{"meta":{"query_hash":"20bd10e9d036","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20bd10e9d036","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Cultural+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1965686537","doi":"10.1080/10286630701201988","title":"A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGNING AND EVALUATING COMMUNITY‐BASED AFTER‐SCHOOL ART PROGRAMS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Art Education and Development","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; The arts; Conceptual framework; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.33550510035277736,"score_gpt":0.4803504492956915,"score_spread":0.14484534894291412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965686537","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0771087,0.00423341,0.7203163,0.009221757,0.00035406952,0.14410344,0.0016111636,0.00024570205,0.04280555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13453077,0.0006889605,0.7718451,0.00038467898,0.00002253292,0.09138423,0.00035692778,0.000025312298,0.000761476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6261591,0.33775467,0.013837699,0.004995137,0.01458085,0.002672521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8158311,0.121266104,0.013850515,0.014114497,0.031092813,0.0038450088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.25243035,0.0022854425,0.0021937734,0.012960177,0.0063561574,0.012206039,0.0068410006,0.003248992,0.005270168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16135558,0.001627456,0.002203435,0.008703765,0.013502913,0.00695612,0.0076083676,0.0034491448,0.0004396788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000600894,0.0050459974,0.01964935,0.01386679,0.0009065678,0.00027602122,0.04684688,0.023786336,0.0025494252,0.56687576,0.0064486996,0.31314734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061822054,0.009233644,0.027993128,0.04601899,0.0023327773,0.00031347942,0.18440548,0.059253182,0.010896617,0.47388756,0.17893946,0.00054350507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022230294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030841457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25243035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039116897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07158705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92188644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976276191","doi":"10.1080/10286630902878568","title":"Cultural spending in Ontario, Canada: trends in public and private funding","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Government (linguistics); Public funding; Cultural economics; Government spending; Private sector; Cultural policy; Economics; Public administration; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.09090064346973428,"score_gpt":0.3560914570386823,"score_spread":0.265190813568948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976276191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8703843,0.008144761,0.0004869158,0.02439647,0.00013819794,0.00015643385,0.032020576,0.00018009667,0.06409226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94852877,0.0058922307,0.00070298644,0.0014559231,0.000060833732,0.000098493285,0.0070676496,0.000076483564,0.03611668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960413,0.00015800931,0.00016676413,0.00021123546,0.0019066943,0.0015160361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98106396,0.0009622778,0.0025166215,0.00037817587,0.0094225565,0.005656419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012551688,0.00036187473,0.0005447782,0.0045324424,0.0051182774,0.0039186766,0.0020284595,0.0008486895,0.0049984246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076431395,0.00055720226,0.0005303336,0.013584488,0.0020824426,0.0011180829,0.0020396924,0.0009776335,0.00056073454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003702666,0.00008917853,0.8362981,0.00063023047,0.000158074,0.0006631772,0.014346949,0.0011979266,0.00099076,0.014104488,0.07048744,0.06066334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019382234,0.000021283156,0.9405611,0.0001694528,0.00002682332,0.00010932477,0.007380576,0.00040131266,0.00019390193,0.00018863719,0.050889507,0.000038654987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99895275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14918873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14918873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20442109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98682046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992248956","doi":"10.1080/10286630600813677","title":"HAROLD INNIS, CULTURAL POLICY, AND RESIDUAL MEDIA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Cultural history; Technological determinism; Social science; Epistemology; Anthropology; History; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03865183925380282,"score_gpt":0.35982411383546764,"score_spread":0.3211722745816648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992248956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010858493,0.100243166,0.0017418397,0.64703876,0.002634181,0.000024729961,0.00006927123,0.000038628263,0.2373509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63839406,0.09586247,0.0024152906,0.08292935,0.003727039,0.00010030233,0.000052939908,0.000114426344,0.17640415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984654,0.0005945265,0.00003999916,0.00016377943,0.00050926994,0.00022703917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561715,0.003130514,0.00015420902,0.00011175142,0.0006022564,0.00038423057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019606443,0.00032942896,0.0002702075,0.0014184052,0.008376301,0.0069734934,0.00079214043,0.0052257716,0.004745481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055863746,0.00020594455,0.00010450511,0.001754946,0.014518043,