{"meta":{"query_hash":"2ee83691bdec","filters":{"venue":"Instructional Science"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2ee83691bdec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Instructional+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1515799968","doi":"10.1023/a:1003996000775","title":"Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Educational psychology; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07487227080497476,"score_gpt":0.42480255023108776,"score_spread":0.349930279426113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515799968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8060087,0.00003322662,0.0005034346,0.00028201312,0.000922901,0.0000485129,0.0000013059956,0.000013527343,0.19218636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487275,3.9307713e-7,0.0046026655,0.00011986073,0.000116003,0.0000057119523,6.234973e-7,0.0000029119985,0.00027910052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987981,0.00035384324,0.0002141635,0.00020471659,0.00022329732,0.00020592133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999273,0.00031526192,0.000105839375,0.00016506884,0.00012146497,0.000019340085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035806794,0.00006303692,0.00009270313,0.00024673424,0.00019913526,0.00001816709,0.0003378061,0.000029631232,0.00031440193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027848216,0.000044686996,0.000024287294,0.0018549154,0.0013993949,0.00010197814,0.000030282356,0.00030696378,0.000030703806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013651804,0.00003561187,0.123199575,0.0000012264622,0.0000029329658,0.0000025762483,0.00410337,0.000002260794,0.0015066226,0.537923,0.000060482722,0.33314872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051902805,0.00007161571,0.9347068,0.000028320797,0.00000303258,0.00066677784,0.029278612,0.00009866249,0.00043968356,0.0038957226,0.030161867,0.00012990007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027193708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004995606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8115072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000572629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009303772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5156129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570100070","doi":"10.1023/a:1020570928993","title":"Modelling cognitive style in a peer help networkt","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Helpfulness; Computer science; Session (web analytics); Style (visual arts); Cognition; Educational psychology; Matching (statistics); Component (thermodynamics); Cognitive style; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0445594746991533,"score_gpt":0.2500649662811737,"score_spread":0.2055054915820204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570100070","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30044055,0.00007984196,0.68423545,0.00033799504,0.0011533824,0.00010560925,9.315158e-7,0.000083594605,0.013562656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97885615,0.0000052226023,0.018256798,0.00006139717,0.0002128083,0.000008193191,2.4305413e-7,0.0000038079072,0.0025953948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981342,0.00003123127,0.00019609967,0.0004413293,0.0008282254,0.00036891366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934787,0.00006330365,0.00006842673,0.00014401042,0.00029219943,0.00008419777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006154111,0.000096893644,0.000095217605,0.00021656106,0.00032189183,0.00022815804,0.00056470884,0.000032180946,0.000069256326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078299825,0.00009200748,0.000032955664,0.0011830346,0.00017132559,0.0010843438,0.0001424046,0.00020306931,0.00012903253],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030003814,0.000047071557,0.0035453178,0.0000041883286,0.000004161829,0.00002311619,0.0014931097,0.3258961,0.00033395528,0.6057711,0.00005583667,0.06282301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012933614,0.000025527626,0.00213653,0.000066616514,6.4617336e-7,0.00007621481,0.00013481305,0.9894454,0.0002181662,0.0014131756,0.006205221,0.00014838319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014698476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042473625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6784156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121190256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005142859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37519562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963514677","doi":"10.1007/s11251-013-9300-7","title":"Making the failure more productive: scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in invention activities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Educational psychology; Construct (python library); Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Scaffold; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.06654024321874319,"score_gpt":0.4276058729175016,"score_spread":0.3610656296987584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963514677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96809155,0.000010654827,0.000021075593,0.029106382,0.0014833092,0.0006033183,0.0000011036403,0.000025268126,0.0006573429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986128,0.0000033720005,0.00030633097,0.00038763485,0.0002751439,0.00019657743,3.9301545e-7,0.00000361154,0.00021411784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981761,0.00012232938,0.00017668314,0.00037315127,0.00082274654,0.0003290093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936336,0.000093892486,0.0001101579,0.00015739232,0.00018825306,0.000086944376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018760745,0.00009191121,0.0000805927,0.00021469529,0.002138162,0.0004929289,0.00053017086,0.00004092349,0.0001052076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006710299,0.00005758079,0.000027219832,0.0015356035,0.002662341,0.0019492613,0.00009426856,0.0001697157,0.0000100831285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009147873,0.00010680278,0.5637395,0.000015266605,0.0000064204924,3.913118e-7,0.22648463,0.00021960055,0.015022093,0.09829578,0.00046932095,0.09563108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006740385,0.000015815709,0.7624855,0.000021636171,0.0000035458977,0.00000625386,0.22072339,0.00007237301,0.0003671944,0.015239259,0.0008820165,0.00011558274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016364359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015917394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19874606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019379705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052717136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973816053","doi":"10.1007/s11251-013-9290-5","title":"Do expert clinical teachers have a shared understanding of what constitutes a competent reasoning performance in case-based teaching?