{"meta":{"query_hash":"25deeb83ff90","filters":{"venue":"International Community Law Review"},"cohort_total":29,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":29,"exported":29,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/25deeb83ff90","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Community+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1503386236","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341290","title":"The United Nations Guidelines on the Use of Armed Private Security","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Business; Private security; Public international law; International law; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.29223267013574367,"score_gpt":0.423569352952903,"score_spread":0.13133668281715932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503386236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019578612,0.09002028,0.011436011,0.058537975,0.012446953,0.003725757,0.015583347,0.0005251612,0.8057666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04649705,0.20158818,0.10259788,0.11019637,0.00514711,0.022782378,0.030334175,0.00095376954,0.47990307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635941,0.01106493,0.0052556335,0.0013604561,0.016492374,0.0022325164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977241,0.0074744094,0.0029102827,0.0014492886,0.010253049,0.0006719364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01848449,0.0023341707,0.001363178,0.007715317,0.0024750095,0.005618872,0.0052925255,0.009983104,0.014673338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03318598,0.0014470994,0.0020232238,0.0072995466,0.00449422,0.0038739739,0.003179958,0.007562661,0.009043385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039414586,0.00010462133,0.0008278656,0.0017979521,0.000025780719,0.0003203008,0.0014732159,0.0004420596,0.0005308971,0.1701062,0.75729114,0.06704061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009870283,0.000014847517,0.0011344706,0.0031455604,0.000011830927,0.00014627098,0.0003029025,0.000046230012,0.000094978306,0.006806164,0.9882591,0.000027830947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09322021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07905193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09322021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057228887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036846146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18535519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967551778","doi":"10.1163/187197308x346832","title":"Recent Developments in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Overview of Case Law and of Certain Principles of Aboriginal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law; Indigenous; Treaty; Supreme court; Common law; Comparative law; Declaration; Sociology","score_opus":0.10099452800996146,"score_gpt":0.39525359135214816,"score_spread":0.2942590633421867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967551778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002432156,0.8915708,0.0007980917,0.03770979,0.0014746363,0.000029504468,0.00013989223,0.000023544018,0.06582159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0663185,0.91192776,0.0023749906,0.0074710837,0.0014026656,0.00003134037,0.0002075194,0.000025407036,0.010240809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127406,0.0011207934,0.00033910538,0.00049395394,0.0056411214,0.0011309346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98889625,0.003516995,0.00055385375,0.00022634503,0.0061855125,0.0006211055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072814324,0.0006633353,0.0006682751,0.018284848,0.008183547,0.010860695,0.0029480078,0.0034985493,0.0047382396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011573627,0.00050719833,0.0007799734,0.027688956,0.012187018,0.003416123,0.001957273,0.003818297,0.00038637748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028130577,0.000053700154,0.0021101336,0.0040848777,0.000042142536,0.00086917053,0.009397096,0.0014655082,0.00039299138,0.63073397,0.16161735,0.18920492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048924185,0.000011418016,0.0069424016,0.0030129307,0.00004284658,0.0003433699,0.003951453,0.0002772327,0.000106265084,0.01656743,0.9686858,0.000053822798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97316957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98086643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13294333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13294333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1405674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9645759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968819331","doi":"10.1163/187197308x366614","title":"Critical Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL): Theory, Methodology, or Both?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Mainstream; Scholarship; Public international law; Political science; Positivism; International relations; Law; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Law and economics; Social science; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.526835883366286,"score_gpt":0.45575676534383924,"score_spread":0.07107911802244671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968819331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044008546,0.039240424,0.17957692,0.29425493,0.0030925567,0.0002421064,0.00018991056,0.00025439987,0.43914023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9371318,0.010875008,0.028294459,0.010410017,0.0017757645,0.0005702835,0.00008363958,0.00008603885,0.010772925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98667276,0.0107185375,0.00030194223,0.0006251438,0.0011841081,0.0004975845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96755743,0.023185626,0.0023826866,0.0028411224,0.0026270389,0.001406013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023988994,0.0005537017,0.00079478795,0.005313876,0.0036189232,0.0138927605,0.0021437828,0.003412701,0.005188349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027901465,0.00022607067,0.0005305024,0.006991261,0.056482546,0.016797723,0.0054678014,0.005416309,0.0004905999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015040991,0.0000041430294,0.000085139305,0.000032348784,0.0000017694247,0.000005899106,0.0014051055,0.000053184445,0.0000074922195,0.9948291,0.0008302778,0.0027439268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032563735,0.0000066904763,0.000149565,0.00034406892,0.000003165675,0.000018863304,0.0043751756,0.0005079512,0.000063789696,0.9662439,0.028278798,0.0000046764007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029451936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032922581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023988994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008037486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006912926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12686741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980505396","doi":"10.1163/187197308x356930","title":"Rhetoric and Reality: The World Bank Development Policies, Mining Corporations, and Indigenous Communities in Latin America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Latin Americans; Rhetoric; Political science; Normative; Indigenous rights; International law; Economy; Economic