{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f8d138555ed","filters":{"venue":"International Game Theory Review"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f8d138555ed","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Game+Theory+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1964737813","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000216","title":"BOOK REVIEW: <i>Differential Games in Marketing</i>. By Steffen Jørgensen and Georges Zaccour","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Chatterjee; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02786565933808989,"score_gpt":0.3589306493530891,"score_spread":0.3310649900149992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964737813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005197771,0.95328414,0.0010577472,0.030611407,0.0002686194,0.0008827977,0.00008506196,0.00005156333,0.008560897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047121514,0.8790645,0.00011341196,0.050442036,0.00011818776,0.00023895249,0.00004983987,0.00003118501,0.02282039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617624,0.0009631856,0.0010782803,0.000630362,0.00088987313,0.0002620315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997018,0.0016030385,0.00043047834,0.0005848696,0.00023480502,0.00012881502],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006999828,0.00025366375,0.0006018297,0.00013948578,0.00005808917,0.00011218057,0.0010918422,0.000059827853,0.008069338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038192086,0.00018943525,0.00018472267,0.00036554356,0.00020550989,0.0003219524,0.00024168495,0.0002440937,0.000768673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015857813,0.00029363626,0.00029535222,0.0010734407,0.000090698246,0.000018388178,0.0001373286,0.0000063428706,0.0008492772,0.065696985,0.7044196,0.22696035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037463594,0.000017234268,0.0009976905,0.0064544496,0.000043455235,0.000053060983,0.000024040315,0.000007274505,0.00010621727,0.08889208,0.9028122,0.00021765663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052101327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029728246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2267427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005871721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051123883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969699379","doi":"10.1142/s0219198903000957","title":"When will the Range of Prizes in Tournaments Increase in the Noise or in the Number of Players?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Generality; Tournament; Multiplicative function; Mathematical economics; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Multiplicative noise; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical analysis; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.041106546109435746,"score_gpt":0.2801495660447802,"score_spread":0.23904301993534444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969699379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84567237,0.0377286,0.00022392845,0.0038820393,0.00030181286,0.00111094,0.00014932435,0.0000029324276,0.11092806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783412,0.019099789,0.00005295249,0.0018655339,0.000024237637,0.00007867168,0.000003455793,0.000008423087,0.0005257333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984837,0.00029534893,0.0008741277,0.00015977876,0.000056116012,0.00013091948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857605,0.0006195532,0.00043947718,0.00033056442,0.000022104783,0.000012264644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005155417,0.00010758084,0.0003687676,0.00007911379,0.000012648487,0.000018865712,0.0007516727,0.000034642686,0.0015998227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006187751,0.000059509708,0.00011119034,0.00014516166,0.000091817186,0.00016186002,0.00004119837,0.00016335177,0.000040975065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077843884,0.00012828496,0.02488667,0.00009085472,0.00002750649,0.0000037673974,0.0023169015,0.000027858678,6.6034994e-7,0.9707401,0.00012204176,0.0015775546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015779672,0.00003946219,0.017489664,0.0013811215,0.000017685798,0.000045340195,0.0010781938,0.00014755737,0.000009485439,0.85679615,0.12121173,0.00020566178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022341762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011549354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13266884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006240088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024067982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977645093","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000150","title":"FORMALIZATION OF MULTI-LEVEL GAMES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Contrast (vision); Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Von Neumann architecture; Generalization; Best response; Extensive-form game; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Sequential game; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2536500171444254,"score_gpt":0.4591666713175731,"score_spread":0.20551665417314768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977645093","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021339178,0.031622656,0.8805222,0.007254304,0.0008563481,0.0011796732,0.0002561128,0.00012456313,0.05684495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831359,0.006155409,0.0032829912,0.0018433686,0.000070066504,0.000063552296,0.000029298119,0.000013521186,0.005405903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978032,0.0002050208,0.0008460446,0.00027852922,0.00074320345,0.00012397823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788153,0.00048127276,0.00047346888,0.00051226007,0.00058993115,0.000061528146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035305019,0.00012162087,0.00029240584,0.00014400326,0.000037786947,0.00003945731,0.0010842509,0.000039129234,0.001850396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002857845,0.00008854762,0.00019207553,0.00044850807,0.0001569501,0.000311625,0.000114295886,0.00008373348,0.0010116335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016755732,0.00011439173,0.000080670005,0.0000464687,0.000024967596,8.647239e-7,0.00016322134,0.00028592226,0.00035669742,0.85141426,0.00035045313,0.14714533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005339802,0.000029464376,0.0024935699,0.0010661411,0.000035037774,0.000031868134,0.000103856335,0.00010604356,0.0025545356,0.85550934,0.13737302,0.00016312719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029541554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033972165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037965703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058686855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979004417","doi":"10.1142/s0219198900000081","title":"EVOLUTIONARY AND DYNAMIC STABILITY IN SYMMETRIC EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH TWO INDEPENDENT DECISIONS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Stochastic game; Nash equilibrium; Statement (logic); Competition (biology); Evolutionarily stable strategy; Risk dominance; Best response; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05656978910844371,"score_gpt":0.37635403092585,"score_spread":0.3197842418174063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979004417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80642,0.1012802,0.0040454455,0.007012518,0.00027012717,0.0017948364,0.00028044527,0.00013793197,0.07875847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779502,0.016466917,0.0009346854,0.00087802764,0.000039568346,0.00018050059,0.000033754,0.000016807548,0.0034994965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955903,0.00091084914,0.0010278542,0.0008055783,0.0013824746,0.00028293612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477285,0.0036250863,0.00024511002,0.00081209,0.00037887372,0.00016598411],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047182306,0.00025156312,0.00046572008,0.0004552507,0.00011462462,0.00008969937,0.0011034496,0.00006363359,0.010751572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002300837,0.00017910136,0.00013707034,0.001530919,0.00040971002,0.0005097248,0.0001767531,0.00032624393,0.0010608372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037651413,0.0005185696,0.011599575,0.000043138705,0.000060796505,0.000026593694,0.00018454093,0.00038991956,0.000045287943,0.25013557,0.0008565509,0.73576295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008620359,0.000081877006,0.16500382,0.0012151394,0.00004900392,0.00037151214,0.0001855901,0.0018897741,0.000008184846,0.7491557,0.08080596,0.00037142844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001548436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004258644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7353915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002126249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000134303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981404793","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000344","title":"THE FIRM AS A NEXUS OF STRATEGIES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Nexus (standard); Incentive; Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Profit (economics); Payment; Production (economics); Industrial organization; Computer science; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027129028750414435,"score_gpt":0.2645972168609178,"score_spread":0.23746818811050338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981404793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01812166,0.3024033,0.006072787,0.006277326,0.0012774118,0.00039070757,0.00011946132,0.00003449346,0.6653029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92690897,0.068783544,0.00008127251,0.00093408895,0.00008828284,0.00003109758,0.000007385205,0.000013216585,0.003152116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910015,0.000016102098,0.00056851935,0.00016505165,0.000028137007,0.000122016856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919057,0.00011081616,0.00036149175,0.0002644563,0.0000428591,0.00002979583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095007895,0.0000926336,0.00026096503,0.000034745644,0.00003881917,0.000049507966,0.00046020388,0.000028384053,0.0007287394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017726494,0.000074931275,0.00015375922,0.00005194427,0.000118143034,0.00017582792,0.00005931674,0.00007750033,0.000701366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001412132,0.000018164385,0.00002049341,0.00005993325,0.000063052015,8.4075265e-7,0.00012267576,0.00015980477,0.0000016988018,0.99607044,0.00011096168,0.003357837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015193154,0.000022726224,0.00008245519,0.00022673521,0.0000044253156,0.000008642395,0.00007593544,0.000013626183,0.000013379697,0.77387756,0.22545557,0.00006702735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056616005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067156684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9087873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039951334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90148747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984423735","doi":"10.1142/s021919891240004x","title":"OPTIMAL TARIFFS ON EXHAUSTIBLE RESOURCES: THE CASE OF QUANTITY-SETTING","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Resource (disambiguation); Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.049322200157272435,"score_gpt":0.2805553824299904,"score_spread":0.23123318227271797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984423735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4596076,0.20583679,0.008110983,0.0036709174,0.002439292,0.0007783518,0.00049581,0.000060702965,0.31899956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886036,0.0072615715,0.0003461535,0.0014666276,0.00029016033,0.000025999818,0.000009282185,0.00001931772,0.0019772777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988861,0.00005713043,0.0006389353,0.00018780155,0.000028027554,0.00020197233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987795,0.00028679904,0.00049355003,0.00035220783,0.000034333458,0.000053662698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028103301,0.00012436773,0.00032877483,0.00007325499,0.00005672944,0.000027347272,0.00037803844,0.00004137005,0.0018326844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002456941,0.00010064775,0.00017418315,0.00007078222,0.000094350326,0.00018855838,0.000094491086,0.00015149986,0.0005530201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019988282,0.000050173257,0.0006032252,0.00011751923,0.000072112096,0.0000054124057,0.00039273925,0.00020483091,0.0000013156425,0.99517775,0.00061139895,0.0027435576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004409129,0.00008792509,0.00047907428,0.0011003755,0.000049438837,0.0004286098,0.00038855258,0.00085061777,0.00008781946,0.12000212,0.87569183,0.00039269615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084829495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000351958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8751756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005618782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071697336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985089376","doi":"10.1142/s0219198906000825","title":"PROPORTIONALITY AND NON-MANIPULABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Axiom; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Bankruptcy; Truncation (statistics); Independence (probability theory); Simple (philosophy); Law; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.026384118455428405,"score_gpt":0.24519600544847145,"score_spread":0.21881188699304305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985089376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63196117,0.11906286,0.004005023,0.0037023348,0.0011349155,0.0020474265,0.00019079393,0.000117474934,0.23777801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952905,0.0018692208,0.0000746995,0.00035816064,0.00012128067,0.000081850674,0.000031981428,0.000012922667,0.0021593643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983669,0.00009361983,0.0009421427,0.00037536444,0.000058563222,0.00016342664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992098,0.00010227281,0.00037248392,0.0002331595,0.00004855137,0.000033689077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003987533,0.00013634893,0.000398977,0.00009728296,0.00002459237,0.00003700593,0.00022650907,0.00005190948,0.0006339272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029272272,0.00013662042,0.00008929502,0.00013695784,0.000093887305,0.00017601028,0.000054737695,0.0001339341,0.00031528194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010254737,0.00011188853,0.090506226,0.00070483633,0.000017315117,0.0000026964105,0.000047959446,0.000026961121,0.000008383892,0.90713936,0.00012213612,0.0013020006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028551795,0.000018592891,0.11914348,0.0010775216,0.0000051443385,0.000018997405,0.0000068496547,0.00017924921,0.000008232411,0.8268191,0.052241646,0.00019566933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017028545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026686335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36332935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009283931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011729718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6941058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986522940","doi":"10.1142/s0219198907001333","title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF COOP ADVERTISING PROGRAMS IN COMPETITIVE DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Competition (biology); Dilemma; Channel (broadcasting); Distribution (mathematics); Advertising; Industrial organization; Plan (archaeology); Marketing; Channel coordination; Microeconomics; Economics; Supply chain; Computer science; Telecommunications; Supply chain management","score_opus":0.025454484994360847,"score_gpt":0.28944781905497113,"score_spread":0.26399333406061026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986522940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89817524,0.018855616,0.014720889,0.0003421231,0.0017573962,0.0020786382,0.000017446964,0.00013858837,0.06391405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900717,0.0004767189,0.00001081121,0.00015540737,0.0001029814,0.00002127898,0.00016485817,0.000009727365,0.000051032228],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990741,0.00006790602,0.0003492546,0.00016139528,0.00019866187,0.00014868706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992043,0.00026366196,0.00019375447,0.00009870083,0.00023206367,0.0000075242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033592468,0.00011058966,0.00024084101,0.00010808002,0.000018774474,0.00003439393,0.00019142502,0.000028636656,0.00018403489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002806035,0.00010165895,0.00008702625,0.00034691356,0.000056825615,0.00032559884,0.00008996684,0.00009909818,0.000035026904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042575249,0.00026256902,0.13357279,0.0050734626,0.00005695325,0.000026428352,0.000033791064,0.0000051151087,0.00070369995,0.31600636,0.000024588633,0.54380846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017682142,0.000033341363,0.800586,0.059509967,0.00027573833,0.000024469262,0.00015673452,0.00020373624,0.0008349443,0.022511397,0.11344131,0.00065417547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007675385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000173775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66701317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053659995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009031955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4145532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989892391","doi":"10.1142/s0219198902000653","title":"SOME RESULTS ON (PRE)KERNEL CATCHERS AND THE COINCIDENCE OF THE KERNEL WITH PREKERNEL","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Coincidence; Mathematics; Kernel (algebra); Bounded function; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03575786326103469,"score_gpt":0.2363023372751855,"score_spread":0.2005444740141508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989892391","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32008693,0.432844,0.0006043117,0.033957653,0.0024472226,0.0035928874,0.00064906426,0.00012690667,0.205691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706713,0.01629965,0.000015159195,0.0017850384,0.0001254331,0.000046544625,0.000002307114,0.000018138247,0.011036436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844915,0.00022933251,0.0007302765,0.00032029804,0.00011798299,0.00015296461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790704,0.00061849883,0.00082998845,0.00054751127,0.000057872494,0.000039089486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029701751,0.00016768335,0.00043618542,0.000046404806,0.00005966816,0.000037502163,0.0007098065,0.000045845536,0.00018453928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009539304,0.00009532367,0.00014812157,0.00013397951,0.00043580367,0.00013577241,0.000093698596,0.00020974495,0.00021790358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025069676,0.000050791663,0.00083786773,0.00021089305,0.00011876346,0.0000017842386,0.00086451735,0.000059747483,0.0000022216,0.99553794,0.0005989856,0.0014658207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008644747,0.00040255202,0.025502663,0.017082922,0.00019367803,0.0003670865,0.00032439406,0.003907838,0.0002087836,0.77012205,0.1721632,0.0010800996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058566155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039671304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65058434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046757326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008267812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38871863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003412690","doi":"10.1142/s0219198907001357","title":"A