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Educational psychology; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Key (lock); Psychology; Mathematics education; Logical reasoning; Computer science","score_opus":0.07755019330662685,"score_gpt":0.3782165528307532,"score_spread":0.30066635952412635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973816053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958323,0.00013203947,0.00043254028,0.00088804495,0.00054936024,0.00026447728,0.0000024776107,0.00003103499,0.001867686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980207,0.00005541075,0.019234741,0.00034800178,0.00010384984,0.000022229311,0.0000047468798,0.000006769343,0.000017197666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979985,0.000064328895,0.0005993117,0.00042884282,0.000595016,0.00031403603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641645,0.0027669815,0.00017616266,0.000241368,0.00011747817,0.0002815498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015190837,0.00013026522,0.00032081897,0.00020802804,0.00022783558,0.00012676885,0.00015922026,0.00008908711,0.00013752433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014308409,0.00010656239,0.000099519224,0.00032445553,0.0018383933,0.0006718028,0.000059910213,0.000427863,0.000011760831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000649238,0.0002750961,0.9511295,0.00001351896,0.00001407991,0.00011081052,0.0005033736,0.00018346436,0.0003682502,0.0032411288,0.00015928932,0.04393655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004988174,0.00071132043,0.9109801,0.0099304505,0.000036043697,0.0029409002,0.011644892,0.057057105,0.00040479485,0.0005244044,0.00039290832,0.00038889618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055329554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029857214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056873642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033909746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007113036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977430202","doi":"10.1007/s11251-012-9230-9","title":"Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Clickstream; Interactivity; Audio equipment; Educational psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Multimedia; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.05591657958953875,"score_gpt":0.388037726389536,"score_spread":0.3321211467999972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977430202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99808186,0.00002460729,0.00007658841,0.0009449057,0.0004129576,0.00010783915,0.0000066518232,0.000017882172,0.0003266858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964289,0.000018961036,0.0031372348,0.000024364626,0.00030847252,0.000007919378,0.000012336072,0.0000050242147,0.000056809607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981074,0.00020553062,0.00034907012,0.00019769034,0.0007114342,0.00042892204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994191,0.00014333751,0.00017246432,0.000104279774,0.0000723041,0.00008850387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018289555,0.000079311765,0.000111754234,0.00027678156,0.00042342785,0.000038504342,0.00027765497,0.000057896723,0.00005551444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007309616,0.00005857275,0.000027643931,0.00141504,0.0005528525,0.0011433285,0.00007921153,0.00032036548,0.0000019976465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052422783,0.00015993106,0.8642794,0.0000028682705,8.379507e-7,5.525044e-7,0.009491503,0.0015651628,0.0032801686,0.002066759,5.377889e-7,0.119147025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015378992,0.000020846492,0.9591529,0.000099387704,0.0000047039616,0.0000021962157,0.038812835,0.0010208663,0.00014296139,0.000081420825,0.00042253005,0.00008558423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002211804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058603208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11906144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019037469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3343601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978724795","doi":"10.1007/s11251-014-9342-5","title":"A fingerprint pattern of supports for teachers’ designing of technology-enhanced learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Buck Institute for Research on Aging","keywords":"Educational psychology; Leverage (statistics); Computer science; Educational technology; Software design pattern; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Psychology; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Software","score_opus":0.05895877894577656,"score_gpt":0.391546486538969,"score_spread":0.33258770759319245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978724795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73981905,0.000012717226,0.25395137,0.00007016235,0.0004797806,0.00008125406,0.0000013493978,0.00004443614,0.005539874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89281774,1.2018799e-7,0.10687425,0.000012783729,0.0000461897,0.000018457402,0.0000011786213,0.000007067155,0.00022220777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878615,0.00012747655,0.00028215343,0.0002819184,0.00028628978,0.00023599762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889785,0.0001222464,0.00031131477,0.00015832573,0.00046450738,0.00004575774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034151964,0.000082175655,0.00016602395,0.00039786487,0.00014216306,0.000007850119,0.0002648996,0.00007695497,0.00006094748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014020785,0.00007749216,0.00003892142,0.0008500944,0.00080981053,0.00009619133,0.00005648359,0.00030542503,0.000003702551],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041533884,0.000056710465,0.06547497,0.000010364765,0.00002168665,7.797949e-7,0.012178295,0.0006821974,0.27087522,0.010535372,0.000053047926,0.6400698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033949325,0.0022494406,0.47317964,0.0002993738,0.000046275673,0.00025637104,0.032289796,0.0014974241,0.43784824,0.03637438,0.011757794,0.00080634485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007049402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.4475045e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63926345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006331189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020638804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31600386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999658503","doi":"10.1007/s11251-008-9071-8","title":"Graduate students’ conceptions of university teaching and learning: formation for change","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Educational psychology; Context (archaeology); Axial coding; Graduate students; Teaching method; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Course (navigation); Pedagogy; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.33682200215259794,"score_gpt":0.45539476432792525,"score_spread":0.1185727621753273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999658503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99320227,0.0000070089554,0.0013238717,0.0019254754,0.00019262725,0.00018027736,0.000003339354,0.000030992313,0.0031341142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98823583,0.00004875731,0.011131475,0.000030609957,0.000089059016,0.000003002433,0.0000016596007,0.0000015263647,0.00045808012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866015,0.0002966419,0.00009084759,0.00012669845,0.00070912746,0.000116520845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919647,0.00032394117,0.00015609465,0.000042206884,0.00022245679,0.000058815152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038298424,0.00003632409,0.00005263112,0.00012121624,0.0037757705,0.000030651958,0.00021038178,0.000021689093,0.000013482567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019224519,0.000039494313,0.000019646914,0.00022606159,0.0011820393,0.0021007748,0.000046591755,0.00015596165,0.0000020670673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085681604,0.00015506695,0.13374819,0.000027051394,0.000019814981,0.0000012562153,0.19980244,0.00030471955,0.003940571,0.5785746,0.00037316783,0.082967445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072364253,0.0001389614,0.82717204,0.000028303866,0.000022619233,0.00003055113,0.038456835,0.0015992849,0.00013798365,0.0023486628,0.12914982,0.00019128792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012846753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010191035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69342387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011294052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015068754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99752116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017217782","doi":"10.1007/s11251-007-9033-6","title":"Sources of students’ frustration in pre-university level, prerequisite mathematics courses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration; Educational psychology; Pace; Mathematics education; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Institution; Process (computing); Point (geometry); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.049375930165069706,"score_gpt":0.41273873286025975,"score_spread":0.36336280269519006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017217782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910658,0.000012540243,0.00023936851,0.00040998068,0.00020386545,0.00015394029,0.0000057538896,0.00001542167,0.007893309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933092,0.000023078395,0.0054434766,0.000008259992,0.000071167546,9.334869e-7,4.0924414e-7,0.000001573984,0.0011418716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979799,0.000040755313,0.00016485364,0.00016598309,0.0013885873,0.00025995204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921125,0.00017579667,0.00009996195,0.00008899955,0.00032809892,0.00009589258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002252799,0.000049207443,0.000078562945,0.00027388617,0.000540857,0.00004838764,0.0005054035,0.000033287386,0.00011236744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004313628,0.000050274037,0.00001954683,0.0013064633,0.0019325259,0.00055482244,0.000079773425,0.000081414364,0.0000064913993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014405879,0.00019728522,0.81922936,0.000011619546,0.00000723597,0.0000023369482,0.029278887,0.00004696071,0.0015608513,0.14721589,0.00008115486,0.0023540254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010830237,0.000016135462,0.97614396,0.000017383752,0.0000020470818,0.0000011671455,0.017849274,0.0000067543124,0.0007241615,0.0020216047,0.0030532281,0.000056006986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002232758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043996917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15691458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002748463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006005076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7120472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032466689","doi":"10.1007/s11251-011-9194-1","title":"The design of technology-rich learning environments as metacognitive tools in history education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Educational psychology; Narrative; Notice; Process (computing); Recall; Mathematics education; Educational technology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16381948288078843,"score_gpt":0.35445101805125323,"score_spread":0.1906315351704648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032466689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8366346,0.0006347533,0.00022507142,0.00048232783,0.0021927326,0.00019557493,4.3381118e-7,0.000033415738,0.15960109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492496,0.00008657257,0.0032570576,0.000029066487,0.00005671957,0.000028728076,2.1555459e-7,0.0000028444824,0.0016138223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989073,0.00010514755,0.00015228649,0.00019257635,0.00042981489,0.0002128247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952364,0.0001452441,0.00011379532,0.00008197207,0.00007548079,0.000059842227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012080276,0.000051713996,0.000068186455,0.0002214216,0.0006457078,0.000011982102,0.00036639447,0.000055660763,0.00014886705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013623339,0.000044214463,0.00001777064,0.00064011116,0.003048755,0.00030608033,0.000028160159,0.00018237063,0.00002872746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032165688,0.00024557597,0.022578293,0.000002101745,0.000009632563,0.0000010236845,0.052226674,0.00004100372,0.0052609607,0.5454925,0.00017321085,0.3739369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030169476,0.00028410603,0.1723958,0.000048025733,0.000024338333,0.000016604447,0.16770631,0.000028675659,0.0025944319,0.095219195,0.56098086,0.00039996198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009703958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006694909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56080765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087530894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002307725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033127427","doi":"10.1007/s11251-013-9275-4","title":"Metacognitive scaffolds improve self-judgments of accuracy in a medical intelligent tutoring system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; Drexel University","keywords":"Metacognition; Dermatopathology; Test (biology); Correctness; Self-confidence; Computer science; Educational psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Pathology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Algorithm","score_opus":0.017300568566595242,"score_gpt":0.3305150644929815,"score_spread":0.3132144959263863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033127427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99445724,0.00003941201,0.000094393006,0.00031378647,0.0007964297,0.00029817753,0.00000346737,0.000040026058,0.0039570453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964763,0.000023713776,0.0031513285,0.00011708335,0.0001485921,0.00004275472,0.0000019134143,0.0000050164444,0.000033300963],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769557,0.000024941492,0.00046730723,0.00032470212,0.0012225307,0.00026492396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681515,0.0021513791,0.00013354585,0.00016351532,0.000383429,0.0003529643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008143719,0.000096744945,0.00024705727,0.00018011406,0.00006111526,0.000023841312,0.00019568233,0.00007675117,0.00025134857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020282619,0.00007449447,0.0000658963,0.0006806952,0.0004286248,0.00023414736,0.000114721865,0.00013473902,0.000077743076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001301995,0.001335865,0.21586832,0.00022162685,0.00014021352,0.000121041216,0.00086163613,0.00003392934,0.025485253,0.021267865,0.00010174717,0.7344323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018740771,0.00032787537,0.9550079,0.0034809774,0.000058588263,0.00041223076,0.0010335053,0.0076012136,0.029150628,0.0007116374,0.00013744306,0.00020390429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060946384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005555462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7391396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025526443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006297086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98796993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041458905","doi":"10.1007/s11251-012-9242-5","title":"Learning “to do” and learning “about” inquiry at the same time: different outcomes in valuing the importance of various intellectual tasks in planning, enacting, and evaluating an inquiry curriculum","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Educational psychology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Multivariate analysis of variance; Pedagogy; Inquiry-based learning; Teacher education","score_opus":0.05596934320903106,"score_gpt":0.39596947476427635,"score_spread":0.3400001315552453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041458905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978338,0.0001688453,0.000032387234,0.0007790985,0.00051576307,0.00017795608,2.6285286e-7,0.000017560478,0.00047432363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986507,0.000013680437,0.0008129989,0.00021812436,0.00013411076,0.000020460619,9.397388e-7,0.0000054208613,0.00014353907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976815,0.0004913688,0.0003159098,0.00029073455,0.0007920835,0.0004284142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985474,0.0009848917,0.00012810992,0.000096105454,0.00009174228,0.00015175168],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055757486,0.00011623215,0.00015810663,0.00015313397,0.0014043851,0.00013854647,0.00027192538,0.000049976814,0.000117884476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005861631,0.000074043695,0.000018539493,0.00069115916,0.0014069768,0.0004176433,0.00024038248,0.00046879568,0.0000038258922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038181406,0.000026843443,0.6907941,0.00000284679,0.000002154696,1.9317184e-7,0.2964883,0.0003289228,0.00023703737,0.0020871677,0.00000512516,0.010023461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011495384,0.000046749505,0.8958256,0.00006886703,0.000003920189,0.000010164148,0.10158408,0.000794059,0.00003704947,0.00088263326,0.00051135506,0.000120540404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057464786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027965376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20503153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031331193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017976994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044109870","doi":"10.1007/s11251-010-9164-z","title":"Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of effective inquiry instruction: are effective instruction and effective inquiry instruction essentially the same?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Perception; Educational psychology; Psychology; Differentiated instruction; Pedagogy; Cognitively Guided Instruction; Coding (social sciences); Teaching method; Teacher education; Sociology","score_opus":0.016156198970285474,"score_gpt":0.33137511688995464,"score_spread":0.31521891791966916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044109870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822237,0.000022445403,0.0005269849,0.0024622823,0.011930052,0.0015197555,0.000011426955,0.0001410565,0.0011623008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993537,0.00003766244,0.003432632,0.00032801752,0.0022117973,0.0003764323,0.000008792602,0.000020746027,0.000046887257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959948,0.00054949283,0.00051730685,0.00087921025,0.0014941673,0.00056503277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970918,0.0005040666,0.00041214266,0.00041120546,0.00124207,0.0003387102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023889595,0.0003256491,0.00034395786,0.00043680525,0.003425357,0.00030952494,0.00065956655,0.0003173201,0.00021519871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001620464,0.00027877104,0.000119137745,0.0025913275,0.008142789,0.0016561673,0.00023727329,0.0010352294,0.000025858777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013875702,0.00026919317,0.0926085,0.00008797164,0.00011736589,0.0000017975658,0.173098,0.000083238156,0.04264179,0.11973547,0.00012832461,0.5710896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009494699,0.00009492843,0.9319512,0.000084115076,0.000056379038,0.00015105846,0.044570025,0.00006370764,0.0030080103,0.015057712,0.0036501454,0.00036325055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014053625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025642728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8393427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054378767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007711408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056095986","doi":"10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0","title":"Teachers as participatory designers: two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory design; General partnership; Curriculum; Instructional design; Pedagogy; Sociology; Participatory GIS; Citizen journalism; Inclusion (mineral); Educational technology; Design and Technology; Knowledge management; Engineering; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.05208186568698806,"score_gpt":0.3397068121729574,"score_spread":0.2876249464859693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056095986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584673,0.000070314054,0.03861777,0.0004296221,0.00055224757,0.00012395639,1.0448572e-7,0.00018507456,0.0015536291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307756,0.0000031228744,0.06877883,0.00006183631,0.00005940715,0.00007641189,2.366725e-7,0.000006235361,0.00023831626],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805933,0.00008330218,0.00016895484,0.00058357534,0.0007373971,0.00036741645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990808,0.000058123147,0.00014724724,0.00036262558,0.00015985253,0.0001913963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008602552,0.00013390524,0.00011407988,0.00026754834,0.00054772367,0.00011383749,0.0006431259,0.000038912556,0.000007570188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006189442,0.00011357983,0.000015487565,0.0012958295,0.0014761114,0.001222432,0.00023643613,0.00028594473,0.00011634086],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037893242,0.000292651,0.043601923,0.000011942786,0.00010867355,0.00066145236,0.034497127,0.1855832,0.044787224,0.06440081,0.0002361562,0.62578094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010413404,0.006980474,0.034143414,0.00052504364,0.00018895564,0.08199248,0.16186996,0.11435314,0.36877775,0.17857918,0.036549363,0.005626835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027190861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060303983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62015414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004896794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054905267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075910976","doi":"10.1007/s11251-005-1274-7","title":"Scaffolding the Appropriation of Self-regulatory Activity: A Socio-cultural