{"meta":{"query_hash":"9aa4addd223e","filters":{"venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9aa4addd223e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+for+Philosophy+of+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W17145050","doi":"10.1023/a:1020832916983","title":"Is there anything wrong with ``God of the gaps'' reasoning?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.055926631845081815,"score_gpt":0.28258501510021533,"score_spread":0.22665838325513352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17145050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7351973,0.004895575,0.00053802656,0.045230024,0.006900248,0.0004532842,0.00018607428,0.0000384986,0.20656098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507475,0.0004139496,0.00026488368,0.0005859269,0.0014347968,0.0000030860324,0.0000022140414,0.000016149163,0.0022042673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990054,0.000038785718,0.00032245956,0.00010452135,0.00042296093,0.00010588445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846935,0.00010184659,0.000527392,0.0001321188,0.000738803,0.000030476545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021698694,0.00010406585,0.00016826269,0.000080305246,0.00019680508,0.00005622384,0.0003853578,0.000048597383,0.00012069278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057839316,0.000064814434,0.00024203763,0.0000224702,0.00030333427,0.00019338822,0.000029496203,0.0002538932,0.000003829911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246628,0.00012342382,0.0013762476,0.00006176142,0.00035785168,0.0000048271,0.014660018,0.000040547537,0.00015128164,0.97338843,0.008874248,0.00083671336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018545864,0.0007008135,0.00037271163,0.001699253,0.00016479123,0.00019218591,0.00085863564,0.0004294664,0.0050953357,0.7645473,0.22379524,0.00028970707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074585085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030541254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25987744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029359104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023314706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2643056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973982489","doi":"10.1007/s11153-011-9324-3","title":"Megill’s multiverse meta-argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Teleological argument; Key (lock); Ontological argument; Computer science","score_opus":0.1471245233604252,"score_gpt":0.29626564515654535,"score_spread":0.14914112179612016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973982489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0536687,0.0040612034,0.0016937682,0.020196468,0.024737777,0.0009118785,0.0006166186,0.00014938653,0.8939642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948884,0.0002066649,0.0010722165,0.000587105,0.001871869,0.000016170028,0.000013057681,0.000015669397,0.0013288094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989721,0.000040849318,0.00040849403,0.00014795274,0.0002924746,0.00013808746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987006,0.000080918755,0.00038139668,0.00011306356,0.0006541166,0.00006986354],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027990024,0.00015276484,0.00026537396,0.00021537307,0.0001886593,0.000034148943,0.00044667308,0.00005426357,0.0015828154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047838,0.00011692066,0.00059092755,0.000013048991,0.00025239922,0.000323187,0.00003861217,0.00015726675,0.000048544178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053670653,0.00018755661,0.00002755423,0.000009021467,0.0022996122,0.000015222778,0.004927051,0.000004278952,0.00005616325,0.98523307,0.0060777455,0.00062604406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007639966,0.00033975075,0.000017703866,0.000028979057,0.00044415277,0.00004670901,0.000088982175,0.0000111025365,0.00093257934,0.82019943,0.17699829,0.00012831445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007423733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016522594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94121975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032090935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022815975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997440428","doi":"10.1007/s11153-014-9445-6","title":"Divine thoughts and Fregean propositional realism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Argument (complex analysis); Ontological argument","score_opus":0.016991193551182768,"score_gpt":0.3261419363527834,"score_spread":0.3091507428016006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997440428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28907818,0.00123568,0.080168106,0.098111965,0.014916635,0.0007802862,0.0002805294,0.00011865265,0.51531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513865,0.00006206793,0.0012364408,0.0005718737,0.0028083513,0.000009061725,0.000014626035,0.000010326146,0.00014863105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988494,0.000070302194,0.0003162954,0.00020265656,0.0004050313,0.0001563465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903506,0.00021132024,0.0002162236,0.000112676535,0.00029836906,0.00012633739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000485002,0.000108582,0.00014627307,0.00013847402,0.00011830704,0.00004230552,0.0003627399,0.00007502851,0.000041891544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013279516,0.00008644353,0.000118726435,0.0000608587,0.00025889953,0.00014943123,0.00004886113,0.00015336786,0.0000131252455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028413054,0.00010013734,0.0001234858,0.000005936767,0.00006412637,0.0000067849874,0.00015037648,0.0000041393255,0.0006919507,0.9921341,0.0016107087,0.0048241145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008601832,0.00039090184,0.00100463,0.00007886892,0.000016948952,0.00034959862,0.0000045195598,0.00012290025,0.0006387284,0.9869908,0.009442208,0.00009971123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013016484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.2317396e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70606047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025780859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013635091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999241399","doi":"10.1023/b:reli.0000014884.74163.bd","title":"Universal