{"meta":{"query_hash":"aef9e2da52eb","filters":{"venue":"Insights the UKSG journal"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aef9e2da52eb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Insights+the+UKSG+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2293114871","doi":"10.1629/uksg.285","title":"DDA and traditional monograph acquisition – the experience of a small university library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Collection development; Data science; Library science; Data collection; Operations research; Computer science; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Marketing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0223453287968308,"score_gpt":0.16546117231599736,"score_spread":0.14311584351916656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293114871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618224,0.00025935724,0.022937456,0.00587497,0.00019569964,0.00006668835,0.0000020384819,0.00003693601,0.008804493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967815,0.00018158405,0.0011100605,0.00028151687,0.00007099928,6.925758e-7,2.0034418e-7,0.0000025727927,0.0015708276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942607,0.0000817138,0.0001189979,0.00009985084,0.00017854437,0.000094855066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.00022987378,0.00010072518,0.00012577315,0.0000257656,0.00006428277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006405726,0.000064609194,0.000059116686,0.000101862664,0.00041090362,0.00021758006,0.0005998947,0.000022526972,0.000044269946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074949135,0.000026631958,0.00005033639,0.00031061127,0.0001798208,0.0020943747,0.00013951331,0.00006936348,0.0000034741752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003164111,0.00026510915,0.022040732,0.000013353367,0.00022906913,0.00017116666,0.057575762,0.00001912613,0.0039608837,0.7854354,0.03554821,0.09442481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002022521,0.00039661798,0.22555637,0.00021530649,0.00001846948,0.0011011944,0.0018429034,0.00095716055,0.016279405,0.38098258,0.37014028,0.00048720924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018422005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.6770353e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4044528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008525575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000756397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.316038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298525665","doi":"10.1629/uksg.278","title":"Making OA monographs happen: Library-Press collaboration at the University of Ottawa, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Context (archaeology); Library science; Scholarly communication; General partnership; Revenue; Political science; Order (exchange); Citation; Publishing; Computer science; Business; History; Law","score_opus":0.2981273963048047,"score_gpt":0.4271542118040114,"score_spread":0.1290268154992067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298525665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377396,0.0055391626,0.0033580966,0.030933892,0.0015380307,0.00027502433,0.00011677235,0.000012412794,0.020486988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314165,0.00082104286,0.00009973965,0.00014066506,0.000091408154,2.4968003e-7,5.0129535e-7,0.000005781076,0.0056989603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938822,0.00055083254,0.00040541252,0.00023362951,0.0046245977,0.0003033379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376464,0.003477416,0.00051484484,0.00059527956,0.001458926,0.00018889233],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287508,0.00009670309,0.00016411017,0.004921272,0.0012303733,0.0010938508,0.0031545588,0.00005434534,0.0010593998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026732655,0.000034902354,0.00010887037,0.042999372,0.00030991228,0.0010266291,0.00071032584,0.00021087589,0.0000374793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008018139,0.000039958297,0.03305653,0.0000021445553,0.000060186878,0.00011405738,0.0011159593,0.000094519746,0.0011973587,0.0060192905,0.89241564,0.06580415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041104172,0.000055468598,0.029532844,0.000027879392,0.000008394769,0.000051367253,0.0011260883,0.00049759785,0.0027140945,0.007282713,0.95819575,0.000096791235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056009614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08033547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0747345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015739177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006953995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809629352","doi":"10.1629/uksg.406","title":"How green is our valley?: five-year study of selected LIS journals from Taylor & Francis for green deposit of articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law); Period (music); Political science; History; Computer science; Art; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07098426101142308,"score_gpt":0.318519038263536,"score_spread":0.24753477725211293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809629352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905742,0.00044191713,0.0032239698,0.003939608,0.0003537355,0.00046247794,0.000008899049,0.000020927548,0.00097427197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955943,0.000043287964,0.00064571516,0.00008673802,0.0020037994,0.000005848079,9.467839e-7,0.000018983605,0.0016003633],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791604,0.00036655518,0.00048534755,0.00019393448,0.00071891875,0.0003192189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978594,0.00017295756,0.0005420676,0.00023029558,0.0010342088,0.00016103683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007481391,0.00015372453,0.00035720313,0.00016871633,0