{"meta":{"query_hash":"20bd10e9d036","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20bd10e9d036","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Cultural+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1965686537","doi":"10.1080/10286630701201988","title":"A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGNING AND EVALUATING COMMUNITY‐BASED AFTER‐SCHOOL ART PROGRAMS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Art Education and Development","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; The arts; Conceptual framework; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.33550510035277736,"score_gpt":0.4803504492956915,"score_spread":0.14484534894291412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965686537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946652,0.00022692398,0.04117917,0.008347827,0.0007307042,0.00025018328,0.000008256138,0.000022130744,0.0025828034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933636,0.0000093296685,0.10158406,0.0030302908,0.0014194978,0.000009588298,0.000008421935,0.0000056621047,0.00056952017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908763,0.00013814955,0.0003484901,0.00006198964,0.00023481227,0.00012891782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824923,0.00073139713,0.00023260438,0.00003476785,0.0006310621,0.00012093762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013650914,0.000089682246,0.00013544598,0.00011025285,0.00019972175,0.00022292587,0.00012423172,0.000037657748,0.00015320403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001302686,0.00006144269,0.00005685859,0.000019461742,0.00025012362,0.00020844057,0.000035549063,0.00024354503,0.000003370231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015416747,0.00033491984,0.0045247115,0.000039459595,0.00039344825,0.000017443752,0.27127323,0.0000158896,0.00074933126,0.5952312,0.003974727,0.121904016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039701625,0.0024951482,0.021948008,0.0009778572,0.00013188038,0.00038929,0.19607362,0.00019060214,0.0018993681,0.20300077,0.5681351,0.00078821334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026395668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028113109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56416035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006723204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097382675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25055602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976276191","doi":"10.1080/10286630902878568","title":"Cultural spending in Ontario, Canada: trends in public and private funding","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Government (linguistics); Public funding; Cultural economics; Government spending; Private sector; Cultural policy; Economics; Public administration; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.09090064346973428,"score_gpt":0.3560914570386823,"score_spread":0.265190813568948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976276191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92821085,0.00007237557,6.646532e-7,0.05399319,0.00041693661,0.000035719517,0.0000018967421,0.000004247971,0.017264089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895538,0.00009433855,0.00009959005,0.00045461854,0.00055161625,5.088635e-7,0.000006055378,0.0000023750094,0.0092371125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852264,0.00005123263,0.00044368088,0.00010366142,0.00056979316,0.00030898207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993739,0.000021118823,0.0002268249,0.000028597657,0.00018820443,0.00016133518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003025423,0.00010926789,0.00017653166,0.00034446534,0.00009953759,0.00028614173,0.00034287496,0.00006231819,0.00031225453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021719393,0.0000802398,0.000048789887,0.00036658833,0.00006135187,0.000945402,0.000038018658,0.00034549343,6.8511105e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016606986,0.00015587738,0.50825834,0.0000026178184,0.00015584155,0.0007389712,0.059823997,0.00014861245,0.00086694,0.15398021,0.070875786,0.20482673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005830769,0.000026320897,0.68516666,0.000069221285,0.000002489398,0.00007581195,0.005323303,0.000005043386,0.000038376176,0.0007991757,0.3077759,0.0001345806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9270669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23690014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035792307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075430784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93595636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992248956","doi":"10.1080/10286630600813677","title":"HAROLD INNIS, CULTURAL POLICY, AND RESIDUAL MEDIA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Cultural history; Technological determinism; Social science; Epistemology; Anthropology; History; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03865183925380282,"score_gpt":0.35982411383546764,"score_spread":0.3211722745816648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992248956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7807442,0.00066460174,0.000005446214,0.18462297,0.0011346582,0.000107229556,0.000039255276,0.000035472385,0.032646142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96104395,0.0007077677,0.00029857672,0.0010388215,0.015279634,0.0000017539643,0.000025896361,0.000008330855,0.021595284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794257,0.00008597277,0.00053416047,0.0001312736,0.0009845523,0.0003214885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819434,0.00009394979,0.00038246025,0.000051552957,0.0010767895,0.00020093378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032022045,0.00016046753,0.00020844945,0.00022831309,0.00026568028,0.00047895024,0.0005013921,0.00012864