{"meta":{"query_hash":"04020041db82","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law"},"cohort_total":81,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":81,"exported":81,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/04020041db82","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Constitutional+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1964565917","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.3.534","title":"Ukraine: Constitutional Court invalidates ban on Communist Party","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Political science; Ukrainian; Constitutional court; Law; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.04026618908334577,"score_gpt":0.33243710314616237,"score_spread":0.2921709140628166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964565917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7132362,0.0024625354,0.0016315638,0.015210788,0.00086290255,0.00023067277,0.00088246557,0.000109505054,0.26537335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658481,0.00038992998,0.0005464806,0.008976612,0.00018454487,0.00007562411,0.00021705688,0.000033810233,0.023727866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846614,0.0017182739,0.0011102366,0.0021062742,0.002218125,0.004380936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894271,0.0056989766,0.0012198196,0.0012825773,0.0016098373,0.0007616926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010439897,0.0003387706,0.0014737057,0.0016820576,0.010023938,0.011189173,0.0033934938,0.011378588,0.00416647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025412815,0.0011908142,0.0010253091,0.0018904284,0.0045758164,0.0028118426,0.0060258345,0.012202487,0.0008585197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047747305,0.00016711187,0.015925143,0.0001507284,0.00028556457,0.0036807726,0.013347579,0.0016105451,0.0063550365,0.9251204,0.020519601,0.01236003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000913137,0.00071258424,0.1982661,0.000994631,0.0015238433,0.0023362832,0.01724676,0.0066408026,0.028212849,0.12530184,0.6170654,0.0007856493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16430469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21820907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16430469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016480668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02592685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32669663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967142330","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon036","title":"Are legislatures good at morality? Or better at it than the courts?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Law; Legislature; Statute; Political science; Institution; Positivism; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06940194629138205,"score_gpt":0.29793886509388956,"score_spread":0.2285369188025075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967142330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03344466,0.013627685,0.027132137,0.61225075,0.0026585204,0.00003793818,0.00006199245,0.00014829352,0.310638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8911957,0.0048196767,0.0056562247,0.07054531,0.002150737,0.00010713343,0.000041261494,0.00012729036,0.025356615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98304623,0.008691276,0.00043826454,0.0021992724,0.0033101481,0.0023147918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834953,0.009476256,0.0022686562,0.0013526947,0.0019497965,0.0014572346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014216971,0.0004388146,0.0009837099,0.0013742639,0.006711002,0.01789622,0.0013647128,0.0076752855,0.008485957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032345064,0.0004953053,0.000748465,0.0012475508,0.0378034,0.018092277,0.0030719244,0.008456955,0.0014940967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013597026,0.000017611557,0.0006122199,0.00004099553,0.000017498049,0.000024691222,0.002016031,0.00007869697,0.00011002218,0.98059046,0.008614632,0.00786362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024034309,0.000041821666,0.0019264652,0.00021201154,0.000034474575,0.00006977065,0.0033384282,0.0002958345,0.0003832624,0.8346068,0.15902942,0.00003766426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004344436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005702743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01789622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054371394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005618909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075187445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967582267","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou073","title":"A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scrap; Law; Political science; Metallurgy; Materials science","score_opus":0.011759031306094521,"score_gpt":0.29209114000702674,"score_spread":0.2803321087009322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967582267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10108965,0.008644901,0.009695463,0.29504442,0.018545555,0.00015920443,0.00016421739,0.00021951548,0.5664372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7521623,0.0035517649,0.00413894,0.045886233,0.0022993288,0.00013176908,0.00009398252,0.00079964835,0.190936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097836,0.0039807325,0.0003481224,0.0010491245,0.0015671487,0.0020764663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98435706,0.008955712,0.001143212,0.0016600332,0.0018822486,0.0020018728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013555913,0.00081869896,0.00063238275,0.002146461,0.029620456,0.027250933,0.002520778,0.013367519,0.015901316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053348616,0.00071567664,0.00073961104,0.0021319056,0.036994077,0.01744814,0.011125916,0.021504935,0.0024605116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010457319,0.000055743232,0.0011509015,0.000102982776,0.000025945023,0.0011579079,0.18406598,0.0003936012,0.0005810306,0.644911,0.12445868,0.042991724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022095517,0.000065068736,0.0012906651,0.00061476167,0.000029037055,0.00020605628,0.14775853,0.00021614356,0.0008620425,0.18788198,0.6609911,0.00006254944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017769033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025700333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029620456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008544161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0141927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071691394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969659142","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq007","title":"Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Separation of powers; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.040872359185949954,"score_gpt":0.35352177569854604,"score_spread":0.3126494165125961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969659142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09181655,0.01842387,0.046501562,0.24995008,0.002173951,0.00007837434,0.000093034025,0.0001500645,0.59081244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578579,0.005124154,0.0058017946,0.007144885,0.00065077073,0.00005453484,0.00003510683,0.000084529434,0.02324634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845595,0.005693925,0.0003681511,0.0015139382,0.0052866656,0.0025779076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939091,0.0026320324,0.00039690553,0.00086829654,0.0015530701,0.00064048904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010927294,0.00032429607,0.00069798616,0.0025587645,0.00914091,0.014547898,0.001923819,0.0042048665,0.002509942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011343143,0.0003601429,0.0004953322,0.001691506,0.074183606,0.015974885,0.0064305146,0.008419683,0.00037022508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028463992,0.0000027189196,0.00011412715,0.000011418904,0.0000014320815,0.00003648318,0.005093883,0.00010689727,0.000034858473,0.99050975,0.0012274074,0.0028582294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002188883,0.00003220111,0.0017705115,0.00027279073,0.000013078223,0.00019420218,0.013554343,0.0013667258,0.00023259365,0.7236744,0.25880796,0.000059367376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3985177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41529435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3985177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053245243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03511126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7923961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976663592","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou060","title":"An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034981083069662855,"score_gpt":0.3633691857699051,"score_spread":0.32838810270024227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976663592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016282044,0.0013670414,0.42392915,0.047076102,0.0011661387,0.00018085242,0.00011139876,0.00021361509,0.5096736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86498845,0.0008560919,0.07073466,0.018715268,0.001353481,0.0009062635,0.00007744245,0.0002587641,0.042109564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770314,0.009122941,0.00084049714,0.0043502613,0.0071189012,0.0015359495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295217,0.0029301192,0.00069938257,0.001749157,0.0013376266,0.00033165287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018891845,0.0007607221,0.00090265385,0.0016935468,0.004313936,0.007864051,0.0035056416,0.005946966,0.0070802397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236171,0.00055971835,0.0012798809,0.001195725,0.036195494,0.013925775,0.00823014,0.010424913,0.0015142809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019005922,0.0000017151336,0.000013637052,0.0000035144299,0.0000014018044,0.0000040581594,0.0001135961,0.00007568416,0.000021160631,0.9989197,0.00023757767,0.0006061553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006692602,0.0000053053222,0.000023619417,0.000013645163,0.0000025792856,0.00001592867,0.00004721724,0.00048059056,0.000112949616,0.99050397,0.008781883,0.0000056351873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019975815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012849603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018891845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049177944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099910796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978172711","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot041","title":"Constitutional reengineering: Dialogue's migration from Canada to Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Business process reengineering; Status quo; Commonwealth; Charter; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.026057979926160168,"score_gpt":0.2839040057802027,"score_spread":0.25784602585404254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978172711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6110739,0.0045182845,0.0047544385,0.049855407,0.00046890357,0.00013934095,0.00014183685,0.00008595213,0.32896194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763148,0.001001756,0.00095070567,0.0031264434,0.000027603952,0.000034875335,0.00003643333,0.000034538753,0.01847286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209166,0.0027732367,0.00014671365,0.0008211987,0.0019935756,0.0021735202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919485,0.003669383,0.0004092901,0.00045886976,0.0021758298,0.0013381792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064338734,0.00028904676,0.00039553505,0.0017042462,0.034779307,0.009845625,0.0016471501,0.0030058916,0.004061048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014124386,0.00026897195,0.00038288732,0.0027680763,0.018118905,0.0040598526,0.007704074,0.005971674,0.00018599028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004473299,0.000028596205,0.0032169875,0.000092078444,0.00001307534,0.0013151238,0.58800983,0.0004920092,0.0010759899,0.36606655,0.007840702,0.031804297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016647022,0.00003947905,0.018432755,0.00028106148,0.000028543502,0.0004701809,0.35401708,0.0014042325,0.0011033989,0.021964937,0.6021032,0.00013859196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13211292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13211292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12413087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980851840","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon038","title":"Roundtable: An exchange with Jeremy Waldron","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05071779769662236,"score_gpt":0.32312169056542595,"score_spread":0.27240389286880357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980851840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051494734,0.008821148,0.00035908958,0.86200505,0.11537868,0.00002269674,0.00007810145,0.00006869422,0.012751652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020076402,0.007948167,0.0009035302,0.7033995,0.07638231,0.00011358955,0.00010576175,0.00039046933,0.1906803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944981,0.0019930934,0.00026025609,0.00085571303,0.0017721717,0.0006207994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840725,0.0072787404,0.00059257005,0.00067154027,0.00341632,0.003968329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064326483,0.0007912084,0.0015185117,0.0011937813,0.008782416,0.008282479,0.0016246445,0.008944263,0.02748458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02747957,0.00067368185,0.0006171769,0.0011484283,0.0027292934,0.0075726956,0.0040741097,0.02398388,0.010176059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013284148,0.00000958978,0.000020304471,0.000012597153,0.0000024741005,0.00008699134,0.00018977493,0.000009231359,0.000048765804,0.0030308503,0.99465466,0.0019214997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009501683,0.000010226203,0.00015733547,0.000085588166,0.00000279236,0.00010475147,0.00079399144,0.000038786216,0.00007026593,0.0014601712,0.9972434,0.000023321467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006193706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137047265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02748458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004512587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048591807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09194505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995720989","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot022","title":"Judicial institutions, the legitimacy of Islamic state law and democratic transition in Egypt: Can a shift toward a common law model of adjudication improve the prospects of a successful democratic transition?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Legal history; Sharia; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Statutory law; Islam; Democracy; State (computer science); Politics; Public law; Geography","score_opus":0.0163367469426727,"score_gpt":0.27835350883592447,"score_spread":0.2620167618932518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995720989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3286966,0.02402987,0.003134911,0.19548501,0.0003505706,0.000095331,0.0001668931,0.000047093494,0.44799367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907182,0.0021746713,0.00026696787,0.001531333,0.00013523687,0.000017364682,0.000016325339,0.0000042082806,0.0051356982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980896,0.00080179237,0.00007829477,0.00016126137,0.00026172135,0.0006072792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966235,0.0018259941,0.00069818564,0.00015897042,0.0004180519,0.0002751828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038701757,0.00015474389,0.00020739152,0.0013109046,0.0062008426,0.0106349215,0.00091700716,0.004298247,0.0052421354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007447844,0.0002027125,0.00015071909,0.0015402465,0.024853177,0.005672304,0.0031706053,0.0042161928,0.0002757801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017727396,0.000019808844,0.00067642884,0.000026493515,0.0000024962933,0.00012829393,0.0021564716,0.00018368234,0.00004505053,0.989604,0.0019676108,0.005171908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105048806,0.00004456946,0.012348735,0.000447835,0.000029877954,0.00013205357,0.012698651,0.0018501766,0.00047360116,0.88865507,0.0831637,0.000050591698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027949657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039115768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027949657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012144035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012018034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08811152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011843670","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol006","title":"Constitutionalism and policies toward women: Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Constitutionalism; Dozen; Gender equity; Political science; Equity (law); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.011874555518844613,"score_gpt":0.26382739331514155,"score_spread":0.25195283779629696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011843670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34752887,0.042180818,0.0012699682,0.18321455,0.0007680063,0.00006667896,0.0009012396,0.00005513259,0.42401478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676125,0.0071358318,0.00039782847,0.009498522,0.00007273905,0.000021014657,0.00012682214,0.000019943258,0.015114756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336773,0.00073931314,0.000104743565,0.000412849,0.0019774942,0.003397874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590176,0.0010009247,0.00028635078,0.000101866826,0.0013331091,0.0013760306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032428086,0.00026931168,0.00054417306,0.0029164667,0.02358531,0.010034272,0.0015129873,0.003128912,0.00471935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009412385,0.00029018574,0.00040040165,0.005217128,0.015799094,0.002185072,0.0030495261,0.0038880352,0.00014494777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009297457,0.000032599666,0.011872389,0.00010765663,0.00004666516,0.00033299843,0.011615829,0.0011572087,0.00030319663,0.9277646,0.019898502,0.026775282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014822415,0.000096073156,0.14842616,0.0015299211,0.00023866326,0.00029148138,0.06817437,0.0015737563,0.0013419138,0.112871185,0.66498846,0.00031976108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99756336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14483187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14483187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20942947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024845134","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.1.139","title":"Canada: Production of private records of victims of sexual assault in R. v. Shearing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.027850139708130797,"score_gpt":0.31555948460722366,"score_spread":0.2877093448990929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024845134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23421508,0.014403505,0.0042233733,0.12542686,0.001920452,0.0033277222,0.10441527,0.00095030473,0.51111746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5270656,0.014710536,0.0112407515,0.013248022,0.00036756537,0.00072213163,0.020090967,0.00025046428,0.4123039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463516,0.0003144329,0.00029139227,0.0002615765,0.0035199756,0.0009773305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98421186,0.0025513042,0.0009515161,0.0014157646,0.00928583,0.001583674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041849837,0.0004056606,0.00034211678,0.005755663,0.009409211,0.0032953906,0.002648773,0.0018049412,0.009643484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02000899,0.00082714506,0.0002521437,0.0071962164,0.0019402853,0.0009382635,0.002159884,0.0016448888,0.0012943908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018673258,0.000088843444,0.027488114,0.0006664009,0.000044129338,0.002382662,0.021567954,0.00088837213,0.0030814502,0.05104157,0.75507975,0.13748406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100860154,0.000065928616,0.15499295,0.00065522233,0.00012844257,0.0006963593,0.008519626,0.00095739774,0.004419281,0.0024998947,0.8267868,0.00017725986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99728847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0520117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0520117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20923431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37737304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028840259","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq002","title":"Proportionality: An assault on human rights?: A