{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ff0f782fefe","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ff0f782fefe","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Architectural+Research%3A+Archnet-IJAR"},"results":[{"id":"W1851286899","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.96","title":"RETHINKING HOUSING EDUCATION IN ARCHITECTURE SCHOOLS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture, Design, and Social History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Commodity; Housing industry; Scope (computer science); Low income housing; Public relations; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Marketing; Business; Engineering ethics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.06897149141773136,"score_gpt":0.3516927202645694,"score_spread":0.28272122884683804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1851286899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3471756,0.0057417005,0.010163171,0.42558426,0.006347054,0.00040698214,0.00005077992,0.00042207073,0.20410843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92228794,0.0013587745,0.008992732,0.028681321,0.0010166711,0.00017431915,0.000028212411,0.00011567341,0.037344463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860957,0.007239758,0.0003910064,0.0010762573,0.0018591341,0.0033381283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97926956,0.008231029,0.0010269894,0.0012337086,0.002185679,0.008053058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023022143,0.00045528897,0.0005254764,0.0032467812,0.02130729,0.012917275,0.003260264,0.008748063,0.012290792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020190692,0.0008257834,0.0006947751,0.0017133509,0.02360576,0.010718459,0.018779496,0.012794927,0.0017474772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008650535,0.0016132556,0.01291467,0.00047545333,0.000021061034,0.00081914547,0.20922971,0.001061923,0.002013491,0.49374336,0.07450089,0.20352055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010859665,0.00031778705,0.025219746,0.0013041276,0.000039283976,0.00013981183,0.14674212,0.0010933331,0.0019976867,0.087437965,0.735498,0.00010156822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037028573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13929017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037028573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023006987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03613772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16692817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147591491","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v7i2.157","title":"CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND REFORMING SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: A Participatory Design Approach to Design Pedagogy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Design studio; Design education; Studio; Participatory design; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.345540564574355,"score_gpt":0.43588172090151617,"score_spread":0.09034115632716117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147591491","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050661717,0.0010034869,0.8767193,0.008949134,0.00022396755,0.0019423123,0.000040916086,0.00013113504,0.060328014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5460043,0.00089883147,0.44363275,0.0007419063,0.000062236395,0.003334272,0.000025604493,0.0000621261,0.005237977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9557246,0.03996899,0.00051024737,0.001164163,0.0020698423,0.0005621938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97098464,0.02426901,0.0008637099,0.0023355174,0.0010690158,0.00047804855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036491387,0.0007399438,0.0007034902,0.0026636058,0.0049384753,0.0070808623,0.0021355727,0.0016274677,0.002791126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020981502,0.0005952229,0.00088884094,0.0014030293,0.023162687,0.0043703895,0.0077028777,0.002469755,0.00021762388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059040845,0.00036000967,0.0023158488,0.00093605346,0.00008746009,0.0002799051,0.2158108,0.006980734,0.0025006172,0.66986847,0.0015685306,0.0992326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002218322,0.00051432586,0.0021601887,0.0017628601,0.00011045951,0.00057076203,0.10670342,0.01689526,0.0038230894,0.71083564,0.15627813,0.00012399828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017695929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037821985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036491387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038812081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008163415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19298714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335819313","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v1i2.22","title":"BOOK REVIEW: SPACES SPEAK, ARE YOU LISTENING?: EXPERIENCING AURAL ARCHITECTURE By: Barry Blesser and Linda-Ruth Salter (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. 