growth; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.15858958293273584,"score_gpt":0.3631553376127609,"score_spread":0.20456575468002508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980505396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1201352,0.030797595,0.002242742,0.46141967,0.00086545676,0.000030649207,0.00004688392,0.000032941152,0.38442892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97637755,0.0042190826,0.00040305077,0.0113597205,0.00037621797,0.000036742033,0.000009348177,0.000016700056,0.007201673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330056,0.0048515503,0.00014779369,0.0003297247,0.0008124957,0.0005578564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98706436,0.010232876,0.001086579,0.00025258432,0.0010102207,0.00035347958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011363749,0.00026620616,0.00034642647,0.0031858403,0.011545485,0.012323104,0.0010592792,0.0037161063,0.0030063132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120986765,0.00023539377,0.00018830897,0.002853546,0.04207602,0.005302189,0.004190649,0.0045363815,0.0001320178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009734976,0.0000181887,0.0007350498,0.00009054965,0.0000059271792,0.00020283619,0.079102285,0.00009844287,0.00011954834,0.90815425,0.0059996564,0.005463489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038492046,0.000030459618,0.0041946294,0.0020378637,0.00004442486,0.0001967236,0.24628891,0.00056352315,0.0006275661,0.26777497,0.4781449,0.000057471625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038245127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028328927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038245127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014432041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010036912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10471231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995319820","doi":"10.1163/187197308x356903","title":"Examining the Utility of Third World Approaches to International Law for International Human Rights Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Public international law; International law; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); International human rights law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.3969786468032323,"score_gpt":0.3892726730279958,"score_spread":0.007705973775236519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995319820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21938623,0.030546974,0.035073787,0.076446906,0.00075098407,0.00023837097,0.00012089411,0.0000391242,0.6373967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98868877,0.004211079,0.0024678975,0.0023453569,0.0001713208,0.00014261794,0.000038309616,0.000016062017,0.0019185183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95047206,0.041980293,0.00080757524,0.00078604143,0.0044637453,0.001490313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79352045,0.17179546,0.011580135,0.004425266,0.016874842,0.0018039154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06285625,0.0003555579,0.00090869836,0.0075731007,0.0043536923,0.02050734,0.0019289037,0.0037758008,0.005082197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11835315,0.00032578755,0.0006462224,0.012409032,0.025435839,0.024561476,0.007946654,0.007435341,0.00051130593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013676354,0.000028614193,0.0030811175,0.00013084918,0.000016350321,0.00006573257,0.0068711312,0.00027914357,0.000030470428,0.9829488,0.0011568592,0.005377199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026723526,0.00014778563,0.011550489,0.0029616773,0.00011261072,0.00019500114,0.07478303,0.0058955345,0.00027223572,0.84582394,0.058189243,0.000041617164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00854263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011973316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06285625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011726263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008531374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33241957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013420596","doi":"10.1163/157181208x361430","title":"Challenges for the (Present/) Future of ird World Approaches to International Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Public international law; Hegemony; Political science; Power (physics); Law; International community; International relations; Globalization; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.38957027246247444,"score_gpt":0.3875547352125882,"score_spread":0.0020155372498862345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013420596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10192496,0.011314843,0.021850068,0.34894025,0.0006561838,0.00006193356,0.000060954357,0.00009510404,0.5150958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98110306,0.002120471,0.003420666,0.005928451,0.00019295281,0.000044648157,0.000018426186,0.000019885454,0.0071512787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98970836,0.0070871366,0.00019220331,0.00043241293,0.001458979,0.0011208751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99148506,0.004293525,0.00055556983,0.0009807158,0.0015033204,0.001181856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02192779,0.00020984949,0.0003873042,0.0011774175,0.005071864,0.018821089,0.0013513255,0.0048974934,0.007245642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009382054,0.00014563132,0.000517936,0.0011478213,0.026542917,0.01096936,0.0069014584,0.0074694585,0.0006312958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007880119,0.000023660328,0.00040343357,0.000036579386,0.0000026948665,0.00006417972,0.007930019,0.00017998087,0.00011922313,0.9743488,0.0034282897,0.013455208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008771603,0.000037921716,0.0011453034,0.00037463498,0.00000802044,0.00022534923,0.06215163,0.0014569802,0.00035966432,0.77001125,0.16418856,0.000031926345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055413917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006498264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02192779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008116428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010171789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11596662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013739425","doi":"10.1163/187197308x366623","title":"Reading TWAIL in the Canadian Context: Race, Gender and National Formation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Race (biology); Immigration; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Public international law; International law; Gender studies; Law; Sociology; History; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.10099078627800959,"score_gpt":0.32829040720698105,"score_spread":0.22729962092897146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013739425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13727847,0.18112929,0.0010958326,0.13756137,0.0025787852,0.00006293393,0.0021454382,0.000062396844,0.5380854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8713766,0.075035885,0.0007547948,0.01189882,0.0004824639,0.000030861396,0.00055381056,0.00004088794,0.03982583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977683,0.00038165812,0.000046521796,0.0001730226,0.0009221007,0.00070846506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941607,0.0017213295,0.00029516488,0.000115711206,0.003131932,0.0005751017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031984842,0.0003719901,0.0006000292,0.005806921,0.015487381,0.010455481,0.0013846846,0.0015603668,0.010789462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073194904,0.00014460225,0.00023624187,0.01020377,0.011100384,0.0025848227,0.0023640322,0.002210933,0.00037377267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008222411,0.00004835195,0.017498545,0.0015268807,0.000053576347,0.00094915094,0.16274597,0.0006651317,0.00040363387,0.41632217,0.23438364,0.16532074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007804129,0.000019814628,0.04424326,0.0028463153,0.000072404975,0.00017415211,0.2171674,0.00018265993,0.00032807127,0.020155353,0.71471965,0.00008303884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08352731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08352731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14448538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6060359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015483754","doi":"10.1163/187197308x366605","title":"Taking Stock of TWAIL Histories","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; International law; Public international law; Political science; Law; Third world; International relations; History; Economic