{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab1775ad0da3","filters":{"venue":"Informal Logic"},"cohort_total":546,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":546,"exported":546,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab1775ad0da3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Informal+Logic"},"results":[{"id":"W1480704407","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.484","title":"Refuting a Standpoint by Appealing to Its Outcomes: Reductio ad Absurdum vs. Argument from Consequences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Proposition; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05017340762988765,"score_gpt":0.27161539873544205,"score_spread":0.2214419911055544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480704407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8787468,0.00032565003,0.11333915,0.0024137963,0.0013876371,0.00054085103,0.000036241006,0.0003079626,0.0029018824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98763347,0.000035765563,0.010383753,0.0012787252,0.00006512014,0.000026257205,0.000014251898,0.0000056115523,0.00055705116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829566,0.00004252477,0.0005563877,0.00030662405,0.00043015197,0.00036863424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912655,0.00005992843,0.00024185139,0.00033252308,0.00008515357,0.00015398317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003741408,0.00017933613,0.0002495387,0.00009107919,0.00029344697,0.00012293772,0.0004888786,0.00007293687,0.00004212045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008757378,0.0001416409,0.00007135962,0.00020921548,0.000035862296,0.000780993,0.00016680073,0.00012170313,0.00032613933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007784551,0.0015777474,0.13162796,0.00078079035,0.0012766594,0.0011697856,0.2471063,0.045186736,0.22389649,0.105871536,0.11846418,0.12226337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009394124,0.0031232927,0.20127086,0.001394516,0.00008606156,0.00084194896,0.005879512,0.16422583,0.21017712,0.0031485977,0.39396328,0.006494854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003697018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016545822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27549908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009767828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007701422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5775949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480769715","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3398","title":"Critical Thinking and Informal Logic: Neuropsychological Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inference; Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Informal logic; Neuropsychology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Critical thinking; Cog; Computer science; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07553556736473438,"score_gpt":0.35941881060869474,"score_spread":0.28388324324396036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480769715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14554532,0.00014654352,0.0008962439,0.0048294426,0.00062963687,0.00017295139,0.0000017101381,0.0002711774,0.847507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812914,0.00014774436,0.00983621,0.007871507,0.00016643076,0.000015612348,0.0000018221052,0.000005533832,0.0006637434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984828,0.00009894298,0.00028805019,0.00020575395,0.00039754552,0.00052686984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991768,0.00019496406,0.000043695574,0.00012536383,0.00018776907,0.0002714265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008389931,0.00014330147,0.00015229278,0.00007930397,0.0009914108,0.00018729003,0.00031442268,0.00016918169,0.0019185044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001449937,0.000113622205,0.00005529332,0.00019189277,0.001017884,0.00077893754,0.00013139042,0.0003379463,0.00022650132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026495401,0.00007754222,0.0033766658,0.0000062502104,0.000004452385,0.000011779668,0.10488132,1.4229855e-7,0.0000017493979,0.88543034,0.00014706719,0.00603623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039857236,0.00042019127,0.43400228,0.000034063927,0.000020708483,0.00005639488,0.12702382,0.000016960872,0.000021377873,0.36376485,0.07365673,0.00058403827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000951044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026931064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84684324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028866365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012577363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481842717","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2990","title":"Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Advice (programming); Action (physics); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03376758596611559,"score_gpt":0.35899716338040316,"score_spread":0.3252295774142876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481842717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61459804,0.000003573981,0.00015818438,0.011856103,0.0005743399,0.0007861615,0.000041854015,0.00021012596,0.37177163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810118,0.0000039426186,0.0032059937,0.006654793,0.00027584957,0.00016014549,0.000013630039,0.000010862112,0.008662967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981278,0.000029812598,0.00039704973,0.0002683989,0.00051480293,0.0006621253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988377,0.000070529015,0.00010887876,0.00035036166,0.0001075795,0.0005249235],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010508462,0.00017020987,0.00021626607,0.00008607896,0.00087199104,0.0003312267,0.0006445838,0.00016228031,0.00041613146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047566704,0.00015613732,0.00013941499,0.00043492977,0.00006743912,0.00068062736,0.00020959321,0.00028980518,0.003938148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014357416,0.0003061321,0.003969219,0.00005041866,0.00009328566,0.000042571053,0.04454602,0.00038156493,0.01666469,0.8528423,0.023499772,0.057460465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021241559,0.000075155964,0.0075783045,0.000015584123,0.0000130827075,0.000001725878,0.0015501833,0.000038489703,0.0007460588,0.0010491963,0.98844427,0.0002755421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021430773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028944195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005976043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016664606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482543593","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.454","title":"Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Epistemology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.0541495122848967,"score_gpt":0.31378775309342377,"score_spread":0.25963824080852704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482543593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.506101,0.000008735149,0.00004781629,0.0026568302,0.00055772,0.00013098308,0.000001438864,0.00015640043,0.49033904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846325,0.000103158774,0.0012569143,0.0123797795,0.0002789771,0.000020726673,0.000008947586,0.0000041888443,0.0013148007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986034,0.000038160626,0.00030636045,0.00012600143,0.0005409557,0.00038508946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938613,0.000062539584,0.000079607344,0.00013558698,0.000157742,0.00017836841],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034071202,0.0001229525,0.000118492746,0.000111026704,0.00095248834,0.000060136823,0.00026693495,0.000142596,0.00042789025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003915204,0.0001064243,0.00005574542,0.00031912434,0.0004466056,0.00084025966,0.000046946807,0.00024995874,0.0011511274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026164329,0.000049038896,0.006159534,0.00000879403,0.000005784242,0.0000064954424,0.01328179,0.00011491234,0.0000028310847,0.9729624,0.00042082468,0.0069614644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009070537,0.00040233653,0.2734618,0.00007203479,0.000008472227,0.000054568533,0.0039902194,0.000026620188,0.0001876434,0.12493216,0.59524775,0.000709338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011591631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021031712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8480302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008720038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032017974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486649415","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.2965","title":"Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Key (lock); Domain (mathematical analysis); Process (computing); Work (physics); Informal logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Software engineering; Computer security; Engineering; Epistemology; Programming language; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.025748299750823052,"score_gpt":0.20080039885908632,"score_spread":0.17505209910826328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486649415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03798862,0.000032663676,0.95688206,0.0000154022,0.00066038227,0.00018742176,7.505647e-7,0.00019559254,0.0040371027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94223344,0.000002282348,0.057596613,0.00007540365,0.000051741175,0.000011519418,0.0000016692501,0.0000030366625,0.000024313435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991649,0.0000132307905,0.00032453163,0.00013380278,0.00014360968,0.0002199595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996053,0.00001400116,0.00007737085,0.00022903355,0.000023569035,0.000050718685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002602818,0.00010048498,0.00012612614,0.000109024266,0.000034267647,0.000041840285,0.0003313679,0.000052565978,0.000011548688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004048631,0.00008320931,0.00003687522,0.0001492883,0.0000050948297,0.00060414575,0.00014079399,0.00007635928,0.0001498668],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024938305,0.00011729372,0.01903272,0.00042983794,0.000038259364,0.000088771805,0.007664918,0.019237049,0.00024818518,0.91316056,0.00012000045,0.039837472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043990745,0.00007067405,0.075024,0.0001003499,0.0000014172416,0.000027962315,0.000028892006,0.9205213,0.00079532986,0.000019880443,0.002774135,0.00019615724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005768994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003860411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91314065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064099506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014141246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3393177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486871773","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3893","title":"Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Warrant; Ceteris paribus; A priori and a posteriori; Intuition; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Inductive reasoning; Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08940304955744048,"score_gpt":0.29413801357619,"score_spread":0.20473496401874952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486871773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198047,0.00029574428,0.0024672449,0.0005940525,0.00063864293,0.00076899177,0.0008278798,0.00006466242,0.07453811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936803,0.0000122490355,0.001178744,0.0010950783,0.0005886568,0.00018088169,0.0003335013,0.0000135985165,0.0029169917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.00004940993,0.00038422423,0.00015796244,0.00008505923,0.00026209743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987889,0.00031664548,0.00029821432,0.0002100688,0.000327765,0.00005839276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024051423,0.0001438866,0.00025158035,0.000043948225,0.0002897993,0.00010764781,0.00023077575,0.0000947352,0.00019883632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021711258,0.00011593392,0.00010362557,0.000033000353,0.0004125961,0.0005714197,0.000062958534,0.00018897087,0.000032693802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001664204,0.00006226102,0.0011765775,0.000029549386,0.00010110516,1.03188064e-7,0.021148514,0.0000015724345,0.00036038877,0.96803254,0.0014961584,0.007574586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006554465,0.00026778728,0.021676848,0.000026241016,0.00010169315,0.0000010878395,0.005949993,0.000070111884,0.00015664089,0.8764571,0.09432935,0.00030768345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019756763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022229213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09283319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003013859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005114519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47276482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487459737","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.483","title":"Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Balance (ability); Action (physics); Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1213658247406551,"score_gpt":0.27601683903559016,"score_spread":0.15465101429493505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487459737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13428317,0.000073449686,0.00004737387,0.00130258,0.00016325564,0.00005643459,0.000003215403,0.000057818856,0.8640127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941801,0.00004526809,0.00007417188,0.0010754728,0.00014545306,0.000022917962,0.000005079925,0.0000028446414,0.004448685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994346,0.000016010174,0.00019308201,0.000050422972,0.00009086481,0.0002150363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.00008269436,0.000022050554,0.00012270153,0.00005221613,0.000043542852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054843676,0.00006126812,0.00009407662,0.0000572821,0.000327738,0.000026767646,0.000111302885,0.000023145547,0.00053438835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000529609,0.00004775413,0.00003367185,0.000041710213,0.00030716893,0.00021464852,0.00006207152,0.00011459708,0.0005143776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004095182,0.000028430257,0.0026927714,0.0000016527571,0.000004140979,0.0000038142077,0.00737817,0.000003423223,3.2509737e-7,0.9886656,0.0010069177,0.0002107068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005415553,0.00013367388,0.067772865,0.000011745563,0.000008404062,0.000036729758,0.0071916147,0.00022608685,0.000017969638,0.038904015,0.88487095,0.0002844183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016846917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015268667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9497615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023050223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030404351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6611455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489834304","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.431","title":"Three Naturalistic Accounts of the Epistemology of Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Naturalism; Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Naturalistic observation; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08681934052222458,"score_gpt":0.2591182896405862,"score_spread":0.17229894911836163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489834304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8212403,0.00031589397,0.000039771923,0.00038022225,0.0015430677,0.000213197,0.000056718352,0.000022929566,0.17618789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703336,0.000024868743,0.000057551115,0.0007163765,0.00014906435,0.0000056207878,0.0000063345037,0.000005138287,0.0020017163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991183,0.000028617234,0.00039579882,0.00008071301,0.00019156582,0.00018496955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908453,0.0001192201,0.00030213586,0.000271275,0.00020076834,0.000022094493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019325443,0.000108509026,0.00025672695,0.000040282423,0.00018820133,0.000006807345,0.0003080896,0.00008446461,0.00022939162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007976409,0.000064598215,0.00014211728,0.000033028096,0.0013737142,0.00013613794,0.000093270704,0.00021345346,0.000031752075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026827185,0.000051381925,0.0041986206,0.00011595619,0.00004535405,0.0000031398984,0.012027309,0.000022664324,0.000057180383,0.9823674,0.00080352527,0.00028065807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031193765,0.0017156539,0.25330406,0.00028190145,0.00033154825,0.00029688148,0.0071163005,0.00036200468,0.006089339,0.33105287,0.3951198,0.0012102885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003730097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000640082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6513145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013278726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006937243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5061507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491477860","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2160","title":"Model Answer: An Evaluation of a Complex Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8183411544940141,"score_gpt":0.54089907330947,"score_spread":0.27744208118454416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491477860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84451103,0.000048686303,0.09269119,0.00012587282,0.00017318847,0.00019039065,0.000007872953,0.00003416092,0.062217627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.908692,0.0000032641085,0.09093961,0.00028878124,0.000024259418,0.000007042264,0.00000447563,0.0000022901966,0.000038300557],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700814,0.00014005935,0.00066157,0.00019054643,0.0017941227,0.00020554234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997575,0.0009791288,0.00034033332,0.00043601642,0.00059296854,0.00007655346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010976457,0.00008844303,0.00020836752,0.0003216021,0.00008193512,0.000064554064,0.0005433426,0.00005592698,0.00029711408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014363026,0.000058335667,0.00006863612,0.0009107929,0.00006711295,0.000520485,0.00009464998,0.000075819145,0.000050973784],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028347862,0.00007929558,0.004444571,0.0000029007913,0.0000065284903,6.118965e-7,0.00069661706,0.6757423,0.0006055825,0.017057858,0.00013342877,0.3012019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008655249,0.0002849107,0.08468075,0.0000058306387,0.00001217906,0.000008149778,0.0006397812,0.5447083,0.00030511813,0.3680175,0.00036253402,0.000109444234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036215504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010068436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35095963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004144817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012895287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492216157","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2233","title":"Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06868165977470571,"score_gpt":0.26781529963186307,"score_spread":0.19913363985715737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492216157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122632995,0.0004225226,0.00006598003,0.00051341695,0.00022932855,0.00009663879,0.0000067992883,0.000052383733,0.87597996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942801,0.00040753523,0.000068517715,0.00070467015,0.00016546572,0.000016087946,0.000021467933,0.0000038472817,0.004332336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943,0.00001281468,0.00026388408,0.000053126623,0.00013051985,0.00010962508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995287,0.000032026383,0.00014200578,0.00016866348,0.000107323176,0.000021256916],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000079122954,0.00007930761,0.00012619274,0.000055428387,0.0002506946,0.00004200544,0.00014048858,0.000022320804,0.0009724741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000959871,0.00006219599,0.000051352876,0.000037469894,0.0002672572,0.00033103192,0.000058082267,0.00006527459,0.00019423985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038159422,0.000054407912,0.001611454,0.000016547141,0.000033402204,0.0000010547012,0.017401025,0.0000132966425,0.000009464256,0.9726102,0.0021705343,0.006040468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006113583,0.00022083915,0.006069844,0.000023477376,0.00002255565,0.0000050293143,0.008266831,0.000065913686,0.00008038092,0.016241532,0.9681997,0.00019254186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101225916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033981873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96602917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012163089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013570474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492321700","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3598","title":"Some Clarifications about the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning. A Reply to Santibáñez Yañez (2012).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Constructive; Analytic reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Psychology; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0388247195506904,"score_gpt":0.2898293096460925,"score_spread":0.2510045900954021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492321700","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24102153,0.0021230164,0.72576636,0.0025640468,0.0020661587,0.0016774343,0.000030551342,0.0002782709,0.024472637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881129,0.000023229391,0.008427101,0.0025619306,0.00016108301,0.000038896924,0.0000055494374,0.000004601232,0.00066471193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884486,0.00011208785,0.0003652817,0.00013316581,0.00024319047,0.00030139423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883795,0.00014790325,0.00026494422,0.0005616589,0.00008955164,0.000097999524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215048,0.00010858061,0.00013097201,0.000084580824,0.00018273861,0.00006379508,0.0005942003,0.000049760765,0.000045365927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012471649,0.00006903765,0.00006585888,0.00026786493,0.000047555684,0.0015912954,0.00015979924,0.0001128317,0.00029456677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011007549,0.00005110603,0.002271469,0.000012735301,0.000022031636,2.8536934e-7,0.012886219,0.00008942182,0.0007630564,0.97601306,0.0016607773,0.006218802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008062024,0.00034256486,0.8801448,0.00012545659,0.000042011747,0.000047785317,0.002791895,0.00503107,0.014652198,0.007551349,0.08784515,0.00061951805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004704203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002329747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96846175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025186624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037860947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37861583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492826849","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2138","title":"Reasoning in Theory and Practice (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Contingency; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Best practice; Politics; Critical theory; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02006693239749318,"score_gpt":0.2923326665683617,"score_spread":0.2722657341708685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492826849","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.279247,0.0042170803,0.37956563,0.006737355,0.00076715706,0.00049971364,0.0000023290033,0.00068228296,0.32828146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95435625,0.00014445097,0.042795982,0.0025594158,0.000032567175,0.0000070540627,6.880226e-7,0.0000028890402,0.00010069993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.000062862746,0.00018322676,0.00016027104,0.00014262911,0.00031607383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991742,0.0004209845,0.00008003199,0.00024272689,0.000028882443,0.000053201195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011410688,0.0000983008,0.00011657766,0.00008465109,0.00007381832,0.00013519329,0.00038169906,0.00007029011,0.000007414435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011044544,0.000077481316,0.00002053334,0.00015437175,0.00007166413,0.0016614546,0.00025520902,0.00015773551,0.000060984028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066579036,0.000028347238,0.0007108387,0.000009526869,0.000006355829,0.00012278711,0.0020508918,0.00084406557,0.00003320482,0.97521985,0.00006186888,0.020845676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008734929,0.0012320819,0.37150994,0.000542023,0.000052873795,0.0045247744,0.008473892,0.010663775,0.0033731584,0.48840898,0.10027671,0.0022068562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053730335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67510927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025565105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070022434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31595963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493131192","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1136","title":"Limits of Truth: Exploring Epistemological Approaches to Argumentation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.828222202449797,"score_gpt":0.49034824065344995,"score_spread":0.3378739617963471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493131192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.900753,0.000027795895,0.012967766,0.0016068856,0.00028590587,0.00022776882,0.0000036478548,0.000034070184,0.08409315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912814,0.000011890979,0.0072200918,0.0007164051,0.00008954302,0.000054035736,0.0000059616505,0.0000027934605,0.0006178777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978382,0.000064918095,0.00073851924,0.00017998356,0.0009778903,0.00020050995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988965,0.00041472263,0.00021109311,0.0002539557,0.0001240072,0.000099732366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002325299,0.00009880687,0.00019044359,0.00022019536,0.00007996634,0.00007987775,0.00036923174,0.00004836012,0.0009523176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068714237,0.000064704596,0.00007304915,0.0004493256,0.000040099098,0.0010767266,0.00007833812,0.0000807085,0.00090253586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013434012,0.0001413319,0.02138654,0.000009781508,0.000013891603,0.0000011953301,0.002857071,0.14166161,0.0002085163,0.12252866,0.0005273981,0.7105297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017350803,0.0016718851,0.7158831,0.000038374154,0.000024219136,0.00002985303,0.006532367,0.15119635,0.021153681,0.007908993,0.093164325,0.0006618167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024883884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007409739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70986784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035949524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044105767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493144150","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.419","title":"Argument Explanation Complementarity and the Structure of Informal Reasoning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Logical reasoning; Informal logic; Sociology; Cognitive science; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.012981263907303328,"score_gpt":0.24339327231801577,"score_spread":0.23041200841071244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493144150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97898453,0.00002590561,0.014167796,0.000530259,0.00033663484,0.00016024157,0.0000042503752,0.00004691973,0.00574344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982594,0.0000055092282,0.01687688,0.00048468186,0.000022270127,0.0000016088268,0.0000048802867,8.7904976e-7,0.000009267011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993821,0.000012721292,0.00021322508,0.00007175191,0.00017296892,0.00014727768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995034,0.00008146239,0.00012737689,0.00021810087,0.00004407282,0.000025614525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026407483,0.000073052404,0.00011096422,0.00003885389,0.00011483736,0.0000793717,0.0004030018,0.000042068656,0.000026113765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006491091,0.00004149621,0.000024700055,0.000076660916,0.00013740046,0.000610548,0.00025841637,0.00015875428,0.0000021755523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024509609,0.0000055364353,0.013289347,0.00001270986,0.000011159491,8.465414e-7,0.0022875853,0.0000393499,0.0004124921,0.96585244,0.000063611245,0.01800044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041020657,0.00026516127,0.85142595,0.00002273112,0.000024137107,0.00018915559,0.0013825853,0.08237399,0.014611616,0.035320662,0.009896077,0.0003858659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001604824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028783904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93053174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032810426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023072635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16921662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494295156","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.515","title":"Topics in Contemporary Legal Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Topical Nature of Legal Argumentation in the Continental Law Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Topos theory; Epistemology; Legal practice; Law; Context (archaeology); Sketch; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Literature; Algorithm; Art","score_opus":0.044204802939065015,"score_gpt":0.3122186965436982,"score_spread":0.2680138936046332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494295156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.693892,0.000022094564,0.000004490838,0.0136212595,0.0001914748,0.0002467911,0.000005540979,0.0000079241945,0.2920084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98791665,0.000009804515,0.000022691182,0.011571746,0.00020333771,0.000015623937,0.000013131662,0.0000012292043,0.0002457682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882406,0.00019108622,0.00026729528,0.00008907814,0.0004259819,0.00020250372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995438,0.00024329218,0.000068577654,0.000085912325,0.000021715556,0.000036731068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006453937,0.000068075526,0.00009570546,0.000027368746,0.00024438053,0.00005160654,0.00025632296,0.00010831665,0.000055659115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008626368,0.00003897172,0.000045961857,0.00018636121,0.0004922963,0.0008199345,0.000014785902,0.00031267677,0.000008064212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023817372,0.00004905448,0.0037089216,0.000002689152,0.0000011642812,0.000014276111,0.002838673,0.0000062504796,0.000009383194,0.9929176,0.00029643008,0.00013176718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002581045,0.000917697,0.65187126,0.000099491685,0.000010467375,0.000040570816,0.021200195,0.00023952733,0.0020152808,0.08431774,0.23621203,0.00049470284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002609375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009865661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90859985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055961427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010775324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39446115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495251174","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.442","title":"Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Software; Empirical research; Data science; Management science; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.04427003261588465,"score_gpt":0.3392112641888877,"score_spread":0.29494123157300306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495251174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89045465,0.00049704756,0.000024066889,0.0002345149,0.00060239865,0.000079189005,0.0000015324936,0.000034409182,0.10807216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702144,0.000029938366,0.0001895398,0.0004824156,0.00007129878,0.000023348322,0.000030116033,0.0000030165115,0.0021489072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936557,0.000023432867,0.00022666794,0.00009764027,0.00007116839,0.0002155184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997169,0.00006645751,0.00007041312,0.00009256067,0.00002966481,0.00002401456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000960652,0.00007757225,0.0000991393,0.00008626467,0.000082282975,0.000014144083,0.00010363143,0.000057096913,0.0004424765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002611207,0.00006441928,0.000032146087,0.0001602764,0.0000653055,0.00023394686,0.000018346054,0.00013468735,0.0003566101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013397136,0.00011790323,0.8660812,0.000014313484,0.000040592462,0.0001005196,0.007791044,0.0002837345,0.000070959846,0.114279725,0.005413595,0.0056724893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032731402,0.000058577567,0.99486077,0.00000418968,0.0000020558487,0.00008301079,0.0021197784,0.00001837615,0.000020141724,0.0008811585,0.0015324665,0.00009217633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031313635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006238084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1287796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003573233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027768301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48448077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495983830","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3656","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05857822156908858,"score_gpt":0.239257830865886,"score_spread":0.18067960929679744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495983830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06823239,0.0005810433,0.000022164053,0.0021415823,0.0031916068,0.00029088612,0.000054832464,0.0001642853,0.9253212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808047,0.000061690385,0.00014164651,0.01417678,0.0009601244,0.000058669917,0.000045347348,0.000008355972,0.0037427202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904907,0.000011203499,0.00022935879,0.00016595767,0.0002680088,0.00027638132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995073,0.000016810392,0.00012870616,0.00018893644,0.00005194629,0.00010629177],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000053577383,0.00014617457,0.00013890822,0.00007110012,0.00048022464,0.00024751198,0.00033473896,0.000045772405,0.010496192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000100056695,0.00011563932,0.00006439923,0.000022892327,0.0002729047,0.0014981081,0.00008176813,0.00011076281,0.0032383224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000584553,0.00037071496,0.0013999204,0.00003348564,0.00008041904,0.000007794219,0.05306651,0.00002194484,0.0005727159,0.3867159,0.54216367,0.015508507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024210094,0.00009535164,0.0017238492,0.000030600604,0.0000018074971,8.1505215e-7,0.0016585304,0.00007319479,0.000049980445,0.015695479,0.98023516,0.00019314751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012956172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008478085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92157847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003687655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012859253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499385902","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2246","title":"Classifying and Analyzing Analogies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10003130450068803,"score_gpt":0.40196325531168026,"score_spread":0.3019319508109922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499385902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1121756,0.00008850744,0.00044004148,0.017445378,0.00020818341,0.00005587071,5.812883e-7,0.000083690495,0.8695021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946687,0.0002730816,0.0007461173,0.0016174171,0.00012362836,0.000003891847,0.0000027059095,0.0000015505688,0.0025629038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.000029440414,0.0001184744,0.0000551762,0.00010616393,0.0001573367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964076,0.000120089695,0.00006132632,0.000055291242,0.00007403439,0.00004851934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042097946,0.00003932659,0.000047595324,0.00008319973,0.00052322214,0.00022474627,0.00007483994,0.000044458597,0.00037924663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005928067,0.000034925142,0.000014101683,0.00043366817,0.00011534963,0.0013115632,0.000019788658,0.0001421265,0.00006490243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086319205,0.0000196291,0.09010726,0.0000044351164,0.000011163347,0.0000038809267,0.015460687,0.000020716054,0.000023279119,0.81781125,0.002326508,0.07420254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060711987,0.000011846089,0.042853948,0.0000030671922,0.0000046960104,0.0000044334774,0.01082116,0.00004628045,0.0000039409674,0.003076592,0.9430425,0.00007081624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007569636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076674926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020697516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015908497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41524848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500258600","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4133","title":"John Locke on Inference and Fallacy, A Re-Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Fallacy; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Toleration; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Rhetoric; Inference; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0582295715362343,"score_gpt":0.28651175291498754,"score_spread":0.22828218137875322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500258600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10296679,0.00004265783,0.0000506839,0.0024675934,0.0005601772,0.00009900117,0.000027147304,0.000108727996,0.89367723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189675,0.00001815799,0.00003678024,0.005834134,0.0009124935,0.000008378176,0.000015326752,0.0000073032165,0.0012706631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909115,0.00003174382,0.00022853643,0.00014508325,0.00018447282,0.0003189979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926174,0.00033259348,0.000047682002,0.000158202,0.000042900418,0.00015687326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012774768,0.0001567523,0.00017028968,0.000049855014,0.00019620695,0.00014549731,0.00014037652,0.0000621263,0.0014100239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021064209,0.00010740621,0.000056720313,0.000022327273,0.00028085598,0.00020760568,0.00008760358,0.00021045927,0.00063417904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039261857,0.00004002956,0.00017164886,0.000020491661,0.000008005286,0.0000018184653,0.000998458,0.0000029321823,0.0000015844382,0.9935466,0.0006884269,0.004480714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000353064,0.00051823264,0.0011027615,0.00002786448,0.000009262608,0.0000031983209,0.00012773345,0.0003017881,0.000025791103,0.09659139,0.9007382,0.0002007493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000490094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039689254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90004975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007230181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009950524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500651006","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2140","title":"Argument and Its Uses (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Assertion; Argumentation theory; Proposition; Epistemology; Argument map; Informal logic; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01677994550145826,"score_gpt":0.22092021098934245,"score_spread":0.2041402654878842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500651006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432944,0.0025391383,0.0001921568,0.00023323494,0.00033141638,0.00015744031,0.000015642372,0.000385215,0.052851364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869865,0.00074485346,0.00017628397,0.0001511277,0.00006627273,0.0000053066115,0.0000013897271,0.000008935979,0.00014715952],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953485,0.000002028133,0.00009778759,0.00005880569,0.00008183786,0.00022469366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984837,0.000011954256,0.000011758443,0.00006406038,0.000009475015,0.000054385975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000041964653,0.000101511774,0.00010720212,0.000038886305,0.00007468703,0.00002647115,0.000051839597,0.000044648852,0.000037449274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000965987,0.000082738916,0.000025435313,0.000040530842,0.000024000414,0.00026801933,0.00004045441,0.00009788235,0.00016597704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028689616,0.00042064453,0.005474582,0.0017288353,0.0016691169,0.000363765,0.01840928,0.7709535,0.01956653,0.07317668,0.030774672,0.077175535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059027695,0.0006556662,0.17479165,0.0002484928,0.0001458887,0.000373525,0.0013246579,0.011224251,0.043476332,0.0027843972,0.7567664,0.0023059873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073225397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019542178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7597292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030522733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005228346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33739948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501985841","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2147","title":"Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04404527886292283,"score_gpt":0.27994082837086837,"score_spread":0.23589554950794553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501985841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43495542,0.0002219935,0.00032716367,0.00089413236,0.00022257601,0.00021711217,0.000019001562,0.00018872622,0.5629539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959148,0.000070788534,0.00052701187,0.0016343486,0.00015222424,0.000019282124,0.00010543241,0.0000069485654,0.0015691408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992059,0.000014640738,0.00030424073,0.00008811618,0.00016635747,0.00022077259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946713,0.000023013305,0.00013476839,0.00022113873,0.00009891452,0.00005505393],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014280558,0.00013907396,0.00012005684,0.00009435033,0.00042433137,0.00038828905,0.0001871437,0.000048655376,0.0009805913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021031145,0.000107079446,0.00004043447,0.00003945911,0.00029496851,0.0017552517,0.00009123969,0.0001392483,0.00033725647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012184572,0.000027139353,0.0001727426,0.00002019938,0.000013647951,0.0000021590147,0.035446808,0.00023304117,0.000009262653,0.9604098,0.00014285144,0.0035101706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069556874,0.0015061359,0.06571474,0.00018232908,0.00014538813,0.00020944582,0.3422223,0.00033589618,0.00080509455,0.26950732,0.31048578,0.0019298904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019605993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036505098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6909025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023946344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051181934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502525946","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2173","title":"Three Recalcitrant Problems of Argument Identification","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Wright; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Counterexample; Principal (computer security); Neglect; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02737763397754952,"score_gpt":0.24158599261892552,"score_spread":0.214208358641376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502525946","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027570447,0.00036507822,0.8229328,0.000082066006,0.00055060233,0.0003221321,0.0000013556823,0.00013097946,0.14804454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905906,0.000025685102,0.008968387,0.00008839915,0.000017273776,0.000021456846,0.0000023747389,0.000003027124,0.00028285323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989954,0.000020525633,0.00036347227,0.00016729724,0.00021291581,0.000240336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923676,0.000028754032,0.00017596524,0.00038972741,0.000108636035,0.000060181483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051739014,0.00010295907,0.00013293471,0.000071152615,0.00007447941,0.000069792346,0.00050838443,0.000062921434,0.000036842852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069111054,0.0000775025,0.00007044865,0.00027012939,0.000046554873,0.0005152611,0.00007026359,0.00008456904,0.00017564358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028489762,0.00007856783,0.0017733581,0.000041993546,0.000011020215,0.0000019707238,0.0008834978,0.00019772207,0.0009701087,0.9782519,0.00020643832,0.017580597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032544557,0.0016953151,0.14182636,0.00021174134,0.00005731861,0.00024300515,0.00023517101,0.06336297,0.12832274,0.5374688,0.121600315,0.0017217994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011999863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018160086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020769261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057112964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.316046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504695408","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3898","title":"A List of Trudy Govier's Publications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019334904331239824,"score_gpt":0.21028989305745838,"score_spread":0.19095498872621855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504695408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05662899,0.000064402506,0.0000076812885,0.0005391395,0.000120006705,0.0001303655,0.000043029548,0.000051677802,0.9424147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317161,0.0000043107693,0.00014420754,0.0011919014,0.0001786058,0.00003185614,0.00005419028,0.0000044057792,0.06667444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995191,0.000003841035,0.00020827142,0.000056847257,0.00008252055,0.00012942865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995411,0.000011513272,0.000115528725,0.0001486389,0.00013885577,0.000044381108],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000039576324,0.00006837369,0.00010655511,0.00005749509,0.00009863836,0.00014660039,0.00012066805,0.000023352157,0.052476693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011447454,0.00004619849,0.00005261193,0.00004037878,0.00019959878,0.00061271334,0.000025330286,0.000076290606,0.00017833624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020636373,0.000024801242,0.00071159535,0.000010425268,0.000008981795,2.5627034e-7,0.012386167,0.000001148163,0.000005144565,0.9277307,0.053915128,0.005203603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006492478,0.00006327544,0.0056073195,0.000004522147,0.0000042925703,0.0000017659846,0.0027371885,0.000026273523,0.0000031822065,0.0004932559,0.9909197,0.00007426731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050130987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007474286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000046724554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021346692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505171067","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.596","title":"Mathematical Proof and Discovery <i>Reductio ad Absurdum</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Epistemology; Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Linguistics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.039017036203172734,"score_gpt":0.25849021220413376,"score_spread":0.21947317600096103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505171067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7343666,0.0005846113,0.010505581,0.00019787202,0.00039501942,0.00075601705,0.000029833478,0.00033751762,0.25282693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93923336,0.000110102716,0.027573483,0.0002477705,0.00024222623,0.00008422972,0.000013078791,0.00006673274,0.032428987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788517,0.00006280079,0.00076829223,0.00027185294,0.00048737117,0.00052453915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841344,0.0004451074,0.00028896137,0.0005623868,0.000086156644,0.00020395295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072323583,0.00037264827,0.0005791473,0.00013925417,0.0004329085,0.00006334109,0.00032535024,0.00022500117,0.0004736483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006799585,0.00029745873,0.00017334137,0.00015950305,0.0006353518,0.0009458862,0.00016709008,0.00027840093,0.00044749503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078985126,0.00038513448,0.000013605111,0.00066147995,0.00007325864,0.00007984851,0.0056090523,0.000011352666,0.0012638546,0.9843416,0.0062882104,0.0011935943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011398831,0.00039137158,0.00021828848,0.00020875596,0.0001233934,0.0023312478,0.00029795608,0.00057590695,0.0016022539,0.8943183,0.09792281,0.0008698578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.8295693e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033117865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22039795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006186763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010077931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506123608","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2592","title":"Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Software; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Philosophy; Psychology; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.06039407464896068,"score_gpt":0.27259465419965995,"score_spread":0.21220057955069926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506123608","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21945721,0.00048476097,0.75611955,0.000186815,0.0025152673,0.0007214541,0.000004533894,0.00028509702,0.020225292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968504,0.000035555197,0.0020126742,0.00020784693,0.00007570277,0.00004109222,0.000006245098,0.000004072123,0.0007664643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880517,0.00004993938,0.0004114898,0.00019124498,0.00021858617,0.00032360072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993914,0.00003569788,0.00012997849,0.0003233192,0.000041178726,0.00007847618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036926108,0.00012876315,0.00016983881,0.00016517419,0.00006108844,0.0001444249,0.00046359922,0.00007383248,0.000023704377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025700263,0.000104258776,0.000049394774,0.00030456678,0.000015144073,0.0008552714,0.00012612197,0.00010182137,0.0003001999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038638012,0.00066115824,0.625981,0.00024400643,0.000058917965,0.0004316087,0.010780025,0.051838413,0.00083954376,0.24304175,0.002296021,0.06378896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014592371,0.00010715579,0.31773794,0.00007905494,0.000003027797,0.00009432404,0.0002116002,0.65056485,0.00013347456,0.0001333602,0.029044831,0.00043115212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007635042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083581144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77739316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045553403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002793164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42515495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509051045","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2594","title":"Argument Representation for Dependable Computer-Based Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependability; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Representation (politics); Certification; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.022330941509751318,"score_gpt":0.23294168385824915,"score_spread":0.21061074234849783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509051045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020660225,0.00012741107,0.962543,0.000017275099,0.0017932986,0.0006449434,0.000012017256,0.0007760902,0.0134257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98904103,0.0000034287527,0.01012452,0.000032982305,0.00028533663,0.00023731595,0.000052568113,0.000025956759,0.00019684494],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913013,0.000006123768,0.00033992532,0.00010442691,0.00012573549,0.00029364537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995626,0.00007238618,0.00004109567,0.00021922762,0.000042477586,0.00006217038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014491819,0.00014572877,0.00017119122,0.000101428,0.000044538003,0.0000619317,0.00013696255,0.00006794106,0.000028582981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006934217,0.00014505403,0.000063944586,0.00013529172,0.00000854518,0.00022068099,0.00001388266,0.00007075917,0.000065133056],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000657457,0.000006495473,0.0008877154,0.00012333413,0.000023179522,0.000004052255,0.00003438896,0.9950214,0.00012289228,0.0012619271,0.00056876265,0.0019392982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109523,0.000052235777,0.0009484912,0.000034761004,0.0000072887224,0.000026523388,0.000025494393,0.9401733,0.00092700624,0.000021292506,0.05709025,0.00018239333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034324625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.949895e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008496787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014188032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59151316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509384081","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4327","title":"Else Margarete Barth (1928-2015)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.08816343641949162,"score_gpt":0.33519203494801536,"score_spread":0.24702859852852374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509384081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081908695,0.0004104738,0.00012858228,0.0009893399,0.0020096807,0.00014393765,0.000018039813,0.00018255478,0.9142087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901343,0.0000036787892,0.00019353261,0.0033891706,0.00040789717,0.000025130277,0.00003169914,0.000012188268,0.006923259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988686,0.00005087788,0.00027932588,0.0001871448,0.00014593612,0.00046812042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.00002483459,0.00009080683,0.00038825723,0.000050388255,0.00022624257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028215954,0.00016317524,0.00019166642,0.00010183173,0.000081991435,0.000022483742,0.00031355102,0.00020978731,0.0015039433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042850905,0.00013896312,0.00007234484,0.00014014194,0.00015351093,0.00027383678,0.0001149779,0.000268523,0.014550615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013514748,0.00025204223,0.008304157,0.000017881905,0.00028949906,0.0003062411,0.0077237496,0.00008130965,0.00004794814,0.89096373,0.066208005,0.024453932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040448145,0.0018579686,0.03813017,0.000010957813,0.000063148815,0.00031229033,0.0012683078,0.00005812063,0.000053817635,0.25574124,0.6976668,0.00079232344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025822808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047993817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90728545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027464604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004001298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512250334","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i4.2855","title":"Logic as (Normative) Inference Theory: Formal vs. Non-formal Theories of Inference Goodness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Inference; Epistemology; Criticism; sort; Philosophy of logic; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.016190786395965957,"score_gpt":0.27531697826798207,"score_spread":0.25912619187201613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512250334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09678042,0.00016259369,0.5255882,0.0001872508,0.0005313842,0.00041602156,0.00001137289,0.00036364215,0.3759591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993006,0.0000838917,0.004512452,0.0017344888,0.00010079297,0.000026208823,0.00001649878,0.000008648599,0.0005110058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668473,0.00013320388,0.0009118062,0.00040814758,0.0006140221,0.0012481184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727404,0.0004711133,0.0006048554,0.0009028116,0.0004808326,0.00026634178],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014798997,0.0005317302,0.000658927,0.00027942346,0.00045369827,0.00032300013,0.0025726901,0.0002912136,0.00015211363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006663705,0.0003816167,0.00023522745,0.0008450904,0.00041591036,0.007074258,0.0009530092,0.0005262085,0.00050311285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012749225,0.00011781718,0.0013612834,0.00004485454,0.000019027306,0.0000148881045,0.0060595074,0.00024230136,0.000058189722,0.9335331,0.000040096216,0.05838146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020027196,0.004804449,0.08700196,0.00019432436,0.000039959446,0.00017006672,0.0011649061,0.01945215,0.0074345837,0.87428844,0.0020124137,0.0014340392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029082083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008628378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8962256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005978477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004195456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512788799","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2133","title":"Classification of Fallacies of Relevance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Argumentation theory; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Digression; Herring; Philosophy; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.03959861232946717,"score_gpt":0.26218911085198154,"score_spread":0.2225904985225144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512788799","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46389386,0.00008286832,0.5259211,0.00019548406,0.00021540024,0.00013994862,0.0000020765938,0.000048817667,0.0095004365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898652,0.00001593527,0.010007724,0.000037126596,0.000011097647,0.0000030173596,0.0000015612094,0.0000010954882,0.000057246012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942064,0.0000075125226,0.00027114095,0.00006691933,0.0001555204,0.000078242156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994482,0.000020151268,0.00022537452,0.00020858651,0.000080550526,0.000017173877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013302258,0.00004421831,0.00008616619,0.00005089867,0.000021213236,0.000009708174,0.0002460636,0.000034468758,0.000003217742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037204816,0.00003560861,0.000031778836,0.00014917323,0.000025719037,0.00046837772,0.000039153296,0.000029240222,0.0000217276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007598218,0.00005150339,0.004357297,0.00010287745,0.0000072066573,5.835778e-7,0.0019504961,0.0039628744,0.025702847,0.953019,0.000040922456,0.010796766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013245335,0.00045147585,0.86288667,0.00014543449,0.0000065535405,0.000016009748,0.00023503997,0.029102035,0.08953378,0.011172254,0.0048354957,0.00029073333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003664137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070605456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001431929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003183961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14520769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513482339","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.3074","title":"Critical Thinking and Small Group Activities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Group (periodic table); Small group learning; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03259517605729282,"score_gpt":0.3255657859277022,"score_spread":0.29297060987040935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513482339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58602047,0.000029357558,0.0005162225,0.008861168,0.0014026866,0.00009491528,0.0000010975522,0.00016094105,0.40291315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845816,0.000020249363,0.0107607,0.0036871382,0.00021978939,0.000009656465,0.0000016231213,0.0000030621109,0.00071616296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930984,0.000028741002,0.0001136676,0.0000853777,0.00020132086,0.00026106858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.0002922498,0.000015678428,0.00006388124,0.000044432163,0.0001345503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065945083,0.000061452534,0.00006943722,0.00003649083,0.0006944212,0.00023129536,0.00013565968,0.00009883595,0.00046219237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074964616,0.000053578508,0.0000207044,0.00006827284,0.00046106076,0.00035496627,0.000052909174,0.0002619978,0.00004220529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021835233,0.000017709777,0.0022896312,0.000007093749,0.0000017409982,0.000001269658,0.014623438,3.3462776e-8,0.00004400191,0.972824,0.00007834921,0.010110579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018002109,0.000060326878,0.033120733,0.000025159281,0.0000103432585,0.000013042839,0.023617998,0.000015737021,0.00013282968,0.54520166,0.39728436,0.000337803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114043214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000555294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42762232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000117964155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009875477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53409964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513875593","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4062","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Wild-Goose Chase for an Essential Distinction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Discipline; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06032515128667516,"score_gpt":0.2754074053714629,"score_spread":0.21508225408478776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513875593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21188009,0.0016472599,0.03994266,0.004667069,0.004113217,0.0016098903,0.000060762977,0.0005558121,0.7355232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961683,0.00009786928,0.000060215087,0.00070306816,0.0008184949,0.00009457192,0.00002151627,0.0000059393,0.0020299829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943763,0.000036734622,0.00018129086,0.00009347958,0.00008966124,0.00016122976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993898,0.00015686292,0.00009934766,0.00022274115,0.00009469698,0.000036534566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025360062,0.0001044546,0.000118435746,0.000025903213,0.0010767421,0.00017624654,0.00015726252,0.000029092475,0.00007934467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007750608,0.00006146115,0.00004315027,0.00002225539,0.00023998015,0.00033026157,0.000076714925,0.00008227841,0.00002493983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054368866,0.000043201886,0.00012769653,0.000016102413,0.000019477944,7.737742e-8,0.010894832,0.00000985058,0.0000038763574,0.96112883,0.0017607412,0.025940917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004917755,0.00056844257,0.0014608467,0.0000056804397,0.000043134358,0.0000051113793,0.003451782,0.0024972218,0.000008434824,0.022472825,0.968807,0.00018776875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000866428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027833038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96704626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010414837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000088135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82815385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515361935","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3530","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rationality; Epistemology; Normative; Heuristics; Dialectic; Defeasible estate; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14280636011229497,"score_gpt":0.32591763813883684,"score_spread":0.18311127802654187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515361935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12605736,0.00078157696,0.00016930653,0.0020596746,0.0027601991,0.00017336565,0.000014779463,0.000050805098,0.8679329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942655,0.00007369796,0.000066094806,0.0012119532,0.0004132683,0.000005919668,0.000008076855,0.0000032909888,0.0039521907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994394,0.000045017663,0.00018891296,0.000028205755,0.00012930884,0.00016913126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993469,0.00030345534,0.00011721056,0.00010239175,0.00010452716,0.000025522419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008084402,0.000053466734,0.00007170098,0.00001618009,0.00033316814,0.000032163978,0.00009629904,0.000057145557,0.00011488128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010022415,0.000031695025,0.000048401616,0.000012466798,0.0004246422,0.00031374148,0.000024491112,0.00025180014,0.00010412224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061176083,0.000013358949,0.00043171606,0.000020642328,0.000011233087,4.8054492e-8,0.05184823,0.0000020694465,0.000012560199,0.9456443,0.0003491482,0.0016605577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014976122,0.00009688486,0.0022668173,0.0000088198685,0.00002302644,0.0000017219633,0.014587601,0.000015147787,0.000614747,0.031472877,0.9506652,0.0000973959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058809466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013218728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057107445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023455688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25624937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515375584","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3457","title":"Logic and Parables: Do These Narratives Provide Arguments?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05793630623058993,"score_gpt":0.2567522117937274,"score_spread":0.1988159055631375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515375584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16423906,0.0010389835,0.000019961797,0.001071154,0.00038022766,0.00022209239,0.000019685422,0.000094258794,0.8329146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942551,0.000031815693,0.00011870644,0.001601051,0.00082476705,0.000026411924,0.00000843612,0.0000070597625,0.0031266462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991939,0.000021948088,0.00020546095,0.000102148064,0.00013121963,0.00034533237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958473,0.000060723443,0.00007902708,0.00012564575,0.000031324773,0.00011852146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015817299,0.0001550024,0.00015795474,0.000044903936,0.00025540445,0.00017653749,0.000106030624,0.000049984414,0.0012332996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030779807,0.000098701086,0.000054075055,0.000025092117,0.0003437078,0.0011191416,0.00007504937,0.00015047574,0.00033500837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029608338,0.00007241734,0.00043718607,0.000025610172,0.000019324014,0.0000018843101,0.034191437,0.0000011379102,0.000008415627,0.9626734,0.0004653557,0.0020742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029917993,0.00019034115,0.00074241246,0.000022056392,0.000012580051,0.000008456232,0.006157119,0.000009998015,0.000042897198,0.23041382,0.76187664,0.00022449475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009758935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013564258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.830016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011162262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010107239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516495875","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3032","title":"Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Adversarial system; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022198047673077415,"score_gpt":0.3097081608687018,"score_spread":0.28751011319562436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516495875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28647357,0.00006798219,0.00002385979,0.0037724788,0.0012792452,0.00014577626,0.0000042170313,0.00006921995,0.7081637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740535,0.00004684164,0.00036253786,0.0005809492,0.00036144827,0.000008926004,0.0000044097396,0.0000019383942,0.0012276225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.00002813612,0.00011710329,0.000089888235,0.00011929489,0.00018016835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970454,0.000075034084,0.000050681214,0.000068438334,0.000041142415,0.000060155355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033589482,0.00006307241,0.000085225445,0.000027933487,0.0006023225,0.00002985067,0.000092442155,0.00010859941,0.00021375058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019122327,0.000054960205,0.00002320305,0.000066406275,0.00046781925,0.00021824641,0.000042926556,0.00013829533,0.000088730005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260062,0.000023759161,0.033185013,0.000011594658,0.000028415316,0.0000065858194,0.024998486,9.838869e-7,0.000058592403,0.9340138,0.0018296122,0.0057805614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025196436,0.00041940899,0.30210927,0.000016864426,0.00007161731,0.00003476831,0.019973645,0.000032936045,0.0003358203,0.22160025,0.45217144,0.0007143212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001905684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007145294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71241355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007434058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005060146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46326387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516596861","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2174","title":"Computational Agents as a Test-Bed to Study the Philosophical Dialogue Model \"DE\": A Development of Mackenzie's DC","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Test (biology); Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Computer science; Work (physics); Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07257964397651419,"score_gpt":0.3025658535435338,"score_spread":0.22998620956701965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516596861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65223604,0.0000043816167,0.34489056,0.00062233314,0.00009760173,0.0005684441,0.0000038410826,0.00004189012,0.0015348749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95578045,3.0600114e-7,0.042629704,0.0014772022,0.000017268958,0.000057008958,0.000005435982,0.0000038507974,0.00002876784],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865264,0.000065393535,0.00044647895,0.00017216777,0.0004391061,0.00022423969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993228,0.000100296966,0.0001344598,0.0002384549,0.00010761001,0.000096400196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064177,0.00012304263,0.00014280128,0.0000788385,0.00019953599,0.00006138724,0.0004916508,0.000046198948,0.000016078855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014229385,0.0000847574,0.00004283706,0.00025095485,0.000018051505,0.00022716353,0.00015216165,0.00008865414,0.000099875455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006749971,0.0018785901,0.029364403,0.000061955616,0.00019470831,0.000037639802,0.10397978,0.48893806,0.00052297727,0.3644245,0.00052486773,0.010005013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017317493,0.00055610784,0.09415897,0.000024594045,0.0000141229,0.000045638313,0.0002920908,0.877877,0.0014275621,0.022793148,0.0006729231,0.00040610746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013953944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008756256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3889389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004512446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021806244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34563065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516702566","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.510","title":"Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Appeal; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Computer science; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10170842010581109,"score_gpt":0.2575299717280949,"score_spread":0.15582155162228378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516702566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6654913,0.00047527315,0.00026226317,0.00043738508,0.0013406363,0.00054413296,0.00007187266,0.000098364944,0.33127877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970578,0.00028332378,0.00018112046,0.0014769485,0.0005293943,0.00004526224,0.000020375914,0.000012851468,0.00039293658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779975,0.000013896665,0.0012530425,0.00038435086,0.000044232263,0.000504748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915564,0.000049037022,0.00035255039,0.00028393322,0.000027449933,0.00013136219],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005867282,0.00017108425,0.0006094776,0.00017247956,0.00016483727,0.000041659507,0.00031494693,0.00023578644,0.0009464433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026548136,0.0001820699,0.00014199529,0.00026273372,0.00024625854,0.0005803178,0.00009859239,0.00021437407,0.0018205438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027642894,0.0001857612,0.5486348,0.00006038991,0.00002075917,0.0000375435,0.0011279111,0.00018690607,0.0000010093631,0.44669068,0.002313713,0.00046403563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026352855,0.0006187982,0.74744236,0.00003639032,0.0000024777478,0.0002374992,0.00024526508,0.0014198272,0.000020181835,0.15772279,0.08870358,0.00091556384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069119514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032057436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33156648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001615824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082432205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516963856","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i4.2853","title":"Vagueness: A Variant Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Vagueness; Predicative expression; Epistemology; Ignorance; Philosophy; Illusion; Recklessness; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Fuzzy logic; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.049579390681012254,"score_gpt":0.22715658829167357,"score_spread":0.17757719761066132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516963856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002581731,0.00006773565,0.00028785734,0.00084226206,0.00021545817,0.00008962684,0.000009204255,0.0001318355,0.99577427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99066293,0.0000034433929,0.00021261317,0.0040458813,0.0009766796,0.0000060345405,0.00001930529,0.0000037892794,0.004069312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993736,0.000009443375,0.00017824459,0.000099193676,0.00012558077,0.00021394776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997026,0.000016702726,0.00004477976,0.00014191018,0.000033810058,0.000060221617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000808648,0.000108781605,0.00012580825,0.000044310935,0.00020274846,0.0001277194,0.00015094886,0.000042312102,0.000634958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013109771,0.00007575962,0.00007706285,0.000032445612,0.000096097385,0.0003721523,0.000022602311,0.00013103412,0.00037206113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019692785,0.00008107492,0.0000020119069,0.0000063633433,0.000006278426,0.000010369917,0.002235177,0.00002063481,0.000003405104,0.98994386,0.0010496596,0.0066214865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036462073,0.0002763714,0.00039291318,0.0000084899275,0.000015008836,0.00002355023,0.00035613708,0.0005842418,0.000017729399,0.3666658,0.63105327,0.00024182667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011143539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004345315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008580411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013171921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517175927","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.466","title":"Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Counterintuitive; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Defeasible reasoning; Proposition; Practical reason; Burden of proof; Element (criminal law); Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08425795611240479,"score_gpt":0.31091842300735095,"score_spread":0.22666046689494618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517175927","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13554631,0.00013486027,0.6982155,0.0018903365,0.0008261525,0.00040961534,0.0000041435655,0.0005790798,0.16239402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95509464,0.000030912215,0.041975982,0.0011479041,0.0000952689,0.000009944103,0.000002281798,0.000003616419,0.0016394627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991978,0.000024206181,0.00019843562,0.00014429158,0.00023025947,0.00020503807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948466,0.000047956146,0.00010564537,0.00025249057,0.000037038873,0.0000721878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001353733,0.000080998005,0.00008936451,0.00004806925,0.00016210593,0.00006694256,0.00024776216,0.000059411414,0.00009557827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061019637,0.00006435914,0.000044839675,0.00013117304,0.000023183728,0.0017514307,0.00013828572,0.00010440054,0.0006789229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006399796,0.00026266434,0.105772085,0.00008676585,0.00007761634,0.00038545328,0.020487119,0.0005140847,0.00046192418,0.757211,0.09680109,0.017876199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010991548,0.00030709791,0.43593678,0.000057850775,0.000008204532,0.001119976,0.00009046877,0.26035342,0.004493049,0.00061337353,0.2953121,0.0006085321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024735125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.848921e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012803757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005593973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8726407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517942169","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.3900","title":"The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07658551332007946,"score_gpt":0.24455823982460984,"score_spread":0.16797272650453038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517942169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38401383,0.00017503272,0.000038172955,0.0014719974,0.00076449104,0.00030615958,0.000017251603,0.000030636682,0.6131824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829507,0.000058569563,0.000021852067,0.00028870098,0.00011815873,0.000025712998,0.0000065817962,0.0000041451262,0.0011812001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926656,0.000015489566,0.00031315128,0.000057174795,0.00018470956,0.00016288953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994133,0.0001418137,0.00019578796,0.00015964588,0.000063449035,0.000025963496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014040036,0.00009190059,0.00011444728,0.000055509816,0.00026995956,0.00009219439,0.00016517268,0.000028006734,0.0007672181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002728977,0.000055230077,0.0000552468,0.000023288649,0.00025578737,0.0003618133,0.000032597443,0.00007094682,0.00010940602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014776564,0.00004022696,0.00011422839,0.000035917692,0.000024934894,8.658914e-8,0.021959169,0.000047274236,0.000018906549,0.9755235,0.0013176497,0.00090333674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006375708,0.0010723275,0.0036559268,0.00023416898,0.000050822273,0.000003141529,0.094494455,0.00028698758,0.0025382484,0.81585866,0.08077279,0.00039492332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001310139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044596367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61428124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038027327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002127944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84005004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518192296","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3329","title":"Speech Act Rules for Burden of Proof in a Modified Hamblin Dialogue System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Burden of proof; Simple (philosophy); Phenomenon; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; Programming language; Medicine","score_opus":0.08018084699401462,"score_gpt":0.2634142577197066,"score_spread":0.183233410725692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518192296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5745163,0.00007885797,0.40078327,0.000045759803,0.0007482638,0.0018543093,0.00002832782,0.00016365733,0.021781268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857315,0.0000014981641,0.014014693,0.000022284114,0.000058726142,0.00007602902,0.000008982438,0.000004418563,0.00008191356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889,0.000031624248,0.00049925956,0.00016226726,0.00017670623,0.00024013814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992691,0.000044509696,0.00025413357,0.00030015665,0.00008596594,0.000046117075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052565656,0.00011353807,0.000229237,0.00017086866,0.000038392296,0.00003215414,0.0004933419,0.000099993944,0.000004122006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040620715,0.00008890004,0.00007296235,0.00015928943,0.000017318915,0.00059626973,0.00009993611,0.000060755698,0.000028000046],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037121595,0.000366933,0.007970232,0.0028548944,0.00008849657,0.000054193595,0.03829564,0.0045222947,0.0034469238,0.86943775,0.0003270561,0.07226436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033445745,0.00081060274,0.049452905,0.00043625757,0.000016008617,0.000059277907,0.0006978107,0.9184495,0.022707658,0.002550041,0.0008466822,0.00062867574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007634777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006296995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037596037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005226229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36252382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518980779","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2964","title":"Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Possession (linguistics); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04225190225435377,"score_gpt":0.263600631053002,"score_spread":0.22134872879864825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518980779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929802,0.00012862476,0.000028015555,0.0011494935,0.0026113952,0.00018256025,0.000024441406,0.00009914668,0.20279612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023,0.000029256014,0.00017825741,0.0028705816,0.00071098714,0.000018887094,0.000029142695,0.000012428288,0.005920416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990436,0.000030739815,0.00032817273,0.00017799227,0.000115667994,0.00030384166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992997,0.00012184592,0.00016168233,0.00022869803,0.00009588125,0.00009218266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000380139,0.00018277825,0.00026967537,0.00007583299,0.00032963048,0.00013012075,0.00016691154,0.0001530704,0.00043771777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055631826,0.0001448649,0.00007672783,0.000017282713,0.0006646281,0.0003841343,0.000102773316,0.00054706953,0.0002498997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024231784,0.000039610302,0.00154919,0.000067648514,0.000033732966,0.000014516567,0.007380411,6.3096223e-7,0.00070977956,0.9826996,0.00025236668,0.007228313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007474072,0.00038801855,0.01360109,0.000024602576,0.00005002965,0.00010916369,0.0016051376,0.000106630294,0.00044149486,0.019055167,0.9633975,0.0004737691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055657787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007514767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008251368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003164463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5907419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519328188","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.456","title":"Whately on Arguments Involving Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1307698772028859,"score_gpt":0.2664980630822711,"score_spread":0.13572818587938518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519328188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.285854,0.000106410684,0.0000036877589,0.0009812497,0.0009513537,0.000120694145,0.000032122578,0.00014061538,0.7118099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98788905,0.00006157543,0.000027477834,0.0040759863,0.00087268784,0.00000975202,0.000026287093,0.000008571916,0.0070285946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988893,0.000028329074,0.00027171505,0.00014152573,0.00027532162,0.00039376624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950486,0.00006688239,0.00005395399,0.00016247739,0.00005200848,0.000159813],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010075269,0.00016209115,0.00016639612,0.000057972582,0.0004914107,0.00007933652,0.00018218346,0.00006319333,0.003123594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051666,0.0001169689,0.00011074158,0.000032014177,0.0002468442,0.00041441532,0.00005134879,0.00025414512,0.0021291655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038651742,0.00010981063,0.0004064639,0.000013099481,0.000014378762,0.000026587737,0.0021079232,0.0000033530189,0.000003291177,0.9955996,0.00090443704,0.00077237474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094707,0.00045528414,0.004206309,0.00004014454,0.000011852001,0.00002110525,0.00025932613,0.00008620493,0.00019508974,0.094280876,0.8995892,0.00034515467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004378189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000080917625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9013187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025800096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016859032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519407843","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.4120","title":"Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016211963584499764,"score_gpt":0.23441591207153797,"score_spread":0.21820394848703822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519407843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832662,0.00005940107,0.18170495,0.00021712708,0.00031856302,0.00037791362,0.0000015718003,0.000047436068,0.034006868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981889,0.0000047488966,0.0014803569,0.00025673988,0.000021930084,0.00000669729,0.0000031308232,0.0000013562997,0.000036153913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920136,0.00013411969,0.00029374412,0.00007284643,0.00019029087,0.000107618354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993727,0.00017200659,0.00018583033,0.00020804993,0.000048329206,0.000013076679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079199293,0.00005799621,0.00010189907,0.000058526504,0.000034155128,0.000019581601,0.0003745019,0.000035563877,0.000017855184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053820033,0.000036451474,0.000030583837,0.0003727652,0.000030486475,0.00029894273,0.000034975852,0.00005324319,0.0000086864175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036248268,0.00011332317,0.033112727,0.00010559086,0.00002019034,0.0000013948958,0.014946911,0.0014044783,0.0036641846,0.90661764,0.00015793079,0.03981937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008447942,0.00035667064,0.96632457,0.000059888112,0.000006807301,0.000011638257,0.00075521815,0.021123754,0.004010206,0.0044692564,0.0018735017,0.00016370957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031436768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013945711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000822985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018409648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1486448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521777945","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2570","title":"The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0161589188497874,"score_gpt":0.24121651909642502,"score_spread":0.22505760024663762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521777945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6167433,0.002797758,0.033033237,0.0019953393,0.0016203391,0.00063933467,0.0000027154076,0.0004091825,0.34275877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977257,0.00038326415,0.0005252014,0.0005521141,0.000056353103,0.00001585605,0.000003072961,0.0000028720822,0.0007355352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900895,0.000025317397,0.000288974,0.0001804779,0.00014537686,0.00035090398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945444,0.000087474145,0.000104991785,0.0002490107,0.000030871666,0.000073236544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044490042,0.000123309,0.00010860997,0.000049622064,0.00028171227,0.00024433093,0.00040511836,0.00005979302,0.000016934178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007822649,0.000072592644,0.000030845255,0.00031605354,0.00009893935,0.0005274492,0.00026914873,0.0001461509,0.00005761713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003887479,0.000076145654,0.21047045,0.000010830801,0.00000901938,0.000106689244,0.0010967324,0.000032612912,0.00005033689,0.6460479,0.00037129308,0.14168912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011932222,0.00062942045,0.73740524,0.00002512846,0.0000069717976,0.00066362,0.0004976552,0.039291706,0.00008429098,0.05169012,0.16799241,0.00052019645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046811187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026318437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041362353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035609846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29602423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521787408","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i1.684","title":"Dialectical Shifts Underlying Arguments from Consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dialogical self; Dialog box; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07583791883038277,"score_gpt":0.30481084002361003,"score_spread":0.22897292119322726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521787408","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40907323,0.0001435492,0.54472613,0.001912079,0.0015305032,0.00035319277,0.0000050342155,0.0003971113,0.041859165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111104,0.0000059959466,0.007204435,0.0015314497,0.00006156568,0.0000037089885,0.000005134474,0.0000014486715,0.00007520449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990904,0.000030455849,0.00024588767,0.00016587383,0.00023736867,0.00023005164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953586,0.000060764087,0.00009143172,0.00020599757,0.000026719586,0.00007920886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001457634,0.000097376,0.00011435288,0.00005136929,0.0001251703,0.00019739877,0.00037262318,0.000064208485,0.000049143775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037316215,0.00007766448,0.00004165124,0.00013677977,0.000027564023,0.0009250195,0.00004830464,0.00008725846,0.00033738674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000420976,0.00023299248,0.016035337,0.000025906651,0.00006474004,0.00013254205,0.005419838,0.00075920427,0.011564986,0.7822351,0.0013968796,0.18209039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019087968,0.0008623883,0.7779563,0.000121278856,0.000017262473,0.000035458055,0.00015744484,0.09642045,0.005411064,0.10721547,0.008916592,0.0009774823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106073225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000837995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.761921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028332248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040637817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43365365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523510547","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.511","title":"Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Teleology; Epistemology; Judicial opinion; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05173227049874057,"score_gpt":0.30530052203843694,"score_spread":0.25356825153969637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523510547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87475526,0.00015603064,0.000077200246,0.0009134776,0.00011014168,0.00009853595,0.000001482145,0.000012414813,0.12387543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998638,0.0004841006,0.00025899798,0.000449095,0.00008347885,0.0000032493674,0.0000014518743,7.000486e-7,0.000080951126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995346,0.000033716955,0.0001163903,0.00003924299,0.00017587723,0.00010016875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973094,0.00012959309,0.000044984263,0.000049011836,0.000029034385,0.000016421627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048293913,0.000028383107,0.00005024436,0.000004918374,0.00043602075,0.000012921041,0.000120250625,0.00006167066,0.000018163611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021056992,0.00001780169,0.000021283695,0.00017354793,0.00021134136,0.00019656164,0.000015086118,0.00008829443,0.0000047200406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011830893,0.00003708876,0.020957459,0.000006824292,0.000004606354,0.0000048007855,0.46922618,0.000086577034,0.00013181003,0.49626613,0.002572605,0.0106940875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064287026,0.00009083149,0.551287,0.00007606115,0.0000220954,0.00002153759,0.2106844,0.00026525726,0.00012897362,0.031359855,0.20514089,0.00028021907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028949886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003312753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5303295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010042052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040830084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33535632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523782963","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3363","title":"Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Normative; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Mathematics; Medicine; Geometry","score_opus":0.06832006801042236,"score_gpt":0.24905272826809566,"score_spread":0.18073266025767332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523782963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71943784,0.0010920243,0.25777403,0.00031829896,0.0010303031,0.0006657024,0.000012205683,0.00008665625,0.019582946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368614,0.000028192846,0.00601228,0.00020783773,0.000023203362,0.000007759438,0.0000016093098,0.0000016764287,0.000031314154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992569,0.000030286676,0.00034214192,0.00008398317,0.00017793197,0.00010876411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992804,0.00005713392,0.00024482276,0.00033103136,0.000061569845,0.000025026597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027055378,0.00006767696,0.00013135059,0.000030234905,0.00003491593,0.000014275414,0.00043981767,0.000033295364,0.00008486852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033078988,0.000039808037,0.00006126085,0.00012032092,0.000029560551,0.00034890103,0.0001311363,0.00004908175,0.00004059986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001056199,0.00066928077,0.098184876,0.0003996486,0.00029820413,0.000009903038,0.059356317,0.00015442862,0.008822126,0.66884404,0.0017762757,0.16137925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018053759,0.0009210147,0.7872653,0.00034817526,0.00005076237,0.000015460635,0.00052006845,0.029563908,0.1496896,0.01213301,0.017133305,0.0005540175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005539402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022748882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009134263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028920973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16233246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523849903","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3351","title":"The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Function (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.028194377758424916,"score_gpt":0.2753973512167284,"score_spread":0.2472029734583035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523849903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5843105,0.00042508918,0.3739452,0.003452776,0.0037592775,0.00097218587,0.000003704445,0.00026151736,0.032869767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944112,0.000007311942,0.0044850544,0.00078311074,0.00013555028,0.000011036718,6.1307696e-7,0.0000026225057,0.00016352108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899876,0.000045764653,0.0003679442,0.0000826682,0.00021372359,0.0002911391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907947,0.00015103554,0.00022168581,0.00037689414,0.000085998334,0.00008489409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010597862,0.00007733102,0.00010604557,0.000042443597,0.00018333021,0.000071481416,0.00041089664,0.000039410228,0.0000030957542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030110267,0.00005119759,0.000044285014,0.00022825274,0.00001873786,0.00069903646,0.00019996117,0.000084480074,0.00007561197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041630195,0.00012844316,0.24079211,0.00020051101,0.000050994706,0.0000027695853,0.018559925,0.0009454886,0.004184655,0.6264414,0.004238515,0.104413554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076007383,0.0005217241,0.6571118,0.00012090639,0.000017199902,0.00011271906,0.00040497663,0.031212993,0.011796365,0.0014474922,0.29581207,0.00068167277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010008429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011353717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6249939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030378933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037832255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20877771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524747256","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4107","title":"Evidential Modals at the Semantic-Argumentative Interface: Appearance Verbs as Indicators of Defeasible Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Evidentiality; Argumentation theory; Defeasible estate; Linguistics; Modal verb; Meaning (existential); Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Epistemic modality; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Verb","score_opus":0.017808356219062623,"score_gpt":0.3236733954009673,"score_spread":0.30586503918190466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524747256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89598465,0.0003799958,0.0029292235,0.000083538514,0.00051114324,0.00035362344,0.000011793513,0.000038244892,0.099707805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969668,0.000021935668,0.000055344168,0.0008443698,0.00008168367,0.00006290895,0.00003083949,0.000010764048,0.0019253871],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871135,0.00017397811,0.00038486347,0.00018049478,0.0002850455,0.00026429625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.00009054844,0.0003330784,0.00025670868,0.00005414768,0.000051058934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047960077,0.00014838678,0.00018938878,0.00012244262,0.0001352011,0.000032717395,0.0002385191,0.000096082345,0.002441762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067376226,0.000102387465,0.000101742,0.00023415276,0.00018213369,0.00027857415,0.0000894948,0.00014576789,0.0020543532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064863916,0.0012731748,0.07199776,0.00065980834,0.0020812175,0.000045472218,0.20680267,0.0009497522,0.02724438,0.32115304,0.0100062955,0.35130003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0144387605,0.0051016593,0.42082033,0.00053130597,0.0010382828,0.00028842236,0.058675837,0.00062549306,0.43941176,0.034563504,0.02255389,0.0019507583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018985053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028877677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41216737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033445864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017282335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525845722","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4055","title":"Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Adversary; Balance (ability); Point (geometry); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07919431369611842,"score_gpt":0.274950669893693,"score_spread":0.1957563561975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525845722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13669981,0.00009546405,0.0008214972,0.0014314993,0.0023496707,0.00022327727,0.000024909683,0.00017323758,0.85818064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842545,0.00001566731,0.0002119712,0.008185797,0.00057460304,0.000021328047,0.000042043182,0.000009052859,0.0066850875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919176,0.000034209577,0.00024079073,0.00011897475,0.00017763056,0.00023662015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937475,0.000110001594,0.00011094221,0.00021525669,0.00013426898,0.000054766293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032983697,0.00013783482,0.00017272192,0.000057561854,0.00049150974,0.00025418372,0.00015263932,0.00007620276,0.00085811253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000658255,0.00010871268,0.00007884449,0.000014844941,0.00034609705,0.00066038826,0.000050610128,0.00020783591,0.0008441833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006123976,0.000029937577,0.00051629747,0.00003090299,0.00002541665,0.0000011970831,0.019702531,0.000017932007,0.000014076714,0.97464436,0.003337742,0.0016734914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002753723,0.000116587384,0.0005867367,0.000015174323,0.000022505381,0.0000046873142,0.002661161,0.00021171673,0.000106475476,0.06786986,0.92793685,0.00019290169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023444112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018653182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020497566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003792562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526433626","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2260","title":"Six Steps of Critical Thinking","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03716238119784803,"score_gpt":0.35233222816606796,"score_spread":0.3151698469682199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526433626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092896834,0.00003489488,0.00010612227,0.006336685,0.00031122446,0.000072785835,0.0000012600187,0.000074363874,0.90016586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075294,0.00004004037,0.0034916508,0.0024086938,0.00010004903,0.0000046337154,0.000001708786,0.0000023676444,0.003197937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991087,0.00004250606,0.00020005908,0.000065739536,0.00034712924,0.00023590922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958414,0.00016666038,0.000017214323,0.00007402923,0.000063520936,0.00009442742],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054243725,0.000050179584,0.00008094926,0.000029235549,0.0003186664,0.000041665196,0.00019503011,0.00006863009,0.008248969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032297638,0.000044265464,0.00003860486,0.00014113852,0.0003176955,0.00022488732,0.00001703433,0.00009784419,0.00038897202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004562201,0.00005284235,0.00089371676,0.000011587019,0.0000023887371,6.94305e-7,0.020132938,0.000004049597,0.0000016901206,0.94310147,0.0003155166,0.03547854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017403968,0.000078367826,0.013553103,0.000046030553,0.000010353162,0.0000020606517,0.008875875,0.000019531239,0.00010735525,0.35677046,0.6201348,0.00022806348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121222925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058690897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89785606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023519742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015973173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526910648","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1041","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526910648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05162849,0.0016226139,0.0053200866,0.013482603,0.0011967288,0.00025442636,0.000040978928,0.00020767233,0.9262464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972946,0.000037787897,0.0016269521,0.004709736,0.0011331134,0.000010063778,0.000028845421,0.0000049783534,0.0027190705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932927,0.000024606814,0.00020703103,0.00009144235,0.00014920252,0.00019844435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958944,0.0001503196,0.000038540868,0.00008791727,0.000083646984,0.000050151026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002582428,0.00008545607,0.00009753905,0.000037949376,0.0006228587,0.00013548753,0.00008259968,0.000051744246,0.0006685593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010390819,0.00006949953,0.000040106548,0.000012116239,0.0005341748,0.0005631498,0.00005487085,0.00018135714,0.00014156307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006735544,0.000023363273,0.00021753578,0.00001776514,0.000008806018,0.000001243564,0.014472124,0.000025628296,0.0000027281108,0.98249966,0.00089124276,0.0018331415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034493871,0.00013882943,0.0016135112,0.000018931158,0.00003442188,0.000022522641,0.0034673451,0.002292649,0.000017915738,0.1487831,0.84302145,0.000244388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019966466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043734378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000125999795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024413928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73202556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527422774","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2141","title":"A Defense of Non-deductive Reconstructions of Analogical Arguments (AILACT Essay Competition Winner)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Strengths and weaknesses; Philosophy; Analogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03471161287276179,"score_gpt":0.2513523004739812,"score_spread":0.21664068760121943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527422774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5311416,0.000021796304,0.00021737731,0.00034091767,0.00026354275,0.000116904586,0.00009407061,0.000022181526,0.46778163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927545,0.000015790873,0.00022952919,0.00024408495,0.0001394457,0.0000068079607,0.00002502127,0.000004738771,0.000059122976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991843,0.000022760385,0.0003747958,0.000097520024,0.00016766047,0.00015294402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999364,0.000060091832,0.00020026742,0.00013200786,0.00018987403,0.000053734475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020197906,0.00010750073,0.00022114669,0.000105214036,0.00013800584,0.000020091165,0.00011743929,0.00007952692,0.0008713002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005199759,0.000082107275,0.00012184154,0.00005340687,0.0008599556,0.00027194826,0.00004476211,0.00021906405,0.00004329447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059481088,0.00012242045,0.000043918113,0.00003148045,0.00003653326,0.0000021675753,0.004486478,0.00017306488,0.00013858729,0.99454176,0.0000028887396,0.0003612198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005897242,0.0003910073,0.0006751403,0.00006736378,0.000024578472,0.000014551175,0.0014596907,0.000021646036,0.0005555313,0.99510485,0.00097569707,0.000120240795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091153015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045693712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4681339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027408152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008247259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9540126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527593050","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2151","title":"Is Argument for Conservatives? or Where Do Sparkling New Ideas Come From?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Criticism; Generative grammar; Opposition (politics); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08390831101960212,"score_gpt":0.37085966794646447,"score_spread":0.28695135692686236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527593050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40901726,0.0012241914,0.03174956,0.23634061,0.0042914217,0.0025175177,0.000083629195,0.00062341726,0.3141524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846342,0.00021808925,0.06674114,0.029685726,0.00053793704,0.00007152481,0.000022304523,0.000012681887,0.01807638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990068,0.000018830911,0.00025022612,0.00012977146,0.00027810287,0.0003162836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935544,0.00018238647,0.00006498368,0.00009499311,0.00010345656,0.00019872298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000333272,0.000094381656,0.00012956928,0.000030298896,0.0004050237,0.0001657075,0.00021249418,0.000086703905,0.0026292016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030406317,0.00007604418,0.00005542053,0.00014628899,0.000118235024,0.00029023725,0.00003368326,0.00009522732,0.0002866788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007210268,0.0000773712,0.003917836,0.00002125248,0.000043903903,0.00000303061,0.083108135,0.000021867922,0.0000075528746,0.8971355,0.009983285,0.005608146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006974297,0.000070410766,0.003089292,0.00006880798,0.000011615959,5.7395505e-7,0.012228752,0.000004147724,0.00012153047,0.3226011,0.6609209,0.00018541176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011552828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052892434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6509376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013689222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008872566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529854977","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3895","title":"Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politeness; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0448599772650792,"score_gpt":0.3185384132817765,"score_spread":0.27367843601669734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529854977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17167586,0.00029374502,0.000009228431,0.013326582,0.00020118854,0.00013371084,0.000005334582,0.0000943349,0.81426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958322,0.0001659464,0.00008088835,0.0031721827,0.0002032768,0.0000062972135,0.0000022303877,0.0000021741769,0.0005348203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927783,0.000018804352,0.0001272904,0.00006732593,0.00018390016,0.00032483015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.00013672345,0.000039200593,0.000069695314,0.00007128006,0.00018881264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002231714,0.000062763,0.0000755294,0.000026999993,0.00043323476,0.00010260911,0.00011441524,0.00013632941,0.0005420738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038009588,0.00004761056,0.000024659998,0.00006461101,0.0006465593,0.0007794283,0.00004814121,0.00015664584,0.00039914678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031547288,0.000008491429,0.0015197225,0.000011117288,0.000002995629,0.0000018271434,0.0027485583,0.0000012969198,0.000005401914,0.9889325,0.00060159015,0.0061633615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013023565,0.000029113316,0.07691991,0.000036150457,0.000004329846,0.0000019228285,0.0018632066,0.000014122354,0.00003082795,0.81913805,0.101681195,0.0001509164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006607769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82415634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014781636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008554346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5935328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530082090","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2152","title":"Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.09082178350827413,"score_gpt":0.2956670442864488,"score_spread":0.20484526077817466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530082090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36850813,0.0006486402,0.00017669285,0.0016493519,0.0013980251,0.0003605929,0.000011691605,0.000091155685,0.6271557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960964,0.000046206602,0.00015128142,0.0018180559,0.00039333006,0.0000159372,0.000013474926,0.0000045632814,0.0014608005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994247,0.000018897352,0.00016445316,0.000081238606,0.00015957205,0.00015116464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961,0.000031934855,0.000059724553,0.00009637266,0.0001611022,0.00004086785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038811984,0.00007999842,0.0000979902,0.000036703732,0.00022988311,0.00008146161,0.00005755642,0.00004130085,0.00028826058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007297467,0.000063384585,0.000032032185,0.000013417455,0.00028281755,0.00024171075,0.000027480191,0.00011807285,0.00012338822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005821135,0.000024772058,0.00015567476,0.000019049296,0.000016743312,0.0000010500124,0.021850934,0.000091205766,0.0000058890587,0.9741874,0.00018993676,0.003451566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015556541,0.00044304336,0.0031159022,0.000027060625,0.00010250218,0.000014010237,0.0044839107,0.00012051003,0.00029083758,0.57249725,0.41700575,0.0003435965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001265252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049703644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6275882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025459323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006676576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3156251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532964229","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2179","title":"Boone's Critical Thinking: An Applied Approach, 2nd ed.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047766901307731154,"score_gpt":0.3388704241782994,"score_spread":0.29110352287056823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532964229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064346395,0.000044206452,0.0031596345,0.001428181,0.0005323011,0.00023044234,9.781284e-7,0.00020674318,0.9879629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96014386,0.000019439014,0.03161913,0.0067826672,0.00017564833,0.00006743047,0.000010868671,0.00000785518,0.0011730717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843735,0.00010353503,0.00024599646,0.000183974,0.0005235654,0.0005055571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992744,0.00012629526,0.000030183204,0.00016606766,0.000097131735,0.00030597823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012732064,0.00011808958,0.00013262444,0.00005405084,0.0009243158,0.00023462664,0.0003032796,0.00015288232,0.0012677264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006529241,0.00010523526,0.00004292578,0.00019627473,0.00039566934,0.00038858072,0.000029720148,0.00022837448,0.00031238745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039153633,0.000119703946,0.00024333135,0.000008634615,0.0000036234944,0.0000011297617,0.0134262135,0.00000508324,0.0000037122065,0.9836484,0.0010111602,0.001525077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020140286,0.000049898492,0.0009359762,0.0000071727377,0.000010350059,0.0000057087063,0.026843084,0.000016001872,0.00007459763,0.28360325,0.6879174,0.0003351728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039372633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013123766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006105184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003518371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533468349","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2242","title":"Shaping the Adversary Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Rhetorical question; Adversary; Reflexivity; Presumption; Epistemology; Style (visual arts); Face (sociological concept); Rhetoric; Subject (documents); Sociology; Rhetorical device; Sensationalism; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Media studies; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Computer security; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.11290439190249243,"score_gpt":0.2664940580452732,"score_spread":0.15358966614278077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533468349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050760256,0.0012655123,0.00003792253,0.0013692465,0.00019716662,0.00005602543,0.000001738677,0.00006829338,0.99192804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95377594,0.0006703453,0.000024513407,0.0037826982,0.00030826597,0.000014029495,0.0000049301825,0.0000025865772,0.04141667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965256,0.000009449364,0.00010855252,0.000036655754,0.000081557686,0.00011120233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970835,0.00002363791,0.000041407788,0.00016179067,0.000051229526,0.000013600767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007046721,0.000058599533,0.000057309673,0.000012456118,0.00062968273,0.00007237044,0.0002158326,0.00001574223,0.0008753433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010018713,0.000029915978,0.00004096874,0.00002314085,0.00013293278,0.00022920767,0.00009112099,0.000098444296,0.0004181798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009084976,0.000011172059,0.00039313483,0.000003060685,0.000024369956,0.0000014518702,0.07212932,0.000012308376,7.3285923e-7,0.8861353,0.032413222,0.008866889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006562891,0.000020740266,0.0006467089,0.0000037935522,0.00000474203,0.000004570934,0.019682689,0.00004414613,7.560494e-7,0.0015242378,0.97794807,0.000053905955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041822746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055035922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000071052737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006294573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9584395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533813471","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2161","title":"Comparing Theories of CT in a Critical Thinking Course","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Course (navigation); Epistemology; Critical thinking; Psychology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05867849087240115,"score_gpt":0.3827827056020941,"score_spread":0.324104214729693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533813471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6521054,0.00008484507,0.00080991955,0.0067455648,0.00044896267,0.00010855246,6.739788e-7,0.00006644768,0.33962962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592686,0.00001263588,0.002896536,0.001055296,0.000039648618,0.0000055241053,0.0000011650841,0.0000020180023,0.000060315648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915135,0.00003517657,0.00022389763,0.00006453129,0.00028545078,0.00023958774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963224,0.00014987227,0.00002669877,0.0000621016,0.0000659707,0.000063100444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008233839,0.000052777057,0.00011376072,0.000045086515,0.00020939349,0.000046520196,0.00017728259,0.000031608688,0.00012439875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058511563,0.0000469495,0.00002777785,0.00018575306,0.00039321563,0.0002435015,0.000037173322,0.00012792806,0.00003451217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038423095,0.00005952038,0.019032598,0.000010499665,0.0000018474012,0.000004033267,0.030431196,0.000054398824,0.0000014285152,0.9499289,0.000006823717,0.0004649319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023676504,0.000024289735,0.03673471,0.00009545478,0.0000039121314,0.0000027235112,0.023367463,0.000007365799,0.00010992863,0.9368232,0.0024880653,0.00010612577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047365026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047115452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34382147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059393355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003505452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1914545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534260015","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4021","title":"Logic, Truth and Inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.07434115442370506,"score_gpt":0.24094128812515714,"score_spread":0.16660013370145207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534260015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08843293,0.00012107669,0.0000146922475,0.0016916582,0.0005755064,0.00012815109,0.0000065375784,0.00010173535,0.90892774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919281,0.000012958367,0.000050347055,0.0038342262,0.00096295995,0.00001719273,0.000007848547,0.0000048956986,0.0031814578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999462,0.000008774321,0.00016109458,0.00009111211,0.00008622815,0.00019078009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965996,0.00008286855,0.000041838626,0.000100167796,0.00004045776,0.00007468998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000048110283,0.00010241918,0.00011453205,0.00003788003,0.00018171345,0.0001875708,0.000087462926,0.000043719363,0.00392483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000374471,0.0000681316,0.00004055314,0.000016385968,0.00033491888,0.00058435183,0.00006977469,0.000117492724,0.0013406166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005916149,0.00001656218,0.000030822,0.000011234629,0.0000066893454,0.0000019668742,0.0034978,9.23644e-7,0.0000027156507,0.98455924,0.003029531,0.008836625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028722113,0.00018961362,0.0015923093,0.0000082415245,0.000008319655,0.000006805052,0.0013143235,0.000091146765,0.00002622615,0.5633474,0.43293422,0.00019419158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044955563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014421422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000052422447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006007389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537723199","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2906","title":"Differentiating Theories from Evidence: The Development of Argument Evaluation Abilities in Adolescence and Early Adulthood","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Task (project management); Competence (human resources); Empirical evidence; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06631082466767106,"score_gpt":0.3518781653574582,"score_spread":0.2855673406897871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537723199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937335,0.0012124337,0.000068209876,0.00033224103,0.00015058221,0.00022567646,0.0000019018122,0.000011121932,0.004264318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909806,0.000021244668,0.0006725159,0.00009978125,0.000030168683,0.0000437108,0.0000055656615,0.0000014908607,0.000027487387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.000085766915,0.0003744311,0.00010990265,0.00018995206,0.00015083188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993629,0.00028308333,0.0001369802,0.00012907054,0.00007149168,0.000016510872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006535543,0.000084682826,0.00011216727,0.000032296753,0.00008759325,0.000034877543,0.00013692127,0.000049155904,0.000115787305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014591705,0.00005293521,0.000018796974,0.00006935108,0.00008958825,0.0001845705,0.000030391353,0.000094999945,0.000006847786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013672828,0.00009415832,0.7133655,0.00003837379,0.00002189428,3.7102245e-7,0.11451047,0.000056654633,0.00011555455,0.08352876,0.000015167763,0.088116355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001520587,0.0000989206,0.9487804,0.00011863614,0.0000060820826,8.119507e-7,0.024666691,0.000022981398,0.00010033911,0.025981523,0.000009496541,0.00006201596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015906237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046925612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23541492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034244607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008098464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21586353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541270524","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3502","title":"Introduction: Special Issue on Charles Hamblin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049076859372270035,"score_gpt":0.24359678403842483,"score_spread":0.1945199246661548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541270524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047288086,0.00007934514,0.109486535,0.0038661351,0.020295473,0.0008423904,0.000006857494,0.00077319134,0.817362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9101517,0.000045124863,0.018205281,0.0025534485,0.057108834,0.000044575027,0.000018647861,0.000015328045,0.011857043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920714,0.000019859799,0.00022466411,0.00017235569,0.00019221491,0.00018374452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994722,0.000009309312,0.000102468686,0.0003152588,0.00004639663,0.00005434471],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019971257,0.00009685971,0.00009985235,0.000094445444,0.000098505516,0.00006605298,0.00034995982,0.000058421818,0.0012185862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021928894,0.00007607579,0.00004272932,0.0001500895,0.000018247618,0.000765097,0.000075565615,0.00008744563,0.0037439712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000723684,0.00019232757,0.0012709755,0.000039759147,0.00002521216,0.000025702411,0.009245568,0.00014405591,0.00016907361,0.6269583,0.13783145,0.22402517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946633,0.00038227334,0.03320274,0.000011852047,0.0000028931997,0.000033803142,0.00007801177,0.0036409514,0.004458746,0.0007303265,0.9568065,0.0002572718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030690437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069950775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019304729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016146125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542052916","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.541","title":"Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin’s Thesis on Deep Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.17176234708785432,"score_gpt":0.3072356358019974,"score_spread":0.1354732887141431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542052916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7617048,0.0004890154,0.0011179616,0.004414695,0.0011281576,0.0016201977,0.00026349354,0.00014006648,0.22912158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211854,0.000043818476,0.00061474054,0.0047898134,0.00039730166,0.00012941303,0.000045619003,0.000013252967,0.0018475038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885833,0.000054680546,0.00045718905,0.00013609305,0.00020980206,0.00028392466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987932,0.00048139962,0.00023545271,0.00025464257,0.00018519683,0.000050099054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004613452,0.0001617358,0.00024032402,0.00004392,0.00059249246,0.0000551428,0.00025635955,0.00007230422,0.00016434967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001758768,0.000102629565,0.00017241128,0.000028067565,0.0007568758,0.00029459296,0.000052313346,0.00016785787,0.000027684724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047997866,0.00008570833,0.00019205379,0.00017909783,0.0000798078,0.000001726947,0.07679998,0.000056298428,0.00010808937,0.91962,0.0014900457,0.0013391952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003748216,0.0038932178,0.0046685487,0.0005271905,0.0003106754,0.00003329021,0.07051161,0.0036290926,0.0040047215,0.2959108,0.6113632,0.0013994812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014121452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032002808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6237092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023791117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005285237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4557033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544285175","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1134","title":"Introduction: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation--A Map","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026422900521133486,"score_gpt":0.2504741357314814,"score_spread":0.22405123521034792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544285175","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008336735,0.00004611904,0.95524406,0.017523127,0.00077424647,0.00043142308,8.210699e-7,0.00015363784,0.017489852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542147,0.0000025772713,0.038645178,0.003621735,0.0012556771,0.00006959311,0.000009083707,0.0000028953655,0.0021785963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908286,0.00004379916,0.00026405713,0.00019099005,0.00021752056,0.00020077906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943495,0.000027766346,0.00008237091,0.00034365276,0.000047925943,0.00006331791],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040139744,0.00009331841,0.00008911371,0.00004852381,0.00018888932,0.00015292966,0.0005141062,0.00004629004,0.000058009868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024802534,0.00005495794,0.00004415098,0.00020453866,0.000021683227,0.0006314639,0.00012994953,0.00009100618,0.00096178695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015031413,0.00014335774,0.00077142386,0.000022027883,0.000020001986,0.0000014081152,0.0026656333,0.046263836,0.00018139325,0.87795556,0.037359502,0.034600835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005086157,0.0002080493,0.0443865,0.000005448677,0.000006716355,0.00014364763,0.00024101847,0.26555002,0.0005955603,0.0005245943,0.6874641,0.00036571978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009599115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001801377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040635143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013091406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545161136","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.544","title":"Hansen & Pinto: Reason Reclaimed","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinto bean; Agronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.06618858955671843,"score_gpt":0.26259461749197327,"score_spread":0.19640602793525486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545161136","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35889044,0.00025892002,0.54532933,0.00090836134,0.0015808552,0.00050010614,0.000003666791,0.0007596813,0.091768645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753049,0.000053805798,0.019774185,0.0006831625,0.00012753734,0.000016202768,0.000011755892,0.0000051921197,0.0040232507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903125,0.000030605643,0.00026320343,0.00016630144,0.00025875447,0.0002498993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992997,0.000032725708,0.000117286676,0.0004017006,0.00006134551,0.00008721951],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020934035,0.000107417356,0.00012571899,0.00007115483,0.00018955617,0.000054564745,0.00043623097,0.00007824639,0.000051501334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048812373,0.000086455126,0.000059341008,0.00020536916,0.000026524427,0.0008360738,0.00010832947,0.00009426232,0.0012706735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019044253,0.0006914572,0.10144835,0.0003410638,0.00020659072,0.00038456792,0.04547278,0.0036769167,0.0124025615,0.41311595,0.16006266,0.26200667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017199335,0.00032923097,0.2304738,0.00008423048,0.000008881883,0.0008425983,0.000049600072,0.050748598,0.0044024456,0.0014266048,0.7089345,0.0009795954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013390758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028912522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6164145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029675766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045927154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545548164","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4112","title":"Deduction without Dogmas:The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Schema (genetic algorithms); Criticism; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12934132883376576,"score_gpt":0.4932052969056455,"score_spread":0.36386396807187976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545548164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81684077,0.000018581983,0.0068983207,0.0053456887,0.0011540679,0.0005211315,0.0000041604812,0.00008118238,0.16913608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920537,0.000014289613,0.0020598785,0.005106813,0.0003443147,0.000042420168,0.000012307124,0.000006150512,0.0003601463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757785,0.0012047073,0.000562365,0.00011107721,0.00026267773,0.00028132406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966586,0.0023868342,0.0004032487,0.00025362152,0.00020431823,0.00009334402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049520824,0.000093566196,0.00016033114,0.00005028888,0.00081043044,0.000007944317,0.00015784374,0.00025595404,0.000639555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053763124,0.000056143115,0.00004313201,0.00016982594,0.00029117355,0.00035349609,0.00009704901,0.0019341068,0.00026683667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028325352,0.00011562546,0.036662877,0.00035622582,0.00004266045,0.000053536933,0.008465155,0.000277743,0.00034625962,0.92864317,0.004332382,0.020421129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007928424,0.0029118552,0.17585371,0.0004952737,0.0005247151,0.0025141404,0.095356114,0.037964463,0.00069286715,0.5396344,0.13487116,0.0012528895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003920639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001873677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38900876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043818964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008762513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84028393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547143664","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3563","title":"Pragma-Dialetics Epistemologized: Reply to Lumer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11064656407234613,"score_gpt":0.37502996710087283,"score_spread":0.2643834030285267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547143664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7511392,0.00024161162,0.00014418829,0.0013193259,0.0017438548,0.0002572178,0.000011312324,0.00013140064,0.24501187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973259,0.0000074399013,0.00076274556,0.010560996,0.00044169094,0.000045229357,0.000016819095,0.000007975703,0.014898118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881846,0.000047799414,0.00029126805,0.00013690411,0.00013584987,0.0005697162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993105,0.000054136362,0.000084041014,0.0002960569,0.000048315178,0.00020694028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025771468,0.00015173563,0.0001862409,0.000050512368,0.00008305563,0.00003471713,0.00021906554,0.00011552128,0.0035911596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009078484,0.00010224461,0.000084103725,0.000135892,0.00005367012,0.00020500456,0.000102671176,0.00014911474,0.0064638914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039278428,0.00038764422,0.3731759,0.000050108534,0.00015292887,0.000032291726,0.020449068,0.000013635951,0.00037841074,0.28473628,0.21333244,0.10689851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027434545,0.00029457448,0.59189975,0.000007581828,0.000016082075,0.00006805938,0.00071376684,0.0000053072195,0.00006388203,0.00030553978,0.40612358,0.00022750709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017816533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061681326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28443074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018417706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008080541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549401724","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2139","title":"Figures of Argument (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Antithesis; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Humanism; Set (abstract data type); Rhetorical device; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Heuristic; Computer science; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.028899692536113217,"score_gpt":0.24284895915962154,"score_spread":0.21394926662350833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549401724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010452565,0.00131962,0.0000500025,0.00011837648,0.0005797618,0.00009711717,0.00006675021,0.000050336992,0.98726547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873498,0.0000668916,0.00016099954,0.000451965,0.00052422896,0.000007870603,0.000012798613,0.000005591372,0.011419868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993069,0.0000040528053,0.00024439924,0.0000727889,0.00015953835,0.00021228543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964666,0.000021543618,0.000086586246,0.000110165,0.000089307025,0.00004575141],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000073362375,0.00009934068,0.00015638758,0.000048257345,0.00018026495,0.000029672537,0.000112781985,0.000027222319,0.0018853275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083484876,0.0000711941,0.000071528986,0.000016957658,0.00016578386,0.000063384505,0.000046460293,0.00008269699,0.00015733854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022083694,0.000062646235,0.000019195091,0.000051562474,0.00003273648,0.000014773806,0.022190532,0.00022527635,0.0000119340575,0.9703927,0.006002812,0.00097371434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031261786,0.00014073255,0.00013023333,0.000026486385,0.000015450258,0.0000010022429,0.0011310457,0.0000057556417,0.00014503452,0.0034435382,0.9945245,0.00012361367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037461836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047862774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032689815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024467417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549433436","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4187","title":"Critical