{"meta":{"query_hash":"24081d91ee4b","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/24081d91ee4b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Architectural+Research+Archnet-IJAR"},"results":[{"id":"W2098327231","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i3.507","title":"The Agency of Making and Architecture Education: Design-Build Curriculum in a New School of Architecture","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Design studio; Architecture; Downtown; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mandate; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Political science; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.024715533966305537,"score_gpt":0.3594375663616201,"score_spread":0.33472203239531456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098327231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82072586,0.008552818,0.14070557,0.017192136,0.0024618953,0.0010829737,0.00001611545,0.000054261476,0.009208379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97074366,0.0005175924,0.027699606,0.00007181312,0.0006722788,0.000010343086,0.0000025014212,0.000031790776,0.00025042312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640185,0.0007882961,0.0008802209,0.00019221327,0.0013128959,0.0004245496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569464,0.0026732234,0.00033487036,0.0002927286,0.00072772324,0.00027681657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028043317,0.00020900642,0.00031241533,0.0011278671,0.00008998078,0.000113195594,0.0011852027,0.00007858216,0.00011718885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004088763,0.00014953947,0.00013093639,0.0005649964,0.00029904622,0.00019900771,0.00015008864,0.0015449285,0.000007450021],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005695059,0.00015665458,0.0034236324,0.00013088739,0.00023143154,0.000015739486,0.0034049088,0.034272175,0.014785363,0.0026904705,0.0040307366,0.9362885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062981998,0.0031245875,0.12511748,0.005360366,0.0001341377,0.0047340817,0.0030325525,0.020215895,0.031551234,0.393494,0.40533915,0.0015983048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013818005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010197463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9346902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012905776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094133796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6712032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107575798","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i1.311","title":"EXPLORING HEALTHCARE ARCHITECTURE THROUGH THE MEDIUM OF FILM: Motives and Techniques","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Health care; Field (mathematics); Function (biology); Transactional leadership; Space (punctuation); Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11256149946529394,"score_gpt":0.3712045076072233,"score_spread":0.25864300814192936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107575798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952899,0.00035597553,0.0040959315,0.039771553,0.0002031868,0.0003236866,0.000017272623,0.000020239646,0.0023131496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869867,0.00076815713,0.011183801,0.0003785322,0.0005269574,0.000016180109,0.0000029492078,0.00002009433,0.000116638534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959713,0.0006349578,0.00053984177,0.00025726,0.0020973554,0.00049924554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796104,0.0010127303,0.00030041885,0.0002616161,0.00023337641,0.00023081077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002159998,0.00017201761,0.0002801936,0.00027466333,0.00022033752,0.000056313067,0.0012182645,0.00005018091,0.00012388377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070413377,0.00010480886,0.00012320974,0.0002870269,0.001129105,0.00035917663,0.00065375783,0.0012453538,0.000010297884],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016476432,0.00030975492,0.15813847,0.00021156672,0.00032350657,0.000100949095,0.041777108,0.0025105763,0.02945514,0.00665962,0.00556851,0.75329715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029124266,0.007400802,0.57293296,0.0015216849,0.00005310752,0.002605436,0.0063934727,0.0015791887,0.04452835,0.17596504,0.18309738,0.0010101305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002503034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093440106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75228703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015539188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008645111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179480323","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i3.703","title":"Key Success Factors and Guidance for International Collaborative Design Projects","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Key (lock); Tacit knowledge; Critical success factor; Engineering; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.14843261254733267,"score_gpt":0.41869834412323576,"score_spread":0.27026573157590306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179480323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85271317,0.0023758938,0.117554344,0.011406136,0.0076002274,0.0013641878,0.00016811427,0.000119171724,0.0066987737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718734,0.00019271777,0.02661526,0.000066175446,0.00091160147,0.000036514728,0.000017375378,0.00003344498,0.0002535081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971884,0.00034304272,0.00050133147,0.00018867308,0.0014138886,0.00036469434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99329877,0.0020083988,0.00017731191,0.00012330321,0.0040366296,0.00035555987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025186304,0.00018470791,0.00021231924,0.0007807737,0.00008356711,0.00031871416,0.000903902,0.000060883987,0.000048229744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061133644,