history","score_opus":0.1544935751962702,"score_gpt":0.3905652003026992,"score_spread":0.236071625106429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015483754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10463051,0.022341521,0.003729238,0.0900352,0.00093332777,0.00002839935,0.00021072938,0.000060390415,0.7780307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88349444,0.0074121244,0.00095698884,0.009940956,0.0004532077,0.00003662762,0.00011915138,0.00011367488,0.097472906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970139,0.0012435045,0.000086710155,0.00044406418,0.00061371154,0.0005979328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937418,0.0030557085,0.00056183146,0.0008413147,0.00096616615,0.0008330413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047220746,0.00020871845,0.00031601122,0.0023149368,0.008482604,0.0129941255,0.0010009811,0.003235617,0.014238078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109285675,0.00017589578,0.00018767445,0.0030478681,0.011396174,0.013341953,0.008597381,0.0052112336,0.0011002503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022233533,0.00001160343,0.0011755199,0.00007529905,0.0000060794637,0.0002891034,0.07484337,0.00009116774,0.000131722,0.87197465,0.022224547,0.029154724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001814272,0.000008967864,0.0015327496,0.00038337143,0.000004098171,0.00017292565,0.031282783,0.00014709933,0.00020147114,0.06930046,0.89695215,0.000012079221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023790475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04333502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023790475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009818195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004210299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07123631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017397267","doi":"10.1163/187197310x527784","title":"Antony Anghie, Bhupinder Chimni, Karin Mickelson and Obiora Okafor (eds.), The Third World and International Order: Law Politics and Globalization, Developments in International Law, 45, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003, 208 pp., ISBN-13: 978-90-41-12166-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Globalization; Politics; Public international law; Order (exchange); Economics","score_opus":0.028425644070195474,"score_gpt":0.3348973936284089,"score_spread":0.30647174955821344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017397267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033094827,0.9681837,0.00055485545,0.014321304,0.0019411419,0.000013668969,0.00007026676,0.000022910652,0.014561211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027173716,0.97452,0.00072362274,0.0010523836,0.0015169368,0.00002046128,0.00009533669,0.00002318273,0.019330729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992225,0.00019207448,0.00004794833,0.00008579696,0.00037284818,0.000078799014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755543,0.0014807397,0.00025197348,0.00005289121,0.00046538032,0.00019365815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016636242,0.0013321432,0.0010996242,0.0034020029,0.0016091127,0.0039670058,0.000890763,0.0018433164,0.026625603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031709536,0.00095423515,0.0003864003,0.0049954373,0.0011832663,0.007622332,0.0011879727,0.002206933,0.016467404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060915605,0.000039372364,0.00055957463,0.0033706096,0.000027129245,0.00012141926,0.0012306676,0.00014032752,0.0003104701,0.010335865,0.74458706,0.23921658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010254537,0.000016537544,0.002566044,0.0015898763,0.000031144224,0.000339231,0.00082148175,0.00008058837,0.00020162381,0.004639332,0.9896898,0.000014046559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125764785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03284215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026625603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016567168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038818151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08907151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017888999","doi":"10.1163/187197308x356921","title":"'Taxing' TWAIL: A Preliminary Inquiry into TWAIL's Application to the Taxation of Foreign Direct Investment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public international law; International law; Political science; Law; International relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06443008176494348,"score_gpt":0.2910778064319638,"score_spread":0.22664772466702032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017888999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6988682,0.0019207806,0.0053916243,0.023311539,0.00010048145,0.00014151465,0.000050892537,0.0000091584325,0.27020586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227977,0.00048127893,0.0004484849,0.00090944394,0.000016114362,0.000026087508,0.000011238999,0.0000030019162,0.005824711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974927,0.0013650011,0.00011545641,0.00018074077,0.00046234124,0.00038385583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229383,0.005193441,0.0009197916,0.00031884667,0.0010861603,0.00018790562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061886976,0.00012033413,0.00031238789,0.00104632,0.005503414,0.0066756504,0.0008880227,0.00245395,0.003338544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015214676,0.00014419165,0.00026639152,0.002765604,0.0077798404,0.00475785,0.004271117,0.0036460666,0.00014643562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025139028,0.000055016768,0.008023465,0.00008771764,0.0000050628623,0.0007413953,0.099155456,0.00025765647,0.0002555212,0.8754475,0.0016911494,0.014255016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023680259,0.00010538043,0.048205517,0.0010398513,0.000030517318,0.000996146,0.47670498,0.0028778678,0.0012865398,0.24197887,0.22670195,0.000048784674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030468702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041564904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030468702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005583615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045676073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060582697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025173500","doi":"10.1163/187197310x498598","title":"Sovereign States and Self-Determining Peoples: Carving Out a Place for Transnational Indigenous Peoples in a World of Sovereign States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Self-determination; International law; Political science; Sovereign state; Declaration; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038109276566115395,"score_gpt":0.3507834376915339,"score_spread":0.3126741611254185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025173500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58671176,0.0095911,0.0029567908,0.057417408,0.00015875636,0.000033462482,0.000016427977,0.000011218014,0.3431031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948832,0.001042881,0.00024035895,0.0007288138,0.000020316149,0.0000074834215,0.0000027607134,0.0000014308085,0.0030728339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620086,0.0024381212,0.0000825059,0.00017817452,0.00039323544,0.0007070908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726844,0.0013705438,0.00046378252,0.00014669912,0.0003462225,0.00040444135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004822393,0.00011266785,0.00031332776,0.0009697833,0.005215433,0.004685906,0.00066725694,0.0024562483,0.003217501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004057306,0.00014095512,0.00020590806,0.00085526233,0.021789677,0.0038927994,0.004758164,0.0025066421,0.00012317122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008057647,0.000030091735,0.0024773285,0.000054655527,0.0000054736975,0.00029302228,0.03878991,0.00011745425,0.00014723171,0.9509949,0.00094892876,0.006132892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038787584,0.00015207939,0.027721113,0.0013669444,0.000039920946,0.0005126814,0.3624713,0.0010141957,0.00051657186,0.3982813,0.20782906,0.000056033918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035413556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056663103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035413556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034675999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007751131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07041484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028818134","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341270","title":"Rising