UNIFYING DIFFERENTIAL GAME OF ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Promotion (chess); Differential (mechanical device); Advertising; Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Differential game; Business; Economics; Marketing; Mathematics; Accounting; Political science; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.022994737474293186,"score_gpt":0.28718452889538115,"score_spread":0.26418979142108795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003412690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8651589,0.027858451,0.01961117,0.0013834146,0.0012298898,0.0008035429,0.000007804868,0.00015330614,0.08379352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970596,0.0017852635,0.0000679298,0.0005050046,0.0002092543,0.000005447715,0.000014040517,0.000012478892,0.00034100536],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991714,0.00001947276,0.00034349633,0.0001489714,0.00019028295,0.00012639319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942875,0.000104616876,0.00019872662,0.00011607204,0.00014093133,0.000010912088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009090695,0.00010566609,0.00018870788,0.00015669935,0.000033002358,0.000051044244,0.00016780524,0.000024279912,0.0009801519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020557328,0.00009340409,0.00007881999,0.00016200436,0.000058818663,0.00033165532,0.0001358796,0.000091491966,0.00002437034],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067756526,0.00010565516,0.022794012,0.0020810815,0.00007907532,0.00001426233,0.00006991206,6.0936316e-7,0.0022390324,0.11651945,0.000099095916,0.85593003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021331853,0.000033072447,0.5574847,0.026566712,0.0014989196,0.00012805127,0.00020740398,0.00077073346,0.00051916717,0.06295761,0.34650537,0.0011950807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030778257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012679338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85473496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013183423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070834258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012705428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198910002556","title":"VON NEUMANN, VILLE, AND THE MINIMAX THEOREM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Institut de France","keywords":"Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Minimax theorem; Minimax; Convexity; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Danskin's theorem; Fixed-point theorem; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Brouwer fixed-point theorem","score_opus":0.018777482732672785,"score_gpt":0.2411784849224101,"score_spread":0.2224010021897373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012705428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10037196,0.15989774,0.0012485149,0.014470329,0.0055556893,0.0012644747,0.00013833973,0.00013964028,0.71691334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774598,0.01189638,0.00005510941,0.0030204959,0.00033501195,0.00006133598,0.000009051801,0.000022358492,0.007140473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873614,0.00014315765,0.00061207113,0.00029183808,0.000055245157,0.00016153372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986346,0.0004848704,0.00039540802,0.00038208542,0.000050317718,0.000052713138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051851445,0.00015411219,0.00042179404,0.00006860965,0.000070548944,0.0000767703,0.00054044364,0.00005922533,0.0018397768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010296963,0.000109926135,0.00016465024,0.000089196656,0.00034203404,0.00012866504,0.00009944204,0.0002909376,0.0010793342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004514537,0.000017294746,0.0004681406,0.00011099082,0.00005916409,0.0000012280034,0.00019099993,3.9821182e-7,0.000015082753,0.9921503,0.00041819082,0.0065230452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004960884,0.000012055198,0.0006455338,0.00030942724,0.000013465676,0.000059462487,0.000022829707,0.00009910611,0.000012502935,0.58288676,0.41530368,0.00013907797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014864282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005077892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87708783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014052892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071477384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026007158","doi":"10.1142/s0219198903001033","title":"Imitation, Group Selection and Cooperation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Handshake; Imitation; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Limit (mathematics); Mutation; Group (periodic table); Biology; Mathematical economics; Genetics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Demography; Sociology; Neuroscience; Computer network","score_opus":0.01716684558162165,"score_gpt":0.3182741714850448,"score_spread":0.30110732590342315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026007158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04252696,0.10353302,0.0814021,0.013904651,0.0027487015,0.002413721,0.00002105392,0.00053122616,0.75291854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440018,0.046171937,0.0005143133,0.002271565,0.00021542894,0.00007737591,0.000038343293,0.000011362574,0.006697857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980511,0.0011397933,0.00024107553,0.0001945849,0.00024460958,0.00012884314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992844,0.00019278316,0.00008830093,0.00007331223,0.00029734094,0.00006384814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025740908,0.00009306553,0.00011716158,0.00005564885,0.0002765011,0.00006768023,0.000113437054,0.000050819464,0.0019001248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012817461,0.00009077118,0.000041165225,0.00021399086,0.0001235531,0.00050465285,0.000010219874,0.00009234088,0.00013977011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012515606,0.000029743142,0.00016172144,0.000029712886,0.000017565597,4.3164317e-7,0.00046488858,0.000013259568,0.00013376781,0.98261154,0.00051605125,0.016008792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023476502,0.000045825094,0.00043562526,0.0004060546,0.000043063214,0.000024171508,0.00030313956,0.00007970384,0.00006251471,0.15285654,0.8453124,0.0001961783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016185251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113125425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90147483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009779449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008195619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031337097","doi":"10.1142/s021919890800200x","title":"A DYNAMIC GAME OF OPERATIONS AND MARKETING MANAGEMENT IN A SUPPLY CHAIN","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Production (economics); Revenue management; Loyalty; Supply chain management; Marketing; Process (computing); Revenue; Revenue sharing; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01688437043869276,"score_gpt":0.2513026813052643,"score_spread":0.23441831086657153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031337097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45632657,0.07481164,0.002833059,0.014971153,0.001656208,0.0047159824,0.00002795273,0.000267561,0.44438985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574799,0.033262182,0.00035243074,0.0047775856,0.00009910566,0.00013618362,0.000049801856,0.000022443064,0.0038203662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987838,0.00006332446,0.0004684824,0.00025390726,0.000268522,0.00016190729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.00005707096,0.0001340039,0.00019356264,0.000080455065,0.000011046046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013839583,0.00015255829,0.0002515223,0.00033571455,0.00003603739,0.000039263723,0.00030379568,0.00002309866,0.001076864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001574682,0.00014238214,0.000079029494,0.00027899706,0.00009054095,0.00039923034,0.00025890538,0.00008511155,0.00008762976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002354686,0.00052637904,0.010945602,0.00797469,0.0003970269,0.00021559221,0.00032521933,0.00045891965,0.00010618304,0.80310005,0.004939238,0.17077562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033378464,0.000034547505,0.10820577,0.0149644455,0.00029504744,0.000076390555,0.0007446087,0.049569782,0.000010761896,0.024966221,0.7967287,0.0010659092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037163616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029917523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7917894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049924798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073596752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031876440","doi":"10.1142/s0219198912500168","title":"STRATEGIC