{"meta":{"query_hash":"b777789ddbc2","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Information Quality"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b777789ddbc2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Information+Quality"},"results":[{"id":"W1999393802","doi":"10.1504/ijiq.2008.022958","title":"The National Ambulatory Care Reporting System: factors that affect the quality of its emergency data","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Quality","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Health Information","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Medical emergency; Data quality; Emergency department; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Activity-based costing; Ambulatory care; Operations management; Medicine; Computer science; Business; Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.3943013979723309,"score_gpt":0.4347433494879706,"score_spread":0.04044195151563973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999393802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620197,0.0014885532,0.006071338,0.0057021854,0.0040405164,0.0003489069,0.0010037225,0.000022482089,0.01930264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990525,0.00035578274,0.00007206191,0.0002182257,0.00018311667,0.000003396864,0.00006305595,0.0000039174893,0.000047913694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953489,0.00013565636,0.0037892149,0.000090270136,0.0005081978,0.00012781142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98895174,0.00029726615,0.009346831,0.00028376223,0.0010703356,0.00005005836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00856249,0.00009329502,0.00026337986,0.00016648899,0.00025467985,0.000051948402,0.00097486115,0.000050298037,0.000036588477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004982412,0.00006365934,0.00016755998,0.00011369536,0.000053120508,0.0014097842,0.00017103861,0.00018890253,0.000025036934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008891434,0.000046692687,0.26820886,0.00039202475,0.0004573616,0.0000017934916,0.010761394,0.00042144427,0.0000059668428,0.7123815,0.0052137105,0.0020203395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037901057,0.000024933843,0.90832525,0.000048697482,0.0000052817827,0.000027519272,0.005884946,0.00047640796,0.00010285072,0.0013061442,0.08329071,0.00012824315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000978617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076514254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71107537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030301203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014012853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5964772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083947418","doi":"10.1504/ijiq.2014.068653","title":"Repairing integrity rules for improved data quality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Quality","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data integrity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Data quality; Data mining; Data cleansing; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Business rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Data science; Business process; Database; Work in process","score_opus":0.37274437675812616,"score_gpt":0.5310786126391739,"score_spread":0.15833423588104772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083947418","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031141946,0.000013153505,0.9475502,0.013307463,0.0027067803,0.00020649975,0.0011439088,0.000032013155,0.00389803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870209,0.000042575328,0.10140817,0.008551,0.0012665732,0.000010722303,0.0012483132,0.000011364555,0.00044038714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933285,0.00065964105,0.0035359643,0.00021574345,0.0020837889,0.00017634776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98815656,0.0031771136,0.0036021126,0.0011233803,0.003806297,0.00013451505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051898304,0.00013403854,0.00038643111,0.00040908862,0.000111608555,0.0008637617,0.0039949645,0.00007901588,0.00014115796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055673283,0.00010037231,0.00022577969,0.00016123493,0.000085095504,0.0073385113,0.0007597962,0.00026718254,0.00011509274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068337866,0.00014681985,0.0013630362,0.00004185583,0.00020918866,3.970289e-7,0.0009889505,0.00010668633,0.00010168773,0.28382495,0.06543984,0.6470932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015015124,0.00008549156,0.024576226,0.00003624385,0.000016650682,0.000011315449,0.0018569365,0.012318179,0.00018166902,0.12780358,0.83142066,0.0001915221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016279459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007386596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85587895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011584738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001387681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9762702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169710203","doi":"10.1504/ijiq.2008.019560","title":"Information quality chain analysis for total information quality management","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Quality","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Information quality; Quality (philosophy); Data quality; Information management; Knowledge management; Information system; Information retrieval; Business","score_opus":0.1660276901368132,"score_gpt":0.459138105283643,"score_spread":0.2931104151468298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169710203","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16612782,0.000013061433,0.8154219,0.004104373,0.002043889,0.0006434594,0.0012375332,0.00006029133,0.010347721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826589,0.000078540426,0.010117763,0.004897316,0.0002325697,0.00004756288,0.0015829905,0.0000058479286,0.00037849037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845867,0.00079277164,0.007947684,0.0001784368,0.0061186953,0.00037572047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403734,0.0013423506,0.007415262,0.00077934825,0.0061749816,0.00025071364],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026690131,0.00031442122,0.00081816193,0.0027857267,0.00036180887,0.0011712215,0.0020242217,0.00016708809,0.00039710428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008049459,0.00026467993,0.0009516955,0.0014953723,0.00016466374,0.027495531,0.00042697377,0.000302792,0.00050284015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003429207,0.00052205735,0.019657543,0.00031223113,0.004645427,0.0000055707496,0.027705612,0.023708174,0.00001833271,0.48385608,0.047929827,0.38820994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004435803,0.00019144149,0.56170774,0.000038054754,0.00019343801,0.00004503136,0.019003844,0.0028136917,0.00015818376,0.014864705,0.39592654,0.00062153756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003259067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042681113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8165311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048723866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020580135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}