212,0.00013904131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091031264,0.00010887583,0.00011224271,0.00029448987,0.00037888612,0.00089405273,0.000097138996,0.00026768367,0.000019028474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012098309,0.00008749813,0.0052171564,0.000004063864,0.00019248934,0.00010243915,0.017685711,0.000042313368,0.0019544046,0.18017612,0.7747261,0.019690748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074860675,0.000037756152,0.033219047,0.00005994488,0.000015611615,0.0002012009,0.0068587023,0.0000020764242,0.0006072739,0.0065915254,0.9514442,0.00021404399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021502605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026492712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18358415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053760636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057266845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009441546","doi":"10.1080/10286630902763281","title":"Doing a Florida thing: the creative class thesis and cultural policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Underpinning; Creative class; Cultural policy; Sociology; Politics; Capitalism; Order (exchange); Creative industries; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Economics; Creativity; Law","score_opus":0.03916585152438747,"score_gpt":0.36950695575366566,"score_spread":0.3303411042292782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009441546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4105598,0.00050409505,0.00003089961,0.49327207,0.00068962574,0.00016736967,0.000010747064,0.00003133989,0.094734035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790124,0.0010364741,0.0003059785,0.0033225585,0.005936306,0.0000015879472,0.0000025087961,0.00000485988,0.010377294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998248,0.00013243048,0.00041235174,0.00012114734,0.0007965046,0.0002895815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833983,0.00010774703,0.00039121803,0.00005488322,0.0009296063,0.00017669372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041174563,0.00015996405,0.00019498117,0.00013913789,0.0005177001,0.00063269463,0.0005955724,0.00009144329,0.00007757923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091326877,0.00008304417,0.00015945316,0.0003244551,0.0002979069,0.0009154499,0.00006352453,0.00033414652,0.000007530234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770199,0.00009524931,0.000978851,0.000003676798,0.0006369464,0.00008682867,0.2050456,0.0001302023,0.002563532,0.211092,0.2288617,0.3502284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006089829,0.00010489041,0.013989841,0.00011543777,0.000030681986,0.00023407943,0.055622954,0.000012772594,0.0004996101,0.008411642,0.9201359,0.00023317737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053162975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027038128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053832127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043752562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8036687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039311850","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2011.567332","title":"The 2010 Cultural Olympiad: playing for the global or the local stage?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Olympiad; The arts; Premise; Cultural policy; Cultural economics; Political science; Virtue; Outcome (game theory); Public relations; Sociology; Economics; History; Law","score_opus":0.13761965802387519,"score_gpt":0.40302056228830846,"score_spread":0.2654009042644333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039311850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14556679,0.0023988085,0.0021723509,0.7886402,0.017852066,0.0015012105,0.00019509843,0.000080969694,0.041592512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178451,0.0010223059,0.00021767482,0.0018588979,0.005125862,0.000018658,0.0000032097812,0.000007840022,0.07390046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982147,0.0001223747,0.0004480369,0.000096410906,0.0007798677,0.00033858654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978549,0.00036275823,0.00043393002,0.00009575286,0.0011379016,0.0001147586],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008745454,0.00014006124,0.00012451292,0.000020597992,0.0015188528,0.0005419035,0.0015920729,0.000080031765,0.00025207555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008828224,0.00004130161,0.00023068396,0.00020830471,0.0007340145,0.0004904297,0.00011017791,0.0002602668,0.000013476522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009239701,0.00006767793,0.0027113627,0.0000031374689,0.0009825556,0.000030599822,0.04788144,0.00010809212,0.000045666755,0.16054042,0.5955054,0.19119968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004312312,0.00005560471,0.009930646,0.000024080993,0.000027482953,0.00009552729,0.05681164,0.00003964352,0.00007796183,0.0016842401,0.9307149,0.00010703712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008081432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054299915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7867813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005420584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005472183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062362675","doi":"10.1080/10286630802281921","title":"Can national cultural policy approaches be used for sub‐national comparisons? An analysis of the Québec and Ontario experiences in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Ottawa","funders":"Arts Council England; Institut national de la recherche scientifique","keywords":"Cultural policy; National Policy; Exploratory research; Comparative research; Political science; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Policy analysis; Regional