{"meta":{"query_hash":"3fc085cbfdb9","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Academic Research in Education"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3fc085cbfdb9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Academic+Research+in+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W4200462098","doi":"10.17985/ijare.951714","title":"Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Academic Research in Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Scholarship; Psychology; Academic integrity; Cheating; Dishonesty; Psychological intervention; Sample (material); Higher education; Medical education; Learning development; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.18888963930104052,"score_gpt":0.5053053569034738,"score_spread":0.31641571760243326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200462098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99823284,0.00008490542,0.000033304277,0.0002913261,0.000004435834,0.00003920746,0.00014771688,0.000002150824,0.0011642136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984921,0.00027400546,0.000103036036,0.0002065885,0.0000042405336,0.000015509246,0.00011029134,0.0000019661386,0.0007922538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970632,0.0003685197,0.00022763092,0.00015097458,0.0014002252,0.00078940665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915017,0.001124888,0.0023339696,0.00018685711,0.0026976452,0.0021549426],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002681854,0.0002832367,0.000384076,0.0020587798,0.004542889,0.0019461883,0.0009807345,0.0008386001,0.0017542636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009468314,0.0003837371,0.00034722793,0.0036070135,0.001765394,0.0006215563,0.0012009563,0.0011439709,0.0003634797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053314987,0.00016622375,0.9442692,0.0000774189,0.000015549154,0.00026683157,0.03935366,0.00003956532,0.000502772,0.00017655017,0.0011100391,0.013968959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000428608,0.00010761234,0.93127805,0.000044447916,0.000008427757,0.00015049074,0.065089986,0.00019132212,0.00014047131,0.000036761812,0.0029180849,0.000029986437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87863916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91645265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012319142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014469229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24415106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}