{"meta":{"query_hash":"04020041db82","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law"},"cohort_total":81,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":81,"exported":81,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/04020041db82","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Constitutional+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1964565917","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.3.534","title":"Ukraine: Constitutional Court invalidates ban on Communist Party","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Political science; Ukrainian; Constitutional court; Law; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.04026618908334577,"score_gpt":0.33243710314616237,"score_spread":0.2921709140628166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964565917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005000844,0.0004144568,0.0016490681,0.009480064,0.0043854783,0.00011784094,0.0001395856,0.000033620017,0.978779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297017,0.00039701894,0.0010534612,0.003511615,0.0008795791,0.000003795151,0.000027592409,0.0000068923714,0.0011498674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967722,0.00040762147,0.0006756843,0.00017277387,0.0017162781,0.00025540247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659234,0.000678119,0.00043723756,0.00012601244,0.0019688858,0.00019741905],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014735332,0.00018846075,0.00025536702,0.00018548298,0.0008025032,0.0002245762,0.0008005535,0.00007691346,0.0014477291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001413292,0.00016825575,0.00024437121,0.00011814317,0.0077221706,0.0005652401,0.000055529337,0.00038268467,0.00023267958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001017032,0.00024114689,0.0013445106,0.0000017524318,0.0002924966,0.00012422449,0.00020956974,0.00024032414,0.00008125337,0.9845394,0.0127190715,0.000104556944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009172249,0.000076989985,0.00026955677,0.00012839184,0.000023077784,0.00021406166,0.0003151306,0.000004583564,0.00039581882,0.02028657,0.97718775,0.00018083968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009072557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011870841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98796934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003699455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010890126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967142330","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon036","title":"Are legislatures good at morality? Or better at it than the courts?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Law; Legislature; Statute; Political science; Institution; Positivism; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06940194629138205,"score_gpt":0.29793886509388956,"score_spread":0.2285369188025075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967142330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.821614,0.0003298268,0.00040342376,0.08254347,0.0052834456,0.00016395144,0.0003410768,0.0000325529,0.089288205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97932416,0.00009173232,0.00010824278,0.0142860105,0.0010345764,0.000003174544,0.000004032777,0.0000063444445,0.0051417537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781877,0.0000964319,0.00045808387,0.00018571226,0.0012520065,0.00018900004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846566,0.0003765195,0.00057564426,0.00014350485,0.00033712582,0.00010153071],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018795767,0.00015254095,0.00017420456,0.00007612377,0.00051974185,0.000061137005,0.00079951546,0.00006287728,0.0011815275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003730694,0.00008759428,0.00021530391,0.00007636538,0.0020603982,0.00045492797,0.00018759142,0.00028364218,0.00016445242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006023745,0.00019317145,0.016983168,0.000004305033,0.00011150883,0.003902234,0.00013550607,0.00051363814,0.016602606,0.8970143,0.06384814,0.00008900384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097534043,0.00005764366,0.016501168,0.0000972903,0.000022483793,0.018383307,0.000013343277,0.000042490636,0.023657063,0.004242174,0.93581885,0.0001888216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018318478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012153266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8927722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020940843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019117963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967582267","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou073","title":"A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scrap; Law; Political science; Metallurgy; Materials science","score_opus":0.011759031306094521,"score_gpt":0.29209114000702674,"score_spread":0.2803321087009322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967582267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28206864,0.0002897136,0.002214914,0.014096054,0.0063766213,0.00018183472,0.00009837951,0.000027493164,0.69464636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995719,0.00003866302,0.00042454054,0.0013790556,0.0016978651,0.0000021644073,0.0000048981565,0.0000059631966,0.000727851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748546,0.0001315282,0.00058478385,0.00013928591,0.0014922499,0.00016669033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975998,0.00038798293,0.00053441705,0.00008546856,0.0013203853,0.00007198048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007929826,0.00012408529,0.00018750767,0.00010479066,0.00052864413,0.00012738281,0.0008076579,0.00006181709,0.0005101561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018597371,0.00009230514,0.00013778437,0.000039164417,0.0021267668,0.000681065,0.000103509716,0.00022414088,0.0000050203944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094619376,0.000035147823,0.0009682815,0.0000047958697,0.00021238337,0.000029127357,0.00035519336,0.00014537617,0.0002817988,0.9975025,0.00007798492,0.00029280272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012922654,0.000039630755,0.0050193127,0.00039360224,0.000047958198,0.0005472812,0.00016475558,0.00010113324,0.0006255626,0.32182664,0.66973335,0.0002085258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072619743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0329443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71365035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024798422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041546443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969659142","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq007","title":"Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Separation of powers; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.040872359185949954,"score_gpt":0.35352177569854604,"score_spread":0.3126494165125961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969659142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02801645,0.0008183239,0.05946704,0.07333779,0.010160905,0.00026550094,0.00017067244,0.000039425147,0.82772386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366534,0.00013356937,0.0030705628,0.0012428176,0.0017154071,0.0000017190166,0.0000047733074,0.0000029951432,0.00016280627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757653,0.000080627644,0.0006283744,0.000108069304,0.0014219866,0.00018438448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968922,0.00043106542,0.00056977425,0.00009971049,0.0018446053,0.00016261812],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011034288,0.00011535319,0.00022347148,0.000106680825,0.00073649967,0.000089380126,0.00081298297,0.00009262099,0.0001994711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006940659,0.000084705214,0.00021001186,0.00013809314,0.008714467,0.0005062832,0.00007985804,0.00043915634,0.000010861256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006137055,0.000074480726,0.0008794203,0.0000011073405,0.00014407226,0.000011274169,0.0003525809,0.0011318611,0.0011902582,0.99228007,0.0030153003,0.00085821183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069168117,0.000019862138,0.00050239224,0.00010939943,0.000058967522,0.00018001745,0.00034727587,0.00014532506,0.0003589433,0.5372216,0.46021926,0.0001452524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023581935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023789727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106842745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005603524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976663592","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou060","title":"An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034981083069662855,"score_gpt":0.3633691857699051,"score_spread":0.32838810270024227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976663592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05850351,0.00008744794,0.1295856,0.043382313,0.004267697,0.0001704959,0.00017001487,0.000046449306,0.7637865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939348,0.0000028496752,0.0027961307,0.001996464,0.0012366825,8.9768815e-7,0.000012130516,0.000002904522,0.0000171346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771184,0.00027745916,0.0005253999,0.00009166143,0.0012446422,0.00014901561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727076,0.00042249405,0.00033597054,0.000081289836,0.0016945257,0.00019494108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021196487,0.0000733595,0.0001603942,0.000103778126,0.00019168889,0.000046872876,0.00042919302,0.00009379668,0.00018716972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011071784,0.00006756208,0.00014526576,0.00006983864,0.0027032841,0.0004477876,0.000013532619,0.00021934506,0.000008821689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007654012,0.00014959477,0.001726821,0.000005170782,0.000045577395,0.000011732773,0.00017631329,0.0008959498,0.00019330902,0.99652904,0.000048421087,0.00014152717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006416906,0.00010510873,0.001144292,0.00011698714,0.000028069326,0.000034595883,0.00009767697,0.00022471338,0.00056712446,0.86600375,0.13091882,0.00011719174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044172857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015592526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013545818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978172711","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot041","title":"Constitutional reengineering: Dialogue's migration from Canada to Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Business process reengineering; Status quo; Commonwealth; Charter; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.026057979926160168,"score_gpt":0.2839040057802027,"score_spread":0.25784602585404254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978172711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46644962,0.0009901257,0.057576317,0.14095598,0.033178397,0.0011384247,0.0014598863,0.00012588334,0.29812536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938743,0.00003781361,0.0014933273,0.0020179532,0.0023657053,0.000015240627,0.000044032473,0.0000026784712,0.00014891193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973767,0.00006703943,0.0005827372,0.00016928591,0.0015460849,0.0002581851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970902,0.0002805238,0.00022772652,0.00007212282,0.0020129066,0.0003165049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027164264,0.00015699604,0.00022889717,0.000089572,0.00042509695,0.00016151853,0.00053917116,0.00007931078,0.0014455599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005307087,0.00014954951,0.00012474874,0.00015877877,0.0024218059,0.00064404565,0.00006158296,0.00020283084,0.00018436414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003383823,0.000044609133,0.0049292413,6.1834083e-7,0.00020369253,0.000056899444,0.0001391636,0.001236041,0.00038604147,0.97706264,0.015549434,0.00035775485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047407337,0.000029008621,0.013647398,0.00010231957,0.000033648532,0.000048080605,0.00032832858,0.000011525304,0.00028309057,0.041779533,0.94300556,0.00025743814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80353504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6077983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007602534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002609375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980851840","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon038","title":"Roundtable: An exchange with Jeremy Waldron","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05071779769662236,"score_gpt":0.32312169056542595,"score_spread":0.27240389286880357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980851840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14209318,0.0021267661,0.022373607,0.018161228,0.0052818297,0.00027620947,0.0001020835,0.00008975896,0.80949533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947526,0.00043671165,0.0010073802,0.0010021981,0.002011076,0.0000041258763,0.0000088869465,0.000004079491,0.0007729578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978052,0.00008843712,0.00033733007,0.00013262632,0.0014277373,0.00020870591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773544,0.000113338596,0.00025200058,0.00006154654,0.0016594467,0.00017821511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041731537,0.00011825479,0.00018954698,0.00011958285,0.0008759272,0.000108032975,0.000465448,0.00006231349,0.0003433183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011540556,0.00009462005,0.00009241907,0.000141843,0.003638192,0.0019309864,0.00003715505,0.00018049161,0.000027919134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013974821,0.00014982524,0.004648365,9.0116157e-7,0.0001621967,0.0003014711,0.0005788321,0.00012847951,0.000035687164,0.99252146,0.00087796047,0.00045505541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010186082,0.00016638763,0.0030654834,0.00008562733,0.0000348149,0.0013264868,0.0005141636,0.000004103616,0.00007866885,0.03032093,0.9631726,0.00021211561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002753104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026253317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96229464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039065297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014673076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995720989","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot022","title":"Judicial institutions, the legitimacy of Islamic state law and democratic transition in Egypt: Can a shift toward a common law model of adjudication improve the prospects of a successful democratic transition?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Legal history; Sharia; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Statutory law; Islam; Democracy; State (computer science); Politics; Public law; Geography","score_opus":0.0163367469426727,"score_gpt":0.27835350883592447,"score_spread":0.2620167618932518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995720989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85480726,0.00113654,0.01844324,0.04843449,0.0010464774,0.0016431715,0.0005218458,0.000016982602,0.07395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845994,0.00016776008,0.0002589563,0.0009391778,0.000120474535,0.000028692206,0.000009038858,0.0000046648656,0.000011326156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782467,0.00017842842,0.0008871611,0.00012657112,0.00082239846,0.0001607994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981148,0.00025046285,0.0006585307,0.00009644229,0.0008423322,0.00003739507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007081243,0.00012744544,0.00032689155,0.000120353994,0.00037962184,0.00003921875,0.00039162667,0.000063465624,0.000025363048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054405926,0.000093104485,0.00013923585,0.00015516153,0.0059385113,0.00055135676,0.000029005976,0.00024240841,7.078216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009943913,0.00015249175,0.000112486676,0.000029247416,0.00012378804,0.000003563118,0.011461589,0.004023856,0.0010354549,0.9827103,0.000048667654,0.00019912912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022450504,0.00019280531,0.0020765627,0.00055492274,0.00018256098,0.00004605673,0.0027652415,0.006243128,0.001072068,0.9838387,0.0005632423,0.00021968281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020046353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035575096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14365265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022216477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009953096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99676675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011843670","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol006","title":"Constitutionalism and policies toward women: Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Constitutionalism; Dozen; Gender equity; Political science; Equity (law); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.011874555518844613,"score_gpt":0.26382739331514155,"score_spread":0.25195283779629696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011843670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57851845,0.0061108624,0.0026254703,0.19292787,0.005435243,0.00036992846,0.00035066018,0.00004309322,0.21361841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941775,0.00075056823,0.00008462251,0.004017422,0.0008561081,0.000005853231,0.000014501286,0.0000019371266,0.000091485104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828374,0.00011455657,0.00038879996,0.00010025727,0.00091746665,0.00019519795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980864,0.0005810161,0.00022464685,0.0000361594,0.00096995645,0.00010181525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067046826,0.00010957014,0.00019274866,0.00009593937,0.0007481843,0.00014892322,0.00024554037,0.000040263123,0.0000576925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025740569,0.00007675515,0.000049419137,0.00012195257,0.012522115,0.00023483342,0.00007191756,0.00014875871,0.0000013576429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012577782,0.000020445163,0.0023771648,0.0000014423237,0.00014004283,0.000038111695,0.0006222834,0.00027970472,0.0000047630024,0.9942943,0.0020207886,0.00007518703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010532993,0.000009653765,0.0018929073,0.0000309992,0.00002049408,0.00018547049,0.0016190492,0.000013003626,0.000008054994,0.31931847,0.6757555,0.0000931172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7915421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35986236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6749758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033376523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018521189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99016523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024845134","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.1.139","title":"Canada: Production of private records of victims of sexual assault in R. v. Shearing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.027850139708130797,"score_gpt":0.31555948460722366,"score_spread":0.2877093448990929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024845134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97906625,0.00013429881,0.0007620124,0.005876385,0.0021167202,0.00008289578,0.000026802938,0.0000026295752,0.011932023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985418,0.0000411712,0.0010744254,0.000048326914,0.00023999794,6.8082704e-7,0.0000018918282,0.0000019490676,0.000049799994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794143,0.00005104782,0.0006567409,0.00008495243,0.0011653631,0.00010043947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979863,0.000101404,0.0005519561,0.00005493071,0.00125561,0.000049781313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085267477,0.00006041715,0.00019267264,0.00012386541,0.000048721977,0.0000085435995,0.00030576487,0.0000486363,0.000047301677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060083193,0.000058660044,0.00004944622,0.00013996546,0.0009568829,0.00038390848,0.000028415749,0.00015097627,4.4462547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015593565,0.00011811223,0.009964082,0.000020773257,0.00005781927,0.000024505089,0.0004144285,0.006985995,0.0054876623,0.97618526,0.00012021728,0.00046522217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074970853,0.0013709464,0.23020208,0.0074819475,0.0003473271,0.0011907674,0.0076440237,0.00007972091,0.20357092,0.15748097,0.3819581,0.0011761137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42324948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43998605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042409328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003772926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6693009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028840259","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq002","title":"Proportionality: An assault on human rights?: A reply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04493501811351099,"score_gpt":0.3839571434318165,"score_spread":0.33902212531830556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028840259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23254713,0.00004510374,0.0006823905,0.015788132,0.007214994,0.00019108887,0.000087401975,0.00006535092,0.7433784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993111,0.000005963635,0.00064089097,0.0020907798,0.0038685878,0.0000060429315,0.000020189951,0.000003847888,0.0002526641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965489,0.000113319176,0.00059176446,0.00019375047,0.0023416854,0.00021060911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962871,0.00014599576,0.00042088225,0.00011397235,0.002807662,0.0002243663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014025937,0.00013968901,0.00020466326,0.00016216478,0.0013663223,0.00015845783,0.0006478552,0.00012891126,0.0008644756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035499112,0.00011711897,0.00019121567,0.000113396934,0.004461219,0.0007353177,0.000041811607,0.00061370473,0.000067428526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091672046,0.00033747967,0.0016312362,5.9511933e-7,0.00014423562,0.00010752386,0.00015573112,0.000028802488,0.0009847175,0.9949857,0.0012277022,0.00030458774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004005538,0.00007944716,0.001955901,0.000033646604,0.000019026307,0.000112797694,0.00007070691,0.0000015144643,0.00027516606,0.3270897,0.66983753,0.00012399614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004026665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068579484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000166543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095381273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034634205","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.35","title":"Realizing equality in the twentieth century: the role of the Supreme Court of Canada in comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Politics; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.04158335274513759,"score_gpt":0.3465534930473471,"score_spread":0.30497014030220954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034634205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41096765,0.0027549823,0.00005389007,0.034230486,0.001816579,0.0005044537,0.0001306143,0.000002907039,0.54953843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999534,0.000059934056,0.000044915792,0.00024548208,0.000082333274,0.0000026036682,6.3317793e-7,9.843144e-7,0.00002908751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974447,0.0006912443,0.00043021358,0.00006894842,0.0012357207,0.00012915615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978306,0.0006184777,0.0004371817,0.000059146227,0.0010302824,0.000024276515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015165014,0.00007130186,0.00017299537,0.00002639172,0.0002519897,0.000025139476,0.0005979115,0.000030313311,0.000040499483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066256674,0.000036091144,0.00010060198,0.0001750519,0.0019209541,0.00016365317,0.00003674752,0.00025962834,2.3919284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030027313,0.00006279454,0.015718894,9.929933e-7,0.00008190912,0.0000026928242,0.016855283,0.0005739871,0.00007835232,0.96631575,0.0002686047,0.000010740624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303765,0.000035946243,0.11014394,0.00028649697,0.000045721514,0.000038052127,0.40142727,0.00003634016,0.0015509578,0.09195795,0.39298296,0.00019061238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3700505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.635282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87435776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007724982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013450913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7077835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059164208","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol004","title":"Religious freedom in Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Religiosity; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitution; Establishment Clause; Sociology; Power (physics); First amendment; Supreme court; Human rights","score_opus":0.006682597125488249,"score_gpt":0.25377052171357906,"score_spread":0.2470879245880908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059164208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32838058,0.0020607,0.0037324878,0.06773421,0.004520785,0.0002655117,0.0002742201,0.000018508612,0.593013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675894,0.00026698195,0.0002204822,0.0020581726,0.0005548848,0.0000015038898,0.00001718214,0.0000018105368,0.00012002966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985522,0.0001322941,0.00038319192,0.000063781,0.00072282524,0.00014571742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983851,0.00071546476,0.00020762089,0.000039356953,0.0005864791,0.000066015295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048814737,0.00006879004,0.0001323299,0.000092254755,0.00017614795,0.00006248737,0.00028957616,0.000025932215,0.000049172082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001691871,0.000050430503,0.00004669006,0.00011678451,0.004944127,0.0001446336,0.000026475356,0.00016115699,0.0000016893058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079730926,0.00001494746,0.0076562637,5.894556e-7,0.000030416142,0.00009450741,0.000080927515,0.0062726066,0.0000011632467,0.9835444,0.0021977765,0.000026674656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011652441,0.000006095763,0.0012088475,0.00003392845,0.0000118675125,0.00015511704,0.00044744703,0.00011554027,0.0000034218465,0.04660878,0.95016783,0.00007588857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98318195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94685256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94797003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005430524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007081591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062874933","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.4.745","title":"The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02086310994059187,"score_gpt":0.30752740761552744,"score_spread":0.28666429767493556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062874933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10345301,0.0011507934,0.00095956266,0.060540188,0.015961783,0.00021354503,0.00013796361,0.000014411948,0.8175687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883664,0.00014790254,0.0000976626,0.00035422732,0.00039463706,9.0523133e-7,0.0000011287315,0.0000021791682,0.00016474807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978167,0.00015731316,0.0004102446,0.00008110736,0.001381228,0.00015343097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772906,0.0006384089,0.00034642717,0.00007859307,0.0011046461,0.0001028513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010412439,0.00007745481,0.00013452105,0.000045254186,0.00038938283,0.00006266066,0.0005370769,0.00004360316,0.00015041654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008649638,0.0000495637,0.000108981716,0.00007462381,0.001746808,0.00021211275,0.000019265524,0.00019116452,0.000005010491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043099062,0.000046750232,0.00089410006,0.0000013407297,0.00006202979,0.000053778745,0.00015249838,0.00037665135,0.000037895203,0.99280715,0.0054052374,0.00011949798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027396026,0.000036364727,0.00040078344,0.00009144799,0.00001678421,0.00008913078,0.0005160875,0.0000085433685,0.00042840655,0.045722313,0.95233893,0.00007721383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1233891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22993574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025841265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026004815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8824483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069583645","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor055","title":"Nonproblematic judicial review: A case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Conceptualization; Political science; Icelandic; Law; Technocracy; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07757805518062609,"score_gpt":0.36377883280781426,"score_spread":0.28620077762718815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069583645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02194904,0.002523808,0.0010158372,0.0021394463,0.0036262535,0.00037557003,0.000022959626,0.00003033416,0.96831673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995144,0.00087793067,0.0008563506,0.0019274835,0.0008340737,0.0000057216093,0.0000013912149,0.000005281188,0.00034773623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762344,0.00023008819,0.00071755896,0.00012109647,0.0011602232,0.00014756488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723375,0.0001403179,0.00046363217,0.000078926816,0.0019653342,0.000118032236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013740085,0.00011266355,0.00023308025,0.000121313955,0.00032732714,0.00005190189,0.0005586153,0.000028350618,0.001138069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005042693,0.0000962622,0.00017544445,0.00010491661,0.0012872696,0.00052197033,0.00007096146,0.00018581114,0.00009663795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042850173,0.000451539,0.0013948042,0.000009505825,0.00034336306,0.0067916913,0.002431122,0.0000023378063,0.000004196054,0.98504084,0.0030818882,0.00040583557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002289391,0.0005532688,0.0010078971,0.0019180416,0.00034554183,0.016597271,0.008990736,0.000005961296,0.0000442089,0.02833156,0.9394483,0.00046782612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014734895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001114754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015096397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041733892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093496570","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi009","title":"Review: Sovereignty in Transition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Transition (genetics); Political science; Law; Chemistry; Politics","score_opus":0.024075141359058003,"score_gpt":0.2583542435533823,"score_spread":0.23427910219432432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093496570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020024339,0.005929397,0.002016638,0.00854546,0.0017065961,0.00007443146,0.00009461261,0.000014332893,0.9796161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98892707,0.00039549996,0.00016323084,0.009518695,0.0007853546,9.79459e-7,0.000014160088,0.000003569305,0.0001914432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892974,0.000036977075,0.00048363066,0.000072557705,0.00038857217,0.000088520384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991608,0.000042140386,0.00015658532,0.00005002433,0.0005339905,0.000056419747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026327072,0.00007397262,0.00015526217,0.00014204891,0.000058547375,0.000036978687,0.00022472344,0.000015758851,0.0022943139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006871247,0.00006469235,0.00016718729,0.000024741494,0.0010059762,0.00045370264,0.000011001134,0.0001645267,0.0001096239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002925255,0.00010509971,0.0000035067114,0.000015849104,0.00006067477,0.00016572383,0.00027145713,0.0005798402,0.000018594706,0.99759763,0.0010881621,0.000064204534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082809135,0.00003946211,0.00001361004,0.0012465,0.00004581166,0.00024179232,0.000060411898,0.0000040675613,0.00006636923,0.14314857,0.8542069,0.00009841488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006842597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013432569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98692465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024938266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017995633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096428617","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi051","title":"Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR help facilitate a culture of rights?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliamentary sovereignty; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Parliament; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Convention; Legislation; Rights of Nature; State (computer science); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017848215959071483,"score_gpt":0.28475449525102664,"score_spread":0.26690627929195515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096428617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14941508,0.003986288,0.0010344682,0.045573574,0.0025843873,0.00049782166,0.0002683645,0.000024082681,0.79661596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982377,0.000058468275,0.000071116425,0.00034625092,0.0009075675,0.0000058888386,0.0000054352745,0.0000012587402,0.00036625622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980456,0.00015796935,0.00047732424,0.00009924237,0.0010756933,0.00014416577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983172,0.00028316662,0.00036322154,0.00005982069,0.0009254043,0.000051196905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637717,0.00010925621,0.00020340632,0.00004834611,0.0014817752,0.0000932396,0.00045260583,0.00004916573,0.00008885261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059965387,0.000054410004,0.00017080865,0.00008462136,0.010143775,0.00019602486,0.000060454287,0.00018770408,0.0000045621437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007619316,0.000056006884,0.00081407407,9.598671e-7,0.00018823537,0.00001661475,0.001082614,0.00007218649,0.000055046057,0.99572206,0.0018584761,0.000057515233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083835836,0.000018495322,0.0012158073,0.00005257533,0.000042663578,0.00005100541,0.0003584798,0.0000018687005,0.00010819637,0.5500374,0.44721115,0.000064027205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034549348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018189896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8488227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012142126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002561696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113553566","doi":"10.1093/icon/mop019","title":"European Committee of Social Rights: The right to a healthy environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Social rights; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.018797418358364463,"score_gpt":0.3055340406164871,"score_spread":0.28673662225812263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113553566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00896832,0.00018600508,0.0019082478,0.06986182,0.0011996219,0.00012126283,0.00005416463,0.000011588828,0.91768897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919748,0.000053348744,0.0005371559,0.0054751346,0.0013748544,7.2808547e-7,0.0000036140327,0.0000030438632,0.00057733705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977064,0.00029881034,0.0005499462,0.00009939225,0.0011973003,0.00014815813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867326,0.00016419111,0.00037630324,0.0000659667,0.00062474416,0.00009552327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010777464,0.000096329386,0.0001625056,0.00009428252,0.0005529257,0.00006234164,0.0008186478,0.000024126868,0.000427622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010437766,0.000066974084,0.00017499675,0.0000705613,0.0014373561,0.00022093738,0.000056734258,0.00017368073,0.00010466736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011951013,0.00013574657,0.000062472725,5.768454e-7,0.00010645149,0.000037603942,0.00113869,0.00006610606,0.00011198971,0.98808426,0.009509989,0.0006266157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037703413,0.00012176926,0.003218251,0.00003301131,0.000015089265,0.00003241875,0.00014513258,0.0000013056654,0.00011259502,0.016314536,0.97955394,0.00007492168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073338786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072394025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019398938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001545908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52959985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120511575","doi":"10.1093/icon/mom028","title":"Does the world need more Canada? The politics of the Canadian model in constitutional politics and political theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitutional amendment; Nationalism; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional theory; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012610480469283725,"score_gpt":0.2915392276026237,"score_spread":0.27892874713334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120511575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12433066,0.0005374604,0.0026493713,0.35558638,0.005871298,0.0005032999,0.0013926747,0.000008869511,0.50912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903602,0.0000051109987,0.00006344825,0.0076293,0.0006643312,0.0000014663599,0.0000014352598,0.000002777474,0.0012719289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973881,0.00016141873,0.0005697625,0.00009268647,0.0013113959,0.00047662028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740595,0.0012052291,0.00024051912,0.00011193429,0.00072189374,0.00031450234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016109145,0.000106937965,0.00015821989,0.00008535811,0.000740584,0.00007620398,0.00072539516,0.00006925345,0.000037130718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009418822,0.00004904915,0.00009729391,0.00014626657,0.011397108,0.00015372987,0.000062319414,0.00038374146,5.8725425e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012526327,0.000018964198,0.009754626,0.000002219299,0.000047812275,0.000024197845,0.00021637532,0.0002989577,0.0000054391767,0.98910874,0.00048974174,0.000020413874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048334373,0.000006927302,0.030503036,0.00017509748,0.00003378513,0.00017826457,0.0013238826,0.00021219856,0.00014315311,0.5360906,0.43070495,0.0001447658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89806736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86602956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013943197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012006902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122426454","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol002","title":"Prologue: North American constitutionalism?