Self Consciousness mysticism and the physical completeness principle","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Mysticism; Consciousness; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Completeness (order theory); Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Denial; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020808291463408228,"score_gpt":0.3395226370576496,"score_spread":0.3187143455942414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999241399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730666,0.00050660886,0.005651574,0.007537346,0.0030327144,0.00029260886,0.000034822715,0.000025805602,0.009851902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832565,0.00010545235,0.00031695602,0.0003162944,0.00081031106,0.000011161819,0.000003865707,0.00000851658,0.00010176753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991704,0.000039864775,0.00023857338,0.0001330351,0.0002864332,0.00013165805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921227,0.00015492247,0.00022060248,0.00009002661,0.0002652242,0.00005695051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018910336,0.00009870957,0.00018053938,0.00007757506,0.00013432714,0.00003803066,0.0003555754,0.000043101092,0.000008462569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002869477,0.00006531454,0.00014236826,0.00005125172,0.00029961483,0.00011219993,0.00004915086,0.00013823899,0.000008438226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011209145,0.00016885286,0.00012993791,0.000005332538,0.00017969486,0.000023400264,0.003044188,0.00023996277,0.00022952544,0.99424976,0.00011770773,0.00049072766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019113138,0.0006928053,0.0017477148,0.00015253226,0.000106487954,0.0015689903,0.0004668522,0.0008971638,0.0007813298,0.92931664,0.044874996,0.00028135587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009589587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023661662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06493312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048595524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004167579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26634496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044444636","doi":"10.1007/s11153-011-9328-z","title":"God, free will, and time: the free will offense part II","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Free will; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.03858197878536924,"score_gpt":0.24077597589177882,"score_spread":0.2021939971064096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044444636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35532564,0.0070198644,0.00019200184,0.14898452,0.015609079,0.00095902174,0.0012111611,0.00014389111,0.47055483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899424,0.0005813495,0.00025527977,0.0014019453,0.0049922955,0.000012893852,0.000016700626,0.0000245307,0.0027726549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988686,0.000055669352,0.00041934798,0.00017083103,0.00031711743,0.0001684759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986392,0.00017394469,0.0003655798,0.000285281,0.00046048762,0.00007546901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003729738,0.000174258,0.00020940734,0.00013804999,0.00054885604,0.00006317665,0.00090136507,0.00007869741,0.0007663281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016737278,0.0001196621,0.00022397724,0.000017569708,0.0006099611,0.00051566237,0.00019282209,0.00025587765,0.000016603648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005503009,0.00010516802,0.000051690287,0.0000094524785,0.00026345035,0.000009930573,0.004542574,0.0000011655401,0.000041949897,0.92174995,0.0719734,0.00070099346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088063814,0.00044293003,0.000036213423,0.00008905558,0.000051378953,0.00011976696,0.000041686977,0.0000151364,0.00014388317,0.7571497,0.24091804,0.00011155215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052246414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017758266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63461673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020238956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027540284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83907557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067837326","doi":"10.1007/s11153-013-9404-7","title":"Incommensurability, incomparability, and rational