{"meta":{"query_hash":"68fb5b766029","filters":{"venue":"International Journal for Court Administration"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68fb5b766029","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+for+Court+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W1814677584","doi":"10.18352/ijca.125","title":"The Development and Role of the Court Administrator in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Christian ministry; Administration of justice; Political science; Law; Public administration; Work (physics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.03635268948329878,"score_gpt":0.35724334599905183,"score_spread":0.32089065651575305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814677584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39103425,0.0071504465,0.0022307925,0.2257301,0.0033442872,0.00046253056,0.0003445756,0.00027870576,0.36942428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696554,0.002810303,0.0015179319,0.010688407,0.00014608957,0.000064563654,0.000119002296,0.00012457365,0.11487372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97907835,0.004181388,0.00046516632,0.0017138572,0.006499106,0.008062297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9237029,0.005247918,0.0016027715,0.00054750155,0.022525074,0.046373818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010023299,0.00039408184,0.0005687878,0.0033486185,0.0573315,0.02221063,0.0041872654,0.005219443,0.013347762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034624614,0.0007608979,0.000379065,0.0043880744,0.012555824,0.004099024,0.007938681,0.0071469937,0.0012320676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022656942,0.0004622521,0.06516197,0.00029046708,0.000057241105,0.005301158,0.26900882,0.00096421706,0.00197977,0.22097984,0.27468282,0.1608849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034343844,0.00014203829,0.048240557,0.0004701019,0.000066001114,0.00044384497,0.23117015,0.0014306451,0.0008592936,0.0052722497,0.7116707,0.0002001209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25365156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25365156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.53463006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8656584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047887478","doi":"10.36745/ijca.326","title":"Technology-Driven Changes in an Organizational Structure: The Case of Canada’s Courts Administration Service","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Service (business); Administration (probate law); Judicial independence; Public administration; Computer security; Computer science; Business; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04337884626706784,"score_gpt":0.36025863822750626,"score_spread":0.3168797919604384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047887478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19982289,0.0019701824,0.00854686,0.31443277,0.0011235165,0.00037054624,0.00033040586,0.00014319288,0.4732596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91422135,0.0015394136,0.0054685553,0.023754576,0.00023789606,0.00009433712,0.00017506462,0.00007700276,0.054431826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98314524,0.0026596612,0.0002476881,0.00111911,0.0061321906,0.0066962177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98332894,0.0025385437,0.0006094365,0.0011528541,0.0065538716,0.005816337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00919078,0.00033321523,0.00025025784,0.002419722,0.040022854,0.014679097,0.0029134497,0.007068928,0.0072611105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01886003,0.00043743593,0.000834419,0.0030985507,0.017907731,0.005760804,0.005126508,0.007445419,0.0006995222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007841697,0.00016610563,0.018391723,0.000065151646,0.000039588176,0.0031577444,0.03688951,0.0025221633,0.0008201348,0.80963016,0.07283879,0.055400506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014208378,0.00014275446,0.04765065,0.0004205289,0.000076145436,0.0009274131,0.068803,0.0057924753,0.0007135174,0.06415955,0.81095,0.00022183935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9713508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15386821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20514852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302430853","doi":"10.36745/ijca.463","title":"Book Review: Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Law; Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02641709906142968,"score_gpt":0.3510344072385747,"score_spread":0.324617308177145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302430853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043562064,0.979487,0.000052819953,0.0065736375,0.0065512983,0.000017503213,0.000120649674,0.000008055536,0.007145391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096821145,0.9622137,0.00015478232,0.010597161,0.008514266,0.0000813617,0.00024944547,0.000016993587,0.017204065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859315,0.00039297287,0.00015581574,0.00014072924,0.00063174684,0.00008555783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941989,0.003223149,0.00054658175,0.000081918566,0.001639044,0.0003102591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001435677,0.0007502922,0.0019997186,0.0040120557,0.0007232205,0.0035000974,0.0014100141,0.00289562,0.032407142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810533,0.00058807636,0.0006064481,0.008670368,0.0012337933,0.0022222658,0.0009977563,0.003454101,0.011730071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035140467,0.000017342882,0.000064604734,0.0046222825,0.00003100833,0.00002616166,0.00004115348,0.000049630533,0.0000350044,0.002335766,0.9271941,0.065547906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028394154,0.000020739222,0.0005915525,0.008023097,0.000034253677,0.00012936982,0.000052277963,0.00001246795,0.000013251764,0.00095243973,0.9901334,0.000008768844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010204565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026546827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032407142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028340628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005850105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10841268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}