EFFECTS OF A BORDER TAX ADJUSTMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Bishop's University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon tax; Welfare; Economics; Environmental tax; International economics; Carbon leakage; Public economics; Business; International trade; Climate policy; Greenhouse gas; Tax reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.0843873780807532,"score_gpt":0.31580761696303306,"score_spread":0.23142023888227986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031876440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05370132,0.6632506,0.00057904515,0.0014762603,0.002920159,0.00063474773,0.00036955075,0.000034696477,0.27703357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8218789,0.1713725,0.00016717019,0.0031186473,0.00051021244,0.000098476296,0.000048290472,0.000025547071,0.0027802556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991063,0.000024611729,0.0005076403,0.00014155192,0.00002620167,0.0001936905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922717,0.000119006676,0.00036830877,0.0001978897,0.000023054257,0.00006457823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006881796,0.00011211796,0.000354268,0.00008465401,0.0000116002675,0.000009745491,0.00022503622,0.000039657545,0.0033722196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013336755,0.000115972136,0.00014631647,0.00006502558,0.00003780326,0.00016596005,0.00005684416,0.00006891454,0.0013128208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007707329,0.00010785246,0.0010117191,0.0008961052,0.0000894577,3.692237e-7,0.00013669048,0.0000013675557,0.0000080142845,0.99386877,0.00044265753,0.003429293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085801695,0.00009370994,0.0068764184,0.0021628842,0.00006931052,0.000027052176,0.00006367436,0.00012350871,0.00029665092,0.44435236,0.54455304,0.0005233864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025195599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017761919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76817757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074092764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005889133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052867428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198913400033","title":"CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE KAR AND FOLK SOLUTIONS FOR MINIMUM COST SPANNING TREE PROBLEMS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Spanning tree; Minimum spanning tree; Focus (optics); Tree (set theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06472994470482157,"score_gpt":0.25378321654376934,"score_spread":0.18905327183894777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052867428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561591,0.29097462,0.15570523,0.049026683,0.009390154,0.022225864,0.0033801666,0.0003115219,0.21282667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904296,0.0029375355,0.00011557583,0.00060500525,0.00010910888,0.0004407646,0.00002726016,0.00001824812,0.0053169015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896204,0.000059297763,0.0006013992,0.00018604577,0.000035107867,0.00015610314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893004,0.00020271167,0.00051648327,0.00021879442,0.000098768316,0.000033176668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012492905,0.00010039926,0.00029058714,0.0000624456,0.000080421414,0.000038043265,0.00030325734,0.000037182876,0.00035977678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052386173,0.000082396225,0.00013840046,0.00010270316,0.000095743446,0.00016789332,0.00007917694,0.000067707486,0.000118027005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035189923,0.00003703292,0.0015881861,0.00045277635,0.000071491384,3.776939e-8,0.00021543911,0.000010714215,0.00019007218,0.9914858,0.0004909778,0.005454002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007827475,0.000071314185,0.021784343,0.00486017,0.00006802438,0.000028115164,0.000101551406,0.0029004496,0.000085478074,0.5673702,0.40154594,0.00040168344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011915848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020697216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026314678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010571643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39393035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057129345","doi":"10.1142/s0219198905000648","title":"BECKMANN'S EDGEWORTH-BERTRAND DUOPOLY EXAMPLE REVISITED","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Duopoly; Bertrand competition; Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Limit price; Market price; Price level; Mathematical economics; Oligopoly; Monetary economics; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.11683686818367628,"score_gpt":0.4165286835842396,"score_spread":0.29969181540056333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057129345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025572598,0.1809291,0.048908036,0.05765635,0.0012936073,0.0023755117,0.00026091465,0.0005019716,0.6825019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89307916,0.01813592,0.0012745094,0.016596658,0.0010504328,0.00017949005,0.00007875909,0.00004173141,0.06956334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629784,0.00062948815,0.0010855489,0.00061887427,0.0011046847,0.00026356778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995949,0.0019251548,0.00041491134,0.001016746,0.00052546145,0.0001687372],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006882099,0.00023067457,0.00047396237,0.00019894494,0.00011024104,0.0001827138,0.0018081854,0.00007303111,0.018845115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026781447,0.0001703636,0.0003269977,0.00067034457,0.00019626365,0.00045110277,0.00017181793,0.00025787792,0.0106197735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036584046,0.0000923971,0.00010692317,0.000032161603,0.00004745811,0.0000031043726,0.0001364773,0.000020822523,0.00013835906,0.543107,0.02561826,0.43066046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018652603,0.000014064405,0.00052385085,0.00045117977,0.00003629272,0.0000430588,0.000024707973,0.000059101367,0.0001671068,0.18564242,0.8126824,0.00016927344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000048723473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000792193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86750656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057536912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004623328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067551151","doi":"10.1142/s0219198905000545","title":"SHELF-SPACE ALLOCATION AND ADVERTISING DECISIONS IN THE MARKETING CHANNEL: A DIFFERENTIAL GAME APPROACH","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; HEC Montréal","keywords":"Goodwill; Stackelberg competition; Business; Channel (broadcasting); Marketing channel; Differential game; Advertising; Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Differential (mechanical device); Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.024018979664764982,"score_gpt":0.27271930192454885,"score_spread":0.24870032225978386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067551151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.634395,0.10333701,0.029006738,0.042047277,0.001501025,0.003506818,0.00001159856,0.00035437054,0.18584016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805255,0.008028284,0.00015289226,0.0028848911,0.00049638597,0.00006514645,0.00002746999,0.000017992246,0.00027437398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873096,0.00015312967,0.00035944182,0.00026467646,0.00031205456,0.00017972854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999065,0.00046314692,0.00017241627,0.00019948972,0.00008916722,0.000010791647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024065257,0.00016325244,0.00020195059,0.00017141867,0.000070226466,0.00022328377,0.0003899836,0.000035833596,0.0003118943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075187045,0.00011946622,0.00008564595,0.00025823247,0.000045879162,0.0005492108,0.00017461728,0.00018946592,0.000048180907],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010262547,0.00012309209,0.0030213413,0.00038165282,0.000033082597,0.0000051380607,0.00021980488,0.000025499057,0.00009022994,0.024124356,0.00060075754,0.9712724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018339991,0.000009859218,0.31921223,0.011224589,0.00063264184,0.0001435006,0.0006243014,0.032013707,0.000010146355,0.011548114,0.62168336,0.0010635251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030956744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002819518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003092779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009251521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4871691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082720961","doi":"10.1142/s0219198907001692","title":"EVOLUTION AND THE COMPLEXITY OF FINITE AUTOMATA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Repeated game; Prisoner's dilemma; Mathematical economics; Automaton; Limit (mathematics); Finite-state