world-choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Rationality; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0415235625018328,"score_gpt":0.29532634495802607,"score_spread":0.25380278245619325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067837326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79480433,0.0008416576,0.00020224089,0.10240252,0.0057520713,0.00069776544,0.00013299727,0.00005989619,0.09510652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516994,0.000048763504,0.00043039006,0.00091375667,0.0027482186,0.000025274032,0.00002443396,0.0000119447595,0.0006272851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881154,0.000063138104,0.0005108054,0.00017856655,0.0002990837,0.00013687155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797964,0.0005826204,0.00030014792,0.0001149806,0.0009331156,0.0000895202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032835372,0.00014544702,0.00021858735,0.00026245837,0.00025686607,0.00015815158,0.00034005212,0.00004703107,0.00060778833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015750114,0.00012432877,0.0001647037,0.000025285386,0.0004704756,0.00057232816,0.00007640157,0.00021102409,0.000027980366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014496197,0.00014927976,0.005903507,0.000026739046,0.00014150846,9.805767e-7,0.00078531005,0.000013172826,0.00009763096,0.97610843,0.014664827,0.0019636306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070841855,0.00016344561,0.0027803297,0.0000603479,0.00001741055,0.00003489985,0.000024932408,0.00009084138,0.000077084005,0.90672857,0.08919125,0.00012248036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001646611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012680203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2003656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042044827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031069925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6654856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082853319","doi":"10.1007/s11153-014-9457-2","title":"Divine hiddenness and the opiate of the people","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Mysticism; Perfection; Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Epistemology; Atheism; Pain and pleasure; Religious experience; Psychology; Theology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.014301617243670017,"score_gpt":0.2369660433471246,"score_spread":0.22266442610345458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082853319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75575674,0.0019155057,0.0006505398,0.1565938,0.010995716,0.0005243352,0.00013810211,0.000022114682,0.07340316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997186,0.00016709481,0.000029269297,0.0004432336,0.0017812939,0.0000048775514,0.0000029483667,0.000007085795,0.00037819988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992648,0.000077922814,0.00029291518,0.00007422902,0.00021740579,0.00007272152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879915,0.00035486108,0.00036969403,0.00011049439,0.00034438653,0.000021409367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004356567,0.0000807806,0.00017003076,0.000058465565,0.00022813202,0.00003700485,0.00044407762,0.000030292013,0.000033699747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015057392,0.000041449453,0.00019889604,0.000014798413,0.0005500759,0.00010530132,0.00006776386,0.00012965401,0.0000016381423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038862112,0.000028398003,0.00027000118,0.000016579916,0.0001030882,1.4399488e-7,0.0023762677,0.000013921482,0.0000350255,0.99516416,0.0007841467,0.00081964105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014467081,0.00010164364,0.00040534392,0.0000876766,0.00004161593,0.000034025856,0.00003915612,0.00013624964,0.00020366887,0.9719002,0.025551576,0.000052104042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060017814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046024124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24142927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069500643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012607008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20267776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090797482","doi":"10.1007/s11153-012-9361-6","title":"Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper’s evolutionary atheology: implications of theism’s noncontingency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Naturalism; Argument (complex analysis); Contingency; Presupposition","score_opus":0.04482859464696918,"score_gpt":0.29680733703915624,"score_spread":0.25197874239218704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090797482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49398312,0.0069947066,0.0008021679,0.05714425,0.015639884,0.0007251348,0.0012419369,0.00009955538,0.42336923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939273,0.00036213518,0.00031860117,0.000547127,0.0043731155,0.000014851041,0.000060743725,0.000017595132,0.000378558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987935,0.00005980425,0.0005531492,0.00013270172,0.0002494881,0.00021139433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982101,0.00036823354,0.00062628125,0.00015344338,0.0005687028,0.00007324721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038346733,0.00015364637,0.00023949613,0.00027741326,0.00025061454,0.00001761854,0.0004542616,0.000090792884,0.0002805858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012039274,0.00012965658,0.0003192437,0.000025071446,0.00032438198,0.0002975432,0.000042613392,0.00021933674,0.00002604271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037620577,0.00034230322,0.0022483678,0.00001799923,0.0002246098,9.830839e-7,0.0018983538,0.000012156066,0.0003624304,0.98197293,0.011218998,0.0013246861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006794504,0.00041915235,0.001972971,0.00015206091,0.000059650214,0.0001111665,0.000068248504,0.000012720185,0.0005653312,0.87989956,0.11590318,0.00015650738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000229147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000564933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49994415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036974157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003937066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5287242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101158524","doi":"10.1007/s11153-015-9527-0","title":"George