reply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04493501811351099,"score_gpt":0.3839571434318165,"score_spread":0.33902212531830556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028840259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045089936,0.0019030474,0.00050483766,0.99077386,0.0028038877,0.0000032360767,0.000018825112,0.00001146615,0.0035298802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027243132,0.004267035,0.00095474056,0.94597155,0.013126326,0.00003416326,0.000023048347,0.000058984468,0.008320981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882663,0.0045512035,0.00057612127,0.002267136,0.0028046703,0.0009742731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726317,0.0218222,0.0009646125,0.0008021265,0.0028866546,0.0008927859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012679625,0.00080953096,0.0010662545,0.001498184,0.006968734,0.007110725,0.0042551346,0.03864143,0.008206995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039743755,0.00049808464,0.0014075937,0.0019615812,0.02247741,0.022065006,0.0061380165,0.039244544,0.0029307157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030398953,0.000027185435,0.00035356075,0.000112366084,0.000012623403,0.00030946388,0.003040452,0.00014140527,0.00015568858,0.49995387,0.484892,0.01097101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000488932,0.00004543677,0.0006789841,0.00048197308,0.000016041915,0.0005365519,0.008118038,0.00058049185,0.0004837644,0.3297372,0.65917104,0.000101634694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069631953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03864143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061759157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007764367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034634205","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.35","title":"Realizing equality in the twentieth century: the role of the Supreme Court of Canada in comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Politics; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.04158335274513759,"score_gpt":0.3465534930473471,"score_spread":0.30497014030220954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034634205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059616793,0.10122774,0.0014473698,0.08512861,0.001079661,0.000026001759,0.00014457047,0.000025940928,0.7513033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932066,0.02983053,0.00069674355,0.011104404,0.00034944637,0.000024614541,0.00006539921,0.000034876884,0.025828078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928861,0.0014771449,0.00009009998,0.0003705499,0.0018838062,0.0032923056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553394,0.0015238285,0.0002303582,0.000100693454,0.0018342223,0.0007769597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036426503,0.00033987124,0.0005080262,0.005859683,0.038447846,0.021499647,0.0018719123,0.0060838014,0.0050192634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008083351,0.00031581995,0.00038089082,0.007190063,0.037294738,0.0069438703,0.0039501246,0.005444635,0.0002323523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008521701,0.000005982793,0.00044711644,0.00003165184,0.00000642915,0.00017528461,0.01542404,0.00014648426,0.000044706503,0.9717228,0.006070229,0.0059167193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020342146,0.000020654095,0.009623642,0.0009016792,0.000049007205,0.0002832855,0.0694098,0.00048635036,0.00035547724,0.15311055,0.76564723,0.0000919504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21252644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21252644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14301412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91335773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059164208","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol004","title":"Religious freedom in Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Religiosity; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitution; Establishment Clause; Sociology; Power (physics); First amendment; Supreme court; Human rights","score_opus":0.006682597125488249,"score_gpt":0.25377052171357906,"score_spread":0.2470879245880908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059164208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5701458,0.009059457,0.0006880829,0.028942322,0.0002666298,0.000061845305,0.0015032775,0.00004801987,0.38928452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875572,0.0014947788,0.00026950316,0.001856262,0.000019037028,0.000010995514,0.00022528702,0.000008017185,0.008558927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965405,0.00026183276,0.00006730625,0.00018922702,0.001307765,0.0016333972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604356,0.000500109,0.00031554548,0.00012341487,0.0017662094,0.0012510716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011816123,0.00011265754,0.0003197567,0.002553328,0.01192367,0.004088194,0.0007005258,0.0008947094,0.0035428773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00576815,0.00014238867,0.00029835728,0.0039771646,0.0054765027,0.00068039936,0.0020918855,0.0016684271,0.00011847021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015521502,0.00006088385,0.06783923,0.0001273211,0.00007238374,0.00069191534,0.016705375,0.0016216435,0.0005935078,0.8331199,0.025945956,0.05306664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012835386,0.00004987009,0.48340276,0.00062051194,0.00010719143,0.0003248634,0.03215805,0.0014416132,0.0006818634,0.030904304,0.44996578,0.00021482463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09852415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09852415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.119106315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71484613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062874933","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.4.745","title":"The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02086310994059187,"score_gpt":0.30752740761552744,"score_spread":0.28666429767493556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062874933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015658882,0.024522973,0.0007952641,0.65926546,0.0071050175,0.000102742175,0.00039332028,0.000035967932,0.29212028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36328024,0.015009646,0.0013333162,0.4329431,0.005827383,0.00019006594,0.0001946835,0.00022178216,0.18099982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98415273,0.0018734945,0.0004194994,0.0011495277,0.006311341,0.006093299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97765315,0.011075064,0.00042729193,0.00057313294,0.007631671,0.0026397672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01227339,0.0010926161,0.0016428479,0.004771025,0.047149803,0.027957851,0.0047381697,0.045491114,0.0077267885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03542311,0.0013217172,0.0014256361,0.006085864,0.033034395,0.0063565583,0.0059911706,0.03509316,0.00086451933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054189968,0.000030968287,0.0005139774,0.00008698757,0.000043280303,0.00025079396,0.00890873,0.00032934526,0.000164917,0.6176968,0.36426824,0.007651813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008312076,0.0000143979305,0.0031648092,0.0007665744,0.00010338067,0.00007597041,0.010255748,0.00033294185,0.00037997562,0.08504258,0.89959717,0.00018339179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98637146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14323182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14323182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18708067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99372965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069583645","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor055","title":"Nonproblematic judicial review: A case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Conceptualization; Political science; Icelandic; Law; Technocracy; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07757805518062609,"score_gpt":0.36377883280781426,"score_spread":0.28620077762718815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069583645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88243794,0.009635452,0.0043673594,0.019500246,0.00036673096,0.00057001016,0.00011625528,0.00003499473,0.082971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977211,0.0071303276,0.0035107064,0.0040770466,0.00049498957,0.00024671017,0.00006727073,0.00002909448,0.007232902],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839761,0.009792363,0.0007649773,0.00092353905,0.002129118,0.0024138622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96859556,0.022149947,0.0039117443,0.0015060693,0.0018804908,0.001956207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014541209,0.00055920065,0.00073717633,0.0021561433,0.015191331,0.006420648,0.0025459528,0.011187317,0.0033202528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028171629,0.00056340004,0.00090655714,0.0038556398,0.006011731,0.00201823,0.0041439505,0.005698297,0.00063790794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048701442,0.0054382463,0.0998858,0.0011301266,0.000187457,0.43033823,0.08045521,0.004379879,0.0024040786,0.24442548,0.036266595,0.094601914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007664001,0.0023475213,0.13565499,0.0024870231,0.00034434727,0.32255977,0.18445879,0.010623929,0.0034349896,0.046323266,0.29057643,0.00042259577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013995688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015191331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059075174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050080717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07690221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093496570","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi009","title":"Review: Sovereignty in Transition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Transition (genetics); Political science; Law; Chemistry; Politics","score_opus":0.024075141359058003,"score_gpt":0.2583542435533823,"score_spread":0.23427910219432432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093496570","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016117019,0.93693805,0.00009644179,0.041790016,0.015731437,0.0000407878,0.00027190946,0.000022499184,0.0049476903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068329726,0.93107224,0.00012609232,0.031867687,0.02485491,0.00014645276,0.00025145803,0.000018603016,0.004829659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984664,0.0005407952,0.00019504213,0.0002727746,0.00035477275,0.00017015707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912606,0.0045116283,0.00092767033,0.00027517817,0.0021456594,0.0008792711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031322201,0.0010486281,0.003260301,0.0063118874,0.0013229204,0.005352902,0.0014364291,0.008604115,0.018287865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013909618,0.0005148614,0.0009427444,0.0070557194,0.002448287,0.002817102,0.0016283488,0.0046930304,0.0048758364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011373374,0.000024550734,0.00023103248,0.015812516,0.00020098155,0.00015186661,0.00010042022,0.000077277335,0.00015912876,0.00576933,0.8950644,0.08229482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102912825,0.000044599325,0.002106001,0.017210077,0.00031057635,0.00020578099,0.00024697607,0.00003384477,0.00005392897,0.004881695,0.974784,0.000019794796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053077424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011320476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018287865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035735352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010559124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061178982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096428617","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi051","title":"Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR help facilitate a culture of rights?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliamentary sovereignty; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Parliament; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Convention; Legislation; Rights of Nature; State (computer science); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017848215959071483,"score_gpt":0.28475449525102664,"score_spread":0.26690627929195515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096428617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053546512,0.0171058,0.0020792782,0.81227285,0.004879059,0.00003753177,0.000036130215,0.000060137452,0.15817459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43346548,0.017015042,0.005622892,0.4041856,0.009793088,0.00028238146,0.00011897761,0.0002980524,0.12921841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9448621,0.03508304,0.0017506533,0.002664484,0.008950215,0.0066894125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91032314,0.066345796,0.0060217497,0.005484652,0.0054205875,0.0064040245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040322825,0.000623653,0.0009297432,0.0020720381,0.012493311,0.031480767,0.0024120777,0.026155485,0.0129108075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09880167,0.0006160828,0.0007474341,0.0034646895,0.040282123,0.02457619,0.010410137,0.019861337,0.0035524499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022964883,0.00003041964,0.0004039756,0.00006226913,0.0000060916727,0.00011913519,0.0054897736,0.00008776665,0.00006976898,0.92694426,0.05121732,0.015546267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004870207,0.000054391065,0.0024037608,0.00064193393,0.00002033287,0.00014683488,0.0057604522,0.0003155089,0.00022912251,0.19532786,0.7949808,0.00007036948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027678844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033806533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040322825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010398476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024463227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21325004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113553566","doi":"10.1093/icon/mop019","title":"European Committee of Social Rights: The right to a healthy environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Social rights; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.018797418358364463,"score_gpt":0.3055340406164871,"score_spread":0.28673662225812263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113553566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0091508515,0.027877033,0.011287774,0.061544444,0.0053023202,0.00056698464,0.0007126123,0.00019251756,0.88336545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42462102,0.02047368,0.03167997,0.12645815,0.005576408,0.0022755738,0.0020096523,0.00035460005,0.38655108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97533876,0.006936412,0.0018765483,0.0024728482,0.009686529,0.0036888928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945431,0.0016715226,0.0005370104,0.000925403,0.0016464754,0.0006765736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226318,0.00092448463,0.0009150682,0.0017189238,0.004944796,0.009501281,0.0018149681,0.01674987,0.0058972323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020177582,0.00040630982,0.0008290329,0.0021289557,0.00778501,0.003713644,0.0052657905,0.008027243,0.0020663105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021997987,0.00002644551,0.000394669,0.00009046525,0.000013703849,0.00013391221,0.0012160011,0.00020285287,0.0003055655,0.9050738,0.06763132,0.02488932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026909216,0.000027704635,0.0018426013,0.0003936562,0.000019129538,0.00021997887,0.00031679103,0.000100089856,0.00037692804,0.062470663,0.9341627,0.0000428699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02820589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023825362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02820589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044504073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02684406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0911026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120511575","doi":"10.1093/icon/mom028","title":"Does the world need more Canada? The politics of the Canadian model in constitutional politics and political theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitutional amendment; Nationalism; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional theory; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012610480469283725,"score_gpt":0.2915392276026237,"score_spread":0.27892874713334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120511575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018458812,0.010058144,0.002688651,0.52989286,0.0013844214,0.000030053967,0.00044081005,0.00007691262,0.43696934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82010406,0.008995289,0.0035737872,0.07374916,0.0005644929,0.00005143663,0.00022849963,0.0001253089,0.092608005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967854,0.00063041976,0.000042869233,0.00041386782,0.0010128295,0.0011145407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968148,0.00076549844,0.00011945337,0.00017741186,0.0011006538,0.0010223007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029720198,0.00029983438,0.00056710996,0.0013820772,0.022597635,0.01283761,0.0013701206,0.0036929387,0.012994369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006593425,0.0002379958,0.00040003294,0.003049145,0.020532733,0.006903839,0.0026928103,0.006050524,0.0007549404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012229101,0.000004296861,0.0003473193,0.000018498316,0.000003312908,0.000047246565,0.0014983709,0.00012289001,0.000041013114,0.96657133,0.027410809,0.003922633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000456729,0.0000132752175,0.0031297281,0.00029097474,0.00003641955,0.00009059074,0.010802969,0.00088224676,0.00015994693,0.31118137,0.6732731,0.00009374519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89894056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10105942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11219968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73324084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122426454","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol002","title":"Prologue: North American constitutionalism?