machine; Dilemma; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.16963203638993185,"score_gpt":0.4264736308364938,"score_spread":0.25684159444656196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082720961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04746587,0.075952925,0.53440326,0.03635145,0.0010636585,0.002097912,0.00019218994,0.0001526966,0.30232003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99488336,0.0021323757,0.00032701413,0.0010708839,0.000058852987,0.000014136778,0.0000050064036,0.0000042639626,0.001504112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979119,0.0004679017,0.0006934429,0.00020312762,0.00062202185,0.000101623875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945846,0.004184823,0.00038802545,0.0004823482,0.00031658108,0.000043590506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01619865,0.00008439038,0.0002578822,0.00008119586,0.000059584672,0.000033495373,0.00086313445,0.000024488887,0.00082315825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045463177,0.0000467137,0.00011987974,0.0003230578,0.001348827,0.00012133934,0.00016534462,0.00009785623,0.00025176333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008030073,0.000022697435,0.00010950116,0.000019275732,0.000014205769,3.3284525e-7,0.00007447605,0.0000048223246,0.000028499624,0.9492443,0.00033263714,0.05006891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032903318,0.000008752742,0.0072759152,0.00022860082,0.000022392096,0.000018028333,0.000061326304,0.00041943128,0.00005053575,0.93808115,0.053452745,0.000052072395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056613544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051663437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018956467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019185385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90130055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085622378","doi":"10.1142/s021919890900242x","title":"A NEW SEQUENCE FORM APPROACH FOR THE ENUMERATION AND REFINEMENT OF ALL EXTREME NASH EQUILIBRIA FOR EXTENSIVE FORM GAMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Enumeration; Sequence (biology); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Order (exchange); Combinatorics; Extreme point; Parametric statistics; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.2541072843506172,"score_gpt":0.4350478281736562,"score_spread":0.18094054382303904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085622378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025151644,0.027055895,0.94054985,0.019584475,0.00021378504,0.0036984184,0.00018443608,0.000038900358,0.0061590937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920091,0.016322548,0.057585403,0.014205167,0.0006087001,0.0014225697,0.00020847401,0.00003927719,0.017598776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801534,0.00009972078,0.00079362735,0.000394878,0.0005171573,0.00017925046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603975,0.0022211964,0.00051689695,0.00049754,0.0006520867,0.00007253253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004033553,0.00016635694,0.00035054376,0.00007563603,0.00008091732,0.00009995207,0.0008626856,0.000042937532,0.0002052142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023026585,0.0001009227,0.00022718582,0.00018265545,0.00010536278,0.00029724024,0.00007366729,0.00007165358,0.000012019383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001074995,0.00003312286,0.0000031378775,0.000050501407,0.000039476337,8.549164e-8,0.00030696995,0.000014409602,0.0016711878,0.527274,0.0046631256,0.46583647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039553543,0.00012377526,0.00013327353,0.0002334482,0.00008771741,0.000018765122,0.00011518202,0.0036920097,0.00048594447,0.7406505,0.253946,0.00011783577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000028003858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018247805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88949394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034568497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006775327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41155082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087042360","doi":"10.1142/s0219198912400026","title":"COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Transfer payment; Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Game theory; Operations research; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06274854512754666,"score_gpt":0.30097729068451456,"score_spread":0.2382287455569679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087042360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.246474e-7,0.9389594,0.000005125176,0.00038654867,0.0009409241,0.0013967211,0.004604742,0.000009995764,0.053696424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000025723484,0.9913709,0.000037438138,0.002917507,0.0002692792,0.0003198581,0.00055232365,0.000052193565,0.004477941],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747944,0.0001696135,0.0016290684,0.00040147218,0.00007449955,0.00024592626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969304,0.00012288957,0.0021252222,0.0007331161,0.00002431321,0.0000640402],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015138935,0.00040341335,0.0020009289,0.00015159462,0.000036702946,0.00003264667,0.0011440894,0.00014551007,0.0043161935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010237477,0.0003068361,0.0010478247,0.0003665972,0.000113927796,0.0001749286,0.00039388792,0.00032204372,0.0018061347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000215342,0.00006965548,0.0000055566816,0.3355926,0.00057440664,0.0000017717045,0.00008594899,1.973756e-8,3.2803436e-9,0.2787972,0.0024260224,0.38244465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049207072,0.0000039764977,0.0000032487658,0.28530163,0.0003410798,0.000025213543,0.0000036850738,1.4638039e-7,4.8673105e-8,0.0046246746,0.70944893,0.00019813735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010335978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.5755681e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7070229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002737472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018539771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110214742","doi":"10.1142/s0219198908001984","title":"A CLASS OF GAMES WITH COUPLED CONSTRAINTS TO MODEL INTERNATIONAL GHG EMISSION AGREEMENTS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Negotiation; Constraint (computer-aided design); Nash equilibrium; Yield (engineering); Kyoto Protocol; Pareto principle; Economics; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Operations management; Ecology; Physics","score_opus":0.10727657609461964,"score_gpt":0.2940236538055442,"score_spread":0.18674707771092453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110214742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5181597,0.02131824,0.03967026,0.01564166,0.0018842521,0.0018047863,0.0028817977,0.0001217596,0.39851755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555882,0.033361778,0.0012449645,0.004796879,0.0001289853,0.000072242336,0.000110732326,0.000030525654,0.0046656546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986538,0.000014978434,0.0007452566,0.00032041597,0.00008341071,0.0001820932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.00006441629,0.000470835,0.00025064644,0.00010920308,0.0001039387],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054469454,0.00016586072,0.0004536287,0.00019176803,0.000031234944,0.000017070719,0.00048877776,0.000048852893,0.0026875662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000217385,0.00016238635,0.00013078017,0.00009916417,0.00013849433,0.00017495739,0.00011294497,0.000096535114,0.0004663552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055634254,0.00058761577,0.020284269,0.0007836266,0.00092053926,0.000029109395,0.0024826205,0.0019065618,0.00022696277,0.9501861,0.009138626,0.012897674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007781186,0.00063500967,0.00964973,0.012427912,0.00015125023,0.0006709823,0.00043321706,0.1336714,0.00095249823,0.24989358,0.58080846,0.0029247797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019269755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045407864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70029247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013894576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032274744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136726930","doi":"10.1142/s0219198901000282","title":"STACKELBERG LEADERSHIP IN A MARKETING CHANNEL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Inefficiency; Channel (broadcasting); Margin (machine learning); Microeconomics; Marketing channel; Economics; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1105704953329919,"score_gpt":0.28897480430249894,"score_spread":0.17840430896950704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136726930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09670467,0.1048627,0.0006601781,0.02751946,0.0025080203,0.0013296166,0.000006032296,0.0003733569,0.766036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674249,0.011587345,0.00002379885,0.015192788,0.0006607788,0.00006272952,0.000033878187,0.00003337383,0.004980358],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988413,0.00008170837,0.0003545406,0.0002356326,0.00023706551,0.00024975103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993429,0.00021424453,0.0001601057,0.00017078542,0.00010151506,0.000010456905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029388878,0.00015064585,0.0002163689,0.00022498956,0.000030528827,0.00010148073,0.00036464893,0.000032987504,0.0042078057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071311236,0.000140888,0.00010373089,0.00037384863,0.000032856344,0.0005305692,0.00012752553,0.00016855894,0.0005412683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038860427,0.00017607497,0.0770072,0.0030065132,0.0000641917,0.00019195562,0.0000721662,0.000009228419,0.000057711008,0.034245558,0.0038546629,0.88092613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007294527,0.000003956421,0.07501295,0.011500573,0.00011872567,0.000048857528,0.00022607855,0.00056869123,0.000002708853,0.011080906,0.90018344,0.0005236852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006082257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006192874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89632875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003700251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000106954885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137531066","doi":"10.1142/s0219198915400071","title":"Mixed