Seas, Receding Coastlines, and Vanishing Maritime Estates and Territories: Possible Solutions and Reassessing the Role of International Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Public international law; Law; Normative; Law of the sea; Argument (complex analysis); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Political science; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018618651818654096,"score_gpt":0.2810541460366586,"score_spread":0.26243549421800455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028818134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022681728,0.16273111,0.0060275723,0.61813265,0.0037403747,0.00007482586,0.00003552288,0.000032347438,0.18654391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66950196,0.1749744,0.010748823,0.10202699,0.006510759,0.0001812758,0.000076223616,0.000054041262,0.035925463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896423,0.005522856,0.00049888704,0.0009113303,0.0022697574,0.0011548288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97945887,0.014505822,0.0015787353,0.0006932359,0.0029715756,0.00079172483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018085083,0.0004859482,0.0010094407,0.0029178576,0.005477882,0.019806046,0.0027707086,0.017504022,0.0047200625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014286438,0.00043905224,0.0007492086,0.0024236606,0.03437703,0.016166443,0.005808348,0.011866472,0.0004219321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061645073,0.000038368784,0.00056278106,0.000163115,0.0000062003314,0.00031179516,0.003538558,0.00028601728,0.0000770439,0.97020054,0.009533725,0.015275714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002388903,0.00009263047,0.0023426719,0.0027228456,0.00003170071,0.0006603321,0.042137183,0.0009831036,0.00033950616,0.43248338,0.51809883,0.00008388858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022235492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033621196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022235492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074531827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012646919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095644176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029904846","doi":"10.1163/187197312x633478","title":"The Protection of Traditional Knowledge in the Knowledge Economy: Cross-Cutting Challenges in International Intellectual Property Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Scope (computer science); International law; Public international law; Law and economics; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Law; Business; International trade; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.4368899986829532,"score_gpt":0.33305170723290933,"score_spread":0.10383829145004386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029904846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08899183,0.03757409,0.03638951,0.21501546,0.0006595515,0.00012000516,0.00006344136,0.00006391089,0.6211222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97154915,0.007997336,0.006531486,0.007149509,0.00058305194,0.00009393685,0.000023917522,0.000016118775,0.006055576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98073775,0.009341215,0.0009402469,0.0014923069,0.0055586924,0.0019297581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666553,0.022584485,0.0024984535,0.00393396,0.003534888,0.00079276407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027485615,0.0003039478,0.00083328155,0.0035869565,0.005345664,0.022975037,0.0022029474,0.008469315,0.0024865842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026459472,0.00032624163,0.00075966807,0.004010889,0.04582783,0.01920012,0.008506849,0.008823461,0.0002739496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036300646,0.000010228707,0.00020497784,0.00003765324,0.000002358918,0.00006899102,0.0015118276,0.00018093077,0.000042620875,0.9896554,0.0007336692,0.0075476994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010693704,0.00004159481,0.0014453109,0.0013031065,0.000014797307,0.00029369575,0.00814152,0.0010915003,0.00027916342,0.9153239,0.07202994,0.000024720352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005443399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005266415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027485615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008241942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01522203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14535952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058807020","doi":"10.1163/157181208x361449","title":"The Future of Women's Rights from a TWAIL Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; Human rights; International law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04651702279936271,"score_gpt":0.34260936635843936,"score_spread":0.29609234355907665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058807020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043546554,0.043953802,0.0048519187,0.32251048,0.00087195967,0.000029667752,0.000061596955,0.000022587412,0.5841513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321387,0.013046452,0.0008335376,0.013365288,0.0006609943,0.000052290023,0.00002279281,0.000015136443,0.0398649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970694,0.0017739389,0.00004310651,0.0001541973,0.00039556925,0.00056379475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977475,0.0013598957,0.00020085779,0.00012608546,0.00029998503,0.0002656048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004589043,0.00023427336,0.0003048803,0.000979027,0.004255807,0.010668558,0.0007874828,0.0037281339,0.007775778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003545154,0.00008760085,0.00022495986,0.000995423,0.021877926,0.0071559492,0.003933146,0.0034005158,0.00044197278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050782346,0.0000057741504,0.00020352856,0.00004167654,0.0000016021154,0.000055531134,0.0069786687,0.00005607261,0.00006924829,0.9808427,0.003572051,0.008168043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055742967,0.000020474654,0.00093618844,0.0005031963,0.0000038554917,0.00012652676,0.037562013,0.00017822676,0.00015979345,0.6319451,0.32855004,0.000008952155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009735405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012304704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010668558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043985317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005357383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031913698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059549485","doi":"10.1163/187197410x12631788215837","title":"Three Images of “Global Community”: Theorizing Law and Community in a Multicultural World","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Normative; Multiculturalism; International law; Public international law; Law; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Politics; International community; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Discipline; Law and