{"meta":{"query_hash":"d2eceb8478f9","filters":{"venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d2eceb8478f9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Information+Research%3A+An+International+Electronic+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2278539648","doi":"","title":"Heritage Language Acquisition and Maintenance: Home Literacy Practices of Japanese-Speaking Families in Canada.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heritage language; Mainstream; Thematic analysis; Literacy; Immigration; Cultural heritage; Process (computing); Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.050318231553645475,"score_gpt":0.4590924541880694,"score_spread":0.4087742226344239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278539648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966246,0.00031901288,0.00004715714,0.0003688935,0.0000054836037,0.0000101870155,0.000051352978,0.0000036857998,0.002569658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967359,0.00047275188,0.00012700631,0.00013305426,0.000001597792,0.000009133246,0.000037528498,0.0000032640057,0.0024797893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942833,0.000095924326,0.000019749717,0.000060493006,0.00011852565,0.0002769243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880636,0.000161464,0.0001717042,0.00003101534,0.0003647655,0.00046468893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060354,0.00025300775,0.00026065944,0.00063765293,0.010330751,0.0019269144,0.00068734464,0.00032564843,0.00291445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001692367,0.00026354368,0.00018270129,0.0011066551,0.0021470983,0.00064778497,0.0017285963,0.0005629349,0.00016661322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052751922,0.000058779468,0.14308172,0.00009132091,0.0000068681866,0.0028837167,0.82833725,0.00003308544,0.001263136,0.00059771,0.0011936731,0.02239996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002379672,0.000038114827,0.0929648,0.000071501905,0.0000094502075,0.0005271941,0.8974716,0.00004937531,0.00022983114,0.000057363446,0.008560793,0.000017522396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9565786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043421388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016960185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024028145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12305534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290108609","doi":"","title":"Library and Information Professionals as Knowledge Engagement Specialists. Theories, Competencies and Current Educational Possibilities in Accredited Graduate Programmes.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Cognitive reframing; Information literacy; Outreach; Promotion (chess); Medical education; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.06619502402364301,"score_gpt":0.4158646248389124,"score_spread":0.3496696008152694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290108609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7756054,0.016371971,0.003787923,0.060929753,0.0002082998,0.00019437184,0.000096060765,0.00008865414,0.14271761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814027,0.002469443,0.0010020233,0.0023392662,0.00005426129,0.0001080751,0.00008144302,0.0000076091437,0.0125350915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956334,0.002327904,0.00014566228,0.0003162348,0.00067402265,0.0009027724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844476,0.007818413,0.0010645267,0.00033462577,0.0010863672,0.005248426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007563352,0.00020306808,0.00022682591,0.0024922641,0.0028318174,0.0080108605,0.0011397869,0.0021066011,0.0058403453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013651904,0.00030601543,0.0002546954,0.0017788098,0.004928903,0.006879427,0.0051781405,0.0022998455,0.0008103923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098565084,0.0016009606,0.17595375,0.000902495,0.000016889633,0.0006670236,0.32483602,0.0003853959,0.00041697186,0.15024023,0.017902296,0.32697946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005079448,0.0005091483,0.20661536,0.0035881659,0.00002874794,0.0012598897,0.57307386,0.002416021,0.0007243029,0.05532916,0.1563517,0.000052864205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077374675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010045826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0080108605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005439071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010523901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039999306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293552842","doi":"","title":"From Coexistence to Convergence: Studying Partnerships and Collaboration among Libraries, Archives and Museums","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Public relations; Phenomenon; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.094376184511978,"score_gpt":0.29269540214883305,"score_spread":0.19831921763685506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293552842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96898246,0.0020231518,0.002640796,0.0025653313,0.000035486428,0.00013888929,0.000029620855,0.0000240984,0.023560198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733233,0.0006111545,0.0007741182,0.00013122417,0.000010466669,0.000104376966,0.000011656008,0.000009179967,0.0010155529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.980706,0.014742953,0.0005797524,0.00079333415,0.00151324,0.0016647038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96425,0.025543561,0.0030546621,0.0009140489,0.002257745,0.003979876],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019238167,0.00038762114,0.0007673864,0.0054678456,0.018431455,0.016474478,0.0018685831,0.0018189783,0.0031206652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028814808,0.00066721113,0.00040754105,0.0056146747,0.018211931,0.017261025,0.018889926,0.002625883,0.0004254577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002084323,0.000044276494,0.008537741,0.000101233294,0.0000042210636,0.00023432117,0.9786759,0.000028907783,0.000103908205,0.0051014395,0.0001813647,0.006965856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029740024,0.000022069033,0.0023878638,0.0001032663,0.0000034238915,0.00012514924,0.9922552,0.000051106726,0.000056138433,0.0014543785,0.003532893,0.000005442397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013750434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016617535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077450643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01521837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10174233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590870827","doi":"","title":"Taking the Plunge: Open Access at the \"Canadian Journal of Sociology.\" Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Five.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Open access publishing; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.89796711116227,"score_gpt":0.723946756507205,"score_spread":0.17402035465506505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590870827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019307803,0.021777323,0.0034916496,0.21151692,0.0075957417,0.000267748,0.0005088483,0.000387682,0.73514634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3984296,0.014938175,0.0065052304,0.020346895,0.001253669,0.00016866044,0.00046726593,0.0003818422,0.5575087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900643,0.0016546997,0.00029095274,0.00040564104,0.005708227,0.0018760937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811582,0.0047712824,0.0006220691,0.0011362225,0.005060332,0.00725192],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071371,0.0004667742,0.00031592476,0.0048274854,0.028215924,0.017774602,0.0024179043,0.007817216,0.062170856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018866263,0.00045461935,0.00048895046,0.00734365,0.016049791,0.015772313,0.006449465,0.00474793,0.0053229975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007018458,0.00010435594,0.002578433,0.00026049867,0.000011207097,0.0020738917,0.021618787,0.00010130066,0.0005671481,0.26134804,0.5755153,0.13575082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012870325,0.000019783254,0.0053062383,0.0003501553,0.000013663099,0.00046199746,0.020926263,0.00012223105,0.0004322938,0.03273942,0.9395524,0.00006253481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54135686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8013916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018155022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049661774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92268836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}