Solution Strategy for MCGDM Problems Using Entropy/Cross Entropy in Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Mathematics; Entropy (arrow of time); Weight; Mathematical optimization; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.25819470629256136,"score_gpt":0.4441788702775555,"score_spread":0.18598416398499412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137531066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02277371,0.0054090274,0.9664107,0.00061652705,0.0017662778,0.00165872,0.000115316005,0.00005272717,0.0011969875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98302716,0.0015393307,0.012811551,0.00085469795,0.00034667,0.00024039256,0.00007112421,0.000046637346,0.0010624176],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934724,0.0014468026,0.0021210455,0.00091533724,0.0015916097,0.000452796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572206,0.002056412,0.0009227154,0.0007386831,0.0004221786,0.00013797317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011178868,0.00034256975,0.00073594763,0.00038265283,0.00012690292,0.00054413325,0.0014340552,0.0001104834,0.00227296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072895302,0.00027717446,0.0003855138,0.0002891982,0.00022729544,0.0005451067,0.00028694747,0.00023275355,0.0007275202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054710626,0.00046127595,0.0009891872,0.00055763096,0.00013965176,0.000014822761,0.0002949162,0.018570116,0.013671955,0.47266048,0.001237237,0.49085563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018409448,0.00016501329,0.0013987469,0.003455399,0.00006665084,0.000047934212,0.000058730304,0.19940154,0.00034612,0.6972318,0.0954786,0.00050848303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011612355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070169713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046414405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061021474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142502904","doi":"10.1142/s0219198901000415","title":"GENERALISATIONS OF THE GILMORE-GOMORY TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM AND THE GILMORE-GOMORY SCHEME: A SURVEY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Travelling salesman problem; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Identification (biology); Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Biology","score_opus":0.019547953420292846,"score_gpt":0.2408912196229989,"score_spread":0.22134326620270606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142502904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1268737,0.40871745,0.08659096,0.022140665,0.0062995716,0.009338067,0.00067312096,0.0012911077,0.33807534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139988,0.07853985,0.0015293179,0.0017348372,0.00016964506,0.00011793368,0.0000994601,0.00006674896,0.0037434343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842435,0.00044484768,0.00053179485,0.00017209699,0.00027130346,0.00015561131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989385,0.0003411426,0.00016127135,0.0003337476,0.00018075369,0.000044566175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020829183,0.00018264429,0.00028621362,0.0000487528,0.000075170174,0.000043865777,0.00046584383,0.000052266983,0.00035407496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028020435,0.00011348663,0.00013890104,0.00027608682,0.00025812272,0.00011008968,0.00007482338,0.00022524579,0.000021277685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002613867,0.00022753107,0.015822591,0.004024947,0.0014764263,0.00001051702,0.003938218,0.13038135,0.0009978875,0.75919133,0.008254065,0.07541373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01173033,0.00012746293,0.07430232,0.02761571,0.0011564378,0.0010760934,0.00040706215,0.28556445,0.0011265661,0.16279481,0.43067414,0.0034246298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021927055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003632182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78712505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003619697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029915145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46278507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153722563","doi":"10.1142/s0219198914500029","title":"DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY AS THE OBJECTIVE OF CONTEST DESIGN","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Stochastic game; Variable (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Simple (philosophy); Degree (music); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08734478404698591,"score_gpt":0.37789300564677064,"score_spread":0.2905482215997847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153722563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08753601,0.07548529,0.0019786605,0.0073945033,0.0011600589,0.0020813982,0.00004875798,0.00006006025,0.8242553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98905987,0.009312701,0.00012927708,0.0004763663,0.000051496387,0.00003817703,0.000001546446,0.00000510361,0.0009254801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888974,0.00047326856,0.0002721489,0.0001024069,0.00018118398,0.000081255195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869674,0.00071503205,0.00025819696,0.00011913807,0.0001880186,0.00002284722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015281055,0.00006956921,0.0002184777,0.00001760627,0.000054394433,0.000007979002,0.00042094185,0.000020542653,0.00031315946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009624337,0.000046754278,0.00010510207,0.000058354573,0.0005132581,0.00006664789,0.00006658158,0.000052230185,0.000054581476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033096367,0.00008285968,0.0007425844,0.00004329388,0.000084850326,2.8546518e-7,0.0044297236,0.0000035318706,0.00080013624,0.9610784,0.00035573856,0.03234551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023601134,0.0011651773,0.024852071,0.011095492,0.0007634876,0.000022253816,0.021745805,0.00008227918,0.040638342,0.5356033,0.36036307,0.0013085952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030207366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006155775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9015238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073161966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041983516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34288764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163568120","doi":"10.1142/s0219198905000600","title":"SUSTAINABILITY OF COOPERATION OVERTIME IN LINEAR-QUADRATIC DIFFERENTIAL GAMES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Overtime; Differential (mechanical device); Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematical economics; Quadratic equation; Link (geometry); Economics; Time consistency; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Actuarial science; Political science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.020031609923356487,"score_gpt":0.34583902762658053,"score_spread":0.325807417703224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163568120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5120657,0.033988714,0.2682157,0.111945115,0.00066439837,0.0033848532,0.00002685379,0.00013097642,0.06957768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246246,0.0033022938,0.00022092732,0.0025184457,0.00008340568,0.000038908332,0.000020525187,0.0000057228517,0.0013473239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987278,0.00026164475,0.0006084635,0.00016237177,0.00010789522,0.00013179697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990055,0.0005073006,0.00009474248,0.00016252165,0.00017519487,0.000054753342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010887195,0.000100153215,0.0004934492,0.000046727782,0.000010255148,0.0000018194735,0.00010056628,0.00008031519,0.0049260054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030895078,0.000068839574,0.00012341436,0.000066106615,0.0002110034,0.000058844198,0.000038099293,0.00016899176,0.00007831944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002611717,0.0004675152,0.00060765364,0.0012444381,0.000061234656,0.0000045468696,0.00006226441,0.000072113755,0.00005379872,0.9795926,0.00012978492,0.017442856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023131634,0.00042389758,0.0103038475,0.00568815,0.00033734692,0.00008213467,0.000029930892,0.101503365,0.00070306903,0.8637127,0.014581429,0.00032092733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017570978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001982787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48039672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006135741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051269053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2382996178","doi":"10.1142/s0219198916400028","title":"Strategic Support of Node-Consistent Cooperative Outcomes in Dynamic Games Played Over Event Trees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Event (particle physics); Node (physics); Sequential game; Mathematical economics; Game tree; Subgame; Computer science; Extensive-form game; Tree (set theory); Backward induction; Non-cooperative game; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Operations research; Economics; Game theory; Mathematics; Equilibrium selection; Combinatorics; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.08526420958749709,"score_gpt":0.420012833805227,"score_spread":0.33474862421772994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2382996178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8871265,0.011165387,0.008853111,0.021596316,0.00096480054,0.002070677,0.00093970686,0.00009747609,0.06718601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831356,0.0032878704,0.000069490765,0.0011282181,0.000015994408,0.00010853606,0.000011507028,0.000012034682,0.012230752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659324,0.0006170836,0.0013038721,0.0004521972,0.00083972956,0.0001938851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594134,0.0024702926,0.00053027685,0.0006083499,0.00037285525,0.000076875076],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036891573,0.00020998818,0.0006297735,0.00021756685,0.000025370471,0.00004044497,0.0010698957,0.000051618015,0.009047914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015918866,0.0001137864,0.0002903633,0.00033008738,0.00027655033,0.00025068974,0.00013840297,0.00010363712,0.0008029756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017588968,0.0005249246,0.007499588,0.00006431573,0.00019801619,0.000014620421,0.00029453292,0.0000871997,0.0036936665,0.9076626,0.00093661074,0.07884805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019232491,0.0002012278,0.051784568,0.0027807795,0.00009904841,0.000047182733,0.0004354157,0.00021020652,0.0010375275,0.8849497,0.055949923,0.0005811878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004500238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004291542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09600908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009116656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103151724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470158534","doi":"10.1142/s0219198920500085","title":"Revenue Sharing in Airline Alliance Networks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Axiom; Revenue sharing; Simple (philosophy); Shapley value; Alliance; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.05593696669172733,"score_gpt":0.3674559966251273,"score_spread":0.31151902993339997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470158534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025742548,0.53864574,0.17194787,0.115293615,0.012688201,0.004853144,0.00063930074,0.0008944272,0.15246342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31342277,0.6647511,0.001961326,0.00833817,0.0016711806,0.0002084752,0.0011940284,0.000051251103,0.008401708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837756,0.000261194,0.0004826138,0.00038464667,0.0003341189,0.0001598656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918747,0.00012150266,0.00030609433,0.00017868019,0.00013323424,0.000073039795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015073746,0.00014829649,0.00030940544,0.00004406507,0.000043118627,0.00006505155,0.0007365697,0.00014366528,0.0005148227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005399817,0.00016255304,0.0001232078,0.00018218937,0.00006995038,0.00009891365,0.00008956586,0.0005316102,0.00006086442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016486959,0.00016987539,0.014425883,0.0034871774,0.0002609143,0.00017509269,0.011762095,0.32266057,0.0000018345171,0.54435354,0.013437358,0.08910075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000365744,0.000013277495,0.0062564965,0.038797297,0.0001232586,0.0000019062375,0.00011524778,0.012381115,0.0000012093744,0.096057706,0.8452294,0.00065737707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013856584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029317592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012539241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012206101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.662872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023589101","doi":"10.1142/s0219198921500018","title":"Markovian Switching of Mutation Rates in Evolutionary Network Dynamics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Markov chain; Mutation; Mutation rate; Markov process; Bifurcation; Replicator equation; Population; Statistical physics; Evolutionary dynamics; Continuous-time Markov chain; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Markov model; Mathematics; Physics; Variable-order Markov model; Genetics; Biology; Statistics; Demography","score_opus":0.027836986058511475,"score_gpt":0.34669759001134065,"score_spread":0.31886060395282917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023589101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030403662,0.37866205,0.09329592,0.079055145,0.011929765,0.00807381,0.0005716846,0.0006828385,0.39732513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399662,0.05530661,0.00087735825,0.0013014235,0.0008949328,0.00013752848,0.0006166795,0.000029872679,0.0008693985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957391,0.0020052097,0.0009269249,0.00044973267,0.00062204717,0.00025699602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980873,0.00054327014,0.0006411209,0.00025922968,0.00038052467,0.00008858868],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034290403,0.00025173498,0.00053781003,0.00013383545,0.00011189623,0.000045932662,0.0008350128,0.0002232753,0.00086683704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013317836,0.00027178435,0.00023975364,0.00038638298,0.00016374457,0.0002794515,0.0003316909,0.00063960813,0.00006816372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013570192,0.00008138048,0.0010461453,0.000756432,0.000105811545,0.000018319228,0.0013913999,0.0039782873,0.000009365578,0.95661324,0.00073793676,0.035125993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024537538,0.000036815865,0.0039810506,0.0116776815,0.00011132552,0.00000833988,0.0005373593,0.009650066,0.000004373608,0.9595926,0.01371793,0.000437127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023334622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005439352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006229569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057944027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153704052","doi":"10.1142/s0219198921500109","title":"H∞ Constrained Pareto Suboptimal Strategy for Stochastic LPV Time-Delay Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Set (abstract data type); Pareto principle; Lemma (botany); Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Control (management)","score_opus":0.02166863874954972,"score_gpt":0.2665561904143082,"score_spread":0.2448875516647585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153704052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032191407,0.4736899,0.45550093,0.0010912134,0.0045755166,0.0031947456,0.00087704934,0.00080815866,0.057043318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948653,0.0016345822,0.00011337433,0.0002496506,0.00039143738,0.00039901133,0.00013601569,0.00004033588,0.0021702647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865615,0.00013433583,0.00053152454,0.0002320154,0.00022884666,0.00021713282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869794,0.0005717025,0.00007869079,0.00025031753,0.00032264454,0.0000786786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007526557,0.00019284127,0.00045245636,0.0000348404,0.000024872232,0.00007425103,0.00025757463,0.0000653246,0.00062022667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032984742,0.00018055855,0.00020740961,0.00008624828,0.00005221791,0.00010417335,0.000019800163,0.000110699206,0.00019566258],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027022266,0.00019302912,0.000030967054,0.011654508,0.002463352,0.0001281457,0.00027083766,0.40026593,0.0031785583,0.4839281,0.009462162,0.08815419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034303118,0.00024070372,0.000056065877,0.01560081,0.00063303753,0.0009725433,0.00051107415,0.66894835,0.00017501481,0.016937852,0.29091674,0.0015774727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024033518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019601919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010841319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007763099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73629636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392893971","doi":"10.1142/s0219198924400097","title":"Dynamic Oligopolistic Competition with Uncertainty and Supply Disruption Effects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Oligopoly; Competition (biology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Microeconomics; Sequential game; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Game