{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab2fc9807593","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab2fc9807593","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Education+in+Mathematics+Science+and+Technology"},"results":[{"id":"W2180762658","doi":"10.18404/ijemst.43557","title":"Lessons Learned about Effective Professional Development: Two Contrasting Case Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional development; Period (music); Psychology; Sample (material); Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.09815600806729347,"score_gpt":0.5125357348929964,"score_spread":0.41437972682570295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180762658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91458285,0.0024036565,0.014300009,0.008424378,0.00012954179,0.00054286356,0.00007592953,0.00003445102,0.059506252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97666806,0.0022127882,0.011241281,0.00045644116,0.000036430454,0.00027367225,0.00004234559,0.000026831842,0.009042161],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.984766,0.01094343,0.0004686304,0.00053164596,0.00152594,0.0017642499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732613,0.020920422,0.0012680312,0.0009039333,0.0015359063,0.0021104668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010223013,0.00069313333,0.0006576023,0.0016838602,0.007058152,0.005943531,0.002950773,0.005066681,0.0027815308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025530491,0.0006086418,0.00057973136,0.002079277,0.0058614644,0.0042172777,0.0053310827,0.004056129,0.00049391564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029222688,0.0015493204,0.0121212555,0.00073619565,0.000032048734,0.04335551,0.8134429,0.0016937417,0.0021144068,0.06247995,0.0038300364,0.058352467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010763761,0.00054913794,0.009512853,0.0011254553,0.000044632827,0.023702566,0.8353539,0.002435499,0.0035500606,0.017549077,0.10598814,0.00008094704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061804475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015560839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010223013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064300303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003038855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05406511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404225281","doi":"10.46328/ijemst.4385","title":"Arguing for Access: Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of Argumentation in Elementary Mathematics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Mathematics education; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07359416804708532,"score_gpt":0.43526139818970017,"score_spread":0.3616672301426148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404225281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95976704,0.0011322205,0.011161302,0.005545968,0.00009428977,0.000070414324,0.000019583116,0.000045138673,0.022164017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684155,0.00029383498,0.0013383765,0.0002615559,0.00001625912,0.000030278798,0.000008338962,0.00002543598,0.0011843448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9462976,0.042313617,0.0014967046,0.001963311,0.0054710805,0.0024577074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90250003,0.077139385,0.0073531377,0.0024383918,0.0058070673,0.0047620377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029265378,0.00055663823,0.00090539694,0.0035089147,0.007455924,0.012850234,0.0018521318,0.0045575346,0.002068166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06699395,0.0008660495,0.00069224735,0.0012508824,0.01922407,0.010044912,0.00894844,0.008473601,0.00041768173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003753789,0.0000569534,0.004726568,0.000060511276,0.000006456752,0.00049700873,0.9834925,0.00004888683,0.0015930806,0.005176024,0.00015700104,0.0041475124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002866392,0.00016643624,0.005503819,0.00021893014,0.000021971773,0.00081662025,0.9627422,0.00056864735,0.0013816714,0.004562428,0.023941332,0.000047198053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025325997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002546867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029265378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032980682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15477192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117713467","doi":"10.46328/ijemst.5315","title":"&lt;b&gt;Geometric Transformations and Symmetry in Primary and Secondary Education: A Review of Themes, Media, and Theoretical Frames from 1990 to Present &lt;/b&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Symmetry (geometry); Focus (optics); Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Set (abstract data type); Concept learning; Transformation geometry","score_opus":0.009767091758695425,"score_gpt":0.3407149747804683,"score_spread":0.33094788302177286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117713467","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000804517,0.99288493,0.00065716647,0.0029054391,0.00067816966,0.00027242312,0.00035243246,0.000011371571,0.0014335285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015152632,0.97656304,0.0033344931,0.0025410766,0.0002678413,0.0012071616,0.0003616251,0.000018337387,0.00055385125],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98319155,0.0068401727,0.0047272467,0.0012637412,0.003553149,0.00042412442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9327941,0.047938984,0.009459097,0.0016379976,0.007586136,0.00058362674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025340477,0.0009768881,0.0025961588,0.015184227,0.0011096912,0.0041888403,0.0015910949,0.002306155,0.005833467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076402836,0.0011519827,0.004670249,0.018652003,0.0025479344,0.0062881736,0.0031669557,0.0023107247,0.0008281407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022363268,0.000035865207,0.0016458087,0.6673356,0.0018262615,0.00014833115,0.0030013882,0.00022061162,0.000445527,0.008738887,0.025952658,0.2904253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013144879,0.00014242271,0.00702018,0.848491,0.0043357303,0.0004285792,0.0015308701,0.000105670035,0.0002520537,0.0035815618,0.13393481,0.00004573355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018847516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042457223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025340477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074628573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02474363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1340149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}