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Constitutionalism; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014854806903517002,"score_gpt":0.2973220546938847,"score_spread":0.2824672477903677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122426454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030913611,0.017487668,0.0013639724,0.14574459,0.005040455,0.000013653686,0.00008732949,0.000048903807,0.82712203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50548947,0.0377154,0.0025158029,0.12066581,0.02088879,0.0002828445,0.00037833472,0.00025842196,0.31180516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729,0.0011329775,0.000094871364,0.00044937528,0.00063104875,0.00040172887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703026,0.0017314685,0.00016971896,0.00033643347,0.00045783017,0.0002743092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035602364,0.00031083298,0.0004083694,0.0015264846,0.008256025,0.009013215,0.0010040499,0.0037499142,0.024238445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094217975,0.00024112196,0.00031884044,0.0022876489,0.01368465,0.008914282,0.003382367,0.009721023,0.0029468942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004284841,0.000008085082,0.00008890042,0.000023298975,0.0000015681496,0.000047143567,0.00085831207,0.000024467443,0.000011115812,0.93503773,0.056459777,0.0074351877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073130204,0.000004139358,0.00045602734,0.00014054369,0.000003268097,0.00009540119,0.000932014,0.00006971757,0.000029494078,0.21555965,0.78269583,0.0000065541617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02672325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034730818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97327673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078069707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058944346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08108562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127507417","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor067","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and the minister of justice: Weak-form review within a constitutional Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Parliament","score_opus":0.047762443208032204,"score_gpt":0.3517338849698267,"score_spread":0.3039714417617945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127507417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024960635,0.7372657,0.004491991,0.10573293,0.0029029138,0.00013375413,0.00010683495,0.000049707985,0.14682001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24436592,0.6480565,0.010775727,0.070570424,0.0022138166,0.0002321164,0.00017579061,0.000059528742,0.023550116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984533,0.005338861,0.00062245195,0.001040354,0.0077426806,0.0007225676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98142666,0.008178542,0.00087951723,0.0007800329,0.008052348,0.00068289397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012838093,0.0003475818,0.00075733475,0.0030518945,0.004977091,0.006523754,0.0015293085,0.0030955856,0.0021128564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031202018,0.00039411904,0.00034234222,0.0057741604,0.013796714,0.0040233666,0.0017815493,0.005695469,0.00038854234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019783196,0.000011477359,0.00043346614,0.0019911062,0.000024742087,0.00010031588,0.0017621266,0.0002834516,0.00016951482,0.734333,0.08095471,0.17991643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001667554,0.000017469383,0.0018811662,0.0041550766,0.000036939964,0.00010164717,0.00059493387,0.0001292,0.00016391362,0.03951647,0.953352,0.000034496716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7192199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.788395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28078008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036546938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1204066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56486726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130896198","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor034","title":"The Nordic counternarrative: Democracy, human development, and judicial review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Globalization; Welfare state; Human rights; Judicial activism; Rule of law; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.05740053860351652,"score_gpt":0.34656052967921347,"score_spread":0.28915999107569695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130896198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09898482,0.17774582,0.0036983702,0.16775517,0.0031005952,0.00004160192,0.00017206982,0.000037493985,0.54846406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401176,0.019047122,0.0010979609,0.0067989514,0.0006926827,0.00003319522,0.000046249468,0.000025048945,0.0321411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925649,0.0046143713,0.00024386174,0.00071264093,0.0010384668,0.0008256954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833401,0.012039577,0.0017343314,0.00058444944,0.0014052587,0.00089623267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008373933,0.00020580715,0.00048403774,0.0017711635,0.0058376053,0.014623748,0.0009800787,0.0041434625,0.0040974184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017091269,0.0002622003,0.00024325303,0.0020089191,0.015770929,0.0049079782,0.0033516292,0.0031487665,0.00027523475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003559757,0.000024405264,0.0025466583,0.00015424704,0.000012796501,0.00037732496,0.0061976523,0.00062209566,0.00006222665,0.9577145,0.016884662,0.015367735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004812714,0.00005605413,0.015762784,0.0021372305,0.000038447623,0.00044659042,0.021752343,0.0009713651,0.0005496418,0.3612917,0.59687877,0.000067038185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0538295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08697365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0538295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012798191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02110717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10703236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137187785","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon004","title":"The role of dignity in equality law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Underpinning; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03387566459346647,"score_gpt":0.31228142075917004,"score_spread":0.27840575616570357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137187785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22484726,0.037500072,0.001842521,0.38681462,0.0007150793,0.00021115188,0.00036425592,0.000029595883,0.34767547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95791966,0.014667459,0.0011841723,0.010899269,0.00007218044,0.000058161233,0.00006282704,0.00003347626,0.015102778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435765,0.0012231213,0.00018685659,0.00035656782,0.0013155062,0.0025603164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98414963,0.007805019,0.00040958193,0.00030816192,0.0043726084,0.002955016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008398968,0.00044583576,0.0009482151,0.0027065806,0.022552604,0.010911061,0.0026425878,0.0043445886,0.0089694355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029811474,0.00030928224,0.00048661916,0.004890789,0.02407072,0.006545333,0.006287467,0.007903095,0.00024389027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014782493,0.00010051236,0.016980838,0.0005746984,0.00004673394,0.0022358694,0.15158823,0.0008014389,0.00024287461,0.645382,0.032968793,0.14893019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009948496,0.00009633424,0.056874715,0.0062367823,0.00015356572,0.0007027664,0.46550098,0.0012730772,0.0006051775,0.21213105,0.25610703,0.00021904494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98874193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99566877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13472907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13472907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25457856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142844092","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol007","title":"Institutions, constitutions, actor strategies, and ideas: Explaining variation in paid parental leave policies in Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Normative; Political science; Government (linguistics); Maternity leave; National Policy; Parental leave; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02199477243476488,"score_gpt":0.30835914557432526,"score_spread":0.28636437313956037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142844092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96988904,0.00074792653,0.00067568955,0.0026950932,0.000015838346,0.000033137123,0.00021911672,0.000009767498,0.025714422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998835,0.0002498942,0.00020304689,0.000070812326,0.0000022143195,0.000008187926,0.00006291449,0.000004184285,0.00056368037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683136,0.0007326968,0.000105424704,0.000247999,0.00089691964,0.0011855502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187565,0.0034080117,0.0013814004,0.00038575593,0.0018734013,0.0010756982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004455673,0.00014739354,0.000327728,0.0031632292,0.006503428,0.0038219683,0.0009977382,0.0005379961,0.0018432777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016521992,0.00017954303,0.0002452834,0.005008221,0.008149339,0.00090184447,0.0021062472,0.00096901954,0.000060697574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013291994,0.000094402254,0.62137955,0.000066395005,0.00010397546,0.0002818043,0.07135088,0.0044266167,0.0004774051,0.25976613,0.0029931387,0.038926825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003581083,0.000028520539,0.85230464,0.00025867688,0.00008525483,0.000055316625,0.089176774,0.0043386957,0.0004529228,0.02297947,0.03021807,0.0000659364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97437006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059884373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059884373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047605474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43449354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143688148","doi":"10.1093/icon/mos048","title":"Religious law as foreign law in constitutional interpretation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013054255779701764,"score_gpt":0.3055705611410323,"score_spread":0.29251630536133055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143688148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07461617,0.009486006,0.14556776,0.071437925,0.001361322,0.00012286672,0.00008835219,0.00013290282,0.6971867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743532,0.0013188485,0.0089806635,0.0054325075,0.0007124876,0.00009412265,0.00002314278,0.00004442098,0.009040654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995787,0.006563292,0.00041983198,0.00085852284,0.0014458222,0.0007546821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026626,0.0073569,0.0005399996,0.0011140419,0.00051985093,0.00020289177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013667181,0.00029918874,0.0006427878,0.0016185812,0.005334601,0.0084737735,0.0014748648,0.0052294047,0.0031147047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011705877,0.00038469856,0.00077274477,0.0011830493,0.04819498,0.010093297,0.005285198,0.0079244645,0.0003696004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013884251,0.0000015280937,0.000039807583,0.0000047772037,7.1164817e-7,0.000016516038,0.0008693756,0.000029779947,0.000027324357,0.99807113,0.00014524313,0.00079238927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013176559,0.000017808681,0.00020542806,0.00010704875,0.000009808016,0.00007518493,0.0011483509,0.00039967048,0.0002549005,0.963127,0.03462659,0.00001502149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039203987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00484589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013667181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040210416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004004707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07227981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152266080","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.2.272","title":"Rule by emergency: Sri Lanka's postcolonial constitutional experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Political science; Law; History; Ancient history; South asia","score_opus":0.013834652431709851,"score_gpt":0.33027409327834933,"score_spread":0.3164394408466395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152266080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131433,0.0025173828,0.00013193738,0.017327929,0.0001545383,0.000039426344,0.00008243693,0.000035332378,0.066567816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918258,0.00081584963,0.00002644766,0.001198816,0.00002574049,0.000019761475,0.000035385885,0.000016218553,0.006035909],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557745,0.0015098479,0.00012729997,0.00023139476,0.00027385153,0.0022801696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976599,0.00087804865,0.00040395124,0.00014249714,0.0001801326,0.0007352842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026204798,0.00043190975,0.00069795595,0.0010549336,0.0247568,0.0099167405,0.0018774959,0.0028173365,0.007842075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043746536,0.0006667096,0.00033306627,0.0018507695,0.022401953,0.004527974,0.012408092,0.009342725,0.0006748478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031483734,0.000036949317,0.0037508074,0.000069721464,0.000009346671,0.0032711397,0.96247953,0.00003395941,0.0003447407,0.020328093,0.004337227,0.0053070066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008185333,0.00004139038,0.00958024,0.000082864135,0.000006430957,0.000573466,0.9368888,0.00002708159,0.00009226151,0.0006746235,0.051998094,0.00002654439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109265715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18658563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109265715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012212464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008006595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152664636","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol009","title":"Property rights and regulatory innovation: Comparing constitutional cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Intellectual property; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02586636513874751,"score_gpt":0.3019422523031773,"score_spread":0.27607588716442977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152664636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878387,0.0021830823,0.0051228395,0.0036580898,0.00005113335,0.00003551859,0.0000675252,0.0000115400435,0.2010316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987936,0.00034718483,0.0002853039,0.00010856419,0.000006757945,0.000011632013,0.000012432703,0.0000037490397,0.0004306666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989272,0.005963888,0.0006722453,0.00074426417,0.0021711253,0.0011765738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586022,0.026072793,0.005941609,0.003442687,0.004039441,0.0019012849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626294,0.00012969872,0.0002909251,0.0024736547,0.0033517773,0.007110752,0.0006838255,0.00067653885,0.0031000315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041061353,0.00016106102,0.00033793593,0.0024128223,0.017648961,0.0062047103,0.0051934733,0.0021408235,0.00011279598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011113422,0.00011332853,0.065583065,0.00013263467,0.000082702536,0.00021136343,0.09276715,0.0011894383,0.00088717445,0.78904796,0.0004125518,0.049461436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007890437,0.00027171534,0.22253774,0.00078384054,0.00015671107,0.00047126264,0.29365656,0.0029412853,0.003496497,0.4134095,0.061973598,0.00022237224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0174072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017045917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0174072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056868345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044296356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04562074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161121277","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou048","title":"National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Member states; Constitutional law; Order (exchange); Constitutional court; Liberal democracy; European union; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.028550262754046186,"score_gpt":0.32019335143912875,"score_spread":0.29164308868508254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161121277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16090052,0.0108555285,0.01818944,0.036030713,0.00048052528,0.00004415858,0.000049853177,0.000064008294,0.7733853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861036,0.001029187,0.0019643034,0.0026345754,0.00013495955,0.000030973864,0.000018777497,0.000011865033,0.008071794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910253,0.004846121,0.00033453747,0.0009977279,0.0016056292,0.001190592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443936,0.0032281727,0.00043014195,0.000747249,0.00074809935,0.00040702615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008683244,0.00014197192,0.00040536022,0.001245333,0.0033052927,0.007991385,0.0007600703,0.00311598,0.0024994358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01295939,0.00021188859,0.00038176368,0.0013100492,0.016842183,0.006925724,0.005536677,0.0043286276,0.00019337001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026200632,0.0000035272744,0.0001283806,0.0000037983864,0.0000013945925,0.0000214074,0.0005873708,0.000116890646,0.000022209559,0.9968712,0.00019745671,0.0020438249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003002531,0.000031827516,0.0015972053,0.0001612621,0.00001253182,0.00013597008,0.001855933,0.000835616,0.00030538582,0.9089206,0.08609404,0.00001959369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035045191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003784877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008683244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004808267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051255524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04592198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943359","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou032","title":"Eulogy for the constitution that was","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Political science; Repeal; Statute","score_opus":0.041009427941542706,"score_gpt":0.33456745657305276,"score_spread":0.29355802863151004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162943359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002161963,0.007732868,0.0053298324,0.062101394,0.0075811488,0.000060329083,0.00029307915,0.00018212333,0.9145572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18316258,0.005578189,0.005799171,0.04483076,0.003476191,0.00030970012,0.0006287045,0.0003842785,0.7558304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786,0.00074179546,0.000105883206,0.0004975686,0.00054077146,0.0002539626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988445,0.0003495751,0.000090252346,0.00026042215,0.0003479948,0.00010711825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017174287,0.00035127864,0.00032820983,0.0008154891,0.0040391595,0.0064528603,0.00052067806,0.0044775335,0.044519562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005818139,0.00019310066,0.0003293134,0.000906014,0.0065460806,0.0035163087,0.0023455156,0.0069016125,0.012526026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007819029,0.0000034249329,0.000053727486,0.000022006987,0.0000017359595,0.000026155862,0.00040402802,0.000028460478,0.000055258643,0.93322515,0.05954185,0.0066303485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004909064,0.000005893551,0.0002002585,0.00009141305,0.0000022877214,0.0000477382,0.00018324549,0.00004404002,0.00005963464,0.047292702,0.9520624,0.000005430461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014310089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015393313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044519562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00450719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004106242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14893281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170502526","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi004","title":"Canada: Supreme Court addresses gay-positive readers in public schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Gay rights; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.046754422815522216,"score_gpt":0.3251092374183937,"score_spread":0.2783548146028715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170502526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21409039,0.0041528787,0.00051150256,0.26148143,0.002103958,0.0003086278,0.0016426308,0.00018335377,0.5155252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5947259,0.0019004808,0.00064167904,0.1259342,0.00054146245,0.00013675947,0.00031023606,0.00011376576,0.2756955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054784,0.0005730748,0.00016566545,0.0005959177,0.0027567192,0.005360678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883652,0.0025489612,0.0003466853,0.00028219205,0.0042530685,0.004204014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003507973,0.0005184969,0.00070920284,0.0014223678,0.049756758,0.009895765,0.0044607734,0.018132165,0.014068534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009295777,0.00086447434,0.00061718625,0.0019341266,0.0071444022,0.0018572641,0.0036709479,0.014387649,0.0014479575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013637058,0.0002658167,0.03597249,0.00017234286,0.000053597727,0.0031892527,0.023436679,0.0005368626,0.0012854717,0.24185239,0.66643757,0.02666117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028023787,0.00011700081,0.096197195,0.00092151825,0.00034164306,0.00071363506,0.0535763,0.001376301,0.003258273,0.018081104,0.82485557,0.0002812314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090309426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090309426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2355265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6552438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171469886","doi":"10.1093/icon/mom012","title":"The voting rights of Japanese citizens living abroad","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Law; Legislation; Order (exchange); Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.013281462788401914,"score_gpt":0.3322265548394566,"score_spread":0.3189450920510547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171469886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59544164,0.00062281225,0.0012119428,0.00731621,0.0001648521,0.000057668763,0.00031565252,0.00002044548,0.3948488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775587,0.00019088571,0.00019410264,0.001224019,0.000092640534,0.00003462579,0.00008838734,0.000005937314,0.020610673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799025,0.0004160164,0.00013119995,0.00029804252,0.00031184143,0.0008526608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983165,0.0004909084,0.00023996418,0.00025949013,0.0003629064,0.00033029332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022248144,0.00017571107,0.00026984603,0.000689418,0.004511656,0.0026291632,0.0005733056,0.0013876336,0.008795976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003725073,0.00017725247,0.0002608434,0.0005086239,0.002915126,0.0011976755,0.0020810757,0.0018569176,0.0008230417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004913343,0.00019472321,0.07237527,0.00013990613,0.000057824054,0.0029445656,0.057325363,0.0006326846,0.010197723,0.7600874,0.031033896,0.06451934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028015065,0.0005922721,0.25212967,0.00048808494,0.0004220677,0.0016121634,0.05829323,0.0045158584,0.012239726,0.1398133,0.52926916,0.0003442875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025879717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033057943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025879717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014411988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014560283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05145812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179177954","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow042","title":"The