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Constitutionalism; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014854806903517002,"score_gpt":0.2973220546938847,"score_spread":0.2824672477903677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122426454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11969706,0.0010086953,0.01092743,0.02528047,0.006256339,0.0002807284,0.00025302774,0.000099545774,0.8361967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941554,0.00011668433,0.0010510195,0.0013137119,0.0031809385,0.0000063492807,0.0000296748,0.000003668179,0.00014252048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738187,0.00011318332,0.0006142019,0.00015811369,0.001463921,0.00026873965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970115,0.00023310009,0.00051580905,0.00006683444,0.00204728,0.00012550646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000501249,0.00014580111,0.00026074107,0.00017692476,0.00067509303,0.00011651902,0.0005728018,0.00004724251,0.00015767533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002668012,0.00013318959,0.00021281847,0.00027621357,0.012183332,0.0005231558,0.00006093473,0.00022137054,0.00007218795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009482452,0.00015068766,0.032032117,7.22663e-7,0.00014862773,0.00014626425,0.00006246638,0.00051498733,0.000025445774,0.96276784,0.003334496,0.0007215134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444401,0.000043544573,0.021937784,0.000029682391,0.000038383398,0.00019883626,0.00014806357,0.0000032364685,0.00004580881,0.08154646,0.8952832,0.0001805212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063722064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00961514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89194876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003271274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016311563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127507417","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor067","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and the minister of justice: Weak-form review within a constitutional Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Parliament","score_opus":0.047762443208032204,"score_gpt":0.3517338849698267,"score_spread":0.3039714417617945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127507417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000069437224,0.8708109,0.000065449574,0.003074444,0.003049176,0.00055430084,0.0005060015,0.0000035401347,0.1219292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12136283,0.8763967,0.000106437874,0.0004621485,0.0014013773,0.00003037681,0.00003465093,0.0000059917484,0.00019949609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951929,0.00041348406,0.002064727,0.00018708732,0.0018274243,0.00031437323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319553,0.0012915494,0.002535507,0.00017533972,0.0025732133,0.00022886453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027982297,0.00032041167,0.0013799876,0.0002199596,0.0012269672,0.000066373395,0.0010249278,0.00021739234,0.00022531096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035956607,0.00016905415,0.00073834904,0.00022556931,0.030217232,0.00036243463,0.000106543084,0.00047821944,0.000015891896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000643904,0.000056393208,0.000013573595,0.0005554698,0.0010691672,0.000011668878,0.0002620471,7.474482e-7,1.9837037e-7,0.99379724,0.0012660167,0.002903073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052656076,0.00002576378,0.00001122485,0.011987974,0.0016154569,0.00033922793,0.000057895304,5.954923e-7,0.0000019871281,0.0484425,0.936822,0.00016879228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019024853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049416985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94535476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031534123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005443095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130896198","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor034","title":"The Nordic counternarrative: Democracy, human development, and judicial review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Globalization; Welfare state; Human rights; Judicial activism; Rule of law; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.05740053860351652,"score_gpt":0.34656052967921347,"score_spread":0.28915999107569695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130896198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015041377,0.008013289,0.00050064153,0.0065272884,0.002019299,0.00014415279,0.000010438256,0.000018753539,0.96772474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898436,0.005745772,0.00040989742,0.0021407825,0.0006665582,0.00000289208,0.0000028818524,0.000004485486,0.0011831194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998209,0.00013092195,0.0005350408,0.000100638,0.0008811875,0.00014323811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979785,0.00016564387,0.00040801128,0.000050804767,0.0013060077,0.00009105007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011284762,0.00009943599,0.00014923277,0.000051911196,0.0011646387,0.000091284746,0.00058724784,0.000027360775,0.00019675739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000321203,0.000070907925,0.00008541058,0.00005328408,0.0027375042,0.00040057208,0.00008104795,0.00017252316,0.000032974087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003478175,0.00003683724,0.0015274169,0.000004385624,0.00020240851,0.000048449652,0.00075524795,2.3911932e-7,0.000010272879,0.99175185,0.0043747188,0.0012534135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034163907,0.000035233443,0.0029856528,0.00047209035,0.000022621685,0.000103894585,0.00020728762,3.9329788e-7,0.00010448477,0.016467007,0.9791647,0.0000949674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001559512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068916345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012807791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041642325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137187785","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon004","title":"The role of dignity in equality law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Underpinning; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03387566459346647,"score_gpt":0.31228142075917004,"score_spread":0.27840575616570357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137187785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.492461,0.0058620996,0.00046990052,0.009468263,0.002709967,0.00018947625,0.0012376859,0.000014351526,0.48758724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999177,0.00005446671,0.00025702905,0.00014476485,0.00027669108,0.0000012475119,0.0000024713552,0.0000020194009,0.00008434848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981,0.00017310663,0.00042676931,0.00008749398,0.0010701735,0.00014246315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998239,0.0007016076,0.00031034782,0.000067748035,0.0005811198,0.00010021361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005949508,0.00006865596,0.00014859537,0.0000332776,0.00034046939,0.000034830413,0.0004718558,0.000047227197,0.000047320158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004626408,0.000053392738,0.00005533978,0.000074974116,0.002709794,0.00024101754,0.00006528252,0.0002077385,0.0000017355326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005601659,0.000025460164,0.013596528,4.2108698e-7,0.000055251767,0.00004047619,0.007974881,0.00004134388,0.000040506,0.97795147,0.000076476106,0.00014116104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005570309,0.000015434756,0.0063277427,0.000051732335,0.000014482755,0.000022284372,0.0024196403,0.000012826377,0.00044120985,0.11574928,0.87427276,0.000115562616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5867233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5907389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8741963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003265801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002089305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142844092","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol007","title":"Institutions, constitutions, actor strategies, and ideas: Explaining variation in paid parental leave policies in Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Normative; Political science; Government (linguistics); Maternity leave; National Policy; Parental leave; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02199477243476488,"score_gpt":0.30835914557432526,"score_spread":0.28636437313956037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142844092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95545125,0.0014367481,0.00060908165,0.017378246,0.0012075864,0.00023625196,0.000120434335,0.000011153602,0.023549268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793357,0.0009371923,0.00006331022,0.00062571466,0.00039910755,0.0000066232956,0.000020004383,0.00000186331,0.000012645317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985573,0.0001853999,0.0004914806,0.00008924903,0.0005015855,0.00017498063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889696,0.00050617324,0.00023699149,0.000030900825,0.00027798073,0.000051001818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066756044,0.00009924358,0.000182136,0.00020899739,0.00045242428,0.00016154782,0.00016398563,0.000049660888,0.000007717612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002743933,0.00007283537,0.00003383366,0.00020644233,0.003661317,0.0006569559,0.00004242621,0.00021021174,3.4745986e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083134044,0.000024711462,0.023703119,0.0000022472636,0.000044017957,0.0000305545,0.0021137116,0.0024098568,0.000005193789,0.97146666,0.000070539165,0.000046230365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007905357,0.000039494804,0.3507126,0.0004766543,0.000060215014,0.00028097694,0.079080895,0.00052783755,0.00002094312,0.500671,0.059752513,0.0004715097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95358455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96147865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47079566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006467403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039713276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143688148","doi":"10.1093/icon/mos048","title":"Religious law as foreign law in constitutional interpretation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013054255779701764,"score_gpt":0.3055705611410323,"score_spread":0.29251630536133055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143688148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008978325,0.0004083825,0.0083297845,0.0047165607,0.0023046166,0.00028711997,0.000022281138,0.000032192856,0.97492075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939836,0.00016682727,0.001084521,0.0038206126,0.00072603126,0.000020474601,0.000031697793,0.000005985219,0.00016022277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705887,0.0001695077,0.0008420012,0.00019768396,0.0014566237,0.00027531566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703777,0.00033205305,0.00043733968,0.00009694126,0.0019017257,0.00019420138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075703405,0.00016649385,0.00024217044,0.00025500244,0.00030974485,0.00032783655,0.00060354476,0.00015892701,0.00063204253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036791115,0.00015967076,0.00020341697,0.00015387112,0.0066151996,0.0017620067,0.0000521468,0.00029022145,0.00032252655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010889457,0.00013898894,0.00062517513,0.000003364955,0.000070739625,0.000092414644,0.0006858109,0.0007245245,0.00019173592,0.99456704,0.0023495548,0.00044173526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013156781,0.000070641414,0.0001852654,0.00019227139,0.00002272948,0.00033106012,0.00082769274,0.00012317511,0.00029006196,0.8757963,0.12063893,0.00020615973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018264767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004682185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055395195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010126872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152266080","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.2.272","title":"Rule by emergency: Sri Lanka's postcolonial constitutional experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Political science; Law; History; Ancient history; South asia","score_opus":0.013834652431709851,"score_gpt":0.33027409327834933,"score_spread":0.3164394408466395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152266080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21549468,0.0011214777,0.017635785,0.02656915,0.014282001,0.00024174427,0.00057566,0.00007205724,0.7240074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964514,0.00008399703,0.0012107724,0.0008320166,0.0012565047,0.0000045346246,0.000025299389,0.000003070585,0.0001324089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975962,0.00005871046,0.0005495699,0.0001515082,0.0013551731,0.00028880461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981184,0.00006400818,0.00031834317,0.0000727356,0.0011725773,0.00025394344],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040968813,0.00013197823,0.00017620422,0.0001547964,0.0005470609,0.00009817302,0.0006469068,0.000111026726,0.0011376075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020283199,0.00012946907,0.00022835324,0.00015879008,0.0063288873,0.00065982674,0.000047239588,0.00023644647,0.00009010104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005143743,0.00015260998,0.0017231622,0.0000011431075,0.00010922073,0.00008430561,0.0032049501,0.00017811004,0.00026777718,0.99181503,0.0023076574,0.000104585815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011404341,0.000044262935,0.0002273595,0.000064654196,0.000023992417,0.00023761044,0.0025140566,0.0000018779315,0.00053033093,0.11957195,0.8754137,0.00022978461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006136148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013076262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003042302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016182587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152664636","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol009","title":"Property rights and regulatory innovation: Comparing constitutional cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Intellectual property; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02586636513874751,"score_gpt":0.3019422523031773,"score_spread":0.27607588716442977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152664636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052463062,0.0014970643,0.0056227595,0.008219735,0.0033964915,0.0001975371,0.000045435063,0.00005561166,0.9285023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995601,0.000038215185,0.00087607413,0.00055869797,0.0023973966,0.000004476115,0.000020135998,0.000002280423,0.0005016963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976468,0.00008011712,0.0006640147,0.00016597143,0.0012454658,0.00019762054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705386,0.00012416202,0.00038083977,0.00005429706,0.0023063484,0.00008049997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062638806,0.00014612352,0.00024038671,0.00020885517,0.001030652,0.0001678286,0.00032446167,0.000091499576,0.00014215369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015713272,0.0001058437,0.00009594452,0.0002255934,0.011357649,0.00072627096,0.00007046113,0.00021170419,0.00001735058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007401214,0.00009767935,0.007975257,0.0000018801711,0.00013344518,0.000063463885,0.00009809998,0.00022057361,0.00016762076,0.98627096,0.0047149756,0.00018202521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006569469,0.000017042,0.0043925648,0.00009846428,0.000026576929,0.00026212042,0.000086764725,0.000007719673,0.00013599305,0.3414782,0.6526851,0.00015249717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025490113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010637745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94313794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002532651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094421575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161121277","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou048","title":"National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Member states; Constitutional law; Order (exchange); Constitutional court; Liberal democracy; European union; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.028550262754046186,"score_gpt":0.32019335143912875,"score_spread":0.29164308868508254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161121277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018278756,0.00021039226,0.019093918,0.017932467,0.0032978067,0.00016164048,0.00009654315,0.00002907341,0.95735025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98882145,0.00012708578,0.0010280359,0.0059529683,0.0036821107,0.000004881699,0.00004260964,0.0000065418067,0.00033433034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389094,0.0012352063,0.0010091729,0.00025293932,0.0032813514,0.0003304043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950119,0.0012851064,0.00055879145,0.000116901676,0.0028814871,0.00014579749],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006483231,0.0002245433,0.00027054903,0.0003340638,0.0008589568,0.00029826345,0.0014808698,0.00007536921,0.00039988096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002377919,0.00017917936,0.00027654812,0.00020502375,0.015212586,0.000933177,0.00010187515,0.00051335257,0.00023571301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064505744,0.0002307601,0.002138779,0.0000023903722,0.00014035276,0.00014340118,0.00039204754,0.0010838243,0.00003772165,0.9866655,0.008555029,0.000545685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012294367,0.00004011041,0.004103357,0.0001264852,0.000020850657,0.00057128206,0.0002519801,0.000051779214,0.0000140228385,0.11855739,0.8748296,0.00020369345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007736968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000158472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98699355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045773978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001598219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98746747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943359","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou032","title":"Eulogy for the constitution that was","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Political science; Repeal; Statute","score_opus":0.041009427941542706,"score_gpt":0.33456745657305276,"score_spread":0.29355802863151004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162943359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015522109,0.0015526562,0.37148413,0.06352865,0.014645831,0.0004022389,0.00008681748,0.00004324447,0.54670423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933732,0.00023643066,0.0007302393,0.0024687976,0.003036627,0.000013276327,0.000005868093,0.000002412398,0.00013313492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983231,0.00010471486,0.0003659448,0.00011312305,0.00089328317,0.00019987795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675405,0.0013190961,0.00031436794,0.00006758574,0.0014569997,0.00008790315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013409223,0.00010422158,0.00017850727,0.000080274534,0.0011546288,0.0001150789,0.0005965671,0.00007226494,0.00014089629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009936084,0.00007360811,0.00022889076,0.00007676666,0.006294786,0.00036368056,0.000046312154,0.00015278356,0.000026869828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010391987,0.000042180694,0.00092996785,0.0000010791966,0.00020719928,0.0000052336763,0.00015470499,0.00029978144,0.000037146856,0.9928025,0.0026163326,0.0027999498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055169343,0.00003214596,0.0004993923,0.000035927125,0.000048530776,0.00007169161,0.00023059812,0.00003383502,0.000081286176,0.15824509,0.8400875,0.00008234697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006383091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007013243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017170253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080674846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99640954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170502526","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi004","title":"Canada: Supreme Court addresses gay-positive readers in public schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Gay rights; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.046754422815522216,"score_gpt":0.3251092374183937,"score_spread":0.2783548146028715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170502526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21476464,0.0019507102,0.0021288681,0.54936016,0.008207152,0.0006378772,0.00050177105,0.00005640484,0.2223924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968046,0.0001499459,0.000691333,0.0015613218,0.0006738174,0.000004315102,0.00001091333,0.0000034155964,0.00010035959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.00010044755,0.00046520267,0.00012770211,0.0015231778,0.00026497716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975863,0.0002068729,0.00027613694,0.00004384169,0.0017110301,0.00017578487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048606988,0.00011903024,0.00020232814,0.0000991729,0.00034859232,0.00015318753,0.00052591227,0.000071289025,0.0001645584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00102947,0.000103832645,0.00009854925,0.00015079466,0.0014308827,0.00089409767,0.000052130414,0.0003428372,0.000012624581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041437084,0.00007751697,0.0040966826,0.0000015218892,0.00017911216,0.0002393805,0.0009148071,0.00079478475,0.000051957242,0.9907901,0.002675205,0.00013743754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003436589,0.00006645813,0.036573768,0.0005926964,0.000043319542,0.00024808187,0.0118022775,0.0000048564902,0.0006636608,0.028356576,0.91772497,0.00048675004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5399717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7634246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028173807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006018916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171469886","doi":"10.1093/icon/mom012","title":"The voting rights of Japanese citizens living abroad","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Law; Legislation; Order (exchange); Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.013281462788401914,"score_gpt":0.3322265548394566,"score_spread":0.3189450920510547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171469886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23990035,0.00028460097,0.0025306637,0.0032531144,0.0069415444,0.0001054517,0.000010471477,0.00001834347,0.74695545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684256,0.000024018593,0.00117801,0.00020433194,0.0008982227,6.165057e-7,9.706662e-7,0.0000026742189,0.00084859756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981745,0.00007607456,0.0006485033,0.00007465015,0.0008378493,0.00018840814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636775,0.0019004159,0.00059285795,0.000049699727,0.0009988323,0.00009041857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030226852,0.00007260256,0.00012555267,0.00009486182,0.0005148798,0.000085698695,0.00063766475,0.000059563736,0.00028145453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072247116,0.00005639106,0.00013145144,0.00006858556,0.0022922936,0.00030654037,0.000049016617,0.00016617452,0.000023378905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002902008,0.000028724433,0.00378935,8.036714e-7,0.00013612889,0.000024206873,0.0026604612,0.000032819775,0.0000753079,0.9920209,0.00058534247,0.000616928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094081747,0.00004287056,0.019692192,0.0004753899,0.00004309286,0.00038314002,0.0117623005,0.000025227924,0.00067741174,0.044927746,0.9207081,0.00032168502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043465145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090119964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031909478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005278419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84460515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179177954","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow042","title":"The harms of remedial discretion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Discretion; Business; Remedial action; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Environmental remediation","score_opus":0.014720302363108987,"score_gpt":0.31319875985039086,"score_spread":0.29847845748728186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179177954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028585574,0.0019039592,0.072959,0.26498044,0.027493058,0.00034427497,0.00015141662,0.000047017224,0.6035353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639463,0.00076665316,0.00028872452,0.00023670653,0.0012257827,0.0000010506894,9.823922e-7,0.0000013872809,0.001084077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985806,0.00007773285,0.0002939383,0.000047269943,0.0009093191,0.00009119037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821913,0.000330479,0.0002988476,0.000042179498,0.0010538844,0.000055451877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076195004,0.000043799366,0.00007296471,0.000007769238,0.00028840345,0.00004213589,0.0004438757,0.000054350083,0.0002768558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034753757,0.000021509151,0.00014909693,0.00004489746,0.0036009958,0.00034430734,0.000017652124,0.000080854814,0.000011452038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006440273,0.000022963153,0.00041890395,3.1048592e-7,0.00007568764,0.0000046620053,0.0003565495,0.0000063228185,0.0010482443,0.9926608,0.002135744,0.0032053734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042513144,0.000019198093,0.0002500772,0.00007952587,0.000011444367,0.000026620439,0.00041058823,8.500938e-7,0.0012134907,0.08135107,0.9161691,0.00004287185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032545242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019100151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001096632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004119936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230516096","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov014","title":"Central and Eastern European constitutionalism a quarter century after the fall of the Berlin Wall: Introduction to the Symposium","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Ancient history; History; Law; Archaeology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.014943024810107166,"score_gpt":0.2626868314514025,"score_spread":0.2477438066412953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230516096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1054393,0.0018445358,0.0030681994,0.53806144,0.017337784,0.000608238,0.00018666469,0.00002680544,0.333427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991931,0.00011759853,0.00009238853,0.0038040928,0.003474366,0.0000037458635,0.000003336345,0.000005157413,0.0005682806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974182,0.00048055308,0.00049719954,0.00014336429,0.0012840173,0.00017665426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977542,0.00015765792,0.0003249802,0.00013332725,0.0014975752,0.0001322706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013981923,0.000121870165,0.00013253943,0.000059098,0.00035542648,0.00015563375,0.0008269816,0.000029209512,0.00004112693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039016397,0.00006396594,0.00015007763,0.000105169966,0.0030918452,0.00033090715,0.00017668212,0.00023632399,0.00002586335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019700936,0.00005497086,0.0035545279,0.0000015153242,0.00016655902,0.000013807493,0.0029378883,0.00069104845,0.00003086586,0.98204416,0.010141163,0.00016646196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044036596,0.000041162828,0.00737477,0.00007503787,0.00004006091,0.00019997724,0.0007960623,0.000022898988,0.000024984913,0.0023860086,0.9885123,0.00008639113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030886757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006474985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017000764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004152539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256635145","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov071","title":"Power-sharing in a re-united Cyprus: Centripetal coalitions vs. proportional sequential coalitions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Centripetal force; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Power sharing; Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Ethnic group; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06842702563837852,"score_gpt":0.36835819261422065,"score_spread":0.2999311669758421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256635145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13013601,0.0006465784,0.013254411,0.047872607,0.017583007,0.00078750297,0.0017934968,0.0001861476,0.78774023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949006,0.000038860977,0.0013326012,0.0017187196,0.0012866561,0.00001051922,0.0001769877,0.000010619476,0.0005244301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963277,0.00023364075,0.00097504666,0.00023041164,0.001840296,0.00039293198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605083,0.00019736543,0.0005347458,0.00013441774,0.0026297807,0.00045285717],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017063782,0.00017150915,0.0002659896,0.00047752925,0.00040055357,0.00019624653,0.0007457274,0.00015996576,0.0010417176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011243562,0.0001903153,0.0002881778,0.00027121397,0.0032670528,0.0010237646,0.0001037169,0.0004838737,0.00006988573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010520806,0.00031980858,0.0053189127,0.0000027914282,0.00012503703,0.00016879018,0.0029582055,0.0006330365,0.00003191223,0.98434657,0.0059797578,0.0000099858335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023818645,0.000069137874,0.0016373973,0.00018883173,0.000041420717,0.0003458158,0.003870157,0.00011688547,0.000045305525,0.08129492,0.90971094,0.00029735075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022011693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001681879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90373117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030777089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045102034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294189301","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov056","title":"Support for international trade law: The US and the EU compared","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Law; International economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.031843220999165936,"score_gpt":0.27069211820449995,"score_spread":0.23884889720533403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294189301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031339522,0.00019685137,0.0050094957,0.22367114,0.01297184,0.00053152017,0.00009170366,0.000039289767,0.7543542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9053671,0.00001026104,0.00042982172,0.089901164,0.004026572,0.000018728344,0.00007583883,0.000007825143,0.00016269252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981095,0.000025259931,0.00061602937,0.00013312168,0.000978671,0.00013739744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978993,0.00022791405,0.0005585735,0.00009037841,0.0011905405,0.000033275875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011101537,0.00014912746,0.00018517846,0.00011139172,0.0002340739,0.00060309365,0.00079672795,0.000043424472,0.0001583891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034242944,0.000087358814,0.00019254118,0.000064796484,0.0018520036,0.0013695031,0.000113663074,0.00018332561,0.000033200162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070758094,0.000070319074,0.00013396051,0.0000033192746,0.000259053,0.000011112113,0.000040458763,0.00048867037,0.000030982847,0.97402847,0.02416206,0.00006402129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004251297,0.000016352866,0.00019151093,0.00002572562,0.000056089128,0.0002140925,0.00007265441,0.0037600077,0.000060672246,0.085085906,0.9061641,0.00010158663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015072813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008257118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088335975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001630753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317979143","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot055","title":"On constitutionalism and the paradoxes of tolerance: Reflections on Egypt, the US, and beyond","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.017875441992593347,"score_gpt":0.32869284200244353,"score_spread":0.3108174000098502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317979143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061898727,0.00094379997,0.0015768431,0.07645592,0.0023053666,0.00039036438,0.0001607761,0.000014494629,0.8562537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118006,0.00031726027,0.00028515345,0.0073387697,0.0005761056,0.000011366118,0.0000035495657,0.0000026648509,0.0002850728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981915,0.00021779696,0.00043195576,0.00011426967,0.00089514285,0.00014933015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670565,0.0018613408,0.00034731982,0.00009045196,0.000889039,0.0001062025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068739586,0.00011634247,0.00019900326,0.0000872959,0.0007626301,0.00012730292,0.00034282022,0.00005953067,0.00022045083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005184064,0.000067894056,0.00011146758,0.00009486432,0.019509958,0.0002925398,0.00003946893,0.00027534468,0.000012937192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013824216,0.000052310243,0.0002759357,0.0000015520718,0.00012297637,0.000005426621,0.00025955457,0.0004676645,0.000024165869,0.99695176,0.0014722333,0.000228157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016332788,0.00010189342,0.0013677569,0.00011726827,0.0000578413,0.0003669179,0.0005924554,0.000031159467,0.0000593272,0.34081486,0.6547147,0.00014252681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010727466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012415981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92928135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008226906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011341131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98315835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318601874","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor012","title":"The Negotiable Constitution: On The Limitation of Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2009 (Charles-Maxime Panaccio)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01593347750121909,"score_gpt":0.26000379293709186,"score_spread":0.24407031543587276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318601874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08944848,0.00013286594,0.0011183461,0.013379156,0.0061851223,0.00028039538,0.00020524106,0.000024002233,0.8892264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937593,0.000060706738,0.00015074588,0.00029274466,0.0009984524,0.0000011955975,0.000011184245,0.0000025854768,0.0047231275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784654,0.00016980256,0.00042732237,0.000119166616,0.0012655542,0.00017163155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960325,0.0010620436,0.0005574053,0.00013371096,0.0021247717,0.00008960086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010545119,0.00011360211,0.00013890713,0.000087040135,0.0013167813,0.00015476142,0.0010389092,0.00008863069,0.00020314274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003002695,0.00006995842,0.00019246487,0.00006232657,0.0044609467,0.00052971183,0.000041982432,0.0004256102,0.00003861066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013793276,0.0000904524,0.0000820883,8.330888e-7,0.00016441113,0.000029118164,0.000087930974,0.000114936236,0.0001720019,0.9922423,0.006828798,0.000049221377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043682157,0.000037507954,0.000441591,0.00004949813,0.000031302447,0.000055199984,0.00008155698,0.000029519968,0.00088896154,0.07601636,0.9218391,0.000092553084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010510858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001090783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015707187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008839941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337162619","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow056","title":"The republican virtues of the “new commonwealth model of constitutionalism”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Separation of powers; Sociology; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03226949416544197,"score_gpt":0.3184463081912751,"score_spread":0.28617681402583317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337162619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030845806,0.002991598,0.05800459,0.29590496,0.009859578,0.00057318975,0.0008079583,0.00004022316,0.6009721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974609,0.0005499364,0.0003777171,0.00053756405,0.0005629092,0.0000022759086,9.4592093e-7,0.0000024798344,0.0005052875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715513,0.00015018001,0.0007928394,0.000103790524,0.0016206448,0.00017739739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957567,0.00083353184,0.000901786,0.00013466888,0.0022619772,0.00011133512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011241405,0.00010599754,0.00022638732,0.00007137375,0.00070936617,0.00003787826,0.0011064047,0.000063509324,0.00008888506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012675608,0.00005242433,0.00028844023,0.00015722275,0.013497491,0.0003741101,0.00013916248,0.00013802493,0.0000027498152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011146688,0.000058545607,0.0021197118,0.0000011311823,0.0002094504,0.0000018402063,0.00015000305,0.00027452316,0.0006733952,0.9912327,0.0036069755,0.0015602898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075672416,0.000033160744,0.0010711061,0.00026969498,0.000042537366,0.000041989904,0.00022330885,0.000012970031,0.0012107702,0.5637487,0.43248785,0.00010115697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010502557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001278016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021760946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004875524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368594978","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov048","title":"Proportionality and Constitutional Culture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049977583296387545,"score_gpt":0.3510176951362327,"score_spread":0.30104011183984514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2368594978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119184945,0.004821475,0.036221147,0.027045593,0.008143582,0.000306245,0.0001957741,0.000075495765,0.91127217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947872,0.00023666176,0.0016167123,0.0012528561,0.0018531834,0.0000042602405,0.000014381734,0.0000022111449,0.00023250104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973714,0.00011478001,0.00051300816,0.0001521806,0.001660129,0.00018852245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959977,0.00010982044,0.00032674414,0.00005133742,0.0031920953,0.0003222734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011271641,0.00012967832,0.00021488374,0.00010722903,0.00047946826,0.00012618615,0.0003408294,0.000097798,0.00012793625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008985755,0.00011116165,0.00011946428,0.00012156018,0.022050232,0.000738494,0.00008235603,0.00021983104,0.000032680648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114322174,0.00009967681,0.005841804,0.0000012522486,0.00017659517,0.000101411766,0.0005136579,0.000065778135,0.000027919235,0.9884306,0.004205857,0.0004210781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000742881,0.000039674862,0.0004679875,0.00005028386,0.000029012443,0.00041534414,0.0007431959,0.0000028800298,0.000029912975,0.28791106,0.7094444,0.00012334641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003334306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013117767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98286873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032309088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028412438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520236492","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow047","title":"Substantive equality revisited: A reply to Sandra Fredman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.025669534638390952,"score_gpt":0.2908419402038372,"score_spread":0.26517240556544625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520236492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16071358,0.00038673577,0.08929208,0.07085283,0.0067491024,0.00037203665,0.00015165086,0.00014131112,0.6713407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815769,0.000006908454,0.0005236511,0.015090997,0.0024609517,0.0000020017558,0.000007408193,0.000005514077,0.00032562471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984698,0.000016148302,0.0005196759,0.00014092364,0.00072469906,0.00012870473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975399,0.00009999898,0.0005265367,0.00009805436,0.0017022815,0.000033231085],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004892396,0.00011319797,0.00017531034,0.00027538958,0.000087878136,0.00022675339,0.00039694612,0.000033490298,0.001175518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005694001,0.000076574135,0.00013416553,0.00015000592,0.00031297753,0.0016153223,0.00008339803,0.000089643625,0.0005100751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019821407,0.00005095936,0.004245293,0.000004525453,0.00008650891,0.000053490752,0.000022103084,0.000013853032,0.0017500243,0.9820385,0.010452643,0.0010839136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007383655,0.0000130269,0.0027549402,0.00024101921,0.000019330484,0.000053031054,0.00003447338,0.0000048652873,0.00054589636,0.014204088,0.98126644,0.00012453072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016083528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043347707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009757957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000843973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575650511","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow063","title":"Real, not nominal, global democracy: A reply to Robert Keohane","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02034290653757923,"score_gpt":0.33240306869038944,"score_spread":0.3120601621528102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575650511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042540077,0.00004295674,0.018767344,0.26259798,0.004391416,0.00014503034,0.00023205673,0.0000376441,0.6712455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484707,0.00006553572,0.0019103715,0.0104753105,0.0015704104,0.0000028075183,0.0000015324604,0.0000029022826,0.0011240575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982865,0.00008280827,0.0004976916,0.00015070738,0.0007097389,0.00027254995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806726,0.00035099103,0.00021753358,0.00008757916,0.00086981076,0.00040683054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007159974,0.000099602,0.0001778027,0.000078731755,0.000218085,0.00009392375,0.00059385394,0.00006599888,0.00077278446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009285629,0.00007572244,0.00015927377,0.00007614464,0.0013668403,0.00064244313,0.000074490345,0.00008741827,0.0002657758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018347224,0.00005978441,0.0006938246,7.1344607e-7,0.00008172811,0.000097706274,0.000062377905,0.000009251149,0.00028120886,0.9902065,0.004701934,0.0036215482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057904323,0.000056069497,0.0015933128,0.00010112014,0.000015586762,0.00020016526,0.00004626903,0.0000011560609,0.00035040695,0.112589106,0.88434786,0.00011993165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016926228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054452627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007418132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013264292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8461448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2681524666","doi":"10.1093/icon/mox007","title":"Federal