Thinking and Cognitive Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Hindsight bias; Metacognition; Critical thinking; Cognitive bias; Focus (optics); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive skill; Cognitive psychology; Confirmation bias; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.13832857104891907,"score_gpt":0.39273917997144797,"score_spread":0.25441060892252887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549433436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15419851,0.00021160564,0.0010654668,0.014304573,0.0007947095,0.00013681038,0.0000019964273,0.00015768426,0.8291286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902142,0.000014206958,0.0022040184,0.0066268845,0.00012933683,0.000006953326,0.0000025158906,0.000002291469,0.0007995813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992063,0.000058985628,0.00011896508,0.00007574348,0.00031658972,0.00022341311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991874,0.00031039742,0.00001555489,0.00003274454,0.00021476216,0.00023915933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762492,0.00005219975,0.00006653356,0.000033338394,0.00035935192,0.00016116971,0.00008224457,0.000063025276,0.00015968806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038975007,0.000044598968,0.0000145137465,0.000102013786,0.00035375077,0.0003412489,0.00004694222,0.0001060755,0.00018730728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060776947,0.000019261099,0.004965849,0.0000043648806,0.0000033368203,0.0000035443977,0.05265678,2.1723278e-7,1.8310227e-7,0.9324146,0.0005610037,0.009364804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044740192,0.0001223618,0.013226682,0.00007813838,0.000022590648,0.000012387439,0.12668003,0.00003146,0.00002763391,0.66043967,0.19858907,0.00032254588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009255651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003972166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8360157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024291523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002771758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4665954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549987018","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2142","title":"Toulmin's Model of Argument and the Question of Relativism (J. A. Blair Prize, 2005)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Relativism; Epistemology; Warrant; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04672540263891843,"score_gpt":0.26036375560586483,"score_spread":0.2136383529669464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549987018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905929,0.0007507318,0.0033909273,0.0022018352,0.00038727897,0.0005461123,0.000043077544,0.000052553896,0.40203458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963789,0.00011810642,0.00043009227,0.0003554083,0.00006116564,0.0000075257326,0.000005271139,0.0000039630563,0.002639563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993686,0.000026671973,0.00029026877,0.00006185216,0.00012468337,0.00012789684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994964,0.000069322654,0.00019529593,0.00012693036,0.00008913608,0.000022898887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004700789,0.000082281884,0.00018761767,0.00003318524,0.00009797989,0.000014127342,0.000081856146,0.000057147492,0.000023439523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003935493,0.000049361173,0.00006135266,0.0000121189205,0.00092521857,0.0002128336,0.00003897389,0.00014677574,0.000006096726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005015316,0.00002868269,0.000028962224,0.000053619082,0.000021084817,2.2531337e-7,0.021097044,0.002407229,0.000031183212,0.9759124,0.00003644174,0.00033298667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031885123,0.00039982647,0.0006065093,0.00012914492,0.000117771735,0.000005551595,0.003120215,0.004317869,0.0014531168,0.9737962,0.012625765,0.00023955174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017790533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017252489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.405786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010683883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049337836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34090063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550985237","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2239","title":"Aspects of visual argument:A study of the March of Progress","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Demonstrative; Frame (networking); Argument map; Visual rhetoric; Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Human–computer interaction; Medicine","score_opus":0.0464284723339781,"score_gpt":0.3584031909180489,"score_spread":0.3119747185840708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550985237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430136,0.000037273487,0.000004171163,0.00005603125,0.00024961535,0.00025029975,0.00000361393,0.0000047287162,0.056380663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957496,0.0000018114081,0.000017662825,0.000022366194,0.000025763993,0.000009153292,0.0000013815994,0.0000014061334,0.00034549265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932665,0.000035060217,0.00024923772,0.0000662736,0.00019589177,0.0001269046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955314,0.000036483358,0.00020398981,0.0001325209,0.0000551635,0.000018726509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022455162,0.000049957027,0.000103898565,0.000049037437,0.000029492241,0.00000273538,0.00022441658,0.000033004013,0.00043514784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013865421,0.00002947909,0.000029851104,0.00026112888,0.00011980436,0.00007461209,0.000044933906,0.00006198934,0.000021056567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021709967,0.0014934377,0.9609928,0.000020817834,0.000026469743,0.000002269701,0.009758732,0.0000121162075,0.00030862048,0.017262913,0.00013392104,0.009770778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026904215,0.0014096771,0.9910731,0.000008897976,0.000008873701,0.0000130890385,0.006084767,0.000022983253,0.00039177318,0.00024315644,0.0004370998,0.000037566824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013482787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024771603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05656136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000043793752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030568295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47645634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552040573","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1226","title":"Analogies and Other Minds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862112021793719,"score_gpt":0.2794089140838773,"score_spread":0.1931977119045054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552040573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08367118,0.00031516986,0.00004497999,0.0007052665,0.0002546514,0.0000657322,0.000012504342,0.00008004782,0.9148505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829669,0.000022314336,0.00019925098,0.008759573,0.00033738062,0.000002199626,0.000004387116,0.0000037039192,0.0077043087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995336,0.000011734645,0.00013949271,0.000074334326,0.000070188384,0.00017065411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997434,0.000035789635,0.00005026772,0.00009982596,0.000037820264,0.00003288818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001300217,0.000088308516,0.00012173949,0.000042612435,0.00015561043,0.000083623134,0.00008108755,0.000053902062,0.00025125078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002133602,0.00006415128,0.000040506686,0.000013433537,0.00029669632,0.00021141108,0.000017678785,0.00012258402,0.00008263865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008747063,0.000013876578,0.0002529244,0.000009450283,0.000008949478,0.0000023941718,0.009437142,0.0000016714935,0.000007788673,0.9764554,0.0015270916,0.012274584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020871153,0.00029341283,0.0036876996,0.000008504537,0.0000143477455,0.0000072252033,0.0026931483,0.00003800521,0.000043126878,0.050871104,0.94197553,0.00015917943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005578781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001602056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94044846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003663015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000114855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.275102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553635644","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.435","title":"Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Pragmatics; Identification (biology); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.29621758523628955,"score_gpt":0.45322481873468606,"score_spread":0.15700723349839651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553635644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58807105,0.00021649037,0.0005540528,0.0020207022,0.00022782669,0.0003984171,0.000001940866,0.00004784353,0.40846166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921623,0.00006281042,0.0011177867,0.0019476927,0.00015733624,0.00034358152,0.000015066567,0.000005190202,0.004188273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984312,0.00025413992,0.00030714026,0.0002877267,0.0002663226,0.00045349178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890995,0.0005332239,0.000054319542,0.00028616714,0.00010953319,0.00010680553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012154451,0.00012661668,0.0001866932,0.000084179264,0.00056200154,0.000056880635,0.0003430248,0.00015289799,0.00026203156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016357953,0.00006759918,0.000048519276,0.0003180292,0.0012629004,0.0001027104,0.00013407573,0.00037555347,0.00046098937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067653426,0.00026199606,0.008173054,0.000005970913,0.000020871345,0.000015392372,0.0030846954,0.00008155768,0.0000044354024,0.97629374,0.010427037,0.00095469726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012624034,0.00085056224,0.96530575,0.0000030956983,0.000004453813,0.0011762289,0.006879143,0.000059871756,0.0000029334874,0.017290981,0.0069929026,0.00017165094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013648409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014909415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002483109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015360689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59252393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553681044","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2278","title":"Wigmore's Chart Method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Rhetoric; Chart; Tree diagram; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03943531913906263,"score_gpt":0.33678029571594514,"score_spread":0.2973449765768825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553681044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013806462,0.00014292513,0.00019308146,0.0021299315,0.00013819199,0.00007727231,0.0000034533605,0.00008471175,0.98342395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712087,0.0003048331,0.0012679065,0.0032288542,0.00048654614,0.0000144581945,0.0000029786142,0.0000019152349,0.0075716306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993529,0.000028263032,0.000108890585,0.000067179455,0.00021172833,0.00023108875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998004,0.000039564846,0.000020102054,0.000045139146,0.000036187383,0.000058642694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030209994,0.0000549015,0.00008291819,0.000018769268,0.00066189433,0.000029817456,0.00012626314,0.000046000052,0.0040836344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004517317,0.00004414766,0.00004661046,0.00014903469,0.0002687004,0.00023584743,0.000018831091,0.00006366359,0.0015628752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001266108,0.0000120865625,0.00093520107,8.1367347e-7,0.00000960338,0.000004009131,0.002424222,0.0000308787,0.0000027686806,0.8500742,0.0014997887,0.1449938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008007067,0.000022282884,0.008168601,0.0000034777333,0.0000049805913,0.0000018565885,0.00080659025,0.000010281911,0.000010599312,0.02917405,0.9616292,0.00008798823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049980765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020067671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007953474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558336695","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2262","title":"Informal Logic: An Overview","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; sort; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Information retrieval; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.16255535349708566,"score_gpt":0.3147098564452695,"score_spread":0.15215450294818383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558336695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11010931,0.00067151757,0.000011244744,0.000300909,0.0006252015,0.00018835059,0.000042734344,0.00023226587,0.88781846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8904568,0.0012722297,0.0004352156,0.02894338,0.0021795193,0.00004437254,0.00024799412,0.000034733603,0.07638578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998576,0.000047092057,0.0004714629,0.00016370804,0.00023912567,0.00050262857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.00005330519,0.00012013731,0.0003550771,0.0001206655,0.0001394412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038438104,0.0002394524,0.0003030803,0.000069330745,0.000444203,0.00021258932,0.00035598504,0.00015394954,0.013865483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022558113,0.00018239426,0.00015876195,0.000045471053,0.0005026465,0.0016684037,0.000053742817,0.00039512137,0.0027572925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040216044,0.00006522682,0.000095972915,0.00007053348,0.00002399262,0.000009481725,0.020106861,0.00007044075,0.0000020114453,0.9344297,0.0010099425,0.044075627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036057545,0.00046027574,0.0011286581,0.00001960759,0.000025523026,0.000019889645,0.0017979809,0.00013197781,0.000018609744,0.021159325,0.9745502,0.00032741931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024730075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062730553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000138124515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006377568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558811497","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4119","title":"The Use of 'No Evidence' Statements in Public Health","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Proposition; Heuristics; Public health; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.590110165758187,"score_gpt":0.4756637280515608,"score_spread":0.11444643770662616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558811497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5304471,0.0006367249,0.0016775326,0.07887203,0.0027294434,0.0027277297,0.000011909134,0.00023237895,0.38266516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902534,0.0019148855,0.0003471574,0.0024168966,0.000034468736,0.000015456328,0.0000021061144,0.0000018615652,0.0050137676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893373,0.00014023577,0.00025676153,0.00005041055,0.000354644,0.00026421508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949604,0.00006125329,0.000113449016,0.00010517709,0.00010740784,0.00011665301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023281283,0.000038819704,0.00006688823,0.00005133977,0.0001710105,0.00012770998,0.00019535898,0.000021735206,0.000081470374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005697893,0.000025415453,0.000019400997,0.00019754896,0.00014550546,0.0012411707,0.00006828322,0.00005218308,0.00018667948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000967291,0.00014554973,0.047044195,0.000035214853,0.000019947138,0.0000026145829,0.11723365,0.00064600195,0.0000020556886,0.35878387,0.1289273,0.3470629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118215845,0.000093653296,0.012138969,0.000009521827,4.2309154e-7,4.1506606e-8,0.006309431,0.000104888546,1.3768265e-7,0.00038268958,0.98080915,0.000032890213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005902263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058367364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85188186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030610577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8922495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561055701","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.468","title":"A Bibliography of Douglas Walton’s Published Works, 1971-2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Classics; History; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.023779333588719812,"score_gpt":0.21505778652080365,"score_spread":0.19127845293208384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561055701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059429687,0.0009520621,0.000016062306,0.00015311108,0.0013487798,0.00014507776,0.00004716456,0.000120222656,0.93778783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816936,0.0021986314,0.00023818508,0.0024588613,0.0015537158,0.000016336347,0.000099395336,0.000016639979,0.011724608],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890846,0.0000091630645,0.00039612225,0.0001307771,0.00024615575,0.00030930067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992354,0.000023190714,0.00021734802,0.00025185468,0.00018250204,0.000089725625],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011395718,0.00016546712,0.00026237604,0.004302976,0.00023028583,0.00018917417,0.00022996904,0.000070247654,0.01604601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010098079,0.000114706934,0.0001864046,0.0020454447,0.0005775533,0.0012846441,0.00005411149,0.00022321573,0.00005724607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006734851,0.00008049494,0.00744084,0.000027760476,0.0000398788,0.00003334166,0.013197604,0.000012912655,0.000001392562,0.076226294,0.901959,0.0009131341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024962303,0.00015369111,0.007035075,0.000028180473,0.00000947327,0.00002019595,0.0016811894,0.000010038742,0.000004695003,0.00017901458,0.99045753,0.00017126022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004136256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003339986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92606324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000024151054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026077154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98485345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561617563","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3159","title":"Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analogy; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Similarity (geometry); Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03699069433430508,"score_gpt":0.26425105325463455,"score_spread":0.22726035892032947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561617563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90234554,0.0002432299,0.08473257,0.0001884544,0.0014176058,0.00018239634,0.000005875561,0.000090046975,0.010794301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963685,0.000004808845,0.002766402,0.0006709808,0.00009292459,0.000006928474,0.000009259662,0.0000017805291,0.000078374316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992511,0.000051695297,0.00018819964,0.00009817641,0.00014864608,0.00026214318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995731,0.000040015093,0.00008098853,0.00021897937,0.00001531207,0.0000715683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035073838,0.000074706695,0.000102928774,0.00008023519,0.0000480957,0.000029802079,0.00029037887,0.00006991495,0.000055492987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023106157,0.00006406422,0.000028451961,0.00011771261,0.000010562159,0.0012401178,0.00011932572,0.00011744881,0.00028287372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001160598,0.00020516799,0.9203138,0.000019690857,0.000019780304,0.000010428499,0.0059373383,0.00039495627,0.00050191116,0.045176305,0.0015011939,0.025907835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033229304,0.000024972818,0.97320145,0.0000069219363,0.000001394126,0.0000022683098,0.00003129686,0.0116479965,0.00020878269,0.00034055195,0.014085533,0.000116548734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027299896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058741163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09402302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004407783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016722277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3635864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561788741","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.453","title":"Making Sense of “Informal Logic”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Mainstream; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Term logic; Epistemology; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computational logic; Description logic; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13198139527560715,"score_gpt":0.27898508574947234,"score_spread":0.1470036904738652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561788741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25436082,0.00007441148,0.00006326624,0.00020683595,0.000644031,0.00010045612,0.000018499062,0.00007362055,0.7444581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960227,0.000026955404,0.00034436537,0.0013679866,0.00048620658,0.000008686789,0.000024799057,0.000005928484,0.0017123589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991089,0.000012423385,0.00037953036,0.00007487864,0.00017866584,0.00024559916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945915,0.000043080043,0.0001891113,0.00017015981,0.000099023986,0.000039463175],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013514447,0.00012390538,0.00015924011,0.00010050335,0.0003452652,0.00003596518,0.00012683698,0.00005655602,0.0015626941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040654853,0.00009895683,0.00008132072,0.000039745293,0.0002919734,0.00087609206,0.00005623887,0.0001339726,0.0003494096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037944304,0.000043076747,0.00027837232,0.00005037177,0.000015484962,0.000010998678,0.03636337,0.00009320683,0.000010143212,0.95959353,0.0015830374,0.0019204328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018956655,0.0014683773,0.03538729,0.00023193727,0.000092286864,0.000983714,0.015076741,0.0015185928,0.001062076,0.156277,0.7844531,0.0015532301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004210681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014785892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8033166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011241408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050636612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564530973","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2845","title":"What Does an Argument Culture Look Like?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Negotiation; Contingency; Conviction; Subjectivity; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03986473648003297,"score_gpt":0.26340109997132033,"score_spread":0.22353636349128736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564530973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036929306,0.0029402007,0.000026511132,0.002312248,0.0013388847,0.00019010367,0.0000060853813,0.00024542137,0.95601124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456848,0.0016588129,0.00010193827,0.0065112947,0.0003305525,0.000012225847,0.000022797485,0.0000031218576,0.04567444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994583,0.00001256194,0.00017159658,0.0000761337,0.00012392836,0.00015747071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995499,0.000008478808,0.0000619194,0.00025720365,0.00008011369,0.000042337473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007133062,0.00010310428,0.00010901251,0.000025443718,0.00039572883,0.00037783978,0.0002198211,0.000030373725,0.00057639566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000034227578,0.000057188154,0.000046271973,0.000017014918,0.000086914,0.0014602268,0.000048172387,0.000097270815,0.00023793883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019019877,0.000101264544,0.000059428145,0.00000552887,0.000022623279,0.0000017474556,0.14030127,0.000007949615,0.0000055334745,0.8104179,0.013086333,0.035971433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001304918,0.00022447504,0.00045538417,0.00001163516,0.0000075462494,0.0000014973142,0.04962524,0.000015333657,0.00001379173,0.010272286,0.93911535,0.00012697764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001247851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000877665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013782787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008590748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6311128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564896744","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4165","title":"Meta-argumentation, An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Informal logic; AND gate; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Algorithm; Logic gate","score_opus":0.0759385134830571,"score_gpt":0.28163161447187723,"score_spread":0.20569310098882015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564896744","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040718902,0.000039376304,0.9462802,0.00015302468,0.0001695996,0.00035483533,0.0000017238626,0.00011629133,0.012166064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93636364,0.000003724112,0.060430694,0.0027431373,0.000058123194,0.00007452795,0.000024680921,0.000004596634,0.00029685546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.00014964472,0.00030163157,0.00025665996,0.00023916953,0.0001992277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00005474381,0.0001362969,0.00029806377,0.00006124117,0.00012235557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010333605,0.0001369588,0.00018021977,0.00011446678,0.00015150051,0.00022732148,0.0003104442,0.00005299808,0.00002732468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031164043,0.00009944505,0.000048635775,0.00017265067,0.000019200324,0.0014772811,0.000094452036,0.00005614312,0.00009881098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116315105,0.000071713795,0.0007241079,0.000029312714,0.00009127805,3.9685602e-7,0.004167409,0.0020732686,0.00047120565,0.97070795,0.00012592746,0.021525778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036632689,0.0021558471,0.2239424,0.000024550647,0.00065633695,0.00013574751,0.001996942,0.6173763,0.0056738015,0.12696904,0.015396863,0.0020088812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002635385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033633207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8956448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001855869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001081823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40552515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566284763","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3620","title":"The Paradox of Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Informal logic; Point (geometry); Limit (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10705498735975393,"score_gpt":0.2826222878400397,"score_spread":0.17556730048028574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566284763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18212245,0.00094070326,0.000026940697,0.00047408065,0.0017182877,0.000110897105,0.000014854435,0.00003909461,0.81455266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456996,0.00005701502,0.000023839208,0.00057137257,0.00051421055,0.000005611967,0.0000037098546,0.0000028585591,0.0042514475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994413,0.000022801742,0.00018396476,0.000032349715,0.00009789067,0.00022167533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952835,0.0001271246,0.00009880252,0.00014441115,0.000066260036,0.000035041863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046179572,0.00006168774,0.000099676094,0.000013824386,0.00027287047,0.000027192898,0.00013945744,0.000039494695,0.00017152097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047160363,0.000034778448,0.00006524268,0.000011831195,0.00051006814,0.0002743964,0.00003731036,0.00014584447,0.00015435315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006853103,0.00001996089,0.0011657032,0.000016083026,0.000011528456,1.0435336e-7,0.01493978,5.108439e-7,0.000004617013,0.9810293,0.0006296912,0.0021758983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010418473,0.0000722357,0.0052186493,0.000004993261,0.00001432607,0.0000022496583,0.0032864,0.000010699236,0.00019557192,0.021480782,0.9695222,0.000087751585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007626801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100105106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96889246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039599645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001519571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20987266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567035606","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2575","title":"Wright's Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Analytical Reading and Reasoning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paraphrase; Subordination (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Taxonomy (biology); Sentence; Reading (process); Linguistics; Quine; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Interrogative; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053216212449543936,"score_gpt":0.27714908536749255,"score_spread":0.2239328729179486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567035606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46343255,0.00003082442,0.00008462476,0.0040822676,0.0004667976,0.00009646213,0.000006533793,0.00016472062,0.5316352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98835546,0.0000053441004,0.0002521805,0.0017812265,0.0022460518,0.000005517616,0.000019171493,0.000010348904,0.0073247296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903506,0.00001708173,0.00022729038,0.00018824123,0.00019987195,0.00033245818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995,0.000048798658,0.000025821739,0.00015650186,0.000087303146,0.00018158366],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030572098,0.00013158268,0.00014345732,0.00011860862,0.0006108526,0.0014880159,0.00013469296,0.000045424145,0.0015848209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017541503,0.00010549954,0.000036116475,0.00003942283,0.000199585,0.0023741487,0.000077317105,0.00019088542,0.00010693339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035005523,0.000023636485,0.00028161975,0.000007699702,0.0000057636653,0.000017704295,0.008832995,0.0000072064054,0.0000012119206,0.9859065,0.001340336,0.0035403504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012453231,0.00052987505,0.00082547823,0.000020722287,0.00001846385,0.000102332255,0.0060307677,0.0005600463,0.000006178357,0.03519659,0.95632285,0.00026219283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038303184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013023363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95498246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022814831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000120260975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567080196","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4019","title":"Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12153300483844601,"score_gpt":0.3028597746975162,"score_spread":0.18132676985907017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567080196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64404285,0.0000795674,0.000009342345,0.000048074475,0.0002866489,0.0001379134,0.0000060131265,0.00004065143,0.35534894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462444,0.0000140782995,0.00047804433,0.000848753,0.00016349246,0.0000076026217,0.000024943247,0.0000066464295,0.0038319929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933505,0.000031234664,0.00022557391,0.00009517544,0.00011138705,0.00020156548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928355,0.00004024344,0.00015387416,0.00017447339,0.0002910361,0.000056822166],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015994179,0.00010576986,0.00018593528,0.00005010047,0.00012879125,0.00007092848,0.00013202081,0.0000650451,0.0011996245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054314423,0.00008316991,0.00005615073,0.000027914777,0.00029498537,0.0008338487,0.000028593638,0.00016108331,0.00026098648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790211,0.000049219747,0.00081792584,0.00002673034,0.00002763815,7.0788883e-7,0.013670418,0.0000144725445,0.00031045437,0.98368114,0.0003958201,0.000987544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031720551,0.0074615125,0.052818153,0.00025882744,0.00027162145,0.000033323406,0.07372656,0.0013955914,0.0075637368,0.46049815,0.39091557,0.0018848984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050922576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008860218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.523183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010516664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000428024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568614932","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.597","title":"Johnson, MacIntyre, and the Practice of Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Teleology; Dialectic; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038482417192970575,"score_gpt":0.2666514324578647,"score_spread":0.22816901526489414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568614932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24773847,0.0004492222,0.000015606174,0.0029110108,0.00033363444,0.00017489176,0.0000068726904,0.000022376704,0.74834794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994513,0.00057538575,0.0001374174,0.002564444,0.0002727261,0.000008590702,0.0000073696547,0.0000023771524,0.0019187315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999623,0.000023538345,0.00015284223,0.000039353858,0.00009524186,0.00006601919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956065,0.00013572635,0.000104053295,0.000071621216,0.00011477426,0.000013177284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019511276,0.000046793128,0.000068264155,0.000015128301,0.00028424963,0.000029033947,0.000051530824,0.000016720254,0.0002668243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006614277,0.000028191456,0.000031592608,0.000016723949,0.00044917455,0.00043784082,0.000013926123,0.00005822526,0.000019722163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032573753,0.000023796785,0.0003087947,0.0000135056225,0.000016443499,2.520693e-7,0.1350041,0.0000032104667,0.0000010174575,0.8613427,0.002978333,0.0002752745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015540649,0.00016001407,0.005120404,0.0000100452935,0.000057239024,0.000044399436,0.04981293,0.00009541663,0.00006753818,0.023933955,0.91898966,0.00015432018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018868581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001505974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91601133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005286271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002046721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2921539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573554956","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2263","title":"Informal Logic and its Implications for Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Informal logic; Normative; Epistemology; Relation (database); Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.05685360908512763,"score_gpt":0.3305164286741749,"score_spread":0.27366281958904726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573554956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06735699,0.0001776106,0.00038760228,0.0038933295,0.00014679422,0.00041920316,0.000087281725,0.0001080826,0.9274231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99306715,0.00002734159,0.00027545626,0.005257306,0.00019437312,0.00013888703,0.000021851954,0.000006178904,0.0010114412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989236,0.0000160831,0.0002974559,0.00020582505,0.000090079135,0.0004669854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934316,0.00012806959,0.0000614256,0.0002352992,0.000050280283,0.0001817594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023117587,0.00015088178,0.00015296346,0.000059420407,0.00025706523,0.000040829524,0.00031742782,0.00014346022,0.002147628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000489596,0.00011690821,0.00007250673,0.00020345203,0.00024274505,0.0004531354,0.000052616804,0.00014399276,0.0010245407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010049057,0.00003996902,0.00013663196,0.000009248458,0.000009525946,0.0000010182217,0.00027808922,0.000012353548,0.000021191365,0.97211236,0.0001067092,0.027172415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007281289,0.0005233427,0.03460836,0.0000068424843,0.000015178539,0.00008199847,0.000023685263,0.00018823134,0.000038315877,0.9305133,0.03301971,0.00025290833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003361846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.8565637e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008392813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001748618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575728999","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2277","title":"Belief and Negation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Negation; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Informal logic; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04564318697619385,"score_gpt":0.24231837800679357,"score_spread":0.19667519103059972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575728999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2877565,0.00012132535,0.0000071367544,0.00034487818,0.00017272828,0.000055310935,0.000006051912,0.00004949118,0.7114866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650261,0.0000995115,0.00008001101,0.0027791974,0.0003967809,0.000005101368,0.00001615972,0.000004229769,0.03159294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996206,0.00001100307,0.0001241603,0.000059827176,0.000062417945,0.00012200263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998054,0.000030053125,0.000029208953,0.00007245325,0.000033061144,0.000029844512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102542384,0.000062697676,0.000079314115,0.000021799548,0.00019352415,0.00006777225,0.000047745696,0.000041596584,0.0020323533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009180889,0.000049251532,0.000025706748,0.00001014118,0.00022969152,0.00031181716,0.000010622088,0.000103864346,0.00036622817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012256012,0.000014521049,0.00015175351,0.0000213744,0.000008864452,0.0000015026976,0.018502312,0.0000106141115,0.000004718323,0.9268249,0.00082412676,0.053623013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020315549,0.00012564543,0.0017896757,0.0000070018045,0.000010775469,0.000005604945,0.00086675613,0.0000860825,0.00002942857,0.0321562,0.9646062,0.000113423805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097437434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001647699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96378213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034917277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010215511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576216411","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1040","title":"The Logic of Deep Disagreements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026788108025452367,"score_gpt":0.2643453754008185,"score_spread":0.23755726737536612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576216411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065031685,0.00023632769,0.9444803,0.0015760143,0.0001744195,0.00008046863,8.633366e-7,0.00008361571,0.04686481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798515,0.00003309769,0.018843953,0.0009730004,0.000054452186,0.000005800429,8.030162e-7,0.0000018041659,0.00023557829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915,0.000017056731,0.0002627572,0.000104994775,0.00021284992,0.0002523655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999367,0.000056581106,0.00009852892,0.00036109006,0.00006503446,0.000051744715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026723277,0.00008542189,0.00008559402,0.00002612405,0.00014159484,0.00008369483,0.0009429583,0.00004213375,0.000018296234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003060704,0.00005035125,0.000039934886,0.00014655308,0.00007182421,0.00046182732,0.00022538044,0.00010031353,0.00018186243],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057720044,0.000027849417,0.00025949537,0.0000050322765,0.000008750137,0.0000011686809,0.0003667933,0.0025787714,0.0000761322,0.58839136,0.00025239243,0.40802646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005674844,0.0005330196,0.008057526,0.000024719895,0.000009974502,0.00003504147,0.00010849897,0.8680259,0.0021908628,0.08666319,0.033344425,0.0004393747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007993341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012343456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001227759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025642941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23375343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576622714","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2135","title":"Eleven Ways to Critique an Article (Part II)","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04004458740729671,"score_gpt":0.3174018368780946,"score_spread":0.2773572494707979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576622714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72715473,0.0010485351,0.00906653,0.003807755,0.0023947346,0.00047103435,0.00010352359,0.00018652696,0.25576663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96704525,0.000055622942,0.0024944895,0.021667156,0.0011461985,0.00008446872,0.0000779069,0.000028959063,0.007399923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801385,0.000079297,0.0005044891,0.00032049496,0.00022636513,0.0008554705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.000033933546,0.00008890154,0.0004607906,0.00014176239,0.00040348875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005121031,0.0002653121,0.0002651576,0.0001236869,0.00026392884,0.00008788338,0.00029139975,0.0003552969,0.005722476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010510308,0.00025663996,0.00013137607,0.00033223687,0.00012044983,0.00080080295,0.00010156665,0.0003704485,0.009884336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003030488,0.0011159105,0.0001789605,0.00006270723,0.0000796725,0.0003113055,0.022854477,0.00039602513,0.0012582046,0.8699624,0.0056569222,0.09782035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006319648,0.008267954,0.017226208,0.0002739094,0.00023664969,0.00094326126,0.011410198,0.00010079327,0.01671666,0.21895202,0.71787167,0.0016810332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085712457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045193598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71221477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008220692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092256705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576669021","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3018","title":"Introduction: Reasoning for Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Argument map; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06267101690754583,"score_gpt":0.34321525046099405,"score_spread":0.2805442335534482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576669021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06280884,0.000252969,0.0005023237,0.05336304,0.009849983,0.00079788925,0.000011442305,0.00030670062,0.8721068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98304105,0.000028414908,0.002513198,0.0011833971,0.0058072913,0.00012628915,0.000006655414,0.0000031816714,0.0072905542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995035,0.0000126896075,0.00009214523,0.00008604073,0.0000759019,0.00022973413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997145,0.0000547873,0.000043248725,0.00008300293,0.000064811924,0.00003966708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005321843,0.00005065381,0.000075510754,0.00002450306,0.0007543231,0.000022675875,0.00011104882,0.00009883054,0.00022102555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036260457,0.00004399107,0.000037196136,0.00007611647,0.0002465226,0.00021967785,0.000026966161,0.00011886737,0.00008685712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024117657,0.000011614748,0.004414411,0.000010796442,0.000012075323,0.0000010381358,0.020754352,3.9030368e-7,0.000014512022,0.9448021,0.014558651,0.015395963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009684577,0.00004995112,0.008295051,0.0000011194362,0.0000051141888,0.0000041871053,0.0031147937,0.000006827595,0.00003116754,0.0032601857,0.98506147,0.00007330946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010094715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095399644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073676683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003226966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577370680","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3801","title":"Informal Fallacies as Cognitive Heuristics in Public Health Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Nottingham; Trent University; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Heuristics; Judgement; Cognition; GRASP; Resource (disambiguation); Public health; Psychology; Cognitive resource theory; Management science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06027199805731966,"score_gpt":0.34857428128352785,"score_spread":0.2883022832262082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577370680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1402399,0.000021104042,0.0027167108,0.0028542834,0.00024157306,0.00029780183,0.0000030590527,0.0001413642,0.8534842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98938996,0.0003529828,0.00040552454,0.00652507,0.00011656358,0.000018687893,0.000020701966,0.000004525623,0.0031659806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984829,0.0001292661,0.0003236996,0.000109022425,0.00037652967,0.00057860673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939376,0.00008180377,0.0001376232,0.000090228925,0.00009199224,0.00020458692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018413701,0.00010437469,0.00015629973,0.00017609078,0.00044447056,0.00020357915,0.00020448795,0.00007783887,0.00038120418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009928433,0.000096869706,0.00004299712,0.00031643777,0.00021152367,0.000778367,0.00010475423,0.00017468934,0.0006583255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018610672,0.000045002744,0.011770585,0.000021909316,0.00000773804,0.0000025601603,0.059510797,0.00006144532,2.940539e-7,0.7312312,0.001214171,0.1961157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004938583,0.00020178694,0.07975126,0.00003186756,0.0000025286656,0.0000016334667,0.037477378,0.00051921105,7.272288e-7,0.0010675014,0.8802607,0.00019152153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002477564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042014434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87904656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090597714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023516602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8461662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578100031","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.3124","title":"Book Review ofControversy and Confrontation, Relating Controversy Analysis With Argumentation Theory.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in MENA","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01792183921212522,"score_gpt":0.2736901392221451,"score_spread":0.2557683000100199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578100031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011577119,0.023318479,0.0066701,0.0014977827,0.00022938817,0.0014023719,0.000010449421,0.00019194908,0.9551024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6776351,0.04349273,0.020592878,0.20603669,0.00025077077,0.00036892245,0.00016866153,0.00004686469,0.05140742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990249,0.00011806131,0.00030507942,0.00014132066,0.00018213972,0.00022849438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992424,0.00020576654,0.00028450554,0.00009911199,0.00008707189,0.00008109945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011564095,0.00010375718,0.000232789,0.000077322286,0.00031271388,0.000046440164,0.00011379862,0.000055639604,0.0037352343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001928904,0.00008619514,0.000051103783,0.00019027092,0.00021941222,0.00094308675,0.000020707319,0.00008202024,0.00006832949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031567542,0.000058431026,0.17968433,0.0002031477,0.0022455044,0.000013951981,0.14170966,0.000035833422,0.000005939948,0.6234371,0.030125536,0.02216486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004969909,0.00048709713,0.221521,0.00044846747,0.0035715834,0.000008840677,0.06346861,0.00021938083,0.00006652999,0.013445364,0.69037753,0.0014156597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036063907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017792861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9036949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091569746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010071676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578187234","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2979","title":"The Question of Truth","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Argumentative; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015477978568294484,"score_gpt":0.26343187938773444,"score_spread":0.24795390081943997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578187234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6253629,0.00006464681,0.30062175,0.00071648165,0.0049692327,0.00032370037,0.0000020171206,0.00018493873,0.06775438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735814,0.0000039686693,0.0023976944,0.000049565595,0.000046714216,0.0000036545466,7.026419e-7,8.7025796e-7,0.0001386732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995782,0.000012552882,0.00015457542,0.00004856257,0.00011812537,0.000087978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995587,0.000060462757,0.00010073593,0.00021376558,0.000045594603,0.000020741903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035405904,0.00003630916,0.0000420054,0.000020459645,0.00008235018,0.000046164558,0.0003021609,0.000033921908,0.000005739543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064830514,0.000020679425,0.000024201488,0.00007151103,0.0000213881,0.00034136098,0.000049628823,0.000070781665,0.00004657454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018809338,0.0000060504954,0.001003175,0.000004529619,0.0000017347874,2.446754e-7,0.00015986268,0.000022443972,0.0014352289,0.9713809,0.000083873994,0.025900109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010586032,0.00041736625,0.54643995,0.000038074024,0.000008116701,0.00006775257,0.00016335657,0.2843098,0.031316534,0.019849716,0.11587823,0.0004524754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039384257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024539902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000041578696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001641256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08432824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578193204","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1115","title":"Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Attribution; Identity (music); Function (biology); Positive economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.059782170620564186,"score_gpt":0.2602218745834,"score_spread":0.20043970396283584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578193204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2147263,0.0047638235,0.000008728208,0.01424522,0.000087554516,0.00028704532,0.000010042828,0.0000162888,0.765855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552333,0.0014394268,0.000019837482,0.0015053673,0.000061356324,0.000030328496,0.000003339252,0.00000136965,0.0014156703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994542,0.00003722383,0.000194487,0.000033347478,0.00011595369,0.00016479597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960536,0.00009786553,0.000077269135,0.00017255777,0.000032372973,0.000014565053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021974462,0.000055262917,0.000086527674,0.000014975276,0.00019027363,0.00008115947,0.0001902017,0.00000967041,0.00035028526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020539734,0.000023385366,0.000026106554,0.000024939263,0.00036104058,0.00021748249,0.000096577496,0.00007234632,0.000019092162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001346821,0.000020645095,0.0011747027,0.000003472726,0.000012398053,7.846395e-8,0.07065225,0.000003516622,8.336346e-8,0.91246945,0.0015869832,0.014062972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000500957,0.000026461723,0.0037888875,0.0000035545183,0.000005140954,7.141337e-7,0.045289822,0.000054047792,7.9148543e-7,0.0013093017,0.94898105,0.000039278584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022526058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017447616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011841476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011272165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3835378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578643490","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.2948","title":"van Eemeren's Pondering on Problems of Argumentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.037459042047807214,"score_gpt":0.24816794421318578,"score_spread":0.21070890216537858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578643490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47389543,0.0000052007017,0.000019994575,0.00023540072,0.00078383234,0.00009341093,0.000006468023,0.00003165692,0.5249286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864477,0.0000028942527,0.00011171048,0.0003016861,0.00028116125,0.000014616483,0.0000261821,0.000003851966,0.0006131068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995653,0.00000493058,0.00017949348,0.000052346637,0.00009738294,0.00010052561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997146,0.00002131061,0.0001017911,0.00009927421,0.00003987157,0.000023126133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000091857866,0.0000630869,0.000063455685,0.00006424635,0.00011443574,0.00004382117,0.0000814315,0.000028325854,0.0019025007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016544329,0.000050943254,0.000027659727,0.000016971562,0.000070219685,0.00040125364,0.000013524228,0.000120054356,0.00017386298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607346,0.00004186584,0.000091844915,0.00003787713,0.000006363508,1.2591786e-7,0.013929359,0.000057720496,0.00065618753,0.9789036,0.00017795608,0.0060885195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010259576,0.0011008076,0.009332045,0.00013334565,0.00004236959,0.000009955709,0.0058738803,0.0006061212,0.012073439,0.72410893,0.24506631,0.00062685274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038859755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005885697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52474934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000045618667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000132828945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581285529","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2927","title":"The Structure and Evaluation of Planning Arguments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Management science; Process (computing); Process management; Computer science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042601381372615446,"score_gpt":0.3830631332940159,"score_spread":0.3404617519214005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581285529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94595945,0.000014080515,0.000036295045,0.00009452236,0.0003793765,0.00018763234,0.0000048026914,0.000007633143,0.05331623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997343,0.0000037028722,0.00007386089,0.000057924382,0.00006135147,0.0000033492558,0.0000062856866,7.9594616e-7,0.000058437898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.000038063972,0.00016853183,0.000022978307,0.00033982005,0.000093730894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957633,0.000048110214,0.00013749689,0.000049592716,0.00016845182,0.000020014259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00158835,0.000028657054,0.000034428667,0.000018786486,0.0004923724,0.0000652517,0.00006744661,0.000034713015,0.00011946411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014941698,0.000018295048,0.000009174576,0.000056593344,0.00010160844,0.00042990886,0.000015230752,0.00005410301,0.0000029590333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016574708,0.0000021739645,0.016615652,0.000008908592,0.000011872061,3.604971e-8,0.06390438,0.00008320829,0.0004985857,0.8171473,0.00022280806,0.10148847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002068398,0.00017534409,0.23809111,0.000028231678,0.00006287393,0.000008647191,0.17275569,0.0042919037,0.003805859,0.08980404,0.4885568,0.00035110392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010615421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019504364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72734326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000089289515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005736492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.378698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581876134","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1137","title":"Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argumentative; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07410902803833037,"score_gpt":0.2813987166423169,"score_spread":0.20728968860398655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581876134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2081829,0.00016466962,0.00030599922,0.0021921757,0.0005126493,0.00029392054,0.0000271261,0.000065790875,0.7882548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98737144,0.000011939622,0.000654675,0.004005378,0.000500431,0.000022881866,0.0000114174645,0.0000056905214,0.0074161454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.000075589705,0.0003513358,0.00010752062,0.00017498757,0.00020074288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.00008779732,0.0001529434,0.00021776033,0.00012243107,0.000034477813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003220057,0.0001162229,0.0001873943,0.000030302946,0.00022655902,0.00004537163,0.00026779564,0.00009050249,0.0004118718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054725348,0.000068786925,0.00014690093,0.000033672743,0.00073252525,0.00029008216,0.00007117976,0.00025438788,0.000068846224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013151366,0.00008561259,0.000644503,0.000056426336,0.000018469893,6.014124e-7,0.011924643,0.00007720175,0.000016344953,0.9854509,0.0008241565,0.0008879647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011372193,0.0004451375,0.013008117,0.00005109758,0.00009547367,0.00006925055,0.012624831,0.0006070556,0.0014992781,0.050701328,0.91922104,0.0005401496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042435586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084842075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016124453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038881928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45097074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583054770","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4140","title":"Sensitizing Reasons by Emulating Exemplars","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07560061435547576,"score_gpt":0.35374861544563757,"score_spread":0.2781480010901618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583054770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31826556,0.00006590906,0.0006782009,0.011029618,0.0007264241,0.00012360151,0.000002616005,0.00022435687,0.66888374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882248,0.000007247798,0.0049595437,0.003639623,0.000112999725,0.0000042180977,0.00000925299,0.000003402248,0.0030389074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991653,0.000047746566,0.00014066843,0.000072444636,0.00030456713,0.00026925566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995099,0.00007152268,0.000032885622,0.0000632006,0.000106823,0.0002157173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008002734,0.00005493369,0.000067093155,0.000024751409,0.00039083546,0.000095776755,0.000099802324,0.000061398845,0.00009643415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006907533,0.000051149796,0.000021643547,0.00013906283,0.000089176516,0.0002485867,0.00003232104,0.00009747695,0.00027092622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012704875,0.00006869099,0.011166858,0.000010782451,0.000014971955,0.000015946644,0.1460915,0.000040708015,0.00007125828,0.76264113,0.049136296,0.030729135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027159977,0.000037409427,0.0020098374,0.000031062722,0.0000066855196,0.00000970784,0.046319652,0.000098753066,0.00009083954,0.028018255,0.9228121,0.00029409412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027303371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038864804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8736758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099690085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021423117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3482299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583554234","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2163","title":"Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical theory; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Criticism; Informal logic; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037260885695353664,"score_gpt":0.2732579846752149,"score_spread":0.23599709897986124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583554234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.130399,0.0045395372,0.00058082177,0.0016323207,0.00014915659,0.0002452188,0.00009221766,0.00005159044,0.8623101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986117,0.00048503932,0.00023829757,0.00029667793,0.000013178894,0.000010758665,0.0000050588374,0.000002628743,0.00033666982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942714,0.000028903247,0.00028691793,0.000043311786,0.00012335084,0.00009038589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999328,0.00012743908,0.00011232226,0.00024522588,0.00016065272,0.000026333042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020925728,0.000065433785,0.00015960338,0.000033211272,0.00014110611,0.000018856115,0.00018712343,0.000023697301,0.00024293849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011573501,0.00004972422,0.000037229336,0.000017832364,0.0008180102,0.00020186968,0.00016097746,0.00006732779,0.000006243712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034689987,0.00006513656,0.0001638108,0.000017311431,0.00004119498,1.2611474e-7,0.020379934,0.0000020855523,0.0000037926839,0.97748846,0.0001499116,0.0016535406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047745975,0.0016390524,0.016834902,0.00030925623,0.00017732914,0.00001434417,0.117185384,0.00002638785,0.000614201,0.50767624,0.3502574,0.0004908832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064313106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008974247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8682127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010467887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027590826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30139926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584611275","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4234","title":"Freeman's Syntactic Criterion for Linkage","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.07404754499049605,"score_gpt":0.29827239263755334,"score_spread":0.2242248476470573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584611275","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041399416,0.0002824309,0.9165162,0.0019429543,0.0016815208,0.00034961736,0.000003180628,0.0005362298,0.037288494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92677706,0.0000060084,0.07089928,0.0017610465,0.00012123671,0.00003129626,0.0000039078986,0.000003962147,0.00039619405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921924,0.000012601427,0.00018529435,0.00014432108,0.00015726767,0.00028129347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993039,0.000100139296,0.00006597675,0.000334864,0.000101275655,0.00009389631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030399207,0.00009952954,0.00013084538,0.00006548145,0.00006802716,0.00015684625,0.0006299054,0.00007372554,0.0000051986153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027459266,0.00007593001,0.000057367204,0.000110256005,0.000030840885,0.0009960606,0.00019551773,0.00007093358,0.000148939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009940382,0.00013178628,0.004010264,0.00017668045,0.000043626293,0.00010063545,0.004881771,0.00036832917,0.00027882823,0.83392215,0.020371526,0.13561502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052242624,0.004310797,0.040990658,0.00012873186,0.000057065798,0.0005884675,0.0017105952,0.27081764,0.0075177574,0.21654432,0.45022437,0.0018853451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025113655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008096748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88537765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021053631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006470473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3096336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584753526","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1140","title":"Missimer's Good Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, 4th Edition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical thinking; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02633819215705317,"score_gpt":0.3475406744429367,"score_spread":0.3212024822858835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584753526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068854965,0.00005043261,0.007890227,0.5301167,0.00640372,0.0006365172,0.000008876714,0.00078608363,0.3852525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93672633,0.000014436198,0.027972601,0.024032539,0.0076200115,0.000041527594,0.00004368573,0.000009101083,0.003539744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985505,0.00007770987,0.00025304794,0.00018901067,0.00053622184,0.00039355305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992606,0.00005355464,0.000030150313,0.00014229518,0.00017739362,0.00033600346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009058638,0.000098084,0.0000943907,0.00008592213,0.0007537597,0.00021640706,0.00023496714,0.000104495346,0.0026433056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071629835,0.00009263208,0.00003366112,0.00021884567,0.00013399025,0.0010904828,0.00003726638,0.00016608975,0.0008703481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010145502,0.00016448634,0.00019473929,0.0000051793386,0.000005132302,7.3824856e-7,0.01689286,0.000029972554,0.00002064402,0.94244826,0.018158583,0.022069246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100291494,0.00010949853,0.0015194133,0.000010046297,0.000007964266,0.0000027989108,0.004984829,0.000024234176,0.00024373771,0.03427543,0.958543,0.00017873639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006735371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010845393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94038445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016252905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017739464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585861394","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2131","title":"Applying Soundness Standards to Qualified Reasoning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soundness; Ceteris paribus; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Process (computing); Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language; Medicine","score_opus":0.04761021898498224,"score_gpt":0.3078718082185359,"score_spread":0.26026158923355364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585861394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72900593,0.000037543712,0.021639094,0.00068735145,0.00085717783,0.0007591694,0.00006841747,0.00044954047,0.24649578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463004,0.000006044209,0.000815283,0.0038998094,0.000089806024,0.00008400836,0.0000017178605,0.000009013642,0.00046427315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872637,0.000016488684,0.00022587566,0.000197828,0.00044464986,0.00038878436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953485,0.0000361528,0.00005696536,0.00019851634,0.000041843705,0.00013166347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002689297,0.00012698643,0.00012570599,0.0000773091,0.00025663592,0.00010163158,0.00029128103,0.00005227126,0.000106717904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065881485,0.00010171584,0.000050158847,0.00033531617,0.000050678867,0.00040463297,0.00011777633,0.00013573871,0.00039965674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026084887,0.000138596,0.00064477476,0.00010341235,0.000007642429,0.00024822442,0.0066213096,0.024393449,0.13604909,0.76225144,0.0012022818,0.06807894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003280915,0.0011169933,0.0029828872,0.0002918754,0.00001967621,0.00032261558,0.0016169072,0.00047241262,0.4289237,0.034289103,0.5249605,0.0017223995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005122179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001511165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7279623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000732454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102597405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51369125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587538784","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3681","title":"Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Position (finance); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.10959721154376895,"score_gpt":0.29624302610621644,"score_spread":0.1866458145624475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587538784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92914844,0.000270873,0.000043664935,0.00012380697,0.00094816065,0.00032441693,0.000006839237,0.00003571591,0.06909806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696714,0.000022191223,0.000017641018,0.0012468768,0.000355256,0.00003929423,0.000009432861,0.000005146557,0.0013370333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993559,0.0000675327,0.000170398,0.000056273875,0.00010100955,0.00024885408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995078,0.00024240297,0.00008011301,0.00009047888,0.0000508739,0.000028322986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004454038,0.000086681255,0.00009859135,0.000049710077,0.00021546298,0.00009168257,0.00009039635,0.00004466606,0.00011033867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008894073,0.000054856402,0.00004663727,0.000028404133,0.00017339208,0.0011755151,0.000037217378,0.00021233245,0.00024037858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025327432,0.0000528203,0.012252348,0.000040772695,0.000022675831,0.0000017126174,0.1397462,0.000032671738,0.000069890986,0.84472585,0.00012659054,0.0029031716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028395923,0.0006597674,0.4073018,0.00021989724,0.00017121239,0.000046937697,0.099146284,0.0007401011,0.0049391957,0.019533375,0.46316808,0.0012337161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014006799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008476657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82519245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000243429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008393624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30896604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587985520","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2264","title":"The Place of Informal Logic in Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Epistemology; Parallels; Informal logic; Foundationalism; Connection (principal bundle); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06053618799393396,"score_gpt":0.2578871470784355,"score_spread":0.19735095908450156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587985520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17714393,0.00026251693,0.0000027018611,0.0008191714,0.00033522162,0.0001689152,0.000018002675,0.000039308583,0.8212102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841057,0.00022864107,0.00003987962,0.0021741805,0.00036276507,0.000017046434,0.00001555002,0.000007964589,0.013048267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987919,0.000043006276,0.0005198966,0.00009392074,0.00019632415,0.00035498774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992679,0.00021170155,0.00014820111,0.00024520778,0.00008353322,0.000043499873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134625,0.00015512445,0.00023129204,0.00006673918,0.00028796398,0.00006803334,0.0003333959,0.00010344202,0.0009417163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047512727,0.000097648845,0.00011307882,0.000056529443,0.000829149,0.0005074625,0.0000497546,0.00037274646,0.00034864052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010740853,0.000038675436,0.0002939861,0.00004771259,0.000016517799,0.0000037534312,0.0146756945,0.00025364725,0.0000015842598,0.9760713,0.00035781227,0.008131911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087856594,0.0005086315,0.0033318459,0.00004766107,0.000018161005,0.0000109909815,0.0034324992,0.0002690377,0.000055597306,0.10585889,0.8852664,0.00032168385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017118422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082816643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012662609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059857346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588067599","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2571","title":"Are Some Modus Ponens Arguments Deductively Invalid?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Modus ponens; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Inference; Medicine","score_opus":0.03863751782486054,"score_gpt":0.2567885819345742,"score_spread":0.2181510641097137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588067599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.757225,0.00045359763,0.035599653,0.0009811993,0.0017520915,0.00040118708,0.0000064944593,0.000725694,0.2028551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919882,0.000041459673,0.0028281184,0.001940601,0.00029976244,0.000020320344,0.0000040646196,0.000007970115,0.0028695068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984793,0.00003403642,0.00028269435,0.00030972096,0.00030085063,0.0005933902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989579,0.000038667462,0.00023480399,0.0004669744,0.00011432569,0.00018733519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022858621,0.00022044027,0.00022494547,0.000135629,0.00021923937,0.00020551564,0.0010406935,0.00011839014,0.000068302346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106220956,0.00017534218,0.0001041559,0.00035633723,0.000072124814,0.0018857331,0.00046821072,0.00020283564,0.0014064979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007976843,0.00059278007,0.05560541,0.00005688085,0.00012108798,0.00073367497,0.0055346433,0.0013076648,0.0004448631,0.8775944,0.00957936,0.048349444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036288558,0.0010004893,0.5879208,0.00012500172,0.000044665067,0.0013974854,0.00081493653,0.037648268,0.003622951,0.15648182,0.20486358,0.0024511928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026631784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005491629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7211126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063949614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006253147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588283721","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2238","title":"Evaluating arguments and making meta-arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14049111011011864,"score_gpt":0.39967178823249605,"score_spread":0.25918067812237744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588283721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7304439,0.0008933515,0.0004357233,0.000051637882,0.00037944329,0.00022911176,0.0000064324836,0.00007487749,0.2674855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926745,0.000022517632,0.0009859503,0.0023536107,0.0001031787,0.00007845228,0.000022305776,0.000010609063,0.0037488404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881446,0.000079483216,0.00030736855,0.00019907174,0.0002449282,0.00035466204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995061,0.000049550137,0.00014130115,0.00019519599,0.000049068465,0.000058778092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005580119,0.0001591818,0.00022229025,0.00009289902,0.00013437092,0.000062755185,0.00011751396,0.00009452684,0.0056908433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005483168,0.00011917674,0.00009647574,0.00013249578,0.00003730645,0.000293343,0.00006668551,0.00014033305,0.0007562828],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007110639,0.00047763073,0.037815224,0.000084757616,0.0045047808,0.00043240606,0.01721736,0.000064356725,0.0010906364,0.039356623,0.0014241734,0.89682096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024852397,0.006003657,0.65947574,0.00022251294,0.014576137,0.003921552,0.028203543,0.003961016,0.0017809375,0.088300414,0.16378711,0.004914941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003757839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006968135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014918212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000893954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589129543","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.457","title":"Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Historicity (philosophy); Centrality; Epistemology; Sociology; Work (physics); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04988486963159874,"score_gpt":0.22105916610393692,"score_spread":0.17117429647233817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589129543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2915172,0.0007179074,0.000026104559,0.000978488,0.0006114451,0.0001805941,0.000011071782,0.000048023685,0.70590913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618834,0.00022398632,0.00006699589,0.00094267813,0.00032140018,0.00001585166,0.000012235848,0.000003758313,0.002224761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992868,0.000023534009,0.00030139388,0.00006655743,0.00015612121,0.00016562972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994542,0.000089493355,0.00017421262,0.00015890624,0.00008556876,0.00003764367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023509041,0.000108168875,0.00016742412,0.000053827876,0.00047674056,0.000030302674,0.00015554462,0.000047902944,0.00046233356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007442495,0.000064417465,0.000060135153,0.000032183616,0.0007941371,0.00063661544,0.000059288956,0.00014634764,0.00005573938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008764685,0.000023930847,0.00030917872,0.00003074457,0.000011064333,9.753117e-7,0.045694306,0.000010736355,9.247846e-7,0.9507036,0.0015960969,0.0015307916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030124285,0.0006573592,0.0329723,0.00005662819,0.000086535634,0.00023366945,0.0068114973,0.00078549533,0.0000967859,0.14445922,0.8102167,0.0006113468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033557593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038078135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80862063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015958964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040206014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50622284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589639477","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.2967","title":"A Bayesian Approach to Absent Evidence Reasoning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Epistemology; Frequentist probability; Bayesian probability; Statistical evidence; Deductive reasoning; Psychology; Philosophy; Bayesian inference; Computer science; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19069346870081977,"score_gpt":0.24495051956886543,"score_spread":0.054257050868045664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589639477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006627224,0.00008771325,0.0007900837,0.0000800334,0.00028187782,0.00011748295,0.0000025062202,0.0000833752,0.9919297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201995,0.000003641078,0.0027498128,0.0017727677,0.00022618208,0.000020156886,9.532886e-7,0.000003958001,0.0032025583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928725,0.000008193358,0.00015891134,0.00013836281,0.0001722973,0.00023499587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996158,0.000011378758,0.000050978386,0.00016284749,0.000041081912,0.00011791548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020460736,0.00009388356,0.00009450418,0.000083191546,0.00038147284,0.00007574142,0.00031593384,0.000022797289,0.00090511463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003497489,0.00007405716,0.00004639128,0.000040629326,0.00023235887,0.00085705833,0.000065420165,0.00009182505,0.0005452705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000274904,0.00003510308,0.000060460847,0.00001459308,0.000003154911,0.000003189386,0.0814725,0.0000132970845,0.000009285459,0.915737,0.0010501521,0.0015737838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039938028,0.0015869525,0.00665687,0.00034240854,0.000039135688,0.00006081925,0.013407123,0.00198784,0.00019861164,0.04363697,0.930362,0.0013218817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019492056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004638223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98872715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022753802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026902331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590091593","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3774","title":"A Serious Flaw in the Collegiate Learning Assessment [CLA] Test","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Rendering (computer graphics); Logical reasoning; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Mathematics education; Critical thinking; Test validity; Validity; Computer science; Applied psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022408105744773383,"score_gpt":0.3322505504779639,"score_spread":0.30984244473319056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590091593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39556503,0.000017796381,0.000015961976,0.002193629,0.00015185444,0.0005120989,5.8330806e-7,0.00005823225,0.60148484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937823,0.0000611184,0.0002468349,0.0011160409,0.00013645107,0.00011117477,0.0000044394824,0.0000043129585,0.004537369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864036,0.00013061202,0.00022622109,0.000103996805,0.0004760421,0.00042274134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993763,0.00031160927,0.00009301264,0.00010663869,0.00005855862,0.00005388294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010029403,0.000103463644,0.00012334414,0.000059106962,0.00055139227,0.00036950587,0.00044606288,0.00008821885,0.00084661535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013369568,0.000069434675,0.000050965176,0.00039888744,0.00013439983,0.0006293348,0.000078099874,0.00033915092,0.0005830287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007311731,0.00017334777,0.87404424,0.000010935994,0.000016928248,0.000020527606,0.044879206,0.00018277558,0.00006636634,0.06698169,0.0051342854,0.0084823975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046737504,0.00018276524,0.8248081,0.0000108228,0.0000066695034,0.0000018021547,0.050412726,0.0004971459,0.0000017395985,0.0009521002,0.12247671,0.0001820292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001992795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010501896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59821725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007660873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012818424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9269844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590508207","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2154","title":"A Dialectical Tier Within Reason","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Dialectic; Epistemology; Core (optical fiber); Product (mathematics); Ecological rationality; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017520099801488904,"score_gpt":0.24203986795852422,"score_spread":0.2245197681570353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590508207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05160077,0.00021813624,0.3283558,0.00071454624,0.0016368901,0.00023533047,0.0000012152956,0.0006665069,0.61657083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975892,0.0000082027245,0.021956734,0.0010193803,0.00017000988,0.000013054987,0.000001985043,0.0000054100447,0.0009332113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988966,0.000019795545,0.00023262897,0.00021945707,0.00023344577,0.00039805696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992893,0.000039088703,0.00007514362,0.00036748906,0.00007012119,0.0001588726],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002719332,0.00014905678,0.0001536278,0.000070101094,0.00014811309,0.0001719412,0.00066698715,0.00011283449,0.000042359177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017801051,0.00010958624,0.00007993091,0.00033613405,0.00007760701,0.00079659914,0.00025762097,0.00021629012,0.0014198544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010862843,0.00005969888,0.0005632275,0.000007895963,0.0000081389035,0.000046152985,0.0018877866,0.00030850145,0.000033166547,0.9886734,0.00029992353,0.008101235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008536361,0.004503079,0.06799152,0.00021787382,0.00006730749,0.0018239085,0.0003678286,0.042512793,0.014720032,0.65493906,0.20084713,0.0034731047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032795204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001827267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92429125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006114877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017154023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592148062","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.1188","title":"Systematically Distorted Communication: An Impediment to Social and Political Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Rationality; Politics; Power (physics); Action (physics); Sociology; Political action; Rhetoric; Mathematical proof; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04082092452419672,"score_gpt":0.26420454706543944,"score_spread":0.22338362254124272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592148062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67894125,0.000053024007,0.00063590053,0.019069193,0.0005453739,0.001233365,0.00000868662,0.00037195787,0.29914126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040294,0.0000011785794,0.00043087138,0.008110473,0.0008517652,0.000046762645,0.000042073825,0.0000076079136,0.0001063552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993077,0.000004023996,0.00019828697,0.00009613378,0.00017788082,0.00021596956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.00001587688,0.00006268497,0.00013392542,0.00011249933,0.000025160896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020706483,0.00010134983,0.00012329659,0.000081924125,0.00035836746,0.0002085872,0.0001894404,0.000043539178,0.00024790078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006682631,0.00008267904,0.000018518276,0.00016564925,0.000060112387,0.0008484692,0.0003961184,0.00008622017,0.00022320193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006890311,0.000027391905,0.013280115,0.00012005745,0.000010153322,7.4459683e-7,0.00017584291,1.7299148e-7,0.000012008805,0.98465925,0.0010158699,0.0006914988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006053422,0.000053361855,0.81844354,0.000032361273,0.000093785,0.0000034200534,0.001533409,0.001224498,0.0000054079396,0.016552052,0.16095582,0.0004969894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017021416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027788567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000095618425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034003117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33715534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592566407","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3421","title":"Moral Hybrids, Moral Relevance and Moral Particularism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15081047697009806,"score_gpt":0.4514853407065988,"score_spread":0.30067486373650076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592566407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6196117,0.0019697493,0.0012781483,0.010845812,0.004129231,0.0011004512,0.000023735101,0.00044862015,0.3605926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767495,0.00018581212,0.0056022587,0.014628869,0.0008290003,0.00007893285,0.000017731652,0.000020840922,0.0018871026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967618,0.0007437536,0.00065276003,0.00018471974,0.0005259157,0.0011310658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963442,0.002333075,0.0002882752,0.0003805952,0.00014564097,0.0005081983],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004513539,0.00020461911,0.00029079543,0.000057034413,0.0009673547,0.000020635767,0.00022683045,0.00044033947,0.0006295012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072914404,0.0001624376,0.000051459254,0.00015710943,0.00038720932,0.0014845993,0.0003761225,0.0040809126,0.0017941848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012744154,0.00009155953,0.39459315,0.00027514852,0.000029071134,0.000028291077,0.004080116,0.000017494283,0.00004759496,0.5822065,0.015163656,0.0033399833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035203435,0.00048022554,0.53486043,0.00035142442,0.00017884659,0.00015138749,0.007432655,0.0025179952,0.00018382122,0.17613259,0.2730143,0.0011759999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015327078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017660348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4060739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006798302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014724323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594876765","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1225","title":"Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Analogy; Discipline; Multidisciplinary approach; Work (physics); Section (typography); Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.3054281408601613,"score_gpt":0.41537523063405213,"score_spread":0.10994708977389084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594876765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036445074,0.00009095696,0.000038189395,0.0059480164,0.00021657023,0.00034765087,0.00005377418,0.00011347472,0.9567463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971784,0.0000052676564,0.00028060196,0.0025376857,0.0014059069,0.000030886345,0.000021181924,0.000007574285,0.023926914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890876,0.00003179665,0.00025767557,0.00016349305,0.00022934064,0.0004089073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993034,0.00022379038,0.000046909452,0.0002019372,0.00013785154,0.00008610815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047156095,0.0001187707,0.00014980299,0.00017232439,0.0007386568,0.00014030948,0.00024968648,0.00006783859,0.00027548452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000988144,0.00008382827,0.00011304523,0.000062049214,0.0002816977,0.00022260736,0.00005772542,0.0002679384,0.00030470148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020707284,0.00014612266,0.0000057745433,0.000012461861,0.000008647736,0.00000893274,0.0053418917,0.000031756674,0.0000108940885,0.9732228,0.014923351,0.006080281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005393529,0.0016530977,0.0008839403,0.000027879776,0.000005633729,0.0000020383288,0.0012136546,0.00047790832,0.000028542847,0.16168188,0.83333933,0.00014675928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014105937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098272496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9353389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025666272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019773252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56812257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595274314","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4109","title":"A Dialectical Analysis of the Ad Baculum Fallacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01772763326987384,"score_gpt":0.24235973076569567,"score_spread":0.22463209749582183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595274314","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26807246,0.000021939823,0.70253456,0.0005341657,0.0006294441,0.00017790857,0.0000021467185,0.00007201317,0.027955377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980533,0.0000014308811,0.0013932941,0.00032791938,0.000022550312,0.000003654024,0.000001153409,0.0000011537841,0.00019551424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992868,0.000051442734,0.00022603502,0.00009496865,0.0002110514,0.00012973194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993707,0.000064013395,0.00012085824,0.0003611861,0.00004916051,0.000034060624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002953074,0.00005874038,0.00013709508,0.00008986589,0.00006420309,0.000041305644,0.00046324247,0.000040042276,0.000028350802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095577234,0.000034291945,0.000139572,0.00067240366,0.00002340252,0.00024028297,0.00014201371,0.00005466438,0.00004494958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022382075,0.00022312533,0.18262805,0.00009582235,0.0007725986,0.000002132304,0.0060182307,0.0146222245,0.0023820035,0.7090219,0.0012047845,0.08300674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015629915,0.00004835457,0.4688553,0.000005176561,0.000055205834,0.0000013760497,0.000009982089,0.5233345,0.00034515173,0.0002378036,0.0068715853,0.00007926595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055784632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042968746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7299809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010785178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017378348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1398385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595464383","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2572","title":"What Should We Do With Traditional Logic?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of logic; Epistemology; Term logic; Paraconsistent logic; Philosophy; Logical consequence; Higher-order logic; Computer science; Computational logic; Artificial intelligence; Description logic","score_opus":0.12343077637447435,"score_gpt":0.32156604426093227,"score_spread":0.1981352678864579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595464383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029400997,0.0002334787,0.0009976514,0.0073494697,0.0006502652,0.000120801546,0.000008169454,0.00008307205,0.9611561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129355,0.00007508926,0.00019799391,0.007313956,0.00022758087,0.00002379862,0.0000095464475,0.000004540626,0.0008539417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897534,0.000027149177,0.00016916287,0.00018747801,0.00025933926,0.0003815188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994748,0.000098091055,0.000049876493,0.00020377206,0.00003000635,0.00014341848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020030276,0.00012767181,0.00011879374,0.000048894835,0.00011516364,0.00009888193,0.00029598997,0.00011190683,0.008762887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013752529,0.00007961954,0.000050590163,0.00024183054,0.00042746685,0.0007706671,0.000032063122,0.0002158858,0.0015340247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016845619,0.00008305114,0.0002495093,0.0000019549184,0.000010400468,0.00009536781,0.0004081809,0.00002926066,0.0000056254744,0.98951524,0.0003324984,0.0091004595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057438546,0.00075823296,0.010922793,0.000025747393,0.000009357392,0.00053080317,0.0005866556,0.000038693648,0.000021806773,0.9436275,0.042671476,0.00023254647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004036248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024004241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96189255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014945831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017329265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595493214","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2909","title":"Zenker's Ceteris Paribus in Conservative Belief Revision: On the Role of Minimal Change in Rational Theory Development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06895057278794707,"score_gpt":0.25334233865687683,"score_spread":0.18439176586892975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595493214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6541033,0.00022028305,0.000001977532,0.003509787,0.00008258592,0.00033980227,0.000023557777,0.000016599424,0.34170213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954178,0.0000091305765,0.000037349942,0.0042060064,0.00015714181,0.000019830446,0.00001742401,0.0000024276783,0.00013293512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925196,0.00005022331,0.0003207674,0.000082585655,0.00014562937,0.00014881084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995869,0.00017757146,0.0000901602,0.00008578516,0.000038608174,0.000021016633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030132418,0.00010036398,0.00014614762,0.00006720195,0.000094109564,0.000028409955,0.00012268039,0.000039060324,0.00070460263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004859686,0.00006117808,0.00003612941,0.000052719428,0.00011832956,0.00020739176,0.000031370106,0.00014958502,0.000047309783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001709811,0.00009552564,0.00041321345,0.0000046536807,0.0000044865646,0.000003710306,0.023520313,0.0000032297235,0.000006133974,0.958276,0.00005679816,0.017444964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010245568,0.0009275123,0.17468043,0.0003149066,0.0000068987424,0.0000028459167,0.00493814,0.00023282018,0.0009805347,0.38744286,0.42906252,0.00038599546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017627013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013497009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57083315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002224873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030251123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77149045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596491580","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3889","title":"Govier's \"Informal Logic\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy of logic; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Argumentation theory; History","score_opus":0.0455844608288752,"score_gpt":0.3423178392393445,"score_spread":0.2967333784104693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596491580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01671527,0.000019604773,0.0053865765,0.0017583602,0.0002830171,0.00039467588,0.0000016789246,0.00052684016,0.97491395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96737516,0.000046810088,0.017528271,0.0035735327,0.00021894445,0.00010178278,0.0000097038055,0.0000073787332,0.011138391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989198,0.000042173804,0.00028937304,0.00008469548,0.00028791963,0.00037604786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993282,0.00007953624,0.00013242158,0.00019608419,0.000108548025,0.00015520128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007213058,0.0001077183,0.00012638405,0.000081497354,0.00045010503,0.0002175143,0.00040030188,0.00012580665,0.0060005784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036037865,0.000085743966,0.000069120266,0.00015306166,0.00016498298,0.0009013715,0.00007274651,0.00018657403,0.0024474033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011484002,0.000032543296,0.0006871134,0.000011913572,0.0000045275815,3.9731532e-7,0.009521917,0.0000015933292,0.000004335575,0.95387393,0.015976597,0.019883975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001560842,0.00009556276,0.0046494785,0.000020674619,0.000007630483,0.0000059070408,0.0052370005,0.0002606246,0.00009300296,0.24438249,0.7447373,0.00035421373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011084953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119576835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038559683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012605412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596851013","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2902","title":"Argumentative Thinking: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychology and Argumentation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03233095517686486,"score_gpt":0.3831865307821221,"score_spread":0.35085557560525726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596851013","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13208768,0.000012170116,0.00028350423,0.62283355,0.002756896,0.0005571549,0.0000017042165,0.00009926021,0.24136807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86752456,0.00006154914,0.0031642243,0.1118709,0.01535206,0.000023863477,0.000022429927,0.000004030794,0.0019763848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991725,0.00009532005,0.00014361941,0.0001427451,0.00025728537,0.00018853658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996891,0.00003351117,0.000036499077,0.00009218335,0.000054077627,0.00009460743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066192565,0.00006791278,0.00006218646,0.00005643611,0.00057544984,0.00012921689,0.0001431471,0.000048395064,0.00074410014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013003229,0.000049142804,0.0000131845145,0.00017204133,0.00009190034,0.00028306482,0.000011278574,0.0001138741,0.00025408407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004948953,0.00008349289,0.00013351324,8.761633e-7,0.0000041908424,6.106981e-7,0.13845298,0.000012438676,0.00001562583,0.64495236,0.035214484,0.18107992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013720422,0.00041553343,0.026776588,0.0000028842278,0.000003950243,0.0000017428921,0.010847359,0.000002782632,0.00007500377,0.07012489,0.89151824,0.00009381081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019777111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006007756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85630375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047805097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003645655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81473744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597492954","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4209","title":"Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.14301484125915587,"score_gpt":0.3319198136403934,"score_spread":0.18890497238123755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597492954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6123546,0.00015575078,0.000054927492,0.00031250593,0.0005212763,0.00017937618,0.00001635728,0.00003898226,0.38636625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947816,0.00002692836,0.00004796832,0.002227899,0.00015143232,0.000019462435,0.000021708034,0.00000494908,0.0027180195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991365,0.00011817344,0.00030083023,0.000114184666,0.00016224616,0.00016803994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951637,0.00013101895,0.000105018546,0.00012497984,0.000059478443,0.00006316455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011466525,0.00011127349,0.0001582228,0.00006683114,0.00009942701,0.00006621284,0.000078808225,0.00005841801,0.00009752437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102474776,0.0000865153,0.000035622987,0.000021395474,0.00025242078,0.00033723848,0.000034842866,0.00017226224,0.00012042333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070545306,0.00005421007,0.0009192513,0.000026091519,0.000009612875,0.0000017705244,0.03590586,0.000018857758,0.000008167712,0.9608622,0.0001114193,0.0020119767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002236093,0.0012366264,0.011750514,0.000056342098,0.000028974395,0.000004689562,0.06845105,0.00007404784,0.00035276863,0.80550736,0.10977467,0.0005268587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017959715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043882462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38364822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003591581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036797355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35279915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597725234","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4203","title":"Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","keywords":"Debiasing; Situational ethics; Taxonomy (biology); Critical thinking; Epistemology; Confirmation bias; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02358649599310291,"score_gpt":0.3352128984735683,"score_spread":0.31162640248046536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597725234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15681715,0.0002709814,0.007462854,0.045927763,0.0028827323,0.0002828039,8.886445e-7,0.00029326783,0.7860615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974472,0.000036339097,0.014133748,0.009023285,0.0003635384,0.000012878385,0.0000044255803,0.0000054907036,0.0019483273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.0001068208,0.00020068491,0.0001306016,0.0003141496,0.00030775435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920917,0.00033368694,0.00003480747,0.00009406893,0.00015087695,0.00017740669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011714821,0.00008657361,0.000099197816,0.0000567068,0.00081255997,0.00029443405,0.0001508635,0.00010196838,0.00032214454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017062214,0.0000758508,0.000026348207,0.00012232216,0.00026824023,0.0005682154,0.00004629208,0.00015350166,0.00013325717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047181,0.00005180178,0.0030075274,0.000018053546,0.0000026934022,2.1579335e-7,0.021098236,0.0000010393672,0.000006870911,0.9113804,0.0011547041,0.06327538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016473635,0.000050559873,0.024261795,0.00010983721,0.000016674598,0.000009028749,0.010195234,0.00014650893,0.00003895726,0.32747862,0.6371892,0.0003388606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018901135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006467429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8176548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006426488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046452752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62496364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597777519","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i1.682","title":"What is a “Real” Argument?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02570972426029476,"score_gpt":0.2664251485682671,"score_spread":0.24071542430797233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597777519","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3407755,0.0011253223,0.41820583,0.014101602,0.0064295,0.0014064348,0.0000055812793,0.001422208,0.21652806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99015087,0.00018113398,0.0028660563,0.0054709595,0.000077677796,0.0000048299135,0.0000030559418,0.0000017089873,0.0012437077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922556,0.000011341669,0.00020889677,0.00013431878,0.00020649507,0.0002134076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995125,0.000011102215,0.00008997125,0.00028769975,0.000034304794,0.000064422136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014940153,0.000088603265,0.000092302944,0.000059074755,0.000078532656,0.00034230374,0.0003730524,0.000051360832,0.000048241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031779039,0.000069529924,0.000050190305,0.00014449103,0.0000069669204,0.0028123106,0.000053872274,0.000055666176,0.00053521077],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016966946,0.00017376369,0.0026514342,0.000036014728,0.000025553318,0.000035619258,0.012198672,0.00033511178,0.001275997,0.42354074,0.010889304,0.5488208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034055137,0.0019380292,0.41863498,0.00027074054,0.000021178485,0.00017801332,0.0007346213,0.29258,0.013600086,0.024013955,0.2428198,0.0018030766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020991027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6493754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000205517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018092534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.687923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599243124","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.513","title":"In view of an express regulation: Considering the scope and soundness of a contrario reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Soundness; Epistemology; Appeal; Scope (computer science); Silence; Practical reason; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.030553505790209132,"score_gpt":0.2339176565947959,"score_spread":0.20336415080458678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599243124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88083005,0.00011749024,0.00010142839,0.00016828849,0.00007136213,0.00013950521,6.8972327e-7,0.000011169115,0.118560046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572474,0.00001602715,0.00028627645,0.003823349,0.00007119842,0.000006113826,0.000006250525,0.0000028105019,0.00006323712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999471,0.000005678235,0.00026300317,0.00005735557,0.000126712,0.00007626871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996322,0.00002374514,0.00017170013,0.00007512507,0.00009274411,0.000004496558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017997864,0.00005853071,0.00010565021,0.000067230234,0.00006232368,0.00003407175,0.000085091146,0.000023869763,0.00011595034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043589633,0.000041567673,0.000018461933,0.000102275975,0.00012542612,0.0016076493,0.00004436366,0.000046844627,0.000004993932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041893276,0.000028212695,0.005028245,0.000072387775,0.0000073945084,0.0000037167777,0.00033179228,0.00043359376,0.0006012931,0.9930852,0.00007061823,0.0002956212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064951773,0.00020591092,0.6220797,0.0009937023,0.00006568788,0.0001965536,0.0017603736,0.09963047,0.012559892,0.0748662,0.18017767,0.000968687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029114014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007288971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91821903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004470434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016268632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16950805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600275594","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1138","title":"Useful Advice and Good Arguments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04805469277669199,"score_gpt":0.26024519275710234,"score_spread":0.21219049998041034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600275594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22302109,0.0002711494,0.000012857596,0.0007233182,0.000378207,0.00009501819,0.000015351212,0.00010726078,0.7753758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96509457,0.000059501148,0.00031739793,0.0051586046,0.00073417544,0.000007796989,0.00001330745,0.000007491238,0.028607141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937755,0.00001518805,0.000191801,0.000095400865,0.00010411415,0.00021593747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996517,0.000044172994,0.000071043796,0.0001187914,0.000056704703,0.00005761323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016211993,0.000105822335,0.00012885817,0.00003839931,0.00020959448,0.000089305075,0.00009759424,0.00005892472,0.00048312542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001679762,0.00008369363,0.000041278083,0.000012982432,0.00023697062,0.00048821926,0.000051353018,0.00017069501,0.00046390865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015630872,0.00005092645,0.0015375481,0.000044765777,0.00003388774,0.0000028505008,0.02110671,0.000011222674,0.000008035057,0.9651528,0.0021610307,0.009874602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031335006,0.0001043969,0.0015863519,0.000008750867,0.000017656062,0.0000068877043,0.0012679633,0.000076785975,0.000044477227,0.005226476,0.9912059,0.00014100714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064369735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046303295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98904485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009299456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001662813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59627616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600870717","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3534","title":"Argumentation in Theory and Practice: Gap or Equilibrium?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relation (database); Reflective equilibrium; Line (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10142632431718962,"score_gpt":0.34787148445680494,"score_spread":0.24644516013961532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600870717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5069705,0.00027037083,0.0000067207743,0.00074958167,0.0005169392,0.00013120896,0.000004356993,0.000030877447,0.4913194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928801,0.000049800365,0.00012816367,0.002752311,0.0006745395,0.000014505221,0.000014579274,0.000004343937,0.0034816687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995114,0.000058398513,0.00014348808,0.000047751422,0.000077256766,0.00016168947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951965,0.00028543113,0.00005983212,0.00006368228,0.000036335066,0.000035082117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000693732,0.000064042084,0.000062839616,0.00003162346,0.000097751275,0.00008357253,0.000042361185,0.000030134535,0.0012186096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016930161,0.000045722656,0.00001807856,0.000021349475,0.00010866401,0.001706569,0.00002105544,0.00007411341,0.00007162857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005119089,0.000055154585,0.0014064325,0.000018726838,0.000006576402,2.4422667e-7,0.16456477,8.1690575e-7,0.000006509338,0.8325982,0.0005954804,0.0006958651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011175388,0.00035510914,0.02855807,0.000035395828,0.000058937007,0.00004138063,0.36744455,0.000030534582,0.00006658324,0.08632355,0.51548076,0.00048758465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002956697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029445704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74627465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001771495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024309784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603968196","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2146","title":"Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Falsity; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Deontic logic; Informal logic; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.045659633876521305,"score_gpt":0.3730706715448779,"score_spread":0.32741103766835655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603968196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37036428,0.00014274707,0.01141988,0.0042237197,0.00020569807,0.00049697526,0.000005585931,0.00015500616,0.61298615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971069,0.000096589836,0.00048231284,0.0016019187,0.00008774052,0.00003104532,0.0000010300442,0.000004532924,0.00058792415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988594,0.000026881431,0.00017962417,0.00012243,0.00039982024,0.0004118344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995945,0.000058101028,0.00007232005,0.00009237145,0.00007979209,0.0001029051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038302178,0.00010109367,0.00009738215,0.000025398393,0.00083463796,0.00029328046,0.0003288884,0.00006685757,0.00011248627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014240424,0.000065217275,0.000057723166,0.00022566231,0.0004358854,0.0009193622,0.00007207744,0.00021101741,0.00031311205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045965837,0.000048416918,0.00009179168,0.000013048841,0.000015194663,0.000025245557,0.04181278,0.026520299,0.000066822795,0.9294754,0.00006226353,0.0018227274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002365466,0.000978251,0.0014257969,0.0001620983,0.000093733936,0.00006574795,0.09589697,0.018446375,0.002561082,0.86202633,0.014806888,0.0011712817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020497062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006294598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62674266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099670295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005395212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64194447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607463045","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1042","title":"Revisiting Deep Disagreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016928815428571078,"score_gpt":0.24567812148776666,"score_spread":0.22874930605919558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607463045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015356622,0.0007656201,0.3893866,0.0010969779,0.0003592416,0.00016578793,6.607848e-7,0.00040122587,0.59246725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96690005,0.00002842554,0.029890588,0.0016761767,0.0004645344,0.000009508421,0.0000026150824,0.0000037236737,0.0010243707],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895096,0.000017876368,0.000257733,0.00018105033,0.00020567,0.00038669675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993603,0.000042136708,0.00009461012,0.00034268465,0.000055483208,0.000104775034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003084787,0.00012809935,0.00012772383,0.00005295733,0.00016070624,0.0001672654,0.0007155947,0.000052021947,0.00012869129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060706952,0.00009628224,0.00007547511,0.00018866976,0.000029322873,0.00095906586,0.0003675296,0.00011972589,0.0015008457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028428233,0.000026283788,0.001992737,0.000015886522,0.000008433712,0.000010048436,0.0017807058,0.00036040734,0.000024557,0.38050243,0.00044450467,0.61483115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010785698,0.0002993747,0.031443164,0.0000674279,0.0000149004945,0.00015314542,0.00017964105,0.23192497,0.0012063426,0.0056948643,0.7270247,0.0009129344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046297146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064754836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95154345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043070377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027917296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608791421","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1135","title":"The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Function (biology); Principal (computer security); Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025871970033994482,"score_gpt":0.23430204422266906,"score_spread":0.2084300741886746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608791421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3723733,0.0018507239,0.5753285,0.010843915,0.0007850744,0.0007276952,0.000004276115,0.00021623196,0.037870273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962846,0.00004037777,0.0024870285,0.00054074253,0.000046155517,0.0000064038445,5.6878304e-7,0.0000012703622,0.0005928303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938107,0.00005624552,0.00018122383,0.00008996645,0.00014187167,0.00014964081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994602,0.00014689441,0.00012019681,0.00020463944,0.000031603522,0.00003646284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006035331,0.00006578722,0.00008581763,0.00002304551,0.00012550966,0.00008879717,0.00031395155,0.00004404331,0.000008901729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045822635,0.000035147164,0.000032068107,0.00006385408,0.00006345824,0.00043010566,0.00013269066,0.00005684274,0.000020230733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010403273,0.000017940727,0.0014636382,0.000012576135,0.000009254272,0.0000013879732,0.000540742,0.000059717615,0.00020251106,0.8819291,0.00052015577,0.11523256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025814788,0.0011497306,0.28722003,0.000086716034,0.000024263258,0.0002967015,0.0008085716,0.15686062,0.008534622,0.042774234,0.49878317,0.00087987696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035162782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000044173285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009170083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009914673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14332597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609079276","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.536","title":"Cogency, Compactness and Microstructure","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04873003567549325,"score_gpt":0.2642242689700556,"score_spread":0.21549423329456233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609079276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56132466,0.0005933271,0.000038764272,0.0009832417,0.00071997166,0.00014013643,0.00004091726,0.00010091194,0.43605804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926145,0.0000299917,0.00008423273,0.0044357385,0.00032597117,0.0000010521234,0.000020069623,0.0000035205476,0.0024849258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994733,0.000013327233,0.00015885374,0.000085015025,0.000075524826,0.00019399913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968404,0.000027361311,0.00006257683,0.00010609371,0.00006740352,0.000052552194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000096374264,0.00010982077,0.00015431659,0.000033744574,0.0002388069,0.0000985967,0.00009456171,0.00006833008,0.00024241922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001347742,0.0000814574,0.00004319474,0.000014640905,0.000330447,0.000249717,0.000019127032,0.00018576362,0.000048763788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019736184,0.000016514135,0.00033221528,0.000026233307,0.000011710696,0.0000054349666,0.017816685,0.0000042768233,0.00015060407,0.9738019,0.0013278174,0.006486887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073844317,0.0005135667,0.029010529,0.000026885022,0.000043698685,0.00007458189,0.0040132497,0.000059700997,0.00037889913,0.150294,0.8143699,0.0004765419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035353285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008657715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049333707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017958173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33217365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615233463","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2843","title":"Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03834399691533259,"score_gpt":0.3009816324172429,"score_spread":0.2626376355019103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1615233463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11986037,0.00004092493,0.00028834582,0.0008550085,0.00018151793,0.00024123344,0.000024026704,0.000035929057,0.8784726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931724,0.0000057884904,0.0002913787,0.0022138713,0.00047799328,0.000020015328,0.00009649273,0.0000048219517,0.0037172078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990863,0.000011634973,0.00026903112,0.00014482925,0.00020897322,0.0002792132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964964,0.000009617166,0.000075443,0.00012674811,0.000060464827,0.00007811056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012603746,0.00013101817,0.0001647612,0.00017403296,0.00015412911,0.00019324938,0.00014801406,0.000031722997,0.00044419387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027680804,0.00010046876,0.00007836951,0.00006421197,0.000056250967,0.0002873075,0.000025695152,0.0000922289,0.00021809043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002462443,0.0002381763,0.0004697703,0.0000071497107,0.000022859704,0.000005328093,0.03387897,0.0007952065,0.0000070564747,0.9595015,0.0015133928,0.003535972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006913784,0.0026342685,0.052088793,0.00024248232,0.0006256142,0.000014166794,0.3883049,0.011786402,0.00036346886,0.2487497,0.28446952,0.0038069107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011753466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009463378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87475544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042715732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024278721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48636115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616088548","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2145","title":"The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Critical Thinking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Computer science; Section (typography); Class (philosophy); Computer-Assisted Instruction; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","score_opus":0.03466845958281332,"score_gpt":0.35108767952085806,"score_spread":0.3164192199380447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616088548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152058,0.000041424722,0.0055173407,0.0036085332,0.0017579818,0.00025326447,5.682836e-7,0.00006772564,0.0735474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646395,0.000010667249,0.0031539078,0.00029628532,0.00005298847,0.000009065804,0.0000010948772,0.0000015687575,0.000010479349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917835,0.00016126185,0.00018000274,0.000059060312,0.0002457556,0.00017555172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918944,0.0006033905,0.000023946397,0.00005712586,0.00008874602,0.00003733751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017913505,0.00004304452,0.00007240183,0.00003690432,0.00038126684,0.00005847566,0.00014522881,0.000059226128,0.000013898804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054267363,0.00003052977,0.000026514026,0.00020699458,0.00031268952,0.00017958911,0.000029661172,0.00011736476,0.000013384357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018014298,0.000030340047,0.002675577,0.000016435943,0.0000022507666,8.960335e-7,0.004905842,0.00006108234,0.0000058082687,0.98285973,0.000002094388,0.009421919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052398717,0.000062851126,0.4605924,0.00016465658,0.0000033664214,0.0000045007446,0.0040005515,0.000016578066,0.00022942871,0.5306278,0.0036637567,0.000110188535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022189037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001664426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4579168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010248745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020626004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2932435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616217205","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.3395","title":"The Pragmatic and Dialectical Dynamics of an Illegitimate Argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dynamics (music); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03816774420360614,"score_gpt":0.23704771561142915,"score_spread":0.19887997140782301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616217205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28252932,0.0000628283,0.00006853947,0.0004325959,0.0006304231,0.00019601092,0.000017060402,0.000037266793,0.71602595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991874,0.000022792166,0.0002604703,0.00014721775,0.0000949285,0.000018310548,0.00001218018,0.000003505232,0.00025317492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995331,0.000020978174,0.00019383326,0.00004814826,0.000078513665,0.00012539866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996629,0.000059823353,0.00008157345,0.00011879928,0.000039908067,0.000037026824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001974785,0.000063281754,0.00007218766,0.00002355577,0.00027265915,0.000062207146,0.00009823593,0.000021805738,0.00032102523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033920736,0.000038429655,0.000018770314,0.0000129653645,0.00029887102,0.0003995067,0.00003136174,0.00006327544,0.000027334198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017214432,0.000037345257,0.00003819701,0.0000223872,0.000008734271,3.9776538e-7,0.020767327,8.62831e-7,5.71959e-7,0.972288,0.00003699493,0.006781949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031547245,0.0007209069,0.004477673,0.00003113881,0.000044639335,0.000020416182,0.010639394,0.0070197023,0.000076420445,0.9623056,0.014119874,0.00022876773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060346625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013508971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7166581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009154663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016565788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35150012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1622591963","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3399","title":"“Reasonable Hostility”: Its Usefulness and Limitation as a Norm for Public Hearings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Explication; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Corollary; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.2847225877389229,"score_gpt":0.26489730686262597,"score_spread":0.019825280876296925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1622591963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32845256,0.00060829154,0.00022429289,0.00061613636,0.00018295596,0.00035845538,0.00001628979,0.00012852639,0.6694125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98966205,0.00008009798,0.00020704688,0.00060016476,0.00006291906,0.00013776138,0.000015602182,0.000005302724,0.009229024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994892,0.000009028618,0.00016832823,0.000081648206,0.00007798288,0.00017381877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.00007466592,0.000073068346,0.00013272479,0.00023186285,0.00004377442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016354921,0.0000867091,0.00011012174,0.000045948862,0.00048778678,0.00012528167,0.00012476867,0.000030484713,0.00027745735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104088824,0.000068581794,0.00003400901,0.000025766012,0.000114303504,0.0007753881,0.000097371434,0.000059780617,0.00012427905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028073062,0.000031814423,0.00082911405,0.000029396313,0.000019813713,1.7564287e-7,0.041181106,1.2728303e-7,6.567219e-7,0.952179,0.00081769354,0.004882996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047926986,0.000316244,0.016564721,0.000013861843,0.000020663972,0.0000053822064,0.018199498,0.00017818279,0.000051013252,0.017081894,0.9468707,0.00021858548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013179614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012913409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94605297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010808684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002313015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37517107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1624665321","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2279","title":"The Lord Scroop Fallacy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.022825718122640858,"score_gpt":0.30025735022324473,"score_spread":0.2774316321006039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1624665321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07770422,0.00009872145,0.000041930078,0.001392155,0.0002528196,0.00006796808,0.0000021481555,0.00005235692,0.9203877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888125,0.000017505983,0.00002769349,0.00263973,0.000120662524,0.000011085891,0.0000010225339,0.0000025324719,0.008367275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925107,0.0000286388,0.00014925793,0.000100080404,0.00012493263,0.0003460336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995205,0.00011305105,0.000023116443,0.00025006555,0.000014011162,0.00007929109],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027693447,0.00007172738,0.000059350175,0.000011567042,0.00025809035,0.00005004554,0.0004092148,0.00005561054,0.008421744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028791475,0.000038843707,0.000045286393,0.000147728,0.0003886298,0.00012787103,0.000032608106,0.00013789129,0.010821031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005713623,0.0000134880565,0.00006747179,4.0765678e-7,0.000003898065,0.000006178653,0.0002076432,0.0000051829024,0.0000028675988,0.86215425,0.00043240027,0.13704906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026542592,0.0001807884,0.01446169,0.0000026916716,0.000003711017,0.000038483253,0.00007648588,0.000055766348,0.000026466769,0.52381116,0.46095005,0.00012728537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001813135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034235418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9120204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064821174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009415847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1630653006","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1117","title":"The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Public sphere; Transactional leadership; Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.016406898815431125,"score_gpt":0.2624387704982772,"score_spread":0.24603187168284607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1630653006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19437544,0.0032837852,0.00012552516,0.10477473,0.00038465494,0.00044257485,0.000010210458,0.000053098993,0.69655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974044,0.0010208839,0.000031765147,0.00047183863,0.000110224064,0.0000123530135,4.845303e-7,0.0000011117264,0.00094692945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993513,0.000039597264,0.00014305967,0.000044090226,0.0002465128,0.0001754391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996078,0.00018896899,0.000055343146,0.000063148895,0.000053222968,0.000031506923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067664846,0.00004858785,0.00007339888,0.000008531513,0.0010225327,0.00006551546,0.00015421267,0.00003271871,0.00016992986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006677143,0.00002275345,0.000051801508,0.000088232446,0.0010181075,0.0002630685,0.000026351254,0.00009095697,0.0000172894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038500068,0.000014656498,0.0004392196,0.0000027591054,0.000029963012,1.6031059e-7,0.022518506,0.0000098532555,4.2263596e-7,0.8908955,0.00055551785,0.08549495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004927268,0.000022510745,0.0040771835,0.0000029095127,0.00000944786,0.0000020393286,0.025246773,0.00003775702,0.00000916746,0.008233563,0.9618071,0.000058820988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032031254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013041192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96125156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016512211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005559904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78645986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1631223529","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2846","title":"Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Pragmatics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028354455352918476,"score_gpt":0.3288622764609626,"score_spread":0.30050782110804414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1631223529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21988659,0.00008061641,0.0033358964,0.006675522,0.0001387654,0.00027779062,0.0000020776504,0.000014684031,0.76958805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604887,0.0000011316931,0.000070864764,0.0038423052,0.00001538296,0.00001031163,8.323412e-7,6.171476e-7,0.000009675372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943364,0.000093264294,0.00020526597,0.00004960611,0.00010493606,0.00011327489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993996,0.00036153584,0.00006354937,0.00014579497,0.00001773463,0.00001177076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057578617,0.000042057316,0.000056981964,0.000028208387,0.00007160551,0.000020851332,0.00017705871,0.00002685212,0.00016549078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002067271,0.000019835772,0.000026323138,0.00014179281,0.00018564986,0.000114615,0.0000121627,0.00011502668,0.000050633167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009680636,0.000028612456,0.00008001758,0.0000012714802,0.000001735408,0.0000027462968,0.010619061,0.00014147193,0.00004092763,0.98628503,0.000022770802,0.0027666616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016122225,0.00018204658,0.054364074,0.000016793483,0.0000057488824,0.000055025765,0.0022299346,0.0019499137,0.000050838808,0.9408842,0.0000534994,0.000046726294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008362406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008827128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77616227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005209231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009258748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1812008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1633926454","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2130","title":"Mapping the Structure of Debate","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Contrast (vision); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.055940628033043206,"score_gpt":0.22791829979139186,"score_spread":0.17197767175834866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1633926454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73651546,0.00020319493,0.000025453275,0.00048279623,0.00070201396,0.00008281094,0.000031346954,0.000032827986,0.26192412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867374,0.000008928686,0.00005861072,0.00062828296,0.00024085389,6.9664026e-7,0.000002732702,0.000002075908,0.00038405394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996721,0.0000025720528,0.00012838612,0.000035850775,0.000052673367,0.000108374064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997721,0.000017498718,0.00006038488,0.00007991905,0.00006170726,0.000008413009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000026363266,0.000055196033,0.00007708648,0.00002542087,0.00020689814,0.000022716275,0.000106086205,0.000018660394,0.00016191264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030640203,0.000028465312,0.000030356816,0.000012408823,0.0002643118,0.000041042662,0.000051809053,0.00006818832,0.000016830067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025416505,0.0000043470104,0.00022268025,0.000011802975,0.000025774581,0.0000029881096,0.02608433,0.00004943993,0.000019635434,0.9726707,0.000087487155,0.00081831316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007754434,0.00022293274,0.00969264,0.000041532483,0.000033395292,0.000023942706,0.014893575,0.000028110044,0.0013527786,0.3240583,0.6485971,0.00028024122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009414358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022510496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6486124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004211958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011914863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17728299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636038418","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3298","title":"Critical Thinking in Moral Argumentation Contexts: A Virtue Ethical Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Criticism; Deliberation; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09585343320322942,"score_gpt":0.3224022864574426,"score_spread":0.2265488532542132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636038418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17858149,0.00047561104,0.0017819558,0.0028808257,0.0021102205,0.0003906649,0.000023703697,0.0001768595,0.81357867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902188,0.0000055219034,0.00081684196,0.0076705045,0.0006876768,0.000031134186,0.00003622684,0.000009065781,0.0005241827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880034,0.00011040546,0.00034835062,0.00011028518,0.00022927819,0.00040131487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993973,0.0002458735,0.000063896005,0.00012009752,0.000086946064,0.00008590563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009798183,0.00013706245,0.00021055619,0.000080653575,0.0003023324,0.00012731776,0.00014176428,0.00023618097,0.00017414044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022676705,0.00011165339,0.0000768034,0.00003249004,0.00059441675,0.00091554184,0.000057687015,0.0009036633,0.00015935618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022679462,0.00009880161,0.0019609954,0.000056479235,0.0000084780895,0.0000019304384,0.057558313,0.00000968531,0.0000061641986,0.939579,0.00014901822,0.0005484599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034501138,0.0008964767,0.025318975,0.00019565715,0.00015700494,0.00008940565,0.08814162,0.002397586,0.0002790435,0.72785616,0.14949387,0.0017240848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012536279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011901429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030741012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003236784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4553093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636256915","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2232","title":"Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Constructive; Philosophy; Metaphilosophy; Ordinary language philosophy; Argument map; Western philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.05550613182209997,"score_gpt":0.32654661092785064,"score_spread":0.2710404791057507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636256915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23934567,0.00021216007,0.0002197229,0.00424661,0.0008142428,0.00041812778,0.000021555039,0.00017370564,0.7545482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914369,0.00007159038,0.00037271148,0.0070910715,0.00035803718,0.00009595307,0.00003549211,0.000020567028,0.0005176992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962792,0.00014081004,0.0010156285,0.00055376656,0.00065934466,0.0013512468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983659,0.00018939463,0.0002346709,0.0006926398,0.00006609216,0.00045133088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009471368,0.00048760508,0.0005793513,0.00042990758,0.00021168827,0.000084089574,0.0010724787,0.00045898248,0.0038232468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016612238,0.00038819195,0.0002584157,0.0011202239,0.00079510495,0.0010548701,0.00035195972,0.00087021315,0.0042630453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057705963,0.0003670381,0.0032098498,0.0000136748695,0.00004200562,0.0004132366,0.00056381867,0.00008524833,0.000035169855,0.98920864,0.000053718642,0.005430517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027538594,0.0010171154,0.058157675,0.000042540618,0.000036499463,0.00045026484,0.00010475507,0.0003197765,0.0000728203,0.9220477,0.014196942,0.00080005184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048863378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000130909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7540305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007199428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005637441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1637573926","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2270","title":"Tindale's Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1011740871062094,"score_gpt":0.2666673883782389,"score_spread":0.1654933012720295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1637573926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14928624,0.00019279258,0.00005423559,0.00013689646,0.000059399237,0.00007308409,0.000012292925,0.00002713618,0.8501579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985377,0.0002135505,0.00027246884,0.00013498268,0.000038168142,0.000009417624,0.000003829074,0.0000035586186,0.013946984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993066,0.000009792221,0.00033859396,0.000052907668,0.00016498606,0.00012710434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951756,0.000032626212,0.000116582865,0.00020995825,0.000095969895,0.000027285292],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009407384,0.0000800995,0.00018250682,0.000035496876,0.00010545808,0.000013432763,0.00019304082,0.000027067743,0.0013576613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010643152,0.000059466147,0.0000707568,0.00002652616,0.00015982651,0.00015700559,0.000057385278,0.0000701835,0.00006953486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052606178,0.00012001437,0.0001063467,0.000029533763,0.000041426974,2.253552e-7,0.02882473,0.0010176663,0.000021306885,0.95846266,0.001202489,0.010120991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007050661,0.00039081703,0.00043443008,0.000048426566,0.000039965613,0.0000020842033,0.0042937323,0.00865264,0.00046778924,0.010419971,0.97425914,0.0002859224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027419272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008859616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011716153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023738778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1643224460","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.594","title":"Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Deadlock; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06648932866527402,"score_gpt":0.25117269335870934,"score_spread":0.18468336469343533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1643224460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929464,0.0003160782,0.1611539,0.00033904694,0.0004746863,0.00045181363,0.000010853146,0.000271888,0.04403534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323076,0.00011141961,0.0057425075,0.0006566119,0.00004018598,0.000015820367,0.000007495164,0.0000029850626,0.00019218856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923444,0.000016133285,0.000206409,0.00015243907,0.00019643607,0.00019411594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956304,0.00003307394,0.000097357326,0.00018547091,0.000050546958,0.00007052225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000111970876,0.00009626926,0.000100272286,0.000065102104,0.00027158257,0.00005970455,0.0002194926,0.000044214852,0.000019865325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029296501,0.00007905887,0.000028885099,0.00011860557,0.000037306003,0.00089333346,0.00014327293,0.000061941886,0.00014947329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027425707,0.00018874725,0.07865374,0.000118294614,0.000100949524,0.00010545549,0.03806959,0.00022798892,0.0018452099,0.8526219,0.006222402,0.021818269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035824452,0.0011417102,0.89992034,0.0001299712,0.00003132177,0.0014210955,0.0012126713,0.057637237,0.0014031297,0.016887996,0.015304201,0.0013278596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006799604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003816931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83573395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020362313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021982254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3223927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644372274","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.475","title":"Dissent in the Midst of Emotional Territory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dissent; Mode (computer interface); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Emotional expression; Emotion work; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.0811437570006583,"score_gpt":0.2765939359898808,"score_spread":0.1954501789892225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1644372274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5043662,0.00012406205,0.0000033668878,0.0005688745,0.00008406732,0.00006861113,0.000012852922,0.00001624004,0.4947557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980208,0.000021603573,0.00003422255,0.00043499042,0.00012013628,0.000010495692,0.000026354972,0.0000023736661,0.0013289778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948114,0.000029876483,0.00019973273,0.000037867376,0.00015424106,0.00009714665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996276,0.00005397451,0.00006557188,0.0002085134,0.000033414544,0.000010937539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108829634,0.000058593872,0.00007397015,0.000046569487,0.00013540134,0.00002950928,0.00029030244,0.000017962451,0.00081598916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001035465,0.00003428397,0.00004093246,0.00002068422,0.0004055755,0.00027258735,0.000037009162,0.000098689416,0.00004972043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095453615,0.000101916434,0.0027413382,0.000015241646,0.000007880472,0.00000787806,0.10858242,0.000046132933,0.000009419304,0.8859574,0.0022039744,0.00031684336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008978475,0.00025298237,0.38904864,0.000079221936,0.000014858643,0.00010732134,0.19215408,0.00013692341,0.00011142476,0.010083658,0.40672117,0.00039186716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021467255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005729468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87587374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007723481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002917751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8934509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1646694252","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.487","title":"Harry J. Gensler - Historical Dictionary of Logic","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0919264655692047,"score_gpt":0.22355356220171838,"score_spread":0.13162709663251368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1646694252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03778611,0.0003958828,0.000052208186,0.0010871693,0.0009993638,0.0000886144,0.000024706276,0.00011034595,0.9594556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822531,0.00003774789,0.00008687876,0.0011665198,0.0009424571,0.000006959474,0.000015333202,0.000006326731,0.015484683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923205,0.000012203721,0.00029544774,0.00009514044,0.00019057578,0.00017458435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995921,0.00004719371,0.000089911635,0.00013587857,0.000072362185,0.000062517225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005104978,0.000108702516,0.00017823689,0.000066014196,0.00025651645,0.00001019634,0.00012651442,0.0000593678,0.0022687307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023500863,0.00008014972,0.00013066725,0.000036389145,0.0002894592,0.00028905677,0.000051412942,0.00015619802,0.000330524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050530645,0.00012133934,0.00024539235,0.000017891623,0.000018144267,0.000030330702,0.0024411818,0.000018511899,0.00001819625,0.9757176,0.020650417,0.00067045685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002444357,0.0002472809,0.0019933356,0.000006343481,0.000011591617,0.00003556513,0.00007369824,0.00005019736,0.000036583835,0.045161977,0.95198864,0.00015034691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047687634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009107194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005193188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024674067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658006387","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3099","title":"Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Tautology (logic); Philosophy; Key (lock); Terminology; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.039994743030757694,"score_gpt":0.24947606329092012,"score_spread":0.20948132026016242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1658006387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006765833,0.00069250626,0.000029054083,0.00005511817,0.0012883106,0.00005255474,0.000011858082,0.000060652706,0.9910441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96312267,0.00000913436,0.00007488913,0.00093312794,0.001610295,0.00000772176,0.000008903504,0.0000054753086,0.03422776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934417,0.000005440729,0.00016620987,0.000052636686,0.00012623904,0.0003052777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969304,0.000026976471,0.00004650893,0.00009863441,0.00005450817,0.00008031619],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010018788,0.000092650844,0.000116323536,0.000042882042,0.00025246598,0.00004795154,0.000085551736,0.000021184633,0.003954694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008895398,0.0000653531,0.00005984216,0.000019233103,0.00008999063,0.00015160922,0.000046878686,0.0000807104,0.0010896936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004973576,0.00004491436,0.0006666487,0.0000135870705,0.00002884472,0.000003583132,0.024591772,0.0000013410461,0.0000012175382,0.9630333,0.009310734,0.0022990375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007935127,0.00004153062,0.0006011928,0.00000330181,0.000020646974,0.0000013740042,0.0014712168,0.000015915235,0.000004506273,0.0003726241,0.9972746,0.000113774724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103407285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005341651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98796386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029271167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066969988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658744261","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3493","title":"The Irrelevance of Relevance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criticism; Relevance theory; Epistemology; State (computer science); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Cognition; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.011024363025027918,"score_gpt":0.22095443507664947,"score_spread":0.20993007205162156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1658744261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07245784,0.00397987,0.16311373,0.0019482757,0.0020735743,0.0007400995,0.0000019586037,0.0004700749,0.7552146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99016094,0.00018701087,0.0068328097,0.00039263867,0.000055695706,0.000029832594,4.5109712e-7,0.0000033850968,0.0023372236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990764,0.000020693293,0.00026355576,0.00013035987,0.00018977409,0.00031920036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885297,0.00026159373,0.00015110351,0.00050882547,0.00016581299,0.000059711565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023006169,0.000102009726,0.00011687418,0.000025599278,0.00017366097,0.00011509119,0.0011704391,0.000049748553,0.000026175509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002225285,0.00005739978,0.00006320815,0.00023122152,0.00012697295,0.00085811154,0.00027525972,0.00012570762,0.00083880423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041525236,0.000021900334,0.0009328707,0.000015886402,0.00001127764,0.000001804495,0.0005906596,0.00007791852,0.0001681577,0.83966863,0.004076022,0.15443069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011259837,0.00088322366,0.11371908,0.000079239064,0.000010733778,0.0001023818,0.00025442793,0.090485044,0.007882833,0.23333229,0.5512158,0.0009089462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025463349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008686356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012809329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046237747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663699010","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2266","title":"How Philosophical is Informal Logic?