harms of remedial discretion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Discretion; Business; Remedial action; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Environmental remediation","score_opus":0.014720302363108987,"score_gpt":0.31319875985039086,"score_spread":0.29847845748728186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179177954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07036504,0.012119861,0.08630263,0.32136708,0.0019651186,0.00017312488,0.00019043464,0.00044058877,0.5070762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93976116,0.0017778995,0.008180388,0.029337399,0.0013306381,0.00015987734,0.000041888976,0.00016381909,0.01924681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95532864,0.015572503,0.0018560608,0.0061821067,0.01719352,0.003867094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447946,0.029704956,0.0037347947,0.014460214,0.005654941,0.0016505022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034246776,0.000672723,0.0011382235,0.0020949796,0.008440808,0.0087349815,0.0031684148,0.010071162,0.0055088825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06519162,0.00064123666,0.0014715111,0.0010409207,0.050529514,0.014488879,0.010116549,0.018455604,0.0011851833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014977406,0.000015122654,0.00024724874,0.00002495926,0.000009620084,0.000077127705,0.0013621337,0.00025517488,0.0001876497,0.9885373,0.0023590336,0.006909709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004621925,0.000036972222,0.0006261404,0.00023446073,0.000023818056,0.00022437227,0.0009700868,0.0008422507,0.00059957587,0.91960585,0.07673416,0.000056092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071660383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060636285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034246776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063528423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010289112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1811164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230516096","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov014","title":"Central and Eastern European constitutionalism a quarter century after the fall of the Berlin Wall: Introduction to the Symposium","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Ancient history; History; Law; Archaeology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.014943024810107166,"score_gpt":0.2626868314514025,"score_spread":0.2477438066412953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230516096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511394,0.33044732,0.0019379087,0.10243235,0.023080703,0.000050533487,0.00023149764,0.00007873014,0.456627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.814673,0.060831502,0.0006005322,0.008068031,0.00776073,0.00008649136,0.0001377969,0.00007873552,0.1077632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982729,0.00069903437,0.000080363076,0.00028020755,0.00025687553,0.0004106336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904424,0.0004884909,0.00011688856,0.00008180894,0.000120284276,0.00014835472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035845167,0.00050510233,0.0005825737,0.0019287788,0.0057930276,0.013302197,0.00076596026,0.003751003,0.0054147476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003174665,0.0003122959,0.0004707481,0.0026086124,0.0100997025,0.0044925907,0.0044324184,0.003938816,0.00051971467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069613525,0.000079425285,0.0008175063,0.00023130824,0.00002395278,0.0005994026,0.019995585,0.00032384644,0.0004027495,0.8798877,0.067692816,0.02987604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010990817,0.000030370358,0.0048474544,0.0009114723,0.000018315295,0.000213376,0.007990429,0.00008165287,0.0002613378,0.027999375,0.9576088,0.000026497557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013789923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011529862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013789923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01054925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034388623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07654053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256635145","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov071","title":"Power-sharing in a re-united Cyprus: Centripetal coalitions vs. proportional sequential coalitions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Centripetal force; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Power sharing; Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Ethnic group; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06842702563837852,"score_gpt":0.36835819261422065,"score_spread":0.2999311669758421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256635145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49093872,0.0010403965,0.021044105,0.003957956,0.00011382195,0.000078327066,0.00003002794,0.000046834077,0.48274985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950482,0.0000767922,0.0006919964,0.00011164412,0.000018885403,0.000013257845,0.0000042739644,0.000004542194,0.004030283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970348,0.0015245103,0.000104820785,0.0004786396,0.00028776287,0.00056946964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984906,0.0005838488,0.0003324184,0.0003374945,0.00011931279,0.00013639884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033440017,0.00021378724,0.00025285388,0.00084181613,0.0047290404,0.0045172274,0.00063536596,0.0013251695,0.0041517033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039860867,0.00017690701,0.00024175523,0.0010774477,0.01368595,0.0034470472,0.0046625016,0.0012737347,0.0003429119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030816318,0.000010679319,0.0018876509,0.000021859129,0.00000897107,0.00028079413,0.009587649,0.0008854513,0.0002396502,0.974379,0.0006450452,0.0120224925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007751026,0.00022038481,0.04509202,0.000383129,0.00009278879,0.0014380972,0.032768358,0.012554239,0.0028306323,0.6602113,0.24422961,0.00010196716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008050788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008611349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008050788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057508843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027686553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041725755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294189301","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov056","title":"Support for international trade law: The US and the EU compared","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Law; International economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.031843220999165936,"score_gpt":0.27069211820449995,"score_spread":0.23884889720533403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294189301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9104074,0.0022302151,0.0004556175,0.005408838,0.00006873622,0.0000116661995,0.00023689774,0.000008792388,0.08117181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980428,0.00026795774,0.000083194645,0.0005541798,0.000019388648,0.0000042501374,0.00012925685,0.0000061128253,0.0008927646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728334,0.0008027297,0.00019551346,0.00024613933,0.0008155614,0.00065662194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345386,0.002719288,0.0016983512,0.00055120944,0.0009959119,0.00058136805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026677472,0.00008162294,0.00037020605,0.001828136,0.0007887885,0.0030440672,0.00034419104,0.0010158017,0.0048846058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011508149,0.00007301764,0.00019247437,0.004468581,0.0017194378,0.00226003,0.0020236012,0.00095998193,0.0002742185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008907848,0.00028322125,0.48925102,0.0002297682,0.00031095388,0.0012146481,0.022396177,0.0010811111,0.0019695163,0.32817012,0.012692038,0.14151065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059417125,0.00025088774,0.8356281,0.00050802686,0.00012372248,0.0007905423,0.04049427,0.0008527632,0.0011386296,0.021444278,0.09865904,0.00005031315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006225515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008774695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006225515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007117738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066715677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016340613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317979143","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot055","title":"On constitutionalism and the paradoxes of tolerance: Reflections on Egypt, the US, and beyond","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.017875441992593347,"score_gpt":0.32869284200244353,"score_spread":0.3108174000098502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317979143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011217234,0.18992148,0.0009958274,0.69266737,0.043862604,0.000015913472,0.000057331927,0.000040870058,0.061221324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47754022,0.13866507,0.0009338879,0.22334448,0.11630835,0.00005842574,0.000068887464,0.0001966556,0.04288406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968458,0.0014190323,0.00015281561,0.00030057665,0.00065628154,0.00062546873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919252,0.0062260637,0.00039400416,0.00021553872,0.0007570437,0.00048227378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006460814,0.00067481986,0.00072760374,0.0019171906,0.006343849,0.01420671,0.002031744,0.008015872,0.0049259826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008660128,0.00027314475,0.00045658808,0.0022566123,0.026314236,0.011535739,0.004764054,0.013193426,0.00048328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059751932,0.00002743507,0.00028542138,0.00065675844,0.000028539742,0.0008230615,0.032297425,0.00028032143,0.00022569271,0.70757306,0.2317449,0.025997661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016086693,0.000014210544,0.0006565555,0.00088962395,0.00001366337,0.00018695295,0.024148764,0.000112502974,0.00015119092,0.10171761,0.87205285,0.000039888182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009001127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014937245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01420671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009810674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005507976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071181715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318601874","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor012","title":"The Negotiable Constitution: On The Limitation of Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2009 (Charles-Maxime Panaccio)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01593347750121909,"score_gpt":0.26000379293709186,"score_spread":0.24407031543587276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318601874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016204633,0.5808145,0.00573982,0.10794841,0.0027592168,0.00003971893,0.00045830294,0.000104338214,0.30051523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28149852,0.42870456,0.009770123,0.031039225,0.009157714,0.00043804428,0.000960797,0.00042524008,0.23800573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981806,0.00075667666,0.000115788745,0.00027469825,0.00049573736,0.0001764857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841917,0.0010487582,0.00012409467,0.00014902199,0.00017530555,0.00008358539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024749672,0.001400655,0.0010509319,0.002667223,0.0028483884,0.0077111525,0.0018037775,0.0071091573,0.014260495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005627361,0.0012520041,0.00051629636,0.003990013,0.013719326,0.011901271,0.0025409574,0.006956041,0.0031838089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014182023,0.000010851316,0.00008704493,0.000115619296,0.000007737688,0.00006929682,0.0009313127,0.00020984942,0.00006664591,0.8119999,0.16904359,0.017443933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021485592,0.000007368015,0.00075669907,0.00087164994,0.000013364635,0.00013233641,0.00052954955,0.00025197322,0.00015920583,0.5355326,0.46170568,0.000018072558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020770771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034757406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020770771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063163936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042971186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047706127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337162619","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow056","title":"The republican virtues of the “new commonwealth model of constitutionalism”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Separation of powers; Sociology; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03226949416544197,"score_gpt":0.3184463081912751,"score_spread":0.28617681402583317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337162619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08127563,0.0017354179,0.08004325,0.068282105,0.00042472352,0.000072595896,0.00005519145,0.00008889309,0.7680222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98034567,0.00033576752,0.0039055091,0.0023044758,0.00021863462,0.00006336646,0.00001646052,0.000028030425,0.012782111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914534,0.004303712,0.00019810737,0.0011255759,0.0020175122,0.00090168306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945281,0.0022584235,0.00052559224,0.0015003874,0.0007664582,0.0004209757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072472785,0.00015106959,0.00038883337,0.00093128055,0.00431047,0.0075325826,0.0010464207,0.0023128584,0.002690355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106667625,0.00025520465,0.00050725107,0.0007374454,0.03797889,0.006653367,0.004479234,0.0051602744,0.00040399036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001903756,0.0000021475742,0.00007151229,0.0000020998393,9.0831827e-7,0.000005787407,0.0004734564,0.00008121732,0.000016844959,0.99842834,0.0003015406,0.0006142359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001309436,0.00001220631,0.00053981645,0.000023008315,0.0000048401985,0.000036228106,0.00040081432,0.0009124031,0.000105081126,0.9607347,0.037206873,0.000010960788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012532215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014250364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012532215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006510824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068188286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047239542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368594978","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov048","title":"Proportionality and Constitutional Culture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049977583296387545,"score_gpt":0.3510176951362327,"score_spread":0.30104011183984514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2368594978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17323028,0.0011134272,0.010574027,0.00958469,0.00017483374,0.000048626356,0.00005798406,0.000034331886,0.8051819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204165,0.00011293783,0.00053722825,0.0003002055,0.000043414202,0.000020142592,0.000009588507,0.000014896603,0.0069198483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991319,0.0049229725,0.00038626703,0.0014404133,0.0011020149,0.000829358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844796,0.008360553,0.001427751,0.002450166,0.002221687,0.0010601496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662176,0.0002776609,0.0004624318,0.0020552003,0.008026719,0.008415186,0.0011386501,0.0012452377,0.010309657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027779797,0.00031679854,0.00024679882,0.002132068,0.031207228,0.006456518,0.004347108,0.00459834,0.0005350117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048989295,0.000009512831,0.00034446717,0.0000048748348,0.0000033354156,0.000009089187,0.0033759512,0.000042150765,0.000040033712,0.9936271,0.00027552168,0.0022630948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016507296,0.000021411795,0.0014783202,0.000031292977,0.000012800366,0.00005491219,0.005060804,0.0003304852,0.000301418,0.9685119,0.02416506,0.00001505672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049793697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004852241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010309657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034752456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027987636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04581052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520236492","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow047","title":"Substantive equality revisited: A reply to Sandra Fredman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.025669534638390952,"score_gpt":0.2908419402038372,"score_spread":0.26517240556544625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520236492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019524973,0.0015686093,0.00011560784,0.9929345,0.0036370826,0.000002164794,0.000007956465,0.000005030389,0.0015338039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060230168,0.00081899855,0.0001280602,0.9835729,0.006843077,0.000016665326,0.0000064592145,0.000037443846,0.0025533987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96933675,0.01112701,0.001998174,0.0067385435,0.0067615863,0.004037897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87557316,0.10699859,0.0023386688,0.0024500135,0.0082990965,0.0043405145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042941194,0.0011543096,0.0033046457,0.0022897176,0.024144735,0.0205399,0.008145802,0.11282631,0.0101259705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320963,0.0018420191,0.002251272,0.0026209874,0.050962806,0.029202174,0.013187981,0.1292147,0.0036281059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000337191,0.000023397804,0.00019037517,0.00007802319,0.000028832486,0.0003417092,0.0051628915,0.000084954096,0.00008132556,0.1459546,0.8426816,0.005338631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011418098,0.000023916313,0.0006029641,0.0010792693,0.00006769936,0.00032094555,0.0106697185,0.00023287699,0.00033301063,0.17345054,0.8129288,0.00017610592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041714553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050897878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11282631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01798104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027101502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22709745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575650511","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow063","title":"Real, not nominal, global democracy: A reply to Robert Keohane","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02034290653757923,"score_gpt":0.33240306869038944,"score_spread":0.3120601621528102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575650511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023167317,0.008074071,0.00019929674,0.9835169,0.0058454447,0.0000023872883,0.000014473263,0.000009770879,0.0021059772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011038589,0.0075219846,0.00044250066,0.9625666,0.013977306,0.000026250384,0.000018958288,0.000051099043,0.0043567126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992849,0.003599818,0.00027081268,0.0012602131,0.0014573272,0.0005628504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651994,0.029568184,0.00080850563,0.000715548,0.0022313306,0.0014768927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114683,0.0009264934,0.0013801615,0.0012638854,0.007068646,0.008078531,0.0032744156,0.032459296,0.0054237503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03350512,0.0007231227,0.0010220099,0.0021082517,0.017998662,0.019643523,0.0047075325,0.054936077,0.0026249315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038613027,0.000019702393,0.00016875372,0.00010136957,0.000010703712,0.00018471364,0.0015467455,0.00010603571,0.000066535096,0.11287271,0.8773711,0.0075130155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046360925,0.000028334785,0.00041893692,0.00059317035,0.00001290941,0.00042055777,0.0028910167,0.00030131504,0.00019295014,0.133038,0.861961,0.0000954678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006183919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006223545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032459296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048281085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045460705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060650945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2681524666","doi":"10.1093/icon/mox007","title":"Federal