{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f8d138555ed","filters":{"venue":"International Game Theory Review"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f8d138555ed","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Game+Theory+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1964737813","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000216","title":"BOOK REVIEW: <i>Differential Games in Marketing</i>. By Steffen Jørgensen and Georges Zaccour","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Chatterjee; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02786565933808989,"score_gpt":0.3589306493530891,"score_spread":0.3310649900149992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964737813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040354533,0.8270243,0.00370804,0.041924838,0.055236742,0.000079152844,0.00041870135,0.0001664469,0.07103824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060198526,0.64187497,0.0033955695,0.019887231,0.038263276,0.00014558843,0.0007975298,0.0002355499,0.28938046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942005,0.00010455148,0.000026757609,0.00009961531,0.00031164347,0.000037382968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737513,0.0014712642,0.0001223551,0.00006223327,0.0007625993,0.00020643415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007283193,0.0013866395,0.0018174761,0.0024898683,0.0006019182,0.0022760069,0.0012623655,0.0019595565,0.039842952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003684893,0.0005300491,0.0007581356,0.003975014,0.0009971695,0.0029632584,0.0008112276,0.0033508025,0.028109133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011164434,0.0000117505,0.000024297779,0.00034918485,0.00000984807,0.000011622046,0.000012271769,0.00014326321,0.00007160159,0.0027607295,0.9581162,0.038478065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013382159,0.000022181468,0.00027214564,0.0006139111,0.000017613344,0.00013702088,0.000019520829,0.00023618886,0.00010032246,0.0054786694,0.9930775,0.000011493226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028072018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006094508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039842952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017980823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015314681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13328797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969699379","doi":"10.1142/s0219198903000957","title":"When will the Range of Prizes in Tournaments Increase in the Noise or in the Number of Players?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Generality; Tournament; Multiplicative function; Mathematical economics; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Multiplicative noise; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical analysis; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.041106546109435746,"score_gpt":0.2801495660447802,"score_spread":0.23904301993534444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969699379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.798907,0.0018673476,0.11273926,0.017201735,0.00017176887,0.00007305497,0.0006468079,0.0004157132,0.06797723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920793,0.0003056294,0.003984804,0.00039843153,0.00010617471,0.000045657554,0.000076984,0.000059230595,0.0029437155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963343,0.0013839981,0.00016028856,0.00075622555,0.00050688,0.0008581278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98500746,0.0070877927,0.0029043213,0.0013332773,0.0011582162,0.0025088983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00629254,0.0004911558,0.0012992548,0.0012602906,0.0011928151,0.0062544895,0.0018191127,0.0028414747,0.0055828206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042587645,0.00065541425,0.00088022836,0.0010125798,0.0029853727,0.009311153,0.0021128755,0.0020923174,0.0012468493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018955684,0.00056942867,0.07660604,0.00051047176,0.00048599605,0.0010167871,0.0022066084,0.081341,0.014524028,0.6544082,0.010767621,0.15566827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012608909,0.0005061787,0.05403206,0.00009628931,0.000087659035,0.00076349766,0.0022712038,0.05746318,0.002111872,0.8750954,0.0072756466,0.00017089667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011302953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011972425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00629254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015523044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005097414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033278525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977645093","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000150","title":"FORMALIZATION OF MULTI-LEVEL GAMES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Contrast (vision); Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Von Neumann architecture; Generalization; Best response; Extensive-form game; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Sequential game; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2536500171444254,"score_gpt":0.4591666713175731,"score_spread":0.20551665417314768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977645093","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011314845,0.001145651,0.9289768,0.0018114364,0.00018790306,0.00017351263,0.0004136689,0.00021188815,0.05576441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5325607,0.0021008484,0.44417432,0.0010000393,0.00036138322,0.0008335783,0.00075642945,0.00010541634,0.018107226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984006,0.00052931457,0.00013589009,0.00032153944,0.00042925007,0.00018324696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990885,0.00034986163,0.00016856006,0.00014962631,0.00016055594,0.000082884144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013788674,0.0007042405,0.0005567439,0.0009896618,0.00085242494,0.002708995,0.0015745687,0.0009594726,0.00714585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024052293,0.00026848615,0.0010574879,0.0010097336,0.0023870878,0.0041047116,0.0024832508,0.0023620012,0.0009633518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039763822,0.000009040709,0.00008346428,0.000037498834,0.000005860313,0.000059052545,0.00010150024,0.0024646374,0.0002529966,0.99277884,0.0005330582,0.0036700775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014878984,0.000026536092,0.00021200338,0.0000793715,0.000018460683,0.0002059441,0.00013237626,0.038252115,0.00042349918,0.9254504,0.035168137,0.0000162629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018878578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019213458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00714585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014995307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011185702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023905277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979004417","doi":"10.1142/s0219198900000081","title":"EVOLUTIONARY AND DYNAMIC STABILITY IN SYMMETRIC EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH TWO INDEPENDENT DECISIONS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Stochastic game; Nash equilibrium; Statement (logic); Competition (biology); Evolutionarily stable strategy; Risk dominance; Best response; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05656978910844371,"score_gpt":0.37635403092585,"score_spread":0.3197842418174063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979004417","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18856514,0.0014238423,0.750813,0.0016125186,0.00011339402,0.00011881324,0.00017832646,0.00009514192,0.057079814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95970875,0.00086899416,0.030145457,0.00009879874,0.00006544693,0.00017762755,0.00011203898,0.000025161875,0.008797743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986564,0.00059443887,0.00005661008,0.00021141833,0.0002761062,0.00020496352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671316,0.0021290206,0.0004994444,0.00012919573,0.00035273246,0.00017651287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002145555,0.000919417,0.00088658766,0.0010091618,0.0008214086,0.0020690802,0.0012591988,0.0013643528,0.0030442164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008298958,0.00040054505,0.0010336628,0.0009350753,0.0025256118,0.002654983,0.0018647974,0.0013887786,0.00041071637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005309063,0.000033205717,0.00066753756,0.000065098764,0.000053200463,0.00019545008,0.0002784286,0.25173622,0.0011020291,0.73658884,0.00065837806,0.008568549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002290548,0.000053311564,0.00035124613,0.000027865664,0.000019600242,0.00012594266,0.000097752265,0.61164004,0.00027958365,0.38581795,0.0015342942,0.000029504288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00319182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015167175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00319182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019986369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001332402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014501154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981404793","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000344","title":"THE FIRM AS A NEXUS OF STRATEGIES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Nexus (standard); Incentive; Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Profit (economics); Payment; Production (economics); Industrial organization; Computer science; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027129028750414435,"score_gpt":0.2645972168609178,"score_spread":0.23746818811050338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981404793","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17539518,0.003685388,0.55730397,0.009707265,0.00014713925,0.0003454185,0.0005323976,0.00026887062,0.25261444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204682,0.0019808959,0.050180566,0.00041017667,0.000075614895,0.00033354,0.0001527109,0.000026971353,0.026371386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840516,0.0006402286,0.00010809589,0.00036425976,0.00029772404,0.00018467181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990231,0.00052301644,0.0001244337,0.00010968353,0.000073392024,0.00014638752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011608308,0.00039272706,0.0008636087,0.00120628,0.0009157761,0.006062364,0.0010544133,0.0025857058,0.008179759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026728,0.00042032552,0.00057340757,0.0014927798,0.0025401225,0.0071121496,0.0025380503,0.0016032555,0.00095080974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066055604,0.000010030388,0.00017891583,0.000012508831,0.000008285411,0.000074243566,0.000051125153,0.0046935263,0.00013844635,0.99114764,0.00020143192,0.0034771718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015041454,0.000019171572,0.00012424322,0.000026178754,0.0000068248646,0.00007287893,0.00010486001,0.02499352,0.00012406193,0.96917,0.005333773,0.000009452119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001670853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014266695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008179759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021017562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018398095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027364016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984423735","doi":"10.1142/s021919891240004x","title":"OPTIMAL TARIFFS ON EXHAUSTIBLE RESOURCES: THE CASE OF QUANTITY-SETTING","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Resource (disambiguation); Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.049322200157272435,"score_gpt":0.2805553824299904,"score_spread":0.23123318227271797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984423735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4224876,0.0011456993,0.47228432,0.0020870604,0.00017201772,0.00017595128,0.00032149584,0.00017061981,0.101155356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98334,0.00027957393,0.012470572,0.00008909205,0.00002629232,0.000054223055,0.00003114626,0.000027648694,0.003681474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988022,0.0005960406,0.00004486626,0.00015497598,0.00016883315,0.00023301174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978459,0.0012634937,0.0002763896,0.0001939813,0.00017944528,0.00024073035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002562356,0.00096933026,0.001471151,0.0010380335,0.001161717,0.0042154216,0.0017442917,0.0020840843,0.007145021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008468707,0.0007068254,0.001144795,0.00092312746,0.0030926438,0.0070739063,0.0019518093,0.0017310558,0.00041867833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016339742,0.00006944423,0.0003963184,0.00009842014,0.000042685417,0.0002525618,0.0001244744,0.30665857,0.0010836711,0.68519044,0.00073073717,0.005189294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009684166,0.00009070913,0.00037658718,0.000047034104,0.000029087954,0.00011154243,0.000129034,0.34267032,0.00034019005,0.65435433,0.0017098826,0.00004439649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039010842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028565924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007145021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029031234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015973549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023902476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985089376","doi":"10.1142/s0219198906000825","title":"PROPORTIONALITY AND NON-MANIPULABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Axiom; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Bankruptcy; Truncation (statistics); Independence (probability theory); Simple (philosophy); Law; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.026384118455428405,"score_gpt":0.24519600544847145,"score_spread":0.21881188699304305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985089376","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3461893,0.0013026623,0.58154565,0.004478942,0.000113214985,0.00028434244,0.000093126786,0.00009523281,0.06589766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640835,0.00037762668,0.030477248,0.00017553687,0.00012555624,0.00019813064,0.000047433998,0.000016482294,0.004498499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991907,0.0052737603,0.0007788149,0.0014311954,0.0017903392,0.00080680597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509008,0.035425626,0.006432171,0.004338582,0.0014897706,0.0014131329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009645698,0.0006715664,0.0012217823,0.0012136422,0.0015051787,0.0045025866,0.0020393499,0.002534951,0.0046290983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04750074,0.00052822125,0.0015355531,0.0010664836,0.010186342,0.009876908,0.004951281,0.004452842,0.00036408278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005771302,0.00009189003,0.0011965871,0.00008252262,0.00003980506,0.00012220492,0.00037803454,0.009659104,0.0012691914,0.97583336,0.00027375566,0.010995774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048588343,0.00005492507,0.00071726,0.000026133172,0.000016347436,0.00011363213,0.00011282227,0.024594057,0.00092931546,0.9720252,0.001345223,0.000016492582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053042837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033944042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009645698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017916645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05101192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986522940","doi":"10.1142/s0219198907001333","title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF COOP ADVERTISING PROGRAMS IN COMPETITIVE DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Competition (biology); Dilemma; Channel (broadcasting); Distribution (mathematics); Advertising; Industrial organization; Plan (archaeology); Marketing; Channel coordination; Microeconomics; Economics; Supply chain; Computer science; Telecommunications; Supply chain management","score_opus":0.025454484994360847,"score_gpt":0.28944781905497113,"score_spread":0.26399333406061026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986522940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7016425,0.0005938375,0.1771345,0.0014366559,0.0000580774,0.00042377008,0.00018936685,0.00023025897,0.11829101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926307,0.00012599035,0.0039789164,0.00004917534,0.000012651054,0.0000741358,0.00001183594,0.00001043017,0.003106232],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984257,0.0007547037,0.000032675027,0.00018394792,0.00019355722,0.00040940868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295044,0.004927048,0.0007644035,0.00041071285,0.0003710163,0.00057645584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019968485,0.00089235284,0.0010683048,0.0009541051,0.0012528861,0.0033920668,0.0016049875,0.002574638,0.0098715555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076791663,0.0006022043,0.0007858767,0.0007090238,0.0024750296,0.0048582843,0.0015070424,0.0012372525,0.00057379407],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001109418,0.0007580068,0.0038267642,0.0002720774,0.00008212097,0.0007876095,0.00041832536,0.49498075,0.0037778693,0.46134847,0.0023983365,0.030240253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022540017,0.0006553157,0.0014186639,0.000054036587,0.000101728154,0.00047283698,0.0005346919,0.85277677,0.0013538133,0.13870412,0.0036445023,0.000058180605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030207296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025579846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098715555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020541316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018018589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033023596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989892391","doi":"10.1142/s0219198902000653","title":"SOME RESULTS ON (PRE)KERNEL CATCHERS AND THE COINCIDENCE OF THE KERNEL WITH PREKERNEL","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Coincidence; Mathematics; Kernel (algebra); Bounded function; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03575786326103469,"score_gpt":0.2363023372751855,"score_spread":0.2005444740141508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989892391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5355209,0.0024116968,0.40140036,0.0023077833,0.0001480682,0.00008934225,0.00021105059,0.0002470827,0.057663716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971999,0.00076268724,0.020367563,0.0001943196,0.00023569001,0.00006394958,0.00014972626,0.00006976531,0.0061572776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983209,0.00031714345,0.00017931066,0.00047744138,0.00034673652,0.00035836443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907393,0.005641783,0.0023029365,0.0009679848,0.00093753845,0.0010757176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00281024,0.0004531803,0.0011248479,0.0018674664,0.0016509381,0.002790936,0.0013425677,0.0012864567,0.008078003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011217597,0.0005833569,0.0015565176,0.002068729,0.0046439148,0.00978993,0.0034886522,0.0033406804,0.00056226517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005113449,0.000044559736,0.0029856751,0.000083048086,0.000025937583,0.00038777303,0.0005698234,0.0013642818,0.0009297965,0.98755336,0.0004814747,0.005523131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018672752,0.00009605426,0.0031334937,0.000035987698,0.00003162544,0.0006522421,0.00040715985,0.008913014,0.0009685288,0.9825781,0.003133755,0.000031384687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008014006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049259234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008078003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013075934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008197505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027023613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003412690","doi":"10.1142/s0219198907001357","title":"A