science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.1703551138626274,"score_gpt":0.35595334062434003,"score_spread":0.18559822676171264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062362675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499747,0.000050311264,0.0000025125123,0.04885748,0.00018718882,0.00011694672,0.0000669422,0.0000026200894,0.000741297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971729,0.00003153986,0.00010792746,0.0006199397,0.0005480448,0.0000118072,0.000027401064,0.0000034652696,0.0014769865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975479,0.0000901664,0.00056475995,0.00013590798,0.001454001,0.00020723957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791235,0.00012559503,0.00049261044,0.000042542397,0.001291156,0.00013574692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030439862,0.0001293802,0.0002770826,0.0002728449,0.00030472843,0.00008449432,0.0005503554,0.00005808872,0.00005737119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004900447,0.000081946,0.00015759973,0.0005846913,0.0003655167,0.00048418695,0.000049533395,0.00017034625,7.63407e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015245228,0.00018671634,0.55051214,0.000004497585,0.0012857165,0.0000077878385,0.37551743,0.0046190643,0.00024250687,0.025250355,0.041044384,0.0011769338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001019105,0.000049813993,0.78099746,0.000032389584,0.00006855928,0.00006061178,0.13318858,0.00064985384,0.00052480644,0.00040834397,0.08271162,0.00028885738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24232885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048534637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016698964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074643960","doi":"10.1080/10286630109358155","title":"From Cool Britannia to Hot Nation: ‘Creative industries’ policies in Europe, Canada and New Zealand","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Diverse Education and Engineering Focus","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creative industries; Political science; Economy; Creative economy; Economic growth; Economic history; Economics; Creativity; Law","score_opus":0.03828290322980071,"score_gpt":0.33314999632406944,"score_spread":0.29486709309426873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074643960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92839694,0.00004836761,0.000011353236,0.061827797,0.0008011735,0.00003898538,0.000020113208,0.000005769717,0.008849525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777113,0.00019205202,0.000096894364,0.0010924981,0.0031030637,5.291937e-7,0.0000044313247,0.000003914148,0.017795302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919534,0.00003321278,0.0001910392,0.00006084598,0.00039781682,0.00012174466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905,0.00004539027,0.00009193613,0.000026385318,0.0005722341,0.00021404767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009032489,0.0000633325,0.00009225696,0.00015751552,0.000045178294,0.00014175235,0.00022848941,0.00003115738,0.00013492581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009506483,0.00005527362,0.000013839126,0.0004280015,0.000039422113,0.00030288676,0.000023803823,0.00011358167,0.0000057140205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234284,0.000062596264,0.03042198,9.66186e-7,0.00017606335,0.00019488363,0.12957147,0.0016072874,0.00028346354,0.011900334,0.7954045,0.03014221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037718614,0.000017730326,0.15891151,0.000041875377,0.0000039681,0.000028794833,0.008475416,0.0000041316653,0.00004473147,0.00027928074,0.83173263,0.000082759805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95325816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59858966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3546685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038186685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014950839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.408735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151732027","doi":"10.1080/1028663032000089507","title":"Singing alone? The contribution of cultural capital to social cohesion and sustainable communities","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Cultural capital; Cohesion (chemistry); Individual capital; Sociology; Social reproduction; Singing; Capital (architecture); Social mobility; Economic capital; Public relations; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Human capital; Management","score_opus":0.01839296562836877,"score_gpt":0.3451088873970723,"score_spread":0.3267159217687035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151732027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800831,0.0001775638,0.000045052006,0.01575456,0.00031478368,0.00010710532,0.000008812319,0.000008540467,0.0035004846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766076,0.000139297,0.000052844138,0.0004221103,0.0008311776,0.0000017309274,0.000005592405,0.0000039697097,0.0008825466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985864,0.00026370864,0.00030647105,0.000049830294,0.0005443928,0.00024917556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975325,0.00010548028,0.00030021687,0.000032145952,0.0019475349,0.00008216334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060544844,0.000093753704,0.00017072436,0.000079776306,0.0007528332,0.0002159183,0.00033935474,0.000067273824,0.000022241622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008151927,0.000057286357,0.00012643673,0.0002026752,0.00036078817,0.0005818934,0.00005989809,0.00017482786,0.0000019799556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087732034,0.000044145647,0.0019888123,0.0000043524437,0.000121847406,0.00000832721,0.21303731,0.00008076664,0.0017934265,0.779777,0.0015032348,0.0015530776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009793604,0.0001451119,0.014600761,0.00007006445,0.000050640254,0.00009268494,0.8916382,0.000016739867,0.00081480504,0.025943639,0.06541827,0.0002297271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006609964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087371963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75383335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029666725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016947891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795562443","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2018.1459589","title":"Brics issue-narrative on culture: strategic or trivial?