Analysis of Changes in Teacher–student Discourse about a Graduate Research Portfolio","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Educational psychology; Metacognition; Self-regulated learning; Psychology; Task (project management); Appropriation; Computer-mediated communication; Perspective (graphical); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Cognition; Computer science; The Internet; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12483189912324982,"score_gpt":0.490696448588246,"score_spread":0.3658645494649962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075910976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962687,0.000035527388,0.00019319056,0.0010180561,0.00020239485,0.00013429376,0.0000031416473,0.00002016277,0.0021245303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967096,0.000004179706,0.0028701709,0.000014348109,0.00016059879,0.000025260328,0.0000018838065,0.0000052858204,0.00020870903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969993,0.00093115965,0.00026554996,0.00034377564,0.0011464892,0.00031369558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885464,0.00018218144,0.0002866215,0.0002652274,0.0003769075,0.000034422148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011109748,0.00009451257,0.00021668577,0.0009958235,0.00040637623,0.000030903077,0.00041020018,0.000060455855,0.00010961288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021691766,0.00006548743,0.0000733654,0.0043525416,0.0013773337,0.00023237203,0.00009262703,0.00047845847,0.0000025474449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000845236,0.0006429704,0.37591302,0.000013513862,0.0005374349,0.0000015093326,0.08136625,0.0029519326,0.09931729,0.086784616,0.000066055516,0.35232085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001843919,0.000038443362,0.9905631,0.000014429947,0.000049150625,0.000005207012,0.0059120203,0.0015281233,0.0013157356,0.00019532593,0.00012147869,0.000072582145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006204312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011879477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6146501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030271057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014195028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5074843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092297292","doi":"10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2","title":"Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Educational psychology; Psychology; Sample (material); Medical education; Mathematics education; Student engagement; Pedagogy; Formative assessment; Medicine","score_opus":0.1186419514415662,"score_gpt":0.46098429083905895,"score_spread":0.34234233939749276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092297292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483241,0.000014794174,0.00012864421,0.0014629358,0.00077782176,0.00019052743,0.0000031306656,0.000025594714,0.049072437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966211,0.0000117047875,0.0031269835,0.000032568754,0.00016240355,0.000002621209,2.6486052e-7,0.0000032804194,0.00003908096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966584,0.00022574769,0.00038772516,0.0002833405,0.0022181687,0.00022664001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977502,0.000680753,0.0005345705,0.00023350398,0.0007239553,0.00007701505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009281762,0.00008443961,0.000118297605,0.00021985926,0.0010597953,0.000047251626,0.00064931664,0.00004942711,0.00044103363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034442607,0.000063920656,0.000060509585,0.0011991344,0.0043247617,0.0007847181,0.00007611139,0.00021813827,0.000004684799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004589383,0.00011228767,0.060276948,0.000004320618,0.000012544559,2.0316962e-7,0.03396669,0.000024570376,0.0066422485,0.8695354,0.0000314309,0.029347468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018497162,0.00007175271,0.89521205,0.000021350446,0.0000080466325,0.000004579178,0.088758215,0.000053425843,0.007902384,0.0061443155,0.0015522498,0.00008662491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012538349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002726768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001908445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005737682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112574881","doi":"10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7","title":"Collaborative design as a form of professional development","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Educational psychology; Agency (philosophy); Collaborative design; Perspective (graphical); Professional development; Collaborative learning; Learning design; Professional learning community; Instructional design; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Learning theory; Activity theory; Knowledge management; Computer science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Systems design","score_opus":0.12916777376228067,"score_gpt":0.4582723958997884,"score_spread":0.32910462213750774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112574881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88593626,0.000017346903,0.0008832242,0.003392039,0.0033844544,0.00023819925,9.764943e-7,0.000032507873,0.10611502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461421,0.0000015165808,0.049823813,0.00012972661,0.0001269308,0.000017951472,8.956387e-7,0.0000021106257,0.003754983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833065,0.00013553238,0.00015975328,0.00015021957,0.0010550214,0.00016879375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785036,0.00012371186,0.00018955262,0.000052309522,0.0016588668,0.00012521204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029886898,0.000048347963,0.000060365266,0.00014236686,0.000801938,0.000050013216,0.0002446009,0.000030593357,0.0002886682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024571288,0.00004197926,0.000008231434,0.0018019531,0.0012580378,0.0008448832,0.00003473938,0.00009249462,0.000067846195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074442156,0.00015984788,0.004005534,0.0000030251988,0.0000091524935,6.55207e-7,0.16750742,0.00007081159,0.0013644153,0.7878062,0.002939016,0.036059465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028159135,0.000071553724,0.037509978,0.00002474934,0.0000023302182,0.000006766532,0.08341136,0.00003014201,0.008110022,0.01880952,0.8515836,0.00015838981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016005516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036261285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84864455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000258188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014184163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114181363","doi":"10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9","title":"Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":559,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Educational psychology; Metacognition; Scaffold; Self-regulated