0.0068732724,0.0020342323,0.0037290002,0.0005905964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018738228,0.000019012195,0.0004445646,0.000058580004,0.0000029555501,0.00015031302,0.0038789355,0.00020115948,0.00006252298,0.87355006,0.106509365,0.015103762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075006674,0.000009559361,0.0006832713,0.0004422597,0.0000041574076,0.00015024343,0.007697821,0.0002951363,0.00045171037,0.3728975,0.6173305,0.000030285602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078524105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079673685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078524105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008796379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007752639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15613413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009441546","doi":"10.1080/10286630902763281","title":"Doing a Florida thing: the creative class thesis and cultural policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Underpinning; Creative class; Cultural policy; Sociology; Politics; Capitalism; Order (exchange); Creative industries; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Economics; Creativity; Law","score_opus":0.03916585152438747,"score_gpt":0.36950695575366566,"score_spread":0.3303411042292782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009441546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039266456,0.010520308,0.0029836716,0.72855276,0.0013066545,0.000042774373,0.000063456704,0.000018266506,0.2172457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87226987,0.008057412,0.0024524585,0.057180546,0.0013949595,0.00018571738,0.000034354816,0.000036441732,0.058388267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966427,0.0017484584,0.000043585034,0.00034043947,0.0004399306,0.00078490376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921069,0.005652145,0.00057940284,0.0002718493,0.00043753456,0.0009521105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006753304,0.00045672344,0.00029072436,0.0014507088,0.012381177,0.009850963,0.0011612346,0.0072928425,0.006737755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011182955,0.00021559844,0.0004109872,0.0010302303,0.026213946,0.008926309,0.004692881,0.0057379403,0.00044330908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013360052,0.000016349295,0.00028976644,0.000037454975,0.0000031194727,0.00008401034,0.006667536,0.00014353852,0.00005855997,0.95974314,0.024284197,0.008659073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004136452,0.000051661737,0.0023547316,0.00058892457,0.000013752146,0.00014920661,0.020705786,0.0005049366,0.00048783075,0.38017455,0.5948703,0.00005697839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022952769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025895229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022952769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01004021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008897544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07284713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039311850","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2011.567332","title":"The 2010 Cultural Olympiad: playing for the global or the local stage?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Olympiad; The arts; Premise; Cultural policy; Cultural economics; Political science; Virtue; Outcome (game theory); Public relations; Sociology; Economics; History; Law","score_opus":0.13761965802387519,"score_gpt":0.40302056228830846,"score_spread":0.2654009042644333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039311850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4770087,0.0055703805,0.0005678174,0.107641846,0.0008647661,0.00009030201,0.00030463008,0.000025501695,0.40792602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366514,0.0029325928,0.00049745815,0.010801362,0.00017443649,0.00004342655,0.00013124042,0.000026932163,0.048741117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987948,0.00025740772,0.000021175709,0.00009793323,0.00014968823,0.0006790268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987249,0.00008745593,0.00009234597,0.00002614795,0.0001369489,0.00093219173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011859925,0.00021455914,0.00021856942,0.00039945808,0.0031703687,0.006961243,0.0007041349,0.0014917452,0.01098168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002196468,0.0001303444,0.00014590501,0.0008754869,0.0046209437,0.0018334166,0.0022821766,0.0023762283,0.00079243904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059204584,0.0006257956,0.18054073,0.0012505408,0.00012184905,0.0016833339,0.06380834,0.0005129107,0.0030858992,0.31992546,0.20771207,0.22014104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005952318,0.00026055856,0.3183493,0.0013291312,0.000044063898,0.00031607968,0.25990683,0.00019804384,0.00079755177,0.009796608,0.4088699,0.00007248458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22834137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66552395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22834137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005297134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008413908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45402455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062362675","doi":"10.1080/10286630802281921","title":"Can national cultural policy approaches be used for sub‐national comparisons? An analysis of the Québec and Ontario experiences in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Ottawa","funders":"Arts Council England; Institut national de la recherche scientifique","keywords":"Cultural policy; National Policy; Exploratory research; Comparative research; Political science; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Policy analysis; Regional