arbiters as facilitators: Towards an integrated federal and judicial theory for diverse states","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Negotiation; Political science; Guardian; Supreme court; Federalism; Diversity (politics); Institution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02787163377166475,"score_gpt":0.3544824664681881,"score_spread":0.32661083269652336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2681524666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093136035,0.0046795337,0.34371328,0.06794444,0.0005805322,0.00053760083,0.00006289246,0.00026350847,0.48908222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696316,0.00090780016,0.017441053,0.0018389898,0.00020896534,0.00026252703,0.00001822151,0.00003998326,0.009650806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97916883,0.013036242,0.0005287223,0.0016675307,0.002727788,0.0028708957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824965,0.011015779,0.0021151113,0.0014221732,0.0015866391,0.0013638419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021905156,0.0006754665,0.0009282093,0.0044892924,0.012888912,0.016992755,0.0037373404,0.008448051,0.004613722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289519,0.0007288848,0.0012417766,0.0018531503,0.03153135,0.017888159,0.00888194,0.007327283,0.00057866395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002659453,0.000007039021,0.00021409514,0.000012111987,0.0000017325951,0.00003365564,0.0020724875,0.00031354136,0.000038961778,0.99581546,0.00022373047,0.0012645046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029632516,0.00004700071,0.00070945104,0.0002859348,0.000037079917,0.00008825426,0.007232823,0.0050142603,0.00033442446,0.94875276,0.037435643,0.00003269774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016619591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024193157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021905156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015673334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024424288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11584693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744710824","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz078","title":"“Dominion status”: History, framework and context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Context (archaeology); Reservation; History; Law; Political science; Genealogy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.017052638051435302,"score_gpt":0.3057070906816013,"score_spread":0.288654452630166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744710824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12285797,0.03324021,0.0047133523,0.032156523,0.00040682606,0.0000384146,0.0001311514,0.000029303294,0.8064262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912464,0.0033261555,0.00025056358,0.00045851854,0.00024852285,0.000016424878,0.000024444982,0.000010227072,0.004418799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.0008417198,0.000043580418,0.00019790567,0.00016960572,0.00025514868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978478,0.0014424687,0.0002722434,0.00007413994,0.0001733294,0.00018999184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022467994,0.0003003617,0.00023393969,0.0040595243,0.0048606964,0.008123133,0.000959469,0.0014657206,0.0036528304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034744213,0.00014482882,0.000113231574,0.004063936,0.0415666,0.0068758056,0.003981438,0.0030984373,0.00017577743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040375594,0.0000045096904,0.00043889324,0.000020603034,8.190074e-7,0.00006378175,0.00830009,0.000057555008,0.000034261473,0.98669434,0.0007179913,0.003663153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009976234,0.000036141188,0.006666629,0.0008795273,0.00000702631,0.000342732,0.031651057,0.00074059214,0.0003766875,0.5319363,0.4273158,0.00003743638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016556377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014091648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016556377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010336305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029313369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07499552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764092000","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz060","title":"Judging constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022608736415300926,"score_gpt":0.3207430179377241,"score_spread":0.29813428152242316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764092000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11573143,0.0015811077,0.166962,0.023403978,0.00071423175,0.00038486012,0.00022036591,0.00022598731,0.6907761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753268,0.00028432754,0.01732124,0.00088527653,0.00016034307,0.00009930827,0.000060664835,0.000052690342,0.005809294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580575,0.02282997,0.0029190176,0.00478424,0.008904309,0.0025050165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90997696,0.058673482,0.0054290635,0.012099867,0.01202214,0.0017984281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03810113,0.00042043775,0.00084461505,0.004527149,0.0073987297,0.01383422,0.0023726649,0.006145549,0.005335471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09723601,0.00047884948,0.00055820745,0.0022155547,0.056229528,0.01431029,0.0067495406,0.007067298,0.0005338813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023619293,0.000002383357,0.00032679876,0.000011336687,0.000002612937,0.000025989066,0.0023829222,0.00015904724,0.00008193588,0.994338,0.0005040325,0.0021626083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013198418,0.00001865825,0.00087899796,0.00012885788,0.00001248929,0.000061443265,0.0032539961,0.0015244085,0.0005796357,0.9549104,0.038587704,0.000030197249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009066456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009502641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03810113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006627104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070073446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20150042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765634779","doi":"10.1093/icon/mox060","title":"Developments in Belgian constitutional law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitutional crisis; Law; Politics; European union; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Refugee; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.042648741457634816,"score_gpt":0.35679234875112265,"score_spread":0.31414360729348784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765634779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05499548,0.2688799,0.010537745,0.058993027,0.0053428216,0.00007239081,0.000989359,0.000350423,0.5998389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632282,0.03979798,0.012636897,0.010708831,0.0015813326,0.000068069465,0.0006588927,0.00029201736,0.071027815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881775,0.0052822493,0.0004224949,0.0016084636,0.0027490328,0.0017602234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558926,0.0026041048,0.00034761304,0.00022288792,0.0009087537,0.0003273292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010180507,0.00039504177,0.0005621923,0.0054721152,0.0060299686,0.015906533,0.0011020938,0.0034441918,0.009324361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010686315,0.00052160816,0.0004959478,0.005266035,0.010174089,0.0033116844,0.0019429252,0.004950437,0.0011569919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016052945,0.000014345168,0.00047763015,0.00012317034,0.000014665941,0.00023013486,0.0026126774,0.0006802375,0.00024204633,0.9547341,0.01747052,0.023384415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008629346,0.000013447218,0.002806767,0.00034592766,0.0000106015905,0.00019913816,0.0012235894,0.00033814574,0.00022820289,0.025913566,0.9688797,0.000032325857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25193256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1967051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25193256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034724634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01952094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50093234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765975750","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz001","title":"Parliamentary war powers and the role of international law in foreign troop deployment decisions: The US-led coalition against “Islamic State” in Iraq and Syria","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Jus ad bellum; Islam; Law; Legislature; Foreign policy; International law; Political economy; Use of force; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007863553429958913,"score_gpt":0.2689763972517284,"score_spread":0.26111284382176947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765975750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61144334,0.0022224027,0.0016004045,0.028775832,0.00023102104,0.00004133966,0.000022861956,0.00001847451,0.3556444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594814,0.00019255155,0.000083858904,0.00094347436,0.000044704022,0.000008480692,0.0000030845893,0.0000056408526,0.0027701205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987237,0.0067181513,0.00038287576,0.00067708903,0.0012672286,0.0037176737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803862,0.014408405,0.002237974,0.00043038753,0.0012898336,0.0012472509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01764177,0.00028386846,0.00039222513,0.0018593522,0.01844241,0.015867662,0.0010923429,0.004365121,0.0045996103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023868734,0.0004914744,0.00031963998,0.0019842358,0.03133044,0.005040057,0.008024453,0.0067167575,0.0004290346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011114602,0.00010615575,0.008915274,0.000068704416,0.000034815344,0.0012333634,0.23008406,0.00050431595,0.0007047963,0.73723996,0.0045336895,0.016463745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001647404,0.00023901598,0.06763723,0.00087846763,0.000120133314,0.0006283614,0.46835127,0.0018183977,0.0027277318,0.1131353,0.3441289,0.0001703338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034261465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054788284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034261465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01343341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083798515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09746671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897181300","doi":"10.1093/icon/moy022","title":"Unstable Constitutionalism—Law and Politics in South Asia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.025541900413855054,"score_gpt":0.3169803067568737,"score_spread":0.29143840634301865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897181300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18789539,0.034906037,0.0044942354,0.07643407,0.0004799809,0.000042198135,0.00008016365,0.00005090339,0.695617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784409,0.007905524,0.0008178671,0.0033055255,0.00018594705,0.000052700725,0.000035236328,0.00003706566,0.009219333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811685,0.0009640849,0.00010412101,0.00020720309,0.00027162407,0.00033609665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757546,0.0015343343,0.00027702044,0.00026108333,0.00016270136,0.00018948498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00396932,0.00029029947,0.00032234984,0.0018717544,0.010072495,0.011706221,0.00073969807,0.0014555986,0.0031354153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030870729,0.00026122842,0.00025377405,0.0037398767,0.031287562,0.008733178,0.0075117545,0.0051613706,0.00026304036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066486427,0.0000069523985,0.0007363811,0.00005787969,0.0000033340416,0.00016714791,0.04627111,0.000067900866,0.00015456133,0.94613385,0.0012036784,0.005190507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015468475,0.000033431254,0.0046322104,0.00061574014,0.000012409926,0.0003805263,0.06745372,0.00032863097,0.0005388907,0.685,0.24096562,0.00002339279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006541666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068160323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011706221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008219328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007828756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0596357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903239299","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa006","title":"Shadow constitutional review: The dark side of pre-enactment political review in Ireland and Japan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutionality; Politics; Institution; Judicial review; Parliament; Shadow (psychology); Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitution; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.030280441528426034,"score_gpt":0.3364541747398641,"score_spread":0.3061737332114381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903239299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82176596,0.0039213677,0.0027043195,0.029466558,0.00024371463,0.00016555889,0.00015067897,0.00006093505,0.14152087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313,0.0004611775,0.00050084,0.0020480265,0.00004830108,0.00004568604,0.000039828996,0.00002147462,0.003704586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96428585,0.012232166,0.002492213,0.0035829248,0.0075993263,0.0098076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91501564,0.032747988,0.014587378,0.008282585,0.02149916,0.007867293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028178765,0.00016383374,0.00090214494,0.0040319376,0.007858037,0.014619097,0.0015919458,0.002773349,0.0030023784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0638095,0.0005158977,0.0005140207,0.0044266023,0.02188116,0.0075643044,0.009395244,0.004048139,0.00026507888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058869174,0.00016118158,0.1385378,0.0010578695,0.00013593928,0.004724735,0.1889758,0.0010036174,0.0033637274,0.556066,0.019974004,0.085410535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019632194,0.0004172259,0.42014137,0.0012149635,0.0003209405,0.0012279535,0.24023083,0.002283183,0.0038252443,0.06609376,0.26351956,0.0005286875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14734909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18760262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14734909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031756036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040521454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29298282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922251482","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz082","title":"New Dominion constitutionalism at the twilight of the British Empire: An introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Constitutionalism; Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Politics; Democracy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013009220931433522,"score_gpt":0.2890994675627693,"score_spread":0.27609024663133575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922251482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03089614,0.27380353,0.0064931354,0.05401406,0.007912298,0.00007774708,0.00022804626,0.000056437788,0.6265185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6857631,0.15965413,0.0036094876,0.0064588,0.004634652,0.00011468991,0.0001985627,0.000119289696,0.13944724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984957,0.00068181317,0.00008446012,0.00013007519,0.00035524127,0.0002527667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870265,0.0008575032,0.0000503812,0.0000666144,0.00022574377,0.000097076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014744463,0.000304294,0.00044014264,0.0025459114,0.0050955573,0.006657569,0.0005189219,0.0019350997,0.006158415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025885124,0.00029929657,0.00029019406,0.0030313102,0.011740954,0.0035948935,0.0014011565,0.0038268021,0.0005207579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012268834,0.000019483678,0.0004704625,0.00021892962,0.000005342902,0.00023190977,0.01094915,0.00036176687,0.00022247357,0.93081313,0.028816426,0.027878577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030174658,0.000012285136,0.0023634543,0.0006331362,0.0000035694616,0.00015274211,0.0031910788,0.00025199424,0.00009296741,0.093404174,0.899869,0.000022557884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13249908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13350034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13249908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015180077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038599079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26345575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944083884","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz021","title":"Celebrating Canada’s sesquicentennial: Lessons from and for the world","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.01742221267194418,"score_gpt":0.29081130885272416,"score_spread":0.27338909618078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944083884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016078075,0.08792188,0.0012345472,0.45882955,0.004074105,0.000024384708,0.00059604965,0.00009435926,0.431147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6344391,0.07389887,0.0024781548,0.044462968,0.0009221341,0.00004088678,0.00044546352,0.000225821,0.24308655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972554,0.0003386003,0.000033956603,0.00017079934,0.00097280723,0.0012284706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976635,0.00028994298,0.000059399998,0.00007856458,0.0007766291,0.0011320644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025424033,0.0004711636,0.0004037522,0.0017132302,0.025935858,0.015141951,0.0014663929,0.0037139321,0.017714962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004997213,0.00026268626,0.00037227463,0.003506843,0.017792027,0.0051365984,0.0045748,0.004679057,0.0012518782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002836819,0.0000109624325,0.0012030167,0.00012593069,0.000010642313,0.0002729217,0.020594738,0.0001637833,0.00010073205,0.50727504,0.4063595,0.063854404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028861107,0.0000029979792,0.0020118116,0.000273823,0.0000046813193,0.000048850627,0.014843892,0.00004174369,0.000055509794,0.01663663,0.96605986,0.00001729826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99546105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105427146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105427146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22709891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7649311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955978599","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz035","title":"Secession and post-sovereign constitution-making after 1989: Catalonia, Kosovo, and Quebec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Sovereignty; Constitution; Declaration of independence; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sovereign state; Context (archaeology); Ratification; Politics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.005643424257650911,"score_gpt":0.28764833022882225,"score_spread":0.28200490597117134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955978599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416762,0.0014386944,0.00015645562,0.0061717886,0.000072241986,0.000039895207,0.0004008953,0.000009827698,0.05003403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907308,0.0003105823,0.00007663845,0.00039613427,0.000007448628,0.000011490852,0.00018082776,0.0000050711446,0.008280967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758804,0.00038140564,0.00007044496,0.00022049993,0.00028035254,0.0014593384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676347,0.0007563853,0.00044478726,0.00018451804,0.0012525168,0.0005983895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028845696,0.00017041573,0.00047468458,0.0011156485,0.008456372,0.005601403,0.0016852692,0.0016232568,0.005155936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005300814,0.0001998196,0.00032133912,0.0023792065,0.0056473254,0.001337054,0.0023825364,0.0035866362,0.000191081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009844904,0.00057968695,0.23578458,0.0002613493,0.00019401967,0.003796448,0.14793004,0.005210858,0.0019927663,0.5069862,0.03481411,0.061465424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014942826,0.0001416154,0.6955532,0.00038247922,0.000078870995,0.00016506431,0.10008534,0.0022811529,0.0009351749,0.005083847,0.19498792,0.00015585482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98587185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99084514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09424652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09424652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047047563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963996696","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz057","title":"Is