UNIFYING DIFFERENTIAL GAME OF ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Promotion (chess); Differential (mechanical device); Advertising; Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Differential game; Business; Economics; Marketing; Mathematics; Accounting; Political science; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.022994737474293186,"score_gpt":0.28718452889538115,"score_spread":0.26418979142108795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003412690","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122827955,0.0010236624,0.6451912,0.0043603783,0.00027818812,0.00064789917,0.0010423627,0.0001911895,0.22443707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93060786,0.0008263119,0.030548645,0.00038681878,0.00014331868,0.00031488837,0.0001272053,0.000024992563,0.03701988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975835,0.00096879463,0.00009480756,0.00043684573,0.00052252336,0.00039355713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980709,0.0012253618,0.00019401874,0.00011586991,0.00015305568,0.00024088431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021939029,0.0011647469,0.00168863,0.0009250627,0.0008235403,0.0031104437,0.0018746351,0.0033965867,0.0100451205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005228462,0.0007554938,0.0012811128,0.0008315064,0.0028391515,0.0052657058,0.0019232424,0.002224498,0.00086916785],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110328125,0.00008285234,0.00037102925,0.00010889707,0.000024619296,0.00024530693,0.00026279493,0.04990501,0.001881107,0.9381994,0.0011746682,0.007633942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022518863,0.0002481694,0.0007447068,0.000047838395,0.00005292592,0.0003332203,0.00013784903,0.32476422,0.0005039678,0.6619383,0.010939091,0.00006445721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065631303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035874953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100451205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036633254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024190904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033604264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012705428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198910002556","title":"VON NEUMANN, VILLE, AND THE MINIMAX THEOREM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Institut de France","keywords":"Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Minimax theorem; Minimax; Convexity; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Danskin's theorem; Fixed-point theorem; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Brouwer fixed-point theorem","score_opus":0.018777482732672785,"score_gpt":0.2411784849224101,"score_spread":0.2224010021897373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012705428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05782133,0.055971775,0.24496835,0.07360618,0.002639267,0.00013577452,0.00035717312,0.00011163407,0.56438845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89108926,0.017945316,0.028550716,0.0065971767,0.002725712,0.00028538163,0.00010991252,0.0000938257,0.052602638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987627,0.00048162212,0.000049259295,0.0002633294,0.0002929762,0.00015000439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984559,0.0011658099,0.00008533129,0.00008817788,0.000141782,0.00006300161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002568238,0.00048771044,0.0007490841,0.0011985302,0.0015236862,0.0031701517,0.00078768656,0.0023479583,0.003634826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008013055,0.0003556515,0.00060388,0.001012196,0.00816939,0.0047216443,0.0017332409,0.003916613,0.00050522416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034509612,0.0000021333183,0.000023369854,0.000009418047,0.0000027359845,0.00001222286,0.00003114868,0.0004899109,0.000027715809,0.996911,0.0011555845,0.0013312605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043427735,0.000002773137,0.000039875842,0.000014084696,0.0000014302398,0.000012460619,0.000011282348,0.0008745054,0.000040183917,0.99228036,0.0067147347,0.000004101813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026180146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001394943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003634826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034517713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013733911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025044441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026007158","doi":"10.1142/s0219198903001033","title":"Imitation, Group Selection and Cooperation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Handshake; Imitation; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Limit (mathematics); Mutation; Group (periodic table); Biology; Mathematical economics; Genetics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Demography; Sociology; Neuroscience; Computer network","score_opus":0.01716684558162165,"score_gpt":0.3182741714850448,"score_spread":0.30110732590342315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026007158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19557375,0.15143597,0.13851047,0.022343863,0.00092333526,0.0002039364,0.00017941302,0.00014832734,0.49068102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478105,0.02006978,0.008500161,0.00092017703,0.00034203386,0.000113596085,0.00006107606,0.00001284776,0.022169903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910766,0.0004226477,0.000029783254,0.00015324111,0.00018282355,0.00010388301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988519,0.0006759533,0.00021290452,0.00006946585,0.0001004346,0.00008935556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010720862,0.0003761673,0.0005802081,0.00071437005,0.000651145,0.0018035432,0.0006476232,0.0016449436,0.0036081069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027681405,0.00011615236,0.00025818407,0.0008213714,0.0045328573,0.0017682473,0.0010546539,0.00069605454,0.0004297888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033411776,0.000030465319,0.0013440507,0.00029001912,0.000040235933,0.00036858133,0.0010438762,0.005549404,0.00071282673,0.9374857,0.0037254556,0.049375888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018001843,0.0000501927,0.0017969051,0.000096996824,0.000017379945,0.0004888794,0.00041009614,0.0044816057,0.00016048389,0.96439093,0.028074916,0.000013639594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016735961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010457992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036081069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011733645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007619761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012070298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031337097","doi":"10.1142/s021919890800200x","title":"A DYNAMIC GAME OF OPERATIONS AND MARKETING MANAGEMENT IN A SUPPLY CHAIN","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Production (economics); Revenue management; Loyalty; Supply chain management; Marketing; Process (computing); Revenue; Revenue sharing; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01688437043869276,"score_gpt":0.2513026813052643,"score_spread":0.23441831086657153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031337097","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2112255,0.00094777136,0.71071273,0.0034978094,0.00014530137,0.00056754105,0.00042515452,0.00011866856,0.07235955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95948064,0.00063916366,0.026612336,0.00015897893,0.00006327063,0.00032017197,0.00007783979,0.000011085416,0.012636501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979373,0.0011405493,0.000071668306,0.00027763416,0.00034077134,0.00023202114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837154,0.0011014852,0.00016033136,0.00006779792,0.000105561114,0.00019330856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017134094,0.00091182016,0.0007882809,0.00057328184,0.000926497,0.0024719117,0.0013891793,0.0023833592,0.004217522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031107985,0.0005656338,0.0005552425,0.001071073,0.002247983,0.00427131,0.0015407819,0.0014334358,0.00031696318],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017328937,0.00013299855,0.00091744843,0.00011790404,0.000043628785,0.0005278358,0.00051311025,0.27219707,0.0021859836,0.7112909,0.0011888676,0.010710881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001389674,0.00023727986,0.00060384383,0.000034955385,0.000034436925,0.00019083836,0.00031475766,0.7425173,0.00046325475,0.24857233,0.006840539,0.000051424024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060525257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003487119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060525257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032281794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019074151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023422122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031876440","doi":"10.1142/s0219198912500168","title":"STRATEGIC