Berkeley’s proof for the existence of God","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Existence of God; George (robot); Philosophy of religion; Epistemology; Ontological argument; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Theology; Theism; Art history; History","score_opus":0.11502401539610928,"score_gpt":0.3097739901679187,"score_spread":0.1947499747718094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101158524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06384374,0.014939507,0.05424078,0.30102715,0.07217196,0.005016166,0.0016857574,0.00014370657,0.48693123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495375,0.000059730755,0.0006249203,0.0002518717,0.0027743843,0.000023387354,0.000005947347,0.000009786679,0.001296208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988062,0.000017073115,0.00041621632,0.00011510423,0.0005270838,0.00011832362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976687,0.0002443743,0.0003937321,0.000112283604,0.001507795,0.00007314162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051160733,0.00009026216,0.0001551108,0.00010435404,0.00018594567,0.000051275947,0.00063434517,0.000030737727,0.00001752943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003081251,0.000058714428,0.00023705156,0.000030775645,0.00028415868,0.00025596557,0.000031785326,0.00010086154,0.000002998816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033222538,0.0000912071,0.00001556942,0.000019548266,0.00006218628,8.996669e-7,0.0028503258,0.000074908414,0.00009344994,0.9764025,0.018263232,0.0017938989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053277554,0.00043487427,0.0000034961315,0.000054381897,0.000021445234,0.000014138327,0.000087034256,0.00032264367,0.0005010157,0.66486406,0.33310118,0.00006299209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004458582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012155848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007181074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008256748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23943049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527853790","doi":"10.1007/s11153-016-9590-1","title":"Everlasting check or philosophical fiasco: a response to Alexander George’s interpretation of Hume’s ‘Of Miracles’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Classics; Art history; History; Medicine; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05288975198086782,"score_gpt":0.32285091995142645,"score_spread":0.26996116797055864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527853790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614272,0.00026709936,0.008435331,0.111538246,0.004106987,0.00067051244,0.0006199764,0.00004876088,0.012885916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970578,0.00007453059,0.00045381012,0.0004899287,0.0014574694,0.000014136267,0.0000057309335,0.000031039253,0.0004155726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976354,0.00013497035,0.0010532096,0.00023023228,0.0007546093,0.00019154904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958691,0.0012934648,0.00079147326,0.00018040177,0.0017336106,0.00013193839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011186978,0.0001955423,0.00039549038,0.00050209445,0.00010584208,0.000038866052,0.0005541383,0.00011684524,0.00029313294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018314708,0.00012821925,0.00037934148,0.00006121925,0.0003749727,0.00025024088,0.00010401665,0.00021271317,0.0000105207455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020087382,0.00027257105,0.000044726425,0.000089279936,0.00032875454,0.000011685164,0.0033420515,0.000052863466,0.026985956,0.94426244,0.00045930088,0.0040629935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018448406,0.0013554394,0.000072138144,0.001584973,0.000048730184,0.000041116415,0.00008001879,0.00016378536,0.0061372207,0.98278505,0.005696552,0.00019015305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026454847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016736405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13563061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009083504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015549986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5228629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584052617","doi":"10.1007/s11153-017-9612-7","title":"Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Omniscience; Theism; Political philosophy; Epistemology; State (computer science); Politics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03574480183137324,"score_gpt":0.3491385892981195,"score_spread":0.31339378746674623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584052617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5534153,0.0019847322,0.016262207,0.37369063,0.012472869,0.001414015,0.00017231324,0.00006423592,0.04052369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415666,0.0037805513,0.00044401808,0.0001763617,0.0012006669,0.000008287506,0.0000025802697,0.0000047417916,0.00022611393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988852,0.00006871218,0.00022726011,0.0001222085,0.00056434947,0.00013225169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986995,0.00013327006,0.00047856665,0.00021537294,0.0004014543,0.00007183441],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015222961,0.0000670951,0.00011129742,0.000088571316,0.0014990506,0.0004993665,0.001454916,0.00003850985,0.0000055115693