the Commonwealth’s approach to rights constitutionalism exportable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Normative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.031378958354921875,"score_gpt":0.31864168189163056,"score_spread":0.2872627235367087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963996696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090500504,0.0014381062,0.028353337,0.14121652,0.0005823794,0.000056283672,0.000085843065,0.000054077842,0.737713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98494786,0.0005080606,0.0021688056,0.0036472343,0.00039403577,0.00005880925,0.00002501914,0.00003007194,0.008220087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814386,0.008576422,0.00075648364,0.0021958977,0.0049652467,0.0020673107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710586,0.017672257,0.0019934585,0.0046678665,0.0034716006,0.0011361917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022687728,0.00027150253,0.00094035774,0.002231152,0.00487935,0.012416415,0.0018925501,0.005471194,0.005933673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04254915,0.00035610897,0.00079422427,0.0016784064,0.053383037,0.0140878605,0.008432077,0.0090944385,0.00044695355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018425108,0.0000025729976,0.00009091511,0.0000037555185,0.0000013519673,0.000011223836,0.0002865245,0.00005110567,0.000012421024,0.99867404,0.00022700758,0.0006373587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011156757,0.0000096821095,0.00043605614,0.000051682127,0.0000062474487,0.000040538194,0.00057901314,0.00046234412,0.000061548955,0.9857987,0.012535264,0.000007757878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012717193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011131541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022687728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010983332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011009646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003053514","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz061","title":"Enforcing constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Normative; Power (physics); Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021840513729224884,"score_gpt":0.31999423877296934,"score_spread":0.29815372504374443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003053514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12825237,0.0016126717,0.17112698,0.030600883,0.00076716486,0.0005600257,0.00011824246,0.00049334316,0.6664683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96597034,0.00036905007,0.017476253,0.0029561943,0.0002267612,0.00019627673,0.000039706825,0.00008458132,0.012680781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95214933,0.020579882,0.0030512663,0.0066419938,0.013631573,0.0039459653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220653,0.0312931,0.007323658,0.023140207,0.01360996,0.0025678445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048682425,0.0004808405,0.0007645546,0.0023447738,0.007586254,0.011295213,0.0031750982,0.004765732,0.003161753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06873077,0.0007041553,0.0006376198,0.0015437631,0.047535803,0.007152426,0.010270376,0.008789692,0.0006869478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022497024,0.00001145524,0.00051848206,0.00001731444,0.000007090128,0.000039447248,0.0032391439,0.00028659715,0.0004893082,0.9901087,0.0008187488,0.0044613834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003610481,0.00005243799,0.0014628092,0.00023632824,0.000047759175,0.000102659294,0.0020492247,0.0018925464,0.0031155937,0.88309604,0.10784493,0.00006359402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013816582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014334854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048682425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007784447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020612184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25746036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026487392","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa018","title":"The African National Congress and the birth of constitutionalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.028517723792277825,"score_gpt":0.23397415235168784,"score_spread":0.20545642855941001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026487392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047297154,0.017847532,0.0013268831,0.091182254,0.00084901485,0.000028853494,0.00006563415,0.000014900673,0.8413878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95577645,0.0038279137,0.0005107159,0.0045326496,0.00030738354,0.000055684683,0.000017403421,0.000020821899,0.034950964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599946,0.00224485,0.00008754192,0.00042043693,0.000446906,0.00080083206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697053,0.0019760018,0.00020767035,0.00034820853,0.00026951643,0.0002280691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00793516,0.000251944,0.000388659,0.0016663651,0.013724404,0.007924022,0.0005538165,0.003461974,0.009592331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01126976,0.00024934424,0.00019685984,0.0017190203,0.027869565,0.009584439,0.005147829,0.006306172,0.0005115609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005862138,0.0000028954641,0.00007550108,0.000008701594,6.0230536e-7,0.000032384498,0.0022099765,0.000022759195,0.000016942597,0.99367815,0.0018866543,0.0020596036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020108224,0.000018606062,0.0015362033,0.0004928724,0.000005625517,0.00013958487,0.0071877427,0.0002007612,0.00030814606,0.49128354,0.4987901,0.000016679607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012191186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013463671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013724404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011483846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007216207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08332151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082811238","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa055","title":"Populist rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Rhetoric; Populism; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.035146984231668114,"score_gpt":0.3140154183536302,"score_spread":0.2788684341219621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082811238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26239952,0.005681885,0.019651229,0.073103,0.00087923853,0.000070977105,0.000064692176,0.00009665717,0.6380528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99378914,0.00024978613,0.00074285525,0.0014327877,0.00012030822,0.000014287343,0.0000050311473,0.00001602825,0.0036296383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887515,0.007889609,0.0002137076,0.0005696674,0.0019023279,0.0006732241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971764,0.023464425,0.0014421573,0.0013937295,0.00153073,0.0004049856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125541445,0.00036900697,0.00044340693,0.002000124,0.010425395,0.012008046,0.001538818,0.0046557244,0.003696648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021523882,0.00031444995,0.00021354154,0.0012644376,0.036386278,0.007133577,0.003911922,0.005273434,0.00039264056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010459616,0.000009803341,0.00030111396,0.000020101937,0.0000027126205,0.00019937316,0.009795245,0.00009622171,0.00011840711,0.9853513,0.0018401998,0.0022551664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005334429,0.00008025327,0.0009377088,0.00045584104,0.00002766204,0.000557329,0.021336675,0.0032582164,0.0029224015,0.83434933,0.13596812,0.000053186406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003170946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037981253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0125541445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067980858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024344085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066393435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121836781","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow012","title":"Bridging the transatlantic divide? The United States, the European Union, and the protection of privacy across borders","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; European union; Political science; National security; Agency (philosophy); The Right to Privacy; State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Business; International trade; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.030322966624632214,"score_gpt":0.31678589729862194,"score_spread":0.28646293067398976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121836781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07253615,0.09580263,0.007775963,0.41589475,0.0025700987,0.000018391102,0.000084455496,0.000047128568,0.40527046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90891516,0.021207443,0.0028820885,0.052140895,0.0010210858,0.00005239413,0.000053910728,0.000036385092,0.013690592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961029,0.0022607124,0.000098135184,0.00043824653,0.00042148793,0.0006784864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701047,0.001468631,0.00041513104,0.0003779458,0.00028196798,0.00044585552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052573895,0.00037019225,0.00053210225,0.0010899174,0.006518817,0.013894427,0.0009829876,0.009163395,0.0072840415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005623707,0.00025775857,0.00053785875,0.0015848865,0.017972244,0.022608187,0.007819424,0.007670991,0.0007061519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014463547,0.000011884756,0.00047036266,0.00002505704,0.00000573269,0.000074938886,0.0038976346,0.00006207416,0.000055721408,0.98005325,0.0036608202,0.01166808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015931777,0.000051362236,0.0024590604,0.0014927961,0.000026023257,0.00028496163,0.028804488,0.00029045358,0.00031507743,0.656158,0.31006265,0.000039263603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006388636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007095747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013894427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002733997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002918528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027804017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127572305","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa086","title":"Federalism’s radical potential","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Federalism; Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; New Federalism; State (computer science); Ideology; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.024512891718684024,"score_gpt":0.312596124226245,"score_spread":0.28808323250756096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127572305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056815356,0.0051851743,0.054381043,0.10473399,0.0014440335,0.00006555086,0.00010398261,0.00019226914,0.7770786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860293,0.0005446848,0.0027090926,0.0025458138,0.00048447071,0.000048159825,0.000018467843,0.00002838264,0.0075915223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375784,0.0033065889,0.00016042557,0.00092580315,0.0010600041,0.0007893698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934918,0.003105569,0.00053495506,0.0014100508,0.00093355676,0.00052393094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009017134,0.0002288058,0.00046543885,0.001226629,0.0069011217,0.0062249047,0.00080268143,0.0031450193,0.0045372983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012785342,0.0002729836,0.00050616165,0.000770967,0.034165602,0.005966578,0.0054567694,0.0058134687,0.0005654616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024671956,0.0000020710943,0.000062594474,0.0000045830375,0.000001574069,0.0000064225287,0.00029224556,0.00006964177,0.00002135745,0.9975611,0.000850827,0.0011251603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007736284,0.000008028782,0.00019189871,0.00003421051,0.000004329402,0.000023967434,0.00020519044,0.0003181002,0.000103584,0.9670556,0.032038536,0.000008728185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034571919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037633625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009017134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058015725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048675234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04768777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148691272","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab019","title":"“It’s the political economy . . .!” A moment of truth for the eurozone and the EU","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Monetary and Fiscal Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Garron Family Cancer Centre","keywords":"Transformative learning; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Economic and monetary union; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Sociology; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.03262337803121635,"score_gpt":0.24338603912774026,"score_spread":0.21076266109652392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148691272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052802417,0.020227438,0.008716173,0.7100344,0.0047411337,0.000015057774,0.00010918681,0.000087643006,0.20326664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282235,0.0036103094,0.0015542665,0.046922434,0.001934565,0.000022746308,0.000044000903,0.00004674661,0.017641537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681574,0.002002507,0.00010954822,0.00028931448,0.00042389493,0.00035908088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974843,0.0014765674,0.00020549307,0.00034284906,0.00032924558,0.00016145618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005295569,0.00020840227,0.0003047033,0.0006712736,0.0032460084,0.009008161,0.00049399544,0.0048203412,0.0036817295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112817325,0.00015307804,0.00026782145,0.00074532937,0.019189958,0.0065962933,0.002186787,0.005107842,0.00041326546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001354679,0.000003588967,0.00015316372,0.000011379768,0.0000023773123,0.000034320004,0.0010457074,0.00016760414,0.00006666712,0.9824923,0.0115397265,0.004469642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016135178,0.00003035953,0.0013316921,0.00032954363,0.000010451567,0.0000964673,0.006191378,0.00045407354,0.00047238203,0.60378647,0.38725463,0.000026431713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047339085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035803108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009008161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030234063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028006017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149844019","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab102","title":"Comparative law at the heart of immigration law: Criminal inadmissibility and conjugal immigration in Canada and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Law; Criminal law; Comparative law; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.021672226556005276,"score_gpt":0.31211759102192743,"score_spread":0.2904453644659222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149844019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474692,0.013631175,0.0007696937,0.01777192,0.00020101374,0.000069408954,0.0004646865,0.000019801217,0.2196031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921897,0.002124699,0.00023434417,0.00059617334,0.000014760863,0.000013203342,0.00009063086,0.000007693593,0.00472865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963038,0.00081734336,0.000099198594,0.00027973275,0.0010294021,0.0014706402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993255,0.002127112,0.00042152562,0.00020627031,0.0028774063,0.0011127169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033451207,0.00022981326,0.0005380974,0.00797912,0.02564873,0.008199973,0.0016816172,0.0015708423,0.005809039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014442632,0.00022344086,0.00030000822,0.012248126,0.019899385,0.0029567205,0.0044865035,0.0027884673,0.00013539627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013097911,0.00014309767,0.09956683,0.00029095451,0.00007371947,0.0014390621,0.21080908,0.0009556048,0.00030551993,0.5971643,0.01685258,0.072268344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027420178,0.00006451868,0.25831392,0.0014198443,0.0001175954,0.00049816375,0.5761921,0.0011960223,0.0004967078,0.029558677,0.13197823,0.0001368159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14993688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14993688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13766763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98595273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160417934","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab029","title":"The political conception of the legal person: A reply to Gila Stopler","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Politics; Adversary; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.053092433875379784,"score_gpt":0.3637367400414045,"score_spread":0.31064430616602473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160417934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019363817,0.0037547403,0.00033817277,0.9871423,0.0011989037,0.000003039278,0.000010871997,0.0000067801075,0.005608813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22960593,0.0077871312,0.0009247822,0.7392197,0.008159548,0.000078971876,0.000029392235,0.000115645904,0.0140788825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914949,0.0056962715,0.00019774797,0.00087767583,0.001116448,0.00061699515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667264,0.028490782,0.00078873493,0.0006406875,0.002113586,0.0012398702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012796812,0.0006342427,0.0012407623,0.0015311182,0.011029371,0.009951446,0.0028564418,0.03116719,0.004444344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637102,0.00062569184,0.0005905131,0.0013517515,0.047891524,0.015358043,0.005972243,0.03425796,0.0012127339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342274,0.000027647442,0.00020525104,0.00007653341,0.000008631894,0.0003344881,0.014782101,0.00012472004,0.000062443665,0.7560154,0.2252336,0.0030949614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006177795,0.00003519287,0.0005328333,0.00091372285,0.000016202255,0.00039713862,0.025509778,0.00061670376,0.0003246192,0.5230433,0.44846055,0.00008830357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015021802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011793732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03116719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00957828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005771528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06949556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163025946","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab041","title":"Ely in the world: The global legacy of Democracy and Distrust forty years on","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sketch; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.02208313572474602,"score_gpt":0.3365698722796519,"score_spread":0.3144867365549059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163025946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1252499,0.09545368,0.0025872998,0.41904095,0.0017476154,0.00001358877,0.00017591256,0.0000557106,0.35567537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93493396,0.020651478,0.000491041,0.021577287,0.0012406519,0.000016625618,0.000049135695,0.000065939465,0.020973843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800974,0.0009111855,0.000042498043,0.00031443278,0.00031868424,0.00040347772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996358,0.0021970752,0.00030308662,0.00037800078,0.0004357298,0.00032805122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037298666,0.00020601723,0.00042398114,0.0015402223,0.0048424355,0.0075380714,0.00032055855,0.0019319417,0.005177907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045232605,0.00017163061,0.0001846486,0.00203331,0.018731419,0.0074683377,0.004552104,0.0043552783,0.00036611178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040737028,0.000022754544,0.0020638218,0.00008881788,0.000014841796,0.00024582693,0.030379798,0.0003054437,0.00009858246,0.88660914,0.031948943,0.04818122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012037258,0.000028559509,0.0047468985,0.0005953627,0.000011051616,0.00016780857,0.014508129,0.00021469595,0.00021453343,0.23097338,0.7484966,0.000030920208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009073655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012696357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009073655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058144797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024572976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042187214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172672511","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab046","title":"Dialogue and distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distrust; Context (archaeology); Law; Skepticism; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016983065412624468,"score_gpt":0.2754866363459421,"score_spread":0.25850357093331766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172672511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09078228,0.01017982,0.0038696765,0.3774989,0.0010111901,0.00009492827,0.00012455543,0.000070533126,0.5163682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93755865,0.0023812093,0.0011852861,0.021018352,0.0002893096,0.000031559077,0.000020402826,0.000042275675,0.037472945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98014015,0.006086208,0.0003136319,0.0016446173,0.007538128,0.0042772777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945,0.01826784,0.001021225,0.00094591704,0.007833139,0.002481886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01524815,0.00031182254,0.000567433,0.0027028737,0.040227734,0.015357493,0.0020670993,0.0074533303,0.0062468746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025858693,0.00046756127,0.00039496814,0.0026067721,0.054609515,0.005846817,0.0058347033,0.00914376,0.00029488403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023463883,0.000022715963,0.0007771204,0.000029570296,0.0000060743055,0.00023315781,0.03399057,0.00041218117,0.00011663356,0.9282325,0.025925728,0.010230254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007282083,0.000044441273,0.0062080882,0.000442387,0.000039385402,0.00019833645,0.060654875,0.0022841124,0.0008281691,0.26999024,0.65893644,0.00030083852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12991776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12991776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12717168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94262373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179810729","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab064","title":"Audit culture of human rights as “governmentality”?