EFFECTS OF A BORDER TAX ADJUSTMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Bishop's University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon tax; Welfare; Economics; Environmental tax; International economics; Carbon leakage; Public economics; Business; International trade; Climate policy; Greenhouse gas; Tax reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.0843873780807532,"score_gpt":0.31580761696303306,"score_spread":0.23142023888227986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031876440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71337014,0.0008087686,0.060635958,0.005554341,0.00032773733,0.00027415124,0.00047488546,0.00015950298,0.21839447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254465,0.00019807176,0.0013804943,0.00021992123,0.000015390131,0.000021878523,0.000021970709,0.000006207806,0.0055914633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991153,0.00044157205,0.000029634932,0.00009203463,0.0000715183,0.00024992684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998095,0.0009176969,0.0004023448,0.00011305086,0.00013460376,0.00033728182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013782898,0.0006754491,0.00076468865,0.0004381076,0.00076718495,0.0022000868,0.0007200948,0.0024811185,0.015375083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005079032,0.00032947012,0.0010264653,0.00044580043,0.0014424002,0.0015686435,0.0015692799,0.001865947,0.00063320086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001228819,0.00067411654,0.006334373,0.00030167613,0.00023984378,0.0017677889,0.0004760086,0.3680359,0.008104971,0.5826618,0.006523831,0.023650886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055556657,0.0011369634,0.010174609,0.000115719195,0.00040868527,0.00052909873,0.0025367814,0.53116006,0.0022366988,0.43562636,0.015354098,0.00016531175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076474734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007410877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015375083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001919877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018483504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051434755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052867428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198913400033","title":"CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE KAR AND FOLK SOLUTIONS FOR MINIMUM COST SPANNING TREE PROBLEMS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Spanning tree; Minimum spanning tree; Focus (optics); Tree (set theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06472994470482157,"score_gpt":0.25378321654376934,"score_spread":0.18905327183894777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052867428","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056873288,0.0064618136,0.867158,0.0032654288,0.0003309507,0.00020665718,0.0003901494,0.00016288107,0.065150924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985364,0.014626356,0.266725,0.0010808875,0.00087242667,0.000998636,0.0008130871,0.00025430243,0.016092898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984049,0.0005830612,0.000114109185,0.00028203617,0.00037693864,0.00023889348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962289,0.0025555436,0.0004224266,0.00023676873,0.00039695983,0.00015939833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026384513,0.0010951181,0.0014402797,0.0016268177,0.0011469962,0.0034534368,0.0025825766,0.0025228888,0.009433081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013931428,0.00047050673,0.0012746789,0.003421307,0.001805261,0.0064765294,0.0021560069,0.003365186,0.000920553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037166257,0.000052122123,0.00022808384,0.00035618397,0.00002254284,0.00004308653,0.00017566874,0.035506718,0.0007307445,0.9248121,0.0036215608,0.034413967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019383906,0.00006233235,0.0002685565,0.00014705076,0.000020584766,0.00019562848,0.00021435361,0.094907746,0.0003512666,0.89714354,0.0066439034,0.00002574797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005076419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005425344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009433081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014217468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011219457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031556845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057129345","doi":"10.1142/s0219198905000648","title":"BECKMANN'S EDGEWORTH-BERTRAND DUOPOLY EXAMPLE REVISITED","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Duopoly; Bertrand competition; Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Limit price; Market price; Price level; Mathematical economics; Oligopoly; Monetary economics; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.11683686818367628,"score_gpt":0.4165286835842396,"score_spread":0.29969181540056333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057129345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10211555,0.0016956732,0.16858561,0.006656437,0.00018516298,0.00014173507,0.00033505767,0.00013911011,0.7201456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482463,0.0012250409,0.019033272,0.00058050564,0.00005493693,0.00007305736,0.00005033245,0.000017950868,0.0307185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993538,0.00028265387,0.000019990617,0.00008422973,0.00012558587,0.00013365434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995622,0.00024057865,0.000046937075,0.000040026447,0.00005226914,0.00005787294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064903783,0.00066373846,0.0007230448,0.00050330535,0.0012435942,0.002602867,0.0012225489,0.0025743148,0.009542989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002507515,0.00028582543,0.0007214184,0.0009744861,0.0017383265,0.0030635418,0.0010595879,0.0017215213,0.0008091524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017093764,0.000012549147,0.00007665922,0.000014737601,0.0000043709333,0.00009941883,0.000057086854,0.0041230167,0.00007384735,0.9916602,0.0015859623,0.0022750653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054382734,0.000041669817,0.00026974338,0.000027419364,0.000016279027,0.00025630332,0.0001436535,0.049895763,0.00018985115,0.9344593,0.0146217095,0.00002385209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009135677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008936827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009542989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016488376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009503972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031924546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067551151","doi":"10.1142/s0219198905000545","title":"SHELF-SPACE ALLOCATION AND ADVERTISING DECISIONS IN THE MARKETING CHANNEL: A DIFFERENTIAL GAME APPROACH","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; HEC Montréal","keywords":"Goodwill; Stackelberg competition; Business; Channel (broadcasting); Marketing channel; Differential game; Advertising; Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Differential (mechanical device); Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.024018979664764982,"score_gpt":0.27271930192454885,"score_spread":0.24870032225978386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067551151","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2646799,0.001033761,0.68674034,0.002888133,0.00013597833,0.00026058545,0.00037618508,0.00008996253,0.0437952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96439505,0.00081562216,0.021933284,0.00018297805,0.00008362562,0.00014077676,0.000053810174,0.00002075974,0.01237408],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796814,0.0010396485,0.000047854264,0.00029297548,0.0002491566,0.00040223688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961294,0.0028988626,0.00034395492,0.00007695618,0.00025492153,0.00029579058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023068388,0.0013280528,0.002049292,0.0012724936,0.0010124771,0.0036348675,0.002397999,0.003221308,0.005354789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057742344,0.0012277517,0.0011825056,0.0010583139,0.0032615284,0.004975072,0.0016698757,0.0018407502,0.00048596185],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031965657,0.00018982132,0.0018393317,0.00016742203,0.00012168044,0.00048395668,0.00034139323,0.6523306,0.0042862715,0.3282028,0.0012654768,0.010451507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072660165,0.000101891346,0.00055490533,0.000019890893,0.00007943302,0.00008791268,0.0001639799,0.91427386,0.00051781867,0.08274299,0.0013385277,0.00004603706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007918578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071188565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007918578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047904295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018721946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034757137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082720961","doi":"10.1142/s0219198907001692","title":"EVOLUTION AND THE COMPLEXITY OF FINITE AUTOMATA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Repeated game; Prisoner's dilemma; Mathematical economics; Automaton; Limit (mathematics); Finite-state