{"meta":{"query_hash":"aace0a54d48c","filters":{"venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aace0a54d48c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Intercultural+Pragmatics"},"results":[{"id":"W2799748611","doi":"10.1515/ip-2018-0007","title":"Identity, doxastic co-indexation, and Frege’s puzzle","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Identity (music); Epistemology; Nothing; Statement (logic); Perspective (graphical); Sign (mathematics); Linguistics; Utterance; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028658089180194576,"score_gpt":0.377246936011611,"score_spread":0.34858884683141644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799748611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6954573,0.00007233712,0.0067741163,0.0014864946,0.00095378095,0.0001709195,0.000012292171,0.0000814894,0.29499125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808204,0.0000029167213,0.00034669173,0.00052340876,0.00031766744,0.000007574921,0.0000043303176,0.0000062156896,0.00070912443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991084,0.00007801852,0.00021289868,0.00020775615,0.00017429852,0.00021867258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.00011789929,0.00007423703,0.00019282404,0.000099284545,0.00010858337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024052177,0.000107799955,0.00011632384,0.00003258319,0.00017069823,0.00011115746,0.0002585363,0.00007603092,0.0015987372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025311587,0.00007585876,0.000030655625,0.00013808328,0.0006984738,0.00032680924,0.00008445085,0.00012603273,0.0016407483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015914191,0.000051284616,0.0004099567,0.000010990305,0.00002494475,0.000006184233,0.0066246134,1.7177848e-7,0.00081016903,0.9878005,0.0023109817,0.001934338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006187723,0.00041731127,0.025718795,0.00008980674,0.00005414493,0.0002255722,0.0018960886,0.0006472454,0.0014263798,0.9620418,0.0064662993,0.00039778856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003236731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057513127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30262476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020285557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004754971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902182306","doi":"10.1515/ip-2018-0023","title":"How (not) to be rude: Facilitatingthe acquisition of L2 (im)politeness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Psychology; Intercultural communication; Interpersonal communication; Politeness theory; Language acquisition; Language education; Sociocultural evolution; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.07137810860615648,"score_gpt":0.32396134773589547,"score_spread":0.252583239129739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902182306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94782424,0.00006276328,0.0002845259,0.009920139,0.00037899477,0.000299643,0.00019235844,0.00011011492,0.04092723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045664,0.0000046197165,0.0013451924,0.0010642561,0.00034844666,0.000020463685,0.00005807263,0.000014948154,0.006687361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890786,0.00011414321,0.00035059644,0.00015274508,0.00026574632,0.00020891786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849844,0.00013601253,0.0001912215,0.0004819266,0.00062928174,0.000063108484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019301497,0.0001734161,0.0002271984,0.00007072921,0.000243853,0.00047487882,0.00046441358,0.000047049914,0.0007029766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001881552,0.000118837655,0.00008920155,0.00005780012,0.0005373351,0.0005373778,0.00014781345,0.00011330441,0.00011373489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030036368,0.00006665654,0.000007847109,0.000111639005,0.00007092335,0.000001028857,0.6345257,0.000004061976,0.0052102027,0.34858024,0.008928057,0.002463559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037916537,0.00042842727,0.00031827373,0.00028971685,0.00006662627,0.000010617433,0.86510384,0.00026371496,0.013084643,0.0069151497,0.112682685,0.00045713945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002212256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092745654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34166512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004603172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023304254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76971006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306825029","doi":"10.1515/ip-2022-5003","title":"Interlocutors’ judgment of Lx conventional expressions: An exploratory study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Psychology; Perception; Exploratory research; Linguistics; Speech act; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06419603551208435,"score_gpt":0.29250291047880533,"score_spread":0.22830687496672097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306825029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946206,0.000088817134,0.000044764158,0.00010513238,0.0008767802,0.00025111923,0.00003066504,0.00009116411,0.0038909428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996042,9.900407e-7,0.000116829695,0.00013200595,0.00019528187,0.00008934853,0.000051080628,0.000016345697,0.0033560903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983959,0.0005111008,0.00041950814,0.00016949339,0.00036402373,0.00013996317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993613,0.000073449344,0.00021584745,0.00020424754,0.000093754235,0.00005143889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005225318,0.00013324748,0.00019281826,0.00007672922,0.0005501881,0.00010038279,0.0002910111,0.000014659604,0.005870423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057028625,0.0001027703,0.00008796106,0.000026820497,0.00009191373,0.0003026057,0.0002261077,0.00040774187,0.000025654075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004383568,0.0013552303,0.0004606102,0.000045587687,0.00012287016,0.000009872396,0.96802914,0.00031704843,0.00088738924,0.018828876,0.0087509155,0.0011486182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005054065,0.0011297804,0.00011786702,0.00008416061,0.000043499025,0.00000674799,0.90793276,0.00068780204,0.00008207064,0.0003981989,0.088807225,0.00020447769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009384208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001791837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08005631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006648434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001972448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99503833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}