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Philosophy of logic; Epistemology; Proposition; Mainstream; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08901164352835382,"score_gpt":0.26421813869440863,"score_spread":0.1752064951660548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663699010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061313204,0.00017854842,0.000029045415,0.012211653,0.0007040046,0.00021164557,0.00007024425,0.00022783577,0.92505383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018622,0.00013572827,0.00017071716,0.025343986,0.0020549481,0.000022927275,0.00006421842,0.0000183499,0.0703269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984704,0.00003258766,0.00040298878,0.00019635432,0.0003236966,0.00057396985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991629,0.000076526565,0.00012636324,0.00033669794,0.00015086384,0.0001466525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026613992,0.0002822731,0.00034152888,0.00008538642,0.00048550984,0.00037437736,0.00036810862,0.00023805104,0.0072397464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041041472,0.00021404622,0.00023066968,0.000050075476,0.000858683,0.0012899372,0.00007236096,0.0006078324,0.0020078619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006384501,0.000056459507,0.00009852962,0.000052676598,0.000042739066,0.000015497531,0.014961949,0.000013520699,0.0000032013625,0.9652438,0.003309695,0.016138094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046279468,0.00035981488,0.00033257352,0.000013832946,0.000029116267,0.000024810706,0.0010868909,0.00009517136,0.000053604224,0.08403366,0.913157,0.0003507396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058699516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008299275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016120257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060524388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1670752956","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.441","title":"Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Dialogical self; Philosophy; Humanism; Pragmatics; Political philosophy; Politics; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19647837320115435,"score_gpt":0.361436787770259,"score_spread":0.16495841456910465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1670752956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21022773,0.00003965236,0.00019245794,0.001994858,0.0002594037,0.00011282833,9.0437635e-7,0.00006019727,0.787112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452436,0.00006576402,0.0021699863,0.001100891,0.00006421158,0.000007233875,0.0000030092806,0.0000022662055,0.0020622632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992175,0.00002321532,0.00021206865,0.00006372362,0.00030576566,0.00017773715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968094,0.00004354235,0.000056450852,0.00007478371,0.00007285827,0.000071441056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028112598,0.000052157193,0.000081852835,0.000039608472,0.00049094326,0.000016819888,0.00015396475,0.000043214128,0.00041392565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010023485,0.000046351477,0.000037204485,0.00010850142,0.0003065795,0.00014328552,0.000032232347,0.00006705166,0.000097723896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023824844,0.00004185206,0.0032325645,0.000010408336,0.0000047735907,0.0000016495312,0.014917742,0.00000692337,0.0000075873404,0.9810678,0.00008235198,0.0006240125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004968168,0.0001813201,0.10755616,0.00009182259,0.000012528645,0.00001053037,0.0119331535,0.000019870653,0.00052006723,0.22430773,0.6544055,0.0004645347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007584195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026010364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7850497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000500196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020809128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45321956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1671099834","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2907","title":"Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Generalitat de Catalunya; Harvard University","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046309208453305294,"score_gpt":0.42664405091087193,"score_spread":0.38033484245756666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1671099834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316622,0.00007204237,0.000019957908,0.00078200764,0.00009879469,0.000118547796,0.000001677547,0.0000070800183,0.067237675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966985,0.000021082407,0.00006134211,0.00013141191,0.00003379634,0.000009898996,0.000005274424,0.0000013289452,0.00006601658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993645,0.000068450696,0.00015246312,0.000093295675,0.00013604079,0.00018526123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944913,0.0002963671,0.00010775292,0.000098585675,0.000030729712,0.00001742008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651177,0.0000737003,0.0000735114,0.000046535,0.00020963716,0.000074115094,0.00017326977,0.000029237455,0.000035098412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012437154,0.000034714154,0.000028855606,0.00017991154,0.00027923426,0.00025220792,0.000016857373,0.00017514924,0.000008433548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012413992,0.00025281962,0.08913072,0.0000060052394,0.00004764972,0.000008380522,0.056741666,0.013601693,0.00031320407,0.7879947,0.00075190846,0.049909856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032213557,0.0012001744,0.96268725,0.0000110620185,0.0000042269285,0.000009220097,0.03370053,0.0001820885,0.000019954854,0.001773029,0.0000357153,0.000054601194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035710013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021339923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87355655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003775416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005812602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16123807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681065072","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2265","title":"The Significance of Informal Logic for Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Soundness; Dialectic; Dialogical self; Conformity; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Sociology; Argumentation theory; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036903429975967746,"score_gpt":0.25780920466722357,"score_spread":0.22090577469125583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1681065072","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10426348,0.000681683,0.5175054,0.0036141868,0.002183433,0.0042349235,0.000062880295,0.000557033,0.366897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357766,0.000042468422,0.0043724347,0.0007138707,0.00013400262,0.00008623537,0.0000064881856,0.0000041351627,0.001062726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883324,0.00001967814,0.00047318946,0.00012978744,0.00024216178,0.00030194325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911284,0.000142172,0.00021334822,0.0003834302,0.00009457279,0.000053661544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004189777,0.00012203018,0.00014813771,0.000043570162,0.00024405465,0.00009028673,0.00076392625,0.000070303824,0.000042430856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033895703,0.0000762208,0.00010609091,0.00018844675,0.00006401775,0.0008920723,0.00006224422,0.000078279045,0.000118925156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102314516,0.00005317633,0.00053432735,0.00011395357,0.000027330578,0.0000016196041,0.0012489016,0.0032353047,0.00021733383,0.8102129,0.0010827095,0.18317011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038073328,0.0022328675,0.04849215,0.00011484852,0.000026939038,0.000056982637,0.00022273988,0.35949847,0.005854169,0.050777968,0.52771795,0.0011975939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018331275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005384723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013073943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049563212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3108194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689147215","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.462","title":"Walton on Argument Structure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Sound (geography); Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.04954695645961323,"score_gpt":0.2313382921791176,"score_spread":0.18179133571950437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689147215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42514873,0.000031091047,0.0000038669546,0.0006122213,0.0009343425,0.00007997481,0.00001863683,0.00006049958,0.57311064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936885,0.000013955506,0.000044574514,0.0026261176,0.00070905214,0.0000067319793,0.00003809308,0.0000041371477,0.00286884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999525,0.0000071792947,0.0001340036,0.00006607134,0.00012391049,0.00014380697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997532,0.000015799651,0.00004974078,0.00011759958,0.000027351869,0.000036329806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000030500738,0.000084037565,0.000069557325,0.000047337395,0.00034698233,0.00003609498,0.00009323889,0.00003147719,0.003104624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000101153155,0.00006124845,0.000031023355,0.000015240684,0.00009112091,0.0002870144,0.00001564254,0.0001073164,0.0005554134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016324364,0.000029703859,0.000068479756,0.000009410352,0.000006920608,0.0000032393768,0.018792348,0.000055273038,0.0000064339724,0.9726283,0.006211384,0.0021721842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659391,0.00045891388,0.0049026543,0.00002284893,0.0000096367985,0.00004119663,0.0009022879,0.000079331876,0.00064588094,0.12865937,0.8635992,0.00031278594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023497922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011727165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8573878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000177727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020609814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99780667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689471221","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2905","title":"What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Production (economics); Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medical education; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Economics; Medicine; Epistemology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.026400168314241034,"score_gpt":0.32614158064133686,"score_spread":0.29974141232709584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689471221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3809658,0.0002703288,0.0010408026,0.38085556,0.002969962,0.00055361935,0.0000018692804,0.0002616312,0.23308045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97501856,0.00068357686,0.0053735687,0.014139922,0.00008052423,0.000007504025,0.000008646038,0.0000012609297,0.004686429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939257,0.000028080629,0.00010425408,0.0000827564,0.00020285265,0.00018947489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965984,0.00007080852,0.000034629065,0.00004235391,0.00009884631,0.0000935085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003614419,0.000063347026,0.00007237862,0.000039642968,0.00037032753,0.00046022728,0.00008083195,0.000056087407,0.0001984443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002961216,0.00004565567,0.000013720357,0.00012989464,0.00017566748,0.001107615,0.000013543291,0.000059961112,0.00004531535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049373534,0.000024719882,0.0013715292,0.0000053160543,0.000005533632,0.0000018261796,0.035518106,6.448567e-7,0.000013289004,0.89947677,0.0012871424,0.06229019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590967,0.00008618859,0.037822608,0.0001045303,0.000015147441,0.0000061367214,0.15038142,0.000012867512,0.00058519,0.15399551,0.6559613,0.00043817938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011613439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089320885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74548125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003616577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017528779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44379824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1698395421","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2243","title":"Why Percy can't think: A response to Bailin","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Generalization; Epistemology; Psychology; Logical reasoning; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04178418691770262,"score_gpt":0.34212966921822574,"score_spread":0.3003454823005231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1698395421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56537676,0.000029932646,0.00029350506,0.11457902,0.00069627666,0.00027036667,0.0000026425926,0.00019918609,0.3185523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846297,0.000039604474,0.0031280206,0.09578824,0.00016322116,0.000021658745,0.000003250102,0.0000047614844,0.016221508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989075,0.000108636705,0.0001746429,0.000106079555,0.00034551206,0.0003576211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993441,0.00015173241,0.000019531186,0.00011898261,0.000107779786,0.000257851],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011773963,0.00007369287,0.000081980426,0.00007864241,0.0004275524,0.00011037657,0.00024346777,0.00007666815,0.0018792235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011310457,0.000064302156,0.000036523026,0.00034612906,0.00009298886,0.00017089542,0.000046328434,0.000115101815,0.00084778207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006774783,0.00018384593,0.004973571,0.000011125183,0.00001803973,0.000056863115,0.3921704,0.000048400027,0.00008044156,0.49671805,0.07797288,0.027088925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090749425,0.000050694238,0.012238938,0.000010096445,0.0000019972956,0.0000036510914,0.010875145,0.000004186996,0.000013678308,0.0057171406,0.9708732,0.00012057307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006995492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091377646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8929003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011446608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037732598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702479143","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2282","title":"Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049566897329281025,"score_gpt":0.2604724410737302,"score_spread":0.21090554374444917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1702479143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18909496,0.00014639398,0.00006744318,0.00032743567,0.00025280766,0.0001874967,0.000040688818,0.00004772132,0.8098351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97548103,0.00004913428,0.0001516454,0.0015344633,0.00025742262,0.000018092767,0.000041383468,0.0000059097347,0.022460908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916095,0.00007868867,0.00033677943,0.00008399836,0.00017254877,0.00016705025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942404,0.00014865385,0.00012557086,0.00017380949,0.00009208967,0.00003584403],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006081352,0.00010397592,0.00017839711,0.000034622757,0.00015546719,0.00003990221,0.00013428893,0.000051581985,0.008310243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003769429,0.00007896595,0.00009060516,0.000019258718,0.00039652028,0.0002865148,0.00001942874,0.00014010754,0.0003929061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031970107,0.00006931411,0.00007165915,0.00009081651,0.000030276211,0.0000020202624,0.011378323,0.00003918019,0.000005508553,0.9834702,0.0004984065,0.0043123486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005429356,0.0002873707,0.0033619693,0.00004587974,0.000058895905,0.000012419965,0.0027694486,0.0000942334,0.00015153484,0.31119463,0.68122005,0.00026062378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054473356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009897977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78737414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001161575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046610487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99259627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1705572361","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2132","title":"Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Fallacy; Inductive reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Inference; Computer science; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Statistical inference; Artificial intelligence; Deductive reasoning; Bayesian network; Causal inference; Machine learning; Bayesian statistics; Frequentist inference; Mathematics; Philosophy; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02421553473010509,"score_gpt":0.2506493351318307,"score_spread":0.2264338004017256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1705572361","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019242968,0.00011837529,0.9341195,0.001234654,0.00020825515,0.00012827596,0.000002158623,0.0003543171,0.044591464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423203,0.000044479166,0.05365954,0.0037332836,0.00007482209,0.000010391343,0.000004123867,0.0000056415934,0.00014745526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985603,0.0000136389435,0.00036934527,0.0002561898,0.00026994353,0.00053055707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916077,0.000028304084,0.00010286434,0.00040665842,0.00008012462,0.00022125494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025972415,0.00022370451,0.00019667063,0.00012652666,0.00020872196,0.00034539393,0.00073906593,0.00014438716,0.0000196417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040205407,0.00018176678,0.000060806742,0.00028538675,0.00010479014,0.0018391905,0.00041164857,0.00027549756,0.00022087489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013685941,0.000037796162,0.0005381159,0.000029620334,0.0000122851425,0.00003943606,0.0013507791,0.005218568,0.00006306659,0.92945105,0.000092691196,0.06315288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00520278,0.002748105,0.035700303,0.00022359156,0.000038178634,0.0016515444,0.00041801893,0.2893195,0.002225744,0.6402594,0.019251054,0.0029617874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007178405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013684324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026468597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014586857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74122345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1708143966","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1045","title":"Knowing when Disagreements are Deep","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12744490325380614,"score_gpt":0.4776130059217621,"score_spread":0.35016810266795595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1708143966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04496634,0.0002222399,0.0037695288,0.014286998,0.0012882103,0.000540104,0.0000048656657,0.00024010298,0.9346816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92884547,0.000062801475,0.008187668,0.0529888,0.0011724326,0.000070395676,0.00001509958,0.000017065773,0.008640281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783427,0.0003144759,0.0005834006,0.00014850906,0.00051194365,0.00060741697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708796,0.0019470649,0.00030413773,0.00031753347,0.0001394465,0.00020384652],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028076344,0.00013116779,0.0001774576,0.000058055197,0.0010805172,0.000016125883,0.0003432435,0.00035027304,0.005476894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054872716,0.000103394275,0.00004898223,0.0000971212,0.00010546407,0.0010736019,0.00031414884,0.0032513917,0.011279455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003419589,0.00043607046,0.2067616,0.0011599103,0.00018287134,0.0000854002,0.06302013,0.0004259647,0.0001086074,0.3599731,0.09797248,0.2695319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010832692,0.00007353105,0.021360172,0.00023402189,0.000029052371,0.0000045888323,0.011537785,0.001273206,0.000014679162,0.023112943,0.9410077,0.00026905866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052889372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029664952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9260413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013207954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111886664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1725914369","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3327","title":"What Hamblin’s Book Fallacies was About","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Literature; Art history; History; Art","score_opus":0.07473956202576132,"score_gpt":0.30722229117635264,"score_spread":0.23248272915059132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1725914369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02432517,0.00077353325,0.0002416198,0.00035491036,0.0014685516,0.00010447947,0.0000029598689,0.00010665609,0.9726221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870737,0.000086158514,0.0001852651,0.006925452,0.00010978697,0.000020516112,0.0000023614837,0.0000050027134,0.005591744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990143,0.000028295504,0.00021811361,0.00016589182,0.00015362892,0.0004197416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999434,0.000045386205,0.000059449758,0.00028921268,0.000033979675,0.00013797902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024888173,0.00012065194,0.00012485881,0.000053165066,0.00010451842,0.000065224434,0.00039750908,0.00011978938,0.009837791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032227446,0.00008656916,0.000071568575,0.0001308115,0.00045633814,0.0010493457,0.00009926771,0.00016518732,0.005907618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067220404,0.000045070945,0.00018456815,0.0000030523815,0.000009553556,0.000023811399,0.004271668,5.437923e-7,0.000013710996,0.9887632,0.0005834797,0.0060341367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006506082,0.0006914711,0.04586628,0.000034911125,0.000017792448,0.000099321085,0.001723561,0.00003792771,0.0007787574,0.7873402,0.16228467,0.0004744759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027809761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041158823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010450287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013960289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1736649079","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3758","title":"Less Ado, More Done: Verbal and Visual Antithesis in the Media.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antithesis; Argumentative; Opposition (politics); Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05678531341418642,"score_gpt":0.2571573719619091,"score_spread":0.20037205854772266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1736649079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83388484,0.00062864285,0.0000050787653,0.0013593867,0.000097362565,0.00011496672,0.000003054281,0.000024991525,0.1638817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977232,0.00027047464,0.000013210133,0.0012412486,0.00010684501,0.000042368225,0.0000040258847,0.0000024881238,0.00059612124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954545,0.000021358175,0.00014901187,0.000048550617,0.00011111706,0.00012452477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996829,0.00011332368,0.000040483144,0.000106745036,0.00004041082,0.000016129972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114833565,0.0000717505,0.00009429845,0.000032637767,0.00022745394,0.00013356557,0.00016475568,0.000021894726,0.00024794202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017239921,0.000039702012,0.000021537493,0.000028366681,0.000226291,0.00032626113,0.0000869479,0.00009360162,0.000105436484],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362264,0.00011281125,0.013797384,0.000033849894,0.000039503404,0.0000042150705,0.3625907,0.000003352183,0.0000038576413,0.50592744,0.012385274,0.10507799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484124,0.00012202117,0.23987854,0.000024862431,0.0000170339,0.000009547911,0.43300095,0.00030530835,0.000008688568,0.00307387,0.32272062,0.00029015602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006077777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003257026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5028536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005079042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068508375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2714791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740547630","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.444","title":"Formal Logic for Informal Logicians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Modal logic; Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Calculus (dental); Modal","score_opus":0.03675715526480909,"score_gpt":0.25258832785109453,"score_spread":0.21583117258628542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740547630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017910836,0.0002706279,0.6376617,0.0002957679,0.0011134807,0.0007141758,0.000015389347,0.0008135164,0.3412045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467335,0.00010498899,0.043836895,0.0049681254,0.00044045466,0.00015751488,0.000042131825,0.000018658813,0.0036977823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970762,0.000026882604,0.0006916219,0.00039444794,0.0004130849,0.0013977523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982986,0.00017261344,0.00028441616,0.0006776913,0.00028773383,0.00027897037],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054434355,0.00041489318,0.00043469324,0.00022991581,0.00087668654,0.00018141858,0.0017865052,0.00029333416,0.00007956368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021305864,0.00031472428,0.00034203642,0.0004982417,0.00021913253,0.003776154,0.00067566364,0.00032105445,0.0007509226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084691754,0.00013946863,0.0025107414,0.00006246498,0.000036861984,0.00007766851,0.0030837073,0.00047188063,0.000039352988,0.9548372,0.0048578596,0.0337981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00907814,0.007419776,0.074430026,0.00007750422,0.00007122188,0.0041689966,0.0008065969,0.14642687,0.003169959,0.060803637,0.68936014,0.0041871467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014195087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019581823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92882264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055493052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002538606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1760838892","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1039","title":"Introduction: Deep Disagreement Re-examined","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05390979412536434,"score_gpt":0.260394562558912,"score_spread":0.20648476843354768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1760838892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037849315,0.00026646003,0.00040515338,0.013189134,0.0027706136,0.00023568964,0.000008755738,0.0002216366,0.9450532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630533,0.000033204593,0.00022716416,0.0054244134,0.0053030825,0.00000779077,0.000052483483,0.000005834946,0.02589272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914145,0.000023245748,0.00027756463,0.00013679996,0.00016237305,0.00025854885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948156,0.000028725302,0.000096096395,0.00023460804,0.00010391565,0.00005508371],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023937432,0.00013201105,0.00016572476,0.000050716557,0.00027252405,0.00009342283,0.00014753459,0.000059507634,0.002334901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044027565,0.00010225619,0.00008040753,0.000029336748,0.00023009948,0.000386213,0.000025463169,0.00020189173,0.0005544199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031447144,0.000066120825,0.000035629262,0.000018033475,0.000019737374,0.0000040387727,0.018533755,0.000035907255,0.000019465764,0.9557517,0.011060033,0.014424136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025163498,0.00045888647,0.0013945815,0.000005075535,0.000021973077,0.0000050530275,0.002694502,0.000057793444,0.000098228156,0.019282073,0.9755469,0.0001832782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022918273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016118173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020298634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016804805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1783745092","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4078","title":"The Virtues of Argumentation from an Amoral Analyst’s Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Duty; Lexicon; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.032270908990052694,"score_gpt":0.28723509559999183,"score_spread":0.25496418660993914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1783745092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56293774,0.00015482231,0.000051750747,0.0005221095,0.00022592643,0.00011520562,0.000046039466,0.000027081898,0.4359193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795514,0.000017688148,0.00005596292,0.00025294445,0.00046924225,0.000008883588,0.000044202352,0.0000030299232,0.001192879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949026,0.000014609553,0.00019369433,0.00006549757,0.0001313876,0.00010455084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939454,0.000038386122,0.000118664866,0.00013242826,0.00028389177,0.00003210622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000068813075,0.000066324596,0.00009738386,0.000039768896,0.0002335223,0.00024428414,0.00012541503,0.000016011569,0.0023939887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034205146,0.00003765203,0.00006983709,0.000021299204,0.00016474094,0.00034934742,0.0000223457,0.000045311874,0.00012663659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082694,0.000026451915,0.00083674176,0.0000011359728,0.00008218874,4.2765916e-7,0.013446868,0.000051505423,0.00001672274,0.984055,0.00032540233,0.0011493141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058203866,0.0005392007,0.025991883,0.000013886775,0.00037096685,4.2748985e-7,0.36054516,0.012399118,0.00052558206,0.565983,0.032634836,0.00041392253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015284505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028831447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43501744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012762894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015129078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784944028","doi":"","title":"Review of F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds) (2008). Controversy and Confrontation. Amsterdam: John Benjamis.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04287864016755116,"score_gpt":0.39562796665687755,"score_spread":0.3527493264893264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1784944028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028461548,0.022724241,0.00005078946,0.01344656,0.00022107919,0.0010257276,0.000029661083,0.00008169053,0.9339587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741076,0.09705079,0.0002678544,0.024455095,0.00043605472,0.000015969707,0.000017636032,0.0000055446917,0.0036434315],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986194,0.00010050987,0.00029509998,0.00011489389,0.0004601415,0.0004099489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924403,0.00013586182,0.0001411867,0.0001138283,0.00018645117,0.00017865545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010378901,0.00008939592,0.00023241942,0.00006598126,0.0003148107,0.000063473686,0.0002797839,0.00008374573,0.00070905435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005645605,0.000074641874,0.00006442785,0.00037075955,0.00039180112,0.0005525208,0.00003407844,0.000114463845,0.00006974798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096005526,0.00010143701,0.008035799,0.0006514391,0.000044771743,0.000009563216,0.021873003,0.0000057859834,0.00026310686,0.3101615,0.08584358,0.572914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070401485,0.00044776825,0.034394942,0.0005275161,0.000030248724,0.0000032524636,0.0025457973,0.00001919083,0.00007789472,0.009094522,0.95185983,0.00029503557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027853332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006073994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93031526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032309435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024596922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7763648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785628550","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3146","title":"Scaring the Public: Fear Appeal Arguments in Public Health Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Fear appeal; Context (archaeology); Public health; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Medicine; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.16374594180265312,"score_gpt":0.41204267932287375,"score_spread":0.24829673752022063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785628550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86341566,0.0011019588,0.00017144886,0.006396774,0.001946959,0.00050280796,0.000011401267,0.00012077233,0.12633221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500483,0.000014216629,0.00016000637,0.0035348348,0.00017104816,0.000103218874,0.000031474417,0.000010892322,0.00096947706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977563,0.00016000858,0.0005130389,0.00012856068,0.00018080452,0.0012613065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990793,0.000028338533,0.00018457798,0.00031130805,0.000035878456,0.00036061584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017339813,0.00012916532,0.0001630666,0.00017512593,0.0002948109,0.000084522435,0.00031771415,0.000111402085,0.001137373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004925716,0.00009214481,0.00008908579,0.00035558152,0.00006447131,0.00087640184,0.0001254611,0.00048049967,0.0011580188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020289248,0.0003775201,0.5969063,0.000017981942,0.000014123523,0.00000270956,0.003693333,8.800321e-7,8.156517e-7,0.19139715,0.003881523,0.20368735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005066017,0.00018505278,0.83325946,0.000028160843,0.00000239975,0.00005280466,0.0017773007,0.000027125552,8.8174414e-7,0.00005778004,0.16398238,0.00012004433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007403336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021801432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23635314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001358296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008822219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1789325687","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3332","title":"A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Analogy; Schema (genetic algorithms); Unitary state; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.041098690935689484,"score_gpt":0.3340418601028231,"score_spread":0.29294316916713364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1789325687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15373354,0.00026703769,0.0032869151,0.0004819773,0.0007161364,0.00021038753,0.000048952737,0.000054425764,0.84120065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956559,0.0000016236677,0.0003718718,0.0030676862,0.00014937704,0.000046196157,0.000026508338,0.000003904635,0.00067694526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991504,0.000020303372,0.00015101647,0.00009274474,0.00008593048,0.0004995924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995377,0.00008979561,0.000041671112,0.00015041961,0.000019855634,0.00016054802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030421242,0.00008421024,0.0000956829,0.000032959393,0.0000830758,0.000008530058,0.0002043234,0.000091482594,0.0011436167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050683702,0.00006406898,0.00004802439,0.000118381744,0.0001595003,0.00026657,0.000046402867,0.00008898837,0.00087199954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056689343,0.00009161921,0.0013755137,0.0000037479767,0.000013744455,7.957424e-7,0.00027887922,3.4982693e-7,0.00010468735,0.9918985,0.0025724357,0.0036030363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020380109,0.0010915569,0.02172346,0.000010727844,0.000043325872,0.00008364362,0.00039055897,0.00010729058,0.001539337,0.577585,0.3947961,0.00059103343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009374996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.2297447e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84192234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010637358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006452347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1790529587","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4173","title":"Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lunds Universitet; Wake Forest University","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); License; State (computer science); Heuristic; Bayesian probability; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.10072867543743115,"score_gpt":0.24071898112441528,"score_spread":0.13999030568698412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1790529587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6618485,0.00021349562,0.0000076090723,0.00061784894,0.0005358194,0.00010436361,0.000010948295,0.000017830824,0.33664364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644214,0.0000062588524,0.0000114475515,0.0010099281,0.00004599067,0.0000022018398,3.739452e-7,0.0000015999144,0.002480083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999549,0.000012963268,0.0001250218,0.000047847607,0.00015892043,0.000106278196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997146,0.000021814849,0.00008546113,0.00009916592,0.0000474478,0.00003150922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023578644,0.000051307426,0.000059952992,0.000020926978,0.00032702612,0.00006124304,0.00020611237,0.000008762484,0.00003626011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033500328,0.000025284906,0.000023260749,0.000020647234,0.000866749,0.00034316472,0.000086937405,0.00007186703,0.000032618274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001043285,0.000065446235,0.0022056822,0.000073055024,0.00004148127,0.0000104061155,0.25891066,0.0002798248,0.00045575632,0.71832734,0.008400254,0.011125784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006192799,0.00024074769,0.0025164483,0.00009492913,0.000022292239,0.000048834834,0.009004636,0.000426202,0.0003759529,0.06798144,0.91842103,0.00024821688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048957278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013886705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91002077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010786684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003286648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31935728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801104780","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3800","title":"Review of Giving Reasons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Media studies","score_opus":0.1258156924345989,"score_gpt":0.4046749205030641,"score_spread":0.2788592280684652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1801104780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010045157,0.0110994885,0.00004902421,0.0016281082,0.0002876957,0.000081673636,9.4092064e-7,0.000039591196,0.9767683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914472,0.0031785918,0.0007498776,0.003107803,0.00017563302,0.000004757428,0.000002068212,0.0000016367717,0.0013323962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995464,0.000039493447,0.0001178302,0.000022792474,0.000105735824,0.0001677273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997132,0.000050797862,0.00006738392,0.000059879738,0.00003637938,0.00007239918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011062286,0.000028383001,0.00006287762,0.00001784446,0.00009405484,0.000006087001,0.00008815311,0.000025867268,0.001193306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050072063,0.000024163417,0.000031899126,0.00012505708,0.00006213672,0.00030905817,0.000012699949,0.00005435958,0.00008711277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001403366,0.00008235053,0.11462861,0.00097227783,0.000011904212,1.3454972e-7,0.094495185,3.2321535e-7,0.0000092542705,0.6851782,0.01333286,0.09128748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027710126,0.0000065285603,0.020598447,0.0004831319,0.0000048959,7.779662e-7,0.006295467,3.9368018e-7,0.0000071726035,0.00010867221,0.9724175,0.00004933218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013933273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017264638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000132321065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007545092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801473620","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2247","title":"Dialogue games as dialogue models for interacting with, and via, computers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Outcome (game theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03574404856459477,"score_gpt":0.2579029793246624,"score_spread":0.22215893076006762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1801473620","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09349666,0.000038059756,0.90306056,0.0002002944,0.00047734362,0.000332924,0.0000023836117,0.00010417262,0.002287612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97635645,0.000017079568,0.02268474,0.0006851774,0.00011018979,0.00003533519,0.000015485433,0.0000060097577,0.00008953842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909693,0.00002029039,0.00025874822,0.00021230786,0.00014162801,0.00027007074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993071,0.00018446572,0.0001580747,0.00019844285,0.000067644214,0.0000843057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020949636,0.0001383732,0.00016700105,0.000089787296,0.00014286088,0.0001880343,0.00027419877,0.00005952479,0.000002859055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027973545,0.00010508008,0.000042118227,0.00011460095,0.000027018123,0.0016824324,0.00012198919,0.00007968706,0.000020337038],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039129113,0.00023504555,0.014365376,0.00031582455,0.00018986297,0.0000942436,0.025919942,0.094647676,0.00079068297,0.24216612,0.0015567762,0.6193272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008437458,0.00036130994,0.0022439638,0.000060128365,0.0000062978156,0.0002143615,0.00008394699,0.9893798,0.00016917763,0.0028230345,0.0035658344,0.00024836083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020186098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006214919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020182779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002314492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4285041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808768081","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.3649","title":"The Authority of Citations and Quotations in Academic Papers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Argumentative; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Situated; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Adaptation (eye); Scheme (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03387149697010778,"score_gpt":0.29456773291646066,"score_spread":0.2606962359463529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808768081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22579426,0.00039155452,0.000018897437,0.00095022755,0.00010901231,0.00007068489,0.00000876934,0.000017092127,0.7726395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816996,0.00008801534,0.000034947567,0.00015239173,0.00005796535,0.000010960953,0.000003100016,0.0000016971496,0.0014809364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957925,0.000020400365,0.00018210062,0.000041909807,0.00007969549,0.00009664132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996127,0.00020179029,0.00006337711,0.00006945368,0.00003963439,0.000013037684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002588292,0.000045726752,0.000077881436,0.000050614977,0.00025068587,0.00003248105,0.00007899624,0.000017147864,0.00009253701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020626622,0.000027633096,0.000025263807,0.00003546295,0.00036455147,0.00014893724,0.00003173491,0.00009714371,0.00000903214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001963966,0.0000039059096,0.0015150651,0.0000050115746,0.000013568293,9.419633e-8,0.02360912,0.000040548883,0.0000039509628,0.9675355,0.00014003571,0.007131214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074777036,0.00022803727,0.17467502,0.000070525195,0.00015302892,0.0000021844553,0.27788073,0.0023121627,0.000030746934,0.100535735,0.44295225,0.00041181146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108095504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032497065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003934852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007746556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19280984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808957944","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4121","title":"A Computational Model of Pragma-dialectics as a Tool for its Analysis and Evaluation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Computer science; Inference; Epistemology; Computational model; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1073896821952895,"score_gpt":0.33639923602423877,"score_spread":0.22900955382894927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808957944","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20068689,0.00002863335,0.79800594,0.000088510256,0.00005512528,0.0003208234,0.000006406364,0.000018412351,0.0007892754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94124174,0.0000011129507,0.05849111,0.00013605026,0.0000139519625,0.000031854917,0.000021809316,0.000001534411,0.00006084336],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991623,0.000026747308,0.000260079,0.00010892306,0.00034772741,0.000094229494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990855,0.00006633014,0.00017977778,0.00010556303,0.000517528,0.000045291414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079796667,0.00006083041,0.00012388063,0.00015528372,0.00004332615,0.000050552717,0.00011911093,0.00004213034,0.0000027072542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018236965,0.000052440788,0.000048254275,0.00028844932,0.0000101411615,0.0005814963,0.00004733255,0.000024970119,0.0000055941446],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015523055,0.0000219354,0.0011261912,0.000021892374,0.000058470046,1.0079072e-7,0.0014431546,0.9472623,0.00005373863,0.046168335,0.000098792116,0.0037295502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055434625,0.00010216258,0.002995378,0.0000030887627,0.000059620674,0.0000023779423,0.000014848595,0.99037534,0.00014518747,0.005637361,0.000045377663,0.00006492897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015134482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008076486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74055487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026870934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016983224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21384732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809953348","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4306","title":"The Argument Form \"Appeal to Galileo\": A Critical Appreciation of Doury’s Account","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Bourgogne","keywords":"Analogy; Fallacy; Appeal; Epistemology; Galileo (satellite navigation); Astrology; Galilean; Philosophy; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.09470143792074692,"score_gpt":0.3107143078415344,"score_spread":0.2160128699207875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809953348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24384353,0.00011650783,0.0009357967,0.015941208,0.0045564035,0.0005059051,0.00002221796,0.00008637794,0.73399204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965574,0.0000027853803,0.000106362895,0.00083175994,0.0003305359,0.00002583319,0.0000048627576,0.0000019873844,0.0021384654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922746,0.000012194536,0.00022383907,0.00006069662,0.00028875776,0.00018703137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994165,0.00005628283,0.00005606788,0.000112104855,0.0002677969,0.000091279624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005395236,0.00005686049,0.00006364734,0.000046284924,0.0002466114,0.00015772737,0.00015770887,0.000021269572,0.00019539484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002515436,0.00003437194,0.000031264117,0.000043279048,0.00014637833,0.00043780237,0.000036707686,0.00005520346,0.00025419693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021914222,0.00003019617,0.0002022452,0.0000047918056,0.0000022764857,8.2252264e-8,0.029937096,0.000040157065,0.0000049526457,0.9486293,0.018344969,0.0027820054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019327819,0.00030818302,0.0034630198,0.000012262558,0.0000068094632,0.0000025628588,0.029401217,0.0009667189,0.00007007012,0.016639093,0.94881576,0.00012103055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009308131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000374357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005850316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010151692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32672718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814822231","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.467","title":"Lightening up on the Ad Hominem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Mistake; Epistemology; Philosophy; Dialectic; Face (sociological concept); Fallacy; Adversary; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.1065747294989697,"score_gpt":0.22638847407853654,"score_spread":0.11981374457956684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814822231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10496409,0.00004996458,0.0000039264073,0.0035106037,0.00050611555,0.00007626918,0.0000073920646,0.000077770244,0.8908039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97235847,0.000013214842,0.000008931068,0.004587033,0.00069814705,0.000009441325,0.000004586988,0.000005328071,0.022314869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945986,0.000010658777,0.00014413026,0.00007100361,0.00013803357,0.00017633138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996402,0.00010414123,0.000045007746,0.00014314994,0.000030092746,0.000037360438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006196155,0.000097190845,0.00009074521,0.000029119008,0.0006006236,0.00005552617,0.00015545163,0.000029514278,0.0016615576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031628988,0.00005006791,0.00008074591,0.000024238794,0.00023405989,0.00018099324,0.000039706687,0.00017885129,0.0014264502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027321563,0.000017070466,0.000009717248,0.000002566818,0.000008125422,0.000011278519,0.006251973,0.0000042438965,0.000003838493,0.9824444,0.0099767,0.0012427747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017372644,0.00016128636,0.00029201157,0.000010833682,0.000004870477,0.000012076,0.0004360159,0.00007539084,0.00013341913,0.0246012,0.9739777,0.000121500314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000069156736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014732568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96400094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007327685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000110951705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1816537332","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2235","title":"Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Empiricism; Informal logic; Philosophy; Odds; Sociology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0786768683797336,"score_gpt":0.2799231439869657,"score_spread":0.20124627560723213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1816537332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09210332,0.0022905823,0.00015017486,0.0008213644,0.000326759,0.00011120403,0.0000030347599,0.00005027822,0.9041433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940438,0.0020582129,0.00008029189,0.00033504478,0.00012166886,0.000012125321,0.000001821688,0.0000027476874,0.0033442376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949044,0.000014473431,0.00021387218,0.000053981785,0.00010838246,0.000118821714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996607,0.00006122047,0.00005479804,0.00012560039,0.00006254772,0.00003513321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092770744,0.00007026656,0.00014611197,0.00003019143,0.00017189646,0.00003057556,0.000090572845,0.00002165105,0.0006570236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020428142,0.000049899736,0.00003474346,0.000029076315,0.0002245928,0.00014267153,0.00009765974,0.00007196819,0.00007348064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000247573,0.00005819843,0.0013229449,0.000016392394,0.000026751837,0.0000014400883,0.008177225,0.0000011716786,0.0000026981959,0.9639382,0.0013929467,0.0250373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016706387,0.00013268847,0.002345748,0.000008659195,0.000011226633,0.000006374487,0.0012183107,0.00002997047,0.000007509649,0.0019309446,0.9940626,0.00007889028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052293744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023102637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99266964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010581832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009982495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71939474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850504143","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.2947","title":"Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Specialized Academic Research","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; University of Windsor; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Argumentation theory; German; Compromise; Law; Political science; Adversary; Position (finance); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Computer security; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.25833923941447323,"score_gpt":0.37806164659121305,"score_spread":0.11972240717673982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850504143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150621,0.0000062129056,0.0000037703892,0.0021155525,0.00032004583,0.00043317614,0.00014663741,0.0000048743836,0.0819076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839985,0.0000086189575,0.000006720072,0.0010951952,0.00023188147,0.00001815219,0.0000019542722,0.000005356241,0.00023224055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878883,0.00007453156,0.0004579789,0.00012837276,0.0003880382,0.00016225774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989364,0.00014625039,0.00047497236,0.00024986255,0.0001663049,0.000026188276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002663464,0.00009130911,0.00014641715,0.00007535251,0.00041121547,0.000050896622,0.00049008004,0.00011296487,0.000115950184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001235095,0.000054461045,0.00009700658,0.00028441183,0.00026421534,0.0001769033,0.00015292144,0.00074338465,0.000038070735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025358982,0.00016116879,0.002597186,0.0000115681805,0.000023651783,0.000001035417,0.012751007,0.00020270297,0.000049357637,0.9838353,0.00016945123,0.00017223987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018265627,0.0055513056,0.27314615,0.00018378781,0.00011111562,0.00017327722,0.13728675,0.008206804,0.016508292,0.26188922,0.27608678,0.0025908889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013667071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020852819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72194606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023051775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000255424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32296777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859258661","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2283","title":"Stanovich's Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2548337427983532,"score_gpt":0.420949601165849,"score_spread":0.16611585836749582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859258661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842054,0.00023831478,0.000020528412,0.00018177745,0.00013162696,0.00008473925,0.000045083554,0.000014664669,0.015077856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973853,0.00009586557,0.00079874485,0.00050978863,0.000028138194,0.000005915975,0.0000031390778,0.0000033345302,0.001169729],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976088,0.00005054678,0.0010147538,0.00023860382,0.00086202286,0.00022532059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998418,0.00078915997,0.0002740654,0.0002849667,0.0001835796,0.00005023287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018124471,0.0001338527,0.00042398702,0.00028601137,0.00009934316,0.0001785529,0.0006952478,0.000084081454,0.0022407747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008350449,0.000088614426,0.00008671333,0.0005110449,0.00017214908,0.0007582838,0.00013992321,0.0001353208,0.0003226852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007248722,0.000057145015,0.15679544,0.0000031590291,0.000016266142,0.000007681922,0.005412713,0.0004712176,0.000005484559,0.0021889098,0.0021521677,0.8328173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009164268,0.0004612432,0.838316,0.0001530317,0.000019507588,0.000018097899,0.008885164,0.0017169787,0.00021530644,0.13424578,0.014619318,0.00043313517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002131793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006034495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83238417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024821118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007646652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859359026","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.428","title":"A Normative Theory of Argument Strength","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03442538884530714,"score_gpt":0.23599609065230576,"score_spread":0.20157070180699863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859359026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49212334,0.00008893145,0.45289725,0.000074401214,0.00037578336,0.00027213263,0.0000058133724,0.000113569586,0.054048788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499416,0.000014018273,0.004534088,0.00016275285,0.00001971025,0.000006615144,0.0000023712694,0.0000013600915,0.00026489593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932456,0.00003360788,0.00025121498,0.000074213014,0.00018761911,0.00012877678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950594,0.000046978425,0.00015824122,0.00020120353,0.00005108886,0.000036570786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020972235,0.0000684385,0.0001026868,0.00006124389,0.00006841279,0.000011611394,0.00028355364,0.00003150388,0.000035246623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019952422,0.00005021873,0.000044173248,0.00012022038,0.0000299638,0.0006025044,0.000090827816,0.00004963009,0.00010034242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029229497,0.00017778232,0.0067264647,0.0000701856,0.000047731668,0.000018648238,0.025015667,0.0008890702,0.00047914512,0.930108,0.0009197918,0.035518285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050173234,0.0020393257,0.67553633,0.00020862746,0.000026077205,0.00041806744,0.0018025996,0.20113383,0.06653638,0.01791393,0.027857328,0.0015101786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014996256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001271227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014063908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030986645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20478603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868696530","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.542","title":"Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Dialogical self; Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.027115976177218996,"score_gpt":0.24257858222951653,"score_spread":0.21546260605229753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868696530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6314438,0.0009023565,0.32084116,0.0006625783,0.0009102008,0.000804347,0.0000027372196,0.0002741413,0.04415871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673605,0.00007540769,0.0022067593,0.0007139392,0.000045594643,0.000021818883,0.0000014615537,0.000002799062,0.00019618585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897915,0.000105345775,0.00031612345,0.00017908028,0.00017706983,0.00024323433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992818,0.00033991577,0.00008110952,0.0001930541,0.000027152471,0.00007697025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004554608,0.00010569214,0.00017262527,0.00007014338,0.00010500955,0.00004332696,0.0002289338,0.000080436046,0.000019531419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033632026,0.00007804637,0.000029813898,0.00016565283,0.00007789617,0.00066494814,0.00011777221,0.00014342625,0.00011788097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046422545,0.00011068721,0.020658452,0.000059955924,0.00000853178,0.000098279095,0.006237482,0.0001242576,0.0002102365,0.933476,0.0003826336,0.038587093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037933015,0.00085589837,0.80107194,0.00015229666,0.000008843583,0.00086060306,0.0002329758,0.13531359,0.0005350627,0.039541688,0.016630143,0.0010036683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032006814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020085376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027799919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035449168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31826386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884892599","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2588","title":"Informal Logic, Argumentation Theory and Artificial Intelligence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Informal logic; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Probabilistic argumentation; AND gate; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm; Logic gate","score_opus":0.10386861184421788,"score_gpt":0.3683984202542381,"score_spread":0.2645298084100202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1884892599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16739026,0.00025504947,0.0030695247,0.0064640846,0.00059820426,0.0003992254,0.000009559126,0.0001854342,0.8216287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933998,0.00064089795,0.0003908689,0.004050549,0.00025518297,0.0000069820653,0.0000044730186,0.0000045919846,0.0012466848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869674,0.00011027823,0.0003060353,0.00010768794,0.00036726802,0.00041198128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918056,0.0002964313,0.000121892095,0.00009102715,0.00014280876,0.0001673021],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017401188,0.000114175906,0.00012644107,0.00007361235,0.000856328,0.00036075397,0.0001997685,0.0002113404,0.0011067718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010110216,0.00010033624,0.000051534807,0.00019523696,0.0005981097,0.0016190626,0.00006742033,0.00027547666,0.000298412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017837652,0.000019685218,0.00018332728,0.000005242591,0.0000064943206,0.0000024491394,0.03262469,0.000020784775,0.000009476441,0.8856253,0.00010481212,0.08137988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001384684,0.00035589276,0.0029031585,0.000019221532,0.000022051458,0.000004692394,0.043107715,0.00058624824,0.00026857678,0.92436767,0.027782772,0.00044353964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003005957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004185237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8260095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003343873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050771276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901770678","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4405","title":"Argumentation & Health, Rubinelli & Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.10742300895438578,"score_gpt":0.32456080583752517,"score_spread":0.2171377968831394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901770678","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064403616,0.00042851034,0.9176286,0.0022586046,0.0017089999,0.00055414456,0.000006680544,0.00038444385,0.01262643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94073784,0.00007241595,0.051836234,0.003951398,0.00024613104,0.00004127521,0.0001535692,0.000012263931,0.0029488755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998462,0.000065261855,0.0004773323,0.00021844015,0.00042318544,0.00035375438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989384,0.000021865888,0.00027579203,0.00043932174,0.00008706433,0.00023759174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005536433,0.00015114597,0.00018154611,0.000121695826,0.00014386732,0.00017137676,0.0004333686,0.000073209216,0.000030945655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032771633,0.00012832637,0.000059785118,0.00026364246,0.000019529833,0.0012776095,0.00012277203,0.000110306435,0.0019932871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016557335,0.0008478483,0.032254126,0.00071287964,0.00013402446,0.000026695408,0.09108728,0.03293959,0.0022354063,0.33581242,0.18932235,0.3144618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003357804,0.00060845516,0.022279542,0.0001043644,0.000011890848,0.00020274747,0.00037341064,0.03432306,0.0006890746,0.0048189317,0.93213105,0.0010996808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029499503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001556799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8763342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007548871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013046608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905359712","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4286","title":"The Basic Slippery Slope Argument","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Scheme (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048176581565806904,"score_gpt":0.25522792303817327,"score_spread":0.20705134147236637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905359712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19936766,0.0013629247,0.44758177,0.007573226,0.0098151695,0.0013128599,0.00000433798,0.0008083709,0.33217368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555224,0.00001628447,0.0017059117,0.0008808588,0.00012691975,0.000020146486,0.0000019731665,0.000002735096,0.0016929435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.000029862269,0.00021534387,0.00010487168,0.000282869,0.00022361503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936163,0.00003986933,0.000089800364,0.00034802605,0.00006706838,0.00009360335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000588445,0.00007870833,0.000070321286,0.00002962911,0.00016030701,0.00020756702,0.0005451688,0.000036017085,0.000007955343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043190088,0.00004494545,0.0000372988,0.0001262689,0.000018567624,0.0006388795,0.00017739745,0.000068155496,0.0007425575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033437776,0.00008853794,0.007870897,0.000027861439,0.000042367654,0.000023627701,0.006370864,0.0021742403,0.0001750643,0.6662358,0.04601474,0.27094257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093701755,0.00029140743,0.028344117,0.000020015144,0.000004494165,0.00005211823,0.00033965503,0.09701856,0.00079111994,0.0028816834,0.8689782,0.00034162187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027557699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011522216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003658351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059487593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95443225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917912646","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2234","title":"Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05739613039954247,"score_gpt":0.30512835920797426,"score_spread":0.2477322288084318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917912646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037647963,0.0011654153,0.0021701653,0.0014497733,0.00067489635,0.0003760054,0.00006623336,0.00022889319,0.9562206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733335,0.00012494225,0.000057381305,0.002308168,0.0002842129,0.00009502294,0.0000645438,0.000007264366,0.023724977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915856,0.000059738082,0.0003282154,0.00010132614,0.00014167723,0.0002104633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990874,0.00013043052,0.00010112772,0.00025150753,0.0003511237,0.00007842947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002959997,0.00013275498,0.00017281639,0.00009808408,0.0006824108,0.00015701835,0.00021413156,0.000036603014,0.0013414352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010857465,0.000105650346,0.000069463895,0.00007594491,0.00021877905,0.0004633057,0.0001165018,0.00012190621,0.0017571514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094596304,0.00006952596,0.00040596514,0.0000052014607,0.00005072772,0.0000024020412,0.02740223,0.000012483359,0.000009521637,0.94417125,0.02274677,0.0050293473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045250735,0.000115606315,0.0015722213,0.000014164947,0.000012609283,0.0000031398092,0.011160809,0.000023200668,0.000025923891,0.008056743,0.978396,0.00016706996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074816875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009836442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95564926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054657645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066234934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919497958","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2255","title":"Govier's Social Trust and Human Communities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04843933174929547,"score_gpt":0.2567183694153997,"score_spread":0.20827903766610426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919497958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5492788,0.000015452824,8.1628194e-8,0.000080801234,0.00004728054,0.0000356037,0.000016695169,0.000026906147,0.45049837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744126,0.000022191283,0.000002845387,0.0007428437,0.0003228942,0.0000062139234,0.000020615167,0.000005043782,0.02446475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995285,0.000021457741,0.00015647807,0.000043613156,0.00008328477,0.00016666349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998223,0.000011450964,0.000032243894,0.00006840299,0.000033133285,0.000032456763],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009724611,0.00008887137,0.00011251604,0.00003336265,0.00114424,0.00025470427,0.00009955026,0.00003370187,0.023023421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000013691861,0.000073800984,0.000037232912,0.000013179129,0.00036784378,0.00034794564,0.000035362373,0.00012256946,0.00022537688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136539475,0.00004072313,0.0027412646,0.000021820011,0.0000238925,0.0000029393368,0.035209876,0.0000016988555,0.0000053894155,0.9404581,0.0044869464,0.016993698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028755728,0.00012963219,0.027331607,0.0000056215404,0.000010276849,0.000002701393,0.004771876,0.000030363142,0.000007885459,0.006554076,0.9607013,0.00016710577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095580536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070782523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95621437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009066633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008732705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937457939","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2578","title":"Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Argumentation theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12100827948780749,"score_gpt":0.30743743939493345,"score_spread":0.18642915990712597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937457939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86104894,0.00044946914,0.000020015852,0.00016138106,0.0007522178,0.0001379332,0.000008708059,0.00005078811,0.13737054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714506,0.000019675032,0.000055646135,0.00060159265,0.0002836147,0.000011431892,0.000019263256,0.0000085005595,0.001855243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867487,0.000061485756,0.0004568861,0.0001396775,0.00026699557,0.00040010473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991714,0.000101659294,0.00019830334,0.00031011718,0.00016831391,0.00005023543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078314764,0.00015696936,0.00021641144,0.0001699773,0.0005459771,0.00025420904,0.0003563881,0.000066781184,0.00041390627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000544166,0.00010717394,0.000088625304,0.00011751813,0.0014409162,0.0011525067,0.000110233035,0.0003496868,0.000063908374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013665153,0.000043818618,0.0021627778,0.00002525017,0.000015659876,0.0000013929422,0.2151704,0.005217555,0.0000615984,0.77052736,0.00007626033,0.00668423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018072935,0.0006285578,0.0048753954,0.00018495253,0.00007734901,0.000022616794,0.45515972,0.054608636,0.000635619,0.08247312,0.39852762,0.0009991003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040775136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042408635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68805426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001967915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004062094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53091156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1938710264","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2285","title":"Flow Charts for Critical Thinking","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Flow (mathematics); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mechanics","score_opus":0.07197582917784268,"score_gpt":0.3008067364438623,"score_spread":0.22883090726601962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938710264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064630516,0.0003372226,0.061599813,0.0090842405,0.0032148524,0.0011465079,0.00007635395,0.0011246331,0.85878587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969864,0.000022394284,0.005552977,0.01943333,0.0030514349,0.00006480856,0.00019777026,0.00002377155,0.0017894886],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990701,0.0000013267013,0.0002304355,0.00015525793,0.00018324466,0.00035964727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960274,0.00004900198,0.000040662297,0.00017929696,0.00011685911,0.000011422389],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002163814,0.00013565284,0.00012959454,0.00008074938,0.0003097659,0.00038250763,0.0003267665,0.000081148304,0.0057348735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015648585,0.00010912591,0.00006917761,0.00019209167,0.00007098056,0.0024980446,0.000080085,0.00009348541,0.0023991852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016675686,0.00009003454,0.0010881796,0.00040781297,0.00001369407,0.0000126428295,0.0000928257,0.000621589,0.000028528731,0.441472,0.025040008,0.5309659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020913058,0.000016120126,0.0015285991,0.000046926933,0.00002375146,0.000009015977,0.000034212575,0.04023733,0.000056682133,0.050260864,0.9073011,0.00027625068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036305977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008158005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9052335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006104809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011454846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941092281","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4115","title":"Steps Towards an Evolutionary Account of Argumentative Competence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Intentionality; Competence (human resources); Reputation; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.05740725527824255,"score_gpt":0.3350521106022462,"score_spread":0.2776448553240037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941092281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6609861,0.00031365184,0.0009084641,0.00004052444,0.0005918313,0.0001830855,0.00006468282,0.00006010743,0.33685157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703336,0.0000049348423,0.0014000423,0.00074784784,0.00009632279,0.000028104772,0.00010114833,0.000005457345,0.0005827605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911666,0.000066235516,0.00025303525,0.00012326664,0.00023728298,0.0002035042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936473,0.000022403792,0.00013165124,0.00019055812,0.00019479322,0.00009583649],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002546795,0.00010267442,0.00014761086,0.00007429802,0.000035633308,0.00001171173,0.00017874516,0.00007878369,0.001003084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030128405,0.000081282094,0.000046360034,0.00013212222,0.00011116771,0.000453946,0.000043794927,0.00010569071,0.00048062726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032734142,0.0022487564,0.033995308,0.00013009289,0.000553231,0.00025266816,0.16782783,0.00029444348,0.0013692164,0.5731731,0.014127668,0.20275429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068739983,0.0056251306,0.7464852,0.000062270396,0.00017839696,0.00037254908,0.16760942,0.0007147851,0.0024648393,0.04799017,0.020564456,0.0010587836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034162676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013075234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7124899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003324452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007520158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950405747","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.514","title":"Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Acquittal; Dilemma; Reasonable doubt; Law; Adversarial system; Hearsay; Epistemology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07507757489754922,"score_gpt":0.332331606111525,"score_spread":0.2572540312139758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950405747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6401737,0.000055176883,0.000024854233,0.00067030767,0.00017774993,0.00013466128,0.000003759131,0.000059705206,0.35870013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683154,0.00006589235,0.00068591174,0.0011257632,0.0002412809,0.000015937741,0.0000065228796,0.000004883459,0.0010222921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870336,0.00006471106,0.00019793762,0.00017289301,0.0003683499,0.00049275573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944735,0.00006852843,0.00006261987,0.00015751093,0.000096978074,0.00016700724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051192066,0.000112129695,0.00015146461,0.000055702716,0.0006502766,0.00006257673,0.0003124267,0.000108483524,0.00036251836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011180543,0.000102180864,0.000041590243,0.00022460529,0.0006045756,0.0015772526,0.000056025856,0.0001845984,0.00019127743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009482127,0.0000633659,0.0028932586,0.000010517141,0.0000024033675,0.000122014775,0.02092778,0.00008138374,0.000027118154,0.9733167,0.00039093048,0.0020696928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012354768,0.0013846429,0.06708941,0.0000950466,0.000051622614,0.00025575125,0.03496653,0.00017323703,0.0006749688,0.09722239,0.7955839,0.0012670286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031758532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031092957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87609434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008632802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016116009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98658705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956201883","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3778","title":"Analogical Arguments in Ethics and Law: A Defence of Deductivism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Normative; Inference; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Analogy; A priori and a posteriori; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07374823441558646,"score_gpt":0.28786238975247674,"score_spread":0.21411415533689027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956201883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705649,0.000029117176,0.000044498724,0.00028314895,0.000050651368,0.00012868397,0.0000018569997,0.000016858738,0.028880294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744576,0.000044523433,0.00024992976,0.0021460925,0.00000959903,0.000012518335,4.0408375e-7,0.0000021488233,0.00008902652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925935,0.00004931641,0.00019893382,0.00012896,0.00016604732,0.00019740323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961543,0.00015641372,0.00005784736,0.0000980813,0.000019870125,0.000052359992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016587955,0.00007592925,0.00010633917,0.000046351888,0.00006109804,0.000023152348,0.0001482699,0.00008247101,0.00009980004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003681416,0.000053842483,0.000020613403,0.00014950178,0.00024816944,0.00045743602,0.00009205268,0.00029782281,0.000067196335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040434843,0.00030728025,0.03755793,0.00014454026,0.0000040338796,0.000051717663,0.0042273495,0.00021738608,0.1910967,0.75385666,0.00013991717,0.012356065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018020867,0.0011743592,0.6198916,0.00015223799,0.000010947566,0.00020134941,0.00061752636,0.0042318315,0.15061127,0.21688262,0.0036013124,0.00082291075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023945725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002297385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5823336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005911866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016413493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21956328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962641047","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i2.1227","title":"Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standards of Proof","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Jumping; Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Ignorance; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.017983002122984103,"score_gpt":0.2787240757650127,"score_spread":0.2607410736420286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962641047","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36053273,0.00023990522,0.6149149,0.0013512117,0.00025696045,0.0005127265,0.0000089836685,0.00010256115,0.02208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942075,0.0000052277633,0.0050663822,0.0006192739,0.000021081405,0.0000022463425,4.60663e-7,8.759211e-7,0.000076929806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992777,0.000010059695,0.00019674517,0.000090607646,0.00030761005,0.000117291536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995844,0.000013134905,0.00007339753,0.00013592404,0.00014218065,0.000050965213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036251283,0.0000594403,0.00010624049,0.00006418783,0.000064153064,0.000047592108,0.00016660646,0.000030008998,0.000005746451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005010545,0.00004530753,0.000019639405,0.00013198498,0.000011446041,0.00040236238,0.0001112345,0.000030908075,0.000003867229],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011249634,0.00011860381,0.0055028084,0.00029935347,0.00003068121,0.000023571793,0.03769928,0.0029087225,0.017190404,0.37707332,0.0041282414,0.5549125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048882538,0.007233238,0.44755304,0.00086995185,0.000025549598,0.00023163005,0.0011259189,0.23061411,0.07672109,0.009682334,0.21925007,0.0018048183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011095906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006485749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6336748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022146784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043951703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18475874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095690048","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4141","title":"Critique of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test: The More You Know, the Lower Your Score","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Watson; Promotion (chess); Construct (python library); Psychology; Construct validity; Critical appraisal; Government (linguistics); Social psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03291475972431309,"score_gpt":0.3555261938659,"score_spread":0.32261143414158694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095690048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16899066,0.00024158836,0.0016668106,0.4207779,0.0059520905,0.00085795525,0.000015475292,0.00022960582,0.40126795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815895,0.000021801025,0.0004189926,0.01611168,0.00047427753,0.000033570945,0.0000018532528,0.000008379218,0.0013399514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804276,0.00023526815,0.00034930967,0.00014472361,0.00077009154,0.00045784266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699897,0.0021745865,0.000073739015,0.00037381012,0.00027911682,0.00009976625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022906007,0.00014042955,0.00014195655,0.000023894287,0.0016111656,0.00019621674,0.0010954669,0.00013571285,0.00036739086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008188447,0.000063050444,0.00013459464,0.00030051163,0.0015285444,0.00024876354,0.00020703718,0.00047085926,0.00007935536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060842817,0.00009981759,0.0051977737,0.00001794494,0.0000075189055,6.669127e-7,0.03415034,0.000011387596,0.0000071030117,0.9541619,0.0034506733,0.0028888036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028253024,0.00014482827,0.05678589,0.00021159054,0.000054207794,0.00001488737,0.04534214,0.00029510428,0.00032136988,0.17445764,0.7216832,0.0004065993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018325767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011664894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8125988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034299264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003236482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095987202","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3536","title":"Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Psychology; Confirmation bias; Deductive reasoning; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057087455808471334,"score_gpt":0.3796888305291928,"score_spread":0.3226013747207214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095987202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579942,0.0029832458,0.0019705608,0.000046733883,0.0005039986,0.0002375747,0.000034320106,0.000021456573,0.03620787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509615,0.000108798034,0.003173393,0.0010936827,0.00009734973,0.000043292737,0.00003944265,0.00000961728,0.00033826797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988745,0.00016621231,0.00039447265,0.00015974419,0.00013410128,0.00027100832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916816,0.0002075167,0.0002677286,0.00018055139,0.000098222976,0.00007784324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006093397,0.00014338877,0.00030631525,0.00012220771,0.00004814129,0.000006260661,0.000092278446,0.00009266011,0.00072778173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016159966,0.00011400073,0.000053864256,0.00014965291,0.00013871312,0.0002815978,0.00005810561,0.00010269367,0.00007014153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00310953,0.0006928453,0.15311816,0.00009540463,0.0019558095,0.000014304236,0.42539188,0.000017390015,0.014592636,0.27266622,0.0016554708,0.12669037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028563656,0.001187788,0.8242186,0.000144551,0.00040662,0.000043826185,0.13955043,0.000010342721,0.018080037,0.012061073,0.0009837932,0.00045658337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010820774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000090654175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67110044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019720499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071244613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096056996","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3869","title":"John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Persuasion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Persuasion; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.03415072681443214,"score_gpt":0.3080317809869491,"score_spread":0.27388105417251696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096056996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16424379,0.000017908293,0.0001540203,0.00040444406,0.00013240978,0.00006355222,0.0000025798374,0.000036929654,0.83494437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776584,0.00001667213,0.00014840982,0.0014607339,0.00018743763,0.000002484609,0.0000010061002,0.0000019303295,0.0004154872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919194,0.000086727174,0.00017291354,0.000066949535,0.00022326931,0.00025818482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952126,0.00013911186,0.000055378394,0.000113729024,0.00006154122,0.00010898186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074455916,0.000057751367,0.00010671228,0.000035814235,0.00019657626,0.000014768285,0.000222451,0.00007471305,0.0003139805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005787167,0.000046132714,0.00005807063,0.00011380465,0.00048757673,0.00035558894,0.00004011834,0.00007990376,0.00023721484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135051705,0.000013372955,0.0004755384,0.0000072793173,0.0000020888847,2.6493896e-7,0.0015305446,0.000008370162,0.000057845617,0.99474144,0.000054257023,0.0030954818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032340994,0.00040134144,0.0070138243,0.000038591643,0.000009039238,0.0000012479126,0.0012215849,0.0000900302,0.0009696725,0.6596654,0.33005205,0.00021378922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011786585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062920312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83452886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014571369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037226273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34378663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096129482","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2280","title":"New Dialectical Rules For Ambiguity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Grice; Argumentative; Epistemology; Conversation; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Argumentation theory; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Computer science; Pragmatics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05556845093921646,"score_gpt":0.34174667509680223,"score_spread":0.28617822415758576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096129482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20887838,0.00020363886,0.0004520964,0.00642166,0.0005317751,0.0007279259,0.000019361065,0.00030754504,0.7824576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384805,0.00023876222,0.0086672185,0.0017073712,0.001612595,0.000060859256,0.000013525751,0.0000086637565,0.049210533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990148,0.000029481842,0.00017362312,0.000110501875,0.00024094242,0.00043063582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995322,0.00014689648,0.000033619744,0.00006756056,0.00006196655,0.00015771089],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002513297,0.000097898184,0.0001428918,0.000012161603,0.00086196425,0.0000979382,0.00019983145,0.000108644126,0.0028530273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003796887,0.00007278442,0.00010669776,0.000101526435,0.00020184816,0.00037023437,0.000028809132,0.000095127274,0.000839586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017358166,0.00006516936,0.0034715168,0.000024941522,0.00006572385,0.0000037940752,0.034292165,0.000054411576,0.000020036596,0.25995305,0.05335767,0.64851797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032747426,0.00007706452,0.022978608,0.000004541015,0.000012965179,4.5064633e-7,0.0009667395,0.000022330993,0.000025131016,0.0059690764,0.9694495,0.00016609403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005021078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011495082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91609186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008123669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000822025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097702105","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2240","title":"Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Selection (genetic algorithm); Argument map; Computer science; Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04348574095594171,"score_gpt":0.2649942197036246,"score_spread":0.22150847874768287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097702105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07934133,0.000018601178,0.0010929618,0.00034335905,0.00028931332,0.00017678537,0.0000012321673,0.00013669883,0.9185997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616527,0.00000627895,0.00042317156,0.035915133,0.0007590746,0.000030148227,0.00015577921,0.000008895921,0.0010488069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991215,0.0000032127505,0.00024490085,0.00013321004,0.00026777337,0.00022943449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959826,0.000013580591,0.00012551622,0.00010609443,0.00014289738,0.000013662308],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007907534,0.00014055237,0.00011037214,0.00012077133,0.0001285691,0.0002842635,0.00018539689,0.000048375015,0.0008029228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015761114,0.000113825896,0.00006555197,0.00018729677,0.00005212692,0.0015988847,0.00008037805,0.00010860433,0.0016239397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038662703,0.00009014974,0.0011774797,0.000023460896,0.000018721948,0.0000079131505,0.000019998126,0.0009818512,0.00006830154,0.99319506,0.0036853547,0.00069306156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007626438,0.000033986973,0.012937742,0.000008263786,0.000014578607,0.000022268016,0.0003190558,0.037887607,0.000027318752,0.005901704,0.94181037,0.00027447098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009441209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063894977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98729336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001556699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001397044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098052878","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3938","title":"In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Virtue; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05033415478823391,"score_gpt":0.2871719785788954,"score_spread":0.2368378237906615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098052878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824277,0.00011727496,0.00093490904,0.0009697456,0.0011936162,0.0003107749,0.000030622465,0.000029397785,0.413986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980613,0.0000042495026,0.00009952415,0.0012687364,0.000118220356,0.000012120848,0.000006089949,0.0000041407593,0.0004255897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992117,0.000060004895,0.00034570548,0.00007122272,0.00015854111,0.00015280202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.00032956243,0.00019587333,0.00019844259,0.000082144405,0.000021168125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005342911,0.00008889171,0.00018802554,0.00005236495,0.00006697954,0.000017061584,0.00021776064,0.000041685656,0.0001562192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011246732,0.0000568289,0.00008489016,0.00003034983,0.0006452851,0.00017137104,0.000037746115,0.00015669025,0.000030054616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027406935,0.00006360877,0.0006239799,0.000088963076,0.000009649456,6.473178e-7,0.006996478,0.00045719882,0.00007093606,0.9905099,0.00023695917,0.0009142667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036333613,0.0020776184,0.012310494,0.00023945962,0.00011603417,0.00000621612,0.012070461,0.0070618424,0.011157858,0.06910356,0.88143104,0.0007920554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027729548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002885826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061467604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041491792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.237758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098116843","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.491","title":"Houtlosser and van Rees (Eds.) - Considering pragmadialectics: A festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistic research and analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0686893643724585,"score_gpt":0.2652641942049797,"score_spread":0.19657482983252123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098116843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88074404,0.0006122915,0.00024523964,0.00058537,0.00022709796,0.00055582804,0.00010821333,0.000068407,0.116853505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630815,0.00023048584,0.0001514709,0.00035268365,0.00034424363,0.000024680185,0.000012012578,0.000009927874,0.002566332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990473,0.000030547533,0.000295934,0.00012471984,0.00022260068,0.00027891612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897724,0.0004384616,0.0001170278,0.00018865427,0.00020340126,0.00007519799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028927336,0.00013219412,0.00021414031,0.00013719201,0.00058815075,0.0000971283,0.00014241751,0.000042295767,0.0007150615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007215772,0.00007720144,0.00010829256,0.000051441428,0.0003852194,0.00016124228,0.000048004706,0.00014581063,0.00002807844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047893493,0.00020707192,0.007495501,0.00038407373,0.00046033098,0.00007136435,0.12382232,0.000111833244,0.00022066908,0.84552866,0.0097209215,0.011498344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018183879,0.0023286093,0.0025586335,0.00018398333,0.00014198518,0.000034821394,0.007248457,0.003130152,0.0018297529,0.040821142,0.939274,0.00063007424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002959132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005280246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067254887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000600996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7829422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098137601","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.432","title":"In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Fallacy; Subjectivism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07432956683130892,"score_gpt":0.2587859281955193,"score_spread":0.1844563613642104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098137601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4906804,0.000035077548,0.00014686753,0.00016943889,0.0003754041,0.00025934362,0.000009329325,0.000013608847,0.50831056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504596,0.000008725886,0.00010981556,0.0014912855,0.000091498856,0.000021804179,0.0000044308404,0.000004100886,0.0032223766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939,0.000044248878,0.0002364358,0.00007801343,0.0001122809,0.00013903051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996222,0.000050948496,0.000098411525,0.00013235083,0.00007473317,0.000021357715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017842896,0.00007633979,0.00013383932,0.00005807106,0.00013671706,0.000009601661,0.0001304775,0.00004286749,0.000028214357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042546402,0.00005040993,0.00006539878,0.000054191656,0.00029990554,0.00020325843,0.000040491515,0.00015126335,0.000030310128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030928346,0.0000709978,0.0021947261,0.000035762972,0.00001202251,0.0000012301484,0.1286229,0.000675933,0.000027291795,0.8679261,0.00029120233,0.00011089391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008481704,0.0027854315,0.29143438,0.00037012066,0.00024503903,0.00042513153,0.21555725,0.003381743,0.009444113,0.27798846,0.18681079,0.0030758532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032210327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024115073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5899376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002445225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003526954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20556574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099340309","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3033","title":"Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Politeness; Politics; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.021880985691730966,"score_gpt":0.2703296868811275,"score_spread":0.24844870118939655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099340309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8450339,0.0001514652,0.0000072055827,0.0002139087,0.0002911202,0.000081870174,0.000008881875,0.000029602537,0.15418205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863803,0.000014577885,0.0000698985,0.00057896454,0.00017246605,0.000013577083,0.000013203071,0.000004907269,0.0004943753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936444,0.00001257661,0.00021007613,0.00010419118,0.00009896722,0.00020977537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997342,0.000031681524,0.00006498951,0.00009963877,0.000037158927,0.000032286625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014360413,0.00010293062,0.00014539825,0.00011429406,0.00013988555,0.00012287885,0.00008408791,0.00003199896,0.0008663258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043303113,0.00008157186,0.00003213191,0.000026662849,0.00027511333,0.00042058266,0.00006494302,0.00013339178,0.000047882564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032930147,0.000035214038,0.008607079,0.000027502032,0.000052135685,0.000016631728,0.045998037,0.000012506857,0.00009635566,0.9368469,0.00008512428,0.008189565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009019025,0.00074478454,0.34325057,0.00021282738,0.00043401806,0.00012326,0.4147287,0.0022691435,0.001759131,0.13645378,0.08826823,0.002736523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038637346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066100103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80039316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010333763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011377544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.948566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100247070","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3890","title":"Govier's \"Invention\" of the Theory of Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Term (time); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.024048589127783643,"score_gpt":0.23399216883924723,"score_spread":0.20994357971146357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100247070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15377943,0.00029598793,0.000012265888,0.00016043287,0.00020434645,0.00012922769,0.000010834086,0.000010762566,0.8453967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98843634,0.000012119469,0.000023736444,0.00025939275,0.00006608732,0.000014507415,0.0000019772867,0.0000026902085,0.011183133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994381,0.000022041444,0.00025031666,0.0000417959,0.00014804669,0.00009967672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999497,0.000030042662,0.00017636032,0.00018282227,0.00010258755,0.000011209747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015361083,0.0000631003,0.00012889536,0.00003305991,0.00009058695,0.000022192235,0.00018916941,0.000013250138,0.009806386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003371573,0.000032483757,0.00014370772,0.000026401724,0.00041225596,0.0001979776,0.00010131258,0.000044027354,0.000110715446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002586546,0.000032984222,0.0005566186,0.000024553858,0.00010722146,1.0790672e-7,0.010201714,0.000021817124,0.000014819225,0.98273593,0.0017035473,0.0045981165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010418316,0.00048657652,0.047290165,0.00026018644,0.00060758885,0.0000034803309,0.2290955,0.00020497078,0.003693678,0.50247276,0.21420908,0.0006341881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012466406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011444221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8346569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005135091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009832714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99109876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101053895","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.474","title":"Norms of Legitimate Dissensus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Action (physics); Political philosophy; Inference; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05418168153881438,"score_gpt":0.3258298747255297,"score_spread":0.27164819318671535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101053895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6514326,0.00002017326,0.000009744687,0.00018693322,0.00030125806,0.00006111393,0.0000052035925,0.00003611719,0.34794685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843246,0.00007289485,0.00017991064,0.00018181736,0.00023454185,0.0000036369852,0.0000030414656,0.000002558644,0.0008891703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931425,0.00001843056,0.00015124197,0.000038894057,0.0002202204,0.0002569422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.0000891932,0.00006145374,0.000065489505,0.00006562473,0.00009033821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000841499,0.000048223632,0.00010128694,0.000028969931,0.00024570446,0.0000069222287,0.00012456837,0.00007262836,0.00012819494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021915995,0.000040207284,0.000050171868,0.00013118207,0.00046248003,0.00015499996,0.000018807217,0.00006183205,0.00010965241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023366576,0.000055079832,0.10836747,0.000025961628,0.00001685201,0.000041499814,0.08958981,0.000014433047,0.000100183126,0.79480606,0.00210374,0.0048555653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013247218,0.00046736875,0.24570353,0.000042568892,0.000035267603,0.000046801106,0.10935647,0.00006766887,0.004571747,0.028451964,0.6090616,0.00087026076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011791206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012149197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016660471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010491116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1889785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104283102","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.476","title":"Making it Public: Testimony and Socially Sanctioned Common Grounds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Rhetoric; Individualism; USable; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Public discourse; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.27491929196703513,"score_gpt":0.3082644806043631,"score_spread":0.033345188637327994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104283102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03633697,0.00050893787,0.00011847688,0.003683041,0.00023211609,0.0000799773,0.0000043702707,0.00014182551,0.9588943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899512,0.00025881422,0.00023567528,0.0022774208,0.0002056181,0.00001815974,0.000007797126,0.0000048945494,0.007040404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994402,0.000015973135,0.00020196426,0.000065069515,0.00011736143,0.0001594613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995845,0.00006497232,0.00008906683,0.00013718178,0.00009704276,0.000027263492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009449085,0.00009060895,0.00013044252,0.00004621662,0.0014224526,0.00013511266,0.00013073802,0.000031472937,0.00035758715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025463958,0.000072811185,0.000034507313,0.000032998385,0.00034841793,0.00053125195,0.00013093604,0.000108950255,0.000085737716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010341215,0.000029202714,0.0063273045,0.000008114221,0.000029906025,0.0000024076376,0.028962148,0.0000015113434,7.579721e-7,0.9427614,0.013698123,0.00816875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023451628,0.00008738458,0.018607697,0.000007901261,0.000008359808,0.000023968227,0.007926425,0.000083284925,6.4173804e-7,0.0060516223,0.96680844,0.00015976018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007375141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000428709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95361423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018372171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003940873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104914370","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3882","title":"Teaching Rational Entitlement and Responsibility: A Socratic Exercise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Obligation; Socratic method; Moral obligation; Rationality; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.1519706868791274,"score_gpt":0.41126543320826536,"score_spread":0.25929474632913796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104914370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90552026,0.0000685544,0.019966995,0.0074958974,0.0008140396,0.00022640194,0.0000039690335,0.00004414331,0.06585976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280995,0.000008134298,0.0034563756,0.0009905839,0.00009195551,0.0000116078845,0.0000049656896,0.000002335459,0.002624095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986214,0.000096252894,0.00037786015,0.00016804451,0.00060476747,0.00013164358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983416,0.0010454762,0.00011476646,0.0002652728,0.00017844055,0.00005443028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061100605,0.00006865599,0.000110743,0.00012280265,0.00028358746,0.0002821759,0.00019286995,0.000054247997,0.00045107797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004729635,0.000046751742,0.000028145969,0.00012289682,0.000083505714,0.000515468,0.00010774071,0.00015509478,0.00024082788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006542546,0.00007004066,0.018097812,0.000033205237,0.000004958782,6.380159e-7,0.004797023,0.00022001083,0.00018212515,0.71991354,0.004050298,0.25256494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027930224,0.00007800513,0.14460282,0.00003609893,0.000009205165,0.000007662555,0.0012937102,0.009569565,0.00008137872,0.786008,0.05786362,0.00017065137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030176947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003168752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2523943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014257214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009282062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5662157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106163222","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3035","title":"The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Epistemology; Informal logic; Adversary; Authoritarianism; Fallacy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.041463758869733615,"score_gpt":0.31932288061602115,"score_spread":0.2778591217462875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106163222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60265976,0.00004937812,0.00026413694,0.00028639843,0.0010876026,0.0004377581,0.000005495845,0.000017569973,0.39519188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977251,0.0000015814948,0.00019361197,0.00043927197,0.00010448146,0.00011902104,0.00000750819,0.0000031968184,0.0014061758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991599,0.0000863358,0.0001966551,0.00008883222,0.00029841563,0.00016990067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993562,0.000053046806,0.000093801835,0.00034289627,0.00012270217,0.00003134941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011763183,0.00007204034,0.00007228063,0.000024741823,0.00017330768,0.000029074012,0.00026945068,0.00007881838,0.00024413505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015528973,0.000034239074,0.000065511,0.00013637134,0.00008017499,0.00006581913,0.000060970146,0.00019194893,0.0001456783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002049113,0.00030983204,0.004066618,0.00002426894,0.000111198635,4.9949233e-7,0.027117176,0.00008381355,0.0030458195,0.7248321,0.0049494216,0.2352543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016234771,0.00040140984,0.8270697,0.000012415147,0.000206413,0.000051570743,0.01924385,0.0011779106,0.005371121,0.031355277,0.11305857,0.0004282923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062225925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006323905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82300305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009755502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027513699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26731077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106800433","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2164","title":"The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rationality; Epistemology; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Morality; Discourse ethics; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01782479360331115,"score_gpt":0.3270627110829669,"score_spread":0.3092379174796558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106800433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23859502,0.00044050557,0.00008836474,0.0032795016,0.00038179435,0.0002455238,0.000010867339,0.000024626102,0.7569338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248075,0.00013285929,0.00007221495,0.00037769222,0.00006635193,0.000013179018,0.0000030711603,0.0000020280788,0.0068518287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989563,0.00022426285,0.00020998494,0.00006765157,0.0002988474,0.00024295418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.00017739875,0.00009127038,0.00011888467,0.00005413919,0.00004327218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018247921,0.0000661213,0.00008759337,0.0000037385012,0.0005177255,0.000055475357,0.0002264467,0.00008601325,0.00017518034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003178704,0.000038394992,0.00008244817,0.00017935765,0.0010244251,0.000498731,0.00002083861,0.00015817463,0.0000151179465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011270193,0.00002984386,0.0028823013,0.0000026108426,0.000006052136,8.7411246e-7,0.010841396,0.00006101314,0.0000054779325,0.98465574,0.0005527897,0.0009506264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061031315,0.0000520529,0.024147373,0.00002221901,0.00001881266,0.000002866418,0.18677492,0.000016338816,0.00024201987,0.2663566,0.521483,0.0002735171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016120714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015186021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75388575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030823034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021067988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3981978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113061902","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1116","title":"Norms and Functions in Public Sphere Argumentation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Public sphere; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Informal logic; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Politics; Library science","score_opus":0.02972089284550115,"score_gpt":0.24290576427185998,"score_spread":0.21318487142635884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113061902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77019984,0.0001009304,0.19881286,0.0016955533,0.00036731322,0.00027682658,0.0000018141777,0.00013523908,0.02840965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493474,0.000008088388,0.0040836185,0.0004012322,0.000050254697,0.000013365481,0.000006461211,0.0000015010634,0.0005007681],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994594,0.000011540067,0.00018359633,0.00009902704,0.00010653526,0.00013992829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974763,0.000014319956,0.000059094615,0.000113851755,0.000022330672,0.000042793097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014467444,0.000057042256,0.00005740633,0.00007867995,0.0000649822,0.00012784921,0.00011688,0.000037246224,0.000056163422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000117995305,0.000046176898,0.000014606934,0.00017587464,0.000009506382,0.001886187,0.000053242933,0.00005530142,0.00018583336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009782183,0.00015463508,0.17372942,0.00004892897,0.000015607235,0.0000056103668,0.0034422162,0.0030139182,0.0005647654,0.25569123,0.0014652457,0.56185865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013293047,0.0001384759,0.68107575,0.000018283241,0.0000027414146,0.00004191612,0.00027417796,0.22953182,0.00025951836,0.0006886175,0.08634013,0.00029922512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037172646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020991551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5615594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003059227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017970457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23885737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113518045","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.455","title":"Evaluating Inferences: the Nature and Role of Warrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Inference; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14724920243985806,"score_gpt":0.32551370930484225,"score_spread":0.17826450686498418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113518045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8165363,0.0008614536,0.0000026548544,0.00012928256,0.00020059466,0.00008143543,0.000008828907,0.000017991944,0.18216142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979647,0.000095710784,0.00007915656,0.00076482253,0.00017167225,0.000004685205,0.0000042689903,0.0000029374662,0.00091204996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994368,0.00003302025,0.00018277479,0.00006138386,0.00014512087,0.00014088077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949706,0.0001404888,0.00010735599,0.00011093697,0.00012245333,0.000021701759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033216606,0.00007419189,0.00012565329,0.00002371948,0.00033159545,0.000021432177,0.000120637254,0.00008015034,0.00012533109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010420762,0.000041529034,0.00003938949,0.000017692737,0.000643628,0.00019039451,0.000043595548,0.00030746812,0.000014435221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019441744,0.000020205363,0.0040063434,0.000048193764,0.00003102859,0.0000013619298,0.12417426,0.000022612916,0.000084021514,0.86386144,0.00013480643,0.007596279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022331718,0.002158696,0.08899248,0.0002109077,0.00019258424,0.00014932384,0.1058476,0.003231177,0.0021801894,0.40498996,0.38874325,0.0010706485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010352098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016975662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45887148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000026323155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004684318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25503978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113569866","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3139","title":"The Curious Silence of the Dog and Paul of Tarsus; Revisiting The Argument from Silence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Notice; Philosophy; Tarsus (eyelids); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023461468101838738,"score_gpt":0.2854504810680133,"score_spread":0.26198901296617455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113569866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84474105,0.016338967,0.00003826832,0.0029771666,0.0013137399,0.0003352683,0.000019008323,0.000020900381,0.13421562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998403,0.0006534618,0.000055388708,0.00017593632,0.00040498548,0.0000060860266,1.8733465e-7,0.0000012998194,0.00029961288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991463,0.00007123951,0.00022090992,0.000050947518,0.00029469043,0.00021590263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987456,0.0008357278,0.00019092344,0.00013468917,0.000058074038,0.00003494964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073372776,0.000058969003,0.000103369624,0.0000054048273,0.00080824643,0.000014961856,0.0003127579,0.000030267865,0.000024284698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015096568,0.000023908227,0.000044218392,0.000117771786,0.00067418657,0.000062947634,0.00014483603,0.00009617275,0.000005568344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043769458,0.0000584364,0.17706315,0.000067139554,0.00008897368,0.0000011348602,0.33082306,0.00001886863,0.00019710063,0.3015708,0.0020844373,0.18798313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021226668,0.00007679194,0.28608125,0.0001491715,0.000071167284,0.000001297737,0.056019194,0.00005909349,0.00026098508,0.009968116,0.6468907,0.00021000355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018179467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043208714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6448062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002072084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031872158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.621646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115206405","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3891","title":"Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054675651937541724,"score_gpt":0.24272749440630823,"score_spread":0.1880518424687665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115206405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30094922,0.00031214353,0.000018798832,0.0005954575,0.0004239056,0.00023137507,0.000009204801,0.00008000107,0.6973799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96906865,0.000050059283,0.00013176646,0.0024650304,0.00040836955,0.000031698735,0.000009759804,0.0000080273985,0.027826628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993632,0.000019689065,0.00020091815,0.00009877406,0.0000929891,0.0002244605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995627,0.000065235334,0.00006985623,0.00014156889,0.00008796134,0.00007268646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013165677,0.000112481604,0.00014794509,0.000033567285,0.0001955229,0.00014803352,0.00010316049,0.00006702997,0.0021181954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003891857,0.00008185019,0.00004834995,0.000012991364,0.00036754736,0.00062153494,0.00005338193,0.00018789437,0.0007915541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008809922,0.000032661992,0.000560776,0.000074960444,0.000025769912,0.0000022260153,0.027144698,0.000003035366,0.000025510237,0.94998693,0.005137495,0.016997106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049448956,0.00023984099,0.005025121,0.000019105093,0.000029172828,0.0000102986105,0.005020151,0.00012440053,0.00006438491,0.054865986,0.9338066,0.0003004667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022411505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114224604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9286691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006143211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001886732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115641323","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2166","title":"The Public Metonym","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Bourgeoisie; Conceptualization; Politics; Epistemology; Counterfactual thinking; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08829527627529442,"score_gpt":0.2686905461985331,"score_spread":0.18039526992323868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115641323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033098715,0.0011606909,0.00007855512,0.0140975,0.00058819924,0.00006975022,0.000005422622,0.00007429311,0.98061574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578637,0.00026685806,0.000054151038,0.001540193,0.0002624453,0.00001037885,0.0000030678807,0.0000030121653,0.0020735043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995595,0.000007254391,0.00012850232,0.000040848277,0.000105784355,0.00015809012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971074,0.00008100107,0.000053260814,0.00008460537,0.00004686947,0.000023544431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015540134,0.000055351444,0.0000495225,0.000017283615,0.0009262776,0.00038713636,0.00010993101,0.000013347451,0.00053457904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013268828,0.000028757859,0.00004054543,0.00002108332,0.00014702795,0.00064949313,0.000021006284,0.000077975805,0.0005792718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062721742,0.0000059016006,0.000020805523,0.0000018073088,0.00001655921,7.6643926e-7,0.0032301177,0.000012048715,2.8457143e-7,0.96173596,0.00061022677,0.034359246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014961274,0.000038385606,0.00013277485,0.0000011077414,0.0000048449424,0.000002476596,0.0021921746,0.0000030700028,0.0000035840128,0.009749702,0.98767126,0.00005102061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058871083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013895986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000058060523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019391497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74455607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115843254","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3401","title":"Arguments as Abstract Objects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ambiguity; Object (grammar); Argument map; Epistemology; sort; Product (mathematics); Linguistics; Term (time); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.046379504268419136,"score_gpt":0.2985493773909435,"score_spread":0.25216987312252437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115843254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39891544,0.00006443936,0.0000214492,0.000004722035,0.00048232547,0.00008331172,0.0000037405628,0.00006621231,0.60035837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99182785,0.0000069174107,0.00014065852,0.0018364249,0.00010417804,0.000029372406,0.000024427427,0.000008281808,0.0060218647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922895,0.00001521683,0.00020472138,0.00012679177,0.00012633472,0.00029797122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995797,0.000016697732,0.00008704099,0.00020512736,0.000034657878,0.00007677536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013825651,0.00011390371,0.00010597466,0.000070781374,0.000056479294,0.000017612492,0.00015220571,0.00011818481,0.020839978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023148337,0.00008944116,0.000068103036,0.00008193269,0.00003702281,0.00023017294,0.000028331313,0.0001430768,0.018286783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018830402,0.002023301,0.024127383,0.00012052808,0.00077407743,0.0019391824,0.13904245,0.0000025090865,0.0013389479,0.35973153,0.013099668,0.4559174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028676405,0.0012939957,0.9109658,0.000033465607,0.000106483814,0.00037597658,0.012515993,0.0000043762866,0.006889884,0.038809467,0.025322536,0.00081440964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003017088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014649298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009309271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016047745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119583573","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4079","title":"The Virtues of Reason and the Problem of Other Minds: Reflections on Argumentation in a New Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Analogy; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Modernity; Sociology; Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.050331563233670294,"score_gpt":0.27744907201247676,"score_spread":0.22711750877880646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119583573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14817438,0.0020354763,0.000020595284,0.0032901214,0.00008876827,0.00058929157,0.0000038853113,0.000016274753,0.8457812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512374,0.0006552294,0.00008702237,0.00022612387,0.0000271175,0.00003776236,8.855847e-7,0.0000018132286,0.003840279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965423,0.000026927903,0.00017630511,0.00002620397,0.00006333458,0.00005297701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996181,0.00012566689,0.00011013931,0.00009643204,0.000042693213,0.000006975242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011852705,0.00003889976,0.00006730923,0.000021988293,0.0001557757,0.000031809013,0.000078911784,0.000011092987,0.00007112425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009895072,0.000017640303,0.000019508907,0.000025115929,0.00021211103,0.00012021315,0.000029048735,0.00004768255,0.000009478067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000446958,0.000015974889,0.00022166675,0.0000051187353,0.000015414038,6.7069608e-9,0.050025973,0.0000054232746,0.000005751472,0.9268447,0.000769595,0.022045663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016005669,0.00036262142,0.011653744,0.00008505428,0.000021604392,0.0000010046031,0.10513976,0.0000950748,0.00013875033,0.06400735,0.81677103,0.00012344027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014386863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006463711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005611529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001056463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21748729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121763187","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4124","title":"Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rationality; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Psychology of reasoning; Analytic reasoning; Dual (grammatical number); Cognition; Psychology; Principle of rationality; Ecological rationality; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Process (computing); Cognitive science; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Verbal reasoning; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05786137500224731,"score_gpt":0.3637557087690261,"score_spread":0.30589433376677877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121763187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7058905,0.00031981058,0.0024901135,0.00017305094,0.00035286826,0.00010150397,0.000009129939,0.00002927752,0.29063374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647737,0.000006767502,0.0010120302,0.0018237294,0.00006754447,0.000016322016,0.000055411725,0.00000352131,0.000537312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994305,0.00004787662,0.00021182798,0.00009207475,0.00010378204,0.0001139569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996102,0.000027969989,0.000103229075,0.00010659938,0.00009871767,0.000053320568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031789232,0.00006048133,0.000096163276,0.000057768586,0.000026046408,0.000010142432,0.000056920388,0.000067461646,0.00046845654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061606,0.00005081965,0.000020844725,0.00008417077,0.00006963436,0.00015877774,0.000020154748,0.000060267124,0.00013656307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005438503,0.00022411642,0.11211414,0.000032704724,0.00013887975,0.000024272336,0.021636002,0.000015216779,0.00060819177,0.8029323,0.009825397,0.05190491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005735475,0.0011309378,0.87890345,0.000023004695,0.00009339617,0.00040363424,0.011594335,0.0001016327,0.001153244,0.08214827,0.018287633,0.0004249728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004685154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000784515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000054257266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017438704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51292706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122225311","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i1.683","title":"Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Newspaper; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Media studies","score_opus":0.013400877473480257,"score_gpt":0.2619267581770227,"score_spread":0.24852588070354245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122225311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04045399,0.00085807696,0.9236096,0.001985049,0.00039859043,0.0005516169,0.0000046170794,0.0026715845,0.029466849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80564797,0.000012116056,0.1912941,0.0029084717,0.00005441688,0.000015286907,0.000014070175,0.0000027110707,0.000050835046],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895203,0.000024555296,0.00027072962,0.00022562868,0.00025879437,0.0002682376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993473,0.000038238766,0.0001614479,0.00028244493,0.00009068208,0.00007984894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020863712,0.00014443358,0.0001319187,0.00013704316,0.00012370302,0.00020897509,0.0005741841,0.00013183402,0.000031534277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010692786,0.000113892136,0.00005594724,0.00030454597,0.00003136559,0.0011648003,0.00006174129,0.00019110477,0.00005097989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003522677,0.000041479383,0.00016052718,0.000010124974,0.0000032587507,0.000022496111,0.00010400212,0.000053885324,0.0034472826,0.22352336,0.00019569139,0.77240264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016522063,0.002537177,0.005294593,0.00018630286,0.000020806772,0.0011343837,0.000024823927,0.057360407,0.18650933,0.73728216,0.006748882,0.0012489369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001506927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016229357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77115375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067199464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000700165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46443865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123122802","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1044","title":"Emotional Backing and the Feeling of Deep Disagreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Feeling; Psychology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03980210751325378,"score_gpt":0.2675602829507883,"score_spread":0.22775817543753454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123122802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30582997,0.0012796097,0.00027801318,0.0020796983,0.00009823148,0.00015947291,0.000009477203,0.00003725076,0.6902283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841374,0.00004494473,0.00032407316,0.00045941444,0.00016831633,0.000006289135,0.000009329011,0.0000026626817,0.0005712146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995223,0.00002055753,0.00020103696,0.000040201885,0.00012199464,0.00009389286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996092,0.00008244308,0.00009253346,0.0001491416,0.00005224872,0.0000144858905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002095008,0.000059713566,0.00008273323,0.000024667548,0.00020436678,0.00010556651,0.00015467401,0.000013656989,0.0012826009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014971757,0.00003341577,0.000034638666,0.000012461997,0.00039836974,0.00033917642,0.00008672253,0.000070782575,0.00003241471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014236639,0.000011892866,0.00011916803,0.000009604667,0.000014829089,9.447193e-8,0.045656282,0.00032500192,0.0000021766175,0.9443453,0.000049757724,0.009451636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006805434,0.00024702805,0.018011298,0.00021615745,0.00015548273,0.000040914605,0.40011966,0.023645027,0.00026803772,0.05234539,0.49725753,0.0008880581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057281617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000415811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8919999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006560344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010196976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123858720","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2253","title":"Reification Fallacies and Inappropriate Totalities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Identification (biology); Doctrine; Ontology; sort; Conjunction (astronomy); Set (abstract data type); Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.015490676401537142,"score_gpt":0.22033394613027807,"score_spread":0.20484326972874092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123858720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3993335,0.0004989806,0.010711886,0.00038162313,0.00017640396,0.00015268532,0.0000016369172,0.00033447798,0.58840877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896396,0.00015613818,0.0035543367,0.00033878683,0.000054071243,0.000011981494,0.0000032120988,0.0000026015982,0.0069148988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993404,0.000018607017,0.00016248395,0.00014913207,0.00011625498,0.00021307987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995909,0.000026507363,0.000043334276,0.00024032408,0.00004128028,0.00005770967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017619738,0.000097674565,0.00009800442,0.000042952914,0.00014631348,0.00020131789,0.00031771747,0.000058475795,0.00008753394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002488059,0.00007353312,0.000027726988,0.0001338607,0.0000746486,0.0008419613,0.000096690506,0.000074712225,0.00029075006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101680125,0.000020826577,0.00096459006,0.000022643291,0.000007443409,0.000004788493,0.005128448,0.000044421355,0.000044943157,0.7554681,0.00031781933,0.23796584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019452712,0.001234652,0.25980276,0.000072384,0.000025898893,0.0005412107,0.0011958932,0.061693814,0.0026699265,0.18371865,0.48536488,0.0017346626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023922554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051294573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5896304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011896438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025116524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3737101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124662483","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2868","title":"Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Heuristics; Appeal; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Jump; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Computer science; Positive economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical optimization; Physics","score_opus":0.06121604731127619,"score_gpt":0.2623205485938987,"score_spread":0.2011045012826225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124662483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6915356,0.000020070864,0.000023370816,0.0074806623,0.00182742,0.0002075246,0.00005563453,0.00011925206,0.2987305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419584,0.0000051779825,0.00018488408,0.04780194,0.0008694744,0.000022757862,0.000022407796,0.000014125653,0.009120806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990464,0.00002087211,0.0002325659,0.0001443326,0.00020266157,0.00035319268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.000046806465,0.00010304815,0.00027978016,0.00012054325,0.000100629106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020985416,0.0001719948,0.00019975986,0.000074144715,0.00032258072,0.00019131269,0.00028581964,0.0000916744,0.0008169192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048653743,0.00012731289,0.000105674575,0.000019350688,0.00021549113,0.00036955715,0.000112438946,0.00042718204,0.0006867915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005028642,0.00011692911,0.005258008,0.00010781295,0.00010310374,0.000018992054,0.11007817,0.000016485188,0.00045651867,0.8544552,0.026873805,0.0024647461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016747692,0.0001180812,0.0017971705,0.00001158142,0.000014950011,0.000004289335,0.0044283797,0.000006182431,0.00019053662,0.008845823,0.98419774,0.00021778325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003314329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012235955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95732397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007238172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016766267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89446926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128146492","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.1237","title":"The Value of Genetic Fallacies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.028469031667915336,"score_gpt":0.209510541999259,"score_spread":0.18104151033134366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128146492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.308159,0.00008374307,0.000004288802,0.000288086,0.0008059933,0.00003996036,0.0000041668154,0.00001975042,0.69059503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646753,0.000009626237,0.00009630745,0.00028711962,0.00020556933,0.0000028151403,3.7610397e-7,0.0000015303218,0.0029291478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958754,0.0000037942227,0.00013253129,0.000041509582,0.00011922146,0.000115379175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971795,0.000034659835,0.00005921834,0.00012440038,0.00003979604,0.00002399161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011824549,0.000045914767,0.000050252933,0.000022405517,0.0004919854,0.000057124424,0.00026442713,0.00001704844,0.00032616963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021449994,0.000026297299,0.000037014306,0.000013429171,0.0010475802,0.00017889579,0.000032570395,0.00009754063,0.000095257674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003942255,0.00000527234,0.00006453957,0.0000036146812,0.0000018673431,3.5553953e-7,0.0050699874,0.0000075108533,0.00022603062,0.9919723,0.00032573158,0.0023188363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005596372,0.0000929616,0.0032839093,0.0000020856646,0.0000032431626,0.0000033532556,0.0005662981,0.00008930612,0.000102162034,0.049108822,0.946627,0.00006486069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044076376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003341542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022919396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022091761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38598526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129530350","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.463","title":"About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Dialogical self; Epistemology; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09924219443778998,"score_gpt":0.2313452211963879,"score_spread":0.13210302675859792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129530350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25084856,0.0016588727,0.000018380584,0.00066350773,0.00030184424,0.000118713775,0.000019342371,0.000121237514,0.74624956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869904,0.0004764401,0.000048775153,0.0012467726,0.00090996106,0.000004032758,0.000014138045,0.0000066224284,0.010302843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994007,0.00000993951,0.00016964557,0.000114468334,0.000100843725,0.00020442948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996351,0.000059846858,0.00004461223,0.00008763261,0.000025327518,0.00014750804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000038320144,0.00013235243,0.00015493372,0.000044328266,0.00039299694,0.00021639277,0.00006683374,0.0000511849,0.00019541879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028088562,0.00009800712,0.00003267547,0.000023788356,0.00052152557,0.0006632007,0.000061018658,0.00013569038,0.000050207433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003225934,0.000013307944,0.00032153772,0.000019536494,0.0000122817155,0.000015075077,0.014392723,0.0000013310064,0.0000043884806,0.9805578,0.0020485043,0.0025812786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005816868,0.00034578043,0.0039748577,0.000016537033,0.00001549413,0.00006673887,0.0012417134,0.000028624258,0.000012722105,0.17552052,0.81791437,0.00028095374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029972868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004587018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062105764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056573463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39966142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129816778","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i4.2854","title":"Confrontation and Ridicule","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Perspective (graphical); Persuasion; Psychology; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Epistemology; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02598441041879077,"score_gpt":0.33630257567469807,"score_spread":0.3103181652559073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129816778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25352812,0.0001449555,0.00034479398,0.0013023285,0.00006823096,0.00010085233,0.0000036782214,0.000047534715,0.7444595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962322,0.000014831262,0.00020095716,0.0017193324,0.00004085384,0.000013485095,0.000006592818,0.0000011264603,0.0017705873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997278,0.0000034716725,0.000082708066,0.000055732286,0.000030563904,0.00009973521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986094,0.000009421564,0.00002533964,0.000069319925,0.000009610171,0.000025357358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000037137233,0.000039161834,0.000048155893,0.000014452449,0.000077552904,0.000010462025,0.000033209795,0.000024762205,0.00031235703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003639423,0.00003150915,0.000011657274,0.000035282188,0.000024166804,0.000029060788,0.000008180701,0.000039200495,0.00036126588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012130171,0.000028683826,0.0010620441,0.0000014256248,0.000009094725,0.0000027247213,0.0026113088,0.0000029359223,0.00006583054,0.90249264,0.009053705,0.0846575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004692347,0.00032800017,0.70606375,0.000001958043,0.000009240126,0.000028563158,0.0019776544,0.000040766998,0.000029013665,0.004451799,0.28648773,0.00011230599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016924108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038296303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89804083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000326125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025219138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46434626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130107788","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2241","title":"Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.029106701376946296,"score_gpt":0.25603876793574365,"score_spread":0.22693206655879736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130107788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60458577,0.00017956414,0.35366175,0.00026388478,0.0005859184,0.00047626314,0.0000035775422,0.00021804155,0.040025216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884319,0.00004026678,0.009936102,0.0002928486,0.00005240453,0.000013182445,0.000002108225,0.0000023982086,0.0012288351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936754,0.000014425912,0.00015199116,0.00014077162,0.00014791955,0.00017737097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967855,0.000018853838,0.00007728799,0.00013324025,0.000033222463,0.000058855752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001234769,0.0000801112,0.00008149009,0.00005939556,0.00009628496,0.00009322318,0.0001979909,0.00004127357,0.000034889395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000118627195,0.000063994965,0.000019198396,0.000112962,0.00001722832,0.0011571564,0.00013067506,0.000055607503,0.00013902073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007730223,0.00018741365,0.23459196,0.0000773141,0.000084354186,0.000052649553,0.006583136,0.0011429344,0.0014118335,0.702143,0.0024975762,0.05115054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002333345,0.00052509666,0.757908,0.0000687199,0.000012548699,0.00027086114,0.000220752,0.14460914,0.0016187623,0.009320143,0.0823857,0.00072696054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051533385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008706088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6928228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001568787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013394389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2609639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132547821","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.3057","title":"The pragma-dialectician’s dilemma: Reply to Garssen and van Laar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Normative; Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Dilemma; Dialectic; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012632179538151392,"score_gpt":0.2442340935455214,"score_spread":0.23160191400737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132547821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84432566,0.00007861279,0.084148705,0.0103647,0.004465421,0.0012279734,0.0000046907803,0.0004338881,0.054950323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936769,0.0000059559457,0.0031643372,0.0022212367,0.00018485228,0.000023065088,8.3222193e-7,0.0000037464981,0.00071909983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919444,0.000023448083,0.0002134038,0.00015642135,0.00017472063,0.00023756379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992377,0.00010913033,0.00009027062,0.0003924083,0.00007072624,0.000099756595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047840748,0.0000888649,0.00008296123,0.000045167628,0.0002976432,0.00034254554,0.00040891318,0.000048267248,0.000010552419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021112878,0.00005580051,0.000026473914,0.00014297398,0.000025830937,0.0005590695,0.00019639879,0.00014944274,0.00017495031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037488146,0.00005601043,0.012669302,0.000038356622,0.000031579923,0.000024145857,0.0059083826,0.00017410661,0.005096171,0.80329627,0.01491564,0.15775256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037603412,0.00022624174,0.13768278,0.000012364758,0.0000046501796,0.00008607733,0.00004969775,0.015621174,0.001371261,0.0016286699,0.8426604,0.0002806148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011261536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019099112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8277448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000088241095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031166575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33031747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132900127","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2254","title":"The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":873,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Psychology; Disposition; Systematic process; Cognition; Convergent thinking; Character (mathematics); Curriculum; Process (computing); Cognitive skill; Empirical research; Epistemology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Creative thinking; Creativity; Work in process; Computer science","score_opus":0.08520723245864432,"score_gpt":0.36159897230624505,"score_spread":0.27639173984760074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132900127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14445008,0.0008840364,0.0044754623,0.44352674,0.0027876196,0.0011500485,0.000014153395,0.00065537554,0.4020565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870376,0.000111122485,0.0016775614,0.009838609,0.00030734722,0.000048584156,0.0000051098064,0.000008190168,0.00096586783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759626,0.00020328234,0.0003681116,0.00020846748,0.001063239,0.0005606145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817586,0.00097159855,0.000026372427,0.00014067424,0.00035217628,0.0003333376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026762832,0.0001408044,0.00012786688,0.0000555086,0.0034128597,0.0007122296,0.00033244517,0.00014276523,0.00058236934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00540927,0.00010707675,0.000052235744,0.00024893408,0.00035864685,0.00069163187,0.00006155232,0.00033498343,0.00048891664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021566659,0.000045047196,0.0009995165,0.000015397663,0.000005279598,0.0000024305534,0.03595192,0.0000016143055,0.000004039452,0.9528641,0.00045873044,0.009630343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028903293,0.00016862142,0.14699261,0.00024569276,0.00004583888,0.000019193207,0.011670104,0.00006918894,0.000064520376,0.5543476,0.28550562,0.0005819867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040512004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062051935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84258753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013484317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022433855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134720723","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2236","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Immortality; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Fallacy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12089603935311828,"score_gpt":0.31216809696240516,"score_spread":0.1912720576092869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134720723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85129434,0.00020958215,0.000017661618,0.005439448,0.00053494034,0.00021669414,0.0000046397836,0.000035500863,0.1422472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590415,0.00014733225,0.000017170225,0.002037903,0.0010557587,0.000008354841,0.000008137466,0.0000044212456,0.0008167856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920046,0.00007894546,0.0002761017,0.00011866828,0.00014870375,0.0001770914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947745,0.00022641245,0.00008130684,0.00013192424,0.000045376084,0.000037524773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051575917,0.0001073326,0.00016043131,0.00003596405,0.00019451723,0.00009096124,0.00009581691,0.00006896708,0.0001342918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080869824,0.00006423016,0.00006083811,0.000035467798,0.0003047118,0.00023442792,0.000039642666,0.00032409752,0.00006618324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042573247,0.00003793115,0.0013128163,0.000015262105,0.00000763947,0.000012453289,0.011459697,0.0000023116088,0.0000038312833,0.98427284,0.00022072061,0.0026119044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014996938,0.00062248204,0.020525135,0.0002225417,0.000051442967,0.00005093194,0.0068687615,0.00029507503,0.00009764739,0.31989163,0.64932925,0.00054539455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026873795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009177451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66438127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016417227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000084080275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.261923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135045205","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.472","title":"Natural Normativity: Argumentation Theory as an Engaged Discipline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Dialectic; Informal logic; Context (archaeology); Situational ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03527115943626872,"score_gpt":0.2777098203818924,"score_spread":0.2424386609456237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135045205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441059,0.000030694555,0.1502514,0.00011228507,0.0005526697,0.0002051167,0.0000018444977,0.00019134302,0.0045487597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948695,0.00000768254,0.003847114,0.00057095266,0.000086661945,0.0000135110195,0.000032674772,0.0000035290623,0.0005684312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887,0.00024384912,0.0002631332,0.00014913858,0.00027041533,0.00020342377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993446,0.0001104002,0.0001449109,0.00027764254,0.0000503773,0.00007207088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008286796,0.00011443935,0.000111114496,0.000087087814,0.0004668627,0.000083179955,0.00035156327,0.00004795477,0.000038207403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075188924,0.00008667687,0.00004586112,0.0001695031,0.000032565556,0.003102679,0.00011005009,0.00025023587,0.00031038365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018225388,0.00053424994,0.013494417,0.000117070005,0.00008377827,0.00013492936,0.15732189,0.0023178947,0.009663662,0.6991358,0.00081254443,0.116201535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003169897,0.00095198664,0.5848978,0.00004931442,0.000016746679,0.0006845685,0.002048016,0.37351772,0.014286269,0.01458989,0.004610145,0.0011776491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028234084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011305179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6845459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002917499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003480979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39894572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135187704","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2891","title":"A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Objectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Medicine","score_opus":0.06646282060450644,"score_gpt":0.28877686783745976,"score_spread":0.22231404723295334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135187704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42873535,0.00012501715,0.00004405139,0.009613239,0.0028280509,0.0003099981,0.000020415004,0.00021509899,0.5581088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98469484,0.000018036568,0.00029199294,0.0023980692,0.0011805544,0.00005197698,0.000004875983,0.000018317625,0.0113413595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987103,0.000114810704,0.0003153596,0.00022305899,0.00020799463,0.0004284736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867415,0.00052424584,0.00009087853,0.00035857293,0.00018224954,0.00016991558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010869975,0.00019765114,0.00026600825,0.00013086463,0.00034880143,0.00013241667,0.00026179268,0.00016001193,0.00061357365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077766465,0.00016084345,0.00011729804,0.000041799827,0.00052454375,0.00030613563,0.000073580384,0.00069916574,0.0013526641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044078377,0.00007140832,0.00003200702,0.000050491853,0.0000245995,0.000028224063,0.039612316,0.0000025163974,0.0010213131,0.9537746,0.00060343253,0.004338313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036711188,0.0006778044,0.0019460982,0.00001972418,0.000021832164,0.00007706343,0.0037325188,0.000016785156,0.00030426725,0.018939734,0.97354966,0.00034738777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007777326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002067636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002083819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001282218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135933060","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4077","title":"Virtue, In Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.057326803594014195,"score_gpt":0.2504277423336299,"score_spread":0.1931009387396157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135933060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27400243,0.00012084575,0.000013034476,0.00055921864,0.00056310825,0.00016275114,0.000004985326,0.00005134242,0.7245223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812332,0.000010354725,0.000029830859,0.0052027423,0.00023316417,0.000029389663,0.000008323452,0.000005338668,0.01324767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937856,0.00002077166,0.00023198868,0.00007673717,0.00008232412,0.00020962999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996343,0.00006555801,0.00005899341,0.00012265195,0.000078548495,0.000039893872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014717954,0.000092086615,0.00014692983,0.00005978255,0.000092662485,0.00008829126,0.00012833573,0.000062771134,0.0021475437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034918605,0.00007026864,0.000052012878,0.00001920016,0.00027708744,0.00053034874,0.000035852274,0.00021573126,0.0026953402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042381184,0.000023232116,0.0005847187,0.000016456848,0.0000062538047,0.0000023870914,0.0135395955,0.000004091092,0.00000957847,0.9773186,0.0018800374,0.006610845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000706126,0.0002466582,0.007987743,0.000028854358,0.000008488774,0.00000508382,0.018055547,0.00018838691,0.000092207214,0.10273419,0.869603,0.00034371493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011457881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002370263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8745844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021562655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136637821","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3036","title":"Feminist Epistemologies of Situated Knowledges: Implications for Rhetorical Argumentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positivism; Code (set theory); Informal logic; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0826821687398541,"score_gpt":0.3915879571860329,"score_spread":0.3089057884461788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136637821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24896339,0.00017350013,0.002114451,0.0075097405,0.0021954537,0.0010666074,0.00009668578,0.00025193833,0.7376282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960209,0.00002524361,0.002001633,0.00017492431,0.00011777467,0.0001089405,0.000021512245,0.000003475741,0.0015255957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992045,0.000034149045,0.00030282716,0.00012125455,0.00008451415,0.00025276293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900395,0.00045981182,0.00016199793,0.00014290196,0.00017881369,0.000052513522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005257691,0.00008633719,0.00017015667,0.000051975978,0.0006374872,0.000019774026,0.00023236177,0.00017202571,0.00004008324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072540226,0.0000752489,0.00007906963,0.00017068133,0.00065934454,0.00010267748,0.000046976835,0.000115694354,0.000030926913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043616667,0.00007672485,0.042672165,0.000038614682,0.000034916186,3.0302252e-7,0.012952831,0.000003116837,0.00061994424,0.9347406,0.002785988,0.0060312003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014392349,0.0008253679,0.3569865,0.00002082228,0.00011515563,0.000018606232,0.031356942,0.000051795818,0.0027818829,0.13853386,0.46721584,0.00065399864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007220017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055165327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022574386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001285914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49031007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136857883","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3143","title":"The Paradox of Analogy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054567972928305584,"score_gpt":0.2442323144040067,"score_spread":0.1896643414757011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136857883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029936375,0.0003704378,0.000008759886,0.0006356886,0.0005451073,0.00004589904,0.000007810756,0.000020247675,0.9684297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996645,0.000012913174,0.000008173901,0.00044267584,0.00069949875,0.0000034978023,0.0000026766352,0.0000021633887,0.0021834513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995651,0.000010352599,0.00014843818,0.000024457877,0.00007467346,0.00017693549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996938,0.00009191207,0.000055376222,0.00009833151,0.000025313637,0.00003525165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011885662,0.000048576312,0.00007056522,0.000015038536,0.0001872367,0.00002230397,0.00010390578,0.000019820276,0.000440188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021650343,0.000025213567,0.000053396147,0.000015837139,0.00027145693,0.00021131545,0.000032067543,0.000069514404,0.00020575713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012152767,0.0000181415,0.00019244921,0.0000038536286,0.000008348432,1.7893545e-7,0.0020770638,9.4434006e-7,0.0000019836457,0.99272627,0.0009077825,0.004050863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007478855,0.00005601991,0.0014050179,0.0000020000505,0.000006300171,0.0000016746066,0.00034382998,0.0000117645095,0.000047326106,0.059254147,0.9387493,0.000047804297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012732714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003241891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003075666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005284833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48197502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137064426","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3610","title":"Arguments Whose Strength Depends on Continuous Variation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Variation (astronomy); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Ignorance; Symbol (formal); Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.026387358559803648,"score_gpt":0.21788137428387164,"score_spread":0.191494015724068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137064426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19485295,0.00000990903,0.000010736707,0.00059978006,0.00047534725,0.00016191207,0.000017822102,0.000092871946,0.80377865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883791,0.000002877201,0.000031751948,0.0019680075,0.00064281636,0.000028346527,0.000032104377,0.0000066046305,0.008908352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930936,0.000013388765,0.00020737464,0.00009910293,0.00016413575,0.0002066234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996141,0.000048261867,0.000080368845,0.0001324319,0.000060338873,0.000064498985],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054872282,0.00011780479,0.000118908945,0.000052865067,0.00019018164,0.0002168675,0.00011609359,0.000047513426,0.0053396863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027053466,0.00008483661,0.000058905287,0.000021292115,0.00006266155,0.00056552276,0.000034828583,0.00013900419,0.0037235674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017315891,0.00009531072,0.00004788502,0.0000048841016,0.000016985032,0.0000023804034,0.002153369,0.000007134655,0.000010326604,0.97710574,0.0020130333,0.018525627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014390956,0.0010657848,0.012518967,0.000040736297,0.000031562326,0.000003494059,0.0006792055,0.00074353715,0.00022687351,0.19495223,0.7877617,0.0005368175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010237295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029958737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7948703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016553953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008376924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99705213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137487617","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2577","title":"The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Informal logic; Epistemology; Begging; Test (biology); Grice; Sociology; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Argumentation theory; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.02657904061724747,"score_gpt":0.2099473469438889,"score_spread":0.18336830632664142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137487617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6425587,0.00073012186,0.00041510616,0.0005397335,0.00020226503,0.00022346982,0.0000036031377,0.00012631858,0.35520068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617195,0.00028164644,0.0001708924,0.0014854791,0.00018533721,0.000010795149,0.0000064134147,0.0000066240336,0.0016808804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990225,0.0000018203351,0.00035362618,0.00008016547,0.0002261929,0.00031573538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993714,0.000026814178,0.0002662598,0.00018081108,0.00015255545,0.000002160192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002548131,0.00013566788,0.00016815729,0.00007951211,0.00042627397,0.0001351406,0.00026278518,0.000046748144,0.00004089194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012618817,0.00008461966,0.00008361135,0.0002538173,0.000118367985,0.0010550548,0.00023172551,0.00010808928,0.00019021693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005392326,0.00003496543,0.008864607,0.00023000472,0.00005846482,0.0000034148122,0.00079777837,0.005362017,0.00006289614,0.8949043,0.012204548,0.077423096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011782955,0.00007310991,0.030684734,0.0002992438,0.00010691231,0.000007742644,0.0007643177,0.6932123,0.000111059955,0.008654541,0.26418433,0.0007234523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027460572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013098678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8862497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007867739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005546302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34506896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137883463","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.1192","title":"The Metaphoric Fallacy to a Deductive Inference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Analogy; Inference; Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Rule of inference; Computer science; Inductive reasoning; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.01801547841746032,"score_gpt":0.279019675044014,"score_spread":0.26100419662655366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137883463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68935126,0.00016548773,0.18622677,0.008666368,0.004164593,0.0005240751,0.0000015185633,0.00058236613,0.110317566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97587925,0.00001019794,0.022557592,0.0011335154,0.000059777532,0.000025889924,2.2980515e-7,0.0000019425966,0.00033160194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991527,0.000014740398,0.00016760723,0.00015046875,0.00018618829,0.00032826915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998985,0.000261245,0.00005254609,0.00051946734,0.00009802274,0.00008372592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003019962,0.00010319806,0.00009971139,0.000057007892,0.00024696297,0.00027995513,0.0014002139,0.00005089582,0.000010135316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000524086,0.000057234905,0.000046436577,0.00033238105,0.000076438795,0.00055374036,0.00045496738,0.00021545321,0.00043019676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007948015,0.000013348812,0.0011438557,0.0000021988255,0.00001233881,0.0000063430475,0.002082179,0.000040268096,0.00054139964,0.8704214,0.0005786798,0.12515001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006911348,0.0008944241,0.36273846,0.000014925438,0.00002289706,0.00022096434,0.0019539408,0.012691471,0.011582934,0.17913705,0.42892444,0.0011273628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060464325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019376272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69128436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007728949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007728097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55294526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139794519","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2931","title":"Truth and Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Logical truth; Criticism; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0797422625294547,"score_gpt":0.2921479428081424,"score_spread":0.21240568027868767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139794519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56611365,0.000053755844,0.000010325368,0.00025426858,0.001366848,0.00011840903,0.000005782649,0.000033127806,0.43204385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969749,0.000009857534,0.000108945285,0.00075759133,0.00045017299,0.000014542294,0.000015818301,0.0000035198973,0.0016646589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995073,0.000016885651,0.00013657012,0.00007325746,0.00013971228,0.00012623689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963933,0.000055647633,0.000057927133,0.00010368719,0.000106341526,0.000037057198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005095334,0.000069542555,0.00008337663,0.000031807896,0.00017430609,0.00007901562,0.00005724913,0.000052706982,0.0008513974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074090916,0.000052139683,0.000028342578,0.000008229604,0.00025028063,0.00024408642,0.00002513998,0.00020438901,0.000111332316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005440379,0.000013907549,0.00016361328,0.000013525764,0.00000856809,4.0327916e-7,0.009422364,0.0000021091075,0.00005861228,0.9766935,0.00019640563,0.013421515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092661765,0.00029947635,0.0071824156,0.000010993531,0.00008585457,0.000013329451,0.004020306,0.0011858748,0.0004180405,0.18917416,0.79635316,0.00032978947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038251786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031264368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79615676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004499032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027708567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9322204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141098873","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.465","title":"Argument Has No Function","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Pragmatics; Dissent; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Function (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.044770427918596124,"score_gpt":0.26928381262016915,"score_spread":0.22451338470157303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141098873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33824474,0.00017589614,0.0014355535,0.000065207445,0.0015126776,0.00013672352,0.0000051704947,0.00013073829,0.6582933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817433,0.000015113445,0.000118515454,0.002661834,0.00032979707,0.00004125628,0.000054693417,0.0000066161892,0.015028891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930066,0.000023302366,0.00018651306,0.00011640501,0.00013774491,0.00023535179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962795,0.000017115466,0.00006266962,0.00017160384,0.00006676105,0.000053895998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010308145,0.00009786635,0.00009715974,0.000061488674,0.00015536639,0.00001958911,0.000078094214,0.0000974425,0.0073242486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018532073,0.00007675168,0.0000678296,0.00009112498,0.00006290023,0.00019623303,0.000020105184,0.0001221275,0.016003601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041169934,0.0019380193,0.032700468,0.00012355148,0.00084392447,0.0011159617,0.039945178,0.00008548505,0.0024418517,0.22352305,0.31496868,0.37819684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002508344,0.0014749417,0.25110108,0.000011964663,0.000073004296,0.00048520786,0.0015773163,0.000053774493,0.0004580584,0.0030180656,0.73873985,0.00049835455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007623153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005721911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64349854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014687818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017931456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141509767","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.485","title":"Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Informal logic; Foundation (evidence); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03237957088350588,"score_gpt":0.30028361755840804,"score_spread":0.26790404667490214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141509767","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41089904,0.0013317022,0.57585496,0.00053281046,0.00019594167,0.0002300113,0.0000018263156,0.000039521037,0.010914198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963306,0.00015644766,0.0033057248,0.00017558852,0.000011614842,0.000008558997,8.5403724e-7,5.657366e-7,0.000010004907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959266,0.000044350378,0.00014139719,0.000051860294,0.00010225766,0.00006746058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997034,0.00013912188,0.00003725374,0.000085255124,0.000023264769,0.000011715775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002507217,0.00003424584,0.000046824916,0.000039270955,0.000063892985,0.000015063074,0.00012279153,0.00001820802,0.0000040740906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074556476,0.000021601505,0.000011391698,0.000091346,0.000056813584,0.0008639962,0.00002399513,0.000037760663,0.0000046123887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033142826,0.000023560477,0.01015446,0.000019312078,7.5481523e-7,0.0000022137524,0.002701959,0.000064335996,0.000073085015,0.9738968,0.000011082313,0.01304913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009847727,0.0004121317,0.88666767,0.00010569978,0.0000074676395,0.0002330912,0.0017476324,0.036750354,0.0020152132,0.06383498,0.00693937,0.00030163137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075015246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038904163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91006184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000038078408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010894898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088088386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141961202","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2579","title":"Critical Thinking in the Schools: Why Doesn't Much Happen?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Parallel thinking; Critical theory; Sociology; Critical systems thinking; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05035368384930244,"score_gpt":0.3649866247988576,"score_spread":0.31463294094955513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141961202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065825924,0.00009576417,0.00068131456,0.14223018,0.0007250301,0.00024723314,7.4899225e-7,0.00011933709,0.79007447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94522446,0.000066984125,0.0015675229,0.052330777,0.00021666742,0.000027758888,0.0000029031958,0.0000033284198,0.0005595882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845713,0.00015574534,0.00025061003,0.000114757866,0.0005697917,0.00045198854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993108,0.0003405351,0.000023228906,0.00013555094,0.00009176751,0.0000981003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019899816,0.0000848284,0.00009321801,0.00006581876,0.00078767614,0.00034886855,0.00051031134,0.00010001706,0.0008892629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001507498,0.000056862064,0.000042592295,0.00040422432,0.00020977827,0.00052151235,0.000048369944,0.00036830973,0.00040902823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049607393,0.000056619385,0.008917007,0.0000041914004,0.0000017718205,0.000015498686,0.026208494,0.0000016029765,7.1661754e-7,0.95843315,0.002692062,0.0036638961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013849232,0.000027853253,0.017786074,0.000034949084,0.000003971289,0.000011359746,0.077723,0.000012604758,0.0000038125952,0.42417017,0.47993195,0.00015575116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004888238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057882426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006617166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002803872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142254252","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.3078","title":"Diagramming Objections To Independent Premises","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Arrow; Argument (complex analysis); Premises; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03932603295168866,"score_gpt":0.23968911017331745,"score_spread":0.2003630772216288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142254252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01952865,0.000068474306,0.32144713,0.000060717073,0.0008437082,0.00022173503,0.0000011296352,0.00042207498,0.6574064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804689,0.000007113315,0.01702367,0.00055678893,0.00008208888,0.000037397782,9.966138e-7,0.0000043252285,0.001818718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902236,0.000016170578,0.00020347921,0.00020603664,0.00017691575,0.00037505166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999272,0.000032701675,0.00006080047,0.00036801587,0.00008217509,0.00018429673],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019208615,0.0001292627,0.000117068455,0.000120839824,0.00018803342,0.00011456953,0.0007729371,0.00007348313,0.00010373221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010391708,0.000101206824,0.00006982807,0.00032844365,0.000026420783,0.000734939,0.00043600614,0.00013461204,0.000952532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002457262,0.00023450877,0.017765027,0.000027461958,0.000039394145,0.000059486672,0.026837956,0.00014318264,0.00017084085,0.8222068,0.0022645013,0.13022625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002240613,0.0032849214,0.5752716,0.00012714993,0.00006298812,0.00071800343,0.0018514062,0.009367492,0.026969844,0.07548561,0.3015402,0.003080139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008335272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076271695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96094024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033284257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000631204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142621508","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.3063","title":"Do Squirrels Eat Hamburgers?: Intellectual Empathy as a Remedy for Residual Prejudice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Empathy; Injustice; Epistemology; Sociology; Residual; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12055312449552753,"score_gpt":0.3566505104062681,"score_spread":0.2360973859107406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142621508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17270952,0.00010391312,0.00088923925,0.0023586878,0.001394798,0.00063566683,0.000005450562,0.0002335043,0.8216692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98037153,0.000062057,0.0054941,0.004592776,0.0002820086,0.00010663296,0.00001019246,0.000009537748,0.009071178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986216,0.00006158351,0.00030240556,0.00017419881,0.0003631688,0.0004770652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990233,0.00036114748,0.000060945426,0.00014516448,0.00020327645,0.00020613067],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011063914,0.000116451425,0.00014072077,0.000082637256,0.00053128,0.000099942736,0.0003152007,0.00014121269,0.0033201713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00260035,0.000102645674,0.00007554979,0.00019947882,0.00028813383,0.0002754385,0.00006099455,0.0001438517,0.00073586317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013131856,0.0001223069,0.0006385238,0.000019594438,0.000024935793,0.000004151471,0.46207967,6.241136e-7,0.000005714563,0.50107414,0.023444839,0.012454202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049723557,0.00048661843,0.0027163427,0.00006356089,0.00002971425,0.000007388951,0.09049335,0.000008553535,0.00080550363,0.15311223,0.75128216,0.0004973179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032229593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010106308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81259805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007446137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046642107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142636695","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3531","title":"What a Real Argument Is","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05494259938175779,"score_gpt":0.3590992580294191,"score_spread":0.30415665864766134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142636695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14610407,0.00015459598,0.00009016189,0.015110835,0.0031424353,0.0001499018,7.449261e-7,0.00010066401,0.8351466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97806007,0.0003792659,0.0009930765,0.010115427,0.0003467727,0.000015225821,0.0000034424054,0.0000021314306,0.010084567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924356,0.00002296424,0.00011484471,0.000044067285,0.000252339,0.00032223779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967474,0.000032104388,0.000022146603,0.00006304626,0.0000385813,0.00016938327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005133835,0.00004617809,0.000049617673,0.000023852554,0.00024270889,0.00012494806,0.00010552582,0.00004353626,0.0024972595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003685135,0.000038818398,0.00002667906,0.0000950646,0.000080193386,0.0009569231,0.000027661084,0.00006182839,0.0012513505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001865856,0.000053668187,0.015516216,0.0000032885507,0.000005283197,2.0713038e-7,0.10744919,1.2851802e-7,0.0000015883862,0.8568444,0.0042791623,0.015845004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000702051,0.0000121770645,0.018415987,0.00001225479,0.000003745999,5.961206e-7,0.034461636,0.0000011340517,0.00007711151,0.015429121,0.93140185,0.000114154886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001318409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013491753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9271227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052343967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100635065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143080384","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4211","title":"Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argument Structure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Dialectic; Informal logic; Analogy; Epistemology; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06898946727387348,"score_gpt":0.2784988722347673,"score_spread":0.20950940496089385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143080384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76010996,0.00036690163,0.22491345,0.0012563519,0.0009973992,0.0006151165,0.000012156014,0.00030024417,0.011428419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849617,0.000006045294,0.0140427025,0.00078188564,0.00006703277,0.000005693541,0.000013717152,0.0000022824195,0.000118932534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901587,0.000027078844,0.00024591628,0.00018256754,0.00030432845,0.00022425762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942267,0.000015318785,0.00010244287,0.00022517149,0.000062311876,0.00017209325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019777243,0.00012500463,0.00014561492,0.00005792636,0.00008189616,0.00015820265,0.0002862633,0.00006624312,0.000043435793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021357486,0.000087373024,0.000028873836,0.00011375575,0.000030260557,0.0005276574,0.00023173743,0.000084756575,0.000051637242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006489247,0.00021608711,0.060213678,0.00013818711,0.000113848546,0.00007047083,0.006383461,0.002729177,0.0031847549,0.8256541,0.01534188,0.085889496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037428455,0.0011155196,0.33127594,0.000047780195,0.000020239397,0.00026414898,0.00042507116,0.30776805,0.0020020742,0.013188684,0.3390869,0.001062751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022624323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006940704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81246537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003634834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028753726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35629687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144144446","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2175","title":"Three Potential Problems for Powers' One-Fallacy Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Counterexample; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.07424296417331332,"score_gpt":0.2579567446520901,"score_spread":0.1837137804787768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144144446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019441592,0.00054052315,0.021937177,0.0004547492,0.0026660224,0.00091949885,0.000064091735,0.00020250509,0.95377386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821296,0.00002747346,0.0011085905,0.0025951236,0.0007130465,0.00008114896,0.000044014247,0.000025135241,0.013275919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989664,0.000036536974,0.0003070927,0.00015101639,0.00014878616,0.00039016982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992916,0.00012353073,0.00012969263,0.00021299296,0.00018007267,0.000062125735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071159675,0.00016406226,0.00021644248,0.000059155678,0.00039374642,0.00012784325,0.00018545988,0.00011275128,0.00082537543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011251866,0.00013170965,0.0001792174,0.000020719026,0.0003933717,0.0003690684,0.000029856765,0.00021919343,0.00019813486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003969105,0.00005845271,0.00003767662,0.000080895334,0.000051905532,0.0000012871307,0.0063329577,0.000033859207,0.0000249344,0.9912814,0.00077917427,0.0012777903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056180946,0.0002903303,0.00007876466,0.000013871151,0.00004477036,0.00000516693,0.0015676824,0.000035656325,0.00008242893,0.57609385,0.42101198,0.00021366052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035044282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034562362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96268797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007014318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90372825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145855346","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i1.692","title":"Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Heuristics; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Analogy; Computer science; Inference; sort; Subject (documents); Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.05435871230586371,"score_gpt":0.25239604860623904,"score_spread":0.19803733630037534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145855346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33220246,0.00018002049,0.096368656,0.00075957424,0.0007980227,0.00015546178,0.000024167259,0.00040313826,0.5691085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96986914,0.00004812789,0.02950754,0.0003230256,0.00006885229,0.000021172578,0.000015044396,0.0000022566844,0.0001448398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993472,0.000012737384,0.00016389479,0.0001694982,0.00010381246,0.00020283807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927753,0.00014687094,0.000066787885,0.00032137777,0.00007550745,0.00011190244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010567995,0.000097696946,0.00009469256,0.000070543036,0.000258057,0.00025606132,0.00047243902,0.00009271171,0.00010430249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012455547,0.00007538257,0.00003453386,0.00019271308,0.00011657828,0.0007503179,0.00018930994,0.00021650067,0.00040347007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.058044e-7,0.000023505147,0.012554248,0.0000018649038,0.0000043823397,0.0000012305028,0.00053620216,0.0000016695091,0.00026188025,0.9775121,0.00023998771,0.008862075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048687952,0.0001384317,0.5086028,0.000011927762,0.00001609558,0.000050902243,0.00018899226,0.011641337,0.00069911213,0.42880613,0.048911244,0.00044616318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007002742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030132022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6376667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004581124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008699098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5185926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146285180","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2903","title":"Argument Content and Argument Source: An Exploration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Bayesian probability; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08683420969472098,"score_gpt":0.2725883723733077,"score_spread":0.1857541626785867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146285180","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3298155,0.000088656656,0.66633993,0.0010605998,0.00027199823,0.0003571095,8.0141115e-7,0.00016500057,0.0019003593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943856,0.000022682772,0.003970731,0.00129787,0.000060424743,0.000012460643,0.00000842618,0.0000018593698,0.00023992656],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991633,0.000025047517,0.00025348584,0.00016263429,0.00021514692,0.00018036562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999516,0.000008378165,0.00011055172,0.00022388619,0.000044617766,0.00009656908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024221568,0.00010088238,0.00010006152,0.00006110109,0.00011446386,0.00019355587,0.000184652,0.00004434063,0.000008910611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008124331,0.00007901982,0.00002467538,0.0000726384,0.000010003169,0.0023826784,0.00004702429,0.00005364826,0.000050426883],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043488602,0.0003608946,0.0033829932,0.00003704984,0.000024125347,0.000014384624,0.013981486,0.003630352,0.0061795954,0.33233654,0.0005663559,0.63944274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00402491,0.0045114183,0.29280457,0.00010587352,0.00002301483,0.00010191094,0.0016919678,0.6204742,0.011388097,0.009082079,0.05449706,0.0012948484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022874365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049534656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6645701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027873526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012337802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32223344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146615740","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3892","title":"Debts, Oligarchies, and Holisms: Deconstructing the Fallacy of Composition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Composition (language); Positive economics; Debt; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Social science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023883342143656502,"score_gpt":0.19975974508407393,"score_spread":0.17587640294041743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146615740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8648781,0.00040387324,0.00075149885,0.0002475404,0.0001390691,0.00013319514,0.000030574807,0.000015412332,0.13340072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852204,0.000108992055,0.00080016605,0.00043200736,0.000037507318,0.000013647921,0.000007021079,0.0000032674673,0.00007533695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993426,0.000006343653,0.00040807773,0.00009096563,0.000009425861,0.00014258518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953574,0.0000588652,0.00021190061,0.00014321311,0.000015529711,0.00003477482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021653854,0.00007119533,0.00015449432,0.00007055292,0.00016754786,0.000052770043,0.00013176167,0.000044267697,0.00024160408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034530232,0.000059054833,0.0000425223,0.000055711556,0.0002416513,0.0005616651,0.0000639327,0.00009289255,0.00025159444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031070108,0.000007123405,0.017633459,0.000010023789,0.000012609981,1.0931269e-7,0.0003533859,0.000096022966,0.000020673424,0.97897214,0.00005635695,0.0028349753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008315439,0.00012567735,0.26121622,0.000033215558,0.000009534327,0.00011659163,0.0012280501,0.004094025,0.00052294426,0.7119381,0.019504443,0.000379706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002166351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005764316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2670341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013316455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009085835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3233821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150078957","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1043","title":"Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Common ground; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13516825870943205,"score_gpt":0.3132166242604163,"score_spread":0.17804836555098424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150078957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24873407,0.0004010625,0.0007902144,0.001891054,0.0014689066,0.0006990461,0.00008670918,0.00029822113,0.7456307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98437285,0.000027460159,0.00020188242,0.004916325,0.0015940393,0.00003473321,0.00009198428,0.00001449978,0.0087462375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991002,0.000032986383,0.00029278002,0.00012695951,0.00013451831,0.00031256393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994027,0.00014582675,0.00013755534,0.00017475072,0.00009070165,0.000048482776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034312293,0.0001476451,0.0001997816,0.00006073714,0.00040810753,0.000110843146,0.00013973229,0.00010723483,0.000109991546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038135273,0.000121845536,0.00011948868,0.000016554364,0.00022184849,0.0003847086,0.000024623527,0.00023367367,0.00018556429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012652327,0.00011170055,0.00008174331,0.000059858216,0.00003656891,0.0000013305566,0.021762528,0.0001387069,0.000021513446,0.954147,0.002325429,0.021187108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007160184,0.0005017635,0.00047470676,0.000028765127,0.00003651925,0.000004129741,0.0015598421,0.0011748689,0.000059951588,0.003945518,0.9912995,0.0001984003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019677024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010857508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005589204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020005822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49687168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150092490","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3679","title":"The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises. Presumptions in Enthymemes.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Fallacy; Proposition; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024294662204071928,"score_gpt":0.28989051130446986,"score_spread":0.2655958491003979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150092490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61216253,0.00039854983,0.00021677626,0.0001282318,0.00024895315,0.00048174086,0.0000147881,0.00003997681,0.38630846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645585,0.000050031766,0.000044284,0.00041318522,0.00006936123,0.0002480356,0.00001639206,0.0000053542167,0.002697507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990164,0.000054181117,0.0003686016,0.00011681609,0.00012833538,0.0003156561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934685,0.00017468487,0.0001094902,0.00026112676,0.000057913832,0.000049960592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021274599,0.000101334896,0.00013661211,0.00005452455,0.000077715944,0.00003135807,0.00023675327,0.00011730659,0.0032415618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008243607,0.000059947408,0.000082352926,0.00013463697,0.00010977877,0.00019219032,0.000058541253,0.00016510158,0.0006222128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043590364,0.00069269276,0.034579054,0.000078331825,0.00019483334,0.000022953118,0.013993456,0.00010053049,0.0050438684,0.5349606,0.0087809535,0.4011168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001212207,0.00027900375,0.9641946,0.000016887705,0.000026220214,0.000027036414,0.002411575,0.000106304506,0.0006062173,0.02469254,0.0062050647,0.00022237713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035500966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073943156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000123649015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014114743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150102685","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3896","title":"Govier on Trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Social trust; Politics; Express trust; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Blind trust; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.07036793476111594,"score_gpt":0.25225399418691247,"score_spread":0.18188605942579653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150102685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099473484,0.000036501602,0.0000065083645,0.00069832784,0.0007747484,0.00013208966,0.000007802379,0.00007466919,0.89879584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93148834,0.00001221577,0.00005222081,0.008134491,0.00067384844,0.000027713166,0.000013014735,0.000008154271,0.059590027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937147,0.000016460976,0.00018214376,0.0000850343,0.000114910836,0.00022997103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995834,0.00005602559,0.00006363255,0.0001674218,0.00007626778,0.000053233787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011281238,0.00010765055,0.00013114416,0.00004012473,0.00019643099,0.00011531716,0.00013558987,0.00006492482,0.005254856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030511615,0.000075341595,0.00007607232,0.000013927766,0.00027131144,0.000307793,0.000028856115,0.00021778618,0.008134555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005269775,0.000026034128,0.00012503199,0.000016319207,0.0000119110055,0.0000013481714,0.006576366,0.000005939242,0.0000074356544,0.9766281,0.010070661,0.0065255617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018343021,0.00027714364,0.001139428,0.000008918082,0.000008088022,0.0000019165204,0.0017398526,0.000051207233,0.000062405066,0.026886504,0.96948624,0.00015486252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018325601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008539488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95941556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000956012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017263867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99565446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150143572","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3345","title":"The Coherence of Hamblin’s Fallacies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07515332941461389,"score_gpt":0.2460258901198267,"score_spread":0.1708725607052128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150143572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2837567,0.0004949952,0.41336986,0.0003283726,0.0021109642,0.00067991077,0.000004514929,0.0002951754,0.2989595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960843,0.0000137314755,0.0033047455,0.000093007206,0.000013991334,0.00000736478,3.4908098e-7,0.0000011301204,0.00048140422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941933,0.00001674476,0.00021622305,0.00006626898,0.00014830421,0.00013311378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945956,0.00004000766,0.00013803242,0.00026905452,0.00006728245,0.000026061325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025788095,0.000053924836,0.00006623194,0.000025433566,0.0000985134,0.000038915005,0.00055002293,0.000030445626,0.000017790037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026854088,0.000030774918,0.000033827797,0.00010527407,0.000042926305,0.00042219597,0.00011439294,0.00004289347,0.00008955075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019162437,0.00004625868,0.016664838,0.000036674857,0.000021676622,0.0000035696476,0.009920619,0.00004782649,0.00079658977,0.9196378,0.001072904,0.05173207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010943909,0.00085762644,0.8321693,0.00007787267,0.000011385401,0.00005200674,0.0009971556,0.053427245,0.03631142,0.014263211,0.060097273,0.00064109615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011489026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032310567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9053746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005572641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024071383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12549648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150745872","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.595","title":"In Defense of Analogical Reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Analogical reasoning; Rebuttal; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Analogy; CLARITY; Inference; Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Logical reasoning; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07993744814897633,"score_gpt":0.23093895555534583,"score_spread":0.1510015074063695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150745872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34223688,0.0000616109,0.0000033704455,0.00005593617,0.0000993416,0.00002287129,0.0000026430662,0.000012255375,0.6575051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818075,0.000011720797,0.00010971749,0.0005646804,0.0000842123,0.0000018197009,0.0000011178096,0.0000012421041,0.0010447683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953437,0.000006746323,0.0001643876,0.000059107733,0.00011056357,0.0001248313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998142,0.000016496888,0.000051458686,0.00006537507,0.00002399728,0.000028462415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009898387,0.00004967579,0.000100751706,0.00008168225,0.0001513894,0.0000074358013,0.00011535894,0.000021089758,0.0008209465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023671448,0.000038363316,0.000036415895,0.000035523954,0.0005326998,0.00042606765,0.000022664146,0.000077497396,0.00007149792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017007878,0.000025664263,0.0007350234,0.0000049258524,0.0000011316429,0.000030349003,0.014280552,0.000032779033,0.000012494108,0.9843224,0.00041220846,0.00012546236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012987072,0.0013121666,0.032582324,0.00008621304,0.000011182336,0.00021258739,0.0034944068,0.0006773249,0.000169053,0.103602685,0.85585034,0.00070299016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009855103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091862545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010165312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002066069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154121373","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2281","title":"The Origin of the Justification of the Two-Wrongs Argument: A Conjecture","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Doctrine; Conjecture; Philosophy; Mill; Mathematics; Theology; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.03557146476488321,"score_gpt":0.2251281143757557,"score_spread":0.18955664961087249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154121373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35217437,0.00017454592,0.0000011768699,0.0020628276,0.0005145505,0.00019084668,0.000021846183,0.00001283714,0.644847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907794,0.000012400679,0.0000038542903,0.000458669,0.00009498046,0.0000052035475,6.5985324e-7,0.000001569207,0.008643253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946105,0.00001796155,0.00018061583,0.000051249517,0.00018581346,0.00010330976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995416,0.000032522865,0.00013526573,0.00024124538,0.00003696897,0.000012399871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001645596,0.00005716381,0.00006165145,0.0000111718455,0.00066620304,0.000034119163,0.0004901638,0.000017378616,0.0007292495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011309065,0.000022549742,0.000071359544,0.000043762117,0.0010995046,0.00016663744,0.000028061804,0.00009760188,0.000030070909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015676049,0.000014811558,0.00004127198,0.000010247465,0.0000051134984,5.207296e-8,0.0132560525,0.00018883793,0.000104960236,0.9798405,0.00077544694,0.0057470156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015063163,0.00005323174,0.001561642,0.000018965928,0.000015263126,0.000002311113,0.00073237106,0.000106786996,0.00056626333,0.02089299,0.975839,0.000060501814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008991421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017308873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012347521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039341452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79847705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154127350","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4295","title":"Inference, Circularity, and Begging the Question","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Begging; Inference; Semantic reasoner; Epistemology; Statement (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1490930985878663,"score_gpt":0.3231040273235812,"score_spread":0.1740109287357149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154127350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31849676,0.0004879626,0.0005289757,0.001719327,0.0012009148,0.00016603456,0.000008313811,0.00012177923,0.67726994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630123,0.000020531854,0.00005665935,0.0017401672,0.0003205084,0.000006317734,0.000008883501,0.0000033870497,0.0015422818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995125,0.00004031169,0.00013225451,0.000063794,0.000111593254,0.00013957056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956304,0.00007315137,0.000057602432,0.00011015634,0.00014805008,0.00004801472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005385489,0.00007343111,0.00009086869,0.00002865014,0.00023299403,0.00014835453,0.00009558868,0.000048208945,0.000033721157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011535151,0.00004527274,0.00002631558,0.000015828839,0.000417587,0.00033042618,0.00006351042,0.0002009639,0.000066445056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034181005,0.0000068217137,0.0015943447,0.000012700324,0.0000074411932,0.0000012085619,0.014255815,0.000011699877,0.0000014616593,0.98167,0.00029514017,0.002139926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038764012,0.00019340511,0.0047394936,0.000026734611,0.000038381295,0.000019144241,0.009251867,0.0005895338,0.00001931574,0.35932344,0.625176,0.0002350052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003198462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044533616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6778045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008247964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040675888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18461686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154311707","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.3886","title":"Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Expert opinion; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06019313579507564,"score_gpt":0.2553742799430113,"score_spread":0.1951811441479357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154311707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52015,0.0005723788,0.002345448,0.022116099,0.0026704466,0.0007856273,0.000052524065,0.00035241465,0.45095506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779349,0.000016212081,0.00022664422,0.0129304165,0.0015342236,0.000060018447,0.000021229409,0.000022605886,0.0072537293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998493,0.00013215549,0.0003231006,0.00020140683,0.00030982998,0.00054047984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889857,0.00032070215,0.00009723993,0.0004528024,0.00014606364,0.000084628766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083259953,0.00024437142,0.00028560025,0.000036661633,0.0013431566,0.000492766,0.00049028255,0.00008416261,0.00025860453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008829825,0.00009107537,0.00011126192,0.000022258393,0.00080569356,0.00038672617,0.00016305897,0.00041810094,0.00039735445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007548856,0.0000226397,0.0001111127,0.000025060763,0.00007961519,0.0000040562986,0.52786064,0.00008758295,0.00016574048,0.45830372,0.0026328124,0.010631565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039883686,0.00034824802,0.00052649534,0.00011797086,0.00008007837,0.0000048258003,0.06560804,0.00031077233,0.00085180596,0.010490987,0.9208636,0.00039832314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008174663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001757709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91823083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021424168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032381387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154754503","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2844","title":"Argumentation and the Force of Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Argumentation theory; Normative; sort; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014548594880289027,"score_gpt":0.24427925918055393,"score_spread":0.2297306643002649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154754503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36420897,0.00025230745,0.5882824,0.0029988654,0.00028062184,0.0005697931,0.0000018013477,0.00009085585,0.043314397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972101,0.000011868581,0.002126968,0.00047196177,0.0000131653505,0.000002385605,0.0000010630205,4.432105e-7,0.00016203642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965096,0.000016000875,0.00012956075,0.00004695732,0.000092613474,0.00006389819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997287,0.000030688785,0.00009011662,0.0001142269,0.000021275006,0.00001499974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021351717,0.00003448045,0.000056246812,0.000021539869,0.000048473783,0.000032065138,0.00013024265,0.00001731174,0.0000027590024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016722237,0.000019906149,0.000018957338,0.00006869319,0.000019113453,0.00038629194,0.000023131024,0.000024346155,0.000006273591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017607359,0.000010879083,0.00084131205,0.000008524765,0.0000043643136,4.2504047e-7,0.0022468974,0.00017050577,0.00052354124,0.9551838,0.00017550093,0.040816654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048132553,0.00053563423,0.64044833,0.000059148162,0.000018174942,0.000065089065,0.00033956376,0.31207174,0.006803773,0.031198781,0.0033397467,0.0003067819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015431317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001863109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.923985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037298526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064782885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08117492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155620277","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i2.440","title":"The Philosophy of Error and Liberty of Thought: J.S. Mill on Logical Fallacies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Mill; Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Morality; Doctrine; Argumentation theory; Socratic method; Politics; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Theology","score_opus":0.08706685823113056,"score_gpt":0.32384441198747294,"score_spread":0.23677755375634238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155620277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5042589,0.0001252282,0.00000609788,0.0007019469,0.000052175426,0.00007664365,0.0000069849516,0.0000147989,0.49475724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998113,0.00029436953,0.000071977374,0.00083430787,0.000059354956,0.0000027655974,3.637171e-7,0.0000014841052,0.00062240905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991923,0.00007904117,0.00021478234,0.000064009415,0.0002256504,0.0002242136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992425,0.00044201128,0.00007821458,0.000106299805,0.000056728022,0.00007428907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042474203,0.00006451807,0.00012700628,0.000019432273,0.00037533476,0.000008287795,0.00021488861,0.000074902164,0.000039262464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055399793,0.000035178502,0.000052857504,0.000106213265,0.0023018962,0.00018333441,0.00005195387,0.000094784504,0.00001653213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056860627,0.000019355879,0.0010343394,0.000006444427,0.0000042930237,0.0000015077552,0.0019114444,0.00000646759,0.000023737584,0.99610275,0.00004868465,0.0007841304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048739812,0.0010763124,0.07891618,0.000057237856,0.000013003063,0.0000134739175,0.0020274534,0.000029792482,0.0025870996,0.7727605,0.14174455,0.00028701202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044508757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008558372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4941348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075548633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042101812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8481433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155747790","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3326","title":"The Presumptions of Meaning. Hamblin and Equivocation.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Meaning (existential); Presumption; Fallacy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11768392159311643,"score_gpt":0.24221173324142367,"score_spread":0.12452781164830724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155747790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016973754,0.00029129404,0.000014228577,0.00008116038,0.00026116223,0.000058157766,0.000006423559,0.000022405344,0.9822914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956349,0.000038258368,0.000055603487,0.00015440302,0.00009571094,0.000006700269,0.0000011976814,0.0000017287987,0.004011509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963117,0.000006795187,0.00013652042,0.000045414145,0.00008405815,0.00009602544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972343,0.000025279178,0.00006372942,0.00010254187,0.00005909341,0.000025920595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015262571,0.000042630763,0.000048748043,0.000039389222,0.00043298432,0.00003578445,0.00012968208,0.000011465739,0.0002528678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001845535,0.000025862832,0.000021777176,0.000015599864,0.00059398613,0.00029814884,0.000032538403,0.000044177563,0.00004924292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067224523,0.000009295634,0.000048601694,0.0000051802017,0.000003258601,1.5931677e-7,0.033560853,5.988484e-7,0.0000064283277,0.9644658,0.00053673156,0.0013563574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019529428,0.00019229652,0.004403309,0.000012579327,0.000016357424,0.000004768482,0.00415246,0.00015942748,0.00006169871,0.11793662,0.8727268,0.00013840524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115327995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043148824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000050589033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021338963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3330209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157635154","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2589","title":"Towards Computational Rhetoric","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Bridging (networking); Argument map; Computer science; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.048923211204574914,"score_gpt":0.25141847753683955,"score_spread":0.20249526633226464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157635154","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0126970075,0.00013040326,0.8830444,0.0006136289,0.00092662394,0.00015372544,0.0000023263428,0.00025762536,0.10217424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834341,0.000006636994,0.015097744,0.00064071204,0.000087184206,0.0000070226642,0.0000041781036,0.0000022973848,0.0007201139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992388,0.000012296831,0.00020723855,0.00011526167,0.0002567723,0.0001696235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962384,0.000021458189,0.00007946367,0.00016207299,0.00005537769,0.000057801968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116396135,0.00007759583,0.00008124214,0.000070727256,0.00009471985,0.00009542661,0.00032541604,0.000043359167,0.00018773542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001530716,0.000063545915,0.000043708973,0.00019778889,0.000011355511,0.000735142,0.00008210864,0.000060222967,0.001137038],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034124191,0.00012790768,0.0024827248,0.00004410377,0.000025303709,0.000022834296,0.0032004088,0.026824888,0.000058464615,0.77289134,0.014456735,0.17986187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036549784,0.0000815926,0.036045156,0.0000074377144,0.000001622845,0.00004184549,0.000009569035,0.9284717,0.00005751461,0.0021844965,0.032555807,0.00017780664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000143902425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010466821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025338264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001226823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157908040","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i2.3098","title":"Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Ambiguity; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Subject (documents); Argument map; Ontology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06479982507607242,"score_gpt":0.2736057414594977,"score_spread":0.20880591638342527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157908040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6032157,0.00020951814,0.2166421,0.0048919963,0.0035168822,0.0021938654,0.0000118719145,0.00067731825,0.16864075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941869,0.000003567035,0.0017437163,0.0030012445,0.00010910476,0.000040037114,0.0000010918238,0.000003578957,0.0009107869],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998998,0.000021019116,0.00023646,0.00020840122,0.00026809867,0.00026802038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921113,0.000010345674,0.00009905516,0.0005203294,0.00008744391,0.00007170277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038891885,0.00011024636,0.00009495774,0.00006140231,0.00016408633,0.00010349725,0.000899418,0.000031934585,0.00009586932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030652533,0.00006639612,0.000045258188,0.00031586835,0.000014520817,0.0007695688,0.00017934387,0.000081227125,0.0010586987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017009726,0.0007125352,0.101913475,0.00042945443,0.00024758678,0.000057995454,0.2788415,0.000992381,0.0015718795,0.25529847,0.05620989,0.30355474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012255756,0.0010064866,0.7364076,0.00009360691,0.000034054567,0.00013400365,0.0007863837,0.023767468,0.080181986,0.003973913,0.15098427,0.0014046766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018558126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022456807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6344941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016195012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035186917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157989973","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3588","title":"Getting Your Ad Banned to Bring the Message Home? - A Rhetorical Analysis of an Ad on the US National Debt","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argumentative; Modalities; Computer science; Linguistics; Debt; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.05918136925967567,"score_gpt":0.30499382305496237,"score_spread":0.2458124537952867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157989973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75307447,0.00035260073,0.000032904,0.00087262515,0.00017239428,0.00011960814,0.000042408414,0.00003267092,0.24530032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617296,0.000008638842,0.00005473308,0.001936656,0.00030088754,0.00001713874,0.00001848273,0.0000069743005,0.0014835409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869317,0.000058655016,0.00031718527,0.00010495483,0.00051383645,0.00031222418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917245,0.00021893028,0.00015387974,0.00024369913,0.00015593141,0.000055132852],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008020556,0.00014129921,0.00024803905,0.00021767989,0.00044775527,0.00013055706,0.00034289702,0.000026997039,0.0011810408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002188569,0.000069710164,0.0002199486,0.00025440467,0.0001552792,0.00042623203,0.00013170573,0.0001377679,0.000090036796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008160196,0.00027022522,0.003606497,0.000017556182,0.0036399097,0.000004440451,0.13836248,0.00569148,0.000046369332,0.8375516,0.0023870126,0.0083408225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010680881,0.0010120883,0.3752695,0.0001422867,0.0067125484,0.000012321132,0.27192107,0.02022009,0.0005182819,0.0027337698,0.3183516,0.002038353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012306758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061601266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8348178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034874767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015589549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159274653","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2165","title":"Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sketch; Sociology; Communicative action; Action (physics); Discipline; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Social science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06547906983314049,"score_gpt":0.4059171181064266,"score_spread":0.3404380482732861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159274653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40026557,0.002130857,0.0010607331,0.0023175036,0.0012277932,0.00039451793,0.0000026716007,0.000098809935,0.5925016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755627,0.00028232957,0.00029334537,0.00060499355,0.000033356995,0.000018060535,0.0000012238121,0.0000017515747,0.0012086631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991453,0.00014133529,0.00016336984,0.00014067817,0.00016739542,0.00024186425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953866,0.00015857763,0.000057523543,0.00006784278,0.00012425861,0.000053158783],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023140565,0.00007521643,0.000107580265,0.00006325667,0.0016798766,0.00006269933,0.00010882331,0.000045649565,0.000036700094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062873977,0.00006145694,0.000017502873,0.00022792698,0.0017871975,0.0005858981,0.00012304289,0.000071501396,0.000032893455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020585887,0.000011985572,0.0026298354,0.000012117227,0.000016869544,0.0000024427063,0.12639438,0.000006780443,0.000026551124,0.86822903,0.00025476541,0.002394663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008530233,0.000568365,0.026793113,0.0000460192,0.000053109154,0.000035852725,0.7211833,0.00003197402,0.0012736234,0.22671752,0.021924566,0.0005195259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008870781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000075887656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6415115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058469508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012942145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160720308","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3899","title":"Why We Still Do Not Know What a “Real” Argument Is","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Subclass; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06304576164918829,"score_gpt":0.25805975060471364,"score_spread":0.19501398895552535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160720308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06379661,0.0009375445,0.0006477391,0.031356584,0.0046345885,0.00063789054,0.00008225663,0.00042094168,0.89748585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665952,0.0009651404,0.00008970516,0.017230788,0.00087778876,0.00002923104,0.000048370865,0.000013260767,0.014150557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906373,0.000022788652,0.0002829556,0.000143567,0.00023039723,0.00025653208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.000072561415,0.000120984034,0.00025511594,0.00013987854,0.00007243432],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029428423,0.00014200035,0.00014426149,0.00007647631,0.00025656112,0.000622808,0.0001823466,0.00007660297,0.0028884127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024628807,0.00011074477,0.000073734685,0.000021629097,0.0001859425,0.0011200386,0.00004989534,0.00018102305,0.0013618715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024545156,0.000043353295,0.000047892692,0.000075277334,0.000018134879,6.1124035e-7,0.08976859,0.000024485851,0.00001592442,0.84172434,0.024319263,0.04393756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002106497,0.000107391184,0.00013390559,0.000052700045,0.00001816421,0.0000011175655,0.0077301334,0.0003892833,0.00020639166,0.010687872,0.980284,0.000178423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026766348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028563078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020176743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022831096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165982645","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2593","title":"E-motion: Moving Toward the Utilization of Artificial Emotion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Robot Interaction and HRI","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Balance (ability); Task (project management); Motion (physics); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.15774101021593065,"score_gpt":0.3911313836363696,"score_spread":0.23339037342043897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165982645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659478,0.000074172036,0.060837172,0.002341815,0.00374306,0.0003038532,0.00000411254,0.00014463552,0.46660337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783295,0.000010657245,0.00004379378,0.0007247777,0.0002692675,0.000008387757,0.000012560689,0.000004257117,0.0010933332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993716,0.000041864707,0.00026030632,0.00007112145,0.00011981169,0.00013528396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959457,0.000046098176,0.00013464746,0.00012196661,0.00008020717,0.000022522516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017290509,0.000062577354,0.00007946811,0.000054257747,0.000093083385,0.00002102683,0.00009752991,0.00008342528,0.004337623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006175279,0.000045691188,0.00006471795,0.0001925019,0.00005097449,0.00017399983,0.000019238769,0.0001088176,0.0005580764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034209626,0.00020596005,0.011753288,0.000014521267,0.000057483434,0.000008224768,0.026472505,0.00075485616,0.0003024889,0.38326204,0.0032208886,0.57360566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011139612,0.00057040877,0.8003904,0.000040029587,0.00006884363,0.00019557908,0.04812049,0.0048763,0.0010516653,0.0110941995,0.13202736,0.00045076758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008156912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016191532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7886371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016919428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010914556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99657255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166139333","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2153","title":"An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09099506718038776,"score_gpt":0.2969452559415837,"score_spread":0.20595018876119597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166139333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31804815,0.000034602323,0.012735504,0.00052108185,0.0007135696,0.00038512552,0.00001749768,0.00022639638,0.6673181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906493,0.0000037511238,0.0023472498,0.005163495,0.00044656402,0.000037059817,0.0000772737,0.000008245161,0.0012670973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.000035158315,0.00026268998,0.00016968754,0.00015214503,0.0002765603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.00002371409,0.000072189454,0.00019522126,0.000089842564,0.00011934245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028415167,0.00013675768,0.0001721485,0.000066966895,0.00027437427,0.00013089439,0.00020547652,0.00008758407,0.00012502266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002727299,0.00010371553,0.00006945375,0.00003618252,0.00024735316,0.00047654432,0.00003265622,0.00018939028,0.00034868333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021402067,0.00014796469,0.00008074466,0.000018156292,0.000009925688,0.0000028609738,0.01633348,0.0024163956,0.00003505843,0.9799878,0.000068106856,0.00087808183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005617182,0.008491385,0.025227956,0.00008429573,0.00019881428,0.00018557269,0.064379744,0.0017921603,0.001699531,0.44158974,0.44765815,0.003075487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001445888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007515585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034573193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003059785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166637659","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.3013","title":"Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06267104608860875,"score_gpt":0.22423442883786868,"score_spread":0.1615633827492599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166637659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21385078,0.00014214568,0.00020108723,0.0004721778,0.0007297581,0.00017071136,0.000019887877,0.000025201472,0.78438824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988784,0.000007492924,0.000058193647,0.0005741717,0.00010340629,0.000012541673,0.000012087307,0.0000012913473,0.00035239256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996916,0.000020917685,0.00014078652,0.000029160634,0.00006468653,0.000052869873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997506,0.000042786447,0.00009757613,0.000055788296,0.000041508967,0.000011745109],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014882059,0.000041173942,0.000058613372,0.0000200582,0.00013496079,0.000020286014,0.000046410547,0.000013329676,0.0012256412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001548852,0.000024200815,0.000020557694,0.000011503566,0.00040284553,0.00046807743,0.000016436848,0.000042230513,0.000025942834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003698327,0.0000126449895,0.00006210912,0.0000068589993,0.0000080574955,3.6565822e-8,0.09493187,0.0000010429371,6.4366435e-7,0.9021166,0.0002634113,0.002559758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002064848,0.0002735646,0.030319314,0.000025326095,0.00007007504,0.000013033553,0.022567645,0.0002816446,0.0008931323,0.896462,0.0467959,0.0002334957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017746908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016337535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7850276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003052602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008826753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166781827","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2252","title":"A Preferred Treatment of Mill's Methods: Some Misinterpretations by Modern Textbooks","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Misrepresentation; Presentation (obstetrics); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; History; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04812645516469246,"score_gpt":0.388681522075549,"score_spread":0.3405550669108566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166781827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.178682,0.00047940147,0.0012602564,0.00020388314,0.000062614316,0.00025473558,0.00006029859,0.00007461681,0.81892216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855993,0.00015677568,0.0023176544,0.00071473053,0.000042368036,0.00002708478,0.0000062410304,0.0000037724303,0.011132097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990625,0.00015815572,0.00024574142,0.000095352574,0.00013694241,0.00030132363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944973,0.00020957678,0.000048087804,0.00013344822,0.00003292628,0.00012621743],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002591473,0.0000887824,0.00015378834,0.000028924722,0.00020279165,0.000027036423,0.00017345547,0.00007965647,0.001184713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009728674,0.00006923673,0.000089016605,0.000070061215,0.0003798572,0.00046020318,0.000009095479,0.000042436026,0.00012906894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094474264,0.00017058618,0.00008930727,0.000008410604,0.00004142606,0.0000014404632,0.026935963,0.00017133371,0.0005801313,0.48471266,0.00014258151,0.4870517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007831363,0.0008539783,0.0006653266,0.00003448444,0.000053341922,0.0000032766561,0.0013960507,0.0015624124,0.0076935953,0.5783911,0.40818942,0.00037393332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000417976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013086309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005314044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007516624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168458288","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3608","title":"Virtue and Argument: Taking Character Into Account","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044226886786066295,"score_gpt":0.25235894873701714,"score_spread":0.20813206195095085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168458288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67539597,0.00018258818,0.00003456241,0.000901084,0.00080750877,0.00022173874,0.0000060649363,0.000080941,0.32236952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010366,0.000031482916,0.00009596745,0.0052127205,0.000563533,0.000031188876,0.000013943444,0.000008008081,0.003939494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934053,0.000015603811,0.00021848387,0.000107296815,0.00010653203,0.00021154036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.00004864025,0.0001375293,0.00013036693,0.00009674328,0.000054746495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016400902,0.00012466351,0.0001536094,0.000051239567,0.00026960138,0.0002642007,0.000109997505,0.000070320464,0.0012924002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027446436,0.00009249474,0.000045415094,0.000012899679,0.00030084036,0.0009450228,0.00007588884,0.00020849341,0.0008303971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060014045,0.000022319757,0.0007952049,0.00006705863,0.000027268008,0.0000021744809,0.02724905,0.0000010624077,0.00012808955,0.95815146,0.0005544943,0.012995841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053534115,0.00026347104,0.01848684,0.0000512216,0.000036576494,0.000013788675,0.0065888506,0.00024037002,0.00023748672,0.083864085,0.8891732,0.00050873373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050519436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017079672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88861877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011875575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015062735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170164284","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2248","title":"Ambiguity in a Dialectical Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Dialectic; Fallacy; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Constraint (computer-aided design); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024231981693972355,"score_gpt":0.27727046776489134,"score_spread":0.253038486070919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170164284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07021322,0.00019223466,0.05692969,0.00057448423,0.00039269976,0.00015322679,4.896523e-7,0.00022491744,0.87131906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644387,0.00003469855,0.001977373,0.00062152016,0.0001043427,0.000012870978,5.640993e-7,0.0000029228709,0.0008018546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989808,0.000035352892,0.00018615366,0.00021907278,0.00016682595,0.00041178527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994314,0.00006716798,0.000043046584,0.00026950368,0.000089081695,0.000099818884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026674356,0.000120281155,0.00015013343,0.00011349297,0.00008390184,0.0000772141,0.0005739128,0.00008624161,0.00007576115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024395552,0.00009548329,0.00006472356,0.0005498189,0.000066611494,0.0006977665,0.00026423408,0.00022475439,0.00058609014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023877034,0.00013104906,0.017335858,0.0000039682104,0.000006076801,0.00016286658,0.0038835707,0.00005012478,0.000020518759,0.96541494,0.0004499441,0.012517204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027888995,0.0012021688,0.61753863,0.000038690054,0.000010897209,0.00059794314,0.0010789838,0.07084908,0.00045166843,0.24133681,0.06291437,0.0011918385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017783674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018230408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011771602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009595298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75331986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170441435","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i3.2172","title":"Against the \"Ordinary Summing\" Test for Convergence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Generalization; Convergence (economics); Test (biology); Mathematics; Epistemology; Applied mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018095908422299578,"score_gpt":0.2676428179057791,"score_spread":0.24954690948347952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170441435","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062300484,0.0011912091,0.9817338,0.0035527921,0.00039182187,0.00049731444,0.000007170639,0.0009883872,0.0054074805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62432414,0.000015455116,0.37183973,0.0035646453,0.00005861983,0.000048851183,0.0000038157564,0.0000046091536,0.00014013029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920887,0.000005765877,0.00018449349,0.00015623606,0.00015672378,0.00028791066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927014,0.00013465522,0.00009277563,0.0003629891,0.000095772666,0.000043653836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026411514,0.00011626162,0.000091500995,0.00004640306,0.00022844027,0.00014534208,0.0013210649,0.00006420368,0.0000032037503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022489508,0.00007069139,0.00006097399,0.0002531235,0.00007775942,0.0008417547,0.00028753091,0.0001494523,0.000038983897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015649744,0.000068199435,0.00045413757,0.000073919764,0.000010693546,0.000039697174,0.0011777435,0.00023009333,0.0021236483,0.8626022,0.002234546,0.13096952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018878944,0.0017189566,0.0017578416,0.00024354622,0.000022175289,0.00029185126,0.00022907778,0.027281685,0.14213254,0.72645545,0.0964516,0.0015273796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012984519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003872883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6180941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003542832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086363056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28827113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171108596","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1114","title":"Assessing the Cogency of Arguments: lbree Kinds of Merits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Public discourse; Law; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06483145228242188,"score_gpt":0.3016563798888918,"score_spread":0.23682492760646995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171108596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32114655,0.00019169516,0.000049701954,0.00074456376,0.00033047367,0.00008024029,0.000010395184,0.00001441182,0.67743194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859464,0.000014109106,0.00025907613,0.0004755619,0.00030663176,0.0000063739594,0.000009087257,0.0000029198368,0.0003315758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942183,0.000014862981,0.00028816535,0.00004074398,0.0001298891,0.00010450888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995505,0.00004255177,0.00019091793,0.00012638557,0.00007416364,0.000015434991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017616118,0.000061360464,0.00009620091,0.00003939248,0.00013439212,0.00004603512,0.0001568256,0.000023720646,0.0010223741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002599137,0.000038862305,0.00004378697,0.000028240609,0.00016729117,0.0008211663,0.000028813834,0.00006637226,0.000038427006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056749336,0.00007545862,0.00026063333,0.00004318506,0.000022117025,1.2449522e-7,0.022261018,0.000041112376,0.00011054185,0.94225,0.00053713704,0.034393005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011381335,0.0006084254,0.029120537,0.00029334176,0.00016961436,0.00002116377,0.020589381,0.0009962294,0.011707039,0.19893447,0.7357734,0.00064831367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003823309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014448278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7433155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007497138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002954482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171666222","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.464","title":"The Contextuality of Fallacies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Kochen–Specker theorem; Normative; Dialectic; Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Quantum; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05304850682439037,"score_gpt":0.2540606301036091,"score_spread":0.2010121232792187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171666222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.666013,0.00044760076,0.25748783,0.00078588654,0.0009250192,0.00036801206,0.000004023488,0.00017048963,0.07379813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855584,0.000032439897,0.0006276286,0.00015395819,0.000018753715,0.0000036024564,5.43731e-7,7.877951e-7,0.0006064451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994264,0.000023003551,0.00021953165,0.00005533142,0.00016378111,0.00011192479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994935,0.000075207005,0.00011559792,0.00023112625,0.00006253055,0.000022074952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002484759,0.00004538854,0.0000710224,0.00001651198,0.00017664128,0.000022926026,0.00036293844,0.0000249498,0.000004539676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042542266,0.000025807401,0.000039182756,0.000084122476,0.000061033545,0.0003311159,0.000083076186,0.000037175632,0.000047818903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016434971,0.0000412444,0.022174524,0.000030485324,0.00002289917,0.000006268514,0.007162894,0.00021978177,0.0006062157,0.9429063,0.002949266,0.023863692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010007082,0.00031473016,0.80607563,0.00002382999,0.0000038031271,0.00012453948,0.0004457598,0.039830722,0.0067704967,0.0022886894,0.14277096,0.0003501281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014673497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9406176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006571278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002488037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13585997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171823291","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.430","title":"Applied Epistemology and Argumentation in Epidemiology","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Epidemiology; Social epistemology; Causal reasoning; Sociology; Causal inference; Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine; Cognition","score_opus":0.07565957776028776,"score_gpt":0.35967247807376496,"score_spread":0.2840129003134772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171823291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95788586,0.00014322173,0.00017187801,0.00091557007,0.00006616692,0.00014964108,8.919805e-7,0.00002625644,0.040640537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920864,0.0002247925,0.001740059,0.0056495834,0.000043102777,0.00001777087,0.000029386036,0.0000028907677,0.00020601987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929094,0.000023510813,0.0003385865,0.0001088495,0.000044832293,0.00019329373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958364,0.003910351,0.00006322675,0.00008494365,0.000014156416,0.00009091848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003637583,0.000064924396,0.00026710893,0.00005923288,0.000027917977,0.0000010130175,0.000023803657,0.00011303508,0.000060932416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009809688,0.00004970511,0.000024582869,0.000066954344,0.00015002409,0.000027889919,0.000023941835,0.00013699556,0.000089579815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022051274,0.00006902605,0.9637548,0.0000137787665,0.0000083341365,0.00009497484,0.0002425603,0.00002977924,0.000027032867,0.01993842,0.00036809474,0.015232683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015510811,0.00027965844,0.9944592,0.000042763942,0.000008256314,0.0004841285,0.00004319876,0.00014856772,0.000026789327,0.0022318044,0.0006686355,0.00005590762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000548427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057258085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040434517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015377305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033539145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182859523","doi":"","title":"A pragma-dialectical default on the question of truth","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05861650614167141,"score_gpt":0.2945879025731903,"score_spread":0.23597139643151888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182859523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37530205,0.000010995133,0.000033812346,0.0010712676,0.001550122,0.00011613046,0.000009927779,0.000042206437,0.6218635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964115,0.0000039395436,0.0000705869,0.0012201564,0.00056486577,0.000010911588,0.000005635324,0.000004994645,0.0017074016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994018,0.000044469227,0.00019641538,0.00006910395,0.00013671289,0.00015148726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991646,0.00041418074,0.00009874972,0.00017600742,0.00011642143,0.000030079374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047094192,0.000083792744,0.00011792559,0.00003322058,0.00017994396,0.000042352433,0.00013509722,0.00008554809,0.00051510957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045791615,0.00004773786,0.000073035844,0.000020255493,0.00057547435,0.00013213564,0.000023367533,0.0004549304,0.00019298111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002393119,0.000035392135,0.000038833066,0.000014064946,0.000009392919,0.0000012723726,0.003947285,0.000002623223,0.00008788392,0.99453986,0.00033030348,0.0009691758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005052505,0.0010058274,0.0020050327,0.000039038692,0.00006030878,0.000024546143,0.0037592223,0.00028668556,0.0022009474,0.22335899,0.76643884,0.00031530726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012471563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004788764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77118087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057531615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004027523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189861499","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4335","title":"Formalizing Informal Logic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Argument map; Computer science; Epistemology; Theoretical computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08350979533523059,"score_gpt":0.2820720715384595,"score_spread":0.1985622762032289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189861499","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06628792,0.00022609733,0.67253304,0.00051276863,0.0023802237,0.00056672154,0.0000049694363,0.00080481736,0.25668344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811991,0.000009178257,0.015746461,0.0020238522,0.00018861076,0.000023800878,0.00001593637,0.0000067964493,0.00078625727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982422,0.000029966628,0.0005297365,0.00018686971,0.00048653712,0.0005247119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988587,0.000031107145,0.00024344499,0.00045250801,0.0001629242,0.00025135218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007241438,0.00019704028,0.00020298388,0.00016545343,0.0001572629,0.00027310982,0.0008204863,0.00013099935,0.000027724644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085211024,0.00015371991,0.000089672154,0.00033166702,0.000030903182,0.0040760976,0.00040278488,0.00016824837,0.0010953075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056429435,0.00010501262,0.012941304,0.00011522747,0.00004379783,0.000060467286,0.010728836,0.006991765,0.00016528142,0.8966172,0.008395171,0.06377954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045752823,0.0014005278,0.04781602,0.00010006723,0.000021283653,0.00058052194,0.0011694963,0.5276642,0.002226742,0.007499027,0.40521163,0.0017352158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007839645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014630905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005196301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011903534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190741863","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4333","title":"On Novels as Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Narrative; Philosophy; Term (time); Linguistics","score_opus":0.14198497969348653,"score_gpt":0.2922095148641722,"score_spread":0.15022453517068565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190741863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0315635,0.000091445145,0.000013296056,0.0004235019,0.0003403258,0.000050908446,0.0000031492466,0.000057527537,0.96745634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96153843,0.000016532294,0.000027225598,0.0028763895,0.000117977645,0.00001323113,0.000005580028,0.000002940167,0.03540166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995789,0.000007413427,0.00012042862,0.000043444496,0.00014089208,0.00010892533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996449,0.000025994028,0.000045662622,0.00016114123,0.00007942375,0.000042875858],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000085305604,0.00006424868,0.00007311495,0.000027653141,0.00016085034,0.00006510455,0.00014731877,0.000015521424,0.00064065267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035785528,0.00004480507,0.000025694133,0.000014201861,0.00007184859,0.00018886343,0.000073637646,0.00006363638,0.004060344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015820136,0.000026070356,0.000042856645,0.0000012167623,0.000011420714,6.042132e-7,0.013067102,0.000008909165,1.6342398e-7,0.9653959,0.019691274,0.0017386614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002501124,0.00018964948,0.00012228849,0.0000044786266,0.0000030801514,0.0000011704971,0.0046381555,0.000014434222,0.000007870505,0.020313408,0.97437906,0.00007630479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058658014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013746606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001672326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001798741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192421421","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4386","title":"Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Confusion; Epistemology; Key (lock); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.16153640127224797,"score_gpt":0.28933537933286396,"score_spread":0.127798978060616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192421421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46036154,0.00067114114,0.00001690659,0.0007448175,0.0007450632,0.00012869763,0.000007125897,0.000060311504,0.5372644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892094,0.000044678884,0.00009358519,0.003949115,0.0002585184,0.000010438458,0.000009925631,0.000006151258,0.006418182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.000026512505,0.00020714574,0.00008931026,0.00010444593,0.00018867609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996267,0.000051794294,0.000052559495,0.00010364295,0.00008544132,0.00007987127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029479995,0.00009466656,0.00015546265,0.000059985443,0.000081520106,0.00006470455,0.00007904335,0.00006849491,0.0001298274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006448272,0.000071912735,0.000027177588,0.000016830594,0.00031229883,0.000343187,0.000060394363,0.00013434753,0.00007259442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035764075,0.000036330835,0.0015426911,0.000028623414,0.000008558636,0.00001984222,0.103264436,0.000015656,0.000009291673,0.88632387,0.0054661515,0.0032488008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000840493,0.0001962265,0.0007422737,0.000021323576,0.000006993685,0.000015039777,0.022108318,0.00020143276,0.000034923985,0.030036489,0.94558245,0.00021402373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042857067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011639758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9401163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011051404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044465127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2932516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194365097","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4330","title":"Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemic virtue; Appeal; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.19395576315062887,"score_gpt":0.30317661237687565,"score_spread":0.10922084922624678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194365097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44067255,0.0034138053,0.000052724,0.00096513366,0.0018614277,0.00026515935,0.000022599323,0.00015317721,0.5525934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788987,0.00015449041,0.00018815338,0.0022154686,0.00035147154,0.0000109555185,0.000010276716,0.000007248541,0.018163215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993012,0.000026662769,0.0002035627,0.00010619002,0.00015795811,0.00020445076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994658,0.0000733904,0.00008287603,0.00013975256,0.00012593914,0.000112205555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000372244,0.00011455882,0.00015980827,0.00004840849,0.00014055478,0.00011897768,0.000121084195,0.000062706036,0.000121755096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011961553,0.000086696586,0.00003876011,0.000018040078,0.00036252374,0.00067001884,0.000077875644,0.00016297375,0.00030628085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008339088,0.000070992064,0.002714928,0.00010322592,0.000054906093,0.000017678429,0.04621361,0.000007941544,0.000018163666,0.9278272,0.0106517505,0.012236237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058107084,0.0005151249,0.0018102233,0.000061663035,0.00003750281,0.000014597507,0.00535112,0.00007879235,0.00005310287,0.039940923,0.9512778,0.00027808492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092232505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020270442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013147488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004860234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39367226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195988402","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4332","title":"Arguing as a Virtuous Arguer Would Argue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Argumentative; Focus (optics); Rhetorical question; Virtue; Perspective (graphical); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19648223612850496,"score_gpt":0.506461509326517,"score_spread":0.30997927319801205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195988402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058258027,0.0001569146,0.0016373344,0.008174014,0.0026578368,0.00054373866,0.0000054412067,0.0003548252,0.92821187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045806,0.000052217885,0.0033657437,0.07865052,0.0010347733,0.00011405882,0.000021800208,0.000032777327,0.012147494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653864,0.00077204197,0.0007625909,0.0002240011,0.0008653654,0.0008373855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555176,0.002561178,0.0003588915,0.00049369177,0.0004305544,0.00060393615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068574287,0.00020307826,0.00028529225,0.00011285128,0.0007881763,0.000024459981,0.00045996357,0.0011746706,0.0013397462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027778175,0.00015987032,0.000065894055,0.00027191525,0.0002067564,0.00074518734,0.00041229263,0.009557395,0.02365558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061692845,0.00020096281,0.018501457,0.00036187738,0.00008666188,0.00031331394,0.029735563,0.00019084665,0.000080244004,0.82788277,0.10825007,0.013779298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016639408,0.0003859924,0.001482838,0.00017378267,0.00003228098,0.00005159291,0.012447171,0.00040600493,0.000031036587,0.10913423,0.8738178,0.00037330104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004205818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052391028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018044542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009036874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203789101","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2134","title":"Lipman's Thinking in Education","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.026724716186284598,"score_gpt":0.33598885441992654,"score_spread":0.30926413823364196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203789101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30363232,0.00008724156,0.00024537588,0.014068194,0.0012191832,0.00017337743,2.0946476e-7,0.000106669555,0.6804674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868072,0.00004637199,0.004833286,0.0071195234,0.00013700365,0.000017826358,0.000003900443,0.0000022199608,0.0010326518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935496,0.000014416412,0.00014392994,0.00006655692,0.00021958079,0.0002005349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978036,0.00002444447,0.00002436947,0.000057369092,0.000047685677,0.000065746295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048349032,0.0000449658,0.000050840925,0.000074024545,0.00025156385,0.00006506281,0.0001519829,0.000059151454,0.00019560689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019311467,0.000042399726,0.000018390881,0.00022665331,0.000069470996,0.00029088382,0.000019990195,0.00010785855,0.00025861387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012254548,0.000054856773,0.0020773634,0.000003269595,6.6865147e-7,5.710685e-7,0.02970734,0.000024437146,0.0000010956088,0.9554478,0.000094662886,0.01258672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015467436,0.00001513794,0.023490366,0.000049086273,0.0000013250636,0.0000011673977,0.015157985,8.867992e-7,0.000031018757,0.8123639,0.14861494,0.000119517084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008390387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063720916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6831749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001798249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008815172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33240443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216342738","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2158","title":"Fogelin's Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal by Robert Fogelin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019796373330791473,"score_gpt":0.2034388104588036,"score_spread":0.18364243712801212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216342738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85530955,0.004800207,0.0046576294,0.0028068186,0.00044205695,0.00045544576,0.0004173288,0.000030278015,0.13108072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984311,0.00014489435,0.0002619808,0.00074242626,0.00008695217,0.000019537842,0.000024407496,0.000006070138,0.00028264982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891937,0.000013131321,0.0007226207,0.00012967126,0.000033384025,0.00018180636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991045,0.00008362568,0.0004754995,0.0002575241,0.00003958633,0.000039265844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062316534,0.00010943437,0.0002383851,0.0000534067,0.00019812628,0.000027081123,0.00036922607,0.00008012339,0.000289304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019212856,0.00007447798,0.00013699348,0.00012650083,0.00024700345,0.00036152056,0.000078351295,0.00015555893,0.00009910093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052806805,0.00004757181,0.001144256,0.000009415797,0.000045750978,2.7630043e-7,0.0008807361,0.004353772,0.00011527717,0.9926295,0.00037844703,0.00034218855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004644313,0.0013395519,0.03553271,0.00009800424,0.00007471593,0.00007567132,0.0011568844,0.006862538,0.0056392476,0.3613691,0.582176,0.0010311999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021324863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041574265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6312604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003999826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008418588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3167676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254235657","doi":"","title":"Wigmore's Chart","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Premise; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetoric; Humanities; Argument map; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04691223052577434,"score_gpt":0.3771612344128916,"score_spread":0.3302490038871173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254235657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043658175,0.000012087971,0.0000113061,0.027796097,0.00023304115,0.00006942308,0.0000015231724,0.00008078923,0.92813754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92176515,0.000058066744,0.00033952892,0.0091939755,0.00031740888,0.000010800806,0.000008697204,0.0000022565757,0.0683041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994842,0.000025868585,0.00011764465,0.00004850385,0.00015625176,0.00016754563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997222,0.00004661661,0.000033335236,0.00007800224,0.00006125218,0.000058640468],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003233491,0.000037924194,0.00003919101,0.000034336063,0.0004029652,0.00012599972,0.00012218113,0.000046694426,0.0329507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015430534,0.000034111355,0.00002085341,0.00031543837,0.00009151382,0.0011594362,0.0000053037074,0.00014152273,0.0047825514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001277504,0.000050724124,0.0012081536,0.0000021449698,0.000005695213,0.0000014972574,0.022620423,0.000018773251,0.000005841249,0.7827634,0.038894814,0.15441577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005194463,0.00001142124,0.0040833484,0.0000011736678,0.0000017250853,0.0000012992499,0.0014412164,0.000007632303,0.000008644813,0.0015043707,0.9928334,0.000053830558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086650084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020440244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020267244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025976362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99599236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278750021","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2231","title":"The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Empiricism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Focus (optics); State (computer science); Sociology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.039946165174666974,"score_gpt":0.2382752332215505,"score_spread":0.19832906804688352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278750021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27466208,0.00039799674,0.0000066426473,0.0028683995,0.0004471625,0.00016133874,0.000009758607,0.00005461297,0.72139204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568355,0.00015547448,0.0000044945305,0.0009976369,0.00030292332,0.000011273696,0.000010830176,0.0000035053058,0.0028303016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939334,0.000011271725,0.0002344521,0.00008108939,0.00009056142,0.0001892752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973387,0.00006426709,0.00006135324,0.00008648119,0.00001612282,0.00003790843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014367313,0.00008668377,0.000081278355,0.000026785092,0.0003863063,0.000164014,0.00007324225,0.00002842609,0.00030234203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025953788,0.000049006063,0.000027203285,0.00003767371,0.0002605408,0.00023859867,0.000048807935,0.00012829254,0.000049810144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005094942,0.000026969934,0.0031139064,0.0000042698357,0.0000041972507,0.000015731366,0.0009397499,0.0000018467974,0.0000028575637,0.9863596,0.00018189101,0.009298015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031326184,0.00015930641,0.01368336,0.000008843061,0.0000054000143,0.0000223834,0.0011600892,0.00021909356,0.000003395227,0.16881508,0.8154872,0.0001225649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006521207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014828509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017480896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007587568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33104333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287465508","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2159","title":"ModelAnswer: An Evaluation of Language in a Complex Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.0885107311913469,"score_gpt":0.30112027045093753,"score_spread":0.21260953925959064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287465508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424851,0.000015585734,0.00041801968,0.00047317997,0.00018092616,0.00023237204,0.000018352925,0.000030777257,0.056145683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.0000010334434,0.00062312256,0.00015357975,0.00016465099,0.0000118680055,0.00010761926,0.0000047202525,0.00003413518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991926,0.00002400171,0.00028271298,0.00007292717,0.00030378118,0.00012399483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995735,0.000011928781,0.00010554573,0.00012846931,0.000158526,0.000021996988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049879076,0.00007119605,0.00010898417,0.00010062777,0.00004454931,0.00003556852,0.00008716521,0.000028432212,0.0007568083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008783502,0.00006254629,0.000024968629,0.000023692037,0.000043922675,0.00021494298,0.000018124634,0.000052553547,0.00004435242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017231108,0.0001004292,0.00021605953,0.0000184646,0.000008284531,0.0000016651674,0.13012727,0.02216246,0.000078484096,0.8446588,0.0000031902655,0.0026076785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051615154,0.00066720915,0.025044687,0.0000969283,0.00012513719,0.0000073737606,0.06135646,0.24909677,0.0007610487,0.6564479,0.0007236436,0.00051133946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028467148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048477515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2269343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000703831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000530994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.828652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312472471","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4357","title":"Developing Critical Thinking with Debate: Evidence from Iranian Male and Female Students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Test (biology); Psychology; Inductive reasoning; Significant difference; Inference; Descriptive statistics; Research design; Mathematics education; Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07519460514203974,"score_gpt":0.3747493998220001,"score_spread":0.2995547946799604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312472471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587218,0.00015753014,0.01200356,0.017798651,0.00033570215,0.00017453985,0.0000026597866,0.00011376334,0.010691777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733191,0.00015897785,0.022578279,0.0029253452,0.000106526255,0.00001573427,9.3029576e-7,0.000005344095,0.0008897434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858105,0.000068731955,0.00019993652,0.00018343265,0.0006038038,0.0003630537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891937,0.0006505176,0.000034392342,0.000100585756,0.00012642774,0.00016870216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068280264,0.00010414985,0.0001189085,0.00003904384,0.00066329795,0.0002520779,0.0003218308,0.00007987363,0.0005619185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090428564,0.00006453973,0.000016842652,0.0001254405,0.00037841874,0.00075990777,0.00011463847,0.00009071895,0.00013677905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004662385,0.000042109587,0.5190121,0.000028965565,0.000024052248,0.000036109523,0.051903456,2.9582787e-7,0.000045309305,0.4087446,0.00011147535,0.0200049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011985056,0.00026236856,0.7767062,0.003313566,0.000057697143,0.000043672713,0.03310814,0.0000064705364,0.0006860418,0.14152049,0.041901212,0.0011956269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026388606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003294641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26722413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000974051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029453484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6152614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320740178","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4522","title":"Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Editors Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015; pp. 289. $139.00 eBook, $179.00 hardcover.