machine; Dilemma; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.16963203638993185,"score_gpt":0.4264736308364938,"score_spread":0.25684159444656196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082720961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41427028,0.032698613,0.41850543,0.009806538,0.0006079779,0.00015741085,0.0004325326,0.00021206867,0.1233092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96812683,0.0058645257,0.019895412,0.00019582282,0.00031449436,0.00010471779,0.000102035956,0.00002009096,0.0053759944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880457,0.00041539487,0.00008235662,0.00021339754,0.00035877543,0.00012549912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246186,0.005976084,0.0006673549,0.000289197,0.00040788949,0.00019754065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010094206,0.00034673707,0.00060277624,0.0013154311,0.00079917954,0.0029418669,0.0007224174,0.0010206748,0.0014836723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007568579,0.00031899245,0.0007344711,0.0010163616,0.003257564,0.0041658347,0.001072576,0.0014877241,0.00012842558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001552213,0.000009682527,0.0006325052,0.000101259095,0.000024949346,0.000120750345,0.00022363862,0.027549962,0.00072211225,0.96231943,0.0005450007,0.007735244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042033203,0.000011452254,0.00046055703,0.000026424432,0.00000685143,0.00009944308,0.00005044887,0.035685074,0.00017686156,0.9604837,0.0029826383,0.0000122555575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001210054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005954303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029418669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018197491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055112276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013203263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085622378","doi":"10.1142/s021919890900242x","title":"A NEW SEQUENCE FORM APPROACH FOR THE ENUMERATION AND REFINEMENT OF ALL EXTREME NASH EQUILIBRIA FOR EXTENSIVE FORM GAMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Enumeration; Sequence (biology); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Order (exchange); Combinatorics; Extreme point; Parametric statistics; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.2541072843506172,"score_gpt":0.4350478281736562,"score_spread":0.18094054382303904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085622378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057017347,0.00009333024,0.9860452,0.00007511479,0.000019889452,0.00010731146,0.000112760536,0.00008322342,0.007761465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09841442,0.0003910157,0.890892,0.00017129796,0.0001182712,0.00058345764,0.00062268076,0.00011047305,0.008696372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810624,0.00058899744,0.00013764948,0.0003925092,0.00062806235,0.00014643294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761873,0.0014080092,0.00014417365,0.00029427645,0.0004323406,0.00010253146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018232898,0.0011905046,0.0013787833,0.0032174354,0.000982576,0.001900485,0.0017296012,0.0010033399,0.009427816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008431204,0.0005874022,0.0019753275,0.0025199915,0.0020326066,0.0057692816,0.0025216353,0.0035805495,0.0018992018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007233218,0.00011161458,0.00087679387,0.00020161316,0.000028511935,0.0001266241,0.00052739016,0.03381333,0.0037857562,0.8581997,0.0018031771,0.100453086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002274891,0.00015087744,0.00039439875,0.00007815045,0.000023491597,0.0002719184,0.00013724597,0.14458245,0.0028117264,0.83559036,0.015893945,0.000042636115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009114896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010498301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009427816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083296676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009822367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0315392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087042360","doi":"10.1142/s0219198912400026","title":"COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Transfer payment; Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Game theory; Operations research; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06274854512754666,"score_gpt":0.30097729068451456,"score_spread":0.2382287455569679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087042360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002198889,0.99520314,0.0009797373,0.00061230984,0.00016495293,0.0000076082315,0.0000170994,0.000009160569,0.0027861812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002388666,0.99613935,0.0006597349,0.00018939163,0.0002130976,0.000009882178,0.000024324432,0.0000025933837,0.00037294778],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912006,0.00019238346,0.00011532484,0.00017914828,0.00032630013,0.00006678011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717844,0.0018805416,0.0002584713,0.000074620555,0.000497481,0.00011043737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532347,0.0011928645,0.0017959056,0.003456456,0.0006678483,0.0023276375,0.001866171,0.0024409296,0.0045904065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029873776,0.0005760226,0.0006981571,0.0074878493,0.001172211,0.003531969,0.0012664944,0.0015166786,0.0016160258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003717301,0.00013937958,0.00040242338,0.027349342,0.00010238974,0.0001538451,0.00019918077,0.002916825,0.00042301777,0.039554738,0.025762293,0.90295935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015046667,0.00011024163,0.0014142116,0.020335935,0.00015078938,0.00069096714,0.00049091555,0.0010787764,0.00036693245,0.026817307,0.94847363,0.00005523508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036902647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004132017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045904065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016740718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033357113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015356362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110214742","doi":"10.1142/s0219198908001984","title":"A CLASS OF GAMES WITH COUPLED CONSTRAINTS TO MODEL INTERNATIONAL GHG EMISSION AGREEMENTS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Negotiation; Constraint (computer-aided design); Nash equilibrium; Yield (engineering); Kyoto Protocol; Pareto principle; Economics; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Operations management; Ecology; Physics","score_opus":0.10727657609461964,"score_gpt":0.2940236538055442,"score_spread":0.18674707771092453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110214742","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020511972,0.00061100494,0.9415391,0.00088049215,0.00018016955,0.0002818902,0.00030261648,0.000093649534,0.035599153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7772431,0.0017150424,0.18822469,0.00084125035,0.00031791738,0.0013884848,0.00039820024,0.00015529353,0.029716052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983816,0.0008223277,0.00007146047,0.0002471152,0.00026805152,0.0002095606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985499,0.00091888255,0.0002051018,0.00009011359,0.00010640216,0.00012960032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018532614,0.0027032848,0.0013073718,0.0007931137,0.0009948489,0.002164188,0.0022042852,0.0028662726,0.005889422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004180169,0.00082211214,0.0023554247,0.0010561101,0.0024905899,0.0029624484,0.0022144641,0.0040364806,0.00061562355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026124853,0.00005827767,0.00021654961,0.000062289095,0.000054746542,0.00013429704,0.00013109775,0.42913792,0.00070364913,0.5644945,0.0014366636,0.0035438905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056904708,0.000050466584,0.00011319324,0.000021366472,0.000019876503,0.000048133785,0.000042627704,0.7287184,0.00017120088,0.26579013,0.0049483916,0.000019252479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006910413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005686034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006910413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022357067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016491824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019702077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136726930","doi":"10.1142/s0219198901000282","title":"STACKELBERG LEADERSHIP IN A MARKETING CHANNEL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Inefficiency; Channel (broadcasting); Margin (machine learning); Microeconomics; Marketing channel; Economics; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1105704953329919,"score_gpt":0.28897480430249894,"score_spread":0.17840430896950704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136726930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5629417,0.00034711388,0.2524757,0.009479815,0.0002266532,0.00021934601,0.000093886374,0.00030989439,0.17390607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98412156,0.00017156769,0.008754731,0.00023369593,0.00007351773,0.000053897227,0.000010719208,0.000017904244,0.006562486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985837,0.00046194205,0.000039041443,0.0001988621,0.00031911422,0.0003973739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629056,0.001539449,0.00069784885,0.0002273541,0.0005395724,0.0007052582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022443507,0.0004372717,0.00057000027,0.0006741491,0.0018644382,0.0028164112,0.0005437678,0.0014941016,0.0069741406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053004865,0.00026972438,0.0004414736,0.00044198713,0.0027130584,0.003941481,0.0015369245,0.001034868,0.0009806541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025539452,0.00021507485,0.0031856576,0.0001456887,0.000056137633,0.00100099,0.0013933887,0.028727958,0.005864109,0.9218482,0.004703358,0.032604057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017935521,0.0003730843,0.0018867196,0.00005665994,0.00007075863,0.00041239386,0.0014099613,0.1257904,0.0031306427,0.8512864,0.015326725,0.00007690672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011960783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016506653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069741406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010816441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014540781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023330808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137531066","doi":"10.1142/s0219198915400071","title":"Mixed