.00097428245,0.00027082342,0.00084446394,0.00008307203,0.00013740033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035560635,0.00010127523,0.00016641407,0.00061984645,0.00012946996,0.00040419766,0.00012376044,0.00025454207,0.00001995179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000568672,0.0008818506,0.113800146,0.000046722707,0.0018218347,0.000018143746,0.82348263,0.0000044100016,0.020162433,0.00062027364,0.011212147,0.027380744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016294574,0.005387025,0.3683503,0.0007413831,0.0026626973,0.000022349852,0.33639362,0.0031886855,0.03298117,0.08975973,0.14233688,0.001881602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044033746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016981348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.487089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004348166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050396222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9475992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916077507","doi":"10.1629/uksg.458","title":"Access, preservation and analysis in a consortial journal archive: the evolution of Scholars Portal Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publishing; Library science; Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Negotiation; Digital content; Digital library; Population; Investment (military); Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03354369933938334,"score_gpt":0.2494329185713749,"score_spread":0.21588921923199156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916077507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93388176,0.00049681234,0.0005495701,0.003213098,0.00033306028,0.00016619057,0.000019527233,0.0000046293358,0.061335333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859583,0.00021892624,0.000023734625,0.00027897264,0.00026761508,0.000002433099,0.0000054814336,0.0000065282497,0.0006005037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851406,0.00024569087,0.0005174282,0.0001014833,0.000464451,0.000156871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990018,0.00019310438,0.0004863574,0.00012411142,0.00013394047,0.000060694696],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077342923,0.000109005814,0.00019369741,0.00044393976,0.00045876025,0.0013328084,0.0004136324,0.000011375093,0.00044276848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045400295,0.000052453743,0.00017549456,0.00016002629,0.00026602365,0.0020975638,0.00010607285,0.00055674015,0.0000070043193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012011917,0.0001659027,0.026973618,0.0000137856105,0.0009702509,0.000036161964,0.01246596,0.0014254837,0.00007457491,0.9541566,0.0012868639,0.0023106835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055020873,0.00010606392,0.57619506,0.00009588877,0.00021263635,0.00018303226,0.0014058942,0.0010178284,0.0000055929067,0.39172137,0.028401267,0.00010516959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009394171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000430042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5624352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003206055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009126402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211865462","doi":"10.1629/uksg.562","title":"Longevity of print book use at a small public university: a 30-year longitudinal study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Demography; History; Gerontology; Subject (documents); Longitudinal study; Medicine; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.07205909569284165,"score_gpt":0.21263142307097146,"score_spread":0.1405723273781298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211865462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864881,0.00026291248,0.0041374443,0.001130346,0.00024438495,0.00012641352,6.7276875e-7,0.00004263435,0.007567112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98467714,0.00006154014,0.0013355485,0.00015742228,0.000060476887,6.281822e-7,4.0918488e-7,0.0000060478797,0.013700786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986618,0.0002395206,0.00023716874,0.00023671969,0.00041767076,0.00020712671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988763,0.00016506037,0.00018340451,0.00037450524,0.00024200199,0.00015876783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019743766,0.00012123545,0.00016968531,0.0001747265,0.0005189477,0.00085978274,0.00082192663,0.000034887576,0.00024895833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008720941,0.000080577855,0.0001120709,0.00066431734,0.0000657723,0.0018721934,0.0010036126,0.00021994491,0.00005328743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021108211,0.002304054,0.8700238,0.000028504455,0.0010523887,0.0047865827,0.021234516,0.000094085495,0.00022602068,0.07398744,0.018561369,0.0074901683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017497375,0.00033636656,0.4917832,0.000043881428,0.000030066769,0.0008087961,0.00076257816,0.00039927103,0.0010056718,0.002134987,0.5006005,0.00034490463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006374314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006794931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48203918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011017891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041380292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8290905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238129400","doi":"10.1629/uksg.258","title":"The Academic Book of the Future","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London; Arts and Humanities Research Council; King's College London","keywords":"Library science; The arts; Diversity (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Work (physics); Media