{"meta":{"query_hash":"68fb5b766029","filters":{"venue":"International Journal for Court Administration"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68fb5b766029","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+for+Court+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W1814677584","doi":"10.18352/ijca.125","title":"The Development and Role of the Court Administrator in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Christian ministry; Administration of justice; Political science; Law; Public administration; Work (physics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.03635268948329878,"score_gpt":0.35724334599905183,"score_spread":0.32089065651575305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814677584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89100647,0.000090187714,0.00008421469,0.10083512,0.0023823977,0.00022363664,0.000014173546,0.0000037208035,0.005360083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.000071309805,0.00033152846,0.00023339613,0.00022555013,0.00001619716,0.0000038282556,0.0000033570761,0.00077195483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887574,0.000065509186,0.00035966115,0.00006493851,0.00052371103,0.00011041466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872935,0.0003445032,0.00028375184,0.000053698113,0.0005355551,0.000053164815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006496897,0.00005034216,0.00005236979,0.00003364825,0.00084761385,0.000116427866,0.0002827746,0.000027208562,0.000024882234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734658,0.00003529856,0.00002447085,0.00010996688,0.00010458172,0.00025778273,0.000012345488,0.00017811666,6.247089e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074787426,0.00053690386,0.34341094,0.000014313961,0.00034544934,0.000030104984,0.06415589,0.00007702166,0.0009991678,0.47596988,0.060911737,0.052800708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022642307,0.000019454174,0.05840016,0.000015111722,0.0000045643133,0.000061853694,0.013143783,0.000058514142,0.0012465536,0.0016326234,0.92512774,0.00006318507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0628797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.880479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.864216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040058716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017444596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98812556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047887478","doi":"10.36745/ijca.326","title":"Technology-Driven Changes in an Organizational Structure: The Case of Canada’s Courts Administration Service","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Service (business); Administration (probate law); Judicial independence; Public administration; Computer security; Computer science; Business; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04337884626706784,"score_gpt":0.36025863822750626,"score_spread":0.3168797919604384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047887478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7300536,0.00001761818,0.0024206138,0.2653555,0.0012860855,0.00040477823,0.0001923291,0.000025636959,0.00024381986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693763,0.000012905244,0.00067073165,0.0012300158,0.0010343876,0.0000100267025,0.000060178907,0.000012751329,0.000031342355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985194,0.00009788876,0.00044912763,0.00017942145,0.00055700546,0.00019710668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975001,0.00015269544,0.00038845788,0.00008917723,0.0017312933,0.00013825677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038208542,0.00011091846,0.00012411263,0.00009489356,0.00046612666,0.00016298395,0.000576098,0.00012367443,0.00024135028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078219315,0.0001007537,0.000029079209,0.0003226155,0.00014532259,0.0003553099,0.000025542795,0.0002255787,0.0000011491632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014836334,0.0004985727,0.022147765,0.00005606678,0.0003118059,0.002201789,0.037599217,0.0074955923,0.02136887,0.8840912,0.008825593,0.013919875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031228275,0.0044802413,0.004592561,0.00035349245,0.00032067494,0.00691693,0.1887202,0.12625061,0.22083472,0.22940703,0.21262985,0.002370857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009068428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9398025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9307341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027582754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037030352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302430853","doi":"10.36745/ijca.463","title":"Book Review: Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Law; Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02641709906142968,"score_gpt":0.3510344072385747,"score_spread":0.324617308177145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302430853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125159845,0.31805262,0.0015087626,0.62007207,0.014179551,0.0014091628,0.000521145,0.00012564276,0.031615045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662935,0.07500914,0.0004366193,0.04266811,0.0037592053,0.00028969286,0.00021793037,0.00002028815,0.011305507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853635,0.000097727665,0.00027839228,0.00013494844,0.00079777517,0.00015478814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991215,0.000116869094,0.00019767878,0.000040371888,0.00043146012,0.00009213743],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008748984,0.00008099489,0.00011991869,0.000058740854,0.0018250896,0.00013094951,0.00023503382,0.000025369349,0.000951591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030668106,0.00008271316,0.00008413636,0.000058125006,0.00016883966,0.00027717228,0.000060479626,0.00016083544,0.00000501383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010117205,0.00007347927,0.00037624428,0.000007562884,0.00009807413,0.000029121065,0.00039311958,0.0000060640746,0.000023591037,0.08479589,0.9104759,0.0036197852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026184678,0.00011510282,0.0004332396,0.00004214102,0.000033716347,0.000108633096,0.0005832649,0.000007706048,0.000020931886,0.010471136,0.98782367,0.000098596734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069634545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019754955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024089913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006203022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}