{"meta":{"query_hash":"c80aaf31aa86","filters":{"venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c80aaf31aa86","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+for+Educational+Integrity"},"results":[{"id":"W1480649662","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v3i1.132","title":"Editorial July 2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Military, Security, and Education Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Presentation (obstetrics); Publishing; Readability; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Publication; Discipline; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.05172738835310694,"score_gpt":0.4427187076327691,"score_spread":0.3909913192796622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480649662","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012799888,0.004527483,0.00019483634,0.03615754,0.87748724,0.00012984134,0.00055600924,0.00040599363,0.0804131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016763539,0.006685184,0.00030993318,0.034848344,0.3465918,0.00012888794,0.0011918895,0.00040547148,0.6081621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841523,0.00017273289,0.00015229557,0.00028361887,0.0007842709,0.0001917914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929929,0.0007503595,0.0003107036,0.0003499814,0.0039708177,0.001625242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019629858,0.0014718104,0.0013489467,0.0020243968,0.0016910784,0.0066122287,0.0022343113,0.0050095734,0.39195725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012598086,0.0005438515,0.0011968509,0.00078048423,0.00083211035,0.002463382,0.0017960885,0.0059238654,0.28807056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016513879,0.000005363844,0.00001588371,0.00006849038,0.0000018874061,0.000040811756,0.0000060980915,0.000005149973,0.000031571337,0.0002029208,0.9920764,0.0075288494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010547203,0.00001147852,0.00009947639,0.000120186014,0.0000028530799,0.000061162486,0.0000218004,0.000009185846,0.00003556631,0.00013755118,0.99948645,0.0000036900615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015113918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040014144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39195725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018375997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025770147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8672992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491625350","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v9i2.887","title":"Editorial Volume 9(2)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Environmental science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.02895376262512629,"score_gpt":0.3876490836946617,"score_spread":0.35869532106953544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491625350","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000068334106,0.003647528,0.00021024072,0.019010583,0.9249416,0.000075091215,0.0003316983,0.00047625072,0.051238682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010682096,0.005531874,0.00037179983,0.032170042,0.6654889,0.00010993536,0.0007219776,0.0004335139,0.29410374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971163,0.0003248154,0.0002542452,0.00046840913,0.0015545944,0.00028161146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883128,0.0016369937,0.0007053529,0.00093053776,0.0057212734,0.0026930226],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026449403,0.0018764891,0.0018641568,0.0034430465,0.0020899593,0.007896951,0.00272811,0.0067125945,0.42217878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017250149,0.00074433285,0.0018318081,0.0017431091,0.0012108784,0.003988014,0.0023738523,0.006304048,0.36366972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001154249,0.000008564482,0.000019166311,0.00008764177,0.0000022217193,0.000037619986,0.000004726194,0.000008132487,0.00003363908,0.00017130714,0.98993623,0.009679195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009170906,0.0000073679757,0.00007275733,0.0001355325,0.000003009955,0.000059715137,0.000013891132,0.00001306869,0.000025795338,0.00020712288,0.9994485,0.000003971239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001336476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027902897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001563039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026655227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8241918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554365104","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v1i1.14","title":"Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":444,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Perspective (graphical); Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.021585796284891455,"score_gpt":0.3815879098520392,"score_spread":0.3600021135671478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554365104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676853,0.016898276,0.00025103873,0.2578129,0.00065937825,0.000032890308,0.00020410756,0.000010368085,0.0564458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93968,0.019218704,0.00014692429,0.035366315,0.0010543453,0.000024056591,0.00007152219,0.000011480649,0.0044266027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955356,0.0021975397,0.00019359105,0.00033344558,0.00074644585,0.000993394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98515886,0.005793468,0.002386047,0.00031265253,0.002852948,0.0034960085],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044289585,0.0002467972,0.00059013756,0.0035964516,0.012068734,0.005917789,0.0010480707,0.0039763018,0.006479625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008058782,0.00028244525,0.00040083815,0.0052206283,0.006317228,0.0060186447,0.0029210364,0.004639326,0.00051602506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019923649,0.0009226388,0.51586556,0.00048212128,0.00010480068,0.003386828,0.31445748,0.0001165099,0.0007047841,0.029634006,0.043313205,0.09081283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001746546,0.0002280707,0.4767551,0.00081501045,0.00006127023,0.0013409612,0.45932886,0.00016256042,0.000179297,0.004104664,0.056940615,0.00006610187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17094153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4090026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008080763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069438154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3398931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575509464","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.782","title":"How do faculty members respond to their students' discussions of academic misconduct and academic integrity?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Academic institution; Qualitative research; Perception; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1208383388445477,"score_gpt":0.4745050081811505,"score_spread":0.3536666693366028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575509464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845359,0.000545789,0.0022864793,0.0068194293,0.00013655999,0.00007222607,0.000037371396,0.000042654738,0.00552363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959863,0.00032979366,0.0006639527,0.0010117445,0.00006675011,0.000062362655,0.000019344085,0.000022657881,0.0018371167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690062,0.023701243,0.00091159524,0.000815704,0.0029379153,0.0026273518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91716564,0.053720403,0.013499124,0.0023038238,0.007031371,0.006279628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020558909,0.00037032872,0.00059577404,0.0016599385,0.009850549,0.0074847178,0.0018784316,0.0030193613,0.0036131057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09331468,0.00047136238,0.0005218785,0.0016111565,0.0067106774,0.004973673,0.005498847,0.003547368,0.0008205773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088525725,0.00009083687,0.019511512,0.00011663239,0.00001545686,0.00045466973,0.95884424,0.000059341888,0.0011119355,0.00078486156,0.0010218598,0.01790008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000536014,0.00010390125,0.006665849,0.00010133094,0.000011519859,0.00027924895,0.9832729,0.00008314344,0.0010433826,0.00036240777,0.008042539,0.000028414828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025849864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042070695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99698067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005024515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006143633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10872722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102671823","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v3i1.128","title":"An exploration of the role of Canadian academic libraries in promoting academic integrity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Academic library; Information literacy; Library science; Political science; Higher education; Exploratory research; Public