{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ff0f782fefe","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ff0f782fefe","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Architectural+Research%3A+Archnet-IJAR"},"results":[{"id":"W1851286899","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.96","title":"RETHINKING HOUSING EDUCATION IN ARCHITECTURE SCHOOLS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture, Design, and Social History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Commodity; Housing industry; Scope (computer science); Low income housing; Public relations; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Marketing; Business; Engineering ethics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.06897149141773136,"score_gpt":0.3516927202645694,"score_spread":0.28272122884683804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1851286899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96650064,0.00042736865,0.00031112236,0.007185231,0.004599056,0.00036445953,0.000022492759,0.00005020183,0.020539407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98694843,0.000064192376,0.004367956,0.00047894137,0.0063301204,0.000014075708,0.000017105021,0.000060743714,0.0017184363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949637,0.0006446085,0.00094826205,0.00037839546,0.0023283316,0.0007366851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965414,0.0008747057,0.00043554537,0.00032838125,0.0014876078,0.00033239677],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028450068,0.00031022573,0.00041529283,0.0024587973,0.0005906804,0.0004382233,0.0017462992,0.00015018541,0.00070520886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017341179,0.0002586174,0.00032455137,0.00021238325,0.0011541714,0.00046140034,0.00026848953,0.005397068,0.00005681393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012306916,0.0005110323,0.0023881067,0.00007160759,0.00024424243,0.00042283646,0.18638659,0.0005525554,0.017466001,0.102798134,0.003970031,0.6839582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015956329,0.00055084785,0.004540802,0.00075127266,0.000026218133,0.00058266445,0.005559612,0.00014789333,0.0013033926,0.6219629,0.36229506,0.0006836937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011382959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010787505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039198183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018008456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147591491","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v7i2.157","title":"CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND REFORMING SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: A Participatory Design Approach to Design Pedagogy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Design studio; Design education; Studio; Participatory design; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.345540564574355,"score_gpt":0.43588172090151617,"score_spread":0.09034115632716117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147591491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541606,0.00017265159,0.04105669,0.0022672168,0.0004887295,0.00055209483,0.0000065644354,0.000054925662,0.0012405274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811301,0.0000748646,0.017903108,0.00012790022,0.00050739053,0.000054347947,0.000003540961,0.000025746082,0.00017298221],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970278,0.000590893,0.00042707185,0.00019317144,0.0012487188,0.00051230233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779457,0.0006862814,0.000106196705,0.00011782269,0.0008865897,0.00040853088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018394339,0.00018453557,0.00022060568,0.0006175553,0.00047991602,0.00020561363,0.00078555336,0.00007409425,0.00014941287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057559705,0.00015126615,0.00008459936,0.0002257323,0.00019625068,0.00071758794,0.00047705587,0.0009279997,0.000076677956],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001619183,0.0007149336,0.0048218146,0.00012001572,0.0010693254,0.00028105621,0.1503043,0.0345104,0.06315293,0.0016713545,0.03040475,0.71132994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0124348765,0.0067709973,0.6041993,0.0007620815,0.0006406777,0.011920552,0.06350655,0.13986799,0.03708843,0.03483364,0.082631685,0.0053432183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019997064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064122346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70598674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003013619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012835737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6168454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335819313","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v1i2.22","title":"BOOK REVIEW: SPACES SPEAK, ARE YOU LISTENING?: EXPERIENCING AURAL ARCHITECTURE By: Barry Blesser and Linda-Ruth Salter (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. 