economics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.05153614974951444,"score_gpt":0.3718891472680568,"score_spread":0.32035299751854235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059549485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41023445,0.0055627073,0.0762628,0.07010748,0.0003704749,0.00015256781,0.000029766436,0.000095596224,0.43718424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653816,0.00028051535,0.0018316461,0.00052078045,0.000029200448,0.000031561773,0.000004168878,0.000010830235,0.0007531254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98441285,0.012364009,0.0001947214,0.00067248923,0.0016368276,0.0007191331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846432,0.010585188,0.0011743831,0.0010471895,0.0012950759,0.0012549242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016499415,0.00044494413,0.00056237297,0.0057617654,0.008860653,0.014195749,0.0021296234,0.0043828236,0.0025913517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013073018,0.00034068112,0.0005453788,0.0023817068,0.104037225,0.020493982,0.013019033,0.0043192133,0.00017176093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057131547,0.000019728785,0.00047911308,0.000032550914,0.0000034641923,0.00006894499,0.06993595,0.00019382904,0.00004959305,0.9255913,0.00032839895,0.0032913263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014227443,0.000025019519,0.00055778783,0.00020773435,0.000008295533,0.00010041747,0.11167547,0.0016568054,0.00011463203,0.8683252,0.01729769,0.000016842016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004213899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003753013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016499415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008394128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004166717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08725828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061568891","doi":"10.1163/187197409x12525781476123","title":"The Dominant Voices in Double Taxation Agreements: A Critical Analysis of the “Dividend” Article in the Agreement between Uganda and the Netherlands","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Withholding tax; Tax treaty; Dividend; Double taxation; Treaty; Convention; Economics; International taxation; International economics; Developing country; Capital (architecture); Investment (military); International trade; International law; Income tax; Public economics; Law; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Political science; Direct tax; Economic growth; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.04050955960519317,"score_gpt":0.3371472719513473,"score_spread":0.29663771234615416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061568891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18484102,0.016110007,0.0060060783,0.08476753,0.001503269,0.00019475717,0.000066343404,0.000018206494,0.70649284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96423465,0.003055259,0.0007694882,0.006963445,0.0003639493,0.00011864563,0.000020617714,0.000045127985,0.024428798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96790564,0.01996809,0.0008974455,0.0014931593,0.0064277085,0.0033079265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96351576,0.029683225,0.0016786432,0.0007537369,0.0037849627,0.0005835819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030354707,0.00042225586,0.00073920126,0.0029199936,0.018850245,0.02184016,0.0024800804,0.010242775,0.0034424474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048728246,0.00064841897,0.00049304374,0.0035131406,0.021736797,0.013864242,0.00751106,0.0092616575,0.0002969922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017323604,0.000017247527,0.00030478297,0.000071078604,0.0000068859927,0.00061119,0.048260693,0.00016811001,0.00008985315,0.9394618,0.0067236153,0.0042673894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055309505,0.000053158878,0.0025672002,0.0018607025,0.000044716693,0.00041077746,0.18662307,0.0010467545,0.0012748997,0.19318469,0.61277425,0.0001045161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04201148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040904332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04201148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020103538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011653483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16053295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064351302","doi":"10.1163/157181208x361421","title":"TWAIL: An Epistemological Inquiry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Public international law; Resistance (ecology); International law; Epistemology; Political science; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26365721813407783,"score_gpt":0.4361974837343906,"score_spread":0.17254026560031277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064351302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097006746,0.005534543,0.03387285,0.08779694,0.0005141588,0.00012186119,0.00016252336,0.00008149057,0.77490884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97927755,0.00092981895,0.0043431306,0.0030222333,0.00011285018,0.00011350156,0.000057309866,0.000030534957,0.012112931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892874,0.006838729,0.0003083621,0.00085446826,0.0017431409,0.000967901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98483384,0.00939959,0.001237892,0.0012091148,0.0025498895,0.0007697686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112871425,0.00031171495,0.00067006913,0.004721615,0.010951781,0.015376014,0.0020960316,0.005010947,0.0071802633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014292692,0.0002542943,0.00047662944,0.0053583737,0.03632265,0.015971377,0.009226406,0.0064123035,0.00052570784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054427123,0.000008616365,0.00023041478,0.00003286244,0.0000021840503,0.00009349682,0.01494417,0.000064229025,0.000034122942,0.98097163,0.0011469828,0.0024658362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011278099,0.000015634796,0.0006914474,0.0005593118,0.000008407862,0.00023407141,0.07988452,0.001559544,0.00030527764,0.77600944,0.1407043,0.00001678814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01518636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016773146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015376014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015095736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010983896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10952771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093027498","doi":"10.1163/187197407x261421","title":"Locating Third World Resistance in the International Law on Foreign Investment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Public international law; International investment; Law; Grassroots; Norm (philosophy); Foreign direct investment; Political science; Law of the sea; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05800631704661396,"score_gpt":0.30089098148633975,"score_spread":0.24288466443972578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093027498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15734236,0.014719253,0.017602379,0.04274143,0.00035289166,0.00005857005,0.00004100681,0.0000659041,0.7670762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877686,0.0016956422,0.00076645624,0.0022263026,0.000114014576,0.000033508553,0.000015331432,0.000019171584,0.0073610744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854756,0.007439714,0.00031749118,0.00072794105,0.0015428975,0.0014243576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829525,0.012786049,0.0016137705,0.0007316781,0.0014948512,0.00042117454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010311876,0.00020580145,0.0005371597,0.0041477424,0.004715611,0.019485004,0.001114366,0.005458708,0.0027226927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015563718,0.00025724544,0.00034978622,0.003847941,0.023570063,0.0066649397,0.0057555567,0.006051995,0.00034174696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000683879,0.000007216344,0.00051103486,0.000022742353,0.00000216562,0.00013244571,0.006317487,0.0001331091,0.000096593765,0.9879302,0.001422261,0.0034179464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019652589,0.0000748471,0.0054124086,0.0011687274,0.000030019624,0.00045714932,0.04115026,0.0023282154,0.0015004374,0.643427,0.3043784,0.00005284756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013156805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010330975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019485004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007866347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051299213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057074666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093985004","doi":"10.1163/187197309x433348","title":"Feminism, Modern Philosophy and the Future of Legitimacy of International Constitutionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Human rights; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Public international law; International law; Law; Doctrine; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Political science; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07711937730871099,"score_gpt":0.38802405603343654,"score_spread":0.31090467872472555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093985004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04850058,0.030802071,0.03535165,0.28248116,0.0012883008,0.0000641879,0.00008302461,0.0000759871,0.601353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749371,0.003974349,0.0031864606,0.004721749,0.0009655467,0.00007801421,0.000017009339,0.000038688773,0.01208112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901748,0.007344447,0.00017267783,0.0006212434,0.0011343426,0.00055247016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98419756,0.0130841,0.0007305676,0.0007659741,0.0008435831,0.00037821877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01413756,0.0003916008,0.0005547302,0.0023448418,0.0055967253,0.009280097,0.0011938098,0.00484281,0.004011114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011882438,0.0003195038,0.00040224646,0.0011773249,0.10291773,0.011219502,0.0046411124,0.0074421884,0.0003584722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014748873,0.0000020845594,0.000026737685,0.000007086322,4.7805474e-7,0.000008979163,0.001413413,0.000057995258,0.000010153834,0.9972274,0.00035608982,0.00088791066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005740516,0.0000064102283,0.00008548895,0.00007634229,0.0000010476242,0.000019567597,0.0011011877,0.000202582,0.000051773197,0.9641289,0.0343159,0.0000050449325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030698196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021584663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01413756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010790613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078291774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140128790","doi":"10.1163/187197308x356912","title":"Law as the Interplay of Ideas, Institutions, and Interests: Using Polyani (and Foucault) to ask TWAIL Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Politics; Political science; International law; Disappointment; International relations; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09569471415254972,"score_gpt":0.41728295076797073,"score_spread":0.321588236615421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140128790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10598189,0.0137759205,0.07786654,0.2971603,0.0006982665,0.00016155092,0.00007085496,0.00010382626,0.50418085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97656894,0.0020500547,0.0074980846,0.00538204,0.00023496094,0.00018294221,0.000011860077,0.000027631579,0.008043427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903554,0.008326164,0.00007717691,0.00031560165,0.0005184455,0.00040725362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98765683,0.010252107,0.00060279225,0.00057575974,0.00061306375,0.00029945263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010764833,0.00033689901,0.00064113707,0.002544467,0.0071119075,0.0100061,0.0015329695,0.0037287893,0.0020306904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01034505,0.00027069252,0.00046234127,0.0020352576,0.07132615,0.013064672,0.0051215882,0.0057638087,0.00026826025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026275734,0.0000052192286,0.00007075459,0.000012216037,0.0000012838983,0.000035941448,0.005650592,0.00012853256,0.000014310449,0.99249,0.00059165334,0.00099683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067118367,0.00000776854,0.00011841606,0.00007140875,0.0000020855648,0.00003902557,0.006869942,0.00078640424,0.00006450504,0.97036195,0.021666246,0.0000055928767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010234652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008658029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010764833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008785738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039793868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06374532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202577288","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341313","title":"Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of National Courts and Human Rights Enforcement: Quo vadis justitia?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Human rights; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Enforcement; Public international law; International law; Universal jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.09434230052143235,"score_gpt":0.3998661713334684,"score_spread":0.3055238708120361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202577288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13783345,0.020559942,0.032479066,0.19352178,0.0009807146,0.000062904146,0.00006251512,0.0000854478,0.6144142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98620784,0.0019620818,0.0017755947,0.0037350615,0.00042951302,0.00003962119,0.000011092614,0.000014815471,0.005824413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873912,0.0071486104,0.00040622795,0.0014990746,0.0017338318,0.0018210605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046196,0.013151335,0.001939981,0.0024741162,0.0012671739,0.0007053729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013792685,0.00018127267,0.0007612609,0.0012423872,0.005283238,0.010662974,0.0015897804,0.005423776,0.0044977926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024155684,0.0003188292,0.00048452173,0.0013914978,0.037131876,0.013676697,0.006212828,0.0064232806,0.00038507834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039951033,0.0000053063586,0.00025824207,0.000018715666,0.0000024396275,0.00003809165,0.0013451142,0.000041100968,0.000053406606,0.99438804,0.000438843,0.0034066346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019728488,0.00003939886,0.0018444597,0.0004122884,0.000024876766,0.0002580953,0.0036190893,0.00065621134,0.00037304708,0.93326205,0.059460048,0.00003063121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005524694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009486901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013792685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040561943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006852836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07294351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568396595","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341343","title":"Addressing the Foreign Terrorist Fighter Phenomenon from a Human Rights Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Terrorism; Legislation; Freedom of information; Law; Political science; Public international law; National security; Imprisonment; Foreign policy; Sociology; Public relations; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.16059195711597685,"score_gpt":0.4207961064564361,"score_spread":0.26020414934045927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568396595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049104363,0.2715373,0.0028681958,0.2844742,0.0030880414,0.00010780267,0.000050772873,0.000023252476,0.38874605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7431747,0.1749343,0.001732494,0.04956136,0.0036288635,0.00013584367,0.000058833244,0.000021988779,0.026751671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943763,0.0036874379,0.00015886221,0.0002413171,0.0006550252,0.0008810907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929367,0.0049937414,0.00076335255,0.00024202069,0.0006826822,0.00038160043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00827267,0.00023644582,0.00037798783,0.0018645481,0.0026052215,0.005860522,0.00083178177,0.0048086112,0.003291005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006998664,0.000115129165,0.00031759418,0.0014397366,0.010176817,0.0047938316,0.0026605143,0.0040626507,0.00029397118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017899329,0.0001239586,0.0032047918,0.0015837757,0.00004047309,0.0008570184,0.018356217,0.0005394207,0.00044694718,0.85679096,0.030294737,0.08774371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016578979,0.00018961537,0.011033918,0.00354458,0.000049262166,0.00076749414,0.042900857,0.00014652353,0.00048056256,0.06475101,0.8760844,0.000035180103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011689615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015119454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011689615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002728128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077037606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043750525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2627035777","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341358","title":"Reforming