2007) ISBN 0262026058","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture and Computational Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Architecture; Art history; History; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Communication","score_opus":0.019457656670061274,"score_gpt":0.30449375454918043,"score_spread":0.28503609787911915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335819313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031081322,0.84518397,0.0011664787,0.03581353,0.053175274,0.000056663244,0.0003767309,0.00021542754,0.063701175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031987866,0.63862026,0.0013328856,0.01985474,0.02785252,0.00010581259,0.00060971244,0.00024131493,0.30818403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943286,0.00007839491,0.000038735787,0.00007615706,0.000341309,0.000032535074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977181,0.0008813823,0.000118880555,0.00005864341,0.0009773334,0.00024563048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006920182,0.0009904574,0.0017350924,0.002474176,0.00080502435,0.0031200827,0.001219068,0.0023053961,0.064574495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036480436,0.0004445532,0.00047492806,0.0038812011,0.00094531407,0.0031773462,0.0010578175,0.0031401913,0.053124487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065395207,0.000005705487,0.0000191404,0.00034663695,0.0000037291175,0.000016474818,0.00003033129,0.000031968684,0.00005643549,0.00049835147,0.9476927,0.051292125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004421234,0.000011527019,0.00017006879,0.00056766206,0.000006092192,0.00028102673,0.000039593815,0.000022336824,0.000032860222,0.00043692085,0.9984205,0.0000069665907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034875183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00955926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064574495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012983561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018320192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2160232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238241649","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v7i1.135","title":"BOOK REVIEW: PRELIMINARY REFLECTIONS ON ‘ENHANCING BUILDING PEFROMANCE’","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Architecture; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Key (lock); Engineering; Management; Library science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Architectural engineering; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04442803685485313,"score_gpt":0.38056351075980255,"score_spread":0.3361354739049494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238241649","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018531218,0.7093136,0.0019261538,0.14960484,0.0205942,0.000112228234,0.00023537928,0.00009477588,0.116265796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016404456,0.6702371,0.0037458173,0.07387545,0.009493367,0.00018910736,0.00042351536,0.00024593502,0.22538525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756026,0.00077940774,0.0001192213,0.0001942606,0.0012295952,0.000117115655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940911,0.0034939945,0.0001795204,0.000111052206,0.0019253128,0.00019898216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034315765,0.00042991954,0.0007333929,0.0017873965,0.0010366983,0.0060832193,0.0010422519,0.0021505961,0.02078196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011510124,0.00030219826,0.00042779755,0.004725058,0.0016152182,0.0058181942,0.0013094977,0.0035915254,0.007858287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018217503,0.000027489039,0.000069212976,0.0018771812,0.000009743941,0.00009199342,0.0015384732,0.0001022482,0.00023989782,0.017366135,0.8215178,0.15714157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015359368,0.000010809753,0.00015256171,0.0005951877,0.0000031485217,0.00007946806,0.0003581025,0.000012217521,0.000040640487,0.0006252811,0.9981171,0.000003965094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073695183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020148026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02078196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032104128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045056264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06952262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570980744","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v6i2.81","title":"MYTHIC FOUNDATIONS: ENGAGING HISTORY FOR ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture and Art History Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Architecture; Documentation; Reproduction; Worship; Studio; History of architecture; History; Sociology; Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Archaeology; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.21825992064715008,"score_gpt":0.39249865361772396,"score_spread":0.17423873297057388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570980744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16013709,0.004308483,0.048793104,0.01881093,0.0008185836,0.0003531209,0.00011606408,0.0007085582,0.7659541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87160635,0.0023782346,0.046131454,0.0013166881,0.00015346918,0.00027239812,0.000106347994,0.00018549472,0.077849545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989497,0.00071542186,0.00001651304,0.00005243951,0.00013148286,0.000134434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865377,0.00063122984,0.000058786027,0.0001999086,0.000066147375,0.00039001147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017072489,0.00027943356,0.00015958733,0.0006879334,0.002713807,0.0047579696,0.00070451805,0.0008755566,0.017933562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003406957,0.00018256583,0.00017773581,0.00045288232,0.0038346397,0.003726935,0.0066859694,0.001645365,0.0014923576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010150127,0.00050770125,0.003644114,0.00052137405,0.000009203987,0.00060253765,0.09200465,0.0007735689,0.0045045903,0.54098,0.042987946,0.3133629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038458766,0.00020798662,0.0033059977,0.00059752294,0.000010213812,0.0005422932,0.041382853,0.0009273877,0.002008913,0.11800612,0.83295214,0.00002012421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010485542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068180915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017933562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017677238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028701199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059993804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}