theory; Mathematics; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.008147705751984377,"score_gpt":0.2520423793876112,"score_spread":0.24389467363562684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392893971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11525857,0.30951896,0.049126774,0.04757874,0.012113857,0.007045191,0.00010278312,0.0025853526,0.45666978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98324966,0.008432098,0.000042746466,0.0057253526,0.00039046354,0.0000990028,0.0002247853,0.000026960895,0.0018089501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991534,0.000029581352,0.0001873662,0.00025924918,0.00023749302,0.00013292987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996308,0.00009465917,0.00006796886,0.00012761891,0.00006635759,0.000012568851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045238645,0.00015704977,0.00016708918,0.00015947544,0.000040834242,0.00026747407,0.00015883485,0.00002116154,0.00070722355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006662873,0.00011690698,0.00005938756,0.00017809574,0.00008078807,0.0005161434,0.00008919764,0.000092959104,0.00047190872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030512838,0.000030557603,0.00017075839,0.006303485,0.00009568191,0.000039683986,0.0000177046,0.00003487183,0.000017235318,0.93628883,0.0016928889,0.05527776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040230533,0.000032276803,0.0027339775,0.015732335,0.00034375986,0.000032833126,0.00005242106,0.022150377,0.0000023511195,0.084041744,0.8741259,0.0003497072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002521289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011025691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.872433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007529581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008217478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7743602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394726262","doi":"10.1142/s0219198924500087","title":"Ecological Economics and Dynamic Games: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Ecology; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.017736051963019445,"score_gpt":0.2555040946396616,"score_spread":0.23776804267664217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394726262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000553571,0.9693493,0.0008227621,0.0050852587,0.0009535684,0.0007421112,0.000264029,0.00006875978,0.022160629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040185645,0.9477371,0.00012186148,0.0056090117,0.000093084884,0.0001860191,0.000056522127,0.00002951661,0.0059812535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811214,0.00007420449,0.0010738964,0.0005224446,0.000024936942,0.0001923771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989875,0.0002659894,0.00028813406,0.000339377,0.000036122266,0.000082896855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021712577,0.00022997358,0.000899863,0.00012777044,0.000028267605,0.0002040451,0.0003820611,0.00008426434,0.0010860752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034614917,0.00020024598,0.00027737106,0.00011639931,0.00007401203,0.00032606864,0.00011886211,0.00020588978,0.001072235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033136587,0.000016845728,0.000004264379,0.09618231,0.00015911512,0.000013776495,0.0000650338,0.0000033516044,1.9314227e-7,0.90011394,0.00080080156,0.0026370578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001188365,0.000034824712,0.0000235131,0.2167017,0.00008632847,0.00031548063,0.000011032136,0.0025450857,3.355543e-7,0.43766212,0.34217796,0.00032278057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.560349e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014931334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46245182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016103973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020509875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399185150","doi":"10.1142/s0219198924020018","title":"Preface: Special Issue on <i>Game Theory and Optimization</i> in Honor of Pierre Bernhard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Sociology; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.046958429296512706,"score_gpt":0.3930694967049926,"score_spread":0.34611106740847986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399185150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016033083,0.13560452,0.04894421,0.019706432,0.0045389105,0.0034068972,0.0007425088,0.00028462586,0.77073884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8062081,0.082455404,0.0018467938,0.0074952473,0.004531398,0.0004402273,0.0001041009,0.000115549425,0.09680317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680483,0.00082395267,0.0009142778,0.00054923625,0.00074273284,0.00016496633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995795,0.0032083185,0.00022591386,0.0004906162,0.00019929609,0.00008087041],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067207306,0.00020087497,0.00043128815,0.0003058581,0.000030679614,0.0001420496,0.00087527453,0.000069238224,0.010611844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025297767,0.00014844227,0.00016137987,0.0006473104,0.00025924045,0.00029212152,0.00016357175,0.00024170072,0.0011412184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011674008,0.000077217854,0.00003124568,0.0001263152,0.000038125563,0.0000067208243,0.0003873273,0.0014328768,0.000029458879,0.7181875,0.0054716887,0.27409476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017112719,0.000043274875,0.00018488054,0.0019457825,0.000033150718,0.000021246262,0.000086971195,0.00067984255,0.00014819218,0.45858425,0.5379489,0.00015238726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012647567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021666228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.790175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047232857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063734784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414815023","doi":"10.1142/s0219198925020025","title":"Preface to the Special Issue on Dynamic Games on Green Environment: Technological Innovation and Policy Initiatives (Part II)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Environmental Sustainability and Technology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Technological change; Game theory; Policy making","score_opus":0.008209521333456433,"score_gpt":0.2805615847528698,"score_spread":0.27235206341941337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414815023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31340048,0.002777669,0.0008166427,0.37030792,0.00035126644,0.0032799223,0.00008765625,0.00022065788,0.30875778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93665445,0.011809727,0.00014139536,0.031556044,0.0003045975,0.0003156352,0.00002599388,0.000017207734,0.01917497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987047,0.0001565794,0.00029586206,0.00040414414,0.0002577519,0.00018099509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938214,0.00014648994,0.00009607644,0.00034282813,0.0000056849044,0.000026798401],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006180278,0.00017548206,0.00017886887,0.00012993807,0.00012845878,0.0000147039855,0.0005078714,0.00008944629,0.003352935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044262278,0.00012239639,0.00004270358,0.00040977588,0.0006518772,0.000096188916,0.0006947887,0.00025795956,0.0007916248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000622737,0.00017795851,0.00048728025,0.000040912124,0.0000289249,0.0000030198028,0.00008691,0.00007941749,0.000079604506,0.36455292,0.002087959,0.63231283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012557075,0.00018543152,0.014574897,0.00029590842,0.000012456003,0.000004135031,0.0000536577,0.000018262894,0.00023446922,0.09136498,0.8930125,0.00011771147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001172961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006962539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8909246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047847416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007314347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414876762","doi":"10.1142/s0219198925500136","title":"The Equal Share Proportional Solution for the River Sharing Problem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Distribution (mathematics); Cournot competition; Consumption (sociology); Cost sharing","score_opus":0.038160170468670485,"score_gpt":0.36112498664554804,"score_spread":0.32296481617687756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414876762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039248422,0.117381774,0.22306281,0.35935608,0.0032473137,0.010387407,0.00012374813,0.00035552762,0.28569284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6206907,0.07238168,0.0015249331,0.020741353,0.0019178651,0.0037729882,0.00019221181,0.00006705861,0.2787112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986832,0.00017649689,0.0003015608,0.00020552667,0.000419116,0.00021408849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902016,0.00045047395,0.00011635894,0.0001931304,0.00019497641,0.000024905432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033811298,0.0000922173,0.000102007645,0.000031995452,0.0007983807,0.00021052426,0.0010344802,0.000025887455,0.00033254147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031458316,0.000052788622,0.00015417543,0.00014089073,0.0003870801,0.00012210311,0.0001392038,0.00010592377,0.00005675768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002359797,0.000016249342,0.00009990238,0.00014691078,0.000113754,2.9540325e-7,0.0007433352,0.000017338258,0.0000015459502,0.85181737,0.0051468546,0.14187285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102932376,0.000006009104,0.00029957696,0.00069593644,0.000055710534,3.9870812e-7,0.0001227216,0.00018465894,0.0000018666912,0.1639467,0.8345285,0.000054949192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067269815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001655239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017578104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009858304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61405796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}