{"meta":{"query_hash":"632025b77c38","filters":{"venue":"Interlending & Document Supply"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/632025b77c38","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Interlending+%26+Document+Supply"},"results":[{"id":"W1982258173","doi":"10.1108/02641610410551978","title":"Unmediated is the message: enhancements to traditional interlibrary loan in a Canadian university","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Diverse Global Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Library science; Service (business); World Wide Web; Computer science; Order (exchange); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.026547938211439196,"score_gpt":0.304973220960427,"score_spread":0.2784252827489878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982258173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.746349,0.00008574836,0.000055114528,0.11659136,0.0008078311,0.0011099443,0.0003459056,0.00008499175,0.1345701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530244,0.00012659805,0.00009208371,0.0013034227,0.00006337571,0.00001329592,0.000016408476,0.0000064187907,0.0030759806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998105,0.0001457892,0.00015034409,0.00027781018,0.000585786,0.0007352572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992701,0.00009842043,0.000034533135,0.00013317936,0.000046445835,0.00041731982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051737606,0.00012466052,0.00012649121,0.00032599215,0.0005073902,0.0001778244,0.00068039744,0.000047793328,0.0023303344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012725824,0.00011328439,0.000066218156,0.0006388288,0.00025661784,0.0008335493,0.00015999391,0.00019368029,0.0004157865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002949223,0.00034455463,0.0655735,0.000030020066,0.00042437963,0.0009965808,0.24616434,0.00010113736,0.00018405133,0.47192913,0.19297034,0.020987052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011205663,0.00018283333,0.040432468,0.0003059727,0.000017054095,0.0000013326708,0.038512405,0.000003082216,0.00035006017,0.009850396,0.90889096,0.00033286464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5836441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6715637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7159206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028849645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007662624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990771933","doi":"10.1108/02641610810878521","title":"The legal problems of document supply by libraries: an international perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Copyright law; Relation (database); Perspective (graphical); Business; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; International law; Law; Intellectual property; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016004387086249832,"score_gpt":0.2377554230299147,"score_spread":0.22175103594366488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990771933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54379845,0.0019939854,0.0007798619,0.019055074,0.004687637,0.0018893954,0.00005478935,0.0005753234,0.4271655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892056,0.00030014006,0.00012560439,0.0006488577,0.0007915596,0.000080474805,0.000093706534,0.00004807596,0.008706008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976847,0.000032626496,0.00062920334,0.0005201714,0.0006449672,0.0004883126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877554,0.00011235676,0.00032124048,0.00041491215,0.00033800592,0.000037947404],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035333875,0.00034013012,0.0002917551,0.0002568863,0.00056119106,0.0011109397,0.0011143372,0.0000743546,0.0073000416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012413533,0.00022784901,0.0001915652,0.00029859052,0.0003403929,0.0063788374,0.00043379833,0.00029263258,0.00031195438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007843214,0.00051738595,0.010046223,0.000090646594,0.000524881,0.000036125355,0.005272698,0.00002207861,0.0038342127,0.18634331,0.7839125,0.008615611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008858979,0.00021617669,0.0008088457,0.00015849715,0.000046017103,0.000024437499,0.0028551728,0.0016811562,0.0044374526,0.0125550805,0.9758825,0.0004487866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045332247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001663757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44540715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021114344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005424468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995150375","doi":"10.1108/02641610010344783","title":"Ownership versus access: the CISTI source/SUMO experience at McGill University","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Service (business); World Wide Web; Computer science; Information source (mathematics); Order (exchange); Table of contents; Library science; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.03136445057380808,"score_gpt":0.2602659978169402,"score_spread":0.22890154724313214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995150375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8727847,0.000076020115,0.010525858,0.0123420935,0.0030923411,0.0007014841,0.00004493082,0.0007822672,0.09965033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97178763,0.000034646622,0.00028107155,0.00083106465,0.00006147752,0.000007307769,0.0000049886903,0.0000057753527,0.026986022],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982945,0.00009964357,0.00028927997,0.00039195243,0.0005029307,0.0004217386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988845,0.00014739449,0.00013134928,0.0006634743,0.00002979571,0.0001434974],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028813083,0.00017497587,0.00013839504,0.00012655537,0.00070498657,0.0005893391,0.0034190393,0.00004648871,0.0021247498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011921755,0.0001232817,0.00010505505,0.0005699817,0.00011902496,0.009454389,0.000711235,0.00012947737,0.001356676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008468158,0.0001627418,0.018574597,0.00007480935,0.00020378914,0.00017005546,0.14162414,0.0021416587,0.000531276,0.06605485,0.26338145,0.5062338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004993112,0.000095753356,0.0008593672,0.00003749134,0.0000026026562,0.000025566624,0.0020067904,0.002790931,0.0017315252,0.00012485076,0.99159694,0.00022888204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022418851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001481654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7282155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003069199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003136679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006380133","doi":"10.1108/02641611211258244","title":"Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature: 79","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Newspaper; Reading (process); Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Resistance (ecology); Copyright law; Political