0.00014780092,0.0000715482,0.00030664224,0.00018333053,0.0006961914,0.00010808184,0.00061280065,0.000011452895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015968492,0.0010337234,0.0442887,0.00036985712,0.00554238,0.0006139925,0.093131624,0.124612264,0.049171243,0.019139085,0.33492294,0.3112057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01087389,0.0038315717,0.031043747,0.00085423276,0.000087558896,0.0015359344,0.011999973,0.07573986,0.08169668,0.042063814,0.7386877,0.0015850404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033976597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024352541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40376475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034479774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005697278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73187095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346338786","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v10i1.908","title":"ALLURE OF THE \"CRYSTAL: MYTHS AND METAPHORS IN ARCHITECTURAL MORPHOGENESIS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture and Art History Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Mythology; Architecture; Meaning (existential); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Crystal (programming language); History of architecture; Perspective (graphical); Perfection; Aesthetics; History; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Computer science; Visual arts; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04937354173543983,"score_gpt":0.30030042406443747,"score_spread":0.2509268823289976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346338786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97971404,0.001235893,0.00008194265,0.014750335,0.0007108058,0.00025225244,0.00007798446,0.000011997841,0.0031647312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970919,0.00018437434,0.00041674793,0.00014469953,0.0006894646,0.000010853581,0.0000012459986,0.000026121206,0.0014346277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962757,0.0005271585,0.0007767337,0.00026850274,0.0016413985,0.0005104694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973157,0.0011917611,0.00034884087,0.00025860718,0.00073350634,0.00015156067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001234954,0.00023924015,0.00040646008,0.0010193826,0.0002886837,0.0000682834,0.0012290723,0.000042570206,0.0003173564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089746737,0.000117485986,0.00029737563,0.0001466343,0.0022834977,0.00021278777,0.0006232018,0.0006822285,0.0000081734615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038182053,0.00045682368,0.025795827,0.00017434028,0.0019331144,0.0005010292,0.15039264,0.00059018855,0.09010248,0.037840854,0.0060760565,0.68231845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068509914,0.0024369038,0.102876596,0.0026137363,0.00013020031,0.0020072465,0.009169375,0.0001673628,0.018233446,0.09396595,0.7603493,0.0011989364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028355856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027233218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7542732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014949283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001738553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8413642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769147247","doi":"10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1398","title":"SMART CITIES AND HERITAGE CONSERVATION: DEVELOPING A SMARTHERITAGE AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Urban Planning and Valuation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Information and Communications Technology; Citizen journalism; Valuation (finance); Cultural heritage; Corporate governance; Environmental planning; Cultural heritage management; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Knowledge management; Geography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.1037289163533863,"score_gpt":0.39498865506900743,"score_spread":0.29125973871562116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769147247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836558,0.00012294386,0.001363028,0.011619776,0.0001732305,0.00029718468,0.000019835472,0.000011461109,0.00273671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907002,0.00007707192,0.0066659576,0.00027273493,0.00021017365,0.000024054843,0.000017174783,0.000016463222,0.0020161667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977001,0.0002633705,0.00037225694,0.00014996943,0.0010876515,0.00042664193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977237,0.0010295729,0.0003179632,0.00023490498,0.00057761924,0.00011621868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025962852,0.00013778722,0.00018658672,0.00023929848,0.0013039515,0.00055922277,0.001151464,0.00004765157,0.00015601884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018774449,0.00011796114,0.000077958364,0.00006538088,0.00094745157,0.00072529376,0.0010401756,0.00046534475,0.0000097455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042306045,0.00023152065,0.71272504,0.0002956823,0.00090479985,0.0010860151,0.06471548,0.001538632,0.008913103,0.017994558,0.044529926,0.1428346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040653194,0.0015491964,0.6594784,0.00065741537,0.000033297056,0.0008574326,0.022489797,0.007857592,0.0031150975,0.10454574,0.1946916,0.00065906555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002253084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010405907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15016167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034571465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016568546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111237938","doi":"10.1108/arch-10-2020-0237","title":"Design tactics for enhancing the adaptability of primary and middle schools to the new needs of postpandemic reuse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Educational