arbiters as facilitators: Towards an integrated federal and judicial theory for diverse states","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Negotiation; Political science; Guardian; Supreme court; Federalism; Diversity (politics); Institution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02787163377166475,"score_gpt":0.3544824664681881,"score_spread":0.32661083269652336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2681524666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7620826,0.00033586792,0.028171862,0.018615752,0.008773964,0.00048748826,0.001737156,0.000044616765,0.17975071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996839,0.00003538569,0.00057240535,0.00092180405,0.0011106736,0.000004106288,0.000010826787,0.0000034888737,0.00050232466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855274,0.0001111529,0.0003270957,0.00013232378,0.0006653862,0.00021127747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982802,0.00020293069,0.00035840724,0.00007291803,0.0008519658,0.00023353753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009451202,0.000105010215,0.00018367302,0.00004576021,0.0011184094,0.00065519015,0.0004958197,0.00007450008,0.00011400642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011654786,0.0000878125,0.00011907118,0.000014212165,0.0028163448,0.0011447953,0.00005094882,0.0001388049,0.000006784963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030146187,0.0000428845,0.0020633424,0.0000025928246,0.00011171143,0.00003674715,0.00051951903,0.000010026188,0.000029970697,0.9935549,0.00042633008,0.0029004985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013245237,0.00016205055,0.005967757,0.00013330579,0.00001845082,0.00008006159,0.0010255254,0.00003984144,0.00007605614,0.35400164,0.6370002,0.00017060866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012135842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019595698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63955325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002088886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078960013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744710824","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz078","title":"“Dominion status”: History, framework and context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Context (archaeology); Reservation; History; Law; Political science; Genealogy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.017052638051435302,"score_gpt":0.3057070906816013,"score_spread":0.288654452630166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744710824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042082343,0.003521422,0.0074575385,0.006640328,0.011176715,0.00017767843,0.00009042897,0.000028128079,0.92882544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265057,0.0003644571,0.0017940883,0.0030990597,0.0009410408,0.0000011553357,0.000005944971,0.000003817252,0.0011398937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998368,0.00009793244,0.0003662719,0.000114899485,0.00084812177,0.00020476143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979941,0.0005484373,0.0003089317,0.000066203706,0.000865256,0.00021702652],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044284094,0.00009677592,0.00018604481,0.000107191845,0.00013198686,0.000058580437,0.00028425493,0.000089545014,0.001674643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036389107,0.000093008945,0.00010545925,0.00004274094,0.0037164192,0.00047720215,0.00003959849,0.00024150802,0.00007599442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082351355,0.00003962631,0.0051145772,0.0000021724757,0.00009021267,0.000025276595,0.00035052374,0.000022467171,0.000041636464,0.9917796,0.00159656,0.0008549967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045090728,0.000042277745,0.00043359972,0.00008610996,0.000015104114,0.000105014675,0.00044985776,0.00000400409,0.000015330468,0.016274888,0.9820165,0.00010643088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006900716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079974314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98041993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005659538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003598595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764092000","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz060","title":"Judging constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022608736415300926,"score_gpt":0.3207430179377241,"score_spread":0.29813428152242316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764092000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0216652,0.0008138437,0.013083422,0.0114830285,0.012024042,0.00023704195,0.00010030299,0.000053294843,0.94053984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956822,0.00015918342,0.0007218649,0.0013670279,0.0014914448,0.0000040336345,0.000014480076,0.0000033288877,0.0005564376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733824,0.00010548048,0.0006028089,0.00016611563,0.0015317731,0.00025556624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709725,0.00029622277,0.0003827038,0.000080486236,0.0019793527,0.00016397808],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080244185,0.00013852377,0.00025299803,0.00021155794,0.00057874154,0.00013526292,0.00058175763,0.00009253302,0.0022941704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031701097,0.00013287827,0.00029402866,0.00017500209,0.0075395624,0.00081638026,0.00007810962,0.00026578305,0.0004817287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006993285,0.00010863305,0.009634994,0.0000018176227,0.0002796035,0.00006388393,0.0001575425,0.00032163676,0.00019547978,0.98775935,0.0010674249,0.00033968262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009735489,0.00003567658,0.0010501737,0.00014852289,0.000039060356,0.00022785147,0.0005492605,0.000009703718,0.00009119553,0.13120742,0.86548257,0.00018502338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038943274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014664324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035884994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020928853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765634779","doi":"10.1093/icon/mox060","title":"Developments in Belgian constitutional law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Constitutional court; Constitutional crisis; Law; Politics; European union; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Refugee; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.042648741457634816,"score_gpt":0.35679234875112265,"score_spread":0.31414360729348784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765634779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058018025,0.00019416596,0.00062937953,0.0060716514,0.0044681868,0.00009125972,0.000057534653,0.000013898979,0.9826721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950235,0.00018546906,0.0013543278,0.0014109854,0.0010256869,0.0000031837144,0.000009786151,0.000004571594,0.000982521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974231,0.00010248561,0.0006513669,0.0001756112,0.0014064235,0.00024101301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751765,0.00017186414,0.0005962877,0.00012850753,0.0014405417,0.00014516446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010458424,0.00014248527,0.0002236498,0.00016081451,0.0011787735,0.0003994856,0.0013443208,0.00007378994,0.0003060991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073297165,0.00013677549,0.00015219707,0.000043911896,0.009869384,0.0013741071,0.00016179714,0.00027793852,0.00012211208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080034144,0.00011523994,0.016295513,0.0000016220134,0.00015714878,0.0003001098,0.00022784165,0.000052229636,0.00004574186,0.9817022,0.00060908607,0.0004132316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011289215,0.000020372561,0.01700305,0.00020572863,0.000010690156,0.00012206011,0.00011905468,0.000003136995,0.00012073431,0.025957033,0.9551409,0.00016833028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009954134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031369017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045692615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010853951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765975750","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz001","title":"Parliamentary war powers and the role of international law in foreign troop deployment decisions: The US-led coalition against “Islamic State” in Iraq and Syria","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Jus ad bellum; Islam; Law; Legislature; Foreign policy; International law; Political economy; Use of force; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.007863553429958913,"score_gpt":0.2689763972517284,"score_spread":0.26111284382176947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765975750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9158277,0.0005833332,0.00014795248,0.0032391413,0.0010368314,0.00036569385,0.000077473036,0.0000054284274,0.07871643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777293,0.0005448765,0.00014504512,0.001166388,0.00018450504,0.000010355517,0.000019507062,0.000005528299,0.00015085851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975125,0.00025368796,0.0007528029,0.00016442039,0.0011486729,0.00016790937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807763,0.0008612388,0.000421884,0.000084523024,0.00050621264,0.000048500682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015617383,0.00013036041,0.00023680775,0.00020469619,0.00016521584,0.00011149536,0.0005877079,0.0000618154,0.00017563842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121920275,0.0000844646,0.00011023951,0.00006122694,0.0022656838,0.00062965346,0.000095632524,0.0002687249,0.000007500764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006081271,0.00009392168,0.00984726,0.0000017154039,0.00013989954,0.0000223438,0.0010952556,0.00060743926,0.00012676955,0.9871241,0.000023800774,0.00030938466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044697737,0.00005162667,0.0059925807,0.00034332057,0.000019607733,0.000070848284,0.0014070872,0.00057315524,0.00021960794,0.9611473,0.025566032,0.00013903664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002972358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007510767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08194522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000313964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002887638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8348006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897181300","doi":"10.1093/icon/moy022","title":"Unstable Constitutionalism—Law and Politics in South Asia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.025541900413855054,"score_gpt":0.3169803067568737,"score_spread":0.29143840634301865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897181300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024787305,0.0015620582,0.002528595,0.007972863,0.0036180574,0.00015390333,0.00012205818,0.000026560654,0.9592286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941832,0.00014211272,0.00075933256,0.002490337,0.0023279653,0.0000029696134,0.000005307452,0.0000032775647,0.00008552368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791497,0.00009955791,0.00054257753,0.00016341764,0.0009995789,0.00027991986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759054,0.0002044347,0.00024476286,0.000057754474,0.0017316705,0.00017084874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007293521,0.0001328679,0.00023108828,0.00018657185,0.000712183,0.00013099171,0.00035447252,0.00009683163,0.00025511676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039657688,0.00012631166,0.00009289336,0.00016724208,0.015230401,0.0006216061,0.00008491045,0.00021093694,0.000041026822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006235809,0.00007013007,0.0031431096,0.0000013598207,0.00010014795,0.000087889064,0.0008620812,0.000023155273,0.000035808796,0.9952207,0.0002745141,0.00011873752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082032324,0.000047100948,0.0008309378,0.00013083509,0.000022760167,0.00017588524,0.00082837796,0.0000069888083,0.00011867032,0.313287,0.68357503,0.00015609973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026830535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026422217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030147587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013985593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903239299","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa006","title":"Shadow constitutional review: The dark side of pre-enactment political review in Ireland and Japan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutionality; Politics; Institution; Judicial review; Parliament; Shadow (psychology); Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitution; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.030280441528426034,"score_gpt":0.3364541747398641,"score_spread":0.3061737332114381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903239299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031697194,0.1938165,0.0009221188,0.4534524,0.0013195345,0.00077524764,0.00024248361,0.000018855344,0.34628314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93468267,0.04166958,0.00011750813,0.022982262,0.00051418843,0.000008880196,0.000009554976,0.0000020224918,0.000013316845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973743,0.00019443252,0.00082833786,0.00015300587,0.0012400785,0.00020986177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980159,0.0004630015,0.00037511447,0.000058925827,0.00089250674,0.00019458203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009894085,0.00013250328,0.000386982,0.000054759315,0.00025053805,0.000031856973,0.00044122298,0.000051190826,0.00015233671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015592928,0.00009481231,0.0001679829,0.00018269365,0.008122833,0.0003072983,0.00010355603,0.00027973292,0.000009566688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000722394,0.0000687532,0.0028752473,0.00008983449,0.00013867396,0.00003743417,0.00013034848,0.000017910119,0.000020937592,0.99159336,0.004519,0.00043626348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011015225,0.000110942055,0.0050930693,0.009207164,0.0002000172,0.00035739093,0.00034283983,0.0000072095168,0.000051217314,0.08464616,0.89863527,0.0002471724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074043736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026827733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93151295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017121591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013001559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922251482","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz082","title":"New Dominion constitutionalism at the twilight of the British Empire: An introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Constitutionalism; Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Politics; Democracy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013009220931433522,"score_gpt":0.2890994675627693,"score_spread":0.27609024663133575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922251482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38317627,0.0033422476,0.0034660995,0.17411883,0.042687364,0.0009367941,0.00028095557,0.000051921368,0.39193952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931848,0.00013466495,0.00019240918,0.0010223495,0.003558488,0.0000025527086,0.000011975559,0.000003507093,0.001889235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997207,0.00020072376,0.00058731105,0.00017433097,0.0016529687,0.00017769713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759066,0.0002223385,0.0005526441,0.00014888654,0.0013778579,0.00010761896],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089538307,0.000116875846,0.0002136224,0.0000507893,0.0012376143,0.00018838895,0.00084955845,0.00008676514,0.0013968657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033647675,0.00008211246,0.00026386598,0.00019813198,0.0049841614,0.0006492047,0.00014943256,0.0002338314,0.00004998592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113989096,0.00006548726,0.0051845904,0.0000014141731,0.00016671703,0.000007646937,0.00022450341,0.00046173626,0.00049761817,0.9807714,0.011547516,0.00095733115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000744906,0.000036494246,0.0054706526,0.00008889283,0.000046555735,0.0004443964,0.00031316804,0.000003565312,0.0006533614,0.054731403,0.93734884,0.00011776503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038437126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066493256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92604005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037281704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021359338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944083884","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz021","title":"Celebrating Canada’s sesquicentennial: Lessons from and for the world","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.01742221267194418,"score_gpt":0.29081130885272416,"score_spread":0.27338909618078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944083884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07279979,0.0045711724,0.0047998247,0.4192342,0.03434007,0.00072733546,0.0017140592,0.00002625284,0.4617873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362177,0.000053100404,0.00023110583,0.0023005796,0.00092121627,0.000001482943,0.0000051433844,0.0000020972514,0.0028635089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991907,0.000025923553,0.00017877073,0.000061014187,0.00045629137,0.00008733272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881077,0.00052238535,0.00015691036,0.000035076755,0.0004011469,0.0000737411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026006656,0.00003805165,0.00007571292,0.000088730514,0.000461789,0.00024673264,0.00025511027,0.000019856041,0.0005406295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012359794,0.0000355809,0.00005378492,0.000037888687,0.00081144215,0.00021822538,0.000017132366,0.00009912928,0.000004494221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002491641,0.0000065826434,0.00092425424,8.905982e-7,0.00007504373,0.000008011609,0.00016108046,0.000064341206,0.000046715613,0.9833528,0.014689981,0.00064537756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029135728,0.0000044703115,0.0011542403,0.000031416443,0.000016265441,0.000009412477,0.00023500255,0.000035889083,0.000008239919,0.0029184935,0.9952516,0.000043626205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91778916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99860823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059492775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044117216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7826205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955978599","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz035","title":"Secession and post-sovereign constitution-making after 1989: Catalonia, Kosovo, and Quebec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Sovereignty; Constitution; Declaration of independence; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sovereign state; Context (archaeology); Ratification; Politics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.005643424257650911,"score_gpt":0.28764833022882225,"score_spread":0.28200490597117134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955978599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76015604,0.0013946915,0.0018151585,0.007267206,0.0034030916,0.00028337276,0.00033272328,0.00003311351,0.22531463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652463,0.00008828492,0.00073563185,0.0017975818,0.0004226846,0.000002249944,0.000014259503,0.0000044272906,0.0004102394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981682,0.000101994396,0.00042703812,0.00018413548,0.0008816017,0.00023705767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811804,0.0003922156,0.00024361108,0.00007665846,0.00096223183,0.00020724235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005037603,0.00013760579,0.00020946251,0.00015049345,0.00022221837,0.00023414183,0.00027629998,0.00012399247,0.0004894795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037845006,0.00012596505,0.00008683292,0.00007062188,0.0031183942,0.0010750431,0.00011267578,0.00026045283,0.00004661766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014546345,0.00004187155,0.018029299,0.000007697428,0.00007597572,0.00009914289,0.00023167318,0.000033254033,0.0001523908,0.98019177,0.000034222267,0.00095722266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004799039,0.00031138858,0.08899138,0.0022918535,0.00021992406,0.0025365783,0.0024270962,0.00057685375,0.00016839043,0.24695422,0.64946884,0.0012544299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030318396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004795624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73323756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026862978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012669413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963996696","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz057","title":"Is