science; Business; Advertising; Law and economics; Economics; Public relations; Computer science; Intellectual property; Law; History","score_opus":0.025972574637227627,"score_gpt":0.28777113847451974,"score_spread":0.2617985638372921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006380133","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004445874,0.9896255,0.00024879875,0.0013784175,0.0021639336,0.0015546157,0.000032735934,0.00013896437,0.004852592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012841725,0.9908954,0.0016998313,0.00064626767,0.00019702756,0.00027989288,0.00007089152,0.000059413574,0.006022878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951932,0.0004721716,0.0016957279,0.0009569811,0.0009074778,0.00077445776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691993,0.0003770826,0.0011365383,0.0011692188,0.00010753535,0.00028970168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008955353,0.00089107006,0.0017682662,0.0006224482,0.0002343868,0.0013124287,0.0025530432,0.00023955206,0.000583685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010691352,0.00056663394,0.00079106865,0.0018673403,0.00013825866,0.002728682,0.0026767831,0.00070075993,0.000075669384],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004596537,0.000038146776,0.000046461493,0.03269393,0.00023776287,0.000010135278,0.00068753585,2.8364452e-8,3.3952054e-7,0.006347155,0.017730672,0.9422032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015147871,0.00006832036,0.000011159437,0.16704999,0.00022562164,0.00019716968,0.000013369114,0.000001125198,0.000029626397,0.0007410954,0.8310229,0.0004881385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008673084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016023063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043569037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002886826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008424059","doi":"10.1108/02641610911006292","title":"Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature: 69","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Originality; Reading (process); Value (mathematics); Monopolistic competition; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marketing; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; History; Monopoly; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01829904448024293,"score_gpt":0.2869007279621632,"score_spread":0.26860168348192026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008424059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036884574,0.988145,0.00024955097,0.0023196896,0.0013086651,0.001603894,0.00002419389,0.00015503466,0.006190314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005231196,0.98943657,0.001996444,0.0011057847,0.00013667582,0.00017862582,0.00006742277,0.00004677296,0.006979409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503917,0.00044269863,0.0017861841,0.0011215052,0.00093576603,0.00067467696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970135,0.00033504877,0.0011222924,0.0011735894,0.00011544048,0.00024012077],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074815634,0.00091108406,0.0018961101,0.00068390707,0.0002360065,0.0016018606,0.0027182961,0.00023772992,0.0003722085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014333148,0.00058698497,0.0008414707,0.0021092421,0.00012008676,0.0021466555,0.0018387674,0.0007163808,0.00005119999],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050610315,0.00003406897,0.00001314465,0.019968504,0.00017183198,0.000021450853,0.00043514,6.238298e-8,2.867508e-7,0.005444081,0.034822628,0.93908376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016735577,0.00012011103,0.000009343383,0.21068452,0.00014181597,0.00017547069,0.000010088578,0.0000019235922,0.000026090636,0.0017077172,0.7864867,0.00046886012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006881639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001415335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9386149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004439879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035309573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017803223","doi":"10.1108/02641610110380890","title":"Resource‐sharing roles and responsibilities for CISTI: change is the constant","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Shared resource; Resource (disambiguation); Key (lock); Order (exchange); Business; Loan; Constant (computer programming); Computer science; World Wide Web; Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.033918227219150325,"score_gpt":0.26335152096535636,"score_spread":0.22943329374620602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017803223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83741486,0.0036514217,0.020548,0.06657261,0.0009865894,0.002532118,0.000049097696,0.00089573587,0.0673496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97608525,0.00008838458,0.0020847365,0.0021794569,0.00012629991,0.0001971269,0.000004152088,0.000014907452,0.019219695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986608,0.000035663714,0.00027416478,0.00043918568,0.00024555667,0.00034460583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902034,0.00043689716,0.00008412886,0.00033902502,0.0000324176,0.000087188986],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036741723,0.00017413197,0.0001523588,0.00020330753,0.00037897832,0.0012715345,0.0006446277,0.000039489936,0.0000858923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005755094,0.00012478579,0.00007540187,0.00026582752,0.0001063232,0.0014020256,0.0005168171,0.000085834814,0.000013189735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007167237,0.000095853735,0.066825494,0.000102601436,0.0002207355,0.00006397905,0.06031337,0.000004340889,0.0002175026,0.59145325,0.09015953,0.18982664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057571457,0.00020765398,0.0024119637,0.00014891256,0.000008878524,0.000076614495,0.0016709904,0.0015235053,0.0014271219,0.04782724,0.9438199,0.0003015164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021143152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000981962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85366035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059432477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029729334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022393613","doi":"10.1108/02641610610669787","title":"Informing interlibrary networking and document supply in the English National Health Service: a comparison of models from five countries and a Caribbean network","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Electronic Health Records Systems","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Interlibrary loan; Service (business); Business; Automation; Computer science; Latin Americans; Information system; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Marketing; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.02941728008784561,"score_gpt":0.37100448581239326,"score_spread":0.34158720572454765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022393613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96610147,0.012147983,0.00054879,0.012711595,0.0018595902,0.0035186745,0.00018121576,0.00014056583,0.0027901188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369514,0.00042194873,0.0007668867,0.0030982406,0.0012403947,0.00036075327,0.00027074787,0.000041315885,0.00010456757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945507,0.0010371769,0.0020587188,0.00048611016,0.00069315796,0.0011741448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996339,0.0020939477,0.0009483568,0.0002844682,0.00018726263,0.00014691713],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002666171,0.00036028295,0.0008194627,0.00023981956,0.0006376219,0.00012840754,0.00037984736,0.00020954364,0.000083036386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030286907,0.00029927847,0.000060133472,0.00037639323,0.00009044531,0.0009814672,0.00031182682,0.0010721465,0.0000059597965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003839741,0.00008512797,0.67802167,0.0015240862,0.00013586158,0.0000076022984,0.21474253,0.0023077407,0.000005569823,0.037184037,0.05991307,0.0056887134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0125561375,0.0022279366,0.11816925,0.02873475,0.00014813279,0.000047178335,0.21395278,0.06267026,0.000045492387,0.17295967,0.38633153,0.0021568933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04199955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025344128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5598524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008848575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007137372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024887450","doi":"10.1108/02641610610700790","title":"Using document delivery data for selecting medical titles in a large STM library: the experience of CISTI","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Medical Research and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Subject (documents); Computer science; Data collection; World Wide Web; Value (mathematics); Library science; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.12973586103965068,"score_gpt":0.5023602319075845,"score_spread":0.3726243708679338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024887450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96800107,0.0020502743,0.0082940925,0.010171186,0.0009781297,0.002118893,0.00029292618,0.00008954525,0.00800389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938664,0.00026510065,0.0030114972,0.00057933753,0.00040881603,0.00014661351,0.00015033348,0.000024439592,0.0015475077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681944,0.0005793747,0.0007383788,0.0003530893,0.00078329,0.00072643056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953143,0.0037421775,0.0002678601,0.00047090446,0.000048483096,0.00015625915],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028447008,0.00013782091,0.00025183256,0.00013726839,0.0003793921,0.00005441998,0.0009570187,0.0001208951,0.008092652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019173683,0.00009314223,0.00004713802,0.00024201593,0.00009988403,0.0009223756,0.0008439852,0.0006583735,0.000035052704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023657822,0.0009640084,0.51456046,0.002462382,0.00029568185,0.00020291853,0.027257321,0.000025580364,0.00412459,0.055613253,0.3447441,0.04738391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029717414,0.0002660251,0.0033532763,0.0033190812,0.00004798999,0.000011860806,0.01871821,0.010049741,0.0013587596,0.006200475,0.9533409,0.0003619457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004255095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014276921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6085968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011731654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052835274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99281406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031528136","doi":"10.1108/02641611211258226","title":"Legal aspects of e‐books and interlibrary loan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Originality; Legislature; Value (mathematics); Loan; Reproduction; Computer science; Library science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0152729630137622,"score_gpt":0.22607522057499996,"score_spread":0.21080225756123777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031528136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5323632,0.00074332335,0.00013029203,0.0006234521,0.0009686987,0.00024241024,0.0000022536929,0.0001339424,0.46479243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958963,0.000017356682,0.000115496885,0.0007318,0.0009055295,0.000012126406,0.000013936531,0.00003301486,0.0022744853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876803,0.000010871198,0.00037154995,0.00023365687,0.00020714292,0.0004087204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995228,0.000043558113,0.00015318196,0.000199497,0.00004792102,0.000033039378],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023213557,0.00022279947,0.00025457074,0.00031054224,0.0000922899,0.00036319278,0.0002462802,0.000053225245,0.0070574735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043542277,0.00017298912,0.000098594865,0.00014927072,0.000099886056,0.004345984,0.0003800504,0.0001678902,0.00034237045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005159938,0.00043418762,0.06709651,0.0007821352,0.00032386748,0.000028611217,0.0023242144,6.5044645e-7,0.014765429,0.5036257,0.31041038,0.099692315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007443128,0.00011548027,0.0062756264,0.00038836733,0.000094454255,0.000027137226,0.0005769589,0.00067620835,0.018284746,0.007973923,0.96430826,0.00053452974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006687935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027827446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6538979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003332613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101532805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99385023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031871483","doi":"10.1108/02641610210452510","title":"Interlending and document supply: a review of recent literature – XLIII","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Surprise; Quarter (Canadian coin); Resource (disambiguation); Interlibrary loan; Shared resource; World Wide