{"meta":{"query_hash":"aace0a54d48c","filters":{"venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aace0a54d48c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Intercultural+Pragmatics"},"results":[{"id":"W2799748611","doi":"10.1515/ip-2018-0007","title":"Identity, doxastic co-indexation, and Frege’s puzzle","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Identity (music); Epistemology; Nothing; Statement (logic); Perspective (graphical); Sign (mathematics); Linguistics; Utterance; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028658089180194576,"score_gpt":0.377246936011611,"score_spread":0.34858884683141644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799748611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21608308,0.0038217967,0.17157522,0.05221632,0.0013073783,0.00009787759,0.00015222539,0.00049952645,0.55424666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462427,0.0003254344,0.006621871,0.0010781393,0.00017158905,0.00003806141,0.000033637614,0.000095279705,0.0070116576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950197,0.0026494015,0.00027173295,0.0009509077,0.0006741081,0.00043420645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545115,0.0024391364,0.00036887528,0.00093284866,0.0006136607,0.00019443681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066076852,0.0006733557,0.00093950116,0.0019597756,0.0042228443,0.004888251,0.0011606197,0.004372598,0.0056012045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012146987,0.0005253279,0.0006449927,0.0013000458,0.025952434,0.015996998,0.0077959574,0.0043790466,0.00080344983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011646025,0.0000043053615,0.000066449546,0.0000129006785,0.0000026081582,0.00005692638,0.0023229928,0.000064325424,0.00010896171,0.99553406,0.00058012956,0.0012345714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012726128,0.000009752818,0.00015163404,0.000025796242,0.000005486855,0.00011673269,0.001188768,0.0005832759,0.00026224786,0.9863376,0.011287501,0.000018463013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028691005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016646817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066076852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004376523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013820273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03494519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902182306","doi":"10.1515/ip-2018-0023","title":"How (not) to be rude: Facilitatingthe acquisition of L2 (im)politeness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Psychology; Intercultural communication; Interpersonal communication; Politeness theory; Language acquisition; Language education; Sociocultural evolution; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.07137810860615648,"score_gpt":0.32396134773589547,"score_spread":0.252583239129739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902182306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9548055,0.0001531736,0.006616819,0.0013183735,0.000038669485,0.00011451414,0.000023224282,0.00012190455,0.03680776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902991,0.00011642873,0.0040350687,0.00018862363,0.000007796528,0.000082203565,0.000016075723,0.000044428845,0.005210286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975109,0.0016592201,0.000048018726,0.00023565648,0.00022053903,0.00032558388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519217,0.0032787041,0.00035022854,0.0003079636,0.0002033408,0.00066764565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023727526,0.00038475668,0.00028378403,0.000280734,0.00196578,0.003100273,0.0006197291,0.0008876142,0.007616765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007544559,0.00022656436,0.000270874,0.000158289,0.0028704542,0.0017773955,0.0039202473,0.0015807066,0.0014363026],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050354534,0.0022535357,0.014381567,0.0013886343,0.00002119368,0.0024452964,0.6988726,0.00046829847,0.11398303,0.01433633,0.004530305,0.1468157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017809084,0.0023153215,0.062354364,0.0011404566,0.00013712744,0.0026723272,0.5708413,0.003547122,0.069500014,0.015878538,0.27122638,0.00020904033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010258909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017369168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007616765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076303264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011801218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025480568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306825029","doi":"10.1515/ip-2022-5003","title":"Interlocutors’ judgment of Lx conventional expressions: An exploratory study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intercultural Pragmatics","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Psychology; Perception; Exploratory research; Linguistics; Speech act; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06419603551208435,"score_gpt":0.29250291047880533,"score_spread":0.22830687496672097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306825029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743515,0.00004892904,0.0008853135,0.000023569195,0.0000058417236,0.00002009473,0.000016237042,0.000008929492,0.0015559283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998926,0.000037490667,0.00043918128,0.000027270931,0.000009561855,0.000025633624,0.000015711043,0.000012213669,0.0005068894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483395,0.0036415735,0.00022713887,0.00048160244,0.0006428581,0.0001729048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97570974,0.017116752,0.0029122988,0.0011844707,0.002564192,0.0005126731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052977903,0.0004845608,0.00040344195,0.00079172617,0.0007877376,0.0023161178,0.00048400566,0.00075040944,0.0025850662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0321535,0.0002379411,0.00019054353,0.00039064873,0.0016944574,0.0011823018,0.001791981,0.0008448871,0.00052470586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063376414,0.00013215575,0.04705496,0.00030366488,0.0000266368,0.0018607212,0.8310102,0.00013476486,0.10266213,0.00085462054,0.00023348522,0.015092813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061034112,0.001723528,0.23872542,0.00017803886,0.00006342894,0.0031023312,0.721428,0.0023981237,0.024240082,0.00075406855,0.0071611176,0.00016474354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015203614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013658194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052977903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045537102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023502084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02801776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}