the International Whaling Commission: Indigenous Peoples, the Canadian Problem and the Road Ahead","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Indigenous; Commission; Law; Subsistence agriculture; Political science; International law; Battle; History; Archaeology; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.07838161551476425,"score_gpt":0.37866727711356374,"score_spread":0.3002856615987995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2627035777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027749095,0.16018234,0.00068450323,0.5924479,0.0041396692,0.0001110633,0.0003826369,0.000054796066,0.21424803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50209,0.10755595,0.0020693203,0.27893588,0.0023400555,0.00015939288,0.0004039297,0.000111551686,0.10633392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593664,0.0015832616,0.00035459726,0.0008305494,0.006124634,0.0051703095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98660856,0.0034421866,0.0005149358,0.0002865618,0.007044517,0.0021032204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013033194,0.0005856457,0.0008483014,0.0035777483,0.022991747,0.016335124,0.0046156826,0.013171771,0.0037034296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018669948,0.00046886317,0.0006282913,0.0056284554,0.01965634,0.003990557,0.0031082635,0.009806806,0.00034586876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032647065,0.000050990904,0.0025556176,0.0005792794,0.000044882225,0.00053043163,0.012845129,0.00055675,0.00021727038,0.6993521,0.25123185,0.032003067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042651634,0.000028602255,0.0095347725,0.0015450119,0.00010280491,0.00011964137,0.01879961,0.00035484167,0.00030405435,0.02351026,0.9455212,0.00013661518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99073315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14151198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14151198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44127408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99572444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122011967","doi":"10.1163/187197308x356895","title":"Writing Resistance Into International Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Resistance (ecology); Public international law; Law; Political science; Reading (process); Order (exchange); Sociology; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07503382519926752,"score_gpt":0.3763888016040989,"score_spread":0.30135497640483133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122011967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029943943,0.03329728,0.021403568,0.2882674,0.009820631,0.00010825526,0.00009015175,0.00013871542,0.61693007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8676082,0.015013728,0.003660567,0.020434624,0.005015934,0.00018635023,0.000103304126,0.0001347025,0.08784256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886077,0.008291857,0.00030164185,0.00067008764,0.0015723892,0.00055629626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788615,0.015890906,0.0012398885,0.0009453373,0.002457643,0.00060475274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010346622,0.00040630306,0.00055851456,0.0025060722,0.005144978,0.009358772,0.00092212483,0.003002246,0.008828016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026968706,0.00019058915,0.00027123865,0.0018585348,0.015887877,0.0094769895,0.0048358976,0.006773462,0.00092590606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011247314,0.00001545089,0.00022025449,0.00011815181,0.000005422495,0.00009089528,0.02477704,0.00013765124,0.00009686101,0.9238024,0.033864018,0.016860768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009114959,0.000035788857,0.00038688476,0.0009033864,0.0000070224683,0.00012796916,0.025126498,0.00053985894,0.00032321026,0.24768159,0.72484726,0.000011503667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033900894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030724735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010346622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004170385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052639726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054718792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126329987","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341452","title":"Taking Air Passenger Rights Seriously: The Case Against the Exclusivity of the Montreal Convention","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Convention; International law; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Harm; International regime; Political science; Business; International trade; Sociology; European union","score_opus":0.041047282314685914,"score_gpt":0.3431841935713487,"score_spread":0.3021369112566628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126329987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04035488,0.011779512,0.006703033,0.4236075,0.0017717183,0.00012967069,0.00014952016,0.000049512055,0.5154547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8271143,0.0045033065,0.0022641756,0.1118594,0.0030461277,0.00020594477,0.000057775418,0.000072783405,0.050876178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97496843,0.011779057,0.000647748,0.002589883,0.006708346,0.0033066021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584079,0.029596528,0.0018651747,0.002085999,0.006560211,0.0014841851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034909654,0.0005627654,0.0007809477,0.0019392025,0.009842302,0.017086335,0.004511116,0.028100027,0.0060049617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048636198,0.00059660536,0.0010533389,0.0020773753,0.0260656,0.009814218,0.0055578467,0.017891586,0.0005329123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013162588,0.000011895957,0.00038159054,0.000030569892,0.00001068782,0.00023698775,0.0016738481,0.00015606376,0.000118529075,0.9798708,0.013977838,0.0035180384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011875515,0.00009063757,0.004238503,0.0011441198,0.00013701158,0.00033193332,0.005764669,0.0016831423,0.0010105189,0.35065043,0.6346585,0.00017174846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25595203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26679423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25595203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016708871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021319464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5089245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127695159","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341454","title":"Activists on the High Seas: Reinventing International Law from the Mare Liberum?