relations; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.07851609246483005,"score_gpt":0.40589672288343787,"score_spread":0.3273806304186078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102671823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002127,0.0061133537,0.0014860039,0.043103658,0.00013790547,0.0002811791,0.00053461414,0.00020984803,0.24792068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98184764,0.0034464593,0.001560392,0.001910826,0.000024445128,0.00004323659,0.00011210398,0.000023155375,0.011031704],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871181,0.0038051163,0.0003441656,0.00041658737,0.005523238,0.0027926737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96220016,0.010530004,0.0030659668,0.00085775164,0.01652171,0.00682436],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010052668,0.00038733488,0.00039465367,0.006686812,0.034095023,0.011188872,0.0019887139,0.0013812372,0.0075609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038081773,0.0003957568,0.00042720445,0.014214594,0.00580451,0.0037345611,0.006174116,0.0015178062,0.00058142544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008584801,0.00054752326,0.21059588,0.0019921693,0.00006953652,0.0014468116,0.2823894,0.00060887495,0.0024965573,0.06971999,0.042215373,0.3870594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059456434,0.00034017678,0.31056604,0.00089270377,0.00015702404,0.00064810825,0.43061417,0.0011216305,0.0028247796,0.0049455445,0.24762759,0.000202753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10500057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20852289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76183605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167255727","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v7i1.744","title":"YouTube: An international platform for sharing methods of cheating","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Popularity; Upload; Demographics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Multimedia; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.21693531073456523,"score_gpt":0.5119126823771453,"score_spread":0.29497737164258003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167255727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66853327,0.007908547,0.07718947,0.0041785613,0.0016506779,0.010189958,0.022631088,0.005055893,0.20266263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564936,0.004870307,0.066296116,0.0010137958,0.00092778384,0.0061336053,0.016990941,0.00094348023,0.0463303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599946,0.0019338301,0.00038556303,0.00027515585,0.0011398662,0.00026625564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815352,0.00847671,0.0024662097,0.0022329346,0.004523142,0.0007658245],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004725928,0.0005662361,0.00050773623,0.0061994293,0.0021326959,0.0019377292,0.00091266545,0.00066938717,0.0067359805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019954756,0.00021958836,0.00035216604,0.004108708,0.0005682625,0.0037734285,0.0019290706,0.0007791864,0.0019431111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097307813,0.0008142733,0.1179994,0.0024523681,0.0002406994,0.0013287279,0.03799222,0.0006944577,0.01131697,0.009017629,0.1158739,0.7012962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001963806,0.0017444637,0.38076115,0.0023839376,0.0003211405,0.0029791947,0.05946314,0.013251004,0.016437339,0.009965358,0.5118954,0.0006015261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059177973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101553835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99933064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077666587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012364491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02499342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460491371","doi":"10.1007/s40979-016-0007-9","title":"A close encounter with ghost-writers: an initial exploration study on background, strategies and attitudes of independent essay providers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Cheating; Collusion; Public relations; The Internet; Focus group; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06262571433169108,"score_gpt":0.3767369157888557,"score_spread":0.31411120145716465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460491371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955344,0.00023195325,0.00048108876,0.0009140886,0.000021909524,0.000021530943,0.000015788666,0.000007752647,0.0027713566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309605,0.00034114876,0.00046758936,0.00042138944,0.000024644221,0.000023395425,0.000020929367,0.00001685876,0.0055880724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949746,0.0032792336,0.0001703793,0.00036165226,0.00066087296,0.00055333396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773637,0.015229449,0.0025667977,0.0007475879,0.0013574105,0.0027349829],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069592106,0.00033637413,0.00051547424,0.0013946819,0.009110972,0.0062546143,0.0009705751,0.0018056141,0.0032175777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022532241,0.00065488723,0.00019100119,0.00091473054,0.005761216,0.0054743816,0.0063145645,0.0032946372,0.0007302921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026735142,0.000040918872,0.0060465066,0.000028287723,0.00000117135,0.0006998662,0.98838824,0.000008010849,0.00044839963,0.00051109557,0.00031936425,0.0034815292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035889714,0.000071934504,0.003147103,0.000046777128,0.000002237709,0.0007069352,0.9872291,0.00009490883,0.00024675863,0.00020120923,0.00823955,0.000009969641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026811666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004967312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018689441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022548684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03680426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884678906","doi":"10.1007/s40979-018-0028-7","title":"Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: a review of the research literature and call to action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Research integrity; Political science; Educational research; Action (physics); Work (physics); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medicine; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.33202150113702406,"score_gpt":0.5686972580840289,"score_spread":0.23667575694700488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884678906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005268224,0.9708623,0.00013960243,0.02515773,0.00083696144,0.000029563798,0.00008751933,0.000008924817,0.0023506475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011262251,0.9821186,0.00081832,0.004812957,0.0004078201,0.000035180656,0.00008282358,0.0000076748565,0.0004544053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779179,0.0050977175,0.0025179205,0.0012115382,0.011412923,0.0018420877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83591086,0.058145583,0.011266165,0.0018903521,0.08328067,0.009506353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030038193,0.0010481701,0.0032135348,0.020610452,0.010147755,0.014227829,0.0040133228,0.00447481,0.004216369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0893605,0.0007299877,0.0015783837,0.03671561,0.010179949,0.007742246,0.0042047068,0.0062357043,0.00059871306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012818657,0.00006560775,0.0073072235,0.14914845,0.0006138391,0.0010474818,0.013595942,0.0005144415,0.00047468065,0.04385322,0.14654136,0.6367096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003169846,0.00005059123,0.014490883,0.20982817,0.0010320419,0.00069976377,0.015397513,0.00019945168,0.00031695847,0.00804665,0.7497594,0.00014677865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8902319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95165795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10417572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47790787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75585127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890784557","doi":"10.1007/s40979-018-0030-0","title":"Effectiveness of tutorials for promoting educational integrity: a synthesis paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Misconduct; Intervention (counseling); Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.043677026637462465,"score_gpt":0.4205006072596121,"score_spread":0.3768235806221496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890784557","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17688265,0.7442161,0.006057811,0.004041373,0.004117727,0.04075367,0.0042209052,0.00031113625,0.019398656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.556188,0.3903425,0.020110067,0.0018624793,0.0018461805,0.024607062,0.001124619,0.00012972232,0.003789401],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770925,0.011759588,0.005856977,0.0011484358,0.0035795043,0.00056294684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9038315,0.07689187,0.009086717,0.0024818412,0.0067122094,0.0009959539],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024794377,0.001308382,0.0044302032,0.004827689,0.0010384202,0.0032575484,0.0016083178,0.0019472602,0.015401165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09258703,0.00059583026,0.008206743,0.0036822367,0.0011799015,0.0020408973,0.0015977474,0.0023604925,0.00083089736],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015647465,0.0038859071,0.002364086,0.42255715,0.021474645,0.00017017394,0.0026185573,0.00047873976,0.00086339033,0.0017670458,0.0027180428,0.52545476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026892992,0.041398115,0.036084652,0.62201434,0.19611782,0.00043088562,0.007912482,0.0013862266,0.0055787982,0.0036274453,0.058312185,0.00024400766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003993949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071272403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044583874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070546106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13112682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916175080","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.780","title":"Editorial 