2007) ISBN 0262026058","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture and Computational Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Architecture; Art history; History; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Communication","score_opus":0.019457656670061274,"score_gpt":0.30449375454918043,"score_spread":0.28503609787911915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335819313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45091316,0.46201503,0.051548224,0.020264296,0.0029373618,0.0017096172,0.00030304486,0.0003115352,0.009997735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396739,0.026600389,0.011410572,0.008448446,0.0057886075,0.000050994175,0.0001264253,0.00035035983,0.007550313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357766,0.00038858815,0.0013171406,0.0005763579,0.0029354142,0.001204839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619895,0.0013126269,0.000417941,0.00038071655,0.0009594007,0.00073034206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021712244,0.00060598133,0.00072646886,0.0009763018,0.00026745876,0.00032888728,0.0015027528,0.0001708903,0.00034847215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066376006,0.0004980042,0.0003490559,0.0003950217,0.00056106114,0.0004954266,0.0004708947,0.0025107856,0.000045937137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021235698,0.00021541829,0.0016889027,0.0012407681,0.0016064249,0.00284768,0.007064146,0.03996473,0.016843967,0.00033913145,0.79660493,0.1294603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018199262,0.0006551466,0.006709358,0.003703073,0.00008519905,0.0033124506,0.0005006964,0.0028802215,0.01155737,0.0013325443,0.96632975,0.0011142571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010506549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006829316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48876074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031260948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017059706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238241649","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v7i1.135","title":"BOOK REVIEW: PRELIMINARY REFLECTIONS ON ‘ENHANCING BUILDING PEFROMANCE’","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Architecture; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Key (lock); Engineering; Management; Library science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Architectural engineering; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04442803685485313,"score_gpt":0.38056351075980255,"score_spread":0.3361354739049494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238241649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6218718,0.22685082,0.046097953,0.07348368,0.006781746,0.0036392098,0.00003864659,0.00076425157,0.020471847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680055,0.017064458,0.0083087925,0.002776954,0.001553454,0.00011391398,0.000008676121,0.00009565391,0.0020726374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962758,0.00025652625,0.0007468959,0.0002426347,0.0018075681,0.0006705857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974133,0.00083916954,0.00015618125,0.00027172326,0.0010319789,0.00028765827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011980438,0.00024703072,0.0003222142,0.0010786556,0.00018266964,0.0001870406,0.0010656196,0.00006318249,0.0008932069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007442355,0.00020551434,0.0002220827,0.0003864412,0.00014015473,0.0004884173,0.00018878662,0.0014895885,0.000115705356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042497253,0.00023988906,0.000085831096,0.00080315245,0.0008354041,0.0008535668,0.0012551519,0.057425167,0.11838491,0.0014399986,0.62551624,0.19273573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023453326,0.0037461275,0.005062841,0.015352732,0.00008385705,0.0026546137,0.0009314138,0.018635336,0.06503891,0.023971168,0.8608824,0.001295295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004399456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033994563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34613362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006971529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018146895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.977999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570980744","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v6i2.81","title":"MYTHIC FOUNDATIONS: ENGAGING HISTORY FOR ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture and Art History Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Architecture; Documentation; Reproduction; Worship; Studio; History of architecture; History; Sociology; Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Archaeology; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.21825992064715008,"score_gpt":0.39249865361772396,"score_spread":0.17423873297057388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570980744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6488007,0.046580564,0.016814623,0.08061605,0.052861053,0.0035169837,0.00038169706,0.00037630915,0.15005204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738229,0.00012787813,0.0050273044,0.0010568328,0.012182512,0.000089897716,0.00005171953,0.00006224007,0.0075787357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620444,0.00044632467,0.0007761936,0.00026842512,0.0015132498,0.00079135445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955083,0.0015597625,0.0004339772,0.0002637303,0.0019069988,0.0003272189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023086641,0.00029377275,0.00036211952,0.0015756846,0.0008040644,0.00014496231,0.0010696015,0.000061275154,0.0008602739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016520709,0.0002333125,0.00040572588,0.000085131,0.001138018,0.0006113353,0.0002469131,0.001331989,0.00007126807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010779367,0.0007863966,0.0006129381,0.00015255231,0.00086605415,0.000019749392,0.26063088,0.00025344567,0.002198132,0.17009081,0.090592355,0.47271878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053583353,0.00030190052,0.00036960578,0.00017901267,0.000037249298,0.00018858969,0.003844346,0.000031561616,0.00018419296,0.028542012,0.96552944,0.0002562606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012164206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000260494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87493706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008769307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007481433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}