{"meta":{"query_hash":"4f839c71885e","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4f839c71885e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Human+Rights+and+Constitutional+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2575313095","doi":"10.1504/ijhrcs.2016.079632","title":"Monetising constitutional rights: the award of damages in constitutional claims","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Redress; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.06256506241237965,"score_gpt":0.3813605190712536,"score_spread":0.318795456658874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575313095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06229198,0.009230532,0.039167188,0.04103759,0.0009987006,0.0001825197,0.0001290502,0.000078988276,0.8468834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96323186,0.0027913172,0.004865651,0.004241873,0.00087754405,0.0001860829,0.0000320857,0.000037800713,0.023735797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719229,0.010621319,0.0017000422,0.0027533947,0.009978775,0.0030236146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97853756,0.015251972,0.001517734,0.0026184358,0.0014818194,0.00059254805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020638874,0.0005233587,0.0010836739,0.0034684564,0.00768556,0.017016795,0.0029773416,0.013422216,0.0065469397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039286025,0.0008099932,0.0008814508,0.0023678974,0.064683884,0.01740393,0.0113304285,0.011133656,0.00067153893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044548933,0.0000073022734,0.00013826582,0.00001508886,0.0000034208524,0.000064228916,0.0006219156,0.00010262421,0.000066046305,0.99675816,0.00032664958,0.0018918164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022983952,0.00006394588,0.0013429812,0.00031315023,0.000022829305,0.0002983351,0.0012310926,0.0005409688,0.00044598914,0.9453908,0.050282747,0.00004423116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009212407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011364489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020638874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009948031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00790942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10915005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362648507","doi":"10.1504/ijhrcs.2023.130015","title":"Federalism: comparative study between India and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08460557943987268,"score_gpt":0.39276932882679155,"score_spread":0.3081637493869189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362648507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8140462,0.0041068997,0.00023088593,0.004731464,0.00008460639,0.000060928483,0.0018027223,0.000046181678,0.17489004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912593,0.001952984,0.00013559918,0.0003461062,0.000014421916,0.000016810143,0.0006413565,0.000018021308,0.0056154015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970061,0.00022625228,0.000070231734,0.0001732359,0.0009571179,0.0015669869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440825,0.0011573962,0.00056660664,0.00018494867,0.0026734362,0.0010092468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010549749,0.0001756022,0.00043957322,0.0065124435,0.0121289985,0.0046606874,0.0011729723,0.0005543777,0.00815871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053935437,0.00021902796,0.00044812588,0.020511726,0.0030272838,0.0009938229,0.0023424893,0.0014047647,0.00033245812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007372968,0.00038020755,0.4040557,0.0008965763,0.00022528635,0.0031702898,0.118058875,0.0013504528,0.0013799593,0.29965845,0.053189583,0.11689729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030097392,0.000060122577,0.7357191,0.00037464616,0.00014045896,0.00056065136,0.1390752,0.0007297634,0.00043702082,0.0023641994,0.12040872,0.000100031524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99490225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079674914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079674914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09327567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5780847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401443183","doi":"10.1504/ijhrcs.2024.10065860","title":"Revamping GST to foster state autonomy in India: lessons from Australia and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; State (computer science); Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Development economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05853354697103608,"score_gpt":0.380619365981864,"score_spread":0.32208581901082795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401443183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57857925,0.0015575967,0.0013834997,0.067437254,0.0002204248,0.0001831332,0.00013423571,0.00007207129,0.35043257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98066723,0.000775557,0.00053911697,0.0032562253,0.000022233899,0.000030877014,0.000033485947,0.000026694066,0.014648571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332255,0.0010677399,0.00013378255,0.00024539218,0.0014654301,0.0037650703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879298,0.004398007,0.00044942822,0.00087628904,0.003810272,0.0025362503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005550188,0.0002357145,0.00045517055,0.0012972683,0.015248549,0.0077438215,0.0023139114,0.0030903632,0.0073159775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017723469,0.00025615463,0.0005173299,0.0029502078,0.0100444285,0.0027472365,0.0058799903,0.0057068598,0.00028810004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019564753,0.00030383302,0.024184793,0.00023459754,0.0000877224,0.0015302585,0.06651797,0.0043454743,0.00069150166,0.76612085,0.033053737,0.102733634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039544265,0.0003094041,0.1301426,0.00096080557,0.0003914793,0.0004299979,0.18740134,0.009012227,0.0021988791,0.15271412,0.5156997,0.00034403685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95878464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05450012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05450012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15632947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39542788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}