{"meta":{"query_hash":"0c8bff286418","filters":{"venue":"Intellectual History Review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0c8bff286418","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Intellectual+History+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1984035234","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2014.891174","title":"Notes on artistic invention in Gothic Europe","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Art history; Art; History; Classics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08710348963677067,"score_gpt":0.30759740966439775,"score_spread":0.22049392002762708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984035234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026524132,0.96138805,0.000029217952,0.003425377,0.000838701,0.0000012590277,0.000028929704,0.0000036023432,0.031632334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06386003,0.91715324,0.00008885623,0.0036356796,0.002043778,0.0000075454495,0.000117236996,0.000010823066,0.013082838],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994487,0.00017211524,0.00005083279,0.00006725714,0.00016017008,0.00010090457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990073,0.0006786853,0.00010608645,0.0000458729,0.00012861019,0.000033419303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088682846,0.00038606967,0.00041001654,0.004248319,0.0014216643,0.0033482318,0.00041497525,0.0007693377,0.005393551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001672317,0.00014179388,0.00028880077,0.009113822,0.0037922845,0.0017137057,0.0017674329,0.0013185781,0.0006581565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013718798,0.000047261652,0.0027371706,0.010883226,0.00023007506,0.0022333532,0.024475725,0.00086456933,0.000525406,0.25063652,0.23695673,0.4702728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070639326,0.000015285737,0.008044263,0.0053884955,0.00003399767,0.00056844205,0.0033584684,0.000012969151,0.00013983608,0.0069336127,0.97548735,0.000010131913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016211456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027018657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016211456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00224761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028633073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032234192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007124940","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2011.623888","title":"Practical Paths in Philosophy: Observations on the 1785-6 Spinoza Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Work (physics); Sociology; Social science; Political science; Art history; History; Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4561879934348054,"score_gpt":0.3053343209689476,"score_spread":0.15085367246585785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007124940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17482583,0.016122412,0.0024337557,0.06088489,0.00040259387,0.000029137993,0.0000767495,0.00003772405,0.74518687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805962,0.002102748,0.00033571178,0.0018717814,0.00015798217,0.00002144086,0.000020929787,0.000027180768,0.014866197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745613,0.0015033454,0.00006423425,0.00023431846,0.00044103683,0.00030092133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608445,0.002695409,0.000297297,0.00023455232,0.0004980279,0.00019027188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004994951,0.00016587137,0.00031055513,0.0018817917,0.00841371,0.0049381657,0.0006323351,0.0022967686,0.0069608544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008878146,0.00018277658,0.0001941765,0.002304042,0.021081565,0.004564952,0.003160366,0.0029939914,0.00046780068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001886909,0.0000056662734,0.00026248666,0.00002880553,0.0000018141183,0.00009629593,0.04066561,0.00004737933,0.000040658313,0.9463374,0.006458431,0.006036566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004865724,0.000015794601,0.003871298,0.00033263816,0.000008236367,0.00019166672,0.043779645,0.00023282488,0.0001608935,0.33389536,0.6174456,0.00001746688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017576052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017187942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017576052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009688837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031297586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07029778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088889028","doi":"10.1080/17496970802124577","title":"The Intellectual Legacy of George Herbert Mead","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); History; Philosophy; Classics; Art history","score_opus":0.09606661999660283,"score_gpt":0.338299379433095,"score_spread":0.2422327594364922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088889028","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020786861,0.56161803,0.003249275,0.36307836,0.024238063,0.000011650846,0.000055716977,0.000060172817,0.04561004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.099452436,0.5718606,0.0050692405,0.18450914,0.038697366,0.00006284733,0.00008659336,0.00016402626,0.1000977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983872,0.00061215396,0.000050850624,0.00028737492,0.00055133936,0.000111131114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947301,0.0032854667,0.00030290207,0.00017676364,0.0009382892,0.0005663861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732974,0.0004678219,0.000538829,0.0015245832,0.002978361,0.004335195,0.00074605667,0.0020293999,0.003463998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009127337,0.00021763655,0.00020201672,0.0012581768,0.006516449,0.004318988,0.001355727,0.0064216037,0.0014497117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000583819,0.000022135802,0.0005623361,0.00048850226,0.000028934286,0.00033531294,0.003547993,0.00013988244,0.00017693678,0.17200726,0.6919146,0.13071771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049753576,0.000012063681,0.0002230763,0.00044188998,0.0000044174712,0.00029385564,0.0005963914,0.000030652365,0.00009271575,0.021926338,0.9763643,0.00000923428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007310425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011490041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007310425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025739633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042072814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018675506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016317577","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2020.1732709","title":"Against