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002133018,0.000046357156,0.00009854674,0.00002990515,0.000867494,0.00077299215,0.0002981323,0.00013821051,0.0000026340508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012584089,0.000105988336,0.0025959562,0.000018643348,0.00014030536,0.0000091236825,0.007137908,0.000009100538,0.00035373078,0.93846625,0.010829024,0.039075546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013015798,0.000055962533,0.0011751596,0.00005036971,0.000010582162,0.000019470279,0.000044104654,0.00012787122,0.00018894182,0.9309835,0.06598089,0.00006159245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012450969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115356306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44074136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004428462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008351544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248547724","doi":"10.1023/a:1003581720308","title":"Arnold B. Come, Kierkegaard as Theologian: Recovering My Self","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.020475224318481488,"score_gpt":0.2606717154406467,"score_spread":0.24019649112216523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248547724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18707651,0.00074193696,0.00006534743,0.010253882,0.004629153,0.00033289092,0.00016582402,0.00012862681,0.7966058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884314,0.0013760655,0.0004375136,0.0017493363,0.004266709,0.000015638072,0.00002172959,0.00002969878,0.0032601547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837554,0.00004197314,0.00061109965,0.0002287787,0.0005027165,0.00023988327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986984,0.00012228417,0.0003262378,0.0001812461,0.00055980874,0.00011200873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028341514,0.00021016037,0.00027103763,0.0002523391,0.0002957142,0.00022918453,0.0006707876,0.00008565431,0.0014650752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069683505,0.00018587029,0.00039607394,0.000042931748,0.00020676407,0.0007527436,0.00003682739,0.0002915617,0.00022682404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068563834,0.0001665365,0.000082091894,0.000030426465,0.00038262253,0.000037085036,0.0032221097,0.00017165238,0.00014497661,0.9731038,0.009848362,0.0121246865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068852695,0.00035314055,0.000022251143,0.00015767313,0.000029022178,0.00014477452,0.000053870786,0.00006127472,0.00036327005,0.50874573,0.48920023,0.00018021825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038963342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003100273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80176663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008701278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006226378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397012953","doi":"10.1007/s11153-024-09914-4","title":"Book symposium: Patrick Todd, The open future: why future contingents are all false. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 224 pp. $80.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05382649079618494,"score_gpt":0.2841327138678885,"score_spread":0.23030622307170356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397012953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026399004,0.28465816,0.0011603324,0.5234844,0.06372764,0.0019330095,0.0011678208,0.0001483415,0.121080376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1862694,0.40895918,0.000936309,0.04046507,0.19869868,0.000032170643,0.00060142967,0.0002868964,0.16375086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985161,0.00009755048,0.0004096255,0.00027384103,0.00049026136,0.00021261128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998498,0.00016458485,0.0004398195,0.00019082864,0.00059867173,0.00010806392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037536424,0.00021649711,0.00028030408,0.00011357932,0.0003608859,0.00063264655,0.0012483703,0.00013522996,0.00012778389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019482275,0.00016029479,0.00043146947,0.00004135417,0.00016547546,0.00069088157,0.00018959364,0.000554769,0.000009056583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020823155,0.00004680521,0.000019823707,0.000042242857,0.00046541897,0.000030270998,0.0020811528,0.000013346072,0.00001710989,0.3724332,0.62371147,0.0009309137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006436135,0.00014078431,0.000008816314,0.00022983953,0.00015568356,0.000040861996,0.0005613306,0.000034447974,0.00005906455,0.09031705,0.9076441,0.00016440608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028380702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093629475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48301932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010678679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013781319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65366316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403230313","doi":"10.1007/s11153-024-09930-4","title":"Free will, transworld depravity, and divine