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Globalization and Cultural Identity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitat de Barcelona; Simon Fraser University; University of Otago; Universiteit van Amsterdam; San Francisco State University","keywords":"Narrative; Political science; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.07522299201089476,"score_gpt":0.45228172028227753,"score_spread":0.37705872827138276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795562443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5223227,0.00011910936,0.000074611,0.053226776,0.0067897956,0.00024496843,0.000036775702,0.00007737194,0.41710788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614185,0.0003239839,0.00011158022,0.0027901393,0.010123704,8.864578e-7,0.000006554428,0.00000529146,0.025219373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998132,0.00017295238,0.00037929308,0.00011363338,0.000998605,0.000203527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667066,0.000036411806,0.00041962575,0.00005882831,0.002631048,0.00018344198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000284478,0.00012299423,0.00016052005,0.00012504424,0.00033488552,0.0004247473,0.0006531223,0.000092737224,0.0017128484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012738397,0.000073891584,0.00014719162,0.00041995547,0.00033120037,0.0007124892,0.00003221968,0.00016570817,0.00024709094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006297817,0.00026882952,0.00020883455,0.000003292035,0.00033225736,0.00008952016,0.1392777,0.000050948966,0.0013001078,0.45924938,0.39386362,0.00472574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011744138,0.0005378643,0.0009849151,0.00010891181,0.00002422582,0.00009858142,0.055171598,0.000014888794,0.00074078183,0.015393177,0.92551214,0.00023848112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011706683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016127096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5316485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036105042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037266972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965003823","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2019.1626849","title":"The trade and culture debate: evidence from US trade agreements <b>The trade and culture debate: evidence from</b> <b>US trade agreements</b> , by Gilbert Gagné, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 2016. 190$80.00 (Hardback).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Political science; Economics; Free trade; International economics; Political economy","score_opus":0.019308528630469505,"score_gpt":0.31285090856544434,"score_spread":0.29354237993497484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965003823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52807486,0.03982177,0.0000782745,0.42588758,0.0027337363,0.001222249,0.0004995331,0.000104815175,0.0015771636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95605785,0.031601835,0.00034200118,0.004958418,0.0030888482,0.000009376268,0.00006265487,0.000050561554,0.0038284764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443454,0.00071949675,0.0011620602,0.0006244981,0.002337437,0.0007219709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970279,0.00078326353,0.0011359986,0.0003452106,0.00020449028,0.0005031869],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076066743,0.00058090076,0.00056690455,0.00012268397,0.0009825387,0.0014496524,0.0021332463,0.0003302818,0.0003557586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008911705,0.00034864384,0.0002875039,0.00045721343,0.0007846626,0.0026731973,0.00017295805,0.0010185204,0.000036775073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054336473,0.00025105255,0.028394407,0.000035337744,0.0013937852,0.000099743105,0.10186707,0.00008749177,0.07389791,0.0023548987,0.7835544,0.007520544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002586642,0.00032742383,0.0719869,0.0017774302,0.000348163,0.00027103478,0.006799329,0.00011865202,0.01298375,0.002287496,0.8995297,0.0009834702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005458447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002425013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42798296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000592301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035778095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966278575","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2019.1626850","title":"Trade and culture: the ongoing debate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Latin Americans; China; European union; Politics; Political science; International trade; Liberalization; Free trade; Commercial policy; Cultural policy; Political