Solution Strategy for MCGDM Problems Using Entropy/Cross Entropy in Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Mathematics; Entropy (arrow of time); Weight; Mathematical optimization; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.25819470629256136,"score_gpt":0.4441788702775555,"score_spread":0.18598416398499412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137531066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008347007,0.00022690675,0.9893227,0.000109969544,0.0000145349795,0.00006478051,0.000014692155,0.00001887343,0.001880385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47439677,0.00053589384,0.5217299,0.0001335618,0.000053711185,0.00060065713,0.00009564778,0.000032399974,0.0024214678],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974112,0.0014075122,0.00015964017,0.00027868227,0.0005942976,0.0001486549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.001315047,0.00017085345,0.00005684032,0.00021414441,0.00008458142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00439486,0.001559385,0.0015821515,0.0019215671,0.0007704716,0.0020246762,0.0014134672,0.0016670672,0.0019537543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005233643,0.0005353382,0.0017422878,0.0015233749,0.0012923706,0.0020870524,0.002275221,0.0014892565,0.00017671414],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100266196,0.00009371148,0.0010882159,0.0003579555,0.00027009493,0.00024989157,0.0003947102,0.69029766,0.002689033,0.23935619,0.0008563902,0.06424587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014542456,0.00007314126,0.00012498736,0.00003113253,0.000027303251,0.00003640907,0.00003432007,0.94705117,0.00046743223,0.051623754,0.0004968388,0.000019022007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019607926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015667224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00439486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018400853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013874652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023242533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142502904","doi":"10.1142/s0219198901000415","title":"GENERALISATIONS OF THE GILMORE-GOMORY TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM AND THE GILMORE-GOMORY SCHEME: A SURVEY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Travelling salesman problem; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Identification (biology); Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Biology","score_opus":0.019547953420292846,"score_gpt":0.2408912196229989,"score_spread":0.22134326620270606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142502904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080597505,0.23480794,0.36494395,0.013782549,0.0021631955,0.00050022214,0.0006865704,0.00054776756,0.30197024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48373985,0.30987033,0.14968485,0.0038792817,0.006912553,0.0006471391,0.0018001511,0.00032526144,0.04314057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984805,0.0003310717,0.00011889178,0.00041469617,0.00044550523,0.00020928317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875486,0.0007125981,0.00013678685,0.00020698625,0.00011621356,0.0000725831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014276074,0.0012681953,0.001663066,0.0025729844,0.0011676002,0.0026939642,0.0025452492,0.0024349599,0.0058440263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043947143,0.0008808698,0.0020560317,0.0063687856,0.0035521209,0.006847963,0.0023749005,0.004451261,0.001233318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003768523,0.00012264152,0.0009507985,0.00103165,0.000053026328,0.00026206175,0.00038650574,0.018825823,0.00049143797,0.8992307,0.008131653,0.07047592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025697085,0.00007989529,0.0013412253,0.00029599865,0.0000331742,0.0011049149,0.0002602685,0.03475029,0.00039300683,0.8412985,0.12036597,0.000050959923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046832757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003282994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058440263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032072787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015840448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023270547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153722563","doi":"10.1142/s0219198914500029","title":"DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY AS THE OBJECTIVE OF CONTEST DESIGN","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Stochastic game; Variable (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Simple (philosophy); Degree (music); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08734478404698591,"score_gpt":0.37789300564677064,"score_spread":0.2905482215997847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153722563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20746723,0.0064253258,0.6161158,0.0047619496,0.00032214157,0.0008007576,0.000330202,0.00013283297,0.16364382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93461573,0.0012998896,0.05626932,0.00026530836,0.0001386098,0.00045450157,0.000060735387,0.000045357538,0.0068506193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077165,0.0052611823,0.00051549484,0.0010265271,0.001879125,0.0005460102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797754,0.012040661,0.0036935147,0.0020022201,0.0014244101,0.0010637849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099811,0.0012318708,0.0009683887,0.001289655,0.000825041,0.004179598,0.0014483568,0.0015827375,0.0075659435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029183302,0.000593369,0.00080432306,0.0012135053,0.00611505,0.0048107565,0.0020082635,0.0023020676,0.00065104297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024272173,0.00014825145,0.0066255694,0.0005431228,0.00010234995,0.000053991294,0.00043344992,0.030051844,0.003925288,0.91253424,0.00095050957,0.044388667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011254615,0.00057189,0.010996263,0.00019367812,0.00007265126,0.00020734723,0.00034063566,0.040282514,0.0024767807,0.9290999,0.015562647,0.00008310291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006637581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001250771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028661597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017364044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052785695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163568120","doi":"10.1142/s0219198905000600","title":"SUSTAINABILITY OF COOPERATION OVERTIME IN LINEAR-QUADRATIC DIFFERENTIAL GAMES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Overtime; Differential (mechanical device); Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematical economics; Quadratic equation; Link (geometry); Economics; Time consistency; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Actuarial science; Political science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.020031609923356487,"score_gpt":0.34583902762658053,"score_spread":0.325807417703224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163568120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31482166,0.0005683065,0.6522211,0.003116242,0.00016689324,0.000098848075,0.00014537724,0.00008236115,0.028779171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825844,0.00028027012,0.013442949,0.00010694961,0.000050355637,0.000081107464,0.000049868886,0.000014124748,0.0033900095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684167,0.0014886055,0.0001959939,0.00043158565,0.00059546524,0.00044670203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925097,0.0048933583,0.0010050754,0.00037727968,0.00081668905,0.00039782454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649868,0.0004625324,0.00090417487,0.0004810624,0.0007561914,0.001818202,0.0011327809,0.00093732314,0.0013436831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011235117,0.0002905351,0.00086406467,0.00065856316,0.0032628682,0.0028941734,0.00206809,0.0016612888,0.00015022338],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010988524,0.00004839677,0.0012141292,0.0001147274,0.000047521746,0.00024121384,0.0006309562,0.09261912,0.002355548,0.89256215,0.0007522002,0.009304067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039741062,0.000086120875,0.0005310659,0.000020530217,0.000019921525,0.00008422199,0.00020162515,0.1970496,0.00061901513,0.7999121,0.0014136976,0.000022422371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003203418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016968029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004649868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018123749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018555528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024591088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2382996178","doi":"10.1142/s0219198916400028","title":"Strategic Support of Node-Consistent Cooperative Outcomes in Dynamic Games Played Over Event Trees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Event (particle physics); Node (physics); Sequential game; Mathematical economics; Game tree; Subgame; Computer science; Extensive-form game; Tree (set theory); Backward induction; Non-cooperative game; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Operations research; Economics; Game theory; Mathematics; Equilibrium selection; Combinatorics; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.08526420958749709,"score_gpt":0.420012833805227,"score_spread":0.33474862421772994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2382996178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27193683,0.00029164142,0.68212557,0.0009001896,0.00008483474,0.0001480569,0.00014734654,0.00019997853,0.044165567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736738,0.00015007568,0.024536045,0.000062783125,0.000016755226,0.00008108771,0.00006142816,0.000020392263,0.0013975885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734664,0.0013013514,0.000121354766,0.00028513002,0.00058720924,0.00035819484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878414,0.0090193115,0.0012086593,0.0005840518,0.00084199326,0.00050456234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002622471,0.00056460936,0.0006459074,0.0005380733,0.0009625449,0.0021431115,0.0015235904,0.0011466726,0.0042012483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017046379,0.00030617244,0.0006236126,0.0008816272,0.0018072064,0.0034907248,0.0018671117,0.0014053696,0.000509781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001667663,0.000111897774,0.00199709,0.00018270232,0.000054579672,0.00086514995,0.00094489544,0.07740367,0.004953609,0.892178,0.0011972025,0.0199445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005851103,0.00015683919,0.0007248088,0.000041503114,0.000044338878,0.00035985754,0.00049100176,0.25433105,0.0017665445,0.7384915,0.0034987142,0.000035394092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010701178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001423216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042012483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006630569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011416352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014054596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470158534","doi":"10.1142/s0219198920500085","title":"Revenue Sharing in Airline Alliance Networks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Axiom; Revenue sharing; Simple (philosophy); Shapley value; Alliance; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.05593696669172733,"score_gpt":0.3674559966251273,"score_spread":0.31151902993339997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470158534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04891282,0.000795497,0.92081743,0.00089462096,0.000079859055,0.00012087003,0.0001272355,0.000091518275,0.028160173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854825,0.0014095233,0.13448177,0.00019211744,0.00015955693,0.0002846328,0.0001907653,0.00007171542,0.008384938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957885,0.0023890329,0.00016627657,0.0005717742,0.0007751448,0.00030922057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750286,0.0015564086,0.00024621695,0.0003410153,0.00022814605,0.00012527271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003504824,0.00075219857,0.001171866,0.0008536779,0.0010747619,0.003019954,0.0023244515,0.0016441483,0.0040387525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006060787,0.00049266603,0.0012701318,0.0015665853,0.0029420867,0.006813705,0.0021275138,0.0022650536,0.00051796564],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026147907,0.00002658527,0.00010735579,0.00007254523,0.000022903407,0.000053760807,0.00007490711,0.08052059,0.00044599487,0.9045776,0.00070951245,0.013361944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026421922,0.000030992247,0.00011624093,0.000027473956,0.000012435163,0.00009672879,0.00006059678,0.17061263,0.00056074024,0.82306534,0.0053723673,0.00001795703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001107864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006514982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040387525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025842672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012451836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01875025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023589101","doi":"10.1142/s0219198921500018","title":"Markovian Switching of Mutation Rates in Evolutionary Network Dynamics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Markov chain; Mutation; Mutation rate; Markov process; Bifurcation; Replicator equation; Population; Statistical physics; Evolutionary dynamics; Continuous-time Markov chain; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Markov model; Mathematics; Physics; Variable-order Markov model; Genetics; Biology; Statistics; Demography","score_opus":0.027836986058511475,"score_gpt":0.34669759001134065,"score_spread":0.31886060395282917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023589101","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33309808,0.0038359961,0.63289845,0.0021433453,0.0002554473,0.000073703006,0.0001823939,0.00022294724,0.027289681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97949034,0.0015819994,0.014763733,0.00013160157,0.00007950526,0.00007364867,0.000041944622,0.000031365555,0.0038057764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992607,0.0003678622,0.000031029955,0.00013791202,0.000119481825,0.00008305313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976035,0.0017244931,0.00025862266,0.00014670882,0.00015550284,0.000111167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016260125,0.00034647336,0.00058274646,0.00074567075,0.0005547622,0.0013243406,0.00089065346,0.0014106433,0.0016838233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00761909,0.00039784974,0.0007048703,0.0005482574,0.0019200057,0.0021533587,0.0007353373,0.0012963507,0.00022853717],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042912776,0.000029380526,0.0015140777,0.00009204581,0.000047020207,0.00021700906,0.00028473866,0.28845316,0.003362954,0.6955887,0.0006733503,0.009694627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019343692,0.000025970521,0.0005858478,0.000028390225,0.000017206983,0.00009801705,0.000038329086,0.65774244,0.0005502804,0.33938253,0.0014841625,0.000027506885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029209447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012727524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029209447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015398213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006147616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011172295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153704052","doi":"10.1142/s0219198921500109","title":"H∞ Constrained Pareto Suboptimal Strategy for Stochastic LPV Time-Delay Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Set (abstract data type); Pareto principle; Lemma (botany); Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Control (management)","score_opus":0.02166863874954972,"score_gpt":0.2665561904143082,"score_spread":0.2448875516647585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153704052","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015436583,0.00028160776,0.97856015,0.00016967232,0.000024712816,0.000037149457,0.000022769509,0.000064083055,0.0054033305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448019,0.0005652313,0.050432723,0.0001313748,0.000027523081,0.00019874058,0.00007069325,0.000032470314,0.0037393623],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925023,0.00026390026,0.000042062435,0.00012054808,0.00023360275,0.00008960175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934703,0.00036600648,0.00009894652,0.000029671304,0.00012692511,0.000031410564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011393017,0.0011682003,0.0007981924,0.000407348,0.0004879634,0.0014631023,0.0006645911,0.00078462856,0.0013960793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017071514,0.00037034476,0.00059476757,0.00047166666,0.0010295827,0.0006872483,0.0009997163,0.0009220976,0.00017082228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049023383,0.000027985743,0.00035740144,0.00014619676,0.00005459433,0.0001981467,0.00014195115,0.8882689,0.004576466,0.08786248,0.0007058751,0.01761086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061115456,0.000031783347,0.000051220562,0.000007641072,0.0000060525913,0.000017277831,0.000011332755,0.98849887,0.00052132236,0.010415655,0.0004265298,0.0000061095293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006193371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030003565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006193371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014536647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016619817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012314618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392893971","doi":"10.1142/s0219198924400097","title":"Dynamic Oligopolistic Competition with Uncertainty and Supply Disruption Effects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Oligopoly; Competition (biology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Microeconomics; Sequential game; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Game