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Publishing; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0279833873614627,"score_gpt":0.362615676583186,"score_spread":0.3346322892217233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320740178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16552885,0.00029936805,0.00032121895,0.025622847,0.010958755,0.00059168035,0.000087772685,0.00021164239,0.79637784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881258,0.0011435837,0.00013612738,0.0015470468,0.005910592,0.000048278318,0.00001839479,0.0000141524015,0.0030560365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982362,0.00020100709,0.00032017124,0.00020254379,0.0005797781,0.00046032557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988402,0.000602291,0.000108349865,0.00013300424,0.00012581475,0.00019032884],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083866477,0.00015794086,0.00016768478,0.0001671076,0.00030616825,0.00034721848,0.0003078966,0.00025420394,0.002485328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014783236,0.00011776039,0.00006540261,0.00015806986,0.00065012014,0.0014063068,0.00007331019,0.00026090935,0.00020013073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055722634,0.00004473773,0.008014929,0.0000042527786,0.000025231639,0.0000032037872,0.018507464,0.0000013050249,0.00009826196,0.9507508,0.014093093,0.008400978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006153633,0.0001350728,0.009340074,0.000057038993,0.000012005778,0.0000011260016,0.0057295887,0.000007509335,0.00040835986,0.14700684,0.83645546,0.0002315735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007689098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036078857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82259697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011879912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323968434","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4606","title":"In Memoriam: Richard Paul","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Jewish Identity and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.026538135935764467,"score_gpt":0.30003552280015444,"score_spread":0.27349738686438996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323968434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3033766,0.00008843723,0.00018681822,0.009264455,0.0023710378,0.00017462038,0.000007700278,0.00010319027,0.68442714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920613,0.00022013062,0.00010159296,0.0014073816,0.0005315422,0.0000071686604,5.976288e-7,0.000002326164,0.00566794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921685,0.000041214767,0.00014337039,0.00007355169,0.00022868365,0.00029629626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997106,0.0000673975,0.00003932206,0.00008038039,0.000035000623,0.00006725614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066731375,0.00005014697,0.0000813194,0.00003368579,0.00015638725,0.000042839463,0.00020192738,0.00010542912,0.00071296055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022467341,0.00003445728,0.000052781535,0.00018332257,0.0001480949,0.00090536725,0.00004466191,0.00006925353,0.0009630394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005878163,0.000066004104,0.069183685,0.000012636317,0.000014383072,0.00003792332,0.016751433,0.0000031779243,0.000094106814,0.83382714,0.06863917,0.011364456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046952258,0.00003168241,0.043369304,0.000015234643,0.0000029271837,0.000001169373,0.002738798,0.000002295442,0.000053838015,0.02606783,0.9270881,0.00015932406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079371326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010716242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8584489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007515744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084142164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324823836","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4294","title":"Being a Correct Presumption vs. Being Presumably the Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Correctness; Presumption; Epistemology; Modal; Order (exchange); Speech act; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055784847355519786,"score_gpt":0.261305293653185,"score_spread":0.20552044629766522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324823836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3829273,0.000110041365,0.00047048877,0.0015388374,0.0020908818,0.0003747349,0.000031107822,0.00020716706,0.61224943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98172617,0.00004449443,0.000034401834,0.0012277638,0.0007783602,0.000030080568,0.000005431633,0.000011297938,0.016142016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990333,0.00007640627,0.00029346716,0.0001386839,0.00013138373,0.00032677798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990737,0.00035940902,0.00013546472,0.00026879655,0.000112861926,0.000049763097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134602,0.00014945731,0.00016019435,0.00004765284,0.0006773943,0.00014589688,0.00019256078,0.00007860869,0.00038744658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013359358,0.00007408593,0.00011113898,0.00002098118,0.00047110478,0.00063917827,0.00008555751,0.00021599169,0.00031876663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005832568,0.000020477039,0.00036423438,0.000044229047,0.000042838517,0.00010985323,0.029335959,0.0000091722595,0.00005580529,0.9418887,0.0017916687,0.026278717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010335136,0.0004543465,0.001002135,0.00016092787,0.00012788836,0.00058498076,0.0051651206,0.00026228657,0.0006639993,0.082491525,0.9075185,0.0005347784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030498818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009956857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90572685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022978775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033154134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5210038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326566256","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4575","title":"An Early Exchange on the Interpretation of Arguments in Texts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; COPI; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017593260104257887,"score_gpt":0.25088355818317093,"score_spread":0.23329029807891305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326566256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84354603,0.000044363285,0.054591168,0.00030414114,0.00029349048,0.00021770174,0.000002194504,0.0000654911,0.100935444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989698,0.000008092524,0.00028945442,0.00033337963,0.00002105011,0.000013437836,4.6786187e-7,0.000002051382,0.00036229214],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935305,0.00004505045,0.00017272035,0.00011246442,0.00014247501,0.00017422301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999444,0.00009637736,0.00009115734,0.00029396074,0.000039780363,0.000034739303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029763402,0.00007666493,0.00008426788,0.00008123588,0.000032342283,0.00003878933,0.0006088175,0.000042559077,0.000058871028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006181933,0.000035711706,0.000030685525,0.00014729639,0.000040512303,0.00072909176,0.000099780606,0.000056245608,0.00018641469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060006663,0.00015096834,0.020194326,0.000016034739,0.00000939535,0.00000710034,0.010468474,0.00003920197,0.0006194225,0.38962397,0.00015291487,0.57865816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020859062,0.0038102518,0.8940442,0.00036034497,0.0000066780603,0.000012258863,0.00017299075,0.04143908,0.008351766,0.045521833,0.0035989846,0.0005956799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016636677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020557656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8738499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022397446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018337667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23960459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335090607","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i1.4469","title":"Denying the Antecedent: The Fallacy That Never Was, or Sometimes Isn’t?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); sort; Section (typography); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13073839555469155,"score_gpt":0.27912212409223525,"score_spread":0.1483837285375437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335090607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20425092,0.00188375,0.00054625084,0.031838946,0.0043027466,0.00090992416,0.00007848273,0.00036611507,0.75582284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91203415,0.00029444232,0.000023702056,0.007885476,0.0008165091,0.000025668593,0.0000030403467,0.000013746355,0.07890327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989234,0.00007437507,0.00025034507,0.00012923447,0.0002360465,0.00038654867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.0005806104,0.000149659,0.0003679775,0.000090291134,0.00004168867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005392908,0.00017621822,0.00017893816,0.000038976363,0.0008556585,0.00020128407,0.0005252369,0.00007585795,0.0020234922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011308218,0.000057506306,0.00014075013,0.000032055046,0.0011440141,0.00079608336,0.0001559497,0.0002413159,0.0007537066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006533827,0.0000264896,0.0005632176,0.0000314724,0.00008691802,0.000007422438,0.033867948,0.0000033354559,0.00003848606,0.9401224,0.009219235,0.015967706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035995166,0.00011220631,0.0012083902,0.000045043704,0.000040644725,0.000019801122,0.011854272,0.000013953272,0.00024719976,0.012636175,0.9732635,0.00019884491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012651067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005975303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018551871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056997942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338011633","doi":"","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06903815881425727,"score_gpt":0.296677684418392,"score_spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338011633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05162849,0.0016226139,0.0053200866,0.013482603,0.0011967288,0.00025442636,0.000040978928,0.00020767233,0.9262464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972946,0.000037787897,0.0016269521,0.004709736,0.0011331134,0.000010063778,0.000028845421,0.0000049783534,0.0027190705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932927,0.000024606814,0.00020703103,0.00009144235,0.00014920252,0.00019844435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958944,0.0001503196,0.000038540868,0.00008791727,0.000083646984,0.000050151026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002582428,0.00008545607,0.00009753905,0.000037949376,0.0006228587,0.00013548753,0.00008259968,0.000051744246,0.0006685593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010390819,0.00006949953,0.000040106548,0.000012116239,0.0005341748,0.0005631498,0.00005487085,0.00018135714,0.00014156307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006735544,0.000023363273,0.00021753578,0.00001776514,0.000008806018,0.000001243564,0.014472124,0.000025628296,0.0000027281108,0.98249966,0.00089124276,0.0018331415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034493871,0.00013882943,0.0016135112,0.000018931158,0.00003442188,0.000022522641,0.0034673451,0.002292649,0.000017915738,0.1487831,0.84302145,0.000244388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019966466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043734378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000125999795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024413928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73202556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480000991","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4641","title":"Criticism without Fundamental Principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Criticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05631132883433282,"score_gpt":0.28335237095204174,"score_spread":0.22704104211770892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480000991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12515676,0.00015303954,0.00007392968,0.0006950164,0.00032784074,0.00007470751,0.000038385817,0.00011552707,0.8733648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92320216,0.000017395376,0.000090477006,0.00094754185,0.00044874102,0.000017017494,0.0000036784973,0.000007650157,0.07526534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992009,0.000010639577,0.00022301696,0.000109492554,0.00018760722,0.0002683803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962115,0.000040310566,0.00006257267,0.00016821972,0.000064961554,0.00004279532],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108551874,0.00012544976,0.00015663565,0.00006725406,0.00024460113,0.0001158308,0.00016476349,0.000020814536,0.009124604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047933583,0.00006553849,0.00009069122,0.000015748408,0.00047196355,0.0005309115,0.000114753406,0.000046003745,0.0011955419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012183872,0.00003129254,0.002318799,0.000011632088,0.00008604913,0.000010316492,0.008855472,0.0000011904975,0.000041617364,0.98026145,0.0014490221,0.006920976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004316897,0.00012769716,0.0014521973,0.000051142946,0.000053369768,0.0000069959337,0.012206087,0.0000135579085,0.00022413555,0.0035935517,0.9815569,0.00028266397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035864912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005274654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9801079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002114414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013628268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487530731","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4664","title":"Latin American Philosophers: Some Recent Challenges to Their Intellectual Character","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Skepticism; Latin Americans; Character (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Originality; Critical thinking; Philosophy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.18349011745280766,"score_gpt":0.3510881769608235,"score_spread":0.16759805950801585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487530731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5531485,0.00014362024,0.00007992226,0.14531481,0.000615023,0.00025039117,0.0000058916758,0.00023073515,0.30021113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112236,0.0010494814,0.00022114461,0.005311015,0.00070669595,0.000023819373,0.0000016609686,0.0000067845613,0.0015570519],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913466,0.000068112546,0.00016465462,0.00012913955,0.00017402908,0.00032938557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.00024217415,0.00007166682,0.00012482822,0.00006369159,0.0001749357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042713212,0.00009446137,0.000116712596,0.00007282514,0.00017232783,0.000039540588,0.00022706513,0.000045995163,0.0013951221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000584353,0.000059166883,0.00003883164,0.00016557272,0.00020360594,0.00034789817,0.000041436415,0.00008794485,0.001019181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014410029,0.000030875563,0.00060908473,0.0000015388074,0.0000097259735,3.9943993e-7,0.21055841,2.104559e-7,0.000054921253,0.06646672,0.00041818756,0.7218355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014788061,0.0001620132,0.015770564,0.0000240358,0.0000024288386,3.6576e-7,0.06663459,9.524194e-7,0.00012058112,0.003085015,0.91386163,0.00018994362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000864348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017371356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91344345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072730196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011284778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488488091","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4661","title":"Employing and Exploiting the Presumptions of Communication in Argumentation: An Application of Normative Pragmatics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Grice; Implicature; Normative; Pragmatics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04086990217938726,"score_gpt":0.3337801653594461,"score_spread":0.29291026318005886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488488091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743923,0.00009854975,0.014746763,0.0001165772,0.000020382358,0.000297034,0.000013193519,0.00001473282,0.010300461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987957,0.000039010883,0.0009161877,0.00008012241,0.000010505076,0.000107587715,0.000023909228,0.0000031470765,0.000023834533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.00010705331,0.00033034818,0.000053699667,0.000078866695,0.00007764145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992244,0.00019719338,0.00027447034,0.0002215013,0.00006839244,0.00001403428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037466045,0.000050258444,0.00008276937,0.00006095644,0.00005197118,0.0000067222454,0.00011040159,0.000039650415,0.000051355953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004235639,0.000029867992,0.000015688913,0.00009880134,0.00009593151,0.00039027454,0.000030164963,0.00005200198,0.00001061471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017615265,0.00034054558,0.070429854,0.00012055135,0.00007301754,5.289964e-7,0.16318685,0.0000747659,0.008375287,0.35131338,0.000033127973,0.40587595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024349699,0.00036910613,0.873489,0.00020390167,0.00007141948,0.000022888004,0.081557564,0.0010858659,0.006738956,0.033520278,0.00026209583,0.00024395906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010808971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007648255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80305916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008639217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006561415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121798135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491923398","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4723","title":"Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Law; Refugee law; Refugee; Political science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Criminology; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07858435713754199,"score_gpt":0.3548801888245751,"score_spread":0.27629583168703314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491923398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87038314,0.00013435353,0.0014713296,0.0016472004,0.00014586704,0.00028383345,0.00000539953,0.00006593125,0.12586296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820375,0.00030529653,0.0006329552,0.00033130558,0.0000514643,0.000009239175,5.975497e-7,0.000002225021,0.0004631462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993913,0.00005616866,0.000101535355,0.00009099456,0.00019341057,0.00016656354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971074,0.00008507711,0.000046491783,0.000077858065,0.000032531298,0.000047329573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000515851,0.000051905277,0.000056919544,0.000028655399,0.00017649273,0.000058937723,0.0000930208,0.000027755113,0.000039884875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009312136,0.000029858067,0.000006206545,0.00007881812,0.0002009,0.0013913236,0.00004770752,0.000066647735,0.000034735458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023698983,0.000042516273,0.044385906,0.000071243594,0.000009630248,0.000049652022,0.008252708,0.0000048409897,0.00042128866,0.85597575,0.00013276801,0.090416685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020664101,0.002744462,0.33860534,0.0019289337,0.00008123988,0.000027243703,0.029590916,0.000019181196,0.0008112366,0.006351844,0.61688316,0.0008900571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010370302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048182625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058358815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057466965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26887035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496029585","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4670","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.08802790957842942,"score_gpt":0.28870144220549887,"score_spread":0.20067353262706944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496029585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21657911,0.0017596412,0.003369517,0.05649208,0.01561409,0.0014205346,0.0010855108,0.00093218626,0.70274734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8248857,0.0003123277,0.00078025553,0.14819889,0.003631035,0.00010910049,0.00007897301,0.00004239323,0.021961287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988656,0.000035903784,0.00034035183,0.0002163138,0.00020901264,0.00033281528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.00012345826,0.00015677085,0.00033888224,0.00013690899,0.00012381299],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017147062,0.00018115694,0.00023648854,0.00006733598,0.00017460347,0.000093617804,0.00024382862,0.00008359198,0.0009710553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011584603,0.00011316834,0.00010215515,0.000022824586,0.00018429213,0.00046029474,0.00011539377,0.00012813427,0.0010134989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028284956,0.00019871577,0.0021279592,0.00005615985,0.00019007197,0.000017640194,0.08628731,0.000011268257,0.00059176685,0.4724608,0.40998527,0.027790166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038736087,0.00015981308,0.00079744455,0.00009859233,0.000005204098,0.0000013925404,0.0023513783,0.000005850199,0.00025117825,0.00817882,0.9875489,0.00021408725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011442447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042375393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6807861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034039098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029797944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498543166","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4662","title":"Enhancing Rationality: Heuristics, Biases, and The Critical Thinking Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Heuristics; Rationality; Irrational number; Cognitive bias; Ecological rationality; Rational planning model; Critical thinking; Decision field theory; Psychology; Management science; Focus (optics); Cognition; Bounded rationality; Behavioral economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Economics; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Decision analysis; Decision engineering; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Management; Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1018061235548303,"score_gpt":0.4434657774391438,"score_spread":0.34165965388431346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498543166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0964378,0.00046760033,0.19979267,0.21263923,0.006263775,0.001661973,0.00005221272,0.0003913861,0.48229337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94646037,0.00004818134,0.047707006,0.003471771,0.0010087403,0.000055446602,0.000003454115,0.0000046516116,0.0012403757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887085,0.00026061657,0.00024173482,0.00009127163,0.0003343186,0.00020119056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950386,0.0044774897,0.00006408608,0.000104365194,0.00028868404,0.000026739031],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038453976,0.000059826576,0.000080712416,0.00005862624,0.0010097802,0.00011599805,0.00017233391,0.000057159497,0.00011152416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02424134,0.000031683965,0.000023380475,0.00022964335,0.001053856,0.00040960519,0.00005786492,0.00009032365,0.000023910836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011429643,0.0000075378516,0.00054159376,0.0000037704397,0.0000037126997,3.0330446e-7,0.00506409,5.249846e-7,0.000015892454,0.9884313,0.00039685547,0.0055229934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201823,0.000031135318,0.005019489,0.0000842407,0.000017933957,0.0000107155065,0.00692255,0.000046540707,0.0002509737,0.81120497,0.17569007,0.00020120491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025584802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000127649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85002255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052640255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044899154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504893451","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808630.005","title":"Criticisms of irrelevance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Positive economics","score_opus":0.037987103153389504,"score_gpt":0.2500416098310899,"score_spread":0.21205450667770043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504893451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028218332,0.0003776286,0.12648122,0.00006145473,0.0006602317,0.00018653668,0.000011640906,0.00008390719,0.8721092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13537298,0.0008246523,0.016395414,0.0017299575,0.00052730826,0.000024157845,0.00007462198,0.000050963834,0.84499997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987433,0.0000058943,0.0005118954,0.00019639226,0.00034327738,0.00019924963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892265,0.00004809996,0.00035336867,0.000483437,0.00013338593,0.000059070484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015422156,0.00019742725,0.00029315648,0.00013082076,0.0000456523,0.000040925883,0.00061542465,0.00021934448,0.00016957168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016883883,0.00017059888,0.0001272865,0.000037918962,0.000042509047,0.00045988837,0.00016026739,0.00017066157,0.00039781784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028339084,0.0000069935586,0.000013252147,0.00007970336,0.000016373744,0.000015698939,0.00014682386,0.000071822644,0.000014206706,0.9861434,0.0008365746,0.012652331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004466199,0.00028245532,0.00057684653,0.00040715706,0.000021156135,0.000092059774,0.000006650514,0.008176166,0.00023007244,0.03789781,0.9512156,0.00064736657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000194244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065950067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026400294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004706146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6956821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505854629","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808630.009","title":"Appeals to authority","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05216900343267786,"score_gpt":0.2674259119534945,"score_spread":0.21525690852081666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505854629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021366284,0.000074635,0.1328925,0.0002583538,0.000916086,0.0003712668,0.000009383266,0.00020769297,0.86524874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01846,0.00007418923,0.0070926375,0.0027911924,0.0007855385,0.000027436061,0.000042226642,0.000027371767,0.9706994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985073,0.000009564061,0.0004637917,0.00031015856,0.00040327752,0.00030586318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884707,0.000026511116,0.000243199,0.0006058752,0.00009458855,0.00018273648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003124131,0.0002647079,0.00029999242,0.0001954618,0.00011142057,0.00015633507,0.00081412256,0.00030432633,0.0002481757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017644428,0.000227786,0.00013114983,0.000060997892,0.0000151045715,0.00046009256,0.00026207295,0.00023699582,0.0043438193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033885572,0.000005920518,0.000023828119,0.000031331136,0.000013283074,0.00002504874,0.0002395259,0.000076974684,0.000006374091,0.95981485,0.006214491,0.03354501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012340404,0.000114511065,0.00052261894,0.00007918854,0.0000055116884,0.000034716057,0.000002288053,0.0012735383,0.00001691743,0.007872639,0.98958635,0.00036834256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036779635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001728415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98337185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065219574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057202353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509172424","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4672","title":"Studying Rhetorical Audiences – a Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Conceptualization; Empirical research; Empirical examination; Sociology; Rhetorical device; Visual rhetoric; Persuasion; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.36684443306193315,"score_gpt":0.4265013016066305,"score_spread":0.05965686854469737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509172424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93088096,0.006129026,0.0027335826,0.0045737172,0.0019926801,0.0013861752,0.00004387627,0.0001986903,0.052061286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940698,0.0017508396,0.00034196718,0.00014147576,0.0001353409,0.00027019705,0.0000029513876,0.0000042691104,0.0032831705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991724,0.00006659799,0.00033015088,0.00012570764,0.00012638126,0.00017878872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894124,0.0006404352,0.0001333187,0.000087804765,0.0001729641,0.000024220511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050983793,0.000110407105,0.0001943806,0.00008982389,0.00034954085,0.000040132134,0.00008950508,0.00002540273,0.000027384003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021776448,0.0000644929,0.00003299341,0.000048677583,0.0003063819,0.00056055165,0.00007821881,0.000046265985,0.000020693327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302923,0.000041605905,0.00081526226,0.00003992333,0.00005776263,3.2570682e-7,0.52409357,0.0000014773892,0.000020882826,0.44811162,0.0013349156,0.025409622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025208103,0.0011576453,0.0047262385,0.00021934505,0.00004470962,0.0000030030565,0.73721117,0.00006595762,0.000041407686,0.049096834,0.20437652,0.00053638185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003471439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028498727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39901477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089238725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012128793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26884207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510825718","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4423","title":"Considering Carneades as a Framework for Informal Logic: A Reply to Walton and Gordon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Logic model; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.04319752763102309,"score_gpt":0.2915213436358697,"score_spread":0.2483238160048466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510825718","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12593998,0.00007258866,0.86697966,0.0023795662,0.0005469374,0.0006906915,0.0000073399797,0.00021022957,0.0031729748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062978,0.000019638195,0.08668929,0.006315751,0.00012756595,0.000093852395,0.000001923402,0.000007608297,0.0004465534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986861,0.000017599565,0.00041187092,0.00025771328,0.00020657413,0.00042018533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989035,0.0002711895,0.00017310285,0.00036407096,0.00011662405,0.00017151011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039232042,0.00017322572,0.00020644595,0.00012388287,0.0001715971,0.00019605139,0.00032969873,0.00012281525,0.000019064586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005563411,0.00011148784,0.00006197765,0.00015422991,0.000035013003,0.0012781988,0.00026803924,0.000082745624,0.00013041287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108870365,0.000027185788,0.006287546,0.00015140612,0.00003217477,0.000011539,0.0052568614,0.00017009597,0.0014656524,0.84729695,0.0010292905,0.13816243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063005826,0.0059986203,0.09576173,0.0016485321,0.000051115887,0.00077311904,0.0010385766,0.034616698,0.031639602,0.11007906,0.70890415,0.0031881945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008763343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016041224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78035784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031900883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055414795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4546342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510917024","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4621","title":"The Real Struggle: An Objective Notion of Expertise?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06397860815651764,"score_gpt":0.27931182389956416,"score_spread":0.21533321574304654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510917024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49640614,0.00008343718,0.00012419595,0.00038769926,0.0009973574,0.00015030819,0.000040037605,0.00006531717,0.5017455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505097,0.00009504039,0.000020284731,0.00017875017,0.00036913608,0.000010597291,0.000004629476,0.0000050748176,0.004265517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936914,0.000046141417,0.00021770677,0.000075328884,0.000119710254,0.00017199249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934787,0.00014404082,0.00012976407,0.00018300819,0.00016294021,0.000032377906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024399355,0.00007998706,0.00011000225,0.000024061168,0.0002749379,0.000034686094,0.00014820059,0.000053827065,0.00011162923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052674965,0.00003742569,0.000058121685,0.000013010124,0.0006293204,0.0004478703,0.00003023488,0.00008065563,0.00004949729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048028433,0.000023004177,0.00021064185,0.000008342973,0.00001753174,6.011407e-7,0.031088538,0.0000012128335,0.00036708033,0.9320793,0.00015899092,0.035996687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00349421,0.0053995056,0.050946876,0.00021197295,0.00013389291,0.000018630946,0.09464075,0.00027789234,0.01913179,0.3583544,0.46601295,0.0013771396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025826803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011457518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016620506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035935795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23187573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521535665","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4720","title":"An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06811105210042746,"score_gpt":0.28864140674621463,"score_spread":0.22053035464578719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521535665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75533646,0.000035487414,0.0046120016,0.00075223536,0.0016525508,0.0007488074,0.00015800858,0.00015652918,0.23654792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948329,0.000005434359,0.00044154277,0.0005263513,0.0006796649,0.000037870872,0.000018747918,0.0000075692105,0.003449951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991777,0.000024611263,0.00032841688,0.00012946912,0.00012329844,0.00021653168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923134,0.00018598037,0.00020438901,0.00008804251,0.00024208453,0.000048187972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061640114,0.000114541916,0.0001964498,0.00005130004,0.00015682155,0.00004505286,0.000167399,0.00009691523,0.00029206675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012233832,0.000066623514,0.00010827607,0.000014789711,0.000568226,0.0008422796,0.000022305972,0.00007494315,0.000027024158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029503615,0.000054760607,0.0002056779,0.00005414059,0.000021853832,4.6027594e-7,0.005360597,8.609918e-7,0.00086900586,0.98820496,0.00022802685,0.0047046263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039543775,0.004867494,0.0025198336,0.00008835456,0.00014897676,0.000016163474,0.013670137,0.000075153155,0.008120281,0.6857832,0.28013724,0.00061881717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017901284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022701299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30242178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016600125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036550784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522053720","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4726","title":"Apologie de la polemique","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.030708891502939952,"score_gpt":0.30121335036925,"score_spread":0.2705044588663101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522053720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023411503,0.0047994843,0.0008492067,0.024374338,0.0013164282,0.000074879594,0.000024534615,0.0000959256,0.9450537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75453615,0.0024488766,0.00052478316,0.0025733865,0.00074773346,0.00001119764,6.0926686e-7,0.000004405131,0.23915283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881965,0.00020640512,0.00019790554,0.00010748762,0.00014309763,0.00052546675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991078,0.0005536846,0.00006402279,0.00009168145,0.00003657746,0.00014627307],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005760979,0.00011606267,0.00014762177,0.00002976668,0.0003306748,0.000023837154,0.00022994836,0.00023662561,0.0013524767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003961079,0.00007012747,0.0000910554,0.0001858918,0.0013842275,0.00047584405,0.000089483074,0.00013207897,0.0011936519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011804082,0.00003524381,0.005375798,0.000013034711,0.000014947133,0.000025102774,0.010027342,0.000001548303,0.000038044775,0.81486607,0.01742787,0.15216318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013749363,0.00010530913,0.003589214,0.00003300021,0.000007678682,0.000006820217,0.00036357608,0.0000022575066,0.000028395201,0.024628771,0.9709629,0.00013459807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009970652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059726357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023895157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014616466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522061514","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4725","title":"Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08521820864784566,"score_gpt":0.2969468926641764,"score_spread":0.21172868401633074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522061514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53927183,0.00068371237,0.0002499507,0.0012131463,0.0010096611,0.0002096653,0.00004734693,0.000065765475,0.45724893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640477,0.0000815242,0.00012142722,0.00051124115,0.000118815355,0.0000043436835,0.0000025392808,0.000004474838,0.0027508417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920577,0.00004331363,0.0003314023,0.000077039,0.00015441273,0.00018808343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.0003150192,0.0003076093,0.00022082556,0.00021193063,0.000023985369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036904242,0.00010302634,0.00020032687,0.00004278756,0.00012473625,0.00001527733,0.00027715397,0.000070048896,0.00034371237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029996372,0.000046068286,0.000102549435,0.000029683746,0.0010121809,0.0002684517,0.00007647202,0.0001533818,0.000036001413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001409942,0.000012868911,0.00074707123,0.00003950592,0.000018677838,5.8965026e-7,0.011630352,0.000004120371,0.0002439321,0.984001,0.0001848128,0.0031029687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022385924,0.0020449467,0.02338693,0.0014532601,0.0002327673,0.000027653728,0.031241026,0.00017883786,0.018876087,0.47475395,0.44433665,0.0012292829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016505412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020887573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50924706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007840174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042021722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37634093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522855291","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4721","title":"Defining Marriage: Classification, Interpretation, and Definitional Disputes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028401602770812277,"score_gpt":0.3046576216162169,"score_spread":0.2762560188454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522855291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1285438,0.00022228518,0.024413217,0.026547953,0.00022368004,0.00035236357,0.00010104434,0.00026869518,0.81932694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997322,0.00007755771,0.0011883851,0.00053361076,0.00006713982,0.000041123803,0.000011808291,0.0000029814073,0.00075538905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941766,0.000024411444,0.00016310257,0.000097154094,0.0001423587,0.00015530692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.00021698857,0.00006937428,0.00007980562,0.00008237113,0.00007734617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025642192,0.00005362956,0.000053750755,0.00003307039,0.00040070008,0.00007634629,0.0001166514,0.000049353937,0.00025237308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002824471,0.000036460682,0.000022555721,0.00009631407,0.00024006689,0.00048438576,0.000040799758,0.000042952062,0.00027636535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004105952,0.0000059071144,0.00559227,0.0000018671283,0.0000027840968,1.5144244e-7,0.0011149362,8.3320595e-7,0.000045945886,0.9702993,0.0003476489,0.022584269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053631363,0.000053735424,0.2656924,0.00005262307,0.000016750739,0.0000062685426,0.0026443691,0.00030262498,0.00007708216,0.17793252,0.5523542,0.00033110395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065527245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009646215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8687782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002648185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008296518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35522097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522944671","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4717","title":"Preface: Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.5567466499763101,"score_gpt":0.577572407979279,"score_spread":0.02082575800296893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522944671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15858062,0.0000674721,0.009606124,0.012979921,0.00055603235,0.000667488,0.00002801329,0.000092798335,0.81742156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808953,0.00007707327,0.0016744926,0.00029090757,0.00020984457,0.00011919896,0.0000021315423,0.000002038072,0.016729007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990808,0.00014290438,0.000119146236,0.00009142597,0.00032772557,0.00023801404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980189,0.0015845901,0.00003833625,0.0000542081,0.00027617172,0.000027766271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001590165,0.000047510355,0.00007234125,0.00006735834,0.00051266665,0.00005092194,0.00016337278,0.000034319957,0.00015414617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001162453,0.000027466773,0.000039896313,0.00008742253,0.00025932633,0.00041914018,0.000045009463,0.00004998749,0.00017860609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090887996,0.000009403609,0.0002446723,0.0000018359606,0.000010884134,2.0734912e-7,0.0011221789,0.000006727815,0.00017169295,0.97337526,0.007091181,0.017875057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026697337,0.00038443916,0.006237153,0.000014626515,0.0000018955111,1.4654185e-7,0.0030816428,0.0000045218303,0.0034648573,0.048691146,0.9377832,0.000069407375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020299233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036015295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086672386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005966629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39430693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523565836","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4724","title":"Redundancy of Redundancy in Justifications of Verdicts of Polish The Constitutional Tribuna","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Doxa; Tribunal; Politics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04529802480962788,"score_gpt":0.31830429247437847,"score_spread":0.2730062676647506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523565836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10070581,0.00023174922,0.00017873544,0.001867492,0.00023961165,0.0001491515,0.00012514593,0.000010460757,0.8964918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998402,0.00024707304,0.00008277481,0.00005383145,0.000043322874,0.000003948465,0.0000024736719,0.0000012022277,0.0011633976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916077,0.000051368235,0.00036799416,0.00005343373,0.00025334288,0.00011306972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920636,0.00021527437,0.00021309592,0.00009459266,0.00025039454,0.00002029084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044568136,0.000044359247,0.000111721085,0.00005915515,0.000103047845,0.0000042731194,0.0002468585,0.00002818481,0.00012619252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007860571,0.000025461582,0.000052639567,0.0001810957,0.0020710784,0.00019902732,0.00004556309,0.000040892726,0.000011970144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016947102,0.000031849508,0.0047563906,0.000007651857,0.00001051969,2.2347048e-7,0.0013161754,0.000008526048,0.0003120294,0.9918038,0.00050565065,0.0012302202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015895751,0.0002572834,0.50292474,0.0005041504,0.000036364134,0.0000036903946,0.0048565175,0.00001243725,0.005490162,0.032997504,0.45107996,0.00024764205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028576955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016677938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95880634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028026074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002039065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76309747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523706814","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4722","title":"Administrative Judicial Decisions as a Hybrid Argumentative Activity Type","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Task (project management); Presentation (obstetrics); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14837381276895004,"score_gpt":0.4268070866641011,"score_spread":0.27843327389515105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523706814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871534,0.000016835282,0.0004645264,0.0037715607,0.00036726004,0.00018276717,0.000017090431,0.0000621878,0.30796438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627,0.00010115826,0.0001702592,0.00050332636,0.00016930002,0.000010291571,0.0000011106908,0.0000031597572,0.0027713845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895775,0.00007510797,0.00014571093,0.00013879256,0.0003576887,0.0003249587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894214,0.0005689238,0.00009098476,0.00010661567,0.00013169566,0.00015965449],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003681884,0.000095456104,0.00012178924,0.00003710099,0.00048243158,0.000058148045,0.00022589418,0.000051481096,0.0012781229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013966698,0.00006174325,0.000057994188,0.0001543329,0.0004071587,0.0008596832,0.000064196254,0.00008446943,0.0016288178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013528999,0.00019340802,0.002493484,0.000005632362,0.000053140244,0.00015529928,0.018567856,0.0000022741028,0.0019716076,0.6493932,0.01090688,0.3149043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001264588,0.0029530493,0.03741365,0.000243684,0.000080223464,0.000048816102,0.014289167,0.000009016766,0.017122334,0.12615462,0.7994626,0.0009582213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010319718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010551198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78855574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084952124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042507087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565213933","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4586","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Relevance (law); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03438545534219384,"score_gpt":0.25798263082187695,"score_spread":0.2235971754796831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565213933","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031849317,0.000038872866,0.9645862,0.0003240177,0.00040200862,0.00031935665,0.0000143409825,0.00006361254,0.0024022681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98300123,0.000011045306,0.016337397,0.00009708454,0.000055192235,0.00003606715,0.0000018501869,0.0000020017987,0.00045812503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946856,0.000008492169,0.00020699242,0.00008847839,0.00009718567,0.00013025777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994694,0.000113401176,0.00013467182,0.00018954878,0.00006814679,0.000024846755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017113102,0.000052112453,0.00008647034,0.000034950168,0.000031810043,0.000012345101,0.00026617572,0.000035661895,0.0000063292023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104688865,0.000029519872,0.000041385625,0.000059960923,0.000017786993,0.00054345024,0.00005105375,0.000014139202,0.000042006126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032113523,0.00004413099,0.0056486386,0.00015385199,0.000014416516,0.0000010889099,0.0006823086,0.000054751345,0.021869157,0.78487736,0.0023455448,0.18427663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073417034,0.0024246045,0.20423932,0.0006619001,0.00002107383,0.000043074477,0.0000761142,0.056115806,0.38465735,0.042409204,0.30057228,0.0014375756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007787939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034008333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000920811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002189073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12037854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573666881","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4347","title":"Clarifying our Ideas in Persuasion Dialogue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Epistemology; Accidental; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10135079636543842,"score_gpt":0.2871500701404811,"score_spread":0.18579927377504268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573666881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47658753,0.00030623053,0.00026072108,0.003975228,0.0025465626,0.00026284892,0.000036030284,0.0001732324,0.5158516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253964,0.00005017217,0.000056025954,0.0014238438,0.0005466575,0.00001053276,0.000007847199,0.000007986268,0.0053572613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916923,0.00004085638,0.00026052987,0.00011727969,0.000121473364,0.0002906212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995807,0.00007765712,0.000082408435,0.00014763222,0.000063992,0.00004760276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037154823,0.00011651635,0.00016926223,0.000091719456,0.00015328598,0.00005041151,0.0001472956,0.00011841229,0.00016047459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010742289,0.00007032467,0.00007871838,0.000023187546,0.000144468,0.00049030426,0.000058686637,0.00022825271,0.0005144862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031070227,0.000031392912,0.0024894322,0.000032297827,0.0000105647305,0.000012324442,0.016611235,0.000003248518,0.00012634526,0.9702599,0.00076501863,0.009627138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002354493,0.0005294584,0.011179732,0.0002432834,0.00003707196,0.00001735913,0.020415246,0.000049913106,0.00034832046,0.17497975,0.78905505,0.00079032115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022749888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001319846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027517342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003739993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575064023","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4796","title":"A Searchable Bibliography of Fallacies – 2016","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Argumentation theory; Phrase; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028621393933764745,"score_gpt":0.25002361193010425,"score_spread":0.2214022179963395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575064023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10015801,0.00030812435,0.84195995,0.0009835402,0.00060190895,0.00034882553,0.000014211015,0.00023874178,0.05538669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475825,0.0004770041,0.003950108,0.00011401643,0.000029554061,0.000008466381,5.6270625e-7,0.0000022927748,0.00065974286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992317,0.000019343595,0.00021889592,0.00010261424,0.00022759472,0.00019987462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942905,0.000055266682,0.00010785507,0.00026835577,0.00008818697,0.0000512833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027533743,0.000067690045,0.000100418285,0.002045643,0.000044367738,0.000036923906,0.00040416184,0.000040743133,0.000048074464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015456055,0.000036947113,0.00006912493,0.0023226454,0.000041702788,0.0010085328,0.00013809252,0.000025896808,0.0001859526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006450732,0.00021731298,0.16691251,0.00029553118,0.00012543445,0.000015199238,0.002126122,0.00013244849,0.061538775,0.510104,0.11359592,0.14487226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042807213,0.0016237423,0.57802874,0.0005977301,0.000014908262,0.00006460787,0.00017284954,0.012799454,0.07524544,0.014831291,0.31112224,0.0012182663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076807766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047461845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8946002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033161882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020459525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23901065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578291748","doi":"","title":"[Review of: D. Walton. Scare Tactics]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Mathematical and Computational Methods","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1755629661947317,"score_gpt":0.3871370690372428,"score_spread":0.21157410284251113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578291748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005559962,0.015033469,0.05212486,0.0016244925,0.00029960246,0.00076037936,0.000027787151,0.00024297072,0.9243265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13222812,0.00538056,0.8478466,0.009324647,0.00024333436,0.00008657802,0.000013353533,0.000041648105,0.0048351134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908376,0.00003651369,0.00043876114,0.000069795846,0.00022334611,0.00014784072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989561,0.00051540066,0.00016637583,0.00017926433,0.00012572006,0.000057164394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003159317,0.000099097095,0.00025809524,0.000033987853,0.000032882064,0.000008011931,0.00016149468,0.00004516987,0.0028540913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009311629,0.00006945056,0.000105082036,0.00010968782,0.00003679667,0.000115677445,0.000057493537,0.0000951355,0.00023610466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002391957,0.00010048848,0.000016525215,0.010177869,0.000018864188,0.0000027247004,0.00014886411,0.0000033858478,0.0000058260903,0.9332186,0.0069575417,0.04934695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031079783,0.00019337668,0.00007248881,0.003633531,0.00007509943,0.000090640155,0.00006174411,0.008494853,0.00029912783,0.92476195,0.061701603,0.00030478928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.210206e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.3448764e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91949135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008139465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008512592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578629365","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4610","title":"How to Disagree About Argument Schemes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Analogy; Inference; Argument map; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02713903951692292,"score_gpt":0.244779492223708,"score_spread":0.2176404527067851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578629365","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07261849,0.00004812599,0.9142061,0.006136076,0.0006471514,0.0002730483,0.0000036552838,0.00016801868,0.0058993725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684585,0.0000073722144,0.008146417,0.00090607547,0.00010681946,0.000023161863,8.439879e-7,0.0000028719564,0.0039605917],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.000012026277,0.00016528381,0.00016033443,0.00023584376,0.0002501793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994007,0.00002697333,0.00007606361,0.00034107044,0.000045695073,0.00010954434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015535363,0.00009714922,0.000095283285,0.00006282034,0.00006948142,0.0001796715,0.00046152656,0.00004102524,0.000026863998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000462369,0.00005439325,0.0000445634,0.000118231415,0.000012217197,0.0010693987,0.00019529273,0.0000294621,0.0006269186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014443396,0.00005863743,0.013249655,0.00003889038,0.000026369176,0.000011034376,0.0012945553,0.000033029923,0.009660607,0.458731,0.0067054154,0.51017636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012490663,0.00041273172,0.14313783,0.00015437094,0.000004983658,0.00002337954,0.00006061887,0.003630996,0.021728987,0.0013329083,0.8276134,0.0006507359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008393348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068215522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91422737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034313656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017860737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80579793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583894427","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i4.4527","title":"Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Windsor; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025830404566766264,"score_gpt":0.23672021036982963,"score_spread":0.21088980580306335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583894427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03539431,0.000012344187,0.0006466215,0.0064117983,0.0005556629,0.00017714362,0.0000084931435,0.0001427702,0.95665085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69109225,0.000005805797,0.00020257788,0.30172905,0.00043330176,0.000020157888,0.000017134913,0.0000091072625,0.0064906366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991803,0.0000029482312,0.00022572685,0.00013233535,0.00025827493,0.0002004237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995011,0.000018806682,0.0001602138,0.00011331753,0.00019475307,0.000011788448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013119438,0.00012552689,0.000094295065,0.000119412485,0.000095572555,0.00017163849,0.00019673118,0.000049412818,0.008469726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007183546,0.000075423945,0.0000635873,0.000111530804,0.00006817194,0.003667218,0.00009913132,0.00006327125,0.0059974557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029014087,0.0000323364,0.0009869129,0.000011761808,0.000027069429,0.0000029510245,0.00010467021,0.000001459888,0.00045121292,0.94107896,0.05667052,0.0006031235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005951653,0.00002035315,0.0009028986,0.000029795056,0.0000109898865,0.000002168129,0.0000555941,0.00043975058,0.00071626547,0.027535008,0.96952224,0.00016976231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012235522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000997705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030829193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000132450805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599474270","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4468","title":"The Role of Quasi-Logical Arguments in Critical Dialogue: A Pragma-Dialectical Redefinition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rhetoric; Logical analysis; Logical consequence; Sociology; Logical conjunction; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08020592866659729,"score_gpt":0.3164677178851709,"score_spread":0.23626178921857363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599474270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112569,0.00023549865,0.0000050578683,0.0009779662,0.0010942708,0.00013662325,0.000028068249,0.000026669355,0.88492686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.00005668477,0.000046340287,0.00014893529,0.000363663,0.000026702352,0.000004763287,0.0000037908333,0.00027708727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991263,0.00002901083,0.0003153231,0.00010463662,0.00013756828,0.00028716502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991617,0.0003496402,0.00011522278,0.0002383274,0.00010140097,0.00003371244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026085635,0.00010092352,0.00017942696,0.00003625506,0.0010260423,0.0002074227,0.0002763273,0.00006588891,0.00011294527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00240959,0.000061373525,0.00005866358,0.000008714302,0.0014387395,0.000117260584,0.00018535228,0.00018063678,0.00006644702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004575558,0.000088186214,0.0032563708,0.0000072022463,0.000012995635,0.000021315787,0.0018436139,2.1284714e-7,0.0000030949554,0.9912025,0.000080390826,0.0034383582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006838515,0.0007555941,0.028214052,0.000039832998,0.000035475776,0.000016255475,0.002320197,0.00029757977,0.00008020165,0.5808485,0.38645878,0.00024965307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017479768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006366344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88650304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011877772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002426211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7891591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599553930","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4821","title":"Critical Review of Arguing With People by Michael Gilbert","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.051809800228486344,"score_gpt":0.33429746891570616,"score_spread":0.2824876686872198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599553930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013274665,0.0065116496,0.000032055344,0.049891938,0.00011587064,0.00021468595,0.000025601865,0.000037111364,0.9298964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309677,0.0039540916,0.0002132653,0.0017261226,0.00011820156,0.0000087732915,0.0000028300688,0.0000021953579,0.00087777816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992544,0.000021570804,0.00016522192,0.00007794431,0.00026414683,0.00021671169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994385,0.000089178684,0.00011225091,0.0001277268,0.00014919664,0.000083122155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002476223,0.00007367802,0.00020076835,0.0000058742767,0.0008706938,0.000041517123,0.00030555323,0.000041341253,0.00020134253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010779429,0.00004285202,0.000048875587,0.000054569493,0.000610227,0.0003551518,0.00008839258,0.00008748364,0.000032770982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006133011,0.000101417085,0.018228097,0.0020400789,0.000060961134,0.000007965877,0.010063454,5.163274e-7,0.00004915376,0.9362647,0.019345867,0.013776493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038369966,0.00047557225,0.016854938,0.0028233125,0.000086646425,0.0000075921434,0.0024116484,0.000006365608,0.000078850586,0.02060145,0.95571667,0.0005532441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009646428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039119442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011436708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002719378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66967607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600687278","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4523","title":"Argument or Explanation: Who is to Decide?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06307956560992599,"score_gpt":0.3175833967711396,"score_spread":0.2545038311612136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600687278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20789877,0.00010020208,0.44628176,0.031310704,0.002414723,0.0005545097,0.0000063214384,0.00049584504,0.31093717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95408535,0.000018583267,0.032985486,0.009372994,0.00009556231,0.000020359008,7.561734e-7,0.0000026111434,0.0034182747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923325,0.0000052632104,0.00016616091,0.00014967688,0.00021000806,0.00023566304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990027,0.000036445283,0.000090609734,0.00073838845,0.000052253094,0.00007958016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015826621,0.000089431654,0.000114786315,0.000054859556,0.0003112162,0.0004873238,0.0014234714,0.000044272434,0.00009609031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012196901,0.000059320653,0.000034387685,0.000054545755,0.000028866758,0.0010216683,0.0005040002,0.000050826093,0.00066446426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008108507,0.000059992693,0.018752985,0.00003220376,0.000042736796,0.00022616786,0.005862177,0.00014650506,0.000045300232,0.43625247,0.07619799,0.4623004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010274261,0.0007600991,0.5681459,0.00007083173,0.000008959746,0.00013603286,0.0004056545,0.010978865,0.007407968,0.011974687,0.39840138,0.0006822143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045561068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005252556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7461866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016250857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043246182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85405654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603318167","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4696","title":"Conductive Argument as a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Electrical conductor; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.09421506125148042,"score_gpt":0.31969895795954545,"score_spread":0.225483896708065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603318167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91712207,0.000014697282,0.018822579,0.0000864705,0.00035115323,0.00017274117,0.0000022944905,0.000040815696,0.06338717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966891,0.0000046683917,0.003025161,0.0000559378,0.000022232049,0.000007503078,0.0000011804467,0.0000018749533,0.00019238294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993589,0.000009711787,0.00020053388,0.00011331959,0.00017199016,0.00014556163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991667,0.000010074619,0.00028023485,0.0004499112,0.000050679744,0.00004235381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112726804,0.00007683748,0.00011355228,0.0000406623,0.00015363695,0.00015654169,0.00057807897,0.00004126144,0.000020024281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000138938185,0.00006190555,0.0000411908,0.000026066995,0.000030799194,0.0010591784,0.00017991528,0.000056756384,0.00008533049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001359082,0.000046628727,0.0019998767,0.00007033207,0.0000281838,0.000016985025,0.0020497998,0.0026861276,0.0067407005,0.9829201,0.000026447797,0.0034011905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030404103,0.001172329,0.1409268,0.00024259344,0.00002484533,0.00014654941,0.00086810236,0.712571,0.08875136,0.048392806,0.0028377546,0.0010254534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031135758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009148799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93452734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017932096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035748264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25244352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620589543","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4775","title":"Practical Argumentation as Reasoned Advocacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06384779590266558,"score_gpt":0.3608316463736511,"score_spread":0.2969838504709855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620589543","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20677926,0.000021315529,0.5862162,0.006159041,0.0019482397,0.00058693695,0.0000015453967,0.00030599034,0.19798146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98076737,0.000008421337,0.01779444,0.00054255646,0.0000919519,0.000013264413,0.0000046446517,0.000002575161,0.0007747817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992193,0.000022499933,0.00019671857,0.00014073696,0.0002426044,0.00017815194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990232,0.00003543778,0.00027752793,0.0005342629,0.00005664187,0.00007294218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002809038,0.00008015598,0.000084825886,0.000037194008,0.00038231327,0.0004878026,0.0004485563,0.000056660796,0.000051658117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025244252,0.000065324835,0.00003894245,0.000034048222,0.00002395674,0.0028429374,0.00016708477,0.00007823973,0.001133723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049651462,0.0001366285,0.013162944,0.000041167787,0.00003249746,0.00007667078,0.002499326,0.000071691415,0.0009483731,0.9002231,0.005470832,0.07728712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032424247,0.0007247467,0.7517793,0.000088563065,0.000024243545,0.00037173863,0.00031142373,0.1541136,0.0077099837,0.0097897565,0.070983894,0.0008603169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016757437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007778995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022505828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072210416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620705614","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4769","title":"Others and Imagination in Reasoning and Argumentation: Improving our Critical Creative Capacity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04429160259314795,"score_gpt":0.37812391927707684,"score_spread":0.3338323166839289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620705614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526777,0.000048797287,0.00050330727,0.01558026,0.00024531333,0.00015010925,0.0000015601262,0.000031020518,0.13076194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941657,0.000025332034,0.0049167387,0.0005991898,0.00004583182,0.000009810568,8.3085985e-7,0.0000017380316,0.00023483088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948967,0.000035882487,0.00010330009,0.00008791808,0.00013018386,0.00015303641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997229,0.000050592127,0.000040115592,0.000053442138,0.000060461556,0.000072505325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005938841,0.000047584894,0.000060586175,0.000034404547,0.0007023568,0.0003268711,0.000069667716,0.00004122561,0.000029146659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015569223,0.000044931217,0.0000074010986,0.000027718266,0.00025590858,0.0007918792,0.000032821343,0.00008813952,0.000005135709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075073262,0.000021811647,0.09383296,0.000021671578,0.0000030244557,0.0000023733344,0.055131618,4.3544807e-7,0.000023591349,0.8098755,0.000029852414,0.041049637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044054887,0.0000411372,0.8674911,0.00007447346,0.0000075171292,0.0000039972506,0.06829144,0.0002986942,0.000108767905,0.061030284,0.0020077894,0.0002042275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001275703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030570387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77365816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051288167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006260532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54020315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620736329","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4818","title":"Steering into the Skid: On the Norms of Critical Thinking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Critical thinking; Critical systems thinking; Focus (optics); Cognition; Vertical thinking; Parallel thinking; Metacognition; Cognitive bias; Psychology; Epistemology; Convergent thinking; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Creative thinking; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05827330696616093,"score_gpt":0.3730733906668486,"score_spread":0.3148000837006876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620736329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20387545,0.000031242475,0.0002803393,0.123972595,0.0011572166,0.00019140683,8.8229325e-7,0.000047060512,0.6704438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943685,0.000015063784,0.00040378087,0.0044118003,0.00013563888,0.000011281699,3.610989e-7,0.0000024281646,0.00065118016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910855,0.00004457659,0.00016036262,0.00006332262,0.0004158364,0.00020732124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904615,0.00048387964,0.000059001093,0.00027327152,0.00008742459,0.00005026225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013847648,0.000057752226,0.0000693621,0.00001580878,0.0027737303,0.0002638497,0.000793212,0.000050735296,0.00030872694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026985707,0.000027985125,0.00004233813,0.000044338838,0.00080987025,0.00022300718,0.000119253484,0.00018585243,0.00009840815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025442146,0.0000156892,0.0006273709,0.0000058852024,0.0000032034839,4.7386348e-7,0.05322959,0.000002778386,0.000002412379,0.94099236,0.00018411543,0.0049335817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001540215,0.00009776767,0.048147555,0.00012805325,0.000015150153,0.0000015515334,0.06290327,0.000069719244,0.0004986059,0.6944309,0.19330087,0.00025253266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040133556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002803377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.790493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028591383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012537237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621191120","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4925","title":"Rethinking Rhetorical Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy: The Living Art of Michael C. Leff","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Rhetorical criticism; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10375970710132104,"score_gpt":0.320933486726976,"score_spread":0.21717377962565498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621191120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08139912,0.0014298119,0.00018712359,0.0027202724,0.00048637026,0.00011802214,0.0000064826186,0.00004751506,0.9136053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98393464,0.00026372564,0.000053869382,0.0005510938,0.00018791204,0.000009461868,7.5675e-7,0.000004662154,0.014993877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994077,0.000041197265,0.00021534624,0.00006647142,0.00012677946,0.00014248096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988544,0.00040659524,0.00016938552,0.00044438933,0.00010319061,0.000022014598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005402531,0.00008786514,0.00014873123,0.000022169046,0.0015972164,0.00020675694,0.00041830717,0.000032414213,0.00022133626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027041844,0.000052085423,0.000048160742,0.0000065632867,0.0007719925,0.00032402045,0.0004111677,0.00015610289,0.000037150312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007894225,0.000010916142,0.0007422042,0.0000150712185,0.000021555757,4.1734373e-7,0.070647046,3.6121418e-7,0.0000022135607,0.9241641,0.0010540393,0.003334142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023740927,0.00016426016,0.01889701,0.00011504625,0.000053389864,0.000013288479,0.031143826,0.00015375786,0.000024248016,0.13838282,0.8105569,0.00025806803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006463651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001252458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062292584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015780342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265966170","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2582","title":"Pinto's Argument, Inferences and Dialectic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0688627130124364,"score_gpt":0.25771830160705134,"score_spread":0.18885558859461493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265966170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23773582,0.00028086745,0.000018091238,0.0023630864,0.000455128,0.00011337214,0.000013452533,0.00009913187,0.758921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265337,0.00018250722,0.000022729331,0.0027159788,0.0007326396,0.000010552179,0.000010084524,0.0000047465355,0.0036674154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992622,0.000017278955,0.00019732065,0.00010618067,0.00012767239,0.0002893429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996433,0.00007166763,0.000038284816,0.000087268396,0.000034831206,0.00012460083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006945662,0.000119787845,0.00013042509,0.000046824018,0.00021309083,0.00016101822,0.00009797797,0.000039100458,0.005673017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004131638,0.000082297156,0.000046886544,0.000029959903,0.00026966404,0.00033189007,0.000061106075,0.00012947644,0.0004844524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019424,0.000038416518,0.0014911155,0.0000132083,0.0000128966485,0.0000068114014,0.0012449358,6.789214e-7,0.0000016140119,0.99251115,0.00025303307,0.004405939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025794262,0.00022547759,0.002736916,0.00001484518,0.000014698737,0.000018648549,0.000259667,0.000051838495,0.000011727982,0.23333834,0.7628991,0.00017079207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008655192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006240674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7626461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008324687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000102514305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753979396","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4947","title":"Précis of The Concept of Argument. A Philosophical Foundation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical and Historical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Pragmatism; Hegelianism; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.072907862517752,"score_gpt":0.32785812691765004,"score_spread":0.25495026439989804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753979396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11361805,0.00016609489,0.000041416322,0.033731647,0.0007086577,0.00028181507,0.000010862403,0.000024162837,0.8514173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992068,0.000029141685,0.000040290743,0.00018583916,0.00018648122,0.0000048933484,5.5619387e-7,0.0000013483157,0.00034467992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922913,0.000028881457,0.0002104361,0.000060823433,0.00033662052,0.00013413078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993302,0.000045932673,0.00028803447,0.00019212757,0.00010333077,0.000040371848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021050361,0.000052228275,0.00014096421,0.00001264082,0.0009050348,0.000019880108,0.0004770733,0.000065345375,0.00012272235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065902685,0.000031772932,0.00009043202,0.000057901587,0.0013699619,0.0002191503,0.00016353987,0.000088863,0.000015114985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001618313,0.000038443693,0.0031774768,0.0000067476826,0.000011484616,2.4278293e-7,0.0023763159,0.000002604098,0.00002961532,0.990298,0.000120697805,0.0039221914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044965756,0.00017280468,0.08248999,0.000032126925,0.00002741731,3.9858926e-7,0.00026199385,0.0000150471415,0.00038164755,0.76407576,0.15195674,0.00013641415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013507993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003346526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005096469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69608873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755085426","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4698","title":"Does Rhetoric Have a Place in Wohlrapp’s Theory of Argument?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Happening; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Work (physics); Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.026522504754625066,"score_gpt":0.3008078491970462,"score_spread":0.2742853444424211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755085426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6180905,0.00011945157,0.00013648126,0.000057790166,0.0006902806,0.00016042027,0.00001369255,0.000023388355,0.38070798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905627,0.000018953588,0.000069654285,0.0002734856,0.00009031584,0.000039693394,0.0000100448,0.0000065444533,0.008928637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991648,0.00006234434,0.00026933284,0.00013026546,0.000122034326,0.00025119184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919057,0.00007120643,0.00023191127,0.0004334987,0.000033611766,0.000039219274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004972323,0.00011081212,0.00017943267,0.00010714849,0.00008405052,0.00003348102,0.00030332786,0.00012163847,0.0014865051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010310089,0.00006545505,0.000068284186,0.000039877767,0.0001082403,0.00025708278,0.00006659155,0.00015271467,0.0002722984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024431038,0.0007712736,0.096290275,0.00015976714,0.0002577276,0.0002507039,0.047881663,0.000017155937,0.0011097182,0.6166461,0.0013230119,0.23284948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006139767,0.000730967,0.8484108,0.00012975666,0.000091119684,0.000044810404,0.022328567,0.00005584173,0.004860648,0.09753774,0.018930681,0.0007393202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017796498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012502079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7521205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016281205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018192188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755107964","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4936","title":"Wohlrapp's concept of justification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Foundation (evidence); Principal (computer security); Section (typography); Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13700339787255736,"score_gpt":0.3094114464042696,"score_spread":0.17240804853171224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755107964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103041664,0.00013615625,0.000121061305,0.0006119239,0.0012383835,0.00012793651,0.000036717673,0.000043103424,0.89464307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904831,0.0000110529745,0.00008201519,0.0003123292,0.0003202459,0.000005118172,0.00001593294,0.0000036981328,0.0087665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995079,0.000011791046,0.00020266318,0.00006585915,0.000090157635,0.00012164627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991969,0.00003591556,0.0002774446,0.00032683078,0.00013734298,0.000025594303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015570881,0.00006745346,0.00013092,0.000025868787,0.00039691932,0.00008559105,0.00025514018,0.000054195163,0.0003463686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086533735,0.000053497268,0.00005998765,0.000004671961,0.0008785009,0.0003864555,0.00004163259,0.0001139822,0.000111447625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008209903,0.000017090902,0.00015685215,0.00003125617,0.000011827912,6.0454835e-7,0.01605745,0.0000061076103,0.00004441297,0.9763022,0.0009234232,0.006440582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007757642,0.00032558342,0.012674322,0.000050703904,0.00007162574,0.0000036363747,0.010036788,0.00017529746,0.0046921005,0.05142664,0.9193921,0.00037540344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017346416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012544091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92487556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000043377013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026199246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3792493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755214255","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4832","title":"Issues of Logicism and Objectivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.10860358335288248,"score_gpt":0.31582165329602374,"score_spread":0.20721806994314126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755214255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4398731,0.00026599978,0.000015821348,0.00044789902,0.00046017717,0.00007377605,0.000015674916,0.00002756694,0.55882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927175,0.0000832722,0.000087084016,0.0002948476,0.00025307073,0.0000027749893,0.0000022767638,0.000003399349,0.0065557403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995369,0.000015680913,0.00015175405,0.00007764095,0.000082245715,0.00013579543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993991,0.000049668848,0.00018486755,0.00025071413,0.00008680293,0.000028809414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002566775,0.00008249155,0.00018597409,0.000026406593,0.00044541748,0.00010741205,0.00016506191,0.000059292885,0.00012787837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011524201,0.00006059879,0.00004802084,0.000003499031,0.0010036774,0.000441875,0.00010035533,0.00012909262,0.000030281417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013384497,0.00002330888,0.003133721,0.00006312404,0.000018008903,0.0000025685583,0.013631414,9.239323e-7,0.00003740495,0.9781772,0.00025183527,0.004647141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000976448,0.00087651977,0.12681578,0.00007311489,0.00007479386,0.000016047037,0.0067685843,0.000097837605,0.0021253538,0.3493587,0.51226443,0.0005523658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064519263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057318725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62881845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000028546506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000143292145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3698091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755429351","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4952","title":"Arguing with People","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05979987672591862,"score_gpt":0.3168351917202865,"score_spread":0.2570353149943679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755429351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17652273,0.00002374117,0.00001606498,0.008599117,0.00007557731,0.0000662818,0.0000019308543,0.00004775747,0.8146468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714184,0.00002818482,0.00017189002,0.00034439185,0.00026066767,0.0000057175307,7.186291e-7,0.0000014373604,0.002045136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994859,0.000008543911,0.00006597039,0.00005971845,0.00017683924,0.00020301237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968356,0.00002254491,0.000075050964,0.00010269979,0.000049901548,0.000066218956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012550599,0.00005363301,0.00008210916,0.000006656386,0.0023846766,0.00014299892,0.0002664573,0.000033655517,0.00014267092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014517593,0.000030185625,0.000024947138,0.0000364612,0.0002935725,0.00039263003,0.00007510374,0.000070426104,0.00013039111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041047722,0.000018828032,0.08332896,0.000008387264,0.000024979168,0.000009211805,0.02450321,0.000009619565,0.0000062878285,0.87606144,0.00071559404,0.015272429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039663722,0.00023060509,0.33381227,0.000026783056,0.000017484515,0.00000374091,0.00761198,0.000014800719,0.000016300954,0.042796973,0.6146952,0.00037723922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001370045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032148282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83326447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012566372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021207605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756336057","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4831","title":"Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13724992406290487,"score_gpt":0.31345534933186914,"score_spread":0.17620542526896427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756336057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93542707,0.000017360639,0.01512781,0.0044397563,0.0034227083,0.00051920285,0.000014565317,0.000085858745,0.04094564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981768,0.000004163644,0.00034691647,0.0011683508,0.00013286508,0.00000819528,0.0000017162289,0.0000019907677,0.00015899519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992805,0.000038198603,0.00021802401,0.00009177961,0.00022475718,0.00014672847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989099,0.000068785885,0.0002763931,0.00067969155,0.000034261488,0.00003098719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037032942,0.00007666939,0.00010671779,0.000032324617,0.0003015124,0.00020625746,0.0009830846,0.000042086987,0.000021103258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009010487,0.00004648916,0.000052449574,0.000024479825,0.000040476396,0.0008190227,0.0002517412,0.00006726758,0.0001162306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006905137,0.00019701727,0.0072181006,0.000077892175,0.00004654087,0.000013639406,0.0030181764,0.00016345376,0.0039513772,0.9485937,0.010367314,0.026283763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046905666,0.0018830671,0.69311863,0.0003514804,0.000028918264,0.000029746057,0.00023548797,0.09210493,0.08101929,0.030761033,0.094650075,0.0011267645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087703396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004043754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010619309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015723497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.231902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772945850","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.4794","title":"Critical Thinking, Bias and Feminist Philosophy: Building a Better Framework through Collaboration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Feminist philosophy; Feminist epistemology; Context (archaeology); Argumentation theory; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08604922485623656,"score_gpt":0.4057764351434814,"score_spread":0.3197272102872448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772945850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12613145,0.00012299894,0.003163242,0.16663778,0.0020512713,0.00028063267,0.000007434326,0.00018201474,0.70142317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93581843,0.000044117627,0.047334153,0.01603488,0.00056483294,0.000015770629,0.0000022259462,0.0000045112224,0.00018107494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889183,0.000052446918,0.00021088775,0.0001537565,0.00038786442,0.00030322283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914503,0.0002986416,0.000082591236,0.00020496921,0.00014883823,0.00011994547],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070905784,0.00010009402,0.00012171951,0.00002729554,0.0032731807,0.0012735131,0.0003274626,0.00017532868,0.00022718812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004043859,0.00008979444,0.000029069215,0.000077278455,0.00076523866,0.00094785634,0.000112495356,0.00022924278,0.00006996908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004929471,0.00001784142,0.0075778216,0.000013408196,0.000004559096,0.0000033927527,0.025811782,2.0805989e-7,0.0000016331493,0.96464217,0.00041214548,0.0015101001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007917328,0.000029348706,0.005713975,0.00007871938,0.0000074160293,0.0000018965726,0.0032463984,0.000006248219,0.000029720648,0.84442234,0.14624059,0.0001441993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110212386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003817296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.809687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044873723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019589736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773386742","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5004","title":"Replies to Commentators on The Concept of Argument: Clarifying Themes, Answering Questions, Settling Objections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07314665647232202,"score_gpt":0.29741403196889993,"score_spread":0.2242673754965779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773386742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4293555,0.00016760643,0.00015420245,0.01614182,0.0024097525,0.00051376305,0.00008395058,0.000116929594,0.55105644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997341,0.000013100978,0.000112371206,0.0018688822,0.00028796392,0.000035770176,0.000009776526,0.000005215103,0.00032596683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994439,0.000018103983,0.0002145512,0.000076516415,0.00010967177,0.0001372621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929154,0.000086889726,0.00017916638,0.0003637648,0.00004765926,0.000030956766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001880787,0.000086776476,0.000090326335,0.000051891857,0.001763984,0.00025995407,0.00025762574,0.00002805124,0.00033510072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121928824,0.000059032,0.00004367519,0.0000146303755,0.0001872536,0.0004384429,0.00006959507,0.00015087613,0.000052626772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008300631,0.000022085367,0.00018259097,0.0000075717307,0.000019165287,2.279951e-7,0.030928494,0.00014494285,0.000014555357,0.96575534,0.0013612198,0.0015555072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008650473,0.0009981684,0.013671364,0.00091218343,0.00014280414,0.000015925134,0.099333525,0.0004986249,0.010610392,0.25843582,0.6135097,0.0010064344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002640027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060739967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021512296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019040683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773477493","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5002","title":"Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1239838527647903,"score_gpt":0.36335270645482604,"score_spread":0.23936885369003574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773477493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6075208,0.000050971827,0.3591991,0.0008572477,0.00047323652,0.00056600996,0.000015182255,0.0001270465,0.031190397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164647,0.000006758791,0.007400133,0.00033377536,0.000047862148,0.000021543274,0.000014870469,0.0000031033721,0.0005255045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914724,0.00010222005,0.00023103078,0.00017164198,0.00019215002,0.00015572464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998433,0.00026322337,0.00083894195,0.00034985394,0.000054178734,0.00006079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007292302,0.00010031821,0.00009793395,0.000060256032,0.0006911636,0.0006178537,0.00036261696,0.00004931029,0.000027595697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044926468,0.0000834673,0.000028104118,0.000039800158,0.00006786174,0.0039011564,0.00017331293,0.00009420663,0.00009612597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004880512,0.000044759425,0.06334265,0.000038342157,0.00003059526,0.000009031786,0.006269449,0.000037373633,0.0012993845,0.9172429,0.00018852338,0.0114481775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086779107,0.00013772341,0.97030646,0.000021486456,0.000012362193,0.00003949602,0.0008300327,0.012826279,0.00059540366,0.01302516,0.0011319122,0.00020590966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072897696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016251244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90696377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025923491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002485123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5957978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785825067","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.5169","title":"Informalizing Formal Logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Deductive reasoning; Logical consequence; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Non-classical logic; Informal logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Classical logic; Theory; Epistemology; Automated reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02538945278425951,"score_gpt":0.24697318777810867,"score_spread":0.22158373499384915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785825067","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2568453,0.00014071133,0.42231414,0.00031171305,0.002512563,0.00084603456,0.0000040363598,0.0007031242,0.3163224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892721,0.0000105132585,0.007613044,0.0017875368,0.00008246772,0.000014151222,0.000010650685,0.0000054632787,0.0012040415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984496,0.000019242467,0.00045146764,0.00018896403,0.0003534679,0.0005372275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990872,0.000038099573,0.0002126788,0.00048477427,0.00007537344,0.0001018421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045174683,0.00017290837,0.00019026338,0.00014923952,0.00013958992,0.00021548098,0.0007556622,0.0001151642,0.000177165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021992353,0.0001350327,0.000100691665,0.0002741049,0.000016298774,0.004735473,0.00037733818,0.00015727934,0.003430808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019098698,0.00003864143,0.016404122,0.00012115333,0.000022364085,0.000010907991,0.0019336238,0.0026667702,0.0005673207,0.9425644,0.0007194934,0.034932103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038058823,0.001216748,0.16583888,0.00014093229,0.000014692772,0.00034614926,0.0005112655,0.58137923,0.0033893047,0.004312781,0.23728128,0.0017628714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038263504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046857263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037155103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051016337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789852890","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5071","title":"The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Audience reception; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Media studies","score_opus":0.041919641714042985,"score_gpt":0.3335044616917954,"score_spread":0.2915848199777524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789852890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3087784,0.0010295827,0.000009370554,0.0037189827,0.00035385802,0.0002220951,0.000027796117,0.000013622611,0.68584627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834967,0.0001389972,0.000029834571,0.00038774463,0.00043101743,0.000010047895,0.0000023439734,0.0000021791095,0.0006481752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940205,0.00003539582,0.0002001639,0.00006334442,0.00019483961,0.000104223225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990098,0.000132817,0.00055940216,0.00009497086,0.00019503215,0.000008011426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003288697,0.00007102534,0.0001062878,0.000023214181,0.0006881446,0.000052336996,0.00015480026,0.000025126872,0.00023213765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121926605,0.00003219752,0.000046587193,0.00003868048,0.0019008435,0.00029282257,0.00009269928,0.00011554489,0.000009466388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053339936,0.000023756662,0.0001256323,0.000017710718,0.00016412258,2.3581957e-7,0.15468475,9.2549243e-7,0.000022645898,0.8394499,0.0010346094,0.0044223536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069296104,0.0013596123,0.006964348,0.000100430974,0.0004645556,0.000003963811,0.69325924,0.00013027551,0.0014499562,0.070015945,0.22520947,0.00034924486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000485303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003626118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.769434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072952785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011723715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7003737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790117762","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5067","title":"The Bullshit Doctrine: Fabrications, Lies, and Nonsense in the Age of Trump","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Doctrine; Nonsense; Collusion; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Economics; Theology","score_opus":0.03645614700779369,"score_gpt":0.3229511440454775,"score_spread":0.2864949970376838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790117762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41824472,0.00010005032,0.00003778362,0.0051402017,0.00009364294,0.00024418355,0.000004323429,0.000019050092,0.576116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687845,0.0002803603,0.000065715634,0.0017826125,0.000065023225,0.0000021131355,0.0000026524435,9.947131e-7,0.0009220804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992897,0.00006535398,0.00021358008,0.000033986576,0.00021689551,0.00018048406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994608,0.00023406112,0.000090555826,0.00013320077,0.00004903186,0.000032358443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011763608,0.00004611104,0.000058035446,0.000043235847,0.00045677682,0.000110398534,0.00023085627,0.00004118045,0.00006663045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046128643,0.000024062298,0.000018305967,0.00021636796,0.0005099277,0.0002813505,0.000028979257,0.000075417505,0.00008127639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006692453,0.000036526333,0.0030243106,0.000013450957,0.000009599596,0.000002378601,0.2651135,0.0000049976134,0.000028445782,0.6434739,0.019510636,0.068715274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024364826,0.000107153886,0.1087485,0.0000067114997,0.0000036538897,0.000005899999,0.03087413,0.00006231218,0.000044027398,0.0019368264,0.85789114,0.000076017874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046662745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011934665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83838046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012152354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083029154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35132042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790829410","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5068","title":"Fake News: A Definition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":456,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Fake news; Phrase; Presentation (obstetrics); News media; Internet privacy; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Social media; Law; Business","score_opus":0.09240612773996595,"score_gpt":0.33929819352687574,"score_spread":0.24689206578690978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790829410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08393072,0.0000059635304,0.00052663067,0.00068507914,0.00026522123,0.000085420426,0.0000027716512,0.00011502254,0.9143832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99066734,0.0000343488,0.000727401,0.0062373765,0.00037311445,0.0000012459453,0.0000080003165,0.000002148881,0.0019490279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992924,0.000020538784,0.00015782527,0.000041804884,0.00023513718,0.00025234473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996113,0.000022810329,0.00006591118,0.00008229858,0.00009994392,0.000117726515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000299629,0.000052614952,0.000055291377,0.000060805007,0.0004089399,0.00011328729,0.00012433795,0.000072256495,0.0025037243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029853577,0.00004398885,0.000030413943,0.00019765037,0.00019294747,0.0009981754,0.000021075357,0.00005615164,0.0040775808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023271521,0.000016170316,0.00041700448,0.000005233009,0.000004851916,9.0638116e-7,0.06725179,0.0000019420752,0.0000115563325,0.84426385,0.020881375,0.06712206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002913541,0.00017269369,0.0074574896,0.0000100317975,0.0000037194998,0.0000037386976,0.01641498,0.00007046172,0.00008820226,0.009490287,0.96584296,0.00015410727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033937505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006442751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94496155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002722493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011422877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792140173","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5070","title":"Critical Review: On Reasoning and Argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Sociology; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.08499954083385157,"score_gpt":0.31517669242290136,"score_spread":0.23017715158904978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792140173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014538776,0.0031610087,0.000033490323,0.0027253337,0.00091809186,0.00014749146,0.000010209175,0.00007202699,0.97839355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94904333,0.0016461904,0.0003621202,0.040467102,0.0017478558,0.000019105704,0.000011147746,0.000011040223,0.006692119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999391,0.000026384694,0.00017799466,0.000099392586,0.00011091742,0.00019430561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954426,0.0001024248,0.000041354477,0.00012874145,0.00012677586,0.000056445926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031509247,0.000092857925,0.0001500714,0.000024602388,0.00027276957,0.000064571046,0.00007072225,0.00004006659,0.00061777333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025483593,0.000066826,0.000039367595,0.000011719759,0.0007121189,0.00019864975,0.00003957766,0.00016370519,0.00042561634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008844732,0.00001578769,0.000033970355,0.00018079675,0.000006928319,0.000002501589,0.0032696342,5.7146824e-8,0.0000017212827,0.9871895,0.005692172,0.0035981224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012372268,0.0005996961,0.00026487754,0.00045782025,0.000027751199,0.000009377657,0.00052471773,0.000025457475,0.00005195297,0.014216294,0.9835529,0.00014546695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021168731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041902535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073323354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000146538305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6764184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793411805","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.4959","title":"Trump, Snakes and the Power of Fables","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Immigration; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Narrative; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04332035917595582,"score_gpt":0.24120870936498154,"score_spread":0.19788835018902573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793411805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07417329,0.0008276751,0.000026449297,0.0007457787,0.00014166607,0.00006109631,0.000006295942,0.00001861945,0.92399913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993874,0.00014160552,0.000046098423,0.0006129417,0.000075983095,0.000005772103,8.508947e-7,0.0000014692666,0.0052412907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971414,0.000011732176,0.00012371558,0.000027153459,0.000057735513,0.00006552853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996533,0.00006462441,0.000057510413,0.00013158814,0.00008461954,0.00000835709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011942234,0.000042316045,0.00008429577,0.000014635101,0.00027597757,0.00003392427,0.00011169079,0.000010630167,0.0006228897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018087403,0.000020519965,0.0000204703,0.000011588596,0.0011041292,0.00011425083,0.00008095118,0.000032271226,0.000049842576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000285251,0.0000045751226,0.00014201314,0.0000028050115,0.000014779679,2.8744825e-8,0.0431448,9.985254e-8,4.7610112e-7,0.95157945,0.003308469,0.0017739886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042375128,0.00012088531,0.0019850659,0.0000060434536,0.000009521541,0.0000014459554,0.021524338,0.000025771262,0.000026310876,0.012444916,0.9633726,0.00005935731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006134427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000773571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001369509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051604343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6820206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793839647","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5069","title":"Donald Trump as a Critical-Thinking Teaching Assistant","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Rhetoric; Section (typography); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041633542909469086,"score_gpt":0.37929798252933267,"score_spread":0.3376644396198636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793839647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047704503,0.000029965626,0.001527288,0.034561276,0.0012643764,0.00011392033,0.000001344519,0.00023882904,0.9145585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96069294,0.000008863353,0.011583821,0.024201883,0.00063878775,0.000012939093,0.0000030271965,0.00000631015,0.002851452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983603,0.000114610375,0.0002746852,0.0001536544,0.000598663,0.0004980875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914044,0.00029500393,0.000040637708,0.0001302777,0.00017104496,0.00022258476],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017176905,0.00010399536,0.00011727123,0.0000697506,0.0019670913,0.0003032527,0.00033449454,0.00011249934,0.0022523182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027406092,0.0000901621,0.000057895046,0.00016075396,0.0005845903,0.00043660664,0.000077975776,0.00028872982,0.0014211093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007746689,0.00003825504,0.00048129706,0.0000065243294,0.000005370337,0.000003976996,0.031100033,1.2236308e-7,0.000013517956,0.95808315,0.0020733913,0.008186603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009955303,0.000086677,0.0021106547,0.000050088565,0.000007671905,0.0000060070397,0.009189452,0.00001377464,0.00008188687,0.28141177,0.706747,0.00019550289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033075904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016222679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009922872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039444552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798608906","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.429","title":"Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rebuttal; Demonstrative; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.13417846293780228,"score_gpt":0.26761529086573543,"score_spread":0.13343682792793315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798608906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7600005,0.00015403824,0.00011727738,0.00081189914,0.00022682417,0.00030643446,0.00003588087,0.00005858717,0.2382885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993351,0.00006877097,0.00024765663,0.0014400602,0.00016526852,0.0000300476,0.000009007545,0.0000044936373,0.0046836846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993046,0.000033903212,0.00021101903,0.00011675271,0.00013047525,0.00020327437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994826,0.000114013084,0.00008408221,0.00018153738,0.000095692805,0.00004209988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024020382,0.00011765673,0.00014321541,0.000018599156,0.0005454075,0.000047691537,0.00012282752,0.00005085738,0.000105746534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004879404,0.00006847588,0.000053845557,0.000015176709,0.000987731,0.00025982092,0.00007026854,0.00023172106,0.00003688304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017141057,0.000047998805,0.0004098183,0.000026859163,0.000021587077,0.0000016414332,0.06841873,0.00024159308,0.0000028697082,0.929101,0.00070235407,0.0010083974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011941361,0.0008609268,0.008501417,0.000036030604,0.000091566086,0.000041491596,0.015632853,0.008684698,0.00022496386,0.6288345,0.33507755,0.0008199066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009659121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034540572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3343752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015263611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004850327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4194889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805271339","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4805","title":"Analogical Arguments in Persuasive and Deliberative Contexts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Analogy; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Humanities; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02370223664687113,"score_gpt":0.2755125901704127,"score_spread":0.25181035352354153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805271339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9267265,0.000077929864,0.056611966,0.00020977303,0.00027064796,0.00026131945,0.0000019638646,0.000053648044,0.015786218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969053,0.0000073636456,0.0020991038,0.0007961457,0.000048761613,0.0000057552234,0.0000018363161,0.0000013966741,0.00013431862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993189,0.000031841464,0.00019485358,0.00015234547,0.00012564177,0.0001764195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996678,0.000029739253,0.00006796483,0.000116728785,0.000062414954,0.00005534813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017171462,0.0000818091,0.00010610833,0.00007325208,0.000077906574,0.00008241405,0.00017445437,0.00005349836,0.00002790569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003098909,0.000060466606,0.000018343882,0.00013197922,0.000052507545,0.00068421965,0.000117417665,0.00006451948,0.00010753329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001365315,0.00028697128,0.14491798,0.0000581601,0.00006895486,0.00012997829,0.059339087,0.000122065474,0.0019644587,0.6189879,0.0016272079,0.17236067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021529768,0.0010715164,0.8925956,0.000055509052,0.0000038071921,0.000060534716,0.0004667608,0.09408966,0.0012970549,0.0033887073,0.004399193,0.00041871425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042262698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006196414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74767756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002118165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001650888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24657565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811066564","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4966","title":"The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Monash University","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Humanities; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.048758547514344705,"score_gpt":0.2748051771569413,"score_spread":0.22604662964259659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811066564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16622715,0.00027868885,0.00020265284,0.0006227726,0.0019524888,0.00018192091,0.000016131866,0.00004634209,0.8304719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167824,0.00003200892,0.00005519219,0.00082526624,0.00062954455,0.000007284549,0.0000064706264,0.0000057935777,0.0067602065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918526,0.000036640864,0.00030938428,0.000075823205,0.00016095267,0.0002319423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992553,0.00013668583,0.00016730881,0.00023480206,0.00017290292,0.000032989163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003894667,0.000095511685,0.00013431792,0.00002385733,0.0004768071,0.00005332612,0.0002696246,0.00004819782,0.00026302136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063695785,0.00005608963,0.000069598704,0.000021882985,0.0014598008,0.0001859047,0.00007324713,0.00012954255,0.00031498916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019508236,0.000016280177,0.0003525689,0.00002495331,0.000031053376,4.4007515e-7,0.013763606,0.0000021319054,0.000022893093,0.9808091,0.0004281334,0.004529346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051087607,0.0008928528,0.0030111063,0.000037147267,0.000057580728,0.0000061210926,0.008782393,0.00040997876,0.0007046833,0.17250694,0.8127998,0.00028047856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011450205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007546678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009984103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023428109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5378697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883212704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4849","title":"Teaching as Abductive Reasoning: The Role of Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Humanities; Philosophy; Defeasible reasoning; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019336360398957936,"score_gpt":0.34437514950171616,"score_spread":0.32503878910275824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883212704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23945917,0.000023132792,0.00015075131,0.0025520758,0.00026212327,0.00009914123,3.7640692e-7,0.00003083067,0.7574224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950709,0.0000065609406,0.0018735508,0.0013189395,0.00019441411,0.0000068037707,0.0000015304024,0.0000015128645,0.0015257932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994312,0.00006227777,0.00011675634,0.000048092472,0.00021329573,0.0001283762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967456,0.0000833433,0.000052285584,0.000058946654,0.0000950695,0.00003582026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069110334,0.000035133937,0.000040950334,0.000020703907,0.0005124247,0.000035135028,0.00013943373,0.000030353996,0.00036453226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004962186,0.000024014427,0.000019740939,0.0000817079,0.00027907593,0.00019249684,0.000022692619,0.000080389735,0.00017028829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040473146,0.000012665816,0.0011363542,9.897337e-7,0.000003865891,4.5306688e-8,0.08554945,3.17221e-7,0.000032450258,0.8987423,0.00007240857,0.014445087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010113788,0.00011530292,0.008425317,0.00002635336,0.000009081896,0.0000017302075,0.17434454,0.000025974876,0.0020456396,0.4524359,0.3623587,0.000110319066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010025199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009659787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7558966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032394106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015477625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39913726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883283813","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4697","title":"On Arguments from Ignorance","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05066091741788435,"score_gpt":0.27722849165826985,"score_spread":0.22656757424038548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883283813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45021674,0.0015599289,0.33966413,0.0029283469,0.025916798,0.0007221462,0.00010492816,0.00025804626,0.17862894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818402,0.00003406063,0.0037051141,0.0035708356,0.0011288914,0.000009805223,0.000014506101,0.0000072894168,0.0096893115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984568,0.000057887584,0.00039160953,0.0002937614,0.0003758051,0.00042417794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896264,0.00007575628,0.00022528236,0.0004831283,0.0001246885,0.00012847925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023789138,0.00019473754,0.00017887792,0.00006341327,0.00021298739,0.0002506998,0.0005560778,0.00015900396,0.0009027816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051870164,0.0001737613,0.000074809526,0.00021606879,0.000106698906,0.0012858105,0.00016111587,0.00014973499,0.0139931515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010699737,0.0003691191,0.006183576,0.00008650897,0.00009446135,0.000059045087,0.007900553,0.0006423132,0.00052216044,0.7090023,0.033285275,0.2417477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002321415,0.0020601908,0.14220607,0.0006608962,0.000026823931,0.000024960167,0.00007833372,0.29077023,0.0056459773,0.020475963,0.5347609,0.0009682468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008882811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007472484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68852633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058642647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054310913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890699443","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5120","title":"Response to Groarke : Figuring Sound","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Music Technology and Sound Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sound (geography); Figuring; Position (finance); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Acoustics; Economics","score_opus":0.026911985796171406,"score_gpt":0.26233640676762304,"score_spread":0.23542442097145164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890699443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73691624,0.000031543514,0.1847016,0.0031579535,0.000578083,0.0001122317,0.00000105229,0.0005219091,0.07397936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818632,0.0000011295933,0.012801263,0.0041038278,0.00006382629,0.000012734517,1.6668373e-7,0.0000020790433,0.0011517861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999262,0.000021049447,0.0001464025,0.00015661296,0.00011957169,0.00029439063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.00007825433,0.00003241056,0.0003962118,0.000059496084,0.000053762265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043119112,0.00008921445,0.00009620186,0.00012134189,0.00034788935,0.00006721201,0.0006861117,0.000071773684,0.00003799157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020638917,0.00007212498,0.0000306694,0.00029039974,0.00013218458,0.00034419209,0.00056691136,0.00009782758,0.0009997771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053410046,0.000058327154,0.004447461,0.000014069253,0.000057216173,0.000080144695,0.02422697,0.000035793277,0.0006421638,0.8757504,0.02180948,0.07234387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062282855,0.00169036,0.1179914,0.000024246003,0.00000510716,0.00011268763,0.00038513864,0.0015873816,0.001685541,0.077653155,0.7976423,0.0005998529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005032789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016363376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79809725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017494382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023738403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890742554","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5223","title":"Can we translate sounds into words? A response to Leo Groarke`'s \"Auditory Arguments: The Logic of ‘Sound’ Arguments\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Sound (geography); Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; sort; Computer science; Function (biology); Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.02304738437153613,"score_gpt":0.30708243176281136,"score_spread":0.2840350473912752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890742554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110203,0.0004384503,0.0018973208,0.0027303873,0.0026846584,0.0007478889,0.000054410073,0.00013344952,0.08029315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98748726,0.000024534924,0.0003054275,0.0064986506,0.0005750768,0.00015637741,0.000024659887,0.00002437715,0.0049036117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976377,0.00035034484,0.00063212705,0.00033663944,0.00041549277,0.00062770373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984918,0.0002238969,0.0002529423,0.00066303916,0.00020781344,0.00016049304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011827028,0.00030885317,0.00032919057,0.00025418872,0.0003015831,0.000067488436,0.0005978337,0.00022486055,0.0025340582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014664285,0.0002083511,0.00018926979,0.0005016116,0.00043078777,0.00024623852,0.000093796916,0.00030541036,0.0014896214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047315933,0.0023251239,0.005515529,0.00038461952,0.002362333,0.00036359415,0.59238917,0.00007886088,0.019533537,0.076892555,0.043634765,0.209204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012839854,0.014553228,0.08734219,0.00035683785,0.0008376726,0.00039696586,0.081356294,0.0000780238,0.005541787,0.2834691,0.51024514,0.0029828872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002475371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039453653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5110329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007445341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007366906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890924417","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5050","title":"On Appeals to Nature and their Use in the Public Controversy over Genetically Modified Organisms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Externalism; Natural (archaeology); Genetically modified organism; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.05638102254125447,"score_gpt":0.2573590903537078,"score_spread":0.20097806781245334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890924417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70647585,0.00019899568,0.00013358312,0.0039470205,0.00023273037,0.00031250756,0.000020717587,0.00004414315,0.28863445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796195,0.000037300855,0.000024926794,0.019298537,0.00013822607,0.000017605187,0.0000032552437,0.0000039743004,0.00085667305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994696,0.0000330847,0.00014587794,0.000079491,0.00010503502,0.00016694723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00020753154,0.000037002985,0.00025155584,0.000086693006,0.00003160619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016495053,0.0000970708,0.00010765144,0.00004872645,0.00029070614,0.00028753895,0.00024340024,0.000050057715,0.00018356995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009372144,0.000049633945,0.000021833317,0.000043247346,0.00019927963,0.00020727543,0.0001163455,0.00016807028,0.00008509526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029814792,0.000021091553,0.00010876103,0.000001500014,0.0000112872585,3.5503012e-7,0.022062363,0.0000011418547,0.000006443728,0.9715388,0.0049372157,0.0012812646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005596141,0.00050347776,0.012849528,0.000011242263,0.0000051580414,0.0000030874432,0.010881252,0.00014433068,0.00002140181,0.01258014,0.96224904,0.00019175261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038385013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048342644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010009442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011300722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27727446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891342704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5325","title":"Where Do Sounds Fit Within Informal Logic?