{"meta":{"query_hash":"aef9e2da52eb","filters":{"venue":"Insights the UKSG journal"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aef9e2da52eb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Insights+the+UKSG+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2293114871","doi":"10.1629/uksg.285","title":"DDA and traditional monograph acquisition – the experience of a small university library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Collection development; Data science; Library science; Data collection; Operations research; Computer science; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Marketing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0223453287968308,"score_gpt":0.16546117231599736,"score_spread":0.14311584351916656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293114871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80911446,0.0013165086,0.002518489,0.01315709,0.000196886,0.00023111438,0.00020874408,0.00029066164,0.17296603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89888614,0.0008208968,0.002234276,0.0019883623,0.00007550892,0.00007832838,0.00011181601,0.00017493076,0.09562975],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184835,0.004858043,0.00019774471,0.0005022276,0.0014382785,0.0011554699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775873,0.010549829,0.000814351,0.0021890898,0.0034231879,0.0054362966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010032748,0.00023042299,0.0003480535,0.0018079652,0.023382392,0.012445087,0.0024209125,0.0012447976,0.020089852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019296682,0.0006167952,0.00024985208,0.0037892573,0.010181343,0.00581783,0.008809131,0.0028008737,0.0033365153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002827891,0.00079856685,0.019328224,0.0003439743,0.000016144037,0.0037672236,0.7624563,0.00021310321,0.001486872,0.01734954,0.03325254,0.1607047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019735575,0.00025646554,0.019413885,0.00015610525,0.0000126466175,0.0011815536,0.6141676,0.00030518125,0.0015467256,0.001831304,0.36103705,0.000071761075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11949982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30510986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11949982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017100563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021069739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23760849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298525665","doi":"10.1629/uksg.278","title":"Making OA monographs happen: Library-Press collaboration at the University of Ottawa, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Context (archaeology); Library science; Scholarly communication; General partnership; Revenue; Political science; Order (exchange); Citation; Publishing; Computer science; Business; History; Law","score_opus":0.2981273963048047,"score_gpt":0.4271542118040114,"score_spread":0.1290268154992067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298525665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2894443,0.03222166,0.00092376786,0.19379213,0.0026368466,0.0004990302,0.0032173984,0.00070137886,0.4765635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6653683,0.013025486,0.0018067282,0.010596658,0.00031868942,0.00015959694,0.0011907129,0.0003713289,0.3071625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.976303,0.004263492,0.0010071158,0.001949119,0.010625005,0.005852375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8877633,0.018961625,0.0044281464,0.003207312,0.034721404,0.050918184],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01232209,0.0003805894,0.0007037628,0.0068527125,0.038866125,0.037491973,0.0033038352,0.0035904467,0.04120414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04018027,0.0010212595,0.000391342,0.018236533,0.009945293,0.008141403,0.00874183,0.0033505429,0.0054094084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048549095,0.00040783937,0.046743143,0.0010413148,0.00011358621,0.0034078725,0.13582097,0.00047754907,0.0017809452,0.03357536,0.57865757,0.19748838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030033569,0.000043730102,0.051774513,0.00036556012,0.000030285786,0.00019302816,0.110892855,0.00017583797,0.00046006657,0.0008103973,0.83507556,0.00014820858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97584707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19207294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38065726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93708086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809629352","doi":"10.1629/uksg.406","title":"How green is our valley?: five-year study of selected LIS journals from Taylor & Francis for green deposit of articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law); Period (music); Political science; History; Computer science; Art; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07098426101142308,"score_gpt":0.318519038263536,"score_spread":0.24753477725211293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809629352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99177015,0.0022828944,0.00007788702,0.0018566998,0.00004634827,0.000042566986,0.00020102398,0.0000063011726,0.0037161026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903127,0.0034204724,0.00018843365,0.0009719545,0.00007935112,0.00006085425,0.00033073153,0.000024177103,0.0046112873],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953779,0.0010500102,0.0007002172,0.0003164535,0.0019013057,0.0006541357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566504,0.014410788,0.014454069,0.0007859282,0.009098548,0.0046002534],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010198887,0.00017397458,0.00043328418,0.008511516,0.0048842