science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.1703551138626274,"score_gpt":0.35595334062434003,"score_spread":0.18559822676171264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062362675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89368117,0.004688671,0.00070988724,0.022874078,0.00012481683,0.00011925836,0.0008521207,0.000025506999,0.07692445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98697543,0.0017262019,0.00039560924,0.0010017013,0.000008637493,0.00005155148,0.00019254978,0.000016881839,0.009631513],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939825,0.0012201049,0.00014642913,0.00033701045,0.0011891108,0.0031248408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930669,0.0014358574,0.0005283312,0.0002235097,0.0029275236,0.0018179063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003864149,0.00030203207,0.00069271895,0.0023878124,0.02820803,0.0060657267,0.0018810468,0.0012531147,0.005230754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008499368,0.0003370505,0.00043635684,0.009436686,0.006428599,0.0026113992,0.00320712,0.001972638,0.00018079436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030916912,0.00013011205,0.15381923,0.00051314227,0.00012792138,0.0024643883,0.65387475,0.0011141653,0.00088187837,0.09109381,0.03104569,0.06462578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020829182,0.0000404348,0.1608211,0.00043986915,0.000052325322,0.00021846384,0.74445933,0.0005735487,0.00024117282,0.00153368,0.091505736,0.00009355677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99967563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27073926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27073926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21634965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8458391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074643960","doi":"10.1080/10286630109358155","title":"From Cool Britannia to Hot Nation: ‘Creative industries’ policies in Europe, Canada and New Zealand","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Diverse Education and Engineering Focus","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creative industries; Political science; Economy; Creative economy; Economic growth; Economic history; Economics; Creativity; Law","score_opus":0.03828290322980071,"score_gpt":0.33314999632406944,"score_spread":0.29486709309426873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074643960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28957468,0.059819177,0.00057498476,0.36884955,0.001688575,0.000115062336,0.0019454416,0.000070428956,0.2773621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8936011,0.014662374,0.00076876784,0.029327124,0.00014609456,0.000110296896,0.0005701502,0.000046628236,0.060767468],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970619,0.0002572983,0.00012476959,0.00009018945,0.00083955127,0.0016262481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958734,0.0006332411,0.0003912108,0.000053483778,0.0011307555,0.0019179233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025084943,0.00040068806,0.00024514078,0.002097001,0.014973267,0.009513437,0.0016926102,0.0048873876,0.010970044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052920613,0.00038745452,0.00033775426,0.004461739,0.00679883,0.004490183,0.0040593646,0.004070327,0.00045374333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009931389,0.00032296908,0.047612306,0.0013448052,0.00014895406,0.0022460236,0.0767112,0.0028622276,0.0028644586,0.351831,0.41659275,0.09647027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010986168,0.00005774344,0.33283716,0.00091997324,0.000059724207,0.00017149869,0.06814259,0.00035229235,0.0009638953,0.0077393204,0.5884063,0.00023966105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068099014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068099014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11878774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49409527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151732027","doi":"10.1080/1028663032000089507","title":"Singing alone? The contribution of cultural capital to social cohesion and sustainable communities","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Cultural capital; Cohesion (chemistry); Individual capital; Sociology; Social reproduction; Singing; Capital (architecture); Social mobility; Economic capital; Public relations; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Human capital; Management","score_opus":0.01839296562836877,"score_gpt":0.3451088873970723,"score_spread":0.3267159217687035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151732027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96981704,0.0008778058,0.00041030318,0.005261609,0.000030735693,0.000012361886,0.000042248,0.0000035691364,0.023544345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995072,0.00015241213,0.00006455425,0.00004283553,0.000008937552,0.0000018368271,0.0000048416155,5.3726353e-7,0.00021686316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838424,0.00064403826,0.000030427193,0.00012434323,0.00024282665,0.00057413155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933373,0.0025088098,0.0013577833,0.0002532036,0.0005461541,0.0019968925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019014566,0.00020837883,0.00028419317,0.0012331236,0.0029236388,0.0040605715,0.0005719139,0.00065048627,0.0033808465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009144671,0.00011546373,0.00017969786,0.0016847822,0.005902862,0.002263286,0.003966077,0.00084616523,0.00010769366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021768032,0.00037676623,0.7600614,0.0001738794,0.0002223476,0.00055227964,0.04084088,0.0018042452,0.00039951378,0.08828995,0.0034737228,0.10358729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002633975,0.00016292291,0.83326536,0.00036701278,0.00014381173,0.00023142877,0.08475492,0.0022657,0.00032035366,0.062086534,0.016321257,0.00005425403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07851357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14932136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07851357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004166161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004882782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15611315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795562443","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2018.1459589","title":"Brics issue-narrative on culture: strategic or trivial?