8(1)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09329351313903278,"score_gpt":0.5109924127027974,"score_spread":0.4176988995637646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916175080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007485259,0.0032765425,0.0002172303,0.045672923,0.92898744,0.000053130803,0.00013661975,0.00024815885,0.021333141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013682513,0.004539397,0.00026473711,0.078295246,0.7991752,0.0000863256,0.00027803332,0.0002641329,0.115728684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946049,0.0006656367,0.0005147244,0.0009766105,0.0027105075,0.000527603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782753,0.003621804,0.0014362286,0.0014745763,0.011596483,0.0035954802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003752619,0.0017634336,0.001784771,0.0027667668,0.0029815785,0.008428095,0.0035279668,0.010762472,0.20518224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029039657,0.0008622988,0.0022438427,0.0012802338,0.0022101074,0.005340003,0.002338955,0.011385584,0.15972835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104995715,0.000008736461,0.00003099342,0.00008320612,0.000002691126,0.00006282698,0.000009337791,0.000010809613,0.000037026795,0.00029333445,0.9926847,0.006765803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000918641,0.000010399317,0.0001138599,0.00021752737,0.0000039130887,0.00015322138,0.000035466303,0.00002639279,0.00004977511,0.00041990765,0.9989532,0.0000071244117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018277394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030525867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20518224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026047481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037301888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.686403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981460216","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0045-1","title":"Developing a university-wide academic integrity E-learning tutorial: a Canadian case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Experiential learning; Mathematics education; Higher education; Learning development; Personal Integrity; Scientific integrity; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.0487292806891621,"score_gpt":0.38049782602163357,"score_spread":0.33176854533247147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981460216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8470608,0.00095627067,0.012617581,0.038781893,0.00040114307,0.0009644963,0.00021110971,0.00025495357,0.09875175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513005,0.0011783547,0.01473183,0.0025827624,0.000047771016,0.00016823177,0.00009935486,0.00011109149,0.029780047],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235016,0.003031725,0.0002101889,0.00037748765,0.0019295783,0.0021008863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479897,0.0026692173,0.000540952,0.00044980325,0.0036628554,0.00787815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078420825,0.00044781374,0.00030822903,0.0013092939,0.022199439,0.00500901,0.003441404,0.0042803725,0.004149712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017536992,0.0003420229,0.00043015054,0.0018774307,0.0043565147,0.0023857006,0.005717468,0.004213221,0.0005964584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027056807,0.0046353345,0.052062497,0.0007757348,0.000045099212,0.096717976,0.39481086,0.0071836202,0.0071770363,0.09297854,0.081838705,0.26150402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008779335,0.00089076324,0.021911051,0.0007580754,0.00005371339,0.018531099,0.43001682,0.011892678,0.007943418,0.006443247,0.5011952,0.0002761607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64694893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85321635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038168486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073569484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7102605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990195677","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0047-z","title":"Are Canadian professors teaching the skills and knowledge students need to prevent plagiarism?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Redaction; Plagiarism detection; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03032029235692155,"score_gpt":0.42519208248398427,"score_spread":0.3948717901270627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990195677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534019,0.007347276,0.0006251468,0.13295624,0.0013453792,0.0002746292,0.0021760801,0.00023171863,0.10164162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555367,0.00401194,0.0008364767,0.006216517,0.00017698294,0.00008857045,0.00046711447,0.000035118243,0.032630518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628323,0.0004182162,0.000105663086,0.00023608559,0.0014461334,0.0015106949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756139,0.0012385688,0.0027333843,0.00041061398,0.009128485,0.010875137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028806087,0.00022948263,0.0004896776,0.0013300932,0.011327652,0.004567692,0.0015372451,0.001422596,0.028976066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015237712,0.00037119447,0.0004404125,0.00354037,0.0020302692,0.0016901385,0.0010628231,0.0011179604,0.0024616614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030598877,0.00033458308,0.4210664,0.0007635798,0.00006276766,0.0009399338,0.039653815,0.0003518087,0.002776761,0.00517333,0.2738509,0.2547201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005717027,0.00012338372,0.7059264,0.00050627085,0.000058951642,0.00026435137,0.08929036,0.00025016067,0.0006054977,0.00046008654,0.20235841,0.00009902056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92150396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053027324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11191782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38474196},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2991996678","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0046-0","title":"Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; Bow Valley College; University of Calgary","funders":"Mount Royal University","keywords":"Cheating; Outsourcing; Work (physics); Narrative; Public relations; Political science; Psychological contract; Psychological intervention; Higher education; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.06651198758456238,"score_gpt":0.43757824429008024,"score_spread":0.37106625670551785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991996678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97077674,0.0015200858,0.0014015725,0.0105021745,0.00013123827,0.00021234954,0.00022321314,0.000028221964,0.015204417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545383,0.00075528456,0.00033001494,0.00082777254,0.000013139893,0.00009136669,0.000047308873,0.000029096549,0.002452187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96933293,0.01868378,0.0008825408,0.0014848573,0.0033860458,0.006229745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95078975,0.031124245,0.0036920987,0.0013723174,0.006085999,0.006935617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021474043,0.0010410333,0.001623794,0.0043719877,0.05314288,0.017317638,0.0054629133,0.0042973286,0.0041912636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036299072,0.0012023745,0.0006316849,0.0070404354,0.041868664,0.007943693,0.017968245,0.011301471,0.0003573157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008035596,0.0000086115515,0.0007733706,0.000023560673,0.0000014783054,0.00022708364,0.99678934,0.000016826672,0.00006823362,0.001341148,0.0002269704,0.00051545235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7002944e-7,0.0000026085272,0.00025401064,0.000039584775,7.913675e-7,0.000023352322,0.9974179,0.000021270787,0.000023567056,0.000093552466,0.0021171076,0.0000056145723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7396964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8013631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08312257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08901003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6030992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109694751","doi":"10.1007/s40979-020-00062-6","title":"Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: the influencing factors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Likert scale; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Scale (ratio); Multilevel model; Descriptive statistics; Survey