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; International law; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; International waters; Monopoly; Enforcement; Political science; Action (physics); Law of the sea; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03602581993130986,"score_gpt":0.28796974117667906,"score_spread":0.2519439212453692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127695159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03574989,0.076042905,0.0012850956,0.57355946,0.0037640904,0.000043574422,0.00002528073,0.000024703697,0.30950493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73666495,0.04297254,0.0011509878,0.16187418,0.004301438,0.00008668319,0.00005425675,0.000047945472,0.052847017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942879,0.0029430946,0.00019992745,0.00037192352,0.0009023833,0.0012948401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910591,0.0060953787,0.0007381248,0.0003735975,0.0008611853,0.0008725899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012883204,0.0002691782,0.00045425424,0.0012650917,0.0040698247,0.010361695,0.0012213674,0.009605486,0.005192308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010568768,0.0002738005,0.0003762706,0.0009962627,0.012670831,0.00761541,0.007072483,0.008938344,0.0006306118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000307926,0.000093083894,0.0012793642,0.00042997045,0.000017949314,0.00059694116,0.012110618,0.00018223256,0.00074467756,0.8529162,0.059703033,0.07189512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023374354,0.00006731458,0.0025425963,0.0014411513,0.000020735448,0.0001644316,0.010978199,0.00012303877,0.00054806453,0.04832808,0.9357442,0.000018775178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013250711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030527879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013250711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034905989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009635422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06813371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250696620","doi":"10.1163/187197308x366597","title":"Foreword","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; International law; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.15772278214557298,"score_gpt":0.37409401404226494,"score_spread":0.21637123189669197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250696620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040700706,0.0075141,0.0007553891,0.21619223,0.18421833,0.0002875695,0.0012382425,0.0004904339,0.58889663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001568131,0.0012540586,0.00022966616,0.11100242,0.018511863,0.0001558502,0.0003643511,0.0001511075,0.8667624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772483,0.00023536671,0.00009898376,0.00028726674,0.0012912089,0.00036239848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952118,0.00090155785,0.0001917066,0.00036660614,0.0025823638,0.0007460031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019063144,0.0008391508,0.0009773541,0.0023079892,0.0051528527,0.0066186553,0.0020009426,0.012163379,0.20619938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011894594,0.00046172205,0.0010197884,0.0010959468,0.0013555048,0.0033624375,0.002880485,0.010235348,0.2406393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045503157,0.000006340357,0.000018662591,0.000020934505,9.445225e-7,0.000015198038,0.000015040887,0.0000040763953,0.000032056363,0.0036281724,0.9903273,0.0059268326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037909788,0.0000049621485,0.00013566848,0.00007189854,0.00000255762,0.000017655424,0.000037986243,0.000010144189,0.0000443917,0.0014995872,0.9981679,0.0000036130746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013299355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027203105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20619938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034250405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006948025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284698612","doi":"10.1163/18719732-bja10080","title":"Failing Forward","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Public international law; International law; Political science; Solidarity; International human rights law; Law; Preparedness; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health law; Public administration; International health; Health policy; Health care; Medicine","score_opus":0.08352622928991277,"score_gpt":0.4106556023060307,"score_spread":0.32712937301611794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284698612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015099989,0.0035879803,0.0039875284,0.17250824,0.013125224,0.000096469346,0.0005965152,0.00024253776,0.8043454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0582047,0.0051675444,0.0029239538,0.09485052,0.0033052925,0.00019765084,0.0007418671,0.00048994925,0.8341185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938089,0.0019411856,0.00025570544,0.0010413715,0.0019763012,0.0009765745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99172544,0.0018028144,0.00037861784,0.0011792972,0.003983455,0.00093031453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071946294,0.0008024999,0.0005247001,0.001492686,0.006284022,0.012199689,0.001834239,0.0068057813,0.1961988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018859087,0.00027970623,0.0007845617,0.0011087438,0.005633705,0.010948723,0.006280226,0.009797574,0.09475931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019578674,0.000022046384,0.0004085605,0.00010886709,0.000007416826,0.00013384726,0.0016143931,0.00008550879,0.00010203385,0.5077413,0.44650453,0.043251924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033913896,0.000007826325,0.00013579492,0.00016573218,0.000003198806,0.00004174973,0.000762895,0.000030568328,0.000071652525,0.022740055,0.97603136,0.000005857337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011874021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01089879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1961988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055810153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0139488615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6563504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393858214","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341493","title":"The War in Ukraine under International Law: Its Use of Force and Armed Conflict Aspects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"War, Law, and Justice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; York University","keywords":"Neutrality; Use of force; International law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Public international law; Territorial integrity; Jus ad bellum; International community; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Aggression; Armed conflict; Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Sovereignty; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12748727701287302,"score_gpt":0.3992455964191553,"score_spread":0.27175831940628226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393858214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22263429,0.49207217,0.0013554574,0.017062979,0.00082423934,0.00006194793,0.00023302354,0.000022201244,0.26573366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8990931,0.09383298,0.00024266574,0.0013864164,0.00028186225,0.000016280834,0.000070932,0.0000050690373,0.0050707203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985696,0.0005704018,0.00012543632,0.000111155336,0.00036786884,0.0002555745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871445,0.00046910174,0.0003949481,0.00004409937,0.0003011987,0.00007626041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018102239,0.00015646381,0.00039317866,0.0027219018,0.0016147139,0.0042345985,0.0002939922,0.0008694076,0.0012071219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019730586,0.00010384729,0.00019706906,0.0026395593,0.0029765945,0.0009772833,0.0015402018,0.0009335166,0.00015804678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054246866,0.0001363502,0.024795681,0.0035695827,0.00015219815,0.0024008793,0.024760641,0.002994865,0.0012829008,0.7519899,0.019590836,0.16827199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000870001,0.00021929288,0.12611528,0.0064247022,0.000120261764,0.001527361,0.023814783,0.0007307428,0.0009225605,0.050959457,0.7891023,0.00005460423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0327109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02920753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0327109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034175618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00664391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065041006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}