the Commonwealth’s approach to rights constitutionalism exportable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Normative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.031378958354921875,"score_gpt":0.31864168189163056,"score_spread":0.2872627235367087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963996696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115823,0.0005710102,0.0045705973,0.03180268,0.0055795163,0.0003982601,0.000114324925,0.000027251897,0.94535404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98732245,0.00006165813,0.00092205836,0.00946459,0.0015025091,0.000011824666,0.000010286068,0.0000036269614,0.00070101593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679023,0.00013695656,0.00063169154,0.00020508002,0.0019425218,0.00029351292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971246,0.0003509905,0.0003519309,0.00014106113,0.0018150999,0.00021628612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011138034,0.00016360388,0.00027587594,0.00014928615,0.0009997272,0.0001704439,0.0010459836,0.00009032756,0.0007186926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016910104,0.000115395545,0.000251946,0.00024634963,0.0035839411,0.00052579306,0.00011459807,0.0003025889,0.00038726142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083003906,0.00012975601,0.0023698104,0.0000016619206,0.00024598528,0.000017158221,0.0008284146,0.00040250385,0.00002643321,0.9835701,0.012220463,0.00010473943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047370905,0.00002747219,0.0009486681,0.00007088343,0.000027421182,0.00014296296,0.0005368961,0.0000078272915,0.000049975533,0.11344756,0.8841184,0.0001482488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028607494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003933592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97574013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032611768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015075221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003053514","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz061","title":"Enforcing constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Normative; Power (physics); Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021840513729224884,"score_gpt":0.31999423877296934,"score_spread":0.29815372504374443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003053514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014732747,0.0007190064,0.012391333,0.0073623382,0.010399013,0.00021688324,0.00008659502,0.000044545646,0.95404756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957298,0.00015653229,0.00070243864,0.0012530048,0.0014710436,0.0000040101263,0.000014935208,0.0000031912346,0.0006650223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973642,0.00009407415,0.0006174108,0.00015785314,0.0015142921,0.00025214962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710107,0.0003052866,0.0003893309,0.00007927087,0.0019620804,0.000162938],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007883714,0.0001373737,0.00025164994,0.00019967546,0.00056602835,0.0001305623,0.0005693091,0.00009504183,0.0024203446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000324973,0.00013064491,0.00029493147,0.00016684273,0.007131083,0.0008407578,0.00007622376,0.00025799498,0.00046646481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007519069,0.00009209521,0.0067535937,0.0000019218257,0.0002731092,0.0000561843,0.00018391924,0.0004022826,0.00019148999,0.99062634,0.0010140094,0.00032988016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009645408,0.000038845574,0.00069963996,0.00014702296,0.000037107115,0.00021969173,0.0006117329,0.000010130629,0.00010864053,0.11817775,0.8788072,0.00017772548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049550546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016956922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036970744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002182442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026487392","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa018","title":"The African National Congress and the birth of constitutionalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.028517723792277825,"score_gpt":0.23397415235168784,"score_spread":0.20545642855941001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026487392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030501059,0.0025977897,0.0023769718,0.13937742,0.00502478,0.0002263818,0.0008190666,0.000021538734,0.84650594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948405,0.00004991458,0.000057467027,0.0034095095,0.0011084822,0.0000030035221,0.0000062072654,0.000002728251,0.0005221737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983849,0.00007643463,0.00053835835,0.00007820791,0.00082865456,0.00009347536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972794,0.00073737884,0.00033193638,0.000041600804,0.0015109692,0.00009871638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034386668,0.00009062523,0.00017773791,0.000033932876,0.00033720586,0.00012872653,0.0004159395,0.000023443636,0.00019209874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043979308,0.00004760746,0.00014427888,0.000027934335,0.010900545,0.00024048261,0.000058487094,0.00018849852,0.0000092016435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039436988,0.00002688953,0.00003164294,0.000004043628,0.00019540657,0.000011454695,0.00061894563,0.0000509952,0.0000073352194,0.9964674,0.0020501546,0.00014135135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010941538,0.000036141173,0.000016930178,0.000020925378,0.000019118295,0.00007677383,0.00029028702,0.00046226694,0.00001064951,0.1187493,0.8791664,0.000057048805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005702856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003494497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048675312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040907206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082811238","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa055","title":"Populist rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Rhetoric; Populism; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.035146984231668114,"score_gpt":0.3140154183536302,"score_spread":0.2788684341219621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082811238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025101574,0.0069670663,0.006215766,0.40409562,0.006869453,0.00033623682,0.00008900609,0.000056251476,0.550269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235344,0.0005494163,0.00022227418,0.0049250764,0.0018896933,0.0000026509467,0.0000017339644,0.0000021104927,0.00005363413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837357,0.000104599065,0.00035275077,0.00009902008,0.0009423593,0.00012768088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851066,0.00027716387,0.0002424506,0.000031802978,0.0007894187,0.00014851503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058244925,0.00008730351,0.00018248976,0.000034506666,0.0006245153,0.00012629859,0.00039391423,0.00004094148,0.00011478052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006919098,0.000060271734,0.00012645187,0.00007526758,0.005731592,0.0003214987,0.0000786046,0.00018342695,0.000023823866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022783533,0.00002096939,0.0010313618,9.482598e-7,0.00015287686,0.000049692942,0.000858315,0.00002557741,0.000017601691,0.9957779,0.0014112886,0.00042561867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012652652,0.00002200446,0.00059116236,0.000034326295,0.000038798775,0.000082255254,0.0005217961,0.000010417837,0.000018442825,0.12792414,0.8694025,0.00008886347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010118512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025783226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96725184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008588564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045439237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99697423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121836781","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow012","title":"Bridging the transatlantic divide? The United States, the European Union, and the protection of privacy across borders","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; European union; Political science; National security; Agency (philosophy); The Right to Privacy; State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Business; International trade; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.030322966624632214,"score_gpt":0.31678589729862194,"score_spread":0.28646293067398976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121836781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15192337,0.0004878203,0.4076073,0.42990512,0.0016743853,0.00070793426,0.00011268408,0.00002624623,0.0075551607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973052,0.00083472155,0.000020469311,0.0008611038,0.0008922403,0.0000035958274,0.000003850801,0.0000046347345,0.000074142146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970079,0.0016627029,0.00038202878,0.00008695823,0.0007240099,0.00013638829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789065,0.00084117055,0.00040809787,0.00012597225,0.000698942,0.00003519214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062643974,0.00008256645,0.00008921277,0.000041599655,0.0010742766,0.0001844656,0.0007912954,0.000020542106,0.000019961251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078420836,0.000029369741,0.000089817775,0.00015097244,0.005762076,0.00036684648,0.000084510684,0.00023988636,0.000006183455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026120708,0.000033672655,0.00020084996,0.000006164267,0.00018117305,0.000012737916,0.0063074054,0.00036639028,0.00031393833,0.9601708,0.0006783236,0.031467326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018737088,0.00006060286,0.0046455585,0.00032130664,0.00014379532,0.00036615852,0.0048708445,0.00014323709,0.00022353858,0.014916458,0.9723205,0.000114298826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023340483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004941594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052534044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016073856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99694365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127572305","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa086","title":"Federalism’s radical potential","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Federalism; Politics; Legitimacy; Political science; New Federalism; State (computer science); Ideology; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.024512891718684024,"score_gpt":0.312596124226245,"score_spread":0.28808323250756096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127572305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02175015,0.0008107383,0.056809425,0.3052392,0.0080927545,0.00016006955,0.0001588765,0.000052059986,0.60692674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98828125,0.000041302148,0.0004954092,0.0070232893,0.0039831554,6.0105936e-7,0.0000020461705,0.0000023077557,0.00017064506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982051,0.000080962964,0.00035042356,0.00008068054,0.0011317274,0.00015107964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988903,0.000077081124,0.00020094671,0.000026743763,0.00050552574,0.0002994486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028506698,0.00006126744,0.00013088871,0.000022654802,0.00017987164,0.0001250811,0.0004229928,0.00005776401,0.0005507482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004423619,0.000054362845,0.00014714326,0.00004892532,0.0014052233,0.0003749445,0.00003162419,0.0001645283,0.000067667555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055379278,0.000029505605,0.0002143646,0.0000016116794,0.000060401966,0.00019684243,0.00017804377,0.00007696414,0.00015050652,0.9937877,0.0050244527,0.00022420286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046712856,0.000025293839,0.00024153994,0.000029407664,0.0000087273065,0.00010636666,0.000048995156,0.00003076991,0.00007454356,0.012633467,0.9862682,0.00006554018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008242224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056603083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012859992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006556054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6030307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148691272","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab019","title":"“It’s the political economy . . .!” A moment of truth for the eurozone and the EU","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Monetary and Fiscal Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Garron Family Cancer Centre","keywords":"Transformative learning; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Economic and monetary union; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Sociology; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.03262337803121635,"score_gpt":0.24338603912774026,"score_spread":0.21076266109652392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148691272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048230495,0.006655889,0.040459193,0.5639219,0.0023283323,0.0002387269,0.00056216645,0.0000042938623,0.38100642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877576,0.0001560728,0.00019200167,0.0112477,0.00047885076,0.0000040854584,0.000004227058,0.0000033914123,0.00015607067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991302,0.000034178127,0.0005725097,0.000083566825,0.00007423453,0.00010531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829066,0.0010182769,0.00032618386,0.00010076113,0.00022537747,0.000038751372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056370924,0.00006845583,0.00018148373,0.000036284346,0.00012841601,0.00007690624,0.00033547496,0.000019814232,0.000076266224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023017485,0.000037820475,0.0001815089,0.000036064663,0.0017260374,0.00012927556,0.00007091005,0.00013515935,0.00000872124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010948069,0.0000347353,0.0003977967,0.000003312132,0.00027723398,0.00000549461,0.00006844023,0.0001943547,0.000003668581,0.99795645,0.0008898613,0.000059150727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012783348,0.000028670242,0.0013643135,0.000017046259,0.000025193503,0.00028038502,0.00016666381,0.0005481185,0.000099595745,0.3581984,0.63794273,0.000050532195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022287995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006524456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98293453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029698644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071521106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63596565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149844019","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab102","title":"Comparative law at the heart of immigration law: Criminal inadmissibility and conjugal immigration in Canada and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Law; Criminal law; Comparative law; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.021672226556005276,"score_gpt":0.31211759102192743,"score_spread":0.2904453644659222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149844019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684999,0.00058150844,0.00014269986,0.0222374,0.00042528,0.00011119076,0.00009105322,0.0000021516278,0.007908839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980453,0.00021316842,0.00004553557,0.0015008586,0.000106243,0.0000023628068,0.000030898293,0.0000013162261,0.00005430124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842894,0.00033826838,0.00042472873,0.00009428405,0.0006241923,0.00008960552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791014,0.00067168835,0.00025001168,0.000053167692,0.0010536266,0.000061350365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085816387,0.00007187776,0.00017497157,0.000035764406,0.0003386469,0.000069999514,0.00011617594,0.0000315732,0.00007572149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007459669,0.000047989597,0.000046297762,0.00009470107,0.0027587456,0.00028081296,0.000044588647,0.00015243414,3.356774e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030534776,0.000028239576,0.003725104,0.0000031684663,0.00005473223,0.000011350897,0.003669056,0.00026675186,0.00015999012,0.9915519,0.000139775,0.00008458836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053033754,0.00012777977,0.057307273,0.0002912547,0.00016642985,0.0006100269,0.035970602,0.0019128822,0.004707202,0.060952835,0.8323302,0.00032013012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8141705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98317105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93059903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033471314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014247736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160417934","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab029","title":"The political conception of the legal person: A reply to Gila Stopler","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Politics; Adversary; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.053092433875379784,"score_gpt":0.3637367400414045,"score_spread":0.31064430616602473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160417934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009931032,0.00013850514,0.0013736974,0.58590287,0.0036766334,0.00007039098,0.000059741888,0.000006104174,0.39884102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834314,0.000010969723,0.00017823263,0.014276283,0.0015681998,0.0000012258366,0.0000010938259,0.0000018895199,0.0005307097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979976,0.00023472267,0.00032029458,0.000079044716,0.0011788618,0.0001894672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971827,0.00065179425,0.00014452435,0.000091211194,0.0017706462,0.00015911502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067913765,0.000057502657,0.00010151477,0.000025035839,0.00044301935,0.00009735784,0.000489848,0.000056759374,0.0001336417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00209388,0.000036596055,0.00019403879,0.00010313956,0.003479617,0.0002070968,0.000058676473,0.00029107337,0.000012210294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041056428,0.00003923217,0.00019937949,0.0000010312694,0.00005573992,0.000027138576,0.00028553876,0.000029832147,0.00023546872,0.9978065,0.0011829319,0.00009616529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002310438,0.000022576403,0.0007021949,0.00007194916,0.000018397484,0.00017130049,0.001309669,0.0000036073611,0.0011219169,0.2588099,0.7374828,0.000054627693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003485052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002710476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021197401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018595807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163025946","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab041","title":"Ely in the world: The global legacy of Democracy and Distrust forty years on","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sketch; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.02208313572474602,"score_gpt":0.3365698722796519,"score_spread":0.3144867365549059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163025946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32494435,0.0015782457,0.00044754575,0.084154084,0.00230246,0.00015648098,0.00013237362,0.0000069415714,0.5862775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976119,0.00014091792,0.00009320907,0.0016636932,0.00043840267,0.0000015450061,0.0000025958514,8.754544e-7,0.00004690708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852103,0.00013073818,0.00030835814,0.00007693278,0.00085938786,0.00010353473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988404,0.00042921002,0.00017787503,0.00004929416,0.00046843954,0.00003478237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005854157,0.000061522886,0.00011769368,0.00003937467,0.0003008722,0.000094850984,0.00035328305,0.000025770622,0.000072289324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034036516,0.000038725702,0.00009369795,0.00021858879,0.0026549916,0.00024971453,0.0000501398,0.00015543132,0.0000038671196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052415668,0.00007459821,0.015358549,6.588917e-7,0.00006974836,0.00011476007,0.00021089452,0.00006609725,0.000007711788,0.98253757,0.00038481006,0.0011221808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063209806,0.000030442514,0.12534669,0.00013961681,0.0000343887,0.00024651876,0.0020796033,0.000003227294,0.000044646957,0.49963573,0.3717141,0.000092928334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007479508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005882105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012431796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071526883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172672511","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab046","title":"Dialogue and distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distrust; Context (archaeology); Law; Skepticism; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016983065412624468,"score_gpt":0.2754866363459421,"score_spread":0.25850357093331766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172672511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03181727,0.006289805,0.000738862,0.22084966,0.0047863624,0.00017676369,0.00022762528,0.000014692075,0.73509896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500394,0.0006549492,0.00011175377,0.0031134496,0.00094890106,0.0000025904494,0.0000063840375,0.0000015741971,0.00015648738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884456,0.00010379283,0.0002463721,0.000095836156,0.0005671465,0.00014231709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985343,0.00023977098,0.00011092035,0.00003608538,0.0009119749,0.0001669484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005597767,0.00007378972,0.00014490953,0.000051010204,0.0010006296,0.0002276008,0.00017419833,0.00004964155,0.00015026801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042740515,0.000053314736,0.00007308186,0.00006548737,0.0066121686,0.0002685405,0.00005115316,0.00015999097,0.00000952205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041520063,0.000012067919,0.002822309,6.455699e-7,0.00013274705,0.00012423626,0.00041955253,0.000003683259,0.000008688062,0.9951359,0.00063247595,0.00066619134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097123254,0.0000084093945,0.007737182,0.000049712016,0.00003878917,0.00048301532,0.00045535664,0.000005098818,0.00002167904,0.1761139,0.8140245,0.00009110729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052735846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.335025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014028042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018047574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99609125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179810729","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab064","title":"Audit culture of human rights as “governmentality”?