{"meta":{"query_hash":"20962a271ba8","filters":{"venue":"International Commentary on Evidence"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20962a271ba8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Commentary+on+Evidence"},"results":[{"id":"W1899744659","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1126","title":"From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Cross-examination; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Divergence (linguistics); Expert witness; Professional conduct; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11921830649706305,"score_gpt":0.45123315576950046,"score_spread":0.3320148492724374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899744659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27908278,0.06319339,0.0029135372,0.2493818,0.0016952367,0.000036167305,0.00018918046,0.000032751715,0.40347517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704772,0.010274533,0.0004288386,0.01633372,0.00034340133,0.000030906926,0.00004880563,0.000020640591,0.0020419145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98553145,0.009287538,0.00060355506,0.0009738038,0.0021298735,0.0014738549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97242886,0.020627512,0.0016221424,0.0014652859,0.0025353604,0.0013208649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02295798,0.00017343496,0.0006126769,0.0030322298,0.01017058,0.01278711,0.0013025965,0.0047500054,0.005287633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035513476,0.00032493795,0.0004303265,0.003846598,0.020083144,0.008204672,0.0064758235,0.0069877533,0.00032784985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022833975,0.00008569602,0.0040275846,0.00023073892,0.000043971864,0.00020678628,0.05787248,0.00018348874,0.00034993398,0.83653754,0.009831269,0.090402134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010670114,0.00032517765,0.052007318,0.0052302442,0.00017878691,0.0003820998,0.16414686,0.0003607557,0.0022659323,0.32453173,0.4502913,0.00017301556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03568135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03568135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006655879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007117128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12141484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035722625","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1027","title":"Finding Facts Fairly in Roberts and Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Doctrine; Credibility; Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.13551182210945284,"score_gpt":0.4373198992100908,"score_spread":0.30180807710063795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035722625","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003570967,0.7328554,0.022609442,0.11038429,0.00979818,0.00017436303,0.00008325685,0.0000714704,0.12045261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09550643,0.76019174,0.023633244,0.05595073,0.016811006,0.00048671284,0.00017461335,0.0001761306,0.04706937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98649246,0.0062144236,0.0013682303,0.0009558689,0.004386652,0.0005823305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97300357,0.023294384,0.0011698599,0.0004712805,0.0017769596,0.00028396506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015039104,0.00064434053,0.0014625075,0.007299816,0.004743333,0.013333659,0.002441291,0.006810108,0.0032659355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04773856,0.0010657539,0.0006547319,0.0067508477,0.023639899,0.022969408,0.0040217964,0.0083159,0.0012042044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017135044,0.000015349679,0.000247159,0.0008737131,0.000018021896,0.00035212078,0.0041782013,0.00020470827,0.000058221234,0.8810467,0.038365528,0.07462305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006706552,0.000020029038,0.00053769746,0.0044683265,0.000019188235,0.00043003057,0.0021282649,0.00012113074,0.00013372603,0.31084898,0.6812547,0.00003119278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074357977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011454566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015039104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047046063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008265033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079535306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}