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Globalization and Cultural Identity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitat de Barcelona; Simon Fraser University; University of Otago; Universiteit van Amsterdam; San Francisco State University","keywords":"Narrative; Political science; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.07522299201089476,"score_gpt":0.45228172028227753,"score_spread":0.37705872827138276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795562443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45220894,0.0029971416,0.0156776,0.09118145,0.0016128733,0.00023008861,0.00034391493,0.0000770006,0.4356711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889854,0.0006450894,0.0008677035,0.0016383085,0.000093418676,0.00006620132,0.000054364496,0.00004440479,0.007605093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946449,0.0038552608,0.00016762098,0.00022206362,0.0005970362,0.0005131103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195975,0.005459601,0.0006991748,0.0004832129,0.0008879026,0.000510285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052766814,0.0005455337,0.0003588158,0.0011873308,0.0067671384,0.010909688,0.0011594484,0.0024442656,0.0035074844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01440778,0.00026670028,0.00028000562,0.0016054071,0.019336669,0.009606784,0.004770228,0.0045602764,0.00045113103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026584481,0.00001504007,0.001095374,0.00013940342,0.0000066034877,0.00048038235,0.59132385,0.00008024817,0.00047641608,0.3958756,0.0047649676,0.005715456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006281723,0.000019098692,0.0012022856,0.00039715992,0.000010177648,0.00032415322,0.79192334,0.00020389471,0.0008757607,0.0333622,0.1716519,0.000023757808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058096554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005565453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010909688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005399899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005179629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039179206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965003823","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2019.1626849","title":"The trade and culture debate: evidence from US trade agreements <b>The trade and culture debate: evidence from</b> <b>US trade agreements</b> , by Gilbert Gagné, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 2016. 190$80.00 (Hardback).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Political science; Economics; Free trade; International economics; Political economy","score_opus":0.019308528630469505,"score_gpt":0.31285090856544434,"score_spread":0.29354237993497484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965003823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15735684,0.16335493,0.00045572498,0.28562468,0.0012016639,0.000044198376,0.002764495,0.000012999381,0.3891844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82334113,0.11758675,0.00028043438,0.043732736,0.0008582577,0.000101039004,0.001716566,0.000034511868,0.012348602],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932614,0.003516472,0.00028214112,0.00026410384,0.0019695524,0.00070624426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679138,0.021883707,0.0046292827,0.00086000055,0.003932002,0.0007811453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008028207,0.00041147275,0.00034222574,0.0022094504,0.004673559,0.0073292977,0.0011687753,0.003694334,0.016568687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032332387,0.00034054733,0.00032397162,0.009833212,0.009098561,0.009136129,0.004392929,0.004179016,0.0016350431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006206622,0.00032792485,0.05110511,0.002601595,0.00028972916,0.00072476687,0.068473764,0.0005597574,0.0001977787,0.3119704,0.445612,0.117516495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020236832,0.00012521302,0.15244645,0.013316592,0.00027613976,0.00042203374,0.16076188,0.00025534176,0.00071789464,0.12093923,0.5504377,0.00009911969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046829406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057984523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046829406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003486365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005636529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09311366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966278575","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2019.1626850","title":"Trade and culture: the ongoing debate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Latin Americans; China; European union; Politics; Political science; International trade; Liberalization; Free trade; Commercial policy; Cultural policy; Political