Web; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Business; History; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.02884968727832211,"score_gpt":0.296857472819339,"score_spread":0.2680077855410169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031871483","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000028926665,0.98490846,0.00043351107,0.00092045555,0.0011903361,0.0014770197,0.000048406564,0.00023890671,0.010780005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000032280444,0.9857427,0.004046109,0.0004642022,0.00015944034,0.0002951087,0.00017286542,0.00007553934,0.009011751],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943648,0.00036189015,0.002119342,0.0014033649,0.0009459893,0.0008046038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968625,0.00041148716,0.0011748369,0.0010415186,0.00014310078,0.00036657936],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006642848,0.0010995063,0.002525536,0.0012769314,0.00018842227,0.0017216216,0.0020908795,0.00031629257,0.001806461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012910378,0.0008743956,0.00077591935,0.0020361526,0.00011937399,0.002991886,0.0017622071,0.0007349589,0.0001368154],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055404885,0.000047277637,0.00001159432,0.044707455,0.00027894645,0.00007000095,0.0006333668,5.0481937e-8,2.3237047e-7,0.003931806,0.036962178,0.91335154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022897487,0.00017806808,0.0000019068838,0.20796053,0.00015867478,0.00026991023,0.000015214501,0.0000048468196,0.000014388128,0.0007055221,0.7898101,0.0006518454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007613999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010454007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9126997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046947645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020983125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041695962","doi":"10.1108/02641610310488600","title":"Resource‐sharing roles and responsibilities for CISTI: for better or for ILL?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Chemical Institute of Canada; Cisco Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Shared resource; Computer science; Business; Computer security; Computer network","score_opus":0.02608454675375148,"score_gpt":0.2788941341008669,"score_spread":0.2528095873471154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041695962","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098135196,0.00017028602,0.8887064,0.006757325,0.0010791875,0.0028286849,0.00010612491,0.0002404501,0.001976337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81590843,0.000009135372,0.15674427,0.0042862245,0.00025945416,0.0014104329,0.000036861693,0.000033188808,0.021312023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984344,0.000032615833,0.00048263613,0.00043484732,0.00019267401,0.0004228182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862474,0.00066457276,0.000149553,0.00037311565,0.00009171546,0.00009630257],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010873269,0.00016952575,0.00021482658,0.0002181876,0.00031278972,0.0010414743,0.00064136286,0.00005496833,0.000029198469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025070415,0.00012641253,0.000112735535,0.00013168911,0.000052627456,0.0035253696,0.00013342926,0.000048015507,0.0000067661163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081792293,0.00006380263,0.0061848178,0.000815766,0.00012952709,0.0000033708445,0.042111095,0.00006279697,0.0012282714,0.70595425,0.16010258,0.08252577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011028707,0.00059645495,0.00008721779,0.0001347845,0.0000052481478,0.000024843352,0.002765056,0.007918221,0.008908872,0.021892045,0.9562843,0.0002800749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040207556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003228008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79618174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055297278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005496438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043735287","doi":"10.1108/02641610911006274","title":"Document supply of grey literature and open access: an update","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Optics and Image Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Grey literature; Library science; Value (mathematics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Operations research; Engineering; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.015153013307300088,"score_gpt":0.31090566610110243,"score_spread":0.29575265279380236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043735287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96846586,0.001005066,0.0003145703,0.011793761,0.00044873465,0.00088392163,0.00003333973,0.00013155834,0.016923156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936314,0.00033461576,0.001166227,0.003290082,0.00039958608,0.000020211262,0.00025811844,0.00002985046,0.0008698954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801946,0.00002342512,0.00058702694,0.0005867974,0.00035271567,0.000430594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987268,0.000020827621,0.00038641773,0.0005157501,0.00029874328,0.000051459516],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049389654,0.00034283803,0.0004895517,0.00059074344,0.0001804375,0.010307012,0.0014725132,0.00007932007,0.0015321553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046174733,0.00029736586,0.00013590124,0.00063629675,0.000055392447,0.016861292,0.0010847716,0.00019930411,0.000072210016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010165027,0.0014670851,0.15645947,0.0008960317,0.0011342814,0.00041300635,0.0023527953,0.00012940212,0.010220334,0.2884906,0.103961766,0.43345875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063132136,0.0008494951,0.109251544,0.0027725704,0.0014889084,0.000048074708,0.0014842662,0.0035056907,0.007549608,0.2535774,0.6102066,0.0029526108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008953464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114595176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50624484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004880538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018180246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047839998","doi":"10.1108/02641610910938578","title":"Key factors for consortial success: realizing a shared vision for interlibrary loan in a consortium of Canadian libraries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Business; Originality; Computer science; Key (lock); Service (business); World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Marketing; Political science; Engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.019328189850065475,"score_gpt":0.25832499036903184,"score_spread":0.23899680051896635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047839998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9227106,0.0004121442,0.033338238,0.013152033,0.0012738935,0.0033906011,0.00033257517,0.00052516174,0.024864784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856971,0.000010368512,0.012317704,0.00044498418,0.000039903367,0.00007705946,0.00010768172,0.000016864593,0.0012883474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805784,0.000039014434,0.00067851075,0.0004804263,0.00020741488,0.00053679856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988673,0.0003966786,0.00020667049,0.00025164773,0.000049835307,0.0002278926],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016804281,0.0002507013,0.00035625751,0.0016970033,0.0001446451,0.0011925868,0.0008507482,0.00009326844,0.000072690345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001123083,0.00023447294,0.0001666561,0.0008133295,0.000064729255,0.006358446,0.0001328568,0.00009404753,0.000002384232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014822433,0.00043750362,0.17016162,0.00038892106,0.00025601772,0.000062896,0.036954068,0.00007646727,0.0025269943,0.5440226,0.19053674,0.05309389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00760147,0.004699032,0.10898943,0.002165,0.000044075383,0.00003011671,0.0028897678,0.008415748,0.08321049,0.08914146,0.6905515,0.002261876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027529474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025335227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5000148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011977252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035354187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054074154","doi":"10.1108/02641610310460673","title":"Inter‐library