research; Phenomenon; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.07375159827665845,"score_gpt":0.3921008257779774,"score_spread":0.31834922750131894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109694751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645066,0.00021834351,0.000073450174,0.00046455977,0.000007670081,0.000024307727,0.00014846175,0.0000044648905,0.002608034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990625,0.000076676115,0.000053231815,0.00005174133,0.000004120367,0.0000066670973,0.00005579306,0.0000014343137,0.00068785733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800867,0.0006045868,0.00008926369,0.00019377828,0.0006459008,0.00045789458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148626,0.0046665133,0.004745469,0.0005086852,0.0058847987,0.00270827],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022579117,0.0001800455,0.00028974732,0.0014635922,0.0033295408,0.0022172946,0.0007974458,0.00049378665,0.0037765184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008421328,0.00014069983,0.00022306814,0.0015910919,0.0012514885,0.00043460814,0.0007625449,0.0008263474,0.0001868563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024837109,0.000070256094,0.9876851,0.000023449775,0.000015525273,0.00012933872,0.004331867,0.000046046345,0.00022431002,0.00010593907,0.0006197141,0.0067236973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.7293233e-7,0.00001624187,0.9934249,0.000018719109,0.000004807671,0.000020264228,0.0055430555,0.00008718783,0.00006123645,0.000009184045,0.0008093001,0.000004221936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.869576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9438579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99950624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012161981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011837739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26238418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114162843","doi":"10.1007/s40979-020-00066-2","title":"In memory of Tracey Bretag: a collection of tributes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05739798794568996,"score_gpt":0.4023185687896094,"score_spread":0.34492058084391947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114162843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877024,0.010657724,0.0005948649,0.64836055,0.3333055,0.000018106048,0.00003716158,0.00006624066,0.006372153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017365206,0.009511316,0.0006821973,0.55164164,0.35220537,0.00008140815,0.000067727065,0.00068688294,0.06775834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762123,0.008035212,0.0018209411,0.0020828608,0.009134916,0.0027138595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92676246,0.033461586,0.0059505305,0.003931686,0.020291124,0.0096027125],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015884232,0.0013591594,0.001940371,0.0029005804,0.025369914,0.029851865,0.0037257753,0.024813248,0.010624325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13185188,0.0007878494,0.0012104535,0.003771943,0.013129788,0.014166751,0.011355208,0.05345061,0.007087487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012216189,0.0000080983145,0.000099043515,0.0000591773,0.000008580397,0.00023981943,0.0037580708,0.000012709916,0.00006967724,0.004075329,0.98688555,0.004771681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027036267,0.000008396972,0.000116285984,0.00024309018,0.0000072500266,0.00027352694,0.004971688,0.000026511381,0.000098533674,0.001804611,0.9924184,0.000029078761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008806105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02313218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97518677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060255285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011805303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08400488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158855527","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00077-7","title":"Ungrading: why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Rating system; Economics","score_opus":0.06699258393408913,"score_gpt":0.5038929804987623,"score_spread":0.43690039656467317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158855527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063330615,0.059155226,0.036383066,0.67845553,0.022883294,0.0004360928,0.0009391359,0.0026421663,0.19277251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17812203,0.042960577,0.072462074,0.2619028,0.012343571,0.0008020529,0.0010296628,0.0036624589,0.4267147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699261,0.013240834,0.0012121086,0.0017101045,0.01281986,0.0010909513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9206214,0.036609676,0.0047107157,0.0036830485,0.030841626,0.0035335287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025936557,0.0010955251,0.0009997383,0.0030530684,0.003297347,0.008746641,0.0023029505,0.004470474,0.02783694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10818804,0.00093504676,0.00057094416,0.0025213775,0.007937059,0.007340032,0.0025661807,0.0075733336,0.016583422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004567705,0.000032300297,0.0022741677,0.00023559274,0.000017884438,0.0000640792,0.0017231443,0.00012376493,0.00036465973,0.026645705,0.79341114,0.17506185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043174165,0.00014605577,0.0064414195,0.0020751564,0.000042853546,0.00047562405,0.0028371601,0.0012566024,0.0014655829,0.056201246,0.9288654,0.00014971486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022939442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037896164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02783694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004757597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076478356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13716727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180478483","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00078-6","title":"Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical governance and application procedures","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Health and Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Corporate governance; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Research ethics; Ethical issues; Curriculum; Subject (documents); Public relations; Sociology; Law; Management; Engineering; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.4907829008208932,"score_gpt":0.6651030609224939,"score_spread":0.17432016010160073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180478483","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033650903,0.059402373,0.6017597,0.22891232,0.0139621915,0.0038841553,0.00041781427,0.0014597274,0.08683676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05953981,0.12558606,0.6705744,0.061086193,0.016298408,0.0133393975,0.0006697936,0.0016602834,0.051245637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86673605,0.10861558,0.008930125,0.0024951377,0.011604615,0.0016185371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81906146,0.15399714,0.0054014996,0.006680284,0.011219717,0.0036399113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08964856,0.0013459405,0.0013467906,0.004195188,0.0053301193,0.016529424,0.0032679013,0.010805908,0.009980747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08893534,0.0013720818,0.0014359143,0.0051191347,0.028225932,0.018102221,0.0114591615,0.020735808,0.008225475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006726017,0.00022180146,0.0005670136,0.0030409775,0.000022622062,0.00071227795,0.031595666,0.000840949,0.0013776661,0.6289238,0.11660102,0.21602905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135356595,0.000096602394,0.00061894464,0.0050490904,0.000006749038,0.0008072437,0.004805183,0.0005620103,0.00044089352,0.17083782,0.8166834,0.000078398894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014022345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017165525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005465621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012959921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47411257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207425528","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00088-4","title":"International students’ knowledge and emotions related to academic integrity at Canadian postsecondary institutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Red River College; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Feeling; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Reading (process); Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.06153495639984373,"score_gpt":0.4460394232579318,"score_spread":0.38450446685808803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207425528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99453354,0.00013284018,0.00006996556,0.0004942583,0.000018365812,0.000021280674,0.00009745247,0.0000049277805,0.0046274057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.0001654459,0.00005436226,0.0001506303,0.000005329872,0.000010883323,0.00006063328,0.000002490373,0.0014860539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700564,0.0003310575,0.00009829553,0.00014294115,0.0012616937,0.0011603106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853681,0.0012334996,0.002943849,0.00030519962,0.0052424134,0.004906974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029210686,0.00025277724,0.0005637632,0.0013311951,0.0076136156,0.00433789,0.0009480575,0.0006306881,0.00475513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010654531,0.00019900622,0.00045738483,0.0016511738,0.002679256,0.000878959,0.002560195,0.0020579228,0.000483336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014046216,0.00027069548,0.7943482,0.000106503736,0.000033500295,0.0002585067,0.16899225,0.00008227389,0.0007266031,0.00053650024,0.0048405733,0.029664027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005293315,0.00014170463,0.6667679,0.00010890495,0.00002295707,0.00013055849,0.3240269,0.00016871886,0.00047302493,0.00012213466,0.007977948,0.000053928725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7455382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7965384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012027686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021630479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5119208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216879224","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00090-w","title":"Student