learning; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05607685798028873,"score_gpt":0.3789977881817368,"score_spread":0.3229209302014481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114181363","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38985428,0.00004312731,0.60864294,0.00074203603,0.00021035856,0.00017118071,0.0000024526853,0.00006452279,0.00026909114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6916966,7.489731e-7,0.3080624,0.00005311249,0.00012407766,0.000027013972,0.0000020119785,0.0000050984295,0.000028960812],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897116,0.00024450626,0.0001879939,0.00025800068,0.00015311953,0.00018520687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856985,0.00084785226,0.00016016621,0.0001089763,0.00028053302,0.00003260828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029110794,0.00007980514,0.00009424647,0.00017443222,0.000895457,0.000040675317,0.0001701707,0.000041027026,0.00004270735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012902787,0.00006106048,0.000030862586,0.0006841173,0.00049259985,0.00013449782,0.000023846049,0.00009793685,0.0000027734377],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055162327,0.00008916912,0.0068878215,0.000008946474,0.000065853594,7.770494e-8,0.0009894652,0.036777902,0.08591367,0.09860525,0.0001043029,0.7705024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011815515,0.00032437633,0.75439805,0.000037131787,0.00008466579,0.00010245352,0.00022221661,0.22320701,0.00609532,0.0030845974,0.010988837,0.00027381492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013517009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.8733733e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77022856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004695992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087426175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6887222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153789086","doi":"10.1023/a:1019871114857","title":"Debriefing interview and Colloquium: How effective are these as research strategies?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Debriefing; Educational psychology; Interview; Educational research; Psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19613140435122942,"score_gpt":0.4718250968233554,"score_spread":0.27569369247212594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153789086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340662,0.00025906882,0.0010322033,0.0025377334,0.00068118895,0.00016952283,0.0000019514082,0.00005369463,0.061198473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99468356,0.000006388459,0.003358582,0.00018033985,0.00016582303,0.00003860774,3.3670983e-7,0.000008574091,0.0015577998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971081,0.0013348057,0.00011563574,0.00048777976,0.00054890005,0.00040478184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876094,0.0005144597,0.000084270134,0.00020624776,0.00034676524,0.000087301654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006077526,0.00010613016,0.00013075561,0.00032247734,0.0007853798,0.00027929316,0.00030386343,0.00006379066,0.0007656509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010551452,0.00008979896,0.000024827443,0.0015036894,0.0018369128,0.00040047552,0.00011694133,0.00071958627,0.00011755104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003475396,0.00009685939,0.009324888,0.000027475337,0.000036477795,0.000031929427,0.014444715,0.000015438392,0.012888873,0.39167154,0.0017063369,0.56972075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057477696,0.00042039665,0.9007335,0.00015926229,0.0000064347705,0.0007603431,0.013419666,0.0004271765,0.00044627607,0.02403392,0.05871208,0.00030616674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021562993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008917191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8914086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011571714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057571386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.838334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606822445","doi":"10.1007/s11251-017-9410-8","title":"Effects of student-facilitated learning on instructional facilitators","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; City University of New York; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Educational psychology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Instructional design; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.03506014183196206,"score_gpt":0.41699660962317064,"score_spread":0.3819364677912086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606822445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970241,0.000011727127,0.00067611324,0.00011023692,0.003260361,0.00011205363,0.000005312337,0.00006561717,0.02551754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927,6.685019e-7,0.0058783996,0.000030100671,0.000138882,0.000015245422,0.0000015736387,0.000008100877,0.0012270368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778306,0.0003510346,0.00027178726,0.0004918925,0.0007776121,0.00032463254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986108,0.0003273158,0.00032853562,0.0003723706,0.0002766457,0.00008431951],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019664022,0.00014976648,0.00018801008,0.00031327465,0.0017100198,0.000079056845,0.00070539117,0.000074848,0.00029054252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018633715,0.00013551148,0.00006635591,0.0003659766,0.002204443,0.00030738674,0.000116643576,0.0006068065,0.00011697203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017155561,0.00019220346,0.31499338,0.00003187677,0.00008894352,0.000013331037,0.0034638809,0.00064887817,0.055597946,0.29632172,0.00009913955,0.32837716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005966366,0.00023619574,0.99066323,0.000031839263,0.0000053710532,0.000028633072,0.0002970352,0.00002884001,0.0024133422,0.0014249085,0.0041366345,0.00013732615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014905828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.615538e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67566985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011678273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809994808","doi":"10.1007/s11251-018-9463-3","title":"Supporting communities of learners in the elementary classroom: the common knowledge learning environment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Educational psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05755096442728311,"score_gpt":0.4093889766245766,"score_spread":0.3518380121972935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809994808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95526445,0.000025729652,0.00060886337,0.0004977072,0.00041249418,0.00008168677,9.751236e-7,0.000013849717,0.043094255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968423,0.0000015849129,0.002454674,0.00019760257,0.00014583848,0.000011400734,0.000002932715,0.0000051196444,0.00033849408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749416,0.001473566,0.00027749356,0.00014729403,0.0003274345,0.00028002134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900115,0.00048967364,0.00019045897,0.00025787123,0.00004477207,0.000016062711],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008394898,0.00008099046,0.00009414247,0.00013219507,0.00097268925,0.000027102682,0.00066368305,0.000029471741,0.0006319738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104907194,0.000049811904,0.000028352551,0.00057637366,0.00295022,0.000099791076,0.00012270085,0.0007214177,0.0000444995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040356124,0.00012863906,0.5737147,0.000005484114,0.000019719942,0.0000014684206,0.12301744,0.00036862158,0.004693729,0.07180533,0.00032438285,0.22588015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002515941,0.0002460978,0.83615166,0.00001996864,0.0000059322524,0.000061703744,0.1050504,0.0006079469,0.00034218002,0.0021058412,0.055047084,0.00010959906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078012067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100944024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26243696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007287013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054013686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913729783","doi":"10.1007/s11251-018-09480-z","title":"Emotion