a fatal confusion: Spinoza, climate crisis and the weave of the world","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Confusion; Politics; Futures contract; Anthropocene; Phenomenology (philosophy); Multitude; Relation (database); Epistemology; History; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Law; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0340553504823599,"score_gpt":0.2046178103409829,"score_spread":0.170562459858623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016317577","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006157244,0.8283306,0.001631252,0.09686187,0.0064423108,0.000008462549,0.000026144513,0.000025146046,0.060517028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3266885,0.6222649,0.0011564139,0.0277364,0.007277785,0.000037608537,0.000061928105,0.00004507381,0.014731354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985488,0.0008135438,0.000057726447,0.000144046,0.0002785391,0.00015727588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.0012040079,0.0001564629,0.000079576836,0.0001847632,0.00012834057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026500495,0.00050821004,0.00048742275,0.0027491304,0.0049372986,0.009301541,0.0009698221,0.0027613635,0.0032740452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032055522,0.00012369287,0.0002384212,0.0032113423,0.024952479,0.011900177,0.0040034866,0.005071149,0.0004500141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035680794,0.00001584791,0.00029040626,0.0012693766,0.00001891591,0.00039251184,0.03185296,0.00014284738,0.00013180528,0.8479918,0.037028205,0.080829605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072701414,0.0000218674,0.0006391267,0.0032839335,0.000013591808,0.00045942294,0.037598114,0.000052195377,0.00012158552,0.11217778,0.84560925,0.000015814661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122592775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017871154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122592775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038680166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060100104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028064549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083202690","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2020.1810911","title":"Between panacea and poison: “democracy” in British socialist thought, 1881–1891","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Socialism; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; Representative democracy; Marxist philosophy; Political science; Law; Communism","score_opus":0.1070818721705752,"score_gpt":0.3102864847186863,"score_spread":0.20320461254811112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083202690","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015418736,0.87148577,0.0003861211,0.02679744,0.0012407985,0.000015381856,0.00006895399,0.000012115006,0.08457474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45103174,0.4977731,0.00048789647,0.0052185645,0.0018032726,0.00005497972,0.0001303697,0.000027823597,0.04347218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974764,0.0014025819,0.00010685081,0.00015035423,0.00055980164,0.00030389626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998609,0.00081942044,0.00012650473,0.000059248505,0.00029820888,0.00008761415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019350501,0.00031514143,0.0003991461,0.0034316059,0.0035946476,0.0031968197,0.0003334558,0.0015979147,0.0028865272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035889936,0.00022175316,0.00013947386,0.005314267,0.01194793,0.0021936535,0.0011857355,0.00201631,0.00056396524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015087698,0.000037845646,0.0018759171,0.003482352,0.000039127026,0.00054331904,0.08034008,0.0007594175,0.00046456055,0.54451865,0.1261814,0.24160653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001450431,0.000026821412,0.009196476,0.0020556436,0.000011699719,0.00015192741,0.004869015,0.00005838885,0.000114276336,0.019145416,0.96434015,0.000015636244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23659691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30631766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23659691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021651456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011972831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47043955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230174075","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2013.841388","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.040249100187934435,"score_gpt":0.2439756786627074,"score_spread":0.20372657847477296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230174075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005423173,0.03772566,0.003431528,0.06616518,0.06320824,0.0001538507,0.0021753039,0.000764693,0.82583314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009486061,0.037443303,0.0024956535,0.049317785,0.032685287,0.00021507929,0.0030752663,0.0004790131,0.86480254