omniscience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Omniscience; Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02823353060310987,"score_gpt":0.28285538453182,"score_spread":0.2546218539287102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403230313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30111104,0.038322296,0.007763124,0.3704196,0.04243952,0.00091020763,0.0018726718,0.00035094316,0.23681061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946767,0.00065150636,0.00021060066,0.0003813745,0.0031823404,0.0000051025563,0.000009087203,0.000013033582,0.0008702367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909896,0.000021181644,0.0002897987,0.0001723276,0.00029545266,0.00012228958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993368,0.00018607652,0.00009315298,0.00009523119,0.00022509937,0.000063640306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002932975,0.00011723611,0.00014331382,0.00024304642,0.00020498638,0.00021159466,0.00043412243,0.000042726308,0.00012502416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058274196,0.00009426127,0.00016703752,0.000026042006,0.00040997218,0.00058200187,0.00005141032,0.0001971531,0.000005609276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011872484,0.000039657072,0.00004706544,0.00004098934,0.0001156985,0.000019904664,0.0015437051,0.0000053479002,0.00021540314,0.98686904,0.0069930954,0.003991376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033193806,0.00019808707,0.000028860739,0.0002171198,0.000031229883,0.0001450565,0.00001658614,0.00009959626,0.0001629315,0.8136801,0.18499777,0.0000906867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025279945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003660326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69356567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019732259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033587214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3843863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405259647","doi":"10.1007/s11153-024-09941-1","title":"Rik Peels: Life Without God—An Outsider’s Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theological Perspectives and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Art","score_opus":0.07110006038285513,"score_gpt":0.43926284649290825,"score_spread":0.36816278611005315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405259647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09333985,0.014543526,0.009950432,0.31813887,0.016307969,0.000812139,0.00014648732,0.0003372928,0.54642344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126,0.0021097588,0.0008850647,0.00044151337,0.0046656765,0.0000069288058,0.000003439946,0.000012100464,0.00061552686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849457,0.00016232007,0.00028418153,0.00023505627,0.00064724416,0.00017665418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825716,0.00038388142,0.00020461172,0.00007772264,0.0008938773,0.00018273895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008922051,0.000112676855,0.00016279629,0.00020560209,0.0002824437,0.00032872695,0.000474162,0.00010105521,0.00015966255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012053179,0.00009196341,0.00025841268,0.00011196439,0.00024251113,0.0009642717,0.000024646539,0.00029644708,0.000021754326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033459516,0.00009326717,0.000113921305,0.000007884577,0.00021127025,0.000020836736,0.009496304,0.000041931376,0.00016606024,0.98406196,0.00289362,0.0025583545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002745047,0.00032255164,0.00012769045,0.00010120421,0.000041882515,0.000038195918,0.0046056644,0.00021849167,0.0000717838,0.9110147,0.08305497,0.00012836907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084182713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070735754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89792013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027062217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026257616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3750159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405418499","doi":"10.1007/s11153-024-09942-0","title":"Review of Rik peels, Life Without God","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Byzantine Studies and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of religion; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04282456026849783,"score_gpt":0.30614343398043264,"score_spread":0.2633188737119348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405418499","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096991495,0.49930957,0.00030537831,0.044409752,0.014448886,0.00033548428,0.0002659331,0.00005585328,0.43989924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8418974,0.14655678,0.0002551419,0.0020377154,0.007012974,0.000012448553,0.000026553798,0.000026918366,0.0021740198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990132,0.000013429664,0.0004720675,0.000103224185,0.00031587353,0.000082237144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889594,0.00005317292,0.00023867087,0.000068959904,0.0007021606,0.00004111097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022800361,0.00009546475,0.00022870465,0.00016176431,0.00009090296,0.00004263557,0.00022053288,0.000020281139,0.00020442881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008375915,0.000074900454,0.00033691223,0.000020334683,0.00013014843,0.00015384666,0.000023883373,0.00012703252,0.000011848992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005275314,0.00003796602,0.000008080163,0.0017647207,0.00026532845,0.000003843941,0.000813744,9.403138e-7,0.000030589064,0.7336122,0.26064032,0.002769563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021361596,0.00014778847,0.0000055042024,0.008496151,0.00007277925,0.000028012159,0.000040485385,0.000028466156,0.000031712574,0.019132733,0.9717253,0.00007746366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042164604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010156175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84092754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013137374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070104565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30543518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}