economy; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0415472612740086,"score_gpt":0.2611140317962046,"score_spread":0.21956677052219603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966278575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93809956,0.0014556595,0.0000338704,0.031787053,0.0010446056,0.000059014026,0.000034408535,0.0000057266247,0.027480096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518937,0.0008723067,0.00015861209,0.0020397312,0.0007934152,5.10416e-7,0.0000020913305,0.0000058380797,0.0009381232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993026,0.000006791914,0.00042863927,0.00009259487,0.000046547113,0.00012282052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994224,0.000020659656,0.00039198197,0.000068189525,0.0000409586,0.000055815784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018040463,0.00008198261,0.00017152287,0.00009041334,0.000034654327,0.0001621637,0.00036083424,0.000041460753,0.00007737639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007126204,0.00005566271,0.00011845992,0.000059263613,0.000037969163,0.00044215313,0.000039469032,0.00015031992,0.00015152381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007211715,0.00006022302,0.03685245,0.000011285357,0.00053145527,0.00001840441,0.0064237993,0.00058628776,0.0005561059,0.9332443,0.016899092,0.004744481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015717105,0.00013984379,0.0750641,0.000045199762,0.000010340848,0.0010019633,0.00088391895,0.0005685352,0.00032230152,0.10566143,0.814467,0.0002636132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010379193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005259361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009335765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001641696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22698595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997253498","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2019.1709058","title":"The China Museum Boom: soft power and cultural nationalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Superstar; China; Nationalism; Soft power; Boom; Commodification; Inequality; Power (physics); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Economy; History; Art history; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.039771104027509906,"score_gpt":0.3505968440407318,"score_spread":0.31082574001322194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997253498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2533473,0.0006818839,0.0000117561285,0.73551303,0.00097153825,0.00009987023,0.000016333954,0.000021600672,0.009336709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98680764,0.0008006183,0.00007515287,0.0033268938,0.0036753223,0.0000016514314,0.0000057076354,0.0000038257253,0.0053031556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844813,0.000072003844,0.00036186012,0.00009720963,0.00082357577,0.0001972228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985023,0.000090960886,0.00029963654,0.000028023693,0.0008491884,0.0002298676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024711923,0.00011174402,0.00012301044,0.000030323004,0.00046398197,0.00054438796,0.0005358714,0.00006611678,0.00019821411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001073372,0.000055670575,0.0001145961,0.0001669918,0.00023592552,0.0006437159,0.0000895488,0.000250982,0.000011573495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017505906,0.0000380097,0.001290319,0.0000026943774,0.00041762408,0.00004917424,0.06795497,0.000040486757,0.0013268138,0.09855879,0.78591335,0.044232722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031278437,0.000039655773,0.009361285,0.000018966142,0.000007882604,0.000059634433,0.009422378,0.0000136942035,0.00007688207,0.0011919946,0.97938776,0.00010706419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088635646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018418944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73346037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018766803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002197524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52495456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092626370","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2020.1811256","title":"Cultural policies in cities of the ‘global South’: a multi-scalar approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Negotiation; Gentrification; Cultural policy; Urban politics; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Narrative; Social science; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10381963264390585,"score_gpt":0.37150735145271063,"score_spread":0.26768771880880476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092626370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8866613,0.00025228938,0.000037356418,0.100395754,0.00058913534,0.0001574869,0.00005281054,0.000013566894,0.011840333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530435,0.00008843871,0.0003879273,0.0013041669,0.0013518517,0.0000017655807,0.0000025642294,0.0000037457385,0.001555187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822927,0.00011895323,0.0005366843,0.00009787414,0.000795099,0.00022214856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864984,0.000021959138,0.00044213957,0.00004803859,0.000702169,0.00013586566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018334782,0.00012468745,0.0002211746,0.000054142296,0.000114543254,0.00014156294,0.00091805926,0.00008816659,0.000053620053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082362414,0.000069853675,0.0002227135,0.00048370264,0.00038629817,0.00041768712,0.0001405125,0.000252445,0.0000036997433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034120184,0.0003249144,0.22044824,0.000036219175,0.0006267078,0.000035629382,0.58226156,0.00217139,0.0014387649,0.09987863,0.08358203,0.008854709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003395205,0.00013038986,0.2824624,0.00029097917,0.00005088289,0.0001302381,0.3690782,0.00026332,0.0012866724,0.0016898301,0.34065285,0.0005690476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004651326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004496554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25707084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041443657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038238702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7031445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200543744","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2021.1988082","title":"What