{"meta":{"query_hash":"3fc085cbfdb9","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Academic Research in Education"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3fc085cbfdb9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Academic+Research+in+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W4200462098","doi":"10.17985/ijare.951714","title":"Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Academic Research in Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Scholarship; Psychology; Academic integrity; Cheating; Dishonesty; Psychological intervention; Sample (material); Higher education; Medical education; Learning development; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.18888963930104052,"score_gpt":0.5053053569034738,"score_spread":0.31641571760243326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200462098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675427,0.001134275,0.000024649826,0.022746474,0.0021841654,0.00010531753,0.000027195267,0.000002801216,0.006232435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98030764,0.017459242,0.00014156179,0.0001455167,0.0006438446,7.3915965e-7,0.000019109855,0.000005788592,0.001276586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949122,0.001966598,0.00053094333,0.0001537666,0.0020922367,0.00034426374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940794,0.0012091163,0.00030026544,0.0000809525,0.0040170606,0.0003131912],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01451833,0.00006721201,0.00016562582,0.002151125,0.00016333861,0.00004100588,0.001619728,0.00064716634,0.00014179721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008162844,0.00007568616,0.0000525525,0.0018941938,0.00027105096,0.000666044,0.00011049153,0.004799307,0.000013468164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120418576,0.00013115072,0.91888016,0.000014831307,0.00006762113,0.00008242165,0.018682623,0.000037755824,0.00058800145,0.013442116,0.017987274,0.029965632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053142017,0.000028794577,0.72502214,0.0008799264,0.0000132174155,0.000062884246,0.063258186,0.000021365973,0.0006563759,0.008207768,0.20116605,0.00015186126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34077275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15873162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19385801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016477199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015253648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}