studies; Sociology; History; Management; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06351996295799234,"score_gpt":0.23793519536253974,"score_spread":0.1744152324045474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238129400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.313261,0.035374116,0.000002200055,0.015619682,0.008535669,0.00024178495,0.000011921266,0.000030622385,0.62692297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92680955,0.00036476308,0.0000011142916,0.0018778839,0.0053691026,0.0000030581086,4.1293947e-7,0.000015306354,0.06555883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876726,0.00014862817,0.0003204862,0.00006955373,0.00048015092,0.0002139321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900365,0.00012841182,0.00024767194,0.0002874496,0.00025005324,0.000082758175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005417184,0.0001204962,0.00011560807,0.000026492637,0.0016452098,0.00078060594,0.0010120476,0.000046997106,0.00027511024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052784624,0.000039610597,0.00016193511,0.000030003463,0.00061581796,0.00058581174,0.00011751091,0.00094384246,0.000046146593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024744777,0.0000126637215,0.000036284087,0.0000021850492,0.000039146515,0.0000033580736,0.04177164,0.000002592682,0.000005530682,0.7829395,0.17307457,0.0020877759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016320449,0.000045914254,0.00014028771,0.000028879738,0.00001825678,0.000060772058,0.012637716,0.000004089795,0.000037400056,0.11664335,0.8701573,0.00006284995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011054996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029790192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6970827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003696631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011128938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408811722","doi":"10.1629/uksg.686","title":"Investing in open: Canadian challenges in bibliodiversity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science; Data science","score_opus":0.07945123421278852,"score_gpt":0.24898555077045917,"score_spread":0.16953431655767065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408811722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26020995,0.002698872,0.00020847742,0.03379014,0.0007276131,0.0001968222,3.328033e-7,0.000028328735,0.70213944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954883,0.00040912224,0.00068019726,0.001665256,0.000030183797,0.0000025959362,1.4604954e-7,0.000002008128,0.001722193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920213,0.00010640589,0.00018626946,0.0001526607,0.00013512954,0.00021738367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954754,0.00010877317,0.000048534508,0.00015379571,0.000030608906,0.00011072144],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032800285,0.000075307784,0.00009871845,0.002053222,0.00035135823,0.0012447167,0.0016274111,0.000037869744,0.000017175871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007878351,0.000050723356,0.000021390386,0.0026906752,0.000028137581,0.0019870675,0.0004788604,0.0002672825,0.00002112859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043481483,0.0001794657,0.2676945,0.000025389945,0.00007428454,0.0014203334,0.037329737,0.0004506348,0.00001752266,0.47477803,0.07460726,0.14337936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009203603,0.000031595304,0.27914482,0.00019292593,0.0000015783838,0.00007812155,0.0007453367,0.001583635,0.00011168548,0.16064948,0.55633056,0.00020991339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051698573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07526411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7352783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013728008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007960387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410122176","doi":"10.1629/uksg.677","title":"Barriers and benefits of transitioning to an equitable open access model: interviews with LIS journal editors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Open access journal; Library science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5755927797252935,"score_gpt":0.5852753503797516,"score_spread":0.0096825706544581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410122176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040689,0.0023370695,0.08099968,0.005852968,0.0017368624,0.00033127234,0.000016304517,0.000005800117,0.00465118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958501,0.0006337404,0.0018430884,0.00057751406,0.0004742216,0.0000055198066,3.8277787e-7,0.000010470652,0.00060497795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938621,0.00045251366,0.00087298657,0.00036657407,0.003952669,0.00049316074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357057,0.0009875351,0.00040786897,0.00048537855,0.0037088697,0.00083977013],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019762257,0.00015836612,0.0003943546,0.0234571,0.0014831093,0.021086445,0.0072368486,0.000073394884,0.00019464167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445557,0.00007275028,0.00009661685,0.05776589,0.00017260153,0.0050222576,0.001763119,0.0006524035,0.0000038902203],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011947625,0.00042198846,0.026833078,0.00003860075,0.00044033903,0.00012494824,0.027268074,0.14559053,0.0019775,0.012328058,0.23176585,0.55201626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009694337,0.005858203,0.066016525,0.0030154376,0.00031428022,0.0023794088,0.024235925,0.18352182,0.015979042,0.4953667,0.19180854,0.0018097961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006441588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011273705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5502065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093971736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073995854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}