218372,0.0004802117,0.00043193364,0.95866203,0.0027081436,0.0051917997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015964688,0.000088633606,0.0013192472,0.00035544782,0.00008011948,0.0018672552,0.029454168,0.010446491,0.0026788437,0.81491935,0.13853666,0.00009411911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064025167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006182003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065221996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023928382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093195856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126056798","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.512","title":"On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Sentence; State (computer science); Position (finance); Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.048102974027944195,"score_gpt":0.29248937480366005,"score_spread":0.24438640077571586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126056798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052863922,0.0014798514,0.5283613,0.07866797,0.0007060649,0.00027210743,0.00033029032,0.00017419492,0.3371442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902907,0.000719686,0.08338844,0.008727755,0.0007114059,0.00059398194,0.0001636505,0.000076156684,0.015328248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894656,0.0055074515,0.00060319854,0.0012339801,0.0025996633,0.00059004483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98314327,0.010778718,0.0015777089,0.002242571,0.0018621217,0.00039558634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013137299,0.0005407899,0.0007121633,0.0033226064,0.0032668577,0.005362566,0.0025396757,0.0058277124,0.005432114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020537168,0.0003037514,0.0015041628,0.001824763,0.02184038,0.012255011,0.0039485805,0.005518962,0.00080343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022590516,0.0000037177751,0.00003251634,0.0000054456564,0.0000014475697,0.000016113174,0.00013169557,0.00005340651,0.000025553076,0.99907255,0.00021713115,0.0004381113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072285316,0.000006308554,0.000069986694,0.000017848879,0.0000034475052,0.00003444848,0.000100090256,0.0010622974,0.00013882751,0.99520904,0.0033458853,0.0000046456908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020551865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001455347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013137299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028429409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022944699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0694775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134147817","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6686","title":"\"Argument and Social Justice\" and \"Reasoning for Change\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Social justice; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.13573150868142844,"score_gpt":0.3743410756992972,"score_spread":0.23860956701786876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134147817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0258093,0.006782201,0.13119905,0.25989774,0.0022336463,0.00016994929,0.00019519952,0.00017195588,0.573541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938121,0.001672071,0.014522427,0.01303139,0.0017715894,0.00044817256,0.00008822281,0.00013935847,0.0302058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97387797,0.01992551,0.00073791813,0.0016230894,0.0025616027,0.0012738906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655993,0.028407438,0.0014847835,0.002266701,0.0016105986,0.0006311572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020654475,0.0012430856,0.0015644603,0.0035047121,0.007837781,0.01598116,0.0034903334,0.016484726,0.011314394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03350826,0.0009127424,0.001168389,0.0032185793,0.095152676,0.02186725,0.0064264336,0.0136001,0.0011208332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012999567,0.00000257799,0.000009840444,0.000007302129,0.0000012899351,0.000004345716,0.00031321836,0.000033977503,0.0000028827383,0.9989699,0.00042312374,0.00023024154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004473456,0.000001237069,0.000013316206,0.000013256765,0.000001554449,0.000004821154,0.00015053454,0.00011922161,0.000011304065,0.99742496,0.0022538307,0.0000015687968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004570919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003759678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020654475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010013244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076554855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109232605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134349690","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6688","title":"Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Sociology; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012149233236909368,"score_gpt":0.2239499615804703,"score_spread":0.21180072834356095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134349690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18421179,0.0065028393,0.22412422,0.009074207,0.0064127427,0.0005415135,0.0047871755,0.0043624826,0.559983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75351954,0.0028189917,0.1200967,0.0015850532,0.0006995173,0.00044663175,0.0027092209,0.0016727566,0.11645166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956506,0.00014168269,0.000033474204,0.00009483006,0.00012894759,0.000036022753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981542,0.0010368816,0.00016355641,0.00028420228,0.00029041388,0.00007064693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004680748,0.0007301442,0.0002914495,0.0017865765,0.0018790461,0.003920385,0.0005536088,0.000974281,0.038499188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054731565,0.00025962887,0.00033627666,0.0018923501,0.0022458332,0.0057433452,0.0014413038,0.0014218383,0.011233259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006524176,0.00007967421,0.0034201096,0.0012487771,0.000045575456,0.0020070137,0.061576422,0.001323213,0.022864893,0.46995425,0.09875069,0.3380769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017173676,0.00012301741,0.0033397104,0.00073753245,0.000025461606,0.001617598,0.017917477,0.0030353693,0.005370985,0.0872016,0.8805514,0.00006262303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088995113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001262265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038499188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007687247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042750363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12879258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134544310","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6691","title":"Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Voting; Worry; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04485955607563597,"score_gpt":0.3052832104326701,"score_spread":0.26042365435703413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134544310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345416,0.00079131837,0.0009604171,0.0065498105,0.00004299105,0.000012945573,0.000044346434,0.000009173326,0.057047345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.00014551176,0.000052477637,0.00010871359,0.0000034293057,0.0000018131246,0.000006117761,0.0000016257425,0.0014487468],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998033,0.00074636406,0.00006977838,0.0001283645,0.00037288835,0.00064965937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957968,0.0017698669,0.0011380925,0.00013851027,0.000639737,0.0005170894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030991721,0.00016364406,0.00019460688,0.00070566346,0.004818804,0.0032077725,0.0004516306,0.0007949644,0.0028942283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00732783,0.00011518496,0.00019085556,0.0005576135,0.01166522,0.0014820612,0.002342537,0.0023382462,0.0001870763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014884045,0.00019192796,0.2645917,0.00007984471,0.000018713989,0.0006653875,0.3493721,0.00045723259,0.00054447935,0.33903882,0.002679946,0.042211033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030060632,0.0001498962,0.29071903,0.00043422825,0.000053926928,0.00069444283,0.52606535,0.0016713816,0.0019636264,0.091044195,0.087064,0.00010990586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4276623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48862326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4276623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00943612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071579916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8503461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135189573","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6690","title":"Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Harm; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Position (finance); Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08738983187923953,"score_gpt":0.34913340870453263,"score_spread":0.2617435768252931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135189573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11237342,0.010733977,0.20332961,0.10394333,0.00074533623,0.00019000717,0.000083163526,0.0003467051,0.56825435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667087,0.001343557,0.020664882,0.004948608,0.00038520084,0.0004949059,0.00005215787,0.00016130772,0.0052405978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9155853,0.058338013,0.0044839038,0.0056216167,0.012205753,0.0037654368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.816727,0.14448385,0.006329723,0.018370379,0.009256988,0.00483196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06294963,0.0007827679,0.0015850283,0.0029545452,0.011324635,0.02119482,0.0052743144,0.011942324,0.0064229094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14292726,0.0013485067,0.001789102,0.0015541702,0.07256238,0.03458585,0.023106512,0.015922403,0.001324724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000174531,0.000013426393,0.00031257683,0.000053524007,0.000010127681,0.0001017559,0.009768724,0.00021348987,0.00011533962,0.9851129,0.00057437364,0.0037064217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012379054,0.000009281667,0.00009699919,0.00016394524,0.0000051047,0.00013587456,0.0025056582,0.0003852227,0.00009399933,0.9858585,0.010719123,0.0000139193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018307031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012496451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06294963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004491893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004077418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33291346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135798979","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6687","title":"“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Politeness; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02411024435833721,"score_gpt":0.26712221614231596,"score_spread":0.24301197178397876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135798979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7858031,0.001293166,0.0063232398,0.018559644,0.000149011,0.000032803564,0.000024829387,0.000020739302,0.18779352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704355,0.00013588357,0.00047264984,0.00027654952,0.000025394058,0.000020620764,0.0000043788395,0.000009034485,0.002011831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991922,0.006489756,0.00015586083,0.00042240403,0.00054625724,0.0004636876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97943145,0.014180551,0.003633385,0.000667223,0.0012318873,0.0008554903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010639504,0.00031875595,0.00028915232,0.0014315151,0.0062438417,0.00544806,0.0005502549,0.0012074405,0.004012686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018687507,0.00021431012,0.00014507373,0.0007138783,0.015274872,0.004855286,0.0039921133,0.002194876,0.0003416947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011129498,0.0000787861,0.013122762,0.00008990552,0.000014723202,0.00025254974,0.6416246,0.000047884543,0.0010974201,0.3230481,0.0013171866,0.019194769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052217416,0.0001212446,0.029482482,0.0007473458,0.00004465524,0.00058793474,0.7066999,0.00083334337,0.0021716887,0.1575667,0.10162919,0.00006329924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038926457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044657122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010639504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00225848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019773298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05626774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137580232","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.5580","title":"Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Deliberation; Toolbox; Dialogical self; Negotiation; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.02647462598638262,"score_gpt":0.24472321853219098,"score_spread":0.21824859254580836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137580232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14350827,0.012613255,0.2636926,0.0888135,0.0017046189,0.00023862884,0.00032711567,0.0005140422,0.48858798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96922183,0.0013241583,0.012860721,0.0021596253,0.00040801437,0.00013295304,0.00012052337,0.00009092083,0.0136812255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776487,0.013475527,0.0012415107,0.0033570745,0.00268879,0.0015883283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95733744,0.028112503,0.003948199,0.005804756,0.0031288664,0.0016683015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017608803,0.0005332217,0.00082722266,0.00248872,0.007211549,0.012302987,0.0018645533,0.007532269,0.009771088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04625194,0.0005446292,0.001220797,0.002123048,0.02154548,0.023052638,0.01360037,0.007215316,0.0013299298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026596994,0.0000135118025,0.00046516352,0.00006752436,0.000015702963,0.0001695425,0.0060315044,0.00033122188,0.00013591652,0.98299867,0.0015193496,0.0082253115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022225295,0.000008223743,0.00017712801,0.00006790085,0.000009438303,0.00013203708,0.0013917993,0.0008036863,0.000108428496,0.97992694,0.017340487,0.00001176846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013002979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006594191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017608803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035714998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002262077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0931254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167101461","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6506","title":"Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Narrative; Credibility; Storytelling; Key (lock); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Empirical evidence; Sociology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11870500366865791,"score_gpt":0.34305655834487603,"score_spread":0.22435155467621812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167101461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45573285,0.003817618,0.29216495,0.035824813,0.0005783834,0.00039203363,0.00023442069,0.00046691424,0.21078813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98405325,0.00024428472,0.013932976,0.00027580926,0.00008769443,0.00007230015,0.00003522086,0.00006310036,0.00123522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93669724,0.048470113,0.002459071,0.003234298,0.007575404,0.001563917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.783639,0.18527374,0.012646241,0.01072339,0.0063456357,0.0013719472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042881865,0.0010205548,0.0012960859,0.0046842652,0.00432621,0.022692516,0.0027390292,0.00789269,0.0070670363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19083492,0.0012548191,0.00089615467,0.0018753516,0.024422573,0.040445965,0.013903791,0.0073843407,0.00080521574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038210792,0.000051264127,0.003798942,0.0007979295,0.0001503266,0.0020164517,0.31929147,0.001902748,0.0058886795,0.6384417,0.0008800429,0.026398318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114942006,0.00022271213,0.0038396034,0.0017613563,0.00022021066,0.0018638762,0.09922233,0.012977609,0.006932317,0.82982516,0.042866174,0.00015374928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007932905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054103404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042881865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031206459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017350371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2267837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168698922","doi":"","title":"Belief's Own Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.14634534080982523,"score_gpt":0.3005148551926571,"score_spread":0.15416951438283186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168698922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026687304,0.0015947695,0.096592166,0.047931984,0.00061053823,0.00008652996,0.00013178824,0.00012925673,0.82623565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357698,0.0005273082,0.011823749,0.0033960068,0.0005209408,0.000126627,0.0000696091,0.00008605927,0.047679827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991527,0.004922578,0.0002801229,0.0009054645,0.0017770606,0.0005878105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661846,0.007871928,0.0004456288,0.002673927,0.0018274907,0.0005626012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077350955,0.0004312367,0.00057549716,0.0012793099,0.003562458,0.008284285,0.001469424,0.0038581777,0.008648192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018191567,0.00034996853,0.0005496403,0.0006710812,0.021372588,0.006801064,0.0032057485,0.006202368,0.0011159361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029978767,0.0000048180104,0.000040254505,0.0000063028715,0.0000026256644,0.000006465435,0.00066406006,0.000050973307,0.000024187728,0.99733645,0.00074486615,0.0011160016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068396675,0.000004401331,0.000070250455,0.000023199593,0.0000049167925,0.000017432938,0.0003384061,0.00036413356,0.00009282572,0.98321426,0.015859777,0.00000349046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025223407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026160057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008648192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038856429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035555402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04090756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169881780","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6338","title":"Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Premise; Ethos; Epistemology; Socratic method; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05205293204337876,"score_gpt":0.24505454503459603,"score_spread":0.19300161299121726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169881780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017886495,0.053675376,0.17074811,0.04497627,0.0036607718,0.00008017,0.00011981599,0.00029493895,0.708558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062182,0.010952635,0.03536976,0.004382673,0.0046504103,0.00023965407,0.000088481276,0.00014897782,0.03794919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932441,0.0046373503,0.00022234998,0.000764158,0.0008678223,0.0002642073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614525,0.0026492411,0.00022804554,0.00046085316,0.000320163,0.0001965058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005417511,0.00063038827,0.00069651206,0.0016687949,0.005607781,0.00888508,0.00068766956,0.003988668,0.004953894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059824223,0.00035916505,0.00057171745,0.0016717368,0.036102705,0.011171035,0.0035392968,0.0061959606,0.0012077654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034090178,0.0000030316296,0.000023604558,0.000022001008,0.000001761183,0.000015864938,0.00066108233,0.00004963217,0.000022172255,0.99625933,0.0007204026,0.0022176253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004947735,0.0000062260992,0.000041670322,0.00004493612,0.0000018034166,0.000037871272,0.00019657807,0.0002340287,0.00003547472,0.9656412,0.03375206,0.000003199705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014707966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008777438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00888508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004124282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022120862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029923916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170645942","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6249","title":"Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Warrant; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Metaphilosophy; Modern philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07601258236806627,"score_gpt":0.2633447537202323,"score_spread":0.18733217135216604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170645942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03683363,0.027546521,0.30601352,0.21851175,0.0019556324,0.00016057087,0.00012997928,0.00023749153,0.40861088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93440086,0.004183915,0.0420548,0.008205069,0.0021543994,0.00035432598,0.000057869504,0.00022575834,0.008363043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96567065,0.025501866,0.0011235885,0.0016746337,0.00459269,0.0014366214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94664687,0.044949286,0.0016885647,0.0040817987,0.0021483635,0.00048520957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03429774,0.0008552505,0.0019966224,0.004427081,0.0068802806,0.01264124,0.0032522406,0.014723611,0.0036831936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049238194,0.0010428801,0.0015733569,0.0030293667,0.10010429,0.029474445,0.009243811,0.014159901,0.00067562616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006076762,0.0000025396928,0.000019081386,0.000028899572,0.0000044527624,0.000047477657,0.001064824,0.00009791118,0.000021759855,0.9975077,0.00034147484,0.0008579357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012668975,0.0000035584817,0.000026858435,0.00007871159,0.0000031354175,0.000047273075,0.0003393965,0.00041046017,0.00006740494,0.98905724,0.009946825,0.000006451498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00256095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014878425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03429774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076620816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045112767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18138593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172785524","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6221","title":"Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Decoupling (probability); Recursion (computer science); Phenomenon; Representation (politics); Computer science; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026877883568998735,"score_gpt":0.3166994423633863,"score_spread":0.2898215587943876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172785524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066130705,0.00069950253,0.8586508,0.0032423064,0.0001025006,0.00011169754,0.00008186678,0.0006423086,0.07033821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7905134,0.00047916613,0.20130856,0.00040021454,0.000062836516,0.00015885085,0.00017134349,0.00017594239,0.006729722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293524,0.0035903451,0.0004009873,0.0009964382,0.0016195173,0.00045738084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873489,0.007204204,0.0011370705,0.0030382928,0.00087536796,0.00039618983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068414155,0.0006072159,0.00054687896,0.0028851936,0.0021967785,0.0066267555,0.0019802717,0.002761949,0.008493206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023463883,0.00075102824,0.0011365555,0.0024944677,0.014490799,0.026316369,0.00745634,0.0036246255,0.0011280881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013676022,0.000007412733,0.00019136113,0.00003666737,0.0000065660456,0.000055604403,0.0025171572,0.0006512113,0.0005161705,0.98733205,0.00016643986,0.008505669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010188564,0.000011441947,0.00011184482,0.000037431644,0.000009601971,0.00008475056,0.0004477109,0.0036624027,0.0005383789,0.9871788,0.007896043,0.000011526685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011501356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078036194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002202607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019846389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03618133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183338055","doi":"","title":"Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.047171164758725556,"score_gpt":0.23049261632130055,"score_spread":0.183321451562575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183338055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047130354,0.03474514,0.18120591,0.090066396,0.0025849207,0.000112683156,0.00035115398,0.00030372562,0.6434998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428768,0.0049300105,0.018091526,0.0030521087,0.0019109155,0.00027539037,0.00011553611,0.00017058155,0.028577158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466056,0.0040823896,0.00018670721,0.0003445934,0.00051441777,0.00021131655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853123,0.009491536,0.00050922495,0.0006266105,0.0005344769,0.00030691107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054054717,0.0012015381,0.0011866383,0.0045824284,0.0055119577,0.013282253,0.0016580377,0.0058478895,0.01273823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011677866,0.0009455758,0.00091637607,0.004747878,0.041266736,0.02387273,0.0039793015,0.008718161,0.0013319275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023810032,0.0000034382253,0.000012950742,0.000015866823,0.0000012071481,0.000010754753,0.0008438005,0.000035267647,0.00001015838,0.9980411,0.0005399203,0.0004831456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070655315,0.0000024446017,0.000017659006,0.000022741333,0.0000023165983,0.000018255425,0.0004107898,0.00012996525,0.000015367405,0.99277425,0.006597049,0.0000021425355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013178405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011394644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013282253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052562007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018293025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042613626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199257122","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6844","title":"Inference Claims as Assertions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.10907747504918679,"score_gpt":0.3166324414169478,"score_spread":0.207554966367761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199257122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058087785,0.0030304682,0.37266487,0.031068651,0.0015625868,0.00028149626,0.000661048,0.00069097505,0.5319521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91713166,0.001101278,0.05315156,0.0024253847,0.001142221,0.0004368635,0.0004670281,0.0003182532,0.0238258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98157823,0.010426309,0.0014220398,0.0023078439,0.0031743057,0.001091228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97291946,0.018105196,0.0017659252,0.0038064024,0.0027641335,0.0006388394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018129082,0.00084732275,0.0007263681,0.0022792383,0.0042651105,0.010665198,0.00240878,0.004883642,0.012612704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03480004,0.00090684084,0.0013320588,0.0017163181,0.022054017,0.028445031,0.008072031,0.0058576553,0.0021739698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014354257,0.0000059628665,0.00006988415,0.000035185425,0.000004871277,0.000060735678,0.0029432203,0.00007984978,0.00015120592,0.9942806,0.0006083797,0.0017458004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896279,0.000015010704,0.00012911345,0.00012530286,0.000025842128,0.00009812079,0.0015314993,0.0010764936,0.000756819,0.96360177,0.032606844,0.000014272508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013103393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009857194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018129082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003514675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020194377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09587687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200163468","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6855","title":"Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CHIST-ERA; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Utterance; Monism; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Plural; Speech act; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05843194211953079,"score_gpt":0.3075587762303023,"score_spread":0.24912683411077152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200163468","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14316943,0.0019049905,0.5874613,0.014049139,0.00072885066,0.00029756394,0.00014164357,0.00062278257,0.2516243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540587,0.00034880295,0.03195408,0.00042685293,0.00026237222,0.0003166344,0.000080971746,0.00017333394,0.012378203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989956,0.006918873,0.00044288067,0.0008242146,0.0013792161,0.00047878647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815749,0.013991722,0.0015024325,0.0016364525,0.00072896003,0.0005654493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061357133,0.0008677478,0.0008796637,0.0019815916,0.0069738734,0.009699838,0.0016792078,0.0032110708,0.006322675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016786402,0.00043465846,0.0012063833,0.0014826349,0.022760822,0.012862392,0.010786586,0.0050350716,0.0015126739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022765153,0.000018721943,0.00018633035,0.00004614956,0.0000043868654,0.00021728536,0.009464934,0.00036432792,0.00033993347,0.9862824,0.00038575858,0.0026669714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019101959,0.000028804037,0.00023794583,0.00009231481,0.000009879638,0.0003064585,0.004189792,0.0054994943,0.0011216309,0.9566187,0.031857293,0.000018513902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053686526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005128427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009699838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003078737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010853864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032449186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200256811","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6840","title":"Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Axiom; sort; Sociology; Speech act; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029513079066404286,"score_gpt":0.263346243746123,"score_spread":0.23383316467971868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200256811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058469024,0.0035414796,0.26328638,0.06253005,0.0021069157,0.00040421542,0.0004012936,0.00036081258,0.60889983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405793,0.00093924487,0.030725185,0.0035864944,0.0006164778,0.00023480608,0.00015109082,0.00022668335,0.022940729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98654336,0.0075222687,0.00073598186,0.0022618785,0.0019620894,0.00097435486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849106,0.005923746,0.0008954491,0.0016564839,0.002202063,0.0008312734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0141798025,0.0005545626,0.00094625674,0.0017495871,0.0042294962,0.011162846,0.0012524544,0.0030318766,0.0095648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236638,0.00048611054,0.0006835278,0.0012046265,0.025477398,0.02140137,0.0049118972,0.005896662,0.0014547518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001897532,0.000006916999,0.00027315694,0.000040109386,0.0000037329003,0.000028819319,0.009731206,0.000047516063,0.00031751403,0.98335016,0.0007570302,0.005424832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011213567,0.000018148983,0.00045214625,0.00012459626,0.000012445441,0.000089788264,0.010481782,0.0004589053,0.0007449657,0.91538686,0.07219834,0.00002085768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024672213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018958776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141798025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004590448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00418858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07499081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200895625","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6854","title":"Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Speech act; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Epistemology; Linguistics; Position (finance); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012676637355366014,"score_gpt":0.24691328910885463,"score_spread":0.23423665175348862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200895625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6043512,0.0006274897,0.20444126,0.0046283617,0.00014583938,0.00025427697,0.000104929924,0.00013764224,0.18530896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887533,0.00005734844,0.009411855,0.00009076519,0.000041205727,0.00006734459,0.000024438745,0.000013863718,0.001539692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96340567,0.021041155,0.0025751144,0.002282896,0.00935949,0.0013357613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90080297,0.061097328,0.019188924,0.008806014,0.007894375,0.002210468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024412876,0.000619621,0.0005125754,0.0033382964,0.0019363093,0.0062872735,0.0012073439,0.002945342,0.0028699846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09461698,0.00035768567,0.00048319413,0.0010674029,0.020797458,0.009024381,0.004404142,0.0028803933,0.0003304711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014825613,0.000127748,0.022071293,0.00014011252,0.000035923487,0.00044911966,0.021439735,0.0021768792,0.0021555955,0.9278448,0.0004088587,0.023001682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005487032,0.00038389934,0.0465729,0.00038668013,0.000059160702,0.0010394139,0.018931787,0.022602698,0.0069982745,0.8913301,0.011486164,0.00015412027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010103562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010016661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024412876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019922024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016972537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12910914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201060884","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6851","title":"Act or Object","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ambiguity; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Relation (database); Externality; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06399501483686106,"score_gpt":0.2419428691968619,"score_spread":0.17794785436000082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201060884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000961049,0.0011487238,0.0067053754,0.0045787035,0.002487853,0.00008601197,0.0003893743,0.00024146592,0.9834013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.109552875,0.0028634928,0.0070300475,0.007558528,0.0020220815,0.0003613389,0.0010033986,0.00065410143,0.86895406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963477,0.001565605,0.000247948,0.000699781,0.0008088712,0.0003300861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997424,0.00076070055,0.00024066828,0.0007976005,0.00052763056,0.00024934678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034113536,0.0010343854,0.0007002716,0.0015514392,0.002787082,0.0092137,0.0012734678,0.0029958298,0.1420771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066379267,0.00034849095,0.0008142476,0.0014273918,0.005126508,0.0070602614,0.0044595753,0.0025900726,0.09598678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048436872,0.000015048579,0.00030873663,0.00020542889,0.000015693031,0.00015951239,0.0024113473,0.00006438991,0.00028082094,0.8937022,0.075165905,0.027622567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008939189,0.000019212894,0.0001800237,0.00019192502,0.000013142928,0.00023743941,0.0006961991,0.000086824104,0.00024376283,0.056022413,0.942289,0.000011048788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014849204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013317132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1420771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021331324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019588387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47529525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202368660","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6873","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018117455343335174,"score_gpt":0.2429755202637301,"score_spread":0.22485806492039492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202368660","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005517309,0.013934941,0.002161244,0.08706999,0.7376699,0.00014360849,0.0016100684,0.0005255235,0.1563331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005002114,0.011324165,0.0012213609,0.03073711,0.4584743,0.00019853488,0.002544678,0.00081142056,0.48968634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768937,0.00036661144,0.00021646895,0.0005565454,0.00089419447,0.00027689524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924717,0.0014063185,0.00049494545,0.0008304451,0.0023297607,0.0024668009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00290024,0.0012100316,0.0011340566,0.0026300661,0.0026555287,0.008880177,0.002228992,0.004332802,0.2888088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011849631,0.0004399979,0.0010287483,0.0016814884,0.0012177182,0.0055477596,0.0036537016,0.0052662324,0.17041151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018690387,0.000018543842,0.00008137253,0.00012073366,0.0000047825606,0.000046939796,0.00003439774,0.000022849026,0.00013054884,0.003887668,0.97394365,0.02168983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004128534,0.000009924232,0.00016114219,0.0000783079,0.0000029725827,0.00006709627,0.0000266904,0.000022653188,0.000042313655,0.0018201465,0.997761,0.0000036978126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091287546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015612466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2888088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021099749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003204286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96616167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205220410","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6765","title":"Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politics; Epistemology; Informal