{"meta":{"query_hash":"20962a271ba8","filters":{"venue":"International Commentary on Evidence"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20962a271ba8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Commentary+on+Evidence"},"results":[{"id":"W1899744659","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1126","title":"From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Cross-examination; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Divergence (linguistics); Expert witness; Professional conduct; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11921830649706305,"score_gpt":0.45123315576950046,"score_spread":0.3320148492724374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899744659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60383844,0.000033482145,0.00015943874,0.3903251,0.0005199766,0.00026441642,0.000039356186,0.000006725183,0.00481306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601749,0.00004672797,0.00012568026,0.039007466,0.0003385608,0.000039207724,0.000100913574,0.0000019158915,0.00016459158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.0006172457,0.00021494829,0.000092483,0.00045487765,0.00012009943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421185,0.0052887104,0.00014508954,0.00014067035,0.000178567,0.000035131838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010408717,0.00006595036,0.00007355424,0.000089402936,0.00021510225,0.00009508142,0.00046641543,0.000021057866,0.00038660486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007766334,0.000044637483,0.000024412482,0.00040730918,0.00015929287,0.0010590832,0.0000340575,0.00018507855,0.00002859624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005308583,0.00059836585,0.106107906,0.0000022695338,0.0000749524,5.9544175e-7,0.44339243,0.001226125,0.00008484928,0.074878976,0.37239838,0.00070429227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032696663,0.00008177505,0.10534582,0.00014459314,0.00002209458,6.636224e-7,0.11644782,0.00054366677,0.00034267132,0.0044292384,0.77217114,0.00014356381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041967735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005796372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39977273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017553396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007085444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035722625","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1027","title":"Finding Facts Fairly in Roberts and Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Doctrine; Credibility; Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.13551182210945284,"score_gpt":0.4373198992100908,"score_spread":0.30180807710063795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035722625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82286394,0.0013254795,0.00026010783,0.17066939,0.0006364095,0.00024023274,0.000005830472,0.00006411976,0.003934489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98353416,0.0011298842,0.001111607,0.013378587,0.0003687784,0.0000156456,0.0000022008521,0.000008463756,0.00045069418],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800205,0.0001759115,0.0003021874,0.00035986834,0.0008956994,0.0002642701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973885,0.0021340977,0.00011438231,0.00014835023,0.000108811066,0.00010586718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009899676,0.00013442108,0.00012820559,0.00023573391,0.00023496803,0.0002090497,0.0006715016,0.00005516427,0.00048825474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016383412,0.00013880282,0.00003504285,0.00019372691,0.00016059488,0.0019615886,0.00016314584,0.00022463656,0.00010845898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067425566,0.0004685969,0.28052902,0.00007525374,0.000058954483,0.0002086845,0.033212658,0.0016715688,0.00057255314,0.019085133,0.10285548,0.5605878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011479744,0.0004594676,0.34612817,0.01032805,0.000054027903,0.000041654195,0.006344674,0.0021255023,0.00214812,0.007926,0.6220753,0.0012210233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012901961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039298683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5593668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042261984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007388769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56602144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}