933,0.009746031,0.0007343181,0.0010630833,0.0028432002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029183168,0.00043473535,0.00035038867,0.012006089,0.0022618393,0.0075452696,0.0028823428,0.001148668,0.0010634222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027203656,0.00021222093,0.41576445,0.0008080454,0.000053890268,0.0029349062,0.51184875,0.000049383587,0.0012654929,0.0018441548,0.008910715,0.056035936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060666216,0.00028590564,0.5071781,0.0005630614,0.000024371642,0.00091901905,0.4449366,0.00007001059,0.00062263396,0.00018136261,0.04515081,0.00006193191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014033207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031319655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041114343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057929615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053937554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916077507","doi":"10.1629/uksg.458","title":"Access, preservation and analysis in a consortial journal archive: the evolution of Scholars Portal Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publishing; Library science; Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Negotiation; Digital content; Digital library; Population; Investment (military); Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03354369933938334,"score_gpt":0.2494329185713749,"score_spread":0.21588921923199156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916077507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48689726,0.01100128,0.016338786,0.094318084,0.002482464,0.00060358486,0.0007515548,0.0010048711,0.38660207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355503,0.0033799016,0.01349205,0.0026060818,0.0012914859,0.000144526,0.0003130076,0.000593969,0.042628657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603396,0.015600287,0.0028245563,0.0023479408,0.016024252,0.002863228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8643231,0.043110315,0.015916727,0.019395443,0.039493747,0.017760713],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05181225,0.000255861,0.0004815081,0.013732947,0.0133402655,0.054187797,0.0032369508,0.0030205243,0.0107461065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11632399,0.0006065019,0.00051235186,0.02062737,0.023924211,0.03296858,0.015959136,0.0028691455,0.0019258041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027614002,0.00022574827,0.053825274,0.00049975706,0.000044085347,0.0012196774,0.1760399,0.00052791205,0.001101313,0.5069424,0.033265326,0.22603244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006284785,0.0002710646,0.051615797,0.0010722316,0.00004970001,0.0014732911,0.18340588,0.0013012969,0.001481285,0.050783567,0.7083016,0.00018138932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03456472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053698417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025984824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036150135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27401263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211865462","doi":"10.1629/uksg.562","title":"Longevity of print book use at a small public university: a 30-year longitudinal study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Demography; History; Gerontology; Subject (documents); Longitudinal study; Medicine; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.07205909569284165,"score_gpt":0.21263142307097146,"score_spread":0.1405723273781298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211865462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.00009691165,0.000040883457,0.0001270325,0.0000038047815,0.000008031267,0.00043787426,0.0000026076239,0.0004627898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998178,0.00016976823,0.000054793363,0.00006322962,0.000010191836,0.00001800831,0.00079843565,0.0000047712497,0.0007028043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917966,0.00018217672,0.00007407165,0.00013177865,0.00020592361,0.00022637387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943153,0.0008616211,0.0019094419,0.0004184373,0.0011095895,0.0013856343],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018481261,0.00016923154,0.00028598326,0.0017571754,0.0012862124,0.0013358493,0.0004717674,0.0005571494,0.0023091116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047599277,0.00033798267,0.0004484584,0.0023059007,0.00052280107,0.0023813692,0.0013671591,0.0016178464,0.0010574376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074915704,0.00019435567,0.99155915,0.000010408809,0.000035341098,0.00011108281,0.003982473,0.00002171883,0.000103398364,0.000062072715,0.00048157905,0.0033634647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001963317,0.00011394667,0.9956262,0.0000113771575,0.000012662854,0.000082098544,0.0034257516,0.00006381603,0.000043509204,0.00002224306,0.0005878442,0.000008480975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044170626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054869384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010509293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010653487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08782703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238129400","doi":"10.1629/uksg.258","title":"The Academic Book of the Future","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London; Arts and Humanities Research Council; King's College London","keywords":"Library science; The arts; Diversity (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Work (physics); Media