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Field (mathematics); Audit; Political science; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.019875944237303683,"score_gpt":0.3394946442671139,"score_spread":0.3196187000298102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179810729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08418946,0.0001822501,0.00050983677,0.0021736566,0.0020577481,0.00005057012,0.00004574114,0.000008497789,0.9107822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403113,0.00002186277,0.00078718876,0.00040986275,0.0006249284,6.624158e-7,0.000012628645,0.0000017237993,0.0041099973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978726,0.00007622526,0.00043026722,0.00008965052,0.0014297466,0.000101534024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824375,0.000052853182,0.00032008707,0.00005272588,0.0012297258,0.000100837904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003378519,0.00007009368,0.00014718235,0.000046831272,0.00035179502,0.00007004657,0.0003185342,0.000058189784,0.0030772425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059962615,0.00005509808,0.00014015874,0.000058525507,0.001157425,0.00030335257,0.000043446136,0.00012233268,0.000033085602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017768989,0.00013135417,0.00033562392,0.0000017192127,0.000165993,0.00024083436,0.0010368011,0.000009078813,0.0010339237,0.99410385,0.0028660225,0.000057011865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004375475,0.000026058899,0.00039282063,0.00008786614,0.0000149106545,0.00013380982,0.00035008875,2.777484e-7,0.0063988534,0.20388564,0.7881984,0.00007367782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035580338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002877211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090709724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198643327","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac040","title":"Para-constitutional engineering and federalism: Informal constitutional change through intergovernmental agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislature; Constitution; Federalism; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Compromise; Constitutional review; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03548451119361003,"score_gpt":0.30479175567726274,"score_spread":0.26930724448365273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198643327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19005695,0.004741803,0.080888756,0.0390599,0.03774734,0.0016012451,0.005573871,0.00019029732,0.6401398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946062,0.000079449164,0.0009058923,0.0026591683,0.0014558481,0.000030117413,0.000029846704,0.0000036893655,0.00022981099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661607,0.00009128277,0.0006276353,0.00017016922,0.0021726193,0.00032225525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987893,0.00017933457,0.0004063429,0.00006469364,0.0003605352,0.0001998029],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065576396,0.00016479637,0.00022934531,0.00009199223,0.00087382237,0.00016177515,0.0004963277,0.00006167598,0.0008437684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020248821,0.00016904023,0.00015878135,0.000102001235,0.004814562,0.0014763614,0.00024221693,0.00036353653,0.000014880989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094467956,0.000104559804,0.002764478,0.000004855705,0.00017751497,0.00013776268,0.0006153824,0.00034210653,0.0000919967,0.9947942,0.0007071882,0.00016550533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011850971,0.00006649823,0.0019678602,0.000088921595,0.000021277785,0.0010905622,0.00044068848,0.000080371705,0.000050007533,0.0046761935,0.9901262,0.00020631605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009526347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008754539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99011797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008486498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089288974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213086076","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab129","title":"Judicial amendment and our constitutional lives: A reply to Emmett Macfarlane","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Secession; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional theory; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Normative; Judicial review; Originalism; Judicial restraint; Constitutional interpretation; Judicial activism; Constitutional amendment; Constitutional law; Sociology; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03469044570718269,"score_gpt":0.3524611504676337,"score_spread":0.317770704760451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213086076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13374756,0.004602378,0.01388755,0.4311943,0.016687522,0.0007595699,0.0005930601,0.00011788295,0.39841017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595333,0.00026208392,0.00422116,0.007059935,0.0018930386,0.000006520821,0.000012814782,0.000003311152,0.0005877884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748933,0.00014446408,0.0005335583,0.00021291299,0.0013831209,0.00023661173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971176,0.00019677055,0.00025998862,0.00006258022,0.002082889,0.00028017804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058867247,0.0001431313,0.0002601606,0.00009343781,0.0005916882,0.00021617867,0.00030663874,0.00005795045,0.00026697715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010863364,0.00012884579,0.00015137343,0.00013921148,0.00210265,0.00042122678,0.00014395724,0.00022670299,0.000050105667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008776197,0.000104523875,0.0014837413,0.000002774231,0.00030862752,0.0004252879,0.0013258226,0.00010914015,0.0006287388,0.9894004,0.005519351,0.0006038361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797709,0.000060776194,0.0014125843,0.0001757036,0.00005626648,0.0006734467,0.00501707,0.000003672296,0.0005928328,0.008845655,0.98195827,0.00022395271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000647244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004071651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98055476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004905291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011177489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77473015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213326079","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab127","title":"Judicial amendment of the constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Constitutional amendment; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Politics; Original intent; Extant taxon; Originalism; Invocation; Constitutional law; Amendment; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02444199024478361,"score_gpt":0.31829335709583545,"score_spread":0.29385136685105184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213326079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030166134,0.0017860145,0.004827821,0.026033143,0.012881079,0.00015004099,0.00011730997,0.000016185586,0.92402226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719006,0.00023108549,0.00032562247,0.0010357958,0.0010943533,0.0000017749909,0.0000032909645,0.0000014786652,0.00011653117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771327,0.00014542308,0.0005234176,0.00009845378,0.001379796,0.00013966368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967587,0.00017024299,0.00042139852,0.000074581374,0.0025045206,0.00007055188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049695047,0.000084369174,0.00018748504,0.000057291873,0.0004911979,0.00004588466,0.00044770696,0.000060250502,0.00032934372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006308633,0.000065073014,0.0002601844,0.00019204967,0.005900217,0.0002678667,0.00010444312,0.0001690148,0.00001155776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004362514,0.00012085918,0.0031190007,0.0000013255134,0.00019943329,0.00005286178,0.00020672173,0.00017156525,0.0010175966,0.9937868,0.0008323256,0.0004478446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075978995,0.000022562946,0.0021302365,0.00021962608,0.000076430464,0.00024605286,0.00067716354,0.0000018715602,0.0051738666,0.17351149,0.817059,0.00012193023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008888518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00321751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236603093","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor073","title":"10 x 10","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harassment; Law; Pornography; Verdict; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Criminology","score_opus":0.03962335443621007,"score_gpt":0.35380493360002174,"score_spread":0.3141815791638117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236603093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0123066455,0.0013141267,0.0004825812,0.011692328,0.00418971,0.000087682056,0.000027894124,0.000027754697,0.9698713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854788,0.000058497448,0.0008638997,0.00043845153,0.0032854155,0.0000019694546,0.0000039871893,0.000002604115,0.009866349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982267,0.00008792634,0.0003245892,0.00006020114,0.0010829396,0.00021764112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802166,0.00020857084,0.00025007728,0.000037091384,0.0013074342,0.00017517987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007052492,0.00008339915,0.00013417969,0.000052041796,0.0003710707,0.00008117293,0.00038539004,0.00006292535,0.010802565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063715765,0.000066532026,0.00015488671,0.00006546665,0.001751802,0.0009397143,0.000051795243,0.00013960584,0.0007883142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055142547,0.00008333648,0.001225521,8.4199155e-7,0.00015430556,0.0000105839135,0.0007851567,0.000018945364,0.000057452628,0.9842054,0.012573715,0.000829593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030608263,0.000016923834,0.0013114642,0.000025926702,0.00001819783,0.00004622162,0.00039869445,0.0000010926337,0.00009169562,0.0016918853,0.99600697,0.00008485371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023041252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006885399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98343325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035681023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023710894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242508267","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor062","title":"10 x 10","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Economic Justice; Democracy; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.023190175728025487,"score_gpt":0.32403834744224586,"score_spread":0.30084817171422035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242508267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007840211,0.00036480633,0.00092807045,0.0029436925,0.0032857126,0.00005750808,0.000027341048,0.00001604042,0.9845366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804526,0.00003392304,0.00054771826,0.0005459486,0.003831366,0.0000010299433,0.0000071069567,0.0000034044463,0.0145768775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998283,0.00007775455,0.00033007338,0.00005873951,0.000999984,0.00025041617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831945,0.00014416796,0.00024246372,0.000051505504,0.0010512581,0.00019118641],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089239003,0.00007669425,0.00011980948,0.00009639009,0.0004359095,0.00010114896,0.00042924954,0.00007139012,0.025361542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014127456,0.000061015333,0.00014178395,0.00006429671,0.0013797857,0.00083683373,0.000025627705,0.00013125801,0.00086826325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281028,0.00012169061,0.0003661452,7.235726e-7,0.0000872035,0.00002233565,0.0009880502,0.000015507765,0.000028616816,0.991724,0.0060291095,0.0005537741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670124,0.000025404337,0.00020673305,0.00002125759,0.0000148004665,0.00013332958,0.00016229371,0.0000010556497,0.000114027025,0.005973118,0.99299866,0.00008229143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030784495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034632158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002363412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008620825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246219574","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.163","title":"Transitional justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02867599649337276,"score_gpt":0.24378825332520843,"score_spread":0.21511225683183566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246219574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013948829,0.00022309332,0.012712946,0.0020714037,0.0060166367,0.00003284205,0.00012470521,0.000013915102,0.9774096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355114,0.0000079945385,0.0006007361,0.0024432489,0.0012750458,0.0000012173043,0.000011801234,0.0000037681382,0.0021050696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883515,0.000043216965,0.000396273,0.00007380304,0.000540926,0.000110607216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876493,0.00010563029,0.00012840935,0.000042520736,0.00084845995,0.000110037174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017226866,0.00008629819,0.0001264132,0.00007963238,0.00015401415,0.00008451571,0.00020825716,0.000028759245,0.0030807303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009314128,0.00007147489,0.00015870282,0.000016048369,0.0011890628,0.00040758582,0.000007266269,0.0001604323,0.00009526164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041367544,0.00012126192,0.0000146143475,0.0000035947542,0.00008992487,0.00009356161,0.00023290563,0.00006149138,0.000022539714,0.997338,0.0018863648,0.00009437792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041185197,0.00003374786,0.0000071626246,0.000022823831,0.00003695739,0.00028327963,0.000107425236,0.000026959176,0.00002592768,0.11448747,0.88447577,0.00008064215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014244708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018643655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101058984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027072467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255395321","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz056","title":"Dialogic remedies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Declaration; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.02327899340654451,"score_gpt":0.3129759707294164,"score_spread":0.2896969773228719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255395321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030758604,0.0008586411,0.0009818546,0.010967963,0.0086563695,0.000108860746,0.000022665252,0.000024809538,0.9476202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589145,0.0002802097,0.00035583577,0.0013145384,0.0016743811,0.0000015902342,0.0000033978051,0.0000020704695,0.0004765422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981761,0.00006721403,0.00035942305,0.00009577523,0.0011439468,0.00015757115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813306,0.00022040529,0.00023843083,0.0000478572,0.0012710614,0.000089198154],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740596,0.000083028535,0.00017207966,0.00010348371,0.00026784127,0.000071400216,0.00044545415,0.00005681216,0.001026279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003213324,0.0000707422,0.0001585548,0.00009310139,0.0024198096,0.00046298848,0.000054319902,0.00015159081,0.00028078037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006104715,0.00004847922,0.006721975,8.2944615e-7,0.00014269911,0.000044901164,0.00023058653,0.00007281933,0.00016521881,0.99074244,0.0012819658,0.00048705895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000432221,0.00003451711,0.0013738,0.00006244115,0.000015406185,0.00006313569,0.00041551268,0.0000016039468,0.000074726384,0.1617411,0.83568907,0.00009647056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051021506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030521123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96513283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018864294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078495324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285201175","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac034","title":"The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutionalism; Executive power; Political science; Power (physics); Executive order; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.025721722348032324,"score_gpt":0.31601420501732164,"score_spread":0.2902924826692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285201175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077688033,0.00461788,0.0005572279,0.044924513,0.00413434,0.0003810041,0.00022041283,0.000019201489,0.9373766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616253,0.00033293696,0.00006708815,0.0027779047,0.00035765066,0.000047287056,0.0000068854624,0.0000026243954,0.00024510623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965482,0.0006442137,0.00062180596,0.00019122112,0.0017053765,0.00028919804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966314,0.0018124457,0.00041872915,0.00007637641,0.00095919747,0.00010185562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022088473,0.00016531277,0.0003043216,0.0001023736,0.0037387887,0.00019581061,0.0007533919,0.0000470122,0.00016584372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030607506,0.000110020876,0.0001943574,0.00023257527,0.03889661,0.00045935254,0.00027423463,0.00058915606,0.000009346522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093664473,0.00009302974,0.00050613453,4.2068692e-7,0.0003328624,0.00008903385,0.0037072143,0.00073778856,0.000009633751,0.99200493,0.0015131474,0.000069185095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021955282,0.000048692647,0.00034686326,0.000038105358,0.000031036736,0.00026998966,0.017037135,0.00001697773,0.000012752752,0.23678122,0.74307674,0.00014491742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002634473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027452318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059402006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014254283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309326512","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac087","title":"Against