and faculty perceptions of, and experiences with, academic dishonesty at a medium-sized Canadian university","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Honesty; Psychology; Perception; Witness; Dishonesty; Medical education; Educational attainment; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.036953735480758636,"score_gpt":0.39202712620430036,"score_spread":0.3550733907235417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216879224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924346,0.00023926349,0.00013730997,0.001938751,0.00003261559,0.000037388254,0.0001846228,0.00001161741,0.0049838033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979067,0.00024522605,0.000116632036,0.00031595243,0.000007781659,0.000010864176,0.00005745061,0.0000043973255,0.0013350644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959174,0.00063410663,0.00017289595,0.0002819499,0.0016056405,0.001388088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972628,0.0024378807,0.0038658478,0.00048024338,0.007119522,0.0134684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003397329,0.00028772425,0.00039760937,0.0018199693,0.01759603,0.0048527615,0.0016550447,0.0006714551,0.0055758255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011575808,0.00027957693,0.00030800956,0.0023417685,0.0045870217,0.0012497546,0.0041710148,0.00193468,0.00033858523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021573773,0.0002021875,0.65979093,0.0002566402,0.00004805856,0.000978869,0.28873423,0.00025439265,0.0024821875,0.0019044573,0.009333292,0.035798926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063625257,0.00013361762,0.4445932,0.00024499404,0.000019626425,0.00022895103,0.5366983,0.0002947175,0.0005373181,0.00021754195,0.016923077,0.00010215423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9416289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99932855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038353935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07626306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2782786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226520937","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0","title":"New priorities for academic integrity: equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Scholarship; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Decolonization; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07299590899366233,"score_gpt":0.4307373877076325,"score_spread":0.35774147871397016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226520937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035770778,0.007690671,0.015047612,0.883709,0.0022080718,0.00009687434,0.000035818568,0.0001361352,0.055305116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91196847,0.0038953458,0.008955003,0.060060438,0.002751046,0.00018423425,0.00004536482,0.00012526657,0.012014803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8512848,0.10834908,0.0052789054,0.006104568,0.02002851,0.008954066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.729095,0.13191299,0.027751535,0.029896978,0.038920287,0.04242322],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12745084,0.00052189315,0.0015353741,0.0035755036,0.027040755,0.040317442,0.0036746766,0.011849631,0.0076618562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14780544,0.00054973405,0.0008613105,0.0032401232,0.09430304,0.040507328,0.033648863,0.02614829,0.0013203457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053590426,0.00010628538,0.006399079,0.000353875,0.00002562467,0.00021898877,0.078520976,0.00014575991,0.00051155686,0.84235495,0.02316856,0.048140746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035756242,0.00018289927,0.0060750986,0.0020124898,0.000033213237,0.00049502193,0.13022798,0.00056812,0.0013918012,0.5856203,0.27321666,0.0001406449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058158776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005990438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98815036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016849749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056245763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6740325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285992815","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00107-y","title":"Academic integrity in upper year nursing students’ work-integrated settings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Academic integrity; Psychology; Work (physics); Scientific integrity; Courage; Personal Integrity; Academic dishonesty; Pedagogy; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Cheating","score_opus":0.04632549582965874,"score_gpt":0.43824791568191623,"score_spread":0.3919224198522575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285992815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989311,0.00008325329,0.00003195663,0.00023469965,0.000011676775,0.000010247574,0.0000100388115,0.0000021902506,0.00068488467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935037,0.00007468117,0.00005188973,0.00009273645,0.0000041734165,0.000011004385,0.000012341051,0.0000014250479,0.00040139607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958371,0.001173146,0.0002564864,0.00026658163,0.00084490963,0.0016218157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98420423,0.0014170274,0.0033655409,0.00052941026,0.0019173459,0.008566519],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043248544,0.00034016088,0.0005630058,0.0012749558,0.0060371407,0.005851128,0.0014380313,0.0011976532,0.00394536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011908151,0.0004944651,0.00046321648,0.0009315148,0.0029555396,0.0020139578,0.0076440433,0.003138038,0.0006373173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104529674,0.0031859984,0.83229375,0.00012814195,0.000034104076,0.00077915913,0.12845416,0.00013782454,0.00058200787,0.0006808334,0.0016587303,0.03196081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012691591,0.0012738477,0.6601461,0.0002583759,0.000016582422,0.00055466185,0.33105013,0.00027068536,0.00066524773,0.00058039883,0.0051185368,0.00005275258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011300007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026376849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99880236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036812534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006589035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026709497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296472389","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00116-x","title":"Recommendations for a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity: perspectives from a survey of students, faculty, and tutors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Academic dishonesty; Context (archaeology); Research integrity; Medical education; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Higher education; Data integrity; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14962581725922944,"score_gpt":0.4894700086381741,"score_spread":0.3398441913789446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296472389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6663889,0.0024223735,0.0053675403,0.31511763,0.0006849829,0.00058246875,0.00028563436,0.00015433245,0.008996099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643916,0.00160443,0.0059407745,0.025732867,0.00017979441,0.00035770013,0.00012980225,0.000046064273,0.0016169958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89590514,0.07397179,0.007011769,0.0020121494,0.012337811,0.008761344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7494131,0.121510595,0.02157712,0.005538938,0.055975977,0.045984227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09856869,0.00046625684,0.00089158834,0.0029934596,0.012393112,0.013489434,0.0024366921,0.005699794,0.004547096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18623696,0.0005942083,0.0006379274,0.0030835455,0.00663827,0.010513196,0.0075721405,0.00744148,0.0008648517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012214736,0.00049397466,0.12109108,0.0009629145,0.00005553204,0.0011195322,0.75087446,0.00018358207,0.0025092047,0.005836945,0.036425788,0.08032492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018960278,0.00018468301,0.014179699,0.0007325066,0.000017528988,0.00027294952,0.9365889,0.0003254998,0.00043151132,0.002183009,0.044984706,0.00008007386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009965314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011194356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008723532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028107623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5212873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297199072","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00111-2","title":"Proactive learner empowerment: towards a transformative academic integrity approach for English language learners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Thematic analysis; Higher education; Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.04923907067262269,"score_gpt":0.4019488676779118,"score_spread":0.35270979700528915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297199072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6642902,0.0015036578,0.080221236,0.12449813,0.0012482987,0.0010064996,0.000060877515,0.0010007992,0.12617032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97020155,0.0004483779,0.016622886,0.0034761268,0.00016740203,0.00040747906,0.000027779563,0.00008200936,0.008566444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97789454,0.01667026,0.00035760712,0.0010589751,0.0021408254,0.001877781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97975487,0.0085610105,0.0016926181,0.0015803756,0.0016640063,0.006747168],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021133186,0.0006588353,0.0004119539,0.001185552,0.0065601,0.012608886,0.002760312,0.0024988176,0.0042191986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020840384,0.00036654185,0.0008200114,0.00047407072,0.010959118,0.0075163487,0.026577916,0.005921294,0.0008756758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012837573,0.0025144976,0.017638724,0.0005663776,0.000060524268,0.001202903,0.6686872,0.00035355467,0.0048801154,0.057039946,0.01621603,0.2307118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013270558,0.0011580996,0.009732731,0.001100395,0.000060731436,0.0015435093,0.6507361,0.0019424822,0.0065752445,0.077522874,0.24940427,0.000090842266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004292727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007714983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019703167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009330627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11176431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376611400","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7","title":"Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: a case of implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Principle of legality; Field (mathematics); Discretion; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23693448257702435,"score_gpt":0.5090555197410058,"score_spread":0.2721210371639815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376611400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50530785,0.002180799,0.014838652,0.301016,0.0020157227,0.00030635577,0.00007095059,0.0003501318,0.17391354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97105676,0.0004636276,0.0026558554,0.01112056,0.00046944266,0.00010277796,0.0000147451165,0.00006518501,0.0140510565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89145905,0.07869056,0.0040700156,0.0034148367,0.015940031,0.0064255744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8340239,0.10390179,0.01966412,0.010800545,0.01717141,0.0144381905],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049962815,0.0005807542,0.00058932055,0.00298512,0.031440444,0.015623879,0.0047423183,0.011390427,0.0070629823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1841212,0.00074335036,0.0009276151,0.0032865892,0.014463632,0.007939165,0.011829637,0.011877048,0.0021588749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027138198,0.00067237066,0.026357466,0.00029749528,0.000055090786,0.053869896,0.5811234,0.00090639386,0.0022982107,0.19928652,0.05526094,0.07960085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008057317,0.00045339382,0.004787017,0.00064518966,0.00004914796,0.018808153,0.35658142,0.0018073681,0.0049929926,0.038159575,0.5734593,0.00017583584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003210271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037384308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98860955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009645118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008400047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2642318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384469708","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00136-1","title":"Student perceptions of academic misconduct amongst their peers during the rapid transition to remote instruction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Student engagement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Perception; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04842813834164943,"score_gpt":0.40661397620512507,"score_spread":0.35818583786347563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384469708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993443,0.000034397137,0.00002528806,0.00018481645,0.0000060154857,0.0000051107722,0.000007049456,0.0000018317106,0.00039129762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997253,0.000034126384,0.000021912616,0.00004265648,0.0000038164612,0.0000047597296,0.000006141915,0.000001068049,0.00016025551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594927,0.0015528343,0.0003185387,0.00026712063,0.0011785264,0.0007337777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745028,0.0055291504,0.009234944,0.00089944556,0.0039826287,0.005851057],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042447983,0.00026359493,0.000483102,0.0012386829,0.0036992235,0.003388981,0.0010748345,0.0011896373,0.0033193505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029149858,0.0002992883,0.00041392233,0.0006937915,0.0020727385,0.001399565,0.0032415465,0.0022604966,0.00046670143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016637133,0.00074432977,0.7790563,0.000068484085,0.000053864977,0.00072146766,0.19700323,0.00010240411,0.0008933895,0.00024825786,0.00088421063,0.02005759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008851851,0.0008277835,0.5645384,0.00010819156,0.000033110482,0.00048276724,0.43037978,0.00043918996,0.00067912193,0.00019152382,0.0022500714,0.00006114182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015355115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018829297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99881035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022258402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021225915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030531466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387568087","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1","title":"Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Everyday life; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.2789330394429113,"score_gpt":0.47481826220170137,"score_spread":0.19588522275879006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387568087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11230651,0.018310454,0.05889771,0.47997096,0.002877556,0.00012217181,0.00003667371,0.00011137308,0.3273666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96147615,0.0024658237,0.00411854,0.019221745,0.00078262284,0.000090314556,0.000012038897,0.000058297006,0.011774624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654857,0.025696918,0.00076984876,0.0022743493,0.003996736,0.0017763289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596713,0.022111,0.0041746185,0.00515954,0.005041164,0.0038423378],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03634497,0.0004539988,0.0006511717,0.001235831,0.013553891,0.016519327,0.0015401021,0.008342438,0.0032781917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041345004,0.00034262694,0.00041447295,0.00071275426,0.10695376,0.019267924,0.015226762,0.017050799,0.0008107662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013510433,0.000029622453,0.0005336185,0.00003870954,0.0000068096565,0.00016734541,0.050484158,0.000095000905,0.00021169093,0.9343999,0.00326438,0.010755239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009696587,0.00006221825,0.0006063732,0.00032957582,0.0000067687406,0.0004916269,0.024381496,0.000396435,0.00041458124,0.84286773,0.13040133,0.00003216918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012832828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001116429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99165756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006507811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01026915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19221288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389752195","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00147-y","title":"A model for preventing academic misconduct: evidence from a large-scale intervention","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Commit; Intervention (counseling); Premise; Psychology; Discipline; Scale (ratio); Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1686443114703947,"score_gpt":0.47803496889414304,"score_spread":0.3093906574237484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389752195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8744851,0.004478287,0.033520773,0.011071507,0.00093930936,0.049422834,0.0010167385,0.0012992593,0.02376633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138881,0.0028196722,0.046403006,0.0016274801,0.00008720063,0.032853242,0.00031972714,0.000045540804,0.0019561364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705053,0.02282341,0.0012230724,0.0016854994,0.0027484116,0.0010142667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9130292,0.06719802,0.0064109256,0.0063472497,0.0035903947,0.0034243588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036535338,0.0013939788,0.0012933754,0.0021560693,0.0032400244,0.0029434355,0.004926677,0.0032393222,0.01332286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085876614,0.0007324772,0.0021120983,0.0015983667,0.0032500005,0.0031385708,0.0040138126,0.003913957,0.001208754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018044375,0.18697134,0.017477483,0.02591546,0.0018029044,0.0002789586,0.014107157,0.01593053,0.0010077907,0.01960409,0.011812245,0.6870476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.14668408,0.3895231,0.09216233,0.05283848,0.015871175,0.00056528626,0.036190435,0.11468682,0.010231584,0.062406857,0.07782052,0.0010193627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015554757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134199755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99676067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010183068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020792764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19321966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402339736","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00163-6","title":"Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Smith