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sound (geography); Process (computing); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.08279806609179577,"score_gpt":0.2761235432991167,"score_spread":0.19332547720732093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891342704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024238728,0.00080064166,0.000086558175,0.00043564357,0.00080902874,0.00012532613,0.00001384774,0.00019991568,0.9732903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546284,0.00018864921,0.0002903262,0.002064759,0.0009136925,0.00003214995,0.000010172608,0.000009673482,0.04186215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988751,0.000017825732,0.0004364556,0.000109232824,0.00023306553,0.00032834752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998993,0.000048806058,0.00019480786,0.0004110541,0.0002874703,0.00006487331],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023449765,0.00018942873,0.00020411963,0.00007162547,0.0009776833,0.00032521196,0.00045509636,0.00007245055,0.0040054834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003562853,0.00013406358,0.00008607661,0.000059083417,0.00066464394,0.0008928617,0.00031121986,0.00020671952,0.0027354974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275124,0.000027593833,0.0006312612,0.00001995373,0.000044212386,0.0000011387172,0.062007654,0.000010093257,8.3231646e-7,0.9128034,0.020152338,0.004258765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002823326,0.00033356273,0.00078526844,0.000020604266,0.000012721245,0.000007532917,0.016062584,0.00010632728,0.000009513514,0.004466638,0.977678,0.00023488609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104027524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005912044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020961183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046136112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892164305","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5040","title":"Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Common sense; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04200780743109701,"score_gpt":0.262437827132096,"score_spread":0.220430019700999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892164305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8424468,0.00050366885,0.00025909895,0.00080450485,0.0003147391,0.00026223663,0.000020240032,0.00002053657,0.15536815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997755,0.000114192255,0.0000990957,0.0010292847,0.0001835594,0.000009616664,0.0000037308887,0.0000031068555,0.00080240186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994146,0.000059064696,0.00022324192,0.000080429825,0.00009768149,0.000124943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945414,0.00017885739,0.00013978875,0.0001034146,0.000095176765,0.000028647499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004199663,0.00009220053,0.0001771143,0.000024339142,0.00027064845,0.00004526999,0.00008134251,0.00003388879,0.00010820679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004223214,0.000051930398,0.00003438834,0.00001331758,0.0041619847,0.00021134573,0.0000834708,0.00010873778,0.000014004069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007678822,0.000012915372,0.0006871034,0.000046794026,0.000040236166,2.7186906e-7,0.11845289,3.238067e-7,0.000017041944,0.87828237,0.0000417313,0.0023415547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005332326,0.0022004796,0.014256035,0.00013105964,0.000260504,0.000027585605,0.11462316,0.0009864845,0.0020616557,0.7840339,0.07544539,0.00064139377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023088229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062266807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15530819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005864635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009762502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892296476","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.4954","title":"Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Informal logic; Argument map; Scope (computer science); Sound (geography); Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.028688946484547288,"score_gpt":0.30371640309501113,"score_spread":0.27502745661046385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892296476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4482898,0.00023487491,0.00087193324,0.00013237057,0.0031979738,0.00029740395,0.000022955317,0.000075934404,0.5468767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057066,0.000011766125,0.00011707907,0.004207657,0.00085258076,0.000045960158,0.000026485597,0.000009763767,0.0041580196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987736,0.00008236047,0.00036733996,0.00016525299,0.0002557074,0.00035577704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906343,0.000069385846,0.00023190703,0.00040975754,0.00017144896,0.000054060776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038253938,0.00015484994,0.00017307082,0.00007765138,0.0001519148,0.00002675416,0.0003576493,0.00013594789,0.006110911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007288693,0.000094167706,0.00010520371,0.00017637893,0.00031375326,0.00019874076,0.00008188896,0.00017055983,0.003985321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002172032,0.0023385955,0.024140425,0.00021181503,0.0019273408,0.00015351333,0.05865454,0.000020152793,0.0035453131,0.5805749,0.17018306,0.15607831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008374415,0.006170834,0.3569454,0.00012700658,0.0005639978,0.00031627124,0.028414337,0.00009985625,0.005873088,0.2099414,0.38144475,0.0017286557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006090286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015601609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5427187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002198065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020832236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903834446","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5029","title":"The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative Inferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Dialogical self; Conversation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Premises; Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Anonymity; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.04082199326469757,"score_gpt":0.3103028636653924,"score_spread":0.2694808704006948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903834446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67094463,0.00013777574,0.000019168807,0.00011137906,0.00007607042,0.000113055736,0.00005731357,0.000038350696,0.32850224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841434,0.00003454793,0.000068240064,0.0001874314,0.000089251946,0.000018771127,0.00004103308,0.0000032619425,0.0011431081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923676,0.00003981012,0.00033098366,0.0000753941,0.00016663261,0.00015043042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.00013732823,0.0002855521,0.0003446103,0.00019861346,0.000024680741],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020895332,0.00010036134,0.00016450688,0.00010085936,0.00047532673,0.00023694469,0.0004522446,0.000023210161,0.0012708753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040758347,0.00005426246,0.00008750931,0.00012368175,0.001005705,0.0004104072,0.000103904946,0.00008238048,0.000046823665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023802862,0.000023880006,0.006755718,0.0000031684583,0.00070866203,1.0916128e-7,0.094253704,0.000051336505,0.000013704665,0.89623386,0.00025568166,0.0016763642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009866877,0.0010940718,0.48767796,0.00006176787,0.0020209674,0.000005708675,0.43567142,0.0011713242,0.0040741386,0.04176175,0.024545202,0.00092898577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006897616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057313824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009338752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045952438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904608130","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5052","title":"Arguing with Images as Extended Cognition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Cognitive science; Order (exchange); Politics; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02017987513203168,"score_gpt":0.29787435326773987,"score_spread":0.2776944781357082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904608130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28729305,0.00006717062,0.0018402773,0.00006114464,0.0003153588,0.00015109968,0.000009502573,0.00014708564,0.7101153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267185,0.0000053016365,0.00063479535,0.002526503,0.00040268243,0.000042187814,0.00005862159,0.000011969783,0.0036460676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916893,0.000033550088,0.00017658842,0.00016214002,0.0001555841,0.00030319212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994789,0.000030756215,0.0000931231,0.00018238323,0.00015171482,0.00006312251],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001581993,0.00012885801,0.00011696991,0.000089003646,0.00012725004,0.00004831097,0.00010489471,0.00009210263,0.005251146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035572866,0.00009185823,0.00004162367,0.00015057942,0.0001568538,0.00030314058,0.000023987017,0.00012754444,0.0060270354],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044232598,0.0008021227,0.0022608675,0.00009985456,0.00062967604,0.0008148353,0.026554061,0.0000023461243,0.006396865,0.17731349,0.013682839,0.76701975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024954068,0.025713699,0.45994368,0.0005617657,0.0014003143,0.0068294387,0.07232712,0.00017995753,0.11203966,0.14837663,0.14275306,0.0049206153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065198336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018321538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76209915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009596131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002179014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905115839","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5077","title":"The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute; McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Epistemology; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.052289089651204525,"score_gpt":0.3782583810100003,"score_spread":0.32596929135879577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905115839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5769414,0.00006528036,0.0019261051,0.0005762869,0.0004821308,0.00013551244,6.7192536e-7,0.000019818284,0.41985282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634796,0.000022499291,0.0031100637,0.00020579493,0.0001250896,0.0000054411803,5.6672195e-7,9.5176415e-7,0.00018160338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932224,0.00017875528,0.00016741357,0.00005039332,0.00014116964,0.00014002588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958724,0.00019678842,0.0000752138,0.000059949172,0.000060415354,0.000020419071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011265017,0.000035528665,0.00006482285,0.000027561196,0.0001669408,0.000024831834,0.00011745792,0.000052604766,0.00011448203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061588694,0.000021157854,0.000028231669,0.00012459375,0.0005268179,0.00023895841,0.000023060902,0.000068805,0.0000259936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050193947,0.000012104624,0.0020351312,0.0000022645402,0.000005631549,7.6156925e-7,0.03212092,0.00001168595,0.00033321365,0.90855426,0.000049798222,0.056824062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016431024,0.002546427,0.17444715,0.00012408494,0.000050153445,0.00003417502,0.09498813,0.0023862752,0.041885868,0.2638929,0.4172347,0.00076706696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000896118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048655932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64466137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000322301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060792107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19410825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905498512","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5065","title":"Two Types of Argument from Position to Know","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Position (finance); Point (geometry); Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04554174471056073,"score_gpt":0.28244212796945395,"score_spread":0.23690038325889323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905498512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49491256,0.00010347089,0.00016239173,0.00055727316,0.001040912,0.00012561973,0.00006807559,0.000044121873,0.50298554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928316,0.000007047087,0.000500058,0.002499688,0.00089917914,0.0000050606645,0.000029216502,0.0000043495793,0.0032238108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951226,0.000015341091,0.00017943498,0.00007123906,0.00009421834,0.00012750953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995778,0.000036098383,0.00007004948,0.00012424054,0.00015474993,0.00003705342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010881415,0.00007056513,0.00012217434,0.000039806448,0.00010446803,0.000029232171,0.00009727152,0.000033418582,0.0009946169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016755652,0.000055271063,0.00004492151,0.000016922682,0.00022547662,0.00015305277,0.000040267114,0.00006948367,0.0007663195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005057142,0.000043161137,0.00016793767,0.000016232092,0.000033568853,0.0000010667013,0.032364912,0.00001616402,0.0005441328,0.9605024,0.0025173624,0.0037424809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066526415,0.0016218211,0.0022409724,0.00008859864,0.00007641862,0.0000017163804,0.0046465523,0.00012744294,0.014392901,0.07948364,0.8962968,0.00035789597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060746033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011097067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009657694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001893611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921887360","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5116","title":"Argumentation As Critically Oriented Pedagogical Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argumentative; Critical thinking; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05872043937979131,"score_gpt":0.3869222871635544,"score_spread":0.3282018477837631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921887360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3845904,0.000009811504,0.00042313224,0.0062067597,0.00094568403,0.00022439043,0.0000014363047,0.000119060576,0.60747933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751768,0.000016836937,0.0016722379,0.012087114,0.00013391938,0.000018164641,0.000028231381,0.0000037074271,0.010862976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884427,0.0000627911,0.00021238306,0.00012400276,0.00043530078,0.0003212551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.0001332604,0.000028407763,0.00009010398,0.00019356215,0.00016657733],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047475353,0.00007518817,0.000093531926,0.0000439878,0.00024251817,0.00009283191,0.00015241395,0.000093894974,0.0059853503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006720587,0.00006516506,0.00004312632,0.00017312226,0.00013593062,0.00032204148,0.0000352359,0.00013051012,0.0058467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010676232,0.0000473358,0.004460655,0.0000058789497,0.000003644126,0.0000018851165,0.011747441,0.0000016351033,0.000021869864,0.980907,0.00032122136,0.0024707601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005450954,0.00022046153,0.027394203,0.000028729473,0.000011607129,0.0000050562567,0.034801252,0.00002201364,0.0001752581,0.096958734,0.8394782,0.00035941895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117213516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034599478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88394827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070914604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026464983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99492735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921916127","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5080","title":"A Dialectical View on Conduction: Reasons, Warrants, and Normal Suasory Inclinations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sun Yat-sen University","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Extant taxon; Scholarship; Preference; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.025915304095070354,"score_gpt":0.26431839522206113,"score_spread":0.23840309112699076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921916127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78417003,0.00080176507,0.019716386,0.004567731,0.0025409502,0.0005733409,0.000004777426,0.00057271594,0.18705228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413395,0.00009338775,0.0036659685,0.0015798718,0.00006036148,0.000010132339,0.0000025240483,0.000002863216,0.0004509261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991611,0.000032642638,0.00019085803,0.00018895639,0.00018438122,0.00024204137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993728,0.00016227948,0.00005465401,0.00029289874,0.00004976908,0.0000676313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024094043,0.00011044834,0.0001544882,0.00008263693,0.00012827339,0.000108279055,0.00031208768,0.00008285486,0.00008016622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011498192,0.00008477679,0.000038855575,0.00018170719,0.000071742135,0.0007991698,0.00019115697,0.00016618244,0.000550314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030431485,0.00007353292,0.009433831,0.000049094124,0.000020104912,0.000019256782,0.0006151853,0.000051726834,0.00007026704,0.8946657,0.0006838509,0.09428698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004569588,0.0037232859,0.68469244,0.00024860504,0.000055217515,0.0011777694,0.00093630137,0.042337034,0.0024523067,0.03068408,0.22729155,0.001831822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001431416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069873213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86398166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015709184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005661586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7073357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922018101","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5340","title":"Rhetoric and Logical Reasoning as Engagement with Being","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Conviction; Argument (complex analysis); Existentialism; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Logical form; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03817517719170175,"score_gpt":0.2441166542721782,"score_spread":0.20594147708047647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922018101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31005645,0.0002674131,0.000015204951,0.0001011953,0.00007802931,0.000087561195,5.392064e-7,0.00005085676,0.68934274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858749,0.00014048391,0.00020231555,0.0005300187,0.00008178285,0.000015891903,0.0000034192744,0.0000043919495,0.013146825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994903,0.000018219698,0.00012878636,0.000085184896,0.00012621151,0.00015125703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996474,0.0000574073,0.000057556274,0.00015430576,0.00005177775,0.000031593565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014174786,0.000092431146,0.00011901793,0.000030824012,0.00034792614,0.00011193597,0.00010656905,0.000020056306,0.000838264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013079564,0.000057931135,0.000019684274,0.000022973576,0.00009421853,0.0002587763,0.00014056978,0.00013105074,0.0003600738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020087733,0.000011187537,0.0041072187,0.000008861566,0.000023646206,0.0000012072402,0.020078298,0.0000062259637,0.0000015068936,0.9721355,0.00014237889,0.003463868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037052148,0.00042930496,0.0063640163,0.00003355705,0.000015344076,0.000011570523,0.02325226,0.00009920718,0.0000063928837,0.0033881515,0.96582955,0.00020014138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004765618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001313319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000129547825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001127763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922307189","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5719","title":"You Will Respect My Authoritah!? A Reply to Botting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Appeal; Epistemology; Defeasible estate; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05664282117680272,"score_gpt":0.27781461651055406,"score_spread":0.22117179533375134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922307189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24765325,0.00008931624,0.000037315065,0.002163849,0.0017529011,0.00030433704,0.000019731828,0.00017999524,0.7477993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092876,0.000006743759,0.0005453953,0.013078146,0.0011589325,0.000018188251,0.000016128013,0.000019756031,0.07586913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987549,0.000039678125,0.0003684438,0.00021264878,0.00021243157,0.00041187124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991392,0.00011580295,0.00012708918,0.00036672014,0.00015048528,0.000100726385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064002554,0.0001674133,0.0002567433,0.00010112633,0.00026423033,0.00016196698,0.00025267445,0.0000806332,0.0009475925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016610476,0.00013575255,0.00012521925,0.00005120518,0.000145421,0.0005714924,0.00011710773,0.00034059858,0.002390631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634883,0.000022137641,0.00058725564,0.00006162847,0.000025984084,0.000008198238,0.037338294,0.000028296712,0.00008811008,0.95514417,0.004606897,0.0020426596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024755445,0.00040953959,0.00083617104,0.000037351903,0.000014248633,0.0000074657205,0.0055282237,0.000044019023,0.00008108389,0.0115503045,0.9809924,0.00025163975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024079991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012987787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002752173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005492843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943196159","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5739","title":"Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Viewpoints; Negotiation; Argumentation theory; Sanctions; Outcome (game theory); Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025064924890414546,"score_gpt":0.29782811240255513,"score_spread":0.27276318751214057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943196159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85316306,0.00009512714,0.0000017464565,0.0015095246,0.00030264194,0.000158264,0.000002678374,0.000019936691,0.144747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978162,0.000047413414,0.000024103807,0.00095972884,0.000074811964,0.0000043680893,0.0000026968037,0.000001152582,0.0010694952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995642,0.000029249264,0.00007285121,0.000039602746,0.00011740114,0.00017672607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997145,0.00015831433,0.000028507138,0.000029381623,0.000022068742,0.00004721719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012343693,0.000031628184,0.00005864097,0.00003521873,0.0000661874,0.000051993033,0.00005264501,0.000058958893,0.00015870514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022733751,0.00002939172,0.000010899442,0.00007337171,0.00008155426,0.00041710076,0.000014578817,0.000052481915,0.00006299493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066911803,0.000008770141,0.44115973,0.000010954471,0.0000063021303,6.5113085e-7,0.029421117,0.0000023108814,0.00001843803,0.52636766,0.0002508586,0.0027465296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009422567,0.00008349798,0.16093932,0.000009031668,0.000010988682,4.995683e-7,0.06860083,0.00008763849,0.000029766707,0.010735982,0.7584138,0.00014640426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084307103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036503052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7581629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000139141075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056779314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.173771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948551323","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.5101","title":"Is an Appeal to Popularity a Fallacy of Popularity?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Mistake; Epistemology; Condorcet method; Fallacy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Voting; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06467047197338276,"score_gpt":0.29503152103600555,"score_spread":0.23036104906262278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948551323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96157086,0.000008019062,0.00008425115,0.00026441124,0.00024324846,0.00027273077,0.000036015987,0.000065373024,0.03745507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930964,0.0000032512635,0.00041856285,0.005112794,0.000040926778,0.000004700218,0.000004984949,0.0000070573774,0.0013113396],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987813,0.000030715397,0.0002981866,0.00024142486,0.00031191917,0.00033645218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930626,0.000015328842,0.000086059605,0.00041231047,0.000032666394,0.00014735376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014526203,0.00013196342,0.00019021907,0.000092201764,0.000066288885,0.000035071258,0.0004710039,0.00008416153,0.00039227883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118660195,0.000106894244,0.00008115912,0.00027873757,0.000040153936,0.000605607,0.00018511023,0.0001536768,0.00096278073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045076606,0.0008564008,0.31451073,0.00040507747,0.000014979311,0.000088534,0.0046439986,0.00057347043,0.3508959,0.28178722,0.0016586474,0.044114254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025650142,0.004902144,0.56160253,0.00011590644,0.00003248911,0.00018188288,0.00047193817,0.0037399428,0.32102,0.021656582,0.08195494,0.0017566507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028080575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021667025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26013064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137002025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027085622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948887261","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i2.4940","title":"The Appraisal of Conductions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Dimension (graph theory); Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Balance (ability); Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07020105457511219,"score_gpt":0.29186607081554206,"score_spread":0.22166501624042986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948887261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23445289,0.000115050054,0.000011157215,0.00042136686,0.0023857767,0.00009732751,0.000012022081,0.000029830173,0.7624746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795131,0.000018905781,0.000023867395,0.00031035664,0.0002414248,0.0000049069404,0.0000061442856,0.0000034567565,0.019877799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995489,0.000016963246,0.00017463896,0.000046019606,0.00008555095,0.0001279219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941576,0.0002217994,0.000090007146,0.00015710513,0.00009830297,0.000017000955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002015357,0.000054743377,0.00009537369,0.000018487164,0.00019444656,0.000035466568,0.00012848752,0.000034859047,0.00042132015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044312797,0.000031940333,0.00006596752,0.000014321891,0.00046374823,0.00018055974,0.000029378629,0.00014251402,0.00040778355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064641554,0.0000095002015,0.00024036187,0.000015450962,0.000016000522,1.1668312e-7,0.00627773,0.000011071237,0.000032265074,0.9917774,0.00094708544,0.00066651835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013908067,0.00011799309,0.00051209185,0.0000045468855,0.000009612962,0.0000024474941,0.00741915,0.000027698517,0.00012313452,0.010928873,0.98065007,0.00006531081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006629573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014275828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98084855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027793908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029269635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52413684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953012294","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.6015","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03459110295401766,"score_gpt":0.21634585223094446,"score_spread":0.1817547492769268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953012294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18953893,0.00001837243,0.0000048927727,0.00022544194,0.0001381933,0.00012033745,0.000017173385,0.00003123837,0.8099054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880726,0.000002294467,0.00007657141,0.0006323843,0.00013140014,0.0000069639814,0.000008655577,0.000003708232,0.011065451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959934,0.0000044991443,0.00016668688,0.00005618827,0.00007511843,0.000098172604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966156,0.000027063146,0.00007677162,0.00015304612,0.000058558493,0.000023009197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004738025,0.000057111876,0.000089929395,0.000032127216,0.00006142662,0.000024876625,0.000114479546,0.00002443415,0.0022640408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005349133,0.00004506328,0.000044613393,0.000015756792,0.00008764521,0.00019451891,0.000024246083,0.0000639412,0.0014078557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011325066,0.000016118975,0.00007464707,0.000021111133,0.000007886499,2.1465893e-7,0.0047541964,0.000019593726,0.00013299978,0.9937242,0.0003396396,0.00089804747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048238377,0.00028583105,0.0011557539,0.000028222348,0.00001918299,0.0000030147398,0.002187812,0.00019131353,0.001288625,0.02949804,0.9646328,0.00022698373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002019945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006526985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033360254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012820408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978151455","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5100","title":"Educating Students to Consistency via Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade de Lisboa; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore","keywords":"Argumentative; Reductio ad absurdum; Argumentation theory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Norm (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Epistemology; Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02827418914085004,"score_gpt":0.3761712352610462,"score_spread":0.3478970461201961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978151455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6879104,0.0000070379583,0.00016682094,0.0029782443,0.0010885284,0.00027589835,3.716164e-7,0.00005031686,0.30752242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98075193,0.000003903209,0.0030836079,0.009003518,0.00007765971,0.000021599215,0.0000046825494,0.000002595955,0.007050517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999104,0.000031630167,0.00017325525,0.00008855404,0.00038457432,0.0002179433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961925,0.000057782767,0.00003452263,0.000075903874,0.0000876708,0.00012489976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049957115,0.00005234112,0.000065704706,0.00004725052,0.00023522376,0.00010978015,0.00019316527,0.000035986814,0.0015608231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015286819,0.000049072387,0.000022318452,0.00017126411,0.000034094868,0.00020684626,0.000042089912,0.00006232709,0.0035892096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012681945,0.00020663749,0.30567524,0.000029611263,0.000020598114,0.0000010141879,0.1399286,0.000018412678,0.00013370404,0.4976666,0.0018676227,0.054439288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063960656,0.00023200818,0.45923105,0.00010695092,0.000016774695,0.0000038480366,0.10616724,0.00001538425,0.00031567685,0.03330017,0.39931843,0.00065286655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000164363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004392266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4643664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008708528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018224222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978897034","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5493","title":"Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Emotive; Presupposition; Argumentation theory; Connotation; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Epistemology; Politics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychotherapist; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023753198669325237,"score_gpt":0.2728871743126417,"score_spread":0.24913397564331646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978897034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2724166,0.000020713496,0.0000054565985,0.00011751036,0.00014139114,0.00006411777,0.0000032581333,0.00002160117,0.7272093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99412453,0.0000017790077,0.00004496669,0.00088478054,0.00013435917,0.000005434495,0.000012936048,0.00000381949,0.0047873785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937755,0.000011853211,0.00017194856,0.00007742652,0.00012695357,0.0002342624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997915,0.000033069573,0.000039881736,0.000078233556,0.00003519881,0.000022128565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009570697,0.000074125586,0.000120226396,0.00009782576,0.000056730576,0.0000719804,0.00007422925,0.000016740738,0.003845673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002319463,0.000056817033,0.00004416939,0.000028882887,0.00008542837,0.0004155666,0.00004487093,0.00007922481,0.00095863856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005456376,0.000014009951,0.0046125893,0.000007600628,0.000020268051,0.0000037050595,0.024900416,0.000042679265,0.0000027106416,0.96968436,0.000087688015,0.0006185173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023661514,0.00063995476,0.03790516,0.00017987136,0.00012977795,0.000009548785,0.80532074,0.0021525805,0.00031711755,0.079727106,0.0701946,0.0010573692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024392284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006765247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88995725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003111873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009838418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994738575","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6033","title":"Emotive Figures as \"Shown\" Emotion in Italian Post-Unification Conduct Books (1860-1900)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Emotive; Unification; Rhetorical question; Cluster analysis; Motion (physics); Psychology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06362397002295854,"score_gpt":0.2830519612487453,"score_spread":0.21942799122578677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994738575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39398745,0.00021240351,0.000004550332,0.00091002026,0.000390788,0.0002494424,0.000028963414,0.000051219027,0.6041652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615444,0.000055870518,0.000035775738,0.0013608849,0.00013442409,0.000010760009,0.00008823165,0.0000074906734,0.012152124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991687,0.000036156624,0.00029012517,0.00013780802,0.0001649104,0.00020229233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946624,0.00009011135,0.00015285546,0.00014030201,0.00011754731,0.000032950717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018419922,0.00013157247,0.00015268064,0.00011442665,0.00017545767,0.00017304477,0.00010985911,0.0000566409,0.004257359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021743157,0.00010487637,0.000058445334,0.000038969916,0.00008374456,0.0012975369,0.000022329521,0.0001633048,0.001914619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003186012,0.00012588961,0.0075988527,0.00017354861,0.00010851705,0.000009242208,0.1216336,0.00029340322,0.00034309228,0.8240847,0.002596347,0.042714193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005899947,0.0003666217,0.025842592,0.000036480964,0.000018220939,0.000005606065,0.021124054,0.00013028375,0.000083088096,0.0016333831,0.94992334,0.0002463186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089805084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001172245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001902412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028298484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995317210","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6046","title":"The Rhetorical and Argumentative Relevance of \"Extreme Consequence\" in Advertising","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Exaggeration; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Psychology; Relevance theory; Cognition; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034604655264190216,"score_gpt":0.30771554908000054,"score_spread":0.27311089381581033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995317210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076306,0.0007802281,0.00009244108,0.00007217201,0.00025932913,0.00015881388,0.000003591451,0.000010627581,0.09099215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985012,0.00008215832,0.00010371296,0.00032452398,0.000015339687,0.000011167072,0.000002856152,0.0000029061318,0.00095615524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993942,0.000049586954,0.00021201285,0.00009010763,0.00009048768,0.00016360222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952435,0.00022942731,0.00008746103,0.00010825574,0.000029226749,0.000021252657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002091396,0.00006316216,0.0001057301,0.00003355455,0.000033776167,0.00001087165,0.00007296498,0.000050477705,0.00020063069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058397567,0.00004042821,0.000022630597,0.00009943784,0.000105493986,0.00013256015,0.000023637787,0.000113198395,0.00011925884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019295578,0.00021440495,0.12689501,0.00011303239,0.00015804844,0.00019196753,0.040407363,0.000032759493,0.010055487,0.4996078,0.00052036985,0.3198742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007434772,0.0018701105,0.8562121,0.00024056784,0.00006264496,0.000472413,0.04419859,0.00044563727,0.006760855,0.06301648,0.01848227,0.00080359593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009696165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026928765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72931707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015670734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014221769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21967654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995714616","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6037","title":"Argumentative Strategies and Stylistic Devices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Leiden; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Identification (biology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024072700619630447,"score_gpt":0.3093085103261368,"score_spread":0.28523580970650636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995714616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6240711,0.00024890807,0.000090336915,0.000012886609,0.00015685521,0.000108949775,0.0000068703766,0.00003199999,0.3752721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968694,0.00000856721,0.00010566459,0.00089580176,0.000036510894,0.000016922248,0.000027351398,0.0000044381977,0.002035377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947315,0.000026984973,0.00013219642,0.000111729765,0.00008064137,0.00017529233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997209,0.000055922934,0.00006271284,0.00009774526,0.000026887928,0.000035872785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000094651376,0.00008963717,0.00010470565,0.000046772973,0.000038484097,0.00008154583,0.00006599048,0.000057584566,0.0031802983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006299125,0.000066800225,0.000023372919,0.00006023858,0.000046547524,0.00045040733,0.000023824672,0.00008720607,0.0017263416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003210624,0.0001173269,0.024083287,0.00014092033,0.00021404994,0.00006213728,0.039152954,0.000011083168,0.00045130248,0.88202465,0.00040530012,0.053015914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028850676,0.0013147228,0.72454256,0.000042773932,0.000112116526,0.0001323099,0.23069787,0.00011027411,0.0002650438,0.021883402,0.017376866,0.000637003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009452593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027938644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000055158216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000151054155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995773050","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6036","title":"Old Delivery and Modern Demagogy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.020052022164361766,"score_gpt":0.2775076998258982,"score_spread":0.25745567766153643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995773050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8341803,0.000071152135,0.000043310272,0.00018299863,0.00025321564,0.0001465871,0.0000026177472,0.00006502221,0.1650548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99032325,0.000057196397,0.00023346068,0.001963114,0.00007391808,0.000003908632,0.0000029961286,0.000004270633,0.007337894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914175,0.000027523849,0.00014320461,0.00011310174,0.0002511456,0.000323274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.00003914511,0.000056721434,0.00011676202,0.000034616874,0.00009432553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028857432,0.000077509336,0.000104149236,0.00004684394,0.00019496075,0.000064717264,0.0001857862,0.00009329531,0.00029047063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035288886,0.00006468558,0.000029649096,0.0000754602,0.0001008003,0.0006107406,0.000087058484,0.00008942448,0.0005187423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009360027,0.0000982647,0.4109711,0.000072509734,0.00007592973,0.000030457426,0.05694428,0.00033908524,0.0008557927,0.4377228,0.0020573284,0.090738826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002828704,0.0005043024,0.34755728,0.00008971409,0.00005116371,0.000012010425,0.0065029394,0.0050662435,0.0005046766,0.09571931,0.5398065,0.0013571787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012278133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044215444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5377492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037634803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005976474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6667556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996404137","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6035","title":"Emotions in Argumentative Narration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Psychology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.02408531498602858,"score_gpt":0.30727972758506716,"score_spread":0.2831944125990386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996404137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67101496,0.000020183877,0.00023680073,0.00008380677,0.00039630153,0.0001672386,0.000004823128,0.000027578855,0.3280483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271977,0.000002715097,0.0001054976,0.0009580534,0.000044744545,0.000032555818,0.000070924056,0.000003879747,0.0060618385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948156,0.000037907423,0.00014655088,0.000095299125,0.00007888713,0.00015978742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997657,0.000023849669,0.000053287276,0.00010885855,0.000025362564,0.000022972194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012738534,0.00006587111,0.000080179525,0.00009753201,0.000027238302,0.000015789436,0.000060744704,0.00006652062,0.005559296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011341037,0.000055377932,0.000032777476,0.00014570371,0.000017090777,0.00025560395,0.000012775177,0.00010810643,0.0056554913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056166766,0.00075695064,0.08489263,0.000067935216,0.00016173927,0.00009237007,0.15823407,0.00030890826,0.0035869328,0.64145845,0.0053348024,0.10454352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003260307,0.00068189367,0.9268955,0.00003079361,0.00002088114,0.00005021293,0.047064222,0.00021977232,0.00049994845,0.011142112,0.009738084,0.0003962758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006701558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004850476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84200287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019372563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010880116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99534976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006942597","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5969","title":"Adversariality and Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Argument map; Variation (astronomy); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1232533442587925,"score_gpt":0.27046581143204734,"score_spread":0.14721246717325484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006942597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29870036,0.00014732976,0.00036304022,0.0059026005,0.0009303936,0.0002248992,0.000039402108,0.00015435343,0.69353765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041295,0.000016123244,0.00010089053,0.008285411,0.00045653185,0.0000031574857,0.00001950618,0.0000028191043,0.00070263114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996255,0.00001687638,0.00012893819,0.00006807504,0.00006626727,0.00009431211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979085,0.000029038198,0.000051559586,0.00004425066,0.000036086156,0.00004824704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009839492,0.000058041784,0.000086761516,0.000010705812,0.0001293618,0.0000596104,0.000046149686,0.000031053445,0.00030503664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034998793,0.000047358273,0.00002737472,0.000010194562,0.0001844033,0.0002985351,0.00002828596,0.00009907272,0.000113253496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023703953,0.00000775295,0.00043540433,0.000047260975,0.00001426555,0.0000015187961,0.048897672,0.000005233098,0.000025512763,0.94720024,0.00083891785,0.0025024961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007898404,0.000365811,0.0028855384,0.000007331153,0.0000444585,0.000002409932,0.011827278,0.00036754663,0.00021780193,0.028983159,0.9542614,0.0002473905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006707793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050928233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037196758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001279319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3339937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007814168","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6160","title":"Review of Truth in Fiction: Rethinking its Logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fiction theory; Philosophical logic; Non-fiction; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Literary fiction; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Literary criticism","score_opus":0.08173305572992969,"score_gpt":0.32263427061565514,"score_spread":0.24090121488572547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007814168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034000697,0.034815058,0.000028827437,0.014695675,0.00036480592,0.0003851992,0.0000075181233,0.00012175702,0.9461811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8693681,0.07942145,0.0005429535,0.0497479,0.0004140465,0.000015322501,0.00001279947,0.0000048931447,0.00047254495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991725,0.00006430402,0.00026162885,0.000086363674,0.00023835736,0.00017684828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963725,0.000048424026,0.00011564125,0.000059124603,0.00007729704,0.0000622716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005498305,0.000064127715,0.00016228776,0.000003570077,0.00014070305,0.000015886684,0.00022157261,0.00012909701,0.00069643016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005416307,0.000049879745,0.000089976085,0.00043913795,0.000098499295,0.00031624926,0.000041215942,0.00020798836,0.000057825717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002285393,0.000038111666,0.00065188843,0.0032553861,0.000016945585,0.000010555398,0.11013086,0.00008175865,0.000036955367,0.8551484,0.02604103,0.0045652906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032110926,0.0001351461,0.00074186537,0.0017926407,0.000018937468,0.0000021317735,0.009428726,0.00005722269,0.00008587537,0.008229835,0.9789464,0.00024013856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026930617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018397664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95290536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002560106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007366174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008054396","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5997","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Amphiboly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Normative; Computer science; Linguistics; Sentence; Natural language; Natural (archaeology); Natural language processing; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical computer science; History","score_opus":0.10710944389011678,"score_gpt":0.2549060210918069,"score_spread":0.1477965772016901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008054396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21574837,0.00046638827,0.00035017898,0.0034326012,0.0016932534,0.00085956196,0.0008584723,0.00022092249,0.7763702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739903,0.000007468931,0.00022015054,0.0013177454,0.0006326623,0.000021815977,0.000026670503,0.0000038056455,0.00037064726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996142,0.000002497506,0.00016880404,0.000055851495,0.000042355103,0.000116327756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997076,0.000047353755,0.00006996169,0.000044522152,0.00010775622,0.000022806405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003090921,0.000062293766,0.00013142446,0.000017945396,0.00010324895,0.000017063314,0.00008397399,0.000021774056,0.00011977111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015380717,0.000044679993,0.000052423547,0.000009121165,0.00018337643,0.000047180485,0.000044278582,0.000034607478,0.000026190612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031942076,0.000011821435,0.00065771816,0.00007993859,0.000031852043,0.0000012770147,0.012624589,0.0000023764653,0.000013507436,0.98212343,0.0032138594,0.001207696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004795287,0.00067453383,0.00090822333,0.000008809892,0.00003335248,6.256084e-7,0.0018497256,0.00022643802,0.0006028049,0.010071904,0.9849889,0.0001551003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018051154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030101071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016294457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012317553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18219973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008265809","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6159","title":"Review of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10639799537616593,"score_gpt":0.4144290276880948,"score_spread":0.30803103231192885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008265809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028566227,0.0030180207,0.00073189393,0.026416758,0.00012213271,0.0002671546,0.0000018822421,0.000066140965,0.9665194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97418773,0.001711883,0.00084436894,0.022722337,0.00021881287,0.000014166898,0.0000048865754,0.0000031487127,0.00029268776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999427,0.0001233695,0.00014038307,0.0000604538,0.00014371354,0.00010503944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960893,0.000092970455,0.00007840983,0.000037228543,0.00010624876,0.00007620645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061624136,0.000038959734,0.00008434589,0.000015330215,0.00009142882,0.000014007736,0.000089598245,0.000028245962,0.0013482008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001551835,0.000034072764,0.000041134328,0.00022308608,0.000114414965,0.0001955147,0.000011673315,0.0000834162,0.00008977166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008213806,0.000016027714,0.00022188124,0.00011970716,0.000007784998,4.5678343e-7,0.09604072,5.0733416e-7,0.000006085945,0.8979932,0.0010280602,0.0045573246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005827951,0.0003730993,0.0027208491,0.0008044705,0.00008096278,0.0000037504556,0.36317202,0.000046450972,0.00012907249,0.030568888,0.601203,0.0003145791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007649942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009470179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97133106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003512187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020279165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008500248","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5082","title":"Proposal of a Classification of Analogies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Mythology; Archetype; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05789007182313207,"score_gpt":0.3105599975672599,"score_spread":0.25266992574412783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008500248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.702425,0.00015902318,0.0016786347,0.00034906386,0.0001285143,0.00017221723,0.000024767729,0.000053406646,0.29500937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908763,0.000005489658,0.00039079247,0.000334288,0.00004501985,0.000010424528,0.000029245852,0.000003086146,0.00009401629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994541,0.000026377867,0.00025107956,0.00007310981,0.00009977648,0.00009559995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996128,0.000022493208,0.00016060154,0.00010472828,0.00007192083,0.000027440525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008533532,0.000054991742,0.00012294773,0.00004078815,0.000012722828,0.000003737315,0.00010517349,0.00006360865,0.0005566282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061535466,0.000041555897,0.000052371302,0.0001542733,0.00007143529,0.000094953895,0.000019684992,0.000064540865,0.00012506272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090489,0.00027075261,0.012507769,0.00030222934,0.0001746964,0.00001605597,0.028936427,0.000021587286,0.037593096,0.7993595,0.002882377,0.11703059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027101766,0.0031524,0.8996008,0.000042063675,0.00017271498,0.000030273437,0.035569254,0.0006351339,0.037497085,0.01282751,0.007289988,0.00047257243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002586431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032983924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88709307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002846676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002448273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6094689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008733909","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6024","title":"Come Now, Let Us Reason Together","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Debiasing; Rationality; Heuristics; Doxastic logic; Individualism; Sociology; Dialogic; Laziness; Ideal (ethics); Methodological individualism; Critical thinking; Externalism; Metacognition; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.053368084653736596,"score_gpt":0.3271676012146058,"score_spread":0.2737995165608692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008733909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09578737,0.000053761876,0.00030103227,0.064739116,0.00044207432,0.00013503588,0.0000022162455,0.00018681509,0.83835256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635444,0.000039849852,0.0015233294,0.03890451,0.00024266979,0.0000074369736,0.0000052566747,0.0000034793625,0.0029190578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930304,0.00003428206,0.00012822733,0.00007531491,0.0002466688,0.00021244047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.00004335597,0.000024728635,0.000053377797,0.000051788833,0.00017693188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025858422,0.000053845415,0.000072463146,0.000013650148,0.00021133103,0.0000699634,0.00017719877,0.0000596788,0.0020018467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002657573,0.000046162382,0.000031121028,0.00015514172,0.00010467697,0.00016524084,0.000033731278,0.000106028325,0.0017494599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019429786,0.000048939637,0.026136966,0.000019142633,0.000012665175,0.0000070548426,0.06548413,0.000009597753,0.000016732292,0.8698902,0.020610193,0.017744912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085188025,0.000029342784,0.008537424,0.000005769776,0.0000023381017,4.2825843e-7,0.0024718673,0.000015369647,0.000028065755,0.0037394555,0.9849913,0.00009344144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072602386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043348547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003124556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001365811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015240314","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6043","title":"Tense Arguments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Epistemology; Radicalization; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Terrorism","score_opus":0.03915595272738473,"score_gpt":0.2660954263661293,"score_spread":0.2269394736387446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015240314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27417475,0.00007733511,0.000002813232,0.00016796337,0.00023671765,0.000101957405,0.000008983745,0.00008281135,0.72514665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96107775,0.000011054857,0.00006947461,0.0011859869,0.000099859964,0.000009852444,0.000029481764,0.0000060809393,0.03751047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994487,0.0000133664,0.00016537507,0.00006666357,0.00013180546,0.00017405093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994711,0.000026557032,0.000070335365,0.00034438982,0.000057102723,0.000030496492],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008988499,0.00008776931,0.000095683645,0.00004595454,0.000116520874,0.00020056026,0.00026340355,0.000026089394,0.009879555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000851607,0.00006239216,0.00004512321,0.000017811362,0.00009840929,0.00060677633,0.00008657746,0.00010241699,0.00648086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010771895,0.000025835234,0.00078962574,0.0000131307,0.000017223263,0.0000019475235,0.014016363,0.00001763816,0.000020790805,0.98183125,0.001867817,0.0013876338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000539676,0.00013871433,0.0030250286,0.000020869238,0.000012162934,0.0000074510563,0.029373923,0.000096214106,0.000082141545,0.0075561455,0.95887333,0.00027432296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007429944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007294939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97427505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010494409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023687466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99429274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016768704","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i4.6028","title":"Frozen","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Agonistic behaviour; Argumentative; Dissent; Framing (construction); Epistemology; Mediation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.039877582383781224,"score_gpt":0.2609257063379207,"score_spread":0.2210481239541395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016768704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15964778,0.00011410971,0.000005422673,0.00023603022,0.0002515013,0.0000922289,0.000009225723,0.00010325784,0.8395404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629263,0.000008973216,0.0000857028,0.0010210818,0.00013774697,0.000007958896,0.000028841276,0.0000057133207,0.035777647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952024,0.000011983978,0.00014735696,0.000059098922,0.00010939053,0.00015191374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950397,0.000031149393,0.000059287104,0.00033047053,0.000049315455,0.00002581227],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008233328,0.0000771173,0.00009081256,0.000040783503,0.00010318541,0.0001924043,0.0002841994,0.00002593,0.01554034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007691951,0.0000551755,0.000043933553,0.000016200962,0.00009661435,0.0005816249,0.000081324775,0.00010192601,0.0072553125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059458434,0.000011740674,0.00038582055,0.000008905474,0.000009638756,8.41166e-7,0.013569656,0.000015167315,0.000010129526,0.9826976,0.0020180542,0.0012665018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029486962,0.000080752056,0.0016237556,0.0000114512095,0.00000683112,0.000003584194,0.025208352,0.00007585994,0.00004632788,0.008191298,0.96427155,0.00018537497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010360617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013659963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008028984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024688941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99351764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029758781","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6689","title":"Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Virtue; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Power (physics); Politics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051573007410098064,"score_gpt":0.28711575886308616,"score_spread":0.2355427514529881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029758781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68750393,0.00029247755,0.000261543,0.00036602162,0.0005599117,0.00013079045,0.000018133065,0.00004510497,0.31082207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992552,0.000045226294,0.000244865,0.0037686073,0.00016264997,0.000013255519,0.0000435431,0.00000478741,0.0031650935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933594,0.000042976182,0.00018340728,0.00013472063,0.00013250748,0.00017044993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955666,0.000056824294,0.00007228459,0.00012885072,0.000113444396,0.00007195694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012696437,0.00010342275,0.00012806847,0.000021474352,0.0003056142,0.00012183939,0.00007887226,0.000037926766,0.0006680439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003588537,0.0000828199,0.00003455882,0.00001863371,0.000383495,0.00056128704,0.00006666831,0.0001349148,0.00011137886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015958056,0.000056883826,0.00043691328,0.000024490155,0.000020433577,0.000015922307,0.07996901,0.00000884772,0.000023704792,0.9132173,0.00004403305,0.006166498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019454078,0.0032966333,0.012195899,0.000081525475,0.00014096314,0.0000704353,0.26464912,0.0010916732,0.003323742,0.37302428,0.3389809,0.0011994124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012329685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087938947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.540193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010978971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037853108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7314612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030518148","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6312","title":"On Presumptions, Burdens of Proof, and Explanations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Deontic logic; Function (biology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.11392229568995417,"score_gpt":0.27014979179833964,"score_spread":0.1562274961083855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030518148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2982115,0.00027025124,0.00014036418,0.0053289197,0.00039364415,0.00034469817,0.00014641235,0.00009406924,0.69507015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964592,0.00002202792,0.00006650285,0.0018074443,0.00019608747,0.000008524908,0.000018700217,0.0000033774813,0.0014181546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00001339592,0.00015626219,0.0000629143,0.00008023264,0.000085395055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996968,0.000072337876,0.000066297944,0.00006487031,0.000060120725,0.00003961134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006596086,0.000059230537,0.00009998569,0.000027939213,0.00011317942,0.000024861525,0.000060418777,0.000033379296,0.00023265652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006436335,0.000046549052,0.00003109926,0.000013317726,0.00020360637,0.00013903627,0.000023297742,0.000113749265,0.000045390887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013982082,0.000016433482,0.000076195276,0.000059857506,0.000013007484,7.4962986e-7,0.02460919,0.000039928036,0.0000156207,0.9728856,0.0017823385,0.0004870804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013234871,0.0020163436,0.0034448705,0.00008347757,0.00010333709,0.000006871484,0.014810304,0.0011501,0.0011503773,0.10589691,0.86947215,0.00054175773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019321062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006365738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86768985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002359375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015711443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25474256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033382224","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6327","title":"Should Climate Scientists Fly?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Argument map; Epistemology; Climate science; Work (physics); Action (physics); Climate change; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Engineering; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.21233637359910273,"score_gpt":0.3018732965723466,"score_spread":0.0895369229732439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033382224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06038132,0.00016034865,0.000081330756,0.003658077,0.0016045534,0.00015936758,0.00007159815,0.00024583723,0.93363756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778012,0.000033233122,0.00015247558,0.018424144,0.00091580016,0.0000071027544,0.000032643133,0.000010063583,0.00262334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990969,0.000019344958,0.00023981437,0.00013864251,0.00017850779,0.00032682315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995482,0.000038773433,0.00008433076,0.00012959489,0.000089701505,0.0001093818],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021793395,0.00011936885,0.00016851866,0.000033856075,0.00035355138,0.00016863216,0.00021479871,0.00006300186,0.0010237735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005659083,0.00009386694,0.000097758755,0.00003929974,0.0004413719,0.00040835515,0.0001032164,0.00024976296,0.0015705437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018775423,0.000016760601,0.0002463617,0.000087169356,0.000013401273,0.000010399278,0.026436642,0.000015613743,0.000032019507,0.9670326,0.004557899,0.0015323517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026247848,0.00019636394,0.00039096188,0.000010358029,0.000019247726,0.000003942927,0.0022348834,0.00028479955,0.00012484741,0.0039970344,0.99226946,0.00020565308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025553129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000928584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98771155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069876446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028683115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038220352","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6328","title":"The Role of Trust in Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Credibility; Fake news; Authoritarianism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Media studies","score_opus":0.028775369238201103,"score_gpt":0.30914636367017717,"score_spread":0.28037099443197605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038220352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81330955,0.000077176315,0.0000038920093,0.0022767459,0.000129216,0.00009278679,0.0000017902515,0.000013064368,0.18409579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991244,0.00005047115,0.000027484417,0.00062159105,0.00012709244,0.000003981664,9.720798e-7,8.65486e-7,0.00004314451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996105,0.000027083308,0.00010323498,0.000021275686,0.00011962587,0.00011827959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978584,0.00009872486,0.00003738066,0.000021588321,0.00001740716,0.00003906397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009919863,0.00002110844,0.00003877762,0.000007769094,0.00009950127,0.0000137464685,0.0000935953,0.00003082701,0.00003803999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027021844,0.000015401994,0.00001673531,0.000118815384,0.000108130414,0.000091990354,0.0000106819225,0.000045597288,0.00002913516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016655942,0.000007435863,0.118293375,0.0000038212697,0.0000030740453,5.636288e-7,0.1865865,0.000012302796,0.00009233475,0.65915084,0.00010305718,0.03573002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032339504,0.00011009634,0.026865132,0.000005116528,0.0000056987774,1.07072175e-7,0.3952162,0.00024739382,0.0022155244,0.038830534,0.53608155,0.00009924028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007144802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025526996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6203203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012451807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006112752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10800851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038512320","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6329","title":"Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Diversity (politics); Supreme court; Theme (computing); Law; Focus (optics); Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1090334188746578,"score_gpt":0.29694606258841155,"score_spread":0.18791264371375377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038512320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5705843,0.0012622882,0.0000610698,0.023767672,0.00019807169,0.00019877258,0.000003992556,0.00019203809,0.40373182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99251723,0.0010400127,0.00014575398,0.0055439826,0.00014274404,7.0833704e-7,6.630661e-7,7.7670705e-7,0.0006081303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995697,0.000020184829,0.00004745116,0.00006337218,0.00017836448,0.00012092476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978936,0.000023737937,0.000022166514,0.000026991176,0.000029875479,0.000107865715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015363847,0.00003714689,0.00004842089,0.0000012814182,0.00088292774,0.00004127073,0.00012433252,0.00007368822,0.0002730295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015098849,0.000028870882,0.00003213484,0.00010271367,0.00017638528,0.0005101022,0.00020067528,0.00008454713,0.00007040434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000691363,0.000016688518,0.064625725,0.0000503883,0.000019384699,0.000011800167,0.64467174,0.000016127218,0.00007509189,0.24207352,0.026564782,0.021805638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040682295,0.00024756024,0.04747226,0.000043898886,0.00003128101,0.0000018809324,0.10753641,0.00012292313,0.000041775464,0.0038823981,0.83988035,0.00033245407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001637045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034028733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8133156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011012951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022717975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67908555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081594041","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6309","title":"Review of Narration as Argument, edited by Paula Olmos","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Latin American Literature Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Narrative; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019821555470122564,"score_gpt":0.3132947290992612,"score_spread":0.29347317362913866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081594041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003975414,0.026747135,0.0001341409,0.03175287,0.00046062344,0.0008072577,0.0000508483,0.00017598916,0.93589574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88839465,0.019156255,0.00065105024,0.089635074,0.00077562203,0.000042067226,0.00010372838,0.000009714077,0.0012318636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991617,0.00006095839,0.00025885567,0.000084047984,0.00027438215,0.00016001111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950176,0.000042310763,0.00019222952,0.00006736554,0.00012050694,0.0000758506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023627364,0.00007398924,0.0001735474,0.000012642113,0.00013990655,0.000021828528,0.00014834452,0.000039776536,0.0005325371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079771806,0.000057971483,0.000062682506,0.00037563167,0.00017774288,0.000302838,0.000042714222,0.00008562905,0.00008225079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040732553,0.000048132413,0.0021681583,0.0017402121,0.000089120134,0.0000034671589,0.06468244,0.0000050418544,0.00043558504,0.03917231,0.8721209,0.019493883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097498036,0.0001436362,0.00016702825,0.00029343425,0.000013004376,2.8971652e-7,0.002285602,0.0000068267846,0.00006723663,0.0001405753,0.99668866,0.00009622924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010972137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053989224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93466383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017905397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006424846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58309084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081735501","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6205","title":"Other-Regarding Virtues and Their Place in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Virtue ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059708128957152884,"score_gpt":0.2543450000964259,"score_spread":0.19463687113927303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081735501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7078478,0.0004821769,0.0010365421,0.0018147222,0.00039724723,0.00027269678,0.000039039587,0.00013007529,0.28797972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918713,0.000021564694,0.000048409616,0.007044131,0.00026271664,0.000009150302,0.000008862449,0.000008088388,0.00072575593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942654,0.00006394647,0.00019698207,0.00010748546,0.00006224208,0.00014280673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963063,0.00015833463,0.00007410529,0.000065598644,0.000027168087,0.00004419103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032086048,0.0001124707,0.00015622911,0.000040729345,0.00012702985,0.000086952125,0.00008508874,0.000052138894,0.00012979584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005595869,0.000081636696,0.00003984536,0.00002351282,0.00022881095,0.00042592976,0.00004215836,0.00019034586,0.00005317721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058099053,0.000010226596,0.0003793913,0.00003892269,0.000015017905,0.0000016022107,0.0746815,0.000041600957,0.00010409451,0.9210636,0.000059373546,0.0035465523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025301646,0.0009885819,0.0016044023,0.00011705565,0.000044405817,0.000009933409,0.15771486,0.0019708502,0.0023726516,0.4656108,0.36617038,0.0008659204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050271618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020839892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45545283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009544723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016161199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3329048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081761332","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6243","title":"CAT Scan: A Critical Review of the Critical-Thinking Assessment Test","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Critical thinking; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12104992679618652,"score_gpt":0.4612182262484039,"score_spread":0.3401682994522174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081761332","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.1996883e-8,0.8206704,0.0000539697,0.020255385,0.0010500716,0.00062551245,0.000023356824,0.00006222642,0.15725903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000025325233,0.9835409,0.0035942532,0.011906116,0.00032734705,0.00013444643,0.00001627025,0.000017038406,0.0004382811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963599,0.00047382212,0.0011451601,0.00028032582,0.0012123985,0.0005284309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582374,0.002896214,0.00023077833,0.000369219,0.0003818372,0.0002982338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019395835,0.0003087009,0.0012001611,0.00005526127,0.00076194044,0.00015264936,0.001217681,0.0002889625,0.0015316914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018057035,0.00019696009,0.0005768568,0.0007087758,0.00094800757,0.00016265461,0.00035179153,0.0006865181,0.00022184756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2288177e-7,0.00006860481,0.000008727807,0.059219282,0.000018032912,0.0000050993954,0.0010153848,9.007942e-9,9.052607e-9,0.63277775,0.00377338,0.3031135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020712496,0.000026863388,0.000009443098,0.07259967,0.00027137206,0.000010678676,0.00030334457,6.005811e-7,7.4058676e-8,0.006506859,0.92002064,0.00022974361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005135236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013974526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91624725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033282925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049285297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082164080","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6002","title":"Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Modal; Argumentative; Cognition; Interpretation (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Sociology; Relevance (law); Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05021629641667193,"score_gpt":0.32025123156349333,"score_spread":0.2700349351468214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082164080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712062,0.0001869765,0.0011455273,0.0005109153,0.00021456297,0.00030738005,0.0000059739978,0.000058409583,0.026364047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98999155,0.0000048803745,0.000603232,0.009045913,0.00008567125,0.000023450422,0.000027525108,0.0000075997937,0.0002101827],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992437,0.00003789048,0.00022753031,0.00018029695,0.00009670352,0.00021389684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997159,0.0000293528,0.00005504804,0.000067387096,0.00003301341,0.00009928946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013544002,0.00010105651,0.00012109553,0.00005621489,0.000054610886,0.000032282816,0.00006148207,0.00007852751,0.00025915806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061624974,0.0000883085,0.000025390535,0.00016336956,0.0000134256015,0.00027965262,0.00005064654,0.00012453836,0.0005258389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033768935,0.00085635274,0.037360776,0.0004229353,0.00018400501,0.00085554924,0.23797913,0.0012543182,0.062929735,0.26265338,0.001453905,0.39067304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016737616,0.0030646052,0.888837,0.00021565302,0.00014967065,0.0002390519,0.026882956,0.022462616,0.019313075,0.0022736036,0.017831307,0.0019928433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020662208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020519273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85147625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011495738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005453184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6758771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082371789","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.5994","title":"Justifying Particular Reasoning in a Legal Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Judgement; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Practical reason; Analytic reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06630570841419381,"score_gpt":0.3038539489600181,"score_spread":0.2375482405458243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082371789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40370616,0.00080726005,0.000342021,0.01316738,0.00022100226,0.00020387802,0.00000292911,0.00012135212,0.581428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556446,0.000042657874,0.00009434774,0.0040652584,0.00019017092,0.0000094968755,9.957628e-7,0.0000012622677,0.00003136883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932915,0.000025776373,0.00014470836,0.00007679097,0.00018488527,0.00023866733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999794,0.0000332523,0.000032786316,0.000024792185,0.000034293236,0.00008089769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019153774,0.0000540119,0.000101006124,0.00001664676,0.00034091674,0.00004505114,0.00009757476,0.00003905579,0.00008493797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044862635,0.00004756851,0.000035433615,0.00021918782,0.00021593785,0.0003124396,0.000050309718,0.00010361954,0.00015939512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023606328,0.00000882144,0.019319711,0.0000039316783,0.0000073173196,0.00004035092,0.011560219,0.00015001038,0.0000095614005,0.96010315,0.0002391355,0.008534175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007809929,0.0001241547,0.040942583,0.00007801076,0.000021888158,0.000003837146,0.055760764,0.00087060174,0.00006592918,0.005365156,0.8955782,0.00040788297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047675273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025017215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029028846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116274416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082480730","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6294","title":"An Unlikely Source of (Absurd and Effective) Case Studies for Introductory Informal Logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Sketch; Informal logic; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm","score_opus":0.06460547192058676,"score_gpt":0.28107440899790626,"score_spread":0.2164689370773195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082480730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95102674,0.0009269927,0.00053889706,0.0019983002,0.0005978323,0.0011637387,0.0001723006,0.00023692822,0.04333827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595326,0.000020437801,0.00015913224,0.002300857,0.0013139719,0.000039728515,0.000018035957,0.000011123405,0.00018344156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903655,0.00003097413,0.000377462,0.00017511491,0.00012338893,0.00025649357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916047,0.00023680241,0.0001589723,0.00013831569,0.00017535391,0.00013007909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017348309,0.000200878,0.0003666706,0.000060831615,0.00031239103,0.000068003465,0.00012634418,0.0000612818,0.000078267105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019598412,0.00014604608,0.00010130656,0.00004509715,0.0006035812,0.00075482175,0.000112809874,0.00017140486,0.000017105396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069247506,0.00009901859,0.00016536808,0.000767971,0.00018892223,0.000069808375,0.067454346,0.00023456277,0.00011472049,0.90275717,0.0010428625,0.026412752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005675557,0.0153893465,0.0011612457,0.00010054733,0.00041767888,0.00045922655,0.044041514,0.0044651334,0.0016399914,0.06713877,0.8578666,0.001644439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019461235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004424467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8568237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010321245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017810624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59555864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082531842","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.5984","title":"Source Related Argumentation Found in Science Websites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Trustworthiness; Computer science; Sample (material); World Wide Web; Epistemology; Fake news; Information retrieval; Internet privacy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04485946343163591,"score_gpt":0.32832698770613206,"score_spread":0.2834675242744962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082531842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5783062,0.00001358801,0.00021391177,0.0019965973,0.00009296229,0.0001477202,6.320975e-7,0.00008758591,0.41914082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995157,0.000013501789,0.00018562001,0.0038380208,0.000035324763,9.252731e-7,0.0000033878755,0.0000018593954,0.0007643465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989701,0.000022110253,0.00024009528,0.00007514073,0.0004086727,0.00028391683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957806,0.000031954012,0.000089333254,0.000053890206,0.00007048851,0.00017628766],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067370734,0.000056507062,0.000068075926,0.00010988612,0.00032898135,0.00019359183,0.00022269502,0.00004912907,0.0007844668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008628007,0.000051010968,0.000017781927,0.0012238993,0.00027924243,0.0023346182,0.000040529074,0.00010480935,0.0010797578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006611299,0.0000430776,0.016846178,0.000036416517,0.0000069462103,0.0000041705334,0.6980255,0.0059800525,0.00060073496,0.23132457,0.0024208573,0.044645354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003335768,0.0005898198,0.27603808,0.000082894614,0.000014887246,0.000009591942,0.21930993,0.038459614,0.0012326716,0.0053239614,0.45457554,0.0010272473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017058988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007211603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47871563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072244264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027262588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082735929","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6214","title":"What is Wrong with Deductivism?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Inference; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09978874048651296,"score_gpt":0.2585445522149686,"score_spread":0.15875581172845563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082735929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25441223,0.000961835,0.00033642267,0.022047987,0.0020400246,0.00037964978,0.000026551754,0.00034529998,0.71945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96810544,0.000088127315,0.00015205359,0.025417907,0.0009182539,0.000009698743,0.000012685097,0.000012605388,0.005283241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932754,0.000015355801,0.00016137867,0.0001280327,0.00014318168,0.00022450577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958545,0.000034343255,0.000079297264,0.00012394352,0.00009146725,0.00008550663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008193116,0.00012795802,0.00016822998,0.000022530983,0.00019515303,0.00025084507,0.00014335444,0.000050810253,0.0008194539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011618011,0.0000884701,0.000059559658,0.000027936208,0.00038036559,0.0012913075,0.000042925072,0.00023890493,0.00048268776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070273556,0.000030160716,0.0002607108,0.00010444647,0.00006821787,0.000015278403,0.20369199,0.000028313165,0.000014003504,0.7852875,0.0043748566,0.0060542505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041312794,0.0006345473,0.00021610745,0.000034261302,0.000040708386,0.000009780356,0.034273006,0.00011725311,0.0003779077,0.0066861003,0.95688486,0.00031234356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035814064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073187606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006527971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041926098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8972446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082914421","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i30.6172","title":"Resolution of Deep Disagreement: Not Simply Consensus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Common ground; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11829525222959104,"score_gpt":0.26951155422027623,"score_spread":0.1512163019906852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082914421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24223492,0.0002608888,0.00067266973,0.0085552195,0.00096393516,0.00036609793,0.00015139177,0.00017064443,0.74662423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929302,0.000014802579,0.00014666434,0.0059088017,0.00034941366,0.0000037329926,0.000024102099,0.0000055445057,0.0006167906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921614,0.000029840667,0.0003228672,0.000092882154,0.00015062223,0.00018767247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00008787271,0.0001554382,0.00011317571,0.00011770424,0.00006265786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015222124,0.00009805582,0.00018254585,0.000025681711,0.0001323748,0.000026530503,0.000121841316,0.000056171022,0.00041762597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010513552,0.00007993334,0.00008745296,0.000025132225,0.0004690165,0.00011675312,0.000054377957,0.00016065052,0.00016845384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247539,0.000027563434,0.00018965105,0.00013629383,0.000036277237,0.000004568886,0.044457834,0.000139855,0.0001235878,0.9509829,0.0015734385,0.002225544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011394854,0.0010999419,0.0015253878,0.000027287067,0.000093260554,0.0000054855595,0.012941464,0.0035913088,0.0012670931,0.011998706,0.96589196,0.00041863145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011021248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002006128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074283735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002568708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45727116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115494046","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6311","title":"Is it Permissible to Teach Buddhist Mindfulness Meditation in a Critical Thinking Course?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Critical thinking; Mindfulness; Buddhism; Metacognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Mindfulness meditation; Cognition; Pedagogy; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10429846753704532,"score_gpt":0.4155374931503654,"score_spread":0.3112390256133201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115494046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16379084,0.0001313853,0.28540412,0.16062976,0.003355137,0.0007477781,0.00012451195,0.00023849495,0.38557798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98203474,4.841863e-8,0.00029025416,0.01478133,0.00019195238,0.0007592517,0.000014605369,0.000010906921,0.0019169336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985612,0.00006221964,0.00048002898,0.00025732297,0.0002777202,0.0003614966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993043,0.00011591669,0.00006337716,0.00019317132,0.00008504337,0.00023821667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026608366,0.00014821271,0.00021052275,0.00011790586,0.00015848453,0.00007586795,0.00033748202,0.00013714338,0.04091231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002001391,0.00013242238,0.000108618115,0.00034766571,0.000053171185,0.00022289621,0.00010079814,0.00032024592,0.0023038655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020562227,0.00033988705,0.0020856368,0.0000761842,0.000029794126,0.00011194014,0.024548385,0.00009880882,0.000009342736,0.5827472,0.36509314,0.02465405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053983256,0.003099607,0.10481337,0.0008583421,0.00016656064,0.00023310907,0.11622513,0.011065847,0.0038896955,0.08104157,0.67097867,0.0022297918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006936995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003127063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81824386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024852345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052577776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116304264","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6310","title":"Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Construct (python library); Public health; Compliance (psychology); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Computer science; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Disease","score_opus":0.06257653265293545,"score_gpt":0.3442094983523258,"score_spread":0.28163296569939034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116304264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057836663,0.00011095217,0.0011527416,0.011144189,0.000101027916,0.00017841026,0.000008468728,0.00020996633,0.9292576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546667,0.00014102002,0.00057776907,0.043456994,0.00015036411,8.89994e-7,0.0000064795995,0.000002810285,0.0009969726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926704,0.0000281346,0.00016716558,0.000063446256,0.00023177589,0.0002424505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919736,0.0000515025,0.00007679029,0.000053526834,0.000026561022,0.0005942736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037945563,0.00006667901,0.00008706294,0.000029630526,0.00042075734,0.00016392095,0.00012727572,0.000071552444,0.0008452597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014838452,0.00005691222,0.000025066562,0.00016448992,0.000118403856,0.0008599768,0.00004771966,0.00009796509,0.00024896435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004939861,0.0000094176075,0.0036202276,0.000055948425,0.000012174664,0.000012660796,0.24011102,0.00014546374,0.000009217292,0.69795436,0.020304201,0.03771591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000372024,0.000077668745,0.006018917,0.0000063310504,0.0000041558,0.0000053630497,0.014107567,0.0007110517,0.000009689733,0.00036606134,0.9781852,0.0001359681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023168944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101115125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029094928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003096887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9255001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116995137","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6070","title":"Putting Reasons in their Place","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11057870179605298,"score_gpt":0.2589531819822904,"score_spread":0.14837448018623742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116995137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19518138,0.00024463763,0.00008380756,0.0068125175,0.0004544493,0.00016913797,0.000029106266,0.0001661674,0.7968588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990672,0.000019613823,0.00019197921,0.0072719934,0.0005048447,0.0000071509,0.0000130024255,0.0000074165973,0.0013120029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936366,0.000031044543,0.00020694562,0.000099915145,0.00007595339,0.00022245324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996309,0.000109893364,0.000070525624,0.000089502326,0.000041299703,0.000057842168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021865992,0.000100538535,0.00015590798,0.000029271912,0.00012278302,0.00006229736,0.00014405159,0.000056575303,0.0002693084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119451935,0.00007682876,0.000059299102,0.0000331767,0.0001612815,0.00026922283,0.000057256657,0.00029496703,0.00022487038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019924493,0.0000189099,0.00094219635,0.000058471927,0.000012277419,0.000010831315,0.106342025,0.000082049584,0.000016581953,0.8854096,0.0011850126,0.005902098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000527912,0.00019964551,0.0008860917,0.00004742399,0.000010736106,0.000005278784,0.014876524,0.0009507099,0.0001361931,0.022812683,0.95927274,0.00027407968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009396079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039772884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008889495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034025074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31329855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117295765","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i4.6034","title":"Exploring the Effect of a Scaffolding Design on Students’ Argument Critique Skills","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Task (project management); Scaffold; Mathematics education; Test (biology); Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10482706211520039,"score_gpt":0.35995646369878387,"score_spread":0.2551294015835835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117295765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832324,0.000016667916,0.00022423857,0.0018076823,0.00019443472,0.00031633076,0.000001069213,0.00006962171,0.014137548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986645,0.00004331074,0.00015081848,0.00069868047,0.00031018874,0.00006468939,0.0000010473541,0.0000042926013,0.000062488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895185,0.0002163377,0.00017389782,0.00008662133,0.00036548235,0.00020581354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910694,0.000640435,0.000073297764,0.000073454816,0.0000364548,0.00006939744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013172256,0.000072923816,0.00010971584,0.000029642033,0.00035437642,0.00008932526,0.00027247393,0.000028552166,0.000026066271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008544105,0.00004966106,0.000051072628,0.00017058649,0.00007270914,0.00023607814,0.000035756406,0.00010463815,0.000041112016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006094163,0.00043193356,0.095399104,0.00055771245,0.00017963855,0.000021816226,0.5581539,0.0074135396,0.0022052235,0.13522856,0.004900351,0.19489877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008410093,0.02330455,0.2371187,0.003807684,0.00045037235,0.000015221696,0.2559434,0.0012407624,0.38071617,0.0032752343,0.082646646,0.003071183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001246819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006488821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37851095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033034303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039457005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27256128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121796051","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2904","title":"Belief-Overkill in Political Judgments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Position (finance); Politics; Social psychology; Adversary; Psychology; Phenomenon; Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.04405389901281902,"score_gpt":0.35689316373343605,"score_spread":0.312839264720617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121796051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45061648,0.000044518576,0.0000014696832,0.0013051437,0.00011818563,0.000106110456,0.000002795224,0.000034944285,0.5477703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958664,0.000023473625,0.00022606403,0.0032365925,0.000064981556,0.0000069252173,0.000002589282,0.000002083,0.0005708926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906784,0.000017556345,0.00020181303,0.00009587376,0.00013162562,0.00048531368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975365,0.000019077099,0.00003318067,0.00007326308,0.00001530283,0.00010553118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017739098,0.00007722558,0.00011737857,0.00005473018,0.00016249118,0.000039429426,0.00016149408,0.00006942066,0.00013490701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004090796,0.00007497741,0.000037310918,0.000096320175,0.00013934264,0.00038729876,0.000047634014,0.00009448031,0.00026007547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011831639,0.0000902495,0.043730978,8.1666775e-7,0.0000020284206,0.000008283987,0.0037860735,0.0000045879674,0.00006647973,0.9488951,0.00026855344,0.0031350155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024226182,0.0010944024,0.7566854,0.000049352777,0.000016918699,0.0000065195723,0.03207604,0.000052584215,0.0021824788,0.114556395,0.08968058,0.0011767133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014925612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005802047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022814491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004426799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33428308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123720998","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i1.657","title":"Quotations and Presumptions: Dialogical Effects of Misquotations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore","keywords":"Dialog box; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Fallacy; Context (archaeology); Articulation (sociology); Equivocation; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.040700388292869066,"score_gpt":0.23705683448492104,"score_spread":0.19635644619205198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123720998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38281092,0.0002719145,0.5951222,0.00008439375,0.00047859087,0.0006016253,0.0000053361296,0.00016579193,0.020459214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979077,0.000025309053,0.02066558,0.00008833332,0.000015779608,0.000034796332,0.0000031979696,0.0000017175207,0.00008827773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999416,0.00003066907,0.0002283478,0.000102633276,0.00010883824,0.00011350597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995051,0.00011094902,0.00010842188,0.00016723888,0.0000551858,0.000053124786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010349496,0.00006649631,0.00009287669,0.000078620156,0.000086294116,0.000025115547,0.00017393664,0.000045741752,0.000017235783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008561969,0.000052358075,0.000032715612,0.00013076972,0.00003907909,0.0005886327,0.00006625301,0.00004588811,0.000035087898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007962891,0.00017504659,0.013928932,0.00016442325,0.00002890301,0.000006506347,0.013102191,0.00007826619,0.0014919186,0.9550941,0.00020989419,0.015711874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052530767,0.00023457229,0.9787885,0.000036097204,0.000012877955,0.000015238676,0.000050590057,0.011049478,0.0022536847,0.0063857296,0.00049478613,0.0001531565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005349095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009485251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96485955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005213781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016082056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21351004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123886083","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.543","title":"Tu Quoque Arguments and the Significance of Hypocrisy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Sincerity; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Adversary; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06841100786804294,"score_gpt":0.31363317025062304,"score_spread":0.2452221623825801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123886083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21332768,0.00013169834,0.00005910871,0.0061127925,0.0001249037,0.0002028673,0.0000065043505,0.000026533384,0.7800079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730355,0.00017209689,0.00007248987,0.0018654122,0.000091245354,0.000006696149,4.7635885e-7,0.0000013451457,0.00048668514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931806,0.000071260336,0.00014709837,0.00005051709,0.00021590204,0.0001971726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994652,0.0002957142,0.00004929497,0.0000782727,0.00004411381,0.000067376866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049412064,0.000046204055,0.00009617015,0.000014156312,0.00036153023,0.000010382595,0.00015319706,0.0000671301,0.000033146185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041093567,0.000028841181,0.000033987115,0.00008194567,0.0019803734,0.00017838525,0.000035477107,0.0001391141,0.000025731842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026215363,0.000009153625,0.0007251983,0.0000060667567,0.000004243566,0.0000016397391,0.0065710065,0.000004308515,0.00000427721,0.9923081,0.0000957389,0.00024406833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010624211,0.000098188946,0.016819214,0.000013689804,0.000014827729,0.000007961803,0.0019634156,0.000060326245,0.0002857928,0.9257237,0.05377379,0.00017669161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011282186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000378094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000098599285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008608602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72967684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123960466","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4719","title":"Anything Goes: An Apology for Parallel Distributed Legal Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal realism; Legal science; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Legal profession; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06997384762087296,"score_gpt":0.4117177567235346,"score_spread":0.34174390910266167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123960466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20740809,0.00003085909,0.121971294,0.26624423,0.0039258017,0.0011878157,0.00017406253,0.0005511256,0.39850673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99202895,0.00000924621,0.0034751906,0.0024925282,0.0002610121,0.00004174694,0.00001675026,0.0000029968453,0.0016715829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.000039146435,0.00020414537,0.00013573094,0.00022091396,0.00039517635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989743,0.00026479742,0.00012376255,0.00014450206,0.00035993694,0.00013267933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014034581,0.00006362715,0.00007253938,0.00009784841,0.0011752881,0.00032727598,0.00037615077,0.00007128949,0.00030587421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027129923,0.000043450906,0.000027286294,0.00051010837,0.0007487692,0.005103313,0.00003182666,0.00010106537,0.00009797441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018841034,0.000030900002,0.000516796,0.0000016677359,0.0000023149435,3.2592106e-7,0.0033241003,0.0000070214946,0.00024091157,0.9823414,0.0012293507,0.012286335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026057052,0.00009624582,0.0026784553,0.0000041270787,0.000004200894,0.000003420975,0.004294962,0.000054096516,0.000087583176,0.010871442,0.98152596,0.00011894946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079262943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044355955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098768774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013596182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9039485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126028283","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.550","title":"Arguing from Definition to Verbal Classification: The Case of Redefining 'Planet' to Exclude Pluto","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Pluto; Style (visual arts); Computer science; Planet; Classification scheme; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Philosophy; Astrobiology; History","score_opus":0.11669377442459032,"score_gpt":0.2723813201979014,"score_spread":0.15568754577331106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126028283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8006843,0.00004199616,0.18530712,0.00057025696,0.0005009947,0.0003397633,0.000032361637,0.00009279787,0.012430416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98201185,0.0000043641503,0.016970292,0.0008461254,0.00009065272,0.0000226846,0.000025027104,0.0000033277145,0.00002566309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906963,0.000034453264,0.0003608872,0.00016817603,0.00018733567,0.00017949211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992169,0.000115449126,0.00014679325,0.00038275926,0.00005534813,0.00008273545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022620555,0.00009554024,0.00012003719,0.000076177894,0.00022924007,0.00005101783,0.00035939022,0.00005356787,0.000022383001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005766357,0.00007045278,0.000031396146,0.00024958904,0.000017774828,0.0003476836,0.00012649181,0.00007661236,0.0002772762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028220174,0.00028484382,0.013991351,0.00012629064,0.00013455428,0.0017164303,0.1379351,0.02656238,0.028161265,0.67940193,0.023580588,0.08782306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031016162,0.0016721012,0.6286845,0.0003716238,0.000055138473,0.0065394146,0.005368882,0.2702272,0.008637809,0.002984172,0.07036034,0.0019971915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077993143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085294014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67641777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031297834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036464397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35639173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126056798","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.512","title":"On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Sentence; State (computer science); Position (finance); Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.048102974027944195,"score_gpt":0.29248937480366005,"score_spread":0.24438640077571586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126056798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90653276,0.000022151184,0.00080502237,0.0047540944,0.0000363534,0.00026935615,0.00001772104,0.000018380204,0.08754415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986708,0.00005259983,0.000033290158,0.00065461075,0.000028596416,0.000025119623,0.000002206908,9.186466e-7,0.000531837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.00006635238,0.00016840568,0.000069783935,0.000213977,0.00014635065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994602,0.00021343584,0.00009211094,0.00014873645,0.000041283405,0.00004419033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023358958,0.000055133172,0.000112712485,0.000026003216,0.0007815097,0.000031466087,0.00022074663,0.000055524597,0.0002768316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012161683,0.000026156458,0.00010908681,0.0002788179,0.0005255966,0.00008192397,0.000055415956,0.00012440528,0.000012266018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006935213,0.000035990044,0.01578659,5.325583e-7,0.000053822285,2.8520012e-7,0.0018069674,0.00006133695,0.000010449665,0.9818346,0.00012569752,0.0002768253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028706447,0.00006371171,0.9493605,0.000003878234,0.00014573209,0.0000017354481,0.0007741578,0.00058851705,0.000071481925,0.0082531925,0.040346812,0.000103229555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013819252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00226446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016796188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007382628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60108197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134147817","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6686","title":"\"Argument and Social Justice\" and \"Reasoning for Change\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Social justice; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.13573150868142844,"score_gpt":0.3743410756992972,"score_spread":0.23860956701786876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134147817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17695184,0.0013890474,0.0007386718,0.10000788,0.0011212385,0.0006713986,0.00009063096,0.00016645806,0.71886283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908603,0.000093441835,0.0005585362,0.0073292423,0.00081408734,0.000019165427,0.0000060818134,0.0000024631584,0.00031671042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944067,0.000024310622,0.000082730825,0.00007714466,0.00011588201,0.0002592332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996643,0.00014215319,0.000022763952,0.000027519334,0.000059965285,0.000083273975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031784453,0.000049685143,0.00007824152,0.000013024177,0.00067944353,0.000073881056,0.000039314004,0.00010581337,0.00002373652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026951247,0.00004659303,0.000022962795,0.000043255415,0.000228593,0.00023666803,0.000051919807,0.00009209386,0.0000046194086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062470926,0.000006475709,0.000097422846,0.000056242076,0.000004108844,0.0000020729499,0.010591629,1.1567485e-7,0.0000033891515,0.9845502,0.000078003795,0.0046040965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086123374,0.00015287758,0.008902595,0.000036377285,0.00014931832,0.000009490058,0.018353,0.00025395522,0.00009401153,0.55111754,0.4197038,0.00036577974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064418906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074006915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81390846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015706393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006423716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5225799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134349690","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6688","title":"Picturing a Thousand Unspoken Words","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Sociology; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012149233236909368,"score_gpt":0.2239499615804703,"score_spread":0.21180072834356095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134349690","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25413314,0.0002912089,0.5125431,0.00064631953,0.0012688885,0.00012137401,0.0000015758935,0.0007445511,0.23024987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97416645,0.000027362468,0.022512052,0.0010698284,0.00010937166,0.000006479314,0.0000027899403,0.0000041601356,0.002101491],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992679,0.000016545646,0.00014328753,0.0001522051,0.00016491117,0.00025516047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952364,0.00001963051,0.000038580452,0.00029786202,0.000048708964,0.00007159501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012582622,0.00008415699,0.00008462745,0.000049006085,0.00012304337,0.0001905663,0.00029445134,0.000056149194,0.000062162115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032025153,0.00007227058,0.0000515415,0.00030041757,0.00001452475,0.0005721614,0.0001884915,0.00012994782,0.00026845286],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035904854,0.00011429178,0.0035008884,0.00008006824,0.00006995113,0.0011146555,0.0039268457,0.003256478,0.005805776,0.18653263,0.001339205,0.7942233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023131594,0.00067597785,0.04667019,0.00013648043,0.00002732099,0.0022875099,0.00055335026,0.04449873,0.30573198,0.026275355,0.56917477,0.001655167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008789509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000893466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79256815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016496391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006589924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34505078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134544310","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6691","title":"Youth Voting, Rational Competency, and Epistemic Injustice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Voting; Worry; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04485955607563597,"score_gpt":0.3052832104326701,"score_spread":0.26042365435703413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134544310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14935128,0.0013075591,0.00033850828,0.004580837,0.0006906007,0.000112495385,0.00002112993,0.00008786055,0.84350973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945415,0.00010615251,0.00059847627,0.0012771867,0.00013622164,0.0000038684975,0.000016650232,0.000001983325,0.003317963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926895,0.000077706056,0.00016924353,0.00011467562,0.0001526908,0.00021675098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995691,0.00014384363,0.00006114417,0.00005933277,0.000108277934,0.000058269634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003626745,0.00006989348,0.00011402854,0.000021317624,0.0007343072,0.000043002325,0.00008409066,0.000083171406,0.000114919756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003474639,0.000064726024,0.000029635863,0.000112211565,0.0003785123,0.00015729644,0.000089365385,0.00011003844,0.00005798935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116964675,0.000017349652,0.041396637,0.000026082418,0.000023160976,0.000020795467,0.041924845,0.00000879284,0.000008714302,0.91508627,0.0003983152,0.001077339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015839002,0.00032468163,0.43338725,0.000104921746,0.00019813927,0.00018403052,0.43188187,0.00024156788,0.00021205489,0.05734103,0.073472135,0.0010684086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011801566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078871165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85774523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017005397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022191748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5647772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135189573","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6690","title":"Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Harm; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Position (finance); Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08738983187923953,"score_gpt":0.34913340870453263,"score_spread":0.2617435768252931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135189573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05445226,0.00013427963,0.00012483285,0.024726171,0.00065292587,0.00008669802,0.000007036156,0.00013406022,0.9196817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699376,0.000037346414,0.00047987245,0.026307328,0.0009090113,0.0000046862597,0.0000026944092,0.0000035517473,0.0023179038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898255,0.000050087427,0.00015100597,0.00009979042,0.0002893271,0.00042724438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993425,0.00014971074,0.000020766764,0.00011585058,0.00009973118,0.00027142573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038540212,0.000064732136,0.00009443173,0.000032080043,0.0003746253,0.00008425846,0.00017817294,0.00012781665,0.00014090995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012565888,0.00006136792,0.000055313296,0.00021139874,0.0001268046,0.0004235478,0.00006866546,0.00020411995,0.0010960929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036469426,0.000012708307,0.000055792294,0.0000047262447,0.0000032348833,0.000022732316,0.0034421766,0.000026151303,0.00004380186,0.99412864,0.0003069708,0.0019494366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001316678,0.00007719889,0.0014187492,0.00002332364,0.0000073004567,0.0000044393323,0.0018875726,0.000017962619,0.0007095689,0.61384356,0.38164905,0.00022963872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016637536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015028576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004139731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024178353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135798979","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6687","title":"“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Politeness; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02411024435833721,"score_gpt":0.26712221614231596,"score_spread":0.24301197178397876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135798979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63862133,0.0018072744,0.000008258201,0.00047783362,0.00029079898,0.000081861785,0.000030606498,0.000051479812,0.35863054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97149384,0.0007590798,0.00005705927,0.003099658,0.00033621825,0.00002816157,0.000045601977,0.000010367567,0.024170041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989931,0.000024834602,0.00024654195,0.00017061258,0.00019446867,0.00037046155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999462,0.000050626986,0.00008952621,0.00017514393,0.00014689153,0.000075773205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013304227,0.00017153857,0.00026364168,0.00007507303,0.00028147592,0.0007137068,0.00011060217,0.000030364588,0.004759648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003480875,0.00012460629,0.000069393776,0.000057549867,0.00051461585,0.0016354368,0.00019582176,0.00010192875,0.00024179011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030139656,0.0000817897,0.00083428837,0.00008451472,0.000461856,0.000104775805,0.45346743,0.000030084579,0.000018131803,0.5201881,0.0011090337,0.023589851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005839625,0.00015165233,0.0018954508,0.00005766283,0.000070432674,0.000013962427,0.8353737,0.00004127298,0.00027613636,0.012255071,0.14886,0.0004207252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000698787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003701614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.507933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004618909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029831137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99615014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137580232","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.5580","title":"Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Deliberation; Toolbox; Dialogical self; Negotiation; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.02647462598638262,"score_gpt":0.24472321853219098,"score_spread":0.21824859254580836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137580232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6855592,0.0005693116,0.28731677,0.0017743232,0.00091561687,0.0002842846,0.0000030577223,0.00012656616,0.023450876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940275,0.000022425225,0.00474421,0.00055633124,0.000026178519,0.000006575777,0.000008427605,0.0000011196973,0.0006072379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950653,0.0000147617,0.00013356356,0.000106961204,0.00013604059,0.00010212108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973595,0.000011041348,0.000048175203,0.00012795109,0.000035893485,0.00004096832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009209681,0.000050499766,0.00005347855,0.000022753457,0.00007303562,0.00010885072,0.00008397778,0.000020768324,0.000028477465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008580966,0.000042014468,0.0000317386,0.00007389321,0.000007707229,0.00048102633,0.00009770702,0.00002780837,0.00005277068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020559028,0.00030366113,0.06455554,0.000304757,0.00016824587,0.00010272291,0.020668926,0.0021784657,0.011864139,0.5513315,0.0031731648,0.3453283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027488226,0.0005728247,0.6150088,0.00009727588,0.000039232753,0.0003006615,0.0027185164,0.30093417,0.016553761,0.0015233138,0.05865926,0.0008434109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009914816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005612456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5504532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018202318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001987104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17133002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167101461","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6506","title":"Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Narrative; Credibility; Storytelling; Key (lock); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Empirical evidence; Sociology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11870500366865791,"score_gpt":0.34305655834487603,"score_spread":0.22435155467621812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167101461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61947787,0.0007681243,0.000031641677,0.00048232905,0.0003020591,0.00014790265,0.000016411628,0.000064723,0.37870893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058586,0.00021580687,0.0004638354,0.00031418202,0.00007953125,0.000023007082,0.00002348981,0.000004892031,0.008289421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991114,0.000057247627,0.00031803237,0.00011099767,0.00023356974,0.00016871287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895525,0.00009371287,0.00020531351,0.00033249974,0.0003753289,0.000037886053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017359662,0.00010598309,0.00015317778,0.000053211625,0.00023656181,0.00013568773,0.00025879702,0.00003861171,0.0068378826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021051875,0.000084809246,0.00006244651,0.00006721998,0.00027721628,0.0012323608,0.00012895247,0.000118770426,0.00027112916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009992181,0.00017534051,0.0006079981,0.00010573803,0.0000815936,0.000015728778,0.4856749,0.00027965693,0.0024363447,0.5029582,0.0021724885,0.0053921347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012131861,0.00073247135,0.005573234,0.00069494516,0.00006732075,0.00003858376,0.8810014,0.000571734,0.020879805,0.016726183,0.07179586,0.00070524844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019283242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044289837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48623198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024054725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013350126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168698922","doi":"","title":"Belief's Own Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.14634534080982523,"score_gpt":0.3005148551926571,"score_spread":0.15416951438283186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168698922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013893842,0.00023551277,0.00017630741,0.0005922835,0.0015271135,0.00010872385,0.000013707826,0.0001200761,0.98333246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457944,0.00008318386,0.00035230885,0.011830748,0.0005358377,0.000014105619,0.000020048898,0.000015321946,0.04135404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990277,0.00007867687,0.00026443854,0.00011652554,0.0001970691,0.00031558058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992373,0.00020520206,0.00009845631,0.0002160709,0.00017449884,0.00006847891],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071258424,0.00014064574,0.00017543863,0.00005174653,0.00044824302,0.00010530368,0.00015593339,0.00017531813,0.0013953137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030564904,0.000109115936,0.00010257665,0.000027908241,0.0005084859,0.00032125966,0.000029308429,0.0007326161,0.00090655347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042315073,0.00002515665,0.00006820008,0.00003526711,0.000015782118,0.000003979512,0.029055264,0.000012406602,0.0000062006725,0.9688737,0.0014070807,0.00049277814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018680574,0.00011155501,0.00008122366,0.000009411875,0.000014591347,0.00000768217,0.0027420458,0.000008052084,0.000108860426,0.073300876,0.92325735,0.00017153553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093696464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038018514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012489163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010499725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169881780","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6338","title":"Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Premise; Ethos; Epistemology; Socratic method; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05205293204337876,"score_gpt":0.24505454503459603,"score_spread":0.19300161299121726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169881780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08076207,0.00012335478,0.00000881782,0.0026378052,0.0003847444,0.00006610751,0.000016382486,0.000044274428,0.91595644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937651,0.000014793336,0.000052500905,0.0024846413,0.000693465,0.000010081213,0.000064459586,0.000004902324,0.0029100329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994163,0.000013728366,0.0002115852,0.00009466996,0.0001111449,0.00015258697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997468,0.00003166036,0.00004199923,0.00009926248,0.00004458719,0.0000356766],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005574745,0.00008397273,0.00011063327,0.000055119646,0.000088172106,0.00008037871,0.000065498665,0.000032478027,0.0022334317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023005265,0.0000708665,0.000054379,0.00005284319,0.00008162878,0.00040069167,0.00003930579,0.00012107888,0.00042653503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019493722,0.00006394838,0.00011718954,0.000016755324,0.000006029023,0.000039622286,0.0019964254,0.00001534104,0.00003076384,0.9949049,0.00039021036,0.0023993587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012332277,0.000152157,0.0027458738,0.000047028527,0.0000129793725,0.000012744869,0.0009863519,0.00018234804,0.00089082407,0.53648376,0.4569388,0.00031385632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012381053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017785218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018094794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020087751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170645942","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6249","title":"Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Warrant; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Argumentation theory; Metaphilosophy; Modern philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07601258236806627,"score_gpt":0.2633447537202323,"score_spread":0.18733217135216604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170645942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824942,0.00086708943,0.000036057943,0.0028505423,0.0009092548,0.00017180333,0.000031700052,0.000012920351,0.11262644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853873,0.000050980965,0.00003161492,0.00031677677,0.00013199807,0.0000042978504,0.000004638608,0.0000022460774,0.0009187423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957114,0.00004861951,0.00019984129,0.000054399196,0.0000642804,0.00006168883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940485,0.00006862446,0.00016097577,0.00018821904,0.000166991,0.000010344888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022673715,0.00005092548,0.00009504703,0.000016572756,0.00019615008,0.00001942758,0.00006569307,0.000030569474,0.00005937221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005111997,0.000026710955,0.00006064461,0.000033501517,0.00053302496,0.00012734889,0.00004039474,0.00010546027,0.0000030494866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004542494,0.000019392282,0.000039320126,0.000069622736,0.000026472688,0.0000025538204,0.012585797,0.000013656371,0.0001941247,0.9853303,0.000056141846,0.001658105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010277396,0.00036327436,0.0051515875,0.00010335711,0.0008686096,0.0009663164,0.08461981,0.00050107,0.038999908,0.6380448,0.22890441,0.00044916634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121296755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024664766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3472855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031431919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022987664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19639526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172785524","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6221","title":"Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Decoupling (probability); Recursion (computer science); Phenomenon; Representation (politics); Computer science; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026877883568998735,"score_gpt":0.3166994423633863,"score_spread":0.2898215587943876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172785524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7883961,0.00072868075,0.0015087251,0.00018687137,0.00024978508,0.00011335767,0.000007397995,0.00001647628,0.20879258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723786,0.00003452287,0.00017983603,0.0007053925,0.00003886391,0.000021137532,0.000019770367,0.0000024934816,0.0017600992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999568,0.000034873818,0.00016091498,0.000070247086,0.00007113886,0.000094815376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962723,0.0001001704,0.000064506334,0.00014089094,0.000048824957,0.00001838198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019800304,0.000042596468,0.00008160983,0.000024015582,0.000057169524,0.0000145341055,0.00004958229,0.000034546367,0.0006934076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076186996,0.000027446462,0.000036847476,0.00009218212,0.00007292241,0.00006734743,0.000034827408,0.0000624441,0.00005112409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004911407,0.00021623107,0.031523224,0.00006355259,0.0003816197,0.000095715426,0.042085808,0.00009424279,0.0007004042,0.84593034,0.0009699241,0.0774478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021355674,0.00037082756,0.7209502,0.00010365672,0.000514576,0.00074620364,0.12038109,0.0026692983,0.013652281,0.10774971,0.010707435,0.00079903525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057676127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014841493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73818064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022440254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010416704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7592327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183338055","doi":"","title":"Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.047171164758725556,"score_gpt":0.23049261632130055,"score_spread":0.183321451562575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183338055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11405875,0.00016812506,0.000002015602,0.00032806196,0.0002034559,0.00008406668,0.000006642975,0.000026573614,0.8851223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973688,0.00001767295,0.00004147227,0.0011899739,0.000121122335,0.000008981894,0.000003592399,0.000004578467,0.001243781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999445,0.000018252595,0.00017941973,0.000092146576,0.0000913984,0.00017373459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978966,0.000027143396,0.000035485962,0.000081294565,0.000014878574,0.000051537216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010745196,0.00009731964,0.00012310279,0.00007772626,0.00009980199,0.000062439125,0.000057611087,0.000032944423,0.00069741975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028188813,0.00007361085,0.000036506986,0.000034415643,0.00014484308,0.00033001826,0.000023039856,0.00012046575,0.00013536462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009369864,0.00003323921,0.00035627454,0.000010301798,0.0000070934125,0.0000067564574,0.0016770158,0.000002251139,0.0000019618076,0.9970981,0.00007823531,0.00071941124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047572728,0.00009796859,0.0006568572,0.0000125343795,0.000007557271,0.0000043754685,0.00026389255,0.000018832987,0.000052713913,0.60113263,0.39711994,0.00015695363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014663187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005352484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8838785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000085456695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007558187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7636257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199257122","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6844","title":"Inference