makes for a creative-friendly community? Untangling the location attributes of creative clusters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Creative class; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Creative Cities; Creative industries; Creative city; Consumption (sociology); Sociology; Public relations; Marketing; Business; Creativity; Political science; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.08283350934173728,"score_gpt":0.39207739478325726,"score_spread":0.30924388544152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200543744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7346359,0.002040567,0.0012418687,0.2509486,0.0024061385,0.00040875064,0.000077595396,0.000018341201,0.0082222475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853687,0.0008344796,0.0004849701,0.00065758865,0.0011894407,0.0000063588523,0.000031248874,0.0000054900484,0.011421693],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998586,0.00027601502,0.0004190976,0.00006383614,0.0005038862,0.00015119332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478215,0.00039609487,0.0005057699,0.00006767468,0.0041836235,0.00006466247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006023261,0.0000926193,0.00017242313,0.00006695553,0.0004127044,0.0003212084,0.00048763503,0.000060963706,0.00009195111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020952786,0.00005709672,0.00015114347,0.00030115727,0.0002806975,0.00091784203,0.000069752,0.00022350837,0.0000013961675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007999217,0.00056587165,0.0021605468,0.000058792648,0.0024496021,0.000037781818,0.5386775,0.0022101055,0.0039242455,0.11604736,0.20610945,0.12695879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097600336,0.00015362677,0.0043157185,0.00054607366,0.00005991354,0.000063955,0.6538939,0.000039478127,0.009897782,0.0046121622,0.32527575,0.00016561532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029268889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001462401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25073287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037218723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057437725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387904338","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2268094","title":"The discursive construction of the role of public service broadcasting amid the rise of the Korean Wave","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Asian Culture and Media Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Korean Wave; Public broadcasting; Neoliberalism (international relations); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Public service; Hegemony; Public sphere; Government (linguistics); Discourse analysis; Political science; Sociocultural evolution; Political economy; Media studies; Public administration; Politics; Advertising; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03227346402404158,"score_gpt":0.3314418975756049,"score_spread":0.2991684335515633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387904338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8125135,0.00044083045,0.000002773621,0.16731744,0.0013808917,0.00016107268,0.000033486675,0.0000060151724,0.018144043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780995,0.00038467068,0.000017810811,0.000126027,0.0010892082,0.000001838487,5.7660344e-7,0.0000033388874,0.0005665673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834394,0.00024434133,0.00038355732,0.000052774107,0.00082599587,0.00014936275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719197,0.00025969223,0.00094980875,0.000097811826,0.0014648035,0.000035913334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057069183,0.00007240332,0.00012852659,0.000043239666,0.00042617787,0.000045987646,0.00086987304,0.000036264093,0.000007590809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017302902,0.00002523159,0.00021869062,0.00054053916,0.00092873763,0.00020670194,0.00016884384,0.00018845637,0.0000013127088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010348699,0.00008453409,0.0322669,0.00002270543,0.0012424302,0.0000027207157,0.44722867,0.0001556817,0.010558581,0.36752754,0.009015927,0.13179083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000613777,0.00005161707,0.10829356,0.00031021834,0.00011992918,0.00008086978,0.7107112,0.000078583325,0.011561756,0.038361948,0.1296899,0.00012666105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013657835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001727337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32916558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076921446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026149928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34219727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391173461","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2296071","title":"Left off the circuit: the impact of shrinking live music tours on cities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Resizing; Economic geography; Political science; Visual