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Field (mathematics); Audit; Political science; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.019875944237303683,"score_gpt":0.3394946442671139,"score_spread":0.3196187000298102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179810729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13373606,0.003549734,0.015973262,0.41902596,0.0012324732,0.000045769964,0.000051839488,0.00012954145,0.42625543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99269545,0.00022876181,0.0004226314,0.004257697,0.00015771254,0.000011934306,0.0000045964616,0.000017566717,0.0022036755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97736436,0.017060187,0.00047244376,0.0011961476,0.0027618585,0.0011448999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753125,0.014467851,0.002630468,0.0033171119,0.0028116142,0.0014603833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020221965,0.00018210545,0.00033230442,0.00121566,0.004925742,0.015543379,0.0010284524,0.003310136,0.002910177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02831191,0.00023875218,0.00018560354,0.0011982168,0.077722214,0.010436022,0.005493741,0.0062447884,0.00028367314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043817013,0.000007134036,0.00030821303,0.000009082829,0.0000016575311,0.000013608544,0.0071445866,0.000037607268,0.000045779107,0.9880013,0.001904016,0.0025225498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014773734,0.00003193376,0.0017811467,0.00023292883,0.000009090816,0.000080441336,0.023023112,0.0006172991,0.0006517517,0.86467713,0.10884475,0.000035720106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063254084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033959057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020221965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076203234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006232564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10694522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198643327","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac040","title":"Para-constitutional engineering and federalism: Informal constitutional change through intergovernmental agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislature; Constitution; Federalism; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Compromise; Constitutional review; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03548451119361003,"score_gpt":0.30479175567726274,"score_spread":0.26930724448365273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198643327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2251631,0.0017544213,0.13935065,0.020682607,0.00017725101,0.00014453141,0.000059093785,0.00020314955,0.61246514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453676,0.000102647165,0.0018760554,0.0002463841,0.000016057635,0.000023468925,0.0000057882016,0.000011279634,0.0031816203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887167,0.006518818,0.00029265296,0.0009310876,0.0020295284,0.0015111956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895811,0.005480133,0.0012944571,0.002297709,0.00096266373,0.0003839934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00927698,0.00021903715,0.0003670711,0.0011291578,0.006508776,0.007952867,0.0014503567,0.0027507767,0.0040326887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014068594,0.00021262527,0.00043314009,0.0016323521,0.053115793,0.0063600196,0.0056805583,0.0044229343,0.00019266715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031989123,0.0000043565906,0.00021772267,0.000007961693,0.0000024053802,0.000053012118,0.0016793478,0.00050556805,0.00009412367,0.9957165,0.00013540604,0.0015803064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001977958,0.000025235167,0.0023822512,0.000107845415,0.000015817057,0.00010711796,0.0041709216,0.0035234848,0.000605084,0.9337064,0.05530542,0.00003068109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045772452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058351733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045772452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014189539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010387804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10295284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213086076","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab129","title":"Judicial amendment and our constitutional lives: A reply to Emmett Macfarlane","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Secession; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional theory; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Normative; Judicial review; Originalism; Judicial restraint; Constitutional interpretation; Judicial activism; Constitutional amendment; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03469044570718269,"score_gpt":0.3524611504676337,"score_spread":0.317770704760451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213086076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042414474,0.012370863,0.00070746127,0.96137285,0.0020872974,0.000004995902,0.000026494161,0.000009298152,0.019179326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5027755,0.018228315,0.0013145572,0.4444746,0.011972593,0.00006180387,0.000051843745,0.00010825463,0.021012474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961824,0.006748622,0.00021834133,0.0010556933,0.001592232,0.0007667671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636801,0.030732226,0.0008311565,0.0010104923,0.0027380586,0.0010079544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01400794,0.000412732,0.0008679818,0.0014093784,0.0128798755,0.008983161,0.0023682162,0.02153325,0.0052195317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03467939,0.00046048558,0.0005429276,0.0017419652,0.04853342,0.0144026205,0.0050362735,0.02834322,0.00069338037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018738088,0.000011736939,0.00010874897,0.00005263744,0.000004796312,0.00021215703,0.017318163,0.00013099029,0.000046135257,0.87391275,0.1045928,0.0035902997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002926553,0.000019544843,0.00043545323,0.00066468347,0.0000076531405,0.00027143495,0.017920066,0.00030603967,0.00020196856,0.3698644,0.61021906,0.00006051134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044779353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03227259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044779353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0168804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008391588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12247646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213326079","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab127","title":"Judicial amendment of the constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Constitutional amendment; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Politics; Original intent; Extant taxon; Originalism; Invocation; Constitutional law; Amendment; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444199024478361,"score_gpt":0.31829335709583545,"score_spread":0.29385136685105184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213326079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029501095,0.0019900675,0.010775675,0.01624228,0.00078249344,0.0001316079,0.000101248224,0.000055060827,0.9404204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479286,0.0007347145,0.0029760976,0.0041548107,0.00037604093,0.00009859228,0.000072619914,0.000032860848,0.04362559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976254,0.008611726,0.0008073123,0.0022659358,0.0077744494,0.004286524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664063,0.007030041,0.0007438329,0.0019175305,0.0033267264,0.00034136232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244688,0.00033464303,0.00063986186,0.0019744385,0.0088114,0.010683214,0.0022816567,0.0062249103,0.0049787676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027489232,0.0003757766,0.0006663377,0.0016730258,0.033124633,0.0032603678,0.0035172445,0.009829224,0.00073298655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021553433,0.000002273164,0.00008654352,0.00000598916,0.000001054061,0.000037119247,0.0006152771,0.000066798646,0.00003754437,0.9972621,0.0010198059,0.000863283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003783503,0.00004512874,0.0018345246,0.00050594215,0.00003732583,0.00020475773,0.0027916124,0.0014157529,0.0011073663,0.6708132,0.32114115,0.00006543589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05084603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05678328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05084603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015661282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02348571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11363113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236603093","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor073","title":"10 x 10","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harassment; Law; Pornography; Verdict; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Criminology","score_opus":0.03962335443621007,"score_gpt":0.35380493360002174,"score_spread":0.3141815791638117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236603093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044392562,0.0013952496,0.00066327566,0.0025598113,0.0037572428,0.00013133929,0.000840984,0.0005923333,0.9896158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002007312,0.0012333834,0.00048394696,0.0012568458,0.00061476417,0.00006231998,0.0009468772,0.00023062211,0.9931639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913967,0.00013620847,0.00004015984,0.00022971496,0.00031250232,0.00014174184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990343,0.000112665155,0.00004911159,0.00016251762,0.0003667414,0.00027474263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062764133,0.0012261787,0.00071316166,0.0015317643,0.0018527525,0.00914344,0.0014912935,0.0032732312,0.86602527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020718775,0.0004555286,0.00088599813,0.0013709886,0.001008271,0.0044932836,0.004386797,0.0025004179,0.7831927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042549076,0.00006464786,0.00043270865,0.00018956898,0.00000786294,0.000097454526,0.00016110252,0.00007832663,0.00036541425,0.018187983,0.86829937,0.11207311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004771935,0.000014841324,0.0002492555,0.00011311005,0.0000015643461,0.00009544199,0.00012003458,0.000026073629,0.000046224264,0.0007203113,0.99860424,0.000004111308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004330749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047910227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13397473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018642357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020549335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242508267","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor062","title":"10 x 10","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Economic Justice; Democracy; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.023190175728025487,"score_gpt":0.32403834744224586,"score_spread":0.30084817171422035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242508267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034626652,0.0017844838,0.00044661068,0.004176722,0.003599042,0.00008906015,0.0007176335,0.00024353556,0.98859674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021021352,0.001247553,0.00030956892,0.001163932,0.0006433172,0.00004562089,0.00068274984,0.000116463365,0.99368864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905163,0.00016946807,0.000038962786,0.0002503069,0.00033234866,0.00015725891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992482,0.000091523514,0.000047268164,0.00010560486,0.00029573892,0.00021152002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069377536,0.0010455681,0.0006760242,0.0012794927,0.0021386202,0.0075970273,0.0013128852,0.002828019,0.74341536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017245372,0.00039335186,0.00067121,0.0014268162,0.001062148,0.003925625,0.0038444865,0.0022842034,0.6396133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034261517,0.000041237356,0.00033930567,0.00014386486,0.000005318238,0.000078682955,0.00018846765,0.00005056286,0.00020621196,0.04308844,0.867443,0.08838061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028372851,0.00001046211,0.0001889962,0.0000672491,9.0744084e-7,0.00005389361,0.00009698759,0.0000150903015,0.000026741554,0.001001107,0.9985328,0.0000029092714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005186671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067904918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74341536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024483115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002294163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246219574","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.163","title":"Transitional justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02867599649337276,"score_gpt":0.24378825332520843,"score_spread":0.21511225683183566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246219574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006561953,0.0009924008,0.0022851627,0.018432664,0.000896103,0.000059300623,0.00008953366,0.000054356107,0.97062856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4260114,0.0008752153,0.0015044585,0.015851412,0.00068313855,0.00018699287,0.00014820362,0.00012221419,0.55461687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746597,0.0005752749,0.00008801833,0.00051772717,0.00047231512,0.00088068994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988262,0.00034123592,0.000059901475,0.0002733787,0.00023048477,0.0002687308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025004141,0.00031744677,0.00047367276,0.0010402243,0.013254634,0.009519562,0.0014896571,0.0054324204,0.057959754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066524534,0.00027874042,0.00049950456,0.0008739916,0.008485107,0.0054037543,0.0052515003,0.0074916454,0.0064373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060227508,0.000015704789,0.000091915324,0.000007416607,0.0000014491993,0.000036262478,0.0010604279,0.000026396714,0.000027812766,0.9634841,0.028993146,0.0062492797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013009789,0.000017501776,0.00060187385,0.00011889569,0.00000790471,0.00009471194,0.003988159,0.00017680299,0.00023270755,0.49018976,0.5045469,0.000011714133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009745952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019199342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057959754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004049583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00837558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19389468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255395321","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz056","title":"Dialogic remedies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Declaration; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.02327899340654451,"score_gpt":0.3129759707294164,"score_spread":0.2896969773228719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255395321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016666539,0.0021848308,0.08295734,0.052687753,0.0011772349,0.0004893007,0.00017147462,0.00037903446,0.8432864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024545,0.00086417684,0.020770999,0.010552299,0.0007459228,0.0005166206,0.00009147534,0.000108047556,0.06389599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97199076,0.01141323,0.0018503458,0.0048991423,0.0070022945,0.0028442931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97118044,0.015231818,0.002220186,0.005402706,0.004465046,0.001499841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0235301,0.00067555014,0.000949631,0.0020736745,0.010056143,0.00944159,0.0033206472,0.008856638,0.024842313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04378871,0.00050840847,0.001012738,0.0010265983,0.029508509,0.014716538,0.010237062,0.011139055,0.0019243393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046585587,0.00001950664,0.000083666455,0.000029117717,0.0000038976054,0.000040087256,0.00092816306,0.0001629102,0.00007661772,0.991527,0.0022336582,0.004890782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041436746,0.00005891046,0.00028689604,0.00023755386,0.000024032575,0.000117503405,0.0013249203,0.0010390428,0.00063730445,0.8253117,0.17087853,0.00004212329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033862847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004767777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024842313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009260556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01433063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12444055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285201175","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac034","title":"The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutionalism; Executive power; Political science; Power (physics); Executive order; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.025721722348032324,"score_gpt":0.31601420501732164,"score_spread":0.2902924826692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285201175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55653965,0.004289099,0.01271608,0.03898272,0.00015985298,0.000066462104,0.00006857877,0.000042180785,0.38713536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768853,0.00017422542,0.00038520974,0.00029192993,0.000019135547,0.00000731831,0.0000038818353,0.000006251843,0.0014235578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817084,0.013666954,0.0004013914,0.0011711037,0.0014099834,0.0016421754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94047046,0.04650658,0.005292717,0.002919982,0.0030584256,0.0017517636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024644567,0.00015687941,0.00038727617,0.0030433482,0.0052044704,0.01097082,0.0013762055,0.002363622,0.0056425184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05479774,0.00029777328,0.00018476888,0.0028945229,0.065804616,0.009837572,0.0044397893,0.0026663078,0.00020458453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002747729,0.000023575732,0.0053163557,0.00003798808,0.0000075062517,0.00011953521,0.02059853,0.00041503302,0.0001076114,0.9652262,0.000761063,0.00735918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000867065,0.0001402741,0.04876743,0.0007238194,0.000057893983,0.00019132887,0.07495466,0.0023703089,0.0014715573,0.75010693,0.1210196,0.00010943966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025759548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051408373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025759548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016707461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008826177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1303345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309326512","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac087","title":"Against