settlement before the European Court of Human Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Isaac Newton Trust; York University","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human rights; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.015501370567499426,"score_gpt":0.30518857481918427,"score_spread":0.2896872042516848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309326512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1361217,0.00007351778,0.001069074,0.017516254,0.0045545804,0.00019210624,0.00044355643,0.000018068786,0.8400111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972688,0.0000028876038,0.00010279314,0.0008259441,0.0011438945,0.0000033099423,0.000052183288,0.0000037511677,0.0005964565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710137,0.00039869887,0.0005177502,0.000082779996,0.0017852054,0.00011420044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980364,0.00009077474,0.0007549606,0.00006859331,0.0009971302,0.0000521827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019505324,0.00007383152,0.00010806902,0.00010692837,0.0011361586,0.000056519166,0.00085155887,0.000017257978,0.00075371953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005811375,0.0000571675,0.00016752005,0.00008174247,0.0010554701,0.00024832052,0.0001120998,0.0002277307,0.000010580466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021814796,0.000111878144,0.0012615367,8.066917e-7,0.00013463669,0.00005219451,0.0006230322,0.00080086343,0.00019565383,0.99374264,0.002800146,0.00025478154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049835094,0.00006367799,0.002710951,0.000029418547,0.000019869964,0.000053037867,0.0003849838,0.0000117938225,0.00019923515,0.057727512,0.9382334,0.00006777182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039777867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008253798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032968578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022044698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8738528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319165491","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad001","title":"Andrej Lang, Review of Afroditi Marketou, Local Meanings of Proportionality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Soviet and Russian History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016182067158931716,"score_gpt":0.31299320944718145,"score_spread":0.29681114228824973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319165491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067555234,0.018154327,0.0036517316,0.0130276615,0.0056136935,0.0003268728,0.0005209121,0.000020775311,0.9519285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968893,0.0010050368,0.0004072068,0.0009074494,0.00032247292,0.000004191665,0.00002205703,0.0000029887779,0.0004393188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971985,0.0002254913,0.00066382665,0.000084522944,0.0017343657,0.000093242255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783057,0.00013766276,0.00085128925,0.00006352034,0.0010460527,0.00007087984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018328486,0.00006559836,0.00022883287,0.00013469139,0.00018913292,0.0000070853735,0.0004607612,0.00003015419,0.004859012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027742243,0.000061493105,0.00022238506,0.00015396756,0.0021681525,0.00020500894,0.000066149965,0.0001891622,0.000004206298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094066374,0.00013352111,0.0013729063,0.000080094454,0.00010606933,0.000041519546,0.00019451448,0.00003382924,0.000073125004,0.98368543,0.013547411,0.00063749676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043056183,0.00006328091,0.0014698886,0.000831016,0.00004611114,0.00016837592,0.00036140182,0.0000035692822,0.0001206742,0.009458085,0.9869576,0.00008939835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020820784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002977972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99013376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000328881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016109772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99605066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381431771","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad025","title":"Theorizing about the executive in the modern state","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Plural; Law; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Judicial review; Law and economics; Democracy; Executive branch; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03773854049261411,"score_gpt":0.3417221363990461,"score_spread":0.303983595906432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381431771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054254714,0.0014906187,0.0035455693,0.096378766,0.0051250015,0.0003488549,0.00010041143,0.00004921332,0.83870685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646443,0.0004836091,0.000029490951,0.0019754039,0.0008397299,0.000008896998,0.0000033395947,0.0000020944217,0.0001930132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997836,0.00023552476,0.00036447454,0.00008934938,0.0012723943,0.00020227622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982617,0.00084497913,0.00019532313,0.00005898331,0.0006005647,0.000038457398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020857514,0.0000833519,0.00011844302,0.00011393592,0.0007025531,0.00014002954,0.0008341156,0.00003330219,0.00003849857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004242933,0.000047744405,0.00013015218,0.00032348884,0.0034600534,0.00032943318,0.00006677334,0.00026314345,0.000053397976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046860903,0.00003077663,0.0010624569,4.1635843e-7,0.000083784755,0.00012028313,0.0048221196,0.0008653466,0.000022425776,0.99003386,0.0015235763,0.0013881006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002724675,0.000012156985,0.004258834,0.000059246595,0.00001084928,0.00005437084,0.0025376102,0.000033888336,0.000012029337,0.6840495,0.3086317,0.00006736114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011030178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015130324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013947961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065642537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392581948","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae012","title":"The consensus-clarifying role of deliberative mini-publics in constitutional amendment: A reply to Oran Doyle and Rachael Walsh","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Political science; Publics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.018387664899195546,"score_gpt":0.32427968092069964,"score_spread":0.3058920160215041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392581948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19614397,0.0337525,0.007042244,0.3246885,0.011129029,0.0012907004,0.0009494963,0.00011272721,0.42489082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604374,0.00040289268,0.0013266618,0.0016174283,0.00034987097,0.0000069736775,0.000006424801,0.0000031680406,0.00024286349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980357,0.00014156931,0.00055924704,0.00015465391,0.0009296046,0.0001792207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979435,0.0006738419,0.0001867834,0.000059141414,0.0010119183,0.00012478091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013511037,0.00010722014,0.0001709059,0.000056255023,0.000423693,0.0002753661,0.0003399001,0.000094619056,0.000081565835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046631927,0.00007966383,0.00012768009,0.00021727619,0.004840702,0.00035745878,0.000065992994,0.00034058318,0.000007179303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000874725,0.00004847734,0.0003695928,0.0000050859057,0.00015942151,0.000053790995,0.0045404984,0.00017101351,0.0007095255,0.9909446,0.0018402911,0.0010702289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000437943,0.000034980716,0.00013754275,0.00024893312,0.000022953413,0.00020721705,0.0051030903,0.00006745117,0.00038899493,0.07919829,0.91404355,0.00010904104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017476354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047729642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91220325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002526238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014169486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401857849","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae036","title":"The normative development of laws on asset preservation and confiscation: An examination of emerging best practices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confiscation; Normative; Asset (computer security); Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.07750610510110867,"score_gpt":0.3372916704582022,"score_spread":0.2597855653570935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401857849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5389975,0.0014457237,0.07107514,0.01700406,0.008873025,0.0005640099,0.00011869285,0.000059847964,0.36186203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789023,0.000052930154,0.0008711624,0.00022287256,0.00079190155,0.0000041066637,0.00005344561,0.0000049150126,0.000108448876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983334,0.000027580521,0.0006608045,0.00010580377,0.00079995213,0.00007243647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968076,0.0004097695,0.0010813348,0.000061371145,0.0016268914,0.00001308381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009795967,0.00009479621,0.000121660654,0.0002158066,0.0001408771,0.00026153668,0.00030737856,0.000037699312,0.00005231748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005131637,0.00007064565,0.000050996725,0.00009834761,0.0007500217,0.0025148706,0.000050943225,0.00012747504,0.00000864742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080766506,0.00011167593,0.0003612927,0.000049461614,0.00019058668,0.000005741186,0.0002137219,0.00034724912,0.0005682727,0.98981774,0.00018219648,0.008071297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012163719,0.00015984874,0.019055909,0.0013431619,0.00016644874,0.00011801389,0.0015328223,0.015506577,0.004974801,0.065447286,0.8901536,0.00032518868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041633255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056384488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92437047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061986255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018102233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2880846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402666796","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae047","title":"Care as a constitutional value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019824332326893703,"score_gpt":0.3464563101381688,"score_spread":0.3266319778112751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402666796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004871265,0.003396973,0.01585788,0.007272591,0.011518947,0.000120366734,0.00007529407,0.0000665248,0.95682013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365556,0.00010638416,0.0019930447,0.00097449665,0.0019778796,0.000002925967,0.000016653714,0.0000034811126,0.0012695838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977835,0.0000695223,0.00041872598,0.00013829478,0.0014233183,0.00016667291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983675,0.00018552059,0.00010536633,0.000047927246,0.0011305925,0.00016309533],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048321811,0.00010394058,0.00013271568,0.00021125424,0.00037507975,0.00036075723,0.00041801255,0.00007646571,0.0020989066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010906636,0.000083741834,0.00018487113,0.00010105637,0.0040964885,0.00058997324,0.0000361327,0.00022182029,0.00036191178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030455165,0.000031491338,0.000088922294,0.000005252538,0.00018724024,0.00066245464,0.0016028562,0.00021535253,0.00003376468,0.9926554,0.0032514604,0.0012353801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024564457,0.000021516647,0.000038861523,0.00020839753,0.000019396319,0.00042563427,0.0005284613,0.000010842903,0.000098986944,0.10198926,0.8963087,0.000104271334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016132428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008786374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005647111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005190128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403197589","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae039","title":"In this issue; Guest Editorial: Unsexing scholarship? Towards better citation and citizenship practices in global public law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Citizenship; Citation; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05802698424311658,"score_gpt":0.3858343987905346,"score_spread":0.327807414547418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403197589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12863895,0.0018725903,0.00034246943,0.14090014,0.1517963,0.00027615108,0.00007070548,0.000054113225,0.5760486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97542787,0.00009492718,0.0006566811,0.0013928731,0.022232331,0.0000034023542,0.000007227878,0.0000033233114,0.00018137481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977825,0.0001897113,0.00047877888,0.00015893026,0.001215047,0.00017503205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873096,0.0003077669,0.00023557506,0.000035788686,0.00058278744,0.00010713585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021936477,0.00009526648,0.00013752462,0.00023141666,0.00016121821,0.000856469,0.0002741211,0.00011169571,0.0004133626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067304814,0.000082012615,0.000050378425,0.00020178183,0.0008443249,0.0020424519,0.000040352916,0.00035100494,0.00003675503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034645178,0.000034630426,0.0026333043,0.000006464116,0.0000597206,0.00028199027,0.0009811807,0.0000049808423,0.000019529178,0.98676246,0.008687482,0.00049360754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035556723,0.000014297261,0.0014420679,0.00021031841,0.0000066478765,0.00006790651,0.00014710208,0.0000049619175,0.000020067675,0.20160419,0.7960369,0.000089979745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012470002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048569776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8467889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006359969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012690573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.825895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411445941","doi":"10.1093/icon/moag059","title":"Causation and Exposition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Causation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.01927299086817125,"score_gpt":0.2632278875830246,"score_spread":0.24395489671485338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411445941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014594998,0.0004386833,0.004709871,0.0178691,0.0043615177,0.000054043634,0.00004733927,0.000014542615,0.9579099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967452,0.00001828379,0.00012027906,0.001502449,0.0009710607,0.0000010363752,0.000008074017,0.0000012045261,0.00063240883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994355,0.00001718743,0.00023585434,0.000053228283,0.00021424315,0.00004397901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992793,0.00008343875,0.00010540936,0.000027344413,0.00047756554,0.000026920472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010322471,0.000051074865,0.00007753406,0.00010836702,0.00011645382,0.000115521536,0.0000957535,0.000020593352,0.00025224063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003662789,0.000042805143,0.000053959167,0.00001397919,0.00087674597,0.00035066108,0.000021308848,0.00009122966,0.000008512886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006231599,0.000044970577,0.00004868526,0.000002883538,0.00009502934,0.000015768928,0.00015260823,0.000013786663,0.00015156582,0.9970491,0.0011053204,0.0012579892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004048379,0.000023429899,0.0001367192,0.00008304663,0.00002109368,0.000052372423,0.000048786715,0.000022940707,0.00027367647,0.44357017,0.5553219,0.00004104417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000129605305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029152552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046015703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007790661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3230407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411724707","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaf021","title":"Chief justices and democratic resilience: Judicial leadership in times of constitutional crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04276085852462981,"score_gpt":0.3309494178866684,"score_spread":0.2881885593620386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411724707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029943846,0.008401561,0.008718006,0.051392943,0.005300311,0.0003645318,0.00013185892,0.000031570708,0.89571536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969272,0.00045655266,0.00058987585,0.0014655906,0.00041643402,0.000004557811,0.0000039724573,0.0000016827936,0.0001341211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767935,0.00014423796,0.00076388847,0.00017652844,0.0010026803,0.0002332994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978625,0.00057467725,0.00035584343,0.00005596139,0.0010621463,0.00008886717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096584694,0.00013773564,0.00033110022,0.00040975772,0.00040952995,0.000064935484,0.0004323495,0.00010955956,0.00025709535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009411641,0.00012996401,0.0001254883,0.00032878466,0.01148455,0.00052039325,0.000082737475,0.00024979937,0.0000052479218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018276124,0.00013331808,0.0109638795,0.000013301188,0.00017757206,0.000046457422,0.00030681017,0.00033197834,0.0000818359,0.98580813,0.0013420647,0.0006118782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024081261,0.00009872527,0.015668148,0.0013479539,0.00019913107,0.00012820073,0.0075209467,0.000053238182,0.00047948372,0.9046361,0.06710658,0.00035336928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013057552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012571939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020864462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023157604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99120563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7131827772","doi":"10.1093/icon/moag001","title":"Incapacitating, or something else? Unpacking Australian amendment culture in the First Nations Voice Referendum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Griffith University; Central Queensland University; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutional amendment; Politics; Openness to experience; Meaning (existential); Amendment; Constitutional theory; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.061040335759728656,"score_gpt":0.39981306556717644,"score_spread":0.33877272980744777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7131827772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017566755,0.00019565939,0.002341927,0.19995664,0.0048384415,0.0003848927,0.00013952525,0.000028870461,0.7745473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246854,0.00009997004,0.00082882744,0.0035183963,0.0005715425,0.000007190284,0.00000916995,0.000002643458,0.0024937277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980188,0.00018227339,0.000566818,0.000115112605,0.0008842029,0.00023278187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982085,0.0006899831,0.00030248586,0.00008090985,0.000647629,0.000070443326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012161941,0.00010924478,0.00015090822,0.00031987933,0.0008872603,0.00027892212,0.0007549531,0.00009644354,0.00019368662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073565345,0.000078643076,0.000114443836,0.00033752303,0.00083890307,0.00044204656,0.000039706443,0.00048215096,0.000009395808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003075214,0.00009186574,0.0007454348,0.000008049419,0.00007634341,0.000055884582,0.0050870506,0.00015994423,0.00001419708,0.9871028,0.006490992,0.00013670039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005602497,0.000024588066,0.0011085863,0.00039024535,0.000021437858,0.00004956089,0.004617455,0.000011344453,0.000037159087,0.065157644,0.9279244,0.00009735062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017781776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02747235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000526846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097368896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}