economy; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0415472612740086,"score_gpt":0.2611140317962046,"score_spread":0.21956677052219603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966278575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04339514,0.20784113,0.0009355567,0.6486803,0.004998275,0.000008528428,0.00013062276,0.000015936088,0.09399451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.704665,0.20046417,0.00079419336,0.075958826,0.0086464165,0.000027550292,0.00010891925,0.000064521635,0.009270391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391395,0.0034884168,0.00019650404,0.0005455131,0.0010615556,0.0007940538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876724,0.007816391,0.00084982737,0.0006162981,0.001548326,0.0014967778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008434664,0.00037656588,0.0010515838,0.002233746,0.007936102,0.020882301,0.0018760489,0.0069303834,0.012106921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012417748,0.00023024577,0.00048896606,0.0060373037,0.027451806,0.0220614,0.0045309043,0.008264767,0.0011633276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059039852,0.00009528881,0.0037936757,0.0005978626,0.00006427677,0.00033336796,0.027220745,0.00043031434,0.00012284068,0.7545626,0.06104797,0.15167198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014179096,0.000036482175,0.0073150415,0.0049736877,0.000036800793,0.0003758047,0.12149447,0.00038179522,0.00012645841,0.5122341,0.3529492,0.000062081475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012155126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010354925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020882301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008416296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059862314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06106478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997253498","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2019.1709058","title":"The China Museum Boom: soft power and cultural nationalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Superstar; China; Nationalism; Soft power; Boom; Commodification; Inequality; Power (physics); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Economy; History; Art history; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.039771104027509906,"score_gpt":0.3505968440407318,"score_spread":0.31082574001322194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997253498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97759306,0.00060826534,0.0001089648,0.003787773,0.000023722861,0.0000083619825,0.00019949683,0.000005930008,0.01766428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998635,0.00019216577,0.000025509875,0.00013496331,0.00000915585,0.000003924809,0.000052153417,0.0000012553681,0.0009459732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996718,0.000041589057,0.000015364021,0.000042005922,0.000062334286,0.00016693345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991768,0.00008893295,0.0002918993,0.00003946327,0.00009701961,0.00030572966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056878704,0.00012819056,0.00017306328,0.0015758077,0.0017013185,0.0020708574,0.00030838657,0.00030495762,0.0053682565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009770991,0.00010067194,0.00018522821,0.0025522024,0.002353169,0.0015641549,0.0018512548,0.0006095269,0.00010771882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012712966,0.00006232423,0.8401878,0.00016465802,0.000066965156,0.0008993354,0.028013894,0.0006868208,0.0006528755,0.075447164,0.007959593,0.045731515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007747412,0.000031643358,0.9624418,0.00008011097,0.000016497308,0.000073968826,0.016978517,0.00060522486,0.00013592214,0.003245095,0.01636711,0.000016406953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11431669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23153389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11431669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005640119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004080852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22730261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092626370","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2020.1811256","title":"Cultural policies in cities of the ‘global South’: a multi-scalar approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Negotiation; Gentrification; Cultural policy; Urban politics; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Narrative; Social science; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10381963264390585,"score_gpt":0.37150735145271063,"score_spread":0.26768771880880476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092626370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17418213,0.012663487,0.028682955,0.18939556,0.0019028265,0.00013965077,0.00014923303,0.00010633903,0.59277767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98016775,0.0036117407,0.0036929648,0.0031537106,0.00032498507,0.00011181253,0.00003587118,0.00007250305,0.008828726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961713,0.002653781,0.00009709867,0.0002305934,0.00038628693,0.00046087574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975351,0.0013655018,0.00024136282,0.00025386852,0.00026693358,0.00033713394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037724518,0.0005868907,0.00048758075,0.0023801925,0.007002021,0.02315558,0.001386091,0.003122985,0.002874326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004271624,0.00031821485,0.00047127815,0.0034508428,0.028940028,0.009341304,0.010432393,0.005695431,0.00018770828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049250802,0.000007231436,0.00059745985,0.000057495054,0.000007164993,0.00006198316,0.014402855,0.0007978932,0.000050208422,0.9789675,0.0018240422,0.0032212199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010117898,0.00001918815,0.0023470747,0.0003802435,0.00002097491,0.000079291385,0.0734884,0.002085091,0.0002682772,0.69763595,0.22363658,0.000028848923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007793653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015679948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02315558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016861925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008480716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12234241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200543744","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2021.1988082","title":"What