regulation tendencies, achievement emotions, and physiological arousal in a medical diagnostic reasoning simulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Educational psychology; Arousal; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019299075060785553,"score_gpt":0.26971886015230767,"score_spread":0.25041978509152213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913729783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.889139,0.000018104796,0.10946393,0.0002770295,0.000666225,0.00014677332,3.4652513e-7,0.000053073854,0.00023551885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931807,0.000005805018,0.006500277,0.00005351558,0.00011522159,0.0000057460948,0.0000017845141,0.0000027019705,0.00013426224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808365,0.000073827556,0.00024545533,0.00046275064,0.0008960279,0.00023831544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932647,0.00021875098,0.000096842035,0.00016008504,0.000108386484,0.00008945791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000996472,0.000094179835,0.00010734177,0.00018630827,0.00023939111,0.00013235417,0.0003167624,0.000062585736,0.000037022353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008005701,0.00008129432,0.000021334896,0.00062491413,0.00014610121,0.0009484615,0.00018296356,0.00018321612,0.000030567793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053278586,0.00005713553,0.07328003,0.000013370373,0.0000032438434,0.0000062374193,0.00036498,0.12085418,0.007296467,0.7527305,0.000004295569,0.04538426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011879526,0.000049859875,0.63544387,0.000097067095,4.980768e-7,0.0000321955,0.000046656758,0.3617592,0.000058574078,0.0019892175,0.00032532576,0.00007876714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007289697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004902561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75074124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018672764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014692926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3315086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042944617","doi":"10.1007/s11251-020-09520-7","title":"Assistance that fades in improves learning better than assistance that fades out","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fade; Copying; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Computer science; Session (web analytics); Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.042495054542788686,"score_gpt":0.25791769987098245,"score_spread":0.21542264532819377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042944617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8250039,0.00019599391,0.16447055,0.0039739315,0.0019270425,0.00020083174,0.0000028260363,0.000292047,0.0039328495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97877795,0.000009525039,0.019301658,0.00043564092,0.00031843854,0.000016858361,8.211899e-7,0.000012262883,0.0011268639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967186,0.00010043191,0.00032107817,0.0010061743,0.0012186128,0.0006350924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900484,0.00011152742,0.00025854722,0.00028929982,0.00013564782,0.00020011287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007031139,0.0002485015,0.0002543309,0.000193733,0.00063400384,0.00072847406,0.0014878555,0.00007515278,0.000019021718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022120266,0.00022507322,0.00009272598,0.0009929613,0.0004195778,0.0023280007,0.00035224625,0.0005927461,0.00007230042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003463696,0.000050615417,0.5557858,0.00007474997,0.00002420868,0.00007102475,0.006346751,0.003962936,0.10909817,0.24828243,0.00011920578,0.07614946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000402339,0.00015169918,0.86761075,0.0002673127,0.000004241131,0.000059150763,0.0013332715,0.023776809,0.030638618,0.0021847826,0.07275486,0.00081619254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007637531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035972524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31182492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023772848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020996682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91782194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315641706","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09614-4","title":"Explanatory inferencing in simulation-based discovery learning: sequence analysis using the edit distance median string","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Levenshtein distance; Construct (python library); String (physics); Computer science; Discovery learning; Sequence (biology); Sequence learning; Artificial intelligence; Edit distance; Psychology; Data science; Machine learning; Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05762025344775303,"score_gpt":0.3178767323916396,"score_spread":0.2602564789438866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315641706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5065484,0.00000800152,0.49251863,0.00009710664,0.0006155582,0.000058862155,0.0000015045907,0.00008645926,0.00006543647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968764,0.0000015934319,0.0027667065,0.000030169589,0.00016984342,0.000007832779,0.0000026005036,0.0000051936495,0.0001396499],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976,0.000103537925,0.00031838115,0.00053111365,0.0010172128,0.00042973048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986966,0.0005733697,0.00018017211,0.00030972864,0.00016330907,0.00007681153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014506258,0.00013426889,0.00015546563,0.0008023652,0.00085847505,0.0004894473,0.0009485362,0.000038215014,0.0000065168942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005372908,0.00010724969,0.000078290774,0.007220929,0.0002738049,0.0016973974,0.00017929848,0.00032831472,0.000010902142],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011778634,0.0000032195055,0.06353559,0.0000034395039,0.000007837666,0.000008000766,0.0004018089,0.8765464,0.0013555727,0.05656009,4.2449153e-7,0.0015764561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005862895,0.000007885517,0.05220721,0.000045416906,0.0000058128744,0.0000021263527,0.00037796126,0.9455665,0.00038230466,0.0006541988,0.0005515069,0.00014047338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037243037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009643789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49032798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004174509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005192119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66027826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324133731","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09622-y","title":"Fostering