logic; Sample (material); Positive economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027387518779317884,"score_gpt":0.27679296397998243,"score_spread":0.24940544520066454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205220410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7761331,0.0028274485,0.19051197,0.009937406,0.000093472656,0.00024500713,0.0004245017,0.00032524666,0.019501874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733046,0.00037522495,0.025417287,0.00012357601,0.00007454674,0.00006176064,0.00015536207,0.000020281528,0.00046730108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272574,0.010726216,0.0017253425,0.0017015582,0.002472751,0.0006482612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8197774,0.15355182,0.013716737,0.00591549,0.00563623,0.0014023083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01617594,0.0006517932,0.0010799099,0.0046077566,0.0025811251,0.0057133734,0.0010354379,0.002954031,0.0026958815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17435409,0.0012101734,0.0012601622,0.0028435371,0.006095057,0.016077487,0.002834463,0.0026964853,0.00034249813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005322307,0.000229048,0.04724663,0.00084408076,0.00025688147,0.0011719973,0.012121869,0.0156567,0.0020520517,0.83126456,0.0016716179,0.08695242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053223765,0.00005410911,0.005301341,0.0001142991,0.00007156646,0.00022544216,0.0010376582,0.039850242,0.00049488485,0.95031327,0.0024481658,0.000035772606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023555043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019740146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01617594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033197855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016031974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08554757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205316861","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6671","title":"A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030527233888512445,"score_gpt":0.2582461837036672,"score_spread":0.22771894981515475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205316861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011492468,0.0030435256,0.5899202,0.010886682,0.0005638629,0.00027352181,0.0006002592,0.0005179253,0.3827015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5214506,0.0026729165,0.3686782,0.0026734723,0.0009245258,0.0010126577,0.0006952076,0.00027400095,0.10161845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479526,0.002108058,0.00043662003,0.001053316,0.0012544198,0.0003522468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618214,0.0014858413,0.0003687141,0.00091801333,0.0007660763,0.00027914243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048125195,0.00095769664,0.00086616585,0.0027341114,0.0034242074,0.00984378,0.002587706,0.004499439,0.018449476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008614529,0.00067881314,0.0018428715,0.0025600365,0.011251603,0.018203756,0.004273941,0.0039168657,0.0050974116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015370025,0.0000016815053,0.000011904586,0.000010429036,0.0000012489404,0.000004661943,0.00007127183,0.00010657062,0.000026997408,0.9982497,0.0003384453,0.0011756343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010767328,0.000007506678,0.000025374595,0.000028685725,0.000004355205,0.000030199737,0.000042378582,0.00096101785,0.000060733935,0.96831983,0.03050424,0.000004859634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014006837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010992613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018449476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037372895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019348282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061719656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205401997","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6876","title":"Reflections on Minimal Adversariality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Adversarial system; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21766171383357957,"score_gpt":0.3516082177876585,"score_spread":0.13394650395407892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205401997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024269896,0.005710244,0.09318437,0.33656722,0.0016576889,0.0000840474,0.000087163826,0.00013155497,0.53830785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382027,0.001891,0.013633677,0.022119524,0.0013296229,0.00020346972,0.000039880866,0.00016173994,0.0224185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97690773,0.016014913,0.00057589717,0.0014899379,0.0035639163,0.0014476327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96869284,0.025634594,0.0012991359,0.0017470265,0.0018649981,0.000761436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022036036,0.0007273212,0.0007635898,0.0019845057,0.008747973,0.01117518,0.002713238,0.007438923,0.00918479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035234157,0.00047243564,0.0010684889,0.0011042425,0.06326027,0.019627748,0.012086092,0.01736066,0.0011657814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002809065,0.0000035679302,0.000017873965,0.00000939837,0.0000013840787,0.000017713724,0.001087943,0.00007394301,0.00001525944,0.9974178,0.0008192614,0.00053298514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004850438,0.000004228667,0.000036944715,0.000069150025,0.0000014368721,0.000031296557,0.00081763184,0.00015592073,0.00006474632,0.9705848,0.028224481,0.0000045241077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019269867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015363992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022036036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009616271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034715848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11653906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205825353","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6662","title":"On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04549004275385226,"score_gpt":0.2664154574572638,"score_spread":0.22092541470341154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205825353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110809274,0.0037427233,0.19008395,0.04619214,0.0013335352,0.0001811839,0.0000882827,0.00017767066,0.6473912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97129077,0.000880966,0.01397795,0.0023292662,0.0006981687,0.00017503,0.000043522898,0.00009209984,0.010512301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802736,0.011620205,0.0005839722,0.001505962,0.0047836215,0.0012327124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96232146,0.02968045,0.0019387538,0.0031359685,0.0019830877,0.0009403255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153128095,0.00061618997,0.0011510157,0.0036521554,0.0065963673,0.008178618,0.0025769374,0.009214266,0.007691017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04326633,0.00045676308,0.0017273295,0.002279968,0.037975147,0.020798245,0.009279001,0.00924478,0.0010619947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056987146,0.00000421905,0.000040141553,0.000013024873,0.0000027157312,0.00005949228,0.00080346793,0.00006880124,0.00003211477,0.998359,0.00015760842,0.00045370747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010913349,0.000009403921,0.00008528291,0.000046676345,0.0000064229976,0.000064943386,0.0005252815,0.00050192646,0.000068278525,0.99333984,0.0053329044,0.000008190676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084888045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084920804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153128095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003643781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017010974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080982804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205851247","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6828","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05924928910875018,"score_gpt":0.2080753500811772,"score_spread":0.148826060972427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205851247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000619154,0.0034422171,0.0004719178,0.005627559,0.011507953,0.00005664696,0.002260723,0.00048588638,0.975528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005651073,0.00041858078,0.000088823595,0.00031784995,0.00056748645,0.0000071603663,0.00030535838,0.00010403056,0.9976255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957234,0.00004818831,0.000016363818,0.00008320423,0.00022865186,0.00005131058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877995,0.00029576075,0.000035757155,0.00015221427,0.0005135282,0.00022278276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055249815,0.0006139328,0.0013189511,0.0033489622,0.001973515,0.006191238,0.00095011643,0.0014768983,0.8049108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028750873,0.00042440288,0.000556148,0.0034584352,0.00076606096,0.0029172213,0.0014936585,0.0018263507,0.6342101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033505938,0.000017603761,0.00007530802,0.00009072825,0.0000033603487,0.00003265862,0.00004191355,0.00004071387,0.00016967996,0.008013678,0.95654035,0.034940526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007506096,0.000009038673,0.00034545502,0.000046334593,0.0000026555583,0.00002448225,0.00004620037,0.000034433073,0.000060728773,0.0017951563,0.9976246,0.000003463184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030032576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010257327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014228887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009895981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27827102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206541865","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.7062","title":"In Memoriam","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2688778067387211,"score_gpt":0.5181205932034403,"score_spread":0.2492427864647192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206541865","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034086173,0.004278513,0.0006739216,0.23850879,0.7360351,0.00005822216,0.00075688376,0.00028547694,0.019062323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011775199,0.005566591,0.0011334476,0.22839515,0.42130047,0.0002991828,0.001043081,0.00052240095,0.3299645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535143,0.0007688394,0.00032216826,0.0009826425,0.002168418,0.00040644364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756613,0.0036496022,0.0009055415,0.0010204768,0.016068147,0.0026949262],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030482665,0.0013938686,0.0015555382,0.0013936688,0.0038010997,0.0063885874,0.0020163753,0.0038638515,0.08798493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05269956,0.00037040177,0.0011517912,0.0006487673,0.0016987441,0.0035167031,0.003395628,0.01375573,0.0664022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016893686,0.000005671832,0.0000448333,0.000024640627,0.0000034479044,0.000087684886,0.00005269476,0.000011904287,0.00003889873,0.0008618052,0.99425226,0.0045991703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007086279,0.000009580432,0.00014818489,0.0000905216,0.0000056316103,0.00020545495,0.00010620335,0.000040430827,0.00007385706,0.0009422633,0.99836034,0.000010588594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036762515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006010674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9120151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004783705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039880066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29433888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206653975","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6233","title":"The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Syllogism; Argument (complex analysis); Dilemma; Section (typography); Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049096189142563265,"score_gpt":0.24016961664877584,"score_spread":0.1910734275062126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206653975","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11236625,0.0037820728,0.48911655,0.04301719,0.001589785,0.00026112606,0.00031706796,0.00046744893,0.34908253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94104135,0.00065566675,0.046403103,0.0029235175,0.00053082616,0.00021741292,0.000089398476,0.00015298354,0.007985847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98342425,0.008372999,0.00092826027,0.0014346086,0.0045840163,0.0012558679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817514,0.0128844455,0.0010067787,0.0016747231,0.0019938077,0.00068888586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010605301,0.0006473557,0.000792125,0.002947114,0.0039014996,0.008217652,0.0023034764,0.0047303396,0.0044565424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0393364,0.0007059392,0.000815847,0.0015774282,0.024290547,0.014973183,0.0069370414,0.007549338,0.0007891264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015501351,0.000008192714,0.0003060512,0.000032178195,0.000002894,0.00007962038,0.0018168775,0.00010722803,0.00010736709,0.993153,0.00080860534,0.0035625084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007867437,0.00001370315,0.0002950579,0.00005513645,0.00000551563,0.00027814033,0.00094087777,0.0013402445,0.00032495422,0.98807526,0.00864803,0.000015277437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015706276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001147271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010605301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003844333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028821868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056086898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211016070","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6692","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05924928910875018,"score_gpt":0.2080753500811772,"score_spread":0.148826060972427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211016070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000619154,0.0034422171,0.0004719178,0.005627559,0.011507953,0.00005664696,0.002260723,0.00048588638,0.975528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005651073,0.00041858078,0.000088823595,0.00031784995,0.00056748645,0.0000071603663,0.00030535838,0.00010403056,0.9976255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957234,0.00004818831,0.000016363818,0.00008320423,0.00022865186,0.00005131058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877995,0.00029576075,0.000035757155,0.00015221427,0.0005135282,0.00022278276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055249815,0.0006139328,0.0013189511,0.0033489622,0.001973515,0.006191238,0.00095011643,0.0014768983,0.8049108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028750873,0.00042440288,0.000556148,0.0034584352,0.00076606096,0.0029172213,0.0014936585,0.0018263507,0.6342101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033505938,0.000017603761,0.00007530802,0.00009072825,0.0000033603487,0.00003265862,0.00004191355,0.00004071387,0.00016967996,0.008013678,0.95654035,0.034940526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007506096,0.000009038673,0.00034545502,0.000046334593,0.0000026555583,0.00002448225,0.00004620037,0.000034433073,0.000060728773,0.0017951563,0.9976246,0.000003463184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030032576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010257327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19508922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014228887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009895981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27827102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211165449","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808630.012","title":"Bibliography","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Bibliography; Library science","score_opus":0.038456266208901566,"score_gpt":0.23982375730326252,"score_spread":0.20136749109436097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211165449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079118874,0.10777154,0.008656507,0.004065064,0.011273424,0.00021344198,0.016848354,0.0019884254,0.84839207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004170848,0.08655571,0.007916219,0.0017109091,0.0030973689,0.00022126018,0.024752606,0.0010797681,0.8704953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939954,0.000051896433,0.000057379842,0.00012811618,0.00032153193,0.000041428197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868923,0.00026662636,0.000088716544,0.00015448096,0.0006609136,0.00014006927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049853657,0.0012357903,0.0010678697,0.011497679,0.0015427881,0.00303667,0.0015010979,0.00083968753,0.39003423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029112203,0.00040081813,0.00067359005,0.016426235,0.00058796175,0.0032227845,0.0014458129,0.0015629684,0.29491746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013360469,0.000021726133,0.00007641752,0.00083461736,0.000005275258,0.00005150996,0.00010613388,0.00020930625,0.00022055277,0.009321754,0.8759526,0.11318676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011696782,0.0000037372345,0.00010867015,0.00028571527,0.0000030980223,0.000058607948,0.000023915689,0.000018908513,0.000043482716,0.0019953991,0.9974542,0.0000030813505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004678946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007111204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019514322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001976867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87004215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212784659","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6838","title":"Argumentative Bullshit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04845570612227417,"score_gpt":0.35750853001407634,"score_spread":0.30905282389180216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212784659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070777655,0.014716565,0.27534226,0.06976068,0.0018266086,0.00019722941,0.00027350648,0.000439255,0.56666625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95343393,0.0017486254,0.0146750165,0.0033990864,0.00044350946,0.00008634298,0.000068662775,0.00012793943,0.02601699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984176,0.0057295477,0.0005143271,0.001365582,0.001978177,0.0005705768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97881365,0.013428327,0.0019094559,0.0031649729,0.0023025405,0.0003811133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011430893,0.00082212745,0.00056753226,0.0025287443,0.0031057866,0.006610215,0.0013387053,0.005270146,0.006461347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023136195,0.00045429924,0.0011210798,0.0010907177,0.025673319,0.015594522,0.0065515717,0.0060243756,0.0013145662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011264873,0.000003896862,0.00018907123,0.000033109558,0.0000056241734,0.00007500149,0.0027828566,0.0001094585,0.00011698148,0.9933755,0.0008108981,0.0024863246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001246977,0.00001791055,0.00037026696,0.00020997335,0.000016410566,0.00031916067,0.0015317951,0.001027263,0.00095276046,0.9146904,0.08082846,0.000023178238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015925006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001110553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011430893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043625664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014970632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060453057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213318344","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6836","title":"Metaphorical Argumentation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Linguistics; Cognition; Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03254101415751576,"score_gpt":0.31413108754878677,"score_spread":0.281590073391271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213318344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033615854,0.009904909,0.3905697,0.026236543,0.0013543215,0.0002303147,0.00022212375,0.00045586005,0.53741044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87359804,0.0029845121,0.093585424,0.0022405519,0.00046581778,0.0002879989,0.00023232312,0.00016070437,0.026444655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925708,0.0048083006,0.00031829395,0.00073119794,0.0012552709,0.00031605497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992698,0.004439719,0.0005795385,0.0010365123,0.00090108556,0.0003452327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006067372,0.0007715903,0.00059072877,0.001701077,0.0029408433,0.005628434,0.001242331,0.0034931859,0.010457267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014741408,0.00032024208,0.00095859956,0.0010299466,0.011186821,0.009117457,0.0046889717,0.0030811382,0.0015312372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000913679,0.000010949959,0.000080273625,0.0001182308,0.000013915025,0.00010772986,0.0024019233,0.0001766334,0.0003286965,0.98840207,0.002129865,0.006220595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021168495,0.000018905628,0.00019163403,0.000144401,0.000010211941,0.00043142415,0.0014699313,0.0011638305,0.00032547163,0.8820309,0.1141763,0.000015773318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040799315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038344416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010457267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001894715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012423239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0349831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220653763","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7212","title":"A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019777146730185158,"score_gpt":0.30188753818250497,"score_spread":0.2821103914523198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220653763","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035866108,0.0027271383,0.6429765,0.019753402,0.00036721653,0.00021518093,0.00021145085,0.00065009756,0.2972328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91790146,0.000613552,0.06900288,0.001126396,0.0003883528,0.00028457027,0.0001233902,0.00028061486,0.010278777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818024,0.011903555,0.0007399143,0.0018031003,0.0030182241,0.00073279015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97998464,0.0118298065,0.0017425144,0.003922438,0.0020761522,0.00044439686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012010909,0.0009807677,0.0008134468,0.004232805,0.0039225905,0.010385604,0.002929456,0.00535504,0.009270024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028820835,0.00078129314,0.0013031947,0.0026462513,0.023640234,0.025621973,0.00738215,0.0040924326,0.0014254283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012363427,0.000007668856,0.00014317251,0.00007066367,0.0000053314993,0.00008386727,0.009365122,0.00022076914,0.0003766227,0.98541903,0.00051220256,0.0037832197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023750665,0.000019349856,0.00031177787,0.00010234463,0.000012852076,0.00028138937,0.002833975,0.0021620041,0.00034292,0.967554,0.026333127,0.000022422992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012301778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008682507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012010909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028272443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001753565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06352049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220688396","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7224","title":"An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Normative; Completeness (order theory); Informal logic; Argument map; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029460803253827415,"score_gpt":0.29155143241908277,"score_spread":0.26209062916525533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220688396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06223942,0.014985674,0.39171213,0.19514275,0.0054751053,0.00054780947,0.00018074481,0.00026522845,0.32945117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8432577,0.0042747012,0.12383142,0.0057508545,0.002212385,0.00076059543,0.00012564885,0.00018504568,0.019601677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9525936,0.032165565,0.0019447375,0.0013998939,0.010596537,0.0012996409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341391,0.05012976,0.0023351891,0.0036227286,0.008859977,0.0009132935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042139567,0.0009850463,0.0012092354,0.013456939,0.006485012,0.013243314,0.0040554586,0.008408965,0.004380591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07442315,0.0007806438,0.0012474551,0.0062638978,0.034311466,0.016697021,0.008526216,0.0066159912,0.0008895158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013822195,0.000008974456,0.000046773042,0.000043652228,0.0000042066517,0.00004235384,0.002298914,0.00025868358,0.000036788984,0.99281704,0.0010982754,0.0033305488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017661148,0.000017015884,0.00011748721,0.0001802941,0.000008272295,0.000058132664,0.0015747201,0.002961523,0.00023419043,0.95022196,0.044592623,0.000016155409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012848538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011238214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042139567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00996323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22285801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220715851","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7215","title":"Argumentation Profiles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Emotive; Fallacy; Toolbox; Epistemology; Computer science; Informal logic; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02478526745486083,"score_gpt":0.24831003468167673,"score_spread":0.2235247672268159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220715851","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029246356,0.0022722292,0.61533016,0.0030382595,0.00070133974,0.0031329202,0.022588164,0.008509121,0.3151815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28985238,0.0025747423,0.50188196,0.0012188056,0.00040299754,0.0026337802,0.038341116,0.0021127213,0.16098149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371827,0.0020199046,0.0010957248,0.0008332139,0.0019887653,0.0003441703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855186,0.0044816113,0.00080270984,0.0024422002,0.0029329385,0.0007886011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039963685,0.0009931362,0.0007401638,0.004898749,0.002006247,0.006712258,0.0016645414,0.0021024283,0.03818752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023057912,0.0006554217,0.0010824219,0.0040806625,0.00062342273,0.006626131,0.0033508216,0.0015017742,0.024838459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050656334,0.0002999593,0.005365871,0.001030883,0.00013498047,0.00091318454,0.0036516811,0.0035075885,0.0056424118,0.4627025,0.08142315,0.43482122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006475151,0.000091334994,0.0014642797,0.0003567418,0.000061581486,0.0008998508,0.0011151633,0.009338582,0.0029849152,0.18294616,0.8006169,0.00005971176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077330164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009597922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03818752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012012625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019175065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12775004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220722819","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7211","title":"Is Every Definition Persuasive?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Meaning (existential); Term (time); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14162785444208084,"score_gpt":0.26839635873142303,"score_spread":0.1267685042893422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220722819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03955633,0.028469272,0.111518234,0.466871,0.0066473354,0.0001346696,0.00017334947,0.00034709892,0.3462827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239072,0.0043961797,0.025131134,0.030891938,0.0025964202,0.00024794883,0.00020200183,0.00037691573,0.012250225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9542015,0.033323344,0.0018777212,0.0037405961,0.0057946127,0.0010622377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377609,0.04180244,0.0038925316,0.0061994586,0.009093614,0.0012510066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029635075,0.0006410246,0.001077146,0.0023219604,0.00498365,0.009772808,0.002162297,0.0061353003,0.0053487527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06973421,0.00051605754,0.0009982103,0.0014695597,0.042615235,0.022533417,0.0055180616,0.008072351,0.0016060966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026021879,0.000011574238,0.0002917089,0.00019536616,0.000022955994,0.00006489214,0.009914479,0.00004929117,0.00019179602,0.97372955,0.0079580685,0.0075442865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029278644,0.000026296215,0.00033801078,0.00048519776,0.00003964008,0.0002629588,0.009600112,0.00029809584,0.00076335133,0.7923864,0.19573264,0.000038069502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009772433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087966956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029635075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032390316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002756584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15672714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220897597","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7225","title":"Burdens of Proposing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Deontic logic; Deliberation; Action (physics); Computer science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Work (physics); Proof of concept; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05305134949221989,"score_gpt":0.36258955226558204,"score_spread":0.30953820277336214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220897597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030548071,0.0043575307,0.333121,0.07057994,0.0019258348,0.0007093708,0.0005998955,0.00037823623,0.5577802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8440404,0.0035117017,0.06962745,0.0127542205,0.003192517,0.0013704745,0.0005357796,0.00040571674,0.064561725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9402475,0.029979266,0.0046270597,0.006128485,0.016000066,0.0030176062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83910346,0.10387008,0.010584999,0.027142987,0.015902374,0.003396091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04247478,0.0015265268,0.0014879544,0.0029453742,0.0066912035,0.01277823,0.0038240275,0.00874459,0.032290857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1771358,0.0014032933,0.001751382,0.0016158065,0.01973371,0.025441667,0.012237649,0.009768403,0.0047423453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004227498,0.000021802758,0.0005425883,0.000087042026,0.000020119056,0.00011037131,0.0010023045,0.00053227134,0.00015399764,0.9866834,0.0024103634,0.008393477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034930836,0.000044285764,0.00040361655,0.00023199608,0.000033996155,0.0002707701,0.000535028,0.0015303757,0.00032393684,0.93078935,0.06576789,0.000033870783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026821883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001674939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04247478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063111996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076990095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22463077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220920946","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7222","title":"Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Informal logic; Education theory; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Higher education","score_opus":0.0073829251218354005,"score_gpt":0.2404133217296493,"score_spread":0.2330303966078139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220920946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075087063,0.3781556,0.018744553,0.38370654,0.024233708,0.000051242427,0.0001477214,0.0001235696,0.18732834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35321283,0.3421293,0.015220815,0.10712427,0.01730166,0.00011854175,0.00016059978,0.00021849517,0.16451344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463,0.0023621083,0.00023931712,0.00088962686,0.0016041507,0.00027491772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528415,0.010968893,0.0005398965,0.00038395036,0.0018251751,0.0009978983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033933537,0.0006590375,0.000623235,0.0032807556,0.0029581615,0.0062522795,0.00066664256,0.0038705359,0.008673136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01406444,0.00029407963,0.0003162243,0.0028810222,0.007124339,0.0055513754,0.002629507,0.0053753844,0.0022728064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043877975,0.000079590085,0.002436237,0.00083092006,0.000033425647,0.0002999828,0.008729324,0.0005015119,0.0002165668,0.5624258,0.2257792,0.19862351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005805786,0.000019566349,0.001086604,0.001461227,0.000011404964,0.00043658138,0.001534013,0.00026797195,0.00021388766,0.11880874,0.87612075,0.000033419103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00557411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059533855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008673136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037755193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005217499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029014528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221034197","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7210","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.017071228551397345,"score_gpt":0.23535375370246878,"score_spread":0.21828252515107144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221034197","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050231634,0.015213186,0.0014426516,0.06177463,0.6895778,0.00019748414,0.0020765408,0.00067708764,0.2285383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030720395,0.011858995,0.00073113607,0.023515243,0.35857704,0.00016140651,0.0025756492,0.00069310394,0.5988154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998408,0.00020919954,0.00013991464,0.00038964523,0.0006639762,0.0001891888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935149,0.0010323498,0.00033659328,0.0005697709,0.0026298596,0.0019164647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018634434,0.001221844,0.0012883039,0.002639759,0.0020259945,0.007607461,0.0020354243,0.0042907293,0.43633184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093861455,0.00045900434,0.00095434656,0.0016380979,0.0008926182,0.005122057,0.0030462327,0.0044204677,0.287887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145260365,0.000015741887,0.00006961933,0.00008720702,0.0000030662407,0.0000384878,0.000016008002,0.000016306461,0.00008044161,0.0011973735,0.97774804,0.020713234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039040915,0.000008885726,0.00016985087,0.00008874856,0.000002291589,0.00006329697,0.000020000512,0.000017873406,0.000033735563,0.00082131824,0.9987668,0.00000331947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001145168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017827335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43633184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016549998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027245656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225620079","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6179","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08774093475108044,"score_gpt":0.20349122757543076,"score_spread":0.11575029282435031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225620079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005800616,0.0061193462,0.00035336454,0.0072927577,0.021890812,0.00007939469,0.0027132742,0.0006375964,0.96033347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00064956467,0.0010527178,0.000095127405,0.00051942875,0.0016787719,0.000012148654,0.0005005868,0.00017774494,0.99531376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899155,0.000072981624,0.00004296764,0.00016430498,0.0006340629,0.00009418942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970776,0.0003744882,0.00011722657,0.000264904,0.0016324536,0.00053343404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006217056,0.0007899638,0.0016647531,0.004442745,0.0020192638,0.009963146,0.001037301,0.0019235857,0.8229893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004715365,0.0006347065,0.0006580107,0.0053677675,0.00067509455,0.003902795,0.0018819682,0.0022019406,0.71567523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020013673,0.0000145216645,0.00007335793,0.00014326083,0.0000044640788,0.000042256845,0.000026260277,0.000036693567,0.00015530037,0.0031780605,0.96452034,0.031785425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006551324,0.000010952972,0.00036218375,0.00006444243,0.0000031603877,0.000041013034,0.000036690646,0.000022536797,0.00005123555,0.00074318255,0.99865353,0.000004540411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025588705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00638026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018931347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015626178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25248432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232660225","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4963","title":"Editors' Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Marxism