loans and document delivery via EUCAT: a new PICA/OCLC initiative","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Union catalog; Quarter (Canadian coin); World Wide Web; Cataloging; Business; European union; Loan; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Finance; International trade; History","score_opus":0.012667705272666684,"score_gpt":0.22535718303948563,"score_spread":0.21268947776681893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054074154","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525297,0.0013281298,0.7028507,0.013391292,0.0045261784,0.0017087088,0.000023495126,0.0011903069,0.12245148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798275,0.000108159686,0.013047667,0.0029076606,0.00009570043,0.000036348916,0.000012406492,0.000017004215,0.003947556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976447,0.00016922677,0.0006773653,0.0005513033,0.00042130344,0.0005360984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869365,0.00012852045,0.0002477565,0.0005337728,0.000033887463,0.0003624295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032741856,0.00031330984,0.00029539835,0.00039413376,0.00019530643,0.0017294913,0.0011259126,0.000077102886,0.000833061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019851474,0.00026761624,0.00011179517,0.00053533085,0.00009186992,0.019385519,0.00053128775,0.00021591685,0.0005324085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083178624,0.00018440688,0.035350163,0.00016171363,0.0003353598,0.00016028219,0.10566288,0.00006323915,0.0013819643,0.32823998,0.34301418,0.18536265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030609188,0.0015274787,0.003728132,0.0008615964,0.00002120731,0.00062082417,0.008163374,0.003625185,0.059877116,0.09054084,0.82605106,0.0019223004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087413704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021356773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8272978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008927198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000192279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059405473","doi":"10.1108/ilds-06-2014-0029","title":"CARL Libraries – a Canadian resource-sharing experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Shared resource; Database transaction; Consistency (knowledge bases); Transactional leadership; Resource (disambiguation); Originality; Data sharing; Transaction data; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Computer science; Library science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Public relations; Database; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.02869280438910099,"score_gpt":0.24226651751185344,"score_spread":0.21357371312275245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059405473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42863673,0.0008907041,0.009555139,0.008653699,0.002136269,0.0005812187,0.00000962503,0.0013409832,0.5481956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721136,0.0000042520146,0.0053554247,0.00093939394,0.00010041065,0.000054486944,0.000010084439,0.0000177329,0.021404589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810433,0.00003368862,0.000311932,0.00053441,0.0004296866,0.000585945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986697,0.00005493723,0.00007391414,0.00045336588,0.00004042127,0.000707661],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017375288,0.00021892518,0.0001749586,0.00051842147,0.00024278084,0.0026572617,0.0015096446,0.00006116348,0.0001870735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065403954,0.00020769701,0.00006956396,0.0006703004,0.00007008389,0.00489636,0.00067592494,0.00013741203,0.0002163115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009090126,0.00008460984,0.17706887,0.000033619748,0.00014071762,0.00052338006,0.124225564,0.0001561697,0.0000823836,0.2820913,0.36129844,0.054204065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036020533,0.0001031866,0.0012130907,0.00007175641,0.0000026090688,0.000047023896,0.001649446,0.00088054023,0.002373889,0.011081253,0.9818201,0.00039687328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073554567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012700778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6205217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033700562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043445974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062009911","doi":"10.1108/02641610210418095","title":"Brief communication: “Providing Access through Co‐operation” – summary of a conference","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Shared Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.06286028007863553,"score_gpt":0.3020598372066275,"score_spread":0.23919955712799196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062009911","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05398393,0.0014894494,0.48110244,0.023448838,0.0018254842,0.0015420257,0.000046144272,0.00078622834,0.43577546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911112,0.00021842873,0.005682139,0.0010188909,0.000035771027,0.000035416993,0.000018310027,0.0000061289015,0.0018736725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821186,0.00011514126,0.00066231244,0.00027704457,0.00046803182,0.00026558212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858737,0.00011187283,0.0003150788,0.0008197594,0.00009297262,0.00007292421],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036183972,0.00015685539,0.00022179773,0.00014971769,0.00024190493,0.0014771644,0.0027626392,0.00005036696,0.0011515298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001592187,0.0001405123,0.00007721009,0.00034208127,0.00011463534,0.020828707,0.0005659745,0.00013230041,0.00023684265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145554295,0.00018219206,0.020470055,0.00017520812,0.00009227332,0.000010092037,0.08258746,0.00026854107,0.0014560133,0.60953176,0.25261393,0.03259792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002212348,0.0006280817,0.002424287,0.0013661466,0.0000136706285,0.00015720741,0.0048348187,0.12650253,0.11182457,0.011732799,0.73691183,0.0013916745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014085196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038803673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005907395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004469535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064744341","doi":"10.1108/ilds-02-2014-0019","title":"In a world of Amazon, is it time to rethink ILL?