Environments and Student Outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Originality; Flexibility (engineering); Reuse; Usability; Computer science; Sample (material); Set (abstract data type); Adaptation (eye); Affordance; Process (computing); Plan (archaeology); Architectural engineering; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.18227756761656447,"score_gpt":0.41979684507500276,"score_spread":0.2375192774584383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111237938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80374736,0.00047027683,0.010096559,0.18473473,0.00017733917,0.0005802662,0.000015990008,0.000003053187,0.00017442637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917028,0.00033225623,0.006674749,0.00051278673,0.00056021666,0.000007706184,0.0000013399977,0.000007856687,0.00020031347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968909,0.00053436536,0.0005118358,0.00010665445,0.0017028014,0.00025344078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485785,0.003881484,0.00025672012,0.000162204,0.00055940944,0.00028233367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038792368,0.00008356191,0.00019331911,0.00016399582,0.00023161774,0.00007019947,0.0015594136,0.000030996845,0.00005182644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010722658,0.00004823964,0.00011024962,0.00025568646,0.00037475367,0.0001405221,0.00035298392,0.00047438842,0.0000019206732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00985219,0.00061915664,0.06642779,0.0002441604,0.0018111274,0.000015415097,0.58184683,0.013179196,0.09552336,0.026270619,0.0216842,0.18252593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062217093,0.007693198,0.43405902,0.0013734595,0.00023947783,0.00012237394,0.17377768,0.0012121286,0.029708818,0.101149164,0.24349867,0.00094430504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004588215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017220194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40806916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001586299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010556427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113800085","doi":"10.1108/arch-08-2020-0159","title":"How our homes impact our health: using a COVID-19 informed approach to examine urban apartment housing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Apartment; Urban design; Architectural engineering; Built environment; Building design; Public housing; Architecture; Environmental planning; Psychology; Urban planning; Engineering; Civil engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.19505790075806959,"score_gpt":0.44364256262562624,"score_spread":0.24858466186755665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113800085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82622105,0.0002581354,0.010208723,0.1619173,0.00021559115,0.000852992,0.000061444254,0.00003490229,0.00022989215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777267,0.000096044554,0.01644239,0.0043704044,0.0011147338,0.000012005442,0.000018965808,0.000038259408,0.00018050271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934923,0.00053954794,0.00077319174,0.00044569775,0.003607242,0.0011420387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961164,0.00023866264,0.0004903636,0.0002490898,0.000198994,0.0027064837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021912858,0.00031570136,0.0005783606,0.0006919765,0.00036762867,0.00038507284,0.001486284,0.000066899134,0.000072077535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020224655,0.00023287912,0.00030588475,0.0007708904,0.00014109728,0.00055447343,0.0008658277,0.0011847272,0.00006225992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008611794,0.00090909796,0.47095355,0.0004040026,0.0011147627,0.000921924,0.047355868,0.13005912,0.017512023,0.0002231005,0.21959798,0.10233679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030484753,0.03187786,0.39623702,0.0017065243,0.0001712567,0.0075606084,0.06085875,0.0994665,0.0029117232,0.004603401,0.3592865,0.004835137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002716311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066329195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1575469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032755171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013776158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94965345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118352855","doi":"10.1108/arch-08-2020-0173","title":"Next time, with empathy: revisiting the studio pedagogy for transitional housing for refugees","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Architecture, Design, and Social History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Algonquin College","funders":"","keywords":"Studio; Originality; Empathy; Refugee; Value (mathematics); Design studio; Pedagogy; Design thinking; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Creativity; Social psychology; Political science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.08427411643800167,"score_gpt":0.3799100251445708,"score_spread":0.2956359087065691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118352855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90988076,0.0050397227,0.024070773,0.04693232,0.0018323823,0.0018034782,0.0006085069,0.00008099338,0.009751061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786212,0.00008651889,0.005633404,0.00057724834,0.011514165,0.00007230972,0.00007856443,0.000065747816,0.003350874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652386,0.0004350837,0.0006036021,0.00029344295,0.001574248,0.0005697784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291754,0.003072664,0.00029076275,0.0001789059,0.0033850407,0.00015506017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002038392,0.00021858755,0.0003630741,0.00038925503,0.0013406529,0.00040163024,0.00079589116,0.000048482125,0.00035509124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094399136,0.00014232803,0.00040376294,0.00009588942,0.0009198861,0.0002886603,0.000098770055,0.0007916016,0.000008259074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0098795565,0.0003638889,0.00014792701,0.00031716548,0.0027827164,0.0007210987,0.24696034,0.002643984,0.0098015135,0.17822513,0.01260018,0.5355565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030265793,0.0013603412,0.00041729628,0.0006348253,0.00011860708,0.0006139786,0.011574649,0.000988302,0.0012990292,0.06093674,0.9185521,0.00047755087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041541443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004583276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025377778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010042074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120525702","doi":"10.1108/arch-10-2020-0245","title":"Speculations