Claims as Assertions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.10907747504918679,"score_gpt":0.3166324414169478,"score_spread":0.207554966367761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199257122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12414,0.00013791079,0.00013159608,0.0012963107,0.00083251344,0.000057353394,0.000012563666,0.000104057886,0.8732877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95609134,0.00005249968,0.00014891342,0.0059891953,0.00039189713,0.000011898409,0.000052129606,0.0000061994015,0.037255917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930704,0.000029864967,0.00021353677,0.00010533889,0.00012571283,0.00021850821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993255,0.00010942076,0.000063121166,0.00019575281,0.0002484378,0.000057771987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012623113,0.00009891261,0.00013822682,0.000033305198,0.0003117593,0.00014260228,0.00012217075,0.00007520216,0.0026914936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011557817,0.00008281954,0.00008846896,0.000035061596,0.00024993974,0.00038318813,0.00005815641,0.00026403464,0.0014737258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033692318,0.00003282775,0.00025566595,0.000018756544,0.00001680564,0.000013834776,0.00777367,0.000012191843,0.000039072816,0.9898712,0.0008289476,0.001133669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018026531,0.00010720518,0.0012531825,0.00001735756,0.000022286058,0.000015531927,0.0048593967,0.00004371027,0.0005086116,0.13745145,0.8553473,0.00019374049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009945737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088486413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8545183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000102317545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014894131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200163468","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6855","title":"Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CHIST-ERA; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Utterance; Monism; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Plural; Speech act; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05843194211953079,"score_gpt":0.3075587762303023,"score_spread":0.24912683411077152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200163468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33330232,0.00038298336,0.0000030064991,0.0008956395,0.0001786913,0.000081295235,0.000028706685,0.00006395996,0.6650634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899794,0.0000671345,0.00030287268,0.0015515711,0.00012403964,0.000016414751,0.00012646941,0.0000069273765,0.008806606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924165,0.000048906757,0.00025198318,0.00009699375,0.00014241593,0.0002180391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946463,0.00006641808,0.00008061681,0.0002668443,0.00008881946,0.000032644293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000111200985,0.00011518442,0.00014408959,0.00007413357,0.00012983261,0.00026260942,0.0002257663,0.000036214245,0.0043537556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034157933,0.00009133854,0.000052208597,0.000057697172,0.00018522183,0.0007599322,0.00012097175,0.00017655618,0.00039339668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014227676,0.0000620876,0.00072729297,0.000011927675,0.000024706567,0.000075808,0.09073687,0.000014195802,0.000075266325,0.9035476,0.00083922636,0.0038708262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001839241,0.00019315674,0.022519588,0.00011615957,0.000035079927,0.00008038007,0.5347335,0.0000825921,0.0055858386,0.03819839,0.3957165,0.00089958124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045737642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003969718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8653492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028855007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078381134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200256811","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6840","title":"Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Axiom; sort; Sociology; Speech act; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029513079066404286,"score_gpt":0.263346243746123,"score_spread":0.23383316467971868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200256811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6194548,0.0000591697,0.000005966146,0.00019180872,0.0004334176,0.00005240965,0.000018925524,0.000028459046,0.37975505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189293,0.00002876152,0.000041099524,0.0002752573,0.00013841252,0.0000039820006,0.000015339036,0.000003938778,0.0076002823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933314,0.00003339154,0.00024656003,0.00008536985,0.0001481196,0.00015338913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991646,0.000023124703,0.00007882017,0.00014062556,0.00055129506,0.000041536856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016522019,0.00007857652,0.00013845784,0.000035517027,0.0001473923,0.000078387115,0.00008413276,0.000036607802,0.0033850651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064766115,0.00006696924,0.00005196431,0.00006038895,0.000098036224,0.0002758185,0.000061025756,0.000101477126,0.0001390666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008144479,0.00008056921,0.0035380442,0.0000562432,0.000023747367,0.000008229702,0.0019744306,0.000018784598,0.00029518068,0.99214804,0.0004639208,0.001384681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010473119,0.00046130907,0.10922712,0.00010326025,0.00007992583,0.000028365808,0.0033151056,0.00048391166,0.0102601005,0.061895933,0.8124752,0.000622466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012082006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050536655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000148385325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011284534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200895625","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6854","title":"Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Speech act; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Epistemology; Linguistics; Position (finance); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012676637355366014,"score_gpt":0.24691328910885463,"score_spread":0.23423665175348862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200895625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499099,0.000057512672,0.0071606277,0.00024965213,0.0001264684,0.00008976349,7.274737e-7,0.000024995084,0.04238031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895115,0.000062448744,0.010042625,0.00030121984,0.000017151524,0.0000061847304,0.0000017464979,0.0000012801102,0.000055852463],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993579,0.00003852687,0.00015974761,0.00010936151,0.00018969683,0.00014477676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996301,0.000052227064,0.00005626994,0.00018351254,0.000059006423,0.000018896793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037026152,0.00006316093,0.00008073739,0.000055763372,0.00007896963,0.00005202624,0.00021003048,0.00003635033,0.000007633741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024489334,0.00004439357,0.000023895775,0.00033233358,0.000031166,0.00052952755,0.00012177228,0.00016831505,0.0000061061473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003951729,0.00022053141,0.062663384,0.00014843143,0.000041167023,0.0002619619,0.008606305,0.0017059483,0.0040878356,0.101683185,0.00014385668,0.82039785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005831978,0.0004806762,0.922195,0.00007159284,0.000006075836,0.00080229744,0.0013759194,0.05090357,0.017616518,0.0026809298,0.0030398231,0.00024435614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019586216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009379488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85953164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002144071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099137156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18103173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201060884","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6851","title":"Act or Object","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ambiguity; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Relation (database); Externality; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06399501483686106,"score_gpt":0.2419428691968619,"score_spread":0.17794785436000082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201060884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018076612,0.00015458207,0.0000038185094,0.00022480177,0.00092364865,0.00003331933,0.000011227451,0.00007196963,0.98050004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333392,0.000018918105,0.000055164546,0.003221545,0.0006452628,0.0000047646527,0.0000097094635,0.0000040387013,0.0627014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942786,0.00000875707,0.0001345922,0.000093142524,0.0001446381,0.00019100438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996764,0.000023239303,0.000037010865,0.0001405105,0.000069595444,0.00005324245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007909174,0.000076532095,0.000097173724,0.000049375645,0.00032952186,0.00012533461,0.00014136027,0.000020126572,0.0084244395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003366618,0.000052191124,0.000059691538,0.00003824221,0.0002034785,0.0004590596,0.00004460837,0.00008887466,0.0010562085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029058496,0.000044067572,0.00006228725,0.000022849952,0.000010740542,0.000090709356,0.0202728,0.000006585156,0.000037673744,0.96210665,0.011163963,0.0061526266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001238411,0.000071901,0.00027972902,0.0000059837394,0.0000049625137,0.000017108146,0.001136262,0.000020929017,0.00006968993,0.0033977998,0.99476093,0.000110842644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039895574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007694736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.983597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021821987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015881454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202368660","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6873","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018117455343335174,"score_gpt":0.2429755202637301,"score_spread":0.22485806492039492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202368660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02226288,0.00010829297,0.7013403,0.12196348,0.020434704,0.00062079995,0.0000044827143,0.00029085865,0.13297418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7223134,0.00004562676,0.037036963,0.022479085,0.16738713,0.000082243445,0.000044958808,0.000017473025,0.050593097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994021,0.00002482629,0.00014779241,0.00012736254,0.00016547438,0.0001324513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952316,0.0000125523675,0.00004104605,0.00031472242,0.00007116515,0.00003735286],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001934721,0.00005315097,0.000057778554,0.000028184542,0.000114781265,0.00013987292,0.00027018177,0.000027277934,0.00040350444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056761823,0.000034961875,0.000029710038,0.00025748453,0.0000059438826,0.00041305975,0.00014041022,0.00005942003,0.0023513227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081529215,0.000037892503,0.00030058992,0.000015413196,0.000012786026,0.000015935231,0.004335259,0.0035225959,0.00076217717,0.18798901,0.60615104,0.19684917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006632971,0.000026866846,0.0062355483,0.0000020235655,0.0000010099483,0.000027498534,0.00005607762,0.0031205865,0.0018132547,0.00011311448,0.98847955,0.000058134614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001256984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029038874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70005053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017747234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028227805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205220410","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6765","title":"Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politics; Epistemology; Informal logic; Sample (material); Positive economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027387518779317884,"score_gpt":0.27679296397998243,"score_spread":0.24940544520066454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205220410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7687984,0.000034506877,0.21218514,0.000546127,0.0005273316,0.00010522764,0.0000017240201,0.000060591592,0.01774094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643743,0.0000028219092,0.0029340647,0.00045264262,0.00003305655,0.0000056938006,0.0000066606563,0.0000015215406,0.00012613433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993209,0.00002082535,0.00019614992,0.000108141256,0.00014169676,0.00021228805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974096,0.000020770029,0.000034679142,0.00013671491,0.000021796872,0.000045072324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000106692656,0.00005309234,0.00007038754,0.000047055215,0.000033476917,0.000089219575,0.00013010988,0.00003152677,0.000023029455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027450486,0.000046861263,0.000024424975,0.00015451753,0.000006508995,0.0008930296,0.00008396788,0.000054132444,0.00008607558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047827825,0.000067186105,0.045843907,0.00004637279,0.000006120936,0.00008091118,0.0019792824,0.00113872,0.0025202583,0.938353,0.00004680219,0.009912645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014766243,0.00007879768,0.7945754,0.000088975365,0.0000031656546,0.000098304554,0.00069425453,0.17349647,0.021698872,0.0052696844,0.0021371227,0.00038233047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074969415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043417833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93308336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040709703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037532976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19109468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205316861","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6671","title":"A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Proposition; Epistemology; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030527233888512445,"score_gpt":0.2582461837036672,"score_spread":0.22771894981515475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205316861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29117242,0.00034431115,0.67873096,0.00016028382,0.00040358127,0.00015488752,0.000004120832,0.0000989667,0.02893047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941117,0.000008246628,0.0051329257,0.0003196305,0.000023029683,0.000004740373,0.000004740309,0.0000014307988,0.00039353268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941,0.000027476874,0.00020376337,0.00008878302,0.00015102867,0.00011898498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952763,0.000036409467,0.00009146927,0.00024465544,0.00006910656,0.00003074305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022122276,0.000053357682,0.0000895574,0.00003067596,0.00003666183,0.00003309349,0.00020496029,0.000030397397,0.0000957783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038025577,0.000042284737,0.00004647747,0.00013069733,0.000011653248,0.00034737625,0.00014223253,0.00003690654,0.000061185754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004550931,0.000049353694,0.0029351264,0.000047999936,0.000017891367,0.000009857171,0.00084964995,0.0001753551,0.0036280102,0.96685183,0.00029363713,0.025136767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026332224,0.00048700528,0.14356734,0.00013777576,0.000025819014,0.0001274792,0.0010318015,0.07818648,0.48223826,0.065427616,0.22520289,0.0009343301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000058992896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020675334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90142417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009360292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045637345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17243215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205401997","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6876","title":"Reflections on Minimal Adversariality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Adversarial system; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21766171383357957,"score_gpt":0.3516082177876585,"score_spread":0.13394650395407892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205401997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019611591,0.00002438877,0.00005724636,0.0015160027,0.0014676773,0.00005592215,0.00003105363,0.00009567346,0.9771404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706994,0.00001098808,0.00013308853,0.0026130828,0.0009414617,0.000008949006,0.000079030426,0.0000048103952,0.02550914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994129,0.000025156509,0.00018392269,0.00010558253,0.00012941913,0.00014305231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995305,0.000053888878,0.00005445342,0.00016582478,0.00015846785,0.000036853224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001519899,0.00007166557,0.0000801991,0.00003803975,0.0004130794,0.00012608257,0.000067594854,0.00005939134,0.0024873398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114897375,0.000062412415,0.00006021258,0.000030584488,0.00012595516,0.0002477642,0.000023222105,0.00018265702,0.00078326045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026422096,0.00004762891,0.000016689162,0.000015163587,0.0000104315695,0.000003725719,0.017044341,0.000028399048,0.00006068857,0.9780565,0.003537592,0.0011523981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018942682,0.00009285209,0.0010121877,0.0000093543695,0.000015940997,0.0000044666785,0.0077059735,0.00003662199,0.00050602946,0.0073937387,0.9829113,0.00012212664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009831065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008238106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002165448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007162324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205825353","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6662","title":"On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04549004275385226,"score_gpt":0.2664154574572638,"score_spread":0.22092541470341154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205825353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14792009,0.00004792713,0.000024522404,0.0023934385,0.00096233195,0.00010356108,0.00012424476,0.000058467373,0.8483654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675974,0.000006364544,0.00006361175,0.011096645,0.0009509119,0.000017890732,0.00011046817,0.000008765298,0.020147903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990411,0.000020236454,0.00026143907,0.00018127495,0.00022093563,0.00027500425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943787,0.000083383864,0.00005089053,0.00021461332,0.000077793724,0.0001354608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005946611,0.00015179826,0.00021260393,0.000062990766,0.00024653552,0.00018344058,0.00015196162,0.000058158483,0.005019732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054291675,0.00012331725,0.00011307898,0.000043920078,0.00008689424,0.00018880698,0.00011601516,0.00016315331,0.0039358675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056635035,0.00008226295,0.000018851553,0.000009734823,0.00003841121,0.000069545014,0.0046272636,0.000028690816,0.000022279655,0.9883624,0.0041770814,0.0025068931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037640444,0.00043591633,0.0005644098,0.00004724661,0.000019003874,0.0000035926898,0.0015431043,0.000032143726,0.0004903422,0.36501396,0.6312317,0.0002421757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014677952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020535957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8282175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028576691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034234123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205851247","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i2.6828","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05924928910875018,"score_gpt":0.2080753500811772,"score_spread":0.148826060972427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205851247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035529587,0.000653971,0.00017834398,0.00010191781,0.001190209,0.000040142106,0.00012639658,0.000016098586,0.9621633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8041563,0.00019726547,0.0012502235,0.0007246521,0.000047711288,0.0000047835183,0.0000122981455,0.000005578142,0.19360119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.0000025065078,0.00039256515,0.00015114795,0.000017266566,0.0001676578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953085,0.000023693912,0.00018704816,0.00018405939,0.00004040573,0.000033925928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023033466,0.00006497629,0.00022946484,0.00006382786,0.000053966723,0.000027784497,0.00011942107,0.000042773605,0.0065235617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011129194,0.0000712528,0.000083608014,0.000097954726,0.000071552204,0.00020802114,0.0001048474,0.000054040225,0.007672398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019499801,0.00006289401,0.013704663,0.000048231217,0.00010528571,0.0000109616285,0.0016365935,0.00035654448,0.000030907602,0.94686073,0.03552419,0.001639528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075017835,0.000057339952,0.018021304,0.000013270906,0.000008766205,0.000008721522,0.0018904072,0.0010073236,0.0010010377,0.01260121,0.9643401,0.0003003566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031296775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036801252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017516108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016306123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206541865","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.7062","title":"In Memoriam","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2688778067387211,"score_gpt":0.5181205932034403,"score_spread":0.2492427864647192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206541865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25052744,0.00010613468,0.0007628746,0.004845353,0.0027641617,0.0000919559,0.0000032393473,0.000023933993,0.7408749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97644645,0.000030830943,0.0013303991,0.007237034,0.00020137624,0.000009487487,0.0000054939997,0.0000021802375,0.014736731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836665,0.00005516062,0.0004410039,0.00012902694,0.0008462837,0.00016189321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991889,0.00020218086,0.00007633274,0.00026989108,0.00021630964,0.00004639671],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019235037,0.000056338165,0.000116345494,0.00012298327,0.00004534286,0.00012835929,0.00023767752,0.000041798063,0.012183901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007995268,0.00003896391,0.0000436063,0.0006678505,0.000020784813,0.0008415574,0.0000950278,0.00009906708,0.003474623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010714616,0.00033002987,0.22176021,0.000018339519,0.000020620793,0.0003357267,0.0051551894,0.015557389,0.0006584114,0.3357154,0.18088754,0.23945399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005246469,0.0000462055,0.1363641,0.000004518569,0.0000014022468,0.000027296808,0.0009633748,0.006558168,0.00094731373,0.03252886,0.8219187,0.00011538924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057803945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097590724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7261382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021047435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022711618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206653975","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i4.6233","title":"The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Syllogism; Argument (complex analysis); Dilemma; Section (typography); Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049096189142563265,"score_gpt":0.24016961664877584,"score_spread":0.1910734275062126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206653975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43796712,0.000547352,0.00015227197,0.0052126553,0.0010470595,0.00022499917,0.00014291766,0.00015907607,0.55454654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449027,0.000037601894,0.000010282327,0.0004475452,0.000988414,0.000015375525,0.000045469944,0.000006529247,0.0039585344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992508,0.000034767458,0.00021931856,0.00013353064,0.00014042483,0.00022110637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999334,0.0002728122,0.00007061636,0.0001571586,0.00009479124,0.00007064359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012672738,0.00012650894,0.000141198,0.000018556615,0.0008374997,0.00032001475,0.00009386812,0.00004963775,0.00019000036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012267983,0.00007432402,0.00007220065,0.00003700861,0.00044014453,0.00035765782,0.0001320099,0.00019781325,0.00011763018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002429236,0.000016754411,0.00084870856,0.000009459879,0.000032858152,0.000011633733,0.0011966801,0.000001923184,0.0000027833114,0.9700614,0.00025219758,0.02754128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002717369,0.000112249494,0.023776965,0.00001146716,0.00003840701,0.000008148813,0.001023538,0.000019037207,0.000040601026,0.22363304,0.7508989,0.00016594188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029120463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026300835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75064665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014471382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018360104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6441455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211016070","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6692","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05924928910875018,"score_gpt":0.2080753500811772,"score_spread":0.148826060972427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211016070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035529587,0.000653971,0.00017834398,0.00010191781,0.001190209,0.000040142106,0.00012639658,0.000016098586,0.9621633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8041563,0.00019726547,0.0012502235,0.0007246521,0.000047711288,0.0000047835183,0.0000122981455,0.000005578142,0.19360119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.0000025065078,0.00039256515,0.00015114795,0.000017266566,0.0001676578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953085,0.000023693912,0.00018704816,0.00018405939,0.00004040573,0.000033925928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023033466,0.00006497629,0.00022946484,0.00006382786,0.000053966723,0.000027784497,0.00011942107,0.000042773605,0.0065235617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011129194,0.0000712528,0.000083608014,0.000097954726,0.000071552204,0.00020802114,0.0001048474,0.000054040225,0.007672398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019499801,0.00006289401,0.013704663,0.000048231217,0.00010528571,0.0000109616285,0.0016365935,0.00035654448,0.000030907602,0.94686073,0.03552419,0.001639528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075017835,0.000057339952,0.018021304,0.000013270906,0.000008766205,0.000008721522,0.0018904072,0.0010073236,0.0010010377,0.01260121,0.9643401,0.0003003566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031296775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036801252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017516108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016306123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211165449","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511808630.012","title":"Bibliography","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Bibliography; Library science","score_opus":0.038456266208901566,"score_gpt":0.23982375730326252,"score_spread":0.20136749109436097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211165449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000066409652,0.0003499104,0.06082452,0.000076011165,0.00076239154,0.0002056671,0.000006485467,0.00022863611,0.93753976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012006679,0.013938481,0.010774111,0.0043731052,0.0014524121,0.00004567284,0.00015174416,0.00007498072,0.9571828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870753,0.00000599772,0.00040065555,0.0002538723,0.00037636826,0.0002555663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894106,0.0000254341,0.000300968,0.00054918195,0.000086531865,0.00009679345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016919995,0.0002534888,0.0002424414,0.005519982,0.00009353283,0.00019026102,0.0007446535,0.00029405326,0.0003326716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031857098,0.0002100079,0.00022474093,0.000960105,0.000029265979,0.0007021887,0.00020349106,0.00022493774,0.0015496153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027783678,0.000007678747,0.00014882044,0.00003615861,0.000034215333,0.000038492246,0.000060458213,0.000032705888,0.0000032808973,0.9324503,0.052553482,0.014631664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015875937,0.00008103405,0.0007172858,0.00005850534,0.0000072272055,0.000044452423,0.0000011137447,0.0012156127,0.0000066108446,0.0111661665,0.98622036,0.00032287053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026679523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006714147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008583981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022098822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212784659","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6838","title":"Argumentative Bullshit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04845570612227417,"score_gpt":0.35750853001407634,"score_spread":0.30905282389180216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212784659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07901099,0.00003135586,0.000172186,0.0015808633,0.00022485407,0.00006442333,0.00000457823,0.00006627397,0.91884446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97077334,0.0000909952,0.0005679214,0.0066515077,0.00011223613,0.0000013734045,0.00001718691,0.0000022929098,0.02178317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927473,0.000035819998,0.00014740854,0.000046822628,0.00026271204,0.00023251661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996018,0.000039507613,0.000055355278,0.00007410676,0.00010743131,0.000121798825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026748946,0.000050696995,0.000065453496,0.00003112225,0.00028471727,0.00012549383,0.00009672335,0.000051321447,0.0056682653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033171006,0.000045053508,0.000037093923,0.00021984235,0.000081219776,0.0007649068,0.000031169504,0.00007299509,0.0014093724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001414812,0.000040312956,0.00058470323,0.000010949099,0.000019716163,0.000021297792,0.26241967,0.000030443643,0.00005459155,0.67480516,0.020193242,0.04180579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034396033,0.000038499333,0.0071278256,0.00000859594,0.0000049354885,0.0000071173777,0.0680469,0.000041758503,0.0011587272,0.0030951903,0.91996783,0.000158656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008586237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012998279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8997746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003754504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002515977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213318344","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i3.6836","title":"Metaphorical Argumentation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Linguistics; Cognition; Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03254101415751576,"score_gpt":0.31413108754878677,"score_spread":0.281590073391271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213318344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3103767,0.0006420712,0.0029990685,0.00020184199,0.0011680741,0.00010141279,0.000010784538,0.00010823708,0.6843918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98766476,0.000018257568,0.0007159498,0.003039156,0.00017965469,0.000035477184,0.00014646586,0.000006686674,0.00819357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925894,0.00005374807,0.00019988517,0.00013454967,0.00014222742,0.00021065382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996176,0.000038191425,0.00005313891,0.00016388933,0.00007190214,0.000055276803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012628871,0.00008498373,0.00011028505,0.00004781441,0.00005960217,0.000034866,0.00007023817,0.00008566669,0.008677867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003964729,0.00007073583,0.00008187019,0.00019772399,0.000023670433,0.00017545251,0.000027444854,0.00011765288,0.0029661043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024938135,0.00057074206,0.004237405,0.000039927476,0.00038417944,0.0008450867,0.011779753,0.000015660937,0.0032728498,0.6717912,0.014699924,0.2921139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008490233,0.0012488739,0.35481617,0.00004017201,0.00067666906,0.0018370621,0.0470269,0.00022177391,0.043251045,0.07322899,0.46728006,0.0018820544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002580744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009265417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014494075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022310214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220653763","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7212","title":"A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019777146730185158,"score_gpt":0.30188753818250497,"score_spread":0.2821103914523198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220653763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8946658,0.00010274121,0.0000970817,0.000046370373,0.00026807952,0.00021587194,0.000027271677,0.000022939283,0.104553856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982113,0.0000025639245,0.00012266533,0.00088937895,0.00002043588,0.0001695404,0.00010771019,0.000004066146,0.00047228602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992498,0.000075087475,0.0002894269,0.00008138086,0.00016163202,0.0001426291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964315,0.00003936005,0.0001430607,0.0001378349,0.000019033276,0.000017547567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038821873,0.00005782995,0.00010053474,0.0001370328,0.000041426403,0.000006815993,0.000094607705,0.000027588318,0.005422042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003081572,0.00005262551,0.000036811307,0.00022110979,0.000018298577,0.00013922465,0.00004402782,0.0001267909,0.00011819788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030305628,0.0034394453,0.061827414,0.0005019682,0.00032542704,0.00072488736,0.23513159,0.002224818,0.0063647768,0.41142535,0.008372619,0.26663116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015928205,0.0039803283,0.62644315,0.00008521761,0.00022264407,0.0006743728,0.2470643,0.0015506846,0.0027239143,0.05449775,0.04546373,0.0013657219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020454827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027526417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5646157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032000746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019985144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99548715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220688396","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7224","title":"An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Normative; Completeness (order theory); Informal logic; Argument map; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029460803253827415,"score_gpt":0.29155143241908277,"score_spread":0.26209062916525533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220688396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8073818,0.00012532291,0.18179527,0.00034134253,0.0012575272,0.00036072748,0.000012462538,0.00022174354,0.008503786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930138,0.0000019070027,0.006569111,0.0002187745,0.000036406378,0.000039006347,0.0000110069,0.0000024887945,0.000107499785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883294,0.0000831757,0.00034365748,0.00017032506,0.00036898436,0.00020094562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993196,0.0000461311,0.00018921173,0.00034425574,0.0000357948,0.00006501557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004783738,0.00008988455,0.00014711768,0.00007417523,0.0001633179,0.00003667084,0.000682858,0.00003518475,0.00017368808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002239895,0.00007240614,0.000059366157,0.0001796357,0.000024300978,0.00048781032,0.00033537057,0.000113907096,0.000028016397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005304608,0.000603697,0.027095001,0.000090210335,0.000034719178,0.000038110757,0.0032406843,0.009624048,0.0046577193,0.922427,0.0009329857,0.031202763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026413104,0.0049025356,0.20016946,0.00002439924,0.000017215081,0.00033875532,0.0010432176,0.5628993,0.0106068095,0.0027037603,0.21356182,0.0010914265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003502787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012432998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003364166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039439215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29526365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220715851","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7215","title":"Argumentation Profiles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Emotive; Fallacy; Toolbox; Epistemology; Computer science; Informal logic; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02478526745486083,"score_gpt":0.24831003468167673,"score_spread":0.2235247672268159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220715851","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4396515,0.00012764412,0.4922854,0.0012890049,0.002770416,0.00097309554,0.000015540374,0.0006272513,0.06226016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949759,0.0000010820472,0.0036139193,0.0006300125,0.00003154318,0.00007044363,0.000015210084,0.000001646682,0.00066024566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994034,0.0000278226,0.00014556463,0.00008860181,0.00021970338,0.00011486883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997245,0.00001177004,0.0000838438,0.00014065216,0.000015612974,0.000023586776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019043639,0.000046210273,0.00004635622,0.000056316414,0.0002135547,0.000055182045,0.00028134946,0.000011307659,0.00016832975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000056639105,0.000040963405,0.000024974614,0.00014876759,0.000004846346,0.00056271587,0.00018443856,0.000059099482,0.00011883853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023334482,0.00014565894,0.01348277,0.000053576692,0.000023859579,0.000022901599,0.0076386947,0.01276409,0.0037003069,0.842491,0.008576169,0.111077696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001946558,0.0009768903,0.23262836,0.0000126705745,0.000009199997,0.00017149147,0.0012518091,0.505288,0.009403234,0.005019732,0.24246943,0.0008226494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001858443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010224015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8374712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032680084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020845857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18430927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220722819","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7211","title":"Is Every Definition Persuasive?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Meaning (existential); Term (time); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14162785444208084,"score_gpt":0.26839635873142303,"score_spread":0.1267685042893422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220722819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1050155,0.00019479381,0.000019604315,0.0010167474,0.0013754688,0.00011182847,0.00012516018,0.00010037592,0.8920405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746916,0.00002129067,0.00006223431,0.012101213,0.00036834658,0.00004257668,0.00007364073,0.000008505493,0.012630588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992771,0.000039301576,0.00018226457,0.00010047811,0.0001940033,0.0002068148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961525,0.00005915484,0.00008819827,0.00013544125,0.000068452675,0.00003351009],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002193064,0.00009409506,0.00011905691,0.0000633243,0.0007726794,0.000056693272,0.00014726954,0.00003216946,0.0069306567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019296582,0.00008593162,0.00011017947,0.000027169546,0.0002038156,0.0002823838,0.000108772074,0.00031285282,0.00041965838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002239165,0.00003643185,0.00014161556,0.00002173977,0.000019771185,0.000006717434,0.041958537,0.000016112836,0.000007353115,0.94854915,0.008390556,0.0008295955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025109327,0.00028478392,0.00036467466,0.0000031165864,0.000021049618,0.000016102154,0.01862661,0.00003806322,0.00002952362,0.057349652,0.92283875,0.0001765642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112616624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052310454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9144482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028427681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005336714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220897597","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7225","title":"Burdens of Proposing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Deontic logic; Deliberation; Action (physics); Computer science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Work (physics); Proof of concept; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05305134949221989,"score_gpt":0.36258955226558204,"score_spread":0.30953820277336214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220897597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25143868,0.000050376162,0.000017594017,0.004361298,0.00028491576,0.0001254994,0.000007355061,0.000041049905,0.7436732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718827,0.000018491215,0.00015701908,0.00089528726,0.00007551004,0.0000039404,0.0000017814482,0.0000022503534,0.0016574609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999208,0.00006177634,0.00012557878,0.00004072572,0.00037909462,0.00018483114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966556,0.00005599643,0.000079757505,0.00005695907,0.0000925111,0.000049192917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009170675,0.000033661607,0.000071368544,0.000034159162,0.00089341763,0.00003511414,0.00018794619,0.00003807343,0.000606568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002685649,0.00003237229,0.0000439802,0.00016470015,0.00019502704,0.00023143775,0.00009807031,0.00018777582,0.000008969702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013304752,0.000034192322,0.0013691129,0.0000088314155,0.00000880209,0.000004189512,0.077327356,0.00023833358,0.00013485407,0.9152871,0.00086373696,0.004710212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041685608,0.00063042354,0.004450339,0.000011982875,0.00001779681,0.000003514875,0.10487324,0.00009554023,0.00029861717,0.11697775,0.7718917,0.00033223146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020047305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001889461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7983093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004286257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024218152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68715364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220920946","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7222","title":"Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Informal logic; Education theory; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Higher education","score_opus":0.0073829251218354005,"score_gpt":0.2404133217296493,"score_spread":0.2330303966078139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220920946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6034073,0.0008760665,0.13849,0.007876734,0.013646506,0.0013312887,0.000037883477,0.0011695081,0.23316468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965751,0.000007575263,0.0013318489,0.0011584233,0.000054971868,0.00011480788,0.00001454583,0.0000019257739,0.0007407623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993438,0.000030121295,0.00015943593,0.000108380904,0.00015933704,0.00019893584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999658,0.000016960328,0.000049194023,0.000196641,0.00003657254,0.000042662527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002657897,0.000055884233,0.000060324903,0.00014448461,0.00023956095,0.00005986289,0.00035576383,0.00002381859,0.000094399235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030798754,0.00005600935,0.000028981678,0.0004912455,0.000010777713,0.00045581616,0.00020886287,0.00019547646,0.00011654897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027438058,0.0003019385,0.0020650832,0.000010126154,0.0000075864846,0.000021691827,0.0016189325,0.0054863445,0.0005013743,0.7378587,0.0050169183,0.24708389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089528726,0.0005224847,0.022060681,0.0000093666185,0.0000036722556,0.00027649177,0.0005920728,0.02038057,0.0018365618,0.025843745,0.9271746,0.00040445177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014097973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001905101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001416165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021546523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2283995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221034197","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7210","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.017071228551397345,"score_gpt":0.23535375370246878,"score_spread":0.21828252515107144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221034197","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057459857,0.00010297332,0.5309679,0.19639736,0.04916374,0.0023874515,0.000021925169,0.0007065148,0.16279228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91798675,0.00000433699,0.0048508793,0.010742071,0.04965975,0.00019586258,0.000020405636,0.0000087325025,0.016531222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.000037134658,0.00014344783,0.000116243726,0.00024638313,0.00013439605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960804,0.000010878067,0.000054599648,0.0002746084,0.000021993224,0.000029864394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036524935,0.000050147606,0.000050335497,0.000051745174,0.00034453155,0.00007796462,0.0004922981,0.000011621733,0.00095244846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001982857,0.000034638728,0.000027073622,0.0002756289,0.0000053811336,0.00032047747,0.00033125686,0.00009276591,0.000980142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001462963,0.000030289773,0.00018047797,0.000005214552,0.000006590744,0.000003612159,0.0054388107,0.023695473,0.00013492559,0.11539823,0.75812155,0.09697022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006560262,0.00008644205,0.0030815648,3.4779634e-7,7.128584e-7,0.000019220402,0.000106734384,0.0071760193,0.000095836265,0.00009672177,0.9892163,0.00005449873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029733597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009119083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86052686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003945959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017176306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225620079","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6179","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08774093475108044,"score_gpt":0.20349122757543076,"score_spread":0.11575029282435031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225620079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024857135,0.000277159,0.0003377502,0.00044195785,0.0006086394,0.00007765802,0.00014659931,0.00002840504,0.9732247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792675,0.00006473107,0.00061345065,0.0019756488,0.00005669722,0.000003493307,0.000004615759,0.000004675294,0.018009199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992906,0.0000016944127,0.00039133962,0.00014487153,0.000016611613,0.00015487726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995885,0.000016886535,0.00021147038,0.00010730396,0.000017568544,0.000058309706],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016371564,0.0000684931,0.00023305847,0.00004736977,0.000044005214,0.000021134496,0.0001736749,0.000037287606,0.0039663822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010389516,0.0000718017,0.000073903,0.00008721786,0.000075200434,0.00022109177,0.00009387879,0.000057924062,0.012556978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087114604,0.000044321416,0.019088347,0.00009761676,0.000133604,0.000004486124,0.0075404877,0.0010189211,0.000029554374,0.86740047,0.10254423,0.0020108363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080753,0.00017510324,0.008599236,0.0000068222803,0.000007689769,0.0000013017942,0.0015415675,0.0050808145,0.00023752182,0.0038302795,0.9794096,0.000302559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028442404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.546719e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010603524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069888692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232660225","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4963","title":"Editors' Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Marxism and Critical Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Publication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.028741882626800316,"score_gpt":0.2440113713568044,"score_spread":0.21526948873000407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232660225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059566475,0.000011360442,0.000027358778,0.0028190971,0.009904199,0.000042260537,0.00000612893,0.0000618598,0.9811711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925826,0.0000035127812,0.000022101862,0.00048154386,0.053080387,0.000005496014,0.0000067876954,0.0000035885055,0.020570599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996091,0.0000055403693,0.00009793762,0.00006261652,0.000081854974,0.00014294453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960715,0.000011930988,0.000041464897,0.00025568873,0.000046864254,0.00003690271],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001245144,0.00005692132,0.00006375073,0.0000186105,0.0007029691,0.00035589517,0.00018866602,0.000025646548,0.00704224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011383427,0.00004184564,0.00003577979,0.0000022643874,0.0003201203,0.0006771893,0.0000613853,0.000093187504,0.0010026027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098474575,0.00000867449,0.000020987862,0.000007804395,0.000002897038,0.0000013826069,0.0006435425,3.248059e-7,0.0000031606285,0.9436244,0.04945491,0.006222062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082251194,0.000044144334,0.00025735638,0.0000021442293,0.0000040711975,0.0000017030104,0.00036055848,0.00001262673,0.000042051797,0.04289815,0.95622605,0.00006889321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035778034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016570493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9606005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000042326883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006865348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235155673","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4691","title":"Transsubjectivity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Id, ego and super-ego; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0722583280999046,"score_gpt":0.27144495526106177,"score_spread":0.19918662716115718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235155673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034500036,0.000013491762,0.00049447775,0.0007121278,0.00047129494,0.00005928716,0.00002530745,0.00005727355,0.9636667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465173,0.0000023036148,0.000031452142,0.0005145374,0.0002776015,0.000007909029,0.000003516813,0.0000035914547,0.0045073614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966484,0.0000042804295,0.00009092157,0.000059550992,0.00006290677,0.00011749497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996386,0.000010894827,0.000060387145,0.00022726932,0.000034114284,0.000028715483],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000049765393,0.00006164535,0.00006746075,0.00002493309,0.00094921765,0.00032253764,0.00021114633,0.00002094505,0.0011968586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022353075,0.000048911188,0.00006278309,0.0000021386086,0.0002243643,0.0008139176,0.000024470548,0.00007633351,0.00039623937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114033055,0.000015421467,0.00012690204,0.0000069643743,0.000010806922,0.0000027373649,0.011292546,0.0000030892704,0.00001290076,0.9831656,0.00023811868,0.005113493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007202535,0.00026502725,0.014147822,0.0000391715,0.000041523308,0.000014204364,0.0008198694,0.0011333646,0.00048386434,0.27050772,0.7113591,0.00046809396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098898716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004190814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035169728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012100592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237840899","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3400","title":"Inference Claims","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Universidade de Coimbra","keywords":"Generalization; Argument (complex analysis); Counterfactual thinking; Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05526603600104324,"score_gpt":0.2529798593404789,"score_spread":0.19771382333943566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237840899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017374028,0.00007521707,0.2056134,0.000046730347,0.0004548281,0.000092423455,5.2924105e-7,0.00036338196,0.77597946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821141,0.000015883785,0.015916884,0.00089079054,0.00005537221,0.000010268911,0.0000012450133,0.0000030956712,0.0009923879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991089,0.000016491704,0.00019829458,0.00017440054,0.00014680496,0.0003551218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992773,0.00003659321,0.00007689945,0.0004143592,0.00007967075,0.00011516546],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018092798,0.00012781691,0.00012208511,0.00006911956,0.000108467306,0.00008428095,0.0010547446,0.000084981264,0.00021251888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050275565,0.00009355766,0.000061357416,0.00023275963,0.00006266837,0.0010029938,0.00035247416,0.00014494172,0.0018535616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045218617,0.000037109658,0.00574478,0.0000066153343,0.000005505059,0.000017385299,0.0029249985,0.00000396494,0.000015472075,0.9615786,0.00047595685,0.029185096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017749899,0.0019808004,0.40049508,0.000063748135,0.000022219616,0.00026568962,0.0003019231,0.0333056,0.007418902,0.40302432,0.14936021,0.0019865248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029780756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011448237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96474004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000140500815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006864288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242009327","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3034","title":"Argumentative Injustice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Injustice; Argumentative; Credibility; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social psychology; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Advertising","score_opus":0.00834268729701935,"score_gpt":0.24001654643667752,"score_spread":0.23167385913965818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242009327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5438469,0.000010773402,0.23406532,0.00052606966,0.0026444749,0.00020103746,0.0000020801556,0.00058589294,0.21811743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660608,0.000002363011,0.032260142,0.001019791,0.00008013648,0.000008708353,0.0000014100481,0.0000022250993,0.00056439097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994451,0.000008139095,0.00011335349,0.000106889966,0.00013331808,0.00019319494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959975,0.000025968277,0.00004654065,0.00021460894,0.000044219418,0.00006889861],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014956499,0.00006915689,0.000054554566,0.000054193228,0.00010651042,0.000113212576,0.00037375587,0.00005153376,0.00008191959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004570796,0.000056395147,0.000027639151,0.00018273461,0.000029859111,0.0007808985,0.000109996305,0.00022278867,0.00087782915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227965,0.00006578702,0.00062688335,0.000016891538,0.000020444235,0.000045446202,0.0042343666,0.000060731505,0.025110431,0.5882913,0.0012330373,0.38027242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028189188,0.0022005301,0.056733903,0.000031594675,0.000040654908,0.0009668674,0.00096527365,0.08258791,0.33039632,0.07012948,0.45109707,0.0020314807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002009126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012620603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51816183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000610058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027982152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102720","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3894","title":"Appeals to Considerations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Authorship attribution; Process (computing); Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05700116448957948,"score_gpt":0.2476048734533704,"score_spread":0.19060370896379092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243102720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061122477,0.00001922699,0.00006541636,0.0084910365,0.0006239601,0.00025618664,0.000008522191,0.0000874274,0.92932576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858127,0.0000011660051,0.00039740998,0.010192049,0.00042890682,0.00009209716,0.000010971711,0.0000031841341,0.0030615209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995846,0.000007483491,0.00015344279,0.000053049927,0.00006589011,0.00013551625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996889,0.000038248425,0.000030181998,0.000102187514,0.0000786509,0.00006180285],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000052565738,0.000058800077,0.00005891698,0.000052963715,0.00026155583,0.0002340603,0.000055444267,0.000018813635,0.015275898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005048214,0.000046815803,0.000021855469,0.000015662561,0.000049297767,0.0006397958,0.000022345966,0.000050673883,0.010570806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.462742e-7,0.0000116439505,0.0000185892,0.0000042113156,0.0000034946445,1.9061343e-7,0.01276837,0.000019219973,0.000012025049,0.9412363,0.0445043,0.0014209672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001016673,0.00010011778,0.0021504117,0.000011249047,0.0000056278445,0.000007083564,0.002378864,0.00007228361,0.000091051035,0.6312801,0.36361685,0.00018466884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015435633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045912486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000762968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002032471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99019957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243106686","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5328","title":"From the Editors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07177379185878373,"score_gpt":0.2706586713046958,"score_spread":0.19888487944591204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243106686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078431405,0.00007742715,0.000052339234,0.0032530543,0.016922398,0.00010465887,0.00005262797,0.00010861071,0.90099746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88779944,0.000006119853,0.00006718999,0.008212842,0.094675615,0.000007436051,0.000026024934,0.000007549765,0.009197752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994711,0.00002267805,0.00014708095,0.000072560586,0.000113453156,0.00017311699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994546,0.00015353046,0.00006268084,0.0001920192,0.00010882119,0.000028342853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017968063,0.000080521226,0.00008944407,0.0000125747965,0.00039999592,0.00009633445,0.00022139918,0.00005401183,0.0016270633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005357501,0.00004469234,0.00005901511,0.0000139404465,0.0009071533,0.00022202882,0.00005347107,0.00017362442,0.0016877587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014836452,0.000015717573,0.0002279511,0.0000045443444,0.000032558557,0.0000013466259,0.07671042,6.65549e-7,0.00000818901,0.6748396,0.24577971,0.0023644664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085201194,0.00009156488,0.00052391854,0.0000048385023,0.000011488276,5.2632856e-7,0.004064322,0.000014195147,0.00006220052,0.031820834,0.9632462,0.00007470161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068260834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055750425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89179975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005290467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002498481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246841944","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.473","title":"The Arguers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Artifact (error); Wish; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.041011668839762615,"score_gpt":0.22025981592556776,"score_spread":0.17924814708580514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246841944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039285487,0.00056277105,0.000010118523,0.00015475441,0.0007851357,0.00003602186,0.0000044995354,0.000046650868,0.9944715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94386786,0.000099612924,0.000026678304,0.00066903344,0.00073511066,0.000006292101,0.0000023329337,0.000003255569,0.054589834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996042,0.000004025457,0.00010972269,0.000038754068,0.0000924816,0.00015077351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997507,0.000055568573,0.000029090792,0.00008003192,0.000059584596,0.000025078447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005322245,0.00005381809,0.000056230474,0.00001219767,0.0012991442,0.00003454495,0.00009652126,0.000010868528,0.0003655863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010794467,0.000027780467,0.000040189927,0.000012139371,0.0003062538,0.000037362923,0.000028107643,0.00006877311,0.00033090662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005424729,0.000005696792,0.00004031464,0.0000018576584,0.000008971506,0.000015422414,0.019527225,0.000002197702,3.1369748e-7,0.95557994,0.023064107,0.0017485392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048063674,0.000036739963,0.00017497904,9.3421954e-7,0.0000024267326,0.000003331732,0.0012584091,0.000015027429,0.0000014595871,0.00070756127,0.9976979,0.000053197007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009098696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016517428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97463375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010065634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010495738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247398033","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4206","title":"Emotive Language in Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emotive; Argumentation theory; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Epistemology; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.030296924163666427,"score_gpt":0.2830444332500542,"score_spread":0.25274750908638777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247398033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28091818,0.000043687738,0.000051983603,0.00021145103,0.00009182647,0.00007919663,0.00000517961,0.00005747988,0.718541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959887,0.0000048399065,0.00013323427,0.0007448289,0.00011589494,0.000014325002,0.00004930982,0.000004798971,0.0029440352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999496,0.000037127043,0.00017278573,0.000060403923,0.00009558132,0.00013814057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965495,0.000042738455,0.00006802344,0.00018361484,0.000030370305,0.000020300786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015705575,0.000074283904,0.00008459255,0.000078701916,0.00008556658,0.00013069526,0.00016564799,0.000023044751,0.0013822245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029171748,0.00005804555,0.000026165448,0.000028301516,0.000101080484,0.00053318805,0.000042182466,0.00009808042,0.0004117059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008087214,0.000023753344,0.00041864187,0.000009655087,0.000004996329,0.0000015056567,0.1262472,0.000037401613,0.000020323057,0.86394507,0.00027465113,0.009008727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025867643,0.00044206684,0.05454471,0.00010397598,0.000029638839,0.000011227525,0.6817246,0.0015193236,0.0007489898,0.038357206,0.21904446,0.0008870042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029896913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017582116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82558787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016532067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000128281845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249214718","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2591","title":"Pollock on Practical Reasoning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pollock; Component (thermodynamics); Epistemology; Computer science; Architecture; Practical reason; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.032313471354079124,"score_gpt":0.2922078628113353,"score_spread":0.2598943914572562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249214718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016460113,0.000059162958,0.06921778,0.0014036256,0.0005461877,0.00012064943,6.740176e-7,0.0005133676,0.91167843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715078,0.000041328985,0.020647686,0.002867239,0.0002373182,0.000010233628,0.0000028797144,0.0000076272554,0.004677905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875253,0.00003555369,0.00021946518,0.00024322236,0.00026883796,0.00048036262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.00013421514,0.00009771195,0.00043626616,0.000049952014,0.00016818702],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025487985,0.00016098721,0.00015141544,0.0000945878,0.00018828701,0.00024488603,0.00058456213,0.00010826765,0.00014913768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029420026,0.00011969498,0.000081662554,0.0003706249,0.00004406469,0.0011913426,0.00028018572,0.00026952074,0.002098818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027468444,0.00007715598,0.004731292,0.00000387995,0.000008606277,0.00016614494,0.000417631,0.00006787718,0.000008045278,0.9736028,0.0041249413,0.016764186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017229948,0.0019922839,0.06272849,0.00008933349,0.000019646428,0.0021344342,0.00022937871,0.06446716,0.0011000173,0.020751888,0.84355134,0.0012130069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009336686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003740314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95504767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029545146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010130736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250676218","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5337","title":"Notice of Books Received","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06871656740323984,"score_gpt":0.29078521118206213,"score_spread":0.2220686437788223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250676218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0948853,0.000082522325,0.00002776949,0.00016021938,0.00020307125,0.00007053136,0.000011822521,0.00006241172,0.9044964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907973,0.000009035378,0.00027991977,0.00057611626,0.00022931247,0.000005338733,0.00001025453,0.0000049914483,0.008087733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946505,0.000018791186,0.00021769734,0.000052476902,0.00011132903,0.00013464243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993085,0.00004492349,0.000121738645,0.00030835238,0.00019157288,0.000024903062],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012061361,0.000073707,0.000103464765,0.000047742986,0.00015372774,0.00007711351,0.00028332075,0.000028826134,0.0035614572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003247883,0.0000542864,0.000039536175,0.000019591324,0.0005701788,0.00039061691,0.00007451092,0.000080016405,0.00046568192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023219129,0.00002190503,0.000057018075,0.000014950053,0.000017069005,6.7448775e-7,0.045250177,0.000002976138,0.00006140493,0.95054054,0.0016207208,0.00238933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006971415,0.0006317834,0.002428485,0.000060584684,0.000044764452,0.0000075698294,0.07913708,0.00021892421,0.0027063005,0.013926207,0.8997462,0.00039496968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017298394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038432897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93661433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061641713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003414263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251917146","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3897","title":"Epistemology Mathematicized","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Subject (documents); Argument (complex analysis); Formal epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Informal logic; Subject matter; Philosophy; Social epistemology; Mathematical logic; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.05818603874721553,"score_gpt":0.21804654054588496,"score_spread":0.15986050179866942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251917146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052288126,0.00003268212,0.000024758747,0.00074354024,0.00034507024,0.00010451956,0.0000019603626,0.00007512277,0.9463842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796815,0.0000014474186,0.0002512565,0.002226553,0.00017766637,0.000025094965,0.000001906722,0.0000027363556,0.017631864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995082,0.000006843005,0.00015985391,0.00006470821,0.0000891589,0.00017125373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999726,0.000025042464,0.000056923604,0.00010580234,0.00004075404,0.000045499128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008173398,0.00006649535,0.00009939733,0.00004907642,0.00025717184,0.00008188046,0.00018058326,0.000022717197,0.013863547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014861631,0.000047488917,0.000040036655,0.000013776533,0.00042166043,0.0006090373,0.000030425701,0.00006251209,0.0072654164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019469403,0.000012784704,0.0000063879943,0.000011813558,0.0000024502701,0.0000012803197,0.0067028934,0.0000011617451,0.00003348111,0.9887822,0.0034440174,0.0009995662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000250888,0.00020231416,0.00035378692,0.0000111321015,0.000005654585,0.000021795773,0.0013404476,0.00025960818,0.000029693932,0.4231617,0.5741553,0.0002076922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007933909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002014305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92875236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009420373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116988385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99350756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254036064","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i4.5001","title":"From the Editors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.10014445378068881,"score_gpt":0.2894497823457241,"score_spread":0.1893053285650353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254036064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06503132,0.000076849894,0.000016601984,0.006285133,0.015274735,0.00009770028,0.000061888095,0.0000632228,0.91309255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467193,0.0000118408925,0.000033809236,0.0029856008,0.038966738,0.000007778056,0.000018571869,0.0000061964383,0.011250154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950916,0.000015493333,0.00013223576,0.000070744245,0.000111343456,0.00016103302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992163,0.00012591598,0.00013634871,0.00043015505,0.00006254078,0.000028723636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001926357,0.00008105661,0.00010046813,0.000008289779,0.0012217329,0.0003635235,0.0004806786,0.00005492524,0.00060777855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012222421,0.000045277357,0.00007314049,0.000002778725,0.0007412368,0.0004218353,0.00010039284,0.0002153064,0.00064691145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011814139,0.000015849055,0.0009780674,0.000007107553,0.000038799688,0.00000398866,0.039024595,0.0000021096344,0.0000046072296,0.8316834,0.12438374,0.00384595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011132661,0.0000316491,0.0038862932,0.0000064510714,0.00001309375,4.2919697e-7,0.0024125439,0.000011571089,0.000023498646,0.037780836,0.9556438,0.00007851197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015504864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064918323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9018424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004520918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023161128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93967056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254494533","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4406","title":"Remembering Richard Paul","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08381470117042797,"score_gpt":0.31734420804947167,"score_spread":0.2335295068790437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254494533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023627905,0.00020056023,0.00006346001,0.0002861703,0.001075423,0.00008122026,0.000007335348,0.0001306761,0.97452724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97513276,0.000034205106,0.00046512182,0.0017754667,0.0009834142,0.0000058167393,0.000010907835,0.000006098968,0.021586213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915767,0.000029049352,0.00013577015,0.00006907626,0.00028794236,0.00032049994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999481,0.000020162579,0.000048753598,0.00010667085,0.00010901045,0.00023438325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042426004,0.000069693306,0.00008949916,0.00003125034,0.00023139484,0.000052592404,0.0001717431,0.00009231635,0.00015483453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002112062,0.00006155874,0.00005022307,0.000112384565,0.0001356725,0.0002888565,0.0000333796,0.00010780478,0.00056292047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020492836,0.000024620787,0.0025735297,0.000014706157,0.000013370684,0.000025620839,0.07804693,0.000092419774,0.000011646621,0.70626146,0.21002008,0.002895104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012290287,0.000029200628,0.00024634053,0.0000031513566,0.0000053288513,0.0000032979647,0.0063762846,0.000010163618,0.000013475354,0.0025658917,0.99051833,0.00010563527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009511707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082825625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95294106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013877614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018442572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7235392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254665787","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i4.3330","title":"Whither Consequence?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Philosophy; Inductive method; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04963537470332596,"score_gpt":0.23128343132173526,"score_spread":0.1816480566184093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254665787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01387184,0.00010836016,0.07481862,0.000062184525,0.00047024456,0.000090699854,7.270501e-7,0.00029505396,0.91028225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794003,0.000009790702,0.017163374,0.0011984913,0.00005156567,0.0000106391635,7.6643346e-7,0.000003756844,0.0021613305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991999,0.000018308569,0.00017336276,0.00015914068,0.0001258904,0.0003233731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936795,0.000022965201,0.000070839385,0.00036938913,0.00006886789,0.00009997986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018917203,0.00011627319,0.0001129366,0.000056905188,0.000093485636,0.000067639965,0.00083226676,0.00007356353,0.00035864554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004109043,0.000082883875,0.0000583788,0.00018428867,0.00009397252,0.00073388434,0.00022503166,0.00011039966,0.0019782588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072445146,0.000039892533,0.0031401068,0.0000069825965,0.000010072016,0.000100058875,0.0037726695,0.0000025147463,0.00004967604,0.97312105,0.0010117699,0.018737955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030920405,0.0025693711,0.210837,0.00009271377,0.00003949276,0.0029389474,0.0006885529,0.017910236,0.018122004,0.48225537,0.25847653,0.0029777426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035874105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001008565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014192411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073272444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256374369","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3864","title":"Informal Logic referees 2011-2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03415496325730991,"score_gpt":0.24363241680067954,"score_spread":0.20947745354336963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256374369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25532043,0.0005407031,0.3564865,0.002292339,0.003593108,0.0018887016,0.000011591838,0.0014205296,0.37844607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830315,0.000028656832,0.009717823,0.0021587373,0.000189982,0.000071834475,0.000018067498,0.0000075014914,0.0047758934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983501,0.00003118798,0.0005223356,0.00020654361,0.00036764552,0.00052220974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988555,0.00004616418,0.00023921624,0.0005454794,0.00014803327,0.00016563442],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030809757,0.00020959953,0.00020585099,0.00015289374,0.00017934776,0.00031265378,0.0008745133,0.00015804524,0.0010197175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003011493,0.00015324313,0.00009274826,0.00017144137,0.000037305206,0.0054974193,0.00035322143,0.00018198388,0.012248288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027767544,0.00020650325,0.018700644,0.0002066141,0.00008229057,0.000022009968,0.0041267565,0.0014799142,0.0012985006,0.72194266,0.07295436,0.17895195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017777011,0.00074254605,0.661249,0.000060059276,0.000014158542,0.00016700779,0.00023795744,0.1180699,0.0013056328,0.0058620544,0.20915185,0.0013621721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026734866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024807192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7277111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000277879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046314974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256433675","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.6012","title":"Robert Pinto","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pinto bean; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041098974014327126,"score_gpt":0.36092229621614863,"score_spread":0.3198233222018215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256433675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37917998,0.0005850422,0.000314768,0.0024504513,0.0025140564,0.0002991992,0.00002317269,0.000088072375,0.6145452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94189817,0.00010716591,0.0002934824,0.006387814,0.00032421137,0.0000063316456,0.000011884531,0.000013163064,0.05095777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586594,0.000099158904,0.0010522397,0.0005046334,0.0017577833,0.000720262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973823,0.0006729055,0.00049488165,0.00087109604,0.00029771606,0.00028113602],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034760358,0.00029118004,0.00048424944,0.00033375,0.00019897292,0.003914789,0.0041571017,0.0005000714,0.007603198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020975496,0.00019880763,0.00021026115,0.0010206113,0.00014376726,0.0075681834,0.0012280991,0.00087172474,0.051497318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018367435,0.00009069789,0.35579342,0.00007278549,0.00006336302,0.00002489229,0.001751103,0.0013963614,0.00013014684,0.15977247,0.15552999,0.3251911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005050244,0.00018352432,0.06453826,0.000081296064,0.000011991417,0.000031918877,0.0007708881,0.003957636,0.00020206685,0.0072530396,0.9220319,0.00043247966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022559961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004252001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7665019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005365517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002610171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281615115","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.6351","title":"Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Action (physics); Restrictiveness; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Metaphor","score_opus":0.0358971185133448,"score_gpt":0.35294353475963636,"score_spread":0.31704641624629154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281615115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18275021,0.000032020147,0.000026548872,0.007982565,0.0006281034,0.00013265801,0.0000025009228,0.000086996704,0.8083584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692151,0.000013987771,0.00059833296,0.013398701,0.00006365831,0.000060988736,0.000009063851,0.0000025513714,0.016637595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991439,0.00007374267,0.00011591848,0.00007216254,0.00038196344,0.00021229827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973965,0.000058112095,0.000027970938,0.000054623357,0.00003605588,0.00008356571],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046052405,0.000045382003,0.00005343165,0.00003512969,0.0009861107,0.000049887363,0.00019127448,0.000017598448,0.009935945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012062032,0.000044174518,0.000028376906,0.00018445787,0.000092368726,0.00015054764,0.00009233109,0.00012855222,0.0006469453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008006074,0.000055446784,0.0012532184,0.0000017554073,0.0000062830695,0.0000039304005,0.08986789,0.000010933955,0.0000059075974,0.89826053,0.0028228532,0.0077032247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011109801,0.000056172485,0.0018432891,0.0000012214338,0.000002305458,0.0000023525056,0.063043125,0.000003955706,0.00003099489,0.0506571,0.8841563,0.00009212844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030741308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023731987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8813334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001256825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002911883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281694601","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.7005","title":"Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Utterance; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05870631369202928,"score_gpt":0.2732412752028867,"score_spread":0.21453496151085744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281694601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1744648,0.00025691718,0.00008330591,0.0012704015,0.0019056001,0.00023168573,0.000056517034,0.0001359147,0.82159483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96673906,0.000010610353,0.0002179935,0.00787477,0.00036313926,0.000083803134,0.0000617226,0.000010694238,0.024638189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991963,0.000058120837,0.00021069509,0.000110426,0.00020081853,0.00022366272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995957,0.00007150023,0.00009553315,0.00013201755,0.00006178937,0.000043452445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027686963,0.000108965054,0.00014169606,0.00005956026,0.0008229192,0.00006477626,0.00020047811,0.00002670163,0.006936005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002009751,0.00009385877,0.00008577644,0.000030089495,0.0003045605,0.00026313934,0.00016921705,0.0003470561,0.00040221369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021538926,0.000040382893,0.00013545579,0.00001615634,0.000029911385,0.000007918144,0.10799755,0.000060974635,0.000010251832,0.88721335,0.0029026484,0.0015638568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002529883,0.0002926375,0.00013252447,0.0000019441866,0.000016368305,0.000006263309,0.032370854,0.00001979155,0.00006196041,0.07342765,0.89325386,0.000163142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028113238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025893646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89035124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042283467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043446395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99397177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281763276","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i1.7133","title":"Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Nankai University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Premise; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Test (biology); Argument map; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.04085974393108532,"score_gpt":0.27257002163024074,"score_spread":0.23171027769915542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281763276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60741144,0.0027360343,0.00003639578,0.0004790864,0.0015479152,0.00023963478,0.000070471906,0.00013454579,0.38734445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315965,0.000036892776,0.000052014017,0.0010106418,0.00018299225,0.000033014978,0.00002256357,0.0000052554533,0.0054969625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992969,0.000018597275,0.00018410603,0.00010221166,0.00022581685,0.00017239277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997418,0.00001630405,0.000078224984,0.000107438515,0.000026818614,0.000029425617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012858096,0.000096098076,0.00012885836,0.00007968384,0.00076189864,0.00014150287,0.00012361565,0.000008861137,0.013323675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010365069,0.00007572116,0.00005639257,0.000024243156,0.00014871448,0.00019003409,0.00034068892,0.000120974066,0.000029593983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015196695,0.000021844779,0.000516949,0.000025408188,0.00018310356,0.000022682538,0.06765937,0.00020974153,0.000013656483,0.9234475,0.003419247,0.0044653183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059344445,0.00023314942,0.0036501957,0.000007683303,0.00016163196,0.000020390748,0.19493745,0.00032698063,0.000047916532,0.02291894,0.7766632,0.00043903952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011101007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001315186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90052855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021274893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000099004765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283210290","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i2.7020","title":"A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Dialectic; Norm (philosophy); Modal; Extant taxon; Relation (database); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.031203308542630842,"score_gpt":0.2725847519998919,"score_spread":0.24138144345726106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283210290","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121131524,0.000046277688,0.8741145,0.0007885196,0.0011334309,0.0006235392,0.000017569919,0.00014983748,0.0019947747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910689,0.0000014999025,0.0074233664,0.00072963914,0.00005072558,0.00023732212,0.00003783165,0.0000031140244,0.00044761796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992787,0.000027762437,0.00021833055,0.00012658432,0.0001908311,0.00015779647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996372,0.000028645782,0.00011645965,0.00015664953,0.000030970914,0.00003009004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029100358,0.00006434481,0.00007324557,0.0000731449,0.00027505105,0.00007382282,0.00028940896,0.000019180166,0.000044500764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001073186,0.000060823477,0.000051370313,0.000119177275,0.000005685567,0.0006229782,0.0001403392,0.00005382996,0.000026292893],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001587336,0.0002334694,0.0038721163,0.0002754141,0.00004419657,0.000013816688,0.012828165,0.024255836,0.01603493,0.8169774,0.0067624347,0.118543535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016708049,0.00076194556,0.012036141,0.0000110153105,0.0000071432264,0.00008514521,0.00037889532,0.9262334,0.001427076,0.0070317136,0.050000317,0.00035639002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026425556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019478662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006753404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026185968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24803095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693842","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7499","title":"Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Modal; Modal logic; Non-classical logic; Mode (computer interface); Object (grammar); Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Logical consequence; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04126604061716679,"score_gpt":0.27771382696207897,"score_spread":0.23644778634491218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03545256,0.000027622003,0.9539677,0.00049374416,0.0010838407,0.0007033757,0.000014070836,0.00016150756,0.008095576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807925,0.0000036037743,0.016402032,0.0017576002,0.00006660584,0.00025328112,0.000043096374,0.0000033288466,0.000677913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990828,0.000027776956,0.0002552873,0.00016720679,0.00025061957,0.00021629284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949104,0.0000700181,0.0001525263,0.00020012908,0.000041714524,0.00004455633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004200236,0.00008584278,0.00009990043,0.000069935006,0.00038348045,0.00008635076,0.0004612967,0.00003087486,0.00009777853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028848834,0.00007140293,0.00006792463,0.00019138904,0.000010250409,0.000521819,0.0002332535,0.000081222795,0.00005237283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078849356,0.00030273906,0.00381295,0.000102880906,0.000039713686,0.00001712016,0.004487962,0.030227961,0.0028421236,0.8480817,0.013933125,0.09607285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022776518,0.0016116374,0.027033212,0.0000074674354,0.0000115176845,0.00006604587,0.0005492384,0.7132031,0.0014912846,0.015102402,0.2380369,0.0006095494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011419569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013568435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055286677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029159735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29494604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693845","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7501","title":"On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Modal; Intuition; Mysticism; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04261809511245998,"score_gpt":0.2549297549123205,"score_spread":0.21231165979986052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46331814,0.000010027256,0.000010617663,0.0017860067,0.00052867027,0.00010159043,0.000033430162,0.000017264743,0.53419423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965714,0.0000011789188,0.000009263779,0.002105678,0.000098781544,0.00004717012,0.000029487424,0.0000020738223,0.0011349166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996363,0.000021126358,0.0001176894,0.000032258056,0.00012678125,0.00006587484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977696,0.000049127684,0.00007141837,0.00007895183,0.000015316442,0.000008217561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000091997346,0.00003748151,0.00003816435,0.00003058056,0.00036434972,0.00002302906,0.00010231583,0.000005632965,0.0057900012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010114167,0.00002462327,0.00002661652,0.000017523607,0.000051327275,0.00014405891,0.000029676177,0.00008253598,0.000050374758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001744013,0.000029169394,0.000009915542,0.0000038771204,0.000004676384,1.06173204e-7,0.022525977,0.0009917179,0.000008154948,0.97262883,0.0031083745,0.0006717729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023824595,0.00049118913,0.00048648546,0.000006267573,0.000011831518,0.0000030783247,0.011990991,0.0016187431,0.00031858738,0.90010923,0.08459911,0.00012623971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066524306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070902684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5332533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014937056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014205394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99511886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693853","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7497","title":"Multi-Modal 2020","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Modal; Sociology; Section (typography); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14516123119922314,"score_gpt":0.5006422706512382,"score_spread":0.3554810394520151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057194367,0.00021506503,0.0026654638,0.021553207,0.005999963,0.0010813787,0.000063511216,0.00048310435,0.91074395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187237,0.000032394404,0.0063749724,0.06122659,0.0003997219,0.00031327037,0.000038586626,0.000016856808,0.012873901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972687,0.0010861721,0.00045474886,0.00013898614,0.0005699591,0.00048148556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969373,0.002344197,0.00021172648,0.00027287455,0.0000840913,0.00014982677],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004470967,0.00009437105,0.000140126,0.000044657354,0.002768097,0.00000575942,0.00040090404,0.00015919082,0.016119894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046985955,0.000082239516,0.000046152814,0.0002145465,0.0001004759,0.00026080644,0.0008827105,0.006948635,0.003115187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090684294,0.0007448646,0.07112209,0.0007466677,0.00012744997,0.0005069514,0.04751522,0.0019349039,0.0007447319,0.52457345,0.33618045,0.0148963835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001233312,0.00020564259,0.014379495,0.000013314194,0.000013046326,0.000021799295,0.013350186,0.002795315,0.000003559323,0.0063890256,0.9614036,0.00019170687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001379305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031188294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89787006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012614153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036206836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693858","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7502","title":"Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Embodied cognition; Gesture; Relation (database); Epistemology; Modal; Sociology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.104619815873734,"score_gpt":0.3769967389866802,"score_spread":0.27237692311294615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99276966,0.000030888776,0.00004680416,0.00096375,0.00008532282,0.0006032355,0.00002377601,0.000008099606,0.005468451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986619,0.000047962283,0.00007573222,0.00091707025,0.000016527958,0.00012666795,0.0000050476565,0.000004301358,0.00014482073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990297,0.0002783565,0.00023323444,0.00014248499,0.0002044962,0.00011173752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990375,0.0006855344,0.00014873661,0.000075933196,0.000034873196,0.000017421522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035918414,0.00009235626,0.00013538968,0.00010066359,0.0003142514,0.000013092113,0.00007530253,0.000022424372,0.000010717163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004108158,0.000051250132,0.000027416303,0.0002246473,0.00012992929,0.00020326136,0.00009184193,0.000201784,0.0000022107351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035204627,0.00020707087,0.00010087375,0.00004938027,0.00002574688,0.0000020409018,0.08612519,0.013911327,0.034856897,0.8566358,0.000015985117,0.0045491923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0133577855,0.0042848634,0.026673092,0.00019907014,0.0002338975,0.00009196921,0.10537626,0.10630269,0.16958354,0.57304484,0.0001374072,0.00071458926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013727393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043771463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.283591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033264452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015446203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24169995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693866","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7503","title":"Kisceral Argumentation in Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Intuition; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.044157122954696024,"score_gpt":0.23684400513177953,"score_spread":0.19268688217708352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06848236,0.000020010473,0.00000421518,0.0008895762,0.00038259535,0.00008215745,0.00002239467,0.000039105744,0.9300776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309754,6.511145e-7,0.000011251572,0.0039624185,0.00020626308,0.000032741642,0.000036049427,0.0000029940102,0.0026500637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995613,0.00001602202,0.00013522843,0.000054839355,0.0001140257,0.00011859284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987435,0.000015800108,0.000030425357,0.000053347067,0.0000075783296,0.000018471635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007555988,0.00004939856,0.000058991667,0.00003897207,0.00026862806,0.000046035606,0.00007709088,0.000008746831,0.0055443146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002500756,0.00004318797,0.000032425865,0.000026326832,0.000090940295,0.00025659057,0.000063974374,0.00013944524,0.000121565165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002315525,0.000037028003,0.00004447236,0.0000032157443,0.000002191789,0.00000664821,0.0045318734,0.00017680896,0.000003354912,0.9939082,0.00032326666,0.0009397402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038508445,0.00015965952,0.00024214902,0.000001739121,0.0000025822817,0.0000029384184,0.0011076886,0.00021014528,0.000019126695,0.24458219,0.7531858,0.000100862475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001374943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003376787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92742753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029670138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067985625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693875","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7500","title":"Amenable Argumentation Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Teacher Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Modal; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.08693887397417614,"score_gpt":0.3492829857426172,"score_spread":0.262344111768441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0856079,0.00002091095,0.00033423514,0.00082501286,0.0002579406,0.00010876665,0.0000014184536,0.00008099303,0.9127628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98863244,0.0000031483698,0.0012347858,0.0015970062,0.00007883613,0.000064126834,0.000025234534,0.0000020584364,0.008362388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942446,0.000062282445,0.00008460933,0.00005451827,0.0002187844,0.00015535625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998366,0.000017847568,0.000042351276,0.0000475891,0.000014282126,0.00004129812],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006051046,0.00003043966,0.00003506895,0.00003920219,0.0008216522,0.000044150376,0.00012235125,0.000013974153,0.002252775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026282674,0.000031434625,0.000019979707,0.000187854,0.00004233956,0.00022833032,0.00003072419,0.00010476774,0.000050577197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080708305,0.00012621525,0.008215716,0.0000052703695,0.000009093049,8.4039135e-7,0.25505176,0.0011373999,0.000015680627,0.7099577,0.0046911994,0.020781023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001767018,0.000040319537,0.003146409,4.8180317e-7,0.0000032615692,0.0000017117932,0.2846955,0.0002075658,0.000007681929,0.00225672,0.7093712,0.000092414804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035999058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013962481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9044004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007510053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011384007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693887","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7498","title":"Gilbert as Disrupter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Modal; Scope (computer science); Modal logic; Informal logic; Mode (computer interface); Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.021882875386332393,"score_gpt":0.2963879283597499,"score_spread":0.27450505297341754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2892042,0.00012805239,0.0000682332,0.00014262123,0.0008184481,0.00010132185,0.000016014716,0.00007035455,0.7094507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95760214,0.0000022619192,0.00003821061,0.007241285,0.00012782322,0.00011503529,0.00007514469,0.000008101673,0.03479002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924546,0.000048861526,0.00016444601,0.00012097043,0.00017197942,0.00024828446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965537,0.000028852344,0.000054624426,0.00019575523,0.000016761118,0.000048636353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001640374,0.000087153356,0.00009202091,0.00006602301,0.00016897873,0.000019288034,0.00016687922,0.000040770992,0.04674018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000141202645,0.00007272116,0.00007489011,0.00012655003,0.00002864176,0.00011535085,0.00010762731,0.00020413571,0.0040870174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085216196,0.00055296253,0.0063313227,0.000024923189,0.00021367971,0.0007850819,0.031064767,0.000055447766,0.00025687556,0.68003684,0.036815878,0.24301007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012107036,0.0007939615,0.025346037,0.0000023229063,0.000040383205,0.0006081684,0.009876015,0.00002277091,0.00012025561,0.01143311,0.9501909,0.00035538798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014500118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006926155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017911689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013946528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693891","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7496","title":"From the Editors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Modal; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019395303028040413,"score_gpt":0.2706361895161204,"score_spread":0.25124088648807996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051334873,0.0002815442,0.000010683889,0.031675205,0.009513434,0.00020943837,0.00006840456,0.00016805713,0.90673834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95343703,0.00004698118,0.00010116191,0.0141857695,0.019945193,0.00005713485,0.00003321824,0.0000038444614,0.012189684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933463,0.00006290637,0.00006680724,0.000048362617,0.0003336571,0.00015364475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997581,0.00008200336,0.000033613796,0.00008031721,0.000016609036,0.000029349349],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034615063,0.000034970068,0.0000367556,9.0762813e-7,0.0019238595,0.000046632696,0.00037225563,0.00003690351,0.0038078313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045838002,0.000021564163,0.000056945526,0.00013808023,0.00014706052,0.00014575299,0.00011639567,0.00019761903,0.00010108275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043347472,0.00001035827,0.00069630856,3.4087302e-7,0.000008406248,0.0000013946492,0.104414925,0.00009194314,0.0000032408861,0.07982985,0.81359506,0.001343871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004431533,0.000011461967,0.00059571996,3.4672408e-7,0.0000027480858,2.0819847e-7,0.070222236,0.0000038011763,0.0000022002573,0.00695191,0.92212605,0.000039004135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013413511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008477435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035407476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006268022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441895","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7143","title":"Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade de Lisboa; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Analogy; Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013091144188072877,"score_gpt":0.23314071469058037,"score_spread":0.22004957050250748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7745257,0.00023697621,0.21661434,0.00043288982,0.0005230564,0.00022915551,0.000018803392,0.00006878391,0.0073503023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784213,0.0000059434688,0.0018015304,0.00020883876,0.000008136044,0.0000101185,0.000012497973,0.0000011086186,0.00010966494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995372,0.000029543045,0.00014686042,0.00007389664,0.0001316867,0.00008076977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973893,0.000022317103,0.000111988295,0.00009173434,0.000013468176,0.000021541175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019412092,0.00003731862,0.000060680017,0.000048705184,0.00010919606,0.000020169135,0.00013884674,0.0000125857905,0.000033621298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006974212,0.000034479315,0.000014480597,0.00010883572,0.000008991593,0.00035785898,0.00013353986,0.00004473705,0.000003280257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046507936,0.00022214677,0.08089548,0.00015496879,0.00007526301,0.000014804333,0.017121045,0.0043225223,0.029891,0.70798594,0.014361538,0.14490879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035662572,0.001902997,0.28710824,0.000036719364,0.0000309722,0.00020875513,0.002322578,0.56641215,0.011499735,0.0049114632,0.12106898,0.00093118724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007550707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028896975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70307446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014460463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011110506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14060257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441906","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7165","title":"You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Word (group theory); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06573458011078719,"score_gpt":0.26390506638099964,"score_spread":0.19817048627021244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46785513,0.0007878921,0.000011065078,0.0022132637,0.0026408047,0.000343449,0.00069456926,0.00020946912,0.52524436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519833,0.00001981912,0.00001936563,0.008247982,0.0004510645,0.00006754328,0.00028471055,0.0000137246125,0.038912494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988705,0.000079785044,0.00028881108,0.00015394646,0.000280097,0.00032687883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946654,0.00003166857,0.00012748747,0.00021129173,0.000080552425,0.00008246498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004474772,0.00014553979,0.00018101076,0.00005017476,0.00079360034,0.0000899786,0.0002798438,0.000048089827,0.0033216914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016461527,0.00012736589,0.00008536104,0.000031161162,0.00016230984,0.00038249715,0.00013351477,0.0004239076,0.00016461663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003964244,0.00016820498,0.0003058466,0.000042488195,0.000044414843,0.000012948321,0.04258351,0.00011260761,0.00006582679,0.9153162,0.03967788,0.0016304003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002688769,0.00053619384,0.00012649293,0.0000019198594,0.00001864058,0.0000072193966,0.0066592023,0.0000574736,0.00010614533,0.0030919795,0.9889249,0.00020090853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025655507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033638455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94924706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004253942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006508431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441914","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.6974","title":"Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Externalization; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Socialization; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.047928764833201645,"score_gpt":0.32421321991701174,"score_spread":0.2762844550838101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57845646,0.00004973905,0.0000042230367,0.00012632026,0.00025618295,0.000086061824,0.00003201497,0.00007081071,0.4209182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948179,0.000009128188,0.000041752548,0.0017916843,0.00035576284,0.00005650141,0.00005735688,0.000011176076,0.0028587335],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904066,0.000108483146,0.00017368473,0.00016319063,0.0002526251,0.00026137158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995235,0.00006492934,0.0001495385,0.0001448566,0.00007778999,0.00003936041],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035327426,0.00013648532,0.00018198232,0.00010463313,0.0012084998,0.00015450551,0.0001797768,0.000013697249,0.007202655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036907288,0.00012019372,0.00007005319,0.000077837154,0.00015378732,0.0010556702,0.00027350645,0.0002570251,0.00012333102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005121748,0.0003906261,0.0009072292,0.000031287967,0.0006056497,0.00014797696,0.5221608,0.000119357836,0.0014002855,0.43005064,0.00069545396,0.042978458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008122791,0.0026713193,0.0079275975,0.000029118262,0.00025346183,0.00004295771,0.85576534,0.00063059945,0.001858307,0.009188818,0.11964114,0.0011790555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003008415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016844466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42086184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007275057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003495877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311441921","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.7175","title":"On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Management science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23758838426911483,"score_gpt":0.5060161726369339,"score_spread":0.26842778836781905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311441921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6986826,0.000010958892,0.00042879858,0.0013580798,0.00046141254,0.00016826231,0.000007631864,0.000027882188,0.29885438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906692,0.0000013541028,0.0001532212,0.0075827013,0.000024939784,0.000044686447,0.0000050773815,0.0000026327261,0.001516178],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974147,0.000115125324,0.00046082368,0.00015399104,0.0016236029,0.00023175022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926555,0.0002726638,0.00014021122,0.00023522633,0.000036979454,0.000049391314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002414275,0.000074600066,0.0001228871,0.00034255785,0.0002108587,0.00008281363,0.00046315204,0.000019736535,0.010574473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034364054,0.00005487846,0.0000485385,0.00078147603,0.000016747781,0.00032618546,0.00024131521,0.000230927,0.0011580792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003104981,0.0004085515,0.16270086,0.0000036083286,0.000010776104,0.000037612703,0.004360944,0.30667087,0.000039672002,0.29657805,0.014335845,0.2145427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016177292,0.0010730415,0.39741632,0.0000067949195,0.0000026190355,0.000029406332,0.002398312,0.112995476,0.000054567823,0.061272185,0.4227914,0.0003421542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025386033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008156122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40845555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109770845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010833618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311442015","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i4.6877","title":"A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Probabilistic argumentation; Management science; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.02733577596593486,"score_gpt":0.2823254326327485,"score_spread":0.25498965666681367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311442015","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20665541,0.00046049798,0.7857036,0.0012990528,0.00083002576,0.00029319455,0.000008345372,0.0001231172,0.0046267416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98902076,0.0000034619477,0.010584553,0.00029760273,0.00002682425,0.000021456777,0.0000035200353,0.0000010474695,0.00004075645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995145,0.000030471718,0.00015730943,0.000067742134,0.00013575016,0.00009418512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975324,0.00004820934,0.00005402461,0.000090186775,0.00002932625,0.000024988534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020024579,0.000036232792,0.000055937777,0.000025984673,0.00015866829,0.000027644563,0.00011289239,0.00001278847,0.00003531839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029859893,0.00003369478,0.000014701069,0.00012591256,0.000018459325,0.00036024055,0.00014775868,0.000050862473,0.0000042660313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047842086,0.000028294131,0.006237132,0.000024032925,0.0000042210627,0.0000017318127,0.00067567616,0.0029682245,0.00019076039,0.9833928,0.00044802684,0.0060243383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015226988,0.0013271064,0.23840663,0.00006319509,0.000027086497,0.0001879169,0.0006906296,0.66339374,0.0008714369,0.04778533,0.045125194,0.0005990184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020873376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013214982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93560743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012675786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018767145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13740332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361283426","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7073","title":"Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Scholarship; Sociology; Mediation; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.13418100913465408,"score_gpt":0.5396705254031104,"score_spread":0.40548951626845636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361283426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42685765,0.0008928225,0.022055656,0.46768177,0.0023185508,0.0061706943,0.000063679065,0.00040969552,0.0735495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738268,0.00039902475,0.0037711894,0.021470169,0.000105955485,0.00022151897,0.0000071270074,0.000008247056,0.00018993209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787265,0.00078078144,0.00051945983,0.00014645174,0.00038564755,0.00029498554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614024,0.03783061,0.00022753226,0.00013027954,0.00032099028,0.00008816061],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010166894,0.00009125874,0.00017671633,0.000050912688,0.0007351407,0.000021298443,0.00012697246,0.00041195404,0.000039183284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11144115,0.00005731799,0.000026755077,0.00013714442,0.0007598063,0.0004877024,0.0002487174,0.0029501508,0.000029348397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007591615,0.000014941402,0.000429869,0.0018391045,0.000030037416,0.00000903331,0.036483184,0.000015648173,0.000211099,0.9570625,0.0012951137,0.0018503281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069178827,0.00094623165,0.008381415,0.0014188354,0.00033270588,0.00017754843,0.3217066,0.037215553,0.0003090576,0.6064345,0.015696608,0.00046306287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067058405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022701532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5469692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038396345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002783597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361284847","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7076","title":"Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03731508347359536,"score_gpt":0.3364279001967068,"score_spread":0.29911281672311146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361284847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5919038,0.000037319292,0.000052479907,0.0045212684,0.0009905079,0.00026259685,0.000004938436,0.00030119537,0.40192586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98479325,0.00014788825,0.00052836526,0.0027795979,0.00009183953,0.000028472841,0.000011437625,0.00000457989,0.011614548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989464,0.000042369855,0.00016938026,0.00012630507,0.00035277114,0.00036276534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995987,0.00007982431,0.000035012792,0.00006980415,0.00006075233,0.00015590082],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006130783,0.00008173041,0.00009037974,0.00008411274,0.0004959755,0.00011892987,0.00014551029,0.000072875446,0.00040866417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002644367,0.000073206385,0.000026426309,0.00033994482,0.00015072922,0.0003001352,0.0000808313,0.00010094853,0.0011810638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027079055,0.00014288296,0.10336347,0.000037553786,0.00006652337,0.000020501473,0.08440271,0.000008042149,0.000047029505,0.72361356,0.011620187,0.076650456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043908836,0.00006970496,0.46630698,0.00003696231,0.000010114984,0.0000021562041,0.011799662,0.00003579796,0.00009588174,0.06765261,0.45323664,0.00031439678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011585592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003990293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.655961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006152979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013795438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361294245","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7926","title":"Books Received","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.032850789568981444,"score_gpt":0.23074847910007767,"score_spread":0.19789768953109624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361294245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26006997,0.000015633525,0.000033918215,0.00060998637,0.0006792227,0.000110640285,0.0000012774476,0.0006686164,0.73781073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98829645,0.0000064628857,0.000027529464,0.005048178,0.00065872027,0.000013868011,0.00007670682,0.000012802532,0.0058592935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992396,0.0000021953633,0.00018070838,0.00011208639,0.00014906914,0.00031632668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996956,0.000018520608,0.00007411022,0.000150616,0.000050848183,0.000010302034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020568087,0.000113406124,0.00011357677,0.00021593703,0.00014577407,0.00016288355,0.00018838391,0.00005666457,0.00044144978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006659607,0.00009213466,0.00006146742,0.00043312626,0.000032281798,0.0009902979,0.00015035736,0.00009341471,0.011646394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020371052,0.000063831125,0.04886284,0.0004062665,0.000069821595,0.00024270362,0.0003098092,0.0012242314,0.0011465251,0.6978534,0.17338736,0.07622954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045194922,0.000016632437,0.04747763,0.000019148521,0.000015162672,0.0000037164205,0.0002409821,0.0076821116,0.000089391935,0.00935595,0.93436605,0.00028124926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008577252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001451152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057597654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000076023075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98912317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361295185","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7639","title":"The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Multivariable calculus; Causal reasoning; Simple (philosophy); Sample (material); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.020350997013837597,"score_gpt":0.2876073364846006,"score_spread":0.267256339470763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361295185","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068300697,0.00009770402,0.9240442,0.000597406,0.00017286117,0.00019117375,0.0000011862245,0.0014495077,0.06661589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.861982,0.000101368,0.13600095,0.0003200069,0.000032600114,0.00002504915,0.0000042268243,0.0000064021183,0.0015274117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991108,0.000019046636,0.0002537936,0.000111426416,0.00025938262,0.00024553275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990628,0.00019241874,0.00013733399,0.0005064851,0.000075501055,0.000025500436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006472512,0.00007462219,0.00010816648,0.00009187758,0.00021059325,0.00007361427,0.0011651642,0.00004281241,0.0000032979028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013923146,0.000046348636,0.000062438834,0.00082712504,0.000055872148,0.00064374035,0.0005370602,0.00011488367,0.00007477961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043786476,0.000010607021,0.00060385786,0.000008559973,0.000020545984,0.0000059774034,0.00085720693,0.0014818851,0.0011834918,0.8764013,0.0013222424,0.11809993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037801152,0.00021572312,0.011036577,0.000052058716,0.00001453301,0.00001872347,0.00028519306,0.31027764,0.033436008,0.5432174,0.10061545,0.0004526432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031272168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045217603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85515195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014483496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025548363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21651845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361295203","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7304","title":"Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Fallacy; Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Rhetorical device; Function (biology); Rhetoric; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010946402060970613,"score_gpt":0.21668509617720935,"score_spread":0.20573869411623874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361295203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39319283,0.0032391616,0.101644576,0.17527618,0.0075064925,0.003394093,0.00001683551,0.0031856813,0.31254417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322724,0.00026107318,0.00022871028,0.0044246796,0.000118603595,0.00004626218,0.0000014725325,0.000003901816,0.0016880608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999215,0.000064574335,0.00013938168,0.00010959235,0.00021265466,0.0002588027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919814,0.00023920329,0.00005497473,0.00045213287,0.000024834282,0.000030728846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009976751,0.00008504341,0.000070448565,0.000028684695,0.00063016324,0.0004400683,0.0008441278,0.00003765298,0.000009943325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000671721,0.000031200012,0.000047680373,0.0004858665,0.00020637714,0.0004545973,0.00039363967,0.000196457,0.00049761357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023036333,0.000004174514,0.00013836253,0.000005043608,0.00002005794,0.000009126946,0.0038251132,0.00031047157,0.000025755351,0.7399125,0.0028682728,0.25285807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019384918,0.00026936101,0.059999187,0.00002952894,0.000028089482,0.00038583062,0.0023156626,0.1412531,0.00088658225,0.067903064,0.72455007,0.00044103136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068464884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021581724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7216818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005377371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024675226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63959813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361296790","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i1.7835","title":"Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0694531939445168,"score_gpt":0.2604043364876503,"score_spread":0.19095114254313353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361296790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04702373,0.0017264575,0.0000029109221,0.0145593025,0.0025151004,0.0007113552,0.00012034082,0.0002375648,0.93310326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98771167,0.0014471399,0.00000907683,0.008071787,0.00085623685,0.00002979004,0.00007480376,0.000009106165,0.001790417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991587,0.00004596346,0.00021427294,0.00011936999,0.00027867605,0.00018304067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993539,0.000054748787,0.0001618966,0.00024110862,0.00013904863,0.00004932839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045731856,0.00011632798,0.00016197731,0.00009733101,0.000399919,0.00008092237,0.00027569165,0.000029019853,0.000495454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007764009,0.00007320534,0.00006770814,0.00018005689,0.00032992856,0.00063484395,0.000026991014,0.00010642015,0.0003373345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003819254,0.000030156023,0.0000038089024,0.0003114097,0.000010285577,0.0000031524282,0.01049296,0.000046927955,0.000053759453,0.9546178,0.033413377,0.0009782003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023685131,0.00042822005,0.00006506589,0.00040544895,0.0000260847,0.0000013914026,0.0021814173,0.00022601346,0.00006317345,0.009792617,0.98638463,0.00018911212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039895094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014629944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003309093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009841251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5424874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380881987","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8058","title":"From the Editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09368286923623231,"score_gpt":0.3615496576959067,"score_spread":0.2678667884596744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380881987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14050192,0.00006536476,0.000026126449,0.03562076,0.0042705503,0.00015907625,0.000017118778,0.0004075221,0.8189316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825955,0.000064844775,0.000018823748,0.0030962643,0.009487044,0.0000095786945,0.000016758915,0.0000019815664,0.0047091804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991976,0.0002523893,0.00010551073,0.00006663578,0.00017879305,0.00019905175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745727,0.0023130465,0.000050705257,0.00010543485,0.000023041935,0.00005049443],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015829068,0.00004707175,0.000058894653,0.000010342859,0.0006951881,0.0000666,0.00031144833,0.0000910351,0.0011375169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001415434,0.000027256574,0.0000521,0.0002697058,0.00025464856,0.0004406238,0.000067554865,0.00017531999,0.0026649795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007267103,0.00001505829,0.0059811254,0.0000014282825,0.0000301189,0.000025226016,0.0617084,0.000029582383,0.000011948852,0.5066869,0.40032467,0.025112873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042647822,0.000016213515,0.0060956427,0.000001409453,0.0000024662793,8.771553e-8,0.0130022485,0.000007115681,0.000002201059,0.07222558,0.9085579,0.00004647262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097462354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003626609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8420936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000882772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005186037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380987881","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7249","title":"The Basic Components of Agreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Agreement; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.32836837640902933,"score_gpt":0.4382867172272609,"score_spread":0.1099183408182316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380987881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562878,0.00005284831,0.0009768466,0.00080558786,0.0013494953,0.00024884727,0.000020275504,0.00007108838,0.040187187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961727,0.00001631834,0.00040236436,0.00031933325,0.00004135184,0.000008829566,0.0000046399323,0.000004160299,0.0030302615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965695,0.00009219382,0.0009531259,0.00018411553,0.0018747143,0.00032635283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965334,0.0020944134,0.00032848289,0.00071777444,0.00025510334,0.00007082145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044298675,0.00010515146,0.0001999687,0.0002558608,0.0002642269,0.00022269369,0.0013205527,0.000047360147,0.000573249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002465312,0.00005386956,0.00012276946,0.0010321097,0.0001346033,0.00030486184,0.000625606,0.00009887522,0.006142726],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027135405,0.000074934265,0.027808338,0.000013255519,0.000044292054,0.000049540915,0.0021064254,0.0038207548,0.0049631824,0.04081348,0.07750258,0.84253186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006703206,0.00011746711,0.50672674,0.000024251955,0.0000048515117,0.00000980848,0.0014449605,0.03522311,0.0006191721,0.030549029,0.4244239,0.00018636753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000158044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013089912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8423455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014270024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025452538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380989094","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7171","title":"Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Syllogism; Computer science; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.06797196942493196,"score_gpt":0.27626657402153054,"score_spread":0.2082946045965986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380989094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37621623,0.000073274714,0.00018197384,0.01567285,0.0022775908,0.00091531005,0.00006508197,0.00079740817,0.6038003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97948164,0.000020457992,0.000073941446,0.0051720403,0.0010205683,0.000102094935,0.00015821336,0.000017105009,0.013953916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988455,0.000044995606,0.00035611424,0.00012949108,0.00026597295,0.00035789612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992682,0.00015084133,0.00011764583,0.00026064835,0.00012390743,0.000078780104],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006333725,0.00015371559,0.00014539933,0.00017846454,0.0008600853,0.00036988687,0.00032351707,0.00006997352,0.002389639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022711173,0.00010140211,0.00007783946,0.00020342958,0.00008940671,0.0010042146,0.00013910189,0.00018778649,0.0059805117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000479482,0.000026634334,0.00005497588,0.00005362736,0.000032402437,0.0000036474717,0.14797284,0.00044292482,0.000047313442,0.7844526,0.06272212,0.0041429433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003969801,0.00023149933,0.0011213118,0.00007229734,0.000048024816,0.000012215041,0.0055037523,0.007392642,0.000103495964,0.050711714,0.9339467,0.0004593359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001597378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008772792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87122464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035833742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047417958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380989868","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8008","title":"Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Parallel thinking; Epistemology; Action (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Vertical thinking; Intellectual development; Lateral thinking; Pedagogy; Convergent thinking; Psychology; Social psychology; Critical systems thinking; Philosophy; Creative thinking; Creativity","score_opus":0.05327950592678515,"score_gpt":0.3735607014985834,"score_spread":0.32028119557179824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380989868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08915783,0.00010273605,0.002309306,0.048003074,0.0076443423,0.0016301177,0.000023596958,0.0021322703,0.84899676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8083947,0.00023110028,0.03821745,0.022409445,0.0017470655,0.000415088,0.00012302567,0.000034633227,0.12842752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881846,0.00003478968,0.0002481587,0.00013295539,0.00029177545,0.00047387194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916905,0.0004275376,0.000057870424,0.00010709513,0.00009696941,0.00014145779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012625376,0.000091714566,0.0001114633,0.00008396559,0.0009462185,0.00017565247,0.0003136642,0.00009721155,0.00047873642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013383221,0.00007263522,0.000058298778,0.0004742012,0.00010514716,0.0002687129,0.000059276517,0.00011133475,0.0005303785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007942316,0.000061086575,0.0010124289,0.00002673899,0.000009841502,0.0000014349715,0.03899262,0.000005933779,0.0000030549336,0.9217128,0.0116454065,0.026520666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017948316,0.00006034755,0.004009164,0.000036597692,0.0000064476576,0.000001532238,0.02178541,0.000024488421,0.000031236013,0.1363563,0.83731604,0.00019298866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091900314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013406297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007525816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066064915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7277643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380990916","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8007","title":"Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan State University","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.09793189935889732,"score_gpt":0.27823741542634034,"score_spread":0.18030551606744302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380990916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75969666,0.00014629884,0.00044683932,0.0031268785,0.0012288983,0.00039041316,0.000079796206,0.0006962657,0.23418795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987955,0.00008102355,0.00006080298,0.002039112,0.00066055765,0.000011325898,0.00007579297,0.000017702454,0.009098733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984291,0.000035279238,0.00042899282,0.00022811178,0.000512718,0.0003657562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901295,0.0005137324,0.00010652008,0.00013520486,0.00012628699,0.00010529384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026381225,0.00022565565,0.00024685764,0.00016732587,0.0009273375,0.00051953015,0.00025222695,0.00007834936,0.0020314804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021419664,0.00014587176,0.00010425595,0.00010881098,0.00041644223,0.00059735804,0.00023904163,0.00028365102,0.0005133007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019527406,0.000051444047,0.00006951835,0.000032293752,0.000044128068,0.000077867444,0.011474662,0.000009663604,0.000035577566,0.9854137,0.0018337145,0.0007621824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096053944,0.0006003308,0.0065570893,0.00014023887,0.000058540572,0.00006222862,0.0021356451,0.0020814158,0.00009534026,0.88461846,0.10211649,0.00057370274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008459283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018486456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2282583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001990022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005324836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380991364","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8057","title":"In Memoriam","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.055560946537658126,"score_gpt":0.37275402242966377,"score_spread":0.3171930758920056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380991364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10134029,0.000008244737,0.000016358092,0.021484159,0.0031397978,0.00009784115,4.7855895e-7,0.00019128667,0.87372154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729987,0.000060991133,0.00046301686,0.0066343187,0.00041670835,0.000020236675,0.00000430915,0.0000023307139,0.019399418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948764,0.000019464998,0.00009500282,0.000042267053,0.00015966484,0.00019595958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983054,0.00005373523,0.000009200934,0.00003808227,0.000020063128,0.000048376718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057308184,0.000026339281,0.00003822267,0.0000671741,0.00011300815,0.000029364684,0.000098675904,0.000036750516,0.0007356774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024603127,0.000023757326,0.0000128116835,0.00043149086,0.000052797208,0.0001697867,0.000021182828,0.00005829688,0.002402272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015243453,0.000011008718,0.0026858062,0.000003171951,9.176886e-7,0.000006090308,0.02301005,0.0000069776966,0.0000012141772,0.9546033,0.016709406,0.002960537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006726773,0.000005894499,0.021165246,0.000004423007,3.8312194e-7,2.1579656e-7,0.0059644594,0.000010529801,0.000008358762,0.07442909,0.89828837,0.00005577157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012609917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014851987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.881579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003114701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011258612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380991468","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.8012","title":"Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Critical thinking; Epistemology; State (computer science); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06755187087734006,"score_gpt":0.3731239650346018,"score_spread":0.3055720941572618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380991468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90066826,0.000041389198,0.000084336716,0.007853177,0.0008036565,0.000106556196,7.382796e-7,0.00019584643,0.09024603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977617,0.00009264521,0.00029816452,0.0012728168,0.00008339888,0.000010131274,0.0000028340653,0.000002554353,0.0004757222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925303,0.000047342888,0.00015581783,0.000088325185,0.00022364104,0.00023184733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.0003300108,0.000010991854,0.000033438348,0.000046847956,0.00007817469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007285603,0.000050649334,0.00006602299,0.0001311995,0.0003491475,0.000084921594,0.0000933166,0.0000787123,0.00022761723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025091798,0.000047817484,0.000013480199,0.00044753778,0.00012939461,0.00031183191,0.000055982568,0.0001505689,0.00033107275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004525477,0.000009209626,0.0011504651,0.000009741344,0.0000012261852,0.0000033547838,0.04348026,0.000003830938,0.0000053120843,0.9468753,0.00017670101,0.008280092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006786827,0.00013810827,0.07046478,0.00015814693,0.000008393705,0.000019007619,0.11515559,0.0014833335,0.00022441898,0.68100476,0.13007604,0.0005887528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049881433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010179693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26587054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042721254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011779217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42553806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380992239","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i2.7686","title":"Group Identity in Public Deliberation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Argumentation theory; Categorization; Argumentative; Identity (music); Epistemology; Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Group (periodic table); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.0825883654461164,"score_gpt":0.36458521357231005,"score_spread":0.28199684812619363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380992239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9062095,0.000012084297,0.000048627247,0.001714274,0.0007684773,0.00010788594,0.0000021903325,0.00015899201,0.09097794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983654,0.00006861399,0.00003923843,0.0007393599,0.00031209918,0.000016237947,0.00001786345,0.0000023202047,0.00043887712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991937,0.00005401156,0.0001362627,0.000050620332,0.00024502538,0.00032032543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972147,0.00008860259,0.00002914184,0.000048254733,0.000036251364,0.00007629026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045065963,0.000038954877,0.00005873746,0.00010814108,0.00021486342,0.00011173155,0.00013693782,0.00008977631,0.00012723496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005386075,0.00003895118,0.00002636291,0.0007766183,0.000090846646,0.0010675924,0.000032593172,0.00008484605,0.0007289382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001337007,0.000008423733,0.039742347,0.0000035453331,0.0000014853907,0.000004882897,0.016442474,0.0000031023658,0.0000100994885,0.9358389,0.0006156912,0.007327738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005143794,0.00006648804,0.36525854,0.000011722016,0.000005432656,8.194813e-7,0.04844074,0.00021730867,0.000030162975,0.22539705,0.35975203,0.00030530553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014592119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009423926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005464223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009129688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9369269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707598","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7802","title":"Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Università di Bologna; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Similarity (geometry); Persuasion; Selection (genetic algorithm); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.3101464769070194,"score_gpt":0.4316794841286712,"score_spread":0.12153300722165178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986051,0.0000040823907,0.00079246453,0.00004266947,0.00010776209,0.00016623519,0.0000037857685,0.000012110109,0.00026584335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997749,0.0000032642288,0.00008817065,0.000022836479,0.000022823553,0.0000071317477,0.0000044549206,0.000001982361,0.000074457574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851847,0.000092145725,0.00062309526,0.00014667136,0.0005101649,0.00010945534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986453,0.00066054234,0.00023617518,0.000093489165,0.0003319339,0.000032561395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021207242,0.00006535281,0.00016051433,0.00043889158,0.00009569517,0.000036196794,0.00007804279,0.0000792646,0.00007570918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013410028,0.000048348636,0.000023089797,0.0010966166,0.00007441224,0.00036218524,0.00007290402,0.00011416721,0.000010701199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008228619,0.00049049006,0.88785064,0.000026675856,0.000014523709,0.0003871603,0.016414944,0.05084379,0.00017784012,0.0033861874,0.0000747335,0.040250722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067932985,0.00037403643,0.88610035,0.000012872215,0.000005410539,0.0017023137,0.03553702,0.068424,0.000017846578,0.007052423,0.00001808171,0.00007628183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005849365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007172578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040174443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014571359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004267133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19716002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707692","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7263","title":"Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06744273608965048,"score_gpt":0.2785592848371255,"score_spread":0.211116548747475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25312194,0.0011640413,0.000011688731,0.025629064,0.0070780925,0.00050873734,0.0000761017,0.0007479746,0.71166235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98262626,0.0014362585,0.000019484596,0.0020717236,0.000749409,0.00004069986,0.00006455907,0.000011160952,0.012980428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989844,0.000018116481,0.00029893528,0.00014257627,0.00023396038,0.00032198848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994029,0.000063149266,0.0001440288,0.0002418661,0.000072128896,0.00007591811],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022478597,0.00014506334,0.00015573773,0.00018968023,0.00032124665,0.0006017937,0.00022597135,0.00004859066,0.001559778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003976616,0.000119182805,0.00007830913,0.000102101025,0.00010030337,0.0017982135,0.00007855394,0.0001392565,0.004683454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042936343,0.00007679412,0.00022997119,0.00011412315,0.000064917,0.0000238036,0.035569914,0.0001041401,0.000009450873,0.8772192,0.029517444,0.057027295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037952294,0.0001672818,0.005818089,0.00027605213,0.00004562323,0.000010360291,0.016935281,0.00045849776,0.00007459371,0.14076868,0.83464223,0.00042378932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039482606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006816331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8051248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034042845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036997062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707737","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7815","title":"Fact and Opinion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Section (typography); Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07437962406435493,"score_gpt":0.37941957076634514,"score_spread":0.3050399467019902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24484578,0.000049082646,0.00009498257,0.01936196,0.0013867876,0.00014186077,0.0000016821913,0.00042286422,0.73369503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937206,0.00023158493,0.00030884967,0.0018428409,0.00009390932,0.0000061053543,0.0000065151708,0.0000014112826,0.0037882125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996317,0.000013116468,0.00006087736,0.000039417533,0.000119113065,0.0001357658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998393,0.000045751527,0.0000088238685,0.000027394723,0.0000190407,0.00005969722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030783587,0.000024781564,0.000029921881,0.000031105006,0.00022628525,0.000045905083,0.000050689905,0.000030407682,0.00021333409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014047603,0.000020962027,0.000008904832,0.00014535179,0.00007043731,0.00011706038,0.000023134591,0.000038079925,0.00055800565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014568257,0.0000057863876,0.005783342,0.0000069645953,0.0000021636502,7.1191715e-7,0.020122267,0.0000012988413,0.0000025426953,0.93271965,0.004795717,0.03655813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000530311,0.00001238082,0.08307742,0.0000064328083,5.6266356e-7,4.3860587e-7,0.006168993,0.000013422457,0.000007631341,0.033530258,0.8770671,0.000062358566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000528822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012960419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89918935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010656245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005667925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.717222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707873","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i3.7124","title":"Are Fallacies Frequent ?