and Critical Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Publication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.028741882626800316,"score_gpt":0.2440113713568044,"score_spread":0.21526948873000407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232660225","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000081008155,0.0047310824,0.00041033895,0.027111704,0.9422437,0.00005842037,0.0005220129,0.00027493632,0.024566794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011884096,0.009098095,0.0007060214,0.033318456,0.72946644,0.00016675466,0.0009288281,0.00048774027,0.2246393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951166,0.00046755024,0.00046781628,0.00086623227,0.0025682359,0.0005134322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797204,0.0035529167,0.0012241091,0.0010816519,0.010853609,0.0035673736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053516733,0.0027529802,0.001956164,0.004203944,0.0023499539,0.008889729,0.0039624395,0.005266772,0.23950054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025342098,0.00078311784,0.0016644241,0.0026434413,0.0012554091,0.0058077443,0.0030782146,0.006674888,0.1816318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077258965,0.0000076086567,0.000020744717,0.00009808484,0.0000017289581,0.000016234262,0.00001032896,0.000018045184,0.0000410485,0.0005089094,0.9879732,0.01129626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063259804,0.000013428076,0.000101443075,0.000112397596,0.000002881665,0.00003579772,0.000019512709,0.000024580804,0.000037530754,0.00066926004,0.9989704,0.0000064595592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087069464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018088311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23950054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020537456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033946761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8012091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235155673","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4691","title":"Transsubjectivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Id, ego and super-ego; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0722583280999046,"score_gpt":0.27144495526106177,"score_spread":0.19918662716115718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235155673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015073445,0.004807384,0.47107565,0.032635916,0.0027804303,0.0002287184,0.00011714569,0.00035657588,0.47292483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8213547,0.0033039749,0.08613475,0.0087089045,0.002543642,0.0009291996,0.0002229035,0.00070824334,0.07609363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97643626,0.015528506,0.0007654606,0.0023226677,0.0038873109,0.0010598268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837833,0.008455999,0.0011010595,0.0036458466,0.0023005386,0.0007133097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016420275,0.00096878555,0.00093718106,0.0022273762,0.004500558,0.008259864,0.0026589115,0.0039504077,0.009365277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018679865,0.00046902391,0.001815885,0.0016028205,0.031465475,0.013473852,0.009016439,0.009863077,0.0038480435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004288927,0.000005705928,0.00006725852,0.000013483815,0.0000034954396,0.00002098114,0.0011612723,0.000038152746,0.000057070898,0.99649787,0.00082443585,0.0013059406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079045985,0.000022165974,0.000111932655,0.000104386556,0.000009675723,0.00015549398,0.0010626368,0.0005802971,0.0003882102,0.8936997,0.10384616,0.000011346695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014102913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012298105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016420275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004150217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025774904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086839736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237840899","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3400","title":"Inference Claims","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Universidade de Coimbra","keywords":"Generalization; Argument (complex analysis); Counterfactual thinking; Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05526603600104324,"score_gpt":0.2529798593404789,"score_spread":0.19771382333943566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237840899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015118923,0.0025562742,0.13441299,0.018683508,0.0032077865,0.0006272783,0.0062715,0.0026515499,0.81647015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5665333,0.003992782,0.083119445,0.0070991185,0.003908682,0.0007534039,0.015172744,0.0012400503,0.31818038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906916,0.0017801224,0.0009771985,0.0027106658,0.0029412077,0.0008993038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981871,0.007875707,0.00067428406,0.0054657683,0.0035595258,0.00055364374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011239806,0.0011743422,0.0011089245,0.003423605,0.004375495,0.007379585,0.0038701002,0.005621172,0.1045059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038298063,0.00077245024,0.002426815,0.0020691473,0.003842429,0.015116609,0.0075722127,0.0048930617,0.024913648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015667612,0.000054063727,0.0010182279,0.00027931898,0.000057869136,0.0005604173,0.0012214012,0.00038464274,0.00057952123,0.92947584,0.031659123,0.034552872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005042389,0.000035269495,0.0007104913,0.00036756284,0.00012300172,0.00054551265,0.0005554182,0.0019773361,0.0020269249,0.6782845,0.31528765,0.000035887864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020377298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017182766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1045059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034254408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002811411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34960705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242009327","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3034","title":"Argumentative Injustice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Injustice; Argumentative; Credibility; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social psychology; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Advertising","score_opus":0.00834268729701935,"score_gpt":0.24001654643667752,"score_spread":0.23167385913965818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242009327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25079924,0.007669619,0.16857237,0.053429216,0.0015276594,0.00032948243,0.00012199307,0.00038298147,0.5171674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815091,0.0007498804,0.0060308306,0.003580648,0.0002854536,0.0000858278,0.000031738335,0.000045003224,0.0076814066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778412,0.01300932,0.0010616439,0.0015455566,0.0053984,0.001143885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92353004,0.050393686,0.011276597,0.0091284225,0.0043345536,0.001336655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012064022,0.00070648035,0.0005349643,0.0029517806,0.0038986874,0.005959173,0.0018168731,0.0041881404,0.0045224386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06711571,0.00032729396,0.000514452,0.001095571,0.017642109,0.007114123,0.0071925856,0.007918214,0.0008956565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067689565,0.00012086434,0.009599068,0.00032718867,0.0000657893,0.0025919338,0.06838038,0.00044608317,0.0018389827,0.86202586,0.0067419917,0.047794186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003640768,0.00013670647,0.011711425,0.0015092947,0.000091152506,0.0148607725,0.046806455,0.0028333801,0.0062501067,0.6745824,0.24105997,0.0001219275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063860137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058344775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012064022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015864454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009197429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06380141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102720","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3894","title":"Appeals to Considerations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Authorship attribution; Process (computing); Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05700116448957948,"score_gpt":0.2476048734533704,"score_spread":0.19060370896379092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243102720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01227868,0.003217735,0.030682836,0.116967924,0.0034183217,0.0001618309,0.0001264307,0.00012622288,0.83302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82448524,0.0017894094,0.010799498,0.07059979,0.007485275,0.0005433872,0.00015057414,0.00028124955,0.08386553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98396087,0.006322176,0.0006821878,0.0021988552,0.005245976,0.0015898626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979163,0.012568347,0.0009782177,0.0018969288,0.0045197406,0.0008736651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013347857,0.00073300715,0.00086353376,0.00257605,0.006363088,0.010045419,0.0025092284,0.011356835,0.01647291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05620589,0.00044568913,0.0012616531,0.0014522633,0.016283631,0.009200538,0.0054609166,0.01066139,0.0032716093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012188643,0.0000071103864,0.00008065269,0.000025351934,0.0000063973253,0.00009129469,0.0007179453,0.000059908733,0.000052723204,0.99040514,0.006695554,0.0018456603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017159346,0.000010016195,0.00016723505,0.00010136753,0.000011216859,0.000084117215,0.0006862826,0.00024464488,0.000070332986,0.9041001,0.0944962,0.000011330575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028289845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002069484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063970014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003437594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07059103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243106686","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5328","title":"From the Editors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07177379185878373,"score_gpt":0.2706586713046958,"score_spread":0.19888487944591204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243106686","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012953616,0.009978108,0.00045749484,0.08037916,0.87453026,0.00004117544,0.00027296884,0.00020769167,0.034003563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002064497,0.010769539,0.0005189702,0.068198174,0.5868723,0.000096430085,0.000445861,0.0004385753,0.3305957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965869,0.0005340434,0.00032188717,0.0006518891,0.0015949691,0.00031036642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98471504,0.0033923048,0.000823657,0.0011173189,0.006702859,0.0032488932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032777633,0.0016330602,0.001301504,0.002861402,0.0028369252,0.010512105,0.0026033265,0.005388793,0.2044066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02274524,0.0006073349,0.0008706926,0.0018904454,0.0018522596,0.0059892596,0.0039754594,0.0075153173,0.14915758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013116381,0.00000712224,0.000033247146,0.000090703994,0.000002455725,0.000022088985,0.000019111194,0.000012850646,0.00006222721,0.0010422841,0.9869152,0.011779709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036722645,0.0000055557307,0.00006261587,0.0000993081,0.0000019949312,0.00003153906,0.000024721767,0.000015273648,0.00003263273,0.0005708478,0.99914765,0.0000039955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009115057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024548746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2044066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002514064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002762774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246841944","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.473","title":"The Arguers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Artifact (error); Wish; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.041011668839762615,"score_gpt":0.22025981592556776,"score_spread":0.17924814708580514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246841944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015219507,0.0070893643,0.059868764,0.3488919,0.027065068,0.00038248263,0.00038022106,0.0005685729,0.5405341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2878462,0.003434869,0.017617315,0.09553702,0.009816146,0.0010413782,0.00048601508,0.00072162476,0.58349943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980962,0.009452531,0.0007718063,0.0028628248,0.0043148347,0.0016360423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97639954,0.009309106,0.002364265,0.0041575558,0.0052657328,0.0025037848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017615048,0.0011112918,0.00088233134,0.0017314448,0.008116666,0.017142065,0.0022942,0.0072809905,0.024528084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055454064,0.0008148828,0.00084892643,0.0013378207,0.016048012,0.012316345,0.0068402947,0.014193419,0.015817612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045463992,0.00002156694,0.0006722684,0.00007560885,0.000017677978,0.00025110703,0.017866064,0.000043438347,0.00065950514,0.86154157,0.10995734,0.008848402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011830581,0.000015067334,0.00026770093,0.00011131235,0.000013153812,0.0002334341,0.007913186,0.00015481687,0.0004880478,0.08010229,0.91067034,0.00001879421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009902635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011525479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024528084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034409857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002860061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093158424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247398033","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4206","title":"Emotive Language in Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emotive; Argumentation theory; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Epistemology; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.030296924163666427,"score_gpt":0.2830444332500542,"score_spread":0.25274750908638777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247398033","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007111036,0.8810889,0.0032310346,0.008555288,0.0023553066,0.000012200335,0.000036328693,0.000035158093,0.103974745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08090682,0.8356191,0.003039978,0.005465843,0.0070233895,0.00011344729,0.00017096722,0.00008565542,0.06757486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979842,0.0011504721,0.000102060076,0.00016279674,0.00045927052,0.00014121168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784005,0.0014928359,0.0001398681,0.00009189095,0.00035336535,0.000081852595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017896215,0.0007263896,0.00076801993,0.002615007,0.0010584954,0.0049125776,0.00097354566,0.0024534236,0.008779541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004061256,0.00025889275,0.0006113849,0.0037753885,0.0047713486,0.005542553,0.0017901312,0.0026239706,0.0046032905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004913329,0.000047608086,0.00013844618,0.0044779056,0.000059805097,0.00018715224,0.0025101376,0.00056124903,0.0004965729,0.46793807,0.18797204,0.33556193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010859505,0.00001610266,0.00046359657,0.0032639096,0.000020391866,0.00023215634,0.0005053425,0.00013290843,0.00012698681,0.09109191,0.9041244,0.000011489597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018662987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001859401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008779541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027014604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022001697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029370546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249214718","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2591","title":"Pollock on Practical Reasoning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pollock; Component (thermodynamics); Epistemology; Computer science; Architecture; Practical reason; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.032313471354079124,"score_gpt":0.2922078628113353,"score_spread":0.2598943914572562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249214718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087899715,0.026275171,0.1320906,0.121744834,0.0021847514,0.00012324796,0.00019228864,0.00041272954,0.7081864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7056627,0.016736005,0.07633344,0.025071796,0.0030534668,0.0005025574,0.00023688628,0.00047702255,0.17192623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681586,0.0015277702,0.00011715534,0.0005095605,0.00074440456,0.0002853435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971462,0.0017052896,0.00013703424,0.0003953527,0.00043084327,0.00018516471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027175196,0.0006246337,0.000574782,0.0016448739,0.0045625498,0.0069335047,0.0013188958,0.0031862147,0.009655851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007840866,0.0004245332,0.0008227371,0.0016178117,0.019177321,0.010073126,0.0036888535,0.0056857453,0.0016813371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034354566,0.000002743858,0.000022564862,0.000013778833,0.0000014927946,0.000010084531,0.00018398059,0.00018896066,0.0000125484385,0.992573,0.0047762734,0.002211204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009222948,0.000005382757,0.000044356362,0.00006597196,0.0000045012116,0.000023753779,0.0001427798,0.0008144465,0.0000775056,0.89091176,0.10789427,0.0000060100783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015972584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008729327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015972584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007053104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036324193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051174104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250676218","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5337","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06871656740323984,"score_gpt":0.29078521118206213,"score_spread":0.2220686437788223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250676218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006390131,0.014482825,0.00029536,0.0041681905,0.020340046,0.00007296728,0.0028296926,0.00054522976,0.9566267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005342343,0.0018630611,0.00008608338,0.0004748321,0.00082605256,0.000009408891,0.0005899074,0.00010465178,0.9955117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994153,0.00003756817,0.000017959617,0.000085119165,0.00039306277,0.000050983974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991085,0.00014158421,0.000028088252,0.00007632456,0.0004657778,0.00017965728],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040204194,0.00068031834,0.0013270349,0.003321591,0.0023266985,0.006721309,0.0010141395,0.0012957453,0.72932374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002140797,0.00046812385,0.0006633378,0.0050391844,0.00053507346,0.0031662981,0.0017293846,0.0024632062,0.56255776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001819896,0.00001944271,0.000058873153,0.00014434087,0.000003100893,0.00004070401,0.000052119594,0.00003068599,0.00013576001,0.003001546,0.94966966,0.046825655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035175683,0.000008363708,0.00025417047,0.00007014422,0.0000015221335,0.00002677443,0.000057045505,0.000011300479,0.000033245582,0.00041015443,0.9991208,0.000003050383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062247985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018535754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27067626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001199196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001235139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38608682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251917146","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3897","title":"Epistemology Mathematicized","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Subject (documents); Argument (complex analysis); Formal epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Informal logic; Subject matter; Philosophy; Social epistemology; Mathematical logic; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.05818603874721553,"score_gpt":0.21804654054588496,"score_spread":0.15986050179866942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251917146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009974127,0.013112252,0.2487868,0.05290247,0.0026997041,0.00015293894,0.00064178865,0.00046535084,0.67126465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76801556,0.010897608,0.103645965,0.01159834,0.0044450853,0.0007590863,0.0010409623,0.0006079881,0.098989345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444205,0.0027111534,0.00032472465,0.0010400626,0.0012238232,0.00025812365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525213,0.0020263987,0.00034877541,0.0013102011,0.00088154717,0.00018093117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166432,0.00065542676,0.00081913004,0.0025123165,0.0029496145,0.009452621,0.001408788,0.0022134231,0.011303811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009956723,0.00039175298,0.0010069631,0.0016018548,0.02210006,0.0102820685,0.0039394954,0.0057208,0.0038120956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024159735,0.0000020652071,0.00003633365,0.000021675918,0.000003836363,0.000008654782,0.00015046429,0.00010801864,0.000026914082,0.99682236,0.0011359231,0.0016814198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063020693,0.0000036047172,0.000058739814,0.00004144715,0.000003225804,0.000031167663,0.00009747734,0.00039542813,0.00007737427,0.9425547,0.056725986,0.000004634741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019549634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086151075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011303811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00583227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004278109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042316258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254036064","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5001","title":"From the Editors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.10014445378068881,"score_gpt":0.2894497823457241,"score_spread":0.1893053285650353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254036064","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027791265,0.02308369,0.0011337695,0.11824807,0.7651752,0.0000713361,0.0006960507,0.00032976706,0.09098421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004005459,0.017680703,0.0008888987,0.06821724,0.32631513,0.00010260606,0.00075415254,0.00048796803,0.58154786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970692,0.00048350365,0.00030292428,0.0005449497,0.0013740106,0.00022541797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868449,0.0029801014,0.0006436932,0.0011293899,0.006408766,0.001993157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027589183,0.0010662372,0.00088729244,0.0024281694,0.0024003661,0.0077608773,0.0020550985,0.0034455196,0.23148374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02135669,0.0004641947,0.0006854248,0.0018030282,0.0013499768,0.0057148035,0.0032905624,0.005859086,0.1687518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011274412,0.000006073378,0.000029409337,0.00008895999,0.0000017713785,0.00002301755,0.00003575113,0.000013778871,0.00006685971,0.0022795117,0.9800759,0.017367596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001845254,0.0000032623436,0.000036419682,0.00006790855,0.000001070779,0.00003149277,0.000022413991,0.000010148578,0.000029159512,0.000517829,0.9992761,0.000002431676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010140481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002197984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23148374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023029658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027835788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7743903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254494533","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4406","title":"Remembering Richard Paul","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08381470117042797,"score_gpt":0.31734420804947167,"score_spread":0.2335295068790437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254494533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020676827,0.22716433,0.00079976686,0.4037288,0.10665803,0.00003101287,0.00051155867,0.00011181443,0.24031778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17246191,0.044883035,0.00061880564,0.062346954,0.022025239,0.000034911474,0.000144746,0.00023396716,0.6972505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835265,0.0006695603,0.00006349116,0.00030043419,0.00039931448,0.00021466376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981945,0.0005882703,0.0002075699,0.00010793075,0.0005542513,0.0003475033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017479698,0.0005160725,0.00034464235,0.0012133972,0.0059378035,0.0046705883,0.0004973436,0.0025174373,0.015489367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008648691,0.00022175146,0.00031245878,0.0011745078,0.0038860582,0.003645661,0.0024567284,0.004475704,0.003396738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042797048,0.000008259459,0.0007355606,0.00012532412,0.000013167146,0.00041919976,0.018140068,0.000034606317,0.00018035353,0.045202456,0.90538055,0.029717617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012114941,0.000006453927,0.000402947,0.00017371289,0.0000031556715,0.00017915176,0.0032864986,0.000003932064,0.00007942029,0.0007599713,0.99509513,0.000008425193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03716404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09174596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03716404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053536994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030915048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073895454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254665787","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3330","title":"Whither Consequence?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Philosophy; Inductive method; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04963537470332596,"score_gpt":0.23128343132173526,"score_spread":0.1816480566184093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254665787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017556928,0.015866257,0.15914185,0.23833542,0.0050727907,0.00006533917,0.0002447378,0.00048665403,0.56323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8738586,0.0060336585,0.022303022,0.034302972,0.0047756755,0.00018147097,0.00017370962,0.00037849278,0.057992525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540895,0.0018320762,0.00018822699,0.0013713884,0.0007775541,0.00042178438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927504,0.004772091,0.00034987638,0.00118099,0.00066654827,0.0002801849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007662955,0.0004908864,0.0007489049,0.00115703,0.0038553125,0.006028743,0.0010202806,0.0038512691,0.020828944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014926466,0.00041718807,0.00080822525,0.0008703168,0.020722361,0.021461407,0.003297446,0.007576051,0.0031925878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015024887,0.0000035463383,0.0000617628,0.000023699879,0.000004403567,0.000030323332,0.00031259313,0.000037718168,0.000059804017,0.9926912,0.002834876,0.003924979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009333406,0.00000891874,0.000067224624,0.000027931212,0.000004748643,0.00006347395,0.00019568046,0.00011561597,0.00018521902,0.9647217,0.034595832,0.0000043619157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001077206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011824617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020828944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032841782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013084841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06967974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256374369","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3864","title":"Informal Logic referees 2011-2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03415496325730991,"score_gpt":0.24363241680067954,"score_spread":0.20947745354336963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256374369","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024071194,0.081881225,0.060140856,0.1642883,0.38965097,0.0004301555,0.008760829,0.0033523669,0.28908822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06292674,0.0405496,0.030557511,0.033431847,0.1342808,0.0010936034,0.015033535,0.0035559018,0.6785704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905129,0.0024957608,0.0009568994,0.0010853452,0.004323031,0.00062601554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968058,0.0073556392,0.0010930366,0.00218562,0.019614223,0.0016934192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064281696,0.0011676118,0.001042027,0.008764805,0.0035021484,0.008874752,0.0018480496,0.0026607735,0.07116784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037632752,0.00043789277,0.0011046949,0.0056523536,0.0022062,0.0052863667,0.0030470903,0.0047835778,0.02656337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026999343,0.00001097962,0.00003833781,0.00018113136,0.0000070610017,0.00006613518,0.00017075457,0.00009037538,0.00017326369,0.028389668,0.94956625,0.021278996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009817089,0.0000060494312,0.00017972768,0.00023649531,0.000007775383,0.00008656792,0.00010238495,0.00015766865,0.00020585727,0.009172171,0.9898198,0.000015679332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012146769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010588557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013449511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005555091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23808014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256433675","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.6012","title":"Robert Pinto","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinto bean; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041098974014327126,"score_gpt":0.36092229621614863,"score_spread":0.3198233222018215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256433675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083118916,0.048606806,0.0062341895,0.66308427,0.073932886,0.00004345486,0.00032957026,0.000697996,0.2062397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023678245,0.0242322,0.0030601516,0.14609715,0.014814896,0.00008067178,0.00026066438,0.0006243783,0.7871516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627256,0.0009800575,0.00010684467,0.0008107129,0.0014797623,0.0003499108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935655,0.0017184714,0.00029426382,0.0005314144,0.002273308,0.0016171243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033492679,0.0006166914,0.0005849919,0.0010205013,0.0023111657,0.006321552,0.0009947256,0.0026990524,0.0846399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021424217,0.00030410202,0.00035503594,0.00048041996,0.0026376848,0.0038263518,0.0025430396,0.0078060436,0.047222134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002134877,0.000009827267,0.00010394715,0.00004008984,0.000004496909,0.0000401609,0.000087780725,0.000044788707,0.00006213429,0.0353397,0.9371002,0.02714543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030715523,0.0000050514573,0.00006842243,0.0000631809,0.0000017890014,0.000057264675,0.000079439174,0.00003010614,0.000065588065,0.007685783,0.99193364,0.0000065529944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037154336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057001617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0846399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002656534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003485224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2831487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281615115","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.6351","title":"Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Action (physics); Restrictiveness; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Metaphor","score_opus":0.0358971185133448,"score_gpt":0.35294353475963636,"score_spread":0.31704641624629154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281615115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037307046,0.0069151176,0.40124562,0.032543536,0.0020005472,0.0002122563,0.00016097161,0.0006598778,0.518955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899926,0.001588334,0.0711828,0.002431113,0.00069535436,0.0002839177,0.00009137943,0.0003292478,0.023471816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98083603,0.012023396,0.0009358518,0.0016463258,0.003930408,0.00062793755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760118,0.017058605,0.0019018776,0.002312974,0.002142804,0.00057196285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011831493,0.0009934887,0.0009055789,0.003385517,0.0038290205,0.012924445,0.0017172382,0.0046420638,0.007605207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030936096,0.00059970043,0.00067693065,0.0019937493,0.04928015,0.024100734,0.00771788,0.007133874,0.0018097924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010786609,0.000004557274,0.00005051459,0.000037285754,0.0000020282328,0.00004485339,0.0023269046,0.0000815995,0.000106938984,0.9945156,0.0004378642,0.0023811508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011172826,0.000009245317,0.000039590297,0.000078142104,0.0000038401313,0.000119732744,0.00055062247,0.00055535877,0.00030563312,0.9755254,0.022793287,0.000007878236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006977395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000550509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012924445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004759062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024992204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062571645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281694601","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.7005","title":"Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Utterance; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05870631369202928,"score_gpt":0.2732412752028867,"score_spread":0.21453496151085744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281694601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05587087,0.016833657,0.25836766,0.15250328,0.0014991264,0.00012985201,0.00015366785,0.00042427878,0.51421756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563567,0.001950626,0.016725587,0.007324191,0.00073391217,0.000106787615,0.0000797769,0.00021878423,0.016503736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863142,0.008303895,0.0005085757,0.0016688744,0.0023655647,0.0008389755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773542,0.016113082,0.001463971,0.0026927537,0.0020051852,0.0003708859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018895062,0.001002692,0.0009486579,0.0035497318,0.0057904082,0.01086028,0.002162888,0.006626611,0.008212835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025068836,0.0005775735,0.0012046036,0.0024389592,0.041412707,0.029358564,0.0074386667,0.01124367,0.0009647309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037704747,0.000003957767,0.000059785616,0.00002094935,0.0000028997426,0.00003014998,0.0037652506,0.000052588868,0.000037296926,0.99423015,0.00043726014,0.0013560351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008325742,0.0000057408974,0.000099126635,0.000080056,0.0000046383325,0.000048161648,0.0011238289,0.00033189476,0.00012098775,0.9679004,0.03026917,0.000007699054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028355024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019119324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018895062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008441112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032005585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09992784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281763276","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7133","title":"Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Nankai University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Premise; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Test (biology); Argument map; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.04085974393108532,"score_gpt":0.27257002163024074,"score_spread":0.23171027769915542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281763276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51753974,0.0018653917,0.3400486,0.002539949,0.00020329234,0.0016213963,0.0012032051,0.0005098102,0.13446864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78581023,0.00032208563,0.20731135,0.00023189535,0.00006419383,0.0009674478,0.001105889,0.00022641616,0.003960639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973484,0.01416102,0.0019765869,0.002967189,0.0065380083,0.0008731592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86497635,0.09610623,0.009864054,0.010146485,0.016473131,0.002433755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027095236,0.0009176614,0.0009505923,0.011116,0.0030309441,0.011259983,0.0016920271,0.0028443604,0.010559991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14427125,0.00060076226,0.0010541646,0.004909201,0.0046372744,0.014478085,0.010601633,0.0028120484,0.002068848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006877578,0.0004714276,0.07027832,0.0013435911,0.0002840526,0.0009711278,0.07420312,0.0019206137,0.016362043,0.6036139,0.0034339114,0.2264301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019051807,0.00029675197,0.050239716,0.0017742943,0.0003816284,0.00090375164,0.042079434,0.039506488,0.018448515,0.80216897,0.04382386,0.00018611999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007403366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014053889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027095236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029772737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035588664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14329505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283210290","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.7020","title":"A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Norm (philosophy); Modal; Extant taxon; Relation (database); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.031203308542630842,"score_gpt":0.2725847519998919,"score_spread":0.24138144345726106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283210290","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015111242,0.0011100892,0.7889634,0.010027176,0.00088241627,0.00026255145,0.00028450074,0.0003990102,0.18295972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.721003,0.0008423616,0.24993412,0.0023409377,0.00179252,0.0011536398,0.00043225862,0.00031420082,0.02218706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869034,0.0050379247,0.0011070984,0.0016541719,0.00450338,0.0007940346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98102206,0.009773286,0.0009913198,0.0015675997,0.0056734052,0.00097224355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111893,0.00070817803,0.0010510179,0.003840398,0.005132881,0.006758968,0.0020848033,0.0051131034,0.01051336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023995671,0.00040656168,0.0018215462,0.0017096414,0.01291565,0.015530186,0.0069583897,0.0055525806,0.002592206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041167677,0.0000031590644,0.000028953411,0.000016534392,0.0000019015664,0.000013701035,0.0001535186,0.00012511016,0.000095012285,0.9978917,0.00043419682,0.0012321299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008744443,0.000009451428,0.00003962606,0.000031729003,0.0000039577844,0.000039481358,0.000097243086,0.0025637727,0.00017838641,0.9872578,0.009760396,0.000009408082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010844892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007553228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004072098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002609409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059175372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693842","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7499","title":"Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Modal; Modal logic; Non-classical logic; Mode (computer interface); Object (grammar); Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Logical consequence; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04126604061716679,"score_gpt":0.27771382696207897,"score_spread":0.23644778634491218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00711381,0.008402434,0.8017431,0.014004872,0.0006325573,0.00015414551,0.0004020806,0.000722127,0.16682498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6085993,0.003938675,0.3499204,0.0046753837,0.0013065683,0.0008426809,0.0006752618,0.0002512842,0.029790435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328023,0.003930275,0.00050289644,0.0006994829,0.0011386356,0.00044858147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225736,0.0052591544,0.0005250635,0.0009667905,0.0005796051,0.0004120408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073636817,0.0010770352,0.0007684694,0.002454969,0.0034556792,0.00963035,0.002123908,0.0030405282,0.008079009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010506467,0.0007540427,0.0017932021,0.0027731168,0.012015018,0.013609085,0.0057315156,0.00655548,0.0018368486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032783296,0.0000032909472,0.000018689365,0.000015964792,0.0000023114153,0.000015410576,0.00017627828,0.00021752395,0.000032952892,0.9975495,0.0005293992,0.0014354063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007300364,0.0000020219225,0.000011483562,0.000013944747,0.0000020288508,0.00001754916,0.000052982607,0.0011384834,0.0000461535,0.99083066,0.007873957,0.0000034007137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026981644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020327412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00963035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059480066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021859373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043156028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693845","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7501","title":"On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Modal; Intuition; Mysticism; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04261809511245998,"score_gpt":0.2549297549123205,"score_spread":0.21231165979986052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040336486,0.0022887732,0.25822818,0.02374107,0.00046864973,0.00013246245,0.00009889145,0.00037954038,0.67432594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93877006,0.0006958262,0.034546733,0.0015224963,0.00023755782,0.00019122835,0.000035396093,0.00012062013,0.023880014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98918915,0.0073120766,0.00032135693,0.0007734258,0.001922492,0.00048154977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900057,0.0064814975,0.00064514705,0.0014125637,0.0010797778,0.00037527754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102289105,0.0005922221,0.00060186343,0.0032566849,0.0049637617,0.011603207,0.0015464092,0.0043720608,0.007495497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017824965,0.00041931684,0.00088107376,0.0019895497,0.032759886,0.017321542,0.007287487,0.0051877387,0.0017005744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004134871,0.0000018762479,0.000025267513,0.000007669739,0.0000010331647,0.00001597601,0.0010897259,0.000066564615,0.000027657377,0.99765754,0.00020545468,0.00089703576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009819144,0.000008218132,0.00004775933,0.000042418924,0.0000022402232,0.000062884756,0.0007159177,0.0008345031,0.00007938271,0.98550063,0.01268853,0.000007701219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011072841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083094556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011603207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004010817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002039477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05409634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693853","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7497","title":"Multi-Modal 2020","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Modal; Sociology; Section (typography); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14516123119922314,"score_gpt":0.5006422706512382,"score_spread":0.3554810394520151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009629109,0.0058366135,0.16581643,0.035730824,0.0014429998,0.0000993203,0.00030462063,0.00023391226,0.78090614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76802146,0.00248663,0.07231605,0.008503573,0.0013446063,0.00041969912,0.00046439044,0.00032742793,0.14611621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333876,0.0038848538,0.00027500556,0.0008704216,0.0013351893,0.00029582903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959765,0.0022192528,0.00024539145,0.00055890816,0.0007577296,0.00024226114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056383223,0.0006501913,0.0004134377,0.0015093395,0.003333835,0.0059482153,0.0011424038,0.0034798873,0.020364825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009752548,0.00035876053,0.0008195732,0.0011456492,0.010988741,0.009301647,0.004855525,0.0041176244,0.0041645532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105680865,0.000004986177,0.000048066307,0.000027583397,0.000003342881,0.00003413724,0.0009844817,0.00006361421,0.00010284163,0.9891741,0.0042722127,0.0052741403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008485176,0.000014226798,0.00014927675,0.00013250904,0.0000054632123,0.00021181713,0.0006593167,0.0010168192,0.00031795877,0.80804425,0.189428,0.00001177748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014026547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012684019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020364825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043234723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017417769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068127096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693858","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7502","title":"Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Embodied cognition; Gesture; Relation (database); Epistemology; Modal; Sociology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.104619815873734,"score_gpt":0.3769967389866802,"score_spread":0.27237692311294615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0748143,0.02383101,0.12719943,0.5297214,0.0021530883,0.00009357205,0.00011625213,0.00018529345,0.24188574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405297,0.004867101,0.019244257,0.016206484,0.00096434756,0.00016289017,0.000029152116,0.00011093936,0.017885137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948618,0.0038923,0.00012185823,0.00042935662,0.00046788296,0.00022672146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870755,0.011080769,0.00054046384,0.00043464525,0.00048128696,0.00038735737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071007134,0.0007722942,0.00066797907,0.0017751803,0.0025476327,0.007962695,0.0021483134,0.00809525,0.0049398225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012157496,0.00035280487,0.0006553193,0.0010123642,0.046048738,0.013582744,0.005065482,0.006620418,0.0010029719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017526001,0.000004177198,0.00006857402,0.000045603017,0.0000032516543,0.00012387274,0.011103908,0.00021156298,0.00015255903,0.984583,0.0014812412,0.0022046564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015822086,0.000018690007,0.00012877435,0.00015314925,0.0000049627834,0.00019809745,0.0042077587,0.0006020077,0.00034358384,0.93711716,0.057186455,0.000023640896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016553324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010751586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00809525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036898192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011249422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037552655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693866","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7503","title":"Kisceral Argumentation in Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Intuition; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.044157122954696024,"score_gpt":0.23684400513177953,"score_spread":0.19268688217708352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019715663,0.014471085,0.15167677,0.06825993,0.0014718112,0.00012040426,0.00014171119,0.0003537012,0.743789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91904044,0.0036650226,0.02844023,0.005432802,0.0012995243,0.00021288855,0.00007876771,0.00014507926,0.041685272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717415,0.009379515,0.00036329107,0.00091607106,0.00153393,0.0006330618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884166,0.008107712,0.0005963239,0.0011375686,0.0011884678,0.00055331434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011475027,0.00063025515,0.0008252186,0.003119823,0.005627855,0.011731358,0.0015312312,0.0075637386,0.006819077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019434202,0.00047233884,0.0008197391,0.0025714452,0.037341155,0.013164503,0.0054515004,0.006130952,0.0015927864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032301366,0.0000024011986,0.000019574072,0.000012044893,0.0000013059547,0.000015761574,0.0004118432,0.00010979678,0.000008772504,0.99730116,0.0009533249,0.0011608873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000755042,0.0000032422336,0.000027010126,0.00004147452,0.0000015341219,0.000019012552,0.00015553412,0.00042036927,0.000026726755,0.98031783,0.018975897,0.0000037219713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028180424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017978145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011731358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003587548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06427461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693875","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7500","title":"Amenable Argumentation Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Modal; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.08693887397417614,"score_gpt":0.3492829857426172,"score_spread":0.262344111768441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693875","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038492638,0.0022175002,0.6172108,0.0044327807,0.00042849698,0.00015867078,0.00018865385,0.00044812,0.37106565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54721045,0.002945022,0.33615804,0.0024142016,0.00083812256,0.00081263727,0.00047236835,0.00042692467,0.108722225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935741,0.003786956,0.00024950327,0.0006299187,0.001463555,0.00029583703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967949,0.0018313982,0.00020396138,0.00049090444,0.0004655895,0.00021340139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004466308,0.00096513826,0.0007960727,0.0026952007,0.0020927219,0.0048832525,0.0023182097,0.0026205173,0.018895654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067940913,0.00035143105,0.0014494689,0.0015054402,0.0051771016,0.006155334,0.00438986,0.0034456945,0.0045626042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002872442,0.000004752343,0.000015294618,0.000021864571,0.0000039517818,0.000026234558,0.00023473654,0.0002748893,0.000049110862,0.9957437,0.00065542036,0.002967232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063750767,0.000006257707,0.00003098932,0.000038156137,0.0000058399933,0.00006244803,0.00011349191,0.0022666024,0.000098353004,0.95404786,0.043317363,0.000006233483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009818255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089392974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018895654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028827433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012703581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063212276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693887","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7498","title":"Gilbert as Disrupter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Modal; Scope (computer science); Modal logic; Informal logic; Mode (computer interface); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.021882875386332393,"score_gpt":0.2963879283597499,"score_spread":0.27450505297341754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014484564,0.028427675,0.011185174,0.24980949,0.0061238282,0.00005011745,0.00010485785,0.00048426286,0.68933004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5884811,0.0138776535,0.005229755,0.06707097,0.0021086207,0.00009294013,0.00007623155,0.00045465768,0.32260805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956761,0.0024462063,0.000115658266,0.00062262424,0.00069163716,0.00044780277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767584,0.00096765015,0.00024786682,0.00036361828,0.00040893522,0.00033618833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025747053,0.0006134395,0.00042316088,0.0013811733,0.0042402986,0.009015153,0.00086886476,0.0043709604,0.011594641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00780134,0.00031044768,0.00029657286,0.0010636445,0.01195235,0.009112978,0.005048668,0.005300346,0.0042720744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021474783,0.000009738907,0.0002665182,0.000046127912,0.000003904164,0.00011182726,0.0046565356,0.0000656057,0.00015088254,0.9194943,0.061668754,0.01350433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081447515,0.000010808272,0.00012239152,0.00010113351,0.0000041570133,0.00027287749,0.0025128417,0.00012635457,0.00025643685,0.15486552,0.84170794,0.000011449839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042020623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059254635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011594641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007124275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026430264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05169046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693891","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7496","title":"From the Editors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Modal; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019395303028040413,"score_gpt":0.2706361895161204,"score_spread":0.25124088648807996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693891","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011110485,0.0108273495,0.0003263156,0.088225335,0.8751014,0.000025851863,0.00018907577,0.00014265819,0.025051061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022156478,0.016490892,0.00048487744,0.09470619,0.6036445,0.0000612226,0.00043359393,0.0002994483,0.28166363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736124,0.0003905806,0.0002480826,0.0004777224,0.0012748567,0.0002473724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98894554,0.0024921868,0.000603115,0.0007477467,0.00505473,0.0021566518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825254,0.0014669605,0.001138039,0.0017761481,0.0024341862,0.008389861,0.0028023818,0.0056008375,0.16545853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018931689,0.00055033935,0.0008529124,0.0015078735,0.0012378831,0.0061791297,0.0032391408,0.007966911,0.12039805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009673193,0.0000059114523,0.000025116567,0.00006835639,0.0000016493863,0.000021101778,0.000016485159,0.000009713266,0.00004215667,0.0008231173,0.9872457,0.011731106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002660618,0.000005160827,0.000059109032,0.00008195128,0.0000015696762,0.000039302024,0.00002679779,0.000012158965,0.000031730367,0.0004281609,0.999308,0.0000034203106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008923405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023147133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16545853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017698818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002561262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441895","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7143","title":"Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade de Lisboa; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Analogy; Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013091144188072877,"score_gpt":0.23314071469058037,"score_spread":0.22004957050250748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441895","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06277154,0.017796198,0.5648433,0.03345767,0.0015533767,0.0002555381,0.00011638731,0.0001811436,0.31902498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8566494,0.002865516,0.12661017,0.0017188865,0.00078751205,0.0003204939,0.000075467564,0.00008604204,0.010886452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744523,0.018711096,0.0009992988,0.0020926564,0.0029458436,0.0007987905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97615755,0.017830053,0.0017150936,0.0019117183,0.0018033176,0.0005822152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01762307,0.0010426636,0.0015238763,0.0049401014,0.0034526098,0.0085187135,0.0019804838,0.00560449,0.005802081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03440003,0.000762783,0.0018683287,0.003056282,0.020719271,0.02086465,0.0065569743,0.0050761797,0.0007303057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010817899,0.0000058557102,0.00008700658,0.00003078434,0.000013447438,0.00003454087,0.00051006366,0.00050575397,0.000040012168,0.9951715,0.00034539387,0.0032449074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009852541,0.000004684433,0.000047977286,0.000028639859,0.0000051954607,0.000021714664,0.00009866415,0.0008900558,0.00004754009,0.9946807,0.004159736,0.0000051486522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087880704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076416787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043793498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016998039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0932008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441906","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7165","title":"You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Word (group theory); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06573458011078719,"score_gpt":0.26390506638099964,"score_spread":0.19817048627021244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031695817,0.0061561423,0.41806534,0.2137313,0.01882566,0.001146759,0.0006981996,0.0021128184,0.3075679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5878485,0.0035474962,0.2990864,0.029973092,0.009148947,0.0019281617,0.0010060996,0.0018800504,0.0655812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.957233,0.01824362,0.0047338856,0.007035887,0.010978602,0.0017749142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8278659,0.0936657,0.013963655,0.023887353,0.035975203,0.004642164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040340133,0.0015322946,0.0026516593,0.005448603,0.005368292,0.013598067,0.00418996,0.010203722,0.023316486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26562476,0.0010934861,0.0016293444,0.0017578512,0.023796804,0.03556823,0.009782042,0.012036596,0.012754858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020613987,0.000070706,0.0007169296,0.0004227445,0.00009471376,0.0004104633,0.0058861547,0.00031212726,0.0009144758,0.91370803,0.038986254,0.03827136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006609201,0.0000466325,0.00028613422,0.0005682576,0.000043591685,0.00035943458,0.002171709,0.001487466,0.0007945475,0.8750003,0.11910557,0.00007032353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013599668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010903525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040340133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028982263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005420148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2133416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441914","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.6974","title":"Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Externalization; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Socialization; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.047928764833201645,"score_gpt":0.32421321991701174,"score_spread":0.2762844550838101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441914","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2911907,0.0012028832,0.5401797,0.0045558843,0.00045017223,0.00071715727,0.00014912321,0.00052190473,0.16103248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90902025,0.00030099036,0.081945226,0.00025210303,0.00014218969,0.00056141306,0.0000898841,0.00016299705,0.0075250203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732765,0.019658031,0.0010810171,0.0021290497,0.0030837099,0.00077177864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94080925,0.0404709,0.005155498,0.009753662,0.002512175,0.0012986707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015053986,0.0005536685,0.0005293205,0.0026602964,0.003043186,0.011462388,0.0017653082,0.002555324,0.0023242326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046809606,0.00037184544,0.00057115615,0.0018611744,0.014787881,0.009558677,0.006606709,0.002508455,0.0006415534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013501816,0.00014792656,0.0047533284,0.00037651224,0.000025872507,0.0006527299,0.26118854,0.00066878047,0.0051812497,0.68144387,0.0012789536,0.044147253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011106199,0.00035964977,0.0064256145,0.001015288,0.00007036951,0.0032635604,0.14002629,0.013458667,0.01176268,0.61116767,0.21220931,0.00012994173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000239059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026139434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015053986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016576785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014614334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07961404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441921","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7175","title":"On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Management science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23758838426911483,"score_gpt":0.5060161726369339,"score_spread":0.26842778836781905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441921","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020319147,0.0159932,0.5780887,0.06420456,0.0013515025,0.0002481892,0.00017501354,0.0002345892,0.31938508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7898621,0.0071630403,0.18123253,0.0053120083,0.0012920244,0.0006996945,0.00013877642,0.00023634326,0.014063465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437994,0.042561617,0.0027202137,0.0021180965,0.0073976927,0.0014028912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8075626,0.16914997,0.006196782,0.0065644723,0.009326984,0.0011991822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045290153,0.001200285,0.0014273179,0.008151231,0.0036381448,0.016693452,0.0023002876,0.006999048,0.008240356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1462071,0.00063403905,0.0015961248,0.007707749,0.042673238,0.026309943,0.0070290505,0.0067029805,0.001376958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055256796,0.000004903461,0.00007485044,0.000045943874,0.000003478335,0.00001494075,0.00032865483,0.00062546984,0.000019272193,0.99564517,0.00029643645,0.0029355106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051096176,0.0000037437062,0.000035548743,0.00007675285,0.000002651937,0.00001125526,0.00010616862,0.0010236471,0.000039029554,0.9949197,0.0037716064,0.0000047760736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025775626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014085814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045290153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081354445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041068587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23952013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311442015","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.6877","title":"A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Probabilistic argumentation; Management science; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.02733577596593486,"score_gpt":0.2823254326327485,"score_spread":0.25498965666681367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311442015","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027252588,0.0005985746,0.92845094,0.0037839287,0.00011881409,0.000423849,0.00039299938,0.00032772133,0.03865052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40215054,0.0007594498,0.58229715,0.00034538753,0.00012697255,0.00088433165,0.0007464353,0.00013753014,0.012552269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98788154,0.007043422,0.00088940485,0.001957693,0.0018866403,0.00034134812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697656,0.019599784,0.0021407988,0.003171929,0.0037696157,0.0015522374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011862239,0.00076896604,0.0006004486,0.0061241244,0.003713288,0.0068308585,0.001754993,0.003020978,0.011184732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032762695,0.00077184284,0.0010076535,0.004067724,0.007991335,0.015539373,0.0048299623,0.0023084164,0.0014160061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003457707,0.00001387431,0.00064539944,0.000089633424,0.000012692782,0.00014363184,0.0012907435,0.0032634903,0.00063555944,0.98079485,0.000621193,0.012454277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026028607,0.00003012885,0.000321774,0.00009666439,0.000023935174,0.00022495323,0.0007337475,0.019652802,0.0006187238,0.926521,0.051724285,0.000025922729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016999884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010786308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011862239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031730416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023661994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062734246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361283426","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7073","title":"Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Scholarship; Sociology; Mediation; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.13418100913465408,"score_gpt":0.5396705254031104,"score_spread":0.40548951626845636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361283426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15554519,0.005160014,0.5744227,0.043866977,0.00043306238,0.00022718833,0.000038673003,0.00037756562,0.21992862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495899,0.0004613004,0.046541173,0.000656016,0.00008747296,0.00013934696,0.000012179068,0.000082977116,0.0024296516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626502,0.030669132,0.00092084444,0.0015388443,0.003364447,0.000856614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.924708,0.05872494,0.0049286955,0.00614706,0.0041260826,0.0013653211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029988926,0.0005312405,0.0006087088,0.003703859,0.007179121,0.012188373,0.0017125469,0.0042077266,0.0027501083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07719905,0.0005662828,0.0006095806,0.001534899,0.045559563,0.020708853,0.0067901216,0.0047448394,0.00059412676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003731125,0.000013803808,0.00048737886,0.000064716056,0.000006291519,0.00006204179,0.027368285,0.000557309,0.00021529703,0.95959175,0.00037461013,0.0112212235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002087383,0.000031991232,0.00034426604,0.000205494,0.000010156787,0.0001082103,0.0077082557,0.0029534763,0.00041829658,0.97258097,0.015596267,0.000021723865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019753566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021008553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029988926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053957105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067329598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15859854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361284847","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7076","title":"Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03731508347359536,"score_gpt":0.3364279001967068,"score_spread":0.29911281672311146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361284847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.640736,0.004416501,0.13106193,0.019793073,0.00088790094,0.0007054507,0.0006519662,0.00048170358,0.20126547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760922,0.0002457982,0.020842971,0.00075855217,0.000115759794,0.00021749015,0.00015335856,0.00009013044,0.0014837192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9334344,0.02970624,0.007245051,0.0048182406,0.021673178,0.003122894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66855085,0.21908696,0.058205765,0.020478772,0.02536962,0.00830801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03469887,0.00095702073,0.0013998629,0.012202292,0.005125249,0.009782425,0.0011850242,0.004961786,0.0070596794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20123546,0.00071894936,0.0009075627,0.0045485334,0.021303462,0.012403588,0.008294442,0.0054943506,0.00082469155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085453136,0.00027466312,0.09704817,0.0010313992,0.00020535135,0.0006418952,0.013302772,0.0010428363,0.0026907723,0.8027929,0.0067169047,0.07339786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009174747,0.00019764889,0.06535122,0.00068676966,0.00010368695,0.0011869139,0.011484239,0.0036880043,0.0025231615,0.8935197,0.02100424,0.00016263178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005404446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000883875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03469887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003154651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019786318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18350738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361294245","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7926","title":"Books Received","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.032850789568981444,"score_gpt":0.23074847910007767,"score_spread":0.19789768953109624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361294245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003507891,0.0085542435,0.0004974204,0.0025323252,0.003820176,0.000048275702,0.0018575398,0.00028895232,0.9820503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00046370924,0.0016240614,0.00023822405,0.00037491185,0.00022309803,0.000011458311,0.00053544645,0.00007461959,0.9964545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996594,0.000028648856,0.000014534769,0.000078075405,0.00018460305,0.00003468701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993839,0.00009560947,0.00002137604,0.00007604099,0.0003005086,0.00012265967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003383468,0.00079808396,0.0009782088,0.0023272242,0.0013695224,0.006112326,0.001080575,0.0015743687,0.7875713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014915541,0.00041109673,0.00053569884,0.0037694692,0.0006881911,0.0029203019,0.0017054854,0.001983335,0.6268754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029621264,0.000031712676,0.00010650429,0.0002330922,0.000004936072,0.00005661041,0.00007117899,0.000074430856,0.00026175016,0.017987955,0.81754357,0.1635987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057712737,0.0000063218117,0.0001805695,0.00010283224,0.0000016759155,0.000035352125,0.00004282056,0.000021744303,0.000039821254,0.0023892017,0.9971712,0.0000026445882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003562668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009942157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21242869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013046794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012387477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30300373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361295185","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7639","title":"The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Multivariable calculus; Causal reasoning; Simple (philosophy); Sample (material); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.020350997013837597,"score_gpt":0.2876073364846006,"score_spread":0.267256339470763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361295185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.672883,0.0038675289,0.22862324,0.015094107,0.00013627314,0.00024952277,0.00024300936,0.00045430724,0.07844906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857041,0.00028921594,0.012907428,0.00031695317,0.00004101109,0.0000455822,0.000038122347,0.000027761724,0.0006298808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981682,0.010818915,0.0011150215,0.0017951133,0.003982299,0.0006066958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8425685,0.12914672,0.009462136,0.01168014,0.0058548534,0.0012876207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024100712,0.00053150865,0.0004528167,0.003071831,0.0012104991,0.0039826785,0.0012174607,0.0014511406,0.0061901323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12556249,0.00048263185,0.00058169814,0.0013183533,0.0071041635,0.007293737,0.0054914514,0.0024772214,0.00041342626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029812506,0.00018367953,0.146511,0.001492824,0.00028245206,0.0016458553,0.11565681,0.003190744,0.0074192327,0.35498592,0.0038110383,0.36452237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006338198,0.00016218159,0.049092054,0.0009608455,0.00011805649,0.0015746973,0.020402042,0.011809364,0.0032025361,0.8754167,0.037090845,0.00010738518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012921066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015328432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024100712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012198961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016576414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12745821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361295203","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7304","title":"Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Fallacy; Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Rhetorical device; Function (biology); Rhetoric; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010946402060970613,"score_gpt":0.21668509617720935,"score_spread":0.20573869411623874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361295203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1152516,0.009729221,0.21179442,0.16533537,0.003395003,0.00024037606,0.0002620743,0.000311722,0.4936802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610001,0.0012204385,0.017475551,0.00707805,0.0004899748,0.0000903072,0.000063105465,0.00016665619,0.012415827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892658,0.00701666,0.00046734276,0.00083927665,0.0017563269,0.0006545494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790075,0.015357844,0.0024472347,0.0015053111,0.0010284272,0.0006537352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010944464,0.0006825452,0.0006105792,0.0018525108,0.005760779,0.010392251,0.0011215418,0.0050928816,0.004964567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02923892,0.0004329283,0.0004997365,0.0012422594,0.030486165,0.015216591,0.00554978,0.006527541,0.00081502536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028571763,0.000013099084,0.0009928751,0.000100890495,0.000010761292,0.00025674966,0.02087577,0.000076441815,0.00047775704,0.9662701,0.0038841078,0.007012786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014618672,0.00004794124,0.0017180286,0.0007509012,0.000040583578,0.0012226743,0.042287044,0.0011268535,0.0022586698,0.73199624,0.2184802,0.0000562675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016528222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024014956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010944464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002849758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018417657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05788058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361296790","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7835","title":"Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0694531939445168,"score_gpt":0.2604043364876503,"score_spread":0.19095114254313353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361296790","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047352118,0.88971126,0.0029322454,0.07839387,0.0036892027,0.000008509699,0.00002373718,0.000027437023,0.024740255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03169256,0.92025423,0.002169718,0.028443476,0.010104994,0.000049905633,0.00007536229,0.00012660604,0.0070830635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876978,0.0072139665,0.0006809052,0.00082558364,0.0030883586,0.00049339875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655447,0.02842403,0.0012376384,0.00089573726,0.003078931,0.0008188381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012668647,0.00086501735,0.0013392734,0.004519762,0.0024796522,0.006906147,0.0021156492,0.005663143,0.006020402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03211588,0.00063647627,0.0006842558,0.006577494,0.012859068,0.010145853,0.0040148688,0.0095356805,0.0029380217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070564536,0.000029842853,0.00016282436,0.004028503,0.00009688532,0.00013979829,0.0036453162,0.0007079274,0.00027792694,0.5758976,0.19861327,0.21632951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011302184,0.0000127396515,0.00027486845,0.003990013,0.000022169012,0.00012024832,0.0008268311,0.000096521486,0.00008422376,0.11950952,0.8750298,0.000021741032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037545147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005156269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012668647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057768575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074091763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06699908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380881987","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8058","title":"From the Editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09368286923623231,"score_gpt":0.3615496576959067,"score_spread":0.2678667884596744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380881987","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012801381,0.012671198,0.00047205997,0.098034516,0.86275035,0.000033307533,0.00018249969,0.000118877084,0.02560928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002717269,0.0122547755,0.0005849653,0.072698236,0.49565488,0.00007449982,0.00030153617,0.00021094509,0.41550294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704844,0.0004886762,0.00026876386,0.00046403037,0.0015073016,0.00022282008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98573226,0.0030872033,0.0006709587,0.00076370157,0.0074294433,0.0023164065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027134148,0.0010504614,0.00092242664,0.002056515,0.0024565568,0.008940143,0.0016033783,0.0038126302,0.11079372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023568032,0.00043190108,0.000645119,0.001587309,0.0015579996,0.004486727,0.0027929035,0.0068107755,0.083946325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010707466,0.000006298366,0.00002703872,0.00008184843,0.000001795063,0.00001893358,0.000023140237,0.0000084911535,0.000048136866,0.0013013345,0.98560625,0.012866084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034085306,0.000005948105,0.00007197726,0.000075324904,0.0000025662675,0.00003204036,0.000038368027,0.000014211425,0.000044380708,0.00073892093,0.9989691,0.0000038163976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012671804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030890605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11079372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016284077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028479223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3706419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380987881","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7249","title":"The Basic Components of Agreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Agreement; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.32836837640902933,"score_gpt":0.4382867172272609,"score_spread":0.1099183408182316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380987881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041683823,0.0036115313,0.42363262,0.024299618,0.0006450548,0.0012520849,0.00053928024,0.00039345014,0.5039425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87400943,0.0017971421,0.10822567,0.0018521358,0.00046963632,0.0016326533,0.0003979477,0.00013967308,0.011475649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93916893,0.029713333,0.0057400796,0.0060945028,0.01572484,0.0035584297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9263501,0.050332367,0.0051839137,0.008358916,0.007988234,0.0017864184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03078155,0.0010803018,0.0014416161,0.0071444465,0.006770598,0.016416177,0.003425703,0.0064453143,0.012285738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07691436,0.0009982274,0.0015428836,0.006568044,0.048738547,0.02661111,0.011116886,0.0057618637,0.0020063377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012374167,0.0000072989696,0.00031568378,0.00008483057,0.000007982013,0.00003085494,0.0019141138,0.00018968999,0.00006634057,0.99157906,0.00043582416,0.0053559663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092948285,0.0000132040905,0.0002223546,0.00013537983,0.000007709697,0.00006503163,0.0013300028,0.0005337241,0.000109738525,0.98564976,0.011910857,0.000012924396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019526297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009865228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03078155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058493176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053461865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16279036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380989094","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7171","title":"Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Syllogism; Computer science; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06797196942493196,"score_gpt":0.27626657402153054,"score_spread":0.2082946045965986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380989094","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012126023,0.0032856243,0.754349,0.12041158,0.0044947206,0.00010891699,0.00021848403,0.00050110894,0.10450456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73331344,0.0026115978,0.21441218,0.02035895,0.00397309,0.0005178144,0.0002807407,0.0007024761,0.023829736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826677,0.00652311,0.0006452354,0.0014481576,0.0025365856,0.00058015395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98492646,0.008249205,0.0009417473,0.0032376132,0.0022139158,0.00043102578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013612844,0.00093676685,0.00089148595,0.0021344319,0.0028969077,0.007999069,0.0030011027,0.0041543357,0.008856576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032471143,0.00047023685,0.0018737778,0.0016254234,0.03078354,0.02189551,0.0051053353,0.011881683,0.001550173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004631494,0.000005883728,0.000046229132,0.000025237747,0.000002811743,0.00002708054,0.00041720734,0.00017996029,0.00004636897,0.9931248,0.0023456234,0.0037741612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006130603,0.000008789686,0.00003900171,0.00005682031,0.000003870415,0.00008044417,0.00015308936,0.0012498032,0.00011192388,0.9808678,0.017409997,0.000012357132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025312726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011947898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013612844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005229479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035576695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07199252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380989868","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8008","title":"Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Parallel thinking; Epistemology; Action (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Vertical thinking; Intellectual development; Lateral thinking; Pedagogy; Convergent thinking; Psychology; Social psychology; Critical systems thinking; Philosophy; Creative thinking; Creativity","score_opus":0.05327950592678515,"score_gpt":0.3735607014985834,"score_spread":0.32028119557179824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380989868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15826225,0.027787773,0.055069502,0.3605538,0.0025764753,0.00008779275,0.00004828263,0.000339301,0.39527476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97163117,0.005270948,0.011005486,0.0072207106,0.00058723055,0.000047219666,0.00001353834,0.000027429172,0.0041961693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996503,0.0021935569,0.000106915875,0.000236737,0.00054385496,0.00041598832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97878325,0.012869647,0.002371603,0.0013189475,0.0014687552,0.0031877295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009209549,0.0003219616,0.00042853047,0.0013230842,0.0014429793,0.0066069565,0.0004648334,0.0016478224,0.0026750688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019886158,0.00015154138,0.00028910273,0.0006925955,0.026090518,0.0089886645,0.003741156,0.003508088,0.0006187072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046184967,0.00017882805,0.006738183,0.00046100945,0.000033724165,0.00014789596,0.012294757,0.00019396,0.00046245818,0.80928946,0.009396014,0.16075753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021117352,0.00008919739,0.0033897045,0.00065201015,0.000015957356,0.00030171635,0.0096591925,0.00040762778,0.00041053814,0.94889957,0.0361216,0.00003166736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006968749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088312366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009209549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011767896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003586984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04870528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380990916","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8007","title":"Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan State University","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.09793189935889732,"score_gpt":0.27823741542634034,"score_spread":0.18030551606744302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380990916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2004291,0.012610032,0.0800452,0.082880996,0.0020534971,0.0001818079,0.00040356393,0.00031664193,0.621079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726299,0.0035614166,0.009319351,0.006205525,0.0010297411,0.0002165024,0.0002481637,0.00005010576,0.0067393165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99124396,0.004468855,0.0004888266,0.0011886221,0.0015801112,0.001029664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865806,0.0072803968,0.002175467,0.0017979357,0.0012981044,0.0008676064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007496338,0.00065774925,0.0011052202,0.0024052467,0.001809254,0.009909649,0.0023998886,0.004379379,0.007426812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018739931,0.0003576879,0.0009703486,0.0028649156,0.050767742,0.022705602,0.0073942035,0.0054879105,0.0012525115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029526944,0.000023677148,0.00039163226,0.000071985734,0.000010876682,0.000045922825,0.0022032834,0.00006270073,0.000063968495,0.99114263,0.0006890125,0.0052648117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017501126,0.000013360225,0.0008761763,0.00006548547,0.000009395057,0.0000901476,0.0025684398,0.00021171813,0.000057278245,0.9912589,0.004820622,0.00001091337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012472264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061731064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009909649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022611679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002078712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039644897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380991364","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8057","title":"In Memoriam","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.055560946537658126,"score_gpt":0.37275402242966377,"score_spread":0.3171930758920056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380991364","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051973865,0.0055112354,0.0013218718,0.1552632,0.75506246,0.000102218306,0.0010079872,0.0007114498,0.08049986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011912864,0.004452665,0.0011144488,0.08492073,0.20650586,0.0002139916,0.0010421214,0.00074196147,0.6890953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658835,0.00061995577,0.0002624909,0.0008433585,0.0013698129,0.00031612237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875022,0.0020648113,0.00052038225,0.00097434426,0.007266348,0.0016718489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021714268,0.0013054227,0.0010636932,0.0015113228,0.0034855555,0.00695502,0.001948762,0.0032302341,0.23237967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031317875,0.00036049157,0.0007783318,0.0007548148,0.0015604813,0.0039614383,0.0036758203,0.008403126,0.15560271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023150387,0.0000070412448,0.000052616902,0.00004124343,0.0000028922714,0.0000851209,0.000078863275,0.000013480907,0.00006742936,0.0016304341,0.9862981,0.011699599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004074236,0.0000069684584,0.000078728495,0.000054811175,0.000002213367,0.000113498194,0.000079502686,0.000026218753,0.00005616629,0.0006915127,0.9988815,0.000004777431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018328024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037179568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23237967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037771661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027279698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77738744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380991468","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8012","title":"Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Critical thinking; Epistemology; State (computer science); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06755187087734006,"score_gpt":0.3731239650346018,"score_spread":0.3055720941572618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380991468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022110753,0.03076302,0.036774956,0.47403127,0.0048280014,0.000091834205,0.000035443143,0.0001483166,0.43121642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360958,0.0086181015,0.00897324,0.0211473,0.0051306235,0.00026149303,0.000029826879,0.00007985612,0.0196637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674935,0.010166602,0.0004527896,0.0005690965,0.0014798049,0.00058239605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96396583,0.030254705,0.0014770871,0.0013125689,0.0020816862,0.0009081006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010156634,0.0003644926,0.00043900014,0.0015133318,0.003212565,0.007839531,0.000997427,0.00497079,0.0027816312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03437165,0.00016112952,0.00035260562,0.0011678527,0.054856192,0.007041309,0.003631871,0.008598605,0.00039139445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004167467,0.00000787061,0.00006737487,0.00003585806,0.0000012327035,0.000019027186,0.002150783,0.00008170044,0.000018620682,0.99155736,0.0023277907,0.0037281539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087770495,0.000009272056,0.00019083473,0.00014508072,0.0000014690977,0.000021257776,0.0009793758,0.00024814458,0.000081987724,0.96263516,0.035671856,0.000006793395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003339049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033116748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010156634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006812234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007722943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053714037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380992239","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7686","title":"Group Identity in Public Deliberation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Argumentation theory; Categorization; Argumentative; Identity (music); Epistemology; Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Group (periodic table); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.0825883654461164,"score_gpt":0.36458521357231005,"score_spread":0.28199684812619363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380992239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19758254,0.002201953,0.14544271,0.050881475,0.00075998995,0.00026742095,0.000050395247,0.00015801477,0.6026555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881039,0.00021814906,0.005529719,0.0006356048,0.00011613431,0.00011576829,0.000011481869,0.000027222577,0.00524194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625471,0.02884693,0.0009742234,0.002432601,0.00256358,0.0026355432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96390444,0.026375879,0.003529814,0.0030744788,0.0017554688,0.0013600005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023793086,0.0004889558,0.00059875695,0.0025950368,0.009157171,0.011999744,0.00169163,0.006736998,0.008845064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04413668,0.0004553732,0.0011465772,0.0014598825,0.026267476,0.01814926,0.013856552,0.004066861,0.001447581],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035062727,0.000032547192,0.00082496065,0.000043268086,0.000008208886,0.00015808707,0.015087918,0.00043446964,0.00007804561,0.9774739,0.0005919672,0.0052315635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040993345,0.000032993656,0.0006690633,0.00012180762,0.000015932765,0.00013044268,0.009952434,0.0017685718,0.00045449188,0.96375054,0.02304425,0.00001855605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014492444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000826649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023793086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00473449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034831779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12583137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707598","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7802","title":"Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Università di Bologna; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Similarity (geometry); Persuasion; Selection (genetic algorithm); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.3101464769070194,"score_gpt":0.4316794841286712,"score_spread":0.12153300722165178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84036,0.00082979223,0.051619574,0.002505727,0.00012507325,0.00073186884,0.00014067635,0.00010845845,0.10357874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768152,0.00012957318,0.020186922,0.00017415803,0.000020682497,0.00019556424,0.00004190681,0.00003031011,0.0024056477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867132,0.010938512,0.00029042017,0.000456665,0.0012575072,0.0003436806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939023,0.054667294,0.0012754917,0.003140528,0.0012801114,0.000613602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070959013,0.000457749,0.00038750883,0.0010912955,0.0028820292,0.002669458,0.0012589241,0.002853028,0.008280251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043604895,0.00033064914,0.0006101572,0.0011676118,0.003605593,0.0034427715,0.002929146,0.0023351626,0.00073886785],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032843323,0.0052712266,0.030982168,0.0018923447,0.00023275125,0.037983295,0.14023264,0.011309604,0.035448607,0.5924148,0.008876979,0.13207127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021418447,0.0041363407,0.050607495,0.0014205619,0.0004023338,0.032016825,0.1139786,0.085771486,0.06923673,0.45704153,0.18286249,0.0003837372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006597127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008231508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008280251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001601687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067994365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037527144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707692","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7263","title":"Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06744273608965048,"score_gpt":0.2785592848371255,"score_spread":0.211116548747475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033452068,0.021826383,0.11641449,0.5506638,0.0031896487,0.000096413525,0.0002143103,0.00023719591,0.2739057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85961217,0.01110805,0.034035135,0.06537403,0.003202777,0.0004287641,0.00013111917,0.0004760196,0.025631888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197817,0.00432645,0.00029634428,0.0010818368,0.0017020551,0.00061512453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798994,0.014268972,0.0019139744,0.0012822268,0.0020252261,0.0006102932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01181984,0.00073565275,0.0012552973,0.002738477,0.0049422816,0.010125221,0.0029570789,0.0075321803,0.005155574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037445676,0.00045384027,0.0010697498,0.0022251573,0.04187979,0.027310798,0.0043202452,0.009154969,0.0013338304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010890334,0.0000063009006,0.000094807496,0.000048119742,0.000008429109,0.000013556601,0.0012768077,0.00005717468,0.000029623021,0.99235076,0.0037568556,0.0023466782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010266233,0.0000060435013,0.00008037725,0.000088560795,0.000008413415,0.00003409624,0.00085388083,0.00021215274,0.00019832204,0.9607778,0.037718706,0.000011318885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030543632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01181984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069143143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003539689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06251001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707737","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7815","title":"Fact and Opinion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Section (typography); Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07437962406435493,"score_gpt":0.37941957076634514,"score_spread":0.3050399467019902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02992978,0.02303895,0.121064365,0.09633371,0.003609098,0.00014834871,0.00046555712,0.00015029937,0.72525984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91512793,0.0103809675,0.025435071,0.010202495,0.0045212274,0.00023634598,0.000418697,0.00010776261,0.03356944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913278,0.004863752,0.00045237804,0.0010530014,0.0017411845,0.00056182436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98594576,0.009503891,0.0014327506,0.0011597945,0.0014779519,0.0004798745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007903405,0.0005120348,0.00061808043,0.0027564294,0.0035349857,0.009039467,0.001249757,0.0030068979,0.010801459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016697124,0.00026489393,0.0005531729,0.0023098632,0.025708351,0.015620698,0.0035958604,0.0033017476,0.0015617566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004153845,0.000002837148,0.00014223163,0.00003575585,0.0000032087287,0.000027582433,0.0016431715,0.00005826246,0.00003376075,0.99194133,0.0019712783,0.0041364003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047306457,0.00001082837,0.00029724167,0.00012745762,0.000004954706,0.00008339414,0.0016474457,0.00020136982,0.000077111974,0.88172054,0.115816884,0.0000080448135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024204648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017029503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010801459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037162106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019302407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041797757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707873","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7124","title":"Are Fallacies Frequent ?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Empirical research; Positive economics; Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3424636682400444,"score_gpt":0.4338737950435198,"score_spread":0.09141012680347538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42534465,0.0129814595,0.41318285,0.05683576,0.001359785,0.0004274406,0.0012861607,0.00055782613,0.08802404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645609,0.0021758436,0.02840679,0.0020891377,0.0004797541,0.00024788096,0.0004897729,0.000090827525,0.0014591112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726529,0.011060833,0.0030326126,0.0055577066,0.0063267825,0.0013691005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79060435,0.1609977,0.02752524,0.012064953,0.007318584,0.001489195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022536999,0.00061924936,0.0016496833,0.007827138,0.0039416347,0.007122639,0.0021784254,0.0036119316,0.008098888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16419281,0.0006513356,0.00094030617,0.007042803,0.012492017,0.017018413,0.0045183143,0.0037599835,0.0010983946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000493329,0.00013915927,0.065408766,0.001403929,0.00034236014,0.00083956035,0.020475093,0.0025491873,0.0010007053,0.7117254,0.006391103,0.18923147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028406053,0.000055461587,0.009407138,0.00046859155,0.00007436643,0.00052281324,0.006412227,0.0023505592,0.0004704713,0.9626744,0.017487217,0.000048404356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025485696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024100582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022536999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029779817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026074625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11918843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098297","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.7667","title":"Arguing with Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Discipline; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.019337828573134267,"score_gpt":0.24574569467040994,"score_spread":0.22640786609727567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01227147,0.0076800366,0.43650782,0.098688275,0.0043256236,0.0004161588,0.00020375791,0.00052390504,0.43938306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61005163,0.0047741276,0.28610092,0.020863073,0.0039169425,0.0012587311,0.00064598286,0.0007188414,0.071669765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94119567,0.04466652,0.002232362,0.00445016,0.0059112003,0.0015440801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95319134,0.032646053,0.0026012217,0.0064207213,0.0037515473,0.0013891433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040267315,0.0017127622,0.0015534584,0.0037349074,0.0069146943,0.021959128,0.0045797667,0.012165779,0.018736081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06639112,0.00095486315,0.0026259106,0.0027135075,0.031930767,0.031494353,0.012864165,0.010706811,0.0048502474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009750231,0.00000935104,0.000060582057,0.000050307128,0.0000131673,0.00005702382,0.0026831313,0.00009535323,0.00006629195,0.99082595,0.0028801763,0.0032489027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017151733,0.000011022352,0.0000503563,0.00017121279,0.000015664576,0.00012238443,0.0011591463,0.00080563355,0.000213429,0.907538,0.089880966,0.000014977266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075245637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054569205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040267315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035910644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21295649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098438","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8483","title":"Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue ethics; Epistemic virtue; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.2045478084717812,"score_gpt":0.5595859967407959,"score_spread":0.3550381882690147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061342992,0.0065409397,0.23084274,0.13220763,0.0033388261,0.00055386726,0.0003508056,0.0007307977,0.5640913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354038,0.00080639106,0.04618555,0.0064025186,0.00093037565,0.00045082349,0.00013183383,0.00015696227,0.009531658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9331354,0.037961517,0.005234372,0.0070613264,0.013112684,0.0034948147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89828265,0.061735082,0.006860902,0.01405492,0.015613271,0.0034532605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06019438,0.000987209,0.0022948931,0.003847563,0.005375869,0.009619019,0.0017064932,0.008550476,0.006954513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10377284,0.0008698629,0.0019381581,0.0011743691,0.049298555,0.01947998,0.010081765,0.005991551,0.0020792168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003465445,0.000018257799,0.00038996057,0.000111492205,0.000025779416,0.00008124848,0.0011128203,0.00015629812,0.00011343777,0.9905606,0.001979222,0.0054161684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036218644,0.000016360511,0.00016119321,0.000070814334,0.000011255025,0.000076471064,0.0002622014,0.00029848798,0.00017606308,0.98735434,0.011524168,0.000012456763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007319001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007940763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06019438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041932524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004453954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31834215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098440","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8437","title":"In Memoriam Michael Scriven","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04348789028557327,"score_gpt":0.2236237930376058,"score_spread":0.18013590275203253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098440","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013117625,0.0031134235,0.0006432052,0.30405414,0.680431,0.00004270602,0.00023198078,0.00018643051,0.011165922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053567863,0.0034682064,0.0007632164,0.22225328,0.45394206,0.00023125985,0.00039739124,0.0005456837,0.3130421],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945427,0.00093691796,0.00034766717,0.0009973712,0.0026066883,0.0005686961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797784,0.0026660324,0.0010637386,0.0007357263,0.012360601,0.0033955884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047962912,0.0017311752,0.00224829,0.0018823759,0.0048087006,0.007614822,0.0025107886,0.007039839,0.060222536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03647652,0.00062789355,0.0014274047,0.00069062377,0.0019155608,0.0041026035,0.0056518824,0.021285076,0.060152486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008714158,0.0000036902818,0.000014687323,0.000011402829,0.0000023196649,0.00003335407,0.000028377295,0.000007395935,0.00003324185,0.0008990965,0.9969928,0.0019647437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012315891,0.000009199472,0.00018031121,0.00007689222,0.0000112566895,0.00009061715,0.00012730654,0.00005455257,0.00011351476,0.0018187434,0.9974917,0.00001353081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040235175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006777989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060222536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006444648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005425734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20146447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098476","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8493","title":"Books Received","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06401105708715357,"score_gpt":0.2722651369713352,"score_spread":0.20825407988418163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008572715,0.048407096,0.0004106169,0.0029475035,0.0028127555,0.000041289462,0.00984,0.00022680723,0.9344565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001774016,0.007836128,0.0002194811,0.00016085153,0.000100985424,0.000012960325,0.002019881,0.000121046556,0.98775464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00003095616,0.000029869043,0.000098663826,0.00015918256,0.000054073265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995969,0.00005462929,0.000028816345,0.00006262813,0.00016648263,0.00009060883],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033982832,0.0011974067,0.0013145405,0.0021429893,0.0014647096,0.0041426676,0.0011126,0.0014267103,0.6031578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010593518,0.0009011221,0.00053642056,0.0051674005,0.0007632268,0.0030880151,0.0015119258,0.0015042817,0.39232305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057080277,0.000025765343,0.00022528604,0.0004059572,0.000010049366,0.00004511629,0.00016195393,0.00016063722,0.00018064836,0.01429409,0.8372929,0.14714059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005228543,0.000004723325,0.00049257977,0.00018820065,0.0000027990434,0.000021946122,0.00005931017,0.000015504507,0.000031385236,0.0010892764,0.9980861,0.0000030579256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023281666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08155845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39684218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019213853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020110128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5660472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098477","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8415","title":"A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Viewpoints; Ambiguity; Normative; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04146038175008145,"score_gpt":0.30578151800191483,"score_spread":0.2643211362518334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098477","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018767928,0.0037180828,0.008643986,0.95791006,0.009176823,0.000017660857,0.000020575277,0.00006645735,0.018569572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2208857,0.00492374,0.011473057,0.70207477,0.028610852,0.00038518666,0.000084447965,0.0008975549,0.030664805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9207954,0.040850915,0.0033611674,0.007369552,0.025563138,0.002059815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86974376,0.09631416,0.0038924133,0.0081863655,0.018523164,0.0033402327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066678576,0.00134554,0.0019513782,0.003942758,0.009283196,0.016574724,0.0051110806,0.029135382,0.005327031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14544271,0.00073539617,0.0017449129,0.0023325812,0.07005328,0.029667454,0.015152552,0.058071624,0.002039878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031008803,0.000018950057,0.00010463535,0.00010834619,0.000022100503,0.00014917678,0.011129223,0.00021222158,0.00021272755,0.9075797,0.07450788,0.005923953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036335176,0.00001673593,0.00008995754,0.0003410278,0.000010515621,0.00014476814,0.004903346,0.00053305266,0.00030316313,0.56033474,0.43324545,0.0000409282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003520455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024509449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066678576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117313815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010045528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35263425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098499","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8311","title":"That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Object (grammar); Persuasion; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08268960158722405,"score_gpt":0.2648012369514965,"score_spread":0.18211163536427244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016798073,0.0040640486,0.10315371,0.08860835,0.002136607,0.00004670398,0.00023451238,0.00023642021,0.78472155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681671,0.0021266767,0.01601159,0.017655788,0.0017834425,0.00019779589,0.0002325217,0.00038819015,0.09343692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536985,0.0020049468,0.00018608672,0.0010161265,0.0010988329,0.00032410858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566996,0.0017686512,0.0002950193,0.0012213822,0.0007628309,0.00028212645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005672659,0.00038778022,0.0005220845,0.0010696694,0.0034228668,0.008177759,0.0012804942,0.004291793,0.0075939763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011773221,0.0003271333,0.00053958246,0.0009360914,0.025706032,0.010830988,0.0053747525,0.0065705953,0.0021116491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033111655,0.0000017202923,0.000029145804,0.00000887241,0.0000011495935,0.00000875869,0.0010086277,0.00001672112,0.000046502602,0.99644876,0.0014412762,0.0009851045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008623903,0.000006327978,0.00007689495,0.000058864025,0.0000047888593,0.000069806294,0.0010930994,0.00016604146,0.00016485069,0.8505005,0.14784281,0.0000073603787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012419772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010105675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008177759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003845257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024317582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03000027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098513","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8473","title":"Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051308530733281975,"score_gpt":0.288812592094232,"score_spread":0.23750406136095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01588199,0.019701352,0.4109269,0.11527638,0.004963567,0.00016975543,0.000175903,0.00023919567,0.43266487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83233076,0.011227729,0.11708196,0.012212575,0.005273964,0.0007480688,0.0002823259,0.0002869218,0.020555774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664828,0.022468522,0.001169032,0.0018833234,0.0069858874,0.0010104324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97001743,0.022960395,0.0010770077,0.0021014137,0.0033473766,0.0004963327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024389595,0.0010638087,0.0017643403,0.0060057305,0.0050553265,0.010126602,0.0028562706,0.010003341,0.0047809365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036075246,0.000711959,0.0015322106,0.0032750787,0.052312285,0.015687855,0.0068224785,0.009275034,0.0013645861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022464135,0.0000024139808,0.000013851113,0.000022384973,0.0000031823336,0.000009701503,0.00015627238,0.0002686634,0.0000097004295,0.99808913,0.0004225602,0.0009998452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006217148,0.0000023824596,0.000013134882,0.00005140896,0.0000017364528,0.000010229085,0.00006380218,0.0005444455,0.000028413368,0.9894135,0.009860965,0.000003683658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018259177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014395021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024389595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076841093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005870298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12898606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877207","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8258","title":"Generative AI and Argument Creativity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Argument (complex analysis); Creativity; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04843543748935351,"score_gpt":0.385232943713059,"score_spread":0.33679750622370547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07689423,0.006108602,0.29289716,0.028947465,0.0010258398,0.00021060128,0.00008332612,0.0006896062,0.5931433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93254036,0.0012941835,0.05267993,0.0016027967,0.00034665357,0.00017060192,0.000075125616,0.0002215409,0.011068836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766917,0.015256542,0.0010474849,0.0019855348,0.0040212027,0.0009975211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91795623,0.0661515,0.0033424147,0.008118258,0.0027891174,0.0016424899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017026465,0.0006799223,0.00062315806,0.0028793267,0.003571899,0.014313862,0.001979354,0.0036760857,0.007995434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046859115,0.0004666056,0.0014231808,0.0014874338,0.03303317,0.013306836,0.008327859,0.006271962,0.0011683406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018309018,0.000022592476,0.0004479584,0.000099710815,0.000014721463,0.00012108004,0.0038221788,0.0007820785,0.0002605582,0.9803249,0.0008531956,0.013232826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021251752,0.000013715733,0.0002006441,0.0000898845,0.0000062651284,0.00021888551,0.00092368317,0.0014030272,0.0004391078,0.9808998,0.015772147,0.000011703617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046176405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039692354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017026465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031922127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032862052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09004563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877232","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8183","title":"The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Sun Yat-sen University","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Analogical reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Analogy; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.058694777136298205,"score_gpt":0.28215423052417177,"score_spread":0.22345945338787357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08186772,0.002138843,0.5967746,0.03672646,0.0007898219,0.0002573082,0.00021028728,0.00043480739,0.28080022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428789,0.00047542792,0.04783265,0.0020250017,0.00050942966,0.00020917402,0.00008039742,0.00009959895,0.005889464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830936,0.006580854,0.0010727003,0.003110673,0.005378858,0.00076330936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624759,0.021984097,0.0021296593,0.009078137,0.003479894,0.0008522424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018630099,0.00057980703,0.0014731257,0.0030147387,0.0029923609,0.0059475554,0.0035782582,0.004504553,0.0074875616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04237692,0.0008086652,0.0019647689,0.001670103,0.027176505,0.01717729,0.008550476,0.010077411,0.0008578692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007172745,0.000004655063,0.000072525596,0.000018158133,0.000006727833,0.000020983825,0.00021369806,0.00008618305,0.00008060155,0.9972995,0.00019773586,0.0019919723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015077549,0.000008182329,0.00006993277,0.000014167762,0.0000074604122,0.00006292566,0.00008762504,0.0005051702,0.00014136995,0.9963064,0.002777177,0.000004386708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055034296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038208003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018630099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037278417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002256126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0985266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877337","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8291","title":"Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Rhetoric; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01573705692344187,"score_gpt":0.23785975874726245,"score_spread":0.22212270182382057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098403394,0.007538186,0.07363821,0.026879795,0.0008853109,0.000073938085,0.00008473583,0.00008587084,0.79241055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822589,0.0009240575,0.004742746,0.0022000063,0.0006202817,0.00007022123,0.000029955998,0.000044915145,0.00910902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98918205,0.0072713615,0.00041172263,0.0006501362,0.0018914243,0.00059321255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900827,0.0076950863,0.0005707739,0.0007612823,0.0006943858,0.0001958915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074337856,0.00059739454,0.00069654424,0.0024564548,0.0054437807,0.008968719,0.0008343263,0.004206005,0.0050706514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01738788,0.00032172626,0.00053050724,0.0015895019,0.024614971,0.010547379,0.0059124054,0.0046045077,0.00057568785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006553301,0.0000042137285,0.00003086288,0.000016821547,0.0000020898676,0.00004432944,0.0026256563,0.00015547266,0.00006033572,0.99511343,0.00039399907,0.0015461168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014165106,0.000006148487,0.00010054124,0.00009021411,0.0000032810383,0.00003301842,0.0007374959,0.00037741463,0.000113937065,0.9869926,0.011525924,0.0000052226133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096293975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088905735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008968719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044592684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017937953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03931409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877419","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8543","title":"Books Received","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06401105708715357,"score_gpt":0.2722651369713352,"score_spread":0.20825407988418163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008572715,0.048407096,0.0004106169,0.0029475035,0.0028127555,0.000041289462,0.00984,0.00022680723,0.9344565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001774016,0.007836128,0.0002194811,0.00016085153,0.000100985424,0.000012960325,0.002019881,0.000121046556,0.98775464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00003095616,0.000029869043,0.000098663826,0.00015918256,0.000054073265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995969,0.00005462929,0.000028816345,0.00006262813,0.00016648263,0.00009060883],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033982832,0.0011974067,0.0013145405,0.0021429893,0.0014647096,0.0041426676,0.0011126,0.0014267103,0.6031578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010593518,0.0009011221,0.00053642056,0.0051674005,0.0007632268,0.0030880151,0.0015119258,0.0015042817,0.39232305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057080277,0.000025765343,0.00022528604,0.0004059572,0.000010049366,0.00004511629,0.00016195393,0.00016063722,0.00018064836,0.01429409,0.8372929,0.14714059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005228543,0.000004723325,0.00049257977,0.00018820065,0.0000027990434,0.000021946122,0.00005931017,0.000015504507,0.000031385236,0.0010892764,0.9980861,0.0000030579256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023281666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08155845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39684218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019213853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020110128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5660472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8222","title":"What Makes an Argument Strong?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09379951201748599,"score_gpt":0.3052495666163226,"score_spread":0.2114500545988366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03326727,0.008474185,0.045758896,0.30662566,0.01088016,0.00023462863,0.00024313132,0.00028191225,0.59423417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90011567,0.005259423,0.029844219,0.024644874,0.006955245,0.0003166108,0.0003092423,0.00033317157,0.032221653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754098,0.012420134,0.0012582649,0.0032186615,0.0061518024,0.0015413439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95036674,0.03192464,0.0041841757,0.0027579255,0.008278722,0.002487855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020709418,0.0010700633,0.0014388579,0.0033270372,0.004537249,0.0131175,0.0017597986,0.008610702,0.013983672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056022245,0.0006553771,0.0012269989,0.0014126806,0.014235568,0.014720948,0.0043318826,0.0051811673,0.0061827595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013572173,0.00007690491,0.002109897,0.0007931356,0.00022187586,0.0011097741,0.0075509734,0.00021090591,0.0014419691,0.93485475,0.02355822,0.027935874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007174012,0.00006321969,0.0014570451,0.0012612421,0.00018348102,0.0006228395,0.007862418,0.0007422264,0.0012952585,0.7884036,0.19798581,0.000051041203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007237911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013294163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020709418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034944091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003992151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10952312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411912","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8435","title":"When Meaning Becomes Controversial","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03581477241618921,"score_gpt":0.3314471516409262,"score_spread":0.295632379224737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21640112,0.0034785958,0.049651425,0.055368196,0.0020053084,0.00028467763,0.00014821101,0.00016889466,0.6724936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756844,0.0004907579,0.004951774,0.0017832236,0.00034646367,0.00012273513,0.00006826244,0.00015883696,0.0045095533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654547,0.020353623,0.0015312042,0.002499547,0.0078045884,0.0023563693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95720416,0.029416954,0.0038213981,0.002633235,0.006021118,0.0009031663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02347768,0.0009284569,0.0009922737,0.0059431503,0.010309463,0.02202149,0.0017413724,0.0071663265,0.008828429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05987925,0.00055920886,0.000898773,0.0049453736,0.04502641,0.028501587,0.011320877,0.007962741,0.0009610343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006758124,0.00001675964,0.0012837655,0.0001534007,0.000019571482,0.00058782834,0.07477031,0.000118626966,0.000567825,0.91006017,0.0024786312,0.009875622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025877192,0.00004085522,0.0018455863,0.0005723612,0.000037347683,0.00044392672,0.09310886,0.00085144606,0.0014180491,0.81799847,0.08361055,0.000046725585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015024208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012649659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02347768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00871821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003699415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12416327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411947","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8358","title":"Sincere and Insincere Arguing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Sinc function; Epistemology; Philosophy; Humanities; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.020198225657455753,"score_gpt":0.250128040746507,"score_spread":0.22992981508905128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29745215,0.0024727997,0.17293498,0.017008238,0.0005505777,0.0002364618,0.00012733926,0.00022320684,0.50899416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789771,0.0002052373,0.012379459,0.0007077038,0.00012004013,0.00008074553,0.000047703834,0.00005644957,0.0074255825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96181744,0.024263034,0.002158185,0.004243361,0.005722121,0.0017959167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9372973,0.03864946,0.0074127717,0.008588168,0.0056500086,0.0024023207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018020147,0.00066653173,0.0009930993,0.0023534456,0.0036492778,0.011276127,0.0017500394,0.0052882596,0.007838934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0369581,0.00062643865,0.0009699168,0.00121441,0.02458221,0.012325415,0.007277762,0.0063532824,0.00095356215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048715763,0.000025335377,0.001351523,0.000060785274,0.000014670209,0.00014634806,0.0052651255,0.00021209815,0.00067324284,0.9876792,0.0005821235,0.0039409245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060267917,0.000086903245,0.0037559497,0.0004526185,0.000055673318,0.00090702274,0.008822666,0.0045275865,0.0033221208,0.9408517,0.037085373,0.000072221286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008055254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095015677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018020147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002922709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019632436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09530079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411952","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8372","title":"Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.2364615027996044,"score_gpt":0.49278444667138294,"score_spread":0.25632294387177856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411952","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15880209,0.0032553973,0.5356301,0.006573995,0.00036593596,0.00059977133,0.00008791584,0.00057947263,0.29410538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9342152,0.00045015552,0.058140177,0.00025405787,0.00015886896,0.00033721427,0.000045213612,0.000107140564,0.006291856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93933076,0.042155407,0.00212254,0.003131653,0.011822788,0.0014368974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91855246,0.05925124,0.007993301,0.0059654256,0.0070005376,0.0012370029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024834368,0.0011069587,0.0010111588,0.0060104085,0.0020383825,0.010143096,0.0012540102,0.00246289,0.0072144694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078969054,0.00045518854,0.0008682535,0.0027325372,0.014495315,0.009388798,0.004813006,0.0026835063,0.0008216696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011501289,0.00009053433,0.0033152266,0.00039853062,0.00007765243,0.0001607367,0.008570524,0.002738127,0.0018684982,0.9048015,0.0010252023,0.07683852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064912936,0.00024566296,0.004035848,0.00034886572,0.000055979217,0.00033209048,0.0036971206,0.011214308,0.003656603,0.95462644,0.021650147,0.00007199564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005793568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006239827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024834368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004037552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028989536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13133824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411958","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8203","title":"As Syllable from Sound","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Musicology and Musical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sound (geography); Syllable; Linguistics; Communication; Psychology; Philosophy; Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.03475992338407406,"score_gpt":0.2521766635056418,"score_spread":0.2174167401215677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033955187,0.0023298166,0.06848879,0.0022519785,0.007922819,0.0002590021,0.0040768962,0.0037981716,0.87691724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63427633,0.0019845665,0.060337175,0.0014545677,0.0017586426,0.0002780684,0.0075652674,0.004442241,0.28790307],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993136,0.00015932854,0.000063637846,0.00017134177,0.00022493966,0.00006719254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901843,0.0003293459,0.00005371371,0.00024417468,0.00028334532,0.0000709602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005136646,0.00056708,0.00043993184,0.0012540246,0.0011720507,0.0052169696,0.0008299988,0.00090797007,0.10534321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003029302,0.00023662894,0.00027255475,0.0011231434,0.0010271696,0.0032409222,0.0023720507,0.0012904401,0.028534038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053153763,0.00006611529,0.0022312857,0.0009872349,0.000038850274,0.0010469662,0.0058581415,0.0004509258,0.014921673,0.42607683,0.10597594,0.44181448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005245538,0.00015683314,0.0039311345,0.00027833573,0.000032967542,0.0012688017,0.0016565601,0.0024833027,0.007125751,0.048248872,0.9347101,0.000054888424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083440106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013618272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10534321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006305772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000596183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3524081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411984","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8397","title":"Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.34861245878554586,"score_gpt":0.5253473424824049,"score_spread":0.17673488369685902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07261708,0.012877289,0.14550446,0.27777985,0.010966288,0.00067146803,0.00020509292,0.0007923281,0.4785862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8164818,0.0042402665,0.0781424,0.019190501,0.0019820402,0.00048941735,0.00023051028,0.00073839445,0.07850464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783165,0.015524355,0.0007697535,0.0008239754,0.0038418514,0.0007236735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570434,0.02800828,0.001840508,0.0019192969,0.009656691,0.0015318504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025321836,0.0006067236,0.000633455,0.0012741952,0.0037223503,0.011935716,0.0012652436,0.004434799,0.017174471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08581251,0.00026018347,0.0004889421,0.0011101791,0.009257721,0.014306444,0.0039157276,0.0049447445,0.0038913111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081733987,0.0002343409,0.002833388,0.0009834848,0.00007629398,0.00046496975,0.016505422,0.0010418812,0.0020588015,0.6174418,0.13306713,0.22447518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011772642,0.0002788151,0.002348161,0.0033836358,0.000077971155,0.0002657853,0.019747734,0.0039482107,0.0036032924,0.50103354,0.46510348,0.00009172461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001525726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020276343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025321836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036100976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035645121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13391632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412173","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8439","title":"An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09367545566890999,"score_gpt":0.39802073070968996,"score_spread":0.30434527504077996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98566645,0.0001865316,0.0028142272,0.00024205788,0.000119823,0.00034501424,0.000033490825,0.000036054636,0.010556277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897085,0.00013104404,0.0066570635,0.00019415468,0.00004377912,0.0005032081,0.000037714093,0.000039900668,0.0026845448],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949884,0.0031823367,0.00034393038,0.0005596627,0.00070857524,0.00021704164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95280176,0.041274708,0.0023077754,0.0013662324,0.0015956674,0.0006539295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006380671,0.0008187231,0.0005943131,0.0004081604,0.0012422304,0.0027588883,0.0010075652,0.0020772873,0.011538364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03511396,0.00055973977,0.0003903474,0.00032783393,0.0023343528,0.0023542966,0.0015295343,0.0023155469,0.000940947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019733096,0.029350512,0.019266723,0.005825112,0.0003094393,0.0041600335,0.25295556,0.0014529813,0.5295739,0.046654094,0.0039073844,0.08681116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012589481,0.12334434,0.11667674,0.0026420963,0.00093795196,0.006699645,0.14351265,0.032430593,0.40626034,0.05111664,0.10301287,0.00077669014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012529426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014486513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011538364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054628635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043354512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03859967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412201","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8753","title":"Books Recieved","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0739256988437811,"score_gpt":0.2824477417592249,"score_spread":0.2085220429154438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006338338,0.084284715,0.0016899155,0.011483669,0.020069147,0.000062174004,0.00282394,0.00034789022,0.87860465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016258062,0.014153735,0.0008596082,0.0020262585,0.0014159007,0.00003104819,0.0009895911,0.00018906673,0.9787089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915016,0.00008986746,0.000041714327,0.00014066778,0.0005230111,0.00005460686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.00016649242,0.000047417587,0.00011523798,0.00048505064,0.000073335126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004646303,0.00081503426,0.0010995064,0.0043986444,0.0018376671,0.0074377307,0.001313889,0.0019341349,0.32983187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022232102,0.0004813273,0.00058898784,0.00829665,0.00213241,0.00388102,0.0017496394,0.0035776566,0.20158295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030000612,0.00002070987,0.00006274713,0.00049544306,0.0000075605567,0.00005702304,0.00018645285,0.000085734326,0.00030843937,0.0387597,0.8626367,0.09734945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028177012,0.0000030656527,0.00010363975,0.00021343352,0.0000022658492,0.0000390848,0.000057091387,0.000017606639,0.000055808872,0.0030458672,0.9964563,0.0000029842995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008959509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019664144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67016816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030124292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027160316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9559135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412254","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8679","title":"In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.04555304093188029,"score_gpt":0.3168111429615405,"score_spread":0.2712581020296602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412254","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013407228,0.010153241,0.0003747363,0.43245646,0.54039615,0.000018756407,0.00027854304,0.00012431675,0.016063813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071889358,0.013379559,0.00074211153,0.3174667,0.3922096,0.00009440245,0.00047620496,0.00040086143,0.26804167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751306,0.0003931197,0.00017847966,0.0005721517,0.0011554265,0.00018775227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881882,0.0028311803,0.00053563603,0.00039806796,0.0065845437,0.0014624466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031119285,0.0011798447,0.0012900463,0.001157181,0.0042791935,0.0059163836,0.0016989745,0.0041194335,0.03202035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02417906,0.0004492726,0.0008478868,0.00072290737,0.00165771,0.004623199,0.002560699,0.01667786,0.028966906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007269429,0.000002579106,0.000014732076,0.000012436047,0.0000016574518,0.000020829837,0.000034044933,0.0000046786636,0.000014895813,0.0006829889,0.9973953,0.0018086364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005203769,0.0000048059987,0.00014324389,0.00009187021,0.000004257989,0.00008719242,0.000108375265,0.00002458123,0.000051897416,0.0011919695,0.99828005,0.0000064149417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007384914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015531072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03202035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003507518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003466491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107118785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942364","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8927","title":"Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Sense (electronics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.033534224480549164,"score_gpt":0.2699586995053394,"score_spread":0.23642447502479025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47767347,0.0038745569,0.03485286,0.08555667,0.0005353457,0.000119948,0.000092001974,0.000108618624,0.39718658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970848,0.00018772627,0.00051990186,0.0008769906,0.00004127426,0.000019976866,0.000008153686,0.000016294725,0.0012448917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662261,0.023535455,0.0007402552,0.0025522574,0.0046174135,0.0023284068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802105,0.011541954,0.002816444,0.0025945606,0.0014702223,0.0013663048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018865395,0.0005095318,0.00070910726,0.0024500662,0.010381454,0.01417066,0.0014454899,0.0049735233,0.0028412677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029003074,0.00032434496,0.00074061536,0.0019343586,0.10229617,0.020172106,0.013938195,0.00666001,0.00031713123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003785396,0.000016245049,0.0021079874,0.000069771515,0.00001728027,0.0005088073,0.28729376,0.00038078858,0.00032565265,0.70225465,0.0017515131,0.0052357316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022376391,0.000040062863,0.0025195733,0.00021251886,0.000014395998,0.00044597875,0.26850086,0.00088852027,0.00019752381,0.6621497,0.064938106,0.00007030648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005525181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037883269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018865395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007933794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004959317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0997709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942375","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.9053","title":"Books Received 09-27-2024","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0551802868686144,"score_gpt":0.21934408862917093,"score_spread":0.16416380176055653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034721123,0.0047630244,0.00044409986,0.0012787118,0.0030691705,0.00003969995,0.002171534,0.00020175704,0.98768485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007224891,0.00096121366,0.00026968817,0.0002081893,0.00018726541,0.000010389648,0.0005302383,0.000079091595,0.99703133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998066,0.000017475095,0.000010316552,0.000053224747,0.000092266135,0.000020126508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999589,0.00011954741,0.00001626385,0.00004719373,0.00015413944,0.00007384323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025032036,0.00074263377,0.000766207,0.0014683477,0.0009161129,0.0043457933,0.0008913433,0.0013191955,0.76642656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010470314,0.0004349664,0.00057284243,0.0022322098,0.0007203484,0.0022108404,0.0011359422,0.001707279,0.550348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006813981,0.000040821607,0.00013344309,0.00036091724,0.000010039491,0.00008602433,0.00009760391,0.00013152117,0.00052998326,0.034855228,0.79671276,0.16697355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010242973,0.000010496033,0.00025491256,0.00012772124,0.0000025841005,0.00005166629,0.000035075107,0.000035245244,0.00006778522,0.0029063679,0.9964945,0.0000033518427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019548945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050475644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23357344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009899362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065517944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33316416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942392","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8910","title":"Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Islam; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011592724968840487,"score_gpt":0.22690195509286784,"score_spread":0.21530923012402736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033926483,0.026496254,0.17582627,0.03545077,0.000870545,0.00013950921,0.0003378801,0.00015204372,0.72680014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8943184,0.008852953,0.06390262,0.0023584538,0.0014373591,0.00021277452,0.00018025402,0.00004298518,0.028694294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983109,0.0008538858,0.00009067609,0.00014367615,0.0004990221,0.00010187232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881905,0.0007307752,0.00013043101,0.000106737,0.00014611831,0.00006693702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028424908,0.0003664538,0.0005476995,0.0015663847,0.002138545,0.0040454273,0.0009612138,0.0023038643,0.0037156949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025560376,0.0003542374,0.0006337098,0.0014430804,0.010677285,0.003032609,0.0018262706,0.003081513,0.00073763664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015401555,0.0000038367402,0.000023092873,0.000011519902,0.0000019474885,0.000029112307,0.00017154694,0.0006361503,0.00002125748,0.99721044,0.00054804585,0.0013414433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003667172,0.0000021750618,0.00005626087,0.000030259365,0.0000015387063,0.000018868337,0.00005400595,0.0022288763,0.00001905639,0.9899436,0.007638474,0.0000032230391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041072075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023346527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041072075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038011253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018993781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027579188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942414","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8818","title":"On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17396522314448498,"score_gpt":0.3165458129415229,"score_spread":0.14258058979703792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016679006,0.015296586,0.16963667,0.2072042,0.0016898311,0.00013530714,0.00011776155,0.00025447426,0.5889862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8798554,0.0039385883,0.07092676,0.012393739,0.001117897,0.0006569095,0.00012075544,0.00039805067,0.03059196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89303964,0.09419482,0.0017654885,0.0032038167,0.0060075917,0.0017886221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9189289,0.06321674,0.0031943696,0.008968332,0.0042849197,0.00140671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036830932,0.0011413678,0.0011668113,0.0039455453,0.013968064,0.021886447,0.0041111144,0.0128785,0.0068890867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059516624,0.0009148189,0.0014522529,0.0026787212,0.10094144,0.027157847,0.010148986,0.014171899,0.002097607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037212003,0.000003197948,0.00003490629,0.000025204476,0.0000025810045,0.000062217994,0.0034672325,0.000091086855,0.000014459061,0.99407876,0.0014399312,0.0007767717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009996654,0.0000042901443,0.0000349511,0.00015634073,0.0000031270486,0.00013697788,0.0025554562,0.0005015716,0.00007049363,0.9302606,0.066257134,0.000008984303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001805823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015835576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036830932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045206915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19478291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8693","title":"Particularism About Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; University of Windsor","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06390580805537117,"score_gpt":0.2839270534649076,"score_spread":0.22002124540953644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031600215,0.010015664,0.44623163,0.031200107,0.0011434748,0.0001423406,0.00028145485,0.0003791404,0.4790059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001228,0.0032817468,0.066431105,0.0046838555,0.0011599697,0.00029195307,0.00028088983,0.000293484,0.023454182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765546,0.0067689596,0.0006409507,0.0024335983,0.0015984506,0.0009026415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885245,0.007064119,0.0008388701,0.0021462338,0.0010130146,0.0004132711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011375928,0.00080676336,0.0010817832,0.0028702945,0.0038119652,0.008696089,0.001881328,0.0047642644,0.0091852145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016155124,0.00087108265,0.002468772,0.001639592,0.026344601,0.019719975,0.0075444705,0.007876912,0.0012756943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032473242,0.0000015331054,0.000058045687,0.00002496109,0.0000059549184,0.000021637714,0.00055813044,0.000107202795,0.000047730326,0.99767286,0.0003119055,0.001186766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004844279,0.000003910212,0.00006625896,0.000032382362,0.000006324949,0.000056251156,0.0001761078,0.00028533695,0.00006413965,0.98171073,0.0175898,0.000003979455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001207835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010127892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011375928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053860205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014376431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060162425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942460","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8953","title":"Does argumentation change minds?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048873403938159955,"score_gpt":0.29312572928256125,"score_spread":0.2442523253444013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3209793,0.0058167535,0.06875336,0.19032605,0.0019221315,0.00014653217,0.0006570703,0.00039302176,0.41100577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823523,0.00079708034,0.0061151846,0.0047123507,0.00023198771,0.000055108743,0.0001112826,0.00004489539,0.00557974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671006,0.0014170583,0.00013109276,0.0009544395,0.00046533503,0.00032212812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057263,0.0044740494,0.0017818065,0.0013611919,0.0010930633,0.0007172426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038551146,0.00032680135,0.00031699703,0.0011005994,0.0012200489,0.0038777203,0.0008208722,0.0032581326,0.01132779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016582971,0.00030929584,0.0006700213,0.00055181346,0.011013883,0.011731458,0.0021382459,0.002502431,0.0019115473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001930958,0.00015651697,0.016743165,0.00041425496,0.00013742843,0.000585989,0.02035924,0.0006803246,0.0027135978,0.88416004,0.010688729,0.06316766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006620791,0.0000989512,0.015049199,0.00015812523,0.000049588947,0.00066580606,0.0044583706,0.0009717919,0.00085258775,0.9320551,0.04552041,0.00005384041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008483059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004849304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01132779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012720822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007128365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037895262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156224","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8461","title":"What are Deep Disagreements?