studies; Sociology; History; Management; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06351996295799234,"score_gpt":0.23793519536253974,"score_spread":0.1744152324045474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238129400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058884645,0.03172601,0.00054217776,0.033456355,0.011874889,0.000016149044,0.0002667518,0.00019525325,0.9213336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015024739,0.018098868,0.0007604762,0.009311429,0.005038345,0.00003039002,0.00045436792,0.00023311964,0.9510484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985543,0.00033406107,0.000055554534,0.00017844357,0.00065893197,0.00021865428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981546,0.0003019747,0.00008999343,0.00027204314,0.0005024119,0.00067905633],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011220013,0.0005366788,0.0004151165,0.001567426,0.004454326,0.015637534,0.00083306833,0.0022052776,0.11603964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044163167,0.00031977225,0.00039684144,0.0023690625,0.0034156702,0.009680633,0.0046120016,0.004334516,0.059668537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073609317,0.0000061224855,0.000079968064,0.000057827583,0.0000017643035,0.000035235662,0.00068681024,0.00002023883,0.000032964785,0.08556471,0.8884169,0.025090136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.6724608e-7,0.0000012646808,0.000047804788,0.000059418326,4.0732908e-7,0.00002866268,0.00018873239,0.000003869388,0.0000070088013,0.0024175192,0.9972435,0.0000013740554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043085325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010550618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003911974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057188505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38819122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408811722","doi":"10.1629/uksg.686","title":"Investing in open: Canadian challenges in bibliodiversity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science; Data science","score_opus":0.07945123421278852,"score_gpt":0.24898555077045917,"score_spread":0.16953431655767065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408811722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018742401,0.022046302,0.0018858172,0.54535633,0.0023643118,0.00006991795,0.0010073483,0.00021357587,0.40831405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59339404,0.043292284,0.0074306787,0.08483507,0.0015147412,0.00012894512,0.0009927509,0.0006451211,0.2677664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97249335,0.002589586,0.00081216765,0.0016603302,0.016112614,0.00633194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460688,0.009674605,0.0013831836,0.0025780005,0.027469866,0.012825511],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01675243,0.0005369111,0.0011863767,0.007148141,0.032131832,0.03754421,0.0048944987,0.0061476203,0.03763106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051368214,0.0007478915,0.00087119965,0.016865348,0.018300146,0.018773245,0.013341879,0.007888013,0.0025594586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007433099,0.000027100856,0.00218839,0.0003450423,0.000026217547,0.000390329,0.010568761,0.00026881302,0.00020535504,0.72331846,0.18389143,0.07869574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023240918,0.000015919035,0.0037058466,0.00045685918,0.000027620497,0.00016587936,0.013308612,0.00021627857,0.00019956692,0.046056487,0.93571645,0.000107304644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98826516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22708479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41574425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8964721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410122176","doi":"10.1629/uksg.677","title":"Barriers and benefits of transitioning to an equitable open access model: interviews with LIS journal editors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Open access journal; Library science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5755927797252935,"score_gpt":0.5852753503797516,"score_spread":0.0096825706544581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410122176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885245,0.00056664087,0.0015133296,0.005188418,0.000092163355,0.00013327316,0.000025937155,0.00001327544,0.0039425525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947161,0.00057183264,0.0009807775,0.0013923862,0.00004592645,0.00016007846,0.000016022163,0.000012652642,0.0021042558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97476315,0.019460974,0.0010269627,0.00074970355,0.0017407888,0.0022583622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002424,0.08096894,0.005668316,0.0009849652,0.0052030026,0.0069324756],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029285643,0.00035759003,0.00070188876,0.001123564,0.0065889605,0.0072695706,0.0012546082,0.0023905546,0.0017986172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08340344,0.0007574019,0.00031725946,0.0011267869,0.006281024,0.0056011006,0.004325259,0.0043225,0.0002653904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006247115,0.00007910797,0.004703347,0.00011305043,0.0000051573115,0.001040235,0.98769534,0.000062621824,0.0006079494,0.00096243963,0.00050601084,0.0041622305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009389347,0.00006237085,0.0013748053,0.00009458256,0.000005973448,0.00018539731,0.99006724,0.00014171348,0.00027346273,0.00036751686,0.0074005267,0.000017125963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003676224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043504154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003782894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051396186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1548791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}