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Purchasing; Renting; Originality; Value (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Operations research; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.01042703259812828,"score_gpt":0.24401836946756442,"score_spread":0.23359133686943614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064744341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6241047,0.00006395974,0.0012490207,0.041581098,0.0012369698,0.0011189368,0.000021603393,0.00030357984,0.33032015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524701,0.000002066929,0.00055402605,0.010411643,0.00036120063,0.000045757093,0.000014513802,0.000054289016,0.03608639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978081,0.000013650669,0.00069932133,0.0005325612,0.00039994635,0.0005464107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.000096193835,0.00031653236,0.00041596324,0.00013300133,0.00002824999],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006354034,0.0003118869,0.00043959063,0.0011617959,0.000059928134,0.00039288372,0.0006111107,0.000075006654,0.0054949145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027614916,0.00030892543,0.0001443893,0.0010726071,0.00006731333,0.002029374,0.0004859907,0.00023890013,0.007275791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023781166,0.0002161256,0.033480752,0.00047465548,0.00006640783,0.00003995155,0.0011424733,0.00004268368,0.005667443,0.063157976,0.8714205,0.024053216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006052916,0.00006811178,0.0034862647,0.001058416,0.000022351935,0.0000028859363,0.00008877282,0.0006884447,0.0043423693,0.011071501,0.97808176,0.0004837976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007600945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025827976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32836542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016103438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012171828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071180250","doi":"10.1108/02641611011025316","title":"Interlibrary loan services at Library and Archives Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Originality; Shared resource; Digital library; Institution; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Library science; World Wide Web; Loan; Computer science; Political science; Finance; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.0025022572947325144,"score_gpt":0.16809351175098558,"score_spread":0.16559125445625306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071180250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91224253,0.00017169557,0.0002608943,0.0062683644,0.0011216725,0.00016921715,0.000008059333,0.00036536885,0.07939221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95521426,0.00003891339,0.006290095,0.0015806232,0.00009235652,0.000018076698,0.000023352146,0.000019143901,0.036723174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987059,0.000029732231,0.00027052237,0.00045249576,0.0002034921,0.00033781622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919564,0.00016340085,0.000087362154,0.00031101573,0.0000018606257,0.00024071686],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000020155494,0.00021747629,0.0001612842,0.00021691756,0.00023708654,0.0012685796,0.00092428323,0.00004143243,0.00051674776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019648555,0.00018995754,0.000046050427,0.0002290657,0.00006504226,0.0066367993,0.0014436662,0.00019830884,0.000012889836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002117856,0.00010295419,0.59862745,0.00024028424,0.00021180186,0.00031594987,0.008174166,0.0000040044333,0.01050281,0.18585174,0.04014537,0.15561166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005713782,0.00012322424,0.054160055,0.0001447751,0.0000061884193,0.00016240422,0.0002722819,0.0014572333,0.054534554,0.012170704,0.8757488,0.00064840884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006815923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017598247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8356034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000087488115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001183071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080866309","doi":"10.1108/02641610810878585","title":"eBook Loans: an e‐twist on a classic interlending service","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Service (business); Interlibrary loan; Loan; Originality; World Wide Web; Business; Digital library; Computer science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Marketing; Sociology; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.02710307269849413,"score_gpt":0.24380038261849898,"score_spread":0.21669730992000485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080866309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79091287,0.00016019844,0.027551873,0.0056291264,0.002536269,0.00077976246,0.000011672854,0.0019606478,0.17045756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97445136,0.00002683249,0.0051629893,0.0029044084,0.00017930749,0.00006984216,0.000019745345,0.000035494475,0.017150022],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736017,0.000096322445,0.00050970126,0.0008031943,0.00062149874,0.00060910324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986798,0.00015133603,0.00016539506,0.0006401675,0.00006238816,0.00030089807],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001810008,0.0003830757,0.00029339173,0.00059873745,0.00044962871,0.0009843257,0.0015255951,0.000088359375,0.00042018187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022432121,0.0003501549,0.00013646003,0.00072421134,0.000076281045,0.00439933,0.00047910458,0.00027743066,0.0007753437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069473,0.0021940279,0.05298424,0.0003406414,0.0008464655,0.002332347,0.09227718,0.00042393865,0.004373976,0.2800139,0.23642212,0.3267217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026480448,0.0021112326,0.009049207,0.0008530325,0.000022022165,0.0007051105,0.0010619108,0.005247353,0.023680985,0.010290991,0.9422719,0.0020581994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005258388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020826159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70584977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028026948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012738146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083278517","doi":"10.1108/02641610610686012","title":"Document supply and open access: an international survey on grey literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Originality; Library science; Value (mathematics); Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Regional