on the post-pandemic university campus – a global inquiry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"IBI Group (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Distancing; Sociology; Qualitative research; Higher education; Pedagogy; Pandemic; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Mathematics education; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1682207960031265,"score_gpt":0.49784749617007357,"score_spread":0.32962670016694706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120525702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584973,0.00025793302,0.00034131244,0.030937118,0.0014770381,0.00018513501,0.00009113075,0.000017452954,0.00819561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566805,0.00010287255,0.00024386312,0.0013915467,0.0008484944,0.0000019851136,0.000022134507,0.00001103834,0.001710021],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627644,0.0010401203,0.00037302572,0.0002718114,0.0015325453,0.00050605024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615127,0.0018508423,0.00017884227,0.00030504557,0.0012192643,0.00029473516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013076138,0.00013880411,0.00017702572,0.00037080073,0.0002798094,0.00006880672,0.0010505453,0.00006896462,0.0015437524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010557959,0.00010071012,0.0002252562,0.00049107696,0.00041209158,0.00010120844,0.00034868234,0.0011854279,0.00024184013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012118757,0.0016899805,0.12769535,0.000056734323,0.0019933116,0.014042932,0.020381417,0.0014035793,0.006504116,0.3042645,0.028630683,0.48121867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036338586,0.0016574039,0.7938157,0.00031909387,0.00003485865,0.004800568,0.010307615,0.0001561952,0.00045522256,0.029268747,0.1552107,0.00034005812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008464004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083032437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66612035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013484389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016394344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137921820","doi":"10.1108/arch-09-2020-0176","title":"Assessing the post-occupancy performance of educational design/build: the thinking while doing initiative","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Educational Environments and Student Outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Post-occupancy evaluation; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Originality; Curriculum; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.10653718702956778,"score_gpt":0.46752284026091984,"score_spread":0.36098565323135207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137921820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89564043,0.000773099,0.0004887771,0.09290666,0.00083412393,0.00021436346,0.000008867152,0.0000041781987,0.009129471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144304,0.00061030115,0.005687484,0.000554654,0.001079372,0.000012319368,0.000008037873,0.0000115522325,0.00059324194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938193,0.0015302502,0.0005535861,0.00017583357,0.0035215006,0.0003995285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903783,0.0070662405,0.00040051166,0.00018530067,0.0018530544,0.00011654376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004895638,0.000121721074,0.00017587187,0.00025886518,0.0011790923,0.00043328697,0.0017073324,0.00004163753,0.00067578896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002781923,0.00007151745,0.00017021525,0.00039421069,0.0009216781,0.0006242684,0.00034838018,0.0009199966,0.0000136438875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006287923,0.0009807738,0.43744802,0.000065404056,0.00172863,0.00011145568,0.20532316,0.010706131,0.006085258,0.13620815,0.0041922857,0.19652194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007468284,0.0003071861,0.8820679,0.00057757646,0.000041473577,0.00024797342,0.042408675,0.00027966336,0.002159501,0.027359756,0.043527428,0.0002760123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022368772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012497578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4446199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003225748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002377492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9068744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312059715","doi":"10.1108/arch-03-2022-0067","title":"Live projects: a mixed-methods exploration of existing scholarship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Society for Engineering Education","keywords":"Scholarship; Relevance (law); Citation; Systematic review; Community engagement; Sociology; Management science; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.17546909964406074,"score_gpt":0.44937195693865795,"score_spread":0.2739028572945972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312059715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793664,0.00026740413,0.015287234,0.000578571,0.002278743,0.00022430308,0.000053979693,0.000047125384,0.0018962219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490153,0.00005722062,0.050199777,0.000027710297,0.00054057053,0.00004215259,0.000017634879,0.00002748532,0.00007214173],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961351,0.0009064495,0.00088046445,0.00015207462,0.0016056224,0.000320272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972149,0.00074708724,0.00027899866,0.00018232327,0.0014986022,0.00007809358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004619705,0.0001357298,0.00023983725,0.0013944643,0.00022092235,0.00010806366,0.0009504251,0.000039191025,0.00041315553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016084176,0.00013011429,0.00012266227,0.0006220746,0.00019021242,0.000544859,0.00035929796,0.0011676219,0.000008862668],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064431585,0.000057577938,0.00074754725,0.00010453111,0.0005093049,0.00013625182,0.0050877496,0.043048736,0.33283237,0.011122844,0.0009065205,0.60480225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049003013,0.0034301088,0.0051705446,0.0009885944,0.00007622701,0.005715694,0.022906223,0.027853005,0.62798786,0.20575373,0.09383935,0.0013783771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024524858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042719953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6034239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033029143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024033901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53059065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393408153","doi":"10.1108/arch-11-2023-0304","title":"An architectural insight into the role of personalisation of homes and its effects on residents’ psychological well-being","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Well-being; Psychology; Psychological well-being; Personalization; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03267108629820107,"score_gpt":0.42866300347545655,"score_spread":0.39599191717725546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393408153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98475903,0.0058490373,0.00009956,0.005149268,0.0006042892,0.00030393645,0.000009095335,0.000022915023,0.003202871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844027,0.00011570443,0.0002985732,0.00008532848,0.000698524,0.000019658535,0.000009548675,0.000028743385,0.00030366585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941468,0.001988939,0.0007077337,0.0004488636,0.0021600507,0.000547562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432963,0.0041584196,0.00021704119,0.00032834863,0.0007249935,0.0002415881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031075391,0.0002312123,0.00038701767,0.001447067,0.00016965273,0.00011908753,0.0014358005,0.00013837546,0.00023724035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009725734,0.00014166912,0.00021916043,0.00039948363,0.00085404643,0.00019608771,0.0002461558,0.0019565246,0.0000372088],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006595285,0.00045653118,0.014692317,0.00021858227,0.0013130592,0.0009328729,0.10051544,0.00019215466,0.052441873,0.052523535,0.00034730174,0.76977104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047900793,0.018209029,0.62909406,0.0031703382,0.00013421156,0.007138506,0.009915822,0.006745044,0.09185312,0.2236331,0.004471106,0.0008455887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036069748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006001905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7689254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010695638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012339189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8500234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411919411","doi":"10.1108/arch-01-2025-0033","title":"Disgust sensitivity and perceptions of urban density and densification","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Sensitivity (control systems); Perception; Environmental science; Psychology; Materials science; Social psychology; Engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.08011432500731605,"score_gpt":0.3802562865972158,"score_spread":0.3001419615898997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411919411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850426,0.000101122685,0.0009876088,0.012957711,0.00026272985,0.00012370272,0.00001864025,0.000008023528,0.0004979026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826926,0.0003022101,0.0008204227,0.0002653867,0.00013037227,0.0000021101705,0.000002465797,0.00000521841,0.00020252417],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775064,0.0005154165,0.00037350194,0.00025604825,0.00086792366,0.00023644701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978531,0.0011689239,0.00014575764,0.00012834513,0.00056512165,0.00013873666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011848724,0.000106285115,0.00018819634,0.0006595175,0.00017415437,0.000054144148,0.0003034495,0.000048403504,0.000021331905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016513371,0.000085505395,0.00007414191,0.00021079663,0.000988472,0.0001648204,0.00028628155,0.000577982,0.000004867168],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008327433,0.000201656,0.049119595,0.000032984186,0.00007227266,0.00014230864,0.00075687777,0.00006148809,0.87253475,0.014386566,0.0010957164,0.060763013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010891886,0.00037820943,0.8845927,0.00025993222,0.000017829332,0.0016692174,0.0003168085,0.0009547026,0.079130456,0.030385973,0.0010631102,0.00014184251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005794411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004268546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007829796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095920994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36420664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}