students’ informal quantitative estimations of uncertainty through statistical modeling","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Construct (python library); Statistical model; Educational psychology; Probabilistic logic; Process (computing); Computer science; Statistical analysis; Key (lock); Mathematics education; Statistical learning; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Data science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5156176544166129,"score_gpt":0.5553366777494712,"score_spread":0.03971902333285826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324133731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5342108,0.0000017667835,0.46317843,0.00007216676,0.00065641006,0.00008783587,0.00008964304,0.00006729282,0.0016356681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44207057,0.00000445535,0.5578276,0.000013220295,0.000016961905,0.000012069632,0.000009330915,0.0000035270791,0.00004225819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998657,0.000033756343,0.00031095004,0.00016156085,0.00064166484,0.00019507253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828976,0.0011402427,0.0001020261,0.00012493106,0.00029500868,0.000048046128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008955989,0.00007216014,0.000121893645,0.00014997927,0.00025029122,0.0000457607,0.00027571936,0.00002280299,0.000067259105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053968704,0.000064636406,0.000021139098,0.0007797111,0.0005275767,0.0003251839,0.00027176534,0.0000777776,0.000024669573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009505871,0.000020489924,0.00021695423,0.000027569848,0.0000074383106,5.3618464e-7,0.001800331,0.030472826,0.0005617227,0.9624585,0.000149415,0.0042747012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014450103,0.00003320344,0.0051169856,0.000025106869,0.000008551326,0.000011872033,0.0037582288,0.24300015,0.00020286826,0.7475643,0.00004803304,0.00008620131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043842556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071011273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2148942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050201405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002710046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64609474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381950436","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09636-6","title":"Metadiscourse, knowledge advancement, and emotions in primary school students’ knowledge building","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education - Singapore","keywords":"Metadiscourse; Psychology; Discourse analysis; Knowledge building; Face (sociological concept); Agency (philosophy); Cognition; Pedagogy; Sociology; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.05576553207625681,"score_gpt":0.4603510281954164,"score_spread":0.4045854961191596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381950436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95924693,0.00014459825,0.0022151682,0.00028147313,0.0019234737,0.00012838752,0.0000034023958,0.00011718999,0.03593935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788612,0.000012542299,0.014067013,0.000053196465,0.00022573178,0.00004181504,0.0000042752044,0.00001222206,0.0067220205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982499,0.00031644403,0.00022214312,0.0005039584,0.00030792938,0.00039966102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934393,0.00017582798,0.00007580704,0.00018893207,0.00011264577,0.00010286718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004021021,0.00012283352,0.00014969405,0.00082864997,0.0005336779,0.000079192054,0.00037490483,0.000046410794,0.00018203311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037217353,0.00011780968,0.000026092015,0.0032215733,0.00065317954,0.0003729645,0.00022785016,0.00041399954,0.00024648538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034212713,0.000283196,0.31738764,0.000029144952,0.00004581193,0.000012825113,0.005071151,0.00020480172,0.029612519,0.33747393,0.0010620712,0.30878267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044596926,0.00003431684,0.9751445,0.00003717983,0.0000047142084,0.000033197335,0.00061628554,0.00007541514,0.00003705385,0.0026316065,0.020806579,0.00013320248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028692468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009744898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6577568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023450723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020082893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4804139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133598","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09639-3","title":"Examining the effects of tempo in background music on adolescent learners’ reading comprehension performance: employing a multimodal approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instructional Science","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Contempt; Cognitive psychology; Reading comprehension; Valence (chemistry); Reading (process); Comprehension; Cognition; Active listening; Facial expression; Task (project management); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Communication; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11065695369853087,"score_gpt":0.30140600314519,"score_spread":0.19074904944665913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384133598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99741924,0.0000010531703,0.00003740695,0.000042195607,0.0011553532,0.00029469706,0.000001152695,0.00007105243,0.0009778419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992972,0.000024541921,0.00017240165,0.0003387886,0.00008530412,0.000024854384,8.092525e-7,0.000009093699,0.000046987567],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974953,0.00010290021,0.0002474276,0.00066224445,0.0010589318,0.00043319038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992104,0.00030026588,0.00011268175,0.00027118225,0.00003446758,0.0000709914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007017814,0.00013886644,0.00013603337,0.00047334476,0.00069839973,0.00007646156,0.000535819,0.00003946942,0.000006139283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042673346,0.00010150965,0.00003543001,0.0030591073,0.0011859059,0.00065266725,0.00020352367,0.00030359285,0.000035443263],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020550713,0.000053738753,0.0052267034,0.000044122047,2.4821202e-7,0.0000045652628,0.0007249157,0.0035441606,0.9738643,0.00054892706,0.000018755327,0.015948975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041820033,0.00017366128,0.8855694,0.00021089149,0.0000022928205,0.00006602357,0.0008332229,0.046699446,0.06573215,0.00006271282,0.00007771836,0.00015429503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003090493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017029621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9081322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001334561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001166811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5371597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}