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984876,0.00028017935,0.00006778473,0.00023502852,0.0007333559,0.00019612402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955396,0.00081746216,0.000239325,0.00052431057,0.0022445752,0.0006347414],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021116934,0.0007071431,0.00044659732,0.0032634314,0.0016823378,0.0055486304,0.0018917045,0.002151029,0.31586418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010014918,0.00025660955,0.0006824964,0.0018539954,0.0017724717,0.0037346906,0.0031510259,0.0034772954,0.17452195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015003031,0.000009272977,0.000084097155,0.00027597204,0.0000035874043,0.000041649895,0.00010997633,0.000024681172,0.000090345515,0.026415518,0.8903329,0.08259711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018761352,0.0000033568847,0.000092974864,0.00020605432,0.0000018126763,0.00003877577,0.00005271478,0.0000048229545,0.000035849924,0.0019487503,0.9976109,0.0000020998816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003775297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044012074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6841358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023924627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051139113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9758367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387701672","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2023.2253582","title":"Dugald Stewart’s empire of the mind: moral education in the late Scottish Enlightenment <b>Dugald Stewart’s empire of the mind: moral education in the late Scottish Enlightenment</b> , by Charles Bradford Bow. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 256 pp., $85.00(hb), ISBN: 9780192865380","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Empire; Scottish Enlightenment; Philosophy; Classics; History; Ancient history; Theology","score_opus":0.04203699802862742,"score_gpt":0.24926252512529942,"score_spread":0.207225527096672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387701672","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014360179,0.8551508,0.0002050281,0.09869695,0.009916421,0.000007719083,0.00006486463,0.000016504184,0.034505703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.113525175,0.7174618,0.00060971186,0.032409683,0.013453087,0.0000350642,0.00016827541,0.00005612827,0.12228113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986792,0.00050834776,0.00006660102,0.00011478009,0.00044227976,0.00018874725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849546,0.0006729243,0.0001473481,0.000053273703,0.00039679708,0.00023408864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028413315,0.00075071485,0.0004082046,0.0014618511,0.002410786,0.0043943264,0.00070098566,0.0024554925,0.006713628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039624525,0.0002950156,0.0002781837,0.0020880548,0.0045779846,0.00511854,0.001622692,0.0025352899,0.001239947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036852147,0.000015381847,0.0002587928,0.00063680665,0.000010765432,0.0002262727,0.0043939054,0.00006979111,0.000116594885,0.062395606,0.8600098,0.071829386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058842575,0.0000119916185,0.0010799773,0.0006664047,0.000004130792,0.00009771731,0.0017166196,0.000016081334,0.000058183585,0.006124156,0.99021214,0.000006700464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07389559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123529635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07389559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005704541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009533254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14693093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405327965","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2024.2435073","title":"Imagination and reason in Leibniz","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Atomism; Philosophy; Complement (music); Point (geometry); Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0749253803705268,"score_gpt":0.24838792022342737,"score_spread":0.17346253985290055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405327965","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017109295,0.57714343,0.028660499,0.04747136,0.0017902715,0.000020238278,0.00007057826,0.00007624805,0.32765806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7728273,0.18148232,0.008652864,0.008477176,0.0035096111,0.000055851247,0.000083703395,0.00005201734,0.024859052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848074,0.00065759814,0.00007803141,0.000181306,0.00047487018,0.00012731069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988386,0.000804997,0.00008402067,0.00008326083,0.00012749109,0.00006158162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035639498,0.00044031028,0.0005513072,0.002764012,0.0017195074,0.005592279,0.00064210605,0.0023367284,0.001790916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002662808,0.000193064,0.000380282,0.0019794493,0.022718683,0.009195853,0.002293531,0.002764484,0.00046014227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033397255,0.0000015738839,0.00004080754,0.000053491796,0.0000019509189,0.00001973655,0.00049537094,0.00009735937,0.000028641709,0.99365836,0.0008109603,0.0047884667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041279577,0.000007903333,0.00021373431,0.00015295892,0.0000031525674,0.000053579566,0.00036741476,0.0001322877,0.000086832806,0.9249514,0.07401953,0.000007066607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040123453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028263826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005592279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004352587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003405696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}