School of Business, Queen's University","keywords":"Regression analysis; Psychology; Academic integrity; Regression; Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.09444063427137273,"score_gpt":0.4713385927775645,"score_spread":0.3768979585061918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402339736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856456,0.00024327652,0.008580424,0.0015280329,0.000035932633,0.00016424283,0.0002673448,0.000101522375,0.0034336275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586785,0.00011814283,0.0029351872,0.00006244825,0.0000135315395,0.00011802402,0.0001794948,0.00002399313,0.0006814324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98428124,0.0112691475,0.0007126176,0.0013690571,0.0013934084,0.000974613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116453,0.06340097,0.011730441,0.005688121,0.004233592,0.0033016151],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020543797,0.0012766485,0.0010338599,0.002476168,0.0020532853,0.0060327444,0.0023892042,0.0011926884,0.009006829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06594094,0.00065020367,0.0028222278,0.0024581943,0.0015677179,0.003425195,0.0047049234,0.0035497288,0.0008496524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023461007,0.00083423994,0.9621156,0.0001501288,0.0009706767,0.00017891343,0.008240616,0.003023495,0.00025248286,0.0046408027,0.0010497235,0.018308861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000652495,0.0007685972,0.811147,0.000568158,0.0015101364,0.0003453351,0.01694327,0.15267776,0.0006661252,0.010645139,0.0044909306,0.0001722783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021490952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013405772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017088694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00425891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10864729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404232621","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00175-2","title":"Future-proofing integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology: prioritizing human rights, dignity, and equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Equity (law); Human rights; Psychology; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.4877763892982634,"score_gpt":0.6122569691056695,"score_spread":0.12448057980740612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404232621","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008507712,0.014314245,0.06446046,0.8441884,0.0029424082,0.00020260333,0.0000302157,0.000087472734,0.06526657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5956222,0.021015905,0.10694069,0.24571584,0.0048763887,0.001030411,0.000070068876,0.00021307275,0.024515534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82259524,0.13323359,0.0061772023,0.0066189854,0.024754886,0.0066201496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7690864,0.15922844,0.014985097,0.023871364,0.019510582,0.013318053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18922767,0.00087117933,0.001973145,0.0025156287,0.014240615,0.032493778,0.004324105,0.019815002,0.0050748577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15631586,0.0008633721,0.0013357144,0.0013078026,0.10631455,0.04187145,0.027097655,0.024881888,0.0016155273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002963856,0.000053638214,0.0009733341,0.00022466663,0.000028311431,0.0001921811,0.0123833325,0.0003411116,0.0002411411,0.9419136,0.010165228,0.033453736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021580456,0.00012179181,0.0005234223,0.0017142743,0.00002935703,0.0004192113,0.00817224,0.00047760195,0.0008634591,0.82073104,0.16685757,0.00006836548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028959727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004839334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012544872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052448872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407607630","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00180-z","title":"Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on GenAI proliferation: generating advanced insights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.024531625998657606,"score_gpt":0.38429153575160174,"score_spread":0.35975990975294414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407607630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603558,0.0011764072,0.002425515,0.011214517,0.00008909443,0.00007765354,0.00005622916,0.000020556114,0.024584318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946181,0.0009249765,0.00045397197,0.0009596368,0.000018353157,0.000043802876,0.000022928018,0.000021349688,0.0029369437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876653,0.007754243,0.0003961237,0.00062384235,0.0019335819,0.0016268843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97658044,0.016796993,0.0019442003,0.0009418027,0.0019400986,0.001796534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014817972,0.00034316615,0.00060546893,0.0020958679,0.010876945,0.009847792,0.0010730149,0.0022569364,0.0023943195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019887153,0.00056109653,0.00035500887,0.0019912869,0.016563931,0.0060977903,0.009091852,0.004303305,0.000376579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005896865,0.0000081645,0.003037156,0.000040769628,0.0000011076606,0.00031446526,0.9915827,0.000014067413,0.00025455395,0.0024898183,0.00029478324,0.0019564272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014106467,0.000012143367,0.001359516,0.00008388653,0.0000019917873,0.00013520877,0.98400843,0.000027041215,0.00014923277,0.0005111493,0.013705141,0.000004899313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013603075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027661407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014817972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009326282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074633663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07836586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408083851","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00182-x","title":"Understanding PSE students’ reactions to the postplagiarism concept: a quantitative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.14830328600280315,"score_gpt":0.4923651865432522,"score_spread":0.34406190054044905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408083851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99618393,0.000050955445,0.0008804821,0.00055723265,0.000014375085,0.00006475445,0.0000559436,0.000019197796,0.0021732121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973852,0.000085034684,0.00047266507,0.00023321681,0.000013037756,0.00015813441,0.00007296022,0.000016680951,0.0015629731],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873754,0.005448926,0.0009359069,0.0007712339,0.003937038,0.0015315381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93060887,0.031385455,0.015021413,0.0031390064,0.014761304,0.0050839493],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01553133,0.00038143076,0.0006605696,0.003118607,0.003510686,0.005056869,0.0011376586,0.0013246835,0.0044900444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06958569,0.0003336892,0.0004868952,0.0020792305,0.003929218,0.0036434068,0.0060739657,0.00328361,0.0011867055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021171448,0.00073291326,0.25969857,0.000310206,0.000038873703,0.00042342814,0.66386867,0.00017333751,0.0038271463,0.002168263,0.002023485,0.06652343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001750345,0.0005503282,0.2653922,0.00018896117,0.000021398684,0.00039512268,0.7097009,0.0007635752,0.0030903616,0.0016979331,0.0180894,0.000092232156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012132626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016084657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002381997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030404776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213854},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4408604286","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00187-6","title":"Global Trends in Education: Artificial Intelligence, Postplagiarism, and Future-focused Learning for 2025 and Beyond – 2024–2025 Werklund Distinguished Research