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024826827953520782,"score_gpt":0.2865627252349799,"score_spread":0.26173589728145913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22716796,0.011093266,0.10251297,0.16626532,0.0016649173,0.00017615463,0.00043442176,0.00018744195,0.4904975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879382,0.001031265,0.003007024,0.0029477228,0.00033113165,0.000057348832,0.00010102018,0.00005718194,0.004529138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95055383,0.029960202,0.0022106315,0.005290557,0.009025043,0.0029596388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91335166,0.05998292,0.007926807,0.0074558873,0.007961282,0.003321457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033523582,0.0006115734,0.0012606082,0.0045024687,0.010977423,0.019226354,0.002790282,0.008176572,0.010823445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09233853,0.0005787266,0.0009277252,0.0055623315,0.044869315,0.032542016,0.012376163,0.010294508,0.0012681499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044226043,0.000019213143,0.0016148259,0.00009086268,0.000022288421,0.00013978865,0.01968001,0.00025422772,0.00008648277,0.9628458,0.0029445533,0.012257821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104013425,0.000010578458,0.00075995305,0.00018245274,0.000010617754,0.00009871051,0.014018579,0.00070259237,0.0001286932,0.96276885,0.021290196,0.00001845273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002556332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018240798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033523582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075473273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048110313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17729175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156227","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8144","title":"Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03107694154317952,"score_gpt":0.33240874835997897,"score_spread":0.30133180681679944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156227","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07914328,0.0012595431,0.62321925,0.035432417,0.0022512148,0.00028205273,0.00037148144,0.0023352194,0.25570557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863739,0.00034623337,0.10731694,0.0042704707,0.00050416286,0.0002160792,0.00022626061,0.0007829443,0.022597987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98659384,0.0061664847,0.00093378616,0.001958701,0.0031904313,0.0011567177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810255,0.012683401,0.0009837005,0.0021887526,0.0025891021,0.0005296372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010669878,0.0010831115,0.0008959967,0.0029363546,0.003728309,0.0076045194,0.0025591054,0.004116778,0.016881404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039322197,0.0011209132,0.0016458483,0.001185517,0.013351951,0.015215349,0.0090949675,0.0071604424,0.0026067263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007742493,0.000037917074,0.0009087584,0.0001181222,0.000019779398,0.00034802646,0.0021603107,0.00038608952,0.00067619287,0.9746037,0.005630638,0.015033037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003816354,0.00004100192,0.00054581714,0.00021965979,0.000039072624,0.00083481777,0.0012705165,0.007427233,0.002862928,0.9310088,0.055653475,0.000058525107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002476565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022830649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016881404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045301733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003127745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05647391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156245","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8380","title":"On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0414757071857795,"score_gpt":0.28457642547190787,"score_spread":0.24310071828612836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018800909,0.0082362555,0.3348056,0.07904909,0.002126555,0.0002168269,0.00009404722,0.00024939943,0.5564213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065391,0.0026893376,0.065976486,0.0069741537,0.0020167117,0.00028957333,0.000079200436,0.00017208367,0.015263243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719295,0.019391043,0.00074797304,0.0012919817,0.0059109526,0.000728414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566697,0.029867271,0.0021988023,0.0026819268,0.0075229346,0.0010593805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028366176,0.0007740721,0.00088116445,0.006329312,0.0030524533,0.011674097,0.0022212807,0.0042995084,0.007976577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033479102,0.0004952722,0.0011460263,0.0020177355,0.035703883,0.011198404,0.005817626,0.007377284,0.0015299189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012531983,0.000009611849,0.00011574003,0.00007622501,0.000009061345,0.000034102064,0.000884361,0.0002706081,0.00005796963,0.992168,0.0018266893,0.004535141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014630309,0.0000137112,0.00015249553,0.00015671598,0.000007343901,0.000049504506,0.00037252606,0.0015978605,0.000104494255,0.982044,0.015475569,0.000011143534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074395345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009419041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028366176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057118325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003376163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15001649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156260","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8801","title":"Arguing About Arguing with Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019011983806611624,"score_gpt":0.2596107137166605,"score_spread":0.24059872991004888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03596884,0.013896189,0.21735221,0.18607618,0.0038760796,0.00022135284,0.00041777827,0.0006675951,0.5415239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005422,0.0046882867,0.04103999,0.01595584,0.002398669,0.0003823409,0.0003805145,0.00043919962,0.03417298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9514408,0.038592227,0.0015597778,0.0027800503,0.0040995404,0.0015276242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93437517,0.051555544,0.0034758863,0.004888112,0.004229897,0.0014753663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042320997,0.0010551558,0.0013674977,0.004205947,0.0072980816,0.017518887,0.0033956955,0.0098166,0.018138966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058319755,0.0007870729,0.0019104787,0.003753689,0.035524264,0.026400672,0.008897375,0.010308149,0.0030190255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018326975,0.000006352773,0.000117142,0.00008222186,0.000015085685,0.00011057198,0.0032092826,0.00016644203,0.00004606153,0.98992354,0.004541697,0.0017632411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003556916,0.000010176253,0.00010344095,0.00038177884,0.000021000018,0.000105486266,0.0023371526,0.0010444437,0.00019051757,0.9377816,0.057973087,0.000015821559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013743816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010080544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042320997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009412336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003972083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22381747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156262","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8792","title":"Reply to Yu and Zenker","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.023583852229091345,"score_gpt":0.2514466061326709,"score_spread":0.22786275390357955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156262","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052280625,0.0013557653,0.0003742899,0.9867704,0.008682485,0.0000035127393,0.0000314227,0.000024155614,0.0022352375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029051404,0.001707839,0.00060648733,0.94384366,0.01518135,0.00005396806,0.00003866285,0.00010050189,0.009416161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937868,0.0024224904,0.00047067506,0.0014873082,0.001394025,0.00043876554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96563864,0.023969693,0.0008370496,0.0020426188,0.0063516283,0.0011603736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009961085,0.00073335343,0.001618364,0.0011994416,0.0048029306,0.0068791504,0.003462739,0.03719533,0.008483887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064764164,0.000703203,0.00087444024,0.0019208888,0.012391047,0.013493528,0.00525296,0.05937914,0.0052736867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006411107,0.000019619813,0.00026951774,0.0000718826,0.000017492208,0.00016889744,0.0013620103,0.00011465584,0.00012630367,0.077636726,0.9132841,0.006864602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007840243,0.000033938657,0.00097437046,0.0005252636,0.00003953259,0.00052226114,0.003902179,0.0011337138,0.00073404144,0.22957899,0.7623226,0.00015469105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003980071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025565543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03719533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004819273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046317093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052679896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156265","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8517","title":"How do Explanations Justify?","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CHIST-ERA; Université de Fribourg; European Commission; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; University of Windsor","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04783395880562871,"score_gpt":0.2836011714613252,"score_spread":0.23576721265569647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156265","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031778205,0.00842332,0.54071546,0.11942121,0.0018750416,0.0002957794,0.0012930608,0.0008258925,0.29537216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8535,0.0027769664,0.11851672,0.0049700574,0.00088984234,0.00026696365,0.0010858544,0.00034764723,0.017645847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98895335,0.0064308913,0.0005969189,0.00182589,0.0016538276,0.0005391222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764766,0.014839921,0.0015488487,0.0044200975,0.0023827676,0.00033162886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014464544,0.0008698609,0.0008279825,0.0032846718,0.002593624,0.0076602725,0.0024576962,0.005762694,0.021966856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035635266,0.00065044506,0.0014253454,0.0018298492,0.0148754455,0.01969432,0.005063519,0.0038720348,0.0027793585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147536275,0.000006960791,0.000400513,0.00007914333,0.000027996133,0.000060918097,0.00085567404,0.0005113546,0.00006706463,0.988116,0.0020641282,0.00779549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012736594,0.0000046549503,0.00020599307,0.00012567318,0.000016025804,0.000049036436,0.00042340904,0.0014425729,0.00018759335,0.9740639,0.023459313,0.000009076497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002719023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002362137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021966856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038378485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031831162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07649672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156267","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.9092","title":"John Hayden Woods 1937-2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03212151766116144,"score_gpt":0.27883212678205926,"score_spread":0.24671060912089782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156267","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012572892,0.157316,0.0014804531,0.36987957,0.35463807,0.000022558115,0.00017684576,0.00006133447,0.115167834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0640298,0.0697433,0.0016323925,0.18632518,0.17003122,0.00007316991,0.00014014066,0.00023750095,0.5077874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992009,0.00023368883,0.00005902907,0.00020373354,0.00022684029,0.00007580451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873465,0.00052867376,0.00013432483,0.000059637157,0.00039643876,0.00014626085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017272384,0.0007906537,0.00051840255,0.0013367783,0.0038140337,0.0047067525,0.0007932372,0.0037693263,0.012421135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057008397,0.00028890403,0.000323205,0.0012062518,0.0063410844,0.0068170973,0.00257056,0.0065863486,0.005756133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003608696,0.000010006757,0.00014847131,0.000104712264,0.000007682332,0.00020427367,0.0010372375,0.00004615223,0.00008064451,0.16380069,0.8183532,0.016170967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000406781,0.000004652018,0.00011903313,0.000137598,0.0000030592093,0.0001178341,0.00027785252,0.000018688082,0.000058434052,0.019918794,0.97933334,0.0000065274958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009371106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01797982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012421135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00449371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026828975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04155284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156292","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8796","title":"Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Syllogism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22231192981234524,"score_gpt":0.3777761772163022,"score_spread":0.15546424740395695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156292","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059729493,0.00926857,0.044622004,0.14410059,0.6335704,0.0005580581,0.010294752,0.0038063931,0.14780627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21766591,0.023387078,0.082660295,0.15016146,0.11312104,0.003396158,0.022454366,0.016320752,0.37083292],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98725325,0.002984098,0.0018394015,0.0013334478,0.0059854863,0.0006044049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043539,0.051444195,0.005535154,0.009078206,0.028473845,0.0011146419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068965023,0.0013947324,0.0009845181,0.0042336774,0.0047169654,0.0048184837,0.0032656575,0.003921214,0.046642173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096923776,0.0007534649,0.0012209057,0.0076648993,0.0046564424,0.005742278,0.0028455714,0.007996217,0.027538776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014026057,0.00003617502,0.00062922924,0.000489926,0.000012253051,0.00023479528,0.00060446234,0.00016379476,0.00022544365,0.026029045,0.93726605,0.034168467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005492533,0.00002588886,0.0013928921,0.0009051106,0.00002533827,0.0005864393,0.0015384115,0.0006945087,0.0012693887,0.017202983,0.97625035,0.000053720367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007756285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008765956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046642173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032371907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040959204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15603364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156312","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.9383","title":"Books Recieved 44(4)","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04153723754773881,"score_gpt":0.22320368897805976,"score_spread":0.18166645143032095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048387508,0.019864526,0.00079017674,0.005740514,0.0068573975,0.00005804142,0.0029542889,0.00026289135,0.96298826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010295747,0.0035145667,0.0003529825,0.0009630822,0.00052404683,0.000027356493,0.00068701216,0.00013157603,0.99276966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928194,0.00007350092,0.00003884946,0.00011153089,0.0004285466,0.00006567232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.00010975001,0.00003235966,0.000078989535,0.00029433775,0.000050334987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006436936,0.0008462476,0.0008415864,0.004235047,0.0016571641,0.0062921704,0.0011256132,0.0027511376,0.43555322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017371988,0.0005718074,0.00060938887,0.0060122265,0.0015986178,0.0030678178,0.0019333002,0.003280377,0.25764638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025526379,0.000023520173,0.00007997792,0.00030363147,0.0000053273707,0.000040513532,0.00016590914,0.000093871866,0.00027115337,0.049263977,0.8601519,0.08957472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025200752,0.000003025302,0.0001413796,0.00011806233,0.0000016293594,0.00001994332,0.000028199063,0.000017666107,0.000047707224,0.002101169,0.9975163,0.000002470885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014359986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029171316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5644468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033476478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003260019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8051148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199466","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8470","title":"Navigating Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029202585259906697,"score_gpt":0.39599365388925867,"score_spread":0.36679106862935196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199466","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036295343,0.0057691857,0.50398743,0.050300088,0.0011339933,0.00042019016,0.00029897902,0.001288751,0.40050605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70381886,0.00208647,0.24734052,0.0028407574,0.0003742333,0.00043531967,0.00043092133,0.0004175133,0.042255454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826172,0.012648932,0.0007239386,0.0015988618,0.0018779704,0.00053310086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836373,0.0117015,0.00085314794,0.0017896015,0.0013354577,0.0006829814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013320578,0.0010916507,0.00088440574,0.0031450999,0.005174531,0.014402573,0.0028244576,0.0067063402,0.021306653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030056795,0.0005555551,0.0011831687,0.0022738846,0.011636207,0.020220852,0.015886221,0.0047015776,0.0035848015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020927,0.000032459524,0.00042483897,0.00022200089,0.000020212072,0.00025675748,0.009666548,0.0016702655,0.0003908168,0.93056005,0.007603184,0.049112566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025786614,0.000028714147,0.000116370524,0.0003974753,0.000012740659,0.00019983186,0.0038863323,0.0062667006,0.0004994434,0.8401671,0.14837871,0.000020818667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011695403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014723865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021306653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004273959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039520385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07127792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199508","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.7770","title":"The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Politics; Environmental ethics; Appeal to emotion; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Appeal","score_opus":0.03522881107665079,"score_gpt":0.25265459931139106,"score_spread":0.21742578823474026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7171841,0.0008879,0.017419955,0.0068600113,0.0002504302,0.00006901295,0.000050681127,0.00006986795,0.25720802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822134,0.00006253574,0.0004932532,0.00018162557,0.000048552312,0.000019974916,0.0000065965205,0.000011684691,0.00095440197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916679,0.0057860045,0.00021323758,0.00059380656,0.0012131798,0.00052586896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97335285,0.019214278,0.00355578,0.00092169724,0.002000779,0.0009545436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063452707,0.00019141853,0.00023127349,0.0016053008,0.0022991695,0.0069031813,0.00050077867,0.0020476591,0.006441025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029115846,0.00028195124,0.0004002414,0.0009093085,0.009548764,0.0053892913,0.0048968336,0.0025025238,0.0003433802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061088265,0.00046684235,0.045327958,0.0008054398,0.000093886614,0.0015466021,0.20616874,0.0016835319,0.010285171,0.6648664,0.0023591581,0.065785445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596572,0.00035212675,0.22794163,0.0007010033,0.00017123228,0.0010529234,0.17052026,0.0077775805,0.005116195,0.5251152,0.060879603,0.00021262822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006301894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000542522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069031813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021171474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007043466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033557415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199576","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8965","title":"A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06285409852933448,"score_gpt":0.3136111732143724,"score_spread":0.2507570746850379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06500171,0.0021798422,0.41460758,0.07679272,0.0019190644,0.0002588366,0.00023114926,0.0004243669,0.43858466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602583,0.0003653361,0.027358314,0.0024242064,0.00057769153,0.0002579212,0.000069679474,0.00013728825,0.008551234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661478,0.018322967,0.0014969526,0.004495273,0.0080550555,0.0014821003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90622413,0.0693848,0.0053881835,0.009069944,0.008117005,0.0018158737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027456421,0.0008396812,0.0012502862,0.0050039934,0.0052157473,0.014583024,0.0034024038,0.009398723,0.013191718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08624153,0.0006799699,0.0016803072,0.0022324102,0.033802804,0.019366417,0.01288859,0.009360696,0.0014843711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095474925,0.0000045077313,0.00010309925,0.000024495434,0.000004599822,0.000025624351,0.00084043335,0.00006923843,0.000058717855,0.9967996,0.0003986747,0.0016613133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026530546,0.000011011029,0.00008757014,0.00014419259,0.000010460208,0.00006875445,0.0009933023,0.0010596806,0.00021564522,0.98049796,0.016875282,0.000009629523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001261881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010595835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027456421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005839089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036129018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14520514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199582","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8749","title":"The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Argument map; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.0160509934446083,"score_gpt":0.24785405747640302,"score_spread":0.2318030640317947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028791277,0.002740297,0.876822,0.0103010805,0.00046188675,0.00034377645,0.00016029959,0.00019194957,0.08018735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62550175,0.00132835,0.3659893,0.0007773503,0.00021635497,0.00047927757,0.00019994758,0.000088075874,0.005419565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734543,0.019206213,0.001353551,0.0015472329,0.0040348377,0.0004038913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95882857,0.026795216,0.0032079138,0.0052265353,0.0052141165,0.0007277792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023651993,0.0010332351,0.0007457194,0.008161412,0.0023664257,0.0081871785,0.0038307637,0.004634056,0.006365202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037731003,0.0006675899,0.0016482453,0.0046497993,0.017271511,0.019542629,0.0055925446,0.004576696,0.0011659658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020930966,0.000016351718,0.00046500686,0.00012647932,0.000019961424,0.000039458955,0.0018530965,0.0008452509,0.00031440755,0.9847366,0.00044786793,0.011114609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047475838,0.000043345306,0.00046063217,0.00028893026,0.000046096196,0.00021821584,0.00093735533,0.010148793,0.0008304124,0.9645189,0.022435445,0.000024433131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089229806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010819404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023651993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059173484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030539946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12508518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199590","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8444","title":"Frustrated and Aware","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Tartu Ülikool","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04706731336458759,"score_gpt":0.2870231179197723,"score_spread":0.23995580455518473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51660293,0.0052126646,0.057029907,0.07008242,0.0012730645,0.00011211475,0.00016534618,0.00018331193,0.34933826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917698,0.00032453687,0.0010922818,0.0025249731,0.0001078538,0.000020803871,0.0000283949,0.000033167125,0.004098237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617315,0.008144874,0.0005392407,0.0014349984,0.0025216516,0.0011859842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831572,0.007805544,0.003708537,0.0016997468,0.0022723728,0.0013565464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006935836,0.00044983742,0.00055590656,0.00096056424,0.004184252,0.008267859,0.0009041969,0.0027548058,0.005178769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029203316,0.00029713553,0.00048680423,0.0006608567,0.016082006,0.008556567,0.006628256,0.004843968,0.00081301364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003053349,0.00010928818,0.01667207,0.0004620398,0.00013527709,0.0016418119,0.4071143,0.0006868463,0.0048887026,0.5129039,0.010807138,0.04427324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006715833,0.0002116063,0.01647732,0.0007080198,0.0001625882,0.0020191085,0.2594047,0.002994837,0.0030225287,0.47063988,0.24407314,0.00021918523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017089191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010021329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008267859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035864522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015706306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03668064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199621","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.9504","title":"Review of Review Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue By Marcin Lewiński and Mark Aakhus","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03155316931440281,"score_gpt":0.31410902907078464,"score_spread":0.2825558597563818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199621","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016010045,0.98822045,0.0005096629,0.008572528,0.0014426331,0.000007531312,0.000010061443,0.0000049817263,0.0010720898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008450318,0.9813426,0.001090731,0.0035423974,0.0046171644,0.00005465661,0.000048115573,0.000020612391,0.0008333996],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850669,0.008395827,0.0020345787,0.001056322,0.0031406924,0.00030578126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9007497,0.072628014,0.005682663,0.0017574914,0.017954368,0.0012277415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016675865,0.00072939455,0.0022134874,0.009263181,0.0014054219,0.0059728487,0.0016307335,0.004017484,0.0026474863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05281519,0.0008876151,0.0007849258,0.010289647,0.0034312948,0.006896702,0.0021998682,0.0035139034,0.0014738159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021088605,0.00006616582,0.0005118399,0.047719784,0.00035759725,0.0002681262,0.0029626142,0.00071678933,0.0005889078,0.045908295,0.20411026,0.6965788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027449265,0.00007087835,0.0018602848,0.034981444,0.0001832133,0.00051034015,0.00080982485,0.0002632044,0.00022438515,0.009572105,0.9514396,0.00005721398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047038095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005754787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016675865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042111687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009416525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08819145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199669","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.9665","title":"Books Received 45(1)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042572053095130014,"score_gpt":0.21607863216454062,"score_spread":0.1735065790694106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006612951,0.011587045,0.00033284904,0.0012367374,0.0051429346,0.000065642074,0.0035523388,0.00049511215,0.976926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070905685,0.0030434907,0.0001898233,0.00033120863,0.00038415127,0.000015612584,0.0011614942,0.00018644815,0.99397874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994155,0.000034845496,0.000028107766,0.00010515829,0.00033927226,0.000077110046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993286,0.00009014328,0.00004180052,0.00009035639,0.00031758167,0.0001314753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003514455,0.0010182114,0.0017566542,0.0043888097,0.0015048992,0.0066401283,0.0011042999,0.0013278946,0.76956195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015404469,0.00066274893,0.0008440659,0.007863196,0.0007104598,0.003038748,0.002064618,0.0020027033,0.72236454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028600894,0.000031049974,0.000114331044,0.00047310395,0.000007910758,0.00005337254,0.000059457958,0.00011217958,0.00031560182,0.006850315,0.86432165,0.1276325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043003333,0.000007780765,0.00032470308,0.00019879788,0.0000035111452,0.000040319315,0.000024483114,0.000018145232,0.000052230593,0.00074120075,0.9985812,0.0000033038777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038182375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008113692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76956195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015376154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001360593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3286919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199671","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8416","title":"Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0385041081269105,"score_gpt":0.2797476144594394,"score_spread":0.24124350633252892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15731308,0.019519625,0.09694208,0.102135,0.0014766555,0.00024176486,0.00020589826,0.00016640313,0.6219995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98025423,0.0017854443,0.0067923013,0.0013593966,0.00027864662,0.00013519677,0.00007517675,0.000025193547,0.009294353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728205,0.021949967,0.00079338084,0.0014246467,0.0022105325,0.00080103683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593775,0.032543465,0.0026375307,0.0017392901,0.002494862,0.0012073411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018631564,0.0007099001,0.00082112016,0.0030433596,0.0056081563,0.0105581125,0.0017747579,0.0066228015,0.007519846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036650468,0.00032527887,0.0006669626,0.0027084155,0.021267641,0.009998319,0.008274199,0.0045383414,0.00078109215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054118645,0.00003614091,0.00072122214,0.0001859496,0.000029165547,0.0002941349,0.009700733,0.0017395866,0.000124339,0.9732194,0.0028218832,0.011073283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000334385,0.000017109296,0.00042977568,0.00022099486,0.000012281713,0.00011373996,0.0034806917,0.0024582588,0.00010939026,0.9697813,0.023328086,0.000014983858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014384626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010097639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018631564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006155544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034644722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098534286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750737","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.8593","title":"It’s A Two-Way Street","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.01933834813605539,"score_gpt":0.31272819182085565,"score_spread":0.29338984368480026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028363522,0.0016492633,0.00875121,0.117942825,0.0039829,0.00011332265,0.0002698474,0.00023265074,0.8386946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46219152,0.0014220416,0.005350585,0.024657212,0.0012232448,0.00014454352,0.00021014798,0.0004949504,0.5043057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833506,0.00059342675,0.000053035325,0.00032837104,0.00030093986,0.00038908876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881244,0.00017717974,0.00010767526,0.00023813963,0.00024486624,0.0004196751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001416071,0.0003503469,0.00042124992,0.0007278537,0.014393256,0.0092566535,0.0006424963,0.0031532566,0.043266583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004123849,0.00025405054,0.0005267971,0.0008004267,0.01061349,0.008231176,0.004612761,0.0058401185,0.007937439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055988374,0.000051792034,0.0013748178,0.000060996143,0.000021147498,0.0008225759,0.023924917,0.00013509982,0.00057787815,0.7995772,0.14788285,0.025514808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010058986,0.000022342965,0.0005509999,0.000094228024,0.0000063613716,0.00019706308,0.008775679,0.00009263093,0.000101690835,0.0378338,0.95230186,0.000013241759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009006982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012294392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043266583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032052305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030092187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14474118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750739","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.9636","title":"Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11482985345442225,"score_gpt":0.30106749596354343,"score_spread":0.18623764250912117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750739","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06591208,0.014807398,0.4063687,0.12070399,0.0016486672,0.00024157898,0.00022883112,0.00043432115,0.38965446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92514104,0.0019724718,0.055377316,0.005315191,0.00085508596,0.00037494334,0.00009150815,0.0003879587,0.010484509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95661676,0.030324811,0.0017739035,0.0038063882,0.005549259,0.0019288844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90668714,0.071154,0.0069518634,0.010215011,0.0030788898,0.0019130647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037431464,0.0012663146,0.0015051428,0.005254398,0.007087638,0.016173968,0.0026575525,0.011818131,0.0069550066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066160195,0.0011519069,0.0016133278,0.003831992,0.05469407,0.036256775,0.011383465,0.012606363,0.0010945325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008569628,0.000004842279,0.00014962292,0.00003185276,0.0000076890365,0.000068852634,0.0015695735,0.000051244773,0.000046684356,0.9965193,0.00046906492,0.0010726942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010691509,0.000007346828,0.00009155539,0.000115196286,0.000010548703,0.00013710328,0.0011973324,0.0004372377,0.00019830829,0.9828712,0.014913695,0.0000097284465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054953207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061416544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037431464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058393436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025151705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19795889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750743","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.8854","title":"Arabic Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Arabic; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029694870514522503,"score_gpt":0.3685523488012284,"score_spread":0.33885747828670587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056362316,0.0065546785,0.0674308,0.007128504,0.0014592954,0.00045188694,0.002941445,0.00092543615,0.8567457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7451349,0.0045113903,0.07618466,0.0015823024,0.0006465418,0.0005304313,0.0034341002,0.0006233085,0.16735238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980414,0.00097530335,0.0001638792,0.00023115124,0.0004918906,0.00009645803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965629,0.001527308,0.00036574344,0.00032929174,0.001096229,0.000118413605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001911199,0.0007105051,0.00030397563,0.0026816435,0.003102207,0.003876643,0.00046868803,0.000903257,0.03402246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008502492,0.00015307206,0.0003023928,0.0024901845,0.0015280837,0.0030806048,0.0020435709,0.0009212133,0.009521348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028292788,0.000057657482,0.0023777094,0.0015973677,0.000032204043,0.00085736177,0.029355722,0.00095615786,0.004634394,0.5040336,0.07431179,0.38150316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011286815,0.000019021514,0.0016730108,0.00041410376,0.000010685713,0.00059705175,0.0055546933,0.0015968961,0.001872032,0.032565903,0.9556647,0.000020588335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011466908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016847333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03402246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016642618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001132891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11381644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111857","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10212","title":"Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyās in Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Legitimacy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Predictability; Deductive reasoning; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03242866915232561,"score_gpt":0.24886990138787293,"score_spread":0.21644123223554732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05715557,0.002918526,0.19024287,0.032322038,0.0005406428,0.00012969377,0.00011982308,0.00025584473,0.7163151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95898455,0.0005912333,0.023085773,0.0012283383,0.0002717341,0.00010004627,0.00003105822,0.000054533935,0.015652625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671715,0.0015176871,0.0001232595,0.00058612775,0.0008366941,0.00021903748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976376,0.0012156488,0.00022430366,0.00051909965,0.00029959952,0.00010380992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00508685,0.00039027596,0.0006101679,0.0018946426,0.0033725712,0.0048553157,0.0012530646,0.0034005046,0.0077422536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081382,0.00037689504,0.00088498316,0.0009212181,0.028154613,0.008938141,0.004026142,0.0038029694,0.0008624578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020205684,0.0000018472277,0.000031339878,0.000004994921,0.0000013426709,0.000012946674,0.00019939913,0.00008267894,0.00002013408,0.99891114,0.00014239925,0.0005896445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007092801,0.0000035351204,0.000053387965,0.000010825642,0.0000018602589,0.000023211374,0.00009991151,0.0006023438,0.000043674627,0.9945597,0.004591625,0.0000027115334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019693025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014186058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077422536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035590355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019557795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026902199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111942","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10167","title":"International Law and Argumentation: Navigating Constraints and Seeking New Orientations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; International law; Scholarship; Sources of international law; Public international law; Soft law","score_opus":0.015486014821811465,"score_gpt":0.2667830553625765,"score_spread":0.25129704054076507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13522865,0.0064815986,0.36075193,0.10198374,0.0005893801,0.00035840902,0.00014072498,0.000261227,0.39420432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.918344,0.00142192,0.073133804,0.0018661824,0.00019905128,0.00038632684,0.00010170356,0.00017465472,0.0043724063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93907124,0.047449198,0.0028051706,0.003658862,0.004656808,0.002358726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91681784,0.063428506,0.005379064,0.005707907,0.0056296997,0.003037046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048252437,0.0010011314,0.0017783688,0.008200505,0.0123921335,0.0357022,0.0039150226,0.008598548,0.005184991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08532924,0.0011773743,0.0013516827,0.006461169,0.07385565,0.057263806,0.021200242,0.0092256265,0.0007189802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001026237,0.0000121296325,0.000544051,0.00005271516,0.0000067510414,0.00009314087,0.02448428,0.00018161675,0.00006251406,0.9660288,0.0005593209,0.007964361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016322756,0.000007124359,0.00017413315,0.0002032649,0.0000097939765,0.000066206165,0.018363481,0.000996188,0.00012096571,0.961974,0.01805265,0.000015884416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046877055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004885093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048252437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010574111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011356916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25518632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111966","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10360","title":"Introduction to the special issue on selected papers from the 2nd International Conference on Debate & Dialogue (ICDD2) 2025","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; International law; International studies","score_opus":0.03341519826680071,"score_gpt":0.29608231987989425,"score_spread":0.2626671216130935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111966","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005287852,0.07060964,0.0037669495,0.1024317,0.5600885,0.00041063497,0.0041652774,0.00051506853,0.25748354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005064415,0.036664452,0.0024200864,0.024332546,0.32334983,0.00043913323,0.0061716703,0.0010385663,0.60051924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995619,0.0008019252,0.00034972563,0.00054052594,0.0023548931,0.0003339426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888636,0.0036401246,0.0007450034,0.0004982494,0.004768597,0.0014844124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367287,0.001356522,0.001434217,0.005717194,0.002326983,0.01054925,0.0013589633,0.003374381,0.26028863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117457295,0.00042719446,0.0014369929,0.003589159,0.0013288681,0.0043646586,0.0031327175,0.004475955,0.11116464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012324082,0.0000073872984,0.000017448894,0.00013076255,0.000002723995,0.00001268091,0.000027612177,0.000012712743,0.00007567457,0.0012715976,0.98752975,0.010899223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005564766,0.000007307956,0.0001645389,0.00022899956,0.0000033422095,0.000020648087,0.000037838425,0.000015337171,0.000035545534,0.0008780506,0.9985979,0.0000049728633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022270647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003919142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26028863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046063527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039811432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8707522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414112182","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10209","title":"Sound Tactics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Ethos; Appeal; Sound (geography); Rhetoric; Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.0687244502704354,"score_gpt":0.28511190596203584,"score_spread":0.21638745569160045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414112182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00791531,0.0018730676,0.14467914,0.0040498567,0.0014120676,0.00046580142,0.00041101757,0.0013097761,0.837884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.380834,0.0026039667,0.12670654,0.003967263,0.00087060395,0.0007094389,0.0009702185,0.001798789,0.4815392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991975,0.0023514584,0.000679171,0.0014200564,0.002759808,0.00081460504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142075,0.003944276,0.0005540077,0.001859216,0.0017678746,0.00045384633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050447844,0.0014324541,0.0008493367,0.0032597077,0.0031015761,0.007520067,0.0022275331,0.0039634653,0.06647277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017616747,0.0006674274,0.0012641732,0.0018991305,0.0051234644,0.008952065,0.0064690495,0.003661864,0.023998681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008032505,0.000051102183,0.00041475001,0.00026726624,0.000030549858,0.00030166842,0.0027229234,0.00026601437,0.0016920412,0.90533954,0.01892523,0.069908634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005020983,0.00010860321,0.00036365085,0.00042453263,0.000068879766,0.0006979942,0.0019731694,0.0018397592,0.003519246,0.3847052,0.6062045,0.00004432752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008826753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013935972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06647277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021787186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018931807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22237355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414150982","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.9900","title":"Virtuous Argumentation and Unendorsed Claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Faith; Function (biology); Virtuous circle and vicious circle","score_opus":0.010125270121212532,"score_gpt":0.2357595170268332,"score_spread":0.22563424690562067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414150982","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25033823,0.0048606102,0.37596408,0.053786553,0.00060881226,0.00019521818,0.0000874446,0.00020870334,0.3139504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829206,0.00037829965,0.012328367,0.00057737384,0.00012156758,0.000054260283,0.00001994387,0.000019831947,0.0035797106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643508,0.02458128,0.0017125701,0.002320048,0.0051958608,0.0018395022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9117662,0.06488765,0.007331478,0.008743609,0.004890738,0.0023803571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039716814,0.0005535263,0.0007819083,0.0029026554,0.0055346554,0.011818922,0.002402181,0.0061846403,0.0040103863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06317516,0.0005058417,0.0010825642,0.0015426376,0.039286897,0.015610076,0.010051059,0.0057466626,0.00052405335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012908897,0.000009190394,0.0001585929,0.000016294705,0.0000059382255,0.0000687081,0.0016090452,0.0002931217,0.00006103529,0.9961046,0.00012460035,0.0015360559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009730327,0.0000056116455,0.000058137168,0.000034080804,0.0000037171233,0.000036000893,0.00048730746,0.0009364939,0.00009391345,0.99575305,0.0025774555,0.0000046264586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007660803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006442171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039716814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034766179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027212894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2100451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414151109","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10211","title":"Civility: One or Many?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Civility; Argumentative; Virtue; Politics; Islam; Dual (grammatical number); Indignation","score_opus":0.06647658840215365,"score_gpt":0.36825007968327966,"score_spread":0.301773491281126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414151109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09830537,0.020578872,0.11550193,0.19031511,0.0034686655,0.00011189971,0.000074136675,0.00028073453,0.57136333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97300243,0.0025284903,0.010422308,0.0041382536,0.0007308556,0.000066730885,0.000032322972,0.000076341086,0.009002233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864695,0.009403262,0.00045878955,0.0011715653,0.0015988813,0.0008981015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98348504,0.009200483,0.0016544601,0.0020933591,0.0016567535,0.0019098517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014781469,0.00062520127,0.00087209826,0.0021765903,0.00736926,0.015533145,0.001383668,0.0040873536,0.0063790055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01864592,0.00032287207,0.0005277291,0.0016858404,0.044989895,0.029294029,0.01105351,0.0068038125,0.0012742353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014115022,0.000016736989,0.0008929323,0.00010635791,0.000011761554,0.0001328635,0.016722422,0.000045600667,0.00012941023,0.96278375,0.001983522,0.017160527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008788289,0.000020176734,0.0004902951,0.00033962564,0.000016697582,0.0004153318,0.033604104,0.0003035432,0.00022296252,0.8659393,0.09861641,0.000022847586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004178197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007287619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015533145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024663317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030324806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07817286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414151137","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10214","title":"Munazara and (non-)Authoritarian Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Operationalization; Normative; Argumentative; Toolbox; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.006152138736075241,"score_gpt":0.23654655328800342,"score_spread":0.2303944145519282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414151137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07910816,0.0028043876,0.56521064,0.025468646,0.00063468685,0.00017022964,0.00006302217,0.00025915419,0.32628107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460122,0.00036115025,0.04193864,0.0013314579,0.00030366963,0.00019016105,0.000026459637,0.000052122912,0.009784144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97383267,0.016828643,0.0010854924,0.0029986384,0.0042410335,0.001013654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506,0.033129185,0.0047674836,0.006079332,0.004459717,0.00096426334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01873369,0.00051756663,0.00086089043,0.0027385328,0.0041785003,0.008803633,0.0018870619,0.00455353,0.0035967764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03913929,0.00039872873,0.0010303863,0.0013418109,0.02332065,0.009752637,0.0052698855,0.004522668,0.0006999129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007423206,0.000010932019,0.00016706747,0.0000246543,0.0000047305703,0.00002169709,0.0013241282,0.00026457786,0.00008601652,0.99385285,0.00020887717,0.0040271273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009101536,0.000011854576,0.00023718449,0.000070692564,0.000007946696,0.000055579003,0.00047001822,0.0020588166,0.00030506455,0.98643976,0.010322223,0.000011646905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070477027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008210787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01873369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029182963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025119989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09907442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116658788","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.8117","title":"Towards a Taxonomy of Bullshit Illocutionary Acts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Taxonomy (biology); Relation (database); Extension (predicate logic)","score_opus":0.05359472916059444,"score_gpt":0.3235030738721588,"score_spread":0.2699083447115644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116658788","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09720912,0.008270429,0.50923693,0.030744422,0.0006016087,0.00087748695,0.0005172362,0.0004758037,0.352067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8437066,0.0028512757,0.14024906,0.0016900984,0.00021297044,0.00086624734,0.00039359427,0.00015256861,0.009877568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922322,0.004377048,0.0005260842,0.00083673885,0.0014312948,0.0005965304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98905843,0.0054639615,0.0015542845,0.0015604257,0.0016474702,0.00071540015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007890047,0.0012229547,0.0008265069,0.009415889,0.0057576555,0.010321784,0.0023709622,0.004542033,0.00428075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009872591,0.00067182153,0.0012608748,0.0048132506,0.03394761,0.020224502,0.0069032563,0.0065198946,0.0007295085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063405428,0.000011843637,0.0010741693,0.00004644017,0.0000037702212,0.00007438648,0.013649351,0.00019111345,0.00012513199,0.9800672,0.0004757301,0.004274538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009972168,0.000022207067,0.0013634356,0.00016788473,0.000008766909,0.000275802,0.015138498,0.0019468316,0.00018775072,0.93558764,0.04526654,0.000024653078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051990906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003911153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010321784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062774327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004191429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045546114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116674201","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.8900","title":"Mind The Gap","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission","keywords":"Fallacy; Dialectic; Meaning (existential); Production (economics); Speech act; Joint (building)","score_opus":0.057907360268195,"score_gpt":0.3592419178911173,"score_spread":0.3013345576229223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116674201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014829698,0.03794303,0.020880226,0.5293207,0.011528139,0.000055715253,0.0002213969,0.00018074516,0.38504043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74726343,0.025640782,0.01242405,0.14684574,0.007912276,0.0002724197,0.00029235007,0.00051585754,0.05883317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924704,0.0044153766,0.00026146258,0.0011236485,0.0010775859,0.0006515179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567283,0.009518382,0.00049886695,0.0015741385,0.0013374583,0.0013983465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007865598,0.0007181998,0.0008701016,0.0014814043,0.0064498526,0.012426366,0.0020805083,0.008136071,0.025452383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018226761,0.00029424034,0.00050034944,0.0010509689,0.0290095,0.021436606,0.0118811345,0.011497083,0.00482181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003254195,0.00002475647,0.00017277371,0.00019557244,0.000009396694,0.0001287539,0.014974803,0.000057893914,0.00016328663,0.9264632,0.030252466,0.027524633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000745366,0.000017546941,0.00017197899,0.000587953,0.0000048505317,0.00024586785,0.01366252,0.00006788793,0.00011007693,0.5221522,0.46296394,0.000007698916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016536342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001380195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025452383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005510727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006485058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085146666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116704647","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.10952","title":"Books Received 45(4)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04267923370030138,"score_gpt":0.21627344216964534,"score_spread":0.17359420846934395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116704647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005621261,0.006014464,0.00037047762,0.0016549812,0.0040398133,0.000030756135,0.0019694837,0.00026753583,0.9850904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00088264234,0.0015492341,0.00014326617,0.00030884022,0.0005237746,0.000012021697,0.0005836027,0.00012976132,0.9958668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995203,0.000045490026,0.0000280141,0.00010432501,0.00023121797,0.00007065483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992724,0.00018084682,0.000036242734,0.00013066344,0.00026473092,0.0001152072],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049653766,0.0010539824,0.0013709905,0.00406549,0.0016292684,0.005875409,0.0011692814,0.001548256,0.7867407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017713291,0.00064766826,0.0008171923,0.0063589257,0.0010735246,0.0027780002,0.0020261325,0.001977267,0.6809244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003724226,0.0000268162,0.00014453495,0.00029413874,0.000008290082,0.000051244893,0.000089876376,0.0001423882,0.00031212298,0.023313921,0.8359827,0.13959678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005354666,0.000006447384,0.00026986856,0.00010398319,0.0000034028244,0.000034128658,0.000025083356,0.000027509848,0.000048983224,0.0018620478,0.9976107,0.0000024065432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036273163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009378678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21325928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018330292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012491286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30418843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116746772","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9704","title":"Paley’s Principle:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Miracle; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.04450280406767941,"score_gpt":0.2860722504427748,"score_spread":0.24156944637509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116746772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011116333,0.0055818846,0.24392147,0.13521686,0.003934777,0.00036840892,0.00032962387,0.00021904663,0.59931165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73287517,0.0032377576,0.12094544,0.045868907,0.006080066,0.002056911,0.00028260602,0.00042375101,0.08822941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709863,0.0130690755,0.0012678504,0.006565511,0.0066049006,0.0015064507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712901,0.017828912,0.0015849976,0.0050021065,0.0035515283,0.0007423302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025328508,0.0009546657,0.0015084178,0.0032041003,0.008482243,0.009196505,0.003330122,0.012656307,0.010499915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062398236,0.0012323421,0.0022067544,0.0017192813,0.052868508,0.021310631,0.0129278395,0.016802324,0.0030945644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013811567,0.000004744947,0.00009565502,0.000036234676,0.000009088028,0.000058682344,0.0009366499,0.000085379455,0.00003929682,0.99245113,0.0032211978,0.0030480765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014188974,0.0000071509858,0.00006922059,0.000072368704,0.0000068744916,0.000091481044,0.00016491498,0.00020971477,0.00009460765,0.9655583,0.033701427,0.00000979289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022947819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017920545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025328508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004267341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054520667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13395154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116762133","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9435","title":"Two-Tier Fallacy Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Łódzki","keywords":"Fallacy; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Conflation; Categorization; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.04602294356571903,"score_gpt":0.2884172560950775,"score_spread":0.24239431252935847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116762133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013981999,0.0010030771,0.8439627,0.0066567115,0.0003030144,0.0005794645,0.00023885732,0.00061210245,0.13266206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57014805,0.0007105215,0.408025,0.0020011463,0.00030356259,0.0014714156,0.00038724937,0.00038443555,0.016568573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96479225,0.015817905,0.0028715015,0.0042005307,0.010716079,0.0016018325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97187805,0.01512968,0.001542565,0.005476472,0.005098306,0.0008749813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026212052,0.0012843166,0.001931368,0.008864876,0.0059709856,0.013985889,0.004611428,0.006348221,0.009965545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040020935,0.0011304531,0.0027978562,0.004630061,0.026492724,0.019413901,0.007699759,0.0070295036,0.0023465892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007877,0.000007825539,0.0001251611,0.00003002182,0.000005609983,0.000020239793,0.00069461204,0.00015355648,0.00006580209,0.99518,0.00037643666,0.00333285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070039696,0.000007520256,0.000086098924,0.000043930013,0.00000689683,0.000052054573,0.0002308814,0.0016729406,0.000109423214,0.9922619,0.005512802,0.000008484977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022277632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016605707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026212052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067960764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042522727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13862425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116795568","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.8373","title":"Introducing Susan Stebbing as a Forerunner of Informal Logic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02664419431136384,"score_gpt":0.23588541942547792,"score_spread":0.20924122511411408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116795568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031870525,0.101443194,0.04766337,0.5117826,0.010644849,0.00006217487,0.00010127198,0.00022727229,0.29620484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74419194,0.042814717,0.02693212,0.054150213,0.0077584293,0.00015180613,0.00008143168,0.00037740736,0.12354192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573886,0.0027245826,0.000120742036,0.0004468634,0.0007047366,0.00026426843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132544,0.006595993,0.00038310644,0.00025733895,0.00097355916,0.0004645568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047899815,0.00051105424,0.00034139608,0.0024743336,0.0062776227,0.009282442,0.0007160655,0.0039631096,0.0023363202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009649187,0.0003628003,0.000365463,0.0015519637,0.028721593,0.010143234,0.003335824,0.0073545864,0.00085777644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026190815,0.000012960436,0.00035648275,0.00006294929,0.0000043013806,0.00020638447,0.022844048,0.00016153452,0.00016450921,0.9347406,0.027676119,0.013744002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008937496,0.000015798121,0.0002685897,0.00045677795,0.0000049953605,0.00025528556,0.0063158628,0.00033246362,0.00030153472,0.5023814,0.48962948,0.000028837885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013769109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009282442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006058573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043282174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043958247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116797904","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9675","title":"Generalizations in Analogical Argument","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Generalization; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Analogy","score_opus":0.02233805115545924,"score_gpt":0.27490957766954843,"score_spread":0.2525715265140892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116797904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030516673,0.005019027,0.82002634,0.009547907,0.00044269377,0.00025442903,0.00015016283,0.0002550118,0.13378777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534134,0.0014204833,0.13796122,0.0017373001,0.00056282745,0.0004363446,0.00012948971,0.00008436863,0.004254512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855694,0.009107423,0.0007077526,0.0017712193,0.0022291087,0.00061505684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793871,0.014403883,0.0015038413,0.002883876,0.0013721945,0.00044914114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01747878,0.00085172587,0.0010203443,0.005382829,0.0037238717,0.00566505,0.0026559404,0.003588561,0.0081871245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028460454,0.0006289959,0.0021725376,0.0030039786,0.021833938,0.021707715,0.0065305536,0.0054992614,0.0005985664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036117203,0.000003357961,0.00007222587,0.000020537058,0.0000052516857,0.000025152018,0.00035351803,0.00055178517,0.00002827025,0.99641114,0.00013037681,0.0023947242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033990002,0.0000043620557,0.000051873194,0.000020565796,0.000002652405,0.000028433113,0.00007705576,0.0010194157,0.000026980508,0.9962063,0.0025554367,0.0000035057692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016671458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008793318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01747878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005355612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017001989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092437744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W826680751","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2590","title":"Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue Between Parties With Different Values","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Argument (complex analysis); Extension (predicate logic); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055834946570033905,"score_gpt":0.24975881962673982,"score_spread":0.19392387305670591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W826680751","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10634196,0.0010261523,0.8294976,0.004290836,0.0002028763,0.00039703943,0.00020655712,0.0002729759,0.05776401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7847187,0.00031965884,0.20676252,0.00028215713,0.00007204196,0.0004933501,0.00016035822,0.00006539221,0.0071259583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989266,0.0077126734,0.00032422613,0.0007094309,0.0007455288,0.0006153887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808791,0.016155675,0.0009223345,0.0006564652,0.0006155931,0.00077077094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009277143,0.0010303147,0.00088310015,0.001764884,0.0038544335,0.008285676,0.00303194,0.00729793,0.005493913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637628,0.0008653381,0.00181977,0.0014920193,0.007565976,0.0075410716,0.005524749,0.002762058,0.00062925916],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015162227,0.000081300546,0.0012593499,0.000111138135,0.00005048518,0.00085374067,0.00974955,0.11180302,0.0006642626,0.86236364,0.000795421,0.012116358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011254147,0.00006886151,0.00031889166,0.000077229946,0.000038663635,0.00022545687,0.0021975623,0.49239218,0.00043491155,0.49077478,0.013309643,0.000049218128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00840385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005616086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009277143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035543442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023977456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049062848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829009663","doi":"","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Immortality; Argument map; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.2514490582201403,"score_gpt":0.3188525034603191,"score_spread":0.06740344524017883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829009663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12523901,0.013003197,0.3107003,0.073894024,0.0016840349,0.000108778775,0.00006484225,0.00023320947,0.47507256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833167,0.0011016745,0.009052766,0.00131415,0.0004209569,0.000077157776,0.000018099925,0.00008140677,0.004617024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96777433,0.025138818,0.0010354662,0.0011954793,0.0034443496,0.0014116156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94187224,0.046376754,0.0022944333,0.0047294586,0.0035680886,0.0011590053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029413663,0.000575289,0.0011470628,0.00465797,0.007586139,0.015322145,0.0020066728,0.006088082,0.0030092432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05129781,0.000628633,0.000985817,0.0023924308,0.06315618,0.033730254,0.013538643,0.0072312197,0.0005583849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009188764,0.000004212286,0.00009209156,0.000029267518,0.0000030252759,0.00005867378,0.008164828,0.00012580345,0.00006556942,0.98867524,0.00021155855,0.0025605108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010919236,0.000011814573,0.000072865296,0.00008825408,0.000006040765,0.00008026426,0.0030348776,0.00048277245,0.00013871968,0.9834805,0.012583082,0.000009760236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011164773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008986789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029413663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004395547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003991863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15555614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890289651","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2573","title":"How to Improve the Convergent Argument Calculation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bowling Green State University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Generalization; Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Calculus (dental); Philosophy","score_opus":0.02560010876327356,"score_gpt":0.24582755050342756,"score_spread":0.220227441740154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890289651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041331733,0.00012569051,0.9878649,0.00045281433,0.00017524211,0.00012106666,0.00006150779,0.000687823,0.0063777906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08233841,0.00020645373,0.9126972,0.00018759395,0.00014541551,0.00041318103,0.0001513535,0.0008232523,0.0030370997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787623,0.010034981,0.0014910008,0.0021166066,0.007093424,0.0005016686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436905,0.027251653,0.0023168842,0.010276872,0.015706146,0.0007580664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019765045,0.0015860308,0.0024115487,0.005616744,0.0019121824,0.0060999985,0.0041638315,0.0027224284,0.01315452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1396439,0.000752518,0.0026385314,0.0031605675,0.0036435747,0.011007033,0.005780526,0.005113261,0.0063702916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013616384,0.00010318749,0.0015710449,0.00032239282,0.00011141098,0.00020727175,0.00051270804,0.012813651,0.0030275753,0.77774525,0.0053917933,0.19805746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006967532,0.000111429974,0.00078470976,0.00017848554,0.00007456423,0.000340535,0.00016241038,0.19430189,0.007691143,0.7786489,0.017544745,0.000091549016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013415439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095804397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019765045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019039097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027258561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104528844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W997711300","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3833","title":"Reason in the Balance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0743684308359901,"score_gpt":0.26310020116898947,"score_spread":0.18873177033299937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W997711300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011821957,0.5939715,0.0072288276,0.06467012,0.00963868,0.000025553578,0.0001784505,0.00014444417,0.32296014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086180255,0.4336926,0.0061687124,0.026364047,0.019262291,0.00014263461,0.000556983,0.00043974462,0.42719272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840516,0.000566492,0.000074455864,0.00023984065,0.00059131795,0.00012273507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983157,0.00094296044,0.00009232389,0.000111176574,0.0004229265,0.0001149304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018871741,0.0007238235,0.0009127873,0.002259359,0.001817463,0.006817007,0.0008300652,0.00277344,0.025985723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004516063,0.00037186532,0.0005404866,0.0022933902,0.0077930144,0.009925625,0.0019683554,0.0034852321,0.009113551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028897537,0.0000169174,0.00009611966,0.0005475208,0.000016160748,0.00003939247,0.00062878337,0.0003552501,0.00011501879,0.5129787,0.3732081,0.1119692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005545858,0.0000060781967,0.00010989542,0.00055828906,0.0000053043846,0.00004903904,0.00021979136,0.000066740686,0.000044328484,0.12388801,0.87503976,0.0000071972718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041322075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005423946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025985723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005194999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08693087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}