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Empirical research; Positive economics; Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3424636682400444,"score_gpt":0.4338737950435198,"score_spread":0.09141012680347538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6191254,0.000033371954,0.0076991445,0.006008579,0.00032834464,0.0003764132,0.00006458386,0.0018770742,0.36448705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914134,0.000007887101,0.001752012,0.00089964096,0.000047999714,0.000043116706,0.000006445893,0.0000040710584,0.0058254413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988137,0.000011644504,0.00032492355,0.00014271426,0.00049484207,0.0002122129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990518,0.00020639203,0.00019156274,0.00037035762,0.00012312672,0.000056762867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008812653,0.000070179325,0.00010661269,0.00017065891,0.00016139573,0.0001518029,0.0005571931,0.00004948401,0.00028253224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006484101,0.000045758272,0.000069007445,0.0009866408,0.00007105319,0.00020203073,0.00020470507,0.00008016562,0.0059215706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110369265,0.00003097713,0.035742972,0.000007663431,0.000007874403,0.000028750206,0.0005471313,0.0014582385,0.0002585321,0.47396016,0.3965932,0.09135345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000841364,0.000050974155,0.12205793,0.000009479326,0.0000021184783,0.000014795026,0.00078265136,0.0042799828,0.00052448525,0.20926405,0.66276425,0.00016514455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000120728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016009843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37228796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000101414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014320175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098297","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.7667","title":"Arguing with Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Discipline; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.019337828573134267,"score_gpt":0.24574569467040994,"score_spread":0.22640786609727567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07179092,0.00025593373,0.86835843,0.00036084995,0.0011069787,0.0002247205,0.0000015717142,0.00060317933,0.0572974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915113,0.0000045346433,0.007236391,0.00026175854,0.00006279483,0.0000092882865,0.0000022620286,0.0000030885433,0.0009085774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994059,0.000007474003,0.0001306056,0.00012301559,0.00017577564,0.00015722116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997358,0.000016445765,0.000028301045,0.00016159391,0.00001853938,0.000039360082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013344482,0.000069947324,0.000059088365,0.0000682607,0.000054319775,0.00025707015,0.00022347209,0.000027230888,0.00002322965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000041370135,0.00004536413,0.000023753691,0.00018316777,0.000007950236,0.00097430986,0.00006296897,0.0000636655,0.00050603837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013908566,0.000051120343,0.0052519236,0.00029493886,0.00008755707,0.00022575833,0.0053932257,0.0018770412,0.0008076572,0.78782356,0.0033866216,0.1947867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070845545,0.00049025594,0.025323562,0.0003894942,0.000013949465,0.00025429294,0.000098589604,0.7541957,0.0023915695,0.0019550445,0.21353929,0.0006397997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016041407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003154193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001874839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026679227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65042686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098438","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8483","title":"Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue ethics; Epistemic virtue; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.2045478084717812,"score_gpt":0.5595859967407959,"score_spread":0.3550381882690147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022488218,0.0018930153,0.053569254,0.024703013,0.010649748,0.0042014862,0.00004619392,0.00075715507,0.88169193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754018,0.00012313806,0.004426049,0.013370188,0.0010533347,0.0009707678,0.000086625216,0.000019870016,0.004548184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979849,0.0004757766,0.00045954884,0.00015548599,0.0005704565,0.00035384652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251807,0.0067978622,0.000095792515,0.0001863697,0.0003099436,0.000091935624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011713478,0.000095458934,0.00011406905,0.000073859475,0.0006362332,0.000028441204,0.0001544652,0.0002830385,0.0016879354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009738623,0.00007184658,0.00005390578,0.00013922407,0.000064529915,0.00049597624,0.000086020016,0.0017257227,0.0026924214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011962056,0.00004427994,0.0002451359,0.0012705115,0.000054373093,0.0000048896623,0.006770262,0.00010960243,0.00014228391,0.8858071,0.041162398,0.06426956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056378136,0.00023438242,0.00078851567,0.0002956746,0.00009145564,0.0000028662114,0.0032157286,0.036099833,0.000034404955,0.14864722,0.8098715,0.00015463075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029695879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025725161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95291364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016671841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005627835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098440","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8437","title":"In Memoriam Michael Scriven","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04348789028557327,"score_gpt":0.2236237930376058,"score_spread":0.18013590275203253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014099813,0.002517622,0.00012008188,0.00050385256,0.011502367,0.00009780807,0.00014792659,0.000060545546,0.97095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6968306,0.00040257524,0.0004999039,0.0016560126,0.0005958323,0.00003111453,0.000012782953,0.000015154508,0.29995602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991624,0.0000016810573,0.00035766643,0.00021707523,0.000016144895,0.00024506854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997691,0.000018775301,0.000045173692,0.00012638414,0.000005828638,0.00003472929],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037237204,0.00008642143,0.00018881643,0.00026041892,0.0000414891,0.00011158472,0.00015526076,0.000049000948,0.006145063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028579227,0.00008815044,0.00007106117,0.00019668948,0.000057243815,0.0006292955,0.00009670171,0.000094946205,0.059843894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005306874,0.000013522887,0.0020505316,0.000029443016,0.00002514278,0.00002348098,0.0013650525,0.00012097193,0.0000010232832,0.8078591,0.1880268,0.00047958043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015948123,0.00001791152,0.0017570087,0.000010567565,0.0000013626351,0.000004320754,0.0002871777,0.0025810695,0.0000064537253,0.026111852,0.9689238,0.00013896635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010731096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012586468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7817473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055325243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011235053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99476343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098476","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8493","title":"Books Received","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06401105708715357,"score_gpt":0.2722651369713352,"score_spread":0.20825407988418163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032571338,0.00048724617,0.000008874526,0.0013061239,0.001956909,0.00006755613,0.000011817148,0.00021586833,0.96337426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94671273,0.000051793613,0.000039996983,0.0020573207,0.0015934624,0.000012165934,0.00002111969,0.000006874164,0.049504556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958265,0.000006428227,0.00012521849,0.0000722971,0.00008184989,0.00013155061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979466,0.00003191619,0.000015055982,0.000088366825,0.000041987412,0.000028034667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009604098,0.00007029407,0.00006095896,0.000031270396,0.00019163986,0.00025370644,0.00008304317,0.000030292264,0.0034280703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009188173,0.000052630145,0.00007247852,0.0000173838,0.000113729475,0.00034098438,0.000015733352,0.00010793583,0.00089650357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014237172,0.000007821568,0.000033351138,0.000032813732,0.00001358122,0.0000011570892,0.06436737,0.0000014584652,0.0000024483872,0.9115986,0.022212813,0.0017271526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040137995,0.00004110809,0.00016224076,0.000015889533,0.000008132673,0.0000020117243,0.0048385127,0.000097094184,0.000010616185,0.029671613,0.96502095,0.000091689275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047559814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031928368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94280815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001577322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004564321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098477","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8415","title":"A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Viewpoints; Ambiguity; Normative; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04146038175008145,"score_gpt":0.30578151800191483,"score_spread":0.2643211362518334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098477","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1676308,0.0004485941,0.8038999,0.017425828,0.0026419521,0.00043563283,0.0000127113235,0.00064124295,0.0068633603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169403,0.0000116260135,0.003983889,0.0036269953,0.00035812828,0.00003026541,0.000007745742,0.0000028559527,0.00028444297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992253,0.000042993004,0.00024070531,0.00017535072,0.00016594569,0.00014968842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999438,0.00019003965,0.00002953054,0.00024691224,0.000045555014,0.000049961265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026796616,0.00008383536,0.0000813839,0.00003839434,0.00008876348,0.00026805306,0.00036146553,0.00006489227,0.000022874747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009607952,0.00004639756,0.000054612756,0.00020316787,0.000011220236,0.0005788724,0.000121947676,0.00011332313,0.00075433054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030359717,0.000056210436,0.0026416131,0.000073217554,0.00005095868,0.00014509671,0.005401419,0.0009937707,0.011230755,0.7516368,0.040795512,0.18694426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032318447,0.00040073015,0.13525467,0.00026666286,0.00001765452,0.0001975465,0.0004897017,0.33001035,0.0019011204,0.019432705,0.5110853,0.0006203705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005798739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007231332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82406324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024316165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000275468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96956444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098499","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8311","title":"That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Object (grammar); Persuasion; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08268960158722405,"score_gpt":0.2648012369514965,"score_spread":0.18211163536427244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060788203,0.0019113092,0.00007221187,0.0026823282,0.0031940504,0.00018374334,0.000049912273,0.00022944121,0.9308888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718136,0.00007273939,0.000088616915,0.0004787096,0.0010160157,0.000013027012,0.000027121612,0.000008325075,0.001114072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932057,0.000019775805,0.00025854877,0.00009981811,0.00014989595,0.00015138702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962974,0.00007850753,0.000057075154,0.00014864362,0.000044746997,0.00004131104],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020216857,0.00010482873,0.00013413861,0.000095757605,0.00012052715,0.00012131886,0.0001468623,0.000062077896,0.001334463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025055915,0.00007643288,0.00010834107,0.000044760338,0.00020355856,0.00064170425,0.00003421886,0.00017228069,0.00037078108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008050652,0.000023032104,0.00007295671,0.00014743344,0.000028298839,0.0000042682555,0.008229885,0.0000058343257,0.0000027217957,0.9811718,0.0012905732,0.009015159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011095479,0.00018612227,0.0011770325,0.00014724759,0.000040367846,0.000016226157,0.0011580235,0.00035100887,0.0001507396,0.8265861,0.16987637,0.00019978391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021909767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007964521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93639314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011830746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059028065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098513","doi":"10.22329/il.v43i4.8473","title":"Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051308530733281975,"score_gpt":0.288812592094232,"score_spread":0.23750406136095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098513","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071750805,0.000557676,0.90743583,0.00065537135,0.0011522053,0.0002506141,0.0000020967796,0.00018310742,0.018012265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977644,0.00001078319,0.001595574,0.00024021101,0.0000498032,0.000010246784,0.0000023234525,0.0000016481288,0.00032500311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934953,0.000058794983,0.00022935793,0.000095428906,0.00015803041,0.00010884185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.00017249449,0.0000634817,0.00016520839,0.0000240532,0.000018183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006696208,0.00005818642,0.00006767999,0.00004583868,0.000070515605,0.0000989419,0.00029866808,0.00003835653,0.00003645159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030662715,0.00003098696,0.000050869792,0.0001697848,0.000031677675,0.00046263495,0.00008420761,0.00007400763,0.00011179278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031995803,0.000007160646,0.0002239333,0.00006479149,0.000009284854,0.0000046566474,0.0014999715,0.00028937435,0.00044176745,0.95392793,0.00016009399,0.04336785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008304848,0.00066756876,0.14512995,0.00039954367,0.000063983345,0.00031009055,0.0017219316,0.69526243,0.01210124,0.10927072,0.033532996,0.0007090254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007990496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.941024e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9260136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014241177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020341215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14369074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877207","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8258","title":"Generative AI and Argument Creativity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Argument (complex analysis); Creativity; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04843543748935351,"score_gpt":0.385232943713059,"score_spread":0.33679750622370547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6707087,0.00048083102,0.003023206,0.0046249996,0.0020222403,0.00020228025,0.000020719363,0.00017628298,0.3187407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98446697,0.000024801293,0.00010897678,0.0034539644,0.00008714374,0.000033075296,0.000003409418,0.000003624578,0.01181806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994473,0.000031637544,0.00010695055,0.00016633686,0.00008700271,0.00016076808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970305,0.00008536272,0.000017163095,0.00011572752,0.000015595928,0.00006307379],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014842169,0.000080758,0.0000723129,0.00006988623,0.00008272875,0.000115765986,0.00006298491,0.000039535415,0.0013627707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029773542,0.000062180894,0.000023703977,0.00015072111,0.00012526885,0.0002457467,0.00003638431,0.00013126268,0.00051551877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043773438,0.00023540904,0.012688548,0.000041067175,0.00003811004,0.00006943856,0.022644565,0.000021637605,0.0022070436,0.790623,0.033346027,0.13804138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005124698,0.0008311805,0.26900947,0.000043870114,0.000035106797,0.00041598544,0.0022139153,0.0036416603,0.0039818897,0.006590051,0.7121682,0.00055616075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024025896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054963793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78403294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015289108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033929733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877232","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8183","title":"The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Sun Yat-sen University","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Analogical reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Analogy; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.058694777136298205,"score_gpt":0.28215423052417177,"score_spread":0.22345945338787357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08326436,0.001221017,0.00033220692,0.0007148978,0.0014142467,0.00026236635,0.00005843322,0.0001342603,0.9125982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925318,0.000047241614,0.000045785997,0.00018215294,0.0002599453,0.00001870627,0.000012870101,0.000005288471,0.0068962616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929905,0.00003397594,0.00025109662,0.0000892176,0.00014254072,0.00018410425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994964,0.00021951442,0.00005916097,0.0001131913,0.000084123516,0.00002761363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037739228,0.00009047293,0.00012707195,0.00002759308,0.00026248043,0.00013219105,0.00016828097,0.000045373366,0.00017998007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023316394,0.000047196896,0.00009662162,0.000033264543,0.00062454154,0.0001928202,0.000057714387,0.0001960877,0.000108287444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014087092,0.000018692885,0.00015867263,0.000096164804,0.000041092466,0.000004247953,0.0049923477,0.000008830338,0.000008827811,0.9858814,0.00032816685,0.00844748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001007649,0.00019767274,0.0012593701,0.000049133763,0.00003114853,0.000004433162,0.0017232386,0.00016452753,0.00007666371,0.14321701,0.85305953,0.000116529445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046627905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012353057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90926737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010490715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038812144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23011494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877337","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8291","title":"Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Rhetoric; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01573705692344187,"score_gpt":0.23785975874726245,"score_spread":0.22212270182382057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70047,0.00018728062,0.0011949214,0.0008067953,0.0015781047,0.00021676802,0.000005781627,0.00013413155,0.29540625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866543,0.0000100688585,0.000054678683,0.012568671,0.0004400797,0.000015144262,0.00009255903,0.0000061700925,0.00015833955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937826,0.0000032576731,0.00021445597,0.00013143297,0.00015484211,0.00011772273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981236,0.000023527526,0.000051508927,0.000044628687,0.000060806535,0.0000071562094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008904911,0.00009467026,0.00008453944,0.0002084065,0.00004338818,0.0003271355,0.00007405311,0.000040590312,0.00025747335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003589742,0.00008082959,0.00002739048,0.00017594638,0.00003088107,0.002113495,0.00006476084,0.000094455696,0.0005390268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070790295,0.000027770608,0.0033584402,0.00005948696,0.000026017336,0.00008518982,0.0003811154,0.00008693633,0.00018237362,0.986465,0.001124781,0.008132151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001337355,0.00006246336,0.13008007,0.00035286354,0.000057586836,0.000017591125,0.0006069501,0.3927909,0.00014703102,0.32995895,0.14395846,0.0006297608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004861163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013806399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.656506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028229326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011600024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6928279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877419","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8543","title":"Books Received","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06401105708715357,"score_gpt":0.2722651369713352,"score_spread":0.20825407988418163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032571338,0.00048724617,0.000008874526,0.0013061239,0.001956909,0.00006755613,0.000011817148,0.00021586833,0.96337426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94671273,0.000051793613,0.000039996983,0.0020573207,0.0015934624,0.000012165934,0.00002111969,0.000006874164,0.049504556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958265,0.000006428227,0.00012521849,0.0000722971,0.00008184989,0.00013155061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979466,0.00003191619,0.000015055982,0.000088366825,0.000041987412,0.000028034667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009604098,0.00007029407,0.00006095896,0.000031270396,0.00019163986,0.00025370644,0.00008304317,0.000030292264,0.0034280703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009188173,0.000052630145,0.00007247852,0.0000173838,0.000113729475,0.00034098438,0.000015733352,0.00010793583,0.00089650357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014237172,0.000007821568,0.000033351138,0.000032813732,0.00001358122,0.0000011570892,0.06436737,0.0000014584652,0.0000024483872,0.9115986,0.022212813,0.0017271526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040137995,0.00004110809,0.00016224076,0.000015889533,0.000008132673,0.0000020117243,0.0048385127,0.000097094184,0.000010616185,0.029671613,0.96502095,0.000091689275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047559814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031928368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94280815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001577322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004564321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392877428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i1.8222","title":"What Makes an Argument Strong?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09379951201748599,"score_gpt":0.3052495666163226,"score_spread":0.2114500545988366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392877428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19243474,0.0041000876,0.00015894929,0.0016227228,0.012391205,0.00029827948,0.000049265505,0.00060263183,0.7883421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673272,0.00019968628,0.0000731471,0.0020268392,0.0013467042,0.00001865872,0.00005737579,0.000013487585,0.028936924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999242,0.000023019571,0.00020521335,0.00013351438,0.00014571185,0.0002505537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963206,0.00004733933,0.000033200737,0.00017234754,0.000052777865,0.00006225614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024015814,0.00012616553,0.00013164594,0.000062351035,0.00017666494,0.00084991066,0.00014410092,0.00006253088,0.0010467892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000756872,0.00009300329,0.00008611898,0.00001951528,0.00026092757,0.0014524651,0.00003905309,0.00024081262,0.0006766092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005858285,0.000022484952,0.000015552865,0.00007381193,0.000027756252,0.0000130603385,0.03281522,0.000016723106,0.0000064042792,0.9469644,0.00064459926,0.019394156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009132137,0.00027655606,0.00006521202,0.00005574387,0.000026806121,0.0000072220996,0.020715171,0.000394141,0.00007073083,0.024859823,0.9532569,0.00018038278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004763339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000475072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016794284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004216418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411912","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8435","title":"When Meaning Becomes Controversial","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03581477241618921,"score_gpt":0.3314471516409262,"score_spread":0.295632379224737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050364444,0.00016817998,0.0006284451,0.019715603,0.0019634266,0.000087659784,0.0000015177562,0.00028446343,0.97211426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98287827,0.000029508197,0.0015716343,0.004205188,0.00033736316,0.000006460592,0.0000037303416,0.0000029706039,0.010964904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937314,0.000021743079,0.0001109895,0.00006923675,0.00021997553,0.00020491064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971294,0.00012467783,0.000009645382,0.00004050751,0.000033931068,0.00007830364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004094255,0.000046279518,0.000056823374,0.00004317501,0.0002363139,0.00022031838,0.00011710533,0.000047815352,0.0020224585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018672319,0.00003887729,0.000038497194,0.00009230765,0.000091923335,0.0003069387,0.000024308869,0.00009772192,0.0007729546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016730003,0.000004669473,0.00021105191,0.0000066830544,0.0000071187915,0.0000035332828,0.028537875,9.0034735e-7,0.00000147414,0.9507399,0.007443807,0.01304131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047791244,0.000011561965,0.00032187407,0.000017383547,0.000004200062,8.9442887e-7,0.004628644,0.00003160567,0.000008585449,0.09702886,0.8978298,0.00006881111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013801096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008300057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006460643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022911957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411947","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8358","title":"Sincere and Insincere Arguing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Sinc function; Epistemology; Philosophy; Humanities; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.020198225657455753,"score_gpt":0.250128040746507,"score_spread":0.22992981508905128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411947","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27962196,0.004442906,0.59114033,0.0020972206,0.0033688536,0.00047866328,0.000007172011,0.0013726293,0.11747025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954852,0.000033540815,0.0035725168,0.00030393733,0.000089205656,0.0000040246605,0.0000017243548,0.0000027089127,0.0005071621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994515,0.000009553484,0.00014689541,0.00013563965,0.0001185407,0.0001378442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974644,0.000029663574,0.000026210308,0.0001358935,0.000017769189,0.000044000306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014102117,0.00007097145,0.00006762849,0.00009424344,0.000072799274,0.0003308551,0.00016071358,0.000043312717,0.00001564493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010491495,0.00005352411,0.000023594492,0.00015283236,0.00001422503,0.0010469452,0.00012246199,0.00007513232,0.00015715617],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028954366,0.000010554086,0.0015765956,0.00021096252,0.000017573748,0.00005141457,0.0039779143,0.00018311164,0.0004724985,0.67339605,0.0013801443,0.3187203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030691718,0.00014699192,0.022521708,0.00022674771,0.0000071272593,0.0001953788,0.00010984417,0.7143517,0.00058150134,0.0037879392,0.2573672,0.00039693477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024959449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070031374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7158632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017138193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027716856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31904435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411952","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8372","title":"Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.2364615027996044,"score_gpt":0.49278444667138294,"score_spread":0.25632294387177856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9287796,0.0019031274,0.0032293608,0.00057303323,0.0007400996,0.0004126809,0.000008725323,0.000043375756,0.06431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988304,0.000110475274,0.0002703034,0.00012920296,0.000035601883,0.000019217154,0.000006481541,0.000002551647,0.0005957869],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974509,0.00008488672,0.00053778844,0.00015946722,0.0016548596,0.00011210311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915415,0.00018897295,0.00011088947,0.00019194359,0.0003082785,0.00004577286],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006221317,0.000075988704,0.00013220902,0.00023473211,0.000060885162,0.0001553192,0.0001537503,0.000046688594,0.0014399294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030127974,0.000046686808,0.000050183815,0.00033755577,0.00004313702,0.00064058707,0.00006307385,0.00007110426,0.00033932202],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004120112,0.000029029174,0.0067397095,0.0001253174,0.000029492896,0.000002159353,0.0057273847,0.006586009,0.0016876798,0.037197225,0.0018690513,0.9399657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005360509,0.00037758364,0.038848758,0.00018071131,0.000050673185,0.00006071479,0.0041628256,0.923595,0.0008153863,0.011092825,0.020108694,0.00017074161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000854341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006028194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.939795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045757588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017612582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411958","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8203","title":"As Syllable from Sound","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Musicology and Musical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sound (geography); Syllable; Linguistics; Communication; Psychology; Philosophy; Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.03475992338407406,"score_gpt":0.2521766635056418,"score_spread":0.2174167401215677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079822,0.02942828,0.00010662295,0.006865717,0.0062737563,0.000098590375,0.00025847147,0.0001645297,0.87698203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49345657,0.00042256515,0.000057031793,0.0077326805,0.0037589448,0.000014473725,0.000117986965,0.000014243515,0.4944255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987929,0.000033478304,0.0003404475,0.00023018305,0.00016532886,0.00043765135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993688,0.00021704247,0.000045199857,0.00018812485,0.00005824397,0.00012260786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015403952,0.00021445121,0.0002602348,0.00010695266,0.00046944033,0.0007720272,0.00019058678,0.00022780015,0.16986999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033950808,0.00017056867,0.00025601007,0.00009538936,0.0005719554,0.0006991313,0.0001156622,0.00040514456,0.035588726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020148986,0.00005020508,0.000026407562,0.00010184509,0.00031461584,0.00017440136,0.0057584955,0.00005502799,0.000003967573,0.91217154,0.06842125,0.012902078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009157508,0.00014662166,0.000080415244,0.000072837036,0.00026838752,0.000011581625,0.0007611519,0.0014800737,0.000011245155,0.15714756,0.839722,0.00020657107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050448827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016641637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77130073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040412135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095518015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96516216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400411984","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8397","title":"Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.34861245878554586,"score_gpt":0.5253473424824049,"score_spread":0.17673488369685902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400411984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059903212,0.039749116,0.0043973005,0.09553939,0.023962788,0.0017634387,0.00017148031,0.0002754586,0.7742378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8216441,0.0015764566,0.0020048136,0.009448443,0.0012888128,0.00022247544,0.00010775148,0.000025482857,0.16368163],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923838,0.0003192118,0.0014006678,0.0005624399,0.0046104672,0.0007234307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974165,0.00054489117,0.00023460279,0.0006840761,0.00082057196,0.00029938298],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011824934,0.00036746808,0.00036059914,0.00046616822,0.00037318715,0.0016297889,0.00074475544,0.00027393253,0.0969118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006463056,0.00027940265,0.00031245287,0.0013824473,0.00023572167,0.003033147,0.00027968385,0.0005183228,0.022739789],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043813176,0.00011801345,0.0010229679,0.00011150004,0.000094991505,0.000040874693,0.005167688,0.010543992,0.00001972882,0.101586744,0.10746882,0.7737809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040584683,0.00032089616,0.004055239,0.00013309343,0.00008941905,0.000063467356,0.0014080011,0.33564946,0.000054789383,0.012688824,0.6448675,0.00026346452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057117737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040781724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77351743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041518986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002343146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412173","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8439","title":"An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09367545566890999,"score_gpt":0.39802073070968996,"score_spread":0.30434527504077996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340798,0.0006842351,0.000032909214,0.000035707155,0.0007290047,0.0005817131,0.000009723346,0.000052719093,0.063794166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914694,0.000001552383,0.000014114189,0.00026389837,0.00008287736,0.00021400944,0.0000254983,0.000008421633,0.00024269182],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986523,0.00024841714,0.00025607026,0.00016997274,0.0005137694,0.00015949603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994983,0.000073102434,0.000053739335,0.0002747301,0.00006338757,0.000036752714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011199252,0.00011557352,0.00012245783,0.00009527293,0.00005801251,0.00004441273,0.00016350202,0.00005861193,0.0030354524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029940373,0.00006668304,0.000074511816,0.00018054711,0.000036493744,0.00017573644,0.000023530925,0.00013639408,0.0005732904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023421966,0.019886503,0.0046434714,0.00006717429,0.0025598425,0.00022253822,0.33653954,0.00016865415,0.028109437,0.17905788,0.0073756166,0.41902715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009733251,0.031012403,0.35094306,0.00011057682,0.0022095467,0.00012288126,0.51693356,0.008953103,0.06367503,0.0097559225,0.005148952,0.0014017277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026049602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003719808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41762543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000338305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023619737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412201","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8753","title":"Books Recieved","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0739256988437811,"score_gpt":0.2824477417592249,"score_spread":0.2085220429154438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049900897,0.024089053,0.000050643026,0.0017272718,0.0015541704,0.000117410214,0.000038766928,0.0002767265,0.9671559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8545853,0.0035255316,0.00004146551,0.0009816148,0.0007406635,0.00002515724,0.0000150378,0.000012667328,0.14007255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999086,0.00002447259,0.00033904606,0.00012420687,0.00017208277,0.0002541656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939823,0.00011775186,0.000052451975,0.00030412816,0.00008115211,0.000046263143],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017525571,0.0001755114,0.00018388224,0.00008219033,0.0005233831,0.0012856792,0.00027621468,0.00006784596,0.0020809467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017407878,0.00012948287,0.0001361898,0.00004095319,0.00026668268,0.00043115538,0.00022155196,0.00026645954,0.004076503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000975949,0.00001395841,0.00004441103,0.00010235146,0.000091449445,0.000006884208,0.015341749,0.0000017871232,0.0000017711659,0.9260283,0.032204017,0.026153572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007778076,0.0001016594,0.00038027146,0.00013023934,0.000036670444,0.000005789943,0.0036744005,0.00024308033,0.0000063906436,0.0031644746,0.9919902,0.00018901106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006475062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000110263445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95978624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030080877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005983337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412254","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8679","title":"In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.04555304093188029,"score_gpt":0.3168111429615405,"score_spread":0.2712581020296602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18842839,0.0005921983,0.0049963132,0.00054012943,0.004980897,0.00041700815,0.00001496259,0.00069705554,0.79933304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540571,0.000038376413,0.017690195,0.0009150782,0.0010045059,0.000047300902,0.0000060549114,0.00005161949,0.026189756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991531,0.000025674171,0.00033087254,0.00010805371,0.00015553483,0.00022677456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993733,0.00032240438,0.000037719612,0.00020407699,0.0000150759015,0.000047410536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006623602,0.00012596948,0.00018279336,0.0001415946,0.00004746259,0.000038113692,0.00016990997,0.000092926726,0.0009762663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020819856,0.000099856145,0.000075248514,0.00018181419,0.00006303428,0.0004005444,0.00004694548,0.00021787251,0.0012275329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011392319,0.000045979836,0.000005537436,0.00037614565,0.0000114255945,0.00015184357,0.003334304,0.0000098270275,0.000027612074,0.9777581,0.017263636,0.001004198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013330183,0.000048252037,0.000010890908,0.00009918754,0.000010782854,0.00006533641,0.00018237658,0.0009189641,0.00018951218,0.73644793,0.2617489,0.00014453822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020890939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008519638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7731433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045944515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004351093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942364","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8927","title":"Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Sense (electronics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.033534224480549164,"score_gpt":0.2699586995053394,"score_spread":0.23642447502479025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90404654,0.0014097948,0.000306619,0.0017093355,0.00014709296,0.00015869216,0.00035188432,0.000018514063,0.0918515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976157,0.00013804426,0.000059436567,0.0019395751,0.000062244224,0.000011565418,0.00000989578,0.0000040259506,0.00015949315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988821,0.00001512388,0.0006391504,0.00018208241,0.000025697766,0.00025581074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954194,0.00006635473,0.00011294046,0.00022270365,0.00000839701,0.000047644255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008030175,0.000120084354,0.0003383526,0.00013360337,0.00004712129,0.00008979711,0.00018800663,0.00008595985,0.00004994663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051322637,0.0001014781,0.00010446316,0.0004370563,0.000057056095,0.00024248187,0.00007536249,0.000117501026,0.00031191905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019582396,0.00001824611,0.08509059,0.000076526136,0.00003059322,0.00000809011,0.0022260437,0.0025076373,0.0000011410317,0.90617603,0.00061486906,0.0032306346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052013085,0.0003118594,0.59660673,0.00006638656,0.000026111135,0.000060389433,0.0014174669,0.013406152,0.000030497908,0.1478335,0.23910762,0.00061314134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038342455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012416048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75834256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058964837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020352585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5796258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942375","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.9053","title":"Books Received 09-27-2024","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0551802868686144,"score_gpt":0.21934408862917093,"score_spread":0.16416380176055653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045395433,0.0028767993,0.00024317282,0.0002719425,0.009734562,0.00009669947,0.00022058243,0.00013068266,0.981886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2121956,0.00035583886,0.00026692843,0.0006024457,0.00019597002,0.00001493852,0.000011880984,0.000012209324,0.7863442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989555,0.0000021426058,0.00042026048,0.00029019426,0.000023915538,0.00030801623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996317,0.00002942355,0.000072166746,0.00019177003,0.000011942235,0.00006297112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038838934,0.00012489781,0.00022840666,0.00020879132,0.000098777826,0.0002559519,0.00019568588,0.00006726321,0.015875064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003947728,0.00012246205,0.00013157912,0.00015480601,0.00009126652,0.00048351704,0.00012311325,0.00013088569,0.13758121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071826516,0.000010713782,0.0010898663,0.00004127192,0.00007911575,0.000013551152,0.0010600334,0.00007696362,0.0000016967042,0.6326087,0.36153853,0.0034723734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119685,0.00003055848,0.0006385238,0.000012895153,0.0000041096696,0.000005557542,0.00031931204,0.0025293115,0.000009977504,0.013903417,0.9822442,0.00018247998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045531786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003461285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62070566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005750176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016600172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942392","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8910","title":"Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Islam; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011592724968840487,"score_gpt":0.22690195509286784,"score_spread":0.21530923012402736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5922296,0.0007647682,0.000210651,0.0003633542,0.0004892105,0.00010076853,6.539813e-7,0.00025268155,0.40558827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543744,0.000028494425,0.00009145339,0.0022231836,0.0005008324,0.000010441538,0.000008755247,0.000009265861,0.0016901512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922913,0.0000032367986,0.00019743759,0.00014312081,0.00011903485,0.00030804786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998062,0.000027476175,0.000040390623,0.000099987024,0.000025178999,7.3593833e-7],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040602867,0.0001297607,0.00013431314,0.00026439497,0.00009797715,0.00032978272,0.00014960665,0.00005247516,0.00008879135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006283908,0.000101853686,0.000060815193,0.0004775751,0.000039185834,0.0017542265,0.0001081406,0.0001823367,0.0010404215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015197518,0.000008974695,0.0014322106,0.00009175629,0.000006970224,0.000063742584,0.00010408297,0.000083725434,0.000016696657,0.9551179,0.0014256674,0.041633077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049642316,0.00003784194,0.08250015,0.00073932915,0.00004361125,0.000022906243,0.0003637998,0.008804849,0.000035483143,0.7557766,0.15060063,0.0005783909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013141647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000971086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40389812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022143902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019724606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942414","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8818","title":"On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17396522314448498,"score_gpt":0.3165458129415229,"score_spread":0.14258058979703792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28216714,0.0004974271,0.000088957124,0.0036584032,0.0011769041,0.00019499997,0.00008159491,0.00006920446,0.7120654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954035,0.00021866262,0.000024635927,0.0016282295,0.00017772282,0.000007674814,0.000008455347,0.0000062289405,0.002524888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920356,0.00006229981,0.00031156326,0.00007365355,0.00021750016,0.00013144362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985057,0.0010721126,0.000099596844,0.00018828026,0.00010921479,0.000025074052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008538424,0.00008962697,0.00016284203,0.000049590075,0.00011490799,0.000037963004,0.00015975349,0.00008452768,0.0005024563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001993199,0.000050069884,0.00010616551,0.000028015036,0.0005984871,0.00009987751,0.000042211755,0.00042000573,0.00006727744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117759055,0.000020252808,0.000014553439,0.00022996464,0.000042425258,0.0000010040242,0.041571297,0.000025365827,0.00002988483,0.95658094,0.0011276178,0.00034493828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023015896,0.0009612267,0.00072032167,0.0003708385,0.00009856891,0.000002557355,0.019264018,0.00030791346,0.0019646944,0.39388138,0.58191884,0.00027950003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034447524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021116505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7132364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073594924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108159875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55015445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942428","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8693","title":"Particularism About Arguments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; University of Windsor","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06390580805537117,"score_gpt":0.2839270534649076,"score_spread":0.22002124540953644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08122818,0.0018027986,0.000278516,0.0009227366,0.004114108,0.00016579304,0.000028490294,0.0003732351,0.91108614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96577674,0.000055144345,0.00008694993,0.0023276068,0.0008369283,0.000020544056,0.000026073893,0.000011077164,0.030858919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.000018574117,0.00022196201,0.00011566746,0.00014202733,0.00025887653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996715,0.000052335497,0.000032175718,0.00014001592,0.00005008806,0.00005385855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022720189,0.000112950256,0.00012745486,0.00005246935,0.00017887283,0.00023060836,0.00010449509,0.00006934054,0.0010842377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020983214,0.00008295071,0.00010690151,0.000025402409,0.00025527438,0.00040611508,0.000043244814,0.00026160615,0.002277221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003453855,0.000015989563,0.000054135347,0.00007937349,0.000043301912,0.000023784276,0.014813991,0.000007639438,0.000010905641,0.97677857,0.0038913703,0.0042774947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008803187,0.00007104233,0.00022508278,0.000034191617,0.000029499022,0.000005914192,0.00079866505,0.00027392947,0.00008911847,0.026998432,0.9712519,0.0001342089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060313196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006704213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012711712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036530295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942460","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i3.8953","title":"Does argumentation change minds?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048873403938159955,"score_gpt":0.29312572928256125,"score_spread":0.2442523253444013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026046533,0.0016930002,0.00006294185,0.0016077909,0.0025264907,0.00018282868,0.000050727787,0.0002910283,0.96753865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97236407,0.000062101055,0.00006052742,0.001005576,0.0015247535,0.00005783159,0.0000388692,0.00000691302,0.024879372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999478,0.0000062228896,0.00014017528,0.00009071148,0.00013316495,0.00015172698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982023,0.000021944265,0.000025039337,0.00008403123,0.000029574801,0.000019203411],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000083765,0.00008905184,0.00008839413,0.000101105994,0.00014064687,0.00032726236,0.00008060338,0.00001679499,0.006357413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008294586,0.000044134846,0.000074123076,0.000034531226,0.000119207056,0.00076045387,0.000041461033,0.00006216053,0.0010423526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044663184,0.000015664466,0.00010120692,0.00006958482,0.00013758507,0.000031897074,0.08613693,0.0000017808342,0.0000037430693,0.8269334,0.0070957,0.079468064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067308334,0.000053192325,0.00023194321,0.000043998156,0.00007885098,0.0000014956549,0.02603819,0.00036326164,0.00005036173,0.0024588732,0.97045624,0.00015627647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001417308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077346776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96336055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012947991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006537137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156224","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8461","title":"What are Deep Disagreements?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024826827953520782,"score_gpt":0.2865627252349799,"score_spread":0.26173589728145913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019690128,0.0006914355,0.85782707,0.0044077947,0.0031998877,0.00035379716,9.3801583e-7,0.0004233071,0.11340564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805902,0.0001387941,0.006179585,0.008414858,0.000055986882,0.0000387279,0.0000029912587,0.0000043947302,0.0045744283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988373,0.000021314852,0.00029865492,0.00022208177,0.00021753681,0.00040311887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991187,0.00006674003,0.000091730166,0.0005521972,0.00010242713,0.00006820045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022866814,0.0001315945,0.00013224437,0.0001406338,0.00019140237,0.0006681048,0.0011505974,0.000067746216,0.00007618763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083463754,0.00011328753,0.000053064286,0.000600353,0.000060197977,0.003913255,0.00054141344,0.00013123888,0.0009882649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009524047,0.00005898034,0.0024124163,0.000029043234,0.000019665531,0.000034922738,0.0010546839,0.0012631556,0.00008437161,0.8095558,0.001315792,0.18416162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007123029,0.00060651137,0.030378561,0.00048107462,0.00003117741,0.000037041835,0.0115975365,0.2633058,0.04771084,0.3308612,0.31273067,0.0015472638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002446726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008049284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004981008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047287973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156227","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8144","title":"Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03107694154317952,"score_gpt":0.33240874835997897,"score_spread":0.30133180681679944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5260903,0.0036765465,0.0028511623,0.032490414,0.008312625,0.00063249347,0.00023430378,0.00027948245,0.42543265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91838664,0.001038785,0.00007943137,0.02204509,0.0007469118,0.00003646114,0.0000140341435,0.00001350862,0.057639144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607396,0.00015738023,0.00087301753,0.00040019926,0.00062961545,0.0018658276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838203,0.00025268155,0.00019912026,0.0004780341,0.00026147964,0.00042663002],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008328384,0.0004304703,0.0004750241,0.00018499,0.00075120066,0.00028481218,0.0009880475,0.00062257354,0.0018252368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022092363,0.00040564834,0.0003622717,0.0007867074,0.0010852452,0.0022538935,0.00036886,0.00061693403,0.0022328915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017423363,0.0002756927,0.007564189,0.00040927378,0.00015567419,0.0000840683,0.091462396,0.00002536179,0.000009794919,0.647999,0.041010782,0.21082956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007730734,0.00039070006,0.017718565,0.00047324333,0.00011896111,0.000014987666,0.03847478,0.00079158886,0.00005094607,0.018667627,0.92186624,0.0006593181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056907465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010128921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88085544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026529413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006433703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156245","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8380","title":"On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0414757071857795,"score_gpt":0.28457642547190787,"score_spread":0.24310071828612836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010571987,0.0011657315,0.0021106524,0.01746362,0.0054449523,0.0006004491,0.000066217566,0.00006864776,0.9625077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79668087,0.00012449821,0.0002460238,0.034293037,0.0010021285,0.0001573152,0.000031067237,0.000021467495,0.16744357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824053,0.0001851092,0.0004766793,0.00026898173,0.00027513673,0.00055358553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815625,0.0009689211,0.00012249318,0.0005138698,0.00013262282,0.00010581948],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009801321,0.0003230349,0.00033345024,0.00012522486,0.000837999,0.0003054227,0.0005296293,0.00022037067,0.0005237613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031584778,0.00021349196,0.00022637883,0.00011818266,0.0014196141,0.00017935883,0.00020107026,0.0007622094,0.0014025256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006830764,0.00024940976,0.000012671498,0.00021995947,0.000103141945,0.0000025343347,0.010044964,0.00045216308,0.0000020896184,0.9672184,0.018841416,0.0027849278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026890854,0.00041070514,0.00012982443,0.00012685287,0.00009034096,0.0000038262365,0.0055178283,0.0004872118,0.000059427908,0.20105542,0.79158634,0.00026331889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015226105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037116057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79506415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006014518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012727494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156260","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8801","title":"Arguing About Arguing with Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019011983806611624,"score_gpt":0.2596107137166605,"score_spread":0.24059872991004888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018127918,0.008657397,0.20899627,0.001568391,0.004714585,0.00043597372,0.000006680452,0.00033924624,0.7571536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85800487,0.0003850024,0.02442203,0.004337696,0.00045919587,0.000047100377,0.000011555001,0.000021705238,0.11231085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710333,0.0000805375,0.0006222657,0.0005500354,0.00041984665,0.0012239551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982936,0.00015640786,0.0002728698,0.0007381414,0.00030430433,0.00023468235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006218141,0.0004684228,0.00045516726,0.00026204344,0.000532903,0.0008476977,0.001332964,0.0002841732,0.00018555424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016991132,0.00037838842,0.00016822753,0.0010962255,0.00029611785,0.0019450338,0.0008013641,0.0005709089,0.0011194681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045203604,0.00015645487,0.008073799,0.00026050146,0.0001253596,0.0001571078,0.0029533722,0.0006178975,0.000019794044,0.7908561,0.0031763017,0.19355808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031026774,0.0010897676,0.033663254,0.0023441822,0.00016362325,0.00032392473,0.0004897793,0.08177281,0.0010739918,0.021391287,0.85305065,0.0015340814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015299482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007772059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017350288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004992454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156262","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8792","title":"Reply to Yu and Zenker","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.023583852229091345,"score_gpt":0.2514466061326709,"score_spread":0.22786275390357955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0262285,0.0013948578,0.0015341251,0.22649916,0.008762052,0.0004185117,0.00007652457,0.00010974142,0.73497653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7605841,0.0001587464,0.0016105265,0.031169705,0.0020603344,0.000019539306,0.0000240484,0.000016173464,0.20435682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895453,0.00002092329,0.0004095514,0.00017345091,0.00012739816,0.00031416307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993098,0.000121042445,0.00008732314,0.0002205185,0.00018155192,0.00007980986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027093806,0.00016511139,0.00019370743,0.00015321809,0.00035717513,0.0003615092,0.00012185412,0.00009064229,0.0011106203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006213624,0.00015887622,0.000049656453,0.00006283953,0.00015534155,0.00021996736,0.00015421167,0.00014730687,0.0006885492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027769838,0.000025786268,0.00057579594,0.00013750896,0.000040211813,0.000008235788,0.012333876,0.000028696017,0.0000020595314,0.96554106,0.006550685,0.01472829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026616844,0.0001334009,0.005862642,0.00016925999,0.00006837776,0.0000065519694,0.0027957887,0.0006108347,0.000030116846,0.12710957,0.8627557,0.00019155578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036350463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042128307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85620505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004606547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006944435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156265","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8517","title":"How do Explanations Justify?","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CHIST-ERA; Université de Fribourg; European Commission; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; University of Windsor","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04783395880562871,"score_gpt":0.2836011714613252,"score_spread":0.23576721265569647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002388541,0.012342487,0.38592306,0.13499999,0.00903504,0.0002505188,0.000014010804,0.0002977463,0.45474863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7911214,0.0008480939,0.026650894,0.007266435,0.0002867836,0.0000339284,0.000010050389,0.000005769989,0.1737766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878883,0.000036184225,0.00025515258,0.00023125629,0.00020234741,0.00048623185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902135,0.00018716368,0.000089603964,0.0004805108,0.00015080554,0.000070565984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022165438,0.00018067428,0.0001999566,0.00019188819,0.00024854788,0.000988189,0.00088313717,0.0001935812,0.00007465011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029748387,0.00015961612,0.000102162456,0.0006166313,0.0001958217,0.0017176584,0.00042943362,0.0002305122,0.0003154516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030732594,0.000027182818,0.0005627904,0.00006412698,0.00002056284,0.000031306507,0.00050277886,0.00013026116,0.0000042974907,0.80164754,0.014645024,0.18236102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039455426,0.00010928282,0.018398724,0.0001310048,0.00003941364,0.00006132388,0.0011182714,0.017166642,0.0002502075,0.033790443,0.9282588,0.00028133052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080496095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058183166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042994652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024061625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9529129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156267","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.9092","title":"John Hayden Woods 1937-2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03212151766116144,"score_gpt":0.27883212678205926,"score_spread":0.24671060912089782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040811308,0.0002206691,0.00012544343,0.0018641986,0.0018894875,0.000113935756,0.000004267809,0.0001548896,0.9548158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491699,0.00008189286,0.000031120082,0.015618808,0.00005557173,0.000019146977,3.7108384e-7,0.000002964252,0.035020236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926144,0.00002564995,0.00016992175,0.00017306964,0.00010705498,0.00026287406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960184,0.00016530641,0.00003531771,0.00014589076,0.000014301078,0.00003734397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006814665,0.000099788085,0.00013017647,0.00008420624,0.0003132679,0.00002362295,0.00024374262,0.00007308269,0.00019838549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029551738,0.00007753197,0.000055444463,0.00031138328,0.00019120674,0.00014632131,0.00019768853,0.0002364455,0.0007188315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030190698,0.00018346375,0.006833796,0.00008671986,0.000026670445,0.0002903245,0.00060709374,0.00011215867,0.009253557,0.8321317,0.12637897,0.023793641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025233693,0.00015425688,0.0063425037,0.0000052886276,0.000010855463,0.000016778738,0.000012003237,0.00005068713,0.0064520775,0.008865703,0.9777144,0.00012307723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008499639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007694662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022193608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024692747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9239364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156292","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.8796","title":"Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Syllogism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22231192981234524,"score_gpt":0.3777761772163022,"score_spread":0.15546424740395695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96709484,0.00011499145,0.0046603684,0.013243671,0.00081826403,0.0004664004,0.000023784847,0.000026656133,0.013551039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963474,0.00004385368,0.00008837205,0.002489859,0.00012602442,0.000081926046,0.000017283539,0.000003747073,0.00080149435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979698,0.00025002132,0.0006409182,0.0002962771,0.00056097587,0.00028201638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951063,0.0038131063,0.00020304238,0.0005537652,0.00028139722,0.00004237949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004680203,0.00016509785,0.00021375327,0.00017232844,0.0004916073,0.00053433405,0.00078811456,0.00016017156,0.00006718547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004813244,0.00007612553,0.000061257684,0.0009158749,0.00041999272,0.00057537516,0.00022149956,0.0004953588,0.00007786687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001684206,0.00013408734,0.528543,0.000043896256,0.000038328253,0.000009892479,0.0081458315,0.00050919235,0.0001112684,0.28047067,0.0029713928,0.17885405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017758097,0.000048629307,0.8406424,0.000021137877,0.000019178753,0.0000034922944,0.007369487,0.000113670634,0.00002055581,0.13398367,0.017489914,0.000110313784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058432575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006073015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31209937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003533117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015832744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57622504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406156312","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i4.9383","title":"Books Recieved 44(4)","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04153723754773881,"score_gpt":0.22320368897805976,"score_spread":0.18166645143032095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406156312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018433297,0.0032223098,0.0001914476,0.00054281007,0.007628456,0.00022968673,0.00046445997,0.000059678194,0.96922785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30656034,0.0012485263,0.00023777763,0.0024453015,0.00011693073,0.000019146652,0.00001654119,0.000009058485,0.6893464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799824,0.0000073772303,0.00092497986,0.00045933184,0.000034767832,0.0005753153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899733,0.00006172436,0.00035587125,0.00046047528,0.00003986094,0.00008474673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006442071,0.0002543781,0.0005763578,0.0004077145,0.00033740234,0.00040882675,0.00048519543,0.00019388572,0.007131182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013156865,0.00028666234,0.00024442977,0.00031542082,0.0002613118,0.00049525127,0.0004308831,0.00021439677,0.037702058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032638534,0.00004622906,0.02133635,0.000082630395,0.00018287599,0.0000036096258,0.0003540261,0.00007975149,0.0000012941415,0.7617369,0.21221848,0.003925153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061260123,0.000049117873,0.022188948,0.00004763684,0.00001795461,0.0000011945588,0.0005029499,0.000821845,0.00002526947,0.007400745,0.96801317,0.00031858968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010209028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050934354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75579464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013131711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006317175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199466","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8470","title":"Navigating Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029202585259906697,"score_gpt":0.39599365388925867,"score_spread":0.36679106862935196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13298832,0.00003105626,0.001495045,0.013544302,0.0007704153,0.00011268665,3.4106952e-7,0.000111711925,0.8509461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852683,0.000014800366,0.0031456372,0.008074778,0.000043831515,0.000012098535,0.000004665279,8.237825e-7,0.0034350837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995747,0.000021407186,0.00010869994,0.000043525968,0.00012389502,0.0001277776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981576,0.000051588286,0.000017522967,0.00003532703,0.000048203798,0.00003159669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032448603,0.000028679122,0.000033549346,0.000012196931,0.0003389294,0.000064316686,0.000080211044,0.000032232554,0.00031089716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019401505,0.000026748317,0.000015322297,0.00017304545,0.00006206588,0.0001540006,0.000015925529,0.00008556009,0.00013956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001114188,0.000010100539,0.003510967,0.000004582718,0.000002505079,2.2116618e-7,0.010401722,0.0000026462276,0.00000499974,0.91233945,0.0004889221,0.07323275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027728218,0.000020408854,0.03168679,0.00012255648,0.000008725445,3.9892737e-7,0.040395565,0.000047467074,0.00047896127,0.22688718,0.6998836,0.00019107941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011552256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035030047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85227996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004814761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013078604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3404106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199508","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.7770","title":"The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Politics; Environmental ethics; Appeal to emotion; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Appeal","score_opus":0.03522881107665079,"score_gpt":0.25265459931139106,"score_spread":0.21742578823474026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16209668,0.0017993392,0.00004676054,0.0030196952,0.00024277846,0.0001290034,0.000021393216,0.000022966358,0.8326214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941623,0.00017434992,0.000024705712,0.0003978542,0.000028185868,0.000011814235,0.000004693501,0.0000011823507,0.005194882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995242,0.000016203749,0.00020981606,0.000037253496,0.00007801356,0.00013456645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996596,0.00016386554,0.00003828862,0.00011425662,0.000013240684,0.000010756154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009313781,0.000048269,0.00007661033,0.000025747093,0.00020807455,0.000021792925,0.0001499115,0.00001500272,0.0001101567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025354402,0.000030213618,0.000030361089,0.000015573702,0.00036685928,0.00009336527,0.00009795245,0.00007050585,0.000036341775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001047436,0.000021156451,0.0044785724,0.00000453635,0.000008476503,1.05368244e-7,0.0011661707,0.000008671428,0.0000019639226,0.9921413,0.0003884661,0.0017700801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005016046,0.00009289032,0.14390723,0.000048426984,0.00000994024,0.0000015682941,0.024353879,0.0003330972,0.00009168429,0.12924445,0.7012607,0.00015454138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042460084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059894195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86289686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002157283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013732588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16003622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199576","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8965","title":"A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06285409852933448,"score_gpt":0.3136111732143724,"score_spread":0.2507570746850379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069123,0.0074438504,0.01550249,0.012974172,0.011816656,0.0016443068,0.00059564656,0.00022811684,0.88067174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6633186,0.00028781788,0.0003489186,0.0047491207,0.0008719965,0.0001154194,0.00016371047,0.00001447406,0.33012998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988233,0.000028101362,0.00043337292,0.00017797174,0.00012864891,0.00040861338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992324,0.00014333156,0.0001263468,0.00015947137,0.0002786783,0.00005977946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035349838,0.00018952716,0.00020156558,0.000120409255,0.000872185,0.0003988319,0.0001413575,0.00020618507,0.00046228227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099144054,0.00018064988,0.00013866156,0.000043691878,0.00034114876,0.0005399087,0.000054970234,0.00023207054,0.00038259826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019852967,0.00011827347,0.000042398726,0.00048613516,0.000067387205,0.0000015041219,0.008558405,0.0002838883,0.0000073183705,0.96955496,0.008933651,0.011747556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007776137,0.0002189437,0.00020723918,0.00014157455,0.000121207384,0.0000015730596,0.0029569794,0.011746892,0.000200921,0.058737487,0.9246432,0.00024635877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020886965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002471278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91570956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056822686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001518249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73666877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199582","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8749","title":"The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Argument map; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.0160509934446083,"score_gpt":0.24785405747640302,"score_spread":0.2318030640317947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020430252,0.00011248932,0.94543695,0.0019640557,0.00096284586,0.0007815515,0.000004034797,0.00014271225,0.030165099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96758497,0.0000022902302,0.028274428,0.0030456996,0.000043490938,0.00006042609,0.000007065135,0.0000025610143,0.0009790558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896395,0.000028229237,0.00027269372,0.00019001559,0.00027383564,0.00027130183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927235,0.000040401646,0.00008151332,0.00048303546,0.00005846895,0.00006421427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002761901,0.00012249313,0.00010307755,0.00007983084,0.00028923978,0.0002675093,0.00073407416,0.00005646433,0.0000068530635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026354726,0.00007379232,0.00005240501,0.00032245356,0.000016187463,0.00022379181,0.0001945818,0.00010242666,0.00005191806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111947,0.00010087134,0.002265347,0.000092899936,0.00004971681,0.000001676144,0.00085009227,0.020368919,0.0010258966,0.9223944,0.008009898,0.044809192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013482366,0.00019274569,0.03162994,0.000067160494,0.000010753582,0.0000052791434,0.00016714816,0.5705244,0.0106005175,0.0023985459,0.382571,0.00048427624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019424002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063911766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94715476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006685068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007730892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30091634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199590","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8444","title":"Frustrated and Aware","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Tartu Ülikool","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04706731336458759,"score_gpt":0.2870231179197723,"score_spread":0.23995580455518473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050903328,0.013268464,0.00013998225,0.0075512175,0.004150169,0.0002107472,0.00013548692,0.000089997564,0.9235506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61985123,0.0015917263,0.00008064972,0.0061536604,0.0006441166,0.000011471433,0.000043939897,0.000009699235,0.37161347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904966,0.0000479424,0.00032228063,0.0001494679,0.000085098945,0.00034554195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999396,0.00012659117,0.00008732976,0.00016380617,0.00015817618,0.000068090645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024139209,0.00018640971,0.0002469397,0.00008387315,0.0004961795,0.00020814888,0.0001250609,0.00025807985,0.000666673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044407232,0.00016788415,0.00007929632,0.000057051206,0.0011766553,0.0003823059,0.00008765154,0.00045857797,0.00019486039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018028055,0.000038792332,0.0005170466,0.0003956811,0.000070772956,0.0000123513555,0.003997217,0.000009654272,0.0000029343307,0.9772487,0.006456734,0.011232071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034396502,0.00015469932,0.0018400016,0.00013864557,0.00008588102,0.000008424807,0.004285389,0.00019460263,0.000049247476,0.04673909,0.9459655,0.00019455413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007574435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005379188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000195163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014111465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7299602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199621","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.9504","title":"Review of Review Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue By Marcin Lewiński and Mark Aakhus","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03155316931440281,"score_gpt":0.31410902907078464,"score_spread":0.2825558597563818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199621","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001716825,0.6485332,0.000014754091,0.006410923,0.000031979947,0.00054521987,0.000029088602,0.000012468434,0.3427055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39004114,0.58999723,0.0001742023,0.017745316,0.000013953062,0.000111472604,0.00033727856,0.0000049227574,0.0015744866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990216,0.0000734891,0.0005673686,0.000095249896,0.00011111274,0.00013119049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995057,0.000053864023,0.0001608397,0.00022455165,0.000042765852,0.000012262937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054723927,0.00010576597,0.00034482393,0.000120456956,0.00007056855,0.000027657637,0.00017194675,0.000012637376,0.000784906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004490331,0.00008608491,0.000044812947,0.00013175065,0.00017656814,0.00022596086,0.00016611429,0.00008809768,0.0000067106484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043594548,0.00033157817,0.014452986,0.059801254,0.0002987328,0.000009593926,0.017812734,0.000011380724,0.000009608502,0.5627958,0.1753294,0.1691033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018786609,0.00015602936,0.03296366,0.119509004,0.0005103559,0.0000036690747,0.027163865,0.0002746048,0.000013762609,0.006087739,0.8107367,0.00070193206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063852617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002812182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6354073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003428628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011099625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85941696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199669","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.9665","title":"Books Received 45(1)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042572053095130014,"score_gpt":0.21607863216454062,"score_spread":0.1735065790694106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009318841,0.0005854286,0.00041812894,0.00026673137,0.0020980437,0.00008893152,0.000072210794,0.000053931893,0.98709774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39014944,0.00013820034,0.00037993744,0.002213638,0.000036560636,0.000016595763,0.0000072021166,0.000003931546,0.60705453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917245,0.000002033591,0.0003756262,0.00019654381,0.000012845988,0.00024052973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996076,0.00001907545,0.00011639713,0.00020565849,0.000016429854,0.000034844972],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030021073,0.00009027151,0.00021893888,0.00017699233,0.00013802799,0.00007796903,0.00021187625,0.000057432873,0.003973329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006608946,0.00009478347,0.000083462975,0.00012947783,0.00008485109,0.0002502236,0.00013327137,0.00007777447,0.021634035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010439784,0.000014322295,0.007118561,0.000011235239,0.000045417743,0.0000011668552,0.00029054604,0.000068432426,0.0000011022169,0.87434804,0.11631336,0.0017773585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033389454,0.000017106044,0.008030666,0.000006438966,0.0000028188874,6.4827907e-7,0.00031996125,0.0006472259,0.000021686914,0.023304118,0.9671803,0.00013511431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035362032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85104394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004298279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013655258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99693716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199671","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.8416","title":"Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0385041081269105,"score_gpt":0.2797476144594394,"score_spread":0.24124350633252892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13015147,0.0003887339,0.0010870253,0.0030493336,0.0011757215,0.00026816863,0.000018140929,0.00008023327,0.86378115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637736,0.000062951505,0.00010248308,0.0060679168,0.0001432546,0.000018357156,0.0000367633,0.0000024198685,0.02979226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995812,0.000014387942,0.00017299653,0.000071193506,0.00005724589,0.00010296785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997287,0.00003665037,0.000037391128,0.000076597506,0.000100445825,0.000020233947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013271676,0.00006695553,0.00008249584,0.000039900748,0.00027937553,0.00011244059,0.000051647345,0.00002795366,0.0003024485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023421428,0.000052450043,0.000020279927,0.000019533656,0.00022164726,0.00025292544,0.000030541752,0.000073871044,0.00005677218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056232966,0.000014353551,0.0006610019,0.000036050096,0.000017221138,3.6170798e-7,0.008543287,0.000008479997,0.000009256216,0.9854517,0.0029606875,0.00229196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048826242,0.000111619185,0.0032619396,0.00002177676,0.000037279187,0.0000011521186,0.0052420255,0.00012961443,0.00023698193,0.036701918,0.95361644,0.00015096906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000493682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039467137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95065576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008683694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002777106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33115986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750737","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.8593","title":"It’s A Two-Way Street","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.01933834813605539,"score_gpt":0.31272819182085565,"score_spread":0.29338984368480026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01556986,0.00012048337,0.00024322291,0.0023159399,0.0005332344,0.0001090284,0.0000045300294,0.0001110388,0.9809927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957441,0.00009974082,0.0005149399,0.011107497,0.00018339438,0.00001329448,0.000003500536,0.0000029584733,0.030633673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991753,0.000043266195,0.00015954851,0.00010342631,0.00021238127,0.00030609695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996067,0.00006886083,0.0000639984,0.00013155414,0.000053911903,0.00007495621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037410934,0.00007764405,0.00011936357,0.00004006975,0.00060799904,0.000045221648,0.00026832247,0.0000674879,0.00034004956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011392233,0.00007019343,0.00009597339,0.0003331081,0.0005339119,0.00025848823,0.0000431779,0.0001263771,0.00016638181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025142472,0.00008492879,0.019978084,0.000025772795,0.000050819584,0.000009741338,0.059956156,0.00010505041,0.00004115669,0.4763946,0.37602565,0.06730291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017366839,0.000023787536,0.0024430763,0.000008354659,0.0000068099084,1.3225478e-7,0.020678855,0.000022519404,0.000009807987,0.000649523,0.97588754,0.00009591204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016000129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017078236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010913816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002757934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46762988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750739","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.9636","title":"Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11482985345442225,"score_gpt":0.30106749596354343,"score_spread":0.18623764250912117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102511436,0.0042358926,0.00057121826,0.0034504293,0.0032372468,0.00087876857,0.00016683865,0.00026688157,0.8846813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309515,0.00039088514,0.0005888101,0.012022675,0.00026576972,0.00013997353,0.00016579553,0.00001886228,0.15545574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.000057315086,0.000557608,0.00026607988,0.00027107503,0.0003975336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915713,0.00010088315,0.00018715454,0.00026808734,0.00020054268,0.000086196436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005185051,0.0002778975,0.00046578547,0.00016330593,0.00046430077,0.00025011064,0.00026709272,0.00011829694,0.0015267807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047804122,0.00021153035,0.00025809163,0.000055977256,0.0004988599,0.0006272105,0.00019746435,0.00032312013,0.00026323044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038472932,0.000118561526,0.0013187627,0.00009955706,0.002011323,0.00000589728,0.0029485011,0.000004887104,0.000025123556,0.98755443,0.0039358903,0.0019385917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010063924,0.00019021709,0.0047521438,0.000042516658,0.0014622727,0.0000059043027,0.0016570783,0.000056618737,0.00015942089,0.09319622,0.89708745,0.00038377853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121264864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001779585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8943582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003185559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063323896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411750743","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i2.8854","title":"Arabic Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Arabic; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029694870514522503,"score_gpt":0.3685523488012284,"score_spread":0.33885747828670587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411750743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070927605,0.000075314616,0.00028394026,0.0046688905,0.0006267459,0.00007756733,3.7844654e-7,0.000048791513,0.9232908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95401466,0.00010864534,0.00014978337,0.0031084418,0.000058446734,0.0000121933945,0.0000020564778,5.80181e-7,0.04254519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968326,0.000015576437,0.000082062594,0.000038037804,0.000077160585,0.00010388843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998475,0.000036022862,0.000022716396,0.000038777634,0.00004185431,0.000013180363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001599445,0.000027695894,0.00003715469,0.000045137902,0.00026708748,0.000030041594,0.000068387286,0.000024214225,0.0002764299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011990983,0.000024035518,0.000017687335,0.0001777713,0.00007945689,0.00016262548,0.000013802163,0.000032190103,0.00018614273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024340875,0.000012411877,0.014996998,0.0000039469305,0.0000069205444,1.0914136e-7,0.013511401,0.0000037976242,0.0000062277995,0.934177,0.011259349,0.026019428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014488316,0.000012809607,0.09575585,0.000008609178,0.000005720597,8.62555e-8,0.028671978,0.000010709225,0.000059401416,0.015035964,0.8602302,0.000063751664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020716217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018199648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032962234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009195279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30267134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111857","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10212","title":"Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyās in Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Legitimacy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Predictability; Deductive reasoning; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03242866915232561,"score_gpt":0.24886990138787293,"score_spread":0.21644123223554732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025475506,0.000058337268,0.000055453304,0.0008987087,0.00020930062,0.00006471448,0.000011298693,0.000013918524,0.9732128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907623,0.0000020816174,0.0000176918,0.002927606,0.00010808545,0.000006664537,0.000015174149,0.0000012259017,0.006159158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995402,0.000008047577,0.00021601083,0.00005062536,0.00008550157,0.00009959408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997981,0.00004331729,0.00003637697,0.00006175617,0.000043045933,0.000017372346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007290761,0.000053001557,0.00010643447,0.00005957938,0.00005453802,0.000016358947,0.00008581391,0.000028231276,0.0008873993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018371748,0.000038650178,0.000041025007,0.000034628254,0.00026119268,0.00015928654,0.000030937776,0.00007823498,0.000048827835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023792887,0.000026035212,0.0001463192,0.000026088126,0.000007324772,9.889068e-7,0.00075662514,0.000023814995,0.000018560624,0.9979394,0.00041394954,0.0006171083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054364995,0.00013742795,0.001583707,0.000042947297,0.000010685651,4.7699245e-7,0.0003233212,0.0004583914,0.00022248167,0.74007326,0.25649822,0.000105430205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062800136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050256186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007659996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023147413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111942","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10167","title":"International Law and Argumentation: Navigating Constraints and Seeking New Orientations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; International law; Scholarship; Sources of international law; Public international law; Soft law","score_opus":0.015486014821811465,"score_gpt":0.2667830553625765,"score_spread":0.25129704054076507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034826633,0.00002081679,0.0025640775,0.0033950738,0.00052390096,0.00013795144,0.0000027435829,0.000067175264,0.95846164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92649,0.000008499626,0.0015229111,0.07081086,0.00026993532,0.000009030808,0.00008156279,0.0000035619967,0.00080365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994349,0.0000023496527,0.00021738184,0.00011302781,0.000129794,0.00010253371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973166,0.000025956773,0.00009828264,0.000042125077,0.00009000437,0.000011971888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009544941,0.00008672997,0.00006624243,0.00007821536,0.00020956878,0.00044540156,0.00007854912,0.00003075247,0.0003642494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039720413,0.00008215174,0.000018744837,0.000114585484,0.00012545212,0.0016854011,0.00009588538,0.0000899419,0.000043260257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007675014,0.0000080775835,0.0040086345,0.000015963602,0.000019095009,0.0000012692366,0.00007986259,0.000014288869,0.0001323796,0.9909478,0.00040167756,0.004363292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037069411,0.00003288448,0.030828638,0.0003226761,0.000084937834,0.000032439337,0.0023477422,0.033356342,0.0004848663,0.21433645,0.7138862,0.0005798845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001780191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004062296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015052423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018129833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42950177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111966","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10360","title":"Introduction to the special issue on selected papers from the 2nd International Conference on Debate & Dialogue (ICDD2) 2025","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; International law; International studies","score_opus":0.03341519826680071,"score_gpt":0.29608231987989425,"score_spread":0.2626671216130935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00944687,0.000011091774,0.000034921788,0.11100569,0.003828508,0.00020904998,0.000039269606,0.000042643514,0.87538195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82132375,0.00044989117,0.00010869326,0.029359479,0.037094668,0.000042110096,0.0001510969,0.000008289512,0.11146201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989544,0.00012017915,0.00019155937,0.00017142262,0.0003749339,0.00018749521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.00022837117,0.000063284446,0.00015112571,0.00021896335,0.00003276592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003407313,0.00010655914,0.00008916542,0.00004723429,0.00064757455,0.00017896699,0.00058535585,0.00004120248,0.0030148178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009772875,0.00006094704,0.00004611936,0.00025897144,0.00017306091,0.00012062349,0.0001078533,0.00020853803,0.0017926886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013449302,0.000024007166,0.00032008503,5.7924177e-7,0.00005524704,7.720812e-7,0.003926992,0.00018331173,0.000033140586,0.6188216,0.364663,0.011836765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011491663,0.00004831383,0.020118322,0.000015785861,0.0000068065347,1.492986e-7,0.0009033208,0.000017141025,0.000041008127,0.0012626329,0.9773986,0.00007300478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010042546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008555991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097909346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007843598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414112182","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10209","title":"Sound Tactics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Ethos; Appeal; Sound (geography); Rhetoric; Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.0687244502704354,"score_gpt":0.28511190596203584,"score_spread":0.21638745569160045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414112182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049429955,0.0003722073,0.00026978142,0.0006763552,0.00038221374,0.000038602233,0.0000021541637,0.00006407308,0.9932516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286326,0.00007889515,0.000060366045,0.0020729988,0.00007743357,0.000010188108,0.0000031837678,0.000001407324,0.06906292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997011,0.000005860114,0.00011990521,0.000033692282,0.000050633673,0.00008883434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997005,0.000044249515,0.000031859534,0.00014958241,0.00006384049,0.000010002745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005178971,0.000048624664,0.00006544931,0.00003461849,0.00033294185,0.000084750915,0.00013293308,0.000015200618,0.0004922253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019559355,0.000036181766,0.00002905284,0.000023826768,0.00010516761,0.00016033568,0.00008719674,0.000066542016,0.00028467906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036485278,0.0000095484465,0.00027691168,0.000005176714,0.000016937178,1.7518695e-7,0.00505873,0.0000024892477,1.5682032e-7,0.9799793,0.011638487,0.0030084592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007767684,0.000015073728,0.0005048044,0.000003570281,0.000006642103,2.9247454e-7,0.005055937,0.000024036395,0.0000028725033,0.026219737,0.968043,0.0000463442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027005144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056114623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000096556605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014452731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5389522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414150982","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.9900","title":"Virtuous Argumentation and Unendorsed Claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Faith; Function (biology); Virtuous circle and vicious circle","score_opus":0.010125270121212532,"score_gpt":0.2357595170268332,"score_spread":0.22563424690562067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414150982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13358629,0.000045237255,0.0018436976,0.0015277502,0.00042846258,0.00014679595,0.0000012788744,0.00015296374,0.8622675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908344,0.000016432801,0.000057950583,0.00653224,0.00010080513,0.000014217753,0.000023638318,0.0000028175514,0.0024175006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999578,0.0000017201352,0.00013765067,0.00007875093,0.00007508125,0.00012881462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999819,0.000010214817,0.00005540094,0.00007002111,0.00003917532,0.00000621236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000068447735,0.000070151575,0.00006721552,0.0001585498,0.00016492492,0.00019732288,0.000049560764,0.000037827132,0.00017852958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001729777,0.000061182625,0.000027990514,0.00025285032,0.000033506756,0.0008753692,0.00006733923,0.000060318784,0.00027154025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019651849,0.00002862343,0.0041882386,0.000049006117,0.000014187849,0.0000020320726,0.000011105994,0.00007716977,0.0001071865,0.9639167,0.0050386298,0.026547423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007006343,0.000008706473,0.09039946,0.000018433606,0.00003311748,0.0000022854063,0.00041548442,0.0070982436,0.000033433596,0.00918843,0.8919696,0.0001321733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070262875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029194569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012758841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010283542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3490191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414151109","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10211","title":"Civility: One or Many?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Civility; Argumentative; Virtue; Politics; Islam; Dual (grammatical number); Indignation","score_opus":0.06647658840215365,"score_gpt":0.36825007968327966,"score_spread":0.301773491281126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414151109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02831641,0.00009412409,0.0001304884,0.00788697,0.00053997955,0.00010075224,0.0000011029275,0.000072707386,0.9628575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8801198,0.00022851206,0.00023847047,0.0047850832,0.00010543766,0.000014801209,0.0000013446016,0.0000010141797,0.11450554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995238,0.000021361453,0.00011596784,0.00005865814,0.00011345357,0.00016674072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997319,0.00007943309,0.000025458807,0.00008055336,0.000059175745,0.000023501942],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002747734,0.000040367944,0.0000727926,0.000047722115,0.00032680845,0.000036586094,0.00013357731,0.000041608335,0.001179068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038675978,0.000031063788,0.000025070789,0.00026084893,0.00015375079,0.00014442654,0.000045619494,0.000056813245,0.00023258319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146245575,0.00003996855,0.009217308,0.000014327303,0.000017641722,4.811445e-7,0.012595152,7.467897e-7,0.000002312999,0.93317264,0.017379766,0.02754505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012847949,0.000021225842,0.060269266,0.000015121313,0.000007142791,1.2259623e-7,0.017456744,0.0000061541555,0.000018600349,0.010758254,0.9112504,0.00006845626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037921077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011657799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92241436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003654624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002103734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414151137","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10214","title":"Munazara and (non-)Authoritarian Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Operationalization; Normative; Argumentative; Toolbox; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.006152138736075241,"score_gpt":0.23654655328800342,"score_spread":0.2303944145519282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414151137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19192465,0.00009149992,0.6349241,0.0010788852,0.0009641649,0.00023299057,0.0000010108924,0.0002688618,0.17051385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641694,0.00001453654,0.011828504,0.0006689879,0.000020345986,0.000009759965,0.0000028054476,0.0000012179321,0.0010369356],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995249,0.000009762081,0.00012610434,0.00011520547,0.00007803244,0.00014600718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997403,0.000016617092,0.000030418145,0.00015011284,0.000026669572,0.000035904795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014592742,0.00006438142,0.000061243096,0.00009944894,0.00015654469,0.00015174337,0.0001776268,0.000048268023,0.000005948954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013515087,0.00005712717,0.000019282077,0.00022857267,0.000018913688,0.00060851686,0.00010377029,0.0000792327,0.000058934795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016823511,0.000025068473,0.0021867484,0.000044445944,0.000021533537,0.000012935031,0.00071793114,0.00012938963,0.0009541836,0.48701888,0.00049920223,0.50837284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041045966,0.0013870345,0.3669223,0.00023928957,0.000052332533,0.00017527356,0.00091682054,0.23107737,0.04947966,0.21229357,0.13197392,0.0013778536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004130705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060199677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79449224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014692879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034266588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23295784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116658788","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.8117","title":"Towards a Taxonomy of Bullshit Illocutionary Acts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Taxonomy (biology); Relation (database); Extension (predicate logic)","score_opus":0.05359472916059444,"score_gpt":0.3235030738721588,"score_spread":0.2699083447115644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116658788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011356514,0.00035696186,0.00026760454,0.0025606088,0.00037031787,0.00015384283,0.0000052358014,0.0000394752,0.98488945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98986155,0.00007806894,0.0004932274,0.0009446383,0.000038406277,0.000029612122,0.0000020283223,9.184557e-7,0.008551539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993973,0.00003777271,0.00018110342,0.000074430274,0.000113614755,0.00019581354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966645,0.00007608141,0.00006398652,0.00008650321,0.00007784077,0.00002914681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034941328,0.0000609549,0.00013265529,0.00006296447,0.00032934727,0.000008916011,0.00018506376,0.00010163017,0.00013794875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001924789,0.00005315108,0.000056189303,0.00021222915,0.00047629426,0.00011614484,0.00008937254,0.00007805997,0.000045679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036183825,0.000033481927,0.011488537,0.00003533396,0.00005323856,0.0000043313876,0.0051213563,0.000009809738,0.0000038060687,0.9663186,0.0067097773,0.010185556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018728744,0.00005822449,0.06126164,0.00001755643,0.000014440968,0.0000011898995,0.00786838,0.0000034376244,0.00009920973,0.011783806,0.9186142,0.000090602014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002929729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001596148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027555587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029935827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25331062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116674201","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.8900","title":"Mind The Gap","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European Commission","keywords":"Fallacy; Dialectic; Meaning (existential); Production (economics); Speech act; Joint (building)","score_opus":0.057907360268195,"score_gpt":0.3592419178911173,"score_spread":0.3013345576229223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116674201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009477355,0.00036888587,0.00010685475,0.011611753,0.00049183704,0.00008450903,9.0056e-7,0.000020943162,0.97783697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94206583,0.00004702419,0.000053239222,0.0030905893,0.000058257585,0.0000093996605,5.4478926e-7,5.706485e-7,0.054674555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955267,0.000042915,0.000093718045,0.00005240189,0.00007939984,0.00017889068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970275,0.00014318673,0.000024651974,0.00008585574,0.000028249717,0.000015298396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043952942,0.00004140074,0.000058549358,0.00002075129,0.0008810551,0.000025191479,0.00020188621,0.000058971505,0.00013847506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001543945,0.00002523317,0.00003350596,0.00015124086,0.00044904833,0.00006518259,0.000060441347,0.00008305253,0.00020246221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011537657,0.000009655582,0.010955911,0.000005192256,0.000026763213,0.000002911953,0.020437615,0.0000045061793,7.6246533e-7,0.9264832,0.019013304,0.023048604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069384405,0.000014979412,0.021932214,0.0000035648343,0.000007570684,6.5585675e-7,0.013744661,0.000003507676,0.000013884348,0.012887824,0.9512777,0.000044078784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013330005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000608939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93258846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012173702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008898172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67764527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116704647","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.10952","title":"Books Received 45(4)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04267923370030138,"score_gpt":0.21627344216964534,"score_spread":0.17359420846934395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116704647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009746549,0.0005491141,0.00043131763,0.00026910898,0.0021799346,0.00008930671,0.00007161963,0.000052819505,0.98661023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4051127,0.00012715535,0.0003546785,0.0021625706,0.00003726471,0.000016289765,0.0000070706856,0.000003892686,0.59217834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991721,0.0000020228176,0.00037551657,0.00019659293,0.000012879788,0.00024089123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996121,0.000019305457,0.0001164231,0.00020055402,0.000016432057,0.00003519487],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030152855,0.000090503556,0.00021895104,0.00017834472,0.00013863161,0.00007642387,0.00020687668,0.00005757548,0.0040547145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006636542,0.00009499866,0.000083015526,0.00013049187,0.00008384724,0.0002505627,0.00012886777,0.000078228484,0.021611927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010897965,0.000014799327,0.007674219,0.000011793111,0.000046545414,0.0000011599014,0.0002975098,0.000063574036,0.0000011972536,0.8686765,0.121370405,0.0018314251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034367896,0.000017903036,0.0088111805,0.0000065759173,0.0000029022983,6.5461165e-7,0.00033682014,0.0005905529,0.000023096232,0.025146695,0.9645813,0.00013863742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005075499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003702784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84352976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004327339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000135481105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116746772","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9704","title":"Paley’s Principle:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Miracle; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.04450280406767941,"score_gpt":0.2860722504427748,"score_spread":0.24156944637509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116746772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011105122,0.00008922669,0.000046691406,0.0023672418,0.0005074421,0.00006587,0.000009031773,0.00008830978,0.98572105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803388,0.0000127603635,0.000017818242,0.007910115,0.00021768847,0.000009441802,0.0000065717545,0.0000028176312,0.011483993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950665,0.000010616919,0.00016276396,0.0000710687,0.00008883595,0.00016004589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996812,0.00005962649,0.00003044973,0.0001362708,0.000060018596,0.00003246083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017886206,0.000075319374,0.00008961118,0.00005972615,0.00021509199,0.00009162762,0.00015594755,0.00005123237,0.0016493344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060037197,0.000055046414,0.000053187658,0.000027318136,0.00022342165,0.00015416338,0.000086404696,0.00020329705,0.0003763509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014008224,0.000015094781,0.00002295996,0.00002067052,0.00001088168,0.0000023543769,0.0010074555,0.0000046704577,0.00000212731,0.99665135,0.00019141998,0.0020569954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083416766,0.00002027227,0.00017832432,0.000009922525,0.0000033988708,3.539698e-7,0.00007517684,0.000038290327,0.00001345945,0.5257984,0.47373158,0.000047450412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015196578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004791927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008405338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041598287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116762133","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9435","title":"Two-Tier Fallacy Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Łódzki","keywords":"Fallacy; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Conflation; Categorization; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.04602294356571903,"score_gpt":0.2884172560950775,"score_spread":0.24239431252935847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116762133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016277295,0.00037938863,0.0003020117,0.00050011993,0.0014682182,0.000106929634,0.0000104240335,0.000110899826,0.98084474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857241,0.000024340461,0.000106620515,0.009699065,0.00043154077,0.000014495406,0.000015275975,0.0000063495168,0.13246131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992929,0.00004670083,0.00022598659,0.00010257491,0.0000914364,0.00024041986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994552,0.00015169842,0.000061125655,0.0002031538,0.00009633925,0.000032490854],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038999063,0.00011871172,0.00016392313,0.000081095575,0.00027956456,0.00009985645,0.00019599697,0.00006239786,0.00091717107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061409424,0.00008984776,0.000101393256,0.000028360248,0.0004355035,0.00027042354,0.000076458,0.00024562664,0.00045955027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022308925,0.000020086238,0.00014322987,0.00003452981,0.000034759887,0.0000023791633,0.008495309,0.000008629908,0.000005306048,0.983201,0.0023593248,0.0056731063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002697866,0.000044667275,0.00024128644,0.000014791986,0.000023117062,9.500957e-7,0.002818088,0.000018338915,0.00005457639,0.30344227,0.69296014,0.000111992646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077016215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022106216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8483834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013242318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006376597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116795568","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.8373","title":"Introducing Susan Stebbing as a Forerunner of Informal Logic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02664419431136384,"score_gpt":0.23588541942547792,"score_spread":0.20924122511411408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116795568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09312388,0.00019341448,0.0000643118,0.0003319366,0.0010805076,0.00015182793,0.000011645532,0.00008552765,0.90495694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98371166,0.000017592904,0.0001512714,0.0024623165,0.00039248742,0.000012767237,0.000012926463,0.000005696228,0.01323329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868023,0.000013881275,0.00049638137,0.00016632107,0.00025396308,0.0003892003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.000049521015,0.00017725788,0.00027742595,0.00016035348,0.00006508388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035081984,0.00017581557,0.0002651636,0.00037132052,0.00047982097,0.00012154672,0.00039880135,0.000057127716,0.0012354767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073742776,0.0001377952,0.00012878,0.0001230537,0.0005759665,0.0010359647,0.00015978949,0.0002099755,0.00019191756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047174268,0.000031236388,0.00020680075,0.000086773354,0.000019225774,0.0000033775098,0.017472824,0.00018600472,0.00004671505,0.97498864,0.0024041857,0.0045070243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074447354,0.00044522798,0.001310588,0.00010789783,0.000043150798,0.000008949359,0.007014654,0.0006748714,0.00028757734,0.040762134,0.9481953,0.00040518813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035228572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035205774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047608144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017650367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116797904","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9675","title":"Generalizations in Analogical Argument","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Generalization; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Analogy","score_opus":0.02233805115545924,"score_gpt":0.27490957766954843,"score_spread":0.2525715265140892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116797904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050639685,0.00010380878,0.896755,0.000858276,0.00047314054,0.0002176142,0.0000010919418,0.00010317158,0.050848242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929466,0.000011907665,0.00493694,0.0012973659,0.00001715345,0.000019728592,0.0000058468054,8.194105e-7,0.0007636331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939346,0.000022476268,0.00023061017,0.00010974003,0.00009990276,0.00014383286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971735,0.00001724858,0.000040366805,0.00017453435,0.000025290543,0.000025181898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015365302,0.000058701502,0.00007847901,0.00014575527,0.00005589737,0.00006753624,0.00026926486,0.000044693512,0.000025116793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019796673,0.000046195506,0.00003620469,0.00040993805,0.000008777204,0.0003388785,0.000105982625,0.000051088966,0.000058791247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015979002,0.00004397883,0.018797869,0.000011320369,0.0000055681417,0.0000049875134,0.00024845797,0.0061731753,0.0001024386,0.96653134,0.0008746332,0.0072046095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082548335,0.00007000162,0.52010745,0.000044465392,0.000003940823,0.000005882026,0.00004029445,0.4289322,0.00047137702,0.0073592914,0.041902725,0.0002369019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005109394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004190657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95917207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003314641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031688345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18837981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W826680751","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2590","title":"Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue Between Parties With Different Values","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Argument (complex analysis); Extension (predicate logic); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055834946570033905,"score_gpt":0.24975881962673982,"score_spread":0.19392387305670591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W826680751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5088979,0.000019740926,0.48977426,0.00014020856,0.00010187568,0.00016173921,0.0000019533418,0.00009125377,0.000811092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961715,0.000015942269,0.0031146717,0.00024737915,0.00018315428,0.00002830173,0.000010724441,0.00000684969,0.00022152605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872255,0.000029226429,0.00029378937,0.00023608252,0.0003358713,0.00038247934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929285,0.000069495334,0.000114591174,0.0003064964,0.00006883491,0.00014771253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014218954,0.00018756688,0.00023183922,0.00011525287,0.00020608302,0.00018531966,0.000426667,0.00006117462,0.000008336025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011857909,0.00012474475,0.000057905443,0.00018398419,0.000021985143,0.0007159947,0.00016282765,0.00010450731,0.00007574014],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001608111,0.00019649683,0.53381723,0.0001689774,0.00021979705,0.00010097953,0.055679526,0.3071852,0.00052075204,0.045532122,0.00041704532,0.05600107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014368328,0.0013848839,0.287306,0.00025765746,0.000045777553,0.00004779678,0.00079592917,0.6993966,0.0027539597,0.0021101616,0.0032688645,0.0011954786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010744727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002592943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48727354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043664102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001703904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50869435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829009663","doi":"","title":"Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Wedge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Immortality; Argument map; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.2514490582201403,"score_gpt":0.3188525034603191,"score_spread":0.06740344524017883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829009663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80803937,0.00052354817,0.000025481078,0.0073691686,0.0006332116,0.00020716943,0.0000038703442,0.000042985474,0.18315518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687105,0.00024499997,0.000039182716,0.0018373141,0.00047706068,0.000007397819,0.0000063209795,0.0000039833603,0.0005126683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928474,0.000054828433,0.00028452105,0.00010528493,0.00010520971,0.00016538765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958664,0.00014455253,0.00006918171,0.00012237843,0.000040149367,0.000037098558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004678425,0.00009060884,0.00014241503,0.000033801334,0.00022574005,0.00008306166,0.00007928554,0.00006030304,0.00024503085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006838704,0.000058366913,0.000052896157,0.000031702446,0.00032692996,0.00030487252,0.000050229526,0.00028272092,0.000050244853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029773151,0.000030303858,0.005082991,0.000032387718,0.000012368071,0.000017321649,0.013631694,0.0000060249863,0.000004259003,0.9752134,0.00022415015,0.005715296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012718914,0.0003244107,0.022474876,0.000104569066,0.00005465746,0.00018483163,0.008330369,0.00038436556,0.000036330628,0.43592978,0.5303864,0.0005175217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058015386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025559275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5392837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015665148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016010094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2682916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890289651","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i1.2573","title":"How to Improve the Convergent Argument Calculation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bowling Green State University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Generalization; Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Calculus (dental); Philosophy","score_opus":0.02560010876327356,"score_gpt":0.24582755050342756,"score_spread":0.220227441740154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890289651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10613955,0.000034639543,0.8805915,0.0069507193,0.0013347584,0.00061483716,0.0000014470152,0.000108209904,0.0042243204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482554,0.0000060178972,0.0014361468,0.0015461413,0.0001107934,0.000033761633,0.0000027160959,0.0000021192454,0.0020367857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992708,0.00001911223,0.00016249905,0.00012594427,0.00023039339,0.00019126745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994789,0.000018074461,0.00008276936,0.00030036602,0.00005293372,0.00006697707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022620136,0.00007960691,0.00006739592,0.000039900508,0.00011907638,0.00020561021,0.00033355548,0.000034336346,0.000015544905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021990527,0.000047997884,0.000041936262,0.0001650298,0.000007765302,0.0005496616,0.000117448835,0.000049559054,0.00021771328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064145825,0.00018803374,0.022712376,0.0000729751,0.00009154523,0.000039820887,0.0111886645,0.014220048,0.01229276,0.51840323,0.015412308,0.4053141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007639943,0.0003512285,0.13506606,0.000017475757,0.000008194149,0.000040478735,0.00015948806,0.3636022,0.0045904526,0.0005384559,0.49445897,0.0004030003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050203653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013491668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88868594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038682356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016191778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27983364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W997711300","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3833","title":"Reason in the Balance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0743684308359901,"score_gpt":0.26310020116898947,"score_spread":0.18873177033299937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W997711300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06933426,0.00023729201,0.0000031509933,0.0020913032,0.00023746127,0.000053314638,0.0000042546903,0.000019224948,0.92801976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927228,0.000014943285,0.0000057808998,0.006361076,0.00060758047,0.000008749057,0.0000037620673,0.00000227451,0.0002730316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954444,0.000025569077,0.0001012464,0.000030985033,0.00010488066,0.00019290448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997451,0.00008787426,0.000025762823,0.00010179048,0.000014422905,0.00002510714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054219255,0.000051667557,0.00005485913,0.000020422302,0.00010032092,0.000047994603,0.00014897618,0.000031580566,0.000554368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004373935,0.000027716313,0.000027224793,0.000018575372,0.00013069775,0.0002995582,0.000024363333,0.00021055508,0.00034387704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005755258,0.000022473325,0.000325591,0.0000044809226,0.0000012731842,9.1055887e-7,0.013803216,8.692882e-7,6.7779456e-7,0.98498285,0.00010711522,0.0007447682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000999696,0.000031672847,0.0034802142,0.0000075500434,0.0000020168043,0.0000040745763,0.0010064961,0.000029508445,0.0000031845636,0.5156583,0.47960573,0.00007124962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036746987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038080416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000047577855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062187987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60699415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}