{"meta":{"query_hash":"d2eceb8478f9","filters":{"venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d2eceb8478f9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Information+Research%3A+An+International+Electronic+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2278539648","doi":"","title":"Heritage Language Acquisition and Maintenance: Home Literacy Practices of Japanese-Speaking Families in Canada.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heritage language; Mainstream; Thematic analysis; Literacy; Immigration; Cultural heritage; Process (computing); Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.050318231553645475,"score_gpt":0.4590924541880694,"score_spread":0.4087742226344239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278539648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97431624,0.00010649996,0.00001624493,0.0033914114,0.00018623561,0.00017137562,0.000008465046,0.000007280252,0.021796267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781877,0.0009869069,0.00008021186,0.00032974593,0.00021316452,0.0000144795595,0.0000191654,0.0000040437717,0.0005335437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788535,0.0003107985,0.0004076319,0.00007464974,0.00086241623,0.000459178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812883,0.00025444978,0.00039640788,0.00008007179,0.0010022679,0.00013796895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002092804,0.00006642796,0.00009207332,0.00049516326,0.00024055377,0.00042626815,0.00033480415,0.000043216263,0.0009770683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012590609,0.00006202684,0.000020020207,0.0003007005,0.00011213264,0.0050931782,0.00003352672,0.00055780134,0.000018324821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014099272,0.000115905204,0.016849792,0.000060645438,0.00005769273,0.000006663917,0.7383094,0.0001300341,0.00064269104,0.062108297,0.0012841822,0.18029374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010027332,0.00012270467,0.100468144,0.00014752396,0.0000031132824,0.00007808907,0.78450716,0.0055356445,0.000112067595,0.0032840143,0.10450853,0.00023030842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88231254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63203824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2502743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001187295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035592602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290108609","doi":"","title":"Library and Information Professionals as Knowledge Engagement Specialists. Theories, Competencies and Current Educational Possibilities in Accredited Graduate Programmes.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Cognitive reframing; Information literacy; Outreach; Promotion (chess); Medical education; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.06619502402364301,"score_gpt":0.4158646248389124,"score_spread":0.3496696008152694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290108609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87514627,0.0005412572,0.00012818069,0.041619077,0.0012981703,0.0014397647,0.00003940913,0.00008268118,0.07970517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899698,0.0048938505,0.00035081798,0.0016982511,0.000756061,0.00018600347,0.00041317227,0.000007297411,0.001724755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644744,0.0005964257,0.0008209977,0.00012524684,0.0013187766,0.0006911058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980313,0.00039916104,0.00029984274,0.00011865469,0.00084054365,0.00031047643],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034279427,0.00014529952,0.00013354875,0.0012404829,0.0010441459,0.0034413047,0.00059198315,0.00007779743,0.0018589658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009293011,0.00012322639,0.000037392456,0.00068407407,0.0005338066,0.15297186,0.00020187919,0.0010046039,0.00017730353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034397697,0.00007673516,0.0031854648,0.000023245808,0.000011532076,1.3635189e-7,0.05079281,0.0000034876418,0.000001555799,0.8631237,0.0029833976,0.07976355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005875366,0.00015639054,0.05745919,0.0001046097,0.0000017239912,0.000026584037,0.049263187,0.0012392261,0.000014854109,0.24604319,0.644915,0.00018854781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031531017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022529044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64193153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002815202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030898142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293552842","doi":"","title":"From Coexistence to Convergence: Studying Partnerships and Collaboration among Libraries, Archives and Museums","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Public relations; Phenomenon; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.094376184511978,"score_gpt":0.29269540214883305,"score_spread":0.19831921763685506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293552842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90769506,0.000038151524,0.0007423172,0.0061745667,0.00029900207,0.00041417207,0.000076469754,0.000035193498,0.084525086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970841,0.00018574494,0.00015221903,0.00038409184,0.00039869422,0.000057901365,0.00012643037,0.0000062905974,0.001604536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853194,0.00009054521,0.0003204723,0.00013061902,0.0005825403,0.00034389913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991466,0.00017149575,0.00010333733,0.00007841631,0.0002866138,0.00021357046],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003415724,0.00010277894,0.00008896963,0.00039032195,0.00054492865,0.003727104,0.00027081705,0.000012895542,0.000648297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098436576,0.00008839097,0.000020848182,0.00006848604,0.00033678082,0.009079598,0.00012503623,0.00036179458,0.0000959229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059350616,0.000039758623,0.00060535356,0.000008585589,0.00007962074,0.0000014958446,0.02999248,0.000019789137,0.00001753777,0.9476791,0.0020514724,0.01944546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006892983,0.0006327536,0.04535646,0.000088330344,0.000008267572,0.00001970272,0.044253506,0.0075079827,0.000035079895,0.50372404,0.39741588,0.00026871322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002496199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019365593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44395506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005987956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012706123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590870827","doi":"","title":"Taking the Plunge: Open Access at the \"Canadian Journal of Sociology.\" Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Five.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Open access publishing; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.89796711116227,"score_gpt":0.723946756507205,"score_spread":0.17402035465506505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590870827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126548,0.0010206404,0.00046828744,0.035363227,0.0014037185,0.00079307193,0.00005743308,0.0000037938944,0.04823499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994458,0.0023418143,0.000042085667,0.0009682364,0.00031558034,0.000030923864,0.000010173902,0.000008326853,0.0018248449],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98552024,0.0020045214,0.0017777405,0.00028858104,0.009061039,0.0013478909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96901333,0.00643411,0.0017450192,0.0005808434,0.02166586,0.0005608428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11761947,0.0001601238,0.0003290047,0.02328331,0.004314975,0.09294292,0.038925167,0.00014260157,0.0039981073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103469186,0.000082376515,0.00014320157,0.0345959,0.0014014395,0.07354462,0.009990384,0.00346885,0.00013256002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054471515,0.00018090745,0.37469465,0.000009368722,0.0004875122,0.0019695286,0.030133748,0.003524437,0.0000055225346,0.06892576,0.42496932,0.094554536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004318983,0.0005789173,0.27538276,0.00012181172,0.000012727864,0.06772875,0.032555003,0.010726784,0.000083516905,0.33542654,0.27259594,0.0004682588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02381657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08022809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2665008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010518523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}