arts; Art; Geography; Economics; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.07699866175469586,"score_gpt":0.3850610705731984,"score_spread":0.30806240881850255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391173461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89770615,0.0010027105,0.000005637754,0.0689669,0.0016362527,0.000113744754,0.000022200076,0.000015931098,0.030530483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859255,0.0004341686,0.000004681285,0.0004070813,0.003511766,9.123006e-7,0.0000016039336,0.000005103953,0.00970918],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985911,0.00009161578,0.00032183694,0.00007040496,0.000752854,0.00017217433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891365,0.00023311256,0.00021850862,0.000057606525,0.0005185365,0.000058588033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043824688,0.000101677084,0.00012067026,0.00009826352,0.00022298832,0.00039376903,0.00070331176,0.000049737406,0.0007104361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003044383,0.00004158425,0.00030770685,0.00017407633,0.0002930398,0.00032430896,0.000051848245,0.00031939964,0.000017674505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008181085,0.000056014236,0.0015007379,0.0000062309987,0.0012752938,0.00006604879,0.2596602,0.0010866208,0.0006391544,0.117963254,0.49693078,0.12073385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005191379,0.00039758763,0.060019705,0.0010462293,0.00008024629,0.00045886374,0.12575282,0.000098263146,0.00073800364,0.027909975,0.78260225,0.0003769408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005502729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046820112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28567144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004923867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057166227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8318517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407384380","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2025.2464036","title":"Jim McGuigan – a tribute","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Political science; Media studies; Art; Art history; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011909424479740385,"score_gpt":0.3523692663648121,"score_spread":0.3404598418850717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407384380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5625851,0.0008671883,0.0005558838,0.017054986,0.0024076218,0.000031989868,0.00010179976,0.000049881382,0.41634554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94433,0.00011081555,0.00047707334,0.0009462535,0.0019366874,0.0000014196594,0.000014036991,0.000005711315,0.052178055],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991004,0.0000064133264,0.00038177127,0.00008476437,0.00030497782,0.00012169816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991068,0.000027933544,0.00025690472,0.00008884001,0.00045643243,0.000063042426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006694639,0.00010033091,0.0001358311,0.0000901129,0.000049398142,0.000046586025,0.0005597634,0.00005662343,0.0005786789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035116333,0.0000797945,0.00015152752,0.00008707202,0.000064923064,0.00023419186,0.000058016252,0.00022975823,0.000013121957],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035471437,0.00026394197,0.00084203266,0.000074075804,0.0008419291,0.00020716223,0.00070431695,0.00023406828,0.84307295,0.015034768,0.10186513,0.036504913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008398464,0.0000069904468,0.000046315196,0.00016178116,0.000016760123,0.00012766119,0.00019888168,0.000009384242,0.2350308,0.0022009942,0.7612792,0.00008134524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011268659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011831056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6594141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035391244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017482063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6336128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415881377","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2025.2574906","title":"Canvas as Indigenous counter-diplomacy: the paradox of Kent Monkman’s visual art in Canadian cultural statecraft","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Art, Technology, and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Visual culture; Visual anthropology; Cultural policy; Cultural heritage; Painting","score_opus":0.015021601750123821,"score_gpt":0.3253807898443375,"score_spread":0.31035918809421364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415881377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9352213,0.00065916375,0.0000020454079,0.020784466,0.00082405156,0.00017202289,0.00011031786,0.000017625236,0.042208996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870441,0.0003246476,0.000007561201,0.002099066,0.0007895047,0.0000067333926,0.000025748797,0.000008161133,0.009694456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850947,0.000049500155,0.00060226285,0.00011590064,0.00039788138,0.0003250065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985849,0.000032939013,0.00033844393,0.00009919699,0.000841546,0.00010292501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000177705,0.00017806476,0.00025636214,0.00042163645,0.0001832831,0.00019371757,0.00075988827,0.00008387448,0.00027290775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013543322,0.00010259145,0.0001708989,0.0000853251,0.0003681333,0.00040210976,0.00006173942,0.0004028021,0.000033195192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037611573,0.00041735993,0.010352436,0.00004121728,0.0016888123,0.0004473477,0.2659864,0.00038961566,0.0011645631,0.54387295,0.16668853,0.008574642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086295424,0.00017988011,0.0058730408,0.00019243,0.000045040757,0.00021913032,0.029925764,0.000031230822,0.00070217304,0.011434219,0.9503443,0.00018980114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23290698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5423891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7836558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005536334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068054715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7722012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}