makes for a creative-friendly community? Untangling the location attributes of creative clusters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Creative class; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Creative Cities; Creative industries; Creative city; Consumption (sociology); Sociology; Public relations; Marketing; Business; Creativity; Political science; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.08283350934173728,"score_gpt":0.39207739478325726,"score_spread":0.30924388544152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200543744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7842178,0.00081789505,0.010378748,0.021605086,0.00015813224,0.00015186182,0.00010632587,0.000058746336,0.18250528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767965,0.00016587801,0.00082399545,0.00016031592,0.000020173975,0.000019255796,0.000011722526,0.000010374654,0.0011085607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582666,0.0022236418,0.00009472339,0.00033575264,0.00055470795,0.0009643908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913995,0.0028459383,0.0014715164,0.00060563476,0.0008079247,0.0028694642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035432088,0.00026370556,0.00035778322,0.0016242192,0.00709268,0.015117318,0.0012038081,0.0016675608,0.0067107887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01263601,0.00029453897,0.0003925964,0.0019201875,0.01234398,0.008146187,0.0063325483,0.0015730237,0.00056958315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002708792,0.00050522573,0.13954581,0.00052572653,0.00009160173,0.0017480613,0.11047376,0.0019143738,0.001378004,0.6303656,0.007225123,0.10595584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007247386,0.00016462263,0.12243346,0.0006276341,0.000080838865,0.0008849194,0.5038277,0.003011944,0.0010132317,0.270052,0.09771411,0.00011697418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062107057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016573574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015117318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040518874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005086003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02939868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387904338","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2268094","title":"The discursive construction of the role of public service broadcasting amid the rise of the Korean Wave","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Asian Culture and Media Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Korean Wave; Public broadcasting; Neoliberalism (international relations); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Public service; Hegemony; Public sphere; Government (linguistics); Discourse analysis; Political science; Sociocultural evolution; Political economy; Media studies; Public administration; Politics; Advertising; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03227346402404158,"score_gpt":0.3314418975756049,"score_spread":0.2991684335515633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387904338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76655143,0.0018832701,0.0058806273,0.0111399675,0.00036948724,0.000096139185,0.00009941523,0.000037589627,0.21394207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932602,0.00044360352,0.00056098186,0.00042088635,0.000045980618,0.000025991243,0.00001780165,0.000026762464,0.005197798],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971469,0.001671668,0.00012312895,0.00025426512,0.00040566557,0.00039827748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944311,0.0032349569,0.00065945013,0.0005888227,0.0007558225,0.00032979317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00647145,0.00044181565,0.00023542205,0.0023228908,0.008391295,0.010098687,0.00085405627,0.0013033679,0.0027931172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062791994,0.0003721288,0.00023752972,0.002698244,0.020290898,0.009789504,0.0040995223,0.0027987834,0.00030660914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654908,0.00001970287,0.004676944,0.0001238209,0.00001095874,0.0006447391,0.7767374,0.00007930365,0.0021575366,0.20027171,0.0016004073,0.0136108855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013317096,0.000036689744,0.008657092,0.00021817593,0.000030881132,0.00030046006,0.8625979,0.0003123386,0.0015115842,0.017184073,0.1091009,0.000036584996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013882338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128054535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013882338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006264293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004515836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045450866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391173461","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2296071","title":"Left off the circuit: the impact of shrinking live music tours on cities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Resizing; Economic geography; Political science; Visual