theory; Mathematics; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.008147705751984377,"score_gpt":0.2520423793876112,"score_spread":0.24389467363562684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392893971","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33856663,0.0016129046,0.61535954,0.0024352043,0.00017451694,0.00016416424,0.0009901692,0.00018260111,0.040514268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875508,0.0005510101,0.007680537,0.000073757525,0.000027170156,0.00006936343,0.0000897317,0.000011863922,0.0039458256],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990252,0.0004152359,0.00003211485,0.00015957098,0.00017676549,0.00019103082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982394,0.0010938392,0.00034120787,0.000054927223,0.00012823941,0.00014232344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093479996,0.0008843961,0.0013233577,0.0005859268,0.00072014384,0.0024332392,0.0018170201,0.0017978718,0.0024503516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027248752,0.0006713568,0.0007857707,0.0013881591,0.0019478895,0.001977378,0.001084356,0.0013739537,0.00018294396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029451943,0.000026042339,0.00033786858,0.00003441387,0.000023642608,0.00017175685,0.000035434845,0.93375486,0.0003259816,0.06394011,0.00020329596,0.0011170706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019444773,0.000032180313,0.00017572829,0.0000090757485,0.000015609226,0.000036492347,0.000028374878,0.97088796,0.00008941797,0.028176863,0.0005132647,0.000015601132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149881495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008177152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149881495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029166734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001849548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029801846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394726262","doi":"10.1142/s0219198924500087","title":"Ecological Economics and Dynamic Games: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Ecology; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.017736051963019445,"score_gpt":0.2555040946396616,"score_spread":0.23776804267664217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394726262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007786834,0.9952009,0.0011280575,0.0009746872,0.00015875697,0.00006310659,0.00019145929,0.000011003241,0.001493367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007469406,0.9904089,0.001120179,0.00047477658,0.00015442952,0.00007502459,0.00012714043,0.000006782779,0.00016338674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746335,0.00093112525,0.0005555783,0.00030197142,0.0006218985,0.00012615611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681327,0.027483517,0.0018228182,0.00036853223,0.001919814,0.00027265496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004123728,0.0011717003,0.0023574156,0.013583141,0.0005530221,0.002371825,0.0011507066,0.0019685407,0.006149782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026841043,0.0007501535,0.0021837729,0.013113543,0.001004793,0.0034789448,0.0010889672,0.0013895261,0.00065753143],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014090231,0.00017269049,0.0031264585,0.40239695,0.002375729,0.0005662435,0.00057447504,0.004076687,0.00037728963,0.04757307,0.0399263,0.49869326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008891732,0.00019514661,0.00943253,0.52043146,0.005788679,0.0014964228,0.0011840693,0.002473589,0.00029973942,0.046399854,0.41209015,0.00011934181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049559884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010530979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99587625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00290667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010077858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021808624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399185150","doi":"10.1142/s0219198924020018","title":"Preface: Special Issue on <i>Game Theory and Optimization</i> in Honor of Pierre Bernhard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Sociology; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.046958429296512706,"score_gpt":0.3930694967049926,"score_spread":0.34611106740847986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399185150","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001833863,0.041902974,0.0016733437,0.051171597,0.8786236,0.00004605886,0.0004149595,0.0001005153,0.025883501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003367214,0.036760703,0.001233862,0.01859861,0.826959,0.00009669456,0.00084534934,0.00040539887,0.11173314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987411,0.00019392013,0.00010399009,0.00023993853,0.000596803,0.00012431924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320096,0.0019405014,0.0004094905,0.00034017855,0.003060028,0.0010488644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017943076,0.0019328595,0.0018002522,0.0038113282,0.0016548464,0.0057184924,0.0018534511,0.0037967905,0.06883405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01067388,0.00048266933,0.0012673151,0.0030114285,0.0010746123,0.003982185,0.0019464977,0.006987998,0.03670693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007675951,0.0000059615722,0.000014142843,0.00008922608,0.0000033289991,0.0000103960465,0.0000056868903,0.000043855143,0.000054533346,0.0014200703,0.99090344,0.0074416082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010877628,0.000022450391,0.00031117737,0.00035718738,0.000012257953,0.000066259934,0.00002509902,0.00018464099,0.00010094206,0.0055020596,0.9933941,0.000012906815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023431524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029331732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06883405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026781603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023458381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23027283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414815023","doi":"10.1142/s0219198925020025","title":"Preface to the Special Issue on Dynamic Games on Green Environment: Technological Innovation and Policy Initiatives (Part II)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Environmental Sustainability and Technology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Technological change; Game theory; Policy making","score_opus":0.008209521333456433,"score_gpt":0.2805615847528698,"score_spread":0.27235206341941337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414815023","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015015398,0.025868107,0.0016220341,0.040626824,0.9084773,0.00008580658,0.0006023517,0.0001264427,0.022440976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021949394,0.03357304,0.0011676506,0.025409978,0.8127736,0.00025819638,0.0015356032,0.00039740972,0.12268959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987305,0.00019808722,0.00012131565,0.00018223692,0.0006305605,0.00013730682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961735,0.0040282146,0.00067025726,0.00045910807,0.0039356616,0.0012893834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022876346,0.0018811363,0.0018533618,0.004466153,0.0017286382,0.005405136,0.002166095,0.004196834,0.099535845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012865347,0.00050657266,0.0013657309,0.003555498,0.00095296005,0.004418747,0.0024866455,0.0077663283,0.044287935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061212195,0.000011862141,0.0000123930295,0.00010658541,0.0000028306565,0.000008437661,0.000007531929,0.000029782368,0.00003784048,0.00078600005,0.9929778,0.006012774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014038954,0.000032791064,0.00041127947,0.00056642987,0.000015040069,0.000056824425,0.000042912234,0.00014398718,0.00008560714,0.0036962314,0.9949222,0.000012607898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028861607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032360216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099535845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020058134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002797332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33298057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414876762","doi":"10.1142/s0219198925500136","title":"The Equal Share Proportional Solution for the River Sharing Problem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Distribution (mathematics); Cournot competition; Consumption (sociology); Cost sharing","score_opus":0.038160170468670485,"score_gpt":0.36112498664554804,"score_spread":0.32296481617687756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414876762","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030225169,0.00028354692,0.92784095,0.0017116335,0.00013640847,0.0002918435,0.0002121646,0.00013071332,0.039167557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4773204,0.0009265288,0.48484462,0.00089237007,0.00023489997,0.0009832785,0.00071730826,0.00026723885,0.033813357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766314,0.00095539045,0.00010094337,0.00046236822,0.0004940083,0.00032412255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983072,0.0009946403,0.00013502134,0.00019225958,0.0002010786,0.0001696096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003035625,0.0015151225,0.0011123174,0.00074245373,0.0012734449,0.0020374137,0.0021261838,0.0022395465,0.014622168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008457751,0.00051648833,0.0016346967,0.0011641795,0.0016724007,0.0049373293,0.004014022,0.0033106853,0.0011733186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000161693,0.00028042376,0.00067603716,0.00027438518,0.00007927745,0.00021463865,0.0003508673,0.18608671,0.0017462153,0.71741676,0.009413142,0.08329982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008834387,0.00013875926,0.00022590677,0.00006151342,0.000037735208,0.00019233918,0.00018710889,0.30313548,0.0012454414,0.6809533,0.013702207,0.00003192647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001532644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016307016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014622168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014568113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002376225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04891604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}