Lecture","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.05784685763756196,"score_gpt":0.46495662347644307,"score_spread":0.4071097658388811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408604286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006918515,0.060680676,0.0017035485,0.8130928,0.018293377,0.00002759905,0.0002089692,0.00017338103,0.09890111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.417197,0.098748595,0.005898543,0.16477287,0.019137945,0.00021997432,0.0012236546,0.00052585674,0.2922756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948344,0.0018641201,0.00022513508,0.00038482016,0.0013340292,0.0013575258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120164,0.0020332732,0.0007416061,0.0004723036,0.0018367841,0.003714396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007913417,0.00058996544,0.00052444363,0.0021658775,0.0047976,0.01324825,0.0010030565,0.006024507,0.02760856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124630565,0.00022367854,0.00045021667,0.0021764943,0.007761168,0.015556824,0.00827062,0.008931529,0.0051668976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040627867,0.000078799356,0.0025278216,0.0002504193,0.000012064112,0.00016960855,0.0076413904,0.000113301525,0.00018655784,0.17824943,0.5772898,0.2334401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003669495,0.000031681226,0.00235085,0.00061770744,0.0000033410624,0.00011670004,0.0070804097,0.00007045868,0.000161218,0.028458564,0.96108806,0.000017268072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004261829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007976671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010705508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011394374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0923599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409262732","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00188-5","title":"Academic and clinical integrity: undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Qatar National Library","keywords":"Academic integrity; Perception; Psychology; Medical education; Nursing; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08083098191398605,"score_gpt":0.5290195315625424,"score_spread":0.44818854964855637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409262732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933342,0.00032198697,0.00022495897,0.002391311,0.000057464655,0.000026383836,0.0000150468395,0.000008094774,0.0036204746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998257,0.00017734688,0.00009199916,0.0005261261,0.0000150652295,0.000013501539,0.000008104048,0.0000022021368,0.0009086432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377465,0.0025632447,0.00042378463,0.00030011192,0.0018048158,0.001133382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344237,0.0037851417,0.0028150321,0.00041545348,0.0032517756,0.0062901773],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071167136,0.0002159733,0.00046295606,0.00077222165,0.004652325,0.0045632017,0.0006609011,0.0012939305,0.006136489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017804215,0.0002182098,0.00030980018,0.0006597118,0.004463279,0.0018407212,0.0052209357,0.0024011494,0.00060719793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009462085,0.0006054215,0.21009122,0.0003074587,0.000030471085,0.0009832871,0.737469,0.000126759,0.002189205,0.0032378554,0.0040290747,0.040835597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010586162,0.00057731004,0.07064687,0.00029742834,0.000018251396,0.0009116169,0.90813714,0.0002405407,0.0008228511,0.0010389519,0.01724955,0.00004899284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039277626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004969962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053239823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037637234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414397238","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00201-x","title":"Redefining assessment tasks to promote students’ creativity and integrity in the age of generative artificial intelligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Creativity; Temptation; Generative grammar; Task (project management); Inclusion (mineral); Creativity technique; Point (geometry)","score_opus":0.16027145110352375,"score_gpt":0.5247919296444852,"score_spread":0.3645204785409614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414397238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6146692,0.0004991506,0.31533912,0.0062122643,0.00029210452,0.0013066689,0.00004754077,0.0011097003,0.06052429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670681,0.00016577891,0.12879272,0.00032393335,0.000032540484,0.00045798437,0.000026429354,0.00006405515,0.0030685689],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523622,0.037014525,0.0019492741,0.0014726437,0.0056559867,0.0015453342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8912373,0.06728534,0.010524876,0.011781633,0.012262239,0.006908622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052670967,0.00081669725,0.00057888764,0.0021972177,0.0033344072,0.0118166,0.002571702,0.00207729,0.0031850245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0899967,0.0006032116,0.00059622986,0.0009433347,0.00685628,0.007224927,0.011656835,0.004240208,0.001010232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074032904,0.0024613095,0.05876251,0.0010530128,0.00006011137,0.0005466293,0.22797033,0.007993976,0.018134752,0.17265256,0.0060196104,0.5036048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041862612,0.006687251,0.07616332,0.0037911462,0.00019039706,0.0015242525,0.13237645,0.07842796,0.05604257,0.43631545,0.2073484,0.0007142031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042850102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089960935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052670967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024638847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00542293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27855402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415122066","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00202-w","title":"Reducing undergraduate students’ trust of commercial contract cheating websites with an academic support literacy intervention","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Reputation; Psychological intervention; Certification; Intervention (counseling); Literacy","score_opus":0.03674219879460586,"score_gpt":0.4593670395512566,"score_spread":0.42262484075665074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415122066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.000027292488,0.00013720064,0.00017277307,0.000011567138,0.00016955254,0.000011215779,0.000023427825,0.000546238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970227,0.00009390595,0.0016472961,0.00013294931,0.00001785566,0.0004468622,0.000040621682,0.0000029890725,0.00059476343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988869,0.00044077696,0.0001009957,0.00007500911,0.00021744594,0.00027892267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942298,0.0010481102,0.0011236938,0.000299139,0.00055037293,0.0027488589],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018390022,0.00048361756,0.0005291248,0.0005686775,0.0008607797,0.0010111511,0.0006804263,0.0008360246,0.004052507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009198856,0.00027782322,0.0004817606,0.0003443819,0.00041222517,0.0005004055,0.0012491494,0.0016766184,0.00044568317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068023354,0.32694155,0.15160128,0.0008535096,0.00022481545,0.0005353769,0.010583396,0.0008751284,0.0121068675,0.0005203258,0.0085888775,0.48036647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055469275,0.11518631,0.8314571,0.00043174165,0.0005586678,0.00040010424,0.009095108,0.007885865,0.017718371,0.00091504544,0.010665723,0.0001390719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011720619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023633128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009560816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00205553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013557017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117465603","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00211-9","title":"Beyond plagiarism: transforming pedagogy to help students write with sources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Key (lock); Teaching method; Professional writing; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02564644105414007,"score_gpt":0.43611940607713123,"score_spread":0.4104729650229912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117465603","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012878787,0.71008784,0.08217313,0.067386635,0.009299972,0.00038349908,0.00006823495,0.0015101405,0.11621177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09591661,0.7618739,0.05959984,0.016050497,0.0036976128,0.0006674088,0.00018971183,0.0009008323,0.061103553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947643,0.002785513,0.0002983016,0.00023068732,0.0017167645,0.00020434879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913476,0.006533008,0.0005696169,0.00031632365,0.0008681509,0.0003652731],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00447386,0.0006722785,0.00079736416,0.002362057,0.0018077717,0.00741154,0.0017489876,0.0023226177,0.0032546008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015213691,0.0003835416,0.00061032147,0.0018334787,0.005503177,0.00813551,0.00413209,0.0049748924,0.002642173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026645646,0.0001329963,0.00070055365,0.0056791,0.000038929466,0.00025991382,0.037226144,0.00033158925,0.0014566495,0.052650746,0.072930865,0.8285659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021799482,0.00010113025,0.0012624373,0.0072709452,0.000028838724,0.0010666851,0.010536793,0.00020358255,0.0014185602,0.022426998,0.9556303,0.00003179468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010098399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021648759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001407254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004038252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023660362},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}