settlement before the European Court of Human Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Isaac Newton Trust; York University","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human rights; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.015501370567499426,"score_gpt":0.30518857481918427,"score_spread":0.2896872042516848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309326512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49374768,0.0036297184,0.030090047,0.040494695,0.0015707953,0.00051870715,0.00026530438,0.0002919339,0.4293912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500265,0.00043083687,0.0018014348,0.0059995083,0.00026713882,0.00007842902,0.00005787418,0.000041684092,0.016320435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92439896,0.041583043,0.0049042604,0.006907151,0.014678893,0.007527604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472424,0.0350324,0.0059236386,0.005442751,0.00450084,0.0018579197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070289545,0.00045090215,0.00078530365,0.0026332112,0.010219298,0.01501388,0.0018591868,0.0079384,0.010155944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08399366,0.00051882095,0.00094048993,0.0033111037,0.011929121,0.006705149,0.012463238,0.008678168,0.0017075902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011327523,0.000100761565,0.009622244,0.00009028729,0.000043701446,0.0021878614,0.01360016,0.0006002675,0.0009811764,0.91526693,0.019885574,0.037507698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002542132,0.0006275203,0.041300032,0.0012325671,0.00022548735,0.004607724,0.052336805,0.0048494753,0.008495727,0.2708372,0.6149175,0.00031582147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049975114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00673465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070289545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038335812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008367145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3717311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319165491","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad001","title":"Andrej Lang, Review of Afroditi Marketou, Local Meanings of Proportionality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Soviet and Russian History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016182067158931716,"score_gpt":0.31299320944718145,"score_spread":0.29681114228824973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319165491","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005463731,0.9730796,0.000074320546,0.017760448,0.004717245,0.0000034688587,0.00002844175,0.0000057360053,0.0042760414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002406827,0.9636974,0.00015940252,0.019505128,0.008339488,0.000018727536,0.00007860211,0.000021423062,0.0057730423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987644,0.00038268036,0.0001318121,0.00021793327,0.00043081588,0.00007247844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686074,0.0019447526,0.00022135077,0.00009128012,0.0007230923,0.00015871799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023079265,0.00083177147,0.00094207906,0.004819234,0.0014466199,0.0031952003,0.0016765194,0.0035448843,0.011114967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068081734,0.00043000068,0.00033702044,0.005345073,0.0033395723,0.0068274722,0.0015774906,0.0045344178,0.006386665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023462308,0.000031426025,0.00021335283,0.0035089608,0.0000212154,0.00010258965,0.00050101377,0.00011642227,0.00008736889,0.04467,0.79156095,0.15916325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003815633,0.000004709086,0.00041282363,0.0020171395,0.000005023349,0.00011026491,0.00007677168,0.000012634468,0.000017811662,0.0028546604,0.9944787,0.0000055357636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007294911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011457991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011114967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038762046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039797286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037183225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381431771","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad025","title":"Theorizing about the executive in the modern state","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Plural; Law; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Judicial review; Law and economics; Democracy; Executive branch; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03773854049261411,"score_gpt":0.3417221363990461,"score_spread":0.303983595906432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381431771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061743595,0.020254353,0.018071068,0.08513358,0.00033340455,0.000021293403,0.00005952783,0.00004634343,0.8143369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809472,0.0041754073,0.0012595477,0.0024871281,0.00040841388,0.000018392782,0.00002564374,0.000012636991,0.010665718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.0004922138,0.000021271837,0.00010216472,0.00016713861,0.000108718006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889755,0.00067073316,0.000110163266,0.000094038216,0.00013727492,0.00009016853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020003715,0.00021216637,0.00020176148,0.001752743,0.0020990467,0.00501402,0.0005761349,0.0015435148,0.005219757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018995391,0.00014262498,0.0002393708,0.0016254515,0.018287681,0.0056884983,0.0016207811,0.0020629282,0.00030749672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.025652e-7,0.0000019970976,0.000075315904,0.000004785756,5.964766e-7,0.000007727875,0.00045571427,0.00010503221,0.000007494279,0.9982944,0.00048314195,0.0005630218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004353978,0.0000047586946,0.00039802876,0.0000988405,0.0000034047441,0.00002441691,0.0013036052,0.00053297443,0.0000381344,0.9593684,0.038219232,0.0000038443222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004404067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005219757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004770253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03461075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392581948","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae012","title":"The consensus-clarifying role of deliberative mini-publics in constitutional amendment: A reply to Oran Doyle and Rachael Walsh","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Political science; Publics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.018387664899195546,"score_gpt":0.32427968092069964,"score_spread":0.3058920160215041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392581948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007384062,0.0023614096,0.0011081444,0.990473,0.0018506638,0.000006430618,0.000008416626,0.000012901068,0.0034406064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13186471,0.0044103255,0.0037107882,0.8411189,0.011420357,0.00015750775,0.000019772058,0.00014417434,0.0071534305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9167178,0.05803336,0.0028834331,0.008888379,0.009542852,0.0039342083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74089795,0.22679245,0.0056894766,0.008944455,0.013047409,0.004628232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10039642,0.00093421503,0.002047441,0.0017924664,0.013791304,0.016582388,0.008503356,0.06218455,0.0063807312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16129933,0.0011318194,0.0021964305,0.001847841,0.09676817,0.04270773,0.013293107,0.07888426,0.0024260588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007058839,0.000034238543,0.00019465186,0.0001931308,0.000017393446,0.0003435941,0.011223786,0.00034824153,0.00007785388,0.84426713,0.13660352,0.0066258237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011126429,0.00004342404,0.00024363327,0.0007502977,0.000014690661,0.00019395066,0.0099981995,0.0008118055,0.0003612965,0.6465526,0.3407663,0.00015250639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010454099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007935378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10039642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016662415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154254725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53095335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401857849","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae036","title":"The normative development of laws on asset preservation and confiscation: An examination of emerging best practices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confiscation; Normative; Asset (computer security); Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.07750610510110867,"score_gpt":0.3372916704582022,"score_spread":0.2597855653570935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401857849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035301205,0.027701741,0.15370542,0.31780457,0.0018689986,0.0005080022,0.00014518034,0.00036644153,0.46259847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8263154,0.018031405,0.108337715,0.031202853,0.001108835,0.00083996565,0.00017521829,0.00023309058,0.01375548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8889877,0.04803755,0.0090000555,0.006892762,0.042925,0.004156893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73469365,0.16826741,0.012016974,0.026174186,0.055693112,0.0031546084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16361167,0.00067736756,0.001070672,0.008391365,0.007973203,0.028821656,0.007458119,0.014296072,0.0022280505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15134107,0.0013545009,0.0010542696,0.005390779,0.063153066,0.018295426,0.007625481,0.020335745,0.0004533456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002789586,0.000024955647,0.00016675275,0.000068787616,0.000003114392,0.000035729045,0.002178687,0.0004143373,0.00006736187,0.986938,0.0019115801,0.008187896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019875639,0.00005593154,0.0008555706,0.0037118525,0.000022697632,0.00018443307,0.0065190634,0.0035543183,0.0012429545,0.8124802,0.17126547,0.000087693006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023558076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018928284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16361167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026476283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052280523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8652715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402666796","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae047","title":"Care as a constitutional value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019824332326893703,"score_gpt":0.3464563101381688,"score_spread":0.3266319778112751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402666796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026290622,0.0038844713,0.021553775,0.074218914,0.0009933709,0.00008643475,0.00010375663,0.000056137633,0.8728125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665621,0.0012694056,0.0032352898,0.008044696,0.00060341315,0.00008835714,0.00005002511,0.000027671975,0.020118982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874774,0.0061056996,0.00048498996,0.001498731,0.00271819,0.0017149999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073505,0.004967723,0.0005832868,0.0015109187,0.0015963869,0.0006065506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010376036,0.00033849938,0.0005142701,0.0013525647,0.00719185,0.011858103,0.001337184,0.0059588174,0.0059923492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014981061,0.0002882528,0.00057092647,0.0010289003,0.06298975,0.006682727,0.006703118,0.0070992713,0.00055383606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013182218,0.0000021998155,0.000051647676,0.0000049381565,8.3909384e-7,0.00001331696,0.00043541918,0.0000466206,0.000019364608,0.9980762,0.00048944127,0.0008587398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014342285,0.000034851106,0.0005629465,0.0003059486,0.000021717693,0.000110679284,0.0019484898,0.00043724256,0.00036670547,0.854458,0.14170866,0.000030428071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015611271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015281472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015611271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013087527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013464887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09495711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403197589","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae039","title":"In this issue; Guest Editorial: Unsexing scholarship? Towards better citation and citizenship practices in global public law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Citizenship; Citation; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05802698424311658,"score_gpt":0.3858343987905346,"score_spread":0.327807414547418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403197589","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000091825976,0.0036060791,0.000090123096,0.097302474,0.8958182,0.000011678528,0.000031800282,0.000043009084,0.003004715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009121157,0.0023305032,0.000047458612,0.018108523,0.9728094,0.0000115813555,0.000013862337,0.00003753054,0.005729033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940982,0.0010697054,0.0005358225,0.00092070963,0.0028418696,0.0005338009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97700727,0.011891168,0.0014063428,0.00080680725,0.0055685868,0.0033198479],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005785856,0.002271987,0.00191123,0.0036136827,0.006013193,0.017429095,0.0035252941,0.013896575,0.020746605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026871394,0.00066410133,0.0014123417,0.0020471155,0.0052501704,0.008490581,0.0033828039,0.018781584,0.008705115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011381757,0.000014846436,0.000045288336,0.00009159906,0.00000423991,0.000057539153,0.00007518704,0.000012375759,0.0000394205,0.0013682501,0.9940435,0.0042365175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019021136,0.00003130691,0.00039804308,0.0005007157,0.000018032119,0.000112928086,0.00045151767,0.0001206687,0.00011472439,0.0038261071,0.99438643,0.000020590773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014921553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002943315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004055195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037209718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06940436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411445941","doi":"10.1093/icon/moag059","title":"Causation and Exposition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Causation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.01927299086817125,"score_gpt":0.2632278875830246,"score_spread":0.24395489671485338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411445941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002031178,0.011583129,0.029996278,0.01910843,0.0028657161,0.00004664374,0.00037922038,0.00015066036,0.9338386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2635762,0.0133029325,0.01055709,0.009103545,0.007360691,0.00050039805,0.000582703,0.00033534528,0.69468105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910307,0.00040054353,0.00003676104,0.00018723999,0.00019204858,0.00008034006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989773,0.0005706675,0.000060492293,0.00020042644,0.00015234543,0.000038837246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013369527,0.0007503926,0.0006614055,0.0021541826,0.0027845586,0.00324187,0.0010282506,0.0027053528,0.04154293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030432716,0.00038775362,0.0007124192,0.001619504,0.0052315905,0.0037964282,0.001684548,0.0035998162,0.0083509395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4790555e-7,0.000002445907,0.000013727042,0.0000068428258,0.0000010896138,0.0000056789645,0.000051720115,0.000021976057,0.000007742373,0.99089545,0.007990029,0.0010026747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025490983,0.0000035596668,0.00007983281,0.000031206382,0.0000041852663,0.000039074588,0.00006412386,0.0001583069,0.000035383422,0.85921043,0.14036901,0.0000022793884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028920206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026188928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04154293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024030507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012973382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1389749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411724707","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaf021","title":"Chief justices and democratic resilience: Judicial leadership in times of constitutional crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04276085852462981,"score_gpt":0.3309494178866684,"score_spread":0.2881885593620386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411724707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12501322,0.025732404,0.0023791518,0.60353875,0.0072525204,0.000046307054,0.000049653023,0.00009738905,0.23589055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640074,0.0038142353,0.00027518085,0.017160408,0.0020338825,0.000029834084,0.00001619907,0.000042963296,0.012619887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870162,0.007299588,0.00025661255,0.00086350425,0.0010146436,0.0035495353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98774976,0.0051985662,0.0014244247,0.00046844553,0.0008242405,0.004334622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092346,0.00033454382,0.00044604723,0.00212255,0.022787044,0.02265874,0.0020775453,0.0051702545,0.0075549386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020485898,0.00041188597,0.00037883938,0.0019366662,0.040391397,0.011485676,0.013110969,0.0105012385,0.0006339191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052901192,0.000048955615,0.0026024445,0.00012301198,0.000018751123,0.001095129,0.19592075,0.00026678538,0.00015622188,0.68813825,0.08328893,0.02828786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003976928,0.0000478432,0.004410981,0.0003600936,0.000012748268,0.00034791458,0.26328754,0.00036808377,0.00014964418,0.17555949,0.5553526,0.000063192376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008353428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0180981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022787044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101343235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0119633805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07353002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7131827772","doi":"10.1093/icon/moag001","title":"Incapacitating, or something else? Unpacking Australian amendment culture in the First Nations Voice Referendum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Griffith University; Central Queensland University; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutional amendment; Politics; Openness to experience; Meaning (existential); Amendment; Constitutional theory; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.061040335759728656,"score_gpt":0.39981306556717644,"score_spread":0.33877272980744777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7131827772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96296227,0.00032305077,0.0010094736,0.0052602654,0.000054885193,0.000016010736,0.000012425572,0.0000036420809,0.03035793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992736,0.00005935022,0.00009447677,0.00014656129,0.0000048490547,0.0000048040197,0.0000023299058,0.0000017865881,0.0004121199],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837699,0.0119975135,0.0004140052,0.0006107282,0.0020261065,0.0011817261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96569145,0.021052727,0.006588832,0.0021323918,0.003016476,0.0015181673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018187163,0.00013089343,0.000295299,0.0018641825,0.006558108,0.0053993026,0.0010091907,0.0011063052,0.00250697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04355616,0.0002787035,0.00021057764,0.0023361538,0.016770205,0.004372914,0.0056859395,0.0034935176,0.00011765772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049493447,0.00010260711,0.07838183,0.0001275749,0.000023931825,0.00046690775,0.76039827,0.00021019106,0.0008311097,0.13047601,0.0010159946,0.02791604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069511093,0.0001712481,0.24020217,0.00054421916,0.000029710647,0.00023715434,0.6824434,0.0013041387,0.0009493432,0.023934841,0.050108634,0.00006817375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029345185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037785962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029345185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070942584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044992534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096184075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}