science; Sociology; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.37047102739059584,"score_gpt":0.5833922385005443,"score_spread":0.2129212111099485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083278517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769985,0.0004905112,0.00043538795,0.0037858414,0.0021934982,0.00081173563,0.00057138747,0.000057572488,0.014655578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865047,0.00037683122,0.00090676005,0.0004932684,0.00026714563,0.000054772012,0.00039119564,0.000029363884,0.010976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98949385,0.00062664115,0.0010971818,0.0016055198,0.0063524777,0.00082433963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380463,0.0024608143,0.00039174993,0.0010627101,0.0017788239,0.0005012789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015744556,0.00037661425,0.0004867938,0.02550777,0.00036579472,0.06581327,0.009585465,0.00015859133,0.0041868896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004293018,0.0002726008,0.0001357536,0.030665483,0.00015481647,0.010639034,0.004697025,0.00048398194,0.00034387587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002522984,0.00030089705,0.78994966,0.0000047660938,0.00004452168,0.00007942731,0.00023583173,0.00003651357,0.0002565848,0.007861919,0.117338024,0.083639584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010795642,0.00050501403,0.841276,0.00009942355,0.0000061025853,0.000022016733,0.00011100639,0.00019451062,0.0014576934,0.02522945,0.1296383,0.0003809131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005830094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094807916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08325867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038786355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112306814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092286976","doi":"10.1108/02641611211214297","title":"How copyright affects interlibrary loan and electronic resources in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; License; Copyright law; Business; Loan; Fair use; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Intellectual property; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.007085593710535995,"score_gpt":0.18127187543722448,"score_spread":0.17418628172668849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092286976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96703553,0.001954349,0.00002960147,0.0037123873,0.0007442013,0.0003381671,0.0000020435375,0.00008849686,0.026095219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955602,0.000053831965,0.00002029578,0.0013712085,0.00071003765,0.000032394837,0.000020093383,0.000041749074,0.0021901496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.000027845737,0.00024621337,0.00034350142,0.00027371378,0.0009067223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995092,0.000087058244,0.00012414297,0.00020714763,0.000024391658,0.00004803703],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025316863,0.00030731337,0.00029405736,0.0003492177,0.00012377268,0.00085384183,0.00032510032,0.00005423693,0.0027817832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004639367,0.00023901937,0.000058486938,0.00030201627,0.000053630232,0.004465586,0.00031421232,0.000332829,0.00007775111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042961724,0.00016019837,0.41110277,0.00045868085,0.00016611839,0.00006600989,0.0017711056,0.0000015349793,0.001726566,0.012956474,0.5169661,0.054194815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007182605,0.000058095327,0.0140636815,0.0002873102,0.00003716663,0.000016542203,0.0011259607,0.0013866401,0.0022208472,0.0012988352,0.9782085,0.0005781787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36739224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45927873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46124238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004813648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075259064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981298},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2163542241","doi":"10.1108/ilds-02-2015-0004","title":"Document supply of grey literature and open access: ten years later","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Intermediation; Business; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.3749393279018769,"score_gpt":0.5661691548216926,"score_spread":0.19122982691981572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163542241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98440576,0.0022875108,0.00016948435,0.0035397247,0.0010708718,0.00078291586,0.00012511073,0.00003135891,0.0075872624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891095,0.00040599066,0.0016345042,0.00025812845,0.00008752823,0.00003938603,0.00002503681,0.000022738528,0.008417166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916027,0.00029543365,0.0010385095,0.0010063715,0.0053414665,0.0007155165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521995,0.0010391447,0.00040161176,0.0009197085,0.0017018109,0.0007177954],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012266174,0.00027204354,0.0005821538,0.02104426,0.00011110278,0.021432744,0.0064771725,0.00014669367,0.0018324768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042620436,0.00019058732,0.00014551527,0.03412834,0.00019769791,0.006323716,0.0071085338,0.0003520759,0.00026102868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021947072,0.00015749993,0.65542656,0.000023785718,0.000095379524,0.00012615204,0.0036879305,0.00001408064,0.0004666107,0.002440976,0.20461218,0.13272938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004185754,0.0014597552,0.4029323,0.0004614268,0.000045149965,0.00010907771,0.0020641661,0.00027217876,0.008236688,0.13417561,0.44516674,0.00089117023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063604116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004161968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25249428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022321289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001807287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491277956","doi":"10.1108/ilds-02-2016-0010","title":"University of Alberta Libraries Interlibrary Loan Department – Creating new relationships, locally and globally","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interlibrary loan; Business; Service (business); Originality; Loan; Value (mathematics); Library science; Service delivery framework; Public relations; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Sociology; Finance; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.010463612778437381,"score_gpt":0.19166381577777689,"score_spread":0.1812002029993395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491277956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49943864,0.0010349548,0.33173102,0.021651106,0.0006756145,0.00074233004,0.00001836714,0.00065114495,0.14405681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94356006,0.000060030037,0.022286506,0.00011200347,0.000027493805,0.0000012688929,0.000005875756,0.000009420573,0.03393734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988232,0.000069282694,0.00027378518,0.00036030012,0.00023591323,0.0002375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989795,0.0004263575,0.00014553576,0.00023865039,0.000021203266,0.00018872644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010158888,0.00016708873,0.00017566679,0.0001799755,0.00017707038,0.00044993625,0.0006361045,0.000054196476,0.0002888343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055059496,0.00013304372,0.00006538528,0.00028002894,0.00010073634,0.0050203092,0.00072158803,0.000070355905,0.000042251868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025213722,0.00009523254,0.30171224,0.000046702484,0.00024583537,0.000046409354,0.008548456,0.000007744018,0.00026902332,0.43184987,0.08560749,0.17131884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037959777,0.0009682361,0.11610782,0.0016515014,0.000048702273,0.00009514777,0.0011721633,0.0005819163,0.0100994455,0.09369612,0.77058816,0.0011947838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016755587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054775406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6849807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006661579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016810022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54253656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916451545","doi":"10.1108/ilds-07-2014-0032","title":"Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature: No 87","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Value (mathematics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Library science; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.014541347586053693,"score_gpt":0.2792991115335034,"score_spread":0.2647577639474497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916451545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000030711078,0.9857835,0.000432164,0.0013621674,0.0023219062,0.001563605,0.000027378052,0.0001510161,0.008355147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000044075245,0.9873201,0.0020001223,0.0012021124,0.0002120297,0.00027050247,0.00007387236,0.000061371415,0.0088158185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948155,0.000548838,0.0018605993,0.0011593055,0.0009376316,0.0006781118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965648,0.0004859885,0.0012469805,0.0012834198,0.00016769595,0.0002511205],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095903553,0.00092412287,0.0020682088,0.0006137651,0.00023976961,0.0015985892,0.0028426812,0.00024383346,0.00052225206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002494858,0.0005906766,0.00086350954,0.0016376517,0.00014606967,0.0018382048,0.002550147,0.0007055254,0.0001469309],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066448565,0.000030315474,0.000022712811,0.045266163,0.0002386996,0.000012520301,0.0003817139,6.276306e-8,4.1416985e-7,0.006069556,0.06854863,0.87942255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017751123,0.00011660063,0.0000045131483,0.20966542,0.00013459277,0.00012942115,0.000006012896,0.0000045563934,0.000019610876,0.0008052909,0.78845537,0.0004811103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008802708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015083964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8789415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039008504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003070176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237325814","doi":"10.1108/ilds.2002.12230bab.004","title":"Expansion of the Canadian National Site Licensing Project","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Business; Telecommunications; Computer science","score_opus":0.03912267943057035,"score_gpt":0.2693615617377775,"score_spread":0.23023888230720713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237325814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542235,0.0003298728,0.00009887352,0.0040067118,0.00040592928,0.00058634905,0.00009927683,0.00003375007,0.040215753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847066,0.000033095657,0.000512245,0.00018949257,0.00005980318,0.0000020375467,0.000016943359,0.0000017948022,0.0007138975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988796,0.00010642439,0.00014554322,0.00014682866,0.00044421805,0.0002773942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961257,0.00009907842,0.000049312544,0.00008865302,0.00005399488,0.00009639901],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031328027,0.00007303516,0.0000723028,0.00014122028,0.00029796158,0.000044296692,0.00017386148,0.000044397388,0.0065958877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014055692,0.000045775054,0.00005736449,0.00021207127,0.000110874425,0.00018778346,0.00002249477,0.00018191035,0.00019868663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009214677,0.000013265796,0.5233811,0.000045880093,0.000049576665,0.000023685165,0.004578688,0.0007113019,0.0009337454,0.00092959515,0.014160003,0.455081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007080316,0.00095771305,0.7726769,0.00035845753,0.000017170705,0.00010437127,0.0004605495,0.024040874,0.0075107366,0.015717521,0.17695592,0.0004917538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2758686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41061753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45458925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042990538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007992487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248781124","doi":"10.1108/ilds.2000.12228aab.018","title":"Canadian court rejects fair dealing defence by library","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer security; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.010103168903791749,"score_gpt":0.3070073940042801,"score_spread":0.29690422510048836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248781124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15039758,0.00023531922,0.000042176387,0.24430996,0.0010669107,0.00033979703,0.000058630118,0.0002553374,0.6032943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375126,0.00020391625,0.0006636158,0.0044948324,0.00023226837,0.00003090402,0.000070869,0.000017363302,0.05677363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860746,0.00014742605,0.00025060948,0.00024267728,0.000282196,0.0004696527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921805,0.00017537225,0.00007213807,0.00016648759,0.00004109205,0.00032683715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003871535,0.00011573336,0.00009914301,0.00017095583,0.00076642656,0.0008105088,0.0003664773,0.00008251201,0.042785946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010258339,0.00012694248,0.000046514928,0.00050501665,0.000084607855,0.002516517,0.000015628775,0.0003111021,0.0010563752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013698412,0.000046295536,0.012672827,0.000006214125,0.000029268936,0.000012679449,0.023999292,0.000007600428,0.00006546618,0.056409236,0.87151,0.03522739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008520727,0.000018997367,0.00033803584,0.000042371095,0.00000856433,0.0000029211335,0.0041110287,0.0000060772754,0.00022748722,0.0018634942,0.99313754,0.00015827827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4390019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10747139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78711504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004142322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011380265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}