arts; Art; Geography; Economics; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.07699866175469586,"score_gpt":0.3850610705731984,"score_spread":0.30806240881850255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391173461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94500285,0.0006483048,0.00023053827,0.012647518,0.00011751958,0.000019589752,0.00029345634,0.000031265103,0.04100896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557436,0.00030509953,0.000057831025,0.0011627354,0.000040566694,0.000008911931,0.00009745505,0.000017651617,0.0027354057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968927,0.0009589577,0.000078234,0.00022263298,0.00048646994,0.0013609327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924905,0.0013191302,0.0020613503,0.0002965805,0.0008955263,0.0029368666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001166359,0.00018346347,0.000289071,0.000895651,0.004185486,0.0068379976,0.0016873683,0.0015754363,0.0155777745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007093752,0.00021882779,0.00040344696,0.0016567436,0.0047497735,0.003362166,0.006061002,0.0026949213,0.0006935548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011720528,0.00068122544,0.4994337,0.00079955644,0.00027393637,0.0053847935,0.1659234,0.0045226063,0.0031185173,0.084643126,0.08187114,0.152176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036479603,0.0003012837,0.5028323,0.00038865366,0.00008093145,0.00041193032,0.3967298,0.00097644597,0.0006192169,0.003964838,0.09355901,0.00009911722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07360103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.193107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07360103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079768365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040061073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14634526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407384380","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2025.2464036","title":"Jim McGuigan – a tribute","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Political science; Media studies; Art; Art history; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011909424479740385,"score_gpt":0.3523692663648121,"score_spread":0.3404598418850717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407384380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030598292,0.00459658,0.00027260013,0.8117955,0.15555625,0.000019151363,0.00004982883,0.00006873689,0.027335476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062772064,0.0026005867,0.00038508492,0.6807927,0.023516895,0.00004201936,0.000052655858,0.00012126363,0.28621152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950815,0.0015890606,0.00047556346,0.0016476095,0.005338016,0.0014415839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783693,0.0037177666,0.00054237334,0.0011782115,0.009763726,0.0064286524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006492497,0.00079189445,0.0016531589,0.0013805322,0.012770688,0.012376007,0.002796602,0.01775264,0.043590143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043934394,0.000691003,0.0009801713,0.00087605184,0.005660276,0.0057533444,0.0052149207,0.03053026,0.027256684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009140404,0.000016513577,0.00006896385,0.0000109952325,0.0000067201613,0.000048944028,0.000068712536,0.000010149309,0.00004740779,0.0069586053,0.9886081,0.004145723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007876723,0.0000073699953,0.00019166869,0.000077586265,0.000005952079,0.000056366564,0.00032127713,0.000030210784,0.000079778336,0.0047265305,0.9944772,0.000018176905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020687683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030179098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043590143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048022056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126852505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1458236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415881377","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2025.2574906","title":"Canvas as Indigenous counter-diplomacy: the paradox of Kent Monkman’s visual art in Canadian cultural statecraft","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","topic":"Art, Technology, and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Visual culture; Visual anthropology; Cultural policy; Cultural heritage; Painting","score_opus":0.015021601750123821,"score_gpt":0.3253807898443375,"score_spread":0.31035918809421364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415881377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34725383,0.0029966224,0.0018885256,0.027096901,0.00026103997,0.000037567414,0.00017101962,0.00007954947,0.6202149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771855,0.00056519994,0.00041404914,0.0007931806,0.00001323077,0.0000074700965,0.00002099903,0.000030271904,0.020970006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982229,0.00035586362,0.000021015956,0.0001607979,0.0005354737,0.0007038605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985139,0.0005284445,0.00007891642,0.00015564148,0.000384987,0.00033815316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017012374,0.00034243072,0.0002690558,0.0015121109,0.031733565,0.015145594,0.0012591748,0.0017249559,0.011587232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031081217,0.000295692,0.00025674707,0.0020356316,0.025992863,0.0029598328,0.004971221,0.0029776306,0.0003117491],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070165785,0.000027130429,0.0044888463,0.0001481563,0.000019389096,0.00069484866,0.3130537,0.00070587173,0.00083318324,0.6179297,0.026430052,0.035598975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015513537,0.000021507849,0.011947549,0.0